<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=60&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-26T08:44:07+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>60</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="242" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="144">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/86af14bc2aa55c27023df363881bcd22.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3902bc40c22049db084f451751c1fff0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2910">
                    <text>The post-treatment deterioration of marine
archaeological wood – where to now?
Godfrey, I. M.1*, Richards, V. L.2 and Cha, M. Y.3

Abstract
As waterlogged wood is ubiquitous in excavation sites, being used for structures (ships and buildings),
tools, personal effects and for decorative artefacts, this material has been the subject of most
conservation research and treatment over the past few decades. The development of disfiguring white
deposits on treated timbers from the Skuldelev Viking ships from Roskilde Fjord in the late 1970s was
initially treated as a minor cosmetic problem. The seriousness of the situation was soon realized when
more timbers were affected and the destruction of timber tissue became evident. Similar problems
have also been encountered with the Batavia timbers from Western Australia, the Shinan ship in
Korea and artefacts from the Mary Rose in England. Problems associated with the presence of iron
corrosion products in treated, formerly waterlogged timbers were further highlighted in 2000 with the
development of highly acidic regions on some Vasa timbers and associated artefacts. These
outbreaks on the Vasa were thought to be related to the inability of the climate control system to keep
the relative humidity in the gallery below 60%. These post-treatment developments prompted a
significant period of focused research and conservation activities, this time involving multi-faceted
analyses and the development of strategies to address a problem that has the potential to affect all
waterlogged timbers excavated from anaerobic sites. This paper reviews the current situation
regarding the role that iron species play in promoting the formation of acidic species and in catalyzing
the oxidation of reduced sulfur species, cellulose and polyethylene glycol and the steps being taken to
reduce post-treatment deterioration of formerly waterlogged wood. The implications for future
conservation treatments of waterlogged wood are discussed.

Introduction
Waterlogged wood is ubiquitous in wet terrestrial or underwater excavation sites,
being used for structures (ships and buildings), tools, personal effects and for
decorative artefacts. As a result waterlogged wood has been the subject of much
conservation research and treatment over the past few decades. The work has been
essential because waterlogged wood may be irreversibly damaged by shrinking,
cracking, warping and possibly even crumbling into fragments should it be allowed to
dry in an uncontrolled fashion (Figure 1).

1

Corresponding author, Dr Ian Godfrey, Department of Materials Conservation, Western Australian
Museum, AUSTRALIA, ian.godfrey@museum.wa.gov.au
2
Department of Materials Conservation, Western Australian Museum, AUSTRALIA,
vicki.richards@museum.wa.gov.au
3
Underwater Excavation and Conservation Division, National Research Institute of Maritime Culture
Heritage , KOREA, cmy040301@nate.com

�Figure 1: Cross-sectional view of conserved (top) and untreated wood (bottom)
showing the extent of shrinkage if highly degraded wood dries without treatment
(Copyright: Western Australian Museum).

The aims of all conservation treatments should be to stabilize artefacts so that
as much of the original material is preserved as possible, the dimensions of the
object are retained and the causes of deterioration are ameliorated. Designated
treatments should involve minimum intervention and if possible, applied treatments
should be reversible or at least retreatable. Although reversibility is often quoted as
an important principle for conservation treatments, it is often very difficult to achieve
in practice. As long as dimensional change is avoided, the ability to retreat organic
objects is enhanced if voids in structures are left unfilled, allowing future access to
either solvents or alternative treatment chemicals. The importance of being able to
retreat organic archaeological objects is clearly highlighted in the case of alumtreated waterlogged wood that has subsequently become highly acidic (Braovac and

�Kutze in press). If it was not possible to retreat this wood, highly valuable
archaeological objects would be lost forever.
Many different conservation treatments have been applied to waterlogged
wood. Most treatments focused on preserving the wood surfaces and dimensions
upon drying. From the mid 19th century to the 1960s, heated, saturated alum
solutions [KAl(SO4)2] were the most commonly used treatment for waterlogged wood
(Herbst 1861:174-176). The aim was for the alum to displace the water and fill the
pores with a material that would solidify when cooled and dried. Unfortunately alum
was not able to fully penetrate the wood, was non-uniformly distributed throughout
the wood and left it prone to collapse. In addition, over time, many alum-treated
objects became highly acidic and deteriorated.
In the early 1960s, the raising of the Vasa and excavation of the Skuldelev
Viking ships from Roskilde Fjord stimulated further research into waterlogged wood
treatment methods. As a result the alum treatment was abandoned and the use of
polyethylene glycols (PEG) adopted as the preferred method for the conservation of
waterlogged wood. For the past 45 years PEG, applied in different media and with
various molecular weight and percentage compositions, has remained the most
commonly used treatment for waterlogged wood.
In addition to PEG however, many other techniques and chemicals have been
used to impregnate and consolidate waterlogged wood. These include sugars and
other polysaccharides (Franguelli 1971:339-346; Imazu and Morgós 1997:235-254;
Imazu and Morgós 1999:210-214; Imazu and Morgós 2002:413-428; Zhang, et al.
2009:253-269), melamine/formaldehyde (Haas and Muller-Beck 1960:150-158;
Wittköpper 1998:277-282), radiation-induced polymerization of vinyl monomers
(Braeker and Bill 1979:97-145; Munnikendam 1967:70-75; Tran, et al. 1990:217234), silicone oils (Smith 2003) and acetone-rosin (McKerrell 1972:111-125). Despite
the successful application of many of these techniques to waterlogged wood of
varying degrees of degradation, none of these methods has overtaken PEG as the
main treatment method for these archaeological materials.
Post-treatment problems have surfaced however, in PEG-treated
archaeological wood. The development of highly acidic regions in the Skuldelev
Viking ships (Jespersen 1989:141-152), the Batavia (Ghisalberti, et al. 2002:281307), the Vasa (Sandström 2003), the Shinan ship (Kim and Yang 2004) and on
artefacts from the Mary Rose (Wetherall, et al. 2008:1317-28) highlighted issues
related to display environments and the complex chemical reactions that continue in
waterlogged wood post-treatment. This paper examines the situation with regard to
PEG-treated wood, presents the results of the latest research and discusses the
implications with respect to the future conservation and research requirements of
waterlogged wood.

The nature of the problem
The acid salts problem associated with PEG-treated wood was first highlighted in the
late 1970s when disfiguring white deposits formed on treated timbers from the
Skuldelev Viking ships recovered from Roskilde Fjord. The issue was initially treated
as a minor cosmetic problem, with the powders simply brushed away and the spots
camouflaged with tinted paint. The seriousness of the situation was soon realized
when more timbers were affected and the destruction of timber tissue became
evident (Jespersen 1989:141-152). Kirsten Jespersen’s analyses identified the white
powder as hydrated iron sulfate, formed by oxidation of insoluble iron sulphides (FeS

�and FeS2). Astutely, Jerspersen also recommended relative humidity control as being
the key to protecting treated timbers from deterioration and encouraged cooperation
with chemists to find methods by which iron salts could be removed prior to
impregnation treatments. Similar problems had also been encountered with the
Batavia timbers and as a result, subsequent research focused on further refining the
problem, examining whether the problem was purely chemical in nature or if
microbiological activity also played a role (MacLeod and Kenna 1991:133-142).
Problems associated with the presence of iron corrosion products in PEGtreated wood were further highlighted in 2000 with the development of highly acidic
regions on many Vasa timbers and associated artefacts. These outbreaks were
thought to be related to the inability of the climate control system to keep the relative
humidity in the display gallery below 60% (Sandström, et al. 2003). High relative
humidity is also strongly linked to the development of acidity in the Batavia timbers
when the climate control system breaks down and in the Shinan ship due to the
naturally high summer humidity and temperatures in South Korea.
The Skuldelev ships, the Batavia, the Shinan ship, the Vasa and wooden
artefacts from the Mary Rose have common problems related to the complex
interactions between the wood and the assorted chemicals incorporated into the
wood structure during their immersion in the marine environment and as part of their
conservation treatment. Corrosion products from corroding iron objects/fastenings
and sulfur produced by sulphate reducing bacteria under anaerobic conditions in the
marine environment permeated the timbers prior to excavation. Recovered timbers
were then treated with PEG. Storage and/or display in high relative humidity
environments encouraged chemical reactions between iron salts, reduced sulfur
species, PEG and degraded cellulose that led to the development of highly acidic
regions in and on timbers and other wooden artefacts from these iconic shipwrecks
(Figure 2). This prompted extensive scientific investigations into the complex
chemistry associated with these problems and suitable treatments to reduce acidity
and ameliorate further deterioration.

�Figure 2. Acid-affected region on a hull timber of the Shinan ship (Copyright: National
Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, Korea).
Iron compounds found on and inside acid-affected timbers include reduced
and oxidized species, specifically pyrite, goethite, melanterite, rozenite, jarosite,
natrojarosite, magnetite, siderotil and siderite (Cha in press; Ghisalberti, et al.
2002:281-307; Jespersen 1989:141-152; MacLeod and Kenna 1991:133-142;
Sandström, et al. 2003). Acid levels in iron-rich areas range from pH4 0 to 3.5.
Although only very low levels of pyrite were detected in Vasa timbers, relatively high
levels of sulfur were found, predominantly in the form of elemental sulfur and thiols 5
of the cysteine6 type (Sandström, et al. 2003). In Batavia timbers however, higher
levels of pyrite and only small quantities of elemental sulfur were found (MacLeod
and Kenna 1991:133-142).
The development of acid salt problems focused attention on the role that iron
plays in promoting the formation of acidic species and in catalyzing the oxidation of
reduced sulfur species, cellulose and PEG. Catalysed oxidation of reduced sulfur
species, such as pyrite and elemental sulfur, leading to the production of sulfuric
acid, was initially thought to be one of the main degradation mechanisms occurring in
treated archaeological timbers (Ghisalberti, et al. 2002:281-307; Sandström, et al.
2003). While acidic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses undoubtedly

4

pH – negative log10 of the hydrogen ion concentration.
thiol - an organosulfur compound that contains a –C–SH or R–SH group where R represents an
alkane, alkene, or other carbon-containing group of atoms.
6
Cysteine – a thiol-containing α-amino acid.
5

�contributes to deterioration of treated timber, subsequent studies demonstrated that
there was less degradation in organically bound sulfur-rich areas of the Vasa and
higher levels of degradation in low sulfur, high iron regions (Almkvist 2008). These
findings indicated that organically bound sulfur was acting as an anti-oxidant and
reducing the catalytic effects of iron compounds in these areas.
In addition to the contribution to acid development by the oxidation and
hydrolysis of iron salts and the production of sulfuric acid, iron species have also
been implicated in free radical reactions, the acid hydrolysis of cellulose and other
species, the oxidative depolymerisation7 of cellulose and PEG (Almkvist 2008; Elding
in press; Godfrey, et al. in press; Lindfors, et al. 2007:57-63), the depolymerisation of
hemicellulose and the formation of increased amounts of low molecular weight
organic acids (formic, oxalic, acetic and glycolic acids) in sub-surface Vasa timber
sections that have high iron to sulfur ratios (Almkvist 2008). While acetic acid
generation can be directly linked to hemicellulose breakdown, the presence of
greater amounts of formic acid in PEG-rich areas indicate that oxidative degradation
of PEG is the major source of this acid (Almkvist 2008; Godfrey, et al. in press). It
became clear that the situation in iron-impregnated, PEG treated wood is far more
complex than originally thought, with more than just sulfuric acid contributing to the
acidity of the timbers.

Where to now?
The increased knowledge regarding post-treatment deterioration of waterlogged
wood necessarily imposes on cultural heritage professionals the need to carefully
consider their actions with regard to the management of this valuable cultural
resource. Some of the questions facing heritage management professionals include:
 What can be done to minimise further deterioration in archaeological wood
that is already in a treated, dry state?
 If timbers are excavated with the intent of conservation, how should current
treatment regimes be altered to minimise on-going post-treatment
deterioration?
 For already excavated timbers for which conservation treatments are not yet
complete, can treatment regimes be modified to take into account recent
research developments?
 Should timbers continue to be excavated for study and conservation and if
excavation is undertaken, is study, documentation and then re-burial an
appropriate preservation management strategy?

Conserved, dry wood
It is clear that although waterlogged timbers initially appear to be stable after
treatment with PEG, deterioration may continue long after the timbers have been
dried. As low molecular weight PEGs are hygroscopic8 their presence in wood,
combined with elevated relative humidity levels, enables sufficient moisture to be
retained for chemical reactions to continue in the ‘dry’ archaeological wood. For
already treated archaeological wood there are limited options to minimize further
deterioration, all of which come at a significant cost. These options depend on the
7
8

Depolymerisation – a reaction which leads to the break up of polymer chains into smaller units.
Hygroscopic – readily absorbs moisture from the air

�condition, size and state of the wood - are they part of a hull structure for instance? In
this latter case, as typified by timbers in the Vasa, post-PEG treatment options are
extremely limited due to the restricted access to individual timbers in the multilayered hull structure. More options are available however for the timbers in the
Batavia hull reconstruction as each timber can be individually removed and re-treated
if necessary.
As first muted by Jespersen (1989:141-152), environmental control of the
storage/display environment, primarily by a reduction in the ambient relative humidity,
is critical to the mitigation of deterioration mechanisms. While the capital cost for
humidity control systems and the on-going running costs are very high, for large
objects such as complete hull structures, this may be the only option available to
minimise further degradation. The Vasa Museum installed a new air conditioning
system in 2004, reducing the relative humidity in the display environment from upper
levels of 65 – 70 % to a target range of 51 – 59 %. The effectiveness of this change
has been reflected in a dramatic decrease in the number of acidic outbreaks that
have occurred following this change in display conditions (Hocker, et al. 2009:469481). By comparison, the conditions in the Batavia display gallery are currently
maintained at 47 – 57 %, reduced from 50 – 60 %, in an attempt to reduce the
incidence of acidic outbreaks.
Conservation professionals continue their efforts to determine the best
treatment options for recovered waterlogged wood and to examine methods by which
already treated wood can be better preserved. In order to minimise the post
conservation problems associated with treated timbers, it is necessary to examine
the kinetics of deterioration processes, the rate of oxygen consumption in treated
timbers, and the environmental requirements that are needed in order to minimise
deterioration processes. Research is continuing in all of these directions with recent
research shedding further light on aspects of deterioration processes including PEG
degradation (Almkvist and Persson 2005:269-278; Mortensen, et al. 2005:261-267;
Mortensen et al. in press), oxygen consumption and measurement in conserved
archaeological wood (Matthiesen and Nordvig in press) and the effects of
consolidants on moisture absorption (and hence on the rates of chemical reactions)
in conserved wood (Jensen, et al. in press). These and more studies are needed in
order to fully understand the nature of the problem and the best way(s) to reduce
degradation of treated archaeological wood.

Treatment of excavated archaeological wood
Despite research into alternative impregnation and consolidation regimes, PEG
impregnation is still the most widely used treatment method for waterlogged wood.
Disadvantages of its use however, include its cost, surface finish (dark, waxy and
unnatural colour unless carefully cleaned) and its hygroscopicity that necessitates
careful control of the relative humidity of storage and display environments for PEG
treated wood.
PEG is viewed by some as being only suitable for short-term stabilization
because of its degradation over time (Christensen, et al. 2010:1-7). Mikkel
Christensen also considers that research is needed in order to develop a more
appropriate consolidant that leaves ‘an airy structure in order to allow re-treatment in
the future’ and that modern materials science should be applied to develop more
durable impregnation regimes, possibly involving ‘foaming a polymer’, a combination
of nanoparticles with a polymeric ‘spider web’, a framework using biomimetic

�materials such as an artificial lignin or via biomineralisation with an inorganic skeleton
(Christensen 2010:1-7).
Until such time as a more appropriate consolidant is developed however, PEG
use is likely to continue. If this is the case then it is critical that any treatment regime
include steps to remove iron compounds from waterlogged wood. The extent of iron
removal needed to minimise continuing degradation of polysaccharides and PEG is
still to be determined. Research efforts should therefore be made to determine if
there is a threshold concentration of iron at which these degradation mechanisms are
of minimal impact. Unfortunately the complex nature of deteriorated wood
components, incorporated chemicals from the burial environment and the differing
grades, concentrations and purities of PEG used to treat archaeological wood,
complicate research efforts in this area.
In the early 1990s preliminary experiments on the extraction of iron corrosion
products from degraded, iron impregnated waterlogged wood found that the use of
sodium dithionite in conjunction with diammonium citrate and PEG solutions, at
neutral pH, was very effective in removing iron minerals from iron impregnated timber
whilst successfully stabilising the wood structure (MacLeod, et al. 1991:119-132;
MacLeod, et al. 1994:199-211). More recently, high performance iron chelators,
diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and ethylenediimino-bis (2-hydroxy-4methylphenyl) acetic acid (EDDHMA), have been successful in removing iron
corrosion products from acid-affected, PEG treated waterlogged wood (Almkvist and
Persson 2006:678-684). Potential problems with the latter treatment however, include
degradation of hemicelluloses due to the alkaline nature of the chelating solution9
and post-treatment removal of the rich red colour that the iron-EDDHMA complex
imparts to the wood. While research continues in this area, a comparison of the
sodium dithionite/ammonium citrate/PEG treatment with both the DTPA and
EDDHMA treatments, found that the former solution was significantly more effective
in removing iron from waterlogged wood (Richards et al. in press).

Reburial of waterlogged wood
Excavation, study, documentation and reburial of waterlogged, archaeological wood
may be a valid conservation management option for some, though not all, of these
problematic materials. Reburial of excavated archaeological materials has long been
used as a management tool, particularly in cases where large numbers of similar
artefacts have been recovered, where the conservation budget is insufficient to allow
the treatment of all objects, where the display or further research value of objects is
limited or when sufficient archaeological information can be obtained from the objects
without the necessity of a full conservation treatment (Bergstrand, et al. 2005:9-39;
Godfrey, et al. 2004:343-351; Manders, et al. 2008:179-203).
Depth of burial has been found to be a very important parameter when relating
the degree of wood decay to the local environment. Many authors have shown that
the extent of biological degradation of wood decreases considerably with burial
depths greater than 50cm (Björdal and Nilsson 2002:235-244; Gregory 1999:78-83).
However, recent studies have indicated that to decrease degradation of wood to
almost negligible levels the depth of burial may need to be significantly greater than

9

Chelating solution – a solution containing a chemical that binds strongly to a metal, forming a
soluble, complex molecule.

�50cm (Bergstrand and Nyström Godfrey 2007:207-224; Nyström Godfrey, et al. 2011;
Richards, et al. 2009:113-160).
So based on past and current research, long-term preservation of reburied
wood requires burial depths of over 50cm, in an environment which is sub-oxic to
anoxic, is strongly reducing in nature with near neutral pH and dominated by
anaerobic chemical and microbiological processes (sulphate reduction and methane
production). In addition, the porosity of the reburial sediment should be low and
possess almost negligible levels of interstitial organic materials such as dead
seagrass, other dead/decaying organic matter or organic pollutants. More
importantly, the area in which the material is reburied needs to be stable and not
subjected to significant sediment movement through excessive water movement,
such as strong current flow, large tidal ranges and frequent storm events (Nyström
Godfrey, et al. 2011).

Conclusions
Although the guidelines for the conservation and preservation of underwater cultural
heritage, developed by UNESCO in 2001, strongly endorse the in situ preservation of
underwater cultural heritage sites and artefacts (UNESCO 2001), wood will continue
to be excavated from at least some underwater sites. Port developments, underwater
pipeline construction and dredging operations for example, often interact with
shipwreck or other submerged archaeological sites. In these instances, excavation
and either documentation, conservation or reburial, even at an alternative site may
need to be considered. More research is needed with regard to the development of
durable conservation treatments, for the amelioration of deterioration processes in
already treated wood and in the development of protocols and guidelines for the
effective preservation of waterlogged wood by reburial.

