<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=47&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-25T23:25:43+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>47</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="25" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="25">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/f214cea47e96ed0cb72662b36c3994e2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>65789552181ea20c5bcadfc3f2a19a80</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="522">
                    <text>A Chinese Perspective on the International legal scheme for the
Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage

Liu Lina
School of Law
Xi’an Jiaotong University
China
Email: liulina223@gmail.com
Abstract
With 18,000 km of coastline and plentiful streams and rivers, China has an extensive
underwater cultural heritage (UCH), which preserves Chinese history and maritime
civilization under the ocean as a kind of “time capsule”. After 20-years of development
of underwater archaeology and the protection of UCH, China has set up a brand-new
national protection system. This contribution first discusses the new development of the
Chinese UCH legal system in the 21th century in three aspects: legal subject, legal
object and legal content. Further it discussed the tremendous challenges faced by the
Chinese legal system. Meanwhile, since its entry into force in 2009, the UNESCO
Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (UNESCO 2001
Convention) has been gradually approved by more and more influential States who hold
various and abundant UCH items. Part two explains the UNESCO 2001 Convention as
the International Cooperation Scheme for Protection of UCH. Part three examines, from
the Chinese perspective, the advantages and obstacles for a State that ratifies the
UNESCO 2001 Convention. There is a final conclusion that argues that through the
UNESCO 2001 Convention diverse national legal protection systems of the UCH have
converged into an international cooperation legal instrument.
Key words: Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH); the Chinese UCH legal system;
UNESCO 2001 Convention; International legal scheme; “Coordinating State”

Introduction
New developments and the challenges for the protection of UCH in China
In 1986 an astonishing auction named “the Nanking cargo (Geldermalsen shipwrecks)”
was held in the Netherlands. The auction contained more than 100 gold ingots and
thousands of Chinese export porcelain from the "Geldermalsen" that had sunk in about
1752 in the South China Sea, and salvaged by Michael Hatcher. The auction raised
more than £10 million (Jörg, 1986). The Chinese authorities were shocked to notice that
there were no provisions in the Chinese legislation that addressed the salvage of UCH
1

�or to claim ownership of the UCH. In the same year, the Chinese Government decided
to develop the capacity for underwater archaeology and it established the Underwater
Archaeology Research Institute under the Chinese History Museum (now the Chinese
National Museum). In 1989, the State Council passed legislation entitled the
Regulations of the P. R. China on Protection and Administration of Underwater Cultural
Relics (1989 Chinese UCH regulation).
After more than 20 years of development Chinese authorities established a wholly new
UCH administrative protection mechanism, aimed at providing professional protection
for the entire UCH in China. The State Administration of Cultural Heritage (SACH) is
responsible for managing and protecting all kinds of national cultural relics, including
UCH. After that the National Conservation Center for Underwater Cultural Heritage
(NCCUCH) got full confirmation from the SACH in order to fulfill its functions, especially
in developing the national UCH excavations, conservation, research and cooperation
with local governments and local underwater archeology institutes. There are mainly
four regional UCH protective administration offices: the Ningbo Office in the Zhejiang
province, the Fujian Office in the Fujian province, the Wuhan office in the Hubei
province, and the Qingdao office in the Shandong province.
The development of Chinese UCH legal system
The appearance of local legislative subjects
It is the local government that refines related local UCH regulations and formulates
feasible operational guidelines after 2008. The Fujian province and the Guangdong
Province contain most various UCH items in China, such as Nanhai I shipwreck, Nan’ao
I shipwreck and Banyangjiao (Reef) I shipwreck. In 2009, the Fujian Provincial People's
Congress revised the Fujian Province Protection and Administration of Cultural Relics
Regulations by adding a new chapter on the protection of UCH, which was the first local
regulation relative to UCH in China. In the same year, the Guangdong province enacted
the Guangdong Provincial measure for the implementation of the P. R. China on
Protection of Cultural Relic, which set up a new “underwater cultural relics reserves” in
Art. 26 in order to protect scattered UCH objects along its continuous coastline.

2

�The particularity of the legal object
In addition to wrecks, sites, artifacts and human remains, the “Chinese Maritime Silk
Road Sites” and “Ming and Qing Dynasty Coast Defense Sites” are unique kinds of
UCH in China. “The Chinese Maritime Silk Road” once provided unprecedented access
by ancient China to the most distant destinations reached by maritime trade. And it can
be seen as a promotion of friendly relations linking East and West. The "Maritime Silk
Road" in China embraces four aspects: the ancient ports, oceanic routes, cargos, and
wrecks, each of which has specific and abundant contents. These four aspects
interrelate systemically in order to form the Chinese traces of marine exploitation ---- the
said “Chinese Maritime Silk Road”. The “Ming and Qing Dynasties Coast Defense Sites”
are the defense constructions and facilities erected by Chinese authorities in order to
prevent invasion m of the Chinese territorial sea and coastal areas in Ming and Qing
Dynasties (from 1368 to 1800AD). These coast defense sites are situated throughout 13
provinces, including Macao, Hong Kong and Taiwan, and are being actively considered
by China for nomination as World Heritage sites.
The extending of legal content in protection UCH
The UCH protection began with the national UCH survey, which now extends from the
coastline to internal waters, the territorial sea and the contiguous zone. The UCH survey
from 2007-2011 covered the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, the East China Sea (including the
Taiwan Strait), the South China Sea (including the Chinese jurisdiction area in
the Paracel Islands and the Spratly Islands). They are all situated adjacent to China,
and in the internal waters of China. It was a comprehensive and scientific national
survey of UCH, named as the third national cultural relics investigation project. There
are 108 supposed UCH sites. SACH and NCCUCH established the South China Sea
UCH office and the Paracel Islands archaeological workstation in 2012.
Excavation, preservation, protection and management are the main tasks of protection
of UCH. With 20 years’ experience of UCH protection, the Chinese authorities are
gradually forming different but more appropriate protecting approaches for each UCH
site in China. Take Baiheliang UCH site for example, which is the world’s
oldest hydrological inscription in the Yangtse River. After considering the Baiheliang
UCH conditions, Chinese authorities decided to build a submerged museum for
3

