<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=65&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-26T12:27:27+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>65</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="639" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="430">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/350f886b04c6a769c804e263a7084103.pdf</src>
        <authentication>639150c0e38d541f16505be487aa426d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6936">
                    <text>The Past, Present, and Future Regeneration Opportunities of Stone Tidal
Weirs - The Case of Taiwan
Tung Ying-Ying

ABSTRACT
Stone Tidal Weirs can be found all around the world and were once an important way for our
predecessors to sustain their livelihood through fishing. However, in recent years, due to technological
advancements, stone tidal weirs have lost their economic value and many have been left to deteriorate
and collapse. Studying stone tidal weirs has become an obscure topic. Nevertheless, stone tidal weirs
were an important fishing method for coastal residents in human history, and have had a significant
impact on human culture in tangible and intangible ways. Although there are few surviving "live" stone
tidal weirs today, as they periodically appear above sea level, they are an underwater cultural heritage
that the public can see and access without diving. They are one of the best materials for advocating and
promoting education on protecting underwater cultural heritage.
Taiwan has many beautifully shaped and numerous stone tidal weirs around its periphery. The
government has made significant efforts in subsidizing restoration, cultivating talent for building stone
tidal weirs, and researching and promoting education in hopes of preserving Taiwan's precious stone
tidal weirs. Local communities and organizations in Taiwan are also making efforts to combine the
cultural landscape of stone tidal weirs with tourism, utilizing the unique features of local stone tidal
weirs to create diverse new opportunities for reuse. By combining the efforts of local residents and
tourists, the shape and good condition of stone tidal weirs can be preserved, and the beauty and fishing
culture of stone tidal weirs can be passed down to future generations, allowing them to exist
sustainably.
Keywords: Stone tidal weirs, fishing, underwater cultural heritage, Penghu
List of Figures
Figure 1. 2018 International symposiums poster (left), 2023 International symposiums poster (middle),
2021 4th APCONF web site (right).
Figure 2 Research results of the Stone tidal Weir investigation provided. by Professor Lee, Ming-Ju.
Figure 3 Jibe Stone Tidal Weirs.
Figure 4 Research project results list.
Figure 5 Publication (left), Media report (right).
Figure 6 Xinwu Stone Tidal Weir Story House DB (left), The "Isle. travel” Studio facebook (right).

I. INTRODUCTION
This article, "The Past, Present, and Future Regeneration Opportunities of Stone Tidal Weirs The Case of Taiwan," is most suitable for the 12th topic of this conference, "Sticks, Stones, &amp;
Old Fish Bones: The Role and Cultural Heritage of Fish Weir Traditions in the Asia-Pacific
Region." Stone tidal weirs were built by coastal residents in the intertidal zone, where they
worked together to construct embankments to trap fish using the ebb and flow of tides. This
was a way for the village to share their fishing harvest and a marine life culture. Taiwan has
the most stone tidal weirs in the world, with over 574 in Penghu County alone. Some stone
tidal weirs can even be traced back over 300 years ago. However, with the development of
technology and the introduction of new fishing equipment, such as trawling, stone tidal weirs
have easily been replaced in economic value.
The decline of stone tidal weirs is a problem faced by all countries around the world.
Nowadays, many countries leave their stone tidal weirs abandoned and collapsed. Stone tidal
weirs require collective effort to build, maintain, restore, distribute fishing harvests, and
manage registrations, but modern people are reluctant to invest labor and funds. Taiwan has
numerous stone tidal weirs, many of which are still "live," meaning that they can still catch
1

�fish and are operational. This article explores the decline and revitalization methods of stone
tidal weirs in Taiwan, which is in line with the 12th topic of the conference.
II. CASE STUDIES
The case studies being examined pertain to the many well-preserved stone tidal weirs in
Taiwan, which serve as a great example of how proper utilization can not only preserve them
but also transform them into new cultural heritages, resulting in a win-win situation.
Therefore, we are pleased to share Taiwan's methods for preserving stone tidal weirs,
particularly in the face of the issues of revitalization and sustainability. This article explores
Taiwan's case studies, which include:
2.1 Accepting the fact that stone tidal weirs are in decline.
2.2 Ways to revitalize stone tidal weirs - Using Taiwan's preservation of
stone tidal weirs as a case study.
2.3 Transformation and regeneration of stone tidal weirs.
III. RESOURCES
3.1 Data collection: historical records and research reports on the preservation of stone
tidal weirs in Taiwan over the years.
3.2 Interviews: scholars who have studied stone tidal weirs in Taiwan and local
historians and cultural workers involved in the reuse of stone tidal weirs.
3.3 Policy making and budget allocation: the government's initiatives towards the
preservation of stone tidal weirs.
IV. FRAMEWORK
4-1 Facing the decline of the stone tidal weirs
4.1.1 The fishing yield is no match for modern fishing
The economic benefits of stone tidal weir fishing are poor. The catch difference between
stone tidal weir fishing and modern fishing boats is too great. In the past, small fishing
boats had poor safety and could not go out to sea in bad weather, so they relied heavily
on stone tidal weir fishing. Nowadays, fishing boats are safer and can catch more fish,
so residents naturally give up the laborious way of catching fish through stone tidal
weirs.
4.1.2 The technology for building stone weirs is gradually becoming lost.
The construction of stone tidal weirs requires the participation of a certain number of
villagers, and the repair of stone tidal weirs also requires the timing of the ebb tide.
Whether under the scorching sun or in strong winds… building, repairing, and patrolling
the weirs are all high-labor, outdoor work. It is not the best job option for young people
nowadays, and they are unwilling to take over. The lack of inheritance of stone tidal
weir construction and repair skills has resulted in a technical gap.
4.1.3 Stone tidal weir fishing cannot become a major job.
The return on investment is not proportional, and it cannot become the main source of
income for residents, resulting in intergenerational gaps. All declining industries in the
2

�world are due to the development of technology and changes in social lifestyles. Those
engaged in the industry cannot obtain sufficient income to support their lives, and
therefore turn to developing industries that can provide for their basic needs. The catch
from stone tidal weirs is small, and after the investment, no one is willing to invest in the
construction and repair of stone tidal weirs again. The decline of stone tidal weirs is an
inevitable result of the operation of the times.
4-2 Ways to revitalize the stone tidal weirs
4.2.1 The government values the protection of stone tidal weirs.
4.2.1.1 Value the cultural status of stone tidal weirs and restoration techniques (1).
Since 2006 and 2008, the Penghu County Government has successively logged the
"Double Hearts Shihu"(雙心石滬 ) (2)and the "Jibe Shihu Group"(吉貝石滬群)(3) as a
cultural landscape (Figure 1). In 2009, "Penhu Shihu Group" was selected by the
Ministry of Culture as one of the 18 Potential World Heritage Sites in Taiwan(4). In
2010, the Ministry of Culture designated the "Penghu Marine Culture Association - Jibei
Baohu Team"(石滬修造技術)(5) as a national cultural heritage preservation and
technology preservation group. Since 2015, the Houlong WaiPu Stone tide Weirs group(
後龍外埔石滬群)(6) have been registered as a cultural landscape in Miaoli County. The
preservation and maintenance of Stone tide weirs is an important project in the
preservation of cultural heritage in Taiwan. The government actively subsidizes the
restoration of stone tidal weirs throughout the country and holds local and international
symposiums in 2018 and 2023 (Figure 1). In 2021, Taiwan hosted the Asia-Pacific
Underwater Cultural Heritage Conference, with stone tidal weirs as the main topic
(Figure 1). In recent years, the awareness of preserving underwater cultural heritage has
gradually increased, and the study of stone tidal weirs has expanded to include the
perspective of underwater cultural heritage.

Figure 1. 2018 International symposiums poster (left), International symposiums poster (middle),
2021 4th APCONF web site (right)

4.2.1.2 Funding is being allocated to encourage scholars to research and restore Stone
tidal weirs.
Taiwan has a large number of scholars studying stone tidal weirs, and their
research can inspire young students to participate, achieving the goal of
passing down knowledge (Figure 2). The government provides funding for repairing
damaged stone tidal weirs and hiring personnel for restoration work.
Hosting international conferences can help understand the current status of
stone tidal weir preservation in different countries, facilitate knowledge
exchange, and promote the belief of protecting stone weirs among
Taiwanese people.
3

�Figure 2 Research results of the Stone tidal Weir investigation provided by Professor Lee, Ming-Ju.

4.2.2 Research achievements and tourism performance establish confidence.
4.2.2.1 "Taiwan has the world's most densely distributed and beautiful stone tidal weirs.
With over 600 households of stone tidal weirs, the ones in Penghu have unique shape
and structures such as the fish trap houses(滬屋), which have become a popular tourist
attraction due to their stunning and distinctive appearance. The public takes great pride
in Taiwan's beautiful stone tidal weirs, enhancing their confidence.(Figure 3)

Figure 3 Jibe Stone Tidal Weirs.
4.2.2.2 Teachers from schools located near stone tidal weirs actively participate in
research.
This encourages students' curiosity and awareness, as well as a culture of research. Such
as Tamkangz University(淡江大學) and National Central University(國立中央大學) in
northern Taiwan, and Tunghai University(東海大學) investigate Miaoli area. National
Penghu University of Science and Technology(國立澎湖科技大學) conducts research
on stone tidal weirs in Penghu. Through these research efforts (Figure 4), people gain a
deeper understanding of the history of stone tidal weirs, community management
methods, interactive approaches, and the unique characteristics of these structures. This
4

�makes stone tidal weirs a familiar and beloved part of our culture.

Figure 4. Research project results list

4.2.2.3 The revitalization of stone tidal weirs brings tourism benefits.
The largest quantity and most beautiful stone tidal weirs bring local characteristics and
tourism benefits to the region. In order to revitalize the stone tidal weirs, young people
have returned to their hometowns and combined tourism with innovative ideas to turn
stone tidal weirs into new tourist attractions. This has not only created job opportunities
for themselves but also brought in tourists to benefit the local community, creating a
win-win situation and allowing for the preservation of the stone tidal weirs to continue.
4.2.3 Community involvement creates value for the revitalization of stone tidal weirs.
4.2.3.1 In regions of Taiwan where stone tidal weirs are alive, there is a commitment
from local historians and young people to preserve them. including Tamsui(淡水),
Sanzhi(三芝), Xinwu(新屋), and Houlong(後龍) in Taiwan island, as well as on the
outlying island of Penghu. In addition to the 七美雙心石滬in Qimei(七美)Penghu, Jibe
Village in Baisha Township(吉貝白沙鄉), Penghu boasts 116 stone tidal weirs, which
are highly concentrated and beautifully shaped, earning it the title of "the land of stone
tidal weirs." In these areas, young people have returned to their hometowns and, under
the guidance of their elders, work diligently to learn the lost technology of building and
repairing stone tidal weirs. They also bring new vitality to the stone tidal weirs through
innovative marketing techniques that are unique to their generation.
4.2.3.2 The active reporting and publishing by non-governmental media and NGO are
crucial for the preservation and maintenance of local cultural heritage in Taiwan.
In addition to government efforts, the involvement of the private sector is the most
stable force. NGOs publish various books introducing stone tidal weirs (Figure 5), and
major media outlets report extensively on the history and characteristics of Taiwan's
5

�stone tidal weirs(Figure 5), making them more than just a term. Through media coverage
of the history and unique features of stone tidal weirs, a strong momentum is created for
the promotion of stone tidal weir preservation by the private sector.

Figure 5 Publication (left), media report (right)

4.2.3.3 Active promotion of combining tourism with stone tidal weirs to create new
economic value.
Stone tidal weirs have become a source of pride for local people, and young people are
willing to return to their hometowns to revive and operate them. By combining the
preservation of stone tidal weirs with tourism, a new way of thinking about stone tidal
weir tourism is created, making it possible to turn the preservation of stone tidal weirs
into a viable and sustainable occupation. This approach leads to a win-win situation for
the preservation of Taiwan's stone tidal weirs and the development of local tourism.
4-3 Transformation and Regeneration of Stone Tidal Weirs
It is not only about reviving and preserving the technology of stone tidal weirs, but also
about reviving the cultural value of stone tidal weirs that have lost their fishing value,
creating new economic value, and transforming them into a sustainable industry.
4.3.1 Xinwu Stone Tidal Weir Story House(新屋石滬故事館)(7) is a converted old
Police watchhouse and dormitory building by the seaside, where local cultural and
historical workers introduce the history and stories of stone tidal weirs, exhibitions, and
local cuisine. The locals are also invited to help restore the stone tidal weirs, which has
gained their recognition. In addition, one-day tours and accommodation experiences
centered around the stone tidal weirs have been developed, which are highly favored by
locals and tourists alike (Figure 6).

6

�Figure 6 Xinwu Stone Tidal Weir Story House DB. (left), The "Isle. travel” Studio facebook(right)

4.3.2 Young people returning to their hometown, Penghu, establishing The "Isle. travel”
Studio"(離島出走)(8) bringing an experienced local master to teach them how to build and
repair stone tidal weirs while also documenting each step of the process to preserve the
precious techniques of the master. Also they organize unique and exclusive stone tidal weir
experiences for in-depth travel, setting themselves apart from other travel agencies.
Promoting the experience of repairing stone tidal weirs, led by the local stone masters, to
rediscover the craft of stonemasonry. By restoring the stone tidal weirs, it awakens people's
memories and emotions towards the ocean, and helps them understand the island culture of
stone tidal weirs (Figure 6).
V. CONCLUSION
As human civilization progresses, our way of life has undergone significant changes. With the
advent of large fishing vessels, the income generated by stone tidal weirs can no longer
compete with that of offshore fishing. As a result, many stone tidal weirs have been
abandoned, collapsed, gradually disappearing beneath the sea. Without economic incentives,
these stone tidal weirs have ceased to be popular topics of discussion, and many have quietly
disappeared. However, in Taiwan, stone tidal weirs face the same challenges but are seen as
important historical and cultural heritage. They were vital constructions for coastal
communities hundreds of years ago, serving as important hubs for social interactions. Thanks
to the efforts of scholars, government support, and active participation from the public, young
people are willing to invest in the preservation and revitalization of these stone tidal weirs.
They have become not only exclusive terms for seaside communities but also a unique tourist
attraction where visitors can experience the traditional practices of carrying and stacking
stones and fishing inside the weirs. Through innovation and regeneration, the history and
features of these stone tidal weirs have spread across all walks of life, and the young people
invested in their preservation have found meaning and value in them. Therefore, the
regeneration of stone tidal weirs in Taiwan can be passed down from generation to generation
and become a unique landscape feature that protects these historical structures. We hope that
Taiwan's stone tidal weirs can become a world heritage list, and other countries can also value
their preservation.

Acknowledgements

7

�I appreciate the assistance provided by the consultant Rich Giomanni Wan and ChatGPT in translating.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

National Cultural Heritage Website國家文化資產網
https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/cultureOverview(Accessed 3 April 2023).
https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/culturalLandscape/20061027000001, National Cultural Heritage
Website, "Double Hearts Shihu" logged as a cultural landscape. (Accessed 3 April 2023).
https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/culturalLandscape/20080602000001National Cultural Heritage
Website, " Jibe Shihu Group " logged as a cultural landscape. (Accessed 5 April 2023).
https://twh.boch.gov.tw/taiwan/intro.aspx?id=13&amp;lang=zh_tw#ad-image-0, Bureau of Cultural Heritage,
Ministry of Culture Website, " Jibe Shihu Group " logged as a cultural landscape. "Penhu Shihu Group" was
selected as one of the 18 Potential World Heritage Sites in Taiwan. (Accessed 5 April 2023).
https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/ptp/20100630000005, National Cultural Heritage Website,
"Penghu Marine Culture Association - Jibei Baohu Team" designated as a national cultural heritage
preservation and technology preservation group. (Accessed 8 April 2023).
https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/culturalLandscape/20151104000001,”Houlong Waipu Stone Tide
weirs group” logged as a cultural landscape. (Accessed 16 April 2023).
https://travel.tycg.gov.tw/zh-tw/travel/attraction/1607, Xinwu Stone Tidal Weir Story House Website.
(Accessed 5 May 2023)
https://www.facebook.com/isle.travel.TW/, "Isle. travel” Studio facebook website. (Accessed 5 May 2023).

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6929">
                <text>The Past, Present, and Future Regeneration Opportunities of Stone Tidal&#13;
Weirs - The Case of Taiwan&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6930">
                <text>Stone Tidal Weirs can be found all around the world and were once an important way for our&#13;
predecessors to sustain their livelihood through fishing. However, in recent years, due to technological&#13;
advancements, stone tidal weirs have lost their economic value and many have been left to deteriorate&#13;
and collapse. Studying stone tidal weirs has become an obscure topic. Nevertheless, stone tidal weirs&#13;
were an important fishing method for coastal residents in human history, and have had a significant&#13;
impact on human culture in tangible and intangible ways. Although there are few surviving "live" stone&#13;
tidal weirs today, as they periodically appear above sea level, they are an underwater cultural heritage&#13;
that the public can see and access without diving. They are one of the best materials for advocating and&#13;
promoting education on protecting underwater cultural heritage.&#13;
Taiwan has many beautifully shaped and numerous stone tidal weirs around its periphery. The&#13;
government has made significant efforts in subsidizing restoration, cultivating talent for building stone&#13;
tidal weirs, and researching and promoting education in hopes of preserving Taiwan's precious stone&#13;
tidal weirs. Local communities and organizations in Taiwan are also making efforts to combine the&#13;
cultural landscape of stone tidal weirs with tourism, utilizing the unique features of local stone tidal&#13;
weirs to create diverse new opportunities for reuse. By combining the efforts of local residents and&#13;
tourists, the shape and good condition of stone tidal weirs can be preserved, and the beauty and fishing&#13;
culture of stone tidal weirs can be passed down to future generations, allowing them to exist&#13;
sustainably.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6931">
                <text>Tung Ying-Ying</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6932">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6933">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6934">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6935">
                <text>Ying-Ying, Tung. 2023. “The Past, Present, and Future Regeneration Opportunities of Stone Tidal Weirs - The Case of Taiwan.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Paul Montgomery, and Bill Jeffrey. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/2011 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="77">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="619" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="410">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/34ac6c1e58d3d45d3d72a1fc5d7f679e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d159a4b3c2c916039b59f95bd2004ea2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6737">
                    <text>Ports and Trade Networks of the Tamiraparani Delta of Tamil Nadu
V. Selvakumar (Associate Professor, Tamil University)

ABSTRACT
The deltas of Tamil Nadu in southern part of India have several ports that acted as nodes of maritime networks.
Evidence of prehistoric hunter-gatherers is found in the Tamiraparani delta in the red sand dunes of Teri in the form
of microliths. In the Iron Age the Tamiraparani region witnessed megalithic settlements with burial sites. The
famous urn burial site of Adichanallur is located in this region. Evidence for early historic trade interaction is found
at the site of Korkai, which has been identified as the center of the early Pandyan kings. The port of Korkai is
discussed in the early Tamil literature and archaeological excavation has revealed evidence for urban activities. In
the Medieval period, Kayal became an important port of trade and it is referred to in the medieval textual sources. It
was a major center for horse trade and the temple of Tiruppudaimaraudir in the Tamiraparani region has evidence of
Arab horse traders in the form of mural paintings. The region is well connected with the Western Ghats and a trade
route connecting Kerala and Tamil Nadu region. The main research problem of the paper is to understand the nature,
function and foreland and hinterland networks of the ports of Tamiraparani valley. The paper discusses the
archaeological evidence of ports of the early historic and medieval periods (Korkai and Kayal) and the maritime
networks that connected with these ports using textual and archaeological sources. The data sources are collected
from the author's fieldwork, critical study of primary sources and collection of secondary literature.
Keywords: Korkai; Indian Ocean Trade; Indo-Roman Trade; Kayal; Horse Trade

INTRODUCTION
The Tamiraparani delta lies in the southern part of Tamil Nadu, adjacent to the Palk Strait that separates
India and the island of Sri Lanka. The Tamiraparani river originates near Agastiyakoodam in the Western
Ghats mountains and meets the Gulf of Mannar, which is part of the Bay of Bengal, near the ancient port
of Korkai and south of the modern port of Tutukudy/Tuticorin. The Tamiraparani river valley is one of the
historically important regions of Tamil Nadu with the evidence of the cultural remains of the Microlithic,
Iron Age, Early Historic and historical periods. This paper discusses the ports and trade networks of the
Tamiraparani delta mainly in the Early Historic and Medieval periods.

ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND
The Tamiraparani river valley lies between Latitudes 8º 21’N and longitudes 9º 13’ N; and 77º 10’ E and
78º 15’ E. The river flows for about 130 km towards the east before joining the Gulf of Mannar and it is
known as Porunai in the Tamil texts and inscriptions (PAN 2021, 19-23). Tirunelveli, district headquarters
in the west, and Tutukudy (Thuthukudy), district headquarters and port in the east, are the important
centres located in the river valley. The popular name of the river “Tamiraparani” is known as Tambapanni
in Prakrit language, and is cognate with the name of Sri Lanka, which is referred to as Tambapanni in the
inscriptions of Asoka (Sen 1956, 66). The Korkai bay, which is near the coast, abounds in tanks and
backwater-bodies now. It has been argued that the river Tamiraparani might have flowed further north,
from its current course, in the early historic period and then moved southwards (Arunachalam et al. 2006,
278-280). Kayal was another port that developed in the medieval period and is located further east of
Korkai in the Tamiraparani delta. Geological investigations reveal that the Korkai bay must have been a
prominent feature adjacent to the coast, in the early historic period (Arunachalam et al. 2006, 278-280).
1

�The trenches excavated at the site of Korkai as part of archaeological excavation by Tamil Nadu State
Archaeology Department in 2021 revealed water-logging in the lower level, below 1.5 m from the surface
level (Tangadurai, Personal Communication, 2023) suggesting possible lower sea-level in the early
historic period. Although the Tamiraparani river valley forms a distinct drainage system, south of the
Tamiraparani river flows the Nambiyar, which originates near Tirukkurungudi and flows parallel in the
south, can also be treated as part of the broader cultural region of the Tamiraparani river valley. The Gulf
of Mannar is famous for pearl fishery and marine shells are abundant in this region (Athiyaman 2000, 1-5;
Arunachalam 2011, 1-8), the river valley is suitable for agrarian produce, and the Western Ghats has rich
forest resources including spices.

Figure 1. Map of Southern Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka with important Sites, by Shika Rai

HISTORY OF RESEARCH
Arch Bishop Robert Caldwell published on the history of this region (1881). He excavated the sites of
Korkai and Kayal and identified urn burials (1887, 80-82, 82-83, 279-290). Based on the study of the urn
burials and the human bones, it has been argued that the people who were buried in the urns were
physically similar to the contemporary population of Tiruneveli region. Robert Bruce Foote explored this
area and identified microlithic sites and the Mesolithic formations of the Teri Sand dunes (Foote 1884,
1-98) and artifacts of microliths have been identified by Zeuner and Allchin (1956, 4-20). Alexander Rea
explored several megalithic burials sites in this river valley and excavated the famous urn burial site of
Adichanallur and unearthed voluminous cultural materials (Rea 1915, 1-40). Mangudi in Sankarankoil
2

�Taluk further north of the Tamiraparani valley excavated by Tamil Nadu State Department of
Archaeology exposed microliths beneath the Iron Age-Early Historic remains (Shetty 2003, 1-3).
Subsequently, the urn burial site of Adichanallur was re-excavated by Archaeological Survey of India in
2005 (Satyamurthy 2007, 55-66; Bhadreenath 2021, 1-15; Nambirajan et al. 2009, 57-61). Archaeological
excavation is ongoing now to establish the site museum at Adichanallur and the task is undertaken by the
Archaeological Survey of India from 2021 (Arunraj et al. 2022, 6-13). Tamil Nadu State Department
undertook excavations at the habitation site in the village of Adichanallur in 2021 and also at Korkai
(PAN, 2021). An archaeological survey of Tamiraparani region has been undertaken by Tamil Nadu State
Archaeology Department in 2021-2022 and they have identified several archaeological sites (Tangadurai,
Personal Communication, 2023). The Megalithic burial site of Sivakalai in the Tamiraparani delta has
been excavated and dates of ca. 1155 BCE has been obtained on the urn burials (Rajan et al. 2021, 57-86).
N. Athiyaman has discussed the importance of the ports of southern Tamil Nadu, mainly in the Gulf of
Mannar region (Athiyaman 2014, 1-15). This region has paintings and sculptures related to the maritime
activities in the temples and they have been studied by Athiyaman (2015, 99-111). The excavated
materials from Adichanallur, especially the copper-bronze artifacts have been studied for their
metallurgical contents and it has been found that these artifacts have high tin content as found in other
megalithic bronze artifacts (Paramasivan 1944, 87-93; Srinivasan 2017, 807-812).

KORKAI IN LITERATURE
Korkai is spoken in early Tamil as well the Greek literature as an important port and centre for marine
resources, especially pearl and chank (Turbinella Pyrum). This section describes the poetic narration of
Korkai in early Tamil literature.
Tamil Literature
The Tamil Sangam texts are generally placed in the early centuries of the Common Era and a few of these
texts could extend to the early medieval period (Zvelebil 1974, 1-50). While the information and
composition of some of these poems were undertaken in the early period, these texts were compiled into a
corpus in the early medieval period, ca. sixth to ninth centuries CE.
Marine Resources of Korkai
The Sangam Tamil texts often refer to the importance of the town of Korkai for pearl fishery and marine
shell industries.
Akananuru (poem 27) mentions that the large port (perunturai, Peru = large and turai = port, in Tamil)
of Korkai was protected ethically and peacefully by the Pandya king who was involved in bloody, violent
battles. The town was famous for pearl fishery, and the pearls from the town are compared to the teeth of
the heroine in the poem.
Akananuru (poem 201) refers to the shining pearl of Korkai munturai (Mun = front and turai = port, in
Tamil), and conch (Turnbinella pyrum). In the famous town of the Pandya, who were victorious with the
support of elephants efficient in warfare and the women of the fisher-folk, who wear leaf dress, deposit
pearl and the Turbinella pyrum with the opening on the right-side. The chank shells with the opening on
the right-side are considered rare and more valuable. Such chanks are known as valampuri in Tamil and
are highly priced even today.
3

�Narrinai refers to the front port (munturai) of Korkai as yielding pearls (Narrinai 23:5). Here the Tamil
term of munturai used to refer to the port is interesting. Some scholars suggest that munturai as a front
port, which was very close to the mouth of the river and perunturai (large port or main port) was in the
interior. Munturai might have referred to the actual port or ferry context nearby the river, while Perunturai
referred to the town in a broad sense.
Aingurunuru (185, -2) poem mentions the munturai port of Korkai where neytal flowers (Nymphaea
nouchali) and pearls are scattered and they resemble the teeth of the heroine. The poem narrates that the
waves bring the shining pearls onto the shore and the pearls trouble the hooves of the moving horses. She
wears the fine shell bangles cut out of Turbinella pyrum, by a sharp tool. Such poetic narrations are
exaggerations that speak about the abundance of pearls in the region.
Cilappatikaram, an epic work in Tamil, mentions the pearl from the Korkai perunturai (14. 180).
Maduraikkanchi, another text of the Sangam corpus, has a more vivid narration. Pearls, and the bangles
cut from Turbinella pyrum, and the various commodities of Paratar, and the salt, the dry fish supplied by
those who drove the timil boats, and the sailors of navai and kalam who brought horses reached Madurai
(Maduraikkanchi, 316 – 325). Here navai and kalam are two types of seagoing watercraft used by
merchants, while timil was the boat often used by the fisherfolk. The same text talks about the quarters
where the bangle makers lived (Maduraikanchi 134–138).
The literary narratives are very clear that pearls and marine shells were extensively exploited in the region
of Tamiraparani delta.
Political Control of the Pandyas
An important category of information from the literature pertains to the political control of the port of
Korkai. Although the existence of strong political control in the early historic period was a matter of
debate (Gurukkal 2012, 1-20), the poems are very categorical that the port of Korkai was controlled by
the political power of the Pandyas.
Akananuru poem 130 refers to Korkai as narrer Valuti Korkai munturai, which means the front port of
Korkai, belonged to the king Vazhuti, who had fine chariots. Aingurunuru (185:1-2) poem is clear that the
port of Korkai was controlled by the Pandya king Vazhuti. Several Pandya kings had the title Vazhuti; for
example Ukkirapperuvazuti and Maran vazhuti. Coins of the early historic period with the name “vazhuti”
have been found in Tamil Nadu. The title Korkai Koman (Sirupanarruppatai 62-63), which means the
headman of Korkai and another title ‘Korkai Ventu’ (Cilappatikaram 10, 65), which means the ‘chief of
Korkai,’ strongly suggest that the Pandya king controlled Korkai.
Greco-Roman Literature
The Periplus Marei Erythrea mentions Korkai as Colchi and it also refers to the pearl fishery here was
undertaken by condemned criminals. It also states that the town was under the control of the Pandyas
(Schoff 1912, 46). The text of Ptolemy which is dated to the second century CE also speaks about Korkai
as ‘Kolkhoi’ and also as an emporium (Renou 1925, 6).
While describing the area north of Korkai it says “Beyond Colchi there follows another district called the
Coast Country, which lies on a bay, and has a region inland called Argaru. At this place, and nowhere
else, are bought the pearls gathered on the coast thereabouts; and from there are exported muslins, those
called Argaritic.” (Schoff 1912, 46). The identity of this settlement and interior region is not certain. The
place of Argaru was identified with Uraiyur, the capital of the Cholas lying further north, and based on the
excavation and the finding of tanks identified as dying-vat (Raman 1988, 1-5); it is argued that such
4

�clothes were produced at Uraiyur. Since pearls and other marine resources were brought to this town, it
could well be the area near Alagankulam (Sridhar et al. 2005, 1-5) and the hinterland could be the region
east of Madurai. Keeladi in this region could be a potential early historic urban settlement associated with
textile production (Amarnath Ramakrishna et al. 2019). The name Argaru could be the contemporary
name of Arrankarai near the mouth of the river Vaigai or the ancient name of Aruppukkottai, which is
famous for the textile industry. The textile class of aruvai referred to in the early Sangam texts
(Athiyaman and Athithan 2018, 41-50) could have been the original name of argaru of the Periplus.

IMPORTANT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IN THE TAMIRAPARANI VALLEY
Archaeological surveys have revealed several prehistoric, Iron Age and Historical sites in the
Tamiraparani valley. This region is also rich in historical settlements, inscriptions and temples. Some of
the important historical settlements related to maritime activities are discussed here in this section.
Exploitation of marine resources in the Tamiraparani region might have begun in the mid- second
millennium BCE, although archaeological evidence has not been identified in this region. Excavations at
Molapalayam near Coimbatore have produced marine shells of Turbinella pyrum and Oliva sp. used as
ornaments in 1600-1400 BCE context (Selvakumar et al. 2022). Such shells are found in the Deccan
Chalcolithic and Southern Neolithic cultures of India suggesting the early exchange in marine shells
(Deshpande-Mukherjee 2006, 259-83). Evidence of Iron Age settlements are found in large numbers in
the Tamiraparani river valley.
Korkai
Korkai is in Sri Vaikuntam Taluk of Tirunelveli district and lies in the delta of Tamiraparani valley.
Adichanallur lies about 15 km further inland and the microlithic site of Sawyerpuram lies three km from
the site. Korkai was excavated by Tamil Nadu Archaeological Department in 1968-69 and in 2020-21.
Based on the excavations, three cultural periods have been identified and they can be described as Early
Historic, Early Medieval and Mid-Medieval (Majeed 1987, 73-77; Sridhar 2004, 48). Brick architectural
remains, urns, ring wells, soakage jars, pottery with Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions, cut pieces of shells and
bangles, beads of semi-precious stones, Northern Black Polished Ware, rouletted ware fragments have
been excavated at the site (Figures. 2-3). A radiocarbon date of 785 BCE was obtained from a trench
(Sridhar 2004, 56). The re-excavation of the site in 2021 produced similar findings.

5

�Figure 2. A ring well or Soakage Jar (?), Korkai, Courtesy: Tamil Nadu State Archaeology Department

6

�Figure 3. Brick Structure, Korkai, Courtesy: Tamil Nadu State Archaeology Department

Sivakalai
Sivakalai is an urn burial site in Tamiraparani valley. The areas of Srimoolakarai, Sivakalai Parambu. and
Parakiramapandi Thiradu have been excavated by Tamil Nadu State archaeology department in 2020
onwards. They have found evidence of urn burials, human skeletons and evidence of rice husk. An AMS
date of 1155 BCE (PAN 202, 16-171; Rajan et al. 2021) is available for the site. The early date suggests
the possible beginning of the Iron Age in the late second millennium BCE.
Adichanallur
Adichanallur was an important Iron Age burial site in this region which has been investigated for more
than a century since 1877 (Rea 2015, 1-40; Satyamurthy 2007, 55-66; Bhadhreenath 2021; Arunraj et al.
2022, 6-13). The burial site has produced a vast quantity of grave-goods including iron objects, copper
bronze artifacts and gold objects indicating the establishment of agricultural and pastoral communities.
Although the habitation site associated with the burial site has not been identified, the evidence proves
that the Tamiraparani valley was extensively occupied by the Iron Age communities, who were involved
in rice cultivation and had some degree of craft specialization from early first millennium BCE (Table 1).
The diverse varieties of metal objects suggest possible long distance trade.
7

�Kayal
Kayal area with a cluster of settlements variously known as Pazhayakayal and Kayalpattinam was the port
of the Medieval period from about 12th century CE and it is mentioned as Cail and Qail in the literary
accounts. Marco Polo, Wassaf and the Arab sources (Dayalan 2019, 28-29) and the Chinese accounts
(Roderich 1993) mention the port and its activities. Kayalpattinam has evidence of medieval Islamic
architecture (Shokoohy 1993). Kayal was famous for trade in horses and it was a major centre for Arab
traders (Anas Babu 2015, 1-15). Marco Polo describes it as an important port and says "all ships touch
that come from the west, as from Hormos and from Kis and from Aden, and all Arabia" (Roderich 1993,
note 2). The continued importance of Kayal in the later period indicates the strategic location of the
Tamiraparani delta in the maritime trade routes of the Indian Ocean network.
Tiruppudaimarudur
Tiruppudaimarudur is a settlement with a temple depicting the paintings of Arab ships (Athiyaman 2015,
99-111). While Tiruppudaimarudur is in the interior at the confluence of the Kadana river with the
Tamiraparani river, the depiction of theme of an Arab ship loaded with horses indicates the predominance
of the horse trade and its impact on the overall political and social developments in the Later Medieval
period and more particularly the role of this region in the maritime trade associated with horse trade.
Tirukkurungudi
Tirukkurunkudi is another medieval temple with sculptures of an Arab ship and maritime activities
(Athiyaman 2015, 99-111). Tirukkurunkudi is located in Nanguneri taluk of Tirunelvei district. It lies 40
km north of Kanniyakumari and 45 km from Tirunelveli.