Bibliography
The chemistry of the Vasa – Iron, acids and degradation,
Doctoral Thesis No 2008:57, Swedish University of Agricultural
Sciences, Uppsala.
Almkvist G. and The movement and stability of PEG in the Vasa wood. In P.
Persson I.,
Hoffmann, K. Straetkvern, J. A. Spriggs and D. A. Gregory
(Eds), Proceedings of the 9th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
2005
Archaeological Materials Conference, Copenhagen, 2004,
ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp 269-278.
Almkvist, G. and Extraction of iron compounds from wood from the Vasa.
Holzforschung, Vol. 60, pp 678-684.
Persson, I.,
2006
Braeker, O. U. and Zum derzeitigen stand der nassholzkonservierung. Zournal fur
Schweizerische Archaologie and Kunstgeschichte, Vol. 36, pp
Bill, J.,
1979
97-145.
Bergstrand, T.,
Reburial as a method of preserving archaeological remains. A
Björdal, C.G.,
presentation of the Marstrand project. In P. Hoffmann, K.
Strætkvern, J.A. Spriggs and D. Gregory (Eds), Proceedings of
Bohm, C.,
the 9th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Christenssen, E.,
Conference, Copenhagen, 2004, ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp
Gregory, D.,
MacLeod, I.D.,
9-39.
Almkvist, G.,
2008

�Nilsson, T.,
Nyström, I.,
Peacock, E.
Richards, V.L. and
Turner, G.,
2005
Berstrand, T. and
Nyström Godfrey,
I. (eds),
2007

Björdal C.
Nilsson T.,
2002

and

Cha, M. Y.,
in press.

Christensen,
M.,
Hansen, F. K. and
Kutzke, H.,
2010

Elding, L. I.,
in press.
Franguelli,
R.,
1971-1972.
Ghisalberti, E. L.,
Godfrey, I. M.,
Kilminster,
K.,
Richards, V. L. and
Williams, E.,
2002
Godfrey
I.M.,
Gregory
D.,
Nyström I. and
Richards V.,
2004
Godfrey,
I.,
Richards,
V.,
Ghisalberti, E. and
Byrne, L.,
in press.
Gregory D.,
1999

Reburial and Analyses of Archaeological Remains – Studies on
the effect of reburial on archaeological materials performed in
Marstrand, Sweden 2003-2005. The RAAR project. Udevalla,
Sweden: Bohusläns Museum and Studio VästSvensk
Konservering.
Available
at:
&lt;http://www9.vgregion.se/vastarvet/svk/reburial/index.htm&gt;
Decomposition of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood, in P.
Hoffmann, J.A. Spriggs, T. Grant, C. Cook &amp; A. Recht (Eds),
Proceedings of the 8th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Stockholm 2001, ICOMCC, Bremerhaven, pp 235-244.
Conservation of shipwrecks in Korea, International Meeting on
Protection Presentation and Valorisation of Underwater Cultural
Heritage, UNESCO and Chinese Academy of Cultural heritage,
Chongqing, November 2010.
New materials used for the consolidation of archaeological
wood – past attempts, present struggles and future
requirements. In Proceedings: Wood Science for Conservation
of Cultural Heritage, International Conference on Wooden
Cultural Heritage: Evaluation of Deterioration and Management
of Change, Hamburg, 2009, pp 1-7.
Vasa – Recent preservation research. In Proceedings of the
11th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Conference, Greenville, North Carolina, May 2010.
Legni preistorici palustri e loro trattamento conservative.
Sibrium XI, pp 339-346.
The analysis of acid-affected Batavia timbers. In P. Hoffmann,
J. A. Spriggs, T. Grant , C. Cook and A. Recht (Eds),
Proceedings of the 8th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Stockholm, 2001, ICOMCC, Bremerhaven, pp 281-307.
In-situ preservation of archaeological materials and sites
underwater. In F. Maniscalco (ed.), Mediterraneum, Massa
Editore, Italy, pp. 343-351.

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analyses of acidaffected waterlogged archaeological wood. In Proceedings of
the 11th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Conference, Greenville, North Carolina, May 2010.
Re-burial of ship timbers in the marine environment as a
method of in-situ preservation. In C. Bonnet-Diconne, X. Hiron,

�Q. K. Tran &amp; P. Hoffmann (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th ICOM-CC
Working Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Conference, Grenoble, France 1998, ARC-Nucléart, Grenoble, pp
78-83.
and A method for wood preservation using Arigal C. Studies in
H., Conservation, Vol. 5, pp 150-158.

Haas,
A.
Muller-Beck,
1960
Herbst, C. F.,
1861
Hocker, E., Dal, L.
and Hocker, F.,
2009

Imazu, S.
Morgós, A.,
1997

and

Imazu, S.
Morgós, A.,
1999

and

Imazu, S.
Morgós, A.,
2002

and

Jensen, P., Helms,
A. C. and
Christensen, M.,
in press

Jespersen,
1989

K.,

Kim, I. J. and Yang
S. S.,
2004
Lindfors,
E.-L,
Lindström, M. and

Om Bevaring af Oldsager af Træ fundet i Tørvemoser.
Antiquarisk Tidsskrift 1858-60, København, pp 174-176.
Understanding Vasa’s salt problem: Documenting the
distribution of salt precipitations on the Swedish warship Vasa.
In K. Straetkvern and D.J. Huisman (Eds), Proceedings of the
10th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Conference, Amsterdam, 2007, Rijksdienst voor Archeologie,
Cultuurlandschap en Monumenten (RACM), Amersfoort, pp
469-481.
Conservation of waterlogged wood using sugar alcohol and
comparison of the effectiveness of lactitol, sucrose and PEG
4000 treatment. In P. Hoffmann, T. Daley, T. Grant and J.
Spriggs (Eds), Proceedings of the 6th ICOM Group on Wet
Organic Archaeological Materials Conference, York, 1996,
ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp 235-254.
The lactitol conservation of a 6m long timber coffin. In C.
Bonnot-Diconne, X. Hiron, Q. K Tran and P. Hoffmann (Eds),
Proceedings of the 7th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Grenoble, 1998, ARCNucléart, Grenoble, pp 210-214.
An improvement on the lactitol conservation method used for
the conservation of archaeological waterlogged wood (The
conservation method using a lactitol and trehalose mixture). In
P. Hoffmann, J. A. Spriggs, T. Grant , C. Cook and A. Recht
(Eds), Proceedings of the 8th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Stockholm, 2001, ICOMCC, Bremerhaven, pp 413-428.
Evaluating long-term stability of waterlogged archaeological
wooden objects through determination of moisture sorption
isotherms and conductivity in conserved objects and
impregnation agents. In Proceedings of the 11th ICOM Group on
Wet Organic Archaeological Materials Conference, Greenville,
North Carolina, May 2010.
Precipitation of iron-corrosion products on PEG-treated wood.
In I.D. MacLeod (Ed.), Conservation of Wet Wood and Metal:
Proceedings of the ICOM Conservation Working Groups on Wet
Organic Archaeological Materials and Metals, Fremantle, 1987,
Western Australian Museum, Perth, pp 141-152.
Conservation of Shinan Ship. The Conservation and
Restoration Report of Shinan Ship. National Maritime Museum,
Korea, pp 16-37.
Polysaccharide degradation in waterlogged oak wood from the
ancient warship Vasa. Holzforschung, Vol. 62, pp 57-63.

�Iversen, T.,
2007
MacLeod, I. D. and Degradation of archaeological timbers by pyrite: Oxidation of
iron and sulphur species. In P. Hoffmann (Ed.), Proceedings of
Kenna, C.,
the 4th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
1991
Conference, Bremerhaven 1990, ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp
133-142.
MacLeod, I. D. and Degradation of archaeological timbers by pyrite: Oxidation of
iron and sulphur species. In P. Hoffmann (Ed.), Proceedings of
Kenna, C.,
the 4th ICOM Working Group on Wet Organic Archaeological
1991
Materials Conference, Bremerhaven, 1990, ICOM-CC,
Bremerhaven, pp 133-142.
MacLeod, I. D., Iron corrosion products and their interactions with waterlogged
Brooke, P. and wood and PEG. In P. Hoffmann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th
ICOM Working Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Richards, V.,
Conference, Bremerhaven, 1990, ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp
1991
119-132.
MacLeod, I. D., Observations on the extraction of iron and chloride from
Mardikian, P. and composite materials. In P. Hoffmann, T. Daley and T. Grant
Richards, V. L., (Eds), Proceedings of the 5th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Portland/Maine, 1993,
1994
ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp 199-211.
Manders,
M., The in-situ preservation of archaeological sites underwater. An
Gregory,
D., evaluation of some techniques. In E. May, M. Jones and J.
Mitchell (Eds), Proceedings of the 2nd Heritage, Microbiology
Richards, V.,
and Science, Microbes, Monuments and Maritime Materials
2008
Conference, 28 June – 1 July 2005, Portsmouth, UK, ,RSC
Publishing, pp 179-203.
Matthiesen, H. and Oxygen measurements in conserved archaeological wood. In
Proceedings of the 11th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Nordvig, M.,
Archaeological Materials Conference, Greenville, North
in press.
Carolina, May 2010.
McKerrell,
H., The acetone/rosin method for conservation of waterlogged
Roger, E. and wood. Studies in Conservation, Vol. 17, pp 111-125.
Varsanyi, A., 1972.
Mortensen, M. N., PEG in the warship Vasa and the Viking ship Skuldelev 2. In P.
Egsgaard,
H., Hoffmann, K. Straetkvern, J. A. Spriggs and D. A. Gregory
Shashoua, Y. and (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Copenhagen, 2004,
Glastrup, J.,
2005
ICOM-CC, Bremerhaven, pp 261-267.
Mortensen, M. N., Formic acid as a marker molecule for polyethylene glycol
Egsgaard,
H., degradation in conserved archaeological wood – a radiocarbon
Hvilsted, S., and study. In Proceedings of the 11th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Greenville, North
Glastrup, J.,
in press.
Carolina, May 2010.
Munnikendam, R. Conservation
of
waterlogged
wood
using
radiation
polymerization. Studies in Conservation, Vol. 12, pp 70-75.
A.,
1967
Nyström Godfrey, Reburial and Analyses of Archaeological Remains – Phase II
I., Bergstrand, T results from the 4th retrieval in 2009 from Marstrand, Sweden.

�The RAAR project. Udevalla, Sweden: Bohusläns Museum and
Studio
VästSvensk
Konservering.
Available
at:
&lt;http://www9.vgregion.se/vastarvet/svk/reburial/index.htm&gt;
In-Situ monitoring and stabilisation of the James Matthews site.
In K. Straetkvern &amp; D.J. Huisman (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th
ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials
Conference, Amsterdam, September 2007, Rijksdienst voor
Archeologie, Cultuurlandschap en Monumenten (RACM),
Amersfoort, pp 113-160.
Iron removal from waterlogged wood and the effects on wood
chemistry, in Proceedings of the 11th ICOM Group on Wet
Organic Archaeological Materials Conference, Greenville, North
Carolina, May 2010.
M., The Vasa’s new battle: Sulphur, acid and iron, Vasa Studies 19,
and The Swedish National Maritime Museums, Stockholm.

and Petersson, H.
(eds.),
2011
Richards,
V.,
Godfrey,
I.,
Blanchette,
R.,
Held, B., Gregory,
D., and Reed, E.,
2009
Richards, V., Kasi,
K. and Godfrey, I.,
in press
Sandström,
Fors,
Y.
Persson, I.,
2003
Smith, W.,
2003

Archaeological Conservation Using Polymers: Practical
Applications for Organic Artifact Stabilisation, College Station,
Texas A&amp;M University Press.
Tran, K., Ramière, Preservation of waterlogged wood, Impregnation with radiationR., and Ginier- curing monomers and resins. In R. M. Rowell and R. J. Barbour
(Eds), Archaeological Wood, Properties, Chemistry and
Gillet, A.,
Preservation, Advances in Chemistry Series 225, American
1990
Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 217-234.
Wetherall, K. M.,
Sulfur and iron speciation in recently recovered timbers of the
Mary Rose revealed via X-ray absorption spectroscopy, in
Moss, R. M.,
Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 35, pp 1317-1328.
Jones, A. M.,
Smith, A. D.,
Skinner, T.,
Pickup, D. M.,
Goatham, S. W.,
Chadwick, A. V.,
Newport, R. J.,
2008
Wittköpper,
M., Der aktuelle stand der konservierung archäologischer
1998
naßhölzer
mit
melamin/aminoharzen
am
RömischGermanischen Zentralmuseum. Arbeitsblätter für Restauratoren
Gruppe 8: Holz Heft 2, pp 277-282.
Zhang,
J.
P., Lactitol conservation of the 1st century BC extremely degraded
Imazu, S., and waterlogged archaeological wooden figures and objects
Morgós, A.,
excavated at the tomb of one of the kings of the ancient Sishui
2009
Kingdom in China. In K. Straetkvern and D.J. Huisman (Eds),
Proceedings of the 10th ICOM Group on Wet Organic
Archaeological Materials Conference, Amsterdam, 2007,
Rijksdienst
voor
Archeologie,
Cultuurlandschap
en
Monumenten (RACM), Amersfoort, pp 253-269.
Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural
UNESCO,
Heritage, UNESCO, Paris.
2001

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2903">
                <text>The post-treatment deterioration of marine &#13;
archaeological wood - where to now?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2904">
                <text>Session 7&#13;
Preservation and conservation of wet archaeological materials and site management</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2905">
                <text>As waterlogged wood is ubiquitous in excavation sites, being used for structures (ships and buildings), tools, personal effects and for decorative artefacts, this material has been the subject of most conservation research and treatment over the past few decades. The development of disfiguring white deposits on treated timbers from the Skuldelev Viking ships from Roskilde Fjord in the late 1970s was initially treated as a minor cosmetic problem. The seriousness of the situation was soon realized when more timbers were affected and the destruction of timber tissue became evident. Similar problems have also been encountered with the Batavia timbers from Western Australia, the Shinan ship in Korea and artefacts from the Mary Rose in England. Problems associated with the presence of iron corrosion products in treated, formerly waterlogged timbers were further highlighted in 2000 with the development of highly acidic regions on some Vasa timbers and associated artefacts. These outbreaks on the Vasa were thought to be related to the inability of the climate control system to keep the relative humidity in the gallery below 60%. These post-treatment developments prompted a significant period of focused research and conservation activities, this time involving multi-faceted analyses and the development of strategies to address a problem that has the potential to affect all waterlogged timbers excavated from anaerobic sites. This paper reviews the current situation regarding the role that iron species play in promoting the formation of acidic species and in catalyzing the oxidation of reduced sulfur species, cellulose and polyethylene glycol and the steps being taken to reduce post-treatment deterioration of formerly waterlogged wood. The implications for future conservation treatments of waterlogged wood are discussed.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2906">
                <text>Godfrey, I. M.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2907">
                <text>Richards, V. L.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2908">
                <text>Cha, M. Y. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2909">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 7</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="547" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="338">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/8d87d78d46c3dca6c0a564b0ba97b372.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4201c17d4aab2a18c96a9a725fb4b32e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6117">
                    <text>The Potential of Maritime Archaeology (Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine
Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical Narrations in Tidore, North
Moluccas, Indonesia
Wisnu A. Gemilang1
Nia N. H. Ridwan1
Guntur A. Rahmawan1
Ulung J. Wisha2
1

Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, Ministry of Marine Affairs and
Fisheries
Jl. Raya Padang-Painan Km. 16, Bungus, Padang, West Sumatera, 25245
2
National Research and Innovation Agency

ABSTRACT
The potential of shipwreck site resources in “Spice Routes,” Ternate-Tidore, reflects several historical pieces of
evidence relating to archaeological remains from the Portuguese and Spanish eras in the surrounding sea and
coastal areas. In the 1990s, a plethora of archaeological remains were salvaged. An integrated archaeological
study is an initial step to optimize the use of underwater archaeological resources in the area of interest. The
survey consisted of local coordination, expert consultation, literature study, field surveys and underwater
observations, mini excavations using water dredging, artefact samplings site measuring and documentation,
artefact desalination, and C14 carbon dating analysis for wooden materials found within the site. Moreover, the
water quality survey for marine tourism interests and Trinidad ship reconstruction is significant in supporting
500 years of circumnavigation of the earth by Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano and supporting
publication and dissemination. Based on the present study, it is observed that Soasio and Tongowai sites have
the potential to be developed as the centre of integrated marine ecotourism with maritime archaeology-based
sites. This consideration is due to plenty of historical artefacts and tourism feasibility assessments. Therefore,
local and regional regulations relating to regional spatial planning are crucial before implementing the
ecotourism project in this area.
Keywords: Maritime archaeology, shipwreck sites, sustainable marine tourism, Tidore
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1: The distribution of underwater archaeology sites in Tidore Islands. Source: Field survey, Research
Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, 2021.
Figure 2: The distribution map of historical sites in Tidore Islands.
Figure 3: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; shipwreck indication (a); ceramic findings (b); jars and
earthenware findings (c); bird’s eye view of Soasio site (d).
Figure 4: Biodiversity in the surrounding Soasio site; coral covers (a); fish ecosystem (b), sediment substrate (c).
Figure 5: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; underwater cannon finding (a); excavated cannon from
Tongowai site (b); A pile of earthenware (c); coral covers and ecosystem in Tongowai site (d).
Table 1: The formulation of the underwater heritage trail development strategy.

1

�INTRODUCTION
Tourism is an essential aspect for a country, which can increase state and local government revenue
(Runtunuwu 2020, 1). Tidore Island is becoming the preferred ecotourism destinations in North
Maluku Province. Exotic natural panoramas combined with cultural-historical sites create an
enchanting paradise in eastern Indonesia (Wijayanti et al. 2022, 1). Tidore Island is worthy of further
development due to its strategic position and many mesmerizing coastal areas as a potency for
supporting marine tourism. However, in developing the tourism potency of this region, many aspects
should be considered since there many existing problems (Kader 2017, 20), such as the local facility
and the low awareness of the underwater cultural heritage UCH importance (Fahri &amp; Alhadar 2022, 2;
Runtunuwu 2020, 2).
The existence of two underwater archaeological sites, Soasio and Tongowai Sites, highlight the
potential for underwater archaeology in the Tidore Islands. Aside from high biodiversity within the
sites, these two primary sites have a historical value related to the shipping and international trade in
the 15-17 centuries AD (Rahmawan et al. 2021, 173). Therefore, the further development should be
supported by a tourism development strategy. Local tourism management and third party’s authorities
should contribute to conserve the remains by establishing policies and protections (Masberg and
Morales 1999, 290). Therefore, this research article on "The Potential of Maritime Archaeology
(Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical
Narrations in Tidore, North Moluccas, Indonesia" is significant to support the development of
underwater historical tourism in the Tidore Islands.

CASE STUDY
Based on information from the local community and local government in Ternate and Tidore, around
the 1990s, there was a lot of goods looting in several archaeological sites in Tidore waters. The lack of
knowledge of the local government and the community about the existence of UCH makes the remains
more vulnerable and less protected (Rahmawan et al. 2021, 170). Therefore, identification of
underwater archaeological potential in Tidore waters is essential as a basis for further conservation,
development, and decision-making in terms of protecting the underwater archaeological remains. In
addition, this study is expected to promote the potential of the site for marine tourism and other
preservation strategies in dealing with the vulnerability of the site and its aquatic environment.

RESOURCES
As mentioned earlier, the primary location of this study is in the Soasio and Tongowai sites, Tidore
Island, North Maluku Province (Figure 1). Many historical objects have been managed as an attraction
for supporting the tourism aspect, such as the Tidore Sultanate Palace, Torre Fort, Tahula Fort,
Sonyine Malige Museum, Sultan Nuku Tomb, Sultan Mosque and Sultan Pier (Sosmiarti and Fahlefi
2019, 282). However, the Tidore Islands underwater history is less promoted and even rarely visited
due to the lack of local awareness regarding the importance of UCH. Therefore, in this study we will
exhibit the underwater archaeological resources in Tidore and further development planning to
promote and manage the remains.

2

�Figure 1. The distribution of underwater archaeology sites in Tidore Islands.
Source: Field survey, Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, 2021.

