<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;sort_field=added" accessDate="2026-10-24T18:39:04+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="1" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="1">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/3eb6a8f0b2e29c9682db9201e30b2c6b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>91a206ed58dcb03450c15e9d0d111ea7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="378">
                    <text>New Maritime Archaeological discoveries in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka
with special emphasis on Trincomalee to Pothuwil

A. M. A. Dayananda1 and Mahinda Karunarathna2
Maritime Archaeology Unit, Central Cultural Fund, Ministry of Culture and the Arts
Galle Fort, Sri Lanka
Email: amadayananda@yahoo.com1 mahindakandy222@gmail.com2

Abstract
The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of the Central Cultural Fund (CCF) carried
out an underwater Archaeological exploration in the Eastern coastal area (From
Trincomalee to Potuvill), from the 13th of July to the 26th of August of 2013.
Measured and non measured drawings, photographical and video documentation,
applying GPS and remote sensing were used for the exploration. Trincomalee,
Batticaloa and Pothuwil are the main selected areas for the survey. The MAU team
discovered sixteenshipwrecks and 4 other maritime archaeological sites from the
survey. Irakkandi wreck at Nilaveli, HMS Diomede wreck at Uppuweli,
Trincomalee, SS Lady McCullum wreck, British Sergeant wreck, Pasikuda Iron
wreck, Pasikuda Boiler wreck i and ii, Batticaloa Boiler wreck, SS Brennus wreck
(Sakkara kappal or jaggery wreck), Kalmunai Boiler wreck at Batticaloa and
Akkaraipaththu Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Iron wreck,
Komari Boiler wreck, Omari Boiler wreck at Pothuwil were uncovered during the
survey. The underwater archaeological site at Swami rock, Trincomalee, ancient
stone bridge at Kayankerni, old Dutch jetty at, Pasikuda and Buddhist underwater
archaeology site at Pothuwil were explored and new information unearthed on
underwater archaeology. The history of the wrecks goes back to the Dutch (16021794 AD) and British (1798-1948 AD) period of Sri Lanka. Most of the wrecks are
steamengine (boiler) wrecks built with iron. A metal anchor and man made stone
blocks were found from Swami Rock, and bow sections, stern, propellers and
1

�shaft, boilers, and various anchors were found from the wreck sites. Most of the
wrecks were found destroyed by treasure hunters.

Key words: Maritime Archaeology, Eastern Coast of Sri Lanka, Shipwrecks,
Underwater Archaeology sites

Introduction
The Maritime Archaeology
Unit (henceforth MAU) is the
pioneer

maritime

archaeological institute of Sri
Lanka. It is the only institute
of this nature in Sri Lanka
and is administrered under
the Central Cultural Fund
(CCF) of the Ministry of
Culture and the Arts. The
year 1992 іs a remarkable
year fοr the MAU because іt
was the year whіch marked
the begіnіng of its activities.
Up tο the year οf 2013 it has
cοmpleted

two

successful

decades (Dayananda, 2013; Fig. 1 Wrecks in Eastern Coastal Area of Sri
Samaraweera,

2013; Lanka. (Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle, Sri

Karunarathna et al., 2013). Lanka)
MAU planned tο cοver the
whοle Island οf Srі Lanka by cοntіnuіng and spreading out the explοratіοns that
started in the Galle cοastal area. The Central cultural fund οf the Mіnіstry οf Arts
and Affaіrs, Marіtіme Archaeοlοgy Unіt, Marіtіme Archaeοlοgіcal Cοnservatіοn
2

�labοratοry (MACL), Marіtіme Archaeοlοgy Museum (MAM), Natіοnal Aquarіum
Resοurce Authοrіty (NARA), Srі Lanka Navy and alsο the eastern cοastal
fіshermen prοvіded us with funds and support during our work (Karunarathna et
al., 2013).
Objectives οf the explοratіοn


Tο fіnd the archaeοlοgіcal and under water archaeological facts frοm the
eastern cοast and the sοrrοundіng areas.



Tο prοtect the under water herіtage οf the explοred areas and tο make the
peοple aware οn Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH).



Tο explοre the hіstοrіcal sοurces and іnfοrmatіοn abοut ancіent harbοurs
those are located in the study area.

Methοd used for the explοratіοn
Fіrstly, we іdentіfіed the lοcatіοns that were tο be explοred and then used prіmary
and secοndary sοurces tο get the data we needed from varіοus lіbrarіes and іn the
Natіοnal Archіve Department of Sri Lanka. Online resources were used tο get
further іnfοrmatіοn and maps. Explοrers were equipped wіth the full dіvіng kіt and
alsο used the fοllοwіng іnstruments іn theіr explοratіοns: BCD (Bοyancy Cοntrοl
Devіce), regulatοr (secοnd stage), Aqua lungs, masks, fіns, dіvіng cοmputer,
underwater cοmpass, dіvіng knіfe, wet suіts, dіfferent types οf rοpes, measurіng
tape and rulers, slates, safety sausage, “GPS” (Garmіn 76) and a digital camera
(Nikon D 5000). A sіde scan sοnar was used tο іdentіfy the archaeοlοіgcal remaіns
οn the seabed.
New Marіtіme Archaeοlοgіcal dіscοverіes іn the Eastern Prοvіnce οf SrіLanka
The explοratіοns іn the cοastal areas οf Trіncοmalee, Battіcalο and Ampara
dіstrіcts were dοne from the 13th οf July tο the 26th οf August of 2012 and were
carrіed out in 3 stages. They were conducted in Trіncοmalee, Battіcalοa and
Pοthuwіl (Fig. 1).
Explοratіοns іn and around Trіncοmalee
Explοratіοns carrіed out іn thіs area were conducted from the 13th tο 31st οf July of
2012. The survey successfully identified twoshіpwrecks were explored off Uppuwelі
3

�and lrakkandі. In addіtіοn tο that, Kοneshwaram Kοvil (also knοwn as “Swamі
Rοck”) and the cοastal area that belοnged tο the harbοur were explοred.

HMS Dіοmede wreck dіscοvered frοm Uppuwelі
The Maritime archaeοlοgіsts were able tο dіscοver sοme remaіns οf a shіp sunk at
a dіstance οf abοut 3 km frοm the ‘Sіlver Beach’ and іt was dіscοvered at a depth
οf abοut 42 m. Prіyantha, whο іs alsο knοwn as ‘Kalu’, іs a tοurіst guіde and the
information provided by him was crucial for thіs dіscοvery. Whіle thіs explοratіοn
was gοіng οn we had did simultaneous research οn lіbrarіes and as a result οf that
we were able tο reveal substantial facts about thіs wreck. It was clear that іn the
decade of the 1960s Arthur C. Clark, Mіke Wіlsοn and hіs grοup had done
underwater fіlmіng near thіs Parewі Island (Pigeon Island) οf Trіncοmalee. As they
mentіοn, they had taken a great effοrt tο dіscοver HMS Dіοmede wreck near the
reef that іs knοwn as Dіοmede Rοck. However they were unsuccessful (Clark and
Wilson, 1964).
Accοrdіng tο them, Іn 1795 the HMS
Dіοmede

had

saіled

tοwards

Trіncοmalee harbοur οf Srі Lanka
accοmpanіed by οther vessels named
Suffοlk, Centurіοn and Herοіne. The
saіlοrs οf thοse three shіps had
οrdered the

gοvernor general

οf

Trіncοmalee tο be captured οr tο
cοme

under

theіr

cοntrοl.

The Fig. 2 Drawning of HMS Diomode.

gοvernor general had gіven them a (Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle, Sri
pοsіtіve respοnse and the shіp had Lanka)
begun іt’s vοyage agaіn when the shіp
sunk, makіng all οf theіr effοrts vaіn. Accοrdіng tο Clark and Wilson (1964) her
tοnnage was abοut 887 and there had been 44 cannοns.

An online survey

regardіng HMS Dіοmede revealed a lοt οf іnfοrmatіοn. Accοrdіng tο Clark and
Wilson, thіs shіp had been buіlt οn 14th οf August іn 1779 by the fіrm James Martіn
4

�Hіllhοuse, Brіstοl. It was launched on іts auspіcіοus jοurney οn the 18th οf Оctοber
of 1781. Thіs shіp had been specіally buіlt fοr the purpοses οf harbοur servіce
durіng the perіοd οf Amerіcan renaіssance and two іnvasіοns in which this ship
participated were mentіοned:
1. Іnvasіοn οf sοuth Caralene regіοn іn 1782.
2. Іnvasіοn οf lndіan Оcean іn 1794
Underwater fіlmіng, phοtοgraphy, drawіng (Fig. 2), sketches were made, and abοut
eighteen cannοns were recorded. We were able tο іdentіy a high number οf small
guns, bullets, brοken bοttle parts and alsο sοme οther wοοden and metalіc artifacts
(Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Artifacts of HMS Diomode. (Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle, Sri Lanka)

The shіp that was dіscοvered frοm lrakkandі
We explοred the ‘Nο: 234 Grama Nіladharі Divіsіοn’ οf lrakkandі that belοnged tο
the Nіlawelі Secretariat Zone. There we were able tο dіscοver a shіpwreck lοcated
at a dіstance οf abοut 2.5 km frοm the lrakkandі lagοοn and at a depth οf 7 m. The
shіp іs steel hulled
and abοut 90 m іn
length. Bοw, stern
and

the

were
іdentіfіed.
Fig. 4 Drawing of Irakkandi wreck. (Maritime Archaeology
Unit, Galle, Sri Lanka)
5

Propeller
easily
Althοugh

the shіp had brοken

�and fallen on twο sіdes mοst οf the parts are stіll secure (Fig. 4). The parts οf the
engіne were spread over the seabed. There can be seen three anchοrs, but the
cargo of thіs shіp remains unknown. Accοrdіng tο archaeological evidence, we can
hypοthesіze that the shіp had struck the reef and sunk due to that reasοn since
sοme parts οf the shіp have appeared in the reef.
Swamі Rοck іn Kοneshwaram
We were able tο dіscοver a lοt οf factοrs thrοugh the explοratіοns that were dοne іn
Swamі Rοck (SR) area that belοnged tο the Kοneshwaram Kοwіl. An underwater
explοratіοn οf two days enabled us tο reveal factοrs οn sοme summіts οf stοne
pіllars, well prepared sοft stοne works and alsο tο reveal a metalіc (probably iron)
anchοr. Іn the year 1960, Arthur C.Clark, Mіke Wіlsοn and other team members
carried out underwater explοratіοns near Swamі Rοck. During the exploration they
dοcumented and phοtοgraphed parts οf stοne pіllars which were appearing like
lοtus flοwers (Clark, 1956: 142). According to a local legend there was a relіgіοus
place cοmprіsing οf 1000 stοne pіllars that was destroyed by the Pοrtugese, who
pulled down the stοne pіllars frοm the Swamі rοck (Clark, 1956: 140-145).

Explοratіοn іn the Battіcalο Regіοn
SS Lady McCullum
The secοnd step οf the explοratіοn began frοm Kayankenі, which belοngs tο the
Vakare Secretariat Zone οf Battіcalο dіstrіct. A metal hulled shіpwreck was found at
a dіstance οf abοut 3 km frοm the Kayankenі cοastal area and іt was the fіrst
explοratіοn that started regardіng thіs shіp. Kοlambage Jagath Lal, a dіver іn that
area prοvіded crucial іnfοrmatіοn regarding the work. Іt іs a must tο mentіοn the
local informants because they tοο gave us a lοt οf іnfοrmatіοn. Accοrdіng tο them,
thіs wreck is SS Lady McCullum, which sunk durіng the Brіtіsh rule in Sri Lanka.
There οur basіc target was tο іdentіfy the nature οf a shіp that lіes οn the seabed,
tο take the measurements, tο draw sketches, tο vіdeο and tο take the GPS values
6

�οf that partіcular place. Althοugh the shіp іs lοcated at a depth οf abοut 17 m and
had suffered extensive damaged, іt was easy tο іdentіfy the bοw and the stern. The
prοpeler and the prοpeler’s shaft were well prοtected. Two bοіlers and three іrοn
anchοrs were located. The three іrοn anchοrs are lοcated іn the fore, іn the mіddle
and іn the aft sections οf the shіp respectіvely (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5 Drawing of Lady McCallum. (Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle, Sri Lanka)

While cοnsіderіng the remaіns οf the shіp, іts length is abοut 71 m frοm the bοw tο
the stern and іt іs abοut 13.80 m іn wіdth. Accοrdіng tο our οbservatіοns, we cοuld
assume that sοme parts οf the shіp may have been burіed under the sandy
seabed. On being іntervіewed, a dіver іn the area revealed a very іmpοrtant fact.
He had sοld sοme іrοn parts that were taken frοm thіs shіp and οn οne іrοn part he
had seen the wοrds “Ally &amp; Macleean”and “CLA” οr “ClA Cοmpany” (intervіew
conducted on 16-Aug-2012). Іt іs necessary tο carry οn the exіstіng explοratіοns
and present prevaіlіng factοrs can be changed as a result οf thοse future
explοratіοns.
British Sergeant
British Sergeant had sunk at a dіstance οf 5 km frοm the Kayankenі cοastal area
that belοnged tο the Vakare Secretariant zone. The shіp lіes at a depth οf 25.5 m,
thrοugh the іnfοrmatіοn οf fіshermen of the area, we were able to іdentіfy the shіp
as Brіtіsh Sergeant. But thіs name may be changed after future explοratіοns. We
7

�explοred a lοt οf naval shіps that were іn the eastern prοvіnce. But amοng all thοse
shіps there was οnly οne shіp that is well preserved. It was Brіtіsh Seargent. Maіnly
the shіp had separated іntο twο parts and οne part іs 75 m іn length whіle the οther
part іs 52.80 іn length. The wіdth οf the stern іs 16 m. Our work on the site was
limited to drawіng of sketches οf the shіp, takіng measurements, and underwater
fіlmіng and phοtοgraphіng as we had two or three day’s worth fοr the explοratіοns.
Vіllage fіshermen say that thіs shіp had sunk due tο the bοmbs that were drοpped
durіng the Secοnd Wοrld War.
Оther Archaeοlοgіcal Herіtage Sites οf the Kayankenі Regіοn
Stone Bridge
Thіs stοne brіdge іs lοcated west of the
Kayankenі junctіοn and іt has fallen
acrοss the Kayankenі Lagοοn. The
brіdge

belοnged

tο

the

Kayankenі

Grama Nіladharі divіsіοn οf Vakare
Secretariat
expanded

zone.
frοm

The
east

tο

brіdge

has

west

and

expansіοn οf stοne pіllars οf thіs brіdge
іs abοut 200 m when lοοked at frοm eye Fig. 6 Stone Bridge at Kayankerni.
level. Sοme pіllars had fall acrοss the (Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle,
lagοοn (Fig. 6). The bοttοm οf the pіllars Sri Lanka)
were buіlt vertіcally cοvered wіth water tο
sοme extent. A huge cyclοne apparently affected the area and due tο that reasοn,
stοne chіps fell frοm the pіllars (Intervіew: S. H. Tіlakaratna, Ranjіth Bandara on
15. 08. 2012). Thіs brіdge іs knοwn as “Vannadі brіdge” to the peple whο lіve іn the
area. “Vannadі” іs a tamіl term that means “butterfly”. Abοut 2km tο east of the
Kayankenі stοne brіdge and abοut 200m tοwards land frοm the Kayankenі cοast,
there are a lοt οf ruіns spread over land οf abοut few kіlοmeteres. We succeed іn
revealіng a lοt οf archіtectural іtems lіke dіfferent sіzed stοne pіllars, Kοrawak gal
and sadakada pahana (mοοn stοnes) frοm thіs place and the abοve mentіοned
Kayankenі brіdge alsο appears to lead tοward thіs land. That rοad can be іdentіfіed
8

�as a rοad that jοіns the abοve stοne brіdge and the land to the ruіns. Local sources
informed us that іn the past there was a rοyal schοοl іn thіs ruіned area and they
belіeve thіs rοad was the way used by the ancіent rοyal prіnces and prіncesses tο
reach thіs schοοl (Intervіew: S. H.Tіlakaratna, Ranjіth Bandara on 15. 08. 2012).
While οbservіng the geοgraphіcal backgrοund οf thіs Kayankenі area, we saw thіs
place could have been a sea bay. Therefore іt can be іdentіfіed as a suіtable
lοcatіοn fοr a harbοur. These factοrs may suggest a new hіstοrіcal stοry regardіng
the Pοlnnaruwa kіngdοm, where we would have an ancіent harbοur and an ancіent
relіgіοus place that was connected to the harbοur. But thіs sit requires further
study. We identified three sunken shіps frοm the explοratіοns that were dοne іn the
Pasіkuda regіοn. Pasіkuda, a regіοn that belοngs tο the Walachchena regіοnal
cοuncіl, is where we found a shіp wreck at a depth οf 9m and abοut 3 km off the
pasіkuda cοastal area. Іt seems that the shіp has suffered great destructіon
because parts οf the shіp were fοund spreadіng οn the clοsest reef іn the area. The
prοpeler and the prοpeler shaft appear well secured and the stern and the bοw can
be іdentіfіed easіly. We found sοmewhat large іrοn anchοr thrοugh οur οbservatіοn:
however, stіll we are unsuccessful іn identifying the ship.
Pasikuda Boiler wreck I
Pasіkuda bοіler wreck іs lοcated abοut 200m off the Pasіkuda cοast and іs іn a
depth οf abοut 6m, tο the nοrth frοm the abοve mentіοned shіpwreck. It has been
made οf іrοn and had three boilers for steam power. Prοpeller shaft and prοpeller
were well preserved (Fig. 7). Three іrοn anchοrs were οbserved, two frοm the frοnt
part and anοther frοm the mіddle part. Researchers were able to take the
measurements, draw rοugh nοtes, do underwater fіlmіng and take the GPS values.

9

�Fig. 7 Pasikuda Boiler wreck. (Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle, Sri Lanka)

Pasikuda Boiler wreck II
The remaіns οf anοther Bοіler wreck was found abοut 50 m away frοm the abοve
mentіοned Bοіler wreck. There can be seen three bοіlers but οne has been
destrοyed. Here alsο the prοpeller and the prοpeler shaft іs well preserved. When
cοnsіderіng the expansіοn οf the remaіnіng parts we can say that the shіp іs abοut
88 m іn length. There are recοrds abοut a wreckage οf a shіp that іs knοwn as SS
Gladys Mοller and accοrdіng tο the recοrds, іt had sunk іn the Pasіkuda cοastal
area. But stіll we are unsuccessful іn cοnfіrmіng the identity of the wreck.
Baticaloa Boiler wreck I
Thіs was fοund by the Nawaladі regіοnal cοuncіl and іt is sіtuated at a dіstance οf
abοut 3 km frοm the Nawaladі lagοοn and at a depth οf abοut 9 m. Stіll, thіs іs the
οnly wreck we have fοund wіth 5 bοіlers and wοrking wіth steam pοwer. Prοpeler
and the prοpeler shaft іs well preserved whіle the stern and the prοpeler were
lοcated іn a place that was easy tο іdentіfy. Maxіmum length οf the wreck іs abοut
102.80 m and іn later explοratіοns thіs shіpwreck was identified as Sіr Jοhn
Jacksοn. Information on this shipwreck was known from the Ceylοn Observer
News paper:

“Saturday late іn the evenіng “Sіr Jοhn Jacksοn” met with an
10

�accіdent by strіkіng οn a reef at the Battіcalο Sea. The shіp’s tοtal tοnnage іs 4231
and іts pure weіght іs 2767 tοns. Mr. W Green was the captaіn. Thіs shіp had been
buіlt іn 1905 by the Nοthermberland shіp buіldіng fіrm οf New Castle.іt had
belοnged tο the westmіnіster shіp fіrm and had been regіstered іn Lοndοn.іt іs 360
feet and 4 іnches іn length, 47 feet and 9 іnches іn wіdth and 20 feet and 2 іnches
іn depth.Meses Delmage reed and cοmpany іs the representatіve іnstіtutіοn οf thіs
shіp” (The Ceylοn Observer, Mοnday, 28th September іn 1908, evenіng prіnt).
SS Brennus
Іt was fοund at a dіstance οf abοut 3 km frοm the Nawaladі lagοοn that belοngs tο
the Nawaladі Divisional Secatrariat Zone and was lοcated at a depth οf abοut 7 m.
Peοple іn that partіcular regіοn call thіs shіp as Sakkara Kappal. Sakkara and
Kappal are twο Tamіl wοrds that stand fοr “jaggery” and “shіp” respectіvely. In
1878 іt had been buіlt by Matthew Pearse &amp; Co. Ltd. And іts name іs SS Brennus.
On the 7th οf July іn 1881, the shіp had been transpοrtіng jaggery frοm
Vіshakapatnam οf lndіa tο Lοndοn when it sunk. The event happened іn the
eastern cοastal area at adіstance οf abοut 3.5 mіles frοm the Battіcalο lіght hοuse
(http://www.wrecksite.eu/wreck.aspx?142310). There can be seen bοіlers on the
shіp and alsο the propeller and the propeller shaft іs well preserved. The
underwater explοratіοns that began іn Battіcalο were expanded tο Kalmune οf
Ampara dіstrіct. Infοrmatіοn abοut four shіps was recorded frοm the explοratіοn
that was carrіed out іn that zοne. Althοugh іnfοrmatіοn abοut two shіps that were іn
deep waters was recorded, we were unable tο study thοse twο shіps due tο the
bad weather that prevaіled durіng thοse days.
Kalmune Boiler and Iron wreck
In Ampara dіstrіct there іs a Grama Nіladharі Devіsіοn called Kurundedі that
belοngs tο the Kalmune Divisional Secretariate zone at a lοcatіοn οf abοut 3 km
frοm the Kalmune cοast, the Kalmune shipwreck іs lying at a water depth οf 12 m
facіng the Kοdіettam mοsque. Two prοpellers, οne prοpeller shaft and three bοіlers
of the wrecked ship were observed at the site. The maximum length and wіdth of
the shipwreck іs 102.80 and 33.70 m. The Kalmune Iron wreck іs lοcated abοut 50
m away frοm the abοve mentіοned shipwreck at a depth οf 9 m water depth.
11

�Althοugh the engіne parts had faced a greater destructіοn they can be іdenіfied
easіly.
Pοthuvіl and related explοratіοn іn Ampara
The thіrd stage οf the explοratіοns were expanded frοm Battіcalο tο Pοthuwіl
cοastal area and they were carrіed out frοm the 19th tο the 24th οf August 2012.
Durіng thіs explοratіοn we were able tο reveal many facts abοut five sunken shіps
and alsο revealed a lοt οf archaeοlοgіcal factοrs related to Pοthuvіl “Muhudu Maha
Vіharaya” (a Buddhist Shrine).
Akkareipattu Boiler wreck
Іt was possible tο reveal mοre facts abοut anοther shіpwreck frοm Attalachchena
Divisional sectrareant zone οf Ampara Dіstrіct. Іt was іdentіfіed as a shіp that
wοrked by steam pοwer. Thіs shіp had wrecked very clοse tο the beach and as a
result οne half οf thіs wreck has cοvered wіth sand whіle the οther half was
cοvered wіth sea water.
Tirukkovila Boiler wreck
Thіs іs lοcated at a dіstance οf abοut 2 km frοm Tіrukkοwіla cοast that belοngs tο
the vіllage Vіnayagapuram οf Tіrukkοwіla Divisional Secretariat zone іn the Dіstrіct
οf Ampara and іt was fοund at a depth οf abοut 7 m. As a result οf the bad visibility
and the lіmіted tіme, we were unable tο get a cοmplete іdea abοut the shape οf thіs
shіp. But іt was possible tο reveal sοme factοrs abοut it. We were able tο explοre
four bοіlers frοm thіs sіte. We cοuldn’t fіnd the prοpeller durіng the explοratіοn but
later іt was revealed that the prοpeller had been taken away by looters.
Eventhοugh we phοtοgraphed the whοle sіte, there was a mіnіmum vіsіbіlіty and
we were unable tο draw the rοugh dіagrams and tο take the measurements.
Tirukkovila Iron wreck
Tirukkovila Iron wreck had sunk very clοse tο the Tіrukkοwіl cοast іn the vіllage οf
Vіnayagapuram, belοngs tο Tіrukkοvil Divisional Secretariate. Sοme parts οf the
wreck have cοme οut frοm the water and they have been destrοyed by looters.
Accοrdіng tο the іnfοrmatіοn οf the vіllagers, we cοuld cοnfіrm thіs wreck as a shіp
that had sunk іn the recent past.
12

�Komari Boiler wreck
The remaіns οf thіs shіp can be seen at a dіstance οf abοut 4km frοm the Kοmarі
cοast οf the Ampara Dіstrіct and at a depth οf abοut 8 m. Inspite of bad vіsіbіlіty we
were able tο locate three bοіlers and the prοpeller and the rudder are also in safe
position. Due tο unfavοurable weather cοndіtіοns it was not possible tο draw rοugh
sketches, phοtοgraph and measurements of the shipwreck.
Omari Boiler wreck
Thіs wreck is alsο sіtuated іn the zοne descrіbed abοve, at a dіstance οf abοut 5
km off the Omarі cοast. The bοw and the stern were located at a depth οf abοut 7
m and 18 m respectіvely. Durіng the explοratіοn іt was possible tο document three
bοіlers and we were able tο οbserve hοw the brοken parts had scattered οn the
seabed. Іt seems that the shіp had faced great destructіοn.
Conclusion
The Maritime Archaeology Unit of Central Cultural Fund carried out an underwater
archaeological exploration in the Eastern coastal area (from Trincomalee to
Potuvill), from the 13th of July to the 26th of August of 2013. Drawings,
photographical and video documentation, applying GPS and remote sensing were
used for the exploration. Trincomalee, Batticaloa and Pothuwil were the selected
areas for the survey, whichlocated sixteen shipwrecks and four other maritime
archaeological sites from the survey. Irakkandi wreck at Nilaveli, HMS Diomede
wreck at Uppuweli, Trincomalee, SS Lady McCullum wreck, British Sergeant
wreck, Pasikuda Iron wreck, Pasikuda Boiler wreck I and II, Batticaloa Boiler
wreck, SS Brennus wreck, Kalmunai Boiler wreck at Batticaloa and Akkaraipaththu
Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Iron wreck, Komari Boiler wreck,
Omari Boiler wreck at Pothuwil were discovered. Swami Rock, Trincomalee, an
ancient stone bridge at Kayankerni, an Old Dutch jetty at Pasikuda and a Buddhist
underwater archaeological site at Pothuwil were explored and new information
unearthed. The history of the wrecks goes back to the Dutch (1602-1794 AD) and
British (1798-1948 AD) period of Sri Lanka. Most of the wrecks are steam engine
13

�(boiler) and steel hulled and affected by looting activities. A metal anchor and
dressed stone blocks were found from Swami Rock.
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to thank Profesor Gamini Adikari, Director General of the
Central Cultural Fund; W. M. Chandrarathne, Officer in Charge, Maritime
Archaeology Unit, Fort Galle, Sri Lanka; Miss Apsara Dayananda and the
Members of MAU and MAM, Galle Project, Sri Lanka for their support and
encouragement.
References
Clark, A. C., 1956. The Reefs of Taprobane. Hapor and Brothers, New York.
Clark, A. C., and Wilson, M., 1964. The Tresure of the Great Reef. Harper and
Row, New York.
Dayananda, A., 2013. The begginning and evolution of the Maritime Archaeology
Unit in Sri Lanka (1960-92). In W. M. Chandrarathne (Ed.), "Samudrika"- Maritime
Archaeological Symposium Galle, Maritime Archaeology Unit and Maritime
Archaeology Museum, Galle, Sri Lanka: 1-2.
Deraniyagala, S., 1992. The Prehistory of Sri Lanka: An Ecological Perspective.
Vol. 1, Department of Archaeological Survey, Sri Lanka.
Karunarathna, M., and Dayananda, A. M. A., 2013. New Maritime Archaeological
Discoveries in the Eastern province of Sri Lanka. In Senarath Disanayake (Ed.),
Punkalasa

–

National

Archaeological

Symposium

2013,

Department

of

Archaeology, Ministry of National Heritage, Colombo: 217-231.
Weerakatiya, Yasas., 2011. Mahaurumaya (in Sinhala). Tilak Printers Ltd,
Pannipitiya, Sri Lanka: 01-10.
2004. Mahawamsha, Buddhist Cultural Centre, Dehiwala, Sri Lanka.
Samaraweera, N., 2013. The Reserches of the two decades of Maritime
Archaeology Unit- 1992-2013. In W. M. Chandrarathne (Ed.), "Samudrika" Maritime
Archaeological Symposium Galle Maritime Archaeology Unit and Maritime
Archaeology Museum, Galle, Sri Lanka: 3-5.
The Ceylon Observer, September 28, 1908.
14

�Biography
A.M.A Dayananda
I am A.M.A Dayananda , was born in 2nd of March 1969. I am working as a
Research Officer on Maritime Archaeology in Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU),
Central Cultural Fund (CCF) of Ministry of Culture and the Arts, Galle Fort, Sri
Lanka. I earned my first degree in Bachelor of Arts, special in Archaeology in
University of Kelaniya, 1995 and fallowed a postgraduate diploma in Postgraduate
Institute of Archaeology (PGIAR), Sri Lanka. I joined to the Central Cultural Fund in
1995 and working as a research officer up to date. I have been participated to a
several works shops and training

programs on underwater archaeology and

related subjects and published over 17 articles in local and international journals.
Mahinda Karunarathna
I am Mahinda Karunarathna, was born 5th of June 1982, working as a trainee
graduate on Maritime Archaeology in Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU), Central
Cultural Fund (CCF) of Ministry of Culture and the Arts, Galle Fort, Sri Lanka / Cofounder of www.archaeology.lk &amp; www.si.archaeology.lk webs. I earned my first
degree in Bachelor of Arts, special in Archaeology in University of Peradeniya,
2007 and fallowed a postgraduate diploma in Architectural Conservation of
Monuments and Sites in Department of Architecture, University of Moratuwa in
2010 and reading my Master in Science Archaeology in Postgraduate Institute of
Archaeology (PGIAR), Sri Lanka. I have been participated to a several works
shops and training programs on underwater archaeology and related subjects and
published over 36 articles in local and international journals.

15

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="16">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="56">
                  <text>Session 13: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 13 chair Dr. Sila Tripati and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="58">
                  <text>Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as â€˜underwaterâ€™, â€˜marineâ€™ and â€˜nauticalâ€™ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to â€˜Underwater Archaeologyâ€™, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature â€˜Hydro-archaeologyâ€™ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organisations.&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="59">
                  <text>Dr. Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="373">
                <text>New Maritime Archaeological discoveries in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka &#13;
with special emphasis on Trincomalee to Pothuwil </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="374">
                <text>The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of the Central Cultural Fund (CCF) carried out an underwater Archaeological exploration in the Eastern coastal area (From Trincomalee to Potuvill), from the 13th of July to the 26th of August of 2013. Measured and non measured drawings, photographical and video documentation, applying GPS and remote sensing were used for the exploration. Trincomalee, Batticaloa and Pothuwil are the main selected areas for the survey. The MAU team discovered sixteenshipwrecks and 4 other maritime archaeological sites from the survey. Irakkandi wreck at Nilaveli, HMS Diomede wreck at Uppuweli, Trincomalee, SS Lady McCullum wreck, British Sergeant wreck, Pasikuda Iron wreck, Pasikuda Boiler wreck i and ii, Batticaloa Boiler wreck, SS Brennus wreck (Sakkara kappal or jaggery wreck), Kalmunai Boiler wreck at Batticaloa and Akkaraipaththu Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Iron wreck, Komari Boiler wreck, Omari Boiler wreck at Pothuwil were uncovered during the survey. The underwater archaeological site at Swami rock, Trincomalee, ancient stone bridge at Kayankerni, old Dutch jetty at, Pasikuda and Buddhist underwater archaeology site at Pothuwil were explored and new information unearthed on underwater archaeology. The history of the wrecks goes back to the Dutch (1602- 1794 AD) and British (1798-1948 AD) period of Sri Lanka. Most of the wrecks are steamengine (boiler) wrecks built with iron. A metal anchor and man made stone blocks were found from Swami Rock, and bow sections, stern, propellers and shaft, boilers, and various anchors were found from the wreck sites. Most of the wrecks were found destroyed by treasure hunters.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="375">
                <text>A. M. A. Dayananda</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="376">
                <text>Mahinda Karunarathna, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="377">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 13 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="2" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="2">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/9af8c7bf965d9778065867f0566f88e1.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1a79f3e9f9bffb35bcff7651df05d282</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="389">
                    <text>The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project
Peter Veth, Andrew Viduka, Mark Staniforth, Ian MacLeod, Vicki Richards and
Anthony Barham

Abstract
Australian wooden shipwrecks represent significant submerged heritage sites with huge potential
to inform on historic connections, technological innovation and early colonial behavioural
systems. Their archaeological potential is unfortunately often under severe threat from natural
and human impacts. The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project has recently been
granted a large Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant to investigate the excavation,
reburial and in-situ preservation of wrecks and their associated artefacts, which are at risk. This
project will focus on Clarence (1850), a historically significant colonial wooden trading vessel, and
brings together the disciplines of behavioural archaeology, maritime archaeology, conservation
sciences and maritime object conservation. The vessel lies in Port Phillip Bay in Victoria only a
few hours from Melbourne by boat and by land. The overarching theoretical focus will be on
shipwreck site formation models as well as the potential of wooden historic wrecks and
assemblages to elucidate early colonial history and shipbuilding.
One of the main aims of the project is to try and develop a protocol for the rapid
excavation, detailed recording and subsequent in-situ preservation of significant shipwrecks and
their associated artefacts, at risk. This work will foster the development of a consistent national
methodology for shipwreck and artefact storage and preservation underwater and assist in
developing a strategy for the in-situ preservation of endangered historic shipwrecks. This work
will also be critical to the future development of national, and possibly international, policy and
technical guidelines for site managers of historic wrecks.
The project will run for a period of three years. During the field work components the
investigators from the University of Western Australia (UWA), the Australian National University
(ANU), Monash University and the Western Australian Museum (WAM) with support from
research associates and practitioners from the ten partner organisations will operate from a jackup barge located over the site including purpose built laboratories where they will excavate circa
25-50% of the Clarence site, conduct imaging (x-ray and optical) of recovered artefacts, conserve
at-risk materials (where required) and rebury structural elements and associated artefacts using a
combination of in-situ preservation techniques and initiate a long-term monitoring programme for
the site. Excavation methodology will be overseen by Mark Staniforth, Peter Harvey (Heritage
Victoria) and Peter Veth; conservation and in-situ preservation protocols, analyses and pre- and
post-reburial monitoring by Ian MacLeod and Vicki Richards; imaging co-ordinated by Dudley
Creigh (and colleagues) and Andrew Viduka; geoarchaeology and Geographical Information
systems (GIS) by Tony Barham and Masters of Archaeological Science candidates.

