<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=67&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-26T13:52:58+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>67</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="624" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="415">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/529bc670c824352dee22b69f904b2a1a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>66d48b269ad704a9048c360608fb44c0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6791">
                    <text>The Impact on the Development of Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka through the
UNESCO Regional Maritime Archaeology Field Schools.
Wijamunige Chandraratne (wijamunigechandraratne@gmail.com)
ABSTRACT
Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka began in 1992 with focus on the historic port of Galle, but most of those
programs were supported by foreign funds and involved foreign consultations. The Avondster (1659) Marine
Archaeology Project carried out from 2001 to 2004 contributed to an extent in the creation of a group of local
archaeologists and conservators. This was useful when the Sri Lankan team took over the research and conservation
independently in 2005, after the tsunami disaster.
In 2006, UNESCO initially provided funding to Sri Lanka so that an Asia-Pacific Regional Field School
Program for Maritime Archaeology could be set up in Galle. The first and second sessions for Training the Trainers
Program took place in 2006 and 2008. However, the lack of support from the Sri Lankan government as well as the
ongoing war in the country, prompted the transfer of the field school project to Chanthaburi, Thailand. Three
Foundation Courses and two Advanced Courses for GIS and In-situ Conservation were conducted. From 2009 to
2012, 76 participants from 17 different countries joined the training courses, with 11 representatives from Sri Lanka.
This paper deals with measuring the development of maritime archaeology in Sri Lanka, especially after the
field school program. This will focus on developing infrastructure, field research, conservation, and human
resources of the Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU). This will also discuss the steps taken to start collaboration
projects in the Asia-Pacific region and among the participants of the previous field schools. Further, the progress of
the ratification process of the UNESCO 2001 Convention in Sri Lanka will be examined.
Key words: UNESCO, Maritime Archaeology, Field Schools
List of Figures
Figure 1: The UNESCO field School 2006
Figure 2: The UNESCO Second Field School (2010)
Figure 3: UNESCO Second Field school 2010 (Thailand)
Figure 4: Godawaya First international Collaboration research Project

Figure 5: Cover page of national Shipwreck database

INTRODUCTION
In 1992, maritime archaeology fieldwork in Sri Lanka started on the historic port of Galle in cooperation
with foreign maritime archaeologists and supported by foreign funds. As a milestone for the field
activities, the Avondster Research and Conservation Project (2001-2004) focused on the shipwreck
Avondster (1659) that sank in Galle harbour. The project involved maritime archaeologists from Australia,
the Netherlands, England, and the United States of America among others (Parthesius 2007). The Dutch
government provided the funding while conservationists comprised the human resource. The project
helped produce a group of Sri Lankan maritime archaeologists as well as conservators for underwater
artifacts. The project laid the foundation to complete the building construction and other infrastructure,
the purchase of equipment and chemicals needed to run field operations. The unfortunate tsunami disaster
that took place at the end of the project hampered all the improvements gained and caused confusion.
Although the tsunami disaster did not cause harm to the maritime archaeology staff, other physical
resources were greatly damaged (Bonke, 2007). The necessary financial and labor investment to restart
the fieldwork was done with the intervention of countries like Australia through the Australian Institute of
Maritime Archaeology (AIMA), and the Netherlands through the Cultural Emergency Response (CER).
Furthermore, the process of establishing the maritime archaeology training center in the Asia-Pacific
region in Galle also commenced with funds coming from the Royal Norwegian Grant and UNESCO.
Under this program, two field schools for Training the Trainers were conducted in 2006 and 2008 held in

1

�Galle (Figure 1 &amp; 2) participated by local maritime archaeologists, conservationists, and foreign trainees.
However, UNESCO decided to transfer the Asia-Pacific Regional Center to the Underwater Archaeology
Division (UAD) in Chanthaburi, Thailand. The new training program hosted three Foundation Courses,
one Advance Course for Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and one Advance Training Course for
In-situ Conservation (Figure 3). These were attended by 11 representatives from Sri Lanka (Menders,
2002). An expectation is to conduct a follow-up on the development of maritime archaeology in Sri Lanka
concurrently with the above courses and thereafter.

Figure 1: The UNESCO field School 2006

Figure 2: The UNESCO Second Field School (2010)

Figure 3: UNESCO Second Field school 2010 (Thailand)

The Inter-cooperative Research Project at the Archaeological Wooden Shipwreck Site in Godavaya
in 2010.
The main topic of discussion at the experts meeting held in conjunction with the Second Foundation
Course in Chanthaburi, Thailand, was to implement a preliminary research project based on international
cooperation regarding the recent discovery of the Godavaya wooden shipwreck in the southern coast of
Sri Lanka. The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) in Galle proposed to organize the expedition and
shoulder the initial expenses of the experts to participate through the UNESCO Bangkok Office and the
Netherlands Cultural Fund. Maritime archaeologists representing India, the Philippines, Indonesia, and
Malaysia participated in the first two weeks of December 2010 and conducted an initial maritime
archaeological exploration in the aforementioned site (Chandraratne, 2017) (Figure 4).

2

�Figure 4: Godawaya First international Collaboration research Project

In parallel with the implementation of this research process, several research papers were published in
international journals that helped make relative and scientific chronologies concerning this archaeological
site.
The archaeological assemblage included pots, grindstones, glaze ingot, and copper ingot established the
date of the shipwreck to the 1st century CE (Common Era). The glazed and copper ingots had been
among the major trade components in the ships during that period.
Further, the management and conservation of Sri Lanka’s coastal belt and internal waters as part of its
maritime cultural heritage was assigned to a team of four (4) maritime archeologists and two (2)
conservationists who were working at that time at MAU. The severe lack of human resources meant the
team was unable to deal with the existing heritage issues and concerns, and therefore it was emphasized
that the development of human resources in the field had to be improved.
Human Resource Development in the Maritime Archaeology Unit
Most of the heritage managers who joined the archaeology field schools in Sri Lanka and Thailand, as
well as in the Avondster project were affiliated with the Department of Archaeology, Department of
Museum, and the Sri Lanka Navy. Thus, they did not always have direct access in taking part of the MAU
fieldwork. Due to this, applications were called for the recruitment of archaeology graduates to the MAU.
Ten archaeology graduates with a special interest in the field of maritime archaeology and who
participated in the short-term residential maritime archaeology field schools were selected for further
training from the initial 39 applications received by the unit. In 2011, field training activities and diving
training activities were started for the newly recruited graduates.
With the addition of the new recruits, the number of the Diving Research Section members of the MAU
increased to 14. Also in 2011, the Northwest Coast Archaeological Research Project started work on the
coastal areas from Chillaw to Mannar to expand the maritime archaeology research activities to other
parts of the islands. These areas were previously limited to the southern coast of Sri Lanka for more than
two decades.
The civil war situation that had started in the 1980s in Sri Lanka completely ended in 2009. By the
beginning of 2012, the work of removing the landmines and death traps in the northern and eastern
coastal areas had also been completed. In the same year, archaeological explorations were extended to the

3

�Eastern coastal belt, and, in the following year, in the Northern coastal belt. It is a special achievement of
the MAU to be able to start maritime archaeological activities in the Western coastal area in 2013.
Due to the monsoon weather conditions, diving research activities in Sri Lankan coasts can only be done
from November to March in the Southern and Western seaboards, whereas from April to October, in the
North Eastern and North Western seaboards. Thus, the annual work plan of the MAU’s Research Section
was limited to two months or less per coastal area each year.
Opportunities for training in international maritime archaeology field schools were very rare for the
second generation of maritime archaeologists. The main factor that affected it was the field school
training activities in Chanthaburi, Thailand by the UAD (Underwater Archaeology Division). Also, as a
low-income country, Sri Lanka’s institutional economy was in a weak state and political inadequacies
created a disadvantageous situation for MAU members to attend international training and postgraduate
opportunities. However, some members were able to take advantage of opportunities based on their
initiative. For example, the participation of two trainees and one trainer representing MAU in the
International Maritime Archaeology Field School held from 15 June to 12 July 2015 in Vietnam. This
training program was hosted by the Institute of Archaeology in Vietnam in coordination with UNESCO
and the Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts (SEAMEO SPAFA) with the
financial support of the Netherlands RCE (RIJKSDIENST V00R Net Cultureel Erfgoed).
The newly recruited MAU archaeology graduates will undergo theoretical and practical training programs
designed to develop their knowledge in maritime archaeology, document and maintain underwater
databases, and study possible damages and solutions. Studying the weaknesses in the existing legal
framework and making proposals for amendments was also included.
Due to the increase in the number of new coastal archaeological sites discovered annually by the maritime
archaeology regional exploration projects that started in 2011, the existing human resource capacity of the
MAU was not sufficient at all to protect and manage those sites. As a result, the MAU joined hands with
the Sri Lanka Police, Sri Lanka Navy, Sri Lanka Coastal Guard, Sri Lanka Fisheries Department, and the
National Aquatic Resources Agency (NARA) to manage the situation through an inter-ministerial
committee to control the damage caused to the maritime heritage sites by the fishing industry, old iron
collectors, and the ones who are using prohibited fishing strategies such as dynamiting. After the
establishment of this committee, a great effort was made to protect heritage sites from the very damaging
and deterministic influence that had been in place until then.
That is, the authority given to the Divisional Secretaries to issue licenses to the private sector to cut and
remove metal ships or other vessels sunk in the Sri Lankan coast is subject to the recommendations of the
above-mentioned inter-ministerial committee. It is a victory to be able to control the destruction of metal
vessels of historical value that have been pilfered through false licenses of the Divisional Secretaries and
pretending these vessels to be recent.
Further, although it is legal to conduct an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) of the land on which
medium and large-scale development projects are started, the implementation of that legal situation
around the coastal belt of Sri Lanka is very slow. However, legal amendments in the year 2000 provided
some relief to overcome this situation. Further, awareness programs organized for the guides of the
tourism diving centers that had taken the diving tourists to the maritime cultural heritage sites were
arranged to give an understanding of what their responsibility should be in maritime heritage
management.
Also, despite long discussions for Sri Lanka’s inclination to adhere to the 2001 UNESCO Convention on
the Protection and Preservation of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, the negotiations have not been
effective enough to reach a final agreement. This can be attributed to the disorganized communication and
lack of focus in the organizational structure. This can be due to political instabilities that arise from time

4

�to time as well as unstable policies and plans have had a strong impact on the study of the process of
updating national legal systems and adapting to international conventions related to the sustainable
existence of maritime cultural heritage. Also, regarding the existing legal status of Sri Lanka's Underwater
Cultural Heritage (UCH) and taking necessary actions to increase its capacity, MAU and the International
Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) works very closely with its subsidiary the International
Committee on the Underwater Cultural Heritage (ICUCH) in the formulation of necessary policies.
National and International Activities of the MAU
After the year 2010, MAU embarked on many initiatives of national importance such as the establishment
of the Museum of Maritime Archaeology (MMA) in 2010. Even though MAU was established in Galle in
the same year, the necessity of creating a museum to exhibit the artifacts recovered from it was strongly
emphasized. The old Dutch warehouse building in the historic Galle Fort was converted into the MMA
after it was removed from its state institutional use and was thereby conserved. Currently, this museum
attracts thousands of tourists daily. Consisting of four galleries, the museum is dedicated to the knowledge
and entertainment of the public by constantly updating science with discoveries.
Conducting short-term maritime archaeology residential field schools for archaeology undergraduates in
the Department of Archaeology of the National University System. The MAU has been conducting
in-house field schools for archaeology undergraduates in universities since 2008 but was done only for a
limited number of selected candidates. After 2010, the course structure of those field schools is patterned
after the course structure of the UNESCO maritime archaeology field school. Consequently, the
archaeology study departments of the respective universities involved all the final year undergraduate
students and recommended that the program be sustained. Because of this, all archaeology graduates are
equipped with a wide range of knowledge about maritime archaeology.
In relation to the collaborative maritime archaeology projects between the MAU and the Underwater
Archaeology Unit (UAU), the Department of Archaeology of Sri Lanka possesses the legal authority to
impose policies. However, since 2001, all aspects of marine cultural heritage exploration, reporting,
publishing, and exhibition are being implemented by the MAU, which is controlled under the Central
Cultural Fund (CCF). Nevertheless, the UAU, with limited human and physical resources, also functions
under the Archaeology Department. Accordingly, a limited number of maritime archaeologists who have
acquired knowledge from the UNESCO field schools are working with both MAU and UAU. Post 2010
emphasis was placed on maintaining maritime archaeology projects in collaboration with both these units.
The UAU members were regularly involved in all the maritime archaeology projects carried out in
connection with all aspects of the Godavaya excavation.
The MAU also collaborated with UNESCO-supported projects in 2010. From 2011 to 2014, the UAU
also cooperated with MAU.
The MAU was involved with collaborative projects with the American Institute of Nautical Archaeology
(INA) organization, centered around the historic wooden shipwreck Godavaya. This cooperation between
MAU and UAU was the main reason for the development achieved so far in the field of maritime
archaeology.

5

�CREATION OF NATIONAL SHIPWRECK DATABASE
The MAU planned from the beginning to include all the data into the system that identified underwater
archaeological sites discovered since the beginning of maritime archaeology research in Sri Lanka. Since
this is not a task that can be done alone, the volunteer services of the Institute of Archaeology and
Heritage Studies (IAHS), a private-sector heritage research institute, have been obtained. Thus, the Sri
Lankan National Shipwreck database was published in the year 2022 and it contains data on 109 marine
archaeological sites discovered by the MAU (Figure 5). This is not a database prepared with complete
data entry and is created based on data updates.

6

�Figure 5: Cover page of national Shipwreck database

CONCLUSION
The maritime archaeology research that started three decades ago in Sri Lanka was done gradually and
was unorganized in the first two decades. However, beginning in 2010, developing research activities
were on a more organized and sustainable basis. The civil war situation in the country had ended and a
peaceful atmosphere was created. The socio-economic situation that had been unstable previously had
improved to a significant level, which enabled maritime archeological activities to be gradually directed
to an organized approach.
In the third decade, the MAU was able to create the necessary background for developing human
resources in maritime archaeology to produce a group of professional maritime archaeologists and experts
in the conservation of underwater artifacts. The programs implemented for the participation of
professionals in related fields and the general public in managing marine cultural heritage were attainable.
The projects implemented so far for the publication of maritime archaeological heritage discoveries
together with the Maritime Archaeology Museum and MAU have been extremely successful.
The awareness programs about maritime archaeology to university undergraduates, the confirmation by
local people's participation for the protection of maritime archaeological sites discovered regionally, and
the awareness programs such as educating the school student community regarding underwater cultural
heritage has been effective. An important achievement is the discovery of underwater archaeological
heritage sites hidden in the regional coastal belt around the island by the regional maritime archeological
explorations. Also of equal significance is the publication of a national shipwreck database carried out in
parallel with the recording of the identified heritage sites. Finally, the UNESCO Maritime Archaeology
Field Schools was a great help for all these developments achieved by Sri Lanka in the field of maritime
archaeology.

7

�Bibliography
Bonke.H., Parthesius .R., Ketel.C.V.D.P., Avondster Project Artifact Catalogue, 2007,Center for International Heritage Activities
, special Publication No.1,The Netherlands.
Clark, A.C., 1964. Ceylon and the underwater archaeologist.Expedition,Vol,6(3):18-21.
Chandearathne, W., 2017, Past Present and future of Asean maritime heritage (Eds.)., Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka,
Underwater Archaeology Division, Fine arts Department, ministry of Culture.
Excavation Report on Ambalangoda Fisheries’Harbour.2012, (Unpublished in Sinhala), The Maritime Archaeology Unit, Central
Cultural Fund, Galle.
Devendra,S., 1996. Under the waters of Galle. The Galle Harbour Maritime Archaeology Project. The D.T. Devendra Memorial
Lecture, 1999. Colombo. Daily News: 21st and 22nd April 1999.
Devendra.s.,Muthucumarana.P.R.,Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka. Twenty Five Years Old and New Beginning, 2013.
(Unpublished) The Maritime Archaeology Unit, Central Cultural Fund, Galle.
Godfrey.I.M.,1998.Report on Wood Identification – Sri Lanka1997.Western Australian Maritime Museum,Perth.
Green.J.,and Parthesius .R.,(Eds.),1997,Galle –A Port in History. Seminar Papers,Australian National Centre for Excellence in
Maritime Archaeology, Special Publication No.2. Gaur, A.S., and etal. "Preliminary Assesment of an Early Historic
(2000-Yeras-old) Shipwreck at Godawaya, Sri Lanka." Bulletin of the Austrolassion lnstitute for Maritime
Archoeology,2OTl,:9-L7.
Green.J., Devendra.S., and Parthesius.R., (Eds.),1998, Report for the Sri Lanka Department of Archaeology: Galle Harbour
Project1996-97. Special Publication No.4 of the Australian National Centre of Excellence for Maritime Archaeology,
Fremantle,1998,ISBN1-876465-6-9:.
Green.J., Devendra.S.,( Eds.),1993, Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka:The Galle Harbour Project1992,Archaeological
Department of Sri Lanka, Central Cultural fund, Western Australian Maritime Museum, and Post Graduate Institute of
Archaeology, Colombo.
Green.J., Devendra.S.,1993,Interim report on the joint Sri Lanka-Australian maritime archaeology training and research
programme1992-3.International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol.22(4):331-43.
Jayathilaka.G., De silva.N.,1998,Ambalangoda Shipwreck: Report on a Preliminary Investigation, Unpublished Report to the
Director General, Dept. of Archaeology, Sri Lanka.
Maritime Archaeological Exploration Report on The Eastern Coastal Area,2012-2013, (Unpublished in Sinhala), The Maritime
Archaeology Unit, Central Cultural Fund, Galle.
Maritime Archaeological Exploration Report on The Northern Coastal Area,2013-2014, (Unpublished in Sinhala), The Maritime
Archaeology Unit, Central Cultural Fund, Galle.
Parthesius .R.,(Eds.), Avondster Project Excavation Report 2007.,Center for International Heritage Activities, special Publication
No.1,The Netherlands.
Martijn R. Manders and Christopher J. Underwood., (Eds.), 2012, Training Manual for the UNESCO Foundation Course on the
Protection and Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Asia and the Pacific , Published by UNESCO Bangkok Asia
and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education Mom Luang Pin Malakul Centenary Building 920 Sukhumvit Road, Prakanong,
Klongtoey Bangkok 10110, Thailand.