FRAMEWORK
The primary data of this study were obtained from a research report by the Research Institute for
Coastal Resources and Vulnerability (RICRV) in 2019 and 2021. The research activities included:
mapping bathymetry, hydro-oceanography, geology, and diving to observe archaeological sites' photos
and videos, and the quality of the ecosystem and aquatic environment (Irani et al. 2022, 3). In addition,
local interviews with the government, village officials, and communities around the site were also
carried out.
Masberg and Morales (1999, 290) suggest that five factors are included in ecotourism development:
(1) an integrated approach; (2) planning and a slow start; (3) Education and Training; (4) maximizing
local benefits and (5) evaluation and feedback. Outcomes are for a successful and viable ecotourism
development; these five factors ensure the objectives are achieved.
Artefact data analysis identified UCH from the Soasio Site and the Tongowai Site (Figure 1). We
aimed to determine artefacts type, age, and the place of origin of production. In addition, observations
of the position of the sites and GPS tracking data of important historical sites along the coast near the
Soasio and Tongowai sites were also carried out, which were analysed to know the spatial distribution
in relation to the two sites.
3

�RESULTS
Historical Tourism and Underwater Archaeological Sites in Tidore Islands
The oceanography of the Soasio site is characterized by relatively weak currents so divers can dive
anytime. Aside from the underwater archaeological remains, clear seawater with various types of coral
reefs and fish are attractions. The Soasio seabed has a slope of about 130 degrees. The distribution of
artefacts in ship wood, ballast stone, and ceramics is 15-20 m deep (Rahmawan et al. 2021, 175).

Figure 2: The distribution map of historical sites in Tidore Islands.

Another site is situated in Tongowai Village where the cannon was found at a depth of 37-42 m
(Figure 2). According to local interviews, the cannon had previously been lifted along with other
artefacts by a salvage company in 1998. This was done by Japanese investors, as proved by the
existence of two drums and ropes tied to the cannon, which were used to lift the cannon. The artefacts
discovered in 1998 are stored in a Central Halmahera Guesthouse in Itagapura. The lifting of the
artefacts at the Tongowai Site occurred when Tidore Islands was under the Halmahera Tengah
Regency.
The Significance of Underwater Archaeology in Tidore Islands
Underwater Archaeology in Soasio
The presence of shipwrecks at the Soasio site was known based on findings of four meters of wood in
an inclined position at the depth of 12 meters. The remains are mostly covered by coral reefs and
sediment deposits (Figure 3a). According to the historical records and local interviews, only Spain and
4

�Portugal colonized Tidore Island. Therefore, initial suspicions were that the ship was a Spanish or
Portuguese ship anchored in the port of Tidore. However, the results of the C14 analysis show the
oldest wood sample is from 1054 AD, and the youngest is from 1379 AD.
The ceramics found at the Soasio site are categorized as porcelain and stoneware. Ceramics made from
porcelain have a white glaze and blue-white colour under the glaze. One intact plate is known as
Swatow blue and white porcelain, which was produced during the Wanli period (1575 – 1659 AD) of
the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 AD), and a bowl fragment is known as blue-white porcelain from the
time of Emperor Tianqi (1621 – 1627 AD) of the Ming Dynasty (Figure 3b).
The findings of earthenware jars based on their size consist of large and small jars. There are seven
large jars and two small jars. The jars are glazed brown, and three of them have four ears. The jars are
all incomplete (Figure 3c). In the water area of the Soasio Site, there are interesting remains in the
form of rock formations deliberately arranged from ancient times that look like wave breakers or
beach protectors (Figure 3d).

Figure 3: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; shipwreck indication (a); ceramic findings (b); jars and
earthenware findings (c); bird’s eye view of Soasio site (d)

The ecosystem around the Soasio site is covered by coral reefs, of about 60% (good condition) at a
depth of 4-15 m, with the basic contour being a reef slope. The coral reef genera found included:
Acropora sp, Merulina sp, Giniastrea sp, Montipora sp, Porites sp, Pectinia sp, Symphyllia sp, Favia
sp, Astreopora sp, Montastrea sp, and Diploastrea sp (Figure 4a). Meanwhile, the types of fish found
were indicator fish or associated fish and target/economic fish such as grouper, snapper, and pelagic
5

�fish (Figure 4b). The seafloor substrate consists of rubble/dead coral rubble, sand deposits and
sediment resulting from landslides around the coast (Figure 4c). Based on the results of the calculation
of the tourism suitability index, the Soasio site is included in the quite suitable category with a value
of 73.02%. The suitability index value is based on the water brightness parameter, coral community
cover, life forms, types of reef fish, archaeological site depth, current velocity, and reef depth.

Figure 4: Biodiversity in the surrounding Soasio site; coral covers (a); fish ecosystem (b), sediment substrate (c).

UCH in Tongowai Site
The Tongowai site at a depth of 37-42 m is where the cannon was discovered. The artefacts found at
the Soasio site are more scattered than at the Tongowai site. According to locals documented in
Rahmawan et al. (2021, 175), the observed cannon was an artefact left over from salvage conducted in
1998 (Figure 5a). Another cannon, earthenware, and ceramics were removed in 1998 by a Japanese
company and are in the government house of Halmahera Tengah Regency (Figure 5b). The condition
of the pottery was not conserved, so a white surface was observed due to salting (Figure 5c).
The brightness or visibility on the seabed of the Tongowai Site reaches 25 m. The bottom contour of
the Tongowai waters is made up of reef flat and reef slope, with the bottom substrate consisting of
dead coral fractures and sand deposits. Coral reefs are found at depths from 1 - 25 m with
concentrations of dense coral cover at depths of 2 - 10 m. Percentage Cover (PC) of live coral reaches
6

�50 % (Good Condition…Figure 5d). The coral genera that can be found include: Acropora.sp,
Montipora sp., Seriatopora sp., Oxipora sp., Porites sp., Stylopora sp., Pectinia sp., Psammocora sp.,
Galaxea sp., Fungia sp., Pocillopora sp., Favia sp. and Hidnopora sp., Goniastrea sp., and there are
sponges, soft corals, and sea fans/Gorgonians. Based on the results of the tourism suitability index
calculation, the Tongowai site's location is categorized into entirely appropriate for tourism with a
value of 77.8%.

Figure 5: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; underwater cannon finding (a); excavated cannon from
Tongowai site (b); A pile of earthenware (c); coral covers and ecosystem in Tongowai site (d).

Maritime and Underwater Heritage Trail Developments
The places where the shipwreck and the underwater remains do exist in the Tidore Islands have
potential for marine tourism, especially for underwater diving objects. Based on the process of
identification and analysis of the data, a strategy for further protection and development of sustainable
UCH in the Tidore Islands can be initiated. The formulation of the management strategy for
developing underwater archaeology potential in the Tidore Islands is shown in Table 1.

7

�Table 1: The formulation of the underwater heritage trail development strategy.
No
Identified Criteria
Strategic Plan
 Aligning the vision and mission makes the Soasio and Tongowai
1
Mutual commitment
sites sustainable tourist destinations
 Involve community members in decision making.
2
People empowerment
 Ensure that local communities receive benefits.
 Ensure environmental sustainability.
 Develop a tourist image (brand image) Gurabunga in line with the
existing tourism image in the area.
 Raising the history of various old buildings in the Tidore Island area,
especially Tongowai and Soasio site
 Environmental conservation.
3
Village attractiveness
 Preservation of traditional customs and culture
 Development of tourism product packaging in the form of
enrichment of tourist attractions, development of tourism packages,
and integrated tourism promotion.
 Provision of supporting facilities for local product development.
 Develop tour packages in Soasio and Tongowai village.
 Education and training on village tourism and tourism awareness.
 Tourism-based entrepreneurship courses/training for residents of
productive age and school dropouts in order to develop local crafts,
4
Human resource development
souvenirs, etc.
 Intensive guidance to local guides on tourist assistance (especially
climbing guides).
 Provide knowledge to the public about UCH.
 Formation of tourism awareness group.
 Increase the creativity of the existing community.
 Provide capital strengthening for the provision of support for tourism
development, both for business capital for souvenirs and capital for
5
Villagers’ motivation
supporting equipment for artistic attractions.
 Equipping tourist companions, especially diving companions, and
providing adequate diving support equipment.
 Encouraging local regulations that facilitate licensing of business
operations in the tourism sector in Soasio and Tongowai villages.
 Planning and development of facilities &amp; infrastructure adapted to
the concepts and strategic plans of tourist destinations (coordination
with Indigenous elders and the Tidore city government).
 Building support facilities for unique traditional tourism activities.
 Prioritizing the development of road infrastructure to facilitate access
for tourists to Tongowai and Soasio Sites and adjacent villages.
 Re-enable the security post along with the security forces or officers,
6
Facility and infrastructure
to avoid criminal acts while in the tourist area.
 The addition of a homestay in an adequate resident's house.
 Public toilet construction.
 Make a spatial/land use plan in the context of developing an
environmentally friendly tourist village.
 Install mooring/marking buoys on the two sites (Figure 8a).
 Promoting Soasio and Tongowai to various mass media, namely print
media, electronic media and also online media.
 Make booklets and leaflets containing information on Soasio and
Tongowai Village and guidebooks about UCH tourism.
 Conduct counselling and socialization for tourism actors.
7
Promotion
 Holding various events related to Tidore UCH.
 Participate in national tourism festival events or exhibitions.
 Installation of information boards (heritage trail) that tell the history
of the sinking of the Trinidad ships and the history of the presence of
the Spanish and Portuguese in Ternate-Tidore (Figure 8b).

8

�The right strategy for developing tourist destinations in Tidore UCH is through Community-Based
Tourism, which reflects the diversity of culture, traditions, natural beauty, crafts and cuisine. Aim to
become the local identity with a concentration of tourist destinations that does not compete for
tourists.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Research Institute of Coastal Resources and Vulnerability (RICRV), Ministry of Marine Affairs and
Fisheries, Indonesia for research funding in 2019 and 2021 in Ternate-Tidore. Gratitude is also given to the local
communities of Tidore who have assisted during the field surveys.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Fahri, J., Abubakar, R. and Alhadar, F.M. “Strategy for developing excellent tourist destination (A case study of Gurabunga
Village, Tidore Island Municipality, North Maluku).” Journal of International Conference Proceedings 5, no.1
(2022): 1-12.
Irani, H.R., Golverdi, M., Rastegar, R. and Rezaei, S. “Rapid ecotourism development and challenges: the case of ecolodge
in Iran.” Tourism Recreation Research (2022):1-6.
Kader, Abdurrahman. "Development planning of tourism destination as local superior economy sector: study at Tidore city
islands." International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences 5, no. 3 (2017): 19-25.
Masberg, B.A. and Morales, N. “A case analysis of strategies in ecotourism development.” Aquatic Ecosystem Health &amp;
Management 2, no.3 (1999): 289-300.
Rahmawan, G.A., Ridwan, N.N.H., Wisha, U.J., Ilham, I., Gemilang, W.A., Andriani, F.W., Sudaryadi, A. and Irwansyah, I.
“Ekowisata Terintegrasi Situs Kapal Tenggelam di Tidore Kepulauan, Maluku Utara.” Jurnal Kelautan Nasional 16,
no. 3 (2021): 169-184.
Runtunuwu, P.C.H. “Tourism sector development strategy in North Maluku: A case study of Tidore Islands.” International
Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific 3, no. 3 (2020): 1-8.
Sosmiarti, S. and Fahlefi, U.A. “Pengembangan Potensi Wisata Sejarah Dan Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Soasio Melalui
Program Paket Wisata Dan Rumah Budaya Sebagai Pusat Kesultanan Tidore.” Buletin Ilmiah Nagari Membangun 2,
no. 2 (2019): 94-108.
Wijayanti, H., Marfai, M.A., Mutaqin, B.W., Hadmoko, D.S., Lavigne, F., Faral, A. and Riasasi, W. “Ecotourism in a
Hazardous Small-Volcanic Island: Tidore Island, Indonesia.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental
Science 1039, no.1 (2022): 12021.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="57">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="319">
                  <text>2023 Session 21: New Technologies and Interdisciplinary Strategies for the Promotion and Protection of Maritime Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="320">
                  <text>Session 21 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="321">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 21 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="322">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="323">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="324">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="325">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="326">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="327">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6107">
                <text>The Potential of Maritime Archaeology (Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical Narrations in Tidore, North Moluccas, Indonesia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6108">
                <text>The potential of shipwreck site resources in “Spice Routes,” Ternate-Tidore, reflects several historical pieces of&#13;
evidence relating to archaeological remains from the Portuguese and Spanish eras in the surrounding sea and&#13;
coastal areas. In the 1990s, a plethora of archaeological remains were salvaged. An integrated archaeological&#13;
study is an initial step to optimize the use of underwater archaeological resources in the area of interest. The&#13;
survey consisted of local coordination, expert consultation, literature study, field surveys and underwater&#13;
observations, mini excavations using water dredging, artefact samplings site measuring and documentation,&#13;
artefact desalination, and C14 carbon dating analysis for wooden materials found within the site. Moreover, the&#13;
water quality survey for marine tourism interests and Trinidad ship reconstruction is significant in supporting&#13;
500 years of circumnavigation of the earth by Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano and supporting&#13;
publication and dissemination. Based on the present study, it is observed that Soasio and Tongowai sites have&#13;
the potential to be developed as the centre of integrated marine ecotourism with maritime archaeology-based&#13;
sites. This consideration is due to plenty of historical artefacts and tourism feasibility assessments. Therefore,&#13;
local and regional regulations relating to regional spatial planning are crucial before implementing the&#13;
ecotourism project in this area. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6109">
                <text>Wisnu A. Gemilang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6110">
                <text>Nia N. H. Ridwan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6111">
                <text>Guntur A. Rahmawan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6112">
                <text>Ulung J. Wisha</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6113">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6114">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6115">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6116">
                <text>Gemilang, Wisnu A., Nia N. H. Ridwan, Guntur A. Rahmawan and Ulung J. Wisha. 2023. “The Potential of Maritime Archaeology (Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical Narrations in Tidore, North Moluccas, Indonesia.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Hans van Tilburg. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1916 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 21 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="165" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2004">
                <text>The Reigns of the Empress Wu, Chung-tsung and Jui-tsung (684-712)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2005">
                <text>Richard W. L. Guisso</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2006">
                <text>Denis Twitchett</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2007">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2008">
                <text>1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2009">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2010">
                <text>Richard W. L. Guisso</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2011">
                <text>Denis Twitchett</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2012">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2013">
                <text>Sui and Tâ€™ang China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2014">
                <text>1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2015">
                <text>Cambridge</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2016">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="236">
            <name>Series</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2017">
                <text>The Cambridge History of China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2018">
                <text>The Reigns of the Empress Wu, Chung-tsung and Jui-tsung (684-712)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2019">
                <text>3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="166" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2020">
                <text>The Reigns of the Empress Wu, Chung-tsung and Jui-tsung (684-712)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2021">
                <text>Richard W. L. Guisso</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2022">
                <text>Denis Twitchett</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2023">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2024">
                <text>1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2025">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2026">
                <text>Richard W. L. Guisso</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2027">
                <text>Denis Twitchett</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2028">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2029">
                <text>Sui and Tâ€™ang China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2030">
                <text>1979</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2031">
                <text>Cambridge</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2032">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="236">
            <name>Series</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2033">
                <text>The Cambridge History of China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2034">
                <text>The Reigns of the Empress Wu, Chung-tsung and Jui-tsung (684-712)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2035">
                <text>3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="596" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="387">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/fb0a4f392e4dbb0d0256e78f3346f42b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>01646eb484c6fc8f205da555ec70d71a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6547">
                    <text>The responsible in-situ accessibility and promotion of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a
strategy for its protection. A discussion based on recent initiatives in the Mediterranean.
Angelos Manglis (Founder, Civil Engineer MSc)
Anastasia Fourkiotou (Archaeologist MA)
Dimitra Papadopoulou (Dipl. Environmental Engineer MSc)
(Atlantis Consulting S.A. Greece)
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the current challenges in the protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) and proposes
the in-situ preservation and responsible accessibility of UCH sites as a strategy for their protection. The questions
in focus are the sustainable management and operational framework that can ensure the UCH sites are protected
and accessible for the purposes of both research and raising public awareness. Broad accessibility including divers
and non-divers can thus enhance the sustainable operation of sites in the long term. This work focuses on the
Mediterranean region in Europe and presents initiatives which have been implemented or are still ongoing under
various national or transnational projects towards the goal of accessible UCH. The results of the efforts so far
include the operation of the first accessible underwater archaeological sites in Greece and integration of technology
to reach a wider audience through digital exhibitions, serious games, and dry dive apps available in museums and
knowledge awareness centers. This work further discusses how the planning of underwater archaeological field
surveys should include considering parameters related to the responsible promotion of the site in a later phase,
after the end of excavation or conservation works, as a protection practice.
Keywords: Underwater Cultural Heritage, promotion, protection, in-situ accessibility
List of Figures
Figure 1. The Accessible Underwater Archaeological Site of Peristera in Alonissos, Greece. (Photo by Matteo Collina,
UNICAL, DIMEG © Ministry of Culture &amp; Sports, Ephorate of Underwater Antiquities.

INTRODUCTION
UNESCO emphasizes the preservation of Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) sites in their original
location and encourages responsible and non-intrusive access for observation or documentation
purposes when necessary and appropriate, subject to certain conditions. This approach helps to raise
public awareness of the significance of UCH and the need to protect it, as all cultural heritage, for the
next generations.
Safeguarding UCH entails among other challenges preventing trawling, anchorage or looting. Strict
legislation and delimitation have proven ineffective so far to this purpose. When people are educated
about their cultural heritage, they come to realize its value and the need for its protection, while citizens
acknowledge the UCH sites as part of their history and develop a sense of pride for their heritage and a
local cultural identity. It is indeed the broad awareness and public accessibility to UCH that are crucial
for the protection and sustainability of the sites. Moreover, accessible UCH creates various benefits for
societies from a cultural, educational and socioeconomic development standpoint.
There are different approaches to UCH promotion with both advantages and challenges in terms of
accessibility and sustainability. One kind of model is the land-based maritime museums with recovered
artifacts of wrecks. Another model is the museums with restored ships with several examples in Europe
such as the ARQUA National Museum of Underwater Archaeology in Spain, the Mary Rose Museum
in the UK, the Roskilde Viking Ship Museum in Denmark, or the Vasa Museum in Sweden.
However, the model of in-situ preservation such as in the case of Accessible Underwater Archaeological
Sites (e.g., underwater parks, underwater archaeological trails) is unparalleled in terms of efficiency and
operational sustainability in the long term. In the Mediterranean, management strategies of UCH vary
depending on the site (material, preservation, accessibility), either applying protective frames over the
1

�remains or involving diving centers for the sustainable operation of underwater parks. Recent
technological advancements on underwater survey and digitalization have enriched physical dive trails
and enabled virtual dives as well.
Herein we present different approaches and models of sustainable management, responsible
accessibility and promotion of Accessible UCH sites in the Mediterranean.