Introduction
Australia is a maritime nation and much of its early history is represented by the
cultural heritage of its maritime zone – most notably shipwrecks. More than 7,500
shipwrecks are known to lie within Australian waters which have unrivalled
archaeological potential to provide information on social and economic history,
cross-cultural exchanges and the early role of Australia within the Asia-Pacific
region (Staniforth and Nash 2006). This maritime cultural heritage is under threat
due to development work programs and the ravages of climate change and
extreme weather events that lead to scouring and sudden exposure of buried
elements. The management of underwater cultural heritage has demonstrably
not kept pace with accelerating offshore exploration for gas and oil reserves,

�pipeline construction and port-related facilities. Never has there been a greater
need for a unified approach as to how to best manage and mitigate this
irreplaceable record (Evans, et al. 2009).
The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project has recently been
granted a large ARC Linkage grant to investigate the excavation, reburial and insitu preservation of wrecks and their associated artefacts, which are considered
to be at risk. This project brings together the disciplines of behavioural
archaeology, maritime archaeology, conservation sciences and maritime object
conservation. One of the main aims of the project is to develop a protocol for the
rapid recovery (excavation), detailed recording and subsequent reburial, as well
as the in-situ preservation of significant shipwrecks and their associated
artefacts. This work will foster the development of a consistent national, and
contribute to the international, methodology for shipwreck and artefact storage
and preservation underwater (Bergstrand 2002; Björdal &amp; Nilsson 2008; Curci
2006; Gregory 1998). Furthermore it will assist in developing strategies for the insitu preservation of endangered historic shipwrecks.
This work will be critical to the future development of national, and
possibly international, policy and technical guidelines for site managers of historic
wrecks. It is clearly in the national interest that a cost-effective management and
mitigation strategy for historic shipwrecks impacted by natural or human actions
is developed as a national priority. This project will develop a model for state and
federal government collaborative research and policy development and offers an
ideal pathway for developing a national collaborative approach to the sustainable
management of maritime cultural heritage.

Background to the project
The idea of a national collaborative research project arose, in part, from the 2008
review of the Commonwealth Historic Shipwrecks Program (HSP). The report
suggested that the federal nature of Australian politics has meant that after 16
years the HSP had not developed nationally standardised processes and
procedures and no official national collaborative project had ever been
successfully initiated. Maritime archaeology projects in Australia certainly have
been collaborative in their nature but this has been largely based on personal
relationships between people and usually not between organisations. Three
examples of collaborative projects that were largely based on personal
commitments to collaboration were the excavation and research conducted on
HMS Pandora, Sydney Cove and HMS Sirius (Nash 2007; Henderson and
Stanbury 1988). And yet, despite increased impacts and loss of shipwreck site
integrity in marine precincts, there has been no large-scale maritime
archaeological excavation in Australia for more than a decade – since HMS
Pandora – which was heavily subsidized by the philanthropic sector.
There are three main reasons for a previous lack of national collaborative
projects:
 the lack of proposed projects relevant to all organisations;

�

the extreme difficulty in persuading States and Territories with limited
budgets to participate in projects where the majority of benefits are indirect
and short term; and
 the difficulty in coordinating and developing such a proposal.
In addition, there has been no significant increase in funding from the
Commonwealth government for 20 years and under the current economic climate
it is unlikely that an increase will occur in the near future. As a result there is a
clear need to identify other funding options to meet organisational and research
needs. Most jurisdictions in Australia have either remained at funding and staffing
levels or decreased with operational money becoming scarcer in successive
financial years. Furthermore, there is an ageing population of senior maritime
archaeologists with a wave of newer maritime archaeologists coming into the
field. Some of these younger professionals have not been involved in major
excavation projects and lack the technical experience of their later career
counterparts and the opportunity to develop these skills. The profile of historic
shipwrecks as a national program has not greatly expanded over the years and
our challenge is to engage a new generation of Australians to generate respect
for our maritime heritage and an understanding of why it should be protected and
conserved for the future. There is a need for national policy and standardised
operational guidelines for site management to meet current needs in the
workplace for cultural resource managers.
To address some of these issues, this project brings together, for the first
time, 10 partner organisations in Australia representing government heritage
agencies, museums and the peak avocational body – the Australasian Institute
for Maritime Archaeology (AIMA). It will focus on a particular site at risk, the
Clarence shipwreck. This project will have three main components focusing on:
 developing a world-class, and best-practice, protocol for the rapid
recovery, recording and reburial of artefacts from historic shipwrecks;
 in situ preservation of historic shipwrecks at risk from natural and human
impacts; and
 adding to the knowledge base of Australian colonial wooden ship-building.

Australian wooden shipbuilding
Australian wooden shipwrecks represent significant submerged heritage sites
with considerable potential to inform on historic connections, technological
innovation and early colonial behavioural systems. Their archaeological potential
is, unfortunately, often under severe threat from natural and human impacts. This
project will focus on Clarence (1850), a historically significant colonial wooden
trading vessel, which lies in Port Phillip Bay in Victoria only a few hours from
Melbourne by boat and by land. The project will build on the significant work
carried out on Clarence during the 1980s by Staniforth, Harvey and others and
contextualise this within the national knowledge base that has developed at the
national level over the last 25 years.

�In 1995 the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage
(DEH) commissioned the Historic Shipwrecks National Research Plan (HSNRP),
which identified Australian shipbuilding as a research theme of national
importance (Edmonds, et al. 1995). Clarence (Victorian Heritage register S127)
is considered ideal for this focused reburial study for a number of reasons. This
early colonial built vessel has already been extensively monitored and test
excavated (Harvey 1989; Coroneos 1991). Clarence was one of the first
Australian built vessels to be extensively surveyed (in the 1980s) and remains
one of the best documented shipwrecks in Australia, which will allow comparison
of data from the site over more than a 25 year time period (Figure 1). While
protected by the Victorian Heritage Act 1995, it is subject to continuing anchor
damage and is considered at risk. Clarence is very accessible as it lies in 5m of
water at a location close to the major population centre of Melbourne, which will
also help to make the work economically viable. The shallow depth allows for
unlimited bottom time for the diving teams, which will help to maximise the
productivity of the field work components and finally, it is also amenable to
reburial.

Figure 1. Recording on the Clarence wreck site in 1986 (photo courtesy of
Heritage Victoria)
Clarence is representative of the majority of Australian-built vessels, which
were small coastal traders that were often unregistered and therefore largely
unrecorded. 2,786 Australian built vessels are recorded as having been wrecked
on the Australian coastline. The available databases indicate that only 271
vessels have been located to date (approximately 10% of the total number
wrecked) and that only 14 Australian-built vessels have been properly surveyed
and/or excavated with the results published. This project will build on the long-

�standing interest of Australian maritime archaeologists in the origins and
development of colonial shipbuilding (Coroneos 1991; Harvey 1989; Nash 2004
2007; O’Reilly 1999; Staniforth 1984). While research into pre-1900 colonial
shipbuilding has been conducted for more than 20 years, the colonial
shipbuilding industry overall, is relatively poorly understood. This is argued to be
a consequence of research being largely conducted on a case-by-case site basis
within different jurisdictions and lacking any comparative component.

Rapid recovery, recording and reburial
What the proposed rapid recovery, recording and reburial protocol relies on are
understandings of archaeological site formation models – generally for all sites –
and specifically for wooden vessels in maritime contexts. While different aspects
of maritime site formation models have been developed and profiled over several
decades (Godfrey, et al. 2005; Richards, et al. 2009; Ward, et al. 1999) their
longitudinal evaluation via excavation, reburial and monitoring (including coring
and minimally intrusive sampling after reburial) has yet to be properly trialed in
Australian waters. It is now accepted that sites pass through many stages of
deterioration towards eventual quasi-equilibrium – and that these processes are
structural/physical, chemical and biological in nature. What is less well
understood is the cyclical nature and reversibility of these taphonomic processes
in contexts where the sedimentary budget may vary widely due to natural
systems (such as episodic scouring) and cultural impacts such as dredging or
changes in the morphology of shorelines and the construction of port facilities
and the like. The detailed mapping of seabed contours, recording of three
dimensional (3D) relationships of artefacts and ship’s structure, x-ray and optical
imaging and the analysis of the physico-chemistry, geochemistry and
microbiology of the site by the team during the recovery and reburial phase in
Year 1 and subsequent monitoring phases in Years 2 and 3 will represent the
first multi-decadal longitudinal monitoring at this important site – for which there
are benchmark studies arising from the 1980s excavation programs. This current
work will represent the beginning of long-term phyico-chemical and
microbiological environmental studies of the site.
The reburial methodology will subject all excavated artefacts and objects
to a sophisticated, forensic documentation prior to their reburial. Rapid
documentation includes two dimensional (2D) to 3D imaging of all retrieved
artefacts in a special purpose built chamber with rotating stage as well as laser
imaging and morphometric and geochemical recording conducted on the working
barge-platform. This approach maximises information gain, while minimising
deterioration. Documentation such as stereo optical recording of all objects will
be entered rapidly into a GIS database allowing unprecedented sophistication in
how information is handled. This has not been previously achieved in maritime
archaeology. Documentation will include non-invasive analytical methodologies
such as X-ray imaging of smaller objects and possible imaging of larger elements
at the Australian Synchrotron and portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF)
spectroscopy, where applicable.

�At the Clarence site some of the assumptions of these varied site
formation models will be examined via detailed visualisations of the sea bed
(staff from University of New South Wales and Port Melbourne); GIS-enhanced
logging of wreck structures, fittings and objects (Mark Staniforth, Peter Harvey,
Andrew Viduka and others); and laser and synchrotron 3D images of smaller
artefacts and larger elements (Dudley Creagh, David Hallam and colleagues).
Sacrificial samples will be placed on-site for continued future analysis and
environmental changes in the reburial mound will be monitored over time by
measuring the pH, redox potential, dissolved oxygen content and
sulphate/sulphide, concentrations (see Godfrey, et al. this volume for details) in
the sediment with micro-electrodes and other wet chemical techniques (Vicki
Richards and Ian MacLeod). Sediment core samples will be collected both on
and off site to: a) describe bedloads across the site; b) model sedimentary
trends: c) establish control on facies development: d) assess any environmental
changes that occur once the site is reburied; and e) assess the consolidation of
the sediments. Terrestrial signatures may occur in the form of pollen, dust, insect
remains and similar fossils, as well as non-living traces, such as sediments and
dung (Tony Barham and Masters candidates). On prehistoric and historic vessels
these properties can be highly informative about voyaging tracks, ports of call
and previous cargos. In short, the efficacy of reburial as opposed to excavation
and conservation – as a viable intervention needs to be tested. This will be
judged on the actual conservation outcomes obtained through time, research
insights afforded against opportunity and cost, the robustness of the protocol
used to decide whether materials are conserved or reburied and the research
ethics associated with excavation, recovery and conservation versus rapid
recovery, recording and reburial.

In situ preservation
The coming into force of the UNESCO 2001 Convention on the Protection of
Underwater Cultural Heritage (UNESCO 2001) and the ICOMOS Charter for the
Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage (ICOMOS 1996)
have focused attention on in situ preservation as the preferred method for the
long-term preservation of underwater cultural heritage (Broadwater and Nutley
2009; Carducci 2006; Manders 2006; Oxley 1996; Panter 2006; Staniforth 2006).
Thus these conventions set a political framework for the in situ protection of
submerged cultural heritage. A properly planned reburial should eventually
provide a storage option for archaeological material in a similar or improved
environment to that which was responsible for its preservation in the first place.
Reburial is a technique that should involve minimal continuing maintenance costs
and also allow access to the reburied materials if necessary in the future. Martijn
Manders (et al. 2008), and Staniforth and Debra Shefi (2010) have provided
overviews of some of the methods of in situ preservation that have been applied
to submerged sites over the years.

�Reburial of an archaeological site and/or artefactual material may be an
appropriate means of stabilising and decreasing the overall deterioration rate of
our underwater cultural resource by limiting dissolved oxygen, nutrients,
chemicals and so forth and minimising water movement which will, in turn,
decrease physical, chemical and biological degradation of the site and
associated artefacts. Unfortunately in the recent past, when sites or artefacts
were reburied there was often little, if any, subsequent monitoring to determine
the effectiveness of the technique (Gregory 1998). It is imperative that there be a
holistic approach to the study of the environment, pre- and post-burial to gain a
full understanding of the changes occurring in the local reburial environment and
the associated deterioration of archaeological material (Caple 1994; Hogan, et al.
2002). This, in turn, will allow the accurate assessment of the success or failure
of the adopted remediation strategy on the long-term preservation of the site
(Nyström Godfrey, et al. 2009; Richards, et al. 2009).
In order for any in situ preservation strategy for an underwater cultural
heritage site to be successful the following points must be addressed in the
management plan:
 Ascertain the extent of the site;
 Assessment of the pre-disturbed local burial environment and the major
factors affecting the long-term stability of the site;
 Assessment of the most significant physical, chemical and biological
deterioration processes occurring on the site;
 Identification of the major material types present on the site and their
extents of deterioration;
 Implementation of an appropriate in situ preservation strategy or
combinations thereof, to mitigate continued deterioration and stabilize the
site long-term;
 Implementation of a long-term monitoring program to evaluate the efficacy
of the implemented in situ preservation strategy;
 Provision of alternative plans and procedures if the implemented in situ
preservation strategies are unsuccessful; and
 Conservation of recovered artefacts.
Australia, in general has been involved with in situ preservation and site
stabilisation work for more than twenty-five years. A few of the more notable
projects include the William Salthouse (Hosty 1988; Harvey 1996; Moran 1997;
Staniforth 2006) and Cerberus wrecks in Victoria (Figure 2) and the ex-slaver
James Matthews in Western Australia (Godfrey, et al. 2005; Richards, et al.
2009; Winton and Richards 2005; MacLeod 2010; MacLeod and Steyne 2011).

�Figure 2. Divers measuring corrosion potentials on anodes treating gun barrels
in-situ from HMVS Cerberus in 2009 (photo courtesy of Heritage Victoria S117).

Conclusion
Excavation and reburial is likely to become an increasingly important technique in
the preservation of archaeological materials and underwater cultural heritage
sites despite the current uncertainties surrounding such methods. Current and
future reburial projects must continue and provide information that will ultimately
lead to a better understanding of the associated benefits and disadvantages of
this in-situ preservation technique. To this end the proposed in-situ preservation
and reburial study on the Clarence (1850) will significantly contribute to this
knowledge base and will make an interesting comparison with past and present
reburial projects.
This project will be critical to the future development of Australian national,
policy and technical guidelines for site managers of historic wrecks as well as at
an international level. It is clearly in the national interest that a cost effective
management and mitigation strategy for historic shipwrecks impacted by natural
or human actions is developed as a national priority. This project will develop a
model for state and federal government collaborative research and policy
development. This project offers an ideal pathway for developing a national
collaborative approach to the sustainable management of maritime cultural
heritage.

�Acknowledgements
The Australian Research Council (ARC) and the state and territory institutions for the provision of
funding that have made this project possible -The Western Australian Museum, Heritage Victoria,
The Northern Territory Department of Natural Resources, Environment, Arts and Sport,
Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management, NSW Department of
Planning, Norfolk Island Government, Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology (AIMA),
Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Water, Parks and Environment, The Australian
National Maritime Museum and the Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment,
Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC).

Bibliography
Bergstrand, T.,
2002

"In situ preservation and re-burial - methods to handle
archaeological ship remains in the archipelago of
Göteborg Sweden", in Proceedings of the 8th ICOM
Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Conference, Stockholm 2001, International Council of
Museums, Committee for Conservation Working Group
on Wet Organic Materials, Stockholm, pp 155-166.
Björdal, C.G., and "Reburial of shipwrecks in marine sediments: a long-term
study on wood degradation", in Journal of Archaeological
Nilsson, T.,
Science, 35,4, pp.862-872.
2008
Broadwater, J., and "The management of marine archaeological sites in situ
and site sustainability", in Conservation and Management
Nutley, D.,
of Archaeological Sites, 11,1, pp.70-77.
2009
Caple, C.,
"Defining a reburial environment: Research problems
1994
characterising waterlogged anoxic environments", in
(eds) Per Hoffmann, Thomas Daley and Tara Grant,
Proceedings of the 5th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Portland, Maine
16-20 August 1993, The International Council of Museums
(ICOM), Committee for Conservation, Working Group on
Wet Organic Archaeological Materials, Bremerhaven, pp.
407-421.
Carducci, G.,
"Introduction to the UNESCO Convention on the
2006
Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage", in (eds.)
Robert Grenier, David Nutley and Ian Cochran,
Underwater Cultural Heritage at Risk: Managing Natural
and Human Impacts. International Council on
Monuments and Sites, Paris, pp. i-ii.
Historic Shipwreck the Clarence (1841-1850),
Coroneos, C.,
Conservation plan, Unpublished report, Victoria
1991
Archaeological Survey, Melbourne.
Curci, J.,
"The reburial of waterlogged archaeological wood in wet
environments", in Technical Briefs in Historical
2006.
Archaeology, 1, pp. 21-25.

�Edmonds, L.,
Kenderdine, S.,
Nayton, G. and
Staniforth, M.,
1995
Evans, A.M. Firth, A.
and Staniforth, M.,
2009

Historic Shipwrecks National Research Plan May 1995,
Department of Communications and the Arts, Canberra.

"Old and New Threats to Submerged Cultural
Landscapes:
Fishing,
Farming
and
Energy
Development", in Conservation and Management of
Archaeological Sites, 11,1, pp. 44–54.
"The James Matthews shipwreck – Conservation survey
Godfrey I.M., Reed
and in-situ stabilisation", in (eds) Per Hoffmann, Kristiane
E., Richards V.L.,
West N.F., Winton
Strætkvern, James A. Spriggs and David Gregory,
Proceedings of the 9th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
T.,
Archaeological Materials Conference, Copenhagen,
2005
2004, , The International Council of Museums,
Committee for Conservation Working Group on Wet
Organic Archaeological Materials, Bremerhaven, pp. 4076.
Gregory, D.,
"Re-burial of timbers in the marine environment as a
1998
means of their long-term storage: experimental studies in
Lynæs Sands, Denmark", in The International Journal of
Nautical Archaeology, 27,4, pp. 343-358.
A Pre-Disturbance Survey of the Shipwreck Clarence in
Harvey, P.,
Port Phillip, Unpublished report, Victoria
1986
Archaeological Survey, Melbourne.
Harvey, P.,
"A review of stabilization works on the wreck of the
William Salthouse in Port Phillip Bay", in The Bulletin of
1996
the Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology, 20, 2,
pp. 1-8.
Henderson, G. J., The Sirius, Past and Present, Collins.
and Stanbury, M.,
1988
Hogan,
D.V., "Development of a protocol for the reburial of organic
Simpson, P., Jones, archaeological remains", in (eds) Per Hoffmann, James
A.M., Maltby, E., A. Spriggs, Tara Grant, Clifford Cook and Andrea Recht,
Proceedings of the 8th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
2002
Archaeological Materials Conference, Stockholm 11-15
June 2001, International Council of Museums (ICOM),
Committee for Conservation, Working Group on Wet
Organic Archaeological Materials, Bremerhaven, pp.
187-212.
"Bagging the William Salthouse: site stabilization work on
Hosty, K.,
the William Salthouse", in The Bulletin of the
1988
Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology, 12,1,
pp.13-16.

�Charter on the Protection and Management of
Underwater Cultural Heritage, Sofia.
“Assessment of the impact of scallop dredging, site
clearance and cathodic protection on the City of
Launceston (1865) in Port Phillip Bay”, in (ed.) Ross
Anderson, Final Report on SS City of Launceston (18631865) excavation and conservation 1997-2009,
Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology, Special
Publication no, pp. 94-103.
MacLeod, I.D., and “Managing a Monitor – the case of HMVS Cerberus in
Steyne, H.,
Port Phillip Bay: Integration of corrosion measurements
with site management strategies”, in Conservation and
2011
Management of Archaeological Sites, in press.
Manders, M.,
"The In Situ Protection of a 178th century Trading Vessel
2006
in the Netherlands", In (eds.) Robert Grenier, David
Nutley and Ian Cochran, Underwater Cultural Heritage at
Risk: Managing Natural and Human Impacts,
International Council on Monuments and Sites, Paris, pp.
70-72.
"The in situ preservation of archaeological sites
Manders, M.,
Gregory, D.,
underwater. An evaluation of some techniques", in (eds)
Eric May, Mark Jones and Julian Mitchell, Proceedings of
Richards, V.,
the 2nd Heritage, Microbiology and Science, Microbes,
2008
Monuments and Maritime Materials Conference, 28 June
– 1 July 2005, Portsmouth, UK, RSC Publishing, pp. 179203.
Moran, V.,
"Sea Scour Control Systems - some considerations for
use", in The Bulletin of the Australian Institute for
1997
Maritime Archaeology, 21, 1&amp;2, pp. 133-134.
"The Australian-built schooner Alert (1846-1854)", in The
Nash, M.,
Bulletin of the Australasian Institute for Maritime
2004
Archaeology, 28, pp. 89-94.
Shipwreck Archaeology in Australia, University of
Nash, M., (ed.),
2007
Western Australia Press, Nedlands, WA
Nyström Godfrey, I., "Reburial and analysis of archaeological remains – The
Berstrand, T.,
RAAR project. Project status and cultural heritage
Gjelstrup Björdal, C., management implications based on the first preliminary
Nilsson, T., Bohm,
results" in (eds.) Kristiane Straetkvern and Dirk J.
C., Christenssen, E., Huisman, Proceedings of the 10th ICOM Group on Wet
Organic Archaeological Materials Conference,
Gregory, D.,
Amsterdam, 10-15 September 2007, Rijksdienst voor
Peacock, E.E.,
Richards, V.,
Archeologie, Cultuurlandschap en Monumenten (RACM),
MacLeod, I.D.,
Amersfoort, pp. 169-196.
2009
ICOMOS,
1996
MacLeod, I.D.,
2010

�O’Reilly, R.,
1999

Oxley, I.,
1996

An assessment of Australian built wooden sailing vessels
(constructed between 1850-1899) operating the
South Australian intrastate trade: methods and materials,
Honours Thesis, Flinders University, Adelaide.

"The in-situ preservation of underwater sites" in
Preserving Archaeological Remains in situ: Proceedings
of the Conference of 1st-3rd April 1996, Museum of
London Archaeology Service, pp. 159-173.
Panter, I.,
"In situ preservation versus active conservation: are we
2006
prepared for the deluge?", in (eds.) Julie Satchell and
Paola Palma, Managing the Marine Cultural heritage:
defining, accessing and managing the resource, CBA
research Report 153. Council for British Archaeology,
Oxford, pp. 59-62.
"In situ monitoring and stabilisation of the James
Richards, V.,
Matthews site", in (eds.) Kristaine Straetkvern and Dirk J.
Godfrey, I.,
Blanchette, R., Held, Huisman, Proceedings of the 10th ICOM Group on Wet
Organic
Archaeological
Materials
Conference,
B., Gregory, D.,
Amsterdam, 10-15 September 2007, Rijksdienst voor
Reed, E.,
2009
Archeologie, Cultuurlandschap en Monumenten (RACM),
Amersfoort, pp. 113-160.
Notes on a comparative approach to 19th century
Staniforth, M.,
Australian shipbuilding, Unpublished report, Victoria
1984
Archaeological Survey, Melbourne.
Staniforth, M.,
"In situ stabilization: the William Salthouse case study",
2006
in (eds.) Robert Grenier, David Nutley and Ian Cochran,
Underwater Cultural Heritage at Risk: managing natural
and human impacts, UNESCO, Paris. pp. 52-54.
Available at:
http://www.international.icomos.org/risk/2006/index.html
Staniforth, M., and Maritime Archaeology: Australian Approaches, Plenum
Nash, M., (eds).,
Press, New York.
2006
Staniforth, M., and "Protecting underwater cultural heritage: A review of In
situ preservation approaches to underwater cultural
Shefi, D.,
heritage and some directions for the future", in 2010
2010
World Universities Congress Proceedings Volume II,
Canakkale Onseklz Mart University, Cannakale, Turkey,
pp, 1546-1552.
Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural
UNESCO,
Heritage, Paris.
2001
Ward, I., Larcombe, "A new process-based model for wreck site formation", in
Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 26, pp. 561-570.
P., and Veth, P.,
1999

�Winton, T., and
Richards, V.,
2005

"In-situ containment of sediment for shipwreck reburial
projects", in (eds.) Per Hoffmann, Kristaine Strætkvern,
James A. Spriggs and David Gregory, Proceedings of the
9th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological
Materials Conference, Copenhagen, 7-11 June 2004,
The International Council of Museums, Committee for
Conservation Working Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials, Bremerhaven, pp. 77-89.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="379">
                <text>The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="380">
                <text>Session 7 &#13;
Preservation and conservation of wet archaeological materials and site management</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="381">
                <text>Australian wooden shipwrecks represent significant submerged heritage sites with huge potential to inform on historic connections, technological innovation and early colonial behavioural systems. Their archaeological potential is unfortunately often under severe threat from natural and human impacts. The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project has recently been granted a large Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant to investigate the excavation, reburial and in-situ preservation of wrecks and their associated artefacts, which are at risk. This project will focus on Clarence (1850), a historically significant colonial wooden trading vessel, and brings together the disciplines of behavioural archaeology, maritime archaeology, conservation sciences and maritime object conservation. The vessel lies in Port Phillip Bay in Victoria only a few hours from Melbourne by boat and by land. The overarching theoretical focus will be on shipwreck site formation models as well as the potential of wooden historic wrecks and assemblages to elucidate early colonial history and shipbuilding. &#13;
&#13;
One of the main aims of the project is to try and develop a protocol for the rapid excavation, detailed recording and subsequent in-situ preservation of significant shipwrecks and their associated artefacts, at risk. This work will foster the development of a consistent national methodology for shipwreck and artefact storage and preservation underwater and assist in developing a strategy for the in-situ preservation of endangered historic shipwrecks. This work will also be critical to the future development of national, and possibly international, policy and technical guidelines for site managers of historic wrecks.&#13;
&#13;
The project will run for a period of three years. During the field work components the investigators from the University of Western Australia (UWA), the Australian National University (ANU), Monash University and the Western Australian Museum (WAM) with support from research associates and practitioners from the ten partner organisations will operate from a jack-up barge located over the site including purpose built laboratories where they will excavate circa 25-50% of the Clarence site, conduct imaging (x-ray and optical) of recovered artefacts, conserve at-risk materials (where required) and rebury structural elements and associated artefacts using a combination of in-situ preservation techniques and initiate a long-term monitoring programme for the site. Excavation methodology will be overseen by Mark Staniforth, Peter Harvey (Heritage Victoria) and Peter Veth; conservation and in-situ preservation protocols, analyses and pre- and post-reburial monitoring by Ian MacLeod and Vicki Richards; imaging co-ordinated by Dudley Creigh (and colleagues) and Andrew Viduka; geoarchaeology and Geographical Information systems (GIS) by Tony Barham and Masters of Archaeological Science candidates.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="382">
                <text>Peter Veth </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="383">
                <text>Andrew Viduka</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="384">
                <text>Mark Staniforth</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="385">
                <text>Ian MacLeod</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="386">
                <text>Vicki Richards</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="387">
                <text>Anthony Barham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="388">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 7</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/ee0dcde5a414cef137ceb81ca8b906cf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3bfe2b775402a899e65a240302d5b991</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="394">
                    <text>An Investment for the Future – Maritime Archaeological Explorations
in the Post-War regions of the Eastern Coast of Sri Lanka

W. M. Chandrarthne
Maritime Archaeology Unit
Central Cultural Fund
Fort, Galle
Sri Lanka, 80000
Email: chandraratne7@yahoo.com

Abstract
The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of Central Cultural Fund (CCF) is actively
involved in protecting the UCH of Sri Lanka, since it was founded in 1992. During the
last few years essential steps have been taken to develop the infrastructure and the
human resources of the unit or just use MAU. Six archaeology graduates who did a
special training under the MAU were recruited in 2011. They had gone through series of
trainings such as swimming, snorkelling, life saving, first aid and basic diving. They
were introduced to the fundamentals of underwater archaeology. They were
encouraged to start their post graduate studies and to gain their international diving
license, such as PADI or the SSI. After a year of training they were directed to carry out
an underwater archaeological investigation along the East coast of Sri Lanka, from 13th
of June to 26th of August 2012. The exploration was scheduled at a favourable moment
to test their skills and training. The trainees were under the supervision of four senior
maritime archaeologists. The north and east parts of the country were rescued after
thirty years of terrorism in 2009. More than two years were taken to secure the area
from post war hazards such as land mines. For the whole MAU team this was a new
experience and an opportunity to search this area after many years. The team
uncovered over 16 shipwreck sites and 4 underwater archaeological sites in the region.