Table 1 Radiocarbon Dating for the Iron Age sites in Tamil Nadu*Calibrated using http://calib.org/calib/
Site Name

Radiocarbon Date Cal BCE

Reference

Sivakalai

1155 BCE

Rajan et al. 2021

Adichanallur

855 BCE

Rajan et al. 2021

Adichanallur

640-650 BCE

Bhadhreenath 2021, 144

Adichanallur*

770-795 BCE

Bhadhreenath 2021, 144

Adichanallur*

795 -830 BCE

Bhadhreenath 2021, 144

Adichanallur*

795-835 BCE

Bhadhreenath 2021, 144

Korkai

785 BCE

Maloney 1976

Adichanallur

682 BCE

Rajan et al. 2021

8

�HINTERLAND AND MARITIME NETWORKS OF THE TAMIRAPARANI VALLEY
The network of the Tamiraparani river valley incorporated many Iron Age-Early historic settlements in
the hinterland and the port of Korkai. Adichanallur is one of the important Iron Age Early Historic burial
sites indicating several agrarian settlements nearby. The rich grave goods including the iron objects and
bronze and gold ornaments and the finding of rice suggest an agrarian economy with craft production in
the Iron Age. The coastal region of the river valley would have been an ideal location for the exploitation
of the marine resources as evidenced by the archaeological excavations at Korkai. Korkai has also
revealed rouletted ware and Northern Black polished ware suggesting strong networking with Northern
India and Sri Lanka. However, no evidence of amphora seems to have been coming from this site to
indicate direct Roman contact as of now. It could be because of limited excavations and the lack of
identification of the excavated ceramics.
Korkai is one of the southern-most entry points of Southeastern India and it would have been an ideal
location for the ships coming the West, which could have had quicker access to the southern part of
peninsular rather than Alagankulam, which is located beyond Rameshwaram island. Alagankulam has
produced large varieties Roman Ceramics unlike Korkai. It needs to be researched further to understand if
the Roman ships and or goods came to Korkai from the south and then reached Alagankulam through the
Palk Strait or they skipped Korkai and the Palk strait and reach Alagakulam by sailing around Sri Lanka.
In the Medieval period, definitely the Arab ships reached Korkai as revealed by the literary accounts.
Perhaps, it was easier for the ships from West to Southeast Asia to reach Korkai and then proceed to
Southeast Asia around Sri Lanka or through the Palk Straits. Periyapattinam in the north to the south of
Alagankulam was another important medieval port (Karashima 2002, 166-169).
The coastal network of Tamiraparani must have had links with the port of Korkai primarily and also with
the networks of Comari (Kanniyakumari) in the South, and Vaigai valley and Alagankulam in the north
and Sri Lanka including Mantai. The network of Tamiraparani was linked with the network of the Vaigai
valley, and the Periyar valley of Kerala through the inland trade routes linking Madurai (Selvakumar
2023, 333-368). The Punalur pass across the Western Ghats connecting Kollam with the Southern part of
Tamil Nadu is another important gateway for the supply of spices and pepper into the port of Korkai from
the Kerala region.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The Tamiraparani region is a culturally rich zone with the rise of agro-pastoral communities and
craftgroups by the Iron Age. There is a probability for the beginning of shell exploitation and shell
exchange in this region in the mid-second millennium BCE. The Iron Age burials of this region have the
rich gravegoods indicating long distance interactions in the Iron Age early historic period. The Western
Ghats region of Southern India was a major source of spices and this region was accessed through several
ports of Southern India from Naura in the North to Arikamedu in the east. Korkai was also part of this
network in the Early Historic period. But, more evidence is required for understanding the nature of
Roman trade connection at Korkai. In the Medieval period, the Tamiraparani delta became more
prominent because of its strategic location very near the maritime corridor linking West Asia and
Southeast Asia in the Indian Ocean.

9

�BIBLIOGRPAHY
Amarnath Ramakrishna, K., Nanda Kishor Swain, M. Rajesh and N. Veeraraghavan “Excavations at Keeladi, Sivaganga
District, Tamil Nadu (2014 ‐ 2015 and 2015 ‐ 16).”  Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 6, (2018):
30‐72
Anas Babu ,T. “Horse Trade at Kayal (c. 1250- c. 1500 A.D).” Paper presented in the 35th Session of South Indian History
Congress, 2015.
Arunachalam, S. The History of Pearl Fishery of the Tamil Coast. Chennai: Pavai Publications, 2011. first published, Annamalai
University, 1952.
Arunachalam, B., B. Sukumar, Ahalya Sukumar. “Reconstruction of Ancient Port of Korkai,Tuttukudi district of Tamil Nadu,”
Current Science 91, no.3, 2006: 278-280
Arunraj, T., V.P. Yatheeskumar and V. Muthukumar “Further Excavation at Urn Burial Site, Adichanallur” Sasanam 5, (2022):
6-13
Athiyaman, N., 2000. Pearl and Chank Diving of South Indian Coast: A Historical and Ethnographic Perspective. Thanjavur:
Tamil University.
Athiyaman, N. “Stone anchors from East Coast of India- A Precursor for Marine Archaeology of Tamil Nadu.” Proceedings of
the Indian History Congress, 61th Session, Calcutta,(2001): 1293-1310, .
Athiyaman, N. “Ancient and Medieval ports of the Gulf of Mannar Coast, East coast India and their Maritime Connections across
Indian Ocean Countries,” Asia Pacific Underwater Archaeology conference Proceedings, Honalulu, Hawaii, edited by Van
Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.). Session 13. (2014): 1-15.
Athiyaman, N. “Maritime Contacts as Depicted in art Forms at the Medieval Temples of Tamil Nadu,” Religion and Society in
Peninsular India (6th‐16th Century A D), edited by Chandramouli .N., 99-111. New Delhi: Aryan Books International, 2015.
Athiyaman, N. and T, Athithan. Tamizhagattil Varalaarrut thodakkaala Nesavut hthozhil: Oru kur Nokku Ayvu. Ungal Nulakam
10, no. 2 (May 2018): 41-50.
Badhreenath, S., Excavation at Adichanalllur. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India, 2021.
Caldwell, B.R. A Political and General History of the District of Tinnevelly, in the Presidency of Madras, from the Earliest
Period to Its Cession to the English Government in A.D.. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 1801, reprint 1982.
Caldwell, B.R. “Explorations at Korkai and Kayal a).” Indian Antiquary 6, (1887): 80-82.
Caldwell, B.R. “Excavations at Kayal,” Indian Antiquary 6, (1887): 82-83.
Caldwell, B.R. “Sepulchral Urns in Southern India.” Indian Antiquary 6, (1887), 279-280.
Dayalan, D. “Ancient Seaports on the Eastern Coast of India: The Hub of the Maritime Silk Route Network.” Acta Via Serica
Vol. 4, no. 1, (June 2019): 25–69 doi:10.22679/avs.2019.4.1.025
Deshpande-Mukherjee, Arati. 2006. Marine Molluscs At Ancient Settlements In The Deccan.” Bulletin Of The Deccan College
Research Institute 66/67 (2006): 259–83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42931452.
Foote, R.B. On the Geology of Madura and. Tinnevelly Districts. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India XX, (1884): 1-98.
Gurukkal, R. Social Formations in Early South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Karashima, Noboru “Periyapattinam: An Important Medieval Port on the Coromandel Coast and Its Identification,” Ancient and
Medieval Commercial Activities in the Indian Ocean: Testimony of Inscriptions and Ceramic-Sherds: Report of the Taisho
University Research Project 1997-2000, edited by Noboru Karashima, 166-169 .Tokyo: Taisho University, 2002.

10

�Majeed, Abdul A. "A Note on Korkai Excavations", Tamil Civilization , vol. 2, nos. l-. 2, (1987): 73-77.
Maloney, C. 1976. “Archaeology in South India: Accomplishments and Prospects,” Essays on South India,  edited byStein, B.
1-40. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
Nambirajan, M , Arun Malik, C.R. Gayathri and A. Anil Kumar. “Significance of the Recent excavation at Adichchanallur,”
Tamil Civilization 23 (2009): 57-61.
PAN = Porunai Arrangarai Nagarigam. Chennai: Tamil Nadu State Archaeology Department, 2021. In Tamil.
Paramasivan, S. “Investigations on ancient Indian metallurgy. I. A pre-historic bronze bowl.” Proceedings of the Indian Academy
of Sciences, Section A, 13 no. 2, (1941): 87-93.
Rajan, K., V.P. Yathees Kumar, M. Rajesh, R. Sivanantham, J. Ranjith and J. Bhaskar “Recent Radiometric Dates and Their
Implications in Understanding the Early Writing System and Early Historic Archaeology” Man and Environment 46 no. 1, 2021
:57-86.
Raman, K.V. Excavations at Uraiyur (Tiruchirappalli) 1965-69. Madras: University of Madras, 1988.
Rea, A. Catalogue of the Prehistoric Antiquities from Adichchanallur and Perumbair, 1915. Madras: Government Press.
Renou, L., La Géographie De Ptolémée L'Inde VII (1925): 1-4. Paris: Librairie ancienne  Édouard Champion
Roderich, Ptak. “Yuan and Early Ming Notices on the Kayal Area in South India” Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient.
Tome 80, (1993): 137-156; doi : https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1993.2596
Satyamurthy, T.,”Adichchanallur: New Discoveries in the light of Rea’s Excavation.” Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology 4
(2007): 55-66.
Selvakumar, V. G.S. Abhayan, Veena Muzhrif Tripathi, Sathish S. Naik, S. Gowrishankar,R. Kathikeyan, Don Wesley, A. Sankar,
Bhavani Jagadesan “Neolithic Evidence from Molapalayam, Noyyal River Valley Coimbatore District, Western Tamil Nadu.
IPPA Conference Abstract, November 2022.
Selvakumar, V. “Early Historic Cultural Landscapes Of The Periyār And Vaigai Valleys In South India And The
Afro-Eurasian–Indian Ocean World Interactions,” The Economic History Of India: Historiographical Issues And Perspectives:
Essays In Honour Of Professor Ranabir Chakravarti, edited by R. Mahalakshmi and Suchandra Ghosh, 333-368 . New Delhi:
Primus, 2023.
Sen, S. Asoka’s Edicts. Calcutta: Indian Institute of Indology, 1956.
Shetty, S. Mangudi Excavations. Chennai: Tamil Nadu State Department of Archaeology, 2003.
Shokoohy, Mehrdad . “Architecture of the Muslim Port of Qā'il on the Coromandel Coast, South India. Part One, History and the
14th–15th Century Monuments,” South Asian Studies 9, no. 1, (1993):137-166, DOI: 10.1080/02666030.1993.9628470 .
Srinivasan, Sharada  “Iron Age beta (23% tin) bronze: Peninsular Indian bowls of Adichanallur, Nilgiris, and
Boregaon.” Materials and Manufacturing Processes 32, (2017):7-8, 807-812, DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1244843
Sridhar, T.S. Excavations at Archaeological sites in Tamil Nadu 1969-1995. Chennai: Tamil Nadu State Archaeology
Department, 2004.
Sridhar, T.S., D. Thulasiraman, S. Selvaraj, S. Vasanthi. Alagankulam, an ancient Roman port city of Tamil Nadu. Chennai: Tamil
Nadu State Archaeology Department.
Zeuner, F. E. and Allchin, B. 1 “The Microlithic Sites of the Tinnevelly District, Madras State.” Ancient India 12, (1956):4-20.
Zvelebil, K. The smile of Murugan on Tamil literature of South India. Leiden:  E. J. Brill, 1974. 

11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6730">
                <text>Ports and Trade Networks of the Tamiraparani Delta of Tamil Nadu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6731">
                <text>The deltas of Tamil Nadu in southern part of India have several ports that acted as nodes of maritime networks.&#13;
Evidence of prehistoric hunter-gatherers is found in the Tamiraparani delta in the red sand dunes of Teri in the form&#13;
of microliths. In the Iron Age the Tamiraparani region witnessed megalithic settlements with burial sites. The&#13;
famous urn burial site of Adichanallur is located in this region. Evidence for early historic trade interaction is found&#13;
at the site of Korkai, which has been identified as the center of the early Pandyan kings. The port of Korkai is&#13;
discussed in the early Tamil literature and archaeological excavation has revealed evidence for urban activities. In&#13;
the Medieval period, Kayal became an important port of trade and it is referred to in the medieval textual sources. It&#13;
was a major center for horse trade and the temple of Tiruppudaimaraudir in the Tamiraparani region has evidence of&#13;
Arab horse traders in the form of mural paintings. The region is well connected with the Western Ghats and a trade&#13;
route connecting Kerala and Tamil Nadu region. The main research problem of the paper is to understand the nature,&#13;
function and foreland and hinterland networks of the ports of Tamiraparani valley. The paper discusses the&#13;
archaeological evidence of ports of the early historic and medieval periods (Korkai and Kayal) and the maritime&#13;
networks that connected with these ports using textual and archaeological sources. The data sources are collected&#13;
from the author's fieldwork, critical study of primary sources and collection of secondary literature</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6732">
                <text>V. Selvakumar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6733">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6734">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6735">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6736">
                <text>Selvakumar, V.  2023. “Ports and Trade Networks of the Tamiraparani Delta of Tamil Nadu.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Brian Fahy. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1991 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="73">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="34" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="34">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/3556397f7797c4dc1f7fe8c39379a639.pdf</src>
        <authentication>56213e4ad423f754f6062e47dc9801b6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="568">
                    <text>Medieval Ports and Maritime Activities on the North Malabar Coast of India

V. Selvakumar
Department of Epigraphy and Archaeology, Tamil University, Thanjavur 613010, India
Email: selvakumarodi@gmail.com

Abstract
The Malabar Coast of India (Lat. 8° and 13° N, and Long. 74° 50’ and 77° 50’E) is
strategically positioned in the navigational network of the Indian Ocean region. From
Early Historic times, this region witnessed intense maritime activities. While there exist
many studies on the Early Historic (300 BCE to 600 CE) and Modern period (1500 to
1950 CE), medieval maritime activities of Kerala have not received due attention. The
Arab and Chinese sources and the Geniza documents help us to understand the
maritime history of this region. Indian, Chinese, Arab and Jewish merchants were
active, with Kozhikode and Pantalayini Kollam emerging as important ports on the North
Malabar Coast. This paper discusses the maritime activities on north Malabar Coast
(from ca. 600 CE to 1500 CE) in general, and the dynamic around the above-mentioned
ports in particular, based on textual and archaeological sources.

Key words: Maritime Archaeology, Ibn Batutta, Malabar, Ports, Indian Ocean Trade

Introduction
India is strategically positioned in the navigational networks of the Indian Ocean region
that connect the eastern and western worlds. The landscape of India is like a
honeycomb that hangs in the “Indian Ocean-scape,” fanned by the southwest and
northeast monsoons, which facilitate cultural exchanges and cross-fertilization across
the ocean. India has been a source of ideologies which have influenced, and natural
resources that have attracted people from different regions of Asia, Europe and Africa.
Because of proximity, variation in the internal and external cultural factors and the
1

�available natural resources, the Indian coastal landscapes have had different microregions. The North Malabar Coast of India (Fig. 1) is one such micro-region that
witnessed the rise of many maritime centres, and it has occupied a significant place in
the maritime history of India. An overview of the maritime history of this region from ca.
600 to 1500 CE is presented in this paper.
The Region
North Malabar lies (Lat. 11° and 13° N, and Long. 74° 50’ and 77° 50’E) in the
southwestern corner of India. This
region, bounded by the Arabian
Sea in the west and by the
Western Ghats in the east, is
drained by several rivers, and
along the sea coast, bays and
backwater lakes occur. The river
mouths serve as landing points for
ships and the rivers support inland
Fig. 1 Location map of Kerala. (Selvakumar, 2014)

navigation. Important loci on the
coast have been the promontory-

like features with bays near Koyilandy, Kannur and Ezhilmala, which offer secure
contexts for the ships. The region is favored by the Southwest Monsoon and it has an
annual rainfall of around 3000 mm. Kerala has forests with resources such as wood and
spices, including pepper. Presence in the terminal zone of the Indian subcontinent gives
Kerala an advantageous position in the Indian Ocean maritime networks.
Previous Research
A few studies are available on the maritime history of North Malabar Coast. History of
the port towns of Kozhikkode (Narayanan, 2006) and Pantalayini Kollam (Raghava
Varier, 2003) has received scholarly attention. The medieval commercial activities of
this region are discussed by Karashima (2002), Chakravarti (2008, 2012) and Habib
(2011) as part of developments in the Indian Ocean region. Sila Tripati et al., (2005)
discuss about a stone anchor found near Hydross Palli Mosque. None of the medieval

2

�ports have been excavated. A surface survey of the ports of this region was undertaken
by the author from 2005 to 2007.
Sources
Historical

texts

assist

in

understanding the maritime history of
the Malabar Coast. The inscriptions
from southern India published under
South Indian Inscriptions and Annual
Report on Indian Epigraphy are
useful for studying the commercial
activities.

The

Mushika

Vamsa

Kavyam, considered to the earliest
known historical text of India, is Fig. 2 Ports of the Malabar Coast. (Selvakumar,
useful for understanding the history 2014)
of North Malabar. For reconstructing maritime history, external sources are very crucial,
as they provide an Oceanic perspective, which is absent in the local sources. Foreign
accounts of Macro Polo (Murray, 1845) and the Moroccan traveler Ibn Battuta give
details on the ports of Malabar (Gibb et al., 1971). The Chinese sources (Raghava
Varier, 2003) and the Geniza documents are very important for understanding the trade
dynamics of the Malabar Coast (Goitein and Friedman, 2008).
In this paper, the maritime activities are visualized in terms of: A) ports/settlements and
landscape features, B) communities and the agencies, C) commodities, D) maritime
corridors and E) navigation and shipbuilding.
A. Medieval Ports/Maritime centers and the Landscape of the North Malabar Coast
The landscape of Kerala is very rich in natural resources, especially pepper, cardamom,
timber and iron. In addition, Malabar Coast is strategically located facing the ports of
West Asia and North Africa. Besides, its congenial climate was a factor that attracted
migrants and maritime agencies.