DEVELOPING MODELS FOR INCLUSIVE ACCESSIBILITY OF UCH SITES
New approaches to standard technologies can contribute significantly to raising public awareness of
UCH protection. Several projects have been implemented or are currently ongoing to promote
Accessible UCH sites in the Mediterranean.
The CREAMARE project aims to create a cross-sectoral collaboration framework to co-produce
creative content to promote UCH and raise awareness about environmental threats to the oceans. The
project is testing the framework through the co-production of a Serious Game that allows players to visit
highly realistic three-dimensional digital replicas of underwater cultural sites and learn about UCH
(shipwrecks, finds, submerged cities, ancient trade routes etc.) and environmental threats. Furthermore,
an ad-hoc web platform is being developed to facilitate the matching and collaboration among cultural
organizations, creative teams, and technology experts to enable knowledge transfer, synergy and coproduction, to autonomously create three-dimensional models and digital contents of UCH and use those
datasets to monitor the conservation state and contribute to the creation of digital apps for their
promotion.
I-BLUECULTURE is another ongoing research project co-financed by the European Regional
Development Fund and Greek national funds that is developing a three-dimensional virtual diving and
exploration system in a video-streaming, which is captured underwater in real-time. The system allows
non-divers to ‘navigate’ (dry-dive) in selected Accessible UCH sites of the Greek archipelago, including
three byzantine shipwrecks with amphoras at Peristera, Alonissos island and the modern wreck of a
cargo ship at Skopelos island. The system can be installed in different contexts (e.g. at museum
exhibitions or portable devices) allowing dry dives in a virtual reality (VR) environment, textured with
live-streaming underwater video. Such three-dimensional virtual explorations can be experienced
whether users are on-site, at the sea surface (e.g. on board with a smart phone), or away from the site,
on land (e.g. at an awareness kiosk with a VR installation).
The MAREBOX project is yet another example of a project that brought together the cultural, artistic,
and creative sectors with technology to create an art exhibition and a virtual walkthrough under the
theme of the current challenges of the sea. The outputs included a dry diving augmented reality (AR)
application for the shipwreck of the classical period in Peristera, in Alonissos Greece.
MeDryDive project, using augmented and virtual reality apps and taking personalized dry dive
experiences a step further, created a thematic tourism product that included a multi-country approach
with Accessible UCH sites in Greece, Italy, Croatia, and Montenegro. The project developed the first
serious game on UCH, enriching the experience of tourists and stimulating their interest in UCH and
thematic diving.
Utilizing augmented and virtual reality increases accessibility to UCH sites for a broad audience. This
model of promotion can offer an immersive experience of the underwater environment, which may not
be possible otherwise for individuals with mobility impairments or disabilities. The virtual tours and dry
diving experiences allow them to explore UCH sites and interact with their surroundings in a simulated
underwater environment.

2

�BLUEMED MODEL: EXAMPLE OF CLUSTER OF ACCESSIBLE UCH SITES AT
aLONISSOS, GREECE
The site and the story
The BLUEMED project aimed to raise public awareness on UCH and at sustainable tourism
development in coastal regions and islands in the Mediterranean. Based on international good practices
for UCH protection, a framework for the sustainable management and promotion of Accessible UCH
sites was developed and pilot-tested in three countries, including the “Capo Rizzuto” Marine Protected
Area in Italy, the ancient shipwrecks in Alonissos and Western Pagasitikos in Greece, and the submerged
sites of Cavtat in Croatia.

Figure 1. The Accessible Underwater Archaeological Site of Peristera in Alonissos, Greece. (Photo by Matteo Collina,
UNICAL, DIMEG © Ministry of Culture &amp; Sports, Ephorate of Underwater Antiquities).

The ancient shipwreck of Peristera is located at the islet of Peristera in Alonissos island and lies at a
depth of around 27 meters (m). It is dated around 425 BC with a cargo of transport amphoras of the
Mendean and the Peparethian type, both from famed Greek wine-production centers in antiquity, Mendi
in Chalkidiki and Peparethos (modern Skopelos island), respectively. The wreck forms an impressive
concentration of around 3000 amphoras that seems to maintain the shape of the merchant ship, indicating
also that vessels with huge volume cargoes sailed in the Mediterranean already in the fifth century BC
(Figure 1). The other three Greek pilot sites nearby are located at the Western Pagasitikos Gulf, near the
village of Amaliapolis. A shipwreck from the eleventh-thirteenth century AD at the islet of Kikinthos
lies at a depth of three to 11 m with a concentration of pithos and amphoras sherds. At Cape Telegraphos
there is a shipwreck of the Roman period at a depth of 17 to 27 m with scattered amphoras sherds of
three main types, while at a shallower depth of 10 to 20 m there are also the remains of a second
shipwreck from the twelfth-thirteenth century CE. In Cape Akra Glaros at Nies Bay, several shipwrecks
of different periods have been discovered, among which a shipwreck of the Middle Byzantine period at
a depth of 15 m, with big amphoras sherds and anchors of different eras, and a second shipwreck at
about 20 m depth, with intact amphoras and scattered fragments of a great stone stock of a wooden

3

�anchor of the Archaic period (seventh-sixth century BC). The several shipwrecks of different time
periods indicate the diachronic trade activity in the area.
The project
To enhance accessibility at UCH sites and include non-divers, BLUEMED developed digital
documentation, three-dimensional-site reconstruction and a virtual diving system, offering a dry-dive
experience and providing augmented and contextual site and marine environment information, in a fun
and educational context. To host an exhibition of the sites, either on a VR environment or through
interactive touch screens, BLUEMED introduced the concept of Knowledge Awareness Centers
(KACs), a type of an information center that can host digital exhibitions, showcase replicas of
underwater finds or the actual recovered artefacts and hold events to raise awareness among local
communities and visitors. KACs can also support the operation of the Accessible UCH sites if located
nearby, indicatively provide information about the operating hours of the site, while the VR dry dive
system hosted the KACs can become a tourism attraction in the area. Four KACs were established under
the BLUEMED project in total. There is a KAC hosted at the National Archaeological Museum of Capo
Colonna, in Crotone, Italy and another one in the Archaeological Museum of Konavle, in Croatia. In
Greece, two KACs have operated since 2020, one in Chora in Alonissos and another one in Amaliapolis.
A web platform was also developed to further introduce users to sites, diving parks, maritime museums
and KACs, and offering dry dives at selected sites.
BLUEMED as a case study of an integrated approach to UCH sustainable management
BLUEMED has developed an all-inclusive model comprising policy recommendations, development
strategies, and a management framework to support the sustainable operation of the sites and the KACs.
The primary objective of the model is to help competent authorities and managing bodies in issuing
policies and managing the sites effectively and sustainably, with the ultimate aim of protecting them.
The model focuses on long-term operation sustainability with monitoring of key performance indicators
covering cultural, environmental, and socioeconomic aspects, and it employs a validation methodology
that assesses the operation of both sites and KACs.
Additionally, a roadmap is provided for the uptake of the model, which can be adapted to local
conditions. The roadmap is a guide that outlines the technical, operational, and policy requirements that
must be fulfilled, the barriers that must be overcome, and the risks and limitations that must be
considered, such as funding, legislation, limited promotion, and lack of tourism infrastructure. The
roadmap also accounts for the unique characteristics of each site and its location and provides a checklist
of steps to follow for the protection, responsible promotion, and sustainable management of the sites.
F action plan may develop as a multidisciplinary synergy of different fields and bodies, including the
The
i
Ministry
of Culture, regional authorities or municipalities, universities and research institutions,
g
international
organizations or local associations, diving centers, museums etc.
u
r
e BLUEMED roadmap
The
S
E
The
roadmap is an agile action plan, adjustable to the conditions and circumstances of an island or
Q
coastal
area where a UCH site is located nearby. Its milestones are the crucial issues to consider, yet
F
these
steps can be in overlapping phases and not necessarily in progressive order. Going beyond the
i
g that meet all the proposed requirements, the roadmap is applicable in cases where the sites may
sites
u some of the standard features. The core milestones of the roadmap are:
lack
r
e
1.\
*
2.A
R
A
B
3.I
C
1
.
T
h
e
a

Mapping, Assessment and Selection of site(s).
Potentials for sustainable tourism development (diving centers, tourism attraction, services and
attractions in the area).
Stakeholders Engagement.
4

�4. Risk Assessment and sustainability KPIs.
5. KACs operation.
The roadmap considers various parameters (environmental, cultural, social, economic) in an area
(locality) as well as the policy and technical aspects for an action plan. Offering either a bottom-up or
a top-down approach, it is a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach, building upon local
community and stakeholders’ involvement, joined by competent authorities and policy makers.
The outcomes
In BLUEMEDPLUS project, as a continuation of the BLUMED to transfer its good practices, such
results have been transferred to three new territories, respectively in Italy, Montenegro and Albania,
along the lower Adriatic that preserves an immense UCH that is still barely known and valued. This new
effort has aimed to enable the transfer of skills and knowledge gained and improve the management of
underwater sites of historical/archaeological interest, promoting new destinations as resources for the
sustainable development of coastal tourism.
The operation of Peristera Underwater Archaeological Site in Greece has been considered successful,
with 260 dives recorded annually since its opening in 2020 and funding secured until 2023. Additionally,
as of 2022, four other Accessible UCH sites in Alonissos are open to the public for diving under
supervision by archaeologists of the Ephorate of Underwater Antiquities. These sites include ancient
shipwrecks with cargo amphoras at an average depth of around 35 m: the shipwreck in Cape Tzelios on
Peristera islet from the Hellenistic period, the shipwreck in Skantzoura island (end of the fourth century
BC), a mid-twelfth century CE shipwreck at Aghios Petros, Kyra Panagia island, and an archaic period
shipwreck in Fagrou islet. These efforts have resulted in the creation of the largest Accessible
Underwater Archaeological Park in Greece with a cluster of five ancient shipwrecks, dropping the pin
for cultural diving tourism worldwide at Alonissos.
With the creation of a cluster of five Accessible UCH sites, there is now the possibility of more dives
and an extended visit to the area, making it ripe for the development of a weekly-based tourism product.
A promotional strategy can be developed to include not only the Alonissos sites but also the
‘CHRISTOPHOROS’ modern wreck, a popular diving site in Skopelos island nearby. The establishment
of a KAC in Skopelos and the development of a dry dive app for the site have contributed to its
popularity. All these developments make the area an exciting destination for cultural diving tourism.

CONCLUSIONS
The results and impact of all efforts have documented the benefits of accessibility of underwater cultural
assets not only among divers but in the general public. We consider the integration of innovative
technologies such as AR and VR applications and the operation of KACs essential to the implementation
of the proposed model. The surge of underwater cultural tourism will undoubtedly enhance the
socioeconomical benefits in the long term, especially if combined with high quality services and tourism
infrastructure in the area.
Tourists consider culture a strong asset of a destination and alternative tourism is an emerging trend
globally. Still, even though coastal tourism is among the priorities of the EU strategy for blue growth,
UCH is rarely included in the touristic promotion strategies and campaigns. UCH can be beneficial for
islands and coastal areas in terms of socioeconomic development, while recreational diving can generate
multiple advantages for the local economies such as direct and indirect revenues from cultural tourists.
Therefore, challenges and prospects of UCH related to blue growth global trends or tourism also need
to be considered by policy makers.

5

�This paper presents different models for the sustainable management and responsible accessibility and
protection of Accessible UCH sites that have been developed in the framework of several projects with
pilot implementation in the Mediterranean. The examples demonstrate the advancements in technology
that allow responsible accessibility of UCH under EU and/or national funding. However, the focus needs
to shift towards the operational sustainability of these Accessible UCH sites. Synergies between policy
makers, managing authorities, and stakeholders will ensure the sustainable management of the sites,
focusing on issues such as monitoring and safeguarding, attractive content and ticketing policy,
responsible promotion, and secure funding.
Considering that responsible promotion of UCH contributes to its protection, planning of underwater
archaeological surveys, excavation or conservation works at UCH sites need to take into consideration
in advance the available options for the responsible promotion of the site(s) and the prospects. Making
the site responsibly accessible to all, following a plan of both in-situ preservation and accessibility from
a distance, and raising awareness of the value of UCH among the locals is key to safeguarding cultural
heritage for future generations.
Acknowledgements
A.M. A.F. and D.P. acknowledge funding from the MeDryDive EU co-financed project under COSME Programme,
MAREBOX Bridging culture and audiovisual content through digital - EACEA 06/2019, BLUEMED project funded by
INTERREG MED Programme 2014-2020 and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF),
CREAMARE project CREA-CULT-2021-COOP managed by the European Education and Culture Executive Agency
(EACEA) under Creative Europe Programme

Bibliography
Beattie-Edwards, M. “England’s protected wreck diver trails and the economic value of a protected wreck”. In A heritage for
mankind, Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Underwater Archaeology (IKUWA V), Cartagena, October 15th18th, 2014; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte Eds. Spain, 198-212, 2016.
Bruno, F.; Lagudi, A.; Barbieri, L. “Virtual reality technologies for the exploitation of underwater cultural heritage”. In Latest
developments in reality-based three-dimensional surveying and modelling; F. Remondino, A. Georgopoulos, D. GonzálezAguilera, P. Agrafiotis Eds.; pp. 220–236, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2018.
Bruno F., Ricca M., Lagudi A., Kalamara P., Manglis, A., Fourkiotou A., Papadopoulou, D., Veneti A. “Digital Technologies
for the Sustainable Development of the Accessible Underwater Cultural Heritage Sites”, J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, no. 955 (2020).
Chand, M. “Residents' perceived benefits of heritage and support for tourism development in Pragpur, India”. Tourism: An
International Interdisciplinary Journal 61, no. 4, (2013): 379-394.
Dwyer, L.; Edwards, D.; Mistilis, N.; Scott, N.; Roman, C.; Cooper, C. “Megatrends Underpinning Tourism to 2020: An
analysis of key drivers for change”. CRC for Sustainable Tourism: Australia, 2008.
El‐Kady, M. “Potentials of underwater cultural heritage in tourism from the perspective of tour guiding in Alexandria, Egypt”.
Journal of Tourism Research 17 (2017): 222-238.
EU Commission. “Report on the blue growth strategy. Towards more sustainable growth and jobs in the blue economy:
Commission Staff Working Document on Blue Growth 2013-2016”.
Hadjidaki E. 1996, “Underwater excavations of a late fifth century merchant ship at Alonnesos, Greece: The 1991–1993
seasons”, Bull. Corresp. Hellénique 1996, no. 120 (1996): 561–593.
Henderson, J. “Oceans without history? Marine cultural heritage and the sustainable development agenda”. Sustainability 11,
(2019): 5080.
Manglis A., Fourkiotou A., Papadopoulou D. “The Promotion of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a Sustainable Blue Growth
Investment: Innovative technologies and bottom-up cooperation initiatives in Mediterranean area” in Corpakis D., Ketikidis P.
(eds.) Responsible Innovation &amp; Entrepreneurship, Proceedings of the 2019 European Triple Helix Congress on Responsible
Innovation &amp; Entrepreneurship (ETHAC 2019), Thessaloniki, Greece, 30 September–1 October 2019, Thessaloniki, 171–175,
2019.

6

�Manglis, A.; Fourkiotou, A.; Papadopoulou, D. “The Accessible Underwater Cultural Heritage Sites (AUCHS) as a sustainable
tourism development opportunity in the Mediterranean Region”. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal 68, no.
4 (2020): 499-503. https://doi.org/10.37741/t.68.4.9
Manglis, A.; Fourkiotou, A.; Papadopoulou, D. “A Roadmap for the Sustainable Valorization of Accessible Underwater
Cultural Heritage Sites”. Heritage 4 (2021): 4700–4715. https:// doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040259
Papageorgiou, M. “Stakes and challenges for underwater cultural heritage in the era of blue growth and the role of spatial
planning:
Implications
and
prospects
in
Greece”.
Heritage
2,
no.
2,
(2019):
1060-1069.
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2020069
Stefanile, M. “Underwater cultural heritage, tourism, and diving centers: The case of Pozzuoli and Baiae (Italy). In A heritage
for mankind”. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Underwater Archaeology, Cartagena, Colombia, 15–18 October
2014; Cartagena, Spain, 213–224, 2016.
Thurley, S. “Into the future. Our strategy for 2005-2010”. Conservation Bulletin 49 (2005): 26-27.
Tikkanen, S. “The Nordic experience: access through maritime dive trails and virtual simulation”. In Proceedings of the
UNESCO Scientific Colloquium on factors Impacting Underwater Cultural Heritage, UNESCO regional Meeting on the
Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage: Conference Book Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels, 13-15/12/2011; 62-65,
2012.
UNESCO. “Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage”; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2001.
UNESCO. “The Benefit of the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage for Sustainable Growth, Tourism and Urban
Development”. Elaborated by the UNESCO Secretariat and the Scientific and Technical Advisory Body of the Convention on
the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, 2001, 2013.
Vodeb, K.; Nemec Rudež, H. “Which attributes are important to tourists in a mature seaside destination? A case of Opatija in
Croatia”. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal 65, no. 3 (2017): 267-279.
Zmaić, V. “The protection of Roman period shipwrecks “in situ”. In Underwater Museums. In Exploring Underwater Heritage
in Croatia: A Handbook; edited by L. Bekić, L., Miholjek, I. 18-19. Zadar, Croatia, 2009.

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="56">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="310">
                  <text>2023 Session 20: Effective Ways to Deliver Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="311">
                  <text>Session 20 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="312">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 20 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="313">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="314">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="315">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="316">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="317">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="318">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6538">
                <text>The responsible in-situ accessibility and promotion of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a&#13;
strategy for its protection. A discussion based on recent initiatives in the Mediterranean.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6539">
                <text>This paper discusses the current challenges in the protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) and proposes&#13;
the in-situ preservation and responsible accessibility of UCH sites as a strategy for their protection. The questions&#13;
in focus are the sustainable management and operational framework that can ensure the UCH sites are protected&#13;
and accessible for the purposes of both research and raising public awareness. Broad accessibility including divers&#13;
and non-divers can thus enhance the sustainable operation of sites in the long term. This work focuses on the&#13;
Mediterranean region in Europe and presents initiatives which have been implemented or are still ongoing under&#13;
various national or transnational projects towards the goal of accessible UCH. The results of the efforts so far&#13;
include the operation of the first accessible underwater archaeological sites in Greece and integration of technology&#13;
to reach a wider audience through digital exhibitions, serious games, and dry dive apps available in museums and&#13;
knowledge awareness centers. This work further discusses how the planning of underwater archaeological field&#13;
surveys should include considering parameters related to the responsible promotion of the site in a later phase,&#13;
after the end of excavation or conservation works, as a protection practice. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6540">
                <text>Angelos Manglis &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6541">
                <text>Anastasia Fourkiotou &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6542">
                <text>Dimitra Papadopoulou</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6543">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6544">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6545">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6546">
                <text>Manglis, Angelos, Anastasia Fourkiotou, and Dimitra Papadopoulou. 2023. “The responsible in situ accessibility and promotion of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a strategy for its protection. A discussion based on recent initiatives in the Mediterranean.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Bill Jeffery. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1967 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="67">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 20 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="425" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="217">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/2b025dc658519af2369571e723593e36.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1f5cc197d24e650c481acfd42e8b5f29</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5206">
                    <text>The Role of ICOMOS, ICUCH and NAS in Underwater Cultural Heritage
Protection in the Pacific
Mark Staniforth
Monash University
Melbourne
Australia
Email: mark.staniforth@monash.edu
Abstract
This paper outlines the role played by ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments
and Sites), which is an international non-governmental organization (NGO)
dedicated to the conservation of the world's cultural monuments and sites and
specifically in awareness raising and training related to underwater cultural heritage
protection. ICOMOS membership requires an individual to be a practicing cultural
heritage professional or have professional qualifications in the fields of conservation
or preservation such as architect, archaeologist, town planner, and engineer,
administrator of heritage, art historian or archivist. ICOMOS International Scientific
Committees (ISCs) (such as ICUCH) are the vehicles through which ICOMOS brings
together, develops and serves its worldwide membership according to their fields of
specialized interest. ICOMOS expects the ISCs to be at the heart of scientific inquiry
and exchange in their domains and to share knowledge among them to foster multidisciplinary approaches to heritage protection and management. ICUCH
(International Committee on Underwater Cultural Heritage) was founded in 1991 by
ICOMOS Australia to promote international cooperation in the protection and
management of underwater cultural heritage and to advise ICOMOS on issues
related to underwater cultural heritage around the world. ICUCH currently has ten
members from the Asia and the Pacific region and this paper will discuss the role of
ICUCH in the region. Furthermore ICUCH’s mission will only be achieved in
conjunction with other stakeholders, such as the Nautical Archaeology Society
(NAS). NAS training aims to increase public awareness at local, provincial and
national levels about the extent and nature of underwater and maritime cultural
heritage as well as about underwater and maritime archaeology.
Key words: Training; Collaboration, Cooperation, Public awareness, Underwater
cultural heritage protection
Introduction
The International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) is a global,
professional non-governmental organization (NGO) established in 1965 that is
dedicated to the conservation and protection of the world’s cultural heritage
monuments and sites (see http://icomos.org/en/). The Nautical Archaeology Society
(NAS) is a global non-government organization (NGO) based in the UK that had its
beginnings back in 1964 (see http://www.nauticalarchaeologysociety.org/). Non1