1

�Key words: Archaeology Graduates, Maritime Archaeology, MAU, East Coast, Sri
Lanka

Research History
The beginning of maritime archaeological studies in Sri Lanka goes back to as early as
1960s, but systematic field and research activities started with the Galle harbour project
in the year 1992. Under the guidance of maritime archaeologists of Western Australian
Maritime Archaeological Museum, Australia and Amsterdam Museum of Netherlands
diving activities began with the help of the local organizations. Combining the
Archaeological Department of Sri Lanka, University of Kelaniya, Postgraduate Institute
of Archaeology (PGIAR) and Central Cultural Fund (CCF) various projects were carried
out to develop and enhance maritime archaeology in Sri Lanka. Most of the exploration
work was based inside the Galle harbour. During this exercise, steps were taken to train
a local diving team and ten archaeological graduates from various disciplines between
1995 and 1999. The training activities continued over several weeks, and after finishing
training the trainees were again sent to their usual land archaeological projects.
Accordingly, a new Maritime Archaeological Unit was created with the background of
undertaking the exploration of the Avondster Project which started in 2001 and
continued until 2004. The primary exploration was the foundation for creating MAU and
in 2001 the trainee graduates who had participated in the Avondster Project were
permanently absorbed in the MAU.
The maritime archaeologists and divers had the opportunity to work with many foreign
abroad maritime archaeologists and learn from their expertise. However, due to
circumstances caused by the Tsunami disaster, most of the data and artifacts that were
discovered in previous years were totally destroyed. After a few years, some maritime
archaeologists and conservators who had trained with the unit left and as a result in
2010 the number of divers remaining in the unit was reduced to four. The remaining
team was not sufficient to recover our history from the sea around our motherland, or to
properly manage our heritage. Therefore that team organized a number of workshops in
order to uplift the human resources in this field. Over a period of time a number of field
schools sponsored by UNESCO, ICCROM and CCF were conducted both nationally
2

�and internationally. During the workshops conducted by the MAU, graduate students of
archaeology from national universities got the opportunity to participate and work with
the maritime archaeologists. This was considered to be a valuable step in the process
of uplifting human resources for the future of the MAU.
Progression of Human Resource in the field
The dangerous terrorism over the last 30 years finally ended in May of 2009. Maritime
archaeological explorations that were previously limited to the Southern and Western
coasts of the Island could now be carried out all over the country. With this need of
excavating the post war regions, a team consisting of ten members was taken into the
unit. The main qualification for membership was that the member should have been
previously engaged in a field school. After selecting ten such candidates, they were
considered as the trainee graduates of the MAU. They were then trained in swimming,
snorkelling, life saving programmes and finally they were recommended as licensed
divers internationally by giving them international diving licenses. After completing those
stages some of the trainees were trained in conservation activities. The trainees were
then enrolled in the MSc degree in Archaeology conducted by PGIAR, and also
supported in improving their English and Tamil language skills to better communicate
with other communities within and outside Sri Lanka.
During their training period, the candidates were taught how to referring to library items,
use internet resources as well as studying the documents of the Department of
Archives. Boat handling, compressor usage, and diving gear maintenance were
practical activities that trainees had to perform. In addition surveying, photography,
shooting underwater video footage, as well as survey techniques were taught to them
using practical events on land. After that, they trained in map reading, communication
and navigation which were conducted by the College of Fisheries and Nautical
Engineering. New trainees were trained for about a year and they were guided to work
in maritime archaeological sites of the eastern coast of the Island between June 13th
and August 26th of, 2012, with explorations over 3 main districts in eastern Sri Lanka.
There they discovered new maritime archaeological sites at which time a sequence of
experiments were conducted. The trainees were able to explore the new found sunken
wrecks and they recorded another 4 archaeological sites during their excavations.
3

�Aims of the explorations
Recording data of maritime archaeological sites of the eastern coast and surrounding
areas was the basic goal of these explorations. Other goals of the project were to
protect the archaeological heritage of the explored areas and motivate the public
regarding the above idea to find out other sites which are recorded but not presently
recognized. Exploring these sites both physically and by using remote sensing
techniques was also a major aim of this project.
Referring literary and electronic sources
Before the explorations, the libraries of Galle and National Archives were used by a
number of members of the exploring team to search for primary and secondary literary
sources that discussed the various sites. The team was divided into two, one engaged
in referring to information obtained by diving at the sites and the other team engaged in
observing the archaeological facts of the surrounding areas. Using the side scan sonar
equipment graciously lent to the National Aquatic Resource Agency (NARA) team from
the donated - the artefacts of the Trincomalee seabed were discovered. Uppuveli and
Irakkandi areas which belong to Trincomalee were totally explored during the project.
During the field recording, photography, video films, sketches and site plans under sea
were done by the new explorers themselves with the guidance of senior archaeologists.
Background of the Exploration
The Maritime Archaeological explorations over the eastern province of Sri Lanka
According to the estimate of 2012, it was decided to carry out an exploration along the
eastern coast of the Island. Explorations were carried out in the district of Trincomalee,
Batticaloa and Ampara of the Eastern province region between 13th June and 26th
August 2012, adopting following 3 steps:
1. Exploration of the Trincomalee District
2. Exploration of the Batticaloa District
3. Exploration of the Ampara District
Exploration over Trincomalee Districts
The exploration related to the Area was done from the 13th of July until the 31st of July,
2012. There, archaeological sites into wrecks were located; one each from Uppuveli
4

�and Irakkandi. Additionally, the sea between Koneshwaram Hindu Temple and the
Harbour which is known Swami Rock was also explored.
The wreck HMS Diomede which was found in the Uppuveli area
Our team was able to discover the ruins of a
wreck at 140 feet depth, 3 km away from the
coast of Uppuveli, an area particularly called
Silver Beach. While the explorations were
ongoing in the area, valuable information was
discovered by our team doing library research.
Further information was found through internet
sources, according to which this wreck was
ordered on the 14th of August, 1779. It was
built by the institution of “James Martin Hill

Fig. 1 Artifact found from HMS Diomede
in Uppuweli. (W. M. Chandraratne)

House”. After finishing the construction, its first sailing was on the 18th of October,
1781. This wreck was specially built for coastline services during the American
Renaissance war period. Two missions done by this vessel have been recorded. One
was the capture of the South Carolina in 1782 and the capture of the Indian Ocean in
1794 (Clerk and Wilson, 1964: 200). Records of HMS Diomede wreck include
photography, videography, survey, and drawing sketches.

About 18 cannons were

scattered around the vessel. A large number of small cannon balls were scattered
around the site, as well as a large number of broken bottles and timber and metal parts
(Fig. 1).

The wreck found from Irrakkandi area
This wreck was discovered at a distance of 2.5 km away from Irakkandi lagoon in the
Nilaveli region known as Coral
Islands. And it was located at a
depth of 7 m. Here also the
exploration included photography
and sketch drawing. But as the
wreck

had

sunk

in

accessible

5
Fig 2 Irakkandai Shipwreck. (W. M. Chandraratne)

�shallow waters, a lot of damage occurred to the wreck. Therefore evidence which could
be used to identify the wreck was destroyed by treasure hunters, and by explosives
used to kill fish in the sea. The wreck was built using iron and it was about 90 m in
length. The bow and the stern could be identified easily, as also the propeller. Though
the hull had been broken in to some parts had been well preserved. The parts of the
engine were scattered in many places. Three anchors were identified, but no records
were found regarding the owners of the vessel (Fig 2).

Swami Rock near the Koneshwaram Hindu Temple
During the exploration over this area a huge amount of valuable evidence was
discovered. Among the evidence found were the tips of stone pillars, and polished stone
slabs. This evidence was discovered after two days of diving activities. According to the
history of this place, a religious place constructed of 1000 stone pillars was situated
here. During the Portuguese period it had been demolished by them and the ruins
dropped away from the rock into the sea.
1. Exploration over Batticaloa Districts
SS Lady McCullum
During the exploration of the Batticaloa District a small area called Kayankerni, in the
Vakare region was explored. Three kilometers away from Kayankerni coast there was
an iron wreck scattered on the seabed. A local diver named Mr. Kolabage Jagath Lal
gave the team the information regarding the wreck. According to the information
obtained from the fishermen of the area, this wreck was identified as the “SS Lady Mc
Cullum” which had sunk during the British rule in Sri Lanka, but future explorations
could change this idea. The explorations over other naval sailings discovered in this
area were explored only for 2 to 3 days. The main goals when accessing the region was
to identify the nature of wrecks scattered around the sea bed, survey the wrecks, draw
sketches, photograph and videotape the wrecks, and calculate the GPS values of the
sites. This wreck was scattered on the seabed at a depth of 17 m and many parts of the
site were totally destroyed. The saved parts were scattered over a large area, but the
bow and the stern were easily identified. The propeller and the shaft were preserved as
well. Two boilers and 3 iron anchors were found there, the anchors being from the bow,
6

�the stern and from the middle part of the wreck. From the remaining evidences it could
be calculated that the length of the wreck was about 71 m from bow to propeller, while
the width was about 13.8 m.
The British Sergeant wreck
Five km away from the Kayankerni coast of Vakare area in the Eastern province,
another wreck was found scattered at a depth of 25.5 m. By the information that came
from local villagers, it was considered that this is the wreck, the British Sergeant, sunk
during British rule, therefore during the same period as the SS Lady McCullum. This
may also change as a result of further investigation. This wreck was the most protected
wreck of all the wrecks explored in eastern province from Trincomalee to Baticaloae by
the MAU team during this project. The ship was broken in to two parts; one part was 75
m long, while the other part was 52.8 m. Its width of the stern was about 16 m. Since
the exploration was done in three to four days; only sketches, photographs and survey
plan were completed during that time. According to the fishermen in this area, the wreck
sank because of bombing attacks during the Second World War.
Other archaeological heritages around Kayankerni
Stone Bridge
This is located across the Kayankerni lagoon in the Vakare region between Baticaloe –
Tricomalee A 15 road. It was constructed from west to east and at eye level. Stone
pillars of the bridge lay scattered up to about a 200 m distance. Some pillars have fallen
down across the lagoon. The pillars have sunk below the lagoon water up to a certain
level.
Wrecks around Pasikuda
Three wrecks were identified during the exploration over Pasikuda coast line. The naval
wreck was identified at a depth of 9 m. Parts of the vessel were scattered in many
areas and many were destroyed, but the propeller and the propeller shaft were well
protected, while the bow and the stern of the vessel could be easily identified. During
the observations over the wreck another iron wreck which was somewhat larger was
discovered. From the explorations done up to now, the name of this vessel could not be
identified.
7

�Pasikuda Boiler Wreck 1
The above mentioned wreck was situated 3 km away from Pasikuda coast at about 6 m
in depth. It was built with iron and steam-powered. Among the remaining evidences of it
there were three boilers found and the propeller and propeller shaft were well protected.
Two iron anchors situated near the bow of the wreck and another anchor at the middle
of the wreck. During the excavations the team surveyed, drew sketches, photographed,
videographed and calculated the GPS value of the site.
Pasikuda Boiler wreck 2
The above mentioned wreck was located 50 m away from the previously mentioned
boiler wreck 1. Three boilers were discovered there, but one was almost destroyed. The
propeller and the propeller shaft were also present. There were four other
archaeological sites around Pasikuda. Several architectural items which belong to the
Dutch period were identified around the Pasikuda coast, among them the remains of a
jetty and the base of a warehouse. During the explorations in Kayankarni and Pasikuda
areas the fishermen of the area Misters S. Novil, Eeshwaran Prabhu and Velmurugan
Arunlath helped the archaeological team greatly.
Wrecks around Batticaloa
Batticaloa boiler wreck 1
This wreck was located in the Navaladi area of Batticaloa. This wreck was found 3 km
away from the Nawaladi lagoon, at a depth of 9 m. Of the boiler wrecks explored during
MAU explorations, this was the only wreck which was powered by five boilers. Here
also, the propeller and the propeller shaft were well preserved. The evidence of the
wreck was scattered on the sea bed protected well enough to identify the bow and
stern. The maximum length of the wreck was about 102.8m (Fig. 3).

8

�Fig. 3 Sketch plan of Baticaloe boiler wreck-1. (W. M. Chandraratne)

SS Brennus
The Nawaladi lagoon situated in the Nawaladi area of Batticaloa is very close to
Silamunei coast of the eastern province. The wreck lies at a depth of 7 m, and is 3 km
from the Nawaladi lagoon. The people in this area use the word “Sakkara Kappal” to
name this vessel. Here ‘sakkara’ means jaggery and ‘kappal’ refers to the ship
according to Tamil language. Boilers could be seen in the wreck and there is also the
propeller and the propeller shaft present.
The wrecks around Kalmune
The explorations carried from Kayankarni area of Batticaloa were taken up to Kalmune
coast of the Ampara district. From the explorations done there, four wrecks were
recorded. Two of them were in the deep sea and due to bad weather during the time
our team was unable to explore those two. However we were able to explore the other
two wrecks during that time.
Kalmune boiler wreck
This above mentioned wreck was located in the Kalmune-1 coastal area of the
Kurundedi village in Kalmune area of Ampara district. Three km away from Kalmune-1,
on the coast line facing the Kodieththam mosque. The wreck lay at a depth of 12 m.
This wreck was found in the deep sea. The remains of two propellers, a propeller shaft
and three boilers were identified. The length of the wreck was about 102.80 m and the
width was about 33.7 m.

9

�Kalmune iron wreck
This wreck was recorded at a depth of 9m and located 50 m away from the Kalmune
boiler wreck. The engine parts could be easily identified among the greatly destroyed
wreck.
1. Explorations around Potuvil area in Ampara district
As the third step of the eastern coast exploration project carried out by MAU of Galle,
the team moved to Potuvil area in Ampara from Batticaloa. From the explorations done
during the 19th to the 24th of August, 2012, facts regarding five wrecks were recorded
and archaeological evidence regarding the religious place of Potuvil Muhudu Maha
Viharaya was discovered during the exploration.
Akkareipattu boiler wreck
This is located in the Attalachchene area of Ampara district. This wreck was powered by
steam.. The wreck had sunk very close to the coast line and therefore half of the wreck
was covered with sand near the beach while the other half was covered with sea water.
Although a permanent exploration was not done there, during a snorkelling survey the
remains of the ship were identified. Several boilers were found and in the future further
exploration should be done related to this site. There the guidance of Mr. J. Yogarasha
was a great help for our activities.
Wrecks around Tirukkovila
Tirukkovila boiler wreck
This wreck was located two km away from the Tirukkovila coast in the Vinayagapuram
area of the Tirukkovila region of Ampara. It lies on the seabed at 7 m. Due to the bad
visibility of the sea water and with survey time being only relegated to one day, the
shape of the wreck was not identified but certain facts regarding this wreck were
discovered. This boiler wreck was powered with four boilers according to our initial
discoveries.
Tirukkovila iron wreck
This wreck was also identified from the Vinayagapuram area of the Tirukkovila region of
Ampara district. Certain parts of the wreck could be seen above the surface of the sea
water and those parts had been destroyed by the treasure hunters of the area. From the
10

�information collected from the villagers it was recognized this wreck had sunk in the
recent past.
Wrecks around Potuvila
Komari boiler wreck
At four km away from the Komari coast of Potuvila region in Ampara district, this wreck
lies at a depth of 8 m. The visibility was poor and as a result only three boilers were
found, but later it was observed that the propeller and the rudder were also present.
Due to the bad weather conditions we were unable to record any photographs, drawings
or surveying regarding this archaeological site.
Omari boiler wreck
In the region where the above mentioned Komari boiler wreck is situated, about five km
away from Omari coast line this wreck was found. Photography recording and drawing
sketches were done here. The bow of the wreck is located at 7 m depth, and the stern
lies at a depth of 18 m. During the exploration facts regarding the three boilers were
identified and parts of the wreck were scattered over a large area. Unfortunately many
parts were greatly destroyed.
Maritime Archaeological activities around Muhudu Maha Viharaya in Potuvila
The major objective of the exploration during the 20th to 24th of August 2012 was to
discover facts regarding the Buddhist archaeological ruins of the religious place
“Muhudu Maha Viharaya” which was considered to have sunk in the sea. There, from
folk stories related to this fact it appears that at a certain period ‘Buddha statues’ and
other architectural items could be seen above the surface of the sea. Therefore our
team was in a hurry to dive in this area. Another story of the area tells us that the great
lady “Viharamaha Devi” had landed on the island from this place. We started our
explorations in the hope of verifying the truth or falsity of these stories (Weerakatiya,
2011: 1-10).
Experimented Region
The

Experimented

Regions

were

decided by the initial diving done before
the explorations. And this region was
11
Fig. 4 Exploration team-1. (W. M. Chandraratne)

�located 400 meters away from the temple to the east and 500 meters away from the
coast line in the shallow sea. The depth of the region was between five and seven
meters. The area consisted of huge rocks. The wind was blowing from east to west.
Throughout the exploration, a rough nature could be seen in the sea. This roughness
was increased in this region because of the stone pillars lying in the area.
Method
The simplest method used here was snorkelling and duck diving using the equipment
we had in the experimental region. The basic method of ‘swim- in- line’ and through that
duck diving was used. If we got any record of archaeological evidence or identified a
place for further experimentation, a buoy was attached to the area. We entered the
experimental site after swimming about 500m wearing diving equipment. The areas that
were identified by a buoy during the initial snorkelling survey, detailed exploration were
then started from that point. There the divers went throughout the site and were able to
collect some photographs and videos with ecofacts related to the site.
Results
After the explorations a few items having architectural value were identified. There was
a circular shaped place which was considered to be a man made creation was which
was highlighted by a buoy. Much evidence which could be considered as being created
by humans was identified by the basic snorkelling survey. In further conservations,
these evidences were found to show the shapes of moonstones, balustrade stones as
well as bricks which are closely related to the construction of Buddhist temples and their
architecture too matches the idea of temple items. Unfortunately, facts or evidence to
prove this idea were not found; for those questions further exploration is required.
Conclusion
The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of Central Cultural Fund (CCF) is actively
involved in protecting the UCH of Sri Lanka, since it was founded in 1992. Last few
years essential steps have been taken to develop the infrastructure and the human
resources of the unit or just use MAU. Six archaeology graduates who did a special
training under the MAU were recruited in 2011(Fig. 4). The terrorism over the last 30
years finally ended in May of 2009. Maritime archaeological explorations that were
12

�previously limited to the Southern and Western coasts of the Island could now be
carried out all over the country. Explorations were carried out in the district of
Trincomalee, Batticaloa and Ampara of the Eastern province region between 13th June
and 26th August 2012, adopting following 3 steps: Exploration of the Trincomalee,
Batticaloa and Ampara Districts. The well trained team uncovered over 16 shipwreck
sites, such as HMS Diomede wreck, Irrakkandi wreck, SS Lady McCullum, British

Sergeant, Pasikuda Boiler Wreck 1, Pasikuda Boiler wreck 2, Batticaloa boiler
wreck 1, SS Brennus, Kalmune boiler wreck, Kalmune iron wreck, Akkareipattu
boiler wreck, Tirukkovila boiler wreck, Tirukkovila iron wreck, Komari boiler
wreck, Omari boiler wreck and 4 underwater archaeological sites (Muhudu Maha
Viharaya in Potuvila, Kayankerni Stone Bridge and Swami Rock near the

Koneshwaram Hindu Temple) in the region.
Acknowledgement
Author is thankful to Professor Gamini Adikari, Director General, Central Cultural Fund,
Department of Culture and the Arts for encouragement and guidance and to the
excavation team of the Maritime Archaeology Unit, Galle, Sri Lanka for their support and
cooperation.
References
Clerk, A., and Wilson, M., 1964. The Treasure of the Great Reef. Harper and Row,
Publishers, New York, p. 200
Karunarathna, M., 2013. New Maritime Archaeological Discoveries in the Eastern
province of Sri Lanka. In Punkalasa - National Archaeological Symposium 2013,
Department of Archaeology, Ministry of National Heritage, Sri Lanka, Colombo: 217231.
Mahawamsha. 2004. Buddhist Cultural Centre, Dehiwala, Sri Lanka.
Panabokke, C. R., 1996. Soils and Agro-Ecological Environment of Sri Lanka. Natural
Resources, Energy, Science Authority, Colombo.
Samaraweera, N., 2013. The Reserches of the two decades of Maritime Archaeology
Unit

1992-2013.

"Samudrika"

Maritime

Archaeological

Symposium,

Archaeology Unit and Maritime Archaeology Museum, Galle: 3-5.
13

Maritime

�Silva, R., and Ariyaratne, P. A., 2007. The Natinal Atlas of Sri Lanka. Survey
Department of Sri Lanka, Colombo.
The Ceylon Observer. (September 28, 1908).
Weerakatiya, Y., 2011. Mahaurumaya (in Sinhala). Tilak Printers Ltd, Pannipitiya, Sri
Lanka: 01-10.

Biography
W. M. Chandraratne (b. 1968), working as a Research Officer of Maritime Archaeology
and Officer- in- charge of the Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU), Central Cultural Fund
(CCF) of Ministry of Culture and the Arts, Galle Fort, Sri Lanka since 1994. He has
participated in several workshops and training programs on underwater archaeology
and related subjects and published over 20 research articles both in reputed local and
international journals.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="16">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="56">
                  <text>Session 13: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 13 chair Dr. Sila Tripati and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="58">
                  <text>Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as â€˜underwaterâ€™, â€˜marineâ€™ and â€˜nauticalâ€™ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to â€˜Underwater Archaeologyâ€™, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature â€˜Hydro-archaeologyâ€™ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organisations.&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="59">
                  <text>Dr. Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="390">
                <text>An Investment for the Future: Maritime Archaeological Explorations  &#13;
in the Post-War regions of the Eastern Coast of Sri Lanka </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="391">
                <text>The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of Central Cultural Fund (CCF) is actively involved in protecting the UCH of Sri Lanka, since it was founded in 1992. During the last few years essential steps have been taken to develop the infrastructure and the human resources of the unit or just use MAU. Six archaeology graduates who did a special training under the MAU were recruited in 2011. They had gone through series of trainings such as swimming, snorkelling, life saving, first aid and basic diving.  They were introduced to the fundamentals of underwater archaeology. They were encouraged to start their post graduate studies and to gain their international diving license, such as PADI or the SSI. After a year of training they were directed to carry out an underwater archaeological investigation along the East coast of Sri Lanka, from 13th of June to 26th of August 2012. The exploration was scheduled at a favourable moment to test their skills and training. The trainees were under the supervision of four senior maritime archaeologists. The north and east parts of the country were rescued after thirty years of terrorism in 2009. More than two years were taken to secure the area from post war hazards such as land mines. For the whole MAU team this was a new experience and an opportunity to search this area after many years. The team uncovered over 16 shipwreck sites and 4 underwater archaeological sites in the region.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="392">
                <text>W. M. Chandrarthne, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="393">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 13 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="4" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="4">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/aed71ad26404c2541bafe9b60397b4f4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1bb61ec4517eaf6690d5507ff955d202</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="399">
                    <text>Maritime and underwater archaeological explorations in Kenya:
Recent discoveries

Caesar Bita
National Museums of Kenya, Fort Jesus Museum, Mombasa, P.O. Box 82412, 80100,
Kenya
Email: mcbita@yahoo.com

Abstract
Kenya is the first sub-Sahara African country to initiate an underwater archaeological
expedition thus legally recognizing the value of underwater cultural heritage. This was
after successful survey and excavation of the 17th Century Portuguese shipwreck,
Santa Antonio De Tanna, in Mombasa. Kenya coast is part of the Western Indian
Ocean; commonly referred to as the ‘Swahili coast’. This coast was a domain of
foreigners from the early centuries of the first millennium AD. It was visited by the
Greeks; controlled by the Arabs, Portuguese and the Europeans. In addition, it played a
major role in ancient transoceanic maritime trade across the Indian Ocean Seaboard
linking the Swahili Coast with the Arab world, India sub-continent, Far East and China,
America and Europe. Owing to crude navigation and sea faring technologies of the time,
there are on the seabed of Kenya traces of these interactions in the form of
archaeological remains. Recent studies have shown that the Kenya coast is home to a
number of shipwrecks and has immense potential in underwater cultural heritage.
Drawing from ancient literature, previous and current maritime and underwater
archaeological studies, and this paper presents the recent discoveries from underwater
archaeological surveys in Kenya. The paper illustrates that there is immense potential
for underwater archaeology in Kenya that requires new attention both in research and
conservation.
Key words: Swahili Coast, Lamu archipelago, Malindi, Maritime Archaeology
Underwater Cultural Heritage, Shipwreck

Introduction
The conservation of maritime and underwater cultural resources has become a major
field of great scientific and regional importance world over. Maritime cultural heritage is
a critical element of Kenya’s wellbeing. In addition to its intrinsic value, it provides us
1

�with important space for recreation and has a significance that makes it worth
preserving; it is part of the environment, has an economic and scholarly value. This
resource is however under ever increasing pressure from human activity. Its protection
is thus a key part of sustainable development, whereby policies to encourage social and
economic development should be equaled by policies to protect our environment. To
effectively protect this heritage one important step is to document how much of this
resource is available.
The National Museums of Kenya (NMK) cannot afford to rely on “accidental” discoveries
by non-scientific ventures and still remain an authentic custodian of the national
heritage. It is for this that Kenya has made efforts to implement the preservation of
underwater cultural heritage (UCH). The country has developed capacities in maritime
and underwater cultural heritage through the training of underwater archaeologists and
establishment of an underwater artifact conservation laboratory. NMK has designed a
maritime archaeological programme for the study of this heritage as well as a database
of all shipwrecks in the country. These efforts are expected to increase the dimension in
which we understand and interpret this heritage in addition to mitigating the risk of
loosing this resource to vandalism and uncontrolled development.
Maritime History of the Kenyan Coast
Kenya is a maritime country with a coastline approximately 600 km long with many
small islands and navigable channels.
This coast, which is part of the Western
Indian Ocean (WIO), commonly referred
to as the ‘Swahili coast’, was a major
player

in

the

ancient

transoceanic

maritime trade across the Indian Ocean
Seaboard. Its inhabitants are known to
have had a history of long and continuous
interaction with not only the Indian Ocean
but also foreign visitors including the
Greeks,
2
1 Fig. 1 Trade goods exchanged across the
Western Indian Seaboard. (C. Bita)

Arabs,

Portuguese

and

the

�Europeans. Further, several early Swahili settlements ranging in time from the 8th-17th
centuries AD dot both the entire coastline as well as its off-shore islands (Garlake,
1966; Chittick, 1984; Horton, 1984; Abungu, 1989; Bita, 2011b). Such include
Mombasa, Lamu, Pate, Faza, Dondo, Kiunga, Ishakani, Ungwana, Siyu, Kilepwe,
Mambrui, Malindi, Gedi, Jumba La Mtwana and Kilifi. These ancient towns linked the
Swahili Coast and other continents across the Western Indian Ocean seaboard
including the Arab world, India sub-continent, south East Asia, the Far East and China,
America and Europe (Fig. 1).
Several

historical

records make reference
to ancient seafaring off
the Swahili coast. The
Periplus

of

Erytharean

Sea,

document

by

the
a
an

anonymous Greek sailor,
mentions

the

east

African coast as early as
2000

BP

(Freeman-

Fig. 2 Figure showing the concentration of shipwrecks along the Grenville, 1962; 1975;
Wright, 1984; Horton,
Kenya coast. (C. Bita)
1990; Whitehouse, 2001;
Chami, 2006). Records by Chinese travelers refer to the Somali coast and her trade
connections with the Far East by late 800s AD, while reports by Arab geographers
allude to thriving maritime communities on this coast by 900 AD (Kirkman, 1964; Datoo,
1970; Martin, 1973; Freeman-Grenville, 1975; Horton, 1990; Hall, 1996). The period
between the first millennium BC and the 2nd half of the first millennium AD was
characterized by crude shipping technology and lack of nautical charts. These crude
navigation technologies, as well as oceanic changes, are likely to have made early
seafarers casualties of coral reefs and violent sea waves. In addition, the East African
coast has been a centre of rivalry between major powers and the resultant wars
3

�witnessed a number of marine armour destroyed and sunken in these waters. This
evidence is today lying on the sea-bed and foreshores in the form of shipwrecks,
anchors, military structures among others (Bita, 2014). In Kenya this underwater
archaeology comes to light from researches, accidental discoveries by fishermen,
written records and oral tradition. Recent investigations that corroborate historical
literary sources have shown that the Kenya coast is home to a number of ancient
shipwrecks. Studies have shown the highest concentration of these sites in Kenya to be
around Mombasa, Malindi and Lamu (Fig. 2) (Breen and Lane, 2003; Forsythe et al.,
2003; Bita, 2008; 2010; 2011b; 2014).
Maritime and Underwater Archaeological explorations in Kenya
There are significant pointers towards the richness of Kenya’s maritime and underwater
cultural heritage. A survey to establish the full range of this resource is ongoing in the
country. The objectives of this undertaking are to identify and understand the range and
distribution of this resource in the Kenya coast and to develop a database of the
maritime and UCH sites for further archaeological investigation and conservation.
Kenya initiated an underwater archaeological expedition after successful survey and
excavation of the 17th century Portuguese shipwreck in Mombasa. This Portuguese
frigate was sunk by Oman Arabs in 1698 in Mombasa during a battle to free Fort Jesus
from the Arabs (Piercy, 1977; 1978; Sassoon, 1980; Boxer, 1960; Lynch, 1991;
Patience, 2006). Following this development, this shipwreck, later dubbed ‘Mombasa
Wreck’, was gazetted as a national monument and is today protected by the country’s
legislation. It is this initiative that made Kenya the first east African sub-Saharan country
to legally recognize the value of underwater cultural heritage. In the subsequent years,
there was a growing importance of underwater archaeology including management of
UCH in Kenya. With the potential of underwater archaeology in the country, a new
research and heritage management perspective was required. As such, Kenya sought
to develop capacities in underwater cultural heritage management through training and
infrastructure development. The country has trained two underwater archaeologists,
three conservators of underwater cultural material and has a well established
underwater artifact conservation laboratory. Additionally, a database of maritime and

4

�UCH sites has been developed for the coastal region and undersea cultural heritage
impact assessments are conducted as part of these efforts.
Recent Discoveries
Several underwater surveys have been undertaken off the Kenyan coast in which a lot
of archaeological heritage has been documented. These surveys include a 2001
maritime archaeological study of Mombasa Island (Breen and Lane, 2003). Others are
the 2006-2009 surveys in Lamu, Malindi and Mombasa by NMK (Patience, 2006; Bita
and Wanyama, 2007; Bita, 2008; 2009 a-b). The latest, and ongoing, is the survey by
National Museums of Kenya in collaboration with National Museums of China, in the
“Sino-Kenya Underwater Archaeology project” (Bita, 2011a; 2013a). In these surveys
numerous maritime and underwater heritage sites have been documented including
shipwrecks, structures and artifacts. Interestingly these have been found to occur
around the ancient towns of Lamu, Mombasa and Malindi; towns that played a major
role in the ancient transoceanic interactions across the Western Indian Ocean (Fig. 2).
Underwater archaeological surveys have also focused on these important towns.
Underwater Archaeological survey in Mombasa
Mombasa Island borders the open sea to the south east and has several channels.
There have been numerous underwater
archaeological surveys of this island in
the previous years that realized a lot of
maritime

and

heritage

sites.

underwater
The

first

cultural
survey

undertaken was the excavation of the
Santa

Antonio

recovered

Indian

shipwreck
wares,

which
Chinese

porcelain, Martaban and Portuguese
jars, canons, mortar shells and bronze
medallions (Piercy, 1977; 1978; Bita,
Fig. 3 Lamu Archipelago: the eastern shores 2013b). A later survey revealed several
have many rock outcrops where ancient ships
5
are believed to have sunk while entering Lamu
Town. (C. Bita)

�anomalies, some being shipwrecks (Breen and Lane, 2003; Forsythe et al., 2003).
Recent surveys (Bita, 2009b; 2011c) have recorded wreck sites and associated
structures (Fig. 3).
Underwater Archaeological survey in Lamu archipelago
Lamu archipelago is composed of several islands but the main ones are Lamu, Manda
and Pate, all with ancient towns by the same names (Fig. 3). Ancient settlements in this
archipelago are important landmarks in the history of the Swahili Coast. They were
important centres of the northern Swahili world with some, like Manda and Pate,
exhibiting evidence of very early occupation (Chittick, 1984; Horton, 1987; Wilson and
Omar, 1996; 1997). Ancient Pate Bay for instance was the gateway to Lamu Town for
sea travelers. Even up to the present, the eastern shores of this island are referred to by
the locals as mlango wa Lamu (gateway to Lamu). This route was used by the
Portuguese for decades controlling the WIO trade (Kirkman, 1964; Freeman-Greenville,
1975; Chittick, 1976; 1984; Hall, 1996). The Arabs dominated the Swahili Coast long
before the Portuguese and used this route for hundreds of years in trade with the
Persian Gulf (Bita, 2011b).
Pate Bay has several long reefs
and many coral rock outcrops such
as Pazzali, Hassani and Hanawi.
These rocks are at the confluence
of Pate channel and the open sea
and being submerged at high tide
suggests many vessels may have
wrecked here. In addition, the lack
of nautical knowledge for this area
caused

many

early

seafarer Fig. 4 Portion of a shipwreck embedded in concretion in
casualties on these coral rocks Mombasa waters. (Coastal Archaeology, National
when sailing through this bay. Over Museums of Kenya)
the years, fishermen in the Lamu
archipelago have been recovering archaeological materials at various sites along these
6

�reefs and channels in addition to seabed surveys (Bita and Wanyama, 2007; Bita,
2009a; 2014). Recent surveys in Lamu have made major achievements in terms of the
volume of artifacts recovered; sites surveyed and amount of data collected. Geophysical
studies have recorded several underwater anomalies while sites identified include areas
with concentrations of pottery and iron anchors (Bita, 2014). A massive anchor
approximately 4m long with 2m long hooks was found (Fig. 4). Standing upright and
embedded in coral, one of its hooks is however missing (this suggests probably its line
was cut when sailors were unable to take it back into the ship). Similar types of anchors
have also been recovered in Mombasa. Small iron anchors 2m long heavily encrusted
and of 3 hooks have also been recovered. This style of 3 hook anchors is not a common
feature of the Swahili Coast and suggests they belong to foreign ships. Early travel
across the Western Indian Ocean was subject to the monsoon winds which alternated
every six months. For instance, foreign traders sailed to the East African coast on the
northwest monsoon wind which blows from November until April. For six months they
would wait for the winds to change direction in order for them to sail back home on the
southeast monsoon winds which blow from June to October. During this period of wait,
ships would be anchored for loading and repairs while the sailors engaged in trade.
Similarly, due to ocean currents and long wait, the ship anchors would, in most cases,
be covered in sand or dragged into rock crevices. Such would make them difficult to pull
back into the ship at departure forcing the crew to cut the ropes and abandon the
anchor underwater. As is the case with Pate channel, many areas have silted over the
years with many sites heavily covered in the sands (Bita, 2014).
Maritime Archaeological Survey in Malindi
Malindi town is located 120km north of Mombasa and is one of the ancient trading
towns which had contact with the outside world in the last centuries of the last
millennium. The town owes, as do many other coastal towns, its origin and prosperity to
the Western Indian Ocean for facilitating transport and trade. It was at one time a
gateway where the movement and transformation of goods were facilitated and urban
services developed to promote maritime trade (Bita, 2008). It is believed to have been
visited by a Chinese fleet in the 15th century. When the Portuguese arrived on the
Kenyan coast in 1495, they found a thriving town and made it their trade headquarters
7

�while monopolising the WIO trade (Hall, 1996; Martin, 1975; Bita, 2012). Malindi Bay
has three ancient centres, Malindi town, Mambrui and Ngomeni. Mambrui and Malindi
were vibrant agricultural regions while Ngomeni was known for production and export of
mangroves (Bita, 2005; 2008). In trading areas, shipwrecks would be closer to certain
shipping hazards such as reefs and projecting headlands. In Malindi Bay, Ngomeni is
located near a headland whereas in Malindi town there is Leopard Bay, the navigation
channel of which is between two reefs. In the two areas, many ships are suspected to
have sunk (Patience, 2006; Bita, 2008; Bita, 2011a-b; 2012). Portuguese records
mention their ships lost and sunk in Malindi and whose locations have not been found
(Patience, 2006). Maritime and underwater archaeological surveys in the area have
documented several shipwrecks (Bita, 2005; 2008; 2011a) including remains of a ship
engine block, sites containing 14th-15th century Indian and Chinese pottery (Bita, 2008;
Bita, 2011a). This corroborates Portuguese and British records of ships lost in Malindi
waters (Patience, 2006).