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6784">
                <text>The Impact on the Development of Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka through the UNESCO Regional Maritime Archaeology Field Schools.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6785">
                <text>Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka began in 1992 with focus on the historic port of Galle, but most of those&#13;
programs were supported by foreign funds and involved foreign consultations. The Avondster (1659) Marine&#13;
Archaeology Project carried out from 2001 to 2004 contributed to an extent in the creation of a group of local&#13;
archaeologists and conservators. This was useful when the Sri Lankan team took over the research and conservation&#13;
independently in 2005, after the tsunami disaster.&#13;
In 2006, UNESCO initially provided funding to Sri Lanka so that an Asia-Pacific Regional Field School&#13;
Program for Maritime Archaeology could be set up in Galle. The first and second sessions for Training the Trainers&#13;
Program took place in 2006 and 2008. However, the lack of support from the Sri Lankan government as well as the&#13;
ongoing war in the country, prompted the transfer of the field school project to Chanthaburi, Thailand. Three&#13;
Foundation Courses and two Advanced Courses for GIS and In-situ Conservation were conducted. From 2009 to&#13;
2012, 76 participants from 17 different countries joined the training courses, with 11 representatives from Sri Lanka.&#13;
This paper deals with measuring the development of maritime archaeology in Sri Lanka, especially after the&#13;
field school program. This will focus on developing infrastructure, field research, conservation, and human&#13;
resources of the Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU). This will also discuss the steps taken to start collaboration&#13;
projects in the Asia-Pacific region and among the participants of the previous field schools. Further, the progress of&#13;
the ratification process of the UNESCO 2001 Convention in Sri Lanka will be examined.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6786">
                <text>Wijamunige Chandraratne</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6787">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6788">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6789">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6790">
                <text>Chandraratne, Wijamunige. 2023.  “The Impact on the Development of Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka through the UNESCO Regional Maritime Archaeology Field Schools.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Bobby Orillaneda, and Brian Fahy. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1996 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="74">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 18 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="692" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="487">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/264c659af323710fdbbe25ce935336ed.pdf</src>
        <authentication>57bbe2311d9e5f1484a61a6edbcc6a4e</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="72">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7468">
                  <text>2021 Session 11: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7469">
                  <text>Session 11 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7470">
                  <text>Abstract&#13;
&#13;
Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as ‘underwater’, ‘marine’ and ‘nautical’ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to ‘Underwater Archaeology’, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature ‘Hydro-archaeology’ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organizations.&#13;
&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome.&#13;
&#13;
Session Organizer:&#13;
&#13;
Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7471">
                  <text>November 2021</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7472">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7473">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7474">
                <text>New Maritime Archaeological Discoveries from SS Indus Ship wreck (1885) in Sri Lanka</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7475">
                <text>The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of the Central Cultural Fund gathered historical evidences on the SS Indus through archival research and a site survey to identify the shipwreck in 2013 and 2014.&#13;
The MAU identified an iron wreck close to the coast of Mullaitivu and tentatively identified it as the SS Indus which sank in 1885 with the valuable carved stone plaques of Baharhut Stupa, India (3rd century BC). Alexander Cunningham, the former Archaeological Commissioner of British India [appointed in 1861] intended to send these plaques to be displayed in the London Museum. According to historical records, they salvaged some of the cargo but there is no record on the fate of the stone plaques. &#13;
The MAU identified an iron wreck about 5km from the Mullativu lighthouse (now in ruins) in 2013. Fishermen and divers helped locate the wreck. According to historical records and nautical charts, the location of this wreck seemed to be the place here the Indus sank. The MAU explored and recorded the site by using photographs, sketches and GPS plotting. The team completed an initial survey but did not find any stone plaques. However, in 2014 and 2017, the MAU excavated the site and identified evidence that proved the wreck is the SS Indus. A drawing of the site and excavated of three test pits were completed in the process. The team unearthed several artifacts but these could not prove the identity of the ship. The MAU is continuing excavations in the site at the moment (Until November 2019) and hope to discuss about the new evidences found from entire research with this paper.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7476">
                <text>Wijamunige Chanraratne</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7477">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7478">
                <text>November 2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7479">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="91">
            <name>Rights Holder</name>
            <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7480">
                <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7481">
                <text>Chanraratne, Wijamunige, and Mahinda Karunarathna. 2021. “New Maritime Archaeological Discoveries from SS&#13;
Indus Ship wreck (1885) in Sri Lanka.” Edited by Brian Fahy, Hans Van Tilburg, Bill Jeffery, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Riley&#13;
Smith. In Proceedings of Fourth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Keelung,Taiwan,&#13;
and Virtual, November 1-5, 2021. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology URL:&#13;
https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/exhibits/show/apconf-muchproceedings/item/692</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="87">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11 2021</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="575" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="366">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/cd553bad50371babe6ce4a369476b7ee.pdf</src>
        <authentication>acf71196f702b6febb8c2a805b406fb4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6350">
                    <text>Goods and Texts: Creating an Archaeological and Historical Narrative of Sri Lanka’s
Connectivity with Southeast Asia, China, and Beyond
Wijerathne Bohingamuwa1
1

Department of History and Archaeology, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka

Corresponding Author: wbohingamuwa@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
This paper deals with Sri Lanka’s interactions with Southeast Asia, China, and regions beyond from the beginning to
the middle of the thirteenth century CE. Several factors, including its central location in the Indian Ocean, have
contributed to connecting the island with these regions. Ceramics, epigraphic, and textual data provide the best
evidence for reconstructing such interactions. This paper is primarily based on the analysis of ceramics unearthed
from the coastal port-urban centres of Mantai, Kantharodai, and Kirinda. This data is compared with the ceramic data
from other sites such as Anuradhapura and Thissamaharama, as well as sites from the Indian Ocean Rim, for
comparison. Material analysis results are compared against and supplemented by epigraphic and textual data. The key
research question addressed here is: What different patterns of Sri Lanka’s connectivity with the eastern segment of
the Indian Ocean might emerge through the analysis of material and textual evidence? Research reveals that the
material evidence not only predates textual evidence for the beginning of Sri Lanka’s interactions with the region
under study but also clearly indicates their continuity up to the middle of the thirteenth century CE. Material evidence,
including beads and the transfer of iron technology, dates the earliest relationships to the middle of the first millennium
BCE. These cultural-commercial connections were regularized and intensified after the fifth and seventh centuries
CE, respectively. Sri Lanka’s culture- historical developments, in general, have always been influenced by the
changing dynamics of the Indian Ocean.
Keywords: Sri Lanka’s external connectivity, Southeast Asia, China, Ceramics
LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS
SEA
Southeast Asia
SCC1
Southern Chinese Celadon 1
WWS
Southern White Wares
SEAW
Southeast Asian Ware
PIOW
Paddle Impressed Orange Ware
BGW
Black Glazed Ware
MTIW
Mica Tempered Impressed Ware
PLOW
Pale Light Orange Ware
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Map of site locations mentioned in the text.

1. INTRODUCTION
Several factors appear to have favorably contributed to connecting Sri Lanka with the regions across the
Bay of Bengal: its location at a critical point in the Indian Ocean; the annual cycle of monsoon winds; the
availability of numerous safe seaports; high-demand trade goods; and its reputation as a centre of Theravada
Buddhism. The importance of Sri Lankan ports to Indian Ocean trade and naval power prompted several
foreign powers to control the island. According to the texts, the religious networks appear to have been the
forerunner that linked the island across the Bay of Bengal and were subsequently expanded to include
political and economic interactions. Material evidence for trade and exchange, however, appears to predate
these historical relations recorded in the texts. Culture-historical developments on the island, therefore,
have always been influenced by those in the Indian Ocean.
1

�2. RESEARCH QUESTION, OBJECTIVE AND METHODS
The key research question addressed here is: What different patterns of Sri Lanka’s connectivity with
Southeast Asia (SEA), and China might emerge through the analysis of material and textual evidence?
Accordingly, the objective here is to understand the nature of Sri Lanka’s interactions with the said region
from about the middle of the first millennium BCE to the middle of the thirteenth century CE. For this
purpose, ceramics unearthed from the Mantai, Kantharodai, and Kirinda (Map 1) were typologically and
statistically analyzed. The origin and provenance of ceramics were determined through comparison with
published material from the Indian Ocean region. The material and sequences wherein they were found
were dated through radiocarbon dates and typological and inter-site comparisons. When the occurrence of
identified material across sites is placed in a chronological framework, the pattern of interactions with
various regions and how they change over time is visible, although the form of interactions is not necessarily
obvious from artifacts alone, for which reason the textual and epigraphic data were integrated.

Figure 1: Map of site locations mentioned in the text (Drawing credit: Wasantha Senadeera).

2

�3. SITES, ASSEMBLAGES AND THEIR CHRONOLOGIES
Mantai, the key site discussed here, was the main seaport of the capital, Anuradhapura, for more than 1500
years. Its excavated cultural sequence dates from the second century BCE to the twelfth /thirteenth century
CE (Bohingamuwa 2017, 65–71). Kantharodai was the urban/ religious centre attached to
Jambukolapattana seaport. The excavated sequence here dates from ca. 500 BCE to the early or mid-first
century BCE (Bohingamuwa 2017, 475–480). Kirinda is located close to Tissamaharama, the ancient
capital of the southern kingdom. Based on radiocarbon dates and diagnostic ceramics, Bohingamuwa (2017,
499–505) dated this sequence from ca. the late third–fourth to the early ninth centuries CE.
Kantharodai has the oldest sequence, but the site declined before the start of the Common Era. Although
historical sources link Jambukolapattana to various ports in India and the SEA at least since the third
century BCE (Mv. 19, 23–43), Kantharodai contains 99.58 per cent local and Indian material. Similarly,
Kirinda too contains only a limited number of SEA or Chinese artifacts. Both sites, however, have a large
number of sherds identified as "Imported.Unknown" of which the majority are considered to be Southeast
Asian based on surface treatment (Bohingamuwa 2017, 194-202). Therefore, Mantai, the longest surviving
site with its diverse assemblage, is discussed, while material from the other three sites is used as
supplementary evidence.

4. CHINESE CONNECTIONS
Of the three sites studied, only the Mantai and Kirinda assemblages contained clearly identifiable Chinese
ceramics, amounting to 452 sherds. Kirinda's had only two Dusun ware (Dusun) sherds datable to the late
seventh to early/ mid-eighth centuries. Since Chinese ceramics, representing 18 wares, were recovered from
Mantai1 (Bohingamuwa 2017, 341; Catalogue Table: C3.9.28), Sino-Sri Lanka connections traceable from
ceramics are discussed based on selected key wares (94 per cent of total Chinese sherds) while comparing
with other assemblages from the island and overseas.
Disregarding intrusive sherds in early phases, the regular Chinese wares occur from around the late seventh/
early eighth century CE (Bohingamuwa 2017, 177). The assemblage includes both storage and tableware.
The profusion of Chinese ceramics is noted in Phase VII, dated to between the early/mid-eighth and late
ninth centuries. In this phase, Chinese ceramics rapidly increased and diversified in terms of sherd counts
(88), number of wares (13), and their types. They included 41 sherds of Dusun storage/transport jars and
12 tableware, such as Yue Celadon Ware (Yue), Changsha Ware (Changsha) and Southern Chinese Celadon
1 (SCC1). The deposit above Phase VII (a disturbed phase) contained 84 sherds, indicating continuity of
cultural-commercial interactions with China. The surface at Mantai has extensive Chinese sherd scatters,
and 260 sherds were sampled. Both Phase ‘D’ and the Surface have 16 wares, which include Ding Kiln
White Ware (Ding) and Southern White Wares (WWS) datable to eleventh/ twelfth centuries. A Chinese
ceramic dump recovered from Allaipiddy contained Southern Song dynasty period ceramics (Carswell

1

Our excavation was confined to 3m X 3m. Carsewell et al. (2015) excavated extensively at Mantai, and their ceramic
assemblage was strikingly similar to ours.

3

�1985). Similarly, a Chinese sherd dating to the thirteenth/ fourteenth century is housed at the Yapahuwa
Museum, indicating the continuity of relations.
4.1 Selected key Chinese wares
Of the 18 Chinese wares, only Dusun (265) and Changsha (55) and Yue (22) wares have considerable sherd
counts. Since they are widely distributed in the Indian Ocean and securely dated, they are discussed here to
illustrate Sino-Sri Lankan connections.
4.1.1 Dusun ware
Dusun is considered to have been made either in Hunan Province (Flecker 2001, 335) or Guangzhou (Guy
2008, 11) and is generally dated to the eighth /ninth centuries CE in the western Indian Ocean region
(Whitehouse and Williamson 1973; Tampoe 1989; Kennet 2004, 65). Dusun recovered from Mantai,
Allaipiddy, and Anuradhapura has been dated by Carswell (2013, 246) to the ninth–twelfth centuries and
by Prickett-Fernando (2003, 74) between the seventh and tenth centuries. Dusun in our assemblage dates
from the late seventh/ early eighth century to the late ninth/ tenth century. The majority of Dusun finds in
Sri Lanka are from the ancient seaports, indicating their transport role, as suggested earlier (Guy 2008;
Flecker 2001).
4.1.2. Changsha ware
This tableware produced in Hunan province (Hughes-Stangton; Kerr 1981, 57–59) is traded across South
Asia to the Persian/Arabian Gulf and to Eastern Africa (Whitehouse and Williamson 1973; Kennet 2004)
in the west to Japan and Korea in the east (Carswell et al. 2013, 256). In Sri Lanka, Changsha is found in
sites such as Anuradhapura and Mantai, which are dated to the eighth to the tenth centuries (Carswell et al.
2013, 256–266; Prickett-Fernando 2003, 56). Regular occurrences of Changsha in our assemblage date
from the early/ mid-eighth to late ninth/ tenth centuries CE (Bohingamuwa 2017, Figure 3.55), which tally
with 760–900 CE dates from Shanga (Horton 1996, 303). Whitehouse and Williamson (1973) considered
Changsha to represent the earliest phase of Chinese ceramic trade with the West. Sri Lanka was an integral
part of this maritime trade network.
4.1.3 Yue Celadon ware
The occurrence of Yue ware at Mantai is similar to Changsha and hence dates to the same period, with a
possible upper date extension up to the eleventh century. Yue ware is widely reported from Sri Lanka,
including Anuradhapura, Yapahuwa, and Polonnaruwa (Coningham 2006; Prematilleke 1982), and is
generally dated to the ninth and tenth centuries (Prickett-Fernando 2003, 75); however, our Mantai Yue
wares date from the eighth to the eleventh centuries. Horton (1996, 307) also reported the continuity of this
ware to the thirteenth century at Shanga. Yue ware is also traded up to the Persian and Arab Gulfs and
Eastern Africa (Kennet 2004; Horton 1996, 307).
The Sino-Sri Lanka relations apparent in ceramics seem to date between the T’ang (618–907 CE) and Song
(960–1279 CE) dynasties.

4

�4.2 Sri Lanka- Southeast Asia (SEA) relations
Ceramics identified as Southeast Asian Ware (SEAW) are tentative and are based on their paddle
impressions (e.g., Karashima 2004, 3–10; Sasaki 2004, 16–20, 48–50). Lertrit (2004) was certain that such
marks were of SEA origin. Similarly, Solheim and Deraniyagala (1972) identified Paddle-impressed sherds
recovered from Kudumbigala, as being Southeast Asian. Our SEA assemblage contains both glazed and
unglazed tableware and storage / transport wares.
4.2.1 Southeast Asian Wares (SEAW)
The SEA assemblage contains 87 sherds, of which only eight are from Kirinda and the rest are from Mantai.
The former had only one ware, Paddle Impressed Orange Ware (PIOW), which appears to date from the
early sixth/ mid-seventh century to the early eighth century. Therefore, the Mantai assemblage is important
to illustrate interactions with that region. It had 79 sherds representing nine wares, of which only Black
glazed Ware (BLAG) is glazed (Bohingamuwa 2017, 337, Table C3.10.32). Their occurrence before Phase
VII is numerically insignificant, but they may indicate the arrival of SEAW from around the late first/
second century, increasing them from the early seventh to eighth/ninth centuries. Their occurrence matches
the dates (100–500 CE, with the majority being after 600 CE) assigned by Solheim and Deraniyagala (1972,
31–32). At Mantai, they continued to arrive until about the twelfth/ thirteenth century. Of the non-glazed
wares, Paddle Impressed Orange Ware (PIOW) and Mica Tempered Impressed Ware (MTIW) are more
certain as being SEAWs for their decorations.
4.2.2 ‘Imported.Unknown’ (Imp. Unk) ceramics and Southeast Asian connections
At Mantai, Katharodai, and Kirinda, there are 1772 sherds (4 per cent) that were identified as non-local for
their firing and fabric. Since their origin could not be determined, they were termed ‘Imported. Unknown’.
This assemblage contains both tableware and storage/ transport ware.
Of the SEA origin ‘Imp.Unk’ sherds, Pale light Orange Ware (PLOW) and PIOW (SEAW) ware resemble
a sherd identified by Schenk (2014, 96) as SEAW from Tissamaharama. This identification is based on
similar finds in Angkor Borei. Tissamahararama sherd is dated to the fourth/ fifth century CE. However,
our SEAWs date from the late first century, and then increased rapidly after the seventh century, making
them the earliest SEAWs in Sri Lanka. SEAWs identified by Solheim and Deraniyagala (1972, 31-38) date
them from 100–500 CE, while most of them postdate 600 CE. This evidence supports my identification of
some ‘Imp.Unk" wares as SEA. The ‘Imp.Unk’ assemblage collectively dates from ca. mid-fourth/ late
third century CE and peaks in the early/mid-eighth century.

5. TEXTUAL AND EPIGRAPHIC EVIDENCE
Mahavamsa’s earliest reference to Sri Lanka-SEA relations is the arrival of Suriguttha of Kelasa monastery
(Burma) with other monks for a religious event at Anuradhapura in the second century BCE (Mv. 29, 13).
Inscriptions datable to the third or second century BCE refer to seafaring, some of which also mention
regions to which they sailed. The first century Periyaminikulam inscription mentions a sailor named Naga,
who worked for Aji Saka of the Javanese tradition (Paranavitana 1970, cxxvii). Somadeva (2006, 57)
5

�identified a ‘Javaka naya’ (Nayaka), a leader of Javakas, in the Mottayakallu inscription. They were all
Malay Peninsula traders who traded with Sri Lanka.
The earliest textual evidence for Sino-Sri Lanka are the emissaries sent by the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220
CE) (Werake 1978, 64–73). Such early China-Sri Lanka relations are clear from Pliny’s record of Rachia,
the chief Sri Lankan envoy to Claudius court, who described his father’s visit to Seres (China). This visit
is recorded in Vamsattappakasini and an inscription at Sasseruwa in Anuradhapura (Abeydheera 2009,
145–165). By the first/ second century CE, Mahaniddesa indicates that Sri Lankan ports acted as transit
points in sea voyages between India and the SEA. Therefore, the Satavahanas of Deccan, India (230 BCE–
220 CE) sent their trading ships to Suvannabhumi via Sri Lanka (Gunawardana 2003, 19–20). It is roughly
when our SEA wares appear at Mantai.
These interactions appear to have intensified after the arrival of Fa-Xian in the fifth century, as is clear from
the 11 religious missions exchanged in the next two centuries (Werake 1978, 64–73). Nandi, who
transported Sri Lankan Buddhist nuns to establish the order of nunneries in China in 426 and 429, was a
highly experienced sailor on long-distance sea voyages (Grimes 1941, 76–79). Buddhist monks played a
significant role in strengthening cultural and commercial relations between the two regions.
Buddhist pilgrims such as Gunawarman and Vajrabodhi stopped in Sri Lanka in their long journeys
(Gunawardana 2003, 24–65) because the island was a Theravada Buddhist centre where there were many
sacred places/ objects of worship. They sailed on merchant ships that were linked to trade routes and trading
ports. Cosmas (XI. 15–16) reports that ‘Seeladiba’ (Sri Lanka) acted as the ‘mediaex’ in east-west maritime
trade, and its ports were linked to trading centres all over the world. The rise of Islam in Arabia and the
Tang dynasty in China brought a new dynamic to the Indian Ocean maritime trade by shifting the Arabian
sea-centered trade to the Bay of Bengal. Consequently, the southeastern and eastern ports of Sri Lanka
gained significance, and an increase in interaction with the SEA is visible in the archaeological record. The
influence of Sri Lankan Buddhist statues in the SEA (Dupont 1959, 631–636), as well as Mahayana
influence on Bodhisatva statues in Southeastern Sri Lanka, is clearly noticeable (Ghosh 1937).
Interaction between the Mahayana sects in Sri Lanka and those in SEA seems to have further strengthened,
as is clear from the eighth century Ratubuka inscription in central Indonesia (Casparis 1961, 241–243),
which mentions an Anuradhapura Abhayagiri Vihara-affiliated monastery. The continuity of interactions
with SEA is also clear from Vijayabahu I’s (1055–1110) political and cultural relations with Burma, as well
as Parakrambahu I’s invasion and subsequent peace negotiations by Buddhist monks (Wickramasinghe
1960, 38–58).
In the texts, Sino-Sri Lankan relations appear to have largely collapsed after the decline of the Tang dynasty
and Buddhism in China. However, the continuity of trade relations is clearly visible in the ceramic record
up to the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries.

6. CONCLUSIONS
The foregoing analysis of material, epigraphic and textual evidence dates the island’s earliest interactions
with SEA and China to the middle of the first millennium BCE. Although not discussed here, the
6

�identification of the transfer of iron smelting furnace technology from Sri Lanka to SEA and up to Japan
from around the fourth century BCE (Juleff 2009, 557–77) and the trade of Sri Lankan-made Indo-Pacific
glass beads, dated to 400 BCE at Anuradhapura (Conningham 2006, 357), to SEA support this claim.
However, such early interactions are not reflected in texts.
By about the third/ second centuries BCE, these interactions seemed to have intensified and expanded up
to China. Many early Brahmi inscriptions dated to this period refer to seafaring and trading communities,
including those from the Malay peninsula. Interestingly, the earliest reference in the Mahavamsa to the
arrival of Buddhist monks in Burma dates to the third century BCE. The visit of Han dynasty emissaries to
the island this time indicates the trading interests of China.
By the beginning of the Common Era, Sri Lanka’s cultural-commercial exchanges had extended from Rome
to China, as is clear from the statements of the Sri Lankan envoy to the Claudius court. These interactions
increased by the late first/ second century CE, as is clear from the appearance of Paddle-impressed wares
and the finding of a piece of Chinese silk at the Kotavehera Buddhist stupa (ColomboPage 2011).
By this time, texts are explicit that Sri Lankan ports were linked to ports in India and the SEA. The fifth
century marked the expansion of these interactions from China to the Mediterranean, as clear from
Procopius (Procopius I.20, 9–13) and the arrival of Buddhist pilgrims such as Faxian in the Island and the
11 religious missions exchanged between China and Sri Lanka. In the next century, Sri Lanka became the
center of Indian Ocean trade, and its ports will be linked to ports around the world (Cosmas XI, 15–16).
The late seventh/ eighth century witnessed the arrival of Chinese ceramics and then a profusion of Chinese
and Southeast Asian wares up to the twelfth/ thirteenth centuries CE. In response to the change of maritime
trade from the Arabian Sea to the Bay of Bengal in the seventh century, southern and eastern ports gained
significance, and close cultural relations with the SEA are clear from the archaeological record, texts,
inscriptions, religion, and art.
While it is difficult, archaeologically, to distinguish between trade and other forms of exchange, most of
the commodities discussed here appear to be traded. Textual data makes it clear that religious networks
were not only the forerunners of these interactions, but they also facilitated political and commercial
relations.

