<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=57&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-26T06:47:12+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>57</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="187" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="80">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c324f807126d85486f05e06ece461e66.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8f528ef644788043b01fc83bbe99327b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2311">
                    <text>The Introduction of Conservation Treatment of Maritime
Artifacts in Korea
Dr Whan-suk Moon1

Abstract
Since 1976, the underwater excavation program, which began with the Shinan ship, has yielded
some 94,500 relics and eleven shipwrecks (including two foreign ships) from 18 sites in Korea.
To conserve each material appropriately
conserved on site and then

the artifacts salvaged from the sea were safely

moved to the laboratory. In particular the hulls of the ships were

salvaged by separated pieces. Treatment of PEG 2-step method was applied for several years.
The two ship hulls (Shinan and Wando) have been displayed after conservation treatment, and
one is being prepared for a new display.
We first tested pre-conservation treatment for safe stabilization and then have applied
the best method of pre-study results to the ceramics, wooden tags, metallic objects, bones,
crops etc. We excavated many bamboo artifacts after 2009, and are currently studying preconservation treatment.

1. Introduction
The dominant maritime relics found in Korea are shipwrecks and their artifacts.
They represent specific points in history, which like time capsules, clearly assert
the culture of previous eras. The number of declared maritime discoveries in
Korea has spanned approximately 242 cases since 1971. Underwater scientific
research began in 1976 with the excavation of the Shinan artifacts. To date,
there have been 18 excavations of underwater sites which have yielded 94,500
artifacts, 11 vessels, including 9 Korean vessels from the Goryeo dynasty, as
well as 2 Chinese vessels. Underwater salvaging was implemented after
determining which areas had the greatest spread of artifacts.
The Mokpo Conservation Center was established for the conservation of
the Shinan shipwreck site in 1980, and has taken full charge of the relics since
then. This paper describes the introduction of conservation treatment of
maritime artifacts salvaged in Korea.

1 Chief

of Underwater Excavation &amp; Conservation Division, National Research Institute of
Maritime Cultural Heritage (NRIMCH), KOREA, moon118@hanmail.net

�2. Conservation treatment and management of maritime
artifacts
2.1. Types of underwater artifacts
So far, the salvaged underwater artifacts are predominately the vessels
themselves as well as the porcelains contained within the site. In the case of the
Shinan shipwreck, interest from several international maritime institutes led to
its collaborative excavation in 1970. During that excavation, 20,000 Chinese
ceramics, red woods (native plants in India and west Asia), 28 tons of coins,
pewter bars, wooden tablets (shipping manifest), and the vessel kitchen utensils
were recovered.
At the Taean underwater site over 29,000 Goryeo porcelains, grains,
salted foods, and small portable dining tables made of bamboo were salvaged.
Scholastically speaking, the ship's manifest in the form of wooden tablets were
of the most interesting. These recorded a sailing time, an owner of the cargo
ship, the quantity of goods, as well as other important data. Also in the Mado
vessel excavation at Taean, more than 62 stone anchors were salvaged, which
demonstrates the frequency of marine accidents in the area. Historical
documents from that era note a lack of national finance as a direct result of
these frequent maritime accidents.

2.2. Conservation treatment of an organic materials
2.2.1. Conservation treatment of old vessels
If it is the case that a salvaged ship is not identified in Korea, then it is named
after the region (the sea) where it is excavated. To date, 10 vessels have been
salvaged, which includes the Shinan, a 14th century merchant vessel from
China.
Salvage operations on Mado vessel number 3 are currently underway.
The vessel's hull was normally made of pine, but the nails were made of more
durable oak. Because wooden nails were used in the vessel's construction, this
made it easier to separate the boards during the salvage operation. The boards
were then cut into smaller sections and labeled. Similarly, the Shinan was cut
into four sections to facilitate its recovery. The base plate of Mado vessel
number 2 was also made of oak. The Jindo ship was constructed with camphor
wood.
In the first stage of the preservation process the hulls of the ships were
placed in a desalination tank for 2~5 years. A consolidation process was also
necessary because of serious deterioration. The ships had been in tidal flats for
hundreds of years attacked by marine borer, bacteria, and soft rot. The
percentage of water content was up to 500%. The outer surface was
substantially deteriorated, but the interior remained consistent to that of green
woods.
In the consolidation process, the wood is first impregnated with 5~20%
of PEG 400 (Polyethylene glycol) at 40 , to begin the consolidation with PEG.
In the second stage the wood is saturated with 25~70% of PEG 4000 for 5~10

℃

�years. The conservation process of two ships is now complete, and they are
currently being exhibited. The third ship is being stored after the second stage
of the consolidation treatment. The fourth ship is now being dried after
consolidation. The Jindo ship, which is made of camphor wood, requires special
care and is being dried using the fixative FRP to prevent deformation and
warping. The drying conditions are being closely monitored.

Figure 1. Storage and desalination in
pool (NRIMCH)

Figure 2. PEG treatment tanks for
salvaged ship (NRIMCH)

Figure 3. Display condition after reconstruction
of Shinan ship (NRIMCH)

2.2.2. Conservation treatment of wooden tablets
From the underwater excavation at Daesom, Taean in 2007, bamboo tables
and wooden tablets (ship's manifest), which describe the type of cargo, the
quantity, the place of shipment, and the receivers were excavated. These
tablets and tables were constructed with bamboo, pine, ash, and chestnut wood.
Several kinds of small tools were used to remove mud from the surface of the
wooden tablets, and the wood was immersed in a 2% solution of EDTA-2Na.
Next, a low concentration (5~40%) of PEG#4000 (in t-butanol) was used to

�make the inscriptions on the wood more visibly distinct for accurate translation.
After that, a vacuum freeze-dry conservation treatment was applied. For
sufficient stabilization of the tablet dimensions, the PEG density of the
immersed tablets was gradually increased in stages over 15~20 days.

2.2.3. Conservation treatment of crops
At the Taean Mado 1 site many crops such as rice, buckwheat, and millet, were
salvaged. Only the husks remained because the crops’ main component of
starch had dissolved and disappeared after more than 800 years of being
underwater.
The safest conservation method for the crops, was chosen among the
waterlogged wood conservation treatments, using Sucrose, PEG immersion,
PEG (in t-butanol), a vacuum freeze-dry conservation treatment, an high quality
alcohol method (cethylalcohol,1 : 1 = cethyl alcohol : stearyl alcohol), which
involved distoetion, color change, by visual observation, and surface
observation using a stereoscopic microscope. It was determined impossible to
keep the logged crops in a consistent dry form without conservation treatment
first. Shrinkage was evident at 9.34% in length, and 26.0% in width. In such
cases, it is essential to apply conservation treatment prior to the drying process.
The formation and color of crops were well preserved in high quality alcohol
method (cethylalcohol). Also the impregnation was concluded in 70% grade,
since there was no difference between 70% and 100%.

Figure 4. After conservation treatment (NRIMCH)

2.3. Conservation treatment of metals
Most of the salvaged metals at the site were shipboard utensils such as metal
pots, copper dishes, and spoons. These were processed for conservation
treatment by initial examination, desalination, stabilization, consolidation and
restoration. In the case of metal pots, 0.5M NaOH was used to desalinate and
eliminate rust on it. Specifically, cast metals might have been severely damaged

�because cracking can occur during the drying process if the artifact is not
prepared properly. Cracking was prevented and reduced with the addition of
adhesive. 0.1M Sodium Sesquicarbonate was used to desalinate and wash the
bronze dishes and spoons. It was also noted that a Citric acid wash easily
removed debris from coins; especially debris on the many salvaged coins dating
back to the Chosun Dynasty. The coins were then treated to prevent corrosion,
dried, and consolidated to complete the conservation process.

2.4. Conservation treatment of pottery
As this paper previously mentioned, the staple of underwater excavation is
porcelains. The salvaged pottery was mostly intact with defined forms, but when
it was damaged, restoration was completed on speculation and through
reconstruction as best could be determined. The pottery that had shells fixed to
their surfaces were placed in HCI, and the shells were removed using a
bamboo knife. They were set in 60 immersion for desalination. After that the
acid was removed by placing the artifacts in flowing water. Fragments of similar
shaped porcelains were recovered in large quantities, thus making the
reconstruction process in the laboratory difficult. However, the more technical
and high quality fragments, such as inlaid celadon, were restored and colored
as well.

℃

2.5. Management
conservation

and

subsequent

change

research

after

There are two methods for managing finished conservation artifacts in Korea;
one method is to exhibit the artifacts, and the other method is to keep the
artifacts in storage. The latter method keeps the relics stabilized at a constant
temperature and humidity. The Shinan and Wando vessels are currently on
exhibition after completion of the conservation treatment. However soon after
the exhibition of the Shinan vessel, corrosion began to occur for two reasons.
First, the metal nails the shipbuilders used to connect the parts of the vessel
began to corrode. Secondly the PEG used as consolidant appeared to increase
the metal corrosion. This type of phenomena was observed in the Vasa, Mary
Rose timber, Batavia and other vessels. Experts are now conducting
investigative research to help prevent this sort of event from occurring. Likewise,
we have also been monitoring the state of change regularly since September
2010.
The two ships in exhibition are currently being monitored. This involves
measuring temperature and humidity, time-lapsed photographic comparison to
check the state of change, and illumination photometry. Oxidization of the
Shinan ship became apparent about a year after it was first exhibited in 1995.
PEG was leeching out of both the Wando and Shinan vessels. But until
currently the amount of the PEG has been small enough to be removed.
Based on the monitoring research results, our Institute is assured of the budget
to improve the constant temperature and humidity of exhibition spaces.

�3. Conclusion
To sum up, this paper has dealt with the introduction of conservation treatment
of underwater excavated artifacts in Korea. Conservation of underwater relics
began with the Shinan vessel excavation. At first, our Institute was in charge of
vessel conservation treatment only, but has treated all types of other artifacts as
well. The primary step in conservation of salvaged artifacts is on-site preliminary
processing, and the treatment of the artifacts prior to laboratory applications. In
Korea, underwater archaeologists and laboratory conservators must work
together to ensure complete treatment and conservation of the Korean maritime
heritage. For this purpose, a new conservation facility in Taean near the
excavation site, now processes everything immediately in conjunction and
cooperation with the conservation treatment centered at our division.
However, even with the addition of this new facility at Taean, the diverse
variety and large amount of materials makes it difficult to deal with conservation
of all artifacts perfectly. For this reason a collaborative research project has
been instituted through an exchange program of personnel with other foreign
maritime conservation organizations; Western Australia Museum being one.
Both institutions are working on research projects set up together. We are
specifically trying to solve the corrosion problem in the Shinan vessel. This will
improve not only our capacity to better treat maritime artifacts, but also their
overall safer conservation treatment in general through global cooperation and
exchange of knowledge.

Bibliography
Bowens, A., (ed)
2009

Underwater Archaeology - The NAS Guide to Principles
and Practice..

Cultural Heritage
Administration.
1984

The Wando Wreck Underwater Excavation.

Cha, M. Y.,
in press

Conservation of shipwrecks in Korea, International
Meeting on Protection Presentation and Valorisation of
Underwater Cultural Heritage, UNESCO and Chinese
Academy of Cultural heritage, Chongqing, November
2010.

Cha, M. Y. and
Yonn, Y. H.,
2011

Conservation of Waterlogged Archaeological Rice
Seeds. The 33rd National Conference of the Korean
Society of Conservation Science of Cultural Heritage,
Korea: 123-124.

Cultural Heritage
Administration.
1988

The Shinan Wreck Underwater Excavation

�Mokpo Conservation

Report on The Excavation of Jindo Log Boat.

Institute for Maritime
Archaeological finds.
1993
Moon, W. S., B. K.
Kim, I. J. and S. S.

On-Site Conservation of the Underwater Objects
Excavated, Conservation Studies 25, National Research

Yang.,

Institute of Cultural Heritage.

2004
National Maritime
Museum.
1999

Report on The Excavation of Talido Shipwreck.

National Maritime
Museum.
2004

The Conservation and Restoration Report of Ship.

National Maritime
Museum.
2005

The Underwater Excavation of the sea off Sibidongpa
Island, Gunsan.

National Maritime

The Excavation of Anjwa ship.

․

Museum Sinan-gun.
2006
National Maritime
Museum.
2008
Nation Research
Institute of Maritime
Cultural Heritage.
2009
Pearson, C.,
1987

Ansan Daebudo Ship Sea Site Submarine Excavation.

ⅠⅡ

Taean Treasure ship , - Submarine Excavation.