Fig. 5 The plan of the Ngomeni Ras shipwreck Fig. 6 The remains of the Ngomeni Ras shipwreck
site.

(Sino-Kenya

Underwater

Archaeology lying

project)

on

seabed.

(Sino-Kenya

Underwater

Archaeology Project).

Ngomeni Ras Shipwreck
While no UCH sites have been located in Mambrui, 10km north of Malindi Town, in
Ngomeni, a village about 30 km northeast of Malindi town, several important sites have

8

�been identified. Ngomeni stands on an arm of land jutting towards the sea (Ras
Ngomeni), which offers a protected shallow harbour formerly used as a gateway for all
seafarers from Lamu to Malindi (Wilson, 1982; Bita, 2008; 2011b). The area was known
for mangrove growing which was exported to, and used in house construction in cities
around the Persian Gulf (Wilson, 1982; Whitehouse, 2001). Surveys in 2008 discovered
a wooden shipwreck that consistently produced materials dating to the 14th century
including Persian and Far Eastern wares. The shipwreck was revisited in 2010-2011
and excavated in 2013. The exposed wood remains of this site are however seriously
threatened by terredo. Ngomeni Ras Shipwreck is a probable 15th-16th century
merchant ship. The site measures 40m x 20m lying 5m below the sea (Fig. 5-6). This
discovery has proved the town participated in ancient mangrove trade across the
Western Indian Ocean (Bita 2011a-b; 2013a).

Fig. 7 A militant bunker overlooking the sea in Fig. 8 Lime and stone jetties and sacred sites on the
Mombasa. (C. Bita)

maritime zone of Mombasa coast. (C. Bita)

Intertidal and Foreshore surveys
Intertidal and foreshore surveys have also documented a rich resource of cultural
heritage. Irrespective of typology, these sites existed to exploit the maritime resource
that is the Western Indian Ocean. The most important include ancient forts, redoubts,
anchorages, ports and jetties. Others are maritime practices such as boat building and
fishing styles. It is their relationship with this ocean that makes them worth studying and
conserving.
9

�Military structures
Ancient East African coast was a centre of rivalry between powers such as between
rivaling Arab rulers, Arabs and Portuguese and later in the 1st and 2nd world war
between Germans, British and Italians (Coupland, 1938; Kirkman, 1964; 1974; Martin,
1973; 1975). These witnessed a number of marine structures erected along the coast
as defense forts or escape tunnels (Bita, 2009a-b). The Kenyan coast is awash with
such, including redoubts, forts including Fort Jesus, Siyu and Lamu, as well as habitable
caves and military bunkers. A majority of these are associated with Arabian, Portuguese
and British periods (Fig. 7).
Moorings, Anchorages, Jetties and sacred sites
Intertidal surveys have recorded ancient moorings and anchorages of different styles
(ranging from metal, lime and stone), ruins of jetties built of stone and lime (Fig. 8). A
majority of these have been attributed to the Portuguese and British periods. Jetties
may probably be related to old crossing points from the Islands to the coastal mainland.
Other equally important features are the sacred sites that are manifestations of the
relationship between people’s beliefs and the elements of maritime environment. Most
shrines are located in rock shelters, caves and secluded places on the seaward side of
cliffs (Bita, 2009b). The traditional ritual paraphernalia including talismans, white and or
red pieces of cloth; mixed colours of red, blue, white and black are mostly strategically
placed so as to come in contact with sea water at high tide.
Acknowledgments
I am thankful to the Director General, National Museums of Kenya, for his support and
nominations to the training in Underwater Archaeology. I am also grateful to UNESCO
for the sponsorship to train in the 3rd Foundation and In-Situ Preservation of
Underwater Cultural Heritage courses in Thailand and participation in the Abuja UCH
meeting. Thanks too to the Chinese government for the bilateral cooperation in
underwater archaeology research in Kenya.

10

�References
Abungu, G. O., 1989. Communities on the river Tana, Kenya: An Archaeological study
of relations between the Delta and the river basin, 700-1800 AD. PhD Thesis, University
of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Bita, C., 2014. The potentials of underwater archaeology in Kenya: A short
communication. In Sila Tripati (Ed.), Shipwrecks around the world: Revelations of the
past, Delta Book World, New Delhi: 486-510.
Bita, C., 2013a. Underwater archaeological survey of Ngomeni Shipwreck site. SINOKenya

Underwater Archaeology Project Report. National Museums of Kenya,

Mombasa.
Bita, C., 2013b. Martaban jars found in Kenya. Southeast Asian ceramics museum
Newsletter. Vol. VII (1) Jun-Sept 2013: 3.
Bita, C., 2012. The Origin of Malindi Town: A Case Study of Mambrui. M. A.
Dissertation. University of Dar es Salaam. Dar es Salaam.
Bita, C., 2011a. SINO-Kenya Underwater Archaeology Project. Preliminary Report.
National Museums of Kenya, Mombasa.
Bita, C., 2011b. Ancient Afro-Asia links. New evidence from a maritime perspective. In
Mark Staniforth et al., (Eds.), Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on
Underwater Cultural Heritage, 8-12 November 2011, Manila: 289-301.
Bita, C., 2011c. Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment for the Lion 2 Undersea Fibre
Optic Cable in Mombasa. National Museums of Kenya, Mombasa.
Bita, C., 2010. Protection of maritime and underwater cultural heritage in Kenya. Paper
presented to the International Conference on Maritime Cultural Heritage, Alexandria,
Egypt.
Bita, C., 2009a. Inter-tidal and foreshore survey of Pate island. Survey Report, Fort
Jesus Museum. Mombasa.
Bita, C., 2009b. The intertidal and foreshore archaeology of Mombasa Island: An
inventory of maritime sites. Survey Report, Fort Jesus museum, Mombasa.
11

�Bita, C., 2008. The Western Indian Ocean Maritime Heritage:

An overview of the

maritime archaeological heritage in Malindi. British Institute in Eastern Africa, Nairobi.
Bita, C., 2005. Malindi. A Review of the History of a Coastal Town at the mouth of River
Sabaki, Kenya. National Museums of Kenya, Malindi.
Bita, C., and Wanyama, P., 2007. Preliminary intertidal and underwater archaeological
survey of Lamu archipelago. Research Report, Fort Jesus Museum, Mombasa.
Boxer, C. R., 1960. Fort Jesus and Portuguese in Mombasa, British Museum, London.
Breen, C., and Lane, P., 2003. Archaeological Approaches to East Africa’s changing
Seascapes., World Archaeology, Vol. 35 (3): 469-89.
Chittick, H. N., 1976. An archaeological reconnaissance in the Horn: the British-Somali
Expedition 1975. Azania, Vol. 11: 117-34.
Chittick, N., 1984. Manda: Excavations at an Island Port on the Kenya coast. Memoir
No. 9, British Institute in Eastern Africa, Nairobi.
Coupland, R., 1938. East Africa and its invaders. Clarendon press, Oxford.
Chami, F., 2006. The Unity of African Ancient History: 3000 B.C. to AD 500. Dar es
Salaam, E and D Vision Publishers.
Datoo, B. A., 1970. Rhapta: The location and importance of East Africa’s first port.
Azania, Vol. 5: 65-77.
Forsythe, W., Quinn, R., and Breen, C., 2003. Subtidal archaeological investigations in
Mombasa’s Old Port. In P. Mitchell., A. Haour, and J. Hobart (Eds.), Researching
Africa’s Past: New Contributions from British Archaeologists, Oxford University School
of Archaeology Monograph 57, Oxbow Books, Oxford: 133-138.
Freeman-Grenville, G. P., 1975. The East African Coast: Selected documents from the
first to earliest nineteenth century. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Freeman-Grenville, G. P., 1962. The Medieval History of the coast of Tanganyika,
Oxford University Press, London.

12

�Garlake P. S., 1966. The early Islamic architecture of the east African coast. Nairobi.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hall, R., 1996. Empires of the Monsoon. Harper Collins, London.
Horton, M. C., 1990. The Periplus and East Africa. Azania, Vol. 25: 95-99.
Horton, M. C., 1987. Early Muslim trading settlements on the East African Coast: New
Evidence from Shanga. Antiquaries Journal, Vol. 67: 290-322.
Horton, M. C., 1984. The early settlement of the northern Swahili coast. PhD Thesis,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Kirkman, J., 1964. Men and Monuments on the East African Coast. Butterworth,
London.
Kirkman, J., 1974. Fort Jesus: A Portuguese Fortress on the East African Coast.
Clarendon, Oxford.
Lynch, M., (Ed.), 1991. The Mombasa wreck excavation. Institute of Nautical
Archaeology Newsletter, Vol. 18 (2): 2-29.
Martin, E. B., 1975. The History of Malindi: A geographical analysis of an East African
Coastal Town from the Portuguese period to the present. East African Literature
Bureau, Nairobi.
Martin, E. B., 1973. A History of Malindi, Nairobi. East African Literature Bureau.
Nairobi.
Patience, K., 2006. Shipwrecks and Salvage on the East African Coast. Dar Akhbar Al
Khaleej, Bahrain.
Piercy, R, C, M., 1977. Mombasa wreck excavation, Preliminary Report. International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 6 (4): 331-47.
Piercy, R, C, M., 1978. Mombasa wreck excavation, Preliminary Report. International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 7 (4): 301-19.
Sassoon, H., 1980. Mombasa Wreck Excavation. Interim Report, National Museums of
Kenya, Nairobi.
13

�Whitehouse, D., 2001. East Africa and the maritime trade of the Indian Ocean AD 8001500. In B. S. Amenoreti (Ed.), Islam in East Africa: New Sources, Herder, Rome: 411424.
Wilson, T. H., 1982. Spatial analysis and settlement patterns on the East African coast.
Paideuma, Vol. 28: 201-219.
Wilson, T. H., and Omar, A. L., 1997. Archaeological investigations at Pate. Azania, Vol.
32: 31-76.
Wilson, T. H., and Omar, A. L., 1996. Excavation at Pate on the East African coast. In
G. Pwiti., and R. Soper (Eds.), Aspects of African Archaeology, University of Zimbabwe,
Harare: 543-554.
Wright, H. T., 1984. Early seafarers of the Comoro Islands: the Dembeni phase of the
9th-10th centuries AD. Azania, Vol. 19: 13-60.

Biography
Caesar Bita has a Masters degree in Archaeology from the University of Dar es
Salaam, Tanzania; a Postgraduate Diploma in Management of Heritage and Museum
Collections from the University of Nairobi, a Professional Diploma in Underwater
Archaeology from Underwater Archaeology Center in China. Bita has participated in
training programme such as Maritime Heritage Training and Integrated Coastal Zone
Management Course (2006, Zanzibar, Tanzania), Regional Training on Maritime and
Underwater Cultural Heritage Management (2010, South Africa), International Training
Workshop on Preservation, Presentation and Education on Maritime Cultural Heritage
(2010, Alexandria, Egypt). He participated in the 3rd UNESCO Foundation Course on
Underwater Cultural Heritage and In-Situ Preservation of Underwater Cultural Heritage
(2011, Thailand). He joined the National Museums of Kenya in 1999 and currently
coordinating underwater archaeological research and underwater cultural heritage
management at Fort Jesus museum, Mombasa, Kenya.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="16">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="56">
                  <text>Session 13: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 13 chair Dr. Sila Tripati and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="58">
                  <text>Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as â€˜underwaterâ€™, â€˜marineâ€™ and â€˜nauticalâ€™ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to â€˜Underwater Archaeologyâ€™, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature â€˜Hydro-archaeologyâ€™ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organisations.&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="59">
                  <text>Dr. Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="395">
                <text>Maritime and underwater archaeological explorations in Kenya:  Recent discoveries</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="396">
                <text>Kenya is the first sub-Sahara African country to initiate an underwater archaeological expedition thus legally recognizing the value of underwater cultural heritage. This was after successful survey and excavation of the 17th Century Portuguese shipwreck, Santa Antonio De Tanna, in Mombasa. Kenya coast is part of the Western Indian Ocean; commonly referred to as the â€˜Swahili coastâ€™. This coast was a domain of foreigners from the early centuries of the first millennium AD. It was visited by the Greeks; controlled by the Arabs, Portuguese and the Europeans. In addition, it played a major role in ancient transoceanic maritime trade across the Indian Ocean Seaboard linking the Swahili Coast with the Arab world, India sub-continent, Far East and China, America and Europe. Owing to crude navigation and sea faring technologies of the time, there are on the seabed of Kenya traces of these interactions in the form of archaeological remains. Recent studies have shown that the Kenya coast is home to a number of shipwrecks and has immense potential in underwater cultural heritage. Drawing from ancient literature, previous and current maritime and underwater archaeological studies, and this paper presents the recent discoveries from underwater archaeological surveys in Kenya. The paper illustrates that there is immense potential for underwater archaeology in Kenya that requires new attention both in research and conservation. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="397">
                <text>Caesar Bita, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="398">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 13 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="5" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="5">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/ec58639175e5eaa5dfa1016f57575cd4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>374f4b44ba42239bbb8cd94d4ff6d3c2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="404">
                    <text>Ancient and Medieval ports of the Gulf of Mannar Coast, East coast India and
their Maritime Connections across Indian Ocean Countries

N. Athiyaman
Department of Maritime History and Marine Archaeology, Tamil University
Thanjavur 613010, India
Email: rajachidam@gmail.com

Abstract
The Gulf of Mannar lies in the south-eastern corner of India, bordered by Sri Lanka on
the south east. It covers the coast of Tamil Nadu from the island of Rameswaram to
Kanniyakumari. This region witnessed extensive long distance maritime activities from
the Early Historic period; from 500 BCE to 500 CE. Like other ports of this region,
Korkai was part of the Indo-Roman trade activities and literally mentioned in Greek
sources. Evidence of Roman contact has been found at the ports of Korkai and
Alagankulam. In the Medieval period, Kayal and Periyapattinam were important ports of
this region, which is also rich in underwater marine resources and famous for their coral
reefs. Stone anchors have been found in this region during surveys by the author. This
region has one of the important marine resources venerated by Indians from the ancient
period: Turbinella Pyrum. Pearl harvesting was very active in this region for several
centuries. It was commercially exploited and exported to many regions in India and
beyond. The proposed paper seeks to study the marine archaeological evidence and
their importance from the Early Historic period to the medieval period; from 500 BCE to
1600 CE.

Key words: Ancient ports, Gulf of Mannar, Korkai, Alagankulam, Pearl fishery, Trade
network

1

�Introduction
Even before the Christian era, a vibrant trade network between Southeast Asia and
Mediterranean region was present in the Indian subcontinent as a transit marketplace.
The Indian subcontinent, rich in resources, played a major commercial role between its
double-sided counterparts of Southeast Asia and the Red Sea region. More studies are
being attempted to view the trade dynamics of these regions from a holistic perspective
as maritime contacts cross both cultural and political boundaries. This paper is an
attempt to view the active role played by the Southeast Indian coast, a part of the
maritime gateway extending between Cape Comorin and Rameswaram Island.
Studying this 300 km stretch of land could be useful for understanding the maritime
importance of this region (Fig. 1).

Sources
To understand the maritime trade process of this region for the study period, ancient
Tamil Literature, specifically the two Sangam
Epics, Silapatikaram and Manimekalai, foreign
accounts

and

sporadic

archaeological

excavations carried out form the basic sources
of the study. The temple inscriptions and
foreigners' accounts of the medieval period are
used for the later periods. Sources available
from Southeast Asia and the Red Sea region
Fig. 1 Map showing the Early Historic are also taken in to account. Marine
and Medieval Ports of the study Area. archaeological studies by the author around
(Athiyaman, 2014)

the Rameswaram region as well as previous
studies made by the author on pearl fishing

were also used as sources for this article.
The Hinterland and the resources for Maritime relations
The inland region of the study area is a dry plain region shadowed by the Western
Ghats of the subcontinent in the west. This region has many rivers; the Vaigai in the
2

�north and the Gundar, Vaippar and Tamraparani in the south. The main source of water
flow in these rivers comes from the Southwest monsoon and to a lesser extent during
the Northeast monsoon. All of these rivers except the Vaigai are not perennial. However
the deltaic area is not as vast as compared to the river Kaveri which flows in central
Tamil Nadu. Except for the regions near the river banks, all the regions are semi-arid in
nature. Archaeological sites found in this region are few compared to sites found in the
northern parts of Tamil Nadu. Those that are found are located along the river course
(Rajan, 2011). As these regions were ruled by the Pandiya Kings, spices and forest
products available in the Western Ghats could be traded through the ports of Bacare
and Nelkynda situated south of Muziri on the west coast, a famous emporium. Only the
pearl and Conch shells were the only local resources from this region contributing to
trade. However, being situated centrally between the east and west, this coast played a
lead role in trade activities.

Ports
The presence of ports indicates the maritime activities of the particular region and their
possible connections with the hinterland. At the very least, resources should be
available the region for ships to come and replenish their food stocks and water. Usually
the river mouths were used as anchorages for the large boats and ships in the east
coast of India. The available evidence suggests that no permanent port structure
existed in the early historic period of the Tamizhakam. However, small boats were used
to carry the goods from the ships to shore and vice versa. In the present study area the
ports or the coastal habitations of considerable importance could be culled out from the
foreigners’ accounts, literature and the inscriptions. During the early historic period, from
the south, the Cape Comorin, the Korkai at the confluence of River Tamraparani and
Alagankulam at the mouth of River Vaigai played a major role in maritime activities.
During the early medieval period and medieval period the newly formed ports of Kayal
and Periyapattinam played a significant role in the maritime activities. Smaller coastal
settlements also were active during this period. The ports of the early historic and
medieval period from the south to the north are briefly discussed here.
Early Historic Ports
3

�Comorin
This is the southernmost tip of the subcontinent which is the meeting point of three
seas; the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Mannar. As the wave travels
along these three seas in different seasons, for the most part the weather in this region
could be rough. The possibility of the existence of a port for maritime trade is remote,
since the place for anchorage and cargo transfer is not conducive. However, in
foreigner accounts, one finds mention of this place invariably as it was considered a
holy place well before the Christian era. Ptolemy mentions this place as Komaria, a
cape and town (McCrindle, 1927). Periplus accounts for it as a cape and harbour and
also mentions that “(T)here come those men who wish to consecrate themselves for the
rest of their lives, and bathe and dwell in celibacy; and women also do the same; for it is
told that a goddess once dwelt here and bathed” (Schoff, 1912). So far, no
archaeological study around this region has been made.
Korkai
Korkai, now 6 km east of the coast, where the sea has receded, was one of the
important emporia of the Pandiyan Kingdom during Christian era. It lies on the bank of
the river Tamraparani. Adichanallur was another contemporary important early historic
settlement lying 15 km west of Korkai. Adichanallur was excavated by Rea and ASI
(Rea, 1915; Nambirajan et al., 2009). Ancient Tamil literature alludes to Korkai as the
place of a fishing community that also dived for pearls and conch shells. One of the
anthologies, akanaanuuRu (130:11), refers to it as a coastal town. Periplus (59)
mentions, "from Comari toward the south this region extends to Colchi, where the pearlfisheries are; (they are worked by condemned criminals); and it belongs to the Pandian
Kingdom..." (Schoff, 1912). Ptolemy accounts 'Kolkhoi' as an emporium (Renou, 1925).
Korkai was famous for pearl fishing until very recently. The pearls obtained from this
place acquired great trade
importance. The importance
of

the

pearl

fishery

is

discussed elsewhere in this
paper.

4
Fig. 2 Anchor salvaged off Rameswaram, Gulf of
Mannar. (Athiyaman, 2001)

�During the 1870's, Caldwell made an exploration and sporadic excavations at Korkai
and Kayal (east of Korkai) and published an article in Indian Antiquary. He made a
thorough survey and found only the pearl oysters and conch shells on the surface and
beneath the soil (Caldwell, 1982). He also came across two Buddha images, two
Singhalese coins and sepulchral urns. He discussed in detail about the sea receding to
the east and the formation of a new port called Kayal during the medieval period. Based
on the literary evidence, the State Department of Archaeology of Tamil Nadu excavated
Korkai in the 1969 and found evidence for the cultural sequence of three periods
ranging from the 3rd century BCE–4th centuries CE, the 4th–10th centuries CE and
between the 10th–14th centuries CE (Sridhar, 2004). The excavations revealed
indigenous pottery with early Tamil scripts, sawed conch shells, bangle pieces, and
semi-precious stones of the early historic period. A brick
structure was also found along with the ring well. The
excavation revealed the uninterrupted activity of this place.
Alagankulam
This site is situated near the river mouth of Vaigai at the
extreme north of the present study area. The place
mentioned in Periplus as 'Argaru' could be identified with
present Alagankulam rather than Uraiyur which is far inland
as proposed by the scholars (Sastri, 1972; Athiyaman, 2013).
As this port was situated in Palk Bay the transfer of cargo
from ships coming from the south was made through a land
crossing about twenty kilometres north. This site was
excavated by the State Department of Archaeology of Tamil
Nadu during 1990's in five seasons (Sridhar, 2005). It yielded
a cultural sequence of four periods ranging from 500 BCE to
1200 CE after which the site lost its importance probably due
to the emergence of the port Periyapattinam during this
period. The site has yielded indigenous as well as western
wares, particularly roulette wares. The site has yielded
Terracotta dice, spindle whorls, and measuring weights. A
Fig. 3 Anchor Salvaged
at

Gulf

of

Mannar.

(Athiyaman, 2001)

5

�remarkable piece of Red Roulette ware dated to 1st-2nd centuries CE was unearthed
with the symbol of ships with oars identified as the depiction of a Roman vessel by
Lionel Casson (Sridhar, 2005). The Roman coins of 4th-5th centuries CE were also
unearthed in this place. This signifies the active role of this port during early historic and
early medieval period.
Medieval Ports
Kayal
As the sea receded along the Gulf of Mannar, Korkai lost its importance around the 10th
century. Another port settlement near the sea at the mouth of the River Tamraparani
was established. This is due to the importance of the pearl and conch shell fishery and
their related activities. This place was also explored by Caldwell during the 1870's. He
reported Chinese porcelain wares of many varieties, broken pieces of Arabian ware and
Arabian gold coins of 13th century implying the east-west contact in this region
(Caldwell, 1982).The Chinese wares of the 13th century found during the exploration at
old Kayal and the absence of them in later periods suggest that another settlement
south of this place established in the later period since the Chinese ware found south of
Kayal, at a site called Punnaikayal, yielded the wares of later periods (Karashima et al.,
2004). So far no excavations have been made in this region. However, the Colonial
records provide ample information regarding this place which implies that the area was
busy with maritime activities.
Periyapattinam
Periyapattinam, one of the late medieval ports, lies in the Gulf of Mannar region 15 km
south of Alagankulam. During excavations conducted by Tamil University with Noboru
Karashima in 1987, many Chinese wares have been unearthed and studied for their
provenance and possible dating (Karashima et al., 2004). It flourished during 13-14th
century CE. It has been mentioned in a Chinese source as 'Dabadan' and Ibn Battuta
described it as 'Fattan' (Karashima, 1989; Karashima, 2004).

Other minor settlements and ports

6

�During the early historic period Ptolemy mentions some other places which were on the
south east coast: Sosikourai, on the Mouth of the River Solen and Kory, also called
Kalligikon (McCrindle, 1927). Of these, Kory could be identified with Rameswaram with
some certainty. Other places are not as clearly understood. During the Medieval period
Kulsekarapattinam, Virapandianpattinam were situated south of Kayal and Kilakkarai
(alias Ninaithathumudittan pattinam), west of Periyapattinam has also been identified
from the Tamil Inscriptions (Jayakumar, 2001). These places must also have played a
considerable role in maritime trade.
Marine Archaeological Studies
Offshore and onshore explorations conducted in the Gulf of Mannar region of India, by
the Centre for Underwater Archaeology of Tamil University have yielded two grapnel
type (Indo-Arabian) stone anchors under the shallow waters in the Gulf of Mannar (Figs.
2 and 3). From the region where these two anchors were collected, two more were also
found onshore, one a grapnel type and another trapezoidal type. These three grapneltype anchors are now exhibited in the Tamil University museum. Apart from this, a
mooring stone, presumably a grapnel type anchor has also been noticed near Tuticorin
coast, which even now is used for mooring the fishing boats (Athiyaman, 2001). Though
they were dated to between 13th and 14th centuries CE a petrographic analysis may
push the date further into the Christian era. Surveys conducted by National Institute of
Oceanography around Manapad area, north of Kayalpattinam revealed single holed
stone anchors indicating the continuance of indigenous navigation technology
(Sundaresh, 2013).
Ships and boats of this region
The Tamil literature clearly suggests that several varieties of crafts were in use during
the early historic Tamizhakam, which proves the extensive nature of its maritime
activities. The crafts ambi, mithavai, naavaay, pahri, punai, thimil and toni were medium
or small sized crafts. Thimil may have been well-designed since it served as a fishing
craft. The crafts naavaay, vangkam and kalam were deep ocean vessels. Not a single
clue into the shape of these crafts could be found. Pahri and toni were coastal crafts
that plied between the big vessels anchored offshore and were also used in the
lagoons. It can be inferred that all the crafts mentioned in the literature except kalam,
7

�which is associated with the Yavanas, were indigenous (Athiyaman, 2011a). Since
references to the ship builders are also available, it is clear that the various crafts were
built by local craftsmen. The author of Periplus mentions ships named sangara which
travelled up to Malacca (Schoff, 1912). This could be the vangkam mentioned in the
Tamil text. Archaeological excavations conducted at port towns of Alagankulam
(Sridhar, 2005), Korkai (Sridhar, 2004) and Periyapattinam (Karashima et al., 2004) in
Tamizhakam prove beyond doubt that busy trade activities were undertaken in ancient
Tamizhakam. The volume of trade carried out with the Red Sea region was so huge
(Selvakumar, 2011), that for the exchange of various commodities there was need to
build various crafts. The early historic Tamizhakam had indigenous knowledge on
navigation and shipbuilding. Although this idea is based on the literary evidence, the
terms of crafts must be studied in comparison with Greek, Sanskrit and other languages
of Southeast Asia. The crafts in the literature of the early historic period were scantily
referred to up to the medieval period and lost their names over the course of history.
The study clearly highlights that several categories of watercrafts were used for different
purposes and the indigenous crafts too had an active role in the long distance trading
(Athiyaman, 2011b).
Pearl and conch shell fishery
Rich in pearl oysters and conch shells the Gulf of Mannar was an attraction not only to
traders but too many writers as well. A great deal of importance was given to the pearl
and chank fishery and references to this industry off Korkai and Kayal are many.
Throughout history, the Gulf of Mannar enjoyed busy trade activities due to the pearl
industry (Table. 1). Besides conch shell diving also had its importance each year. A
detailed study of this Industry has already been documented by scholars (Arunachalam,
2011; Stephen, 1998; Athiyaman, 2000; Decla, 2008).
Table 1. Account of Pearl and Chank Fishery on Indian Coast of Gulf of Mannar
Account of

Period

Reference

Megasthenes

3rd century CE

McCrindle, 2008

Strabo

21 CE

McCrindle, 1979

8

�Periplus

60 CE

Schoff, 1912

Pliny

77 CE

McCrindle, 1979

Pan Kou

end of the first century Sastri 1972
CE

Cosmos

6th Century CE

McCrindle, 1979

Ma Twan Lin

550 - 600 CE

Sastri, 1972

Yuan Chwang

645 CE

Sastri, 1972

Chau Ju-Kua

1225 CE

Hirth and Rockhill, 1966

Marco Polo

1260 -1300 CE

Yule and Cordier, 1993

Account

of

embassies 1279-1292 CE

Sastri, 1972

between China and India
John of Montecorvino

1292-1293 CE

Sastri, 1972

Wang Ta Yuan

1330 CE

Rockhill 1915

Friar Jordanus

1323-1330 CE

Sastri, 1972

Ibn Battuta

1333-1345 CE

Sastri, 1972

Duarte Barbosa

1516-1517 CE

Dames, 1967

Caesar Frederic

1563-1581 CE

Caldwell, 1982

Perdro Teixeira

1568 CE

Sinclair

and

Ferguson,

1967
Van Linschoten

1576-1592 CE

9

Arunachalam, 2011

�This industry was worked by the local fishing
community,

namely

Paratavar,

from

time

immemorial as the conch shell collection is carried
out even today by them without any intervention
(Athiyaman, 2000). This industry around Korkai and
then Kayal region has attracted many traders from
east and west and this enhanced its influence in the
socio-political environment of the inland region
(Arunachalam, 2011; Stephen, 1998).
Horse Trade
Arabian horses were traded along the West and
East Coast of South India in the early historic
period. The horses making voyages along the
Arabian Sea reached the South east coast of Tamil Fig.