Acknowledgement
This paper is primarily based on my PhD field research. I acknowledge the University of Oxford-based SEALINKS Project of Dr.
Nicole Boivin and Prof. Dorian Fuller’s NERC Early Rice Project for funding my fieldwork and dating. I thank my supervisors,
Dr. Nicole Boivin, Dr. Derek Kennet, Dr. Damian Robinson, and Ms. Kalangi Rodrigo for proofreading.

7

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abeydeera, A. “Raki’s Mission to Romanukharatha: New Evidence in Favor of Pliny’s Account of Taprobanê, “N. H.” 6.84-91”.
Habis 40 (2009): 145–65.
Bohingamuwa, W. Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean: External Connections and Internal Networks (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, 2017). University of Oxford. The United Kingdom.
Carswell, J. “Chinese ceramics from Allapiddy in Sri Lanka”. In A Legacy of Asia’s maritime trade. 3-49. Kuala Lumpur (Southeast
Asian Ceramic Society), West Malaysian Chapter, 1985.
Carswell, J., Deraniyagala, S. and Graham, A. Mantai-City by the Sea. Aichwarld: Linden Soft Verlag, 2013.
Casparis, J. G. de. “New Evidence on Cultural Relations between Java and Ceylon in Ancient Times.” Artibus Asiae (1961):241–
48.
ColomboPage,
2011.
ColomboPage:
Sri
Lanka
Internet
Newspaper.
[Online]
http://www.colombopage.com/archive_11/Mar14_1300117391KA.php [Accessed 25. 08. 2014].

Available

at:

Coningham, R. A. E. Anuradhapura: The British-Sri Lankan Excavations at Anuradhapura Salagha Watta, 2 Volume 2 – the
Artefacts. BAR S1508. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2006.
Cosmas Indicopleustes: Topographia Christiana. II-XI
Dupont, P. “Les Buddha Dits d’Amaravati En Asie Du Sud-Est.” Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient 49, no 2 (1959):
631–36.
Flecker, M. "A Ninth-Century AD Arab or Indian Shipwreck in Indonesia: First Evidence for Direct Trade with China.” World
Archaeology 32, no. 3 (2001): 335–54.
Ghosh, D. “Two Bodhisattva images from Ceylon and Srivijaya.” Journal of the Greater India Society 4, (1937): 125–127.
Grimes, A. 1941. “The Journey of Fa-Hsien from Ceylon to Cantan.” The Journal of the Malayan Branch of Royal Asiatic Society
XIX, no 1 (1941): 76–92.
Gunawardana, R. A. L. H. 2003. “Seaways to Seilediba: Changing Patterns of Navigation in the Indian Ocean and Their Impact on
Precolonial Sri Lanka” In Sri Lanka and the Silk Road of the Sea, edited by Bandaranayake, S. Dewaraja, L., Silva, R. and
Wimalaratne, K. D.G., 17–36. Colombo: Central Cultural Fund, 2003.
Guy, J. “Early Nineth-Century Chinese Export Ceramics and the Persian Gulf Connection: The Belitung Shipwreck Evidence.”
The Oriental Ceramic Society of the Philippines Newsletter, no. February (2008): 7–12.
Horton, M. Shanga, Archaeology of a Muslim Trading Community on the Coast of East Africa. The British Institute of the Eastern
Africa Memoir 14. London: The British Institute of the Eastern Africa, 1996.
Hughes-Stanton, Penelope. and Kerr, Rose. Kiln sites of ancient China an exhibition lent by the People’s Republic of China.
London: British Museum, Oriental Ceramic Society, 1981.
Juleff, G. “Technology and Evolution: A Root and Branch View of Asian Iron from First Millennium BC Sri Lanka to Japanese
Steel.” World Archaeology 41, no 4 (2009): 557–77.

8

�Karashima, N. In Search of Chinese-Sherds in South India and Sri Lanka. Tokyo: Taisho University, 2004.
Kennet, D. Sassanian and Islamic Pottery from Ras Al-Khaimah. BAR S1248. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2004.
Lertrit, S. “Late Prehistoric and Early Historic Ceramic Chronology for Central Thailand.” Silpakorn University International
Journal 4, no 1-2 (2004): 5–37.
Mahavamsa. Colombo: National Museum, 1912.
Paranavitana, S. Inscription of Ceylon: Early Brahmi Inscriptions, Vol. I (Part1). Colombo: Department of Archaeological Survey
of Sri Lanka. 1970.
Prematilleke, P. L. Alahana Pirivena, Polonnaruwa Archaeological Excavation Report (April – September 1981). Colombo:
Central Cultural Fund, 1982.
Prickett-Fernando, M. “Durable Goods: The Archaeological Evidence of Sri Lanka’s Role in the Indian Ocean Trade.” In Sri Lanka
and the Silk Road of the Sea, edited by Bandaranayake, S. Dewaraja, L., Silva, R. and Wimalaratne, K. D.G., 53–76. Colombo:
Central Cultural Fund, 2003.
Procopius, History of the wars Vol I. London: The Loeb Classical Library, 1961.
Sasaki, H. “Chinese and Thai Ceramics in Kottapatnam” In In Search of Ceramic-Sherds in South India and Sri Lanka, edited by
Karashima, N., 16–21. Tokyo: Taisho University Press, 2004.
Schenk, H. “Pottery of so-Called “Kaolin Fabric” at Tissamaharama-Citadel (Sri Lanka) in the 4th and 5th Century AD” In South
Asian Archaeology, edited by Franke-Vogt, U. and Weisshaar, H. J., 357–64. Linden Soft Verlag, 2005.
Solheim, W. G., and S. U. Deraniyagala. Archaeological Survey to Investigate South Asian Prehistoric Presence in Ceylon, Ancient
Ceylon Occasional Papers no.1. Colombo: Department of Archaeology Sri Lanka, 1972.
Somadeva, R. Urban Origins in Southern Sri Lanka, Colombo: Postgraduate Institute of Archaeology, 2006.
Tampoe, M. Maritime Trade between China and the West. An Archaeological Study of the Ceramics from Siraf (Persian Gulf), 8th
to 15th Centuries A.D. BAR S555. Oxford: Archaeopress, 1989.
Werake, K. M. M. “A New Date for the Beginning of Sino- Lankan Relations” The Sri Lankan Journal of the Humanities iv, no 12 (1978): 64–73.
Whitehouse, D., and Williamson, A. “Sassanian Maritime Trade” Iran XI (1973): 29–49.
Wickramasinghe, S. “Ceylon’s Relations with South-East Asia with Special Relations to Burma” Ceylon Journal of Historical and
Social Studies III, no1 (1960): 38–58.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6342">
                <text>Goods and Texts: Creating an Archaeological and Historical Narrative of Sri Lanka’s Connectivity with Southeast Asia, China, and Beyond</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6343">
                <text>This paper deals with Sri Lanka’s interactions with Southeast Asia, China, and regions beyond from the beginning to&#13;
the middle of the thirteenth century CE. Several factors, including its central location in the Indian Ocean, have&#13;
contributed to connecting the island with these regions. Ceramics, epigraphic, and textual data provide the best&#13;
evidence for reconstructing such interactions. This paper is primarily based on the analysis of ceramics unearthed&#13;
from the coastal port-urban centres of Mantai, Kantharodai, and Kirinda. This data is compared with the ceramic data&#13;
from other sites such as Anuradhapura and Thissamaharama, as well as sites from the Indian Ocean Rim, for&#13;
comparison. Material analysis results are compared against and supplemented by epigraphic and textual data. The key&#13;
research question addressed here is: What different patterns of Sri Lanka’s connectivity with the eastern segment of&#13;
the Indian Ocean might emerge through the analysis of material and textual evidence? Research reveals that the&#13;
material evidence not only predates textual evidence for the beginning of Sri Lanka’s interactions with the region&#13;
under study but also clearly indicates their continuity up to the middle of the thirteenth century CE. Material evidence,&#13;
including beads and the transfer of iron technology, dates the earliest relationships to the middle of the first millennium&#13;
BCE. These cultural-commercial connections were regularized and intensified after the fifth and seventh centuries&#13;
CE, respectively. Sri Lanka’s culture- historical developments, in general, have always been influenced by the&#13;
changing dynamics of the Indian Ocean.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6344">
                <text>Wijerathne Bohingamuwa</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6345">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6346">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6347">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6348">
                <text>Bohingamuwa, Wijerathne. 2023. “Goods and Texts: Creating an archaeological and historical narrative of Sri Lanka's connectivity with Southeast Asia, China, and beyond.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Wijerathne Bohingamuwa. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology.URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1946 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6349">
                <text>Wijerathne Bohingamuwa</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="64">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 8 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="287" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3334">
                <text>With Perry to Japan: A Memoir by William Heine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3335">
                <text>William Heine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3336">
                <text>University of Hawai'i Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3337">
                <text>1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3338">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3339">
                <text>William Heine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3340">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3341">
                <text>1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3342">
                <text>Honolulu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3343">
                <text>University of Hawai'i Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3344">
                <text>With Perry to Japan: A Memoir by William Heine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="255" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="161">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/53e747dab4bc7b186e474731863b47a9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7f9c4a50528db5bafa6664a0403fd4f1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3020">
                    <text>Urdaneta and the health cargo of the Tornaviaje1
Mr Xabier Armendáriz2

Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the food cargo of Urdaneta’s Tornaviaje and it’s direct
consequences over the health of his sailors. The paper will focus on health issues on board,
specially in view of the unknown route that they would follow to go back to the Americas. We will
focus on how Urdaneta planned to overcome problems related to prolonged stays at sea,
specially health problems due to lack of fresh food. Through contemporary accounts and
diaries, we know that Urdaneta understood the necessity of having fresh fruits on board, and
took action to ensure the safety of his crew by introducing local fruits from the Philippines such
as coconuts. His efforts were successful, and his perilous trip was made with less than 10% of
mortality, with no direct mention to scurvy.

1. Introduction
If Friar Andrés de Urdaneta (birth Villafranca de Ordizia, Gipuzkoa, 1508 –
death Mexico city, 1568) is known to history is, due to his extraordinary return
trip from Asia to Mexico, his deed is a milestone in the history of navigation. On
the 8th of October 1565, on board the nao San Pedro, he arrived in Acapulco
after a long and difficult journey across the biggest Ocean on Earth. He had just
established a secure and passable route to go back to the Americas from the
Philippine Archipelago. However, Urdaneta's achievements do not end in his
nautical knowledge and his ability to successfully complete the crossing of the
Pacific Ocean eastwards. Other aspects of his personality and knowledge as a
sailor and as a man of science can be found in documental sources and his
own personal comments, such as the comparative analysis made by him
regarding the different experiences that arose during these great maritime
expeditions of his time.
We will discuss exclusively Urdaneta's knowledge of an illness that has
ravaged sailors since human populations started conquering the waves: scurvy.
That Urdaneta was aware of this disease and that he took measures to fight it
can be inferred from the fact that none of the sailors in his ship, the San Pedro,
died of it during he return voyage from the Philippines to New Spain - which
lasted four long months.

2 . The diet on board during the exploration of the Pacific
One of the biggest problems on board ships during the 16th century was the
conservation of food. Generally speaking, the small amount of fresh food
available - fruits and vegetables - was distributed following a hierarchical order
that gave preference to the officers of the ships, not usually reaching the sailors
(Mira-Caballos 2010:9; López-Ríos 1993:67), and it had to be consumed during
the first days of travel. The deterioration of fresh food was extremely fast, not
1
2

to Mari
Society for Basque Studies, SPAIN, info@xabierarmendariz.com

�only due to the natural cycle of cellular decomposition, but also due to the
storage conditions in the cargo hold. The high temperatures of some areas and
the humidity destroyed all food that had not previously been dried, salted or
smoked. Even these processes did not guarantee that the food would be
preserved for the whole voyage (Fernández Duro 1957:140). The need to
submit the food to these processes of preservation limited the type of products
that could be carried on board, since not all types of food can receive such
treatments. Not many fruits and vegetables can endure the process of
preservation, so their presence on board a 16th century ship is extremely rare.
The diet of sailors was basically two types: the first one was the navy
hardtack, a sort of unleavened bread made with flour and water and baked
twice or more to prolongue its preservation (Marañón 1940:220)3. The second
group was made up of legumes (chickpeas, lentils, and beans), dried or salty
fish and meat, vinegar, oil and cheese. Even when this diet contained a good
amount of calories, its nutritional value was very deficient (Mira Caballos
2010:8). The legumes were toasted in the oven to improve their preservation,
destroying any vitamins that they might have contained (Marañon 1940:221).
The food was weighted carefully and distributed among the sailors by a
steward, who could reduce the rations under the captain's orders in times of
shortage4. The main course consisted of a bun mixed with a stew of legumes
and water. A few days per week,5 salty fish or meat was eaten along with some
cheese. The remains of the maggoty hardtack was mixed with water to produce
a dull soup that was served for dinner. This soup was known as mazamorra.
The only consolation they had was the vinegar, which was served on rare
occasions, and the wine, of which the sailors received around one litre (L) per
day each. The wine helped to calm the hunger, as well as the thrist produced by
the salty rations (Mira-Caballos 2010:10)6. Such diets were rich in
carbohydrates and provided some proteins, but it was lacking in vitamins.

3. Scurvy: the disease of the sea
Scurvy is the most common nautical disease. The prolongued periods of time
spent at sea and the lack of fresh food provoke a general state of avitaminosis
in a short period of time, specially vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid). The symptoms
start with tiredness and depression, then changes in the gums and in the skin
appear followed by strong pain and swelling of the joints. The peak of the
disease comes when the gums are so swollen and weakened that the act of
eating ends with loss of tooth and a strong smell of rot. Other symptoms that
usually accompany scurvy are hemorrhage, edemas, jaundice and high fever.
3

Even though hardtack was more nutritious than the common bread because it was
made from bran, its hardness was so great that it had to be soaked in salty water in order to eat
it (Marañón 1940 :220).
4
These were unforseen circumstances, like for example bad weather and bad winds that
might delay the trip more than expected; or perhaps the inability to call at a port due to political
conflicts.
5
The disponibility of meat and fish was sometimes diminished by the damage made by
rats, insects and rotting. With some luck, fish was abundant in the seas that the ships were
sailing, which was always a great improvement over the poor diet on board.
6
The wine given among the sailors was of low quality, unlike the one provided to the
officers on board. However, even the distinction between food qualities was not enough to
prevent scurvy among the higher ranks.

2

�Death overcomes the patient between convulsions and shock.
Due to the severity of its condition, scurvy was the deadliest nautical
disease in long distance navigation (López-Ríos 1993:97-99). References to the
disease are common since Classic Antiquity; Hippocrates, Celsus and Pliny
wrote about it (López-Ríos 1993:98)7. Vasco de Gama himself lost a hundred
men of a hundred and sixty-eight to the disease on his expedition to India;
according to his logbook Diario de a bordo (1496-1497) (López-Ríos 1993:99)
The disease was so widespread that they were down to eight working men per
ship at one point.
The symptoms can show up in a span of between one month and a half
and three months, depending on the availability of fresh food on board. In
general, a person needs around 10 miligrams (mg) of vitamin C per day. The
body's reserve of vitamin C is around 1,5 grams (gr) and 3 gr, depending on the
health of the sailor prior to embarking. A rough estimate of the lapse of time that
it takes to develop scurvy in oceanic expeditions can be made, taking into
account that in periods of shortage the maximum loss of vitamin C is 4%
(López-Ríos 1993:97-99).
Until the mid 18th century, medical science considered scurvy a
contagious disease of unknown origin, and that it was most likely triggered by
the climate, the digestive system or humorism (López-Ríos 1993:106).
It is commonly accepted by the history of medicine that Dr. James Lind
(1716-1794) was the first person to cure scurvy. Lind, who was a surgeon on
board the Brittish vessel HMS Salisbury, conducted a clinical trial on board,
testing changes in the diet of his subjects to see whether such alterations
affected the development of scurvy. A few selected subjects afflicted with
scurvy kept the standard on-board diet, while two sailors were given cider and
two other men were given lemons and oranges8. In his famous book, A Treatise
of the Scurvy published in 1753, he described the results of his experiments:
the two men who drank cider improved, while the two sailors who were given
lemons and oranges made a full recovery (López-Ríos 1993:107).

7

Cited by López-Ríos: Hipócrates: “LIber de internis affectionibus” In Enciclopedia
Internacional de Cirugía. Madrid, Moya, 1883, I, p.206.; Celso: De Medicina, II, chapter III;
Plinio: Naturalis Historiae. XXV, chapter III.
8
Due to the relevance of his experiment, we transcribe the most enlightening sections:
On the 20th of May 1747, I took twelve patients with scurvy, on board the Salisbury at sea.
Their cases were a similar as I could have them. They all in general had putrid gums, the spots
and lassitude, with weakness of their knees. They lay together in one place, being a proper
apartment for the sick in the fore-hold; and had one diet common to all, viz, water-gruel
sweetened with sugar in the morning; fresh mutton-broth often times for dinner; at other times
puddings, boiled biscuit with sugar, etc.; and for supper, barley and raisins, rice and currants,
sago and wine, or the like. Two of these were ordered each a quart of cyder a-day. Two others
took twenty-five gutts of elixir vitriol three times a-day, upon and empty stomach; using a gargle
strongly acidulated with it for their mouths. Two others took two spoonfuls of vinegar three times
a-day, upon and empty stomach; having their gruels and their other food well acidulated with it,
as also the gargle for their mouth. Two of the worst patients, with the tendons in the ham rigid,
(a symptom none of the rest had), were put under a course of sea-water. Of this they drank half
a pint every day, and sometimes more or less as it operated, by way of gentle physic. Two other
had each two oranges and one lemon given them every day. […] The consequence was, that
the most sudden and visible good effects were perceived from the use of the oranges and
lemons; one of those who had taken them, being at the end of siks theis fit for duty. (Lind, J.
1753: 145-148)

3

�4. Andrés de Urdaneta
Urdaneta was born in the gipuzkoan village of Villafranca de Ordizia towards
the end of 1507 or the first months of 1508. His family was most likely involved
in the maritime trade with the recently discovered West Indies, the Spice islands
and an area well known to the Basque whalers: Terranova, el mar de los
bacallaos - the cod sea (Miguel 2002:21). This link between the sea and
Urdaneta's explains his cunning ability in trade. It also sets him within the world
of Basque seafaring. Basque sailors who traveled to Terranova in search for
cod or whales did not usually suffer from scurvy (Agirre 2004). Contemporary
documents show that the most common beverage on board was cider, since
wine was too expensive for the Basque shipowners. Cider is a good source of
vitamin C, which would account for a reduced number of scurvy cases in
Basque ships (Agirre 2004)9. This knowledge was most likely known by
Urdaneta.
Urdaneta was only 17 when he set sail to Asia with the doomed Loaysa
expedition. Of the seven ships that left Corunna on 24th of July 1525, only one
managed to arrive in Mindanao (current Philippines). We don't know what
Urdaneta's role in the expedition was, but he seemed to have been well
considered by the officers of the ships since he signed as a witness in Elcano's
last will. Urdaneta and the remaining crew (26 sailors) were stranded in the
Spice Islands. He remained in the Pacific region for almost a decade, until he
reached Spain on a Portuguese ship, on 26th of June of 1536. During these
years he suffered many misfortunes, but he also acquired a vast amount of
knowledge. The sources of this knowledge were diverse, but possibly the most
interesting was the rescue of castaway sailor Gonzalo de Vigo, from the
Magellan expedition. He survived in the island of Guam, and knew the language
of the local population. Urdaneta spent most of his years in the Pacific with
Gonzalo de Vigo, from whom he learnt that language (Miguel 2002:40-42;
Arteche 1943:160).
On his arrival to Europe he was captured by the Portuguese, who seized
Urdaneta's diaries, in which he wrote about his time in the Pacific. He escaped
from Lisbon and upon his arrival in Valladolid, he started re-writing his
experiences in Asia-Pacific. Based on his writings, both the diaries and the
memorial, it is clear that Urdaneta had a deep knowledge of the Spice Islands,
their geography, the people who inhabited them, their customs, wind patterns
and so on (Arteche 1943:160-162). This knowledge helped him undertake such
a difficult task as the “tornaviaje”, the return trip Westwards to Mexico, and it
most likely helped him to control direct health issues that threathened the
voyage.

9

Cider has been the alcoholic beverage traditionally consumed in the Atlantic coast of
Europe and the south of the British Isles. The humid climate made it difficult to grow vines, but
apple trees grow abundantly. There are many references to the Basque custom of drinking
cider, but perhaps the most interesting was made by French Inquisitor Pierre de Lancre. De
Lancre defined the Basques as bad farmers who prefered life at sea and their women as
witches who used the cider from the apple, the fruit of sin: “ne mangent que pommes, ne
boyvent que jus de pommes, qui est occasion qu'elles mordent si volontiers à cette pomme de
transgression, qui fist outrepasser le commandement de Dieu et franchir la prohibition à notre
premier père”. Lancre, Pierre de., 1612. Tableau de l’inconstance des mauvais anges et
démons… Livre I, Discours II. Chez Jean Berjon. Paris.