�preservation of its UCH in situ, which is now the symbol of a submerged museum in the
world (UNESCO Museums and Tourism, 2013). Another example of protection of UCH
in China is the Shanhujiao (Reef) I shipwreck, located in the Paracel Islands. Chinese
authorities had to scientifically excavate (from 2006 to 2008) and conserve these
cultural relics on land for preserving its scientific and archeological value in a good
condition. After the excavation of the Shanhujiao (Reef) I shipwreck, the NCCUCH and
CACH started the preliminary experimental study on the conservation of ceramics,
metal and wooden relics from Shanhujiao (Reef) I shipwreck. The Chinese National
Museum and the CCUCH organized more than 10 training courses on diving skills,
methodology of underwater archaeology, and the UCH conservation since the 1980s.
Now, the CCUCH and archaeological team in the coastal cities in China have been able
to fill the gaps left open over decades.
Challenges in China’s UCH legal protection
Firstly, from the 1980s, looting and illicit trafficking were rampant in the South China
Sea. China’s underwater relics attract a growing number of Chinese fishermen who
dived for these riches (Yanhong, 2011). With the development of underwater technology
and human understanding of the deep ocean, different marine exploration companies
from all over the world came to the South China Sea for salvaging and exporting relics
along the Maritime Silk Road. “The Nanking Cargo” auction in Christie's in the
Netherland’s was the main cause leading to the 1989 legislation. In April 2011 the
Chinese authorities investigated UCH in the Paracel Islands and reported that 26 UCH
sites (more than 50% of the UCH sites in the Paracel Islands) had been illegally
destroyed and excavated. What is worse, there is a reasonable suspicion that some
neighboring countries deliberately damaged Chinese UCH in the South China Sea. For
instance, a Ming-dynasty shipwreck located near Huangyan (Scarborough Shoal) was
commercially excavated and destroyed by two 2000 ton foreign vessels (Yanhong,
2011). Secondly, a huge number of Chinese UCH outside the Chinese territory was not
preserved under the national legal UCH protection system. A frequent type of UCH
were merchant ships of the British East India Company that once frequently carried
Chinese goods, shipping out of South China Sea bypassing the Cape of Good Hope to
Europe and even to Africa. In the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic oceans a variety of
4

�shipwrecks prove this fact, such as the Mauritius shipwreck in the Cape Lopez of the
Gulf of Guinea, the Manila galleon casa in the Gulf of California of the USA, the
Goteborg shipwreck in the Swedish bay, and the Prince de Conty (France) in Loscat,
Mediterranean (Chumming, 2003). In addition to shipwrecks that contained Chinese
goods, Chinese experts discovered more and more Chinese shipwrecks outside China’s
territory, such as nine Chinese shipwrecks in Lamu Islands, Kenya (Underwater
Archaeology Research Centre, 2012). Thirdly, the Chinese UCH items are traded, sold,
bought or bartered as commercial goods in eminent auctions. The most famous auction
was the said “Nanking Cargo” in Christie's, Amsterdam in 1986. Then there was “The
Vung Tau Cargo” auction in Christie's (Amsterdam) in 1992, “The Diana Cargo” auction
in Christie's in Amsterdam in 1995, the “Tek Sing” (the China’s Titanic) auction in
Stuttgart, Germany in 2000, and the “Made in Imperial China” auction in Sotheby's
(Amsterdam) in 2007(Christie's Auction Catalog , Amsterdam).
China has carried out the conservation of UCH for over 20 years and accumulated
certain experience in practice and in theoretical research. The content, object, subject
and the methods of protection of the UCH in China has changed a lot, but the national
legislation is not effective in preventing illegal salvage or illicit export of the UCH outside
the Chinese territorial sea. This is the proper time to explore the view on UCH outside of
China, and to research an international legal approach to the protection of the UCH.
The UNESCO 2001 Convention: the International Cooperation Scheme for
Protection of UCH
The UNESCO 2001 Convention, at the present time the most complete legal instrument
for the protection of UCH, is far from being a powerful and popular international
Convention. However, as the offshoot of the United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS), it indeed provides an effective international cooperation
scheme for protecting UCH in different maritime areas, which does not change the limits
of maritime areas or of the maritime power and jurisdiction of coastal states. Although
the two principles of the UNESCO 2001 Convention, the principle of in situ preservation
as the first option and the principle of non-commercial exploitation are based on the
recognition of significance of the interplay between the UCH, its history and its context,
5