Conservation of Marine Archaeological Objects.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2306">
                <text>The Introduction of Conservation Treatment of Maritime Artifacts in Korea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2307">
                <text>Session 7&#13;
Preservation and conservation of wet archaeological materials and site management</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2308">
                <text>Since 1976, the underwater excavation program, which began with the Shinan ship, has yielded some 94,500 relics and eleven shipwrecks (including two foreign ships) from 18 sites in Korea. To conserve each material appropriately  the artifacts salvaged from the sea were safely conserved on site and then  moved to the laboratory. In particular the hulls of the ships were salvaged by separated pieces. Treatment of PEG 2-step method was applied for several years. The two ship hulls (Shinan and Wando) have been displayed after conservation treatment, and one is being prepared for a new display. &#13;
&#13;
We first tested pre-conservation treatment for safe stabilization and then have applied the best method of pre-study results to the ceramics, wooden tags, metallic objects, bones, crops etc. We excavated many bamboo artifacts after 2009, and are currently studying pre-conservation treatment. &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2309">
                <text>Dr Whan-suk Moon</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2310">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 7</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="488" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="280">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c1533cde635f46a15ced79111b4ae56d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>68cbd8b6f8e30e8c16513cc98c636d6c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5609">
                    <text>The Iron Grapnel Supposed to Belong to the Sinan
Shipwreck and Other Anchors in East Asia

Mitsuhiko Ogawa
Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology
qq3a3qt9@poppy.ocn.ne.jp

Abstract
In 2016 an iron grapnel was shown in some special exhibitions marking
the 40th anniversary of the Sinan shipwreck excavation in Korea. The
grapnel 2.3m length has four arms, and it had been raised by a
fisherman’s net in 1972 before the wreck was discovered. Around the
Song Dynasty of China, stone anchor stocks composed of wooden shanks
were generally used; their distributions ranged from the Primorsky region
of Russia in the north to the south in Vietnam and the Philippines. In
Korea and in Japan, crude stone anchor stocks modelled after Chinese
anchors were widely used at that time. From the Takashima underwater
site associated with the Mongolian invasion of Japan in the 13th century
or during the early Yuan Dynasty, stone anchor stocks of separate type
were frequently discovered. After the Ming Dynasty, iron grapnels started
to be used in large, but at the same time wooden anchors were also kept
in use on different styles from region to region. In Japan, iron four-armed
grapnels were appeared in some art pictures after the Muromachi Period,
and then during the Edo Period those grapnels became popular as the
mainstream of Japanese anchors. The iron four-armed grapnel, which is
considered to have belonged to the Sinan shipwreck, seems to have
equipped on a Japanese vessel dated from the Edo period to early
modern times as its characters are found among Japanese grapnels.
However, the possibility that it still belonged to the Sinan shipwreck could
not be denied completely, because the actual origin of Japanese grapnels
is unknown; Chinese manufacturing technology of grapnels, which is
known for the time being, was different from Japanese one, but another
technology, which would have an impact upon both Japanese and the
Sinan shipwreck’s grapnels, might have existed in China.
Key words: Sinan shipwreck, Korea, grapnel, anchor

�Introduction: The Iron Grapnel Believed to belong to the Sinan
Shipwreck
In

2016,

an

iron

grapnel

was

displayed

along

with

the

reconstruction/restoration model of Sinan Shipwreck in a special
exhibition that commemorate the 40th year anniversary of the Excavation
of the Sinan Shipwreck in Korea. This iron grapnel displayed along with
the restoration model was stated that it was a Chinese steel anchor from
the Yuan Dynasty, and it belongs to ‘the Sinan shipwreck’ (National
Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2016). The grapnel is
2.3m in length and has four arms. It was raised by a fisherman’s net in
1972, before the wreck was discovered (National Research Institute of
Maritime Cultural Heritage, Korea, 2016).

The author has observed iron grapnels at museums in China; these
anchors were dated later than the Ming Dynasty. Also in Japan, iron
grapnels were used from the Edo Period to modern era. The author only
had a brief knowledge of iron grapnels that were widely used in China and
Japan, and he never had conducted a research on it. Moreover, the author
could not find any researches focused on iron grapnels conducted by
other scholars. The author has observed an interesting point on these
anchors that, about morphology-wise, the iron grapnel found near the
Sinan Shipwreck site was very similar to Japanese type. In this paper, the
author shares his comparative studies on iron grapnels that was believed
to belong to the Sinan Shipwreck and other ones which were widely used
in China and Japan.
Chinese Iron Grapnels

�Tiangong Kaiwu, a Chinese technical document at the end of the Ming
Dynasty, described methods to manufacture ‘Iron anchor anchors’ (Song,
1639). To build an iron grapnel, individually made four arms were joined
to a shank on after another at the end. For forging, materials from an old
earth wall sieve were sprinkled on the forging areas. On the iconography
that explain the forging processes, total 15 people were displayed,
including who supported shanks and arms and who forging. From these
iconographies, peculiar rectangle sectional shapes of the grapnel were
not yet confirmed. Around this time, a ship carries 5 to 6 Iron anchors; the
largest one is about 500 loaves, and it is used in emergency. In addition,
it was described/instructed that Iron grapnels could not be used on the
stone bottom area; it had to be used on sandy and mud seabed. Also,
there is a description that a ship applied sudden stop by dropping a stern
anchor to avoid collisions to ships in front.
According to Guanzhuo Wang, a historian who studies ships in China, it
is said that ‘stone anchor’, ‘wooden anchor’ and ‘Iron anchor’ coexisted
simultaneously in the Song and Yuan Dynasties, while primarily ‘woodstone anchor’ was widely used (Wang, 2000). In Chiming Uekgo Picture
of the Northern Song Dynasty, a ‘small iron anchor’ was depicted near the
bow of the river ship. In Jilin City, Jilin Province in 1975, a small three-arm
iron grapnel (22.5cm in length) dated the early in the Kim Dynasty was
found. In historical written sources from the Song and Yuan Dynasties,
these were descriptions on different types of anchors: ‘iron anchor’ and
‘iron anchor with four nails’ were widely used; in the Ming and Qing
Dynasties, ‘iron anchor’ was used in the northern sea area of hard mud
bottom; ‘wooden anchor’ was used in the southern deep sea of soft mud
bottom, both are respectively used depending on the types of sediments;
and for river ships ‘iron anchor’ was widely used. Regarding

�archaeological examples of ‘iron anchors’, an iron grapnel was found on
the Ming dynasty shipwreck during its excavation in the Songji River,
Liangshan, Shandong Province, in 1956. This anchor was 1.36m long and
had inscriptions on the surface, and it said ‘Hongwe 5th made’ and ‘85
loaves of heaviness’. Another archaeological example was found from
Quanzhou, Fujian, in 1981; it was an iron grapnel which was 2.68m long
and 758.3kg.
The author also visited and observed a few iron grapnels; he visited the
sea castle in Penglai City in Shandong Province, the Quanzhou Bay Old
Ship Museum in Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, the Guangzhou
Museum in Guangzhou City in Guangdong Province. Additionally, there
are reported documents about iron grapnels excavated from the Penglai
Sea castle (Chen,1989) (Fig. 1). The author analysed and studied
characteristics of those iron grapnels from these materials, but since the
amount of information is too big to share in this paper; therefore, detailed
descriptions of individual materials shall be reported in another occasion.

Fig. 1 (left): Iron Grapnel Excavated
from Penglai Sea Castle. (Chen,
1989)

�Chinese iron grapnels were built by forging individually forged arms to the
shank; in many cases, the joint points between arms and the shank
displayed peculiar shapes of remnants created by the forging (Fig. 2).
Additionally, there were examples that used/forged steel sheets on the
joinery points as a reinforcement. The cross-sectional shapes of the shank
and arms have irregular circular shape or irregular square shape; there
are no examples of clear rectangle shapes that can be seen on iron
grapnels found in Japan. The anchor ring had a small circular shape, and
its inner diameter was relatively small. It indicates that the end of the
shank was molded to make a hole. In many cases, those forging marks
were conspicuous. Also, there were examples that wood leaf-shaped fluke
were attached at the tip of arms. The shape of four arms formed a ‘+’
shape when it was seen from the crown side (Fig. 3).

�Fig. 2 (left): Iron Grapnel of the Ming Dynasty at the Dengzhou
Museum. Fig. 3 (right): Iron Grapnel of the Qing Dynasty at the
Dengzhou Museum.
Japanese Iron Grapnels
Ishii Kenji, a scholar who studied history of ships in Japan, explained
weights of the ‘the first anchor’ of the Bezai ship. He also studied
transition/evolution of Japanese anchors (Ishii, 1983). His studies on
history of Japanese anchors started with ancient simple stone anchors
that composed of a rope tied to a natural stone. On the ships traveled to
Tang (China), as well as on ships used between Heian Period and the
Medieval Era in Japan, wooden anchors were commonly used. The
wooden anchors used on these ships composed of a flat stone
sandwiched by two branches of hook-shaped trees. Based on
iconography that ‘iron grapnel’ and ‘wooden anchor’ were depicted in the
Scroll ‘Jinguu Kougou Engi Emaki’ in 1443, he believed that iron grapnels

�might be used on Daimyo's warships and other large ships around the
15th century.
Yet, Ishii indicated that there must be technical difficulties to forge iron
grapnels if Japan tried to build it domestically around that time; and the its
cost for mass-production must be another problem. Therefore, he
suspects that the iron grapnels in the 15th century were imported from
China. In the 16th century, use of iron anchors become popular among
warships. Yet, wooden anchors were often depicted with merchant ships
in the first half of the 17th century; the beginning of wide spread uses of
iron grapnels might need to wait until the middle of the 17th century.

Other Japanese scholars agree with Ishii 's theory about date of its
beginning and wide distribution of iron grapnels. Matsui analyzed 49 iron
grapnels found mainly northern area (Hokuriku) in the main island of
Japan, and he concluded that the transition to iron grapnels occurred
sometime in the 18th to the 20th centuries based on morphological
analysis on anchor rings and attached rings (Matsui, 2013). Ishihara restudied researches on wooden anchors conducted by Wang, Ishii,
Tamura, and several other researches, and he concluded that transition
from wooden anchors to iron grapnels were caused/triggered by
shipworms which ate wooden products in the sea (Ishihara, 2015).
Ninomiya examined the maritime traffic in Tokyo Bay and the Sodegaura
fishery industry based on literature/historical sources; also, he descrived
the perspectives of trading and distribution of iron grapnels in the Edo
Period in Japan (Ninomiya, 2017). Tamura, a folklore scholar, conducted
folklore investigations on ‘anchor blacksmith’ in Fukuyama City, Hiroshima
Prefecture. Tamura noted that iron grapnel was forged by superimposing
plate-like steel called ‘Yao’ (Tamura, 1978). He also described the

�manufacturing process of the iron grapnels: each part, such as four parts
of arms, a shank, an anchor ring and an attached ring were individually
prepared first, and then the arms and anchor rings were forged onto the
shank, and arms were spread into form 4 arms, then the loop of anchor
ring was expanded. His investigation was very important to conduct a
comparative study of manufacturing methodology of different anchors;
therefore, his research is especially important for the author’s researches
In Japan, at least 50 iron grapnels are known to be exist. The author
studied characteristics of these anchors; however, its information may be
too detailed to share in this paper, so that he has to wait to share such
detailed information until other opportunities. In general, Japanese iron
grapnels were composed/welded of separately built plate-shaped steels,
so that the cross-section of the shank and arms display a clear-cut
rectangular shape (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4: Iron Grapnel Raised up off Suzu City, Ishikawa Prefecture.
Although sometimes it displays slight lamellar traces and forge contact
traces due to forge weld, surfaces of Japanese iron grapnel are flat.

�Nonetheless, there are no examples in Japanese grapnels that shows
wrapped steel sheets reinforcements on arms alike Chinese grapnels.
The arms of Japanese grapnels were forged into the shank, and then the
arms were expanded after; henceforward, many of the (side-profile)
shapes of anchors showed a gentle ‘J’ shape (Fig. 5). And the shape of
the four arms from the crown exhibited a ‘X’ shape (Fig. 6). Although the
anchor ring displayed a large almond shape; the introduction of the
electric hammer in the modern period has made it smaller and the crosssectional shape tends to be circular.

Fig. 5: Iron Grapnel at Fukuura Shika Town, Ishikawa Prefecture.

�Fig. 6: Iron Grapnel at Fukuura Shika Town, Ishikawa Prefecture, from
its Crown Side.
Anchor of the Era before and after the Yuan Dynasty
Regarding the small iron grapnels, the first evidence appeared in the
North Song and Kim Dynasties. Although, the word/noun of ‘iron anchor’
and ‘iron anchor four nails’ appeared in literatures of the Song Dynasty,
the first archaeological evidence of iron grapnel had to wait until the
beginning of the Ming Dynasty (Wang, 2000). Anchors that widely used in
the Song Dynasty were ‘wood-stone anchor’ with ‘mono style stone
anchor stock.’ Regarding Yuan Dynasty, wood-stone anchors with
‘separate style stone anchor stock’ were main archaeological evidence
found from the underwater site at Takashima Island, Nagasaki Prefecture,
Japan; this site is also known for the Mongolia Attack to Japan in 1281.
Contrarily, mono style stone anchor stocks were rarely found in this site
(Takashima Town Board of Education, 1996). In the Takashima Island
site, however, a mono-style stone anchor stock was cut in half and

�converted as ‘separate style stone anchor stock’. This may indicate that
the both types had been coexisted, or it was at their transition period
(Ogawa, 2008a and 2008b). Those wood stone anchors with this
‘separate style stone anchor stocks’ was also used at Penglai Sea Castle
in Shandong Province and Quanzhou Bay in Fujian Province (Li, 1998).
Afterwards, ‘wood-stone anchor’ with ‘mono style stone anchor stock’ had
shifted into ‘wooden anchor’ with wooden stock. Iron grapnels appeared
at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, yet it did not mean that wooden
anchors disappeared due to the appearance of iron grapnels. An
iconography from Qing dynasty displayed sea boats using both wooden
anchor and iron grapnels. Therefore, for the Sinan Ship dated the middle
of the Yuan Dynasty, there is a possibility that Sinan Ship used wood
stone anchors (or wooden anchors) and iron grapnels at the same time.
Conclusion
The cross-section of the shank likely belonging to the Sinan shipwreck is
rectangular in shape, and a part where the arms as well as the anchor ring
are attached to the shank is pounded to connect by a flat piece of iron.
The arms curve gradually inward and make a figure of ‘J’. The crosssection of the arm is flat rectangular. The anchor ring is large, narrowly
long and almond like shape. Moreover, the cross-section is flat
rectangular. There features obviously resemble the futures of Japanese
iron grapnel; based on those reasons, the author believed that the
grapnels that believed to belong to the Sinan shipwreck was most likely
belonged to the iron grapnels of the Japanese vessels dated from the
early modern period to the modern period.