�government organisations, such as ICOMOS and NAS, are often dependent on
membership fees for the majority of their funding and therefore tend to have limited
funding available to conduct ‘activities’ on a ‘paid’ basis. They also often have a very
small number of paid staff and therefore it is up to the membership, working
collaboratively, and individual members, usually working with other partners, to
volunteer their time (usually at no cost), find funding and conduct activities ‘under the
auspices’ or ‘on behalf of’ a particular NGO. Clearly ICOMOS, NAS and other
‘membership-based’ NGOs depend on their membership to take a proactive role in
initiating, and contributing to, collaborative activities often volunteering their services
pro bono (at no cost).
This paper considers ICOMOS and one ICOMOS ISC - ICUCH (International
Committee on Underwater Cultural Heritage) together with NAS and the NAS
Training Programme. It discusses a range of activities conducted by ICOMOS and
NAS members, in relation to raising public awareness and conducting training about
the management, preservation and protection of underwater cultural heritage in the
Asia and the Pacific region. Unlike the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, the
2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage had
no fund to pay for activities included in the original convention although an account
has now been established to allow for pooling donor donations to support certain
projects and programmes (Jeffery, 2006; Parthesius and Jeffery, 2011: 281). This
lack of funding as well as inadequate numbers of trained and experienced maritime
archaeologists and underwater cultural heritage managers in many countries in the
Asia and the Pacific region are recognized as significant problems.
The 2001 UNESCO Convention, nevertheless, has two articles related to public
awareness and training. The first is Article 20 - Public Awareness that states:
Each State Party shall take all practicable measures to raise public
awareness regarding the value and significance of underwater cultural
heritage and the importance of protecting it under this Convention.
and the second is Article 21 - Training in underwater archaeology, which states:
States Parties shall cooperate in the provision of training in underwater
archaeology, in techniques for the conservation of underwater cultural
heritage and, on agreed terms, in the transfer of technology relating to
underwater cultural heritage

2

�The need for raising public awareness about, as well as training and teaching
(capacity building) in, maritime archaeology and underwater cultural heritage
management in the Asia and the Pacific region have been identified as important
issues for more than a decade including during at least three UNESCO supported
regional meetings and in their resultant action plans or recommendations. The first
arose from the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on the 2001 UNESCO
Convention held in Hong Kong in 2003 (Prott, 2006: 158-160). The second was from
the 2010 International Meeting on Protection, Presentation and Valorisation of
Underwater Cultural Heritage held in Chongquig in China (Shuguang, 2011: 433434). The third was the Asia-Pacific Meeting on the Protection of Underwater
Cultural Heritage held in Koh Kong, Cambodia in 2012.
ICOMOS
ICOMOS has more than 11,000 members, over 100 National Committees and nearly
30 International Scientific Committees. International Scientific Committees (ISCs)
focus on specialist areas of heritage conservation and are made up of ICOMOS
members drawn from those specialist areas. ICOMOS expects the ISCs to be at the
heart of scientific inquiry and exchange in their domains and to share knowledge
among them to foster multi-disciplinary approaches to heritage protection and
management

see

http://www.icomos.org/en/about-icomos/committees/scientific-

committees
ICOMOS works for the conservation, protection, use and enhancement of cultural
heritage monuments, sites and places including buildings, historic cities, cultural
landscapes and archaeological sites. ICOMOS is dedicated to promoting the
application of theory, methodology, and scientific techniques to the conservation of
the world's architectural and archaeological heritage. Its work is based on the
principles enshrined in a number of ICOMOS Charters including the 1964
International Charter on the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites
(the Venice Charter), the 1996 Charter on the Protection and Management of the
Underwater Cultural Heritage and the 2000 International Charter for the Protection
and Management of the Archaeological Heritage (see http://icomos.org/en/chartersand-texts).
ICOMOS works closely with UNESCO, ICOM, ICCROM and other partners, across a
wide range of areas in relation to cultural heritage protection, preservation,
management and training. ICOMOS is primarily composed of its National
3

�Committees (NCs). Within the Asia and the Pacific region (as defined by UNESCO
and comprising of 50 nations) there are more than 20National Committees at present
plus ICOMOS Pasifika which covers all of the island nations of the Pacific Ocean.
Many of these National Committees have websites and for a complete list of National
Committees

with

contact

details

and

website

addresses

see

http://icomos.org/en/network/national-committees/list-of-national-committees.
ICOMOS Pasifika was created in 2007 and aims to further the conservation and
protection of heritage places in the Pacific Islands, with a focus on the cultural and
natural specificities of the region. In particular, ICOMOS Pasifika aims to raise
awareness with regards to the conservation of heritage places in the Pacific Islands
amongst local, national and regional cultural organizations in the region (see
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Icomos-Pasifika-International-Council-onMonuments-and-Sites/357945310963424). ICOMOS holds a General Assembly
(Congress or Conference) every three years – the 18th ICOMOS General Assembly
with the main theme of “Heritage and Landscape as Human Values” will take place
in

Florence,

Italy

from

10

to

14

November

2014

(see

http://www.icomos.org/en/about-icomos/governance/general-information-about-thegeneral-assembly/18th-general-assembly-florence-2014). To date the only ICOMOS
General Assembly to be held in the Asia and the Pacific region was the 15th General
Assembly

held

in

Xi’an,

China

in

2005

(see

http://www.international.icomos.org/xian2005/home_eng.htm).
ICOMOS membership requires that an individual be working as a practicing cultural
heritage professional and/or to have formal qualifications in one of the fields related
to cultural heritage conservation/preservation such as architects, archaeologists,
historians, town planners, engineers, administrators of heritage, art historians,
geographers, anthropologists or archivists. The author, for example, has been an
ICOMOS member for more than two decades. Individuals, and institutions, can apply
for membership through their National Committee and there are more than 100
ICOMOS National Committees. If there is no National Committee in a particular
country, however, then membership requests can be made through the ICOMOS
International Secretariat for approval by the ICOMOS Executive Committee (see
http://www.icomos.org/en/get-involved/join-icomos). The author encourages all
underwater cultural heritage professionals in the Asia and the Pacific region to join
ICOMOS and to get involved in ICOMOS ISCs.
4

�ICOMOS provides a network of experts that benefit from the interdisciplinary
exchange of its members and who are available to provide assessment and advice
on cultural heritage matters. ICOMOS publishes reports and special editions on
cultural heritage topics such as the Heritage at Risk – Special edition titled
Underwater Cultural Heritage at Risk (2006) which can be downloaded from the
ICOMOS website (see http://www.icomos.org/en/component/content/article?id=195).
In addition ICOMOS supports open access, free and unrestricted, to scientific
publications, through the project ICOMOS Open Archive: EPrints on Cultural
Heritage (see http://openarchive.icomos.org/). Part of the ICOMOS mission is to help
to raise public and government awareness about cultural heritage protection and
cultural heritage issues. It also encourages ICOMOS members to volunteer and
participate in capacity building and training activities. These parts of the ICOMOS
mission provide the general basis for members of ICOMOS ISCs to undertake, and
be involved in, awareness raising, training and capacity building activity, which is the
main focus of this paper.
ICUCH
ICUCH (International Committee on Underwater Cultural Heritage) was established
as an ICOMOS scientific committee in 1991 to promote international cooperation in
the protection and management of underwater cultural heritage and to advise
ICOMOS on issues related to underwater cultural heritage around the world (see
http://icuch.icomos.org/the-icomos-international-committee-on-the-underwatercultural-heritage/). ICUCH has a global membership of professionals and focuses on
international cooperation, legislative issues, and quality standards for interventions
and training and closely cooperates with regional and international NGOs, including
NAS, in raising public awareness. In the early 1990s ICUCH developed the ICOMOS
Charter on the Protection and Management of the Underwater Cultural Heritage
which was ratified by the 11th ICOMOS General Assembly in Sophia, Bulgaria in
1996 see: http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/underwater_e.pdfICUCH also
assisted in the drafting of the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of Underwater
Cultural Heritage (2001) and continues to lobby for its ratification (see
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-cultural-heritage/2001convention/official-text/).
The aims of ICUCH include to: stimulate international interest in the conservation of
the world's underwater cultural heritage among government and private institutions,
5

�practitioners and the general public; establish standards for the training and
qualification of practitioners involved with the conservation and management of
underwater cultural heritage sites; and share experience and expertise in the
conservation and management of underwater cultural heritage sites. For more than a
decade ICUCH membership was restricted to one member from each country but
this situation changed as a result of the Eger-Xi’an Principles for the International
Scientific Committees of ICOMOS adopted by the 15th General Assembly of
ICOMOS at Xi’an in October of 2005, as amended by the Scientific Council in July
2008

(Eger-Xi’an

Principles,

2008)

see:

http://www.icomos-

uk.org/committees/international-scientific/. Since 2009 ICUCH can, and does have,
more than one member from a number of countries including Argentina, Australia,
Canada, Denmark, Lebanon, South Africa and the USA. In addition, over the past
five years, ICUCH has considerably expanded its membership from about 20 to 48
members. The Asia and the Pacific region (as defined by UNESCO) currently has 10
ICUCH members (one from each of Japan, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Thailand, India,
Indonesia and China and three from Australia). It is clear that, just as ICOMOS need
more members in the Pacific, ICUCH needs one, or more, members from the Pacific.
ICUCH membership is not simply an issue for the Asia and the Pacific region, for
comparison, the Europe and North America region has 19 members while the Africa
region has just 5 members and the Arab States just 4 members. Fortunately in 2014
ICUCH will be considering an expansion of ICUCH membership as part of the flowon effects from the Eger-Xi’an Principles. The author has been a member of ICUCH
since 2009 and for a full list of ICUCH members see: http://icuch.icomos.org/icuchmembers/
ICUCH’s Vision, Mission and Strategy for the period 2009-2012 were formulated at
the Annual General Meeting of ICUCH in Québec in 2008 and include the following
missions:
▪ To assist other stakeholders in the field of maritime archaeology to manage,
protect, carry out sound study, and share knowledge on underwater cultural heritage.
▪ To raise public awareness of the existence of the world’s archaeological
underwater cultural heritage.
▪ To promote the protection and management of underwater cultural heritage
through facilitating development of national and regional cooperation, programmes,
and legislation.
6

�▪ To encourage an inclusive approach in underwater cultural heritage.
These particular missions were to be carried out using the following strategies:
▪ Promoting and actively assisting in capacity building in all the roles
mentioned in the Annex of the 2001 UNESCO Convention.
▪ Promoting education in underwater cultural heritage at all levels.
▪ Being strongly involved in raising public awareness.
These ICUCH missions and strategies, specifically those that encourage ICUCH
members to undertake, and be involved in, awareness raising, training and capacity
building in underwater cultural heritage protection and management, are the main
focus of this paper. ICUCH, for example, is an official partner of UNESCO
Underwater

Cultural

Heritage

Partners

in

Asia

and

the

Pacific

see:

http://www.unescobkk.org/culture/uch/partners/
As part of the Asia-Pacific Regional Capacity-Building Programme in Underwater
Cultural Heritage several ICUCH members, including the author, were invited to
contribute to three UNESCO Foundation Courses and two Advanced Courses on
Underwater Cultural Heritage between 2009 and 2011 (Staniforth, 2010). These
courses were primarily funded by the Government of Norway with support from the
Government of Thailand but they have not been run since 2011 as a result of a lack
of available funding. These courses were primarily held in Chanthaburi (Fig. 1) in
Thailand

see:

http://www.unescobkk.org/culture/uch/capacity-

building/courses/foundation/
One valuable product of this particular collaboration has been the development of
the Training Manual for the UNESCO Foundation Course on the Protection and
Management of Underwater Cultural heritage in Asia and the Pacific (UNESCO
Bangkok, 2012).
This

training

manual

can

be

downloaded

(for

free)

at:

http://www.unescobkk.org/culture/uch/uch-publication/. Another publication that a
number of ICUCH members contributed to is the Manual for Activities directed at
Underwater Cultural Heritage published by UNESCO in 2013 (Maarleveld, Guerin
and

Egger,

2013)

which

is

available

to

be

downloaded

(for

free)

at:

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-cultural-heritage/
In addition to involvement in awareness raising, training and capacity building
individual ICUCH members have been involved in collaborative research and

7

�underwater cultural heritage management projects in the Asia and the Pacific region
(Kimura et al., 2014; Lê et al., 2011; Manders, 2010).

Fig. 1 First UNESCO Foundation Course on Underwater Cultural
Heritage in Chathaburi, Thailand in 2009. (Mark Staniforth)

NAS
The Nautical Archaeology Society (NAS) was formed to promote interest in
underwater cultural heritage and is dedicated to advancing education in nautical and
maritime archaeology for everyone – its members, the general public and across the
global archaeological sector. NAS membership is open to everyone regardless of
qualifications and NAS publishes a quarterly member’s newsletter as well as a peer
reviewed academic journal twice a year – the highly respected International Journal
of Nautical Archaeology (IJNA). The NAS International Training Programme has
been delivering courses in maritime archaeology and underwater cultural heritage for
nearly 30 years see: http://www.nauticalarchaeologysociety.org/content/what-nastraining-programme
The NAS Training Programme has a modular structure, starting with a one day
Introduction course and working through the Part I, II and III Certificates and finally
the Part IV Diploma. The NAS programme has a published handbook available, now
in its second edition (Bowens, 2008) and is open to everybody with the Introduction
course requiring no prior learning or qualifications. The NAS Training Programme is
designed with courses in a wide range of topics and subject areas within nautical
8

�and maritime archaeology. The author has been involved with the NAS Training
Programme since the mid 1990s when the Australasian Institute for Maritime
Archaeology (AIMA) introduced NAS training into Australia (Moran and Staniforth,
1998). From 1997 AIMA tailored the NAS Training programme to suit Australian
conditions and sites and the author served for five years as the first AIMA/NAS
Senior Tutor in Australia. Over the last fifteen years or so, dozens of AIMA/NAS
Training courses have taught hundreds of people in all states of Australia about
underwater cultural heritage and maritime archaeology (see: http://www.aimaunderwater.org.au/parts-i-iv/).
In addition AIMA/NAS Training has also been successfully incorporated into
university level studies in maritime archaeology, for example, those conducted at
Flinders University (Staniforth, 2008). In 2012 the Nautical Archaeology Society
(NAS) gave permission for a pilot program of NAS training to be conducted in
Vietnam (at no cost) on a “one-off” basis. NAS Training was conducted at the
Institute of Archaeology building in Hanoi, over a three-day period during
November/December of 2012. Early in 2013 NAS granted a free NAS International
license to the Institute of Archaeology (IA) in Vietnam and the author was appointed
as the NAS Senior Tutor for Vietnam for a five-year term. With support from the
Nghe An province an NAS Introduction to Maritime Archaeology training course (1
day) was held in Vinh city on Thursday 16 October 2013. Thanks to the Hoi An
People's Committee, which agreed to sponsor NAS training at Hoi An in November
2013, an NAS Introduction courses (1 day) took place on 7 November followed by an
NAS Part 1 course (2 day) on 8 and 9 November 2013 (Fig. 2).
The NAS Training programme in Vietnam has been designed to increase awareness
at local, provincial and national levels about the extent and nature of Vietnam’s
underwater and maritime cultural heritage as well as about underwater and maritime
archaeology. With the assistance of partners, sponsors and contributors, NAS
training has been provided free of charge to more than 100 Vietnamese students,
government agency personnel, archaeologists and others in order to raise
awareness about underwater cultural heritage and maritime archaeology in Vietnam.
Hopefully, this should help Vietnam to preserve and protect its underwater cultural
heritage see: http://www.themua.org/vietnam/nas.php

9

�Fig. 2 NAS practical training at the Nghe An Museum in
Vinh City, Nghe An, Vietnam. (Mark Staniforth)

University level teaching
UNESCO has suggested that the minimum qualification for an archaeologist is: “A
degree in archaeology or similar qualification recognized by the country in which the
archaeologist is working” see:
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-culturalheritage/underwater-heritage-tutorial/tutorial/
Throughput the world, tertiary qualifications at some level from undergraduate
degrees through to Doctoral level degrees from a fully accredited university are
usually seen as the basic qualifications required for professional underwater or
maritime archaeologists and underwater cultural heritage managers (Staniforth,
2008a; 2008b; 2009; 2010). Unfortunately university level teaching in maritime
archaeology is both limited and expensive in the Asia and the Pacific region, which
means that only a limited number of maritime archaeologists and underwater cultural
heritage managers have been able to benefit from this level of training. One of the
few examples where university level training has been made available at no cost to
participants, was organized partly using ICUCH networks, when the Maritime
Archaeology Program (MAP) at Flinders University was awarded funding from Aus
AID, the Australian federal government’s overseas aid organization, to bring 11 midcareer professionals involved in maritime archaeology from the Asia-Pacific region to
Australia for a 6 week training program (Staniforth, 2011). Mid-career professional
10

�training like this goes some way to fulfilling social justice and equity aspirations to
make university level teaching in maritime archaeology available to more people in
the Asia and the Pacific region (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Opening ceremony of the Flinders University Intensive Progam on
Underwater Cultural Heritage in Adelaide, South Australia in 2009. (Jun Kimura)

Language of Instruction
There is no doubt that for training courses with participants who come from a number
of different countries, such as the UNESCO Foundation courses, there is a need for
a single common language. One result is that most previous training activities in the
Asia and the Pacific region have been conducted in English. Nevertheless, in order
to successfully conduct public awareness raising and training within an individual
country, the content really has to be interpreted and translated into the national
language.
The language of instruction was seen as one of the key issues for NAS Training in
Vietnam, for example, where it was clear that we needed to have the training both
interpreted into spoken Vietnamese and translated into written Vietnamese.
Fortunately the Institute of Archaeology (IA) has been able to provide interpretation
services for NAS training and, in addition, the entire content of the NAS Introduction
course (11 sessions) has now been translated into Vietnamese. One of the benefits
of this approach has been to increasingly involve IA archaeologists in NAS training
with the stated aim of allowing NAS training to be primarily taught by Vietnamese
archaeologists within five years. In 2013 IA was also able to establish an Underwater
11

�Archaeology Department, headed by Dr. Le Thi Lien, which was, in a small part, as a
result of the NAS training initiative and will aid NAS training over the next few years.
Conclusion
ICOMOS, ICUCH and NAS can and do provide networks, advice, support and
training programmes but they are by no means the only ways of conducting these
activities. It is hoped that some approaches outlined in this paper can be adopted
and adapted by other countries, organizations and individuals in the Asia and the
Pacific region as the basis for effective collaboration and co-operation in awareness
raising, training and teaching of underwater archaeologists and underwater cultural
heritage managers.
Acknowledgements
I would like to particularly thank my colleagues in ICUCH, NAS and at Flinders
University for their contributions to, and support for, the networks, programmes,
projects and field schools that this paper discusses. Also the enthusiasm and interest
of the trainees and students has helped to make these activities productive as well
as enjoyable to conduct. I hope that they enjoy their involvement with underwater
cultural heritage as much as I have.
References
Bowens, A., (Ed.), 2008. Underwater Archaeology: The NAS Guide to Principles

and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell and the Nautical Archaeology Society,
Portsmouth.
ICOMOS., 2008. Eger-Xi’an Principles for the International Scientific Committees of
ICOMOS. ICOMOS, Paris.
Jeffery, W., 2006. Federated States of Micronesia. In S. Dromgoole (Ed.), The
Protection of the Underwater Cultural heritage: National Perspectives in light of the
UNESCO Convention 2001. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden: 145-59.
Kimura, J., Staniforth, M., Lien, L. T., and Sasaki, R., 2014. Naval Battlefield
Archaeology of the Lost Kublai Khan Fleets. International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, Vol. 43 (1): 76-87.
Lê, Thị Liên., Nguyễn,Thị Mai Hương., Pham, C., Staniforth, M., Delgado, J. P.,
Kimura, J., and Sasaki, R., 2011. Understanding the Bach Dang battlefield from
recent research results. In M. Staniforth, Jennifer Craig, Sheldon Clyde Jago-on,
Bobby Orillaneda, Ligaya Lacsina (Eds.), Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific Regional
12

�Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage. Asian Academy for Heritage
Management. Manila: 77-90.
Maarleveld, T. J., Guerin, U., and Egger, B., (Eds.), 2013. Manual for Activities
directed at Underwater Cultural Heritage: Guidelines to the Annex of the 2001
UNESCO Convention. UNESCO, Paris.
Manders, M. J., 2010. Dutch involvement in Asian Underwater Cultural Heritage
management: building upon old connections. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 5
(2): 117-127.
Manders, M. R., and Underwood, C. J., (Eds.), 2012. Training Manual for the
UNESCO Foundation Course on the Protection and Management of Underwater
Cultural heritage in Asia and the Pacific. UNESCO Bangkok, Bangkok.
Moran, V., and Staniforth, M., 1998.The AIMA/NAS Part 1 Training Program. The
Bulletin of the Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 22: 137-138.
Parthesius, R., and Jeffery, W. F., 2012. Building country-relevant programmes in
the context of the implementation of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of
Underwater Cultural Heritage. In S. J. van der Linde, M. H. van den Dries, N.
Schlanger and C. G. Slappendel (Eds.), European Archaeology Abroad: global
settings, comparative perspectives. Sidestone Press, Leiden: 267-286.
Prott, L. V., 2006. Finishing the Interrupted Voyage: Papers of the UNESCO AsiaPacific Workshop on the 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater
Cultural Heritage. Institute of Art and Law, Leicester.
Shuguang, L., (Ed.), 2011. 2010 International Meeting on Protection, Presentation
and Valorisation of Underwater Cultural Heritage. Chongqing, China: Proceedings.
Cultural Relics Press, Beijing: 433-4.
Staniforth, M., 2008a. Strategies for teaching Maritime Archaeology in the 21st
century. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 3: 93-102.
Staniforth, M., 2008b. Collaboration is the key: Developing field and work skills in
collaboration with government, museum and commercial underwater cultural
heritage organizations. In R. Radic Rossi, A. Gaspari and A. Pydyn (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the European Association of
Archaeologists (Zadar, Croatia, 18-23 September 2007. Session: Underwater
Archaeology), Hrvatskoarheoloskodrustvo – Profil, Zagreb: 111-120.