4

�The Tornaviaje
Urdaneta's life was quite remarkable. In 1538 he accompanied Pedro de
Alvarado to New Spain to help him organize a new expedition to the Spice
Islands (Miguel 2002:48). However, after the death of Alvarado, Ruy López de
Villalobos took control of the expedition, which was meant to seek a return route
to New Spain. Urdaneta was left behind, and Ruy Lopez de Villalobos'
expedition failed.
Meanwhile, Urdaneta occupied relevant roles related to maritime issues,
working in the service of viceroy Mendoza (Miguel 2002:50). In March 1553,
Urdaneta's life changed after he joined the order of the Augustinians. Although
he led a monastic life, he was mentioned repeatedly in connection with the
Spice Islands. In 1560 the new viceroy of New Spain, Luís Velasco, received a
letter from king Philip II ordering him to mount a new expedition to the Spice
Islands.10 The Spanish king was aware of the need to establish a Spanish
presence in Asia, specially in the Philippines after disputes with Portugal arose
regarding the ownership of the Maluku Islands. Philip II was also pressed by the
need to find an alternative way back through the Pacific Ocean, and not around
Africa, which was controled by the Portuguese. In the king's own words: “porque
lo principal que en esa jornada se pretende es saber la vuelta, pues la yda se
sabe que se haze en breve tiempo” [Translation: because our chief concern of
this journey is to find a way back, since the outbound journey is known to take a
short time] (Miguel 2002:54). The command of the new expedition was asigned
by Gipuzkoan Miguel López de Legazpi. However, the technical command felt
in the hands of Urdaneta (Arteche 1943:146), who had mentioned several times
his absolute certainty that he would be able to find his way back through the
Pacific Ocean to complete the return trip.
Each man had different missions: Legazpi was instructed to take control
over the Philippines, while Urdaneta was ordered to find his way back to New
Spain through the Pacific Ocean in what will be known as the Tornaviaje.
It was during the organization of the expedition that Urdaneta showed his
deep knowledge of naval medicine gathered from his experience on board the
Loaysa expedition and his observations during his stay in the Pacific Ocean. In
several letters to Philip II and viceroy Velasco, he insisted on provisioning the
ships with kidney beans (which contains vitamins B1,B2,B3,B9), broad bean
(rich in vitamins C, A, E, B1, B2) and guarana, a tropical fruit with a high content
of vitamine C (Miguel 2007). In a report for viceroy Velasco related to the
Tornaviaje, Urdaneta explains the characteristics of a disease that he himself
had observed first-hand in the Loaysa expedition:
De mas de [e]sto, da una enfermedad en esta Mar de Poniente a los
hombres que se les creçen y podreçen las enzias y mueren muchos de
[e]sta enfermedad, que a nosotros solo en una nao se nos murieron
desde el estrecho hasta las yslas cuarenta hombres y aun a los que an
ydo desde a Nueua España para la Espeçieria no les a dexado de dar
esta enfermedad empero como la nauegaçion se haze em poco tiempo y
lleuan bastimentos frescos, no haze tanta impresión como haze en los
que ban desde España por el Estrecho (Miguel 2009: 483-484).
[Translation: Besides this, there is a disease in this Sea of Ponente that
makes men's gums grow and rot and many die from this disease, in only
10

(Archivo General de Indias (AGI) Section Patronato, 23, 12).

5

�one nao forty men died from the strait to the islands, even those who
went from New Spain to the Spice islands have also been affected but
since the navigation takes a short time and they have fresh food, the
disease does not affect them as much as those who travel from Spain
through the strait]

Both references indicate without a doubt that Urdaneta knew of the
effects of lack of fresh fruit and vegetables in the development of scurvy, even
when he was unable to identify the agent that was involved (vitamine C would
not be discovered until the 20th century)11.
Legazpi's expedition set sail on 21st November 1564, and reached the
Philippines in 22nd January 1565, without any loss attributed to scurvy.
Urdaneta served as the interpreter for Legazpi on his arrival to the Philippines,
and in short he was ordered to start the journey back. The nao San Pedro was
ready for her return to New Spain. On 1st June 1565 they set sail from Cebu
following a North-East course. In command of the expedition was Legazpi's own
grandson, Felipe de Salcedo, who was only 18 years old. However, Urdaneta
was in charge of the navigation. The story of the trip was recorded by Esteban
Rodríguez, first pilot, and Rodrigo de Espinosa, second pilot. Unfortunately,
Urdaneta's account - which can be found in the National Library of Paris - is
badly preserved and barely legible. From the pilots' accounts we know that
Urdaneta stocked up the vessel for eight or nine months, although he knew that
the trip would take around four months at the most. They sailed between the
islands of the archipelago until they reached Luzon, and there the pilots wrote
that Urdaneta replenished the food they had already and ordered to stock a
large amount of coconuts (Miguel 2002:77). After this last call, the ship never
touched land until they reached Acapulco.
The relevance that Urdaneta places in coconuts is not casual. The
coconut can be easily preserved and it lasts for a long time, something he
would have known from his experience in the Maluku islands. Also, it is a
reliable source of water in case of shortage. Perhaps its most remarkable
feature is its great content of vitamin C, which is 3,3 mg (around 6%). The
vitamin is present in the pulp, as well as in the water12. It could be argued
Urdaneta knew about the use of coconut in the prevention of scurvy during his
stay in the Maluku islands. He spoke fluent Malay and Tagalog, and he knew
local maritime customs and their types of ships (Miguel 2002:71; Arteche 1943:
160).

5. Arrival in America
During the trip, Urdaneta made several tackings to calculate longitude
estimates, prolonguing the trip more than necessary. On 18th September 1565,
after navigating across the Pacific for three months and a half, they sighted the
11

Albert Szent Gvordyi, Chemistry professor at the University of Budapest, isolated the
vitamin C of a green pepper in 1928. He received the Nobel Price of Medicine and Physiology
in 1937 for this and other achievements.
12
It is worth noting that the biggest producers of coconuts are currently located in
Southeast Asia. The Philippines tops the list with 17 million tons per year. Indonesia and
Malaysia, the old Maluku islands, produce 16 million and half million respectively (Food And
Agricultural Organization of United Nations: Economic and Social Department. The Statistical
Devision. (2007) http://faostat.fao.org/

6

�coast of California, approximately around the island of Santa Rosa.
The balance of deaths on board was of 16 out of a 200 men crew, just
around 8% of the sailors when most vessels of the same period lost between
33% and 40% of the crew to scurvy, while many more were suffering the last
stages of the disease (Miguel 2002:81). None of the accounts that have
survived mention scurvy, although they do tell of the bad health that suffered
most of the crew - just a few who reached the Americas were fit to work - even
under the care of Urdaneta, who also acted as the nurse on board13.
Within sight of land, Urdaneta decided to continue to Acapulco, where
they arrived on 8th October, two weeks after reaching California. It would have
been surprising that Urdaneta would not have stopped for provisions if there
had been cases of scurvy on board. That would have meant depriving the crew
of the fresh food that he knew was essential against scurvy. He also prolongued
the trip to make tacking maneuvers. The sixteen deaths on board and the
general exhaustion of the sailors can be attributed to any of the common
infectious diseases, tropical maladies or traumatisms that usually affected life
on that type of vessel - the nao - (Marañon 1940:223). We cannot forget that
these men had been at sea for almost ten months since the outbound trip.
Another point that hints at Urdaneta's knowledge of naval medicine
comes from a surprising source. A deserter of the outbound expedition, Alonso
de Arellano, completed the return trip before Urdaneta on board the patache
San Lucas, thanks to the knowledge shared with him by Urdaneta. However,
the men that were still alive when they reached the Americas were severely ill
with scurvy14.
Eleven years after the death of Urdaneta, an augustinian friar called
Agustín Farfán, published in 1579 his Tratado Breve de Medicina (Brief Treaty
of Medicine). He must have known Urdaneta, since they were members of the
same order. In his book, Farfán writes that to prevent scurvy the patient should
be administered: “un medicamento con medio limón y media naranja amarga,
con un poco de alumbre quemado” [translation: a remedy with half lemon and
half orange, with a bit of burnt alum] (Farfán 1579). These observations were
made 200 years before Johann Georg, Heinrich Kramer or James Lind made
their observations.
Once the Manila galleon route was established,15 we find constant
references regarding the use of citrics in the galleon's infirmary cabinet:
Variedad de naranjas: Lumben, amumontoy, aoson, apugan, caramisca,
malcape, cabuagao, opong-opong y samugao, bien naturales o en
conserva se cargaban en los galeones. La variedad del limonero
biasung, abundante en Visayas fue muy eficaz para evitar el escorbuto
(Cabrero 2009: 574)
13

Urdaneta was accompanied by a member of his order: friar Andrés de Aguirre. In
contemprary accounts there is an explicit mention by the crew thanking the friars for their care
(Arteche 1943: 181)
14
“La gente estaba turbada, que no había quien acudiese ni acertase con cabo ninguno
por la grande oscuridad (sic) que hacía y también por estar toda la gente enferma de la grande
hambre y sed que han pasado y pasaban y aunque hubieran que comer no podían, porque a
todos se les andaban los dientes y les creció mucha carne de la boca, tanto que les tapaban
las encías y en tocando en cualquier cosa se les caían los dientes”. (Cuevas 1943)
15
It was also common that upon arrivel on the Californian coast the natives would
approach the galleons on canoes to offer the exhausted sailors citrics and other fruits cultivated
by the missionaries ( Lyon 1990: 27).

7

�[Translation: “variety of oranges: Lumben, amumontoy, aoson, apugan,
caramisca, malcape, cabuagao, opong-opong and samugao, either
natural or preserved were stocked in the galleons. The lemon tree variety
called biasung, abundant in Visayas was very effective in the prevention
of scurvy”]

In any case, it seems that not all sailors and explorers serving under the
Spanish crown shared this knowledge. It could be perhaps that this information
was not transmitted generally among captains of the fleet or the officers
responsible of the vessels16. Another possibility is that this knowledge was
ignored in lieu of commercial gain in view of cargo distribution and the costs of
the quantity and quality of the crew's food.

6. Conclusion
Taking into account the Tornaviaje and Urdaneta's knowledge, it is
unsustainable to maintain that scurvy was considered a contagious disease up
to the 18th century. Contemporary documents show that Urdaneta was a
Renaissance man, whose knowledge and experience were taken into account
by the Spanish crown. His indications were applied broadly to long oceanic
travels, such as the Manila galleon route.
On the other hand, Urdaneta's notes about health on board are clear and
concise. From them it can be determined that Urdaneta possessed ample
knowledge of the nature of scurvy. In fact, if we take into account the language
used in his anotations, it could be suggested that this knowledge was shared
with other pilots, although it was not a general knowledge among every pilot.
The familiarization of Spanish pilots with scurvy and its treatment using fresh
food and citrics could have been wider than previously thought. However, as
mentioned before, there was not a general education plan that would have
guaranteed that every pilot in a Spanish vessel had access to this information.
In later oceanic travels scurvy was again present, but it is difficult to determine if
this is due to ignorance or to stocking and logistic issues related to supplies and
preservation. After reviewing Urdaneta's work, it seems more likely that the
latter option was to be blamed.
It is not the aim of this paper to establish whether it was James Lind or
Urdaneta he conqueror of scurvy, like English literature portrays the former.
Instead, our goal is to point out the lack of communication between the navies
of the great world powers, which were battling each other for territorial
expansion. In this sense, the lack of communication postponed the
generalization of the cure against scurvy, which led to the deaths of too many
sailors who met a horrific and painful end.

Bibliography
Agirre, E.,

“La sidra” In Euskonews &amp; Media. Nº CCLXXXIII. [html],

16

An example can be found in memorial nº 4, that captain Pedro Fernández de Quiros
sends to don Luis de Velasco, viceroy of Peru, in 1598. In a long list of the provisions that were
needed for his 1605 expedition to the mythic Terra Australis, he lists the required food, giving
little relevance to fresh vegetables and a total absence of citrics and other fruits (Fernandez de
Quiros 1597-1614: IV, 62-63)

8

�2004

Arizaga, B.,
Martinez, S.,
2006
Arteche, J. de.,
1943
Cabrero
Fernandez, L.,
2009
Cuevas, M.,
1943.
Farfan, A. Fr.,
1579
Fernandez
Duro.C.,
1857
Fernández de
Quirós, F.,
2002
Gargantilla, P.,
2011
Lind, J.,
1753
Lopez-Ríos
Fernández, F.,
1993
Lyon, E.,
1990
Marañón, G.,
1940

Eusko Ikaskuntza- Basque Studies Society, Donostia-San
Sebastián, available at:
&lt;http://www.euskonews.com/0282zbk/gaia28203es.html&gt;
[Accessed 20 August 2011 ]
Atlas de las villas medievales de Vasconia, Bizkaia, Eusko
Ikaskuntza, Donosita-San Sebastián.
Urdaneta. El dominador de los espacios del Océano Pacífico,
Espasa-Calpe, Barcelona.
“Alegría, tristeza y ansiedad en la travesía del Galeón”, in
(ed) Susana Truchuelo, Andrés de Urdaneta: Un hombre
moderno, Ayuntamiento de Ordizia, Lasarte-Oria.
Monje y marino: La vida en los tiempos de Andrés de
Urdaneta. Galatea, México.
Tratado Breve de Medicina, Ciudad de México.
Disquisiciones náuticas. La mar descrita por los mareados,
Imprenta de Aribau, Madrid, Electronic edition available at
www.openlibrary.org
Memoriales de las Indias Australes. Edición de Pinochet de
la Barra, O. Crónicas de América 1597-1614, Dastin, Las
Rozas.
Breve historia de la medicina. Del chamán a la gripe A,
Nowtilus, Madrid.
A treatise of the scurvy, (ed.) Facs., Edimburgo University
Press, Edimburgo,1953.
Medicina naval española en la época de los descubrimientos,
Editorial Labor, Barcelona.

“Track of the Manila Galleons” In National Geographics,
Sep.1990.
“La vida en las galeras en tiempos de Felipe II” in Ars
Médica. Revista de humanidades, From Historia y Vida,
Espasa Calpé, Barcelona.
Miguel, J.R. de., “Urdaneta, un hombre moderno”, in Euskonews, CDXV,
2007
[html] Eusko Ikaskuntza-Basque Studies Society, DonositaSan Sebastián. Available at:
&lt;http://www.euskonews.com/0415zbk/gaia41502es.html&gt;
[Accessed 20 August 2011]
Miguel, J.R. de., Urdaneta en su tiempo, Sociedad Oceanográfica de
2002
Gipuzkoa, Donosita-San Sebastián.
Miguel, J.R. de., “Las dificultades náuticas del Tornaviaje", in (ed.) Susana
2009
Truchuelo, Andrés de Urdaneta: Un hombre moderno,
Ayuntamiento de Ordizia, Lasarte-Oria.
Mira Caballos,
“La vida y la muerte a bordo de un navío del siglo XVI:
E.,
algunos aportes”, in Revista de Historia Naval, CVIII,
2010
Ministerio de Defensa, Madrid.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3015">
                <text>Urdaneta and the health cargo of the Tornaviaje</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3016">
                <text>Session 9&#13;
Spain and the Asia-Pacific region</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3017">
                <text>The aim of this paper is to analyze the food cargo of Urdanetaâ€™s Tornaviaje and itâ€™s direct consequences over the health of his sailors. The paper will focus on health issues on board, specially in view of the unknown route that they would follow to go back to the Americas. We will focus on how Urdaneta planned to overcome problems related to prolonged stays at sea, specially health problems due to lack of fresh food. Through contemporary accounts and diaries, we know that Urdaneta understood the necessity of having fresh fruits on board, and took action to ensure the safety of his crew by introducing local fruits from the Philippines such as coconuts. His efforts were successful, and his perilous trip was made with less than 10% of mortality, with no direct mention to scurvy. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3018">
                <text>Xabier ArmendÃ¡riz</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3019">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="29">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="210" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="90">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/87b2bf213fd1ab2c9ae4c07cefd584d8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>128a91919393cc03d17dce9ef6093136</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2562">
                    <text>Spain and the Underwarter Cultural Heritage in the
Asia-Pacific Area
Xavier Nieto1

Abstract
In 1521, Ferdinand Magellan reached the Mariana Islands in the name of king Charles I of
Spain. His travel of exploration to seek out a westward route to the Spice Islands lead to a long
standing presence of Spain in the Asia-Pacific region. Miguel Lopez de Legazpi established the
first Spanish colony in the Philippines in 1565 and only a few months later, Andrés de Urdaneta
had made a safe return trip to Acapulco which lead to the establishment of the Manila-Acapulco
galleon trade route that lasted until Mexico’s independence in 1815.
Today, Spain’s maritime legacy is dispersed around the world, with a large number of
settlements and wrecks located in the Asia-Pacific region. For the past 30 years, the Spanish
government has done enormous efforts to study its past overseas, especially in the Americas.
Finally, the time has come to rediscover our links with Asia-Pacific countries and redesign our
cultural ties with the region. In this paper I will analyze Spain’s institutions and laws that will
hopefully lead to a new collaboration paradigm that will re-evaluate Spain’s role in the history of
Asia-Pacific.

It is well known that a sunken ship is a valuable document to be taken into
account to explain the history of any country.
For centuries the world was Spain’s action field and the ships were the
most important means of transport for men and products. Consequently our
history is deeply linked to that of countries where our ships called at.
No wonder, therefore, the interest of Spanish institutions to participate in
conferences like the present one. Sometimes we are there to make scientific
contributions and in other cases, like the present one, to learn about
participants’ new ideas so as to initiate and strengthen personal and institutional
relationships that will surely bring about new possibilities for the understanding
of Spanish links with the Asian-Pacific zone.
My intervention will focus on the importance of the joint work among
countries, under United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO) recommendations, in order to locate, preserve and
work on these documents submerged in the seas and oceans all over the world.

Introduction
We cannot forget, significant as it is, that the Philippines owes its name to
Infant Felipe, who would later reign in Spain under the name of Philip II (1556 1598), a monarch who would eventually also become king of Portugal, under
the name of Philip I (1581 - 1598). Once the Portuguese colonies had been
incorporated to the Spanish ones, this double crown allowed the monarch to
extend his administrative and political control over territories located in five
continents. This new development forced the monarch to design new strategies
based on naval communications, thanks to which Spain asserted its presence,
1

Director del Museo Nacional de Arqueología Subacuática – ARQUA, Ministerio de
Cultura de España

1

�both culturally and administratively, in the Philippines and the Pacific for more
than three hundred years between 1565 and 1898.
The failure in 1524 of the Spanish-Portuguese meeting held in Badajoz in
order to find solutions for the dispute over ownership of The Moluccas, gave
reasons for the Spanish Kingdom to send, the following year, six ships
commanded by Juan Garcia Jofre de Loaysa following the route opened by
Magellan in the Pacific. Despite the failure of the expedition, it was possible to
reach The Moluccas and the Philippines and to gather enough experience to
assess the difficulties involved in making the journey around South America,
forcing them to open a new route, this time from Mexico.
The mission fell to Alvaro de Saavedra, who in 1526 was ordered by king
Charles V to establish a route to the Pacific departing from Zihuatanejo, in
current Mexico (González 1964:210-211). Two vessels reached the East Indies
with relative ease, however the return trip was a complete failure. Spain would
have to wait another twenty years before a successeful return route could be
established.
The Treaty of Zaragoza (Tratado de Zaragoza 1529) clarified, in theory,
the division of Asia between Spain and Portugal. Althoughit was not respected,
it had the advantage of focusing the interest of Spain over the archipelagos
which were not under Portuguese influence. In particular, the Spanish focused
on the Philippines, which had already been named so by Ruy Lopez de
Villalobos during his expedition in 1542.
In the seventeen years between the expeditions of Jofre de Loaysa and
that of Lopez de Villalobos` the first phase of a typical process of naval
colonization had been completed. Characterized by progressive geographic
penetration through a rather uneven process, gathering experience through trial
and error assessment, accumulating geographic and seafaring knowledge,
studying economic efficiency and establishing a framework for sharing power
and influence with pre-existing populations..
This allowed Miguel Lopez de Legazpi to carry out the last "jump" and in
April 1565 he settled down in Cebu Just two months later he sent the San
Pedro back with a cargo of cinnamon. The Manila Galleon trade route had been
opened (see Junco this volume). .Coinciding with the transfer of the capital from
Cebu to Manila this route joined the Asia-Pacific to Mexico and Europe..
Bearing in mind that the Spaniards soon gave up the exploitation of
unprofitable resources in the area, This route would not have been particularly
noteworthy had it not been for the role of Manila as the port of redistribution and
the prompt abolition of the trade ban imposed on individuals. Chinese silk
arrived in Manila and cotton from India, in whole rolls or as dresses, shirts and
tablecloths as well as all kinds of manufactured goods (Pérez Herrero 1989;
Schruz 1939). From Japan, during the short period of sporadic direct contacts,
people arrived with manufactured metal parts, lacquered pieces and furniture
(Ibid.). Traders, in turn, would redistribute products from elsewhere and in this
way tapestry and carpets would come from Persia (Ibid.). An extensive and
ramified network had been created which facilitated the arrival of Eastern
exoticism to Spain and at the same time that of Mexican and Peruvian silver to
Western countries. This was done through an intense maritime traffic, not
without dangers which no doubt has marked the seas with underwater
archaeological remains. Nowadays this could be seen as a legacy of the Asian-

2

�Pacific and Spanish history, which is to be preserved for historical research and
public enjoyment.