�In the current state, however, it is difficult to establish precise dating of the
Japanese style iron grapnels due to lack of the data and information for
establishment of manufacturing. On the other hand, there is another
possibility for the iron grapnel from the Sinan shipwreck to seek its origin
in China. There might be some manufacturing techniques in China that
would become the origin of Japanese grapnel manufacture later. This
possible original manufacture technique has not been found/confirmed yet
in China; however, it could be possible that Sinan shipwreck had carried
Chinese iron grapnel that produced by Chinese manufacturing techniques
that would be taught to Japanese later was onboard the Sinan shipwreck
of the Yuan Dynasty. Nonetheless, the author concludes that, under these
circumstances, it was most likely that the iron grapnels that is believed to
belong to the Sinan shipwreck was a Japanese iron grapnel from the early
modern period to the modern period.
Acknowledgements
The detailed data on the four-armed iron anchor that believed to belong
to the Shinan shipwreck has been shared by Dr. Hong Soon-Jae and Dr.
Park Ye-Ree of the National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural
Heritage. Mr. Yuichiro Tashiro also helped me greatly for the related
articles on the webpages. I deeply express my gratitude toward them.
References
Chen, T.,1989. Penglai Old Ship Belongings Analysis: Penglai Old Ship
and Dengzhou Old Port. Dalian Maritime College Publishing House,
Dalian (in Chinese).
Ishii, K., 1983. Zusetsu Wasen Shi Wa, Zusetsu, Nippon Kaiji Shi Wa
Sosho, Vol.1. Shiseido, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Ishii, K., 1995. Wa Sen I, Mono to Ningen no Bunkashi, Vol. 76, Hosei
University Press, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Ishihara, W., 2013. Ikari No Bunka Shi, Book Series of Bukkyo University,
Shibunkaku Publisher, Kyoto (in Japanese)

�Li, G., 1998. Ancient Chinese anchors: their rigging and conservations.
The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 27(4): 307-312.
Matsui, H., 2013. Yotsuzume tetsuikari no kisoteki kenkyu: fune ni
kakawaru mono no keishiki gakuteki kosatsu. Bulletin of Archaeology
(Department of Archaeology University of Kanazawa), Vol.134: 27-52 (in
Japanese).

National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2016.
http://blog.naver.com/seamuse1994/220889730348
National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2017.
http://www.seamuse.go.kr/seamuseweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?
nttId=1155&amp;bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000249&amp;pageIndex=2&amp;searchtitle
=&amp;searchcont=&amp;searchkey=&amp;searchwriter=&amp;searchWrd=&amp;searchCtgryY
n=A&amp;mn=KO_02_04#link
Ninomiya, T., 2017. Yotsu zume ikari ni tsuite, Study of the History of
Sodegaura City, Vol.18: 69-79 (in Japanese).
Ogawa, M., 2008a. Kaiiki ajia no ikariishi koroshi. In Y. Yokkaichi (Ed.),
Mono Kara Mita Kaiiki Ajiashi, Kyudai Ajia Sosho, Kyushu University
Press, Fukuoka: 1-37 (in Japanese).
Ogawa, M., 2008b. Higashi ajia kaiiki ni okeru chugoku sutairu ikariishi no
Kkenkyu. Proceeding of the First Korea-Japan Underwater Archaeology,
Korea: 103-144 (in Japanese and Korean).
Song, Y., 1637 (1969). Tiangong Kaiwu (in Chinese), Trans. K. Yabuuchi,
Toyo Bunko, Vol.130, Heibonsha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Takashima Town Board of Education, 1996. Takashim Kaitei Iseki III,
Takshima-cho Bunkazai Chosa Hokokusho, Vol. 2. Takashima Town
Board of Education, Takashima-cho (in Japanese).
Tamura, Z., 1978. Tomo no ikari to kugi. In Hiroshima Prefecture (Ed.),
History of Hiroshima Prefecture: Folk Custom, Hiroshima Prefecture,
Hiroshima: 709-716 (in Japanese).
Wang, G., 2000. Chinese Old Ship Graphic Chart. SDX Joint Publishing
Company, Beijing (in Chinese).

�Biography
Mitsuhiko Ogawa was bone in Ishikawa Prefecture in
1968. He received MA degree in Archaeology from the
University of Kanazawa in 2005. He is majoring in
underwater archaeology, especially, in anchors and
stone anchor stocks as well as in Chinese ceramics. He
became a member of the Kyusyu Okinawa Society for
Underwater Archaeology in 1992 and has been a senior
research associate of the Asian Research Institute of
Underwater Archaeology since 2011. He has excavated
many underwater archaeological sites such as
Takashima Island, the Maegata Bay or Ojika Island (Yamami), and has
also involved in the survey of underwater cultural heritage around the
Japan Sea. He has published many papers related to underwater
archaeology in East Asia.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5603">
                <text>The Iron Grapnel Supposed to Belong to the Sinan Shipwreck and Other Anchors in East Asia </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5604">
                <text>In 2016 an iron grapnel was shown in some special exhibitions marking the 40th anniversary of the Sinan shipwreck excavation in Korea.  The grapnel 2.3m length has four arms, and it had been raised by a fishermanâ€™s net in 1972 before the wreck was discovered.  Around&#13;
 the Song Dynasty of China, stone anchor stocks composed of wooden shanks were generally used; their distributions ranged from the Primorsky region of Russia in the north to the south in Vietnam and the Philippines.  In Korea and in Japan, crude stone anchor stocks modelled after Chinese anchors were widely used at that time.  From the Takashima underwater site associated with the Mongolian invasion of Japan in the 13th century or during the early Yuan Dynasty, stone anchor stocks of separate type were frequently discovered.  After the Ming Dynasty, iron grapnels started to be used in large, but at the same time wooden anchors were also kept in use on different styles from region to region.  In Japan, iron four-armed grapnels were appeared in some art pictures after the Muromachi Period, and then during the Edo Period those grapnels became popular as the mainstream of Japanese anchors.  The iron four-armed grapnel, which is considered to have belonged to the Sinan shipwreck, seems to have equipped on a Japanese vessel dated from the Edo period to early modern times as its characters are found among Japanese grapnels. However, the possibility that it still belonged to the Sinan shipwreck could not be denied completely, because the actual origin of Japanese grapnels is unknown; Chinese manufacturing technology of grapnels, which is known for the time being, was different from Japanese one, but another technology, which would have an impact upon both Japanese and the Sinan shipwreckâ€™s grapnels, might have existed in China.   </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5605">
                <text>Mitsuhiko Ogawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5606">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5607">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5608">
                <text>Mitsuhiko Ogawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="528" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="319">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/59e0f43444e6dc4b9ee02a88b508e760.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c798578e0cb81af17f7b9c5a4eddf124</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5934">
                    <text>The Jaluit Atoll TBD-1 Devastators: Archaeological Analysis and Preservation
Assessment of a WWII Site.
1
2

Peter D. Fix, PhD (Texas A&amp;M University, Associate Research Scientist)
Russell E. Matthews (Air/Sea Heritage Foundation, President)

ABSTRACT
The topic of the paper, entitled “The Jaluit Atoll TBD-1 Devastators: Archaeological Analysis, and Preservation
Assessment of a WWII Site,” best fits within the session, Underwater Cultural Heritage of World War II in the
Asia-Pacific Region: Discoveries, Opportunities &amp; Challenges due to its context and subject matter. Before
sunrise on 1 February 1942, aircraft from the USS Yorktown (CV-5), sortied as part of Task Force-17’s attack
on the Japanese Mandated Islands of Jaluit and Milli, in present day Republic of the Marshall Islands, and
Makin, the northernmost island in the Gilbert Islands chain. During the raid, two TBD-1 Devastator torpedo
bombers [BuNo. 0298 (5-T-7), and BuNo. 1515 (5-T-6)] were forced to ditch in Jaluit Lagoon as each aircraft
was low on fuel. The aircrews of both planes survived the water landing, were captured by Imperial Japanese
Naval forces, and survived captivity in POW camps in Japan. Since 2004, a group of scientists, engineers and
researchers have undertaken seven expeditions to the resting place of these aircraft in a remote section of the
lagoon to document and conduct analysis on aspects of the artifacts’ preservation. As part of the monitoring and
assessment, plans have been generated to potentially recover one of the aircraft to archaeological and materials
conservation standards.
KEYWORDS: World War II, Naval Aviation, TBD-1 Devastator, Marshall Islands

INTRODUCTION
Since 1 February 1942, two TBD-1 Devastators [BuNo. 0298 (5-T-7), and BuNo. 1515 (5-T-6)] have
remained submerged in Jaluit Lagoon, the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Each artifact was
the result of a controlled emergency landing on water when the pilots determined that it would
not be advisable to try to return to their carrier strike force. The location, on a remote atoll in the
central Pacific Ocean, and the even more isolated western side of Jaluit Lagoon, has sheltered
them and protected each plane from inadvertent contact or vandalism. The first of the two aircraft
was identified during a US National Parks Service sponsored cultural survey in the late 1990s while
the second was relocated a few years later following a dedicated search by local divers. Although
slightly different, the preservation level of each submerged structure is exceptional. Starting in 2004,
a team of scientists and historians have visited the site seven separate times to document and assess
their condition. The two aircraft provide a unique opportunity for in situ study. One is submerged
at an average depth of (-)50 feet and has overwhelmingly been assimilated into the surrounding
environment of a coral head. The other is submerged at a depth of (-)110 feet and lying on a
coralline sandy plain where there is considerably less biologic activity. Over the course of the
seven expeditions to the site, the planes have been thoroughly documented by hand
measurements, photomosaic models and one of them, BuNo. 1515, the deeper wreck, was
thoroughly laser-scanned with subsea LiDAR. Along with on-site corrosion testing, engineers have
assessed the aircraft’s structural integrity, and samples have been exported under permit for
metallurgical analysis. The archaeological documentation and preservation analysis have helped
guide the formation of plans to potentially archaeologically recover and stabilize one of the
submerged structures for future museum installation and display. This conference paper is an
overview of the project and draws directly from the Permit Report (2018-1) submitted to the US
Navy History and Heritage Command, Underwater Archaeology Branch in 2021.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Shortly after clambering from the wing of their TBD-1 Devastator into the small, three-man
inflatable life raft, James Dalzell, RM/1c, Radioman/gunner on BuNo. 0298 recalled looking up
and seeing “…number 6 hit!” The number six Dalzell referred to was BuNo. 1515. Herbert R.
1 approximately 100 yards from his position. It
Hein, Jr., as it made an emergency water landing
was down to good fortune, skill, and the experience of pilots LT. Harlan T. ("Dub") Johnson
aboard torpedo bomber

�BuNo. 0298 and ENS. Herbert R. Hein, Jr. in BuNo. 1515 that all six members of the combined
aircrews survived their planes’ ditching into the lagoon at Jaluit Atoll on 1 February 1942, and that
none suffered serious injury during the event. The floatation bags meant to keep each aircraft afloat
deployed as designed, allowing time for the aircrews to inflate the rubber life rafts and escape with
whatever survival gear that was immediately available. Once the raft was clear of BuNo. 0298, the
crew attempted to puncture the floatation bags with .45 caliber bullets from their service pistols so the
plane would not fall into enemy hands. Unfortunately, the small bullet holes failed to deflate the bags
sufficiently, and the Bombardier, ACMM Charles E. Fosha had to reenter the bobbing plane to
retrieve what he called his “sword,” a long, dagger-shaped blade that he kept with him in the center
cockpit in case the floatation bags unintentionally inflated during flight. The dagger worked and
BuNo. 0298 slowly disappeared beneath the surface of the lagoon.
Over on BuNo. 1515, the crew did not have the same trouble sinking the aircraft, however the radio
antenna anchor point inadvertently snagged and punctured the life raft during evacuation and it began
to deflate. Suddenly, only one rubber boat remained for six men. Taking turns, half the men stayed in
the water while the group slowly steered their raft about a mile and a half to Pinglep Islet on the
western perimeter of the lagoon. Once safely ashore, they were given shelter, along with food and
water by the resident Marshallese. Several days after the incident, both aircrews were captured by
marines of the Imperial Japanese Navy, who had been dispatched from the seaplane base located on
the eastern side of the lagoon. Taken as some of the earliest American POWs, the six US Naval
airmen were transferred to the Japanese home islands where each survived the duration of the war by
working as prisoner laborers.
The two TBD-1 Devastators and their aircrews were part of combined airstrikes on the Japanese
Mandated Islands of the Marshall and Gilbert Islands, by two United States carrier task groups
centered around the USS Enterprise (CV-6) and the USS Yorktown (CV-5). The USS Enterprise was
at the center of Task Force 8 under the command of Vice Admiral William “Bull” Halsey Jr., which
attacked the northern atolls of Kwajalein, Wotje and Taroa. Task Force 17, under the command of
Vice Admiral Frank Jack Fletcher and centered around the USS Yorktown, attacked Jaluit and Mili
Atolls in the Marshall Islands, and Makin Island in the Gilbert Island Chain. On the morning of the
launch, heavy squalls and lightning were reported in the direction of Jaluit. Since Jaluit was the
furthest target from the carrier, 17 Douglas SBD Dauntlesses of Bombing 5, and 11 Douglas TBD-1
Devastators of Torpedo 5 were the first to launch from the ship and all were reported clear of the deck
by 0517. With the thick, overcast cloud cover and storms nearby, few of the aircrews were in visual
contact with each other during the 140-mile journey to Jaluit Atoll. It was not until they broke through
the ceiling at approximately 1,000 feet that they could begin to assess their targets around the islet of
Jabor. Each plane dropped their bombloads and many continued to strafe targets on land and in the
harbor. Shortly after dropping bombs over the target harbor area at Jabor, Jaluit Atoll, the pilot, Lt.
Johnson of BuNo. 0298 determined that his plane would not have enough fuel to make it back to the
carrier, and they might not even be able to make “Point Truck”. “Point Truck” was an area south of
the atoll that had been designated as the rendezvous location where a destroyer would be stationed to
act as a lifeguard and pick up the crew of any downed aircraft in the event they could not get back to
the carrier task force.
The first offensive action by the United States Navy in the World War II Pacific Theater following the
surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, the two aircraft’s connection to the raids on the Marshall and Gilbert
Islands, alone, would elevate each to the classification of “significant” and qualify them for inclusion
on the US Secretary of the Interiors’ list of National Historic Landmarks. The two aircraft, however,
could also be considered “significant” for their revolutionary designs. With an overall length of 35ft
and a height of 15ft 1in, the Douglas Aircraft Company’s TBD-1 Devastator recorded several firsts
for any aircraft built for the US Navy. It featured an all-metal structure of semi-monocoque
construction. The single low-mounted wing was 50ft across but was fitted with revolutionary power
actuated hydraulic folding mechanisms that would cut the wingspan virtually in half (down to 25ft
8in) to better store more aircraft on the crowded hangar decks of fleet aircraft carriers. It also boasted
the debut of independent Bendix® wheel brakes on its main landing gear, and completely enclosed the
2