Calicut (Kozhikkode), Pantalayini Kollam and

Mangalore were the major medieval ports of the North Malabar Coast (Fig. 2), besides
the smaller ports such as Cumbala, Kasaragod, Nileshwar, Eli, Baliapatnam,
3

�Dharmapatam, Chombaye, Badagara, Pantalayini Kollam, Parappanangadi and
Ponnani (Kurup, 1997). A few specialized centers, e.g. Beypore, which served as a
major shipbuilding centre in the late historical period, also perhaps existed in the
medieval period. The smaller ports and the hinterland settlements also had an important
role in the economic system and they supported the larger ports. The larger ports-cumpolitical-commercial centers developed due to the resource concentration, external
demand for commodities, and the nature of organization of local polities.
Mangalore
Mangalore (12°51'35"N, 74°49'57"E) was an important port catering to the hinterlands of
Karnataka region and northern Malabar, and it was a major commercial centre, as it
figures in many travelers’ accounts. It is identified with Ibn Battuta’s Manjarun, a major
estuary of Malabar. It is said to have had 4000 Mohammedan merchants including the
greatest merchants from Yemen and Persia and was rich in spices and ginger. It was
here that the Jewish merchant, whose letters have been preserved in the Cairo Geniza,
was involved in commercial activities in the twelfth century (Goitein and Friedman,
2008).
Ezhilmala
Ezhilmala or Mount Eli (12°2'39"N, 75°11'51"E) was another important centre along the
Malabar Coast. The hill here served as an important landmark, as it is prominently
visible from the sea. This hill is considered to be part of Early Historic chief Nannan’s
territory. Ezhilmala is identified as the northern most limits where the ships of China
reach, according to Ibn Battuta. The mount Hili was considered sacred to
Mohammedans and Hindus. The existence of a mosque is also mentioned by Ibn
Batutta (Gibb et al., ‎1971). It is no surprise, since in the Indian tradition that such
prominent landscape features (e.g. hills) are considered sacred. Venetian traveler
Marco Polo, who visited India at the end of the thirteenth century mentions mount Eli,
i.e. Ezhimala. The nearby settlement of Madayi is also important and in the compound
of a mosque (considered to be medieval in age), West Asian glazed ceramics were
found in 2008. Vallabha II, The king of Mushika (Mushika=rat in Sanskrit and Eli in
Malayalam, and hence the Mount Eli) dynasty founded the ports of Madayi and
Valapattinam (Vallabha Pattanam=Valapattanam). Narayankannur inscription found
4

�near Ezhilmala gives details about the trade guild of Manigramattars, who were the
protectors of the temple land (Raghava Varier, 2003: 160). After Ezhilmala, the port of
Jurkannan is mentioned as the next destination by Ibn Battuta, and its king was held in
high regard. The exact location of this place is unknown. Dadkannan is the next town
mentioned and it could be identified with Dharmadam. Fattan is mentioned as the place
before Pantalayini Kollam and it had Brahmin population. Mention is made of a mosque,
which was used by strangers, by Ibn Battuta.
Pantalayini Kollam
Ibn Battuta mentions Fandarina as the town next to Fattan. Pantalayini Kollam (different
from the port of Kurakkenikollam (Quilon) of South Malabar) was an important port on
the Malabar Coast, located a little north of Koyilandy. This port figures in the accounts of
Ibn Battuta as Fandarina and it is identified with “Shaojunan” of Daoyi Zgilue (Aoyagi
and Ogawa, 2004: 51). Its location is close to a bay, which is considered an Ideal
location for wintering of the Chinese ships (Raghava Varier, 2003). Name of a merchant
called Kantancantirayya Chetti from Pantalayini Kollam occurs in an inscription (ca.
1234-35) from Vizagapattinam, a medieval port on the Andhra Coast (Annual Report on
Indian Epigraphy, Ins. 98 of 1909). Mostly ceramics of thirteenth and fourteenth
centuries were unearthed from Pantalayini Kollam (Aoyagi and Ogawa, 2004: 52). This
town also had Jewish and Arab merchants.
Calicut
Calicut or Kozhikkode was a major port in the northern part of Kerala. The reason for
the development of Calicut was perhaps the Samuthiri (Zamorins) kingdom. In addition,
its location in north Malabar directly opposite to the Gulf is very significant. Calicut
seems to have emerged as a major trade centre mainly from the thirteenth century
(Narayanan, 2006). According to Das Gupta, before the13th century the Persian Gulf
was an important commercial region which had direct connection with Chinese ports via
Kollam in southern Kerala. It has to be noted that in 2014 a large hoard of Chinese
coins were unearthed from Southern Kollam. This trade route was disrupted with the fall
of Abbasid Caliphite in 1258 CE, due to the Mongol invasion. As a result, the Persian
Gulf lost its importance and the Egyptian Karimi merchants gained prominence and
Calicut gained importance (Das Gupta, 1967: 5). Marco polo who visited Calicut in
5

�1293-94, mentions that Calicut was an important port and was famous for spice trade
(Raghava Varier, 2003). Ibn Batutta also gives a detailed account of Calicut port (Gibb
et al., ‎1971). The Samuthiris were the leading political powers here from the thirteenth
century. They could raise a strong army; build an alliance with the Muslim traders to
develop commercial activities in this town. Kamal-ud-Din Abdur Razzaq ibn Ishaq,
a Persian ambassador to the court of Samuthiris (Zamorin of Calicut), gives details on
Calicut, which seems to have emerged after the decline of southern Kollam. The
Chinese admiral Zheng He touched Calicut eight times (Chakravarti, 2012: 85), which
suggests that Calicut had a settlement of Chinese merchants. The Samuthiris also had
maintained good relations with the Chinese empire. Calicut also figures in the accounts
of Marco Polo and Niccolò de' Conti. Obviously Calicut was a large cosmopolitan centre
with Arab, Jewish, Chinese and local merchants, and well known for pepper and other
spices and the famous textiles called Calico. The dominance of the Arabs could have
reduced the significance of the Chinese merchants at a later date.
B. Communities and Agencies
Apart from the local people, who were mainly suppliers and consumers of goods, the
merchant communities played an active role in the maritime activities, which cannot
develop merely with the presence of one group; they are the result of interactions and
exchange involving multiple partners. This is very much evidenced by the Jewish,
Indian, Arab and Chinese communities who were involved in the mercantile transactions
of the Malabar Coast. After the 12th century the Arab traders were dominant on the
coastal landscape. However, numerous merchant guild inscriptions in the interior
regions suggest that local traders were also dominant in many parts of South India
(Karashima, 2002.)
Geniza documents and the Jewish Trader of the Malabar Coast
Geniza documents are an important source of medieval merchants of the western
Indian Ocean (Goitein and Friedman, 2008). These documents have been compiled and
edited by Goitein, and Amitav Gosh has published on the contexts of the letters (Ghosh,
2012). Abraham Bin Yiju was a Tunisian Jewish merchant who had set up a brass
factory on the Malabar Coast perhaps near Mangalore and was sending commodities
from Malabar region. He had married a girl from Malabar and lived on the Malabar
6

�Coast for about 17 years. The correspondence between him and his agents is
preserved in the Cairo Geniza documents. These documents help us understand the
connections and the importance of the trade. The letters mention about a Nambiyar who
was a Nakhuda, a ship captain. Geniza documents also prove that pepper was the
dominant commodity in the trade, and it adds that iron was also exported from the
Malabar coast. The fact that the Jewish trader set up a brass factory here reveals the
entrepreneurial activities of the merchants across the oceans. The luxury commodities
that the Jewish merchant demanded from his contacts in West Asia, give a glimpse on
the personal preference of the merchants.
Medieval Merchant Guilds
From the early medieval period, trade guilds were active in South India, including the
Malabar Coast. The Terisapally copper plates of ninth century mention about the
Anjuvannam and Manigramattar (Abraham, 1988). Mercantile activities of medieval
South India were very dynamic from about 13th century CE. Inscriptions mention the
activities of Nanadesis and Tisaiyayirattu Ainurrvar. Merchant guild inscriptions occur in
several places of Kerala: Pantalayini Kollam, Ramantali, Talakad, and Wayanad
(Shanmugam, 2002: 297-307).
C. Commodities
Commodities are important ingredients of maritime trade. As social complexities
increased, communities required prestige goods from long distance for various reasons
including social hierarchy and warfare.
Pepper
Pepper was an important exported commodity in the maritime trade of the Malabar
Coast. Pepper grows naturally and it was also cultivated extensively in medieval Kerala.
The bulk of the pepper production gave Malabar Coast an advantage in the spice trade
of the Indian Ocean.
Horses
Horse, an important animal of prestige
(Fig. 3), transport and warfare was in
great demand in the medieval period,

Fig. 3 The Chera King of Kerala depicted on a
7horse in the 11th century paintings of
Brihadhiswara
(Selvakumar, 2014)

Temple,

Thanjavur.

�when feudalism and warfare were on the rise. The Sangam Tamil texts of the early
period indicated that horse and chariots were symbols of the chiefs and royalty. To
maintain political supremacy, the local rulers acquired horses very extensively and as
result the horse traders, from northern part of Kerala, amassed a lot of wealth and
numerous inscriptions mention their activities in various parts of South India. Kudirai
Chettis (horse traders) of Malaimandalam figure frequently in the inscriptions and
because of their access to the western coast, these traders could dominate horse trade
in South India.
Other Commodities
In addition to prestige goods, subsistence goods such as rice and wheat, and fine
clothes, semi precious stones, metal and camphor were also traded. The Geniza
documents indicate the preference of the Jewish trader for good quality paper and other
personal items.
D. Maritime Corridors
The Malabar Coast represents one of the historically important maritime stretches in the
Indian Ocean world. The Malabar Coast was part of four important corridors of trade.
Corridor (A) covered from Gujarat to the Malabar Coast; the second corridor (B) linked
the east coast of India. The international corridors that connected with the ports of West
Asia (C) and with China and the East (D) are the other two. The ships from Malabar
came to Gujarat with spices, timber and areca nut and returned with clothes, pepper
and horses (Habib, 2011). The merchants from the Malabar Coast were active in the
medieval Andhra coast. It is also clear that Bengal supplied rice to Maldives Island and
in turn shells were exported from the Maldives (Chakravarti, 2012: 86).
It is considered that the Chinese Junks sailed up to the Malabar Coast and the goods
were transported into the ships of the western world from Malabar Coast (Aoyagi and
Ogawa, 2004: 53). It was convenient for the Chinese sailors to navigate up to the
Malabar Coast, and similarly the Arab sailors could continue to operate from the West
Coast of India. The Malabar Coast interlinked these eastern and western Indian Ocean
realms, beautifully and acted as an intermediary (transit) space in the “Indian Ocean
scape”.
8

�E. Navigation and Shipbuilding
Navigation is the key
factor that facilitated
maritime
The

enterprise.

texts

give

a

detailed picture of the
navigation during this
period. The tradition of
shipbuilding was well
established

in

this

region in the medieval
period (Kurup, 1997;
Greeshmalatha

and Fig. 4 Beypore Boatbuilding yard. (Selvakumar, 2014)
Rajamanickam, 1997).
Beypore still has a tradition of building large ships called Uru, which are now
manufactured for the Gulf market (Fig. 4). The watercraft of Uru is mentioned in the
medieval inscription of Mottupalli of Andhra Pradesh. The reason for the emergence of
large shipbuilding industries in the north Malabar seems to be theavailability of good
quality timber in the Nilambur forests (Kurup, 1997). A stone anchor reported by Sila
Tripati et al., (2005) near Kannur belonged to a large ship. The Indians also owned
large ships as evidenced by the Geniza documents and Ibn Batutta indirectly mentions
that he sailed in a ship that was produced in India. The abundance of teak wood and
Anjili (Artocarpus hirsutus) here made the building of large ships easier. Ibn Batutta
mentions about three types of Chinese ships that plied on the Malabar Coast. The
medieval sailboat excavated at Thaikkal in southern Kerala displays Southeast Asian
and Chinese features (Tomalin et al., 2004; Selvakumar, 2006). The maritime contacts
obviously brought new elements into local shipbuilding traditions.
Discussions
Maritime activities are the result of a number of factors, both internal and external.
Efflorescence of culture, elite consumers and organized state are essential factors for
long distance trade. The emergence of empires in West Asia, India and China boosted
9

�the maritime activities in the Indian Ocean. Fluctuations were also seen in the intensity
of the trade due to changes in the political and economic factors in the Indian Ocean
region. The historical developments in medieval India reveal that maritime dynamics of
this region is partly due to the core cultural developments in the interior and partly due
to external factors. The coasts are regions where external and internal factors fuse. The
coastal landscapes at times remain entirely distinct cultural regions from the interiors,
because of the external dynamic. From the developments it is clear that the fortunes of
ports fluctuated according to the political scenario. We notice the rise of Calicut and the
decline of Kollam in the medieval period. From the fifteenth century, the long distance
voyage declined and the different sectors of the trade routes from West Asia to China
were navigated in separate lags and were dominated by different navigators; the route
from west Asia to India was dominated by Arab navigators, while those from India to
Malacca were dominated by Indian navigators and the Chinese navigators dominated
the stretch between Malacca and South China (Das Gupta, 1967).
Calicut, Pantalayini Kollam and Mangalore were the major ports of the North Malabar
Coast. The reasons for the rise of major ports in North Malabar could be attributed to
the strong political power, especially the Samuthiris. They did realize the importance of
the maritime trade and the dynamics that could bring wealth and prestige goods for the
territory, and supported the activities of the merchants. With regard to the goods of
trade, pepper was an important commodity exported from this region, while horse was
one of the important items of import. In addition timber was also exported and reference
is also made to the construction of ships on the Malabar Coast. Camphor was imported
from Southeast Asia and carnelian, from Gujarat. The Jewish traders seem to have
been active in the trade activities from about ninth century in Kerala. From the analysis
of evidence, one could see the predominance of Arab traders from the 13th century in
South India. Similar pattern is also seen on the east coast. This could be attributed to
the dominant role of West Asian kingdoms in medieval Asian history. The development
of strong states, state policies and consumerist elites and materialistic, enterprising
merchants were essential for the maritime commercial activities. Urbanization and
commercial activities, including the proliferation of merchant guilds, took stronger roots
in South India from the thirteenth century, which could be attributed to the “medieval
10

�globalization” (a world system) that was sweeping across the Indian Ocean Regions.
The historical sources clearly indicate that external factors were as dominant as internal
factors in the development of long distance maritime trade.
Acknowledgements
My thanks are due to Sila Tripati, Veronica Walker and Brian Fahy for their suggestions
on the paper. I am grateful to the Nehru Trust for the Indian Collections at the Victoria
and Albert Museum for providing travel grant in 2013, which supported data collection
for my research.
References
Abraham, M., 1988. Two Medieval Merchant Guilds of South India. Manohar, New
Delhi.
Aoyagi, Y., and Ogawa, H., 2004. Chinese Trade Ceramics of the Thirteenth and
Fourteenth Centuries in the Malabar Coast. In N. Karashima (Ed.), Search of Ceramic
Sherds in Southern India and Sri Lanka, Taisho University Press, Tokyo: 47-54.
Chakravarti, R., 2008. Visiting Far Away Ports: India’s trade with Western Indian Ocean
800-1500. In Rajat Datta (Ed.), Rethinking a Millennium: Perspectives on Indian History
from the Eighth to Eighteenth century, Essays in honor of Harbans Mukhia, Aakar
Books, Delhi: 249-274.
Chakravarti, R., 2012. Merchants, Merchandise and Merchantmen: The Western Seaboard of India and the Indian Ocean (500-1500 CE). In Om Prakash (Ed.), History of
Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, Vol. VIII (1), Centre for Studies in
Civilization, Delhi: 59-116.
Das Gupta, A., 1967. Malabar in Asian Trade: 1740-1800. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Ghosh, A., 2012. In An Antique Land. Ravi Dayal Publisher, New Delhi.
Gibb, H. A. R., Defremery, C., and Sanguinetti, B. R., ‎1971. The Travels of Ibn
Battuta AD 1325-1354. The Syndicate of Cambridge University Press, Hakluyt Society,
London.
Goitein, S. D. F., and Friedman, M. A., 2008. India Traders of the Middle
Ages: Documents from the Cairo Geniza “India Book”. Part I. Brill, The Netherlands.
Greeshmalatha, A. P., and Rajamanickam, G. V., 1997. The Shipbuilding Technology
as practiced in Beypore, Kerala. In K. S. Mathew (Ed.), Shipbuilding and Navigation in
the Indian Ocean Region AD 1400-1800, Munishiram Manoharlal Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi:
44-54.
11

�Habib, I., 2011. Economic History of Medieval India, 1200-1500. History of Science,
Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, Vol. VIII (1), Centre for Studies in
Civilization, Delhi.
Karashima, N., (Ed.), 2002. Ancient and Medieval Commercial Activities in the Indian
Ocean: Testimony of Inscriptions and Ceramic-sherds. Taisho University, Tokyo.
Kurup, K. K. N., 1997. Indigenous Navigation and Shipbuilding on the Malabar Coast. In
K. S. Mathew (Ed.), Shipbuilding and Navigation in the Indian Ocean Region AD 14001800, Munishiram Manoharlal Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi: 20-25.
Murray, H., 1845. The Travels of Marco Polo. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg.
Narayanan, M. G. S., 2006. Calicut: The City of Truth. University of Calicut, Calicut.
Raghava Varier, M. R., 2003. Patalayani Kollam: A Medieval Port Town on the Malabar
Coast. In Kesavan Veluthat and P. P. Sudhakaran (Eds.), Advances in History, Essays
in Memory of Professor M. P. Sridharan, Professor M. P. Sridharan Memorial Trust,
Calicut: 154-179.
Selvakumar, 2006. Nature and Characteristics of the sailboat excavated at TaikkalKadakkarappally, Alappuzha District, Kerala. In A. S. Gaur and K. H. Vora (Eds.),
Glimpses of Marine Archaeology in India, Society for Marine Archaeology, Goa: 4-14.
Shanmugam, P., 2002. Topographical List of the Merchant guild Inscriptions. In N.
Karashima (Ed.), Ancient and Medieval Commercial Activities in the Indian Ocean:
Testimony of Inscriptions and Ceramic-sherds. Taisho University, Tokyo: 297-307
Sila Tripati., Manikfan, A., and Mohamed, M., 2005. An Indo-Arabian type of stone
anchor from Kannur, Kerala, West coast of India. International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, Vol. 34 (1): 131-137.
Tomalin, V., Selvakumar, V., Nair, M. V., and Gopi, P. K., 2004. The ThaikkalKadakkarapally Boat: An Archaeological Example of Medieval Shipbuilding in the
Western Indian Ocean. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 33 (2): 253263.
Biography
V. Selvakumar is a faculty member of the Department of Epigraphy and Archaeology,
Tamil University, Thanjavur, India. His research interests are Indian Ocean Exchanges,
Archaeological theory, Archaeology of South India and Heritage Management. He has
published one book, Tamil Cultural Connections across the World, 2010, and co-edited
a book, namely, History of Thiruvathikunnam (in Tamil, 2013).