4

Mosaic

of

Nadu and were much sought after up to the Thiruppudaimarudur painting of
Vijayanagar period. The inscriptions recounting Horse Trade. (Athiyaman and
horse trading and the sculptures and paintings on Rajavelu, 2011)
maritime activities depicted in the medieval temples
of Tamil Nadu are striking examples. The Nayak period painting depicting an Arab ship
arrival with horses was found at Thiruppudaimarudur Temple, Thirunelveli District and
sculptural representation of Arab merchants landing in a ship at Thirukkurungudi temple
provide authentic evidence regarding the maritime activities of this region (Deloche,
2011; Athiyaman, 2011, Figs. 4-5). This trade was mainly carried out by the Arab
merchants as the inscriptions and the art representations suggest (Jayakumar, 2001;
Athiyaman, 2011; Rajavelu, 2011).
Maritime Trade with Southeast Asia and China
Since Sri Lanka is nearest the study region, the maritime trade contact was very
frequent and almost uninterrupted from 3rd century BCE. The evidence of the existence
of early contacts is covered in recently edited volumes (Manguin et al., 2011). The
earliest Tamil inscription is found at Khuan Luk Pat of Thailand, a touch stone belonging
to the goldsmith of the third century CE (Chaisuwan, 2011). Medieval Tamil Inscriptions
10

�at various places of Southeast Asia prove beyond doubt that the contact between Gulf

Fig. 5 Sculptural representation of Horse Trade (Thirukkurungudi). (Athiyaman, 2011)

of Mannar region and Southeast Asia was prolific (Subbarayalu, 1998; Karashima,
2002). It continued as one could glean from the accounts of pearl fishing in the Gulf of
Mannar even during the Colonial period.
Maritime Trade with Western world
Many studies have been made by scholars on the Indo-Roman trade after Warmington
(1974). The ports of India, trade goods, shipping and navigation have been studied in
the light of the foreign accounts, archaeological excavations conducted at Indian ports
of Pattanam, Pumpuhar, Arikamedu, Alagankulam and Korkai, pottery inscriptional
evidences and the Vienna Papyrus as well. It is beyond the scope of this present paper.
However, the western trade with this region was continued, without break and this
region played an active role in it (Young, 2001; De Romanis, 2012).
Potential region for Marine Archaeological Studies
The Gulf of Mannar has more marine archaeological potential than the northern coast of
Tamil Nadu of India. The Marine Archaeological studies carried out at various places of
the Northern Tamil Coast like Pumpuhar, Arikamedu and Mamallapuram did not yield
much evidence except for the 18th century shipwreck explored by CSIR-NIO, Goa, off
Pumpuhar (Sila Tripati et al., 1996; and Sila Tripati et al., 2003). The excavation
conducted by the Archaeological Survey of India, also did not yield any concrete
11

�evidence due to the nature of seabed. In northern Tamil Nadu a lot of sediments are
carried by the rivers throughout the year and they are deposited in the littoral and
shallow water region. The clay formation is so high that a fairly good marine
archaeological exploration is not at all possible. However, the Gulf of Mannar is
protected by Sri Lanka from the onslaught of huge waves and cyclones. Hence the
shipwrecks and lost anchors could be found with more convenience. The sea is
relatively calm for long periods. Moreover, the stone anchors found off Rameswaram
can be taken as a precursor for marine archaeological studies. The busy trade activity
throughout history allows one to presume that this region should be probed intensively
in future.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dr. M. Thirumalai, Vice-Chancellor, Tamil University for
his constant support in research and giving permission to contribute the paper at the
Asia Pacific Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage, Hawaii. Acknowledgement is
also due to Drs. S. Rajavelu and V. Selvakumar of Tamil University for their suggestions
in improving the paper.
References
Arunachalam, S., 2011. The History of Pearl Fishery of the Tamil Coast. Pavai
Publications, Chennai. (First Published by Annamalai University, 1952)
Athiyaman, N., 2000. Pearl and Chank Diving of South Indian Coast: A Historical and
Ethnographic Perspective. Tamil University Press, Thanjavur.
Athiyaman, N., 2001. Stone anchors from East Coast of India- A Precursor for Marine
Archaeology of Tamil Nadu. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 61th Session,
Calcutta: 1293-1310.
Athiyaman, N., 2011a. Nautical Terms as Gleaned from Ancient Tamil Literature. In
Mark Staniforth, Jennifer Craig, Sheldon Clyde Jago-on, Bobby Orillaneda, Ligaya
Lacsina (Eds.), Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater
Cultural Heritage, Manila: 119-130.
Athiyaman, N., 2011b. Maritime Contacts as depicted in art forms at the Medieval
Temples of Tamil Nadu. Paper presented in the National Seminar on Religion and
Society in Peninsular India: 7th -16th Century AD, held on 24th-26th Feb 2011, at the
Dept. of History, Pondicherry University, Puducherry.
Athiyaman, N., 2013. Some Early Historic Ports of Tamilakam: Revisited. Paper
presented in the 8th National Conference on Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean
12

�Countries held at CSIR-NIO on 1st-2nd July 2013, Society for Marine Archaeology,
Goa.
Caldwell, B. R., 1982. A History of Tinnevelly. Asian Educational Services, New Delhi.
Chaisuwan, B., 2011. Early Contacts between India and the Andaman Coast in
Thailand from the Second Century BCE to Eleventh Century CE. In P. Y. Manguin, A.
Mani, and G. Wade (Eds.), Early Interactions between South and Southwest Asia:
Reflections on Cross-Cultural Exchange. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies,
Singapore: 83- 111.
Dames, M. L., 1967. The Book of Duarte Barbosa, Vol. I &amp; II, Kraus Reprint Limited,
Nendeld.
Decla, S., 2008. The Portuguese on the Pearl Fishery Coast. St. Mary's College,
Toothukudi.
Deloche, J., 2011. A study in Nayaka period Social Life: Tiruppudaimarudur Paintings
and Carvings. Institut Français de Pondichérry, Puducherry.
De Romanis, Federico., 2012. Playing Sudoku on the Verso of the ‘Muziris Papyrus':
Pepper, Malabathron and Tortoise Shell in the Cargo of the Hermapollon. Journal of
Ancient Indian History, Vol. 27: 75-101.
Hirth, F., and Rockhill, W. W., 1966. Chau Ju-Kua. Paragon Book Reprint Corp. New
York.
Jayakumar, P., 2001. Ports of Tamil Nadu: Medieval Period (in Tamil). Anbu
Veliyeetakam, Thanjavur.
Karashima, N., 1989. Trade Relations between South India and China during 13th and
14th centuries. Journal of East West Maritime Relations, Vol. 1: 59-81.
Karashima, N., (Ed.), 2002. Ancient and Medieval Commercial Activities in the Indian
Ocean: Testimony of Inscriptions and ceramic-sherds. Taisho University, Tokyo.
Karashima, N., 2004. Periyapattinam in Daoji Zhilue and Ibn Battuta's Travels. In N.
Karashima (Ed.), In search of Chinese-sherds In South India and Sri Lanka. Taisho
University Press, Tokyo: 28-33.
Karashima, N., Kanazawa, Y., and Yamamoto, N., 2004. Periyapattinam/
Nagapattinam/ Devipattinam/ Kayal/ Kulasekarapattinam/ Madurai Government
Museum. In N. Karashima (Ed.), In search of Chinese-sherds in South India and Sri
Lanka. Taisho University Press, Tokyo: 22-27.
Manguin, P. Y., Mani, A., and Wade, G., (Eds.), 2011. Early Interactions between South
and Southwest Asia: Reflections on Cross-Cultural Exchange. Institute of Southeast
Asian Studies, Singapore.
McCrindle, J. W., 1927. Ancient India as described by Ptolemy. Munshiram Manoharlal
Publisher Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (published in 2000).

13

�McCrindle, J. W., 1979. Ancient India as described in the Classical Literature.
Munshiram Manoharlal Publisher Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (Reprinted 2000).
McCrindle, J. W., 2008. Ancient India as described by Megasthenese and Arrian.
Munshiram Manoharlal Publisher Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (Originally published in 1901).
Nambirajan, M., Malik, A., Gayathri, C. R., and Anil Kumar, A., 2009. Significance of the
Recent Excavations at Adichchanalluur. Tamil Civilization, Vol. 23: 57-61.
Rajan, K., 2011, Emergence of Early Historic Trade in Peninsular India. In P. Y.
Manguin, A. Mani, and G. Wade (Eds.), 2011. Early Interactions between South and
Southwest Asia: Reflections on Cross-Cultural Exchange. Institute of Southeast Asian
Studies, Singapore: 177-196.
Rajavelu, S., 2011. Ships and Navigation in the Medieval South India. In Mark
Staniforth, Jennifer Craig, Sheldon Clyde Jago-on, Bobby Orillaneda, Ligaya Lacsina,
(Eds.), Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific regional conference on Underwater Cultural
Heritage, Manila: 181-190.
Rea, A., 1915. Catalogue of the prehistoric antiquities from Adichanallur and
Perumbair. Government Museum, Madras.
Renou, L., 1925. La Géographie De Ptolémée L'Inde (VII, 1-4). Paris, p.6.
Rockhill, W. W., 1915. T'OUNG PAO: Notes on the Relations and Trade of China with
Eastern Archipelago and the Coasts of the Indian Ocean during the Fourteenth
Century, Part II, LIBRAIRE ET IMPRIMERIE, CI-DEVANT, E. J. BRILL LEIDE.
Sastri, K. A. N., 1972. Foreign Notices of South India: From Megasthenes to Ma- Huan.
University of Madras, Madras.
Schoff, W. H., 1912. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea. Longmans, Green and Co.
London.
Selvakumar, V., 2011. Archaeological, Literary and Ethnographic Evidence for
Traditional Boatbuilding in Kerala, South India. In Mark Staniforth, Jennifer Craig,
Sheldon Clyde Jago-on, Bobby Orillaneda, Ligaya Lacsina (Eds.), Proceedings on the
ASIA-PACIFIC regional conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage, Manila: 201-220.
Sila Tripati, Parthiban, G., Vora, K. H., Sundaresh and Bandodkar, S. N., 2003. Lead
ingots from a shipwreck off Poompuhar, Tamil Nadu, East Coast of India: Evidence for
overseas trade and their significance. The International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, Vol. 32 (2): 225-237.
Sila Tripati., Gaur, A. S., Sundaresh, Gudigar, P., 1996. Marine Archaeological
Explorations in the Kaveripoompattinam Region: Fresh light on the Structural Remains.
Man and environment, Vol. 21(1): 86-90.
Sinclair, W. F., and Fergusson, D., 1967. The Travels of Pedro Teixeira, Kraus Reprint
Limited, Nendeld

14

�Sridhar, T. S., 2004. Excavations of Archaeological sites in Tamil Nadu (1969-1995).
Department of Archaeology, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.
Sridhar, T. S., 2005. Alagankulam: An ancient Roman Port city of Tamil Nadu.
Department of Archaeology, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.
Stephen, S. J., 1998. Portuguese in the Tamil Coast. Navajothi Publishing House,
Pondicherry.
Subbarayalu, Y. 1998. The Tamil Merchant-Guild Inscription at Barus, A Rediscovery.
In Claude Guillot (Ed.), Histoire de Barus, Sumatra, Le Site de Lobu Tua I: Etudes et
Documents, Cahiers d 'Archipel 30, Paris: 25-33.
Sundaresh., 2013. Stone anchors of Manapad Region, Tamil Nadu. Paper Presented in
the 8th National Conference on Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries,
Dedicating to Dr. S. R. Rao 1st-2nd July 2013 Organized by Society for Marine
Archaeology, National Institute of Oceanography Dona Paula, Goa.
Warmington, E. H., 1974. The Commerce between the Roman Empire and India. Vikas
Publishing House, New Delhi.
Young, G. K., 2001. Rome's Eastern Trade: International Commerce and imperial
policy, 31 BC - AD 305. Routledge, London.
Yule, H., and Cordier, H., 1993. The book of Ser Marco Polo. Munshiram Manoharlal
publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Biography

N. Athiyaman working as a Professor in the Department of Maritime History and Marine
Archaeology of Tamil University, Thanjavur, India has about 30 years of service in
research organisations at various levels. He has participated in marine archaeological
investigation off Pumpuhar, in collaboration with National Institute of Ocean Technology,
Chennai. He has salvaged four stone anchors and two metal anchors of medieval
period in Gulf of Mannar. He has participated in excavations of early historic settlement
sites conducted by Tamil University. He has authored four books and edited 13 volumes
on Archaeology, History and Maritime History. He is the life member of Indian History
congress, Society for Marine Archaeology and Tamil Nadu Archaeological Society.

15

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="16">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="56">
                  <text>Session 13: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 13 chair Dr. Sila Tripati and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="58">
                  <text>Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as â€˜underwaterâ€™, â€˜marineâ€™ and â€˜nauticalâ€™ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to â€˜Underwater Archaeologyâ€™, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature â€˜Hydro-archaeologyâ€™ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organisations.&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="59">
                  <text>Dr. Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="400">
                <text>Ancient and Medieval ports of the Gulf of Mannar Coast, East coast India and their Maritime Connections across Indian Ocean Countries </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="401">
                <text>The Gulf of Mannar lies in the south-eastern corner of India, bordered by Sri Lanka on the south east. It covers the coast of Tamil Nadu from the island of Rameswaram to Kanniyakumari. This region witnessed extensive long distance maritime activities from the Early Historic period; from 500 BCE to 500 CE. Like other ports of this region, Korkai was part of the Indo-Roman trade activities and literally mentioned in Greek sources. Evidence of Roman contact has been found at the ports of Korkai and Alagankulam. In the Medieval period, Kayal and Periyapattinam were important ports of this region, which is also rich in underwater marine resources and famous for their coral reefs. Stone anchors have been found in this region during surveys by the author. This region has one of the important marine resources venerated by Indians from the ancient period: Turbinella Pyrum. Pearl harvesting was very active in this region for several centuries. It was commercially exploited and exported to many regions in India and beyond. The proposed paper seeks to study the marine archaeological evidence and their importance from the Early Historic period to the medieval period; from 500 BCE to 1600 CE. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="402">
                <text>N. Athiyaman, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="403">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 13 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/708b4dbbe6bc70240824e2adba5ea2c7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7f76272b6c6a6bc27bc51a651cf0ba4d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="409">
                    <text>Cultural attitude and values towards
underwater cultural heritage and its influences on the management actions in
Indonesia
Zainab Tahir
Directorate of Coast and Marine Affairs, Jakarta, Indonesia 10110
zen02zen@yahoo.com
Abstract
Understanding attitudes and values towards underwater cultural heritage (UCH) is
critical element in determining appropriate approaches to a wide variety of planning and
management actions. Management actions such as gaining support to protecting
historic shipwreck and its associated relics, designing and implementing new
management methods depend on an understanding of cultural norms and values of
their success.
In Indonesia, historic shipwrecks and its associated relics are managed through two
different policies. Cultural protection Act 11/2010 mandates protection on cultural
heritage including underwater remains, and Presidential Decree 19/2009, regulated
commercial management processes, incorporating UCH as marine resources with
potential economic value, which might contribute to community welfare. These two
paradoxical procedures have raised long debate between stakeholders, including
government agencies.
Using individual interview, this paper attempts to understand cultural attitudes and
values towards shipwreck and its relics in related government agencies in Indonesia, in
which resulting the two deferent management approaches. Furthermore, this writing
also examines the possible influences of these policies on the current management of
UCH in this country.
Key words: historic shipwrecks and its cargoes, intrinsic value, commercial interest,
private company
Introduction
Substantial amount of underwater cultural heritage in the form of historic shipwrecks
and its cargoes are predicted lying off Indonesian Water. This form has lost mainly due
to natural or accidental causes. Currently, there are twenty underwater sites
documented, spreading from South China Sea to Java Sea.The character of the wrecks
varies from one another. For example, the Cirebon wreck, found in Java Sea, is a 10 th
century wooden shipwreck containing large amount of artifacts from Five Dynasty
Chinese ceramics to glass bottle from Iran, enriched history of an ancient trade in

�maritime silk road, while in Tulamben, Bali lies beneath the water a World War II
transport ship the USAT Liberty. Each wreck has its story, comprising valuable
knowledge, technology and culture from specific periods and place, assigning it not only
exceptional and irreplaceable (Smith &amp; Couper, 2003) but also finite.
Therefore, some experts assert that historic shipwrecks are human legacy and it
deserves protection and management, ensuring these heritage is interpreted and
shared with the wide public and preserved for the benefit of present and future
generations (Jameson and Scott-Ireton 2007; Spirek and Scott-Ireton 2003 see in
(Leshikar-Denton, 2010). However, beside the concern of safeguarding the UCH, there
is a distinct-profit interest towards historic shipwrecks. It is likely related to a different
value assigned to the objects by different parties. Delgado (1988) examines the
monetary benefit provided by historic shipwrecks, in particular its cargoes, besides
cultural, historical, archaeological, aesthetic and recreational (Delgado, 1988). Public
has witnessed how the Geldermalsen and Vung Tau were priced $16 million and $7,2
million respectively in the auction house. Some people have seen this commercial
interestas threat against preservation and protection of the heritage. Kaoru and
Hoagland (1994) supported that those values can overlap considerably causing conflict
among parties over appropriate use of historic shipwrecks (Kaoru &amp; Hoagland, 1994).
Overlapping interest towards historic shipwreck and its cargoes become an interesting
issue on managing underwater cultural heritage in Indonesia. Legally, there are two
distinct policies imposed in regard to managing underwater artifacts. First is a policy
places this heritage as significant cultural, archaeological and historical remains
required preservation and protection, while the other policy has governed the objects as
marine resources with physical value, allowing consumptive use of the heritage

�i

. Hypothetically, this paradoxical management type is influenced by knowledge,

perception and attitude of people in a policy making level. Some studies have shown
that people’s perceptions and attitudes towards particular objects or management
issues are shaped by their knowledge, educational background, socio economic factors
or management intervention (Allendorf et al. 2006; Shrestha and Alavalapati 2006; Xu
et al. 2006; Alkan et al., 2009; Shibia 2010 see in (Htun, Mizoue, &amp; Yoshida, 2012).This
paper is about to portray and compare perceptions and attitudes of decision making
level officers from two institutions in Indonesia, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
(MMAF), and Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC), towards an underwater cultural
heritage and its current management. Both institutions plays significant role in managing
UCH in the form of historic shipwrecks and its cargoes in this country. The result of the
study might provide preliminary insight and support in developing appropriate
management strategies towards historic shipwrecks and its cargoes in Indonesia
Methods
Policies towards historic shipwrecks and its cargoes in Indonesia
Shipwrecks exploration in Indonesian water has a long history, started from the
exploitation of the Geldermalsen in 1986. Before this period, there was no specific
national mandatory on managing historic shipwrecks and its cargoes (Tanudirjo, 2008)).
Discovery of the Geldermalsen and the fantastic value of its cargoes became an eyeopening reality to the government in regard to the significance of historic shipwrecks,
particularly its cargoes (Tanudirjo, 2008). In 1989, the Presidential Decree concerning
Valuable Objects from the Sunken Ship commanded the government to form a special
committee, which has responsibility to manage the cargoes discovered from shipwrecks,
included permitting its exploration and exploitation (Decree No. 49, 1989) ii. Since then,
the monetary interest of underwater cargoes has become a concern inmanagingthe
UCH in Indonesia.Three years later, in 1992, Act concerning Protection of Cultural
heritage had been released under Ministry of Education and Culture, and it mandated a
protection of cultural resources in land and underwater (Act 5, 1992)iii. The Act was
revised in 2010 through Act 10/2010 and this new is clearly prohibited transferring
cultural objects to other countries for any purposes but education and research.

815

�However, another new act concerning Coastal Management (Act 27, 2007), released
under Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, classifies historic shipwreck and its
cargoes as marine resources, in which the protection and economic concerns can be
mutually managed.
Sample and Data Collection
Perception and attitudes of the government officers from the two ministries regarding
underwater cultural heritage were measured by a personal interview, using
questionnaire. The questionnaires consisted of three sections, first is started questions
to identify general knowledge about the valuable cargoes from shipwrecks, answered in
Yes, No and Not Sure; the section 2 is 15 major statements covered in 3 parts, part 1 is
meant to gauge perceptions on the state of the significance of an underwater heritage,
part 2 scales the attitudes towards the current management of historic shipwrecks and
its cargoes, and the last part is to identify responses on the management implication;
then the section 3 is personal information. Perceptions and attitudes were measured by
asking respondents to rate statements using Likert-type scale from 1 (Strongly
disagree), 2 (disagree), 3 (not sure), 4 (agree) and 5 (strongly agree), few statements
used strongly unacceptable to strongly acceptable form. The questionnaires were
closed type, however few parts of the section 2, the respondents were given space to
provide comments.
The respondents were gathered using non-probability method, with purposive sampling
technique (Kumar, 2013). This paper only examined perception and attitudes of the
decision making level officers (i.e. Head of Unit, Deputy Director and Director) from
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) and Ministry of Education and Culture
(MEC), focusing to the unit or directorate that has closely responsible in managing
underwater cultural heritage. From MMAF, 9 high official members of Directorate of
Coastal and Marine Affairs were chosen, while in the MEC, the target respondents were
Deputy Directors of Directorate of Culture and Head of the Preservation and Protection
of Cultural Resources Office. The total respondents from the two institutions were 18
people.
Result
The first section, the respondents were asked four general questions with a Yes, No or
816

�Not sure answer to assess their understanding of the status of historic shipwrecks and
its cargoes in Indonesia. Respondents who answered “yes” were preceded to the
section 2 enquiring their perceptions and attitudes towards management of historic
shipwrecks and its cargoes and the implication. In general, as it is written in table 1, all
respondents from both institutions distinguished that historic shipwrecks and its cargoes
are not only important but also protected. They also have knowledge, that these historic
objects are opened for commercial purposes.
Table 1. General understanding on the status of Historic Shipwrecks and its cargoes
Questions on survey instrument

Percentage
Yes

Do you know about the valuable objects from the sunken ship or
commonly known as BMKT?

100

Do you think historic shipwrecks and its cargoes are important?

100

Do you know historic shipwrecks and its cargoes are protected?

100

Do you know some of the cargoes, discovered from historic
shipwrecks could be sent off to auction?

94,4

Perceptions of the officers on the significant values of an underwater cultural
heritage
Concerning the significant value of an UCH in the form of historic shipwrecks and its
cargoes, the respondents were asked to scale 4 statements. These statements are
narrowed to portray perceptions of the officers towards the consumptive use and the
non-use value of historic shipwrecks and its cargoes (See (Kaoru &amp; Hoagland, 1994).
The results as indicated in table 2 show the officers from both institutions have strong
agreement on valuing historic shipwrecks and its cargoes. Both of them are aware that
there are several different values attached to these entities. Shipwrecks and its cargoes
are historically and culturally significant, framing intrinsic quality of maritime past, as
many experts support that historic shipwrecks are a closed context reflecting the society
of the time; it has the potential to provide information about the people on board, ship
construction, navigation technology, and the goods it was transporting; however, beside
those essential value, it also have short term economic opportunities gained from this

817

�historic object (See (Delgado, 1988; Huang, 2013; Hutchinson, 1996; Kaoru &amp; Hoagland,
1994).
Table 2. Perceptions of the officers on the significant values of the UCH

Statement
On survey instrument
Protecting underwater cultural
heritage is important (i.e. historic
shipwrecks and its cargoes)
because it has historical value
By managing historic shipwrecks
and its cargoes provide
livelihood and other economic
opportunities.
The government should protect
historic shipwreck and its
cargoes in order to preserve
national and cultural identity.
Artifacts from historic shipwreck,
such as ceramics and jewellery,
are highly valuable in the
antique market.

Respondents-Scale (%)
Correl.

n1,
1

n2,1

n1,2

n2,2

n1,3

n2,3

n1,4

n2,4

n1,5

n2,5

0

0

0

0

0

0

22.2

0.0

77.8

100

0.958

0

0

0

0

0

0

66.7

6.0

33.3

33.3

0.853

0

0

0

0

0

0

55.6

33.3

44.4

66.7

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

22.2

88.9

77.8

11.1

0.160

n1 = 9 (respondent from MMAF), n2 = 9 (respondent from MEC); 1 - 5 = likert scale, 1 = strongly disagree, 2 =
disagree, 3 = not sure, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree; Correl. = Correlation

Perceptions of the officers on the current management of Historic Shipwrecks
and its cargoes
Currently, private company funds exploration of shipwrecks in Indonesian water.
Consequently, they have rights to own 50% of the cargoes or 50% generated from the
selling artifacts. The five statements in the questionnaire tried to explore how decisions
making level officers perceive the involvement of the third party in exploring historic
shipwrecks and its cargoes, auctioning the artifacts, and an appropriate funding source.
In response to the statements, as it is shown in the table 3, the respondents from both
institutions scaled strongly agree to agree that the government has responsibility to
provide funding support to exploring and managing the historic shipwrecks and its
cargoes. However, interestingly, when they were giving an option whether the fund for
exploration should be provided by the government or private, the responses were varied,
33,3% officers from MMAF agreed the exploration should be funded by the government,
33% of it opposed the idea and 22,2% was not sure. 55,6% from MEC preferred the
private as fund source, instead of the government, yet 22% strongly agreed if the fund
818

�support is from the state, while 11% was not sure. Even though, more than half of
MEC’s respondent agreed the private providing fund for exploration, there were 33,3%
of them refused the involvement of the third party would assist to manage and preserve
historic shipwrecks and its cargoes.
Table 3. General Knowledge on the Status of Historic Shipwrecks and its cargoes
Statement
On survey instrument
Exploration of shipwrecks and its
cargoes should be conducted and
funded by government not by
private company.
National policy allows private
company to perform recovery
excavation of historic shipwrecks
and auction its cargoes off; then
the selling income will be shared
between government and private
company.
We can auction off artefacts
discovered from one shipwreck as
long as the national museum has
pick the Significant
Representative Collection.
The government has responsibility
to provide funding support to
explore and manage historic
shipwreck and its cargoes
To help managing and preserving
historic shipwreck and its cargoes
in Indonesian water is by involving
third party or private company to
explore it

Respondents-Scale (%)
Correl.

n1,
1

n2,1

n1,2

n2,2

n1,3

n2,3

n1,4

n2,4

n1,5

n2,5

11.
1

0.0

33.3

55.6

22.2

11.1

33.3

11.1

0

22.2

0

22.2

11.1

56.7

0

0

55.6

22.2

33.3

0

-0.067

0

0

0

77.8

0

0

44.4

11.1

55.6

11.1

-0.24

0

0

11.1

0.0

0

0

44.4

55.6

44.4

44.4

0.970

0

0

0

33.3

22.2

11.1

66.7

44.4

11.1

11.1

0.659

0.476

Furthermore, the biggest difference between the officers from the two institutions is
when they were asked their perception on getting the artifacts off to auction. Even
though, the unique and rare pieces must be list as state property and prohibit for sale,
still 77,8% respondents from the MEC against the idea of selling the underwater
artifacts, and only 11% respectively scaled strongly agree and agree to this idea. While,
55,6% and 33,3% of the MMAFs’ officers settled with the notion of commercial interest.
They commented, that principally they agree to bring the mass product artifacts off to
auction but the rare one must belong to the country.Subsequently, strong negative
correlation (See(Rumsey, 2003) between officers existed, when they were asking their
819

�opinion on the current National Policy in which allows private company to salvage and
auction the underwater artifacts. There was strongly disagreement towards the policy
(56,7% and 22,2%), even though 22,2% of MECs’ officers marked agrees towards it.
While 55,6 and 33,3% officers from MMAF were consistently support this involvement.
Attitudes of the officers towards the management implication
Integrating commercial values of historic shipwrecks and its cargoes into the policy have
evolved public perceptions towards the objects. Since 1989, number of private
companies permitted to explore shipwrecks in Indonesian water has increased and
hundred thousands of artifacts discovered along the shipwrecks (PANNAS, 2012).
However, despite the fact that this practice attracts investment to the country, some
people criticized the exploration and salvage activities in Indonesia are far concern to
the money-making and tend to disregard the intrinsic value of the objects (Tanudirjo,
2008). The International Congress of Maritime Museums mentioned the exploration of
the Geldermalsen as an example how commercial salvor destroy the historical value of
the cargoes (See in (Hallwood &amp; Miceli, 2005).
Six statements in the table 4 examine attitudes and perceptions of decision making
officers from two main institutions, that closely responsible for managing underwater
heritage, towards the management implication of the current policy. There are some
significant differences between the MMAF and MEC regarding the statement that
income generated from investment on shipwrecks and its cargoes benefits the country.
66,6% MECs’ respondents resisted that business on shipwrecks is not profitable to the
state, contrasting 66,7% of the respondents from MMAF. The correlation between the
high official respondents is negative. Similarly, most of the MECs’ do not accept to gain
revenue by selling artifacts, while more than half respondents from MMAF (66,7%)
consider this policy as an agreeable. Interestingly, when the MECs’ officers were asked
about banning the auction, the proportion of MECs’ (44,4%) who agreed and disagreed
is similar.
Furthermore, a significantly higher percentage of the MECs’ (88,9%) believed the
exploration of shipwrecks destroys the context of maritime history, while 56,7% from
MMAF disagreed with the statement and one third of them have no knowledge
820

�regarding the issue. From one perspective, it might understandable if the proportion of
“not sure” answers were little high considering respondents from MMAF generally come
from different study background such as environment and economic. Yet, one MMAF’s
respondent stated exploration might destroy the context of history if there is no strong
regulation existed. Despite strong agreement from MECs’ about destruction of historical
context, there are slightly high proportion of its respondents (44,4%) accepted the
exploration done by the private has contributed to the preservation and protection of the
historic shipwrecks and its cargoes, even though 33,3% of them disagree with this.
Some people believe that exploration and recovery of historic shipwrecks and its
cargoes might be considered as one way to safeguard the objects from being illegally
salvaged and also providing further opportunity of the wide public to access the objects.
Table 4. Attitudes and perceptions of the officers towards the management implication
Statement
On survey instrument
Income from business on
underwaterartifacts benefits the
country.
National policy should ban selling
the cargoes discovered from
shipwreck
Exploration of historic shipwrecks
and its cargoes, done by private,
has contributed to the
preservation and protection of
underwater cultural heritage.
Exploration of historic shipwrecks
and its cargoes, done by private
company, has destroyed the
context of maritime history
Business on shipwrecks and its
cargoes attract more investment
to Indonesia
Government auctions off artefacts
discovered from shipwrecks to
gain country’s economic income.

Respondents-Scale (%)
Correl.

n1,
1

n2,1

n1,2

n2,2

n1,3

n2,3

n1,4

n2,4

n1,5

n2,5

0

22.2

11.1

66.7

11.1

0.0

66.7

11.1

11.1

0

-0.17

11.
1

0.0

11.1

44.4

44.4

11.1

33.3

44.4

0

0

0

0

0

0

33.3

44.4

11.1

55.6

44.4

0

11.1

0.476

0

0

55.6

0

33.3

0

11.1

88.9

0

11.1

-0.27

0

1

11.1

55.6

22.2

0.0

55.6

22.2

0

11.1

0.036

0

44.4

11.1

33.3

11.1

11.1

66.7

11.1

11.1

0

-0.39

Discussion and Conclusion
This survey was conducted to accomplish the main task of determining the perceptions
and attitudes of the decision making level officers from different institutions towards
historic shipwrecks and its cargoes. As it is predicted, the two institutions showed
821

�negative correlation for particular commercial interest issue. The policy on sending
artifacts off into auction becomes sensitive among respondents from the MEC. Kaoru
and Hoagland (1994) noticed that some individuals might find commercial attachment to
the historical objects is offensive. To inform, all of the interviewees come from similar
background, archaeologists and historians. Their knowledge on the historic objects
might associate with their perception and attitude. In parallel with some studies resulted
that greater in knowledge are associated with greater influence of attitudes on behavior
(See (Fabrigar, Smith, Petty, &amp; Crites Jr., 2006). On the other hand, high officers from
the MMAF tend to consider the consumptive use over the non-use value of the historic
shipwrecks and its cargoes (See Kaoru and Hoagland, 1994). They argue that historic
shipwrecks and its cargoes along with other natural ecosystems are part of marine
resources, which can be used and managed for the sake of the community wellbeing.
Accordingly, the long term development goal of the MMAF are maximizing the use of
the resources to achieve prosperity while keeping sustainability towards environment,
social, culture, and economic as a based of actions (MMAF, 2007). Therefore, it is not
surprising when the officers from this ministry have supported the inclusion of
commercial value of historic shipwrecks and its cargoes into their policy. Assumption on
the physical benefit of historic shipwrecks, particularly its cargoes is tempted, even
though further research is required to justify how much direct and indirect benefit
generated from this business until now.
In relation to the involvement of private company in funding and exploring historic
shipwrecks and its cargoes, apparently, there is ambivalent on the respondents from the
MEC. It is realized that, exploring shipwrecks and its cargoes is an expensive project.
The government has a limitation to fund the exploration of historic shipwrecks due to the
country’s economic development priorityiv; this constraint encourages institution to seek
for alternative funding source in order to study and explore more the maritime past. At
the same time the private company offers an opportunity to access the historical time
capsule on the deep ocean, with mutual benefit sharing mechanism. It often places the
government in dilemmatic positions; partnership with the private company or salvors
means allowing them to take away their shares, half of the historic cargoes, separating
the artifacts as whole context, however, without fund support, the access to explore, to
822

�study and to research are also limited. While, looting and illegal salvage continually
threatens the objects.
In fact, both respondents are aware of the intrinsic cultural and historical value of the
entities, however, they value the objects differently, in which resulting different
management. At the end, managing historic shipwrecks and its cargoes requires
political willingness. The national government, include both institutions need a
comprehensive action to unravel dispute and settle down national strategy on managing
the underwater cultural heritage in the form of historic shipwrecks and its cargoes.