�crew positions (pilot, bombardier, radio operator/gunner) under a glass canopy. Incorporated within
the airframe and skin were still more technological advances including the integration of special alloy
metals such as Alclad® aluminum.
Of the 129 TBD-1 Devastators built for the United States Navy, none were preserved in any museum
or collection and the location of only eleven wrecks is currently known. Seven are at the bottom of the
Coral Sea, approximately 500 miles off the eastern coast of Australia. These Devastators are
associated with the wreckage of the aircraft carrier USS Lexington (CV-2), which was located and
documented by the research vessel R/V Petrel on 4 March 2018, resting at a depth of approximately
9842 feet. Two other examples lost in stateside training accidents have also been found. One is off the
coast of Miami, Florida in approximately 500 feet of water, while the other is off the coast of San
Diego, California in approximately 800 feet of water. Of all these aircraft, the two in Jaluit Atoll
lagoon, by far, combine the highest level of preservation with the greatest accessibility.
RESEARCH DESIGN
The overlying archaeological research design for this project has sought to study the two planes for
both their historical and archaeological value, while monitoring the submerged structures’ physical
integrity and level of preservation, to determine the best plan to potentially recover and conserve the
most promising example. Data collected during the seven individual site visits has been augmented
with archival research, oral history interviews, and lab analysis to develop a more complete narrative
of the raid on Jaluit, and detailed data on the Douglas Aircraft Co. TBD-1 Devastator.
Access to the site for the first four expeditions was through small regional dive boats that had to make
the 100 plus nautical mile trip from Majuro to Jaluit. Later trips were from larger live-aboard dive
charter boats moored nearly on top of the site. On each trip however, the dive platform was some
form of self-contained breathing apparatus. Most divers reached the two sites by diving on
compressed air, and strictly adhering to Navy Dive Tables, which limited an individual’s bottom time
to approximately 10 minutes, but greatly increased the safety factor while working in such an isolated
area. In 2013, dive team members Brett Seymour and Brian Kirk dove using a mixed-gas fraction of
Nitrox, which allowed Brett to stay on site longer than the rest and gain the images required to
assemble a photographic mosaic of the deep wreck BuNo. 1515. During the 2018 site visit, Brett
Seymour and Evan Kovacs both dove on a closed-circuit rebreather system, which allowed them
considerably greater bottom time on the site, less decompression time, and a shorter surface interval.
Throughout all expeditions extensive documentation has been conducted on both sites that include
still photography and videography, sketches, written descriptions, hand measurement, LiDAR
scanning and the use of several analytical instruments.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES AND SITE FORMATION
The two VT-5 Devastators ditched into the lagoon at Jaluit on the same day, under the same
conditions, and barely 100 yards apart. Each sank to the bottom within minutes of one another and
appear to have received only minimal damage in the process. The only notable difference between the
two aircraft is that one slid 50 feet down the west side of a reef face, while the other sank to a depth of
110 ft and landed on a relatively flat section of bottom sediments. In the process, both received nearly
the exact same overall structural damage. Archaeologically, the two planes provide an excellent
opportunity for comparison between the two series of aircraft. BuNo. 0298, the shallow wreck,
represents the first batch of 114 aircraft delivered to the US Navy by the Douglas Aircraft Co. BuNo.
1515 was part of a second order of 15 planes that replaced aircraft that had crashed in operational
accidents or were considered beyond repair and stricken from the US Navy inventory. While very
similar there were slight nuances between the two separate aircraft orders that can only be confirmed
by the side-by-side comparison of the two Jaluit TBDs.
A catalog of missing features or damage to the structure of the Jaluit Devastators was made by visual
observations during the expedition dives, comparison of the two aircraft, and through review of
3

�historic photographic and written resources. Each can be divided into two categories: accident damage
incurred during the initial ditching event and damage due to long-term immersion in saltwater.
Damage or missing features attributed to the ditching:
1. The two floatation bag cover plates on each aircraft are not on the site.
2. The tail wheel for each aircraft is missing and not on site.
3. The engine on each aircraft is either disassociated from the structure or the engine bolts
originally holding the engine in place have fractured.
4. A small section of the skin on the underside of the fuselage aft of the recess for the torpedo
has been ripped and folded back.
5. The outboard end of the port aileron frame (“shallow wreck”) is bent and folded from contact
with a coral head after sliding down the reef face.
6. The port bombsight door is open on the “deep wreck.”
7. The port wing of “deep wreck” may be slightly bent aft.
8. The upper skins on the horizontal tail surfaces (most evident on the port side of the “deep
wreck”) are deformed inwards, presumably due to water pressure acting on the still air-filled
watertight compartments within as the planes sank.
9. Port leading edge landing light on the “shallow plane” is hanging loose.
10. Pilot’s seat in the “deep wreck” is out of alignment (twisted to the left) and possibly broke
loose during the ditching.
Missing or Damaged Features
1. .30 Caliber M-2 Flexible Mounted Machine Gun from the “shallow wreck” is missing.
2. The Pilot’s map case from the “deep wreck” (the same could not be verified on the “shallow
wreck” because of coral intrusion).
3. Norden Bombsights on both wrecks are missing.
4. The fuel tank filler plate on each wing from both planes is missing.
5. The port side of BuNo. 0298’s top canopy has shattered.
6. The starboard horizontal stabilizer on BuNo. 0298 has recently separated from the tail
structure and now hangs from its internal control linkages with the outboard edge resting on
the seabed.
Undisturbed Features
1. Pilot’s cockpit
2. Bombardier’s cockpit
3. Gunner’s cockpit
PRESERVATION ASSESSMENT
By the time the first group of project researchers dove onto the site in 2004, the two submerged
structures had already been subjected to a little over 62 years of immersion in salt water. Corrosion
had been, and remained, active in several notable places, but the overall condition of the aircraft was
exceptional considering the environment. Engineers that assisted in the project frequently noted how
much strength and integrity the structures appeared to hold. Part of the challenge of assessing the level
of preservation for any aircraft is the number of different types of metals that were incorporated into
the aircraft. For the Aluminum and steel categories, there are approximately twenty to twenty-five
additional variations of metal created through alloying or plating. Finishing processes also change the
material properties of a metal, which in turn alters its corrosion resistance. The TBD-1 metals were
cast and wrought, heat treated and cold worked, annealed, and quenched by different mediums.
On site, observers specifically searched for visual evidence of active corrosion of the structural
metals.
4

�1.
2.
3.
4.

Signs of galvanic action, or dissimilar metal contact.
Signs of stress corrosion (especially on extruded pieces).
Signs of pitting corrosion or copper deposition.
Signs of accelerated corrosion due to differential aeration cells, including crevice corrosion.

Visual observations and documentation of metals deterioration has been undertaken on each trip
through written descriptions and a photographic record. This has allowed for monitoring and
comparison analysis over the duration of the project. In addition, corrosion potentials (Ecorr) have been
taken on several trips and one trip employed ultrasound to determine the overall thickness of the
aircraft skin. Disarticulated samples from each aircraft were collected during the 2006 site visit and
exported under permit to laboratories at Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, TX for
metallographic analysis and to determine if microbial influenced corrosion could be playing a role in
the deterioration of the metal structure.
CONCLUSIONS
Both TBD-1 Devastators in Jaluit Lagoon are historic and hold considerable archaeological
information. Information that can be found nowhere else, but on these two sites. Galvanic corrosion
and differential aeration cells resulting in crevice corrosion, and the growth of soft corals and sponges
across the surfaces of the planes, which is presumed to be forming new differential aeration cells, are
beginning to accelerate the deterioration rate of both planes. Since it is closer to the surface and
affixed to a coral head, BuNo. 0298’s assimilation into the environment is far more extensive and
coral growth on top of the plane’s engine and pilot’s cockpit is flourishing. Because removing it from
this environment would undoubtedly cause irrevocable harm to the ecosystem, and since BuNo. 1515
offers additional information not available in the original drawings or blueprints of the plane type, the
Devastator Project scientific team has moved forward with developing plans to recover the deeper
wreck. The engineering team is currently working out some final aspects of the initial lift off the
bottom. Considerable logistical planning remains, but when completed the proposal will be submitted
to the US Navy History and Heritage Command, Underwater Archaeology Branch for approval and
permission to move forward. The Devastator Project team is likewise consulting regularly with the
RMI Historic Preservation Office as well as the local and traditional leaders of Jaluit Atoll, working
together to determine the best path to protect and preserve these unique cultural heritage resources.

5

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Christiansen, Henrik, The Archaeology of World War II in the Marshall Islands, Five Volumes: Vol I Torwa (80 pages); Vol
II: Wojja (65 pages); Vol III: Jalwoj (55 pages); Vol V: Tourism: (33 pages). Historic Preservation Office, Majuro, 1994.
Dalzell, James W., RM/c, Radioman/rear gunner TBD-1 BuNo. 0298, Narrator, Ric Gillespie, and Russ Matthews
Interviewers, 2004.
Douglas Aircraft Company. Handbook of Instructions for the Erection and Maintenance of the Model TBD-1 Airplane for
the United States Navy. Santa Monica, CA: Douglas Aircraft Company, 1937.
Douglas Aircraft Company. Pilot’s Handbook for the Model TBD-1 Airplane. Santa Monica, CA: Douglas Aircraft
Company, 1937.
Fix, Peter D. and Russell E. Matthews. Final Report: US Navy History and Heritage Command, Special Use Permit #20181. MS on file. 2021.
Gillespie and King, The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, “Jaluit Submerged Aircraft Survey,” TIGHAR
Tracks Vol 20, #3 July 2004.
Harris, M., &amp; Martin, L-E, Jaluit “Underwater Survey, Final Report,” Historic Preservation Office, Majuro, 1997.
Lundstrom, John B. 1984. The First Team: Pacific Naval Combat from Pearl Harbor to Midway. Annapolis, MD: U.S. Naval
Institute.
Macleod, Ian. “In-situ Corrosion Studies on Wrecked Aircraft of the Imperial Japanese Navy in Chuuk Lagoon, Federated
States of Micronesia.” International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 35(1):128 – 136.
Plaia, T.W. et al., Investigation of Bacteria Associated with WWII Aircraft Wrecks in Jaluit Lagoon, Marshall Islands:
Implications for Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion. Published Report submitted to Underwater Archaeology Branch,
Naval Historical Trust, Department of Navy, 2006.
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, 54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq. (2014), and Protection of
Historic Properties, 36 CFR part 800.
United States Navy; Office of Naval Intelligence. Early Raids in the Pacific Ocean, Combat Narrative, The Raid on the
Marshall and Gilbert Islands February 1, 1942, Washington, DC: Publication Section, Combat Intelligence Branch Office of
Naval Intelligence, United States Navy, 1943.