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="16">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="56">
                  <text>Session 13: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 13 chair Dr. Sila Tripati and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="58">
                  <text>Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as â€˜underwaterâ€™, â€˜marineâ€™ and â€˜nauticalâ€™ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to â€˜Underwater Archaeologyâ€™, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature â€˜Hydro-archaeologyâ€™ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organisations.&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="59">
                  <text>Dr. Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="564">
                <text>Medieval Ports and Maritime Activities on the North Malabar Coast of India</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="565">
                <text>The Malabar Coast of India (Lat. 8Â° and 13Â° N, and Long. 74Â° 50â€™ and 77Â° 50â€™E) is strategically positioned in the navigational network of the Indian Ocean region. From Early Historic times, this region witnessed intense maritime activities. While there exist many studies on the Early Historic (300 BCE to 600 CE) and Modern period (1500 to 1950 CE), medieval maritime activities of Kerala have not received due attention. The Arab and Chinese sources and the Geniza documents help us to understand the maritime history of this region. Indian, Chinese, Arab and Jewish merchants were active, with Kozhikode and Pantalayini Kollam emerging as important ports on the North Malabar Coast. This paper discusses the maritime activities on north Malabar Coast (from ca. 600 CE to 1500 CE) in general, and the dynamic around the above-mentioned ports in particular, based on textual and archaeological sources. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="566">
                <text>V. Selvakumar, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="567">
                <text>5/16/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 13 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="695" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="490">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/10045d82e716b110bdeb6dd2a09edf94.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3ae8b1d158e9bd0bbe45277d08c931b7</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="72">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7468">
                  <text>2021 Session 11: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7469">
                  <text>Session 11 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7470">
                  <text>Abstract&#13;
&#13;
Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as ‘underwater’, ‘marine’ and ‘nautical’ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to ‘Underwater Archaeology’, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature ‘Hydro-archaeology’ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organizations.&#13;
&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome.&#13;
&#13;
Session Organizer:&#13;
&#13;
Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7471">
                  <text>November 2021</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7472">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7473">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7499">
                <text>Textile Trade and Hinterland Settlements of the Lower Kaveri Valley on the Coromandel Coast of India from 13th to 20th Century CE&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7500">
                <text>The textile industry became one of the important economic activities on the Coromandel coast from the Late Medieval Period. Several ports became active on the Coromandel coast as a result of the urbanization contributed by long-distance trade and colonialism. The Lower Kaveri Delta region on the Coromandel Coast had many ports and was connected hinterland settlements. The settlements show evidence of textile production at many of these sites, and settlements of weaver communities are present in this area even today. The settlement of Nangur excavated by the author in 2019 produced evidence of textile weavers in archaeological as well as ethnographic contexts. Thirumullaivayil was one of the important ports of the region that connected with Nangur and other craft settlements in Sirkazhi region. This paper focuses on the textile trade on the later medieval and colonial periods and the hinterland settlements that connected with the ports of Lower Kaveri valley. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7501">
                <text>V.Selvakumar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7502">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7503">
                <text>November 2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7504">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="91">
            <name>Rights Holder</name>
            <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7505">
                <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7506">
                <text>Selvakumar, V.. 2021. “Textile Trade and Hinterland Settlements of the Lower Kaveri Valley on the Coromandel Coast of India from 13th to 20th Century CE.” Edited by Brian Fahy, Hans Van Tilburg, Bill Jeffery, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Riley Smith. In Proceedings of Fourth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Keelung,Taiwan, and Virtual, November 1-5, 2021. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology URL:&#13;
https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/exhibits/show/apconf-muchproceedings/item/695</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="87">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11 2021</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="237" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="139">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/438d12313cbfccf82e6c2d45a73bdf34.pdf</src>
        <authentication>79c81e1234bc102a7b532dcb0fa21435</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2878">
                    <text>Archaeological, Literary and Ethnographic Evidence for
Traditional Boat-building in Kerala, South India
Veerasamy Selvakumar1

Abstract
Kerala possesses rich maritime traditions dating back to the Early Historic period. A few types of
traditional watercrafts developed indigenously and some are influenced by external contacts.
Archaeological excavations revealed a medieval sailboat at Kadakkarappally in 2003 and an
Early Historic canoe at Pattanam in 2007. The Early Historic Sangam Tamil texts refer to the
watercrafts of Kerala. Traditional boat-building still survives in Kerala. This paper presents the
evidence for traditional boats in Kerala, their historical context and the possible external
2
influences, until the 15th century Common Era (CE).

I. Introduction
Kerala's strategic location connects the eastern and western worlds in the Indian
Ocean region Kerala‟s internal processes and external influences have caused
the development of a vibrant maritime culture, including interesting watercraft
types, than any other region in India. This paper presents a survey of traditional
boat-building in Kerala, its historical context and the possible external influences,
until the 15th century CE.
With the Western Ghats on the east and the Arabian Sea on the west,
Kerala (Lat. 8◦ 15' and 12◦ 50' E; Long. 74◦ 50' and 77◦ 30' N, Figure 1A) is
enriched by the monsoons, 44 perennial rivers, 15 backwaters and a 600 km
coast. The average temperature is between 20◦ and 32◦ C, and the annual rainfall
varies from 1800 to 3600 millimeters (mm). Kerala has rich wood sources
suitable for boat-building.

Previous Research
Experiments undertaken in methods of navigation to survive in the water-filled
landscape led to the development of indigenous watercrafts, some of which still
survive. The Classical texts3, medieval travelers4 and the European adventurers5
and administrators6 discuss the traditional watercrafts of Kerala.
Systematic research on the traditional watercrafts was initiated by the
Europeans. James Hornell (1920:21-24) offers an account of the traditional
watercrafts. A.P. Greeshmalatha and Victor Rajamanickam (1993;
Greeshmalatha and Rajamanickam 1995; Rajamanickam 2004) documented the
nature, distribution and construction techniques of the watercrafts.

1

Department of Epigraphy and Archaeology, Tamil University, INDIA, selvakumarodi@gmail.com
Designation for the Georgian „Calendar Era‟.
3
Specifically the Sangam Tamil (Zevelebil 1974) and Greco-Roman texts, e.g. The Periplus
(Casson 1989; Schoff 1912).
4
For instance, Ibn Batuta (Lee 1829) and Marco Polo (Benedetto 1931; Yule 1993).
5
Cabral 1995; Barbosa, Stanley 1866; Varthema 2004.
6
For example, Francis Buchanan 1806: 419-420; and William Logan 1884: 39.
2

1

�Rajamanickam and V.S. Arulraj (1994:9-24) present the watercrafts from Tamil
and Malayalam literature. Other important studies include Lucy Blue's
Kattamaram Project 2005-2007, Jesse Ransley's The Backwater Boats of Kerala
(2008, 2010), and Ralph Pedersen's study on the clench-fastened boat (2010).
Archaeological excavations exposed an Early Historic canoe at Pattanam
(Cherian, et al. 2007a; Cherian, et al. 2007b; Cherian, et al. 2009) and a
medieval sailboat at Thaikkal-Kadakkarappally (Nair, et al. 2003; Pedersen 2004;
Selvakumar 2006a; Tomalin, et al. 2004). An Indo-Arabian type stone anchor has
been identified near Kannur (Tripathi, et al. 2005).
Several publications exist on Late Medieval boat-building (Appadorai
1936; Arunachalam 2008; Joseph 2003; Malekandathil 2001; Mathew 1997).
Despite these studies further investigations are essential for a holistic
understanding of boat-building in Kerala.

Figure 1. Map of Kerala (Drawing by Tangadurai, 2011) and Canoe from
Pattanam (Photo by Mohammed 2007).

2

�II. History of Boat-building
Prehistoric Age
Boat-building in Kerala, perhaps, extends to the prehistoric period. Kerala has
evidence for prehistoric cultures; especially traces of the early Holocene
microlithic food-gatherers who existed along the littoral of coastal/riverine
contexts (Rajendran 1989; Selvakumar 2006b). Kerala was perhaps first
occupied by the Homo sapiens, who might have migrated along the coast from
Africa in the Late Pleistocene (Petraglia, et al. 2009). Movement and fishing in
riverine/coastal regions were essential for their subsistence, and hence, there is
a possibility that rafts like kattumaram and teppam, which involve securing the
logs of wood/bamboo with creepers, emerged as an adaptation to the
environment.7 It is probable that dugout canoes were crafted using fire and/or
lithic tools.
In the later prehistoric context, i.e. post-3000 Before Common Era (BCE)8,
it is probable that the Harappa civilization (Ratnagar 2006) and its West Asian
counterparts interacted/traded with the microlithic communities of Kerala which
perhaps brought in new boat-building techniques.

Iron Age
Little research exists on the trade, navigation and boat-building of the Iron Age
communities (ca. 1000 to 500 BCE), which built megalithic burials with gravegoods for the dead (Gurukkal and Varier 1999). The iron implements suggest
advanced metallurgy, and the carnelian beads and bronze artifacts indicate longdistance trade. The factors such as political conflicts, internal exchange and longdistance trade would have required the plank-built boats, extended dugouts and
sails.
External contacts would have influenced the boat-building traditions of
Kerala. Colonization of Sri Lanka by Vijaya from North India in 543 BCE,
depicted in the Ajanta paintings, means that large vessels were used in India in
the Early Historic period (Panikkar 1947:32). In addition, the ships of the Indian
Ocean Rim9 would have visited the Iron Age Kerala greatly. Teak wood and
perfume of Kerala origin are reported to have been used during the time of King
Solomon of the Old Testament (Narayanan 2004:41) and the reference to the
land of Ophir in the Bible, identified with Kerala, if authentic, point to longdistance trade (Rawlinson 2005:102).

7

Such rafts are built by securing banana, bamboo and other light wood with creepers or plant
fibres. They are made even today.
8
BCE=Before Common Era, a designation indicating years before the beginning of the Georgian
Calendar.
9
By Indian Ocean rim, I mean the countries along the rim of the Indian Ocean from North Africa to
Southeast Asia, and also the islands of this Ocean.

3

�Early Historic (300 BCE to 500 CE)
The Early Historic period has comparatively better evidence. Pan-Indian
interactions, "rudimentary" urbanization, political conflicts, craft-specialization and
the Indian Ocean trade (Champakalakshmi 1996; Gurukkal 2010; Ray 2003;
Selvakumar and Darsana 2008) induced by the internal and external factors (e.g.
spice trade and Roman Empire) impacted Kerala. The Classical texts and
archaeological record attest to the vibrant trade and the multi-functional towns
with markets, ports and manufacturing and boat-building centres (e.g. Tondi,
Muciri and Nelkynda as discussed in R. Champakalakshmi 1996: 105-141.

Pattanam Canoe
Excavations at the Early Historic site of Pattanam (25 km north of Kochi),
proposed to be Muciri, produced the lower portion of a dugout (extended?) canoe
(6 m+) (Figure 1B), near a wharf with bollards of teak. Accelerated Mass
Spectrometry (AMS) Carbon14 (C-14) dates place the canoe in first century
BCE/CE (Cherian, et al. 2009; see Cherian this volume). The canoe, similar to
modern vanji, is made of Artocarpus hirsutus (anjiliy/aini) wood famous for
contemporary dugouts. With a carved frame in one end the canoe shows
evidence for caulking and repair with a piece of wood. The canoe perhaps was
used for the transportation of goods/people along the rivers and backwaters. The
Sangam texts refer to kazhittoni (canoe of backwater) that brought gold from the
Yavanar's kalam10 (PuranaanooRu, 343, Selvakumar 2008) to Muciri. Similarly
Pliny11 says that the Roman ships could not enter Muciri and, the goods were
transported in smaller crafts (Sastri 1939:53). Therefore, the archaeological
context perfectly matches with the texts. Was the smaller craft a kazhittoni or
some other type?

Texts
The Sangam texts mention several watercrafts including kalam, naavaay,
vangkam, timil, ambi and puNai (Subrahmanian 1966). The description and
context help identify their purpose, but not their design and structure. For nautical
terms in literature (Rajamanickam and Arulraj 1994; see Athiyaman this volume).
The last three crafts meant for coastal-riverine navigation were indigenous; while
the first two--sail-driven, sea-going vessels--in some contexts were non-local.
Periplus12 mentions about colandia and sangara (Schoff 1912:46) plying in the
Bay of Bengal and Southeast Asia which are considered to be outriggers of
Southeast Asian origin (Sakhuja 2009).

10

The texts often mention about nankalam. Nan means 'good' in Tamil and kalam refers to ships,
ornaments, weapons and pottery. Here is refers to ships. Yavanar means people of GrecoRoman and West Asian origin.
11
Pliny the Elder, who lived in the first century CE, was a Roman writer and naval commander.
His account gives details on the Indo-Roman trade.
12
The Periplus Marei Erithrei is a Greek navigational guide dateable to the mid first century CE
(Casson 1989). The name of the author of this work is not known.

4

�Evidence from South India
Moving east of Kerala, the Early Historic port of Azhakankulam in southern Tamil
Nadu, has two graffitio motifs of boat on pottery (Sridhar, et al. 2005). According
to Lionel Casson (1996) one specimen (Figure 2A) is similar to the Roman ships.
The sherd is broken and the double ropes of the second mast are very clear and
hence it matches with the Ajanta/Satavahana motifs and not with the mosaic of
the Ostia specimen (Figure 2C).
The coins of Satavahana (Sharma 1980) ruler Vashistaputra Sri Pulumavi
II have a double-ended ship having two masts secured with a single rope on
either side; the stern has a rudder (Figure 2B).13 The coins of Satavahana
Gautamiputra Yajna Sri Satakarni (Bajpai 1981:145; Mookerji 1999:51) have a
vessel with twin ropes on the exterior sides of the masts and single rope on the
interior, for better compactness to the ship. It appears to have a raised foreside,
and both types seem to be sea-going vessels.
In Deccan, the Ajanta paintings have several ship depictions (Figure 2D);
one type, carrying pots, has three masts and some carry animals (Mookerji
1999:39; Schlingloff 1976), which prove that large ships were used in India.
Pieces of teak, perhaps used in ships, were recovered at Berenike
(Abraham 2007:290), which might have come from Kerala. The volume of ship
traffic suggests possible repairing facilities in Kerala. The abundance of corroded
copper and a few tin pieces from Pattanam (Cherian, et al. 2007a; Cherian, et al.
2007b) indicates their probable use in ship building/repair, and it is not clear if
Roman ships were built in Kerala.

Figure 2. Watercrafts of Early Historic Indian Ocean Region- A Graffito,
Azhakankulam; B Motif on Satavahana Coin; C Motif from Ostia; D Pleasure
Boat motif, Ajanta

13

Wilfred Harvey Schoff (1912: 244) has different versions of the boats on the Satavahana and
Pallava coins; their accuracy is uncertain.

5

�Nature of Watercrafts
The evidence suggests four categories of watercrafts:
1. The raft types for fishing on the sea and backwater. While kattumaram
does not occur in the Tamil texts, maram does, and it means
ship/boat/raft (Subrahmanian 1966: 645)
2. Dugout canoe for transport of people and goods, and fishing.
3. Ambi of the Tamil texts which exchanged fish for paddy (PuranaanooRu
343) might be a plank-built or an extended plank-built type. It is
spoken of as including faces of horse and elephant. Did ambi have
a keel and the extension of which had animal figureheads?
4. The large sea-going ships, e.g. vangkam, naavaay and kalam with sails
and also colandia and sangara (Schoff 1912: 46). Interestingly, as
in English, kalam refers to both utensil and ship in Tamil. Yavanar
tanta vinai maaN nankalam in Akanaanooru 149 suggests the
Roman origin of certain kalams. The poets, not familiar with the
specific names of the Roman ships, used the generic label kalam.
The native crafts are precisely named with their functions; e.g.
kazhitthoni and ambi in PuranaanooRu 343. Naavaay could be a
ship of North Indian origin, as its root word naav is Indo-European,
not Dravidian, and vangkam, perhaps belonged to the Bay of
Bengal region.

Early Medieval (500 to 1000 CE)
Data on the watercrafts and the navigation of this period is scanty. However, the
ship motifs from the Pallava coins (Tripathi and Raut 2006) and Ajanta
(Schlingloff 1976) prove the importance of maritime activities. Vangkam occurs in
the Medieval Tamil texts (Appar Devaaram 1.84.7). Obviously state formation
and commercial interests in South India boosted navigation and boat-building.
Kerala witnessed the ships of West Asia, Coramandal coast, Southeast
Asia and China. Perhaps Islam and Christianity too reached Kerala during this
period. Increased evidence for trade occurs from the ninth century. The merchant
guilds of Anjuvannam and the Christian presence at southern Kollam in 849 CE
evidenced by the Terisappalli copper grants are noteworthy (Abraham 1988;
Subbarayalu 2001; Varier 2003:160). The Jamat mosque inscription (late tenth
century) at Patalayinikollam mentions about the guilds of Manigramattar and
Valanjiyar (Varier 2003:155; SII, 8, 162:69). The maritime empire of the Cholas
controlled southern Kerala and northern Sri Lanka, which further proves the
importance of boat-building so the empire could be connected. By the end of this
period Muslims were very active on the South India coast due to their interest in
the Indian Ocean trade.14 The West Asian navigation technologies might have
been introduced to Kerala. Beypore, north of Kozhikode, and other settlements
perhaps emerged as major boat-building centres.

14

Ghosh 1992: 362 suggests that Muslims were pushed out of Mediterranean trade by the
Christian states from the 10th century CE.

6

�Late Medieval (1000 CE to 1500 CE)
Evidence for boat-building of this period is available in Arab, Chinese (Karashima
2004a; Sen 2006), European and native (Payyanur Paattu, Antony 1994)
sources. The polities of Kerala which were in frequent skirmishes needed
watercrafts for political and administrative purposes. Reference to the
Kudiraichettis (horse traders) of Kerala occurs in Tamil inscriptions (Rangacharya
1919:1641). Merchants of Kerala were active on the east coast of India
(Karashima 2004b:7), Sri Lanka (Pathamanathan 2004) and Southeast Asia
(Selvakumar 2010).
South India witnessed the merchants from the Indian Ocean Rim. Idrisi
mentions about Fandarina (Pantalayinikollam) where ships of Sindh anchor
(Varier 2003:162). The Genizah letters of Ben Yiju mention about a nakkudha
named Nambiyar, perhaps a ship captain (Goitein 2001:430). The Cholas
dominated the eastern Indian Ocean in the 11th century and they took
expeditions to Sri Lanka, and to Southeast Asia to protect their maritime interests
(Kulke, et al. 2009). The Chola inscription at Krishnapatnam of Andhra (1256 CE)
mentions about the vessels named marakkalam15, thoni, vedi, padavu, kalavam,
kamarasavalli and turi (Karashima 2004b: 7). Three types of Chinese ships that
visited Kerala are mentioned by Ibn Battuta. Pantalayinikollam, north of
Kozhikkode, was a wintering port for Chinese ships and Chinese sources
mention southern Kollam as a major port (Varier 2003). Clearly West Asian
dominance and Chinese interest grew in this phase (Sen 2006).

Kadakkarappally Sailboat
At Kadakkarappally (N Lat. 9 95. 470'; E Long. 76 18. 41' ca. 35 km south of
Kochi, Chertala Taluk, Alappuzha dt), a damaged sailboat was excavated in
2002-2003 (Nair, et al. 2004; Pedersen 2004; Selvakumar 2006a; Selvakumar
2011; Selvakumar, et al. 2004; Tomalin, et al. 2004). This is the first significant
example of a large boat to be excavated in India (Figure 3).