13

�Staniforth, M., 2009. Work-Integrated Learning in Maritime Archaeology: An
Australian Approach. The International Journal of Learning, Vol. 16 (8) Publisher
Site: http://www.Learning-Journal.com
Staniforth, M., 2010. Issues in Education in Maritime Archaeology. In R. Amoeda, S.
Lira and C. Pinheiro (Eds.), Heritage 2010: Heritage and Sustainable Development.
Greenlines Institute for Sustainable Development, Evora, Portugal: 315-322.
Staniforth, M., 2011. The Flinders University Intensive Program in Underwater
Cultural Heritage Management.

In M. Staniforth, Jennifer Craig, Sheldon Clyde

Jago-on, Bobby Orillaneda, Ligaya Lacsina (Eds.), Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific
Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage. Asian Academy for Heritage
Management, Manila: 613-623.
Mark Staniforth is an Adjunct Senior Research Fellow in the School of Geography
and Environmental Science at Monash University and an Adjunct Associate
Professor at Flinders University in Australia. He has been an ICOMOS member for
two decades and he is an expert member of two ICOMOS International Scientific
Committees - ICOMOS - ICUCH (International Committee on the Underwater
Cultural Heritage) and ICOMOS - ICAHM (International Committee on
Archaeological Heritage Management). Mark is also the NAS Senior Tutor for
Vietnam. Mark was the Convener of the Maritime Archaeology Program (MAP) in the
Department of Archaeology at Flinders University for 14 years (1997-2010) where he
taught topics in undergraduate and postgraduate maritime archaeology and
underwater cultural heritage management.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="4">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="10">
                  <text>Session 1: UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and International Cooperation</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="11">
                  <text>The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is a specialized agency of the UN. It has 195 Member States. The UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage adopted in 2001 is the international communityâ€™s response to the destruction of submerged archaeological sites by treasure hunters and industrial activities. It reflects the growing recognition of the need to ensure the same protection to underwater heritage as that already accorded to land-based heritage. It provides legal protection, enables States Parties to adopt common approaches to preservation and provides effective professional guidelines on underwater cultural heritage. The Convention and its Annex have been officially endorsed by most professional associations of underwater archaeologists.&#13;
The 2001 Convention entered into force on 2 January 2009. Today it has been ratified by 44 States. The objectives of the UNESCO session are to:&#13;
* Enhance understanding of the 2001 Convention in terms of its background, its benefits, its ethics and its potentials for contributing to sustainable development,&#13;
* Identify a strategy for enhancing capacity in the protection and research of underwater cultural heritage,&#13;
* Identify a way forward for increasing ratifications of the 2001 Convention by the countries in the region.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="12">
                  <text>Etienne Clement </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5198">
                <text>The Role of ICOMOS, ICUCH and NAS in Underwater Cultural Heritage Protection in the Pacific</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5199">
                <text>This paper outlines the role played by ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites), which is an international non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to the conservation of the world's cultural monuments and sites and specifically in awareness raising and training related to underwater cultural heritage protection. ICOMOS membership requires an individual to be a practicing cultural heritage professional or have professional qualifications in the fields of conservation or preservation such as architect, archaeologist, town planner, and engineer, administrator of heritage, art historian or archivist. ICOMOS International Scientific Committees (ISCs) (such as ICUCH) are the vehicles through which ICOMOS brings together, develops and serves its worldwide membership according to their fields of specialized interest. ICOMOS expects the ISCs to be at the heart of scientific inquiry and exchange in their domains and to share knowledge among them to foster multi-disciplinary approaches to heritage protection and management. ICUCH (International Committee on Underwater Cultural Heritage) was founded in 1991 by ICOMOS Australia to promote international cooperation in the protection and management of underwater cultural heritage and to advise ICOMOS on issues related to underwater cultural heritage around the world. ICUCH currently has ten members from the Asia and the Pacific region and this paper will discuss the role of ICUCH in the region. Furthermore ICUCHâ€™s mission will only be achieved in conjunction with other stakeholders, such as the Nautical Archaeology Society (NAS). NAS training aims to increase public awareness at local, provincial and national levels about the extent and nature of underwater and maritime cultural heritage as well as about underwater and maritime archaeology.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5200">
                <text>Mark Staniforth, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5201">
                <text>Van Tilburg, H.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5202">
                <text>Tripati, S.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5203">
                <text>Walker Vadillo, V.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5204">
                <text>Fahy, B.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5205">
                <text>Kimura, J.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="35">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 1 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="465" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="257">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/127f4e9676ecc066f564fa683dca32da.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4263c4ec4942ac6ab6327a6125ff0ed8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5390">
                    <text>The Sacred and Cultural Maritime Sites of Fiji-An Inventory
in the Making
Elia Nakoro
Archaeology Department
The Fiji Museum
Thurston Gardens
Suva, Fiji
Email: rocksfel@yahoo.com.au
Abstract
The Fiji Museum Archaeology Department, since 2015, has begun
inventorying the different underwater and maritime sites in Fiji. Ratification
of the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater
Cultural Heritage and review of the legislation on the Preservation of
Objects of Archaeological and Palaeontological Interest Act (Chapter 264)
has had little fruition due to limitations in manpower and resources.
The Fiji Museum has however taken first steps towards realizing the
amendment of the legislation by developing and drafting an overarching
policy for the institution. The Fiji Museum continues to deliberate on the
draft policy encompassing all aspects of its services, which includes
underwater and maritime cultural heritage sites, to ensure that Fiji’s
cultural heritage is protected.
This paper will elaborate on the different types of underwater/maritime
cultural heritage sites in Fiji and the inventory process of documenting and
creating a database, including challenges and opportunities. It will
highlight the importance of the database in assisting the Fiji Museum in its
work to raise awareness and provide advice to Government and relevant
authorities in the respect, preservation and protection of these submerged
historical treasures.
The paper will also highlight the various agencies with common goals to
protect underwater cultural sites and discuss the importance of interagency collaboration.
Key words: Cultural heritage, maritime, preservation, and protection

�Introduction
The Fiji Islands
The island nation of Fiji encompasses over 300 volcanic islands. About
100 of these are inhabited, rich in biodiversity and cultural heritage.
Fiji is located in the tropics of the southern hemisphere and has a total
land area of approximately 18,300km2 that covers the region positioned
between a latitude of 12°N-21°S and longitude 176°E-178°W (Nakoro,
2014).

Fig 1: Map of the Fiji Islands. (Fiji Museum)
The Republic of the Fiji Islands is a multicultural nation with a tapestry of
cultural traditions of Indigenous Fijians (iTaukei), Indians, Europeans,
Chinese and other minority cultures. While all the various cultures can be
linked to the underwater heritage of the nation through shipwrecks, the

�iTaukei people are custodians to a special, sacred and mysterious
connection to the land, which includes sacred underwater or maritime
sites.
In capturing the fascinating connection between the sacred maritime sites
and its owners, the Archaeology Department embarked on a digitization
project in 2015 to document details pertaining to the sites and protection
under legislative powers1 entrusted to the Fiji Museum. Utilizing the basic
Microsoft Access tool, the department developed its maritime sites
database.
The Fiji Museum
The Fiji Museum is located in a historically significant site within an old
fortified village that was called Suva. During the expansion of the city, the
inhabitants of the old settlement were relocated across the harbor. Today,
the area known as the Thurston Gardens complements the Fiji Museum
in the background. Currently under the jurisdiction of the City Council, the
Thurston Gardens have great potential for a facelift with plans in the
pipelines for this to eventuate before the end of 2017. Adjacent to the
Gardens is the historic and newly refurbished Albert Park where the
monoplane Southern Cross, piloted by Sir Charles Kingsford Smith made
a safe landing on its first transpacific flight from Hawaii to Fiji en route to
Australia in 1928. Similarly the northwestern fringe contains the remnants
of the World War II underground tunnels and the Allied forces military
headquarters, which now accommodates the residence of the British High
Commission and Fiji’s presidential palace and compound

�Fig. 2: Location of Fiji Museum. (Google Earth)
Since its establishment in 1904, the Fiji Museum has been governed by
two legislations - the Fiji Museum Act and the Preservation of Objects of
Archaeological and Palaeontological Interest (POAPI) Act, enacted in
1940. The latter, which is administered by the Archaeology department of
the institution, is the legal instrument covering the protection of cultural
heritage sites in Fiji. This legislation has a more generalized definition of
cultural heritage where underwater cultural heritage sites such as
shipwrecks, planes, sunken villages, islands and the likes are not
specifically mentioned but in the clause which reads ‘…or any objects of
archaeological, anthropological, ethnological, prehistoric and historic
significance....’ covers any form of culturally significant sites and objects
without distinction of their location. As such the Fiji Museum, Archaeology
Department with limited manpower and resources tries to cover all
aspects of Fijian cultural heritage.
In early 2017, the institution underwent a change in leadership involving
the designation of a new Director and Board of Trustees members. The

�driving force behind changes to the Museums’ priorities, new leadership
identified gaps in legislation of the safety of cultural heritage sites in Fiji,
as a target area to be addressed. The Board endorsed the review of the
legislation and the Archaeology Department is currently in the process of
forming the relevant committees to spearhead this process. These
committees will be tasked with development of policies to strengthen the
role of the department and its legislation. The Convention on Underwater
Cultural Heritage has also been highlighted as an ideal approach in the
near future.
The Archaeology Department
Cabinet endorsed the legislation that governs the work of the Archaeology
Department in 1940, however the Archaeology unit of the Fiji Museum
was not formally established until over 5 decades later in1995. Since its
establishment, the Archaeology Department has been involved in the
identification, documentation and protection of terrestrial archaeological
and cultural heritage sites of the nation. This includes the protection of
ancestral old village sites, sacred grounds, cemeteries, caves, or any
prehistoric or historic significant places discovered from the impacts of
development.
Today, the Archaeology unit at the Fiji Museum is comprised of four staff
members who look after the entire Fijian group of islands. At present the
team, focuses much of its efforts on terrestrial cultural heritage sites
meeting an influx of community requests to survey, record, document and
protect places of cultural heritage significance against the ever-looming
threats of development. Most of these issues are related to a complicated
land acquisition system that was developed in the early stages of Fiji’s
colonial administrative system.

�The Archeology department plays a crucial role in the implementation of
Archaeological Impact Assessments (AIA) in line with Environment Impact
Assessments (EIA) for national development projects such as tourism
development, infrastructural development, agriculture, and other land use
development.
In addition to this, the department is engaged in national projects for
climate change mitigation and reducing carbon emissions through carbon
trade with the Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest
Degradation and Foster Conservation (REDD+) and the Mangrove
Ecosystem Conservation and Livelihood (MESCAL) projects. This
includes the setting up of new forest reserves where a rapid survey is
warranted. The Archaeology team’s role in these projects is to identify
cultural heritage sites within the earmarked forest boundaries and to
examine and record the ancient forest system - in particular, evidence of
the impacts of human activities on natural systems.
The Archaeology Department is mandated under the same legislation to
issue archaeological research permits for local and international
researchers and field schools. During the course of the research, the
officers of the Archaeology Department are required to be present
providing advice to researchers, conducting the various traditional
protocols on their behalf and ensuring that proper procedures itemized in
the research permits are carried out.
This paper will explore and discuss the different types of underwater
cultural heritage sites in Fiji with focus on traditional maritime sites. It will
highlight the inventory process of documentation and the creation of a
database to assist in the preservation and protection of these submerged
historical treasures.

�The paper will also feature the various institutions or agencies with mutual
goals to protect underwater cultural sites and discuss the importance of
stakeholder collaboration.
Maritime Cultural Sites Database
Fiji is one of the more developed nations in the Pacific region making it
particularly vulnerable to the destruction and loss of significant cultural
features related to the history and identity of its people. With limited
resources and manpower, the Archaeology Department is at the forefront
of defending the nation’s cultural heritage from such threats. At present
the department manages six databases, as listed below:
1. Terrestrial Cultural Heritage Sites
2. Traditional maritime cultural heritage sites
3. Shipwrecks
4. Excavated Archaeological Research Materials
5. Lapita Sites
6. Oral History recordings
Excavated archaeological research materials that are kept in the
department’s storage facility and oral history recordings are managed
using the Microsoft Access platform.
Terrestrial cultural sites, maritime heritage sites, shipwrecks, and Lapita
sites, on the other hand are maintained using the Geographic Information
System (GIS) program ArcGIS. Since the information has spatial
attributes, the ArcGIS program is an appropriate tool for such systematic
recording, information analysis, mapping, and data sharing within national
authorities on the preservation of cultural heritage sites.
After each survey, the Archaeology team members marked each site
visited using a Global Positioning System (GPS). The GPS data is later

�transcribed for report compilation and corresponds to the national register
or database. The database is rather a useful tool in decision-making,
advising authorities dealing with national development on the existence of
cultural heritage sites in earmarked project areas.
Given that a small team looks after the various functions of the
Archaeology unit for the whole country, managing four separate
databases on ArcGIS was a challenging responsibility that fell solely on
the Head of Department. A combination of limited human resources, a
lack of capacity in team members and no centralized system contributed
to a constant backlog in updating the database.
Ideally, the vast information database managed by the Archeology
department needed to be maintain on a single database as all databases
shared common coordinates from the various sites surveyed, the only
difference being in the key thematic areas.
In June (2017), the Fiji Museum successfully installed a file server for a
centralized mechanism available to all the museum departments. This
was a great boost to the institution, as each department ceased to have
separate databases of the same contents to manage. Soon after the
installation of the server infrastructure, the Archaeology Department
embarked on a weeklong staff capacity building in the areas of field
mapping with the use of conventional survey methods, the use of GPS,
GIS and database management including Microsoft Access. This enabled
all team members to update the database in a shared folder as and when
needed, freeing up time for departmental heads to carry out their
supervisory functions improving productivity greatly.
Merging the 4 data sets was advantageous and crucial to improve
database management efficiency while ensuring that all four themes of

�terrestrial sites, maritime sites, shipwrecks and Lapita sites are equally
represented in the Archaeology departments work.
Legislation Pertaining to the Protection of Underwater Cultural
Heritage Sites in Fiji
Currently, the overarching legislation (POAPI Act) makes feeble reference
to the safeguarding of underwater or maritime sites. However, it is
encouraging that there are agencies that share similar goals to protect
Fiji’s cultural heritage including underwater sites. In the past year, these
agencies have taken a stance on the activities within Fiji’s Exclusive
Economic Zone propelled by a nationwide implementation of marine
protected areas towards the sustainable monitoring and use of marine
resources as food supply and transport. The global concerns of mitigating
climate change and the different treaties and conventions that Fiji is a
signatory to have elevated these agencies to take action.
Below is a list of these agencies, which include Government, civil society
organizations and regional institutions now in the forefront of maintaining
marine protected areas.
Government Agencies
1. Maritime Safety Authority of Fiji (MSAF)
MSAF is responsible for the registering, regulations and safety of shipping
services and shipping routes in Fiji. As a member state of the International
Maritime Organization (IMO), the United Nations specialized agency with
responsibility for the safety and security of shipping and the prevention of
marine pollution by ships, Fiji is trying to secure the international
recognition for the protection of two significant sea areas recognized for
ecological, socio-economic, cultural and scientific reasons which may be
vulnerable to damage by international maritime activities (www.imo.org,

�16th July 2017) under the Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) special
protection action by IMO.
Fiji has several maritime ports of entries and two of these have been
identified as meeting the criteria for PSSA. This further enhances the local
regulations in the protection of maritime cultural significant areas. The two
sites, the Beqa Passage and the Vuda Passage, may have shipwrecks
and other sensitive cultural components necessary for submission to have
the passages protected. The Archaeology Department is a new member
of the taskforce for the PSSA. On the 14th of July, 2017, the taskforce held
its second meeting since its establishment and many stakeholders
attended. The PSSA taskforce is in the early stages of information
gathering and report submissions.
2. The Department of Environment (DOE)
Mandated to protect the environment and regulate development
procedures in the country, the DOE, under the Environment Management
Act (EMA-2005) is vital in the protection of coastal cultural sites. In July
2017, the Fiji Museum was consulted to assist in the protection of three
World War II lookouts constructed out at sea threatened by a development
application for the construction of a jetty.
3. The Fijian Naval Unit under Republic of the Fiji Military Forces
The Fiji Navy is responsible for the maritime needs in boarder control such
as watching over Fiji’s exclusive economic zone ad organizing task and
rescue missions. Similar to any naval force, the Fiji Navy is equipped with
a dive team that recently (2017) spearheaded a diving expedition to
assess the discovery of seven chests in Fiji waters. The chests were
believed to contain explosives and arms. Unofficial information stated that

�these would have been WWII materials-mine. The Fiji Museum continues
to work closely with the Fiji Police to confirm the contents of the chests.
4. iTaukei Affairs Board (iTAB)
i-Taukei Affairs Board is the Government arm that looks after any matters
concerning indigenous Fijians or i-Taukeis. With crucial mandates for
safeguarding Fiji’s indigenous culture and traditions, it is vital that iTAB is
aware of the significance of the maritime sites as all the sacred sites are
of iTaukei origins. iTAB has access to legal expertise to be able to assist
with the protection of intangible cultural heritage.
Non-Governmental Organizations
5. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
The IUCN is heavily engaged in conservation works in the Pacific and in
Fiji, with a regional office in Suva, Fiji. The organization has signed a
Memorandum of Agreement with the Fiji Government to provide advice
and review legal frameworks, policies, legislations and conventions in
safeguarding and protecting Fiji’s environment. In 2016, IUCN included
the cultural heritage sites (an area that is usually overlooked) in its list of
marine protected areas and consulted the Fiji Museum for information and
advice (H. Wendt and N. Yakub, personal communication, July 12, 2017).
Regional Institutions
6. The Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC)
Similar to the role of the IUCN, SPC has the expertise and equipment for
underwater surveys. SPC also has a unit that looks after the cultural
affairs of the Pacific region and is aware of the significance of underwater
cultural heritage.