6

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="40">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="166">
                  <text>2023 Session 4: Underwater Cultural Heritage of World War II in the Asia-Pacific Region: Discoveries, Opportunities &amp; Challenges</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="167">
                  <text>Session 4 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="168">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 4 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="169">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="170">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="171">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="172">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="173">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="174">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5926">
                <text>The Jaluit Atoll TBD-1 Devastators: Archaeological Analysis and Preservation Assessment of a WWII Site. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5927">
                <text>The topic of the paper, entitled “The Jaluit Atoll TBD-1 Devastators: Archaeological Analysis, and Preservation&#13;
Assessment of a WWII Site,” best fits within the session, Underwater Cultural Heritage of World War II in the&#13;
Asia-Pacific Region: Discoveries, Opportunities &amp; Challenges due to its context and subject matter. Before&#13;
sunrise on 1 February 1942, aircraft from the USS Yorktown (CV-5), sortied as part of Task Force-17’s attack&#13;
on the Japanese Mandated Islands of Jaluit and Milli, in present day Republic of the Marshall Islands, and&#13;
Makin, the northernmost island in the Gilbert Islands chain. During the raid, two TBD-1 Devastator torpedo&#13;
bombers [BuNo. 0298 (5-T-7), and BuNo. 1515 (5-T-6)] were forced to ditch in Jaluit Lagoon as each aircraft&#13;
was low on fuel. The aircrews of both planes survived the water landing, were captured by Imperial Japanese&#13;
Naval forces, and survived captivity in POW camps in Japan. Since 2004, a group of scientists, engineers and&#13;
researchers have undertaken seven expeditions to the resting place of these aircraft in a remote section of the&#13;
lagoon to document and conduct analysis on aspects of the artifacts’ preservation. As part of the monitoring and&#13;
assessment, plans have been generated to potentially recover one of the aircraft to archaeological and materials&#13;
conservation standards. &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5928">
                <text> Peter D. Fix</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5929">
                <text>Russell E. Matthews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5930">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5931">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5932">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5933">
                <text>Fix, Peter D., Russell E. Matthews. 2023. “The Jaluit Atoll TBD-1 Devastators: Archaeological Analysis and Preservation Assessment of a WWII Site.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Alexis Catsambis. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology.URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1897 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="54">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="316" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3707">
                <text>The Japanese Merchant Marine in World War II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3708">
                <text>Mark P. Parillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3709">
                <text>Naval Institute Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3710">
                <text>1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3711">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3712">
                <text>Mark P. Parillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3713">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="152">
            <name>ISBN</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3714">
                <text>1557506779</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3715">
                <text>1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="185">
            <name>Edition</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3716">
                <text>First Edition</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="212">
            <name>Num Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3717">
                <text>256</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3718">
                <text>Maryland</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3719">
                <text>Naval Institute Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3720">
                <text>The Japanese Merchant Marine in World War II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="315" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3696">
                <text>The Jesuits, Japan, and European Expansion in the Sixteenth Century</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3697">
                <text>Derek Massarella</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3698">
                <text>Deutsche Gesellschaft fÃ¼r Natur- und VÃ¶lkerkunde Ostasiens</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3699">
                <text>1999</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3700">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3701">
                <text>Derek Massarella</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3702">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3703">
                <text>1999</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3704">
                <text>Tokyo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3705">
                <text>Deutsche Gesellschaft fÃ¼r Natur- und VÃ¶lkerkunde Ostasiens</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3706">
                <text>The Jesuits, Japan, and European Expansion in the Sixteenth Century</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="314" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3684">
                <text>The Kautilya â€œArthasastra,â€ Part II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3685">
                <text>R.P. Kangle</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3686">
                <text>University of Bombay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3687">
                <text>1972</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3688">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3689">
                <text>R.P. Kangle</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3690">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3691">
                <text>1972</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="185">
            <name>Edition</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3692">
                <text>2nd</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3693">
                <text>Bombay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3694">
                <text>University of Bombay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3695">
                <text>The Kautilya â€œArthasastra,â€ Part II</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="171" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2091">
                <text>The Kumano-no-morota-bune, Or, the Many-paddled-ship of Kumano</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2092">
                <text>Shinji Nishimura</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2093">
                <text>Society of Naval Architects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2094">
                <text>1920</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2095">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2096">
                <text>Shinji Nishimura</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2097">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2098">
                <text>1920</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="188">
            <name>Extra</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2099">
                <text>External Resources: Find this item at Abebooks.com (Bookseller) Find this item at Antiquarian Booksellers Association of America (Bookseller) Find this item at Biblio (Bookseller) Cite This Item Search for versions with same title and author | Advanced options ...
Edition: 2nd ed.
Language: English
Responsibility: by Shinji Nishimura.
More Records: Show record information
Entry: 19910419
Update: 20060412
Provider: OCLC</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="205">
            <name>Library Catalog</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2100">
                <text>OCLC WorldCat FirstSearch</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="212">
            <name>Num Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2101">
                <text>44</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2102">
                <text>Tokyo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2103">
                <text>Society of Naval Architects</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="236">
            <name>Series</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2104">
                <text>Nishimura, Shinji, 1879-1943. Study on the ancient ships of Japan ;; pt. 1; Variation:          Nishimura, Shinji,; 1879-1943.; Study on the ancient ships of Japan ;; pt. 1.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2105">
                <text>The Kumano-no-morota-bune, Or, the Many-paddled-ship of Kumano</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="170" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2074">
                <text>The Lady Washington at Kushimoto, Japan, in 1791</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2075">
                <text>Jim Mockford</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2076">
                <text>William S. Dudley</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2077">
                <text>Michael J. Crawford</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2078">
                <text>Brasseyâ€™s Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2079">
                <text>2001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2080">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2081">
                <text>Jim Mockford</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2082">
                <text>William S. Dudley</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2083">
                <text>Michael J. Crawford</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2084">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2085">
                <text>The Early Republic and the Sea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2086">
                <text>2001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2087">
                <text>83-100</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2088">
                <text>Washington DC</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2089">
                <text>Brasseyâ€™s Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2090">
                <text>The Lady Washington at Kushimoto, Japan, in 1791</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="570" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="361">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/d57ed3d4a256bb16fcf29a276d4c89c9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>dd21585de62507eb045b9432dc382821</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6306">
                    <text>The Lashings and Knots of the Chau Tan Shipwreck
Ian McCann
ABSTRACT
The Chau Tan shipwreck is the oldest ocean-going cargo ship yet found in Vietnam dating from around the 8th9th century CE. It provides a unique opportunity to study the construction methods of a lashed- lug ship from that
period. Over 40 of the ship’s timbers were retrieved but unfortunately all the lashings connecting the lugs were
severed during the salvage and no record was made of the salvage. There was still enough in situ ropes to start to
build a small list of the types of simple knots and complicated flat braided lashings that were used in its
construction. For this paper ropes were made using simple technology that may have been available at the time
the ship was built. The two knots used on the Chau Tan ship are widely used, even today. The braided lashings
are a different matter, they do not appear in any maritime archaeology or sailing literature that the author could
access. First the author had to work out how the lashing was tied. It was then tested for strength to try and further
understand it's utility. The results were surprising and emphasised the value of experimental archaeology.
Keywords: Lashed-lug, rope strength, experimental archaeology
List of figures
Figure 1. Lashings on timber CT-T3
Figure 2. Lashing loops
Figure 3. Lashing model of some of the Punjulharo lashings and Chau Tan
Figure 4. Lashing after the stringer was removed and after the lashing was removed from the through holes.

INTRODUCTION
The Chau Tan vessel was carrying a cargo of mainly ceramics from Changsha, Ding and Yue kiln sites
in Hunan province, China (Kimura 2015:3; Kimura 2016:51, Giang 2016:74). The shipwreck was
discovered close to the village of Binh Chau in the province of Quang Ngai in Central Vietnam in the
early 2000’s. Severe weather had stripped metres of sand from the seabed, allowing the salvage of its
cargo. Over 40 of the ship’s timbers were also recovered and sold to a local collector, Lam Du Xenh.
THE LASHINGS
When found, the wreck was in a remarkable state of preservation with nearly all the lashings that held
the vessel together intact. Later, the salvors cut the lashings to facilitate the removal of the timbers. The
boat’s internal structure, such as the frames, thwarts etc. had been removed during salvage operations
and not saved.
The few intact lashings were of one type, a woven lashing that may have held longitudinal round battens
with a flattened face that may have held some form of caulking in direct contact with and along the join
of the hull planks. This lashing has also been found in Thailand on the Bueng Kum shipwreck inspected
and recorded in early 2023 by Wongsakorn Rahothan and Naphat Piromrak (2023, 8). These lashings
and their position on the timbers can be seen in Figure 1. Most of the lashings are located within 70mm
of the corner of each lug. On top of the lashings are overhand knots and a single fisherman’s knot
(Figure 1 lower right). These helped determine how the lashings were tied.

1

�Figure 1. Lashings on timber CT-T3 circled in red and two intact lashings. (Photo Kevin Edward and Author).

Each of the hull timbers have through holes drilled in the face and the side with matching holes on
adjacent timbers. During Vietnam Maritime Archaeology Projects (VMAP) fieldwork in 2017 the
author selected 26 through holes where the quantity and diameter of ropes that were threaded through
the holes were measured. Each of the matched holes has a rope of two strands threaded through them
and this rope appears to be one continuous length that is wrapped around from between 18 to 26 times.
The difference in the number of wraps is due to the variation in the thickness of the rope, being from
between 3.2 mm to 5.49 mm. This variation may indicate that the strands were crudely made by hand
or with simple tools.

ROPE HISTORY
Rope has been a staple technology for humans for millennia and rope making techniques, through trial
and error, have resulted in different cultures constructing rope in similar ways. The longevity of
techniques used in rope making is demonstrated by a painting on a wall in the tomb of Nefer at Saqqara,
Egypt, circa 2465–2323 BCE. It shows a method of making ropes using a rope spinner to twist the ropes
(Wendrich 2008, 1909). A photograph taken in Egypt before 1916 shows the same process (Mackay
1916, 126). In both illustrations the person making the strands is using a rope spinner. This illustrates
an unchanged method of rope making spanning over 4000 years. It is likely that this long use of an
unknown rope making methodology has been repeated in the Indo Pacific region. This rope spinner
method was chosen by the author to make the ropes due to its longevity of use, not that it may have
been a method of rope production used in the Indo Pacific region.

2

�Early rope making in Asia is shown in two photographs from the Bristol Historical Photographs of
China website, pictures pa01-24 from the W. Palmer Collection and picture ba05-120 from the
Bannister Family Collection. These two photographs show rope being woven by hand from a stiff fibre,
possibly bamboo. A 1960s photograph of a Vietnamese rope factory in Qui Nhon in the (Dalby and
Thede 1962, A11-18) shows two rope makers extending the length of a thick coiled rope, each working
from opposite ends. Again, the material used is a stiff fibre and again the twisting is done by hand. What
these three photographs demonstrate is that ropes can be made with basic tools and wherever flora with
suitable fibres are found.

ROPE FIBRES
One of the complications of studying flora used to make rope is the lack of a database of identified
waterlogged material (Haw 2019, 510). Allied with this is the variety of plant species in each genus.
Palm trees are a common source of natural fibre for making ropes but there are between 2400 (Eiserhardt
2011, 1392) to 2600 known species (Baker and Dransfield 2016, 209). Fibres from the palm tree Arenga
pinnata have been identified by archaeologists as being used on the construction of Southeast Asian
boats, (Lacsina 2016, 9; Mochtar 2018, 15). We need to differentiate between palm species as this may
help narrow down the geographic region of where the ropes were made and help to determine where
the boats using those ropes may have been constructed or repaired. It must also be a consideration that
rope may have been traded.
Multiple types of rope fibre have been used, and still used, on boats. Different parts of a palm tree, such
as the upper trunk and leaves, will produce a fibre of different colour, the latter being dark and the
former being lighter, as well as of different texture and strength. This further complicates species
identification. During a visit in 2016 to the island of Taumako in the Duff Island group, the author
recorded a recently built Vaka, a large ocean voyaging outrigger canoe. Four different types of rope
were used in its construction: two from palm trees, the leaves and upper trunk; one coconut fibre rope
and the third, bamboo. After the Vakas first sea trial some palm fibre rope lashings were strengthened
using strips of bamboo, indicating that different materials from possibly different locations may be used
on any given vessel.
MAKING THE ROPE
In attempting to make rope the author constructed a rope spinner similar to the example seen on the
Egyptian tomb and photograph and a simultaneously rotating three-hook system were the rope making
‘machines’ used. The only fibres that could be sourced were sisal (Agave saliana) and hemp (Cannibis
sativa). Both rope makers worked well with around 10 metres of 3.5mm two strand rope being made in
45 minutes and 30 minutes respectively and with a little practice, a uniform rope could be made.
Two of the most important things learnt by making rope is that a tightly spun, uniform diameter rope
will produce a better-quality lashing, and when tightly spun, a rope will expand in diameter and tangle
once the rope is released of any tension. If the tension is maintained on the rope for several hours by
stretching it between two fixed points, the rope maintains the same diameter, does not tangle and is a
stiffer, denser rope. When discussing the modern rope manufacturing process with Kent Mills from WA
Ropes and Hardware, he explained that the diameter of a natural fibre rope will expand after
manufacture. A 14 mm diameter hemp rope could measure up to16mm when on a spool, as the diameter
of the rope is measured during manufacture when it is still under tension.