15

Marikar, surname of certain South Indian Muslims is considered to have derived from
Marakkalarayar which means ship master/captain/owner (cf. Marakkalanaayakan in Barus
inscription, Subbarayalu 1994), the Tamil equivalent (?) of nakhuda/naquid (Goiten 2001).

7

�Figure 3. A General view (from south) of the excavated boat at Kadakkarapally
(Photo by Ralph Pedersen 2003).
It is a flat-bottomed, nailed and plank-built boat; intact length ca. 18.67 m,
width, ca. 4.05 m. The boat had a transom stern, partly disturbed, and a
curvilinear-pointed bow, which resembles kettuvallam. It had double masts, one
in the bow and the other amidships. It is made of Anjily wood (Artocarpus
hirsutus) and for the bulkhead Cassia fistula wood is used. Two C-14 dates of
Cal ad16 920–1160, average 990±70 years (Birbal Shani Institute of
Palaeobotany (BSIP, Lucknow) and Cal ad 1020–1270 (Beta Analytic), place the
boat between twelfth and fifteenth centuries CE. The boat displays a mixture of
technologies some of which do not survive in contemporary Kerala. The "lashedlug" technology has interesting parallels to methods used in Southeast Asia and
its compartments resemble the Chinese tradition.

16

'Cal' refers to calibrated age of the dated sample. It is the calendar age of the sample.

8

�Modern Period (from 1500 CE)
The boat-building scenario changed drastically during this period because of the
colonial presence (the Portuguese, Dutch and British)17 and the emergence of
maritime empires (Mathew 1997), and the lack of powerful local polities. A
dugout canoe of late historic period (Figure 4) was found at Uzhavur near
Koothattukulam in 2006, but many such finds in Kerala either go undocumented
or end up as firewood.

Figure 4. A Dugout canoe excavated at Uzhavur-Puthuvely, Kottyam District, and
Kerala (V.Selvakumar 2006)
The water-filled southern and central Kerala produce several varieties of
watercrafts. From the boat song of vanjipaattu to the Khalasi workers of Baypore
yard the boat-building tradition is very dynamic (Joseph 2003). Malayalam has
about 38 names for watercrafts (Rajamanickam 2004). Vanji is a canoe for
river/backwater transport; kettuvallam is a stitched plank-built boat used for largescale transport, and its modified version functions as houseboats; changnadam
(sangara) is used for ferries and palliOdam for ritual purpose; chundan vaLLam
for the boat race in Alappuzha is an important type. Iruttukutthi vaLLam was used
for piracy earlier. Caalattadi or kattumaram is used by the fisher-folk of Kerala.
churulan vaLLam, Odi vaLLam, veppu vaLLam and kochchu vaLLam are other

17

Modern and contemporary ship-building are not discussed in this paper.

9

�traditional craft varieties. Craftsmen of Beypore produce large vessels, uru18,
which are now manufactured mainly for West Asian customers.

III. Discussion
The internal and external dynamics have conditioned the traditional boat-building
in Kerala, especially in Southern and Central Kerala which have numerous rivers
and backwaters. The dugouts and rafts, which perhaps developed in prehistoric
Kerala as an adaptation to environmental conditions, have been in constant use;
however, their specific design has probably changed. Plank-built vessels,
extended dugouts and use of masts and sails might have been introduced in the
Iron Age when internal social complexities and external interactions intensified.
The find of the Pattanam canoe is no surprise as similar canoes are used
even today. Naavaay and vangkam were large seagoing vessels perhaps
manufactured by the major traders in the Early Historic. While the smaller crafts
were the products of day-to-day demands, the larger ships were the result of
long-distance trade and the capitalist enterprise of major traders and guilds or
political enterprise of the states. The chiefs did control the trade and used ships
for political and economic benefits.19 The Indian Ocean trade brought merchants
and watercrafts from different parts of the world to Kerala which might have led to
hybridization of boat-building technologies. Reference to "the well-crafted vessels
given by the Yavanar" in Tamil Akanaanooru poem 149 suggests that particular
ships were Greco-Roman in origin. The indigenous ships were also used in longdistance trade. The questions of joining planks through stitching and nailing in
the Early Historic period and their origin need more research.
Very little is known about the early medieval watercrafts but continuity of
early crafts is possible. From the 9th century the Indian Ocean witnessed
increased commerce, and West Asian communities dominated the Indian Ocean
trade (Arunachalam 2008). These communities with interest in Southeast Asia,
traded on a variety of goods, including horses which were in great demand in late
Medieval South India. Kerala along with the east coast of India was an ideal
ground for these communities due to its location in the sea route connecting
West Asia and Southeast Asia and the spice wealth. Therefore, the West Asian
boat design dominated in certain contexts. Perhaps the native trading groups
faced competition from the West Asian traders and it is probable that some of the
traditional Indian designs (e.g. Vangkam, Kalam) lost their importance. The
Beypore uru design is considered to be influenced by West Asian traditions
(Hornell 1920). According to Hornell (1920: 7), "the Malayali adheres to the
indigenous dugout design, the Arab type is largely built at those Mappilla centers

18

In the Mottupalli (1358 CE, SII XXVI, 635). and Krishnapatnam inscriptions (Karashima 2004b:
7), uru is the generic name for ships.
19
The Chera king Senguttuvan defeated his enemies/pirates on the sea and a Chera king was
'operating gold-yielding naavaay and other kalams would not pass his way (PuranaanooRu 126)
in the Early Historic period. PathiRRuppattu (II, Canto, 8-10) mentions about a Chera king, who
punished the Yavanar and took away their ship (?) with valuables.

10

�where the strain of Arab blood is appreciable, as for example at Calicut, Beypore
and Ponnani". However, this categorization cannot be extended to the past. It
needs to be researched carefully to understand if the Beypore design is entirely
non-local or any of the early Indian elements were incorporated in it. Craftsmen
of Beypore perhaps built boats of different types for various markets; and hence
they could have copied and experimented with a combination of technologies.
The Kadakkarappally sailboat, with Southeast Asian (cf. Manguin's 1996)
and local features, suggests that certain types were abandoned in the past. It
also proves that iron nails were used in medieval Indian boat-building, contrary to
the widely held notion (Selvakumar, et al. 2004: 79). The competition over the
Indian Ocean trade increased from the 15th century with the arrival of colonial
powers and large watercrafts were built in Kerala to fulfill their ambitions.
Several traditional watercrafts are used in Kerala and some of their names
occur in ancient texts. The absence of kattumaram in the Sangam texts is
puzzling; does maram in the texts refer to kattumaram? Or did it become popular
later? While the contemporary watercrafts can help us to understand ancient
navigation they are not static representations of the past navigation system.
Modification, abandonment and introduction of boat designs have been a
constant process due to social-economic and political demands. For example,
traditional watercrafts have disappeared in many traditional river crossings
("Kadavu') due to the new concrete bridges. The kettuvallams have been
modified into houseboats for promoting backwater tourism (Zacharias, et al.
2008).
Kerala has been the meeting ground for boat-building traditions of the
eastern and western Indian Ocean regions; so detailed research, documentation
and preservation of traditional boat-building methods are required for the growth
of nautical archaeology in Kerala and the preservation of traditional nautical
knowledge.

Bibliography
Abraham, M.,
1988

Two Medieval Merchant Guilds of South India, Manohar,
Delhi.

Abraham, S.,
2007

“South Asian Perspective”, in (eds.) Steven E. and Willeke
Wendrich, Berenike 1999/2000: Report on the Excavations at
Berenike Including Excavations in Wadi Kalalat and Siket, and
the Survey of the Mons Smaragdus Region, Sidebotham,
pp.285-294, Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles.

Antony, P. (ed.),
1994

Payyanur Pattu: Pathavum Padanavum (Malayalam), D. C.
Books, Kottayam.

Appadorai, A.,
1936

Economic Conditions in Southern India (1000-1500 AD). Vol.
II, University of Madras, Madras.

Arunachalam, B.,

"Technology of Indian Sea Navigation (c. 1200-c.1800)", in

11

�2008

The Medieval History Journal 11, pp. 187-227. DOI:
10.1177/097194580801100202

Bajpai, K.D.,
1981

"Source Material for Indian Art history", in Cultural contours of
India: Dr. Satya Prakash felicitation volume, Satya Prakash,
Vijai Shankar Śrivastava eds., pp. 143-147, Abhinav
Publication, Delhi.

Begley,V., and de Rome and India: The Ancient Sea Trade, The University of
Puma, R.D. (eds.), Wisconsin Madison.
1991
Benedetto, L.F.,
1931

The Travels of Marco Polo, translated by Aldo Ricci, London,
1994. New Delhi, Reprint.

Buchanan, F.,
1806

A Journey from Madras through the Countries of Mysore,
Canara, and Malabar, Asian Educational Services, Chennai,
1999, Reprint.

Cabral, P.,
1995

Voyage of Pedro Alvares Cabral to Brazil and India, Asian
Educational Service, New Delhi.

Casson, L.,
1989

The Periplus Maris Erythraei, Princeton University Press,
Princeton.

Casson, L.,
1996

"On Alagankulam Graffito", in Indian Express. Madras Edition.
April, 6.

Champakalakshmi, Trade, Ideology and Urbanization: South India 300 BCE to
CE. 1300, Oxford University Press, Delhi.
R.,
1996
Cherian, P.J.,
Selvakumar, V.,
and Shajan, K.P.,
2007a

"The Muziris Heritage Project: Excavations at Pattanam", in
Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology, 4, pp.1-10.

Cherian, P.J.,
Selvakumar, V.,
and Shajan, K.P.,
2007b

“Evidence for the Ancient Port of Muciri”, in Chemmozhi, 2.1,
pp. 26-27.

Cherian, P.J., Ravi “Chronology of Pattanam: An Early Historic Indo-Roman-West
Asian Port Site on The Malabar Coast”, in Current Science,
Prasad, G.V.,
Dutta, K., Ray, D. 97, 2, pp. 236-240.
Kr., Selvakumar,
V.and Shajan,
K.P.,
2009
Ghosh, A.,

In an Antique Land, Ravi Dayal, Delhi.

12

�1992
Goitein, S.D.,
2001

“From Aden to India”, in (ed.) Ranbir Chakravarty, Trade in
Early India,, pp. 416-434, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

Gurukkal,R.,
2010

Social Formations in Early South India, Oxford University
press, Oxford.

Greeshmalatha,
"An Analysis of Different types of Traditional Coastal Vessels
along the Kerala Coast", in Marine Archaeology, 4, pp, 36-50.
A.P. and
Rajamanickam, G.
V.,
1993
Greeshmalatha,
“Kattamaram in South Kerala: A study of Constructional
Techniques”, in Indian Journal of History of Science, 30, 2-4,
A.P. and
Rajamanickam, G. pp.87-102.
V.,
1995
Gurukkal, R and
Raghava Varier
M.R., (eds.),
1999

Cultural History of Kerala Vol-1, Department of Cultural
Publications, Thiruvananthapuram.

Hornell, J.,
1920

The Origins and Ethnological Significance Of Indian Boat
Designs, Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta
1920, Re-issued by South Indian Federation of Fishermen
Societies, Trivandrum.

Joseph, C.C.,
2003

The shipbuilding and navigation in India and the Portuguese
during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Ph.D.
Dissertation,
Pondicherry
University,
Pondicherry.
http://hdl.handle.net/10603/838,

Karashima, N.,
(eds.)
2004a

In Search of Ceramic-Sherds in South India and Sri Lanka,
Taisho University Press, Tokyo.

Karashima, N.,
2004b

Machilipatnam/Mottupalli/Krishnapatnam/Kottapatnam/Pulicat,
In Search of Ceramic-Sherds in South India and Sri Lanka,
Karashima ed. pp.1-10, Taisho University Press, Tokyo.

Kulke, Nagapattinam To Suvarnadwipa: Reflections on the Chola
Kulke, H.
Naval Expeditions to Southeast Asia, Institute of Southeast
Kesavapany and
Sakhuja, V. (eds.) Asian Studies, Singapore.
2009
Lee, R. S.,
1829

The Travels of Ibn Batuta 1325-1354, Translated to English.

13

�Logan, W.,
1884

The Malabar Manual, Kerala Gazetteers
Thiruvananthapuram, New Edition, 2000.

Department,

Malekandathil, P.,
2001

Portuguese Cochin and the Maritime Trade of India, Manohar
Publishers and Distributors, Delhi.

Manguin, P.Y.,
1996

“Southeast Asian Shipping in the Indian Ocean During the
First Millennium A.D.”, in (eds.) Himanshu Prabha Ray and
Jean-François. Salles, Tradition and Archaeology: Early
Maritime contacts in the Indian Ocean: proceedings of the
International Seminar Techno-Archaeological Perspectives of
Seafaring in the Indian Ocean. pp. 181-197, Manohar, New
Delhi.

Mathew, K.S.,
1997

Ship-building and navigation in the Indian Ocean Region, AD
1400-1800, Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

Mookerjee, R.K.,
1999

Indian Shipping: A History of the Sea Borne Trade of the
Indians from the Earliest Times, Munishiram Manoharlal, New
Delhi.

Nair, M.V.,
Selvakumar, V.,
and Gopi, P.K.,
2004

“Excavation of a Unique Sailboat at Kadakkarappally”, in
Current Science, 86, 5, pp.709-712.

Narayanan,
M.G.S.,
2004

“Maritime History of Kerala: Notes for a Master Plan”, in The
Journal of Centre for Heritage Studies, 1, pp.39-50.

Panikkar, K.N.,
1947

A Survey of Indian History, The National Information and
Publication Ltd., Bombay.

Pathmanathan,S.,
2002

“The Nanadesis in Anuradhrapura: A Unique Bronze Image of
Virabhadra”, in (ed.) Noboru Karashima, Ancient and
Medieval activities in the Indian Ocean: Testimony of
Inscriptions and Ceramic-Sherds, pp. 48-56, Taisho
University, Tokyo.

Pedersen, R.,
2004

“Shipwreck in the Coconut Grove: The Kadakkarappally
Boat”, in Institute of Nautical Archaeology Quarterly, 31,2,
pp.3-9.

Pedersen, R.
2010

"A Clench-Fastened Boat in Kerala, India", in International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology 39.1. pp.110-115.

Petraglia, M.D.,
Clarkson, C.,
Boivin, N., Haslam,
M., Korisettar, R.,

“Population Increase and Environmental Deterioration
Correspond with Microlithic Innovations in South Asia ca.
35,000 years ago”, in Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 106, pp. 12261-12266.

14

�Chaubey, G.,
Ditchfield, P.,
Fuller, D., James,
H., Jones, S.,
Kivisild, T., Koshy,
J., Lahr, M.M.,
Metspalu, M.,
Roberts, R.,
Arnold, L.,
2009
Rajamanickam, V.
G.,
2004

Traditional
Indian
Shipbuilding:
Memories,
Technology, New Academic Publishers, New Delhi.

History,

Rajamanickam, V.
G., and Arulraj,
V.S.,
1994

Maritime History of South India, Tamil University, Thanjavur.

Rajendran, P.,
1989

Prehistoric Cultures and Environment, Classical Publishing
Company, New Delhi.

Rangacharya, A.,
1919

A Topographical list of Inscriptions of the Madras Presidency:
with Notes and References. Vol.3, Government Press,
Madras.

Ransley, J.,
2008

“The Boats of Munrothuruthu: Identity, Landscape and
Producing the Social World”, paper presented at the Third
International Congress on Underwater Archaeology, UCL,
London.

Ransley, J.,
2010

“In response to Pedersen's „A Clench-Fastened Boat in
Kerala‟: a Revealing Boat Narrative not a „new‟ type of boat”,
in International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 39, 2, pp.
423-431. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-9270.2010.00282.x)

Ratnagar, S.,
2006

Understanding Harappa: Civilization in the Greater Indus
Valley, Tulika Books, New Delhi.

Ray, H.P.,
2003

The archaeology of seafaring in ancient South Asia,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Rawlinson, G.,
2005

Phoenicia in History of Civilization, Tauris, London.

Sakhuja, V. and
Sakhuja, S.,
2009

“Rajendra Chola I's Naval Expedition to Souhteast Asia: A
Nautical Perspective”, in (eds.) Hermann Kulke, Kesavapany
and Vijay Sakhuja, Nagapattinam To Suvarnadwipa:
Reflections on the Chola Naval Expeditions to Southeast

15

�Asia,
pp. 76-90, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies,
Singapore
Sarma, I. K.,
1980

Coinage of the Satavahana Empire, Agam Kala Prakashan,
New Delhi.

Sastri, K.A.N.,
1939

Foreign Notices of South India: From Megasthenes to
Mahuan, Madras, University of Madras.

Schlingloff, D.,
1976

“Kalyanakarin's Adventures: The Identification of an Ajanta
Painting”, in Artibus Asiae, 38,1, pp. 5-28.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3250094 .

Schoff, W.H.,
1912

The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in the
Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century, Munshiram
Manohar Lal, Third edition, 1995.

Selvakumar, V.,
2006a

“Nature And Characteristics Of the Sailboat Excavated at
Taikkal-Kadakkarappally, Alappuzha District, Kerala”, in (eds.)
A.S. Gaur and K.H. Vora, Glimpses of Marine Archaeology in
India, pp.4-14, Society for Marine Archaeology, Goa,

Selvakumar, V.,
2006b

“Recent Archaeological Findings in the Angamaly-Kalady
Area, Periyar Basin”, in (ed.) Charles Dias, Kerala Spectrum:
Aspects of Cultural Inheritance Dr. K.J.John Felicitation
Volume, pp.81-89, The Indo-Portuguese Cultural Institute,
Cochin.

Selvakumar, V.,
2008

“The Living Dead and Lost Knowledge: Indo-Roman Trade
and Internal Exchange Systems of Ancient Tamil Country”,
Papers of the International Seminar on Muziris Heritage
Project: Archaeological Research, pp. 21-28, Trivandrum,
Government of Kerala.

Selvakumar, V.,
2010

Tamil Cultural Connections across the World (up to 1600 CE),
Tamil University, Thanjavur.

Selvakumar, V.,
2011

“Contacts between India and Southeast Asia in Ceramic and
Boat Building Traditions”, in (eds.) Pierre-Yves Manguin, A.
Mani and Geoff Wade, Early Interactions between South and
Southeast Asia: Reflections Cross-cultural Exchange, pp.197220, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.