�While these institutions and agencies have a shared vision to promote the
protection of Fiji’s underwater cultural heritage sites, there is a need to
inform these stakeholders on the role and functions of the Fiji Museum in
safeguarding UCH. The Archaeology Department needs to lobby and
promote the significance of UCH and the need for collaboration between
all stakeholders involved.
Sacred Maritime Sites
Fiji is filled with many traditional or cultural sites and practices which
cannot be explained with scientific knowledge. Attempts by Mr. David
Attenborough, a BBC documentary reporter in the early 60s were futile as
he tried to explain some of the practices he came across such as the fire
walkers of Beqa, the turtle calling in Koro, the fishes in the lake on Vanua
Balavu.
Below is captured some of the fascinating and respected maritime sites
that the Archaeology Department has already listed in its database:

�Fig. 1: Map showing the names of places mentioned in the Sacred
Maritime Sites section.

1. The sacred fishes of Naigani Island
On the eastern coast of mainland Viti Levu, the paramount chief of Verata,
Rokomoutu holds and can be identified with the traditional title 2of the
‘Ratu.’ It was said that when the first Fijian’s left Lake Tanganyika in Africa
for Fiji, the daughter of Lutunasobasoba (the chieftain of the group) asked
to take with her some pet fish. In Fiji, the fishes (Sardinella fijiense) known
as Daniva or sardines, were put in the Verata waters by the princess. So
catching the fish with a spear or using of fine nets or fishing lines were
prohibited. Normally the Trevallies would swim after the Daniva and push
them close to land and during this pursuit there would be a lot of splashing

�noise on the beach. People would normally go to the beach and pick the
Daniva.
When the fishes were in Verata, Rokomoutu, one day tried to use his
spear on them. He threw his spear, missed them and it landed on the
rocks. He slipped, hitting his knee on the rock (today, the mark of his spear
and his knee on the rocks are still evident). Furious, he said to the fishes,
“go down to Naigani (an island about 37.5 kilometers north of Verata as
shown on the map) where I will not see or hear you, and when I want to
drink boiled water, I will come down for you” (oral history recording with
Naigani village elder, 2004)
The people of Naigani would catch the Trevallies as they come close to
land with the sardines. Similar to the Norse folklore of Thor and his goats,
when consuming the Trevallies, the bones are not allowed to be broken.
The bones are then carefully placed back in the water where it comes
back to life. According to the people of Naigani, one can easily tell the
difference between a newly formed Trevally from an old one and this is a
traditional practice that is still carried out today.
2. The sacred passage between the island of Ovalau and Naigani
One of the oral accounts collected from Naigani was that there were two
cousins named Laginiwasa and Rakavono. One day, the cousins ate the
young germinating coconut palms, which is called ‘vara’ in the iTaukei
dialect. The vara had been planted by Laginiwasa’s father Ratu (chief)
Matanabalavu. Hearing Ratu Matanabalavu coming, Rakavono fled but
not before he was seen by Ratu Matanabalavu. Encountering Laginiwasa
and enraged at his behavior, Ratu Matanabalavu banished him from the
island. Laginiwasa took his double hull canoe (drua) and fled to the island
of Moturiki which is south of Ovalau Island (Ramoli and Nunn, 2001).

�A few days later Ratu Matanabalavu confronted Rakavono and told him
that he must leave the island as Laginiwasa had done. Lacking his own
drua, Rakavono swam to Rukuruku on the northwestern coast of Ovalau
island (Ramoli and Nunn, 2001).
According to the oral narrative, the path when Rakavono swam, is a warm
passage about 8 kilometers in distance. Several fishermen from both
Naigani and Ovalau have swam the passage without any swimming aid
stating that the warmth provided buoyancy and any cold water
encountered during the swim meant that the path where Rakavono swam
was not being followed.
3. The sacred stone of Matuku
Matuku is an island located in the Lau group (southeast of Viti Levu). It
was also the only island in the Lau group that was not conquered by the
Tongan army led by the Tongan prince, Enele Ma’afu’out’itonga (around
the 1840s). On the eastern end of the island, there is a stone which is
submerged during high tides. The stone, reddish in color is almost
rectangular in form and about 1 meter x 1.5 meters in dimension can be
found amidst beach cobbles near Levukaidaku village. This reddish stone
displays

traditional

relationships

between

Levukaidaku

and

the

neighbouring village, Raviravi. According to the oral accounts collected
from both villages, giant tidal waves occur instantaneously when a villager
from Raviravi walks past the stone.
Similarly, another reddish stone which is smaller in size is located about
20 meters west of the previous one happens to cause giant tidal waves
when it is disrespected through speech or action.

�The giant waves can only be calmed when a clan member from
Levukaidaku performs a ritual by covering the red stones with leaves from
a particular tree.
4. The sacred mosquito crevice, Matacaucau
Along the eastern coast of the main island, Viti Levu, there is a mysterious
maritime site. This is a crevice at the foot of a cliff at high water mark. The
crevice is called ‘Qara ni namu.’ Qara is opening and namu is mosquito.
The Qara ni namu contains mythical history. It is said that this was a gift
by Rokomoutu who was the leader of one of the migrating party from the
hills of Nakauvadra. While sailing across towards Verata Ucunivanua,
strong winds tore his sails and he decided to seek shelter close to land to
mend his sails. As a gift for the people that helped him, Rokomoutu
presented a parcel containing mosquitoes, which was supposed to be his
present to the Turaga na Ratu from Verata to awake him every morning.
This was instead gifted to the people of Matacaucau for their assistance.
The villagers of Matacaucau relayed stories that anyone who disturbed
the Qara ni namu would suffer dire consequences in that mosquitoes
would swarm the village resistant to repellents and sleeping nets. It was
also relayed that during ceremonial festivities young men would
purposefully stir the Qara ni namu to

Conclusion
Pacific Islanders are deeply connected with the ocean. The ocean as the
source of life, the medium for transportation between islands and
sustaining livelihoods, much of the Pacific’s history is related to the use of
the ocean where some of it are now underwater.

�Similarly, the Fiji Islands is littered with historical sites related to maritime
heritage. This paper offers a glimpse of the diversity of distribution of
maritime heritage sites, most of which are connected through myths and
legends and have unexplainable occurrences. However, these mysterious
heritage sites are considered in the iTaukei language as the ‘sau ni vanua’
or the power of the land and its people.
On the contrary, current climatic conditions should also be considered. Fiji
is experiencing the threats of global sea level rise where a total of 64
coastal villages are earmarked for relocation. More than 3 villages have
already been relocated under the National Climate Change Fund and the
Archaeology Department is mapping a proactive strategic plan on the
potential of documenting all community related heritage in affected
villages which will add to the list of underwater heritage in the future.
Given that human and financial resources are lacking, the Fiji Museum
will slowly proceed and continue to document underwater cultural heritage
sites while working in collaboration with other government agencies and
NGOs in creating awareness on the significance and protection of UCH.
Endnotes
1
Preservation of Objects of Paleontological Interest Act: (Laws of Fiji,
Chapter 264)
2
Title, name by which a person or group is identified, the (usually honorific)
name by which a kin-group is known or, less commonly, their plant, fish
or other animal (Gatty, 2009).

References
Gatty R, 2009, Fijian-English Dictionary with notes on Fijian culture and
natural history, Publication under the Auspices of the Southeast Asia
program Cornel University, New York.

�Government of Fiji, 1940. Chapter 264: Preservation of Objects of
Archaeological and Palaeontological Interest in Laws of Fiji. Government
Printery, Suva, Fiji Islands, Pp 2
Nakoro E. 2014. The Fiji Museum’s Efforts Towards the Preservation of
Underwater Cultural Heritage Sites in Fiji, Session 3, Underwater Cultural
Heritage, Museums, and Sustainable Development, the Proceedings of
2014 Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage,
May 12-16, Honolulu, Hawaii. Pp 99-112.
Nakoro E. and Matararaba S. 2014, Archaeological Assessment Report:
Report prepared for the Vanua of Waimaro Levulevu specifically for the
villages of Verata Ucunivanua and Matacaucau, Fiji Museum, Suva, Fiji.
Ramoli A. and Nunn P. 2001, Naigani Island and its historical connections
with Ovalau and Moturiki Islands: convergences between legend and fact,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247769057, accessed on the
16th July, 2017.
BBC, 1960, The People of Paradise, video, episodes 1 &amp; 2

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="21">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="75">
                  <text>2017 Session 1: Underwater and Maritime Archaeology and Capacity  Building in the Pacific Islands</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="76">
                  <text>The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) spanning human history from the Stone Age to the atomic age.  Since the first Pacific UCH Workshop held in Solomon Islands in 2009, the Pacific island nations have been progressing in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme by awareness raising, research and capacity building activities through inter-disciplinary cooperation and promoting synergy with the Pacific World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Programmes. Notable progresses include, among others, the SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA) Outcome Document of the 3rd UN International Cooperation on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) (Samoa, 2014) that contains references to the importance of UCH for sustainable development of SIDS and SIDS ratification of the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001), as well as the enhanced cooperation between universities in the Pacific islands and professional training institutions through UNESCO University Twinning and Networking Programme (UNITWIN) for Underwater Archaeology. &#13;
&#13;
With this as its background, the session â€œUnderwater and maritime archaeology and capacity building in the Pacific Islandsâ€ will be held with the aims to: i) share information on recent progress in awareness raising, research and capacity building activities in underwater and maritime archaeology in the Pacific Islands, ii) identify priority actions, iii) foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.  The session especially welcomes presentations focusing on the protection and management of UCH belonging to indigenous community shared UCH in the Pacific, addressing challenges and opportunities facing Pacific SIDS in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme and the promotion of the UCH Convention, presenting good practice in ensuring the effective engagement of Pacific island countries and community in UCH management for their sustainable development, and proposing collaborative projects in this area.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="77">
                  <text>Akatsuki Takahashi&#13;
UNESCO Office for the Pacific States, Samoa</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="78">
                  <text>Andrew Viduka, Maritime and Commonwealth Heritage, Australian Government,</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="79">
                  <text>Nicolas Bigourdan, Western Australian Museum</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5384">
                <text>The Sacred and Cultural Maritime Sites of Fiji-An Inventory in the Making</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5385">
                <text>The Fiji Museum Archaeology Department, since 2015, has begun inventorying the different underwater and maritime sites in Fiji. Ratification of the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and review of the legislation on the Preservation of Objects of Archaeological and Palaeontological Interest Act (Chapter 264) has had little fruition due to limitations in manpower and resources. The Fiji Museum has however taken first steps towards realizing the amendment of the legislation by developing and drafting an overarching policy for the institution. The Fiji Museum continues to deliberate on the draft policy encompassing all aspects of its services, which includes underwater and maritime cultural heritage sites, to ensure that Fijiâ€™s cultural heritage is protected. This paper will elaborate on the different types of underwater/maritime cultural heritage sites in Fiji and the inventory process of documenting and creating a database, including challenges and opportunities. It will highlight the importance of the database in assisting the Fiji Museum in its work to raise awareness and provide advice to Government and relevant authorities in the respect, preservation and protection of these submerged historical treasures. The paper will also highlight the various agencies with common goals to protect underwater cultural sites and discuss the importance of interagency collaboration. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5386">
                <text>Elia Nakoro </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5387">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5388">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5389">
                <text>Elia Nakoro </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="39">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 1 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="307" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3600">
                <text>The Sea Route of the Sunken Ancient Vessel on the Seabed off Sinan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3601">
                <text>Mu-Byong Youn</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3602">
                <text>November 1977</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3603">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3604">
                <text>Mu-Byong Youn</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3605">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3606">
                <text>November 1977</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3607">
                <text>18-23</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="225">
            <name>Publication Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3608">
                <text>Korea Journal</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3609">
                <text>The Sea Route of the Sunken Ancient Vessel on the Seabed off Sinan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="10">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/5a1d178ee063643692aeb3f7a48d0ba9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5caa9671e99f98b4dbcc98e38dfb0c2f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="431">
                    <text>The sea stories and stone sails of Borobudur
Douglas Inglis
Texas A &amp; M University
PO Box 114, Waimanalo, HI, 96795 US
E-mail: divingarchaeology@gmail.com
Abstract
The most profound examples of ancient Southeast Asian ship iconography are found on
the walls of the 9th century Borobudur monument in central Java. As the contemporary
assemblage of nautical iconography from Southeast Asia is limited, the ship reliefs play
an important role in debates over trade and expansion in India, Indonesia and mainland
Southeast Asia.
The Borobudur ships are technical depictions, and contain data about rigging, rope use,
rowing configurations and outrigger construction. Elements in their design have
persisted independently as Indonesian watercraft evolved, including outriggers, bipod
masts, canted rectangular sails, and quarter rudders. Discussion has focused on
construction features, and scholars have made various assertions about how the
vessels might have been built, how they were used, and their origin.
The vessels' artistic context is often ignored. The ship reliefs are part of a religious
narrative which directly influenced how the panels were designed, how the ships were
portrayed, and how we should ultimately interpret them. The stories provide important
clues as to where each vessel was headed, who was aboard, and what is happening on
deck. Despite their detail, the Borobudur vessels should be interpreted cautiously, and
not as ancient blueprints. They are artistic renditions that were never meant to float they were meant to inspire.
Key words: Borobudur, bas-reliefs, Sailendra, Indonesia, Java, nautical archaeology

Introduction
The most informative examples of ancient Southeast Asian ship iconography are found
on the ninth century CE Borobudur monument in central Java (Fig. 1). Borobudur is a
massive terraced pyramid, decorated with thousands of bas-reliefs that tell stories from
the lives of the Buddha, Bodhisattvas and other saintly figures. Javanese artisans
depicted 11 boats within the 1,460 elaborately carved stone panels (Fig. 2). Due to the
quality of their technical detail, the artistic, religious, and narrative context of the
Borobudur vessels is often ignored. This is problematic, because the vessels are
1

�components of Buddhist narratives which directly influenced how the panels were
designed, how the ships were portrayed, and how we should interpret them. Moreover,
examining the Borobudur vessels in the context of their associated seafaring stories
provides unique insights into the Javanese perception of sailing, the ocean, and its
dangers.
Borobudur
Members of Java’s Śailendra Dynasty
erected Borobudur sometime between
780 and 832 CE (Miksic, 2010:29).
Viewed from above, Borobudur’s nine
terraced levels resemble a series of
nested concentric squares and circles.
Fig. 1: Eastern Indonesia, showing the location
of Borobudur

Thislayout is similar to that of a mandala,
a sacred diagram that represents the

structure of the universe (Miksic, 2010:37). The unique design of the monument has
generated more than a century of debate, yet its ultimate nature remains a mystery.
Borobudur seems to have been a place of pilgrimage and instruction. Over the centuries,
diverse groups of monks and devotees deposited thousands of votive stupas and clay
tablets at the monument (Ray, 2005:318). The visitors continued their pilgrimage as
they slowly circled the monument, ascending level by level. The panels on the lower
levels depict the core of Buddhist teaching: the Mahakarmavibhanga (laws of karma),
the Jātakas (stories of the Buddha's past incarnations), the Lalitavistara (stories from
the Buddha's final incarnation), and the Avadānas (stories of other enlightened beings)
(Soekmono, 1976:20-36). It is probable that once these basic lessons were mastered,
monks might have permitted select pilgrims to ascend to the upper levels containing the
more challenging and esoteric teachings of the Gandavyuha and Bhadracari (Miksic,
2010:71). Surrounded by reliefs of holy figures, miracles and magical stories, the visitor
was within a scared, mystical world (Miksic, 2010:46).

2

�The

Ship

Reliefs

and

Their

Artistic Context
Eleven

ships

Borobudur’s

are

depicted

reliefs.

They

in
are

remarkably technical depictions,
with data about rigging elements,
rope use, rowing configurations,
and
Fig. 2: Vessel I.b.86, Minister Hiru’s ship (from Van
Erp, 1923)

outrigger

construction.

Numerous scholars have used the
reliefs

to

expand

our

understanding of ancient sailing vessels including Van Erp (1923), Hornell (1946),
Mookerji (1957), Needham et al. (1978), Horridge (1982), Manguin (1993), Ray (1994),
Jahan (2006), and numerous others. Debate has focused on five outrigger vessels with
canted rectangular sails, bipod masts, and rowing galleries; they are most akin to kora
kora of the 16th and 17th century (Horridge, 1978:9). Due to their exquisite detail, the
Borobudur vessels are often treated as ancient blueprints, while their artistic context is
ignored. This is problematic, because the vessels are components of religious
narratives which directly influenced how the panels were designed, how the ships were
portrayed, and how we should interpret them.
The vessel depicted in panel I.b.86 has inspired several reconstructions. These sailing
hypotheses combined information from the reliefs with evidence available from artwork,
ethnography, archaeology, and indigenous seafaring traditions. These reconstructions
include Sarimanok, commissioned by Robert Hobman and sailed from Java to
Madagascar in 1985 (Dennison, 1985), Philip Beale’s full-sized replica, which was
launched in 2003 and sailed from Jakarta to Ghana (Beale, 2005), and the Spirit of
Majapahit, launched from Jakarta in 2010 on a goodwill voyage to Brunei, the
Philippines, Japan, China, Vietnam, Thailand, and Singapore (Antara, 2010, July 5).
Erik Peterson used I.b.86 as a set of blueprints to draft a detailed reconstruction (Fig. 3).
Petersen (2003:42) hypothesized that the artist "started by making a precise picture of
the ship as seen from the side.” To accommodate for some of the obviously skewed
3

�elements,

Peterson

suggested that the artist
changed perspective to
illustrate

the

rowing

galleries and outriggers
“as seen from above and
from in front." Peterson
executed

this

blueprint

experiment well, but there
are several problems with
the
1 Fig. 3: Erik Peterson’s elegant reconstruction of I.b.86 (from
Peterson 2003).

underlying

assumptions.
carvings

The
are

not

schematic side profiles with elements added in contrary views. The artist who created
I.b.86 was a master stone-carver (Van Erp, 1923:19). They chose to depict I.b.86 sailing
toward the viewer at an angle, an incredibly difficult illusion to attempt in bas-relief. To
show this perspective, the artist exaggerated the stagger of the bipod mast legs and
depicted the forward face of the outrigger booms, none of which would be visible in
schematic view. The ship tapers dramatically from stem to stern to further reinforce this
perspective. The point where the bow enters the water (marked by a furled wave) is
close to the lower part of the frame while the break of the stern is positioned much
higher. When combined with the tapered form, this slanted waterline gives the
impression of an oblique view. The artist tried to simulate this viewpoint in panel I.b.53
as well. The strake lines sweep up to the stem, and down the other side, giving us a
head on view of where they meet at the bow. More importantly, I.b.86 is not sitting
upright in the water. The artist went to great efforts to show the ship under full sail. The
canvas billows in the wind. The rigging is taut. The artist also exaggerated the forward
rake of both stem and stern to show that the vessel is heeling over on its side and
responding to the force of the wind (this was not corrected in Peterson’s model, which
has retained the extreme forward rake of the stem and sternpost).1The artist was
attempting to show a dramatic three-dimensional view.
4

�Peterson (2003:42) hypothesized that while the individuals aboard the vessels were
exaggerated, "the relative size of all the ship parts seemed to be accurately
represented.” In his reconstruction of I.b.86, Peterson insightfully suggested that each of
the modules in the rowing gallery accommodated one individual, and derived a
waterline length of 16.4m (23.4 m overall) by estimating that the distance between each
of the "modules" in the rowing gallery was 1 m (Petersen, 2003: 52). However, size is
seldom realistic in ancient iconography. Manguin (1993:263) correctly observes that
"with very few exceptions, iconographic representations of sailing vessels teach us little
of the structure and size of the craft depicted… …What one learns from these
depictions concerns the superstructure: how many masts and sails were used and what
their shape was, the position and number of rudders, and whether or not outriggers
were present."