3

�LOAD TESTING THE ROPE
A device was set up to measure the breaking strain of the rope. A 5,000 lb capacity analogue Dillion
dynamometer to measure the load, and a high ratio yachting winch or a 1,500 kg lever block to apply
the load, were used. Ten samples from each batch of two strand rope were tested for their breaking
strain. Next the ropes’ breaking strain was tested first with an overhand knot and secondly a single
fisherman’s knot. The figures were rounded to the nearest kilogram. The average breaking strain for the
sisal rope was 24kg and for the manila rope, 29 kg. The overhand knot in both the sisal and manila
reduced the strength of the rope by an average of 33 per cent, the single fisherman’s knot by 21 per
cent.
Commercially produced rope made from sisal, manila, jute, bamboo, nettle, seagrass, raffia, Egyptian
flax and an artisanal coir rope from Vietnam were also tested. All these ropes had a similar percentage
reduction in breaking strains when knotted. Comparing the breaking strains of different ropes made
from different materials is problematic. Fibre strength, length and the aging process are a few of the
factors that can affect the results. One of the main factors observed during these tests that impacted the
breaking strain of the rope is the manufacturing process. Refined rope with a consistent density and
diameter, such as the Egyptian flax, nettle and bamboo broke just outside the knot. The Vietnamese
coir, handmade sisal and hemp often broke where there was a visible defect in the rope, such as a point
where the diameter of the rope was noticeably thinner or where coarser fibres could be seen. To help
set some meaningful benchmark strength for the different fibres, the weight of a given section of rope
in relation to its diameter was recorded. A 100 mm length of rope from each test was weighed and this
provided a strength, diameter and weight ratio. For example, the two-strand spinner made rope, when
held under stress after making, would be between 15-30 per cent thinner than when the same type of
rope was immediately released from any tension. With the tension released, the rope would tangle and
expand in diameter.

REPRODUCING THE LASHING
A wooden model was made by reproducing a section of the hull, the model was made using short
timbers and were joined by wooden dowls or treenails with through holes for the lashing. The hull
planks were made from a hardwood and the stringer from a softwood. The intact lashings on the Chau
Tan wreck had an internal diameter of approximately 47 mm which indicates the diameter of the
wooden stringer that it held. A piece of wooden pole representing a stringer was carved to this size for
the lashing to be woven around (Figure 2).
The rope made from sisal and made using the rope spinner was chosen to make the lashing. Two 3800
mm lengths of rope were wound around the stringer and through each of the through holes 24 times,
creating a continuous bundle of loops that were secured with an overhand knot, (Figure 2 bottom left).
Two wooden wedges were placed between the round wooden stringer and the hull planks creating a
gap of approximately 10 mm. This gap was needed to allow the binding rope to be fed around the
bundles of loops. As the weaving of the lashing progressed, this gap would be gradually reduced to
where the lashing had drawn the stringer tight onto the hull planks. Two 1,200 mm lengths of rope were
secured to the top of the looped bundles on top of the stringer (12 o’clock) and secured with an overhand
knot (A). These ropes were then woven around the bundles as figure two lower left and right. One of
the 120 mm ropes is passed on the inside of the bundles, between the bundles and the stringer (B), over
the top of the bundles (C) and fed under itself (D), in effect making an overhand knot (E). The knotted
rope is pushed up to the top of bundles (F) then pulled tight. The same process is repeated on the
opposite bundle with the same rope. This sequence is repeated until the lashing is formed a quarter of
the way around the wooden stringer. Then the second 1200 mm rope is woven from the top down on
the opposite side of the stringer until it formed a quarter of the way around the other side of the stringer.
Now both 120 mm ropes are at the maximum diameter of the stringer (three and nine o’clock) and the
bundles of loops now are vertically above the through holes. The ropes can be threaded through and
4

�pushed up the lashing as there is a growing gap between the round stringer and the vertical ropes of the
loops. The remainder of the 1200 mm ropes are used in the same fashion until the stringer is held tight
against the hull timbers. Once the lashing was completed, (Figure 2 top right), the stringer was held
fast. A total of 10 metres of rope was needed to make the lashing.

Figure 2. Above left. the lashing loops set up, right the lashing completed, and lower right and left the sequence used
to make the lashing.

PURPOSE OF THE LASHING
This lashing appears to perform two functions; it pulls the stringer hard against the hull planks and at
the same time, pulls the two planks together.
This is a unique feature of the Chau Tan vessel; other lash lugged vessels have longitudinal stringers
sitting on top of the ribs or frames leaving a gap between the stringer and the hull planks. As an intact
internal structure from the Chau Tan shipwreck does not exist it is not known if the timbers were
stringers or if they serve different functions. Figure 3 is a photograph of a model with a combination of
lashings from the Punjulharo boat (1 and 2) with the large frame sitting across lugs and the stringers on
top of one of the large frames (Lacsina 2016, 130; Mochtar 2018, 52). The small lashing (1) is securing
a small batten that is at 90 degrees to the joins of the hull planks (Manguin 2019, Figure 7, Mochtar

5

�2018, 58). Three and four show how the Chau Tan stringers might have been placed under the frames,
between the lugs and in direct contact with the hull planks seams.

Figure 3. Lashing model of some of the Punjulharo lashings (1 and 2) and how the Chau Tan stringer or batten may
have been lashed (3 and 4). (Model and photo by the author).

The small lashing (Figure 3, 1) has some of the same physical characteristics as the Chau Tan lashing.
Two bundles of loops are threaded through opposite holes on opposing planks. These bundles are then
bound together with another rope that passes over a small batten with a continuous loop. The batten is
sitting across the hull plank seam and its purpose is to provide a physical link between the two hull
timbers and hold them tightly together at that point.
The Chau Tan lashing and stringers also join the two hull planks tightly together, adding strength to the
internal frame from the sizable stringer and helping to distribute loads across the internal structure. They
could also be used as another system of caulking if the bottom of the round stringer was flattened.
There are examples of battens lashed along the seam lines of a boats hull timbers as part of the caulking
system. The bronze age Ferriby boat has a wooden batten or capping lath lashed with yew along the
joins of the hull planks, (Wright 2104,16), with caulking moss between the batten and the hull planks.
These thin battens would not provide much additional strength to the vessel.

LOAD TESTING THE LASHING
When weaving the lashing four 2,200 kg sewn slings were placed between the stringer and the hull
timbers. Two of the tapes were attached to the 1,500 kg lever block and anchor point, the other two to
the dynamometer and a second anchor point. This set up was used for the static load test of the lashing.
A load was gradually applied until a measurement of 1,160 kg was reached, there was no movement of
the lashing and no gap between the stringer and the hull timbers. The test was stopped at this stage due
to the lever block starting to malfunction and concern in case the lashing failed as the author had to be
close to the test rig to apply the load.

6

�With the testing model intact and with no visible damage a second load test was set up, this time
applying a dynamic load. A peak load of 1,270 kg was reached. The lashing was still intact but both
sides of the lashing had stretched; the left by 4mm the right by 18mm. None of the fibres had broken;
however, where the strands passed over the edge of the wooden holes, a slight flattening of the fibres
could be seen. This is the point where the lashing would most probably fail if the lashing was tested to
destruction.
The stringer could now be slid out from the lashing, (Figure 4 left) and by cutting two of the bundles of
loops the whole knot could be removed from the model (Figure 4 right). This allows the structure of the
knot to be clearly seen.

Figure 4. Figure 4. Lashing after the stringer was removed and after the lashing was removed from the through holes.

CONCLUSION
The Chau Tan lashing has been proven to be a very strong lashing and simple to make. The gap between
the curve of the stringer and the lashing would allow a rope to be bound around the looped bundles to
tighten the lashing if it stretched. If damaged at sea it would be possible to completely replace the
lashing whilst underway. Making rope using simple technology is straight forward and surprisingly
quick. By following a few basic principles, a uniform rope of good quality can be made. Making rope
can be as simple as rolling fibres in the hands to form strands and then twisting those strands to form
rope. Alternatively, a simple wooden device, such as a wooden rope spinner, could be used. What this
shows is that rope can be made almost anywhere, even on board a sailing vessel, if suitable material is
at hand.
More research is needed on identifying the species of plant used to make ropes particularly those that
have been waterlogged. A comprehensive comparison of the strength of the different lashings systems
in relation to the internal structural configurations of strakes, thwarts, stringers, knees and frames that
have been used to construct lash lugged vessels is needed. This will give us a better understanding of
the strengths, weaknesses, and flexibility of the lash lugged tradition of boat building.

7

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baker, William J., and John Dransfield. "Beyond Genera Palmarum: progress and prospects in palm systematics." Botanical
Journal of the Linnean Society 182, no. 2 (2016): 207-233.
Conard, Nicholas J., and Maria Malina. "Außergewöhnliche neue Funde aus den aurignacienzeitlichen Schichten vom Hohle
Fels bei Schelklingen." Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 2015 (2016): 60-66.
Dalby, M., and W. Thede. "The Junk Blue Book." A Handbook of Junks of South Vietnam (1962).
Eiserhardt, Wolf L., Jens-Christian Svenning, W. Daniel Kissling, and Henrik Balslev. "Geographical ecology of the palms
(Arecaceae): determinants of diversity and distributions across spatial scales." Annals of Botany 108, no. 8 (2011): 1391-1416.
Giang, Do Truong. "Diplomacy, trade and networks: Champa in the Asian commercial context (7th-10th
Centuries)." Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines sur l’Asie du Sud-Est 27 (2016): 59-82.
Haw, S.G., “The genus Afzelia and the Belitung ship.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 29, no. 3 (2019):505-518.
https://hpcbristol.net/ Historic Photographs of China, Bannister Family Collection ba05-120 and W. Palmer Collection pa0124. Last accessed 22/3/23.
Kimura, J. Shipwrecked? New developments in Southeast Asian maritime archaeology and the safeguard of shipwrecks in the
region. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 44 no. 1(15), pp. 1–4.
Kimura, Jun. "Maritime archaeological perspectives on seaborne trade in the South China Sea and East China Sea between
the seventh and thirteenth Centuries." Crossroads: Studies on the History of Exchange Relations in the East Asian World 11
(2016): 47-61. Lacsina, Ligaya. "Examining pre-colonial Southeast Asian boatbuilding: An archaeological study of the Butuan
Boats and the use of edge-joined planking in local and regional construction techniques." PhD diss., Flinders University,
School of Humanities and Creative Arts., 2016.Mackay, E., 1916. Note on a new tomb (No. 260) at Drah Abu'l Naga,
Thebes. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 3(1), pp.125-126.
Lacsina, Ligaya. "Examining pre-colonial Southeast Asian boatbuilding: An archaeological study of the Butuan Boats and the
use of edge-joined planking in local and regional construction techniques." PhD diss., Flinders University, School of
Humanities and Creative Arts., 2016.
Manguin, Pierre Yves. "Sewn Boats of Southeast Asia: the stitched-plank and lashed-lug tradition." International Journal of
Nautical Archaeology, 48 no. 2 (2019): 400-415.
Mackay, E., 1916. Note on a new tomb (No. 260) at Drah Abu'l Naga, Thebes. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 3(1),
pp.125-126.
Mochtar, Agni Sesaria. "The Seventh-Century Punjulharjo Boat from Indonesia: A study of the early Southeast Asian lashedlug boatbuilding tradition." PhD diss., Flinders University, College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences., 2018.
Wendrich, Willemina. "Ancient Egyptian Rope and Knots”. Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and
Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer. pp 1908-1909. 2008.
Rahothan, Wongsakorn and Piromrak, Naphat. Bueng Kum Ancient Shipwreck. Unpublished report Division of the Thai Fine
Arts Department, 2023.
Wright, E.The Ferriby Boats: seacraft of the Bronze Age”. City: Routledge, 2014.

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="42">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="184">
                  <text>2023 Session 6: Lashed-lug boats: Emerging research from Southeast Asia and the Pacific</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="185">
                  <text>Session 6 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="186">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 6 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="187">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="188">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="189">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="190">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="191">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="192">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6299">
                <text>The Lashings and Knots of the Chau Tan Shipwreck</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6300">
                <text>The Chau Tan shipwreck is the oldest ocean-going cargo ship yet found in Vietnam dating from around the 8th9th century CE. It provides a unique opportunity to study the construction methods of a lashed- lug ship from that&#13;
period. Over 40 of the ship’s timbers were retrieved but unfortunately all the lashings connecting the lugs were&#13;
severed during the salvage and no record was made of the salvage. There was still enough in situ ropes to start to&#13;
build a small list of the types of simple knots and complicated flat braided lashings that were used in its&#13;
construction. For this paper ropes were made using simple technology that may have been available at the time&#13;
the ship was built. The two knots used on the Chau Tan ship are widely used, even today. The braided lashings&#13;
are a different matter, they do not appear in any maritime archaeology or sailing literature that the author could&#13;
access. First the author had to work out how the lashing was tied. It was then tested for strength to try and further&#13;
understand it's utility. The results were surprising and emphasised the value of experimental archaeology.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6301">
                <text>Ian McCann</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6302">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6303">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6304">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6305">
                <text>McCann, Ian. 2023. “The Lashings and Knots of the Chau Tan Shipwrecks.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Ligaya Lacsina, Agni Mochtar, and Pierre-Yves Manguin. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1941 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="63">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="74" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="74">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/4aa437aae0f4b03e1556034917967a78.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d81539f5a6662f3363d36e1fd15e2d3a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="803">
                    <text>The Local Pacific Inventory:
Maritime heritage resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands
Hans Van Tilburg
NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Honolulu, Hawaii 96825, USA
Email: hans.vantilburg@noaa.gov
Abstract
The systematic investigation of underwater cultural heritage in the islands started in
1989 with the University of Hawai`i’s Marine Option Program. This slowly grew into a
graduate certificate program in maritime archaeology and history. Manned submersibles
with the Hawai`i Undersea Research Lab contribute to deep water discoveries and site
surveys. Today the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office
of National Marine Sanctuaries continues heritage resource site assessments in
Hawai`i, in collaboration with partner agencies and programs. The underwater cultural
heritage in Hawai`i reflects a multicultural diversity of archaeological and historic
properties, such as coastal stone fishponds, submerged heiau, 19th century plantation
landings, inter island steamships etc. Major events like World War II left behind
numerous naval shipwrecks and submerged aircraft. These are the physical elements
of maritime cultural landscapes that describe Hawai`i’s maritime past.
Key words: Hawaii, World War II, Culture landscapes, Heritage preservation, Maritime
archaeology
Introduction
Hawai'i’s underwater cultural heritage speaks directly to the ancient past, the
multicultural historical period, and the forces of modernization and globalization leading
to the modern present. It is a testimony to dynamic change. The resources that reflect
this diversity lie beneath the warm blue waters of the North Pacific, generally unknown
to the public, on the slopes of the tallest mountain on Earth (including the undersea
portion). Discovering these resources opens windows on elements of the Islands’
otherwise unseen history. Awareness of the value of this unseen heritage has been
increasing steadily over the past two decades. This paper provides an introductory
description of the current state of underwater cultural heritage investigations in the main
Hawaiian Islands and some of the chief types of heritage resources found in Hawai'i.
(Note: the term “UCH” here includes U.S. national criteria, 50-year limit, etc.)