Bibliography
Delgado, J. P. 1988. The value of shipwrecks. In J. W. Murphy (Ed.), Historic
shipwrecks: Issues in management (pp. 1 - 10). Washington, DC: Partners for Livable
Places.
Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., Petty, R. E., &amp; Crites Jr., S. L. 2006. Understanding
Knowledge Effects on Attitude–Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance,
Complexity, and Amount of Knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
90(4), 556 - 577.
Hallwood, P., &amp; Miceli, T. J. 2005. Economic Analysis of the Legal Regimes Governing
Salvage of Historic Shipwrecks. Ocean Development &amp; International Law, 36(4), 323 337.
Htun, N. Z., Mizoue, N., &amp; Yoshida, S. 2012) Determinants of Local People's
Perceptions and Attitudes Toward a Protected Area and Its Management: A Case Study
From Popa Mountain Park, Central Myanmar. Society &amp; Natural Resources: An
International Journal, 25(8), 743-758.
Huang, J. 2013. Odyssey's Treasure Ship: Salvor, Owner, or Sovereign Immunity.
Ocean Development &amp; International Law, 44(2), 170 - 184.
Hutchinson, G. 1996. Threats to underwater cultural heritage: The problems of
unprotected archaeological and historic sites, wrecks and objects found at sea. Marine
Policy, 4, 287 - 290.
Kaoru, Y., &amp; Hoagland, P. 1994. The value of historic shipwrecks: Conflicts and
management. Coastal Management, 22(2), 195 - 213.
Kumar, P. S. 2013. Sampling Design Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers
in Agricultural Science, Social Science and Other Related Fields (pp. 427). India:
Springer.
Leshikar-Denton, M. E. 2010. Cooperation is the key: We Can Protect the Underwater
Cultural Heritage. Maritime Archaeology, 5, 85-95.
Management of Coastal Zone and Small Islands, 27 C.F.R. (2007).
823

�Ministerial Decree. Standard Operation Procedures on Survey and Salvage of the
Valuable Objects from the Sunken Ship, 39 2000.
PANNAS, B. 2012. Laporan Perkembangan Pengelolaan BMKT. Annual Report.
PANNAS BMKT.
Presidential Decree. National Committee of Salvage of the Valuable Objects from the
Sunken Ship, 19 2009.
Protection of Cultural Heritage, 10/2010.
Rumsey, D. J. 2003. Statistics for Dummies. Hoboken: NJ. Wiley.
Smith, H. D., &amp; Couper, A. D. 2003. The Management of the Underwater Cultural
Heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 4, 25-33.
Tanudirjo, A. D. 2008. Pendahuluan: Awal Jaringan Pelayaran dan Perdagangan. In B.
B. Utomo (Ed.), Kapal Karam Abad ke 10 di Laut Jawa Utara Cirebon (Vol. 1, pp. 1 25). Jakarta: PANNAS BMKT.

Biography
Zainab is an Underwater Archaeologist working for Ministry of Marine
Affairs and Fisheries. Zainab received her Bachelor in Archaeology at
Hasanuddin University and a Master Degree in Environmental
Science, specializing in Protected Area Management at James Cook
University, Australia.

i

Sources are Act 11/2010 concerning Protection of Cultural Objects and Act 27/2007 concerning Coastal Area Management and
Small Islands.
ii
This presidential Decree was revised in 2000, 2007 and 2009 due to the changes of responsible institution, however the substantial
content has not been altered. Since 2000, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries is the mandated institution to lead the committee.
iii

In order to harmonize the two legislations, the special committee has imposed a decree ordering the exploration and recovery of
historic shipwrecks and its cargoes should be documented and recorded by the contractor. In addition, the unique and rare cargoes
must be returned to the state (Ministerial Decree 39, 2000).
iv

Based on the Indonesia Strategic Framework for Development 2012 – 2016, there are five focus area, renewable energy, disaster
risk management, agriculture, human resource development and eastern Indonesia

824

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="15">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="52">
                  <text>Session 12: Underwater Cultural Heritage of Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="53">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="54">
                  <text>The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions.&#13;
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex.&#13;
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation.&#13;
This session will discuss:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH.&#13;
â€¢ The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="55">
                  <text>Nia Hasanah </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="405">
                <text>Cultural attitude and values towards  underwater cultural heritage and its influences on the management actions in Indonesia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="406">
                <text>Understanding attitudes and values towards underwater cultural heritage (UCH) is critical element in determining appropriate approaches to a wide variety of planning and management actions. Management actions such as gaining support to protecting historic shipwreck and its associated relics, designing and implementing new management methods depend on an understanding of cultural norms and values of their success.&#13;
&#13;
 In Indonesia, historic shipwrecks and its associated relics are managed through two different policies. Cultural protection Act 11/2010 mandates protection on cultural heritage including underwater remains, and Presidential Decree 19/2009, regulated commercial management processes, incorporating UCH as marine resources with potential economic value, which might contribute to community welfare. These two paradoxical procedures have raised long debate between stakeholders, including government agencies.  &#13;
&#13;
Using individual interview, this paper attempts to understand cultural attitudes and values towards shipwreck and its relics in related government agencies in Indonesia, in which resulting the two deferent management approaches. Furthermore, this writing also examines the possible influences of these policies on the current management of UCH in this country.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="407">
                <text>Zainab Tahir, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="408">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="7" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="7">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/92aaf00c10c453cf0aa33756881ed92a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e02504450a683054e2a91663c4fe7d75</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="414">
                    <text>Types of river transportation in the east coast of
Sumatra before the 19th century: an analysis based on the findings of boats in
North Sumatera Province
and Siak districts, Riau Province

Azwar Sutihat
Cultural Heritage Preservation Office of West Sumatera Province, Riau,
and Riau Island
Ministry of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia
Jl. Sultan Alam Bagagarsyah, Batusangkar, West Sumatra, 27281
E-mail: azwar_sutihat@yahoo.com
Abstract
In the east coast of Sumatra, there were kingdoms that relied on river as the main
transportation. In this region, there are big rivers with the same characteristics that
empty into the Strait of Malacca, including Asahan River, Siak River, and Batanghari
River. Not only relying on the river as the main transportation, some kingdoms even
established their center of the kingdom on the river bank. These included the Deli
Kingdom nearby Deli River, Siak Kingdom nearby Siak River, Serdang Kingdom nearby
Serdang River, and the Ancient Malay Kingdom nearby Batanghari River.
In 2013, the Cultural Heritage Preservation Office carried out a study on the findings of
a boat in Siak River. The type of the boat is considered a rarity for the east coast of
Sumatra region. However, it bears a similarity with the boat founded in Deli Serdang
District in 1997, which was analyzed by Medan Archeological Agency. In addition of
bearing a similarity, the study also concluded that the two boats are believed to be the
type of boat that is used before the 19th century. From the findings of both boats, we
can then describe the type of boats as the means of transportation in the east coast of
Sumatra before the 19th century.
Key words: River Transportation, East Coast of Sumatra, before the 19th Century

Introduction
Indonesia with its marine potential, is a country about ¾ of which is covered by sea. As
a country with around 17,508 islands, Indonesia is known as the largest archipelago in
the world with sea areas of 5.8 million square kilometers, and has the second longest
coastline in the world (81 thousand km). With its location and condition, Indonesia has
various natural resources, and unique floras and faunas throughout the country
(Ardiwidjaja, 2011).

1

�Archipelago or inter-islands means an area comprised of islands that are separated by
water, making the area consists of water or sea water. Therefore, it is impossible for the
inhabitants to move from one area to another without being supported by a floating
object. The object called boat is reputedly the oldest means of transportation in the
world. Yet, its history of origin is still not known. Archaeological evidences of the
existence of boats have been widely revealed, including in the form of cave paintings,
referred to and described in the ancient inscriptions, and in sculptures of stone temples
(relief). The depiction of boats in these archaeological evidences also show the
development of boat building technology based on the shape of the boat in the
corresponding era.
The shape and technology of the boats seem to adjust the everyday function and the
cruising challenges; whether the boat was used as a means to facilitate the movement
of people in search of food, trade and habitat movement or migration. According to
experts, in the past there have been movements of people that brought along their
culture. Evidence of these events can be seen through
similar cultural works from one place to another (Siswanto,
2010).

Migration

cannot

be

separated

from

the

advancement in technology achieved by the people itself.
East Sumatra (Ooskust van Sumatra or Sumatra's
Ooskust) is a term that developed in the 19th century to
refer to an area around the eastern coast of Sumatra
island. In this region, some Malay kingdoms successfully
imposed its hegemony over the river that was a major
transportation at that time. Some of these kingdom also
established the center of the kingdom by the bank of small
and big rivers, including: Siak Kingdom with the center of Fig.1: The east coast of
its kingdom in the downstream of Siak River, Langkat Sumatra (red line)
(Source:
Kingdom near the Langkat River, Deli Kingdom nearby Deli www.indonesiataglance.files.
River, Serdang Kingdom nearby Serdang River, Asahan wordpress.com)
Kingdom nearby Asahan River, Bilah Kingdom in Bilah River and Labuan Panai
Kingdom nearby Panai River.
2

�The eastern coast of Sumatra has a long history as the traffic route of trade. Its strategic
location makes this area as the main line of trade since centuries ago. In the mid-18th
century until the late 19th century, the Kingdom of Siak had been a dominant force in
the east coast of Sumatra. The dominance of Siak Sultanate over the areas in the
eastern coast of Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula was quite significant that they were
able to replace the previous Johor influence over the control of trade routes (Marsden,
2008). Long before that, in the 7th until the 11th century AD, the Sriwijaya Kingdom that
controlled the Malacca Straits was known as a maritime kingdom that possessed
mastery in the ship and shipping navigation technology. The Sriwijaya Kingdom relied
the life of its kingdom on trades and maritime activities. Therefore, Sriwijaya had
extensive relationships with other countries, not only in the archipelago, but also with
China, India, and the Middle East (Riyanto, 2011). Besides Sriwijaya, the Old Malay
kingdom (Malayapura) also relied on the river as a major transportation. This kingdom
was originally centered in Jambi inland on the banks of the Batang Hari River and
moved to Dharmasraya and then to the upstream area of Batang Hari River in Tanah
Datar, West Sumatra.
Boats and Sailing in Indonesia
Boat is one of the maritime cultures that since prehistoric times has played important
role in human’s life in the world, including Indonesia. The oldest written record of water
transport in the form of a boat in Indonesian waters mentioned in Kedukan Bukit
inscription of 683 AD stated the existence of a Sriwijaya’s king that was travelling on a
boat (Riyanto, 2010). In addition, information about boat and sailing in Indonesia was
derived from Chinese news that told a story about a priest travelling to India by boat in
672 AD. Other notes are the interpretation of Pierre Paris based on other foreign
sources stating that in the 3rd century BC to the 1st century AD there had been sailing
activity using boats from Sumatra to India.
A research by F.L. Dunn and D.F. Dunn (1977) stated that between 20,000 to 18,000
years ago the sailing technology in Southeast Asia was still very limited. There was no
sailing activity in the open ocean, and sailing activity was possibly still limited in shallow
waters such as swamps and mangrove forests which were influenced by the sea tide.
3

�Then, 9000 years ago boat and raft were started to be known. They were used in
swamps and for limited sailing in the open water. Area exploitation using boats was only
carried out in line with the enhanced knowledge in boating skills. Furthermore, it is
estimated that approximately 5000 years ago there was exploitation of the South China
Sea region through mastery of the ever developed marine navigation and boat
technology. The use of outriggers and simple sail made of woven leaves enhanced the
exploitation area with cruising range far enough from the beach.
Boat is understood as a manifestation of maritime needs (or other waters; rivers and
lakes) as well as the aspiration of the supporting communities. The shapes or
characteristics of local boats will be influenced by factors such as surrounding
environment and local traditions at that time. Boat tradition is embodiment of a system
of ideas about what boat is and how they should design and build the boat. Terminology
of engineering design parameters and how to build a boat is a social practice that
contains symbolic and ideological aspects. In practice, the shape, size and complexity
of a boat will be limited or determined by the desires of the community over its
usefulness, availability of materials and the purpose of a boat to be operated. Therefore,
the shape or characteristics of local boats, structural characteristics, appearance and
usefulness, are predominantly influenced by local values, both physical and non
physical (Budiman, 2010).
Based on the types, sailing can be divided into sailing in open waters and in inland
waters (rivers and lakes). In Sumatra Island, there are large rivers that become the main
road heading to inland areas. The interaction between human and rivers in Sumatra is
estimated to have taken place since thousands of years ago. Even in this modern era,
the relationship can still be seen to this day. Some of the major rivers empty into the
east coast of Sumatra (Malacca Strait). These include the Deli River, Serdang River,
Padang River, Siak River, Batang Hari River, and Musi River. Physical evidences of
sailing in the inland areas of Sumatra include findings of relatively intact ancient boats.
From this finding, we can then describe the types and shapes of boats used as a means
of river transportation in the east coast of Sumatra, especially before the 19th century.

4

�Besar II Terjun Village, Serdang Bedagai Regency, North Sumatra Province
In 2003, a local resident found a boat at the base of Terjun River. The boat was then
lifted by the community and placed in the house of the boat founder. The boat was a
dugout canoe (hollowed) made of an intact, large, and long wood. Dugout/hollowed
canoe are made by removing the center part of the wood. For local communities, this
type of boat is known as sudur itik boat, because the overall shape of the tip of the boat
resembles the beak of a duck. The boat was 910 cm long, 86 cm wide and 28 cm deep.
The boat wall has an average thickness of 3 cm. In each of the inner side of the hull,
there are thirteen sangkar (local term for these components in South Kalimantan), which
is the rectangular protrusion engraved directly on the tree trunk that is used to make the
boat. These sangkars are 20-26 cm long and 8-10 cm wide. Their function is to support
the boards or logs that are laid crosswise on the body of the boat as wall reinforcement
and can be used by passengers or rowers (Koestoro, 2010).

Fig. 2: Sangkar components on boat (Source:
Medan Archaeological Research Office)

Fig. 3: Sudur Itik boat (Source: Medan
Archaeological Research Office)

5

�Padang River, Tebingtinggi, North Sumatra
The boat was founded by local resident at the base of Padang River in 2006. This boat
has the same shape and construction as the boat found in Serdang Bedagai Regency.
The construction is made of solid wood, and perforated in the middle. The boat is 610
cm long, the widest section is 113 cm wide, and 29 m deep. The middle part of the boat
has a slightly rounded shape and elongated at both ends. Both ends are somewhat
tapered.

1 Fig. 4: Itik boat sketch (Source: Medan Archaeological Research Office)
Inside of the boat hull, there are eight sangkars. The sangkars are 22-27 cm long, 12-14
cm wide and 10-15 cm thick (Koestoro, 2010). In the boat wall, both at the base and at
the hull, there are parallel holes with diameter of 1 cm that penetrate the wall of the boat.
The holes are covered with a round wood that has the same size as the thickness of the
body of the boat. Communities in Riau call this hole as kakap hole that serves to
equalize the thickness of the hull of the boat. The kakap hole serves a guide or a basis
for the process of dredging the inside of the boat. After perforation is complete, the
kakap holes eyes are closed or clogged with wood so that water does not get into the
boat.

6

�Muara Bungkal Village, Siak Regency, Riau Province
Boat in Muara Bungkal village was founded by local residents in 2012. The boat was
founded at the base of Minas River (a tributary of the Siak River). Once lifted by the
residents, the boat was then placed in the yard Muara Bungkal village office. This boat
is made of a piece of wood that is hollowed in the middle. Its shape is like a mortar, the
middle part is somewhat rounded and slightly tapered at both ends (mortar-like shaped).
Tapered shape, especially in the bow, was probably selected to make it easier for the
boat to travel in shallow water, in fast-flowing water, with rocky and muddy river bottom.
This is related to the river terrain. Overall, the length of this boat from the tip of the bow
(front) up to the end of the stern (rear) is 8.3 meters. The middle part of the boat (the
widest) has a width of 77 cm with a height from the stern of the ship to the base of 20
cm. In each part of the inside of boat hull there are sixteen penuku (sangkar). Penuku is
a term used by local community. Penuku has similar function with sangkar in a boat
found in North Sumatra, namely to support the boards or logs that are laid crosswise on
the body of the boat as a wall reinforcement and can be used by passengers or boater.
There are different components between penuku/sangkar in Muara Bungkal Village and
penuku/sangkar found in North Sumatra. Penuku in the boat of Muara Bungkal has a
hole in the middle with average size of 6 cm long and 4 cm wide. Penukus on both
sides of the hull are connected by wood. These connecting woods are called gadinggading. Gading-gading has a function as a peg between penuku. In the boat wall, both
at the base and at the hull, there are parallel holes with diameter of 1 cm that penetrate
the wall of the boat. The holes are covered with a round wood that has the same size as
the thickness of the body of the boat. The local community calls this hole as kakap hole
that serves to equalize the thickness of the wall or the hull of the boat.
Types of river boat in the east coast of Sumatra before the 19th century
Water environment is an important element in supporting the life of human being. Rivers,
lakes, and oceans are environment that provide sources of foods and, at a certain time,
become the most effective transportation infrastructure to move further and faster. The
rivers in Sumatra became an important means of transportation from inland to coastal
areas and vice versa. Interaction between humans and rivers in Sumatra has been
going on for thousands of years. Boat as a means of transportation can be
7

�Fig .5: Boat in Muara Bungkal Village (Azwar Fig .6: Boat components (Photo and
Sutihat, August 2013)
Modification by Azwar Sutihat, August 2013)

understood as a form of adaptation of human interaction with the environment.
According to Johnston (1980), based on shape, material and construction, the
development of boats can generally be classified into several types, namely:
a. Raft boat, which is boat that was formed from the composition of a single piece of
wood tied together horizontally. The next stage is marked by the addition of a
layer of wooden beams tied together with the direction of crossed wooden beams
on top of the first layer, so that the raft is composed of several layers of wooden
beams.
b. Dug-out canoe, which is a boat which is formed of a hollowed tree trunk in the
middle so that the shape resembles the mortar.
c. Planked-boat, which is a boat which construction of its body is formed from
arrangement of boards with specific merging technique.

8

�Based on the shape, materials and construction, boats found in North Sumatra and in
Siak Regency, Riau Province fall under dug-out canoe type. The three boats have
similarities in term of construction and components. The similarities are:
a. There are penukus/sangkars to support the boards or logs that are laid crosswise
on the body of the boat as wall reinforcement and can be used by passengers or
boater.
b. There are kakap holes that serve to equalize the thickness of the walls or boat
hulls.
c. There are gading-gading that functions as peg between penukus/sangkars. In
the boat found in North Sumatra, these gading-gading components no longer
exist. While in the boat found in Siak there are still 2 pieces of gading-gading.
d. Both ends of each boat have a tapered shape that resembles the shape of
duck beak. Because of this shape, the Malay community called the boat as
sudur itik boat. In the manufacturing process, the tapered shape was selected
to achieve better boat speed, and to facilitate better navigation in shallow
waters that have many plants. This is clearly related to the river terrain in the
east coast of Sumatra that is dominated by mangrove swamps.
Koestoro (2010) indicated that the trees used in the manufacture of boats found in North
Sumatra are possibly Artocarpus champeden, Intsia palembanica that is resistant to
moisture or Hopea sangal that falls under Dipterocarpaceae family. While the materials
used in the manufacture of wooden boats found in Muara Bungkal village, Siak
Regency is believed by local people as Giam wood (Cotylelobium spp, Vatica spp) that
fall under Dipterocarpaceae family.
A description of boat building technique on the east coast of Sumatra can at least be
obtained from traditional boat building techniques in Kuantan Singingi community of
Riau province that is still ongoing. Traditional boat building, that is called jalur by the
Kuantan Singingi community, has been going on for hundreds of years. The cultural
connection, and close geographical location makes it possible to do a reconstruction of
building techniques of boats found in North Sumatra and Siak Regency based on the
9

�traditional boat building techniques in Kuantan Singingi Regency, Riau Province.
According Koestoro (2010), the existence of sudur itik boat in the Besar II Terjun village
is part of the historical formation of large plantation estates in the east coast of Sumatra
in the late 19th century. Besar II Terjun village is one of residential areas located in the
middle of plantation of what used to be the area of the Sultanate of Serdang. The boat
finding in Padang River cannot be separated either from its historical context. This area
was once one of residential areas in the middle of plantation which was once a territory
of the Sultan of Deli.
The existence of a boat in Muara Bungkal village, Siak Regency has a historical
relationship with the Kingdom of Siak as a maritime kingdom. The eastern coast of
Sumatra has a long history as the traffic route of trade. Its strategic location makes this
area as the main line of trade since centuries ago. Marsden (2008) mentioned that at
that time Siak was a supplier of wood material to Batavia (Jakarta) to build ships in large
numbers. Even the woods for construction of naval warships in Penang Island were also
sourced from Siak. Furthermore, it is said that Siak was a powerful maritime kingdom.
The naval force of Siak often attacked Johor, Malacca, and various places in the east
and west coast of the peninsula. In term of trade, it was mostly carried out by Keling
ships. They traded clothing materials, raw silk, and other goods that they provided in
Penang or Malacca. In return, they received gold, wax, sago, salted fish, fish eggs, ivory,
gambier, camphor, and various types of rattan. The role of Siak River as part of the core
region of the kingdom had a major effect on the economic growth of Siak Sri Indrapura.
In the 18th century, in 1767 to be precise, Siak Sultanate led by King Ismail had
become a dominant force in the east coast. The advancement of Siak economy is
evident from Dutch notes that stated that in 1783, there were about 171 merchant ships
from Siak heading to Malacca. Siak became a trade triangle between the Dutch in
Malacca and the British in Penang Island (www.wikipedia.org).
Conclusion
Rivers in Sumatra Island become an important means of transportation from inland to
coastal areas and vice versa. Interaction between humans and rivers in Sumatra has
been going on for thousands of years. Some kingdom in Sumatra even made the river
10

�as the main force in maintaining their existence. Boat as a means of transportation can
be understood as a form of adaptation of human interaction with the environment.
Findings of boats in three locations in the east coast of Sumatra show that before the
19th century, there were river cruising boats in this area. The first feature can be seen
from the shape and construction that fall under the type of dug-out canoe. The two ends
of each boat have a tapered shape that resembles the shape of duck beak. The Malay
communities call such boat as sudur itik boat. The second feature is the boat
components such as penuku/sangkar, kakap hole, and gading-gading. In some
locations in the Indonesian archipelago, we can still find dug-out canoe made of one
piece of wood. However, nowadays, we can no longer find dug-out canoes that have
similar components as sudur itik boat. In the future, we need to have a more in-depth
study of sudur itik, particularly regarding the manufacturing technology, the identification
of the types of wood, radiocarbon analysis (to determine the absolute age of the boat)
and the conservation techniques (waterlogged wood conservation).
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Cultural Heritage Preservation Office of West Sumatera, Riau, and Riau
Island - Ministry of Education and Culture, Medan Archaeological Research Office, Siak
Regency Government, especially the Office for Education and Culture of Siak Regency,
Sungai Mandau Government Sub-District, Muara Bungkal Government Village,
Research and Development Centre for Marine and Coastal Resources, Ministry of
Marine Affairs and Fisheries, and to all people who always support us in conducting
study and preservation on marine archaeological resources.
Bibliography
Ardiwidjaya, Roby., 2011. “Temuan Perahu Kuna di Rembang”. Varuna. Jurnal
Arkeologi Bawah Air. Vol.5/2011. Direktorat Peninggalan Bawah Air. Jakarta. p. 1-5.
Budiman, Arief., 2010, “ Bentuk Perahu Awal Manusia Pulau Borneo sebelum
Persebaran Penutur Austronesia: Sebuah Hipotesis”. Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi.
No.6/tahun 2010.Yogyakarta: Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta. p. 120-153.

11

�Dunn, F.L, and Dunn, D.F., 1984, Maritime Adaption and Exploitation of Marine
Resources in Sundaic Southeast Asia, Prehistory a Reader, ed. De Velde, P.V.,H.248,
Foris Publication, Holland.
Jhonstone, P.,1980, The sea-craft of prehistory, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.,
London.
Koestoro, Lucas Pratanda., 2010, “Bangkai Perahu di Pesisir Timur Sumatera Utara
dan Pembudayaan Perahu”. Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi. No.6/tahun 2010.Yogyakarta:
Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta. p. 84-109.
Marsden, William., 2008, Sejarah Sumatera. Komunitas Bambu. Jakarta.
Riyanto, Sugeng., 2010, “Perahu Kuna Punjulharjo dan Arkeologi Maritim Nusantara” .
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi. No.6/tahun 2010.Yogyakarta: Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta. p.
2-13.
Siswanto., 2010, “Temuan Perahu Kuna di Rembang”. Varuna. Jurnal Arkeologi Bawah
Air. Vol.4/2010. Direktorat Peninggalan Bawah Air. Jakarta. p. 1-5.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kesultanan_Siak_Sri_Inderapura
www.indonesiaatglance.files.wordpress.com

Biography
Azwar Sutihat was born in Yogyakarta on February 11, 1983.
In 2008, he completed his study in the Department of
Archaeology, Gadjah Mada University. From 2009 to the present,
Azwar works at the Cultural Heritage Preservation Office of West
Sumatra, Riau, and Riau Island, Ministry of Education and
Culture, Republic of Indonesia. Over the last 5 years, he has
various experiences working in the field of preservation of
cultural heritage and has participated in several international
level activities such as Workshop on “Document Preparation of
World Heritage Nomination” (2013), Workshop on “Managing
Indoor Climate Risks” (2013), ”Sub-Regional Training Workshop
on "Disaster Risk Preparedness and Management” (2013), and World Culture Forum
(2013).

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="15">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="52">
                  <text>Session 12: Underwater Cultural Heritage of Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="53">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="54">
                  <text>The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions.&#13;
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex.&#13;
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation.&#13;
This session will discuss:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH.&#13;
â€¢ The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="55">
                  <text>Nia Hasanah </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="410">
                <text>Types of river transportation in the east coast of  Sumatra before the 19th century: an analysis based on the findings of boats in North Sumatera Province  and Siak districts, Riau Province</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="411">
                <text>In the east coast of Sumatra, there were kingdoms that relied on river as the main transportation. In this region, there are big rivers with the same characteristics that empty into the Strait of Malacca, including Asahan River, Siak River, and Batanghari River. Not only relying on the river as the main transportation, some kingdoms even established their center of the kingdom on the river bank. These included the Deli Kingdom nearby Deli River, Siak Kingdom nearby Siak River, Serdang Kingdom nearby Serdang River, and the Ancient Malay Kingdom nearby Batanghari River.  In 2013, the Cultural Heritage Preservation Office carried out a study on the findings of a boat in Siak River. The type of the boat is considered a rarity for the east coast of Sumatra region. However, it bears a similarity with the boat founded in Deli Serdang District in 1997, which was analyzed by Medan Archeological Agency. In addition of bearing a similarity, the study also concluded that the two boats are believed to be the type of boat that is used before the 19th century. From the findings of both boats, we can then describe the type of boats as the means of transportation in the east coast of Sumatra before the 19th century.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="412">
                <text>Azwar Sutihat , in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="413">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="8">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/875858654025fec90d9a9ab6e63862ab.pdf</src>
        <authentication>58a5982c7977d3775fdaf32e9a11a520</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="419">
                    <text>The continuation of traditional boatbuilding in Cam Pha, Sam Son and Cua Lo,
Vietnam
Ken Preston
Independent Researcher
Seattle, US
Email: kenpreston46@gmail.com

Abstract
This paper will describe recent and current construction activity on three separate
building sites, one each in Cam Pha (near Halong City), Sam Son (near Thanh Hoa),
and Cua Lo (near Vinh). The three sites produce boats generally in the Northern
Vietnamese/Chinese tradition, but with significant differences in both design and
construction details and techniques. The designs that will be discussed are all traditional
style motor vessels, that is, vessels whose design and style were developed prior to the
availability of powerful diesel engines but are now motorized. They include:
 The Halong Bay “Square Head” boat, a mid-sized utility and fishing vessel that is
the dominant wooden boat in Halong Bay in the size range from 18' to about 35'.
 The Sam Son large traditional fishing vessel, A 60' class seagoing shallow draft
vessel derived directly from a 3-masted lug rigged sailing vessel with a long
history in the Northern Coastal waters.
 The Cua Lo mid-sized utility fishing boat (works in a number of fisheries), which
is the only significant design in use from the small fishing port on the south bank
of the river at Cua Lo.
Key words: Traditional Boatbuilding Techniques, Cam Pha, Sam Son, Cua Lo,
Northern Vietnam

Background
Between 2005 and 2013, I have made a total of 8 trips to Vietnam, totaling about one
year accumulated time in country, or in nearby Laos and Cambodia. My purpose has
been to document the continued building and use of wooden fishing and freight vessels
along the coast and up the Mekong. I have made repeated visits to certain specific boat
building sites and boatyards. Among these are three in particular in northern Vietnam.
Many of their techniques are very similar and the boats they build have much in
common. The three sites, Cam Pha (23 km north of Halong City), Sam Son (near Thanh
Hoa) and Cua Lo (near Vinh), are all within a distance of 300 km along the northern
coast. Though they have other commercial interests, all three are vigorous fishing towns.
1

�Although epochal changes in technology can lead to radical changes in boat building
and design (availability of steel saws leading to readily available planking for example,
or the introduction of inexpensive diesel engines leading to broad transom sterns) my
expectation is that a thorough knowledge of the surviving traditional construction
techniques and vessel designs will provide significant insight into the origin and perhaps
age of shipwrecks and on-shore remnants of older vessels.

The common boat building techniques and the similarities of design characteristics of
the boats built in the three towns described can be summarized as follows:


The planking is edge nailed from plank to plank



The primary fastenings are black iron, hand forged square spikes and
commercial bolts and nuts.



The boats are built right way up on a single central plank, with one or both ends
bent up to serve as stem and stern post.



If a separate stem timber is used, it is bolted directly to the central bottom plank,
effectively replacing the bent up bottom plank's function.



The wood is bent when necessary by heating it over a slow fire and bending the
plank with weights or levers or both.



Although all three boat designs are more or less descended from sailing
ancestors, they are all pure motor boats today.



They are usually built to ground readily, with hoisting rudders and flat (but
rockered) bottoms that keep their props mostly off the bottom.



The boats have long overhanging bows, and their lines are long and easy, with
very few sharp bends in the planking.



Two of the three are, in effect “5-plank” boats with two chines each side. That is,
they have the flat bottom “plank”, sloping bilge “planks” and near vertical side
“planks”, though each “plank” will be made of a number of individual pieces.

Cam Pha
When I first became aware of the building site on the derelict beach below the town of
Cam Pha in 2005, one old man with a crew of up to eight men and women was building
2

�two different sizes of the typical “Halong Bay Squarehead” utility vessel. These boats
are traditional both in their overall style and in the manner of their construction. Their
defining characteristic is their odd (but very useful) square foredeck. They are
commonly built in lengths from 20' to about 40', the smallest having no cabin other than
a small box or a deck over the engine and perhaps an arched canvas cover over the
hold. The larger sizes have substantial houses built at deck level over their engine
areas.

1 Fig. 1 Cam Pha Construction Sequence, 2005 – 2012. (Ken Preston)
The building process of the traditional “squarehead” boat (Figs. 1 and 2)


The central plank is tapered at the forward end then bent sharply upward at each
end by heating over a slow fire while forcing one end of the plank down with
weights. More recently, a separate stem timber is bolted to the forward end of
the central plank and the aft end is bent up as before.



The central plank is set up, with props at bow and stern to support the ends and
bolted down to deadmen set in the sand.



Planks are added to the boat in pairs, port and starboard, by edge nailing with
3

�hand forged square boat spikes about 5” long x 1/4” thick. The plank is first
offered up and the inner edge marked to follow the previous plank. The builders
use large wooden clamps, chains and prybars to hold the plank in position while
it is marked and fastened.


The upper edge of the new plank is marked to utilize the available wood while
achieving the hull curvature the builder has in mind and the plank is sawn to
shape.



It is offered up a second time to check the sawn shape, and at that time the two
adjacent plank edges are marked for spike locations at about one foot on center.
The “new” plank will be chisel cut to produce a V-shaped tapered opening into
the interior of the plank at each nail location, then the plank will be braced on
edge and a nail “guide hole” drilled from the center of the plank into the chiseled
entry.



The plank already on the vessel will also be drilled, from the marked nail location
straight into the center of the plank.



With both the old and new planks drilled for spiking, the new plank is offered up
one more time and pried into position with clamps and pry bars while it is nailed
off.



If all goes well the spikes will be driven home using a punch to drive them into
the chisel cut slots into the face of the plank. If there is trouble with the fit up, the
spikes can be withdrawn with the same punch, catching under the hooked head
of the spike, the correction made and the plank finally fastened off.



These boats are not 5-plank boats; they are a simple round bottomed shape. At
the turn of the bilge nothing is done differently, except that the new plank is pried
up to match the builder's idea of the correct angle. Usually, with one plank above
the bottom in place, a floor timber will be added amidships, chopped to the angle
with a balance-hatchet and spiked in place. A similar timber will be placed to
form the lowest member of the future transom stern.

4

�Fig. 2 Cam Pha Construction Sequence, 2005 – 2012. (Ken Preston)


Thereafter, the sides are raised with at most a few additional floor timbers and a
futtock or two to help hold the growing hull together. The wood used at Cam Pha
is generally dreadful, full of knots and checks, and sawn relatively thin. The fit up
of the plank seams is quite casual.The builders rely heavily on good caulkers to
make their boats water tight.



At the top of the lower portion of the hull, a doubly thick but narrow plank or “wale”
is placed full length each side. By this time the stem and transom are both well
established and effectively locked into place by the planking and the wale.



A cross-timber is added at the top of the stem, extending out to the sides to mark
the extent of the foredeck and provide a landing for the forward end of the sheer
plank (which is twisted sharply through nearly 90 degrees to land flat on the
cross timber) and the filler pieces that bridge the wide gap in the planking under
the foredeck.