Fig. 4: Multiple panel layouts. I.b.53 has three subdivision, while I.b.86 is divided in two (based
on images from www.photodharma.net, Anandajoti, 2013).

5

�Panel proportions and division are the primary factors determining the size, shape, and
complexity of the Borobudur vessels. The long panels of the first gallery are commonly
divided in half or in thirds (Fig. 4). These sub-divisions show related scenes, a
progression of events, or serve to clarify the characters and activities depicted. The
watercraft in half-panel format (I.b.86, I.b.88 and I.b.88) have much more detail than
those compressed into third-panel format (I.a.115, I.b.23, I.b.53, I.b.82) or those on the
Balustrades (I.B.a.54 and I.B.a.193).We can see the effects of compression when we
compare three of the outrigger-type ships, I.b.53, I.b.86, and I.b.88. Each has the exact
same configuration of an outrigger with three booms, rowing galleries, bowsprit, and two
bipod masts. I.b.53 is shortest, with 6 rowing stations and 6 sailors, I.b.88 has
10stations and 10 sailors, while I.b.86 is the longest with 12 stations and 19 sailors. One
could argue that each panel represents different sized vessels (Manguin, 2010:185).
This is not necessarily the case. Vertically, each ship consistently fills 90-95% of the
panel. The yard ends nearly reach the top of the frame, while there is only a small gap
of water between the outrigger and the bottom of the frame. I.b.86 fills a much greater
horizontal area than I.b.53, which makes I.b.86 appear long and skinny while I.b.53
looks practically tubby. They have the exact same configuration, and likely represent the
same type of vessel, just compressed and uncompressed according to the work space.
The point of these observations and critiques is that the Borobudur Vessels were not
created in a vacuum. They are framed by other scenes. The needs of those scenes
dictated how much space the artist could work with. If space wasample, they created a
beautiful, intricate vessel such as I.b.86. If they had to include more events, the artists
allocated less space to the ships and compressed their features, as with I.b.53.In
examining the details of these ships, it is important to remember that the vessels are
components of stories. The activities and individuals aboard are the centerpieces of the
narratives, while the watercrafts are elaborations.
Seafaring Stories and Buddhism
The maritime folklore associated with the Borobudur vessels is critical to their
interpretation. Sea stories have deep roots in the literature of India. The second
millennium BCE hymns of the Rigveda mention merchant voyages and sailing to distant
6

�islands.2 Although Vedic literature mentions incidents in the sea, it does not provide
evidence of extensive maritime travel (Ray, 2003:13). Shaw (2012:131) observes that
surprisingly, almost no travel by watercraft occurs in India’s great epics the
Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyana. Where sea travel is mentioned, it is in similes and
metaphor. For instance, the Karna Parva (Book 8 of the Mahābhārata) describes
overwhelming grief like "shipwrecked mariners struggling on the bosom of the vast
deep" (Ganguli, 1889:II) while the Anugita Parva (Book 14) compares joy to the elation
of castaways who have made it safely to shore (Ganguli, 1896:LXX). The absence of
sea travel likely reflects the prohibitions against travel by boat found in Indian scripture
and codes of law. The dharmasūstras goes as far as to equate sea travel and maritime
trade with crimes such as theft from a Brahmin (Shaw, 2012:13).3 Later codes of laws,
such as the Manusmṛti (from the beginning of the first millennium CE), deal with
practical aspects of riverine transport (Buhler, 1969: pt. 8).
Buddhist maritime folklore demonstrates a
familiarity with seafaring that is not found in
earlier Indian literature. The Jātakas contain
numerous references to ship building and
ship operation (Ray, 1994:180). The texts
knowledgably describe the roles of captain
and

crew

(Schlingloff,

1988:198).This

familiarity is not surprising, as the Jātaka and
Avadāna traditions matured in the first half of
the first millennium CE when a series of
Fig. 5: Vessel I. .a. , sho ing up raga
and the mouth of the ocean (from Van Erp,
1923)

trade booms between China, India and the
West drove new developments in sailing, the
expansion of maritime trading networks, and

the proliferation of ports (see Hall 1985; Ray 1994; Christie 1998; Manguin 2004).
During this period, developments in Buddhis men courage maritime development by
removing Brahmanical stigmas associated with travel, trade, and outsiders (Wheatley,
1983:272) and by embracing private wealth as a vehicle that could serve spiritual needs
7

�(Holcombe, 1999:280).Hall (1985:37) concludes that Mahāyāna Buddhism was a direct
response to the expanding world of commerce.
Pilgrims, missionaries, and monastics traveling along the trade networks between India
and China spread Buddhist teachings as they went. Kandahjaya (2004:73-79)
calculates that between the third and sixteenth centuries CE, approximately half of
these initial Buddhist “transmitters” followed the sea lanes that connected India, Sri
Lanka, Southeast Asia, China, and the Indonesian Archipelago. Buddhists established
monastic communities which conscientiously served the spiritual and material needs of
the laity. This created intimate connections with local villages and trading groups
resulting in an “interactive support system” (Ray 1994:122; Ray, 2005:320).
The resulting contact between Buddhists and maritime communities created conditions
conducive to the incorporation of maritime folklore into Buddhist scripture. Seafaring
stories would have been an important part of the oral traditions, song, dance, and
dramatic

performances

throughout

maritime

Asia

(Shaw

2012:132). 5Buddhists

capitalized on the excitement, danger, avarice, and courage inherent in maritime
folklore, and populated Jātakas and Avadānas with greedy merchants, daring sailors,
horrible sea monsters, oceans filled with treasure, islands populated by demons, spirits,
and goddesses. These dangers and temptations became components of a vast
metaphor in which the ocean represents saṃsāra, the endless cycle of death and rebirth,
and crossing the ocean represents the process of awakening, searching for
understanding, finding salvation, acquiring merit, and obtaining enlightenment (Shaw
2012:133; Tatelman 2013:114). Just as the Buddha offered salvation from the cycle of
saṃsāra, bodhisattvas developed into saviors that could be called on by sailors during
times of distress (specifically Avalokiteśvara/Padmapāni/Guānyīn, see Rao, 1991: 1856; Ray, 1994: 153; Ohnuma, 1998: 337-40).
Heroes and Mariners
Buddhist seafaring stories are unique, both in their presentation of the nautical/maritime
traveler as hero (Shaw, 2012:130), and in their focus on the lower classes of people(e.g.
traders, craftsmen, sailors, etc.) who are generally below description in the Vedic texts
(Hall, 1985:37). Borobudur’s intricate reliefs provide an intimate look at both heroes and
8

�sailors as they were conceived in the ninth century CE. An example is the story of
Suppāraka/Supāraga the blind navigator (Jātaka No. 463, the Suppāraka-jātaka and
Jātakamāla No. 14, Supāraga-jātaka), carved in panels I.B.a.53-55). Suppāraka (a
former incarnation of the Buddha) was a master navigator. He lost his sight as he grew
old, and retired from seafaring. A group of merchants (from Bharuch, west India)
beseeched him to join their voyage to suvarṇabhūmi, the lands of gold (often identified
as the Malay Peninsula).A gale blew their ship across sixseas until they eventually
came to the jaws of the ocean at the end of the earth. Suppāraka knew that only a
miracle could save them. He cried out "Friends, bathe me speedily in scented water,
and put new garments upon me, prepare a full bowl, and set me in front of the ship"
(Rouse, 1901: 90). Properly prepared, Suppāraka leapt to the bow, used both hands to
pour libations into the sea, and uttered his saccakiriyā, an assertion of truth so powerful
that it can transform reality (Fig. 5).6The power of his invocation propelled the ship back
across all six oceans in a single day (Rouse, 1901: 86-90).

Fig. 6: A close-up of figures from the relief, sho ing upp raka pouring out libations in
I.B.a.54, and prayer and ceremony from I.b.86 (based on images from www.photodharma.net,
Anandajoti, 2013).
9

�Without knowing the story of Suppāraka, it would be difficult to identify many aspects of
the crowded ship depicted in I.B.a.54. Clearly the sea monster is a source of distress.
However, without knowing the story, it would be impossible to know that it represents
the devouring mouth of the ocean at the edge of the world. The Jātakamāla (No. 14)
describes the behavior of the ship’s crew during the horrendous gale: “Some were
overcome by affliction and stood speechless with terror, some behaved courageously
and were busily working to avert the danger, and some were absorbed in prayers to
their tutelar deities”(Speyer, 1895: 177 vv. 8). The exact same three reactions (terror,
courage, and prayer) are mirrored in the stones of Borobudur. Some of the crew are
acting courageously, fighting to control the sail. One is standing on the yard and
wrestling with the sail while three are in the stern hauling on the ropes. Desperate
passengers in the center of the ship are jettisoning the cargo. Two sitting figures have
placed their faces in their hands, sobbing in despair. Another figure has his hand raised
high, perhaps calling on the gods. Thanks to the Pāli text (Jātaka No. 463), we know
that this figure on the bow is Suppāraka, pouring forth libations exactly as described in
the narrative (Rouse, 1901:89), Van Erp, 1923:16).
Importance of the Narratives
The actions and reactions of the nearly one-hundred figures aboard the Borobudur
Vessels provide important insights into how the Javanese perceived seafaring. Panel
I.b.23 shows mariners laboring to raise a sail while their comrades spend time catching
fish. Panels I.b.108, I.B.a.54, and I.B.a193 show us how seamen reacted to a storm –
some struggle to save the ship, a few pray to their gods, others yet cling to the rigging in
terror while their comrades are thrown into the tumultuous sea. Panel I.b.86 is famous
because it provides elaborate technical details of how Southeast Asian shipwrights
constructed watercraft during the classical age. However, I.b.86also teaches us a great
deal about ancient seafaring. Hiru’s voyage in the Rudrayana-avadana (Divyāvadāna
No. 37) is the epitome of a successful expedition; its depiction in I.b.86 correspondingly
shows us what an ideal voyage should look like. The crew are lively about the ship,
hauling on the rigging and setting the sails. They show bravery by conducting daring
acts at the masthead and bowsprit. They are religious and mindful, performing the

10

�proper rituals at the bow of the vessel (Fig. 6). Hiru sits high in the stern, vigilant, and
directing his ship to a successful landfall.
The Borobudur vessels are components of Buddhist narratives which directly influenced
how the panels were designed, how the ships were portrayed, and how we should
interpret them. Examination of the figures demonstrates that the Borobudur vessels can
provide more information about ancient seafaring than just the technical configurations
of Southeast Asian watercraft. They are material evidence of the intimate connection
between Buddhism and seafaring, and provide unique insights into the Javanese
perception of sailing, the ocean, and its dangers.

Footnotes
1

If we look at other vessels of this type, the forward rake of the stem is not as prominent, and the sternpost is actually raked
slightly aft (as with I.b.88 and I.b.108).
2

For examples, see Griffith (1896: v. I.25.7, I.48.3, I.56.2, I.116.3-5, and VII.88.3).

3

Shaw (2012: 130–1) also points out that Brahmins were traveling between India and Southeast Asia, so the prohibitions may not
have been as serious as these laws seem to indicate.
4

The Manusmṛti contains rules concerning
-

, 1969: pt. 8).

5

Shaw (2012:132) suggests that these vernacular versions probably thrived in ancient India, but were almost never preserved in
Hindu literature as high“
adventure, or
”
6

S

k

ā

“A
T
”
“T
”
w
k
k ā
k
w
w
w
S
ā k w
T
w
manifest the speakers wish, in this case, delivering the ship back to shore (Kong, 2012: 7–8).

w

l
and fact (in the case of

Bibliography
Anandajoti, Bhante, 2013. Photographs from the
Photodharma.net.
Accessed
August
http://www.photodharma.net/Indonesia/Indonesia.htm

Borobudur
10,

Monument.
2013,

Antara, 2010 (July 5). Spirit of Majapahit to sail to eight countries in pride building sea
voyage.
The
Jakarta
Globe.
Accessed
January
24,
2014,
http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/archive/spirit-of-majapahit-to-sail-to-eight-countries-inpride-building-sea-voyage/
Beale, Phillip, 2005. The Borobudur ship expedition – official website. Accessed
January 18, 2014, http://www.pioneerexpeditions.com/borobudur/index.htm
11

�Dennison, Richard, 1985. Flight of the Sarimanok. Orana Films.
Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trans.), 1889. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa,
Vol. 3, Book 8: Karna-Parva. Bharata Press, Calcutta.
Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trans.), 1896. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa,
Vol. 4, Book 14: Augnita-Parva. Bharata Press, Calcutta.
Griffith, Ralph T.H (trans.), 1896. Hymns of the Rig Veda, Vol. I. E. J. lazarus and Co:
Benares.
Hall, Kenneth R., 1985. Maritime Trade and State Development in Early South East
Asia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Holcombe, Charles, 1999. Trade-Buddhism: Maritime Trade, Immigration, and the
Buddhist Landfall in Early Japan. Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 119 (2):
280-292.
Hornell, James, 1946. Water transport: origins &amp; early evolution. University Press,
Cambridge, England.
Horridge, G. Adrian, 1978. The Design of Planked Boats of the Moluccas. National
Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London.
Horridge, G. Adrian. 1982. The lashed-lug boat of the eastern archipelagoes, the Alcina
MS and the Lomblen whaling boats. Trustees of the National Maritime Museum,
Greenwich, London.
Jahan, Shahnaj Husne, 2006. Re-examining ‘Borobudur Ships’ as Evidence of Maritime
Contact with South Asia. In Adalbert J. Gail, Gerd J. R. Mevissen, and Klaus Bruhn
(Eds.), anamālā: Festschrift A.J. Gail, Weidler Buchverlag, Berlin: 78-86.
Kandahjaya, Hudaya, 2004. A Study on the Origin and Significance of Borobudur.
Thesis (Ph.D.) Graduate Theological Union, Berkley.
Kong, Choy Fah, 2012. Saccakiriyā the belie in the p
Buddhist tradition.Choy Fah Kong,Singapore.

er

true speech in heravāda

Krom, N. J., 1927. Barabudur: Archaeological Description. Vols. I. Martinus Nijoff, The
Hague.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves, 1993. Trading Ships of the South China Sea. Shipbuilding
Techniques and Their Role in the History of the Development of Asian Trade Networks.
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 36 (3): 253-280.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves, 2010. The Ships on the Borobudur Reliefs. In John. N. Miksic,
Noerhadi Magestari, Jan Fontein, Timbul Maryono, and Idham Bachtiar Setiadi (Eds.),
Borobudur: majestic, mysterious, magnificent, Taman Wisata Candi Borobudur,
Prambanan &amp; Ratu Boko; Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia:180-185.
12

�Miksic, John N., 2010. Borobudur in the Beginning. In John. N. Miksic, Noerhadi
Magestari, Jan Fontein, Timbul Maryono, and Idham Bachtiar Setiadi (Eds.), Borobudur:
majestic, mysterious, magnificent, Taman Wisata Candi Borobudur, Prambanan &amp; Ratu
Boko; Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia:26-75.
Mookerji, Radha Kumud. 1957. Indian shipping: a history of the seaborne trade and
maritime activity of the Indians from the earliest times. Orient Longmans, Bombay.
Needham, Joseph, Wang Ling, and Lu Gwei-Djen, 1978. Science and civilization in
China. Vol. 4, Part 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ohnuma, Reiko. 1998. The gift of the body and the gift of dharma. History of Religions,
Vol. 37 (4): 323-359.
Peterson, Erik, 2003. Reconstruction of the large Borobudur outrigger sailing craft. In
Lucy Blue, Fred Hocker and Anton Englert (Eds.), Connected by the Sea: Proceedings
of the Tenth International Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology, ISBSA, Roskilde:
50-56.
Soekmono, R., 1976. Chandi Borobudur: A Monument of Mankind. Paris: The Unesco
Press, Paris.
Speyer, Jacobus Samuel (trans.), 1895. Gātakamālā,
Āryaśūra. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.

r Garland

Birth-Stories of

Rao, Nalini, 1991. The Bodhisattva as savior of seamen. In S. R. Rao (Ed.), Recent
Advance in Maritime Archaeology: Proceedings of the Second Indian Conference on
Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries January, 1990. Society for Marine
Archaeology, National Institute of Archaeology, Goa, India: 185-188.
Ray, Himanshu Prabha, 1994. The winds of change: Buddhism and the maritime links
of early south Asia. Oxford University Press, Delhi.
Ray, Himanshu Prabha, 2003. The archaeology of seafaring in ancient South Asia.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ray, Himanshu Prabha, 2005. The Axial Age in Asia: the archaeology of Buddhism (500
B.C.-A.D. 500). In Miram T. Stark (Ed.) The Archaeology of Asia, Blackwell Publishing,
Malden and Oxford.
Rouse, W. H. D. (trans.), 1901. he Jātaka; or, Stories of the Buddha's former
births.Vol. IV. Cowell, Edward B., (Ed.). University Press, Cambridge.
Shaw, Sarah, 2012. Crossing to the farthest shore: How Pāli Jātakas launch the
Buddhist image of the boat onto the open seas. Journal of the Oxford Centre for
Buddhist Studies, Vol. 3: 128-56
Schlingloff, Dieter. 1988. Studies in the Ajanta paintings: identifications and
interpretations. Ajanta Publications, Delhi.
13

�Tatelman, Joel. 2005. The heavenly exploits. New York University Press, New York.
Wheatley, Paul, 1983. āgara and c mmandery: origins of the Southeast Asian urban
traditions. University of Chicago, Dept. of Geography, Chicago.
Van Erp, Th., 1923. Voorstellingen van vaartuigen op de reliefs van den Boroboed er
M n graphie n ver unst en ultuur 1. di-Poestaka: 'S-Gravenhage.

Biography
Douglas Inglis studies the archaeology of seaborne exploration
and contact. He is a graduate student in the Nautical
Archaeology Program at Texas A&amp;M, a professional
archae l gist at ultural Surveys
Ha aiʻi and a member
the Explorers Club. Doug served as assistant director of the
Warwick Shipwreck Project in Bermuda and the ongoing
Rockley Bay Research Project in Tobago. He is passionate
about public history and outreach, and writes about nautical
archaeology at http://divingarchaeology.com.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="15">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="52">
                  <text>Session 12: Underwater Cultural Heritage of Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="53">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="54">
                  <text>The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions.&#13;
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex.&#13;
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation.&#13;
This session will discuss:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH.&#13;
â€¢ The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries.&#13;
â€¢ Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="55">
                  <text>Nia Hasanah </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="427">
                <text>The sea stories and stone sails of Borobudur </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="428">
                <text>The most profound examples of ancient Southeast Asian ship iconography are found on the walls of the 9th century Borobudur monument in central Java. As the contemporary assemblage of nautical iconography from Southeast Asia is limited, the ship reliefs play an important role in debates over trade and expansion in India, Indonesia and mainland Southeast Asia.   &#13;
&#13;
The Borobudur ships are technical depictions, and contain data about rigging, rope use, rowing configurations and outrigger construction. Elements in their design have persisted independently as Indonesian watercraft evolved, including outriggers, bipod masts, canted rectangular sails, and quarter rudders. Discussion has focused on construction features, and scholars have made various assertions about how the vessels might have been built, how they were used, and their origin.   &#13;
&#13;
The vessels' artistic context is often ignored. The ship reliefs are part of a religious narrative which directly influenced how the panels were designed, how the ships were portrayed, and how we should ultimately interpret them. The stories provide important clues as to where each vessel was headed, who was aboard, and what is happening on deck. Despite their detail, the Borobudur vessels should be interpreted cautiously, and not as ancient blueprints. They are artistic renditions that were never meant to float - they were meant to inspire.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="429">
                <text>Douglas Inglis, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="430">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="306" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3589">
                <text>The Sea-craft of Prehistory</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3590">
                <text>Paul Johnstone</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3591">
                <text>Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3592">
                <text>1980</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3593">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3594">
                <text>Paul Johnstone</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3595">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3596">
                <text>1980</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3597">
                <text>London</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3598">
                <text>Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3599">
                <text>The Sea-craft of Prehistory</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