Preservation
Ships of different origins, Chinese, Indian, Japanese, Spanish, Portuguese,
Dutch, British to name just a few, are now a fragile, irreplaceable and valuable
cultural heritage. It is essential to know the national history and the interplay of
cultures that shaped and conditioned the history and culture of mankind
Unfortunately, traditional practices of recovery accelerated in recent
decades by technological means and by the increased economic value of
recovered things has caused the destruction of a cultural heritage. This can
sometimes lead to loss of historical information involving countries different from
those where the discovery occurs. That is why the preservation of this heritage
should be a multinational task characterized by collaboration among affected
countries.
There are many threats to this heritage as many countries still poorly or
inadequately protected by national laws. These are either subjected to
internationally recognized texts or the responsible body fails to implement the
rules. Despite a countries ratification of international conventions they simply
lack the means for compliance. Nor is it a minor obstacle the important
differences, sometimes irreconcilable, among national laws of the countries
involved in the partnership for historic preservation of a sunken ship.
We are facing a fragmented and diverse legal system that reflects very
different legal positions of the different states whose interests are sometimes
brought face to face: old naval powers against States that had been colonized
and later become independent, flag states in front of coastal states (Aznar
2009).
The United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of the 10th
of December 1982, which by its wide acceptance could be a valid or at least
guiding document, barely deals with Underwater Cultural Heritage. Only two
articles, 149 and 303, refer to the issue:
Article 149 states:
Archaeological and historical objects.
All objects of an archaeological and historical nature found in the Area shall be
reserved or disposed of for the benefit of mankind as a whole, particular regard
being paid to the preferential rights of the State or country of origin, or the State
of cultural origin, or the State of historical and archaeological origin.

Although this article states that the archaeological remains found in the area "...
will be preserved or disposed of for the benefit of all mankind ..." the ambiguity
of the text allows for various interpretations by failing to establish, for example,
the meaning of "... preferential rights ... "or what is meant by" ... dispose of ... "
Article 303
Archaeological and historical objects found at sea.
1. States have the duty to protect objects of an archaeological and historical
nature found at sea and shall cooperate for this purpose.
2. In order to control traffic in such objects, the coastal State may, in applying
article 33, presume that their removal from the seabed in the zone referred to

3

�in that article without its approval would result in an infringement within its
territory or territorial sea of the laws and regulations referred to in that article.
3. Nothing in this article affects the rights of identifiable owners, the law of
salvage or other rules of admiralty, or laws and practices with respect to
cultural exchanges.
4. This article is without prejudice to other international agreements and rules
of international law regarding the protection of objects of an archaeological
and historical nature.

The obligation that the articles place upon all States to protect archaeological
objects and to do so through international cooperation is most valuable but it is
true that the ambiguity involved in making it obligatory all over "... the sea ..."
introduces elements of conflict as when regarding its application in international
waters, for instance.
Paragraph 3 does not solve, at least for coastal states, the legal dispute
with flag States and leaves a door open to apply the rules of rescue for boats of
historical value.
Regardless of legal interpretations, that which underlies the UNESCO
2001 Convention is the obligation of the protection of underwater archaeological
sites given their value for all mankind and the fact that this protection requires
close collaboration among all the countries involved.
It is the UNESCO 2001 Convention on the Protection of Underwater
Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention) which prohibits commercial exploitation as
one of the main causes of damage and destruction, insisting on the universal
value of this heritage and the need for international collaboration.
Thus the 2001 Convention becomes a hindrance to the activities of
treasure hunter companies which see their profits threatened both by the
decline in the price of their stock market values and the lack of product to sell.
Not surprisingly treasure hunters are continuously taking actions against the
2001 Convention.

Present Situation towards Underwater Archaeological Heritage
Spain has a long tradition in the preservation of the historical heritage and it is
contemplated both in the Constitution (Constitución del Reino de España 1978)
currently in force and in various sectorial laws. Thus Article 46 of the
Constitution of 1978 provides that:
Los poderes públicos garantizarán la conservación y promoverán el
enriquecimiento del patrimonio histórico, cultural y artístico de los pueblos de
España y de los bienes que lo integran, cualquiera que sea su régimen jurídico
2
y su titularidad. La ley penal sancionará los atentados contra este patrimonio

A specific law, 16/1985 on Spanish Historical Heritage provides in Article 40
Forman parte del Patrimonio Histórico Español los bienes muebles o
inmuebles de carácter histórico susceptibles de ser estudiados con
metodología arqueológica, hayan sido o no extraídos y tanto si se encuentran
2

Public authorities will guarantee the preservation and will promote the enrichment of the
historical, cultural and artistic heritage of the peoples of Spain and the goods that form part of it,
whichever is its legal regime and ownership.The Criminal Law will sanction the attacks against
this heritage. Spanish Constitution, 1978, Article 46

4

�en la superficie o en el subsuelo, en el mar territorial o en la plataforma
continental. Forman parte, asimismo, de este Patrimonio los elementos
geológicos y paleontológicos relacionados con la historia del hombre y sus
3
orígenes y antecedentes

This article which summarizes the legal position of Spain in this field has
some peculiarities that deserve to be mentioned:
a) .- Unlike the 2001 UNESCO Convention, Spain does not set the 100-year
period as necessary to give any asset historical heritage value, so that its value
is acquired not by age but by their potential value as a source of historical
documentation.
b) .- No legal distinction is made among archaeological objects whether they
come from ground or underwater findings.
c) .- Archaeological objects are protected whether they are extracted or not.
d) .- As in national and international legislation, ships are considered as
buildings, the law protects both the vessel and its cargo.
e) .- All these objects are part of the Spanish Historical Heritage, which
prevents, among other actions, commercial exploitation by private people.
Since Article 46 of the Spanish Constitution establishes that the criminal
law shall punish any offences against this heritage, the Penal Code provides in
Article 323 that: “Será castigado con la pena de prisión de uno a tres años y
multa de doce a veinticuatro meses el que cause daños en … yacimientos
arqueológicos”.4
After analyzing the articles and annexes of the 2001 Convention we can
see that essential aspects such as the concept of heritage as a public good are
excluded from any commercial transactions and the need of protecting it as a
value for society. This presents remarkable similarities with present Spanish
law.
On 6 June 2005 the Spanish Parliament ratified the 2001 Convention
which from January 2, 2009 became part of the legislation that sets the Spanish
activities in this field.
Although Spain joined with some delay in the practice of underwater
archeology, the creation in the 70’s of the so-called Patronatos de
Investigación Arqueológica Submarina (Submarine Archaeological Research
Trusts) marked the institutional positioning that allowed in the 80’s and 90’s the
emergence of stable institutions dependent on the Ministry of Culture and the
Autonomous Governments.
Right now the National Museum of Underwater Archaeology, commonly
known as ARQUA, dependent on the Ministry of Culture and the centers of
Underwater Archaeology in Catalonia, Valencia and Andalusia provide staff and
technical expertise enabling them to act on underwater cultural heritage.
These legislative developments and infrastructure are supplemented by
3

The Spanish Historic Heritage is composed by movable and immovable heritage of
historic character that are subject to be studied with archaeological methodology, that have
been or haven't been extracted and if they are either on the surface, subsoil, in territorial waters
or in the continental platform. Also considered part of this Heritage are the geological and
paleonthological elements related to the history of mankind and its origins and history. Spanish
Historical Heritage Law, 16/1985, Article 40
4
It will be punished with a sentence of up to three years in prison and a fine of between
twelve and twenty four months to whomever might cause damage in...archaeological sites.
Spanish Penal Code, Article 323

5

�the National Plan for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (Green
Paper 2010). This document sets targets to achieve over the coming years.
There is a publication, Green Paper: National Plan for Protection of
Underwater Heritage (Aznar, et al. 2010). that, after a diagnosis of the present
situation, presents remedial corrective measures necessary to advance in the
treatment of this heritage.

A POSSIBLE FUTURE
The signing on December 2, 2010 in Washington of a partnership between the
Spanish Ministry of Culture and National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) included, among other issues, the protection and
research of wrecks in the respective countries. It is a good example of the kind
of activities that can be carried out
There is a large chapter in Spanish history that requires all the
information provided by Spanish vessels sunk in the Asia–Pacific area. They
should therefore be treated as historical artefacts in accordance with the spirit of
the 2001Convention.
Two aspects of the 2001 Convention are essential in this type of activity:
no commercial exploitation of archaeological sites and collaboration between
the States concerned.
Spain has, as part of its heritage, important archives essential for a full
scientific understanding of an archaeological site. At the same time we also
have very good professional historians and underwater archaeologists capable
of working together to provide a complete vision of the Spanish presence in
Asia-Pacific territories.
The National Museum of Underwater Archaeology - ARQUA is the
technical section of the Ministry of Culture competent in these matters and
collaboration with other research teams. It can carry out work of cataloguing
the underwater archaeological sites of Spanish history with Pacific countries.
With this catalogue we will have a tool to manage the underwater cultural
heritage. It will allow us to establish the most effective actions to perform,
bearing in mind its preservation and further scientific research.

Bibliography
Aznar Gomez, M. Green Paper. National Plan for Protection of Underwater
Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture, Madrid, access
et al.,
(http://museoarqua.mcu.es/patrimonio_subacuatico/plan_na
2010
cional/index.html)
Aznar, M.,
La protección jurídica internacional del Patrimonio Cultural
2009
Subacuático, Arqueología Nàutica i Subaquàtica,
Monografies del CASC, 8, pp. 35-46.
Constitución del
Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 311, 29/12/1978
Reino de
España,
1978
Pérez Herrero,
El Galeón de Manila: Relaciones Comerciales entre Oriente
y América. In: de Paula Solano Pérez-Lila, F. Extremo
P., 1989
Oriente Ibérico: Investigaciones Históricas, Metodología y
6

�Schurz, W.L.,
1939
Tratado de
Zaragoza,
1529

Estado de la Cuestión. AECID, Madrid, pp.445-458
The Manila Galleon, E.P. Dutton, New York.
Tratado de Zaragoza. [manuscript] Archivo General de
Indias (AGI), Patronato, 49, Nº2, ramo 9. The text is
reproduced in full in Rumeu de Armas, A. 1992: El Tratado
de Tordesillas Mapfre, Madrid.

UNESCO,
2001Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage, United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.
United Nations, 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Paris.

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2557">
                <text>Spain and the Underwarter Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Area</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2558">
                <text>Session 9&#13;
Spain and the Asia-Pacific region</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2559">
                <text>In 1521, Ferdinand Magellan reached the Mariana Islands in the name of king Charles I of Spain. His travel of exploration to seek out a westward route to the Spice Islands lead to a long standing presence of Spain in the Asia-Pacific region. Miguel Lopez de Legazpi established the first Spanish colony in the Philippines in 1565 and only a few months later, AndrÃ©s de Urdaneta had made a safe return trip to Acapulco which lead to the establishment of the Manila-Acapulco galleon trade route that lasted until Mexicoâ€™s independence in 1815.&#13;
&#13;
Today, Spainâ€™s maritime legacy is dispersed around the world, with a large number of settlements and wrecks located in the Asia-Pacific region. For the past 30 years, the Spanish government has done enormous efforts to study its past overseas, especially in the Americas. Finally, the time has come to rediscover our links with Asia-Pacific countries and redesign our cultural ties with the region. In this paper I will analyze Spainâ€™s institutions and laws that will hopefully lead to a new collaboration paradigm that will re-evaluate Spainâ€™s role in the history of Asia-Pacific.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2560">
                <text>Xavier Nieto</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2561">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="29">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="492" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="284">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/ca521fbf9871fd5ccea14958a5342eab.pdf</src>
        <authentication>50a2da2b93919375039998fd8e24370c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5639">
                    <text>Seamanship and Navigation: Seafarers on Board Daily
Skills in Chinese Junk
Xu Lu
Chinese Sailing Junk Expedition Society
xuluxm2013@yahoo.com
Yu Long Fa
Xiamen Old Fishing Port
13666084562@163.com

Abstract
Chinese sailing traditions changed a little through time; sailors inherited
their onboard skills, expertise, and experience by orally imparting others
with physical instruction. But these daily skills were rarely recorded or
studied in the past. For seafarers, how to operate and maneuver a
Chinese junk was their daily work; and apart from sparse historical
documents such as Phing-Chou Kho Than (Yu, 1117), Shi Liu-Qiu Lu
(Xiao and Xia, 1580) (Fig. 1), and preliminarily observations by G.R.G.
Worcester, Joseph Needham, Thomas Hoppe, and others, seamanship
and navigation were kept in the minds of surviving successions of living
sailors. In 2004, the author had an opportunity to sail on a nearly 100 year
old Jin Hua Xin as an apprentice sailor for her last voyage. Several months
of onboard experiences provided a rare field investigation to approach the
complex mechanism of crew, their organization and their daily work. This
experience led the authors to raise a marine ethnographic field
investigation project along Fujian coast. Experimental archaeology
creates effective scenes for realistic performance of past systems. A small
full-size replica LanTay II was built for a series of archaeological voyages;
the data gathered from the traces of past sailing routes will verify and add
some knowledge for understanding the real daily work of Chinese
seafarers onboard. In this paper, the authors shall present combined
researches on historical documents, past observations with lively oral
materials achieved by marine ethnographic field investigation on
traditional sailing ports along South Fujian coast; throughout this research,
the authors approach the knowledge about seafarers onboard daily skills
and try to present the research about the sailors methods to maneuver
the junk and its navigation system by means of a combination of instinct,
eyesight, memory, and skill.

�Key words: Chinese junk, seafaring, ethnography

Fig. 1: One of the Earlier Documents to Record the Compass Bearing
Direction for Sailing Routes between Fu-Chow to Ryukyu in 1580.
Introduction
In 2004, the author had opportunity to sail on the three-masted Jin Hua
Xin as an apprentice sailor for her last voyage, this long voyage from Dong
Shan Bay of southern Fujian to Zhu-Hai of Canton took 9 days and
covered 330 nautical miles. Jin Hua Xin was the last working traditional
sailing junk in China coast; nearly 100 years old (Xu, 2010). Several
months of onboard investigation voyage provided a rare field experience
to approach the complex mechanism of crew, their organization, and their
daily work; and this experience led the author to raise a subject of
seafarers with a marine ethnographic field investigation project along the
Fujian coast in 2001. The details of seafarers daily work on Chinese junks
are little known by outsiders previously; yet the last successors of sailors
and fishermen recollected their past stories piece by piece. Experimental
archaeology creates an effective scene for realistic performance of past
systems by sailing a full-scale reconstruction boat. A small full-size replica
LanTay II is planning an archaeological voyage to cross the Taiwan Strait,
the data gathered from the traces of past sailing routes will verify and add
some knowledge for understanding the real daily work of Chinese
seafarers onboard.
Previous Researches

�The studies on seamanship for operating and maneuvering Chinese junks
have not yet been explored in detail. To improve productivity, safety and
speed standards of the traditional water transport industry, a unique
official field investigation and iconographies collected for Chinese cargo
junks had been engaged in Fujian during 1958-1959. These works were
restrictedly published in book in 1960，also a reference for sail design
and use was attached in its appendices. This may be the only short
description in Chinese for sailing practices. Sometime in the early 20th
century, European scholars tried to understand the composition of
Chinese junk. A brief description about the structure and working principle
of yuloh has been included in G.R.G. Worcester’s marine ethnographic
field investigation (1947). Joseph Needham (1971) also had a brief
introduction about the action of wind on a Chinese junk under sail, and the
principles of tacking and wearing. There are also a few references about
the performance of Chinese sails under different angles of apparent wind
in Thomas Hoppe’s English manuscript in 2004.
One of the earlier European scholars who observed Chinese traditional
navigation is G. R. G. Worcester (1947). He noticed some important
details and technical logic that others had not found before; his description
is a following:
“In former days, lighted joss sticks suspended from the deck head
were the only timepieces…the cheap alarm chock has greatly
simplified navigation for the junk master. The junks carry no charts of
any kind. The laodahs find their way by means of a skillful combination
of sea instinct, keen eyesight, good memory, and an instinct for
direction nearly as a homing pigeon…they stand in for the land,
depending entirely upon their knowledge of its appearance and the
depth and nature of the soundings to give them position, for to them
the bottom of the sea has its hills and valleys like the land, and they
acquire an intimate acquaintance with its contours and the type of
bottom to be expected in each locality.”

�Another European scholar, Joseph Needham, noted the joss sticks used
by Chinese seafarers (1971):
“…(besides sand-glass,) Burning incense in stick-like form is a
practice which goes far back into China’s Middle Ages, and it would
have been very easy to measure time approximately enough with the
‘joss-sticks’.”

Needham (1971) also categorized the history of navigational methods into
three periods: (a) primitive navigation (b) quantitative navigation
(Measurement): +900 A.D. in East Asia (c) mathematical navigation:
+1500 A.D.
In 2008, an original map of the China Seas region was rediscovered in the
Bodleian Library Special Collections in Oxford by Robert K. Batchelor
(2014) and Timothy Brook (2013). The Selden Map is a detailed map of
Southern China dated the mid-16th century; it appears that the old Xiamen
port is the beginning of all the sea routes on the map, it also labeled the
trade routes departing from Xiamen.
A recent paper summarized the navigation and religion in traditional
Chinese junk have listed several historical materials and demonstrated
with two collections of sounding lead in Quan-Zhou (Lin, 2015).
Historical Contexts
A boat under sail is a very complex historical mechanism; the vessel
consists and represents a naval architecture system, as the tools for
different functions, as a space to reflect the weather, the waves and the
currents, and as a society for the composition of crew and their daily life.
In his encyclopaedic work, Heavenly Creations (chapter on boat, Tian-

�Gong-Kai-Wu), Song Yingxing (1637) divided the Chinese vessels into
sea-going, river and other craft; and then, he classified these for many
types according to their different sailing environment. This classification
may be applied even today because Chinese sailing traditions have
changed little through time, and the last sailors and fishermen of wooden
sailing junk still survive/alive. This paper focuses on Sha-Po-Wei, the main
area of old Xiamen port until the first half of the 20th century, the ages
when wooden sailing boats shuttle in the Taiwan Strait.
Sha-Po-Wei, along with adjacent coast lines, was an ideal port for
seafarers due to its location on the sea route connecting East Asia,
Southeast Asia, and Taiwan (Fig. 2). The demand of marine transportation
and ocean fishery brought seafarers from coastal regions of Quan-Zhou
and lower Zhang-Zhou River. Seafarers of Sha-PoWei divided into two
types: crews and fishermen. The crews mainly migrated from Hui-An
county of Quan-Zhou, while fishermen moved from Zhang-Zhou river
basin belong to Hai-Chen county. Fishermen of Sha-Po-Wei called
themselves ‘sea beggars,’ and it is subdivided into several groups
according different fishing method, namely types and lengths of fishing
vessel. Those groups (between fishermen and local resident, fishermen
and crews, even between different groups of Sha-Po-Wei fishermen) were
rarely communicating each other. Furthermore, both fishermen and crews
lived in their own enclosed social space to avoid troubles with others;
many of them have not even walked several miles out to countryside in
whole their life.