1

�Current State: Surveys in the Context of Education
Academic investigation started in 1989 with an in-water workshop and small symposium
hosted by the University of Hawai'i’s Marine Option Program.

The Marine Option

Program (MOP) provides hands-on marine education experiences for students from any
field of study, operating across the ten-campus university system. MOP’s maritime
archaeology component was initiated partially in response to the passage of the U.S.
Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 (ASA, 1987). Over time the symposium grew into a
graduate certificate program in maritime archaeology and history, led by an instructor
trained at East Carolina University’s Maritime Studies Program. Between 1996 and
2002 MOP offered annual classroom and field courses in maritime history,
anthropology, and a six-week maritime archaeology field class. Numerous students
obtained the specialized certificate, and some went on to Masters-level studies at Texas
A&amp;M University or East Carolina University (Van Tilburg, 2002). Though the maritime
archaeology certificate program no longer exists, a two-week field survey class for
university students continues today under a National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)/University of Hawai'i partnership. The class is known as the
Maritime Archaeology Survey Techniques (MAST) course. Taught by NOAA staff,
students are introduced to broad aspects of the UCH preservation field in the
classroom, prior to beginning the underwater survey. Study sites are selected among
the main Hawaiian Islands, and students gain field experience while documenting
previously

unrecorded

heritage

resources,

thus

contributing

to

the

State’s

archaeological inventory. Non-diving days are used to explore local heritage among the
Hawaiian Islands (e.g. monuments, museums, other archaeological sites) and talk with
local divers and Hawaiian cultural practitioners about marine resources and
preservation management.
NOAA instruction in maritime archaeology also takes the form of public outreach (in
addition to formal university education), as Maritime Heritage Program staff have been
certified to teach the Nautical Archaeology Society’s (NAS) training curriculum. NAS is
a non-profit organization based in the United Kingdom and dedicated to advancing
education in nautical archaeology at all levels. To date, NOAA has conducted six NAS
Intro and Level One courses in the Pacific (Juneau and Anchorage in Alaska, Seattle in
2

�Washington State, and several courses in the Hawaiian Islands). Maritime archaeology
field courses taught at the University of Hawai'i also give the students the opportunity to
obtain the NAS training credential. From its early inception until today, the University
and now NOAA have also supported the annual Symposium on the Maritime
Archaeology and History of Hawai'i and the Pacific. The maritime symposium, now in its
24th year, regularly draws 60-70 professional and avocational participants, as well as
local divers and the general public. The three-day event includes presentations, panels,
receptions, field trips, and usually an informal back-yard barbeque for the conference
“banquet,” local-style grinds.
NOAA’s Maritime Heritage Program
In 2002, NOAA launched its Maritime Heritage Program under its Office of National
Marine Sanctuaries. The Maritime Heritage Program is designed to support maritime
heritage discovery and resource preservation across the sanctuary system. The
sanctuary system serves as the trustee for a national network of 14 marine protected
areas encompassing more than 170,000 square miles of marine and Great Lakes
federally protected waters (Fig. 1). More than half of these protected areas are in the
Pacific: Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (NMS), Cordell Bank NMS, Gulf of
the Farallones NMS, Monterey Bay NMS, Channel Islands NMS, National Marine
Sanctuary of American Samoa, Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale NMS, and the
Papahānaumokuākea
Marine National Monument
in

the

Northwestern

Hawaiian Islands.
With the incorporation of
cultural

resource

management,

maritime

archaeologists could begin
to

take

existing
equipment,
capacities

advantage

of

platforms,
and

diving

previously

Fig. 1 NOAA map of sanctuary system locations (NOAA
ONMS)
3

�dedicated to purely natural resource research missions.

More importantly, cultural

resources and historic properties within marine protected areas began to gain
consideration as unique, significant and worthy of protection. The legal mandate to
protect cultural resources was actually already an integral part of the sanctuary
systems’ founding legislation, the National Marine Sanctuary Act of 1972, which allowed
designation of marine protected areas of special national significance due to their
“conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological,
educational, or aesthetic qualities…” (emphasis added…NMSA, 1972). Today the
NMSA is one of the most important pieces of federal legislation in the United States for
protecting cultural submerged resources in the oceans and Great Lakes. The Maritime
Heritage Program is vital, but not large. With five sanctuary sites on the U.S. West
Coast, and three in the island Pacific, there are currently only three NOAA
archaeologists in the Pacific region.
Deep water surveys (beyond typical scuba depths) are often cost-prohibitive.
Fortunately Hawai'i benefits from a unique manned submersible program known as the
Hawai'i Undersea Research Lab (HURL). HURL was established in 1980 as a joint
NOAA/University of Hawai'i center with the primary responsibility of advancing
knowledge of the nation’s deep water resources and marine processes. Simply put,
operations director Terry Kerby and his HURL team, with the two three-person
submersibles Pisces IV and Pisces V, have located more underwater heritage sites than
any single other program in the State. These discoveries have been accomplished
through

surveys

conducted

during

HURL’s

pre-season

preparatory

dives,

(testing/training dives for both subs and pilots), cost-efficient opportunities for target site
identifications and assessments.
Maritime Cultural Landscapes in Hawai`i
To date, there has been no single comprehensive assessment of these resources in the
waters around the main Hawaiian Islands. Rather, information comes from different
sources: the HURL deep water database; the University of Hawai`i’s collection of
student site reports; a desk-based assessment of U.S. Navy properties in Hawaiian
waters (Van Tilburg, 2003); and local journalists and avocational researchers combing
through historic newspapers. Importantly, trust is slowly being built between
4

�management agencies and the general public, and sport divers are beginning to report
their own investigations and discoveries. This has led to a partial resource inventory in
the main Hawaiian Islands of some 150 underwater ship and aircraft locations, many of
them potential heritage properties.
It is impossible here to list all the heritage sites discovered and all the maritime
archaeology projects conducted in the Islands, but rather than discussing sites
individually, contextual understanding of Hawai`i’s UCH can be gained by considering
thematically-organized maritime cultural landscapes, for it is the cultural context of
human activity that patterns this resource. This approach also better integrates
archaeological

data

with

the

existing

and

broader

ecosystem-based marine

management approaches. Resources associated with three types of maritime cultural
landscapes will be introduced here: 1) ancient aquaculture production; 2) the plantation
and ranching era; and 3) the military landscape.
Ancient Hawaiian Aquaculture Systems
Prior to Western contact, the stone seawalls and gates of coastal fishponds, or lokai'a,
were prominent features of the Hawaiian landscape. Hundreds of coastal ponds of
various sizes produced protein for a large population by taking advantage of nutrientrich runoff from the highlands through the loʻi or taro fields and the brackish coastal
setting. Ocean tides through the seaward gates or makaha created flow through the
ponds, while the long seawalls protected juvenile fish populations from marine
predators. Each island had a handful of notable and productive ponds, while the island
of Moloka'i, with is shallow shoals, featured the greatest number of coastal pond
locations. The construction and maintenance of these systems represented an
impressive commitment of labor and social structure. Most of the traditional ponds are
now in ruins, submerged, orcompletely distroyed.

Coastal development and

sedimentation, as well as the degradation of upstream runoff, have combined to serious
effect. Fishpond sites are vulnerable to these larger-scale processes, rather than to the
perhaps more familiar individual impacts of divers on historic resource sites. However,
an increasing effort exists today to physically restore some of these fishponds to
productivity (Handy et al., 1972).

5

�University of Hawai'i students assisted in mapping the shallow submerged remains of
stone fish traps and fishpond wall at Kaloko Honokōhau National Park on Hawai'i Island
in 1997 with limited success, and have also pursued surveys of other lithic sites
including the ruins of an underwater heiau or temple, and the distribution of stone
fishing tools (basalt sinkers, anchors, etc) at specific off shore locations (Fig. 2). Statewide archaeological studies assessing the styles and conditions of the many fishpond
locations around the main Hawaiian Islands have been completed, but there has been
no other underwater archaeological survey conducted on the structural remnants of this
type of coastal cultural resource. Existing archaeological reports are exclusively
terrestrial, while the ruins of the fishponds are often totally submerged. The question
should be posed: would the type of archaeological survey techniques designed for
historic UCH properties like shipwrecks be appropriate or even effective for scattered
and broken stone walls often buried in coastal sediments?

Fig. 2 (left) University of Hawai`i students mapping submerged fish trap structures at Kaloko Honokōhau
National Historic Park, 1997. (J. Kuwabara UH MOP)
Fig. 3 (right) Near shore survey work on a plantation-period steamship wreck, Shipwreck Beach, Lanai. (J.
Kawabata UH MOP)

Hawai`i’s Historic Plantation and Ranching Period
The early to mid-19th century saw the skills associated with both sugar plantations and
with cattle ranching introduced to the Hawaiian Islands, and subsequently plantations
and ranches had an enormous impact on the economy and society of historic Hawai'i.
Both ranching and plantation economies relied on maritime transportation to the
transshipment port of Honolulu, and from there to continental destinations. Yet, with the
few exceptions of Honolulu on O'ahu, Hilo on Hawai'i, and Kahului on Maui, the Islands
6

�lacked protected harbors where ships could lie in safety in all weather. Open roadsteads and narrow passages between fringing reefs were the usual setting, and often
the skillful use of surf boats or cliff-side moorings and overhead wire systems were the
only way to transport both passengers and products. Historic documents record the
losses of hundreds of commercial sailing ships and steamers, generally clustered in the
vicinity of historic landing locations (Thomas, 1983). Inter island commerce was
hazardous business. The shipwrecks identified with Hawai'i’s early plantation history,
some submerged in a high-energy warm-water marine environment for over 100 years,
have experienced significant biochemical deterioration and mechanical break-up.
Whether wood or iron or steel-hulled, Hawai'i’s known steamship wreck sites generally
consist of only the heaviest machinery components (boilers, engines, propeller and
shaft, anchors etc.) lying on the sea floor adjacent to scattered cargo, small artifacts,
and hull debris. These components are often heavily encrusted in corals and coralline
algae (Fig. 3). Some of the shipwreck sites were intentionally disposed hulks already
stripped of useful equipment. Notably, rough and remote Shipwreck Beach on the north
shore of Lāna'i was used by Hawai'i ship owners for many years to dispose of hardworking steam ships which had outlived their useful service. Lāna'i’s north shore was
chosen as wind and water there would force the hulks firmly aground on a relatively
uninhabited coast. The reefs along the island’s north shore also presented natural
hazards to inter island shipping. The resulting cultural landscape at Shipwreck Beach
therefore reflects not only Hawaiian settlements and history, but also at least a dozen
accidental losses and intentional disposals of 19th and 20th century schooners, barges,
and steamships.

Several seasons of maritime archaeology fieldwork (1999, 2001,

2009) have been conducted at Shipwreck Beach (The Lāna'i Project, 2009).
Nine wreck sites associated with the plantation and ranching era have been assessed
to some level, and four of those (SS Maui survey in 2010, SS Kaua`i in 2012, SS Hornet
survey in 2009, and an unidentified steamship in 2001) have been the specific subject
of NOAA/UH field class surveys, with historical interpretations and site plans.
Steamship landings are also considered as potential historic locations, with the potential
to shed light on both land and marine human activities. Landing locations typically
include pilings, heavy mooring chains and anchors, cargo handling equipment like
7

�winches and derricks, cable, pilings, and assorted artifacts like bottles, fire
extinguishers, etc (Fig. 4). Only two of these landing sites have been surveyed in full by
maritime archaeologists: Waimanalo plantation landing in 1999 and industrial Mahukona
Harbor, former entry-point to the Kingdom of Hawai'i, in both 1994 and 2012.