Aft, the wale continues on past the lower transom and defines the lower edge of
the upper transom. This was originally a common feature on Chinese sailing
vessels, on which the upper, outer transom provided some protection to the
5

�rudder (hanging on the lower transom) in following seas. Nowadays the rudder is
often a typical steel plate motorboat's rudder, positioned deeper under the hull in
the prop-wash.


Since the sheer plank tumbles home a bit aft and rolls out nearly 90 degrees
forward to form the squarehead, it is always fitted in at least two pieces, scarfed
about amidships.



With the planking finished (or nearly so) the balance of the framing is fitted into
the hull, using all sorts of rough pieces of timber, sawn to gentle curves, beveled
to fit with the balance hatchet and spiked into place with boat spikes. Here and
there the hull, as originally planked, won't suit the builder's eye and he'll bore a
hole through plank and frame for a bolt, which will be used as a clamp to force
the planking into place against the frame.



Very different from Western practice, the floors and frames do not usually overlap
much if at all, and may not even touch each other.



With the planking complete, in the older model, a false stem was fitted over the
hood ends of the planks at the bow and shaped to a somewhat sharp entry. In
the past two years the use of a completely separate stem has become the norm
and that stem, bolted to the central bottom plank, is rabbeted in normal fashion
as planks are brought to it.



At some point after the planking is complete to the sheer, the curvature of the
plank ends, where they transition from the lower to the upper transom, will be
marked by eye with white chalk and cut out with a mallet and chisel.



With the frames in place and trimmed to height, bulkheads are installed full depth
(spiked to the frames and edge nailed plank to plank) at least one at the forward
end of the engine area and another at the forward end of the fish hold. Often
even fairly small boats are divided into five compartments (lazarette, engine room,
fish hold, forward hold, and a space under the fore deck). Often the fish hold will
be drilled through the planking to provide a free-flooding wet well for the catch.
No doubt the hulls derive a great deal of their strength from the bulkheads, since
the frames are not continuous anywhere.



Deck framing and hatch coamings are installed along with uprights extending
6

�from the floor timbers to the eventual height of the cabin top.


Decks are laid and cabin joinery completed.



With the hull construction complete, she's released from her anchorage to the
earth and propped up first on one side, then the other for caulking. Since the
planks were fitted roughly and tight edge to edge and no caulking seam was cut,
it is done by the caulkers as they go along, opening up not only the seams
between planks but also the checks and splits in the planking. Quantities of
waste fiber are driven into the seams and splits, trimmed with a chisel, and
troweled over with a gray mastic for sealant.



At that point the vessel is ready for power and outfitting for her work and is
routinely put overboard on a high tide and towed away to have her engine fitted
elsewhere.

Fig. 3 Cua Lo Construction Sequence, 2005 – 2012. (Ken Preston)
Sam Son (Figs. 3 and 4)
Although the boatyard in the river mouth north of town does significant new construction
of various sorts, for this paper we will only consider the construction of large traditional
vessels on the beach in front of town. They are built on a single very long bottom plank
7

�bent up at each end to form the stem and what amounts to the central plank of a narrow
transom stern. They are fastened with hand forged square boat spikes and commercial
steel carriage bolts. Since I have not seen the entire building sequence, some points
can only be surmised, but in general:


The bottom (which comprises the “bottom plank” and the two “bilge planks”) is
built complete in one piece lying on coconut palm trunks that are set to support
the line of the bottom rocker, on sand bags a foot or so above the beach. The
bottom planking is bolted through the floor timbers (which do not extend past its
edge) but a number of edge nails are also used.



The entire side “slabs” are edge nailed together and cut to final profile flat on the
beach. When I arrived to see one of these boats at this stage, the port side was
complete and lying flat on the sand alongside the completed bottom, with its
stern quarter region already bent into a sharp curve upward. The starboard side
was not yet complete forward, additional planks were being offered up where the
slab lay in the sand, but the stern quarter area was already in the midst of being
bent up over a slow fire. This is the only example I have seen of bending the
slab upward by levers rather than downward with weight, a concession to the
size of the completed sides, which are massive, with planking nearly 2” thick and
require a number of planks edge nailed and scarfed lengthwise.



Unlike at Cam Pha, these heavy planks are not repeatedly offered up and
marked, cut, offered again, marked again, drilled, offered again and finally nailed.
Rather they are offered only once on the sand, cut to shape with a circular saw,
and edge nailed directly where they lie. The chisel cuts to provide an entry for
the spike are the same as at Cam Pha but the hole is drilled from the chiseled
opening into the two planks. Since the drill cannot bend to run cleanly into the
center of the old plank as it effectively does at Cam Pha the drilled hole
necessarily is aimed toward the far side of the plank. A small bend is placed in
each spike before driving and most of them stay within the planking. Only now
and then does one break out to the surface of the side.

8

�Fig. 4 Cua Lo Construction Sequence, 2005 – 2012. (Ken Preston)


With the sides nearly complete but lying flat on the sand on either side of the hull,
a single temporary mold is erected and braced off amidships.



In the course of a long day, the sides are raised into position on the bottom,
wrapped around the temporary mold and fastened off to the bottom and the
raised stem and transom sections of the central plank. The process requires
about 20 men to pick up the sides one at a time and temporarily hold them
generally in place with rope, chain and chain falls. But the rest of the day's effort
only involves eight to ten men, slowly urging the side slabs into contact first with
the transom portion of the center plank, then bit by bit with prybars, chain falls,
large wedges and brute strength, bringing the chine together full length. The
chine fasteners are carriage bolts roughly 1/2” x 10”, driven into drilled holes
through the side and into the edge grain of the bottom on approximately one foot
centers.



Thereafter the futtocks (side frames) are cut and fitted, one pair per floor timber,
but not necessarily in contact with the floor and not normally bolted to it. In some
9

�examples I've seen the futtocks are deliberately spaced between the floors. The
futtocks are shaped like hockey sticks, sawn to shape, so that the short end of
the hockey stick projects out onto the hull bottom and becomes a primary
connection and strength member at the chine. They extend well above the
original side slabs to support additional structure.


Above the sides that were erected in one piece, a thicker plank or wale is
wrapped around the frames. Bulwarks are raised a further foot to 18” and given a
rail cap, which is often armored with a smoothly welded stainless steel cover to
help prevent hangups of the fine web used in their nets.



Aft, three or four beams are let into the top plank of the original sides and are
used to extend the deck substantially to each side, with the bulwarks boxing in a
comfortable aft work deck. This gives the boat a peculiar appearance aft, with a
large boxy aft deck area above the shapely quarters.



The rudder lowers through a trunk extending from the aft deck through the
bottom, and the whole aft compartment is left free flooding and not even caulked.
A tight bulkhead between the rudder compartment and the rest of the vessel may
be the only tight bulkhead. Other bulkheads may be added, but in many cases
the hull is effectively open from end to end.



A centerline hatch runs full length of the fore deck, covered with loose hatch
covers that apparently are never dogged down.



The “pilot house”, if any, is low, providing only sitting headroom, and may be nonexistent, the engine house covering the engine but not offering crew quarters.



As recently as the 1990's these boats were rigged with three masts and three lug
sails and provided with a Chinese style daggerboard working vertically in a trunk,
but none of them carry a rig today and there is no sign of the daggerboard.

Cua Lo (Figs. 5 and 6)
The small fishing boat harbor in the creek at Cua Lo is remarkable in that all the
resident boats are the same model, ranging in size from about 25' to about 50'
overall length. Before my visit in late 2012 I had not seen any of these boats under
construction, only hauled for maintenance. In late 2012 there were two new boats
10

�about 35 feet long standing partially framed and planked in the yard on the south
bank nearest the mouth of the creek.

Fig. 5 Sam Son Construction Sequence, 2005 – 2012. (Ken Preston)
At that time one was clearly a week or two further along than the other, which
immediately gave some indication of the sequence of building. I was able to examine
them in detail at that time and again about one month later. More recently, in late 2013
the same small yard had three boats under construction spaced a couple of weeks
apart, from a bare bottom going together to a nearly planked up vessel. Between these
three visits we have essentially complete documentation of the building sequence.


The boats are built on a central plank which is bent up aft to form the run, leading
to what will be a

broad, but narrow (top to bottom) planked transom in the

finished boat.


A separate stem timber is bolted to the bottom plank and rabbeted for the
planking. The first three or four floor timbers swallow the stem.



The floor timbers are cut to the profile of the bottom and the planks are bolted to
them, rather than being edge nailed without benefit of frames. Fastenings in
11

�general are bolts, not spikes. The boats give the impression of being round
bilged from outside, but they are actually multi-chined, with hard chines as well
as an arced bottom. The planking is very thick and probably planed to relieve the
sharp corners outboard. The planks are definitely planed to remove scars from
flame bending.


Sawn elbows are bolted to the floors, and the futtocks in turn are bolted to the
elbows, forming a typical western-style complete frame. However, only a few
frames are completed before the planking is advanced further. The hard chines
are formed by sawing the angles into the floors and futtocks, not by making each
futtock straight and splicing the frame with gussets.



Rather than advancing the planking piece by piece, when the turn of the bilge is
reached a separate plank is placed above the next chine angle to stabilize the
frames and apparently also to provide a guide for building subsequent frames.
Great care is taken with fitting each plank and the plank seams are routinely
nearly perfect.



The boats have a great deal of rocker and the stern is built broad and flat, which
forms a very easy long run. Individual planks at the stern are allowed to run wild
for most of the construction.



The slot and framing for the rudder trunk are placed early in the bottom
construction.

Since the harbor partially dries at low tide all the boats have

hoisting wooden “barn door” rudders.


Perhaps unique to this design, two futtocks on each side up forward are made of
massive timbers, and project well above deck and bulwarks. They will support a
cross timber which will support the long booms which the local fleet uses to push
a net ahead of the boat.



To provide more working deck aft, the next to last topside plank is rolled out from
plumb to nearly horizontal and extends the beam a few inches each side, thus
producing a small reverse knuckle in the topsides aft. Alternatively, two or three
cross beams may be let into the sides and the aft deck planked over them to
provide yet a wider work area aft.



The final topsides plank lands on top of the timber that all the previous bottom
12

�and side planks had been bolted to and becomes the bulwarks of the cockpit and
the working deck forward, but also the lower sides of the engine house or cabin
midships.

Fig. 6 Sam Son Construction Sequence, 2005 – 2012. (Ken Preston)
Summary
The primary techniques of the northern Vietnamese boat builders, flame bending, edge
nailing, building the bottom on a single central plank and raising the sides on the bottom
(whether in one piece, or plank by plank) are consistent along the northern coast of
Vietnam but those techniques allow for construction of a wide range of boat types.
Thus, even if the style of boat changes (e.g. from sail to power) the building techniques
will still provide a “signature” which may be useful in identifying their origin.
Biography
Ken Preston was born in 1946, took a degree in Geology, and served in the US Army
in Vietnam. He went commercial fishing off the US West Coast until he went broke, then
pursued a career in marine construction (harbor works, bridges, docks, dredging,
breakwaters and so forth). Ken held a license as a tug boat operator for a period of
years, but only worked on boats locally on construction projects. Since 2005 he has
spent six weeks to two months each year traveling in Indochina, documenting the
remaining traditional (primarily wooden) fishing and freight boats of the region.

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="15">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="52">
                  <text>Session 12: Underwater Cultural Heritage of Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="53">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="54">
                  <text>The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions.&#13;
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex.&#13;
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation.&#13;
This session will discuss:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH.&#13;
â€¢ The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="55">
                  <text>Nia Hasanah </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="415">
                <text>The continuation of traditional boatbuilding in Cam Pha, Sam Son and Cua Lo, Vietnam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="416">
                <text>This paper will describe recent and current construction activity on three separate building sites, one each in Cam Pha (near Halong City), Sam Son (near Thanh Hoa), and Cua Lo (near Vinh). The three sites produce boats generally in the Northern Vietnamese/Chinese tradition, but with significant differences in both design and construction details and techniques. The designs that will be discussed are all traditional style motor vessels, that is, vessels whose design and style were developed prior to the availability of powerful diesel engines but are now motorized. They include: &#13;
&#13;
*The Halong Bay â€œSquare Headâ€ boat, a mid-sized utility and fishing vessel that is the dominant wooden boat in Halong Bay in the size range from 18' to about 35'.&#13;
&#13;
*The Sam Son large traditional fishing vessel, A 60' class seagoing shallow draft vessel derived directly from a 3-masted lug rigged sailing vessel with a long history in the Northern Coastal waters.&#13;
&#13;
*The Cua Lo mid-sized utility fishing boat (works in a number of fisheries), which is the only significant design in use from the small fishing port on the south bank of the river at Cua Lo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="417">
                <text>Ken Preston, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="418">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="9" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/7512c47f527a62b96d97b981d0d0f61b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a915684fbd11f437885dc4f3e0947a99</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="426">
                    <text>USAT Liberty Shipwreck Site in Tulamben, Karang Asem Regency,
Bali is Under Threats

Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan, Semeidi Husrin, and Gunardi Kusumah
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerabilities
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia
Jl. Raya Padang – Painan Km. 16, Bungus, Padang, West Sumatera, 25245
Email: niahasanah79@gmail.com

Abstract
USAT Liberty shipwreck site located in Tulamben Village, Karang Asem Regency, Bali
Province is the most popular shipwreck diving attraction in Indonesia. The shipwreck is
well-known throughout the world and brings in many domestic and foreign tourists since
the 1980s. This underwater cultural heritage has a historical-archaeological value; it is a
US cargo ship that sank during World War II and now the shipwreck functions as an
artificial reef and is home to various marine life. This makes the wreck a very important
coastal resource of this region and has a significant impact in the local people’s life. The
condition of the site is currently considered to be vulnerable due to a variety of damage
caused by natural and human factors. Threats due to high water dynamics such as
currents and waves that could cause erosion, scouring, sliding, and other changes in
the physical environment make this shipwreck site highly vulnerable to a variety of
mechanical and physical damage as well as chemical weathering and corrosion. The
large number of tourist who dive on this site also threatens the site. The marine
archaeological research of 2013 conducted by Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
is aimed at study the deterioration of the wreck, to collect hydrodynamics,
sedimentation, and water quality data for providing an overview of recent conditions of
this underwater site, the ocean dynamics of Tulamben waters, along with the damages
suffered by USAT Liberty wreck which threatens its sustainability as an underwater
cultural heritage and diving attraction. Identify the different types of potential
vulnerabilities would become the basis of policy making for its preservation efforts in the
future.
Keywords: USAT Liberty shipwreck site, Natural and Human Threats, Vulnerability,
Dive attraction, Bali
Introduction
There are a lot of publications on USAT Liberty shipwreck site located in Tulamben
Village, Kubu District, Karang Asem Regency, Bali Province that highlights the
importance of the site; it is the best known shipwreck diving destinations throughout
Indonesia and one of the best in the world. We could find hundreds of thousands posts

1

�mentioning the site on the internet (Fig. 1). The research found also many publications
discussing the locals attempt to protect
the

site

traditional

by

imposing

laws,

their

Awig-awig,

local
which

includes fishing prohibitions nearby
shipwreck location and prohibitions of
destroying the ship's structure and
coral reefs. The rules seemed indeed
to be obeyed and nobody dares to
intentionally violate this laws. Such
matters have been discussed very
Fig. 1 USAT Liberty in 1918 and 1941 and Its Wreck
Site Location. (US Army Signal Corps Photo SC 131484, comprehensive
in
the
writings
US National Archives &amp; Research Institute for Coastal
Kamaludin (2002), Supriyatun (2007),
Resources and Vulnerability)
Noerwidi (2007), and Ridwan (2011) and it has also been confirmed by the elders of
Tulamben Village through

interviews with Mr. Nyoman Karyasa (Kelian Adat

Tulamben)i and Mr. Degeng (Kelian Banjar Dinas Tulamben)ii. However, until now there
are no attempts from governments to discuss the vulnerability of USAT Liberty to
withstand the effects of the natural environment and human factors. These risks are not
covered by studies conducted by relevant institutions and authorities on the site. Thus
far, undertaken studies are only focused on the stage of mapping and documenting, as
the work carried out by Bali Office for Preservation of Cultural Heritage in 2011 (Tenaya,
2011). Therefore, this paper will discuss the vulnerability of USAT Liberty based on the
identification of numerous factors threatening the shipwreck and its ecosystem, both
environmental and human. This paper will also discuss what measures need to be
considered to prevent further damage that could lead to the destruction and loss of the
USAT Liberty. This extremely important issue requires to be addressed because the
existence of USAT Liberty and its diving industry are the only basis of the villagers' life.
USAT Liberty History
According to Radigan (1996), USAT Liberty is American freighter ex AK-35, and ex
Liberty (ID 3461), built in 1918 by Federal Shipbuilding Co., Hackensack, NJ with

2

�125.43 x 17 x 8.08 m in dimension, 4,809 tonnage, and equipped with one piece
2500ihp power steam engine. She was launched on 19 June 1918, and the local
newspapers at that time mentioned that she was the largest steel freighter ever made.
In October 1918, this ship was used by US Navy and was named the USS Liberty (ID
3461). In 1939, it was used by US Army who renamed her as Liberty US Army
Transport (USAT Liberty). In May 1941, US Army and US Navy approved the decision
that US Navy would return to take over the ship, but then US Navy did not get the
personnel to be placed on her so that the ship eventually remains Army’s property. In
her journey from Australia to the Philippines carrying railroads, rubber, and logistics for
the Allied Forcesiii, USAT Liberty torpedoed by Japanese Submarine I-166 in January
1942 off Lombok Straits. US Destroyer, Paul Jones, and Dutch Destroyer, Van Ghent,
attempted to drag her to Singaraja Port but she was already damaged and could not go
very far and stranded at last on Tulamben shores (http://pacificwrecks.com; wikipedia).
The ship then sank deeper and deeper into the depths and currently resides in a sandy
slope at 3 - 30 m depth about 40 m from shoreline.
USAT Liberty Shipwreck Dive Attraction
Shipwrecks in Indonesian waters are one of the main potential marine resources that
could be utilized for marine tourism (Ardiwidjaja, 2007). Under Indonesian regional
autonomy law, shipwreck sites could become region’s assets as marine tourism
destination, as well as for the establishment of maritime museums. USAT Liberty is the
most famous shipwreck dive site in Bali and has been included in the top 12 world
shipwreck sites to be dived as noted by scuba diving website. Tourists regard this site
as "a giant aquarium" due to the present of ± 400 marine life species which live around
the site. There are also ± 100 species of high seas fish which visit the site regularly.
Divers can find groups of bumphead parrotfish, barracuda, grouper, pigmy seahorse,
nudibranchs, morray eel, jackfish, napoleon, fusiliers, surgeon fish, trevally, bream,
anthias mill, batfish, large sweet lips fish, angelfish, butterfly fish, anemone fish, lionfish,
scorpionfish, hawkfish, pufferfish, coral trout, the gobies, blennies, shrimps, dottyback,
and others. Hard corals and soft corals i.e, giant barrel sponges, giant sea fans,
tubastrea, gorgonians can also be found easily at this location. Scuba-mania claimed
Tulamben as one of the most beautiful dive sites in Indonesia besides Komodo Island,
3

�Bunaken, Wakatobi, Raja Ampat, Lembeh Strait, Karimun Jawa, Bangka, Banda Sea,
and Alor (Pickel, 2010; http://gekodivebali.com; http://scuba-mania.com/). In addition, it
is the easiest location to enjoy recreational diving and to enjoy underwater scenery
around the shipwreck. All skill
levels divers could dive due
to its unique positions in the
seabed that ranging from
shallow water until 30 m.
USAT Liberty has brought
immense
Tulamben

benefits
people's

to
lives

since 1980s and is closely
related

to

people's

livelihoods. It is important not
Fig. 2 Characteristics of Tides and Currents in Tulamben Waters.
(Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability)

only

for

villagers

the
but

Tulamben
also

communities in Bali Province because all diving operators in Bali offer diving trips to
USAT Liberty to the tourists. Nowadays, there are about 150-200/day tourists diving on
the site and communities’ income obtained from fees and services is about 500-1,000
USD/day. Meanwhile, the Tourism and Cultural Agency of Karang Asem noted that its
regional revenue from tourism sector in 2012 was 1,200,000 USD and there were
416.363 foreigners came to the region to dive. This number is increasing continuously
every year (http://karangasemkab.bps.go.id; Ridwan, 2011).
Marine Archaeological Research
In 2013, Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability conducted research
at USAT Liberty shipwreck site in order to determine its significance and current
condition as well as to carry out a visual observation of the deterioration and the extent
of the damage. The research also aims to find out the physical environmental conditions
and its changes as well as to identify the various factors threatening the site. This
research result could become a basic reference for further conservation effort and a
basis for the establishment of Maritime Conservation Area in accordance with the
4

�Marine and Fisheries Ministerial Decree No. 17/2008 and the Underwater Cultural
Heritage Site (UCH) determination in accordance with Law No. 11/2010 on Cultural
Heritage. The field survey was conducted in June-July, August, and September 2013.
Interviews with local communities, agencies, and relevant stakeholders to obtain data
and information on the weather and climate conditions; shipwreck's history, and tourism
industry development, had also been conducted. The team performed marine geology,
ocean hydrodynamic, and water quality measurements to obtain sedimentation, water
quality, and hydro-oceanographic data such as tidal, currents, and wave. Installing
Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) equipment at 22 m depth with bottommounted system at USAT Liberty site location is a method to collect hydrodynamics
data. Those data above are needed to determine water dynamics surrounding site
location and to analyze the environment’s influence on shipwreck sustainability.
Threats and Site conditions
Natural Factor
Nicholas Flemming (2011) said that globally, underwater archaeological sites are
vulnerable to variety of damages caused by nature or human. A number of sites are
devastated due to waves and erosion processes. Threats to shipwreck sites can be
related to the changes in environmental factors due to the ocean dynamics in the
region. The currents and winds could spur high waves and cause sedimentation,
erosion, shifting, and sliding, thus making shipwreck sites susceptible to variety of
physical-mechanical damages, as well as chemical damage i.e corrosion matters.
USAT Liberty site is located in an area strongly affected by a very dynamic
oceanographic conditions where the currents from Pacific and Indian Ocean meet. Tidal
data measured by ADCP has 26.9 days duration commencing on August 29, 2013 until
September 25, 2013 with a 10 minute data interval. Furthermore, the data were
analyzed by using the T_TIDE processing program (Pawlowicz, 2002). Figure 2 shows
the results of data analysis in which the tidal analysis results (predictions) appears
closer to the actual data rate of up to 96.5% representation. Dominant tidal constituents
are O1, K1, M2, S2, SK3, M4, S4, 2MS6 and M8. Based on the number formzahl (Fz =
0822), the nature of the tides in Tulamben waters is a mixture tidal tends to double
5

�(Mixed predominantly semi-diurnal). ADCP current measurements enables us to see
the profile of water mass flow column. Figure 2 shows the flow characteristics of
Tulamben waters in the form of scatter plots at 4 different depths from the bottom
waters, each 5 m, 10 m, 15 m, and 20 m. From scattter plot, it is clear that the current
in Tulamben waters are generally dominant moving from East to West direction. Based
on the wind data, other factors that lead to differences in the surface characteristics of
the scatter plots clearly caused by currents driven by waves and a longshore. Profile of
current flow also show the current tendency to move westward and northward, so that
the

resultant

predominantly

direction
to

is
the

Northwest. The current results
measurements

show

the

maximum current to the North
reaches v=1 m/s, while to the
West

the

maximum

flow

reaches u=0:58 m/s.
Volcanic sandy seabed around
the wreck and the presence of
strong currents at certain times

Fig. 3 Extreme Weather Condition in Tulamben Coast on
can cause scouring in the Juli 2013. (Nia Ridwan)
shipwreck area. The hull
section located in shallow waters can be affected by all kinds of weather conditions and
there is also a large swell which can destabilize the fragile sections of the ship. The part
of USAT Liberty shipwreck at the top is starting from a depth of 3-10 m so they could be
affected significantly by the power of waves, currents, and winds at the surface. The
weather conditions that are occasionally extreme lately in Tulamben waters most likely
caused by climate change phenomenon. In extreme weather condition, wind will drive
high waves and strong currents on the surface of Tulamben waters and could put strong
pressure and make the ship parts in the shallow areas suffered the damage, became
fragile, unsteady, and finally collapsed and fall down to the bottom, or befall the another
ship part below it. So that successive events happened will cause even more damage
6

�(Fig. 3). High waves on July 2013 hit Tulamben beach for 3 days and reached 3-4 m in
height, and even had destroyed some hotels located right in front of shipwreck location.
A few days after storms, we found there are 4 parts of USAT Liberty ship that are
collapsed and dislodged from her superstructure: 1 point at the stern area, 1 point at the
middle section, and 2 points at bow area. In fact, previously the collapsed parts of the
hull have also experienced significant corrosion, so we strongly assumed that the high
corrosion rate in these parts has weaken them, added by high waves effect so
eventually those parts were no longer capable attached in her superstructure, then
detached and fallen down (Fig. 4).
In 1998, El Nino caused severe bleaching in the coral reefs of the shipwreck site
(Pickell, 2010) and from our observation, nowadays coral reefs attached to the hull are
also experiencing stress. Tulamben dive guides stated that at this time many species of
fish are disappeared from the site. The strong currents and waves in Tulamben waters
also led to high erosion processes. Based on our observation, a process that deposited
the USAT Liberty in its current location due to strong coastal erosion that occurs
continuosly. While the USAT Liberty initially shipwrecked on the beach, it has been
moving to greater depths because the sandy bottom upon which it rests has been
eroded by currents, tides, and waves. Athough all existing publications indicate that the
tremor from the 1963 Mount Agung eruption was a major contributor to the shipwreck´s
current location, our research shows that the erosion is probably the main process
responsible to USAT Liberty's current location. Mount Agung tremor may also have
affected her movement, but erosion is the most predominantly ocean and coastal
dynamic process in that area. The elders of Tulamben Village mentioned that the
difference between the distance of the current Tulamben beach and the previous shore
line is about 100 m, thus, it can be said that there have been a shoreline change. The
Regional Spatial Layout Plan 2012-2032 of Karang Asem Regency on Distribution of
Protected Areas nowadays states that Tulamben is one of the coastal areas which is
highly vulnerable to coastal erosion.
Tulamben beach is covered by black volcanic stones from Mount Agung's eruptions
prior to 1963. We presume those stones used to be covered by sand, and then the sand
was progressively run out and eroded by waves and currents. Eventually later, the
7

�expanse of volcanic stones previously existed in the layer below the sand are
appearediv. Since the erosion process has progressiveley "dropped" the USAT Liberty
into the ocean and taking into account its position on a 60%-90% slope, it is highly likely
that the USAT Liberty will move deeper into the ocean at depths that are no longer
safely accessible by divers (Fig. 5).
Human Factor
The concept of in-situ preservation in protecting and managing UCH raises the idea of
making an underwater museum in the site (Delgado, 2011) and a wreck dive attraction.
In fact, the easy access to the shipwreck site for tourists and divers represent a
potential threat even though it is an opportunity for archaeologist to present UCH to
society. The marine tourism has improved the communities’ welfare; however, the
impact of yacht marina construction, coastal buildings, hotels, water sports resorts,
touristic scuba diving, and the collection and souvenir sales have also impacted
negatively in the preservation of the site (Fleming, 2011). The damage to the shipwreck
caused by humans is not as
dramatic

as

the

damage

caused by nature; however,
this damage is cumulative
and significant (Viduka, 2006,
62). The excessive use of
USAT Liberty shipwreck in
Bali is indicated by the large
number of divers and their
impact on ship preservation
and its environment have not
been

examined

by

local

governments. They do not
Fig. 4 The Heavy Corrosion Ship Hull at Bow Section which
are Collapsed right after High Wave Event on July 2013. (Nia realize that the large number
Ridwan)
of
divers
who
perform
underwater activities have incurred in a tremendous pressure on USAT Liberty and its
ecosystem. Increasing number of divers in USAT Liberty does give a significant
8

�advantage to the development of that area, although on the other hand it could cause
environmental damage problems to the sea floor and the shipwreck itself. The concern
about its further degradation is actually emerging from the communities and local dive
guide lately. They dive with the guests almost every day and they notice that there has
been extensive damage to the USAT Liberty and its ecosystem. They also informed that
at present time many fish species no longer appear on the site and many coral reefs are
damaged and destroyed by the divers' negligence and carelessness (Pickell, 2010).
The tourists at USAT Liberty site are not intentionally damaging the site and breaking
awig-awig, but it is certain that many divers unintentionally destroy the site. The ability
of each tourist diving in USAT
Liberty is not homogeneous. Many
tourists

do

not

have

diving

qualifications and they use the site
to get their diving certification.
Uncontrolled

flapping

fins,

arbitrarily penetration into the hull,
hands touching and holding the
ship's parts directly could cause
damage
Fig. 5 The Hypothesis of Tulamben Beach Erosion
History that Showing the Chronology of the Fall of
USAT Liberty into Her Current Position. (Research
Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability)

to

USAT

Liberty.

Moreover, the habit of most divers
to feed the fish is also against the
rules of fisheries conservation. The
large number of divers visiting the

site may also lead to exposure of the sandy sea floor in USAT Liberty site. The divers’
fin kicking could agitate the seabed and kill unique animals and destroy some sensitive
coral reefsv. Besides physical-mechanical damage, the concentration of oxygen from air
released by divers may transform into air pockets trapped in the ship's hull. This will
accelerate the oxidation process which will increase the corrosion level and will
accelerate the chemical destruction process, and corrosion is one of the most
threatening chemical damage to iron objects (Fig. 6.)

9

�Conclusion
Nowadays, extreme weather conditions often hit Tulamben area and the estimated
effect

is

fairly

severe

on

shipwrecks and its marine life.
Erosion is the most dominant
environmental

changes

in

Tulamben

which

can

substantially

influence

the

preservation
Liberty.
currents,

of

The

the

USAT

movement

tides,

high

of

waves,

especially in extreme weather
conditions
damage

causes
and

physical

accelerates

the

Fig. 6 A Large Number of Divers in USAT Liberty Site.
mechanical fragility of shipwreck (Nia Ridwan)
that
has
been
previously
corroded. Meanwhile, the sedimentation rate is relatively small and does not
significantly affect USAT Liberty.
Today, awig-awig protection is not sufficient and needs to be strengthened by other
preservation efforts, i.e. limiting the number of divers on the USAT Liberty. This may not
be easy to apply and there will be disagreeing parties who think it will reduce the
community's income. Another solution could be to make the site an exclusive dive sites
like SS Yongala in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia which has a limit of 7,000 tourists
per year. We can monitor and limit the number of divers and still get a high income for
the community by raising the entrance fee. In order to implement these policies,
mapping this tourist destination according to its type becomes very important. Tulamben
needs to be reviewed whether it is a mass-tourism, limited tourism, or eco-tourism area.
Placing fish apartments and sinking another ship nearby can also be performed to build
a new artificial reef and to provide an alternative dive site. The use of in-situ
preservation methods such as corrosion prevention by cathodic-anodic protection using
10

�sacrificial anode can also be done. Another site stabilization to anticipate problems
caused by natural hazards can also be enforced. Depth study, long-term measurements
and model analysis need to be done to get the complete of data. Measurement and
monitoring the hull's progressinve shift can be performed by regularly benchmarking
and photo recording of the site after extreme weather conditions events. Making
physical models, and numerical modeling are needed to prove the erosion evolution
hypothesis that occurs over a fairly long period in Tulamben beach.
References
Ardiwidjaya, R., 2007. Pemanfaatan Benda Arkeologi Bawah Air (Shipwreck): Satu
Peluang Peningkatan Daya Tarik Wisata Selam. Diskusi Ilmiah Sumberdaya Arkeologi
Laut, Jakarta.
Delgado, J., 2011. The Impact on and Opportunities arising from Tourism to Submerged
Sites. UNESCO Scientific Colloquium on Factors Impacting the Underwater Cultural
Heritage, 13th-14th December 2011, Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels.
Flemming, N., 2011. UNESCO Scientific Colloquium on Factors Impacting the
Underwater Cultural Heritage, 13th-14th December 2011, Royal Library of Belgium,
Brussels.
Kamaluddin, L., 2002. Pariwisata Bahari dan Konservasi. Pembangunan Ekonomi
Maritim di Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Noerwidi, S., 2007. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat pada Pelestarian Situs Bangkai Kapal
USS Liberty, Tulamben Bali, http://arkeologika.wordpress.com/2007/10/31, retrieval
April 5, 2013.
Pickell, D., and Wally S., 2010. Diving Bali: The Underwater Jewel of Southeast Asia.
Periplus, Singapore.
Radigan, J. R., 1996. USAT Liberty ex-AK-3, ex-Liberty (ID 3461), http://navsource.org,
retrieval March 19, 2013.
Ridwan, N. N. Hasanah., 2011. The Importance of Empowering Local Community in
Preserving Underwater Cultural Heritage in Indonesia: Case Study in Tulamben, Bali
and in Taka Kappala, Selayar-South Sulawesi. In Proceeding on the Asia Pacific
Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage, Manila.
Pawlowicz, R., Beardsley, B., and Lentz, S., 2002. Classical Tidal Harmonic Analysis
including Error Estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE. Journal Computers and
Geosciences, Vol. 28.
Supriyatun, R., 2007. Potensi Obyek Wisata Warisan Budaya Bawah Air di Tulamben,
Kabupaten Karang Asem. Varuna, Jurnal Arkeologi Bawah Air, Vol. (1/2007): 00-00.