�Fig. 2: A Map of South Fujian and Old Amoy Port Sha-Po-Wei.
Organization
To learn composition of crews is the first step to approach their daily life.
In general, 15-20 tons deadweight trade vessel with two sails allocated 56 sailors, 30-35 tons also two sails would be 7-8 sailors, 55-65 tons with
three sails has 12-13 sailors. Crews were temporary employed between
by the ship owner; however, in addition to their lower wage, every sailor
was allowed to carry a few private cargo up to 250 kilograms, and usually
the ‘laodahs’ (equivalent to captain in Western) had doubled weight and
doubled payment more than other crews. There are five chief positions in
Chinese trade vessel; these were laodah, (and vice laodah, which is

�equivalent to helmsman in the western world), mast head, sampan,
foreboard, and supply chief (besides the ‘chu-hai’ who served as ship
owner's representative also in charge of accounting and port to call for
loading and unloading cargo). The crews were on duty during the day and
in two shifts in the night; they changed shifts in midnight. Laodah and vice
laodah keep working throughout the voyage until they cast the anchor.
Chuhai did not participate in onboard works.
For a local long-line fishing vessels crew size was much bigger than a
corresponding-sized merchant ship. Lodah and vice laodah had to work
day and night during the deep-sea fishing voyage; there were no chief
positions for other sailors, hence there were no arranged shifts. After
vessel dropped the long liner fishing, sampans were lowered one by one
along the fishing route; 3-4 sailors on each sampan were taking back the
hooks. This hard work usually lasted all day long.
There is a small shrine at the aft area of the poop deck containing the
effigy of the junk’s patron saints, Goddess of Mercy, Matsu, Guandi, etc.
The laodah or vice laodah of trade vessel burned incense in stick-like
‘joss-stick’ one by one throughout the voyage to keep alight in the shrine
where the compass laid also. For fishing junks, it was same but joss-stick
only burned one in morning and one in evening, as well as some important
occasions and critical times. Many local long liners have one ‘tong-ki’, a
trance-state man while intercommunicated oracles onboard; he would
give advice in case of an emergency. The tong-ki was a fisherman in
normal times, and they did not receive extra payment.
A living room/quarters was located at the aft area of the ship, or the lower
area of the quarter-poop deck; laodah’s bunk on the back on the left,
opposite side was for chu-hai. In Chinese junk, portside also named yuloh
side while starboard called sail side. Ice butt and stove located in the sail

�side, toilet and water bin were in the yuloh side. Sailors carried water in a
bin contained 30 ‘dan’, or 1500 kilograms.
Seamanship
The bamboo strip sails had been adopted in Chinese junks since the
Western Han Dynasty (206 BC-220 AD), and used up until the early 20th
century. However, the last successors of seafarers along the Fujian coast,
which the average age is 80 years old, mostly never saw the bamboo
sails; some of them just heard them from their previous generation or two
generations earlier in which these sails were being used. To operate a
bamboo matting sail, it has to be rolled and unrolled; it is heavier than one
used cloth sail. There is an idiom applied to both sail types, and that says
‘trim one's rubber to the wind’. The cloth lugsail was fasten on odd number
of bamboo from luff to leech where could see the balance from the mast;
each end of the batten on the leech was connected by the bight and
through some euphroes lead the control sheets terminated in one main
sheet to the stern of the upper deck. The sail was often very heavy, and it
required the whole crew at the winch to set the sail. On Jin Hua Xin, it
required approximately 12 minutes with six sailors to turn the winch. The
vice laodah held the tiller and order the trimmer to control the main sheet,
while the laodah served as a navigator and rarely handled the rudder.
The leeward sailing, windward sailing, and wind abeam sailing were the
main points of Chinese sailing junk under different angles of apparent
wind. The latter was rarely recorded by previous researchers, both Song
Yingxing (1637) and Needham (1971) seemed to be confused between
the beam reach and windward sailing. The local seafarers call it ‘tripod
sheet’ as the sheet system have fasted the main sail keep it at
approximate 50 degree angle with the stern, which is the position in
between the leeward sailing and windward sailing. The Old Xiamen

�seafarers often used tripod sheet when they set sail to Tainan by the
winter monsoon (northeast or north wind). The main sail of Fujian junk
was hung on starboard side of the mast, thus the sailors on quarterdeck
would see the bamboo battens while sailing with tripod sheet; they called
it open sail (all the way on the road was port tack, the batten was force to
left the mast). When the boat went back to Xiamen by using same
monsoon, no matter sailing with close reach or beam reach ,it was
starboard tack; this was call close sail (the batten was pushed to touch
the mast) as the bamboo battens could not been seen at the position of
laodah. Moreover, Chinese sailors often worked to windward tacking and
jibing by turn the stern to wind; accident jibe was deemed to be dangerous
especially under the strong wind.
Onboard tools include axes, nails, knives and cloth tec., were used for
emergency repairs. The author learnt and experienced to block the bottom
loopholes in the towed voyage of Lan Tay II at February 2004 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: To block the bottom loopholes of the LanTay II.

�Navigation
Just like people live in mountains naturally know and understand their
surrounding landform, Chinese seafarers understood that the seabed had
hills and valleys similar to the land with different sediment types; sailors
used these sediments and topography of the seabed to acquire positions
of the vessel on voyages. The last successors of Fujian seafarers did not
use the needle sailing route manuscripts, but they relied on their trained
eyesight and memories. Yet, some of them also learnt the manuscripts
given by their previous generation; therefore, they can read and
understand it.
Phing-Chou Kho Than, written between 1111 and 1117 by Chu Yu,
described navigation techniques as follow:
“The ship’s pilots are acquainted with the configuration of the coasts,
at night they steer by the stars, and in the day-time by the sun. In dark
weather they look at the south-point needle (compass). They also use
a line a hundred feet long with a hook at the end, which they let down
to take samples of mud from the sea-bottom, by its smell they can
determine their whereabouts.”

The sounding lead was used to ascertain the depth of water, the head of
lead has a hole filled with soap or grease to stick to a few seabed materials
to identify if there was sand, mud, or stones. The weight of a sounding
lead was between 3-5 kilograms. The word ‘fathom’ and ‘water’ was used
by old Xiamen port seafarers to mean a two-arm span, which is
approximately 1.6 meters. Usage of the sounding lead was also described
by Xiao LiuQiu Man Zhi written in 1755. When thrown into the sounding
lead from window of yuloh or shipboard, sailors should remain the boat
stationary. Every five waters there was a red sign in the rope.

�The laodah or vice laodah burned a joss-stick and kept it alight in the
shrine after the ship set sail, and each incense ran about one hour; this
also helped them to acquire the positions in the sailing route. Chinese
seafarers almost never used the ‘distance’ to describe the sea route, but
instead of ‘how long’ it took.
In the middle of the Selden Map, there is an illustration of a Chinese
mariner’s compass at the top, this may be the earliest sample can be seen
today (Fig. 4). The compass was divided into 24 points represented by the
twelve Chinese, earthly branches and the twelve heavenly stems. The
most common compass was consisted of a round wood box, where an
arrow shaped needle was balanced inside. The oldest style compass was
dry-pivoted, later ones were filled with water; yet both were called ‘drygen’ by local seafarers. After the compass was improved with 12 Chinese
characters, it came to 360 degrees; this compass was called ‘luo-gen’.
The seafarers were taught to use the compass and to calculate the tides
and winds since they were young. Every seagoing junk had two dry-gens,
at least, should one needle lose its magnetic field. The Vice laodah kept
one on his side, while the loadah kept another one. In the night, it was
illuminated by the laodah’s opium pipe. Even sampans from long line
fishing junks had their own small dry-gens.

Fig. 4 (right): The Chinese
Mariner’s Compass on Selden
Map.

�Besides compass and sounding lead, Sha-Po-Wei fishermen used
primitive astronomical guidance for them to orient themselves. They could
read directions by simply by 4 stars during the night. Venus for east,
Needle End Star for south, West Star for west and North Star for north.
Sailing Routes
There are a least eleven historical documents about compasses and its
bearing directions for sailing routes in Taiwan Strait: these are listed as
follows:
1. Si yi Guang Ji (四夷广记), written between 1592 and 1598 by Shen
Mao Shang.
2. Shun Feng Hsiang Sung (顺风相送 Fair Winds for Escort), written in
about 1593.
3. Tung His Yang Khao (东西洋考 Studies on the Oceans East and
West) ,written in 1617 by Chuang Hsich.
4. Chih Nan Cheng Fa (指南正法 General Compass Bearing Sailing
Directions), written before 1669.
5. Hai Kuo Wen Chien Lu (海国闻见录)，written in 1730 by Chen Lun
Jiong
6. Peng hu Ji Lue (澎湖纪略)，written during the reign of Emperor
Qianlong in Qing Dynasty by Hu Jian Wei.
7. Xiao Liu Qiu Man Zhi (小琉球漫志)，written in 1755 by Zhu Shi Jia.
8. Wai Hai Ji Yao (外海纪要), written in early 19th century by Li Zen
Jie.
9. Xia-Men Zhi (厦门志，Xiamen Chronicle), written in 1839 by Zhou
Kai.
10.
Xia-Men-Gang ji shi (厦门港纪事), written in 1843 by Dou
Zheng Biao.
11.
Hai Jiang Yao Lue Bi Jiu (海疆要略必究), written in 1856 by Li
Yan Yu.

�When a ship set sail to Tainan from Xiamen, nearly all the above
documents showed similar descriptions for navigation; departing from
Nan Tai Wu of Xiamen at direction between ‘chen’ and ‘Xun’ (amount to
127.5°)，it takes seven ‘gen’ to Peng-Hu hill, then sail at direction of ‘xun’
(about 135°)，and it takes another five ‘gen’ to Luerhmen of Tainan.
Many sailors of old Xiamen port served on merchant junks between south
Fujian and Taiwan; they sailed to Tai-Nan in north wind season, went to
Wu-Qi of Taichung, Lu-Kang of Chang-Hua, Dong-Shi and Bu-Dai of
Chia-Yi, kee-Lung during south wind season. Mostly, they set sail from
the old Xiamen port; it took less than one tide to arrive Bay Liao-Luo of
Quemoy. After waiting for good wind, they set sail again and used the
tripod sheet sailing to Ma-Kung of Peng-Hu for approximately twenty
hours. They then waited for suitable winds and tides to Luerhmen; it would
take another 10 hours. They would try to sail closer to the east direction
when sailed across Taiwan Strait. It would take much less time when ones
sailed from Tainan to Xiamen.
Archaeological Experiment of LanTay II
On 21st May 2017 at 10 am, LanTay II set sail from port of Liao-Luo of
Quemoy planning to trace the historical sailing route by heading 127.5° to
Peng-Hu (Fig. 5). The weather forecast for the day were Wind Northeast
Beaufort force 3, Swell 1.3 meters, but the author onboard found that the
wind had veered to east and increasingly, while the swell is more angular
than the wind after the ship entered Taiwan Strait. The course of the ship
had to turn in direction of 170°-180° to steer quartering sea. The LanTay
II was under control until 16 pm, when the skipper made the decision to
abandon the boat at the position 24.1743°N, 118.5535°E, while the
situation was Wind East Beaufort force 6-7, Swell 3 meters and 6-7 meters

�instantaneous. The 6 years of preparatory archaeological voyage lasted
6 hours, all the crew numbers transferred to companion ship.

Fig. 5: The archaeological voyage of LanTay II.
As postmortem reports of the experiment, Sha-Po-Wei indigenous
fishermen had compiled the warning signals as below:
a.

The day of 21st May was the 26th day of the fourth month in Chinese

lunar calendar, one of the brightest days of the Great White Planet in the
whole year; and it is the day for brewing disaster the whole year ahead in
Taiwan Strait. It means that this is a day with storm surge and a taboo day
for sailing.
b.

The included angle of wind and wave increasing with the height of

the sun which reached the maximum after 12 am, and they stacked up
into higher swell. The best set sailing time to cross Taiwan Strait was 4
am.

�c.

The position where the ship was abandoned is right between

seabed valley and hills based on the past records; that was where the
swell on the sea surface become rougher (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6: The Sha-Po-Wei indigenous fisherman motioned the topography
of the seabed of the Taiwan Strait they recorded half a century ago.
Discussion
The seamanship and navigation of the Chinese Junk requires a plethora
of nautical knowledge and a variety of onboard skills. All knowledge
regarding Junk ships (including sail and rudder, sounding lead, mariner’s
compass, joss-stick, compass bearing recorded for sailing route, wind and
tide, etc.) formed a closely connected knot of complementary techniques.
The information gathered during the marine ethnographic field
investigations at old Xiamen port indicated that a series of traditional
onboard skills displayed by the last successors of sailors and fishermen
may be closely corresponding to skills and techniques described in the
historical documents that range from Song Dynasty to Qing Dynasty.
Nonetheless, details of the geographic parameters of sailing routes are
still obscure, such as accurate depths and seabed materials, and the
sailing directions under the effect on winds and tides. An old local

�seafarers proverb says, ‘The stationary compass bearing recorded but
flexible brains’, and also says ‘Live performances to speak clearly’, thus
experimental archaeological methodologies, or sailing a real ship, shall be
used to study their historical context to reconstruct navigational practices
and methodologies for sailing in China Seas. The better way forward with
archaeological voyages is involving the older seamen and indigenous
fishermen into the sailing investigations. The authors believe that
expected discoveries of this research-investigation will bring new
evidence that significantly extends our knowledge of earlier onboard lives
of Chinese Junk ships.
Oral Sources
1. Capt. Zhuang XingJie, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 27th March 2012.
2. Capt. Zhuang XingJie, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 30th March 2012.
3. Huang ChaoQi, Ruan PengShi, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 11th April
2012.
4. Capt. Zhuang XingJie, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 13th April 2012.
5. Huang ChaoQi, Yu LongFa, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 21st April 2012.
6. Huang Chao Qi, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 17th June 2014.
7. Ruan YaYing, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 10th November 2014.
8. Ruan YaYing, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 11th April 2015.
9. Zen JinTang, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 12th April 2015.
10. Ruan YaYing, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 12th December 2015.
11. Zen JinTang, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 18th December 2015.
12. Ruan QueTou, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 27th December 2015.
13. Ruan ShiLu, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 30th December 2015.
14. Ruan ShiLu, Ruan QueTou, Sha Po Wei of Xiamen, 8th January
2016.

�15. Capt. Zhang TongLong, Ruan QingTing, and Yu LongFa, Si Ming Nan
Road of Xiamen, 27th May 2017.

References
Anonymous, 1653. Selden Map of Southern China and Southeast
Asia (MS Selden Supro 105). Bodleian Library (University of Oxford),
Oxford.
Anonymous, 1593. Fair Winds for Escort / Shun Feng Hsiang Sung
(MS Selden Supro 145). Bodleian Library (University of Oxford), Oxford.
Anonymous, ca. 1669. Chih Nan Cheng Fa / General Compass Bearing
Sailing Directions (MS Selden Supro 578). Bodleian Library (University of
Oxford), Oxford.
Batchelor, R. K., 2014. The Selden Map and the Making of a Global
City, 1549–1689. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Brook, T., 2013. Mr. Selden's Map of China: Decoding the Secrets of
a Vanished Cartographer. Bloomsbury Press, New York.
Chen, Lun Jiong, 1730. Hai Kuo Wen Chien Lu, Repn. in 1970. Economic
Academe of Taiwan Business Bank, Taipei.
Chu, Yu, 1111-1117. Phing-Chou Kho Than, Repn in 2006. Elephant
Press, Zhengzhou.
Chuang, Hsich, 1617. Tung His Yang Khao (Studies on the Oceans
East and West), Rpen in 1970. Economic Academe of Taiwan Business
Bank, Taipei.
Dou, Zheng-Biao, 1843. Xia-Men-Gang ji shi. In Six Xiamen Territoria
Seas Literatures Annotation of Xiamen, Repn. in 2013, Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen.
Hoppe, T., 2004-2008. Mainland China Revival of the Junk. Unpublished
Manuscript.
Hu, JianWei, ca. 1736. Peng hu Ji Lue, Repn. in 1970. Economic
Academe of Taiwan Business Bank, Taipei.
Li, YanYu, 1856. Hai Jiang Yao Lue Bi Jiu. In Six Xiamen Territoria
Seas Literatures Annotation of Xiamen, Repn. in 2013, Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen.

�Li, ZenJie, ca.1800. Wai Hai Ji Yao. In Six Xiamen Territoria Seas
Literatures Annotation of Xiamen, Repn. in 2013, Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen.
Lin, Han, 2015. Navigation and religion in traditional Chinese ship.
Symposium of Navigation and Religion of the Traditional Ships in
East Asia, Busan.
Needham, J.,1971. Science and Civilisation in China, Nautical
Research, Vol. IV: Physics and Physical, Part III: Civil Engineering
and Nautics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sailing Cargo Junks Office of Department of Transportation of Fujian
(Ed.), 1960. Fu jian sheng Mu Fan Chuan tu ji (Collection of Cargo
Junks Drawings for Fujian Province). Department of Transportation of
Fujian, Fuzhou.
Shen, MaoShang, 1592-1598. Si yi Guang Ji, Repn. in 1947. China
Central Library, Nanking.
Song, YingXing, 1637. Heavenly Creations (Tian-Gong-Kai-Wu) in Sequel
to Si-Ku-Quan-Shu, Zi Radical, Repn. in 2002. Shanghai Ancient Books
Press, Shanghai.
Worcester, G. R. G., 1947. The Junks and Sampans of the Yangtze:
A Study in Chinese Nautical Research, Vol. 1: Introduction and Craft
of the Estuary and Shanghai Area. Statistical Department of the
Inspectorate General of Customs, Shanghai.
Xiao, ChongYe and Xie Jie, 1580. Shi Ryukyu Lu (Diplomatic Mission to
Ryukyu), Repn. in 1997. Economic Academe of Taiwan Business Bank,
Taipei.
Xu, Lu, 2010. A Ship Archaeological Investigation on Canton Style
Sailing Junks: the Jun Hua Xing Case. In China Maritime Museum
(Ed.), The Position and Mission of China’s Maritime Culture,
Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House, Shanghai: 236-252.
Zhou, Kai, 1839. Xia-Men Zhi (Xaimen Chronicle), Repn. in 1996. Lu Jiang
Press, Xiamen.
Zhu, ShiJie, 1755. Xiao Liu Qiu Man Zhi, Repn. in 1970. Economic
Academy of Taiwan Business Bank in 1970, Taipei.

�Biographies
Xu Lu (Chinese: 许路) is
Founding Director and Chief
Maritime Archaeologist of
NVOCC Chinese Sailing Junk
Expedition Society (CSJES).
He is a commissioner of
China
Maritime
History
Studies
Association
and
Fellow of The explorers Club.
He also works as a co-research fellow for NSC-ANR project Maritime
knowledge for China Seas hosted by École française d'Extrême-Orient
(EFEO) and Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica (IHP) in
2014-2018 duration. His English publication include The Naval
Architecture of Ancient Fujian Style Sea Going Sailing Junks: An
Overview (Delta Book World, 2014).
Yu LongFa (Chinese: 余龙发)
is a local fisherman at Xiamen
old fishing port, born in 1952
at ShaPoWei. He works as a
professional fisherman since
the age of 12, being a skillful
master of seamanship and
navigation in east and South
China Sea during past 50
years. He assisted Mr. Xu Lu
with the recording and decoding on board skills in Chinese Sailing Junk.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5631">
                <text>Seamanship and Navigation: Seafarers on Board Daily Skills in Chinese Junk </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5632">
                <text>Chinese sailing traditions changed a little through time; sailors inherited their onboard skills, expertise, and experience by orally imparting others with physical instruction. But these daily skills were rarely recorded or studied in the past. For seafarers, how to operate and maneuver a Chinese junk was their daily work; and apart from sparse historical documents such as Phing-Chou Kho Than (Yu, 1117), Shi Liu-Qiu Lu (Xiao and Xia, 1580) (Fig. 1), and preliminarily observations by G.R.G. Worcester, Joseph Needham, Thomas Hoppe, and others, seamanship and navigation were kept in the minds of surviving successions of living sailors. In 2004, the author had an opportunity to sail on a nearly 100 year old Jin Hua Xin as an apprentice sailor for her last voyage. Several months of onboard experiences provided a rare field investigation to approach the complex mechanism of crew, their organization and their daily work. This experience led the authors to raise a marine ethnographic field investigation project along Fujian coast. Experimental archaeology creates effective scenes for realistic performance of past systems. A small full-size replica LanTay II was built for a series of archaeological voyages; the data gathered from the traces of past sailing routes will verify and add some knowledge for understanding the real daily work of Chinese seafarers onboard. In this paper, the authors shall present combined researches on historical documents, past observations with lively oral materials achieved by marine ethnographic field investigation on traditional sailing ports along South Fujian coast; throughout this research, the authors approach the knowledge about seafarers onboard daily skills and try to present the research about the sailors methods to maneuver the junk and its navigation system by means of a combination of instinct, eyesight, memory, and skill.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5633">
                <text>Xu Lu </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5634">
                <text>Yu Long Fa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5635">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5636">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5637">
                <text>Xu Lu </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5638">
                <text>Yu Long Fa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="517" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="308">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/8e569cbe07a379111ce84b992e44fdd9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5611ddbb442af71af85f30e7e8912dff</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5824">
                    <text>Variable Longline Fishing: The History and Sustainable Innovation of a
Traditional Marine Ecological Knowledge
Xu Lu (Chinese Sailing Junk Expedition Society, 1420511969@qq.com)
Yu LongFa (Xiamen Fishing Port, 13666084562@163.com)
ABSTRACT
Amoy variable longline fishing is an efficient, accurate and controllable traditional fishing technique
created by Amoy fisherman, which has been popular in the Taiwan Strait and Zhoushan fisheries for
hundreds of years. It was replaced by seine and trawl since the 1970s but continues to exist with inshore
small-scale fisheries. It is a fishing method based on traditional marine ecological knowledge such as
seabed topography, water current and fish migration. It evolves with environmental conditions, and is a
living marine cultural heritage.
In the past ten years, we have conducted a series of experimental archaeology studies on traditional
shipbuilding, traditional navigation and traditional longline fishing. The studies expanded the boundary of
marine ecological knowledge. This introduces a special perspective on the effects of climate change
towards marine ecology and other external conditions. We aim to explore feasible coexistence with
underwater cultural heritage and maritime cultural heritage by exploring the role of Amoy’s longline
fishing as an innovative precision fishing technology. We work to teach local communities to use
traditional methods to carry out non-destructive, accurate and efficient productive fishing in the complex
environment of underwater cultural heritage (UCH). We promote the variable longline fishing for
nomination on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, developed from
the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
List of Figure
Figure 1: Detected Seabed Topography and Sediment Using a Sounding Lead

INTRODUCTION
In the past twenty years, we have conducted a series of experimental archaeology studies on
traditional shipbuilding and navigation, and have also come into contact with traditional fishing
techniques closely related to them. Among them, we conducted a special study on the local
history of Amoy longline fishing (Xu 2018) and successfully included it in the local intangible
cultural heritage list. However, it is precisely because of being in the East Asian cultural zones
where Chinese characters or even certain dialects are used, it is difficult for mainstream
academia to understand the field research-based technological history or intangible cultural
heritage.
As the issue of UCH is increasingly receiving attention to address major global threats, such as
climate change, we urgently hope to introduce and promote Amoy variable longline fishing to
the world. Its ‘variable’ is an understanding and technical logic that is adjusted to respond to
changes in the marine environment and other external conditions. As an easy to learn and
localized marine knowledge system, the variable longline fishing can coexist sustainably with
underwater cultural heritage in various regions of the world.
CASE STUDIES
Longline fishing may first appear in the Iron Age after the prehistoric stone tidal weirs and tidal
zones gathered. The longline fishing operation is called ‘Banggun’ in Hokkien dialect, which

1

�‘Gun’ refers to a specialized fishing line.
The variable longline fishing is based on the data of seabed topography and sediment
morphology of the target fisheries detected by iron sounding lead. For fishermen engaged in
longline fishing the bottom of the sea has its hills and valleys like the land, and they acquire an
intimate acquaintance with its contours and the type of bottom to be expected in each locality.
This knowledge is supplemented by the data of wind direction, wind force, tidal direction and
velocity, the habits and rules of different water colors, upper, middle and lower water layers, and
different fish habitat and migration,; so as to adjust the specifications of longline fishing gear
and bait form according to the conditions of the operation site of target fish species. It can avoid
catching young fish and non-targeted fish species by no selectivity.
This traditional fishing technique involves releasing a main line from a boat into the sea, with a
certain number of branch lines tied at a certain distance to the main line, and each branch line
ends with a fishing hook with bait attached. Each basket of longline is equipped with sinking
stones and buoys at the head and tail, which are used to control the main and branch lines in
specific depths of water. This traps adult fish in specific water layers. According to the different
fishing layers and fish species, longline fishing can be divided into two types of operations:
fixed fishing and floating fishing. According to the combination of fishing vessels, it can also be
divided into single vessel operation and barge-carrier operation. Each basket of longline is
equipped with more than 10 to 100 branch line fish hooks based on the size of the fish hooks.
During operation, first release the first buoy and sinker, then place the longline, with a buoy
mark attached between each basket longline, and a tail basket tube mark attached to the end of
the last basket longline.
In the Wanli year of the Ming Dynasty, it was recorded that fishermen in southern Fujian had
already mastered the migration patterns of hairtail fish in the East China Sea by late sixteenth
century and pursued shoals of fish. They crossed provinces and transferred to the waters of
southern Zhejiang for operation. According to a historical painting from the Himi City Museum
collection dating back to 1785 in Japan, long line fishing was introduced to the coastal areas of
northern Japan during the Edo period (1603-1615 CE), and was used to catch snapper and cod
in offshore areas (Figure 1).