Selvakumar, V.
and Darsana, S.
2008

“Genesis and Development of Urban Processes in the
Ancient/Early Historic Tamil Country”, in (eds.) Gautam
Sengupta and Sharmi Chakrabarty, Early Historic
Archaeology of South Asia, pp. 337-374, CASTEI, Kolkata.

Selvakumar, V.,
Nair, M.V., Gopi,
P.K., and

Spatio-Temporal Contexts of the Sailboat Excavated at
“Kadakkarappally”, in The Journal of the Centre for Heritage
Studies, 1, pp.75-82.

16

�Sreedharan, P.
2004
Sen, T.,
2006

“The Formation of Chinese Maritime Networks To Southern
Asia, 1200-1450”, in Journal of the Economic and Social
History of the Orient 49, 4, pp.421-453.

SII

South Indian Inscriptions, Archaeological Survey of India,
New Dlehi.

Sridhar, T.S.,
Thulasiraman, D.,
Selvaraj, S., and
Vasanthi, S.,
2005

Alagankulam: An Ancient Roman Port City of Tamil Nadu,
Tamil Nadu Department of Archaeology, Chennai

Stanley, H. E.J.,
1866

A Description of the Coasts of East Africa and Malabar in the
Beginning of the Sixteenth century, by Duarte Barbosa, A
Portuguese Translation from an early Spanish Manuscript in
the Barcelona library.

Subbarayalu, Y.,
1994

“Sumatravil Tamil Kavettukal”, in Avanam, 4, pp.114-124,
Tamil.

Subbarayalu, Y.,
2001

“Anjuvannam: A Maritime Trade Guild of Medieval Times”, in
Studies in Cola History, pp.144-152, Surabhi Pathippakam,
Madras.

Subrahmanian, N., Pre-Pallavan Tamil Index, University of Madras, Madras.
1966
Tomalin, V.,
Selvakumar, V.
Nair, M.V. and
Gopi, P.K.,
2004

“The Thaikkal-Kadakkarapally Boat: An Archaeological
Example of Medieval Shipbuilding in the Western Indian
Ocean”, in International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 33,
2, pp.253-263.

Tripati, S., and
Raut L. N.,
2006

“Monsoon Wind and Maritime Trade: a Case Study of
Historical Evidence from Orissa, India”, in Current Science,
90, 6, pp. 864-871.

Tripathi, S. A,
Manikfan and
Mohamed, M.,
2005

“An Indo-Arabian Type of Stone Anchor from Kannur, Kerala,
West Coast of India”, in International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, 34, 1, pp.131-137.

Varier, M.D.R.,
2003

“Pantalayinikollam”, in (eds.) Kesavan Veluthat and P.P.
Sudhakaran, Advances in History Essays in Memory of M.P.
Sridharan, pp. 154-179, Professor M.P. Sridharan Memorial
Trust, Calicut.

17

�Varthema, L. D.,
2004

“The Itinerary Of Ludovico Di Varthema Of Bologna From
1502 to 1508”, in School Oriental Asian Studies Bulletin of
Burma Research, 2, 2, pp.119-129.

Yule, H.,
1993

The Travels of Marco Polo, Dover Publications Inc., New
York.

Zacharias, S.,
Manalel, J., Jose,
M.C., and Salam,
A.,
2008

“Back Water Tourism in Kerala: Challenges and
Opportunities”, paper presented in conference on Tourism in
India-Challenges, Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode.
http://hdl.handle.net/2259/597.

Zevelebil, K.,
1974

Tamil Literature, Harrassowitz, Weisbaden.

18

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2873">
                <text>Archaeological, Literary and Ethnographic Evidence for Traditional Boat-building in Kerala, South India</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2874">
                <text>Session 2&#13;
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2875">
                <text>Kerala possesses rich maritime traditions dating back to the Early Historic period. A few types of traditional watercrafts developed indigenously and some are influenced by external contacts. Archaeological excavations revealed a medieval sailboat at Kadakkarappally in 2003 and an Early Historic canoe at Pattanam in 2007. The Early Historic Sangam Tamil texts refer to the watercrafts of Kerala. Traditional boat-building still survives in Kerala. This paper presents the evidence for traditional boats in Kerala, their historical context and the possible external influences, until the 15th century Common Era  (CE).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2876">
                <text>Veerasamy Selvakumar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2877">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="24">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="204" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="84">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/afd95b2da6233918c93b7845bed55df2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8447339fe70d9267a84d49330bbd5769</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2526">
                    <text>What lies beneath the Sydney Opera House?
Veronica M. Bullock1

Abstract
When Australia celebrated the bicentenary of European settlement in 1988, a high profile bicentennial
project was the construction of a new lower concourse for the Sydney Opera House. During excavations
some giant chains were recovered. The „Sydney Cove Chain‟ was ultimately identified as (British)
Admiralty Pattern Mooring Chain (APMC).
Much less well known than Admiralty Pattern Anchors and Buoys, APMC is likely to persist on
seafloors at British anchorages around the globe due to it‟s high quality iron composition and hefty design
- each link measures around 1 metre in length and bar width is typically 60 – 100 millimetres (mm). Also,
because it sits on the sea floor, often beneath a layer of silt, APMC is likely to be well preserved by these
anoxic conditions at many locations.
In the case of the Sydney Cove Chain there is good evidence to support the theory that at least
some elements travelled with the second Governor to the Colony of New South Wales in 1795 – just
seven years after first settlement. There is also evidence that these same chains were used by Matthew
Flinders to moor the ruined H.M.S. Investigator, after completion of the first circumnavigation of Australia
in 1803.
More startling than this is the possibility that such chains were used in the boom defence of
Sydney Harbour, against such potential foes as the French, Russians, Spanish and Americans. In fact,
between Napoleonic wars the French scientific expedition led by François Baudin camped with permission
yet unease on Bennelong Point – the site of the current Sydney Opera House. What other archaeological
treasures remain buried in this area?
In 1987 the contract archaeologist monitoring the building site determined that it was too disturbed
to yield significant archaeological evidence (Higginbotham 1987b:8; NSWHO / DUAP 1996:8-9). Master‟s
research in 2003 questioned this conclusion, and presented a „statement of significance‟ containing more
positive findings (Bullock 2003).

Where it all began

In 1988 Australia celebrated 200 years of European settlement. 2 It was the biggest party
Australia had ever seen!
Many and varied preparations were made across the country to commemorate
the event in which heritage featured. As a newish country settled by Britons (but only
just), there was collective soul searching about what it might mean to be Australian at
that time.
Officially discovered in 1770 by Captain James Cook of the Royal Navy while
searching for the fabled Great Southern Land, Britain realised the use it could put
Australia to at about the time it lost the War of Independence in North America (17861783) – Australia was established as the largest gaol the world had ever seen.
The most „iconic‟ site in Australia is Sydney Cove. It is where the ships of the
„First Fleet‟ dropped anchor on 26 January 1788. It is now instantly recognisable the
world over as it is framed by the Sydney Harbour Bridge on its western headland
(Dawes Point), and the Sydney Opera House on its eastern headland known as
Bennelong Point - named after the Aboriginal Australian who lived there for a while at
the first Governor‟s pleasure.
1
2

Significance International; info@significanceinternational.com
For many of the original inhabitants of Australia the occasion became known as „Invasion Day‟.

1

�Figure 1. Sydney Cove: the site of first settlement of Australia, with the Sydney Opera
House in the foreground and the Sydney Harbour Bridge in the background. The
archaeological material discussed here was recovered from the land near the „East
Sydney Cove‟ label.
Bennelong Point served as a site for many functions – livestock pen, limeworks,
saltworks, sandstone quarry, Governor‟s landing place, inter-racial laboratory, guest
campsite (Malaspina 1793; Baudin 1802), defensive battery then fortification,
promenade, parade ground, horse ferry, boat shed, steamship wharf, tram depot, and
finally Australia‟s most recognisable opera house (Kerr 1993:1-13). One bicentennial
celebration project was to create a new lower concourse for the Sydney Opera House
with shops and extended promenades.
Bennelong Point remained public land, despite challenges from the world of
commerce - which nevertheless encroached from the western shore. After the
construction of the Sydney Harbour Bridge by 1932, a more picturesque use for
Bennelong Point than the obsolete Fort Macquarie Tramshed was proposed by the city
fathers in the 1950‟s. An international competition to design a „National Opera House‟
was announced in 1956.
The competition was won by Dane Jorn Utzon, with his „white sails‟ design. It was
a long and difficult building project, partly because of the innovative design which
presented new problems, and partly due to the personalities involved. Utzon left the
project well before it was finished and the work was completed by the New South Wales
Public Works Department (the Department).

Archaeological investigation
Up to the time of the opening of the Sydney Opera House in 1973, it appears that no
official archaeological investigations had been carried out on the site.

2

�In 1986 the Department began to dig up the past towards the creation of the
bicentennial lower concourse.
An official permit to investigate the archaeology of the site was not sought or
granted under the State Heritage Act, and so any recovered material did not officially
have to be conserved, or lodged anywhere. However, when demolishing a seawall on
the western shore of Bennelong Point (also known as East Sydney Cove or East
Circular Quay), some intriguing large-scale objects were discovered.3

Figure 2. Lengths One (right) and Three (left) of the „Sydney
Cove Chain‟ near the find location at the Sydney Opera House
forecourt 1986. Reproduced courtesy of the Australian National
Maritime Museum.

3

It should be noted that at this heady time in Australia‟s history, proper civic planning and development
procedures were sometimes not followed. In Sydney, public outcry focussed on expedited development of
the next large bay to the west of Sydney Cove, known as Darling Harbour (location of the Australian
National Maritime Museum), which was modernised with considerable disregard for heritage.

3

�Figure 3. Archaeological material donated to the Australian
National Maritime Museum (ANMM) from the Sydney Opera
House site in 1987. ANMM Registration Department assigned
„Object Numbers‟ (00000XXX, N/N, NCXXXXX), and link
numbers 1 – 20 used in Bullock (2003) are shown. „Sydney
Cove Chain‟ material includes all links, rings and staples
numbered 1 – 20. Engineering_artefacts N/N, 00000149 and
00000150 are not directly related to the Sydney Cove Chain, but
were recovered from the same archaeological site. Drawn by V.
M. Bullock from object photographs. Not to scale.
It appears that the Department engaged an archaeologist from November 1986
until August 1987 to conduct „archaeological monitoring‟ of the site, almost as an
afterthought. This type of minimal archaeological investigation is usually recommended
because a site is likely to have low significance or because it has been so disturbed
through usage that any archaeological evidence yielded would be of limited value due to
compromised archaeological context (NSWHO / DUAP 1996:8-9).
When the first large-scale objects were excavated and began reacting adversely
with the above-ground atmosphere a metals conservator from the fledgling Australian
National Maritime Museum (ANMM) was consulted. In due course many of the
recovered objects were acquired into the National Maritime Collection (Higginbotham
1987a; Higginbotham and Bullock 2003; Hughes 1987:18).
The archaeologist, Edward Higginbotham, began by documenting two sections in
the vicinity of the discovered objects at Bennelong Point. The sections were located
about 40 metres apart, midway between the eventual find sites, which were roughly 200
metres apart. The sections reveal seawall and slab construction from different
engineering phases at the tidal location - built over piles, tar, concrete, rubble, fill, silt,
soil, mud, slurries or sandstone bedrock. He found the type of material typical of past
activity at many historic engineered sites e.g. salt glazed ceramic pipes, wooden fittings
4

�(wharf and deck structures), large scale metal fittings (including fixtures for seawall and
perhaps for cranes), and also glass bottles and broken glass (Higginbotham 1987b).
Higginbotham considered that the deposits were associated with a seawall
completed in 1884 relating to Circular Quay (Sydney Cove) commercial shipping. This
determined the theme under which the objects were acquired into the National Maritime
Collection as „Economic and Commercial History‟. His 1987 conclusion, „confirmed the
absence of archaeological deposits associated with the early development of Sydney
Cove and Circular Quay‟ (Higginbotham 1987b:8).
On Australia Day, 26 January 1988, Queen Elizabeth launched the bicentennial
celebrations for Australia at the Sydney Opera House, and in 2007 the Sydney Opera
House became a World Heritage Site (UNESCO 2007). .

The Sydney Cove Chain Conservation Plan
The 2003 „Sydney Cove Chain Conservation Plan‟ (the Conservation Plan) reduced the
uncertainty surrounding the significance of the Sydney Cove Chain by calibrating visual
and documentary evidence to revise back the dates of deposition of the artefacts by at
least 20 years, and firmly identified the chain artefacts typologically with initial naval
usage of the Cove - from the arrival of the second fleet in 1795 until the navy moved
operations one bay to the east (Farm Cove) in 1841.
Condition problems (delaminating stone and metal surfaces) and lack of time to
conduct conservation or significance assessment led to suggestions by 2000 that the
objects be de-accessioned It was at this point that the objects were suggested as the
subject of a student project – in the first instance to devise a treatment regime
compatible with both metal and stone components. Once this was done, however, it
became clear that no treatment would be undertaken unless someone could show that
the objects were of some significance. This is when conservator turned into curator, as
relevant staff curators still had no time to investigate the significance of the objects.

Sydney Cove Chain ‘statement of significance’
Following is the „statement of significance‟ 4 created for the ten items comprising the
Sydney Cove Chain acquired into Australian National Maritime Collection (ANMM) in
1987:
The massive wrought iron chain pieces recovered from Sydney Cove in 1986-1987 are
typical Admiralty Pattern Mooring Chain deployed around the globe between
approximately 1580 and 1988. These objects are rare in Australian maritime experience
and unique in Australian maritime collections, because such chains are commonly left in
situ on the seafloor to continue serving as permanent moorings – or are abandoned. The
Sydney Cove Chain was imported from Britain and used to moor hulks and convict
transports in Sydney Cove shortly after English settlement (~1795-1823+), during the
primarily naval phase of use of the Cove.
4

A „statement of significance‟ is „a reasoned, readable summary of the meaning, values and
importance of an item or collection. A statement of significance makes the importance of items
and collections accessible to a wide audience.‟ (Russell and Winkworth 2009:63).

5

�The Chain tells us about naval equipment and practice at a time before the full
phasing in of chain for shipboard use (beginning 1817), and the incorporation of a clump
anchor, hewn from local rock, is symptomatic of the shortages of naval stores
experienced in the colony.
There is evidence to suggest that Captain Matthew Flinders laid such a chain for
his hulked ship H.M.S. Investigator, after completion of a major part of his
circumnavigation of the continent he named Australia. Apart from association with the
earliest period of English settlement, the Chain is also connected with later phase
commercial usage of Sydney Cove, as parts of it were dredged up and used as fill behind
civic seawalls from around 1860.
The Sydney Cove Chain is in poor condition and in need of conservation
treatment. The iron retains friable but treatable original surfaces, and the corrosion
expansion of one link threatens the integrity of the sandstone clump anchor. The rarity
and representativeness of the Sydney Cove Chain and related artefacts is significant for
early Australian history, and a range of significances have been assigned to the objects
according to archaeological provenancing detail.
The capacity of these extremely heavy gauge objects to support interpretations
of the past, which seek to demonstrate the stamina and ingenuity of earlier generations in
creating and positioning equipment, without motorisation, or making-do in local
circumstances (clump anchor), is also significant. The Sydney Cove Chain may also be
used to interpret late eighteenth-early nineteenth century quarrying practice, wrought iron
production and chain production, as well as the naval practices of mooring and boom
defence.

Admiralty Pattern Mooring Chain
A fundamental problem with the Sydney Cove Chain when research began was that noone consulted at the ANMM or the Sydney Heritage Fleet had seen chain of that large
size before. Each of the three lengths comprise three iron links approximately 1 metre
long each, and one ring. Length One is attached to a large sandstone block with a
similarly large iron staple. The heavy gauge of the Chain is extraordinary – the bar it was
made from ranges between 2 and 4 inches in diameter.
After a national and international search the object type was finally identified by
the Chief Salvage and Mooring Officer of the Ministry of Defence in the United Kingdom,
Mr Morgyn Davies O.B.E., as „Mooring Cable, Square Link‟ or Admiralty Pattern Mooring
Chain (APMC) (Davies 2003a). He explained that its main usage in British Admiralty
permanent moorings meant that it mostly remains on the seafloor, where it is often
purchased in situ by commercial port managers in the knowledge that a diver check will
confirm that corrosion and fouling are not advanced (Davies 2003b).
Whether made from wrought iron, cast iron, forged steel or cast steel, the heavy
gauge and high quality metal used in Admiralty Pattern designs, the absence of a
welded stud link between each long side (as found in ship-board chain), and location on
the seafloor often in a layer of silt, promotes corrosion resistance. Davies is aware that
all production types continue in active use at many locations around the world (Davies
2003b).
The Sydney Cove Chain appears to be made from rolled wrought iron. It is not
now possible to tell whether it was also oiled, painted or tarred against rusting, although
it may have been „case hardened‟ 5, with the same aim in mind. Testing revealed high
5

Surface carbon layer added during forging process.

6

�phosphorous content, which along with sulphur is a traditional corrosion inhibiting
inclusion. Metallurgical analysis concluded that the phosphorous content indicated an
English origin, even though archival evidence was found of massive chain production in
Australia by at least 1822 (SRNSW 6053 4/1756:152-155).
The Conservation Plan traces Sydney Cove mooring patterns from the first day of
European settlement. The muddy bottom and rocky foreshores were found to favour the
local creation of clump anchors, and the three lengths of chain may represent specific
usage in „Resilient type‟ or 3-arm‟ moorings, but they may also have been used in „Trot‟,
„Single‟, or as Matthew Flinders‟ log book attests, in „Bridle type four-arm‟ moorings
(Curryer 1999:137; L C of A 1951:154).