11

�Tenaya, I. W., Gde Yadnya, dkk., 2011. Laporan Pemetaan dan Penggambaran
Situs/Kapal Karam U.S.A.T Liberty, Tulamben Karang Asem. Balai Pelestarian
Peninggalan Purbakala Bali, Gianyar.
Viduka, A., 2006. Managing Threats to Underwater Cultural Heritage Sites: The
Yongala as a Case Study. In Underwater Cultural Heritage at Risk.
http://gekodivebali.com, retrieval July, 2013.
http://karangasemkab.bps.go.id, retrieval May 10, 2013.
http://scuba-mania.com/tag/indonesia/17, retrieval November 17, 2012.
http://pacificwrecks.com/ships/usn/USATliberty, retrieval April 2, 2013.
http://wikipedia_USAT Liberty, retrieval October, 11, 2011.
Biography
Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan is Maritime Archaeology Research Scientist graduated
from Department of Archaeology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta. Since 2005,
she has been working in Ministry of Marine Affairs &amp; Fisheries, Republic of Indonesia in
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability. In 2011, Nia appointed as
Head of Research Cooperation &amp; Technical Services Division until present. She has
researched several underwater sites throughout Indonesian waters. Her current
research focuses to identify the factors threatening shipwreck sites and to examine
ways to mitigate it. Nia had attended UNESCO Foundation Course on Underwater
Cultural Heritage (2010) and In Situ Preservation Course (2011) in Thailand; 3
SEAMEO SPAFA-ICCROM trainings: in Thailand (2010), Singapore (2011), Philippine
(2011); The Netherlands Cultural Heritage Agency Course on Managing Climate Risks
towards a Sustainable Conservation of Mutual Cultural Heritage in Brazil (2011); and
ICCROM Forum on Science in Conservation (Italy 2013).
Endnotes
i

Kelian Adat is community leader who deal with social issues such as funeral rites, marriage ceremonies, rituals and traditional
customs regulations.
ii
Kelian Banjar Dinas is a hamlet head who is in charge in taking care of administrative matters, i.e. making residents identity card,
family card, and then passing them to the village office, district office or civil registry office.
iii
Tulamben residents said that USAT Liberty also carried large quantities of black pepper and eucalyptus oil.
iv
This is confirmed by the village elders were say that they have no idea where those stones suddenly appeared. Even mentioned
that these stones arise because of the "miracle of God". However, this can be explained scientifically associated with coastal
erosion processes were fairly dramatic.
v
In the 90s, a French photographer, who despite professional but was reckless, dived on USAT Liberty and dropped his fairly heavy
camera. It hit a poisonous coral reefs attached to ship's hull. Besides destroying the hull and the reef, he and the other divers
nearby also experienced severe poisoning (Pickell, 2010).

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="15">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="52">
                  <text>Session 12: Underwater Cultural Heritage of Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="53">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="54">
                  <text>The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions.&#13;
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex.&#13;
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation.&#13;
This session will discuss:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH.&#13;
â€¢ The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="55">
                  <text>Nia Hasanah </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="420">
                <text>USAT Liberty Shipwreck Site in Tulamben, Karang Asem Regency,  Bali is Under Threats</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="421">
                <text>USAT Liberty shipwreck site located in Tulamben Village, Karang Asem Regency, Bali Province is the most popular shipwreck diving attraction in Indonesia. The shipwreck is well-known throughout the world and brings in many domestic and foreign tourists since the 1980s. This underwater cultural heritage has a historical-archaeological value; it is a US cargo ship that sank during World War II and now the shipwreck functions as an artificial reef and is home to various marine life. This makes the wreck a very important coastal resource of this region and has a significant impact in the local peopleâ€™s life. The condition of the site is currently considered to be vulnerable due to a variety of damage caused by natural and human factors. Threats due to high water dynamics such as currents and waves that could cause erosion, scouring, sliding, and other changes in the physical environment make this shipwreck site highly vulnerable to a variety of mechanical and physical damage as well as chemical weathering and corrosion. The large number of tourist who dive on this site also threatens the site. The marine archaeological research of 2013 conducted by Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries is aimed at study the deterioration of the wreck, to collect hydrodynamics, sedimentation, and water quality data for providing an overview of recent conditions of this underwater site, the ocean dynamics of Tulamben waters, along with the damages suffered by USAT Liberty wreck which threatens its sustainability as an underwater cultural heritage and diving attraction. Identify the different types of potential vulnerabilities would become the basis of policy making for its preservation efforts in the future.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="422">
                <text>Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="423">
                <text>Semeidi Husrin</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="424">
                <text>Gunardi Kusumah, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="425">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="10">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/5a1d178ee063643692aeb3f7a48d0ba9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5caa9671e99f98b4dbcc98e38dfb0c2f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="431">
                    <text>The sea stories and stone sails of Borobudur
Douglas Inglis
Texas A &amp; M University
PO Box 114, Waimanalo, HI, 96795 US
E-mail: divingarchaeology@gmail.com
Abstract
The most profound examples of ancient Southeast Asian ship iconography are found on
the walls of the 9th century Borobudur monument in central Java. As the contemporary
assemblage of nautical iconography from Southeast Asia is limited, the ship reliefs play
an important role in debates over trade and expansion in India, Indonesia and mainland
Southeast Asia.
The Borobudur ships are technical depictions, and contain data about rigging, rope use,
rowing configurations and outrigger construction. Elements in their design have
persisted independently as Indonesian watercraft evolved, including outriggers, bipod
masts, canted rectangular sails, and quarter rudders. Discussion has focused on
construction features, and scholars have made various assertions about how the
vessels might have been built, how they were used, and their origin.
The vessels' artistic context is often ignored. The ship reliefs are part of a religious
narrative which directly influenced how the panels were designed, how the ships were
portrayed, and how we should ultimately interpret them. The stories provide important
clues as to where each vessel was headed, who was aboard, and what is happening on
deck. Despite their detail, the Borobudur vessels should be interpreted cautiously, and
not as ancient blueprints. They are artistic renditions that were never meant to float they were meant to inspire.
Key words: Borobudur, bas-reliefs, Sailendra, Indonesia, Java, nautical archaeology

Introduction
The most informative examples of ancient Southeast Asian ship iconography are found
on the ninth century CE Borobudur monument in central Java (Fig. 1). Borobudur is a
massive terraced pyramid, decorated with thousands of bas-reliefs that tell stories from
the lives of the Buddha, Bodhisattvas and other saintly figures. Javanese artisans
depicted 11 boats within the 1,460 elaborately carved stone panels (Fig. 2). Due to the
quality of their technical detail, the artistic, religious, and narrative context of the
Borobudur vessels is often ignored. This is problematic, because the vessels are
1

�components of Buddhist narratives which directly influenced how the panels were
designed, how the ships were portrayed, and how we should interpret them. Moreover,
examining the Borobudur vessels in the context of their associated seafaring stories
provides unique insights into the Javanese perception of sailing, the ocean, and its
dangers.
Borobudur
Members of Java’s Śailendra Dynasty
erected Borobudur sometime between
780 and 832 CE (Miksic, 2010:29).
Viewed from above, Borobudur’s nine
terraced levels resemble a series of
nested concentric squares and circles.
Fig. 1: Eastern Indonesia, showing the location
of Borobudur

Thislayout is similar to that of a mandala,
a sacred diagram that represents the

structure of the universe (Miksic, 2010:37). The unique design of the monument has
generated more than a century of debate, yet its ultimate nature remains a mystery.
Borobudur seems to have been a place of pilgrimage and instruction. Over the centuries,
diverse groups of monks and devotees deposited thousands of votive stupas and clay
tablets at the monument (Ray, 2005:318). The visitors continued their pilgrimage as
they slowly circled the monument, ascending level by level. The panels on the lower
levels depict the core of Buddhist teaching: the Mahakarmavibhanga (laws of karma),
the Jātakas (stories of the Buddha's past incarnations), the Lalitavistara (stories from
the Buddha's final incarnation), and the Avadānas (stories of other enlightened beings)
(Soekmono, 1976:20-36). It is probable that once these basic lessons were mastered,
monks might have permitted select pilgrims to ascend to the upper levels containing the
more challenging and esoteric teachings of the Gandavyuha and Bhadracari (Miksic,
2010:71). Surrounded by reliefs of holy figures, miracles and magical stories, the visitor
was within a scared, mystical world (Miksic, 2010:46).

2

�The

Ship

Reliefs

and

Their

Artistic Context
Eleven

ships

Borobudur’s

are

depicted

reliefs.

They

in
are

remarkably technical depictions,
with data about rigging elements,
rope use, rowing configurations,
and
Fig. 2: Vessel I.b.86, Minister Hiru’s ship (from Van
Erp, 1923)

outrigger

construction.

Numerous scholars have used the
reliefs

to

expand

our

understanding of ancient sailing vessels including Van Erp (1923), Hornell (1946),
Mookerji (1957), Needham et al. (1978), Horridge (1982), Manguin (1993), Ray (1994),
Jahan (2006), and numerous others. Debate has focused on five outrigger vessels with
canted rectangular sails, bipod masts, and rowing galleries; they are most akin to kora
kora of the 16th and 17th century (Horridge, 1978:9). Due to their exquisite detail, the
Borobudur vessels are often treated as ancient blueprints, while their artistic context is
ignored. This is problematic, because the vessels are components of religious
narratives which directly influenced how the panels were designed, how the ships were
portrayed, and how we should interpret them.
The vessel depicted in panel I.b.86 has inspired several reconstructions. These sailing
hypotheses combined information from the reliefs with evidence available from artwork,
ethnography, archaeology, and indigenous seafaring traditions. These reconstructions
include Sarimanok, commissioned by Robert Hobman and sailed from Java to
Madagascar in 1985 (Dennison, 1985), Philip Beale’s full-sized replica, which was
launched in 2003 and sailed from Jakarta to Ghana (Beale, 2005), and the Spirit of
Majapahit, launched from Jakarta in 2010 on a goodwill voyage to Brunei, the
Philippines, Japan, China, Vietnam, Thailand, and Singapore (Antara, 2010, July 5).
Erik Peterson used I.b.86 as a set of blueprints to draft a detailed reconstruction (Fig. 3).
Petersen (2003:42) hypothesized that the artist "started by making a precise picture of
the ship as seen from the side.” To accommodate for some of the obviously skewed
3

�elements,

Peterson

suggested that the artist
changed perspective to
illustrate

the

rowing

galleries and outriggers
“as seen from above and
from in front." Peterson
executed

this

blueprint

experiment well, but there
are several problems with
the
1 Fig. 3: Erik Peterson’s elegant reconstruction of I.b.86 (from
Peterson 2003).

underlying

assumptions.
carvings

The
are

not

schematic side profiles with elements added in contrary views. The artist who created
I.b.86 was a master stone-carver (Van Erp, 1923:19). They chose to depict I.b.86 sailing
toward the viewer at an angle, an incredibly difficult illusion to attempt in bas-relief. To
show this perspective, the artist exaggerated the stagger of the bipod mast legs and
depicted the forward face of the outrigger booms, none of which would be visible in
schematic view. The ship tapers dramatically from stem to stern to further reinforce this
perspective. The point where the bow enters the water (marked by a furled wave) is
close to the lower part of the frame while the break of the stern is positioned much
higher. When combined with the tapered form, this slanted waterline gives the
impression of an oblique view. The artist tried to simulate this viewpoint in panel I.b.53
as well. The strake lines sweep up to the stem, and down the other side, giving us a
head on view of where they meet at the bow. More importantly, I.b.86 is not sitting
upright in the water. The artist went to great efforts to show the ship under full sail. The
canvas billows in the wind. The rigging is taut. The artist also exaggerated the forward
rake of both stem and stern to show that the vessel is heeling over on its side and
responding to the force of the wind (this was not corrected in Peterson’s model, which
has retained the extreme forward rake of the stem and sternpost).1The artist was
attempting to show a dramatic three-dimensional view.
4

�Peterson (2003:42) hypothesized that while the individuals aboard the vessels were
exaggerated, "the relative size of all the ship parts seemed to be accurately
represented.” In his reconstruction of I.b.86, Peterson insightfully suggested that each of
the modules in the rowing gallery accommodated one individual, and derived a
waterline length of 16.4m (23.4 m overall) by estimating that the distance between each
of the "modules" in the rowing gallery was 1 m (Petersen, 2003: 52). However, size is
seldom realistic in ancient iconography. Manguin (1993:263) correctly observes that
"with very few exceptions, iconographic representations of sailing vessels teach us little
of the structure and size of the craft depicted… …What one learns from these
depictions concerns the superstructure: how many masts and sails were used and what
their shape was, the position and number of rudders, and whether or not outriggers
were present."

Fig. 4: Multiple panel layouts. I.b.53 has three subdivision, while I.b.86 is divided in two (based
on images from www.photodharma.net, Anandajoti, 2013).

5

�Panel proportions and division are the primary factors determining the size, shape, and
complexity of the Borobudur vessels. The long panels of the first gallery are commonly
divided in half or in thirds (Fig. 4). These sub-divisions show related scenes, a
progression of events, or serve to clarify the characters and activities depicted. The
watercraft in half-panel format (I.b.86, I.b.88 and I.b.88) have much more detail than
those compressed into third-panel format (I.a.115, I.b.23, I.b.53, I.b.82) or those on the
Balustrades (I.B.a.54 and I.B.a.193).We can see the effects of compression when we
compare three of the outrigger-type ships, I.b.53, I.b.86, and I.b.88. Each has the exact
same configuration of an outrigger with three booms, rowing galleries, bowsprit, and two
bipod masts. I.b.53 is shortest, with 6 rowing stations and 6 sailors, I.b.88 has
10stations and 10 sailors, while I.b.86 is the longest with 12 stations and 19 sailors. One
could argue that each panel represents different sized vessels (Manguin, 2010:185).
This is not necessarily the case. Vertically, each ship consistently fills 90-95% of the
panel. The yard ends nearly reach the top of the frame, while there is only a small gap
of water between the outrigger and the bottom of the frame. I.b.86 fills a much greater
horizontal area than I.b.53, which makes I.b.86 appear long and skinny while I.b.53
looks practically tubby. They have the exact same configuration, and likely represent the
same type of vessel, just compressed and uncompressed according to the work space.
The point of these observations and critiques is that the Borobudur Vessels were not
created in a vacuum. They are framed by other scenes. The needs of those scenes
dictated how much space the artist could work with. If space wasample, they created a
beautiful, intricate vessel such as I.b.86. If they had to include more events, the artists
allocated less space to the ships and compressed their features, as with I.b.53.In
examining the details of these ships, it is important to remember that the vessels are
components of stories. The activities and individuals aboard are the centerpieces of the
narratives, while the watercrafts are elaborations.
Seafaring Stories and Buddhism
The maritime folklore associated with the Borobudur vessels is critical to their
interpretation. Sea stories have deep roots in the literature of India. The second
millennium BCE hymns of the Rigveda mention merchant voyages and sailing to distant
6

�islands.2 Although Vedic literature mentions incidents in the sea, it does not provide
evidence of extensive maritime travel (Ray, 2003:13). Shaw (2012:131) observes that
surprisingly, almost no travel by watercraft occurs in India’s great epics the
Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyana. Where sea travel is mentioned, it is in similes and
metaphor. For instance, the Karna Parva (Book 8 of the Mahābhārata) describes
overwhelming grief like "shipwrecked mariners struggling on the bosom of the vast
deep" (Ganguli, 1889:II) while the Anugita Parva (Book 14) compares joy to the elation
of castaways who have made it safely to shore (Ganguli, 1896:LXX). The absence of
sea travel likely reflects the prohibitions against travel by boat found in Indian scripture
and codes of law. The dharmasūstras goes as far as to equate sea travel and maritime
trade with crimes such as theft from a Brahmin (Shaw, 2012:13).3 Later codes of laws,
such as the Manusmṛti (from the beginning of the first millennium CE), deal with
practical aspects of riverine transport (Buhler, 1969: pt. 8).
Buddhist maritime folklore demonstrates a
familiarity with seafaring that is not found in
earlier Indian literature. The Jātakas contain
numerous references to ship building and
ship operation (Ray, 1994:180). The texts
knowledgably describe the roles of captain
and

crew

(Schlingloff,

1988:198).This

familiarity is not surprising, as the Jātaka and
Avadāna traditions matured in the first half of
the first millennium CE when a series of
Fig. 5: Vessel I. .a. , sho ing up raga
and the mouth of the ocean (from Van Erp,
1923)

trade booms between China, India and the
West drove new developments in sailing, the
expansion of maritime trading networks, and

the proliferation of ports (see Hall 1985; Ray 1994; Christie 1998; Manguin 2004).
During this period, developments in Buddhis men courage maritime development by
removing Brahmanical stigmas associated with travel, trade, and outsiders (Wheatley,
1983:272) and by embracing private wealth as a vehicle that could serve spiritual needs
7

�(Holcombe, 1999:280).Hall (1985:37) concludes that Mahāyāna Buddhism was a direct
response to the expanding world of commerce.
Pilgrims, missionaries, and monastics traveling along the trade networks between India
and China spread Buddhist teachings as they went. Kandahjaya (2004:73-79)
calculates that between the third and sixteenth centuries CE, approximately half of
these initial Buddhist “transmitters” followed the sea lanes that connected India, Sri
Lanka, Southeast Asia, China, and the Indonesian Archipelago. Buddhists established
monastic communities which conscientiously served the spiritual and material needs of
the laity. This created intimate connections with local villages and trading groups
resulting in an “interactive support system” (Ray 1994:122; Ray, 2005:320).
The resulting contact between Buddhists and maritime communities created conditions
conducive to the incorporation of maritime folklore into Buddhist scripture. Seafaring
stories would have been an important part of the oral traditions, song, dance, and
dramatic

performances

throughout

maritime

Asia

(Shaw

2012:132). 5Buddhists

capitalized on the excitement, danger, avarice, and courage inherent in maritime
folklore, and populated Jātakas and Avadānas with greedy merchants, daring sailors,
horrible sea monsters, oceans filled with treasure, islands populated by demons, spirits,
and goddesses. These dangers and temptations became components of a vast
metaphor in which the ocean represents saṃsāra, the endless cycle of death and rebirth,
and crossing the ocean represents the process of awakening, searching for
understanding, finding salvation, acquiring merit, and obtaining enlightenment (Shaw
2012:133; Tatelman 2013:114). Just as the Buddha offered salvation from the cycle of
saṃsāra, bodhisattvas developed into saviors that could be called on by sailors during
times of distress (specifically Avalokiteśvara/Padmapāni/Guānyīn, see Rao, 1991: 1856; Ray, 1994: 153; Ohnuma, 1998: 337-40).
Heroes and Mariners
Buddhist seafaring stories are unique, both in their presentation of the nautical/maritime
traveler as hero (Shaw, 2012:130), and in their focus on the lower classes of people(e.g.
traders, craftsmen, sailors, etc.) who are generally below description in the Vedic texts
(Hall, 1985:37). Borobudur’s intricate reliefs provide an intimate look at both heroes and
8

�sailors as they were conceived in the ninth century CE. An example is the story of
Suppāraka/Supāraga the blind navigator (Jātaka No. 463, the Suppāraka-jātaka and
Jātakamāla No. 14, Supāraga-jātaka), carved in panels I.B.a.53-55). Suppāraka (a
former incarnation of the Buddha) was a master navigator. He lost his sight as he grew
old, and retired from seafaring. A group of merchants (from Bharuch, west India)
beseeched him to join their voyage to suvarṇabhūmi, the lands of gold (often identified
as the Malay Peninsula).A gale blew their ship across sixseas until they eventually
came to the jaws of the ocean at the end of the earth. Suppāraka knew that only a
miracle could save them. He cried out "Friends, bathe me speedily in scented water,
and put new garments upon me, prepare a full bowl, and set me in front of the ship"
(Rouse, 1901: 90). Properly prepared, Suppāraka leapt to the bow, used both hands to
pour libations into the sea, and uttered his saccakiriyā, an assertion of truth so powerful
that it can transform reality (Fig. 5).6The power of his invocation propelled the ship back
across all six oceans in a single day (Rouse, 1901: 86-90).

Fig. 6: A close-up of figures from the relief, sho ing upp raka pouring out libations in
I.B.a.54, and prayer and ceremony from I.b.86 (based on images from www.photodharma.net,
Anandajoti, 2013).
9

�Without knowing the story of Suppāraka, it would be difficult to identify many aspects of
the crowded ship depicted in I.B.a.54. Clearly the sea monster is a source of distress.
However, without knowing the story, it would be impossible to know that it represents
the devouring mouth of the ocean at the edge of the world. The Jātakamāla (No. 14)
describes the behavior of the ship’s crew during the horrendous gale: “Some were
overcome by affliction and stood speechless with terror, some behaved courageously
and were busily working to avert the danger, and some were absorbed in prayers to
their tutelar deities”(Speyer, 1895: 177 vv. 8). The exact same three reactions (terror,
courage, and prayer) are mirrored in the stones of Borobudur. Some of the crew are
acting courageously, fighting to control the sail. One is standing on the yard and
wrestling with the sail while three are in the stern hauling on the ropes. Desperate
passengers in the center of the ship are jettisoning the cargo. Two sitting figures have
placed their faces in their hands, sobbing in despair. Another figure has his hand raised
high, perhaps calling on the gods. Thanks to the Pāli text (Jātaka No. 463), we know
that this figure on the bow is Suppāraka, pouring forth libations exactly as described in
the narrative (Rouse, 1901:89), Van Erp, 1923:16).
Importance of the Narratives
The actions and reactions of the nearly one-hundred figures aboard the Borobudur
Vessels provide important insights into how the Javanese perceived seafaring. Panel
I.b.23 shows mariners laboring to raise a sail while their comrades spend time catching
fish. Panels I.b.108, I.B.a.54, and I.B.a193 show us how seamen reacted to a storm –
some struggle to save the ship, a few pray to their gods, others yet cling to the rigging in
terror while their comrades are thrown into the tumultuous sea. Panel I.b.86 is famous
because it provides elaborate technical details of how Southeast Asian shipwrights
constructed watercraft during the classical age. However, I.b.86also teaches us a great
deal about ancient seafaring. Hiru’s voyage in the Rudrayana-avadana (Divyāvadāna
No. 37) is the epitome of a successful expedition; its depiction in I.b.86 correspondingly
shows us what an ideal voyage should look like. The crew are lively about the ship,
hauling on the rigging and setting the sails. They show bravery by conducting daring
acts at the masthead and bowsprit. They are religious and mindful, performing the

10

�proper rituals at the bow of the vessel (Fig. 6). Hiru sits high in the stern, vigilant, and
directing his ship to a successful landfall.
The Borobudur vessels are components of Buddhist narratives which directly influenced
how the panels were designed, how the ships were portrayed, and how we should
interpret them. Examination of the figures demonstrates that the Borobudur vessels can
provide more information about ancient seafaring than just the technical configurations
of Southeast Asian watercraft. They are material evidence of the intimate connection
between Buddhism and seafaring, and provide unique insights into the Javanese
perception of sailing, the ocean, and its dangers.

Footnotes
1

If we look at other vessels of this type, the forward rake of the stem is not as prominent, and the sternpost is actually raked
slightly aft (as with I.b.88 and I.b.108).
2

For examples, see Griffith (1896: v. I.25.7, I.48.3, I.56.2, I.116.3-5, and VII.88.3).

3

Shaw (2012: 130–1) also points out that Brahmins were traveling between India and Southeast Asia, so the prohibitions may not
have been as serious as these laws seem to indicate.
4

The Manusmṛti contains rules concerning
-

, 1969: pt. 8).

5

Shaw (2012:132) suggests that these vernacular versions probably thrived in ancient India, but were almost never preserved in
Hindu literature as high“
adventure, or
”
6

S

k

ā

“A
T
”
“T
”
w
k
k ā
k
w
w
w
S
ā k w
T
w
manifest the speakers wish, in this case, delivering the ship back to shore (Kong, 2012: 7–8).

w

l
and fact (in the case of

Bibliography
Anandajoti, Bhante, 2013. Photographs from the
Photodharma.net.
Accessed
August
http://www.photodharma.net/Indonesia/Indonesia.htm

Borobudur
10,

Monument.
2013,

Antara, 2010 (July 5). Spirit of Majapahit to sail to eight countries in pride building sea
voyage.
The
Jakarta
Globe.
Accessed
January
24,
2014,
http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/archive/spirit-of-majapahit-to-sail-to-eight-countries-inpride-building-sea-voyage/
Beale, Phillip, 2005. The Borobudur ship expedition – official website. Accessed
January 18, 2014, http://www.pioneerexpeditions.com/borobudur/index.htm
11

�Dennison, Richard, 1985. Flight of the Sarimanok. Orana Films.
Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trans.), 1889. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa,
Vol. 3, Book 8: Karna-Parva. Bharata Press, Calcutta.
Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trans.), 1896. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa,
Vol. 4, Book 14: Augnita-Parva. Bharata Press, Calcutta.
Griffith, Ralph T.H (trans.), 1896. Hymns of the Rig Veda, Vol. I. E. J. lazarus and Co:
Benares.
Hall, Kenneth R., 1985. Maritime Trade and State Development in Early South East
Asia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Holcombe, Charles, 1999. Trade-Buddhism: Maritime Trade, Immigration, and the
Buddhist Landfall in Early Japan. Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 119 (2):
280-292.
Hornell, James, 1946. Water transport: origins &amp; early evolution. University Press,
Cambridge, England.
Horridge, G. Adrian, 1978. The Design of Planked Boats of the Moluccas. National
Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London.
Horridge, G. Adrian. 1982. The lashed-lug boat of the eastern archipelagoes, the Alcina
MS and the Lomblen whaling boats. Trustees of the National Maritime Museum,
Greenwich, London.
Jahan, Shahnaj Husne, 2006. Re-examining ‘Borobudur Ships’ as Evidence of Maritime
Contact with South Asia. In Adalbert J. Gail, Gerd J. R. Mevissen, and Klaus Bruhn
(Eds.), anamālā: Festschrift A.J. Gail, Weidler Buchverlag, Berlin: 78-86.
Kandahjaya, Hudaya, 2004. A Study on the Origin and Significance of Borobudur.
Thesis (Ph.D.) Graduate Theological Union, Berkley.
Kong, Choy Fah, 2012. Saccakiriyā the belie in the p
Buddhist tradition.Choy Fah Kong,Singapore.

er

true speech in heravāda

Krom, N. J., 1927. Barabudur: Archaeological Description. Vols. I. Martinus Nijoff, The
Hague.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves, 1993. Trading Ships of the South China Sea. Shipbuilding
Techniques and Their Role in the History of the Development of Asian Trade Networks.
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 36 (3): 253-280.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves, 2010. The Ships on the Borobudur Reliefs. In John. N. Miksic,
Noerhadi Magestari, Jan Fontein, Timbul Maryono, and Idham Bachtiar Setiadi (Eds.),
Borobudur: majestic, mysterious, magnificent, Taman Wisata Candi Borobudur,
Prambanan &amp; Ratu Boko; Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia:180-185.
12

�Miksic, John N., 2010. Borobudur in the Beginning. In John. N. Miksic, Noerhadi
Magestari, Jan Fontein, Timbul Maryono, and Idham Bachtiar Setiadi (Eds.), Borobudur:
majestic, mysterious, magnificent, Taman Wisata Candi Borobudur, Prambanan &amp; Ratu
Boko; Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia:26-75.
Mookerji, Radha Kumud. 1957. Indian shipping: a history of the seaborne trade and
maritime activity of the Indians from the earliest times. Orient Longmans, Bombay.
Needham, Joseph, Wang Ling, and Lu Gwei-Djen, 1978. Science and civilization in
China. Vol. 4, Part 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ohnuma, Reiko. 1998. The gift of the body and the gift of dharma. History of Religions,
Vol. 37 (4): 323-359.
Peterson, Erik, 2003. Reconstruction of the large Borobudur outrigger sailing craft. In
Lucy Blue, Fred Hocker and Anton Englert (Eds.), Connected by the Sea: Proceedings
of the Tenth International Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology, ISBSA, Roskilde:
50-56.
Soekmono, R., 1976. Chandi Borobudur: A Monument of Mankind. Paris: The Unesco
Press, Paris.
Speyer, Jacobus Samuel (trans.), 1895. Gātakamālā,
Āryaśūra. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.

r Garland

Birth-Stories of

Rao, Nalini, 1991. The Bodhisattva as savior of seamen. In S. R. Rao (Ed.), Recent
Advance in Maritime Archaeology: Proceedings of the Second Indian Conference on
Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries January, 1990. Society for Marine
Archaeology, National Institute of Archaeology, Goa, India: 185-188.
Ray, Himanshu Prabha, 1994. The winds of change: Buddhism and the maritime links
of early south Asia. Oxford University Press, Delhi.
Ray, Himanshu Prabha, 2003. The archaeology of seafaring in ancient South Asia.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ray, Himanshu Prabha, 2005. The Axial Age in Asia: the archaeology of Buddhism (500
B.C.-A.D. 500). In Miram T. Stark (Ed.) The Archaeology of Asia, Blackwell Publishing,
Malden and Oxford.
Rouse, W. H. D. (trans.), 1901. he Jātaka; or, Stories of the Buddha's former
births.Vol. IV. Cowell, Edward B., (Ed.). University Press, Cambridge.
Shaw, Sarah, 2012. Crossing to the farthest shore: How Pāli Jātakas launch the
Buddhist image of the boat onto the open seas. Journal of the Oxford Centre for
Buddhist Studies, Vol. 3: 128-56
Schlingloff, Dieter. 1988. Studies in the Ajanta paintings: identifications and
interpretations. Ajanta Publications, Delhi.
13

�Tatelman, Joel. 2005. The heavenly exploits. New York University Press, New York.
Wheatley, Paul, 1983. āgara and c mmandery: origins of the Southeast Asian urban
traditions. University of Chicago, Dept. of Geography, Chicago.
Van Erp, Th., 1923. Voorstellingen van vaartuigen op de reliefs van den Boroboed er
M n graphie n ver unst en ultuur 1. di-Poestaka: 'S-Gravenhage.

Biography
Douglas Inglis studies the archaeology of seaborne exploration
and contact. He is a graduate student in the Nautical
Archaeology Program at Texas A&amp;M, a professional
archae l gist at ultural Surveys
Ha aiʻi and a member
the Explorers Club. Doug served as assistant director of the
Warwick Shipwreck Project in Bermuda and the ongoing
Rockley Bay Research Project in Tobago. He is passionate
about public history and outreach, and writes about nautical
archaeology at http://divingarchaeology.com.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="15">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="52">
                  <text>Session 12: Underwater Cultural Heritage of Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="53">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="54">
                  <text>The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions.&#13;
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex.&#13;
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation.&#13;
This session will discuss:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH.&#13;
â€¢ The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="55">
                  <text>Nia Hasanah </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="427">
                <text>The sea stories and stone sails of Borobudur </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="428">
                <text>The most profound examples of ancient Southeast Asian ship iconography are found on the walls of the 9th century Borobudur monument in central Java. As the contemporary assemblage of nautical iconography from Southeast Asia is limited, the ship reliefs play an important role in debates over trade and expansion in India, Indonesia and mainland Southeast Asia.   &#13;
&#13;
The Borobudur ships are technical depictions, and contain data about rigging, rope use, rowing configurations and outrigger construction. Elements in their design have persisted independently as Indonesian watercraft evolved, including outriggers, bipod masts, canted rectangular sails, and quarter rudders. Discussion has focused on construction features, and scholars have made various assertions about how the vessels might have been built, how they were used, and their origin.   &#13;
&#13;
The vessels' artistic context is often ignored. The ship reliefs are part of a religious narrative which directly influenced how the panels were designed, how the ships were portrayed, and how we should ultimately interpret them. The stories provide important clues as to where each vessel was headed, who was aboard, and what is happening on deck. Despite their detail, the Borobudur vessels should be interpreted cautiously, and not as ancient blueprints. They are artistic renditions that were never meant to float - they were meant to inspire.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="429">
                <text>Douglas Inglis, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="430">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