2

�Figure 1: Detected Seabed Topography and Sediment Using a Sounding Lead

The earliest professional investigation into the fishing industry in Xiamen began in 1922.
Investigators from the Water Obstetrics Department of Jimei School claimed there were 150
fishing boats engaged in longline fishing in Xiamen (Zhang 1922). According to statistical data
from 1930 to 1931, Xiamen's fishing industry was particularly prosperous, with fishing boats
and boats operating in Xiamen. The annual fishing output was approximately one million yuan
silver dollar (Su 1931). Another data from the same period shows there are over 120 fishing
boats of all sizes in Xiamen; with over 4000 fishermen, with an annual fishing output worth
approximately one million yuan silver dollar (Huang 1933).
Amoy variable longline fishing can not only use low-cost simple fishing gear to make small
scale producers quickly grasp and benefit, but also combine with modern large fishing boats,
fish carriers, echometer, hydraulic and electric winches to achieve relatively high production
efficiency.
Amoy's variable longline fishing tradition is also rare in the world where women and men work
together at sea and get equal payment for equal work. Further, organizing the fishing gear can be
carried out on land, providing job opportunities for unskilled laborers.
Amoy's variable longline fishing established a deity revered as the ‘Diao Caowang (King of
Longline Fishing Vessels)’ during a period of uncertain times. It is enshrined in a specialized
temple called the ‘Long Zhu Dian (Dragon Ball Temple)’, forming a unique folk religion. At
this location we collected sounding hammers, navigation compasses, stone anchors, sinking
stones, buoys and other ancient longline fishing tool remains.
In May 2015, the historic home port of Amoy's variable longline fishing, Shapowei, was
permanently closed for redevelopment into a tourist spot. Its fishers were told to stay away
(Liang 2018).

3

�RESOURCES
The variable longline fishing technology mastered by fishermen in Xiamen is also a common
technology that’s heritage is based on thousands of years of practical human experience. This
tool is simple, easy to learn, scalable, and transferable, which can quickly provide local
sustainable blue food to local communities, making a significant contribution to economic
benefits. But so far, there has been relatively limited historical research and technical
observation, and there has been a lack of fishermen taking the lead and standing from the
perspective of fishermen.
Since 2015, we established a community of interests with Xiamen longline fishermen who just
lost their fishing work. We have systematically sorted out the eight series of methods for their
longline fishing gear for the first time, extracted technical logic, and applied for inclusion in the
local intangible cultural heritage list. We have organized a technology transfer team to inherit
the variable longline fishing techniques of Fujian and Zhejiang from the offshore to the open
sea, allowing fishermen to return to the ocean and use friendly fish resources for variable
longline fishing instead of net fishing.
The veteran fishermen in Xiamen Port are an important component of this team, mainly
responsible for technology transfer work, while members of our organization provide project
assistance and management work. We hope that based on the success of the project, local
fishermen who have made changes due to our help can also become members of our fishermen's
technical team to help other regions. At the same time, we also assist them in forming their own
teams and copying our solution model to promote variable longline fishing. This returns a
common technological heritage of humanity to society. We hope to promote and teach variable
longline fishing technology to the world, especially low-income coastal areas.
The co-author of this paper, Yu Longfa, is the most famous fisherman in Xiamen longline
fishing industry. He has over 50 years of marine fishing experience in Fujian fishing grounds,
Zhejiang, and Taiwan Strait, and is also a representative inheritor of Xiamen's intangible
cultural heritage of longline fishing techniques.
FRAMEWORK
The crisis of global marine fish resources is mainly caused by the large-scale and
undifferentiated centralized net fishing of recent decades. A 20-year retrospective review of
global aquaculture issued at 6th Workshop on Lipid Nutrition and Metabolism in Aquatic
Animals of China, aqua feeds are reliant on fish meal and fish oil sourced from wild-captured
forage fish. Increasing use of forage fish is unsustainable. About 70% fishmeal and fish oil are
used in aquaculture. Currently we do not have exact data on the cost of dozens to hundreds of
wild captured forage fish needed to feed an adult cultured fish. Variable longline fishing does
allow for accurate numbers of captured adult wild fish. This is undoubtedly better for ecosystem
health than aquaculture and other methods of fishing.
So where and how is any solution currently being applied?
The innovative approach of Amoy variable longline fishing solution is reflected in the following
aspects:
1. Technological innovation: a set of strict technical logic. Sort out the key factors and

4

�important links, helping fishermen to develop sustainable longline fishing programs
based on local geographical conditions and current status of fishery resources,. This
provides innovative paths for the future implementation of the control of total amount in
fishery resources.
2. Innovation of promotion methods: the fishermen who master the variable longline
technology get better benefits than any other fishing methods as soon as possible. This
promotes the replacement of net fishing and other fishing methods.
3. Community friendly Innovation: let local fishermen increase their income. Encourage
women and disabled people to participate in learning and production, and support
teenager experience.
4. Overall solution Innovation: through the collection and analysis of the first-hand data of
the operation site, transformed previous static fishing data into real-time dynamic
guidance. The project provides data and technical support for the future fishing
traceability, origin certification, format planning, and quota management.
5. Sustainable innovation: studying the sea conditions and fish conditions from local
fishermen, setting fishing gear for trial operation, adjusting fishing gear for trial
operation again, formulating local operation methods and compiling operation
guidelines, teaching local fishermen operation techniques, replacing existing fishing
methods with variable longline fishing for offshore production operations to measure
the solution impact, write reports and put forward suggestions on utilization and
protection of local marine fishery resources. Then the living standard of fishermen in
the project implementation area can significantly improve, and the marine fish resources
are significantly protected. This is measured annually, and can be expanded to more
areas.
The operation tradition and future promotion of Amoy variable longline fishing technology
adheres to the most restrained environmental footprint, are the first local fishermen to use a
small single fishing boat with a length of less than 10 meters for nearshore operation. In
contrast, the fishery harvest is family operated, with surplus sold in local markets. Where
conditions are sufficient, it is considered to develop into a consortium of fishermen. This uses
vessels of 20 meters length, adopts the mode of sub mother-ship operation, takes the location as
the center for offshore operation and the catch enters the market circulation system and the
online direct-to-consumers sales system.
Sailing fishing vessels can be used for the single vessel operation and the production operation
of sub and mother-vessels of Amoy variable longline fishing technology. Even if the diesel
engine is used as the power engine, it consumes little petroleum fuel. Small fishing boats are
usually equipped with two 8 HP engines, with a speed of 5-6 knots and an average fuel
consumption of 6 litres per hour. Coastal operations usually consume 6-12 litres of diesel per
voyage. For fishing operations up to 20 nautical miles offshore, 60-70 litres of diesel oil are
usually consumed per voyage.
Take the example of the Amoy variable longline replacement demonstration project of
Zhoushan Zhongjieshan islands in 2020-2021 funded by World Wildlife Fund (WWF). We first
coached the local government to establish a specialized NGO organization as the specific
implementer of the project. Through their collaboration with local marine fishery administrative
authorities and marine nature reserve management authorities, we mobilize local fishermen, and

5

�then send a technical team of Amoy old fishermen for technology transfer work.
CONCLUSIONS
This paper focuses on Amoy variable longline fishing, exploring the history and technical logic
of this unique local traditional marine ecological knowledge system. Here, we point out the
value of its intangible cultural heritage and physical remains. Based on this, we explore the
possibility of continuous innovation as a solution for non-destructive, accurate, and efficient
production fishing in complex water bodies. We also seek a solution for sustainable
development of marine fish resources and low energy consumption production fishing. We aim
to replace other fishing methods that may cause damage to seabed sediments in various water
areas including UCH, and support a vital fishing industry for local fishermen including those in
the site protection areas.
We are concerned about marine cultural heritage in the face of climate change and global
economic recession. We also care for marine life and marine livelihoods. Humans need food,
and with limited land resources, they naturally turn to huge ocean resources. Human wisdom
should be used to develop marine resources in a sustainable manner. Amoy old fishermen said
that in the history of longline fishing, there have been more and more fish in the sea.
Longline fishing seems to be negotiating with the Dragon King. I'll catch
your son and I'll keep your grandson. The young fish won't take the bait.
The catch of the hooked fish is far less than the breeding quantity, so the
fish will naturally be able to reproduce.’

Bibliography
Huang Zhiyan. “Report on the Investigation of the Life of Fishermen in Xiamen Port.” China Construction Monthly
(Nanjing) 7, no. 3, (1933): 125-140.
Liang, Chenyu,. “So Long, Xiamen Fishers, and Thanks for All the Fish.” Sixth Tone 11 July, 2018. Available
through: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mFL_NlGfpzkSfgE-EV5_cQ
Su Jingyu, Chen Peizhen, and Xie Yunsheng (Eds.), 1931. Guide Xiamen, Chapter 8: Industry, Marine Products. Xin
Min Shu She, Xiamen.
Xu, Lu. “Amoy Longline Fishing: Going Our or To Flee.” The Paper [Pengpai News] 8 October 2018. Available
through: https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2472837
Zhang Rongchang. “Fisheries in Xiamen.” Fisheries. Alumni Association of Jiangsu Provincial Fisheries School 4
(1922): 39-44.

6

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="36">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="129">
                  <text>2023 Session 1: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="130">
                  <text>Session 1 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="131">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 1 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="132">
                  <text>2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="133">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="134">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="135">
                  <text> Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="136">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="137">
                  <text>Conference presentation</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="55">
              <name>Date Available</name>
              <description>Date (often a range) that the resource became or will become available.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="138">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="139">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5816">
                <text>Variable Longline Fishing: The History and Sustainable Innovation of a&#13;
Traditional Marine Ecological Knowledge&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5817">
                <text>Amoy variable longline fishing is an efficient, accurate and controllable traditional fishing technique&#13;
created by Amoy fisherman, which has been popular in the Taiwan Strait and Zhoushan fisheries for&#13;
hundreds of years. It was replaced by seine and trawl since the 1970s but continues to exist with inshore&#13;
small-scale fisheries. It is a fishing method based on traditional marine ecological knowledge such as&#13;
seabed topography, water current and fish migration. It evolves with environmental conditions, and is a&#13;
living marine cultural heritage.&#13;
In the past ten years, we have conducted a series of experimental archaeology studies on traditional&#13;
shipbuilding, traditional navigation and traditional longline fishing. The studies expanded the boundary of&#13;
marine ecological knowledge. This introduces a special perspective on the effects of climate change&#13;
towards marine ecology and other external conditions. We aim to explore feasible coexistence with&#13;
underwater cultural heritage and maritime cultural heritage by exploring the role of Amoy’s longline&#13;
fishing as an innovative precision fishing technology. We work to teach local communities to use&#13;
traditional methods to carry out non-destructive, accurate and efficient productive fishing in the complex&#13;
environment of underwater cultural heritage (UCH). We promote the variable longline fishing for&#13;
nomination on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, developed from&#13;
the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5818">
                <text>Xu Lu</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5819">
                <text>Yu LongFa</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5820">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5821">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5822">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5823">
                <text>Xu, Lu and Long Fa Yu. 2023. “Variable Longline Fishing: The History and Sustainable Innovation of a Traditional Marine Ecological Knowledge.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Akifumi Iwabuchi, and Kotaro Yamafune.” In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL:https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1886 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="53">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 1 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="674" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="466">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/93e2c4e9142367ccee6cd833be8e8e58.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2b1112993b181e7340c9ed8820177a3b</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="65">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7187">
                  <text>2021 Session 2: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7188">
                  <text>Session 2 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7189">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 2 of the 2021 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7190">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7191">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7192">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7193">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="58">
              <name>Date Copyrighted</name>
              <description>Date of copyright.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7194">
                  <text>2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7255">
                <text>The Earliest Hokkien Maritime Vocabulary and Jargon Recorded in a Spanish-Chinese Dictionary of the 17th Century</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7256">
                <text>It has always been a difficult task to research and transcribe ancient seafarers’ terms pronounced in different regional dialects. Since 2015, the author has been trying to mark the Southern Hokkien (Minnan) dialect seafarers’ terms pronunciation using Chinese Pinyin, and to record them in Chinese characters, but had not able to find the final solution.  In 2018, an oldest and largest extant Spanish-Chinese dictionary was discovered in the University of Santo Tomas Archives, this Dictionario Hispanico Sinicum is supposed to have been compiled in 1626-1642 for missionary purposes in Fujian by Spanish missionaries of the Dominican order with the assistance of Chio Chiu (Zhangzhou) people living in Manila. The dictionary has a total of over 1102 pages, containing about 21,000 entries, including single words, short sentences, idioms and slang. From left to right are Spanish entries, Southern Hokkien vernacular Chinese characters, Southern Hokkien dialect in Romanization, and Mandarin in Romanization. The dictionary not only contains a lot of seafarers’ terms, but more importantly, it also has enough single words to combine into the required new terms. This solves the problem of phonetic alphabet and Chinese character recording for Southern Hokkien dialect that has plagued us for many years.  Instead of presenting a regional dialect seafarers’ glossary still very much in the making, this paper has focused on possible solutions for editing maritime vocabulary and jargon in different dialects, keeping the logics of nautical technology in mind. with a particular emphasis on the technical logic behind them. Appropriate selections from dialect dictionaries compiled by missionaries in the past may all contribute to the edition of a proper nautical technical vocabulary and seafarers’ glossary for the whole Chinese coastline.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7257">
                <text>Xu Lu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7258">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7259">
                <text>November 2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7260">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="91">
            <name>Rights Holder</name>
            <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7261">
                <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7262">
                <text>Lu, Xu. 2021. “The Earliest Hokkien Maritime Vocabulary and Jargon Recorded in a Spanish-Chinese Dictionary of&#13;
the 17th Century.” Edited by Brian Fahy, Hans Van Tilburg, Bill Jeffery, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Riley Smith. In&#13;
Proceedings of Fourth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Keelung,Taiwan, and&#13;
Virtual, November 1-5, 2021. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology URL: https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/exhibits/show/apconf-muchproceedings/item/674</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="22" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="22">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/e18e5e5a8709f4beba2462d73909aa3d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a5f9c138ae3f59f1557c9d848cbb3566</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="505">
                    <text>The Naval Architecture of Ancient Fujian Style Sea Going Sailing Junks:
A Manuscript

Xu Lu
Chinese Sailing Junk Expedition Society
Xiamen, 361003
People’s Republic of China
Email: xuluxm2013@yahoo.com
Abstract

As the most important qualities of ancient Chinese sailing junks, the square bows and
sterns with transverse watertight bulkhead and the lugsails with bamboo mat and strip
remained the same over thousands of years. Of which, the traditional Fujian style sea
going junks is one of the major vessel forms for the ocean and oversea route in ancient
China. This paper make an interpretation of Fujian style sea going junks through ship
form and structure, principle of design, models, choice of material, sequence of
construction, painting and decoration, tools, ship-builders, and ship component remains.
This study is combined with the interpretation of Chinese historical documents and
drawings, foreign historical drawings, ethnographical field work on main traditional
shipbuilding centers along the Fujian coast, reconstruction of traditional shipbuilding,
land archaeology evidence, and especially gathers information from a newly discovered
illustrated manuscript for shipbuilding. This manuscript at present is the most detailed
manuscript found pertaining to the principle of design, modulus system, main unit data,
measures and amounts materials used for each ship form. The purpose of this paper is
to recover the historical archetypes of ancient Fujian Style Sea going sailing junks, then
providing one set of helpful method to explain and identify relevant ship remains
excavated in future shipwreck underwater archaeological projects.
Keywords: Fujian style Sea going junks, Traditional shipbuilding, Ship remains, Naval
architecture, Manuscript

Introduction
The traditional Fujian style sea going junks is one of the major vessel forms in ancient
China. But, what did that ancient junks look like? How were they made? How were they
operated and maneuvered? China’s navigation and naval architecture constitute a
history of this production technology with its root in the common people. Extant
historical data is rather limited and therefore regrettably slight when contrasted with the
1

�art and expertise accumulated over time and the ancient and magnificent culture that it
represents. The emergence of sea-faring wooden vessels, their development,
transformation and eventual disappearance had a lot to do with the political and
economic conditions as well as the available natural resources at any specific time.
Without question, changes in available resources as well as in sea routes entailed
modifications to form, size, function, names, and even the mode of operation of these
vessels. Equally, the technological development and improvement in ship design had its
effects on society and the subsequent trajectory of social history. Before, domesticated
shipwreck archaeology was founded in the matching and displaying of wrecks, and
never went further to carry out experiments on replica and reconstructions according to
ancient navigation environment perspectives.

Even after researching into the history of naval architecture and ancient writings,
searching through relics from different dynasties, focusing mainly on the general
conditions of ship-building and the wide variety of methods of manufacturing through
every historical period, we are still unable to reconstruct history in its entirety. What
could be done was to set up a systematic way of collecting data; then to summarize,
understand and subsequently experiment with them. With this data as the foundation,
the project became to produce a series of replicas using methods of construction that
had been passed down from generation to generation, so that people today can see
and experience them; replicas that may allow later generations to reconstruct actual
history. Only by doing so can we answer the three questions pertaining to ship-building
and sea-faring history listed above, an only then can the value of research be made
clear.

Ship Form and Structure of Fujian Style Junks
Facing Taiwan across the strait, Fujian has 3,324 km of coastline and 1,404 small
islands off the coast. The way of life of the ancient Yue people, Fujian’s early
inhabitants, was sea orientated with sea travel as their main means of communication.
Despite the hilly landscape and mountain ranges in Fujian’s hinterland, these proved no
barrier to its economic interaction with other provinces and places overseas (Fig. 1).
2

�The inland, inshore and offshore sea-faring
networks linked Fujian with the outside
world

thereby

shipping
continuously

ensuring

and

that

fishing

developed.