Figure 4. Types of moorings for ships.
Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty 1951:154.
An alternate use of APMC is in the construction of defensive chain barriers and
booms. Research revealed large iron chains to keep unwanted shipping away from
certain locations from at least the Fourth Crusade in 1203, when the Venetians broke
the chain protecting Golden Horn Bay on the Bosphorus. They carried it back to Venice,
along with the four bronze horses from Constantinople‟s Hippodrome which now adorn
St Mark‟s cathedral (Diamant 1989:87). Various locations in England, Europe, the
Mediterranean and North America have been defended in this way.
Notable examples include „ye mightie chayne of iryne‟ which failed to stop the
Dutch invading a tributary of the Thames to steal the English flagship Royal Charles in
1667, and „George Washington‟s Watch Chain‟, which succeeded where Benedict
Arnold failed, in deterring the British at West Point in 1780 (Diamant 1989:1-2). In the

7

�American Civil War (1861-1865) the Confederates 6 were credited with being particularly
inventive in such matters of the emerging field of „psychological warfare‟ (Diamant
1989:xv). At Charleston they combined Dutch chevaux de frises timber bulwark and iron
spear technology with chains to flummox Union ship captains (Diamant 1989:39).
Debate raged for centuries as to the effectiveness of chains and booms as
deterrents (Baker Brown 1910:7; Clinch 1915:210, 215). Consensus found that, if
deployed, defensive chains and booms should be operated from and protected by the
firepower of overlooking fortifications on headlands (Corp. of Royal Engineers 18531862:172, 288).
This matter was played out in Sydney as naval, military and civic advisors
informed successive government enquiries into Colony defences. The two main schools
of thought battled over whether to focus on protecting Sydney Cove or the larger Sydney
Harbour (Port Jackson), closer to the open ocean (Bullock 2003:117-122; Austin
1979:264, 150; SRNSW 6052 4/1752:156. With batteries 7 on Bennelong Point and
Dawes Point just 666 metres apart, Sydney Cove was amenable to such defensive
chain deployment.
From first settlement batteries had been „thrown up‟ along Sydney Harbour in
panicked reaction to European conflicts e.g. Garden Island in 1796 against the French
and in 1820 against the Russians (Macey 2002); George‟s and Middle Heads against
the Spanish from 1801 (Austin 1979:151; Hendy-Pooley 1903:135). The French were
the abiding enemy, with their presence being felt from the first with de La Perouse‟s
vessels only prevented from making landfall at Botany Bay by strong winds, as the
British First Fleet scouted the same Bay for a suitable settlement site in late January
1788 (Marchant 2011).
Fear of America was fuelled by the 1839 clandestine appearance of Captain
Charles Wilkes‟ U.S. Naval Expedition in Sydney Harbour. He bragged, „Had war
existed, we might, after firing the shipping, and reducing the great part of the town to
ashes, have affected a retreat before daybreak, in perfect safety‟ (Jones 1986:13).
By 1873 visiting English novelist Anthony Trollope made the following
observations about the „martial ardour‟ of Sydneysiders (Dow 1966:36):
I had previously no idea that the people of New South Wales were either so suspicious of
enemies, or so pugnacious in their nature. I found five separate fortresses, armed, or to
be armed, to the teeth with numerous guns – four, five or six at each point – Armstrong
guns, rifled guns, guns of eighteen tons weight, with loopholed walls, and pits for
8
riflemen, as though Sydney were to become another Sebastopol …There was a boom to
be placed across the harbour, and a whole world of torpedoes ready to be sunk beneath
the water, all of which were prepared and ready for use in an hour or two. It was
explained to me that „they‟ could not possibly get across the trenches, or break the boom,
or escape the torpedoes, or live for an hour beneath the blaze of guns. „They‟ would not
have a chance to get at Sydney.

6

The Confederate States were the southern states of the now United States of America. During the
American Civil War the southern and northern states were at war.
7
A defensive battery is a simple form of defence and comprises earthen or stone walls, cannons and / or
rifles, along with people trained to fire ammunition and return fire.
8
Sebastopol was the capital of the Crimea. The Crimean War was waged between Great Britain and
Russia between 1892 and 1896.

8

�A comprehensive scheme for upper harbour protection with booms and large
chains was proposed to Parliament in 1863, and there is some evidence that materials
were bought. To date, however, there is no evidence that such defences existed at the
mouth of Sydney Cove. The matter of the effectiveness of these deterrents was decided
with the invention of more powerful guns and mines, and the consequent outdating of
fortifications. Also, Australians seemed finally and uneasily to accept the English
philosophy: that by maintaining its maritime supremacy in the Northern Hemisphere
attacks on its interests on the far side of the world would be averted (Lambert 2001:100104).

Conclusion
Australia‟s 1988 bicentennial party caused the Sydney Cove Chain to be discovered. It
is unfortunate that the opportunity to conduct a more serious archaeological
investigation was not taken at the time, as quick work left the ANMM, as custodial
institution, with long-term challenges concerning these surprisingly delicate objects.
The Conservation Plan allowed deeper investigation. A number of firm results
reduced the uncertainty surrounding the assemblage, and twenty-two recommendations
cover the topics „General Heritage and Museum Practice‟, „Implementation of
Conservation Plan‟ and „Significance Research‟, making the path clear for the Museum
when it is in a position to act (Bullock 2003). Most of the recommendations can be
achieved in-house.
A major external recommendation is that heritage bodies acknowledge the
ongoing difficulties cases like the Sydney Cove Chain confer on custodial institutions,
and that they adjust and enforce their regulations to avoid such outcomes. In 1996 the
New South Wales heritage legislation and bureaucratic structures changed for the better
(NSWHO 1996, 2002), but some feel that still more could be achieved for historical
evidence (Heritage Act Review Panel 2009; Curby and McClean 2009).
A further bold recommendation is internal to the collecting institution – that it
seriously address its object accessioning backlog before trails go cold. To this end some
alternatives were suggested, ranging from engaging student volunteers or paid extra
staff in a significance assessment and documentation drive, through to implementing a
moratorium on new acquisitions until backlogs are addressed. In view of the
Conservation Plan research it was also suggested that the objects should be reclassified
under the „Maritime Archaeology and Ship Technology‟, „Naval Service in Australia‟, or
even „Colonial Exploration‟ (rather than „Economic and Commercial History‟) collecting
themes, pending evidence obtained through further significance research.9
The Sydney Cove Chain is positive proof that archaeological deposits at
Bennelong Point may indeed hold keys to a range of early usages at this site of
fundamental importance to Australia‟s history and identity. As significance assessment
changes when new evidence becomes available and according to the perspectives of
the people consulted, I hope that further evidence comes to light following the
„Significance Research‟ recommendations in the Conservation Plan. This should further

9

Please note that the ANMM Collection Development Plan was updated in 2005, so the particular
collecting theme names would now need to be adjusted.

9

�reduce uncertainty about these unusual objects, as well as other aspects of Bennelong
Point‟s past.

Epilogue
The Sydney Opera House Conservation Plan of 1993 has been updated twice. The third
edition dated 2003 describes the bicentennial lower concourse building works of the late
1980‟s, assigning to these modern works a „B‟ level of significance i.e. „considerable
significance‟10 (Kerr 2003:33). The eminent author of this report James Semple Kerr
recognises the surviving parts of the 1860‟s seawall as one of the two major surviving
elements of early occupation of the site in this area. Although, „encased in concrete or
buried in mud‟ (Kerr 2003:94) he recommends its removal only, „where it becomes
necessary for the stability of the broadwalk or associated structures above‟ (Kerr
2003:57). Kerr concludes that the Bennelong Point site „is now so heavily disturbed that
sub-surface cultural remains are limited‟ (Kerr 2003:94).
Although official comprehensive investigation of Bennelong Point seems out of
the question now, development work has continued at the site e.g., the Sydney Harbour
Tunnel (1992) (passes underneath this archaeological locale); the Sydney Opera House
Parking Station (1993). The fullest report on the archaeological potential Bennelong
Point appears to have been produced in preparation for the current general site
development in 2010 (GML 2010). One result is that this year archaeological
investigation is being made of the other element that Kerr noted as significant: a
nineteenth-century Bennelong Drain (GML 2010).
After learning of this work I contacted the consultants to make them aware of the
Higginbotham reports and the Conservation Plan, in the hope that they may recover
some better provenanced APMC material, or perhaps even some anchor points for a
Sydney Cove chain defence!

Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the Australian National Maritime Museum for granting permission and providing
assistance for my study of these objects, as well as the many people who provided jigsaw pieces along
the way. In particular I thank Dr Christopher Jenkins for baseline support and help with all things digital,
and the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority for awarding the thesis its 2004 Heritage Prize.

Abbreviations
NSWHO
SRNSW

New South Wales Heritage Office
State Records of New South Wales

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Austin, M.,
1979
10

The Army in Australia 1840-1850. Australian Government
Publishing Service, Canberra.

The scheme ranges from A = exceptional significance to D = little significance.

10

�Bullock, V.M.,
2003
Baker Brown Lieut.
Col. W., 1910
Clinch, G.,
1915
Corps of Royal
Engineers (eds),
1853-1862
Curby, P., and
McClean, S.,
2009

Curryer, B.N.,
1999
Davies, M.,
2003a
Davies, M.,
2003b
Diamant, L.,
1989
Dow, H., (ed),
1966
GML (Godden
Mackay Logan Pty
Ltd),
2010

Hendy-Pooley, G.,
1903

NSWHO, Heritage
Act Review Panel,
2007
Higginbotham, E.,
1987a

Higginbotham, E.,
1987b

Sydney Cove Chain: conservation plan, Unpublished Master‟s
thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney.
History of Submarine Mining in the British Army, Royal
Engineers Institute, Chatham.
English Coast Defences – from Roman Times to the Early Years
of the Nineteenth Century, G. Bell and Sons Ltd., London.
Aide Memoire to the Military Sciences. (Framed from
contributions of officers of the different services). John Weale,
High Holborn.
„Position re Heritage Amendment Bill 2009‟, Professional
Historians Association of New South Wales, Sydney. Available
at:
http://www.phansw.org.au/publications/Heritage_Act_Position_P
aper_PHA_(NSW)_June_2009.pdf
Anchors – an illustrated history, Chatham Publishing, London.
Commentary on data provided and three questions from Ms V.
Bullock – Letter dated 12 February 2003.
Commentary on data provided and ten questions from Ms V.
Bullock.
Chaining the Hudson: the fight for the river in the American
Revolution, Carol Publishing Group for Lyle Stuart, New York.
Trollope’s Australia: a selection from the Australian passages in
Australia and New Zealand by Anthony Trollope, Thomas
Nelson (Aust) Ltd, Melbourne.
Sydney Opera House: Vehicle and Pedestrian Safety Project
(VAPS), Archaeological Management Plan and Archaeological
Impact Assessment, Report prepared for the Sydney Opera
House Trust, February, Sydney. Available at Appendix D:
http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_j
ob&amp;job_id=3623
Defenders and Defences of Australia, with Military
Reminiscences In The Australian Historical Society Journal and
Proceedings [Read before the Society 5th October 1903]: 130140.
A Review of the New South Wales Heritage Act 1977 - Report of
the Independent Expert Panel, December 2007. Available at:
http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/docs/mediareleases/heritagact_r
eview_report.pdf
Interim Report on Mooring Rings and Chains from circular Quay
East and the Opera House Forecourt, Edward Higginbotham &amp;
Associates Pty Ltd / Consultant Archaeological Services for the
Department of Public Works, New South Wales, May 1987.
Archaeological Watching Brief During the Remodelling of the
Opera House Forecourt, Sydney, New South Wales, Consultant
Archaeological Services for the Department of Public Works,

11

�Higginbotham, E.,
and Bullock, V.,
2003
Hughes, J.,
1987
Jones, C.,
1986
Kerr, J.S.,
1993

Kerr, J.S.,
2003
Lambert, A.,
2001

L C of A (Lords
Commissioners of
the Admiralty),
1951
Macey, R.,
November 2002
Marchant, L., R.,
2011

NSWHO,
2002
NSWHO, Heritage
Act Review Panel,
2007
NSWHO / DUAP,
1996
Russell, R. and
Winkworth, K.,
2009

New South Wales, December 1987.
email correspondence, 7 March 2003.

'Caring for maritime artefacts‟ in Heritage Conservation News,
Vol. 4 ,2, Heritage Council of New South Wales, Sydney.
Australian Colonial Navies, Australian War Memorial, Canberra.
Sydney Opera House: an interim plan for the conservation of the
Sydney Opera House and its site, Commissioned by New South
Wales Public Works for the Sydney Opera House Trust,
December, Sydney.
Sydney Opera House: a plan for the conservation of the Sydney
Opera House and its site (third edition), Sydney Opera House
Trust, Sydney.
„Australia, the Trent crisis of 1861 and the strategy of imperial
defence‟ In (eds) D. Stevens and &amp; J. Reeve, Southern Trident:
History and the Rise of Australian Naval Power, Allen and Unwin,
Sydney.
Admiralty Manual of Seamanship (seventh impression 1977),
Volume III, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, London.
“Island‟s Tourism Birth a Date with History” In Sydney Morning
Herald Newspaper, Fairfax Press, Sydney.
'La Pérouse, Jean-François de Galaup (1741–1788)', Australian
Dictionary of Biography, National Centre of Biography,
Australian National University:
http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/la-perouse-jean-francois-degalaup-2329
Local Government Heritage Guidelines, New South Wales
Heritage Office, Sydney, Chapter 3, Section 3.1.1, Available at:
http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/guidelines/index.htm
A Review of the New South Wales Heritage Act 1977 - Report of
the Independent Expert Panel, December 2007. Available at:
http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/docs/mediareleases/heritagact_r
eview_report.pdf
Archaeological Assessments, New South Wales Heritage Office
/ Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, (NSWHO / DUAP),
Sydney.
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of
collections, Collections Council of Australia / Commonwealth of
Australia, Available at:
http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/publications/significance
2-0/

12

�SRNSW, Reel 6053
4/1754,
1822
SRNSW Reel 6052
4/1751,
1820
UNESCO,
2007

Overseer of Blacksmiths, New Lumberyard, Referred to in
papers and evidence, and testified before the Board of Enquiry
into the Engineers Department, December 1821 – March 1822.
J.T. Bigge on the Defence of New South Wales, 2 October 1820:
156.
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/166

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2521">
                <text>What lies beneath the Sydney Opera House?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2522">
                <text>Session 11&#13;
Diversity in approaches to maritime archaeology, underwater cultural heritage and related areas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2523">
                <text>When Australia celebrated the bicentenary of European settlement in 1988, a high profile bicentennial project was the construction of a new lower concourse for the Sydney Opera House. During excavations some giant chains were recovered. The â€˜Sydney Cove Chainâ€™ was ultimately identified as (British) Admiralty Pattern Mooring Chain (APMC). &#13;
&#13;
Much less well known than Admiralty Pattern Anchors and Buoys, APMC is likely to persist on seafloors at British anchorages around the globe due to itâ€™s high quality iron composition and hefty design - each link measures around 1 metre in length and bar width is typically 60 â€“ 100 millimetres (mm).  Also, because it sits on the sea floor, often beneath a layer of silt, APMC is likely to be well preserved by these anoxic conditions at many locations.&#13;
&#13;
In the case of the Sydney Cove Chain there is good evidence to support the theory that at least some elements travelled with the second Governor to the Colony of New South Wales in 1795 â€“ just seven years after first settlement. There is also evidence that these same chains were used by Matthew Flinders to moor the ruined H.M.S. Investigator, after completion of the first circumnavigation of Australia in 1803. &#13;
&#13;
More startling than this is the possibility that such chains were used in the boom defence of Sydney Harbour, against such potential foes as the French, Russians, Spanish and Americans. In fact, between Napoleonic wars the French scientific expedition led by FranÃ§ois Baudin camped with permission yet unease on Bennelong Point â€“ the site of the current Sydney Opera House. What other archaeological treasures remain buried in this area?&#13;
&#13;
In 1987 the contract archaeologist monitoring the building site determined that it was too disturbed to yield significant archaeological evidence (Higginbotham 1987b:8; NSWHO / DUAP 1996:8-9). Masterâ€™s research in 2003 questioned this conclusion, and presented a â€˜statement of significanceâ€™ containing more positive findings (Bullock 2003).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2524">
                <text>Veronica M. Bullock</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2525">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="27">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="421" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="210">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/198a5e7dddd7043fb413267eee938194.jpg</src>
        <authentication>78f590dbf8e9bbef8be6bee2402ab935</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="6">
            <name>Omeka Image File</name>
            <description>The metadata element set that was included in the `files_images` table in previous versions of Omeka. These elements are common to all image files.</description>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="106">
                <name>Width</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5151">
                    <text>517</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="107">
                <name>Height</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5152">
                    <text>365</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="108">
                <name>Bit Depth</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5153">
                    <text>8</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="109">
                <name>Channels</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5154">
                    <text>3</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples of still images are: paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps.  Recommended best practice is to assign the type "text" to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5146">
                <text>Nautical Angkor: The Social Life of Boats in the Khmer Empire</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5147">
                <text>Poster</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5148">
                <text>&lt;h2&gt;This poster examines boats as depicted in bas reliefs in the Bayon temple that represent the everyday life of the Khmer empire during the 12th century.&lt;/h2&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;h2&gt;Click here to see the poster: &lt;a title="Angkor Boats Poster" href="http://www.uri.edu/artsci/his/mua/posters/Angkor_Boats.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.uri.edu/artsci/his/mua/posters/Angkor_Boats.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5149">
                <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5150">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="26">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="452" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="247">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/dbf7c68a6543fba165355956fa03dbd2.jpg</src>
        <authentication>71509665c2887d7a60e91fff2b77df2c</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="68">
                  <text>Poster Session 2014</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="69">
                  <text>Posters presented at  the Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples of still images are: paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps.  Recommended best practice is to assign the type "text" to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5330">
                <text>Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of Angkorian ships</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5331">
                <text>Poster presented at the 2014 Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5332">
                <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5333">
                <text>7/9/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="38">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="453" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="248">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/20cdf55356540e81a1b2bb89476e0b3a.jpg</src>
        <authentication>8a93e83bc5666549d74e93c0dcf9d422</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="68">
                  <text>Poster Session 2014</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="69">
                  <text>Posters presented at  the Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples of still images are: paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps.  Recommended best practice is to assign the type "text" to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5334">
                <text>The snake, the crocodile, and the king &#13;
Decorative motifs in the royal barges of Angkor</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5335">
                <text>Poster presented at the 2014 Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5336">
                <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5337">
                <text>7/9/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="38">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="455" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="250">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/3e22c12746e4facfb177c1027d0d51e1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>37e6c4554daacfcb88958278f85a80d0</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="68">
                  <text>Poster Session 2014</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="69">
                  <text>Posters presented at  the Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples of still images are: paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps.  Recommended best practice is to assign the type "text" to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5342">
                <text>A VOC ship in the walls of Angkor Wat?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5343">
                <text>Poster presented at the 2014 Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5344">
                <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5345">
                <text>Xabier Armendariz</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5346">
                <text>7/9/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="38">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