Fig. 4 The industrial archaeology of landing locations: loading derrick at the Waimanal plantation
landing site, in-use circa 1880. (T. Casserley NOAA ONMS)

Military Vessels
U.S. naval activities in Hawai'i have evolved through a number of distinct phases,
beginning with early goodwill visits in the 1820’s, and progressing through the
commitment to develop a major naval base at Pearl Harbor by 1900, and beyond. The
military construction boom and transfer of forces to the islands accelerated in the 1930’s
prior to World War II. Hawai'i soon became home to the U.S. Pacific Fleet, and
numerous air stations, naval stations and other facilities.
Unprecedented naval activity took place among the Hawaiian Islands during the War, in
the skies as well as on and under the sea. To understand the military landscape of
heritage resources, though, we need to look beyond combat losses. The Hawaiian
Islands only came under actual attack a handful of times: the attack on Pearl Harbor
and O'ahu military installations on December 7th 1941; the Battle of Midway June 4-7th
1942; Japanese submarine shelling of Kahului, Nāwiliwili, and Hilo harbors on
December 30th 1941; and a Japanese seaplane bombing incident on O'ahu March 3rd
8

�1942 known as Operation K. By far, the many known military properties in Hawai'i’s
waters today are testimony to the intensive combat training operations (leading to
accidental losses) during the war years, rather than direct attack. The known footprint of
the military cultural landscape within the main Hawaiian Islands is significant in size and
complexity, and may make up the majority of the underwater heritage resource sites.
Thousands of naval aircraft and pilots took part in intensive training activities in
preparation for combat operations in the Pacific. Records from 1924-1952 indicate over
1,485 naval aircraft sunk in the vicinity of the Hawaiian Islands during that period. Many
of these submerged aircraft crash sites are also war graves. The submerged aviation
landscape is not random, but patterned and island-specific. Often, naval aircraft are
found in direct relationship to former naval air station runways. Locating and identifying
these aircraft has become a popular pursuit for local sport and technical divers,
particularly as closed-circuit re-breather (CCR) technology has advanced and become
more available to the specialized public. Some submerged aircraft have become regular
destinations for Hawai'i’s recreational diving industry. Several formal surveys have
focused on documenting naval aircraft (Catalina PBY-5A in Kaneohe study 1994;
Corsair F4U-1 survey in Maunalua Bay 2002; Helldiver SB2C-1 and Hellcat F4F in
Mā'alaea Harbor 2011…see Rodgers et al., 1998). Additionally, HURL's research
submersibles have located and identified dozens of deep water aircraft sites, including
several Keystone PH-1 biplanes from the 1930’s, several Dauntless SBD’s, Avenger
TBM’s, and Helldiver SB2C’s…and the giant Martin JRM-1 flying boat (Naval, 2004). Of
the many aircraft lost in the islands, over 30 have been located and assessed to some
extent. The Hawaiian Islands played a major role in the development of naval aviation in
the Pacific (Fig. 5). In a fashion similar to the numerous aircraft, the wreck sites of
amphibious landing craft (ramped craft delivering troops onto the beach) and
amphibious assault vehicles (tracked vehicles transiting the ocean/beach and moving
inland) are also ubiquitous in Hawai`i. Several surveys have focused on documenting
the remains of these resources (LVT-3 AMTRACK Maui survey 2011; LVT (A)-4
AMTRACKs Maui survey 2013; LSM O'ahu survey planned for 2014). As with the
aircraft, the distribution of these amphibious sites is also patterned and specific.
Several areas in the main Hawaiian Islands served as amphibious training beaches
9

�prior to major amphibious operations during WWII (invasions of Saipan, Iwo Jima, etc).
These include the shores of North Kohala on Hawai`i Island and the southern corridor of
Mā'alaea to Mākena on Maui, both within the NOAA sanctuary (Fig. 6). Maui also
featured facilities for the Maui Amphibious Training Center and the Combat Demolition
Training Center on Mā`alaea Bay, where the first Underwater Demolition Teams (UDT)
were trained in surveying and destroying undersea obstructions and in reconnaissance
for shore invasions.

(Maui’s WWII Legacy, 2011)

Hawai'i proved to be the major

combined forces Pacific training area for the innovation of amphibious tactics during
World War II.

Fig. 5 (left) A WWII dive bomber (SB2C-1 Helldiver) ditched 31 August 1944; now a popular recreational
dive site. (H. Van Tilburg NOAA ONMS)
Fig. 6 (right) MAST students at the site of an amphibious assault vehicle (LVTA-4 AMTRACK), near the
former Maui amphibious training beaches, 2013. (H. Van Tilburg NOAA ONMS)

There are many other military vessels in Hawaiian waters. The naval inventory lists
over 80 US Navy ships and submarines lost in the vicinity (including inshore patrol
vessels, fleet oilers, requisitioned fishing sampans, numerous auxiliaries) and many of
these have been located and identified. Unlike the early whaling or plantation periods,
the peak of military activity in Hawai'i during World War II occurred only a little over 50
years ago. Modern steel construction, pre-fabrication, and sheer industrial productivity
account for the fact that there are many more identified WWII and military-related
properties in Hawaiian waters than any older sites. Furthermore, several military sites
directly associated with the December 7th, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor and O`ahu
military installations have an importance far beyond individual archaeological surveys.

10

�The battleship USS Arizona BB-39, launched from the New York Navy Yard in 1915,
was sunk in Pearl Harbor during the December 7th attack with the loss of 1,177
casualties. Much has been written about the USS Arizona, the reverence felt for this
site, and the place it occupies in the American national narrative. In 1983 the National
Park Service Submerged Resources Center initiated the archaeological survey of the
site (Lenihan, 1989), and subsequent field projects took place in 1998, 1999, 2000, and
2001, partnering at various times with academic, commercial, and military groups.
Follow-up studies on bio-fouling and metals corrosion, as well as a site monitoring
program, continue today. Multiple lines of inquiry revolve around questions of structural
integrity, the specific processes of deterioration, the amount and location of fuel oil
remaining in the ship, and the possibilities for long-term site preservation (Russell and
Murphy, 2004). In many ways, these studies are defining the nature of submerged
World War II resources and their relationship to the ecosystem.
In 2002 Terry Kerby and his HURL team discovered a small two-man submarine sitting
upright in over 1,200 feet of water off the south shore of the island of Oahu (Japanese
Midget Submarine, 2005). This submarine was one of five secret weapons of the
Japanese Imperial Navy involved in the attack on Pearl Harbor, which heralded
America’s entrance into World War II in the Pacific. The sub sits upright and intact, in
relatively good condition, with a slight list to port. Both torpedoes were still in their tubes,
and no extensive exterior damage was visible except for a shell hole at the base of the
conning tower’s starboard side, corresponding to the shot which sank the sub. Since
then, agencies have collaborated on multiple survey and monitoring missions to the site,
and a programmatic agreement for preservation management is currently being
reviewed between NOAA, National Park Service, State Historic Preservation Division,
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Van Tilburg, 2007). Also since then,
HURL has continued its efforts in deep water maritime inventory, and gone on to
discover the fifth and last Japanese two-man submarine from the 1941 attack, and
several other advanced and aircraft-carrying Japanese submarines scuttled after the
war (I-14; I-201; I-401; I-400…see Kerby, 2013). The society in Hawai`i today was
largely influenced by the Pacific conflict; the Islands were almost overwhelmed by the
number of servicemen and military activity during the war. The heritage resources
11

�beneath the sea stand as the physical reminders of this period. The echoes of this
major national and international event still strongly reverberate for island residents and
visitors alike.

Looking Towards the Future
There is great potential for the investigation of Hawai'i’s submerged heritage resources,
and the indigenous aquaculture structures, historic properties related to the plantation
and ranching periods, and the extensive military resource base, will remain important
additions to the story of Hawai'i’s past. Though there is no longer any academic UCH
program in the state, the public agency collaboration between NOAA and the University
of Hawai'i continues. The necessary prioritization, which is an inherent part of that
effort, must carefully consider public opinion, for public agencies which employ maritime
archaeology as a tool for public resource management have that responsibility. The
field of underwater cultural heritage is relatively new to Hawai'i and not well understood.
Effective education and outreach efforts remain, therefore, equal to or greater than
efforts to simply conduct more individual site assessments. How the investigation of
underwater cultural heritage resources in the islands can continue to be incorporated
into marine planning processes, and how heritage sites can ultimately contribute to
increasing ocean awareness and ocean resource stewardship, remains to be seen.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Dr. Cindy Hunter and the UH Marine Option Program, Terry
Kerby and the UH Hawai'i Undersea Research Program, and the local divers and
colleague scientists in Hawai'i who are sharing in the growing awareness and protection
of our underwater cultural resources.

References
ASA

Abandoned

Shipwreck

Act

1987.

43

USC

ss2101-2106

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/43/ch39.html, accessed 11 November 2013.
Handy, E. S. C., and E. G., and M. K. Pukui, 1972. Native Planters in Old
Hawaii. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu.

12

�Japanese

Midget

Submarine

2005

http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/maritime/expeditions/midget_sub.html,

Expedition.
accessed

10

September, 2013.
Kerby, T., 2013. Discovery of Imperial Japanese Navy Submarine August 1st, 2013.
Hawaii Undersea Research Lab unpublished report, Honolulu.
The

Lāna`i

Project.

http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/maritime/expeditions/lanai/welcome.html,

accessed

8

December 2013.
Maui’s World War II Legacy. http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/maritime/expeditions/maui/
accessed 10 October, 2013.
Naval

Aviation

and

Deep

http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/maritime/expeditions/mars.html

Water

Discoveries.

accessed 12 December

2013.
NMSA National Marine Sanctuaries Act 1972.16 USC s1431 et seq.
http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/about/legislation/ accessed 10 November 2013.
Rodgers, B. A., Coble, W. M., and Van Tilburg, H., 1998. The Lost Flying Boat of
Kaneohe Bay: Archaeology of the First U.S. Casualties of Pearl Harbor. Journal of the
Society for Historical Archaeology, Vol. 32 (4): 8-19.
Russell, M., and Murphy, L., 2004. USS Arizona Preservation Project Research
Rationale October 2004. National Park Service Submerged Resources Center, Santa
Fe.
Thomas, M., 1983. Schooner from Windward: Two Centuries of Hawaiian Inter Island
Shipping. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Van Tilburg, H., 2002. Underwater Archaeology Hawaiian Style. In C. V. Ruppe, and J.
F. Barstad (Eds.), International Handbook of Underwater Archaeology, Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York: 247-266.
Van Tilburg, H., 2003. U.S. Navy Shipwrecks in Hawaiian Waters: An Inventory of
Submerged Naval Properties. Naval Historical Center report, Washington Navy Yard.
Van Tilburg, H., 2007. The Japanese Midget Sub at Pearl Harbor. In J. H. Jameson
and D. A. Scott-Ireton (Eds.), Out of the Blue: Public Interpretation of Maritime Cultural
Resources, Springer Press, New York: 182-195.
13

�Biography
Hans Van Tilburg holds a BA in geography from University of California Berkeley, an
MA in maritime archaeology/history from East Carolina University, and a PhD in history
from the University of Hawai`i, where he ran the graduate program in maritime
archaeology and history. Hans has taught courses in world maritime history and
published over 30 articles and book reviews, as well as several books. He has served
as a consultant for UNESCO’s cultural heritage program and instructor for UNESCO’s
UCH Foundation courses. He is currently the maritime heritage coordinator and unit
diving supervisor for NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries in the Pacific.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="7">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20">
                  <text>Session 4: Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="21">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 4 chair Akatsuki Takahashi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="22">
                  <text>The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage. Underwater sites in Oceania span human history from the Stone Age to the Atomic Age. Due to the cultural richness of underwater heritage in the region and its complex history, the protection of these sites is of high importance for the region. Moreover, the potential for sustainable tourism in partnership with diving industry has been attracting a growing attention.&#13;
The first UNESCO regional workshop on the Pacific underwater cultural heritage took place in December 2009 in Honiara, Solomon Islands. As possible steps towards building a capacity for managing UCH, participants at the workshop identified the following needs; systematic recording and maintenance of a database of submerged and underwater sites; exploring licensing activities directed at underwater sites; and developing a training and education programme for managers. The papers presented by experts at the workshop were compiled, edited and published as "Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania" in 2010.&#13;
Based on the recommendations made at the Honiara workshop, a Feasibility Study on Pacific Capacity Building Programme was prepared by Flinders University with UNESCO support. The Study recommends a possible capacity building programme to be hosted by the University of the South Pacific (USP) in Fiji. The launching of the Pacific Heritage Hub (PHH), a regional facility for knowledge management, capacity building and partnership building, at USP in 2013 presents an opportunity for the actual implementation of the capacity building programme. UNESCO is also exploring the possibility of organising regional and national consultations in the Pacific focusing on cultural policy development.&#13;
The objectives of the session are to:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Enhance understanding of characteristics of UCH in the Pacific.&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Identify priority actions.&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="23">
                  <text>Dr. Akatsuki Takahashi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="799">
                <text>The Local Pacific Inventory: Maritime heritage resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="800">
                <text>The systematic investigation of underwater cultural heritage in the islands started in 1989 with the University of Hawai`iâ€™s Marine Option Program. This slowly grew into a graduate certificate program in maritime archaeology and history. Manned submersibles with the Hawai`i Undersea Research Lab contribute to deep water discoveries and site surveys. Today the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationâ€™s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries continues heritage resource site assessments in Hawai`i, in collaboration with partner agencies and programs. The underwater cultural heritage in Hawai`i reflects a multicultural diversity of archaeological and historic properties, such as coastal stone fishponds, submerged heiau, 19th century plantation landings, inter island steamships etc. Major events like World War II left behind numerous naval shipwrecks and submerged aircraft. These are the physical elements of maritime cultural landscapes that describe Hawai`iâ€™s maritime past.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="801">
                <text>Hans Van Tilburg, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="802">
                <text>5/13/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="14">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