Fujian’s
industries

In

addition,

Fujian was rich in natural resources such
as wood, iron, tong oil (Verniciafordii seeds
oil), lihui (lime obtained by burning oyster
shells), rattan, hemp and lacquer. With
such handy materials that could be used to
build ships, ship-building prospered across
the province. Viewed from a different
perspective, Fujian’s coastline was full of
Fig. 1 A Color Images of Fujian Style War Junk. (W. creeks and inlets. Facing the Strait of
Alexander)

Taiwan, it was situated where warm and

cold air currents mingled. Not only was the wind strength very inconsistent, it was also
where typhoons move inland from the sea during the summer and autumn. Due to this
complicated natural environment, certain demands had to be met with regard to form,
function and structure of ships, and to the choice of materials and skills employed in
their manufacture. It is such circumstances that gave birth to vessels with V-shaped
bottoms, raised flat bows, indented sterns, flaring bulwarks, framing, stern-hung, lifting
rudders lowering deeply below the keel line, and wide cambered decks that eased the
drainage of water. These unique environmental and cultural factors together made the
Fujian style junks one of the major vessel forms in ancient China.
Building Fujian style junks required standard procedures in the choosing of ship form,
design, materials and construction strategy, and involved manufacturing processes
such as carpentry, metal work, sewing, painting and smelting. The Southern Song
dynasty seagoing ship unearthed in Houzhu in Quanzhou in 1974, the mid-Yuan
dynasty Fujian merchant ship discovered in Xin’an of Korea in 1982, and the many
ships found in the sea-beds in Lianjiang, Pingtan, Putien and Dongshan in Fujian
province are comprised solely of those parts of the ships that were below the waterline.
3

�Therefore, they provide no information on the complete form and design of these
vessels. These remains, however, do prove that during the Song and Yuan dynasties
the necessary skills developed to build the three-sectioned keel, the water-tight cabins
and stern-hung rudders that could be hoisted and lowered.
Historical Evidence
The earlier records from extant historical writings that contain information on different
types of ship from the Fujian style junk series were written around the late 16th to the
mid-17th century. A middle 17th century collection of the Berlin Ethnologic Museum was
the earliest meticulous color image of Fujian style junks (Anonymous, mid-17th Century).
A mass of Drawings of Chinese ship anchored around Matsuura and recorded by local
Japanese painters since last decade of 17th century (Oba, 1972) were of great value for
study. In 1796, William Alexander’s colour images are the earliest and the best realistic
portrayals of Fujian style junks available to us today (Fig. 2).
Domestic sources were researched as
well. The Navy Abstract, written in the year
of the Emperor Kangxi (1654-1722) by the
regional commander Chen Liang Shi
contained an iconography for Fujian style
warship (Chen Liang Shi, 2002).

The

Taiwan Conversation by Writing, written
between the years of the emperor Kangxi
to

Yongzheng

by

Huang

Shu

Jing,

recorded parts of materials, quantities and
specifications

needed

to

build

the

Ganzeng types of Fujian warship (Huang
Shu Jing, 1957). The Illustrated Manual of
Instruction in Shipbuilding for the Navy of
Fujian Province, a manuscript between the
years of the emperor Yong zheng to
Fig. 2 The Coast of Fujian Province and the Qianlong by anonymous writer recorded
Location of Sha Po Wei. (Xu Lu)
by the order of the Admiralty (Anonymous,
4

�Mid-18th
listed

Century),

the

kinds

of

warships in use during
that time. Types like
Ganzeng, Shuangpeng,
Pingdi, Fazhuo, Bajiang
were listed, and their
peculiarities and used
for different areas and
condition. The Regions
Formula of Fujian Sea
Going
Fig. 3 The Old Dockyard in Sha Po Wei inside Xiamen Gang. (Xu Lu)

Warships,

a

woodblock edition was

written in 1768 by the order of the emperor Qianlong (Anonymous, 2002). Through
putting together mostly-forgotten information that have been scattered all over the world,
the appearance and design of junks traceable to the Song and Yuan dynasties are
visualized. These sources show wahat ancient Fujian style sea-going junks probably
looked like.
Ethnographical Field Investigation and Manuscripts
From 2004, we began to visit the main traditional shipbuilding centers along the Fujian
coast and carried out the field investigation of wooden sailing junks. We found 7
manuscripts recorded and inherited by 4 shipwright families. The Sha Po Wei inside
Xiamen Gang (Old Amoy Port) is a famous traditional shipbuilding center up to the first
half of the 20th century. It was comprised of more than 15 private dockyards around 3
hectares of shoreline (Fig. 3). The Chen family in one of largest and oldest dockyards in
the region, the family migrating from Huian country to Xiamen Gang at least five
generations ago. An illustrated manuscript of naval architecture was archived by Mr.
Chen Yan Ning of this family. It is 51 pages of paper, 22.5 cm in length and 11cm wide,
6 vertical red lines to a page, badly written in the end of 1910s.The manuscript was
drawn by Chen Yan Ning’s uncle, Chen Guo Zai (died in 1949), and then his son gave it
to Chen Yan Ning. It contents size and cost of fourteen Fujian sea-going sailing junks,
5

�all the numbers expressed in Suzhou
numerals (Table 1). It is the most detailed
record so far pertaining to the principle of
design, modulus system, main unit data,
measures and the amount of materials
used for different ship forms. One of those
is Da Pa, a junk that each side of hull is
printed five gun ports (Fig. 4), it is the only
civil junk with gun ports in the period of
the Republic of China, alias Hei Bo or
Feng Wei Chuan by recorded of G. R. G. Fig. 4 The Manual of Da Pai in the Naval
Worcester (Worcester, 1948) (Fig. 5).

Architecture Manual of Chen’s Family. (Chen Guo
Zai)

Design
In ancient times, master ship-builders relied on their individual experience and the
knowledge passed down from previous generations. They would make patterns on the
spot rather than prepare drawings with precise dimensions in advance. Traditional shipbuilding was a conservative, physically demanding profession. Apprentices were people
from the lower end of society who could not afford an education. Being mostly illiterate,
ship-builders’ experience and knowledge was an oral tradition, passing it down to
apprentices as they worked. In those days livelihoods very much depended on such
skills, so what they learned they kept to themselves and seldom disclosed. For these
reasons, illustrated construction manuals were rare. When designing a new ship, Fujian
shipwright would decide on the measurements:



The length of the keel (longgu) and the rise at both ends based on the
intended use of the particular ship;



The location of the four main transverses – those at the front and back,
behind the mast and that which defines the main cabin;



The width and depth of the ship in proportion to the length of the keel
(longgu), for example, the measurement of the transverse behind the mast
should be 4/10 the measurement of the keel.

6

�

All other measurements such as the bottom-width of the transverse behind
the mast, the top and bottom widths and locations of other transverses were
then defined based on experience and according to the type, usage and
other requirements of the vessel.



The height of the mast depended on the top-measurement of the transverse
immediately behind. So was the size of the major sail.



Finally, measurements of width and the size and shape of the rudder post
and tiller were determined.

The earliest historical document about design of Fujian style junk that has been
discovered up to now is a document from the early Qing dynasty.

Fig. 5 Feng Wei Chuan. (G. R. G. Worcester)

Models
The building process started with making a model. Measurements would then be
proportionately enlarged for making the ship. This was a method recorded in documents
from the Song dynasty onward and continues to be used even in the present. Currently,
7

�scholars take the making of models as the means by which to conserve and record the
technology used to make a particular ship, but the ship-building industry knows well that
components are difficult to reduce and reproduce to scale. Hence details that scaled
down would be too small to show are often omitted.

Furthermore, to build a ship

requires totally different skills to those required for making a model. When detailed
plans and descriptions are lacking, models can at times be misleading. Model offered
the possibility of experimenting with various solutions before the replica in full scale was
begun.
Selection of Material
As far as the choice of wood is concerned, a kind of natural fir tree Cunninghamia
lanceolata (Lamb). Hook from Fujian a mountainous area was normally used for the
parts of a ship’s shell that have direct contact with the sea, such as the keel (longgu),
bottom, shuishe (literally water snake), and zouma (literally running horse), the deck
and transverses (gecangban, literally cabin-separating boards), and natural small-leaf
camphor for other parts of the body such as cangliangzhuo (base of cabin beams)
liangtou (beam-end) and gecangfuqiang (cabin-separating strengtheners). For the
rudder and anchor which required harder material, kundian wood, which was grown in
Guangdong and Southeast Asia was used. Wood for the mast was the most carefully
selected, natural fir trees from Fujian aged 80 or more were generally used. Extant
historical documents prove that tight rules governing the selection and quantity of
materials to be used for ships built in imperial shipyards existed from the mid Ming. The
allowances, however, seem overly lavish. With experienced folk ship-builders,
measurements of all the parts would be clear in their minds as they searched for
materials. Any piece of wood was to them an assembly of some parts. Ship-building
uses a lot of wood, but the availability of wood is subject to specific growth cycles. A
shortage of supply occurred in Fujian from the early Ming Dynasty, and with it, the cost
of ships went up. Wood was then imported in large quantities from Southeast Asia
(Chen Xi Yu, 1991). At the same time, some folk-shipyards moved out of Fujian. Some
relocated abroad where a few expanded to substantial size. With them Fujian shipbuilding technology spread overseas.

8

�Launched

1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

1915
1914

Type

Owner

Da
Shuang Zhang
(Jiang)
Da Gu
Da Gu
Da Gu

Qiu Xiong

Da Pai
Da Pai
Da Pai
口 Cao
(DiaoCao？)

1906

Jin
Mu Chuan
Chong Wu Changshun hang
Chong Wu Cheng Chuan
Chong Wu Chang Shun
Xiu Chuan
Jiu Zhi
He Shang
Tou Chuan
De Bao

Shui Chuan

Length of
keel
(chi/meter)
28.4/8.72

Cost
(Silver
Dollar)
500

22.7/6.81
28/8.4
21/6.3
35/ 10.5
31.5/9.45
21/6.3
30.5/9.15
22/6.6
30.5/9.15
30.5/9.15
27/8.1
31/9.3
20/6

500

230

Table 1. The Contents of Fourteen Fujian Junks from the Naval Architecture Manual of Chen’s Family.
(Chen Guo Zai)

Sequence of Construction
Traditional production starts with establishing the keel (longgu), fixing transverses
(longuyiban, literally dragon bone wing-boards), parts of bottom planking, gecangban,
biban (bilge Keel), wen (stabilizer), lianggung (upper ribs), then the intermediate ribs
between the transverses, and finally, the remaining bottom planking. After these, work
on the weather deck begins. First the boards along the bulwarks, followed with shishe
on the exterior of the bulwarks, shuixianmen (literally narcissus door) and then the
bulwarks. The dragon-eye is usually installed on an auspicious day chosen by the
boatman. When the making of the ship’s hull is finished, the filling or Lihui (Caulking)
and all sewing work too come to completion. Before the new ship is launched, the
exterior of the shell is first covered with a mixture of rice soup and lihui to protect
against shipworms. The owner selects a date and time for the launching after which the
mast is set up and the sails bent on. This pattern of ship-building is traditional for many
9

�areas along China’s coastline and continues to be used even up to the present.
Scholars named it chuankefa, literally the Chinese frame first system. The modern
Chinese building techniques for large wooden ships begins with the keel, then erects
the frames or ribs and the bottom planking before completing the side planking. This
method of ship-building first appeared in Shi Ryukyu Lu (Diplomatic Mission to Ryukyu)
written by the Ming dynasty diplomat Xia ZI yang in 1606 (Xia Ziyang, 1970).
Painting and Decoration
That part of hull below the water-line is usually covered with baikehui (lime from white s
hells). The flares (tuolang ban, wave-lifting boards near the bow) are also first covered
with lime before painting the figure that characterizes Fujian junks with a solution made
of glue, tung oil and natural color pigments. Some Fujian junks even come with a carved
head of a lion at the bow. Dragon eyes on the bulwarks near the bow are usually made
of camphor. Particular rules govern the size and shape of these eyes: the ratio between
the keel length and eye should be 110:4; eyes for fishing boats should look downwards t
o signal the search for catches while eyes for merchant ships should look at the route a
head. Mulong (wooden dragon), i.e., loach poles (qiuyuji) are painted on the bulwarks n
ear the stern, a seabird (muyi) on the yingban (the oval-shaped sern facing), and at the
bottom of the yingban is the board which carries the ship’s registration number. Accordi
ng to legend, qiuyuji, muyi bird and Matsu (Goddess of the Sea) are the three treasures
that watch over the safety of ships. A statue of Matsu or a paper charm as its substitute
may be placed in a sanctuary in the after part of the poop.
Tools
Confucius says, “Good tools are a prerequisite to the successful completion of a job”.
For the execution of specific tasks, special tools are required, such as axes, chisels,
saws, files, tweezers, awls, knives, rulers and modou (ink markers) used by carpenters,
and hammers, large tweezers, sickles, paint-brushes, truncheons for working with lime
are used by other workers.
Axe: triangular in shape, the axe is the most important tool in ship-building. In traditional
ship-building, the qualification of ship-building masters is measured by the number of
years he has used an axe.
Adze: shaped like a hoe, it is also named guangfu (smooth-out, or faying axe) meaning
10

�that it is used for smoothing out or faying in parts.
Saw: for cutting raw materials into boards.
Plane: for smoothening out wood surfaces.
Lu Ban ruler: also known as “wengong ruler”, which, according to legend, was a system
of measurement invented by Lu Ban following Daoist truth and the laws of the Eight
Diagrams. With birth, aging, sickness, death and suffering as the basis, the ruler is
divided into 8 parts named cai, beng, yi, li, guan, li, hai and ben. When using the ruler,
cai is the top and beng the end, and it is important also to avoid the inauspicious and
adopt what is auspicious.
Modou: that part which serves as a container of ink is called mochi (ink-well) which
holds cotton wool soaked in ink. There is a line reel at the end. Cotton thread comes
through from the modou and is also soaked with ink. To use the modou, the cotton
thread is first fastened to the piece of wood which requires marking at each end, and by
gently pulling the thread outwards near the center and then letting it go, a clear and
distinct ink line appears on a raw piece of wood or boards measuring several meters.
Caulking iron: made of wrought iron and steel for the teeth. An iron loop forms part of
the wooden handle and is used for mixing hemp, rattan and lime and inserting the
mixture into crevices.
Shipbuilders
Over the centuries, ship-builders coming from Fuzhou, Quanzhou and Zhangzhou
slowly gathered in Fujian. Apprenticeship generally started at the age of 11 or 12.
Those who joined the profession were mostly members of ship-builders’ families; their
children, cousins or relatives. No less than 3 years of training were necessary. In the
beginning, apprentices were not allowed to handle the axe and helped only in menial
duties such as mending or minor repair work. Only after a number of years of training,
when students had picked up sufficient knowledge and skills from their masters, were
they allowed to work on important components such as keels, helms and masts before
they became masters. There is a common saying, “Master of a particular shipyard
builds ships exclusive to that shipyard”. Each shipyard had its unique ship form.
Generation after generation of ship-builders inherited the skills, expertise and

11

�experience passed to them by their predecessors, which over time established a given
set of practices and forms.
Crossed the Pacific Voyages
In Donnelly’s Chinese Junks and Other Native Craft, he listed three most important
crossed the Pacific voyages have been taken by type of Fuzhou pole junk and another
one was make by Xiamen fishing junk.






“Keying”: length of 48.7 m, Hong Kong to London, 1848.
“Whangho”: length of 30 m, Shanghai to San Pedro, 1906.
“Ningbo”: length of 42 m, Shanghai to San Pedro, 1912.
“Amoy”: length of 21.03 m, Xiamen to Victoria, 1922.

Captain Eric de Bisschop sailed a Xiamen built 12 ton gross junk Fou Po II in the
southwestern Pacific Ocean and East Indian Ocean. In 1955, a Fuzhou style cargo junk
with a length of 23 m, Free China, sailed from Taiwan to San Francisco. In 2008, our
experimental replica of Fujian Style warship “Princess Tai Ping” sailed form Xiamen to
San Francisco and Hawaii.
Conclusions
Unlike shipbuilding in other indigenous areas, the Chinese shipbuilding tradition
changed a little through all the time, the structure of square bows and sterns with
transverse watertight bulkhead and lugsails with bamboo mat and strip showed little
change over thousands of years, and the last successors of traditional shipbuilding are
alive. Western classifying studies of Chinese sailboats in the early of 20th century just
based on the field investigations and the interviews with the successors of traditional
naval architecture, such as the great achievements of François-Edmond Paris, Louis
Audemard, Barbosa Carmona, Donnelly Ivon, G. R. G. Worcester and Etienne Sigaut,
etc. It is last chance to be invested promptly on ethnographical field work investigation
for Fujian coast traditional shipbuilding centers. The Naval Architecture Manual of
Chen’s Family provided most detailed database so far, yielding valuable information
pertaining to principle of design, a modulus system, main unit data, and measures used
for typical ship forms of traditional Fujian style sea going sailing junks. ~There are still 3
shipwrights alive in Sha Po Wei, a valuable ethnographic resource, soon to be lost.
12

�Therefore, historical and archaeological projects need to be invested into promptly to
recover the historical archetypes of ancient Fujian Style Sea going junks, which will
provide helpful methods to explain and identify relevant ship remains excavated in
future shipwreck underwater archaeological projects.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to all members of CSJES, the last craftsmen of traditional Fujian naval
architecture and seamanship, who provided their invaluable experience and knowledge.
I must also express my sincere thanks to Dr. Jia Hao and Miss Jia Xiaofan. Dr. jiahao
helped me to search relevant historical materials and Miss Jia xiaofan revised the article
format.
References
Chen Guo Zai., 1919. The Naval Architecture Manual of Chen’s Family, Manuscript
(private collection), Xiamen.
Anonymous, Mid-17th Century. The Island of Formosa (painted on parchment).
Collection of Berlin Ethnological Museum, Berlin.
Oba, Osamu., 1972. About Drawings of Chinese Ship Kept in Matsuura Historical
Museum, Hirato: The Referential Material of Chinese Merchant Ship in the Era of Edo.
Memo 5 of Research Institute of East and West Academicals Studies of Kansai
University, Osaka suita: 13-49.
Chen Liang Shi., 2002. The Navy Abstract (Shui Shi Ji Yao), Reprinted from the Original
in Late 17th Century. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, Shanghai: 329-337.
Anonymous, Mid-18th Century. The Illustrated Manual of Instruction in Shipbuilding for
the Navy of Fujian Province (Min Sheng Shui Shi Ge Biao Zhen Xie Ying Zhan Shao
Chuan Zhi Tu Ji), Manuscript.
Anonymous, 2002. The Regius Formula of Fujian Sea Going Warships (Qin Ding Fu
Jian Sheng Wai Hai Zhan Chuan Ze Li), (Reprinted from the Woodblock Edition in
1768). Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, Shanghai.
Huang Shu Jing., 1957. The Taiwan Conversation by Writing (Chi Kan Bi Tan),
Reprinted from the Original in Early 18th Century.
Business Bank, Taipei: 35-37.

13

Economic Academe of Taiwan

�Worcester, G. R. G., 1948. A Classification of the Principal Chinese Sea-going Junks
(south of the Yangtze). Shanghai Statistical Department of the Inspectorate General of
Customs, Shanghai: 66-67.
Chen Xi Yu, 1991. Chinese Sailing Junks and Overseas Trade. Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen: 114-127.
Xia Zi Yang, 1970. Shi Ryukyu Lu (Diplomatic Mission to Ryukyu), (Reprinted from the
Original in 1606). Economic Academe of Taiwan Business Bank, Taipei: 235.

Biography
Xu Lu is the initiator and director of Chinese Sailing Junk Expedition Society (CSJES),
an exclusive institute focus on protect and study ancient Chinese naval architecture and
nautical navigation. He also is commissioner of China Maritime History Studies
Association. As a maritime archaeologist special in the field of junks, he spent over a
decade on field work to investigate and ethnographic study the last traditional sailing
craft still be built and operating in China, wrote and released numerous academic
papers. He led an experimental archaeological ship-reconstructions project in 2007,
Princess Taiping, a junk replica sailed across the Pacific.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="12">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="40">
                  <text>Session 9: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="41">
                  <text>Interview with Session 9 chair Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="42">
                  <text>East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia.&#13;
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities. Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="43">
                  <text>Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="501">
                <text>The Naval Architecture of Ancient Fujian Style Sea Going Sailing Junks:  A Manuscript</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="502">
                <text>As the most important qualities of ancient Chinese sailing junks, the square bows and sterns with transverse watertight bulkhead and the lugsails with bamboo mat and strip remained the same over thousands of years. Of which, the traditional Fujian style sea going junks is one of the major vessel forms for the ocean and oversea route in ancient China. This paper make an interpretation of Fujian style sea going junks through ship form and structure, principle of design, models, choice of material, sequence of construction, painting and decoration, tools, ship-builders, and ship component remains.  This study is combined with the interpretation of Chinese historical documents and drawings, foreign historical drawings, ethnographical field work on main traditional shipbuilding centers along the Fujian coast, reconstruction of traditional shipbuilding, land archaeology evidence, and especially gathers information from a newly discovered illustrated manuscript for shipbuilding. This manuscript at present is the most detailed manuscript found pertaining to the principle of design, modulus system, main unit data, measures and amounts materials used for each ship form.  The purpose of this paper is to recover the historical archetypes of ancient Fujian Style Sea going sailing junks, then providing one set of helpful method to explain and identify relevant ship remains excavated in future shipwreck underwater archaeological projects.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="503">
                <text>Xu Lu, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="504">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