�this article aim to focus on the cooperation scheme which established the valuable and
effective international legal instrument for Member States.
UCH International Database
Each State Party to the UNESCO 2001 Convention has the obligation to share UCH
information with other States Parties concerning UCH. According to Art.19, that
includes: discovery of heritage, its location, UCH excavation or UCH recovery contrary
to this Convention. Therefore, the Secretariat of the UNESCO 2001 Convention
suggests that States Parties submit to it national authority information to establish a
worldwide UCH database. States parties are also able to disseminate UCH information
to other appropriate regional, international databases, such as MACHU (to make
information about our common UCH accessible to researchers, policymakers and the
general public, originated by the European Union’s Culture 2000 program,), NAVIS I,
NAVIS II (an open database of ancient ship supported by the European Commission
Directorate General X), Shipwreck Asia Database (a regional shipwreck database,
classified by the geographical regions, supported by the Toyota Foundation).
The UCH Reporting and Notification System
States Parties have a different reporting and notifying obligation in different maritime
areas. But in the territorial sea or the archipelagic waters, the coastal States have only a
soft obligation (“should”) to inform the flag State or other States with an effective link
with UCH, with a view to protecting State vessels and aircrafts (Art. 7). In the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ), on the Continental Shelf (CS) or in the Area, each State Party
have a definite obligation to report the UCH discoveries and activities to that other State
Party accordingly, or to all other States Parties (in Art. 9 and Art. 11).
UCH Coordination States scheme
The UCH Coordination States scheme is regulated by Articles 9 to 12 of the UNESCO
2001 Convention. In the EEZ or on the CS, the “coordinating State” is the State Party in
whose EEZ or on whose CS UCH is located “unless the State Party expressly declares
that it does not wish to do so”. In that case the “coordinating State” is that which is
based on a cultural, historical or archaeological link to the concerned UCH. By the same
rule is to be decided a “Coordinating State” in the Area to issue all necessary
6

�authorizations for agreed measures on behalf of all interested States Parties. The right
of a “Coordinating State” is to implement measures of protecting UCH, cooperation and
consultation among States Parties and conduct their decisions.
Assessment of the desirability and feasibility of UNESCO 2001 Convention in
China
Benefits for China to protect Chinese UCH
The UNESCO 2001 Convention sets up reciprocal obligations between Member States
and it designs at the same time UCH protective rights for its States Parties. Without this
legal instrument States would be entitled only to a limited jurisdiction and sovereignty in
their EEZ and on the CS according to international law. And in the Area, the doctrine of
international law on freedom of the high seas provides that activities related to UCH
found in the Area are to be governed by the flag State. First, UNESCO 2001 Convention
entitles coastal States in Art.8 to protect UCH within their contiguous zone. In case that
China becomes a State Party to this Convention, it would acquire a positive right in its
favour to initiate activities on UCH in its contiguous zone, more than defensive activities
to prevent removing UCH from contiguous zone in UNCLOS Art 303 (2). Secondly, the
UNESCO 2001 Convention entitles States Parties to take all practicable measures to
prevent immediate danger to UCH in the EEZ and on the CS. According to the
UNCLOS, the coastal State and other States share different rights and jurisdiction, as
governed by its Parts 5 and 6, while the UNESCO 2001 Convention can be seen to
expand the traditional rights of coastal States. As a State Party to UNCLOS, China
regulated the marine sovereign rights in the Law of the People's Republic of China on
the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf (China EEZ and CS Law)
mainly “for exploring, exploiting, conserving and managing natural resources” and “for
conserving and managing the trans-boundary population, highly migrating fishes,
marine mammals (in Art. 3 and Art. 6) in its EEZ. And the 1989 Chinese UCH regulation
does not provide for the UCH protective provisions based on different marine zones.
However UCH cannot be defined as a natural resource or a fishery activity. Hence, the
Chinese authorities are now not entitled to take measures for prevention of immediate
danger of UCH according to current Chinese national laws or regulations. If China
becomes a State Party to the UNESCO 2001 Convention, it will be able to take any
7

�practicable and necessary measures or request other States Parties to handle looting or
trafficking activities that happen in the Chinese EEZ in South China Sea. What is more
important, the Operational Guidelines (draft) also provides possibility of cooperation of
States Parties with other intergovernmental organizations, for example with Interpol, in
order to prevent UCH excavations or recovery contrary to this Convention.
Last but not least, the UNESCO 2001 Convention provides the effective international
cooperation mechanism for all States Parties in protection of UCH. China should take
advantage of the information-sharing forum (Art. 19), such as MACHU, to collect
information with other State Parties about any Chinese shipwrecks discovered outside
Chinese territory. Otherwise, underwater archaeology and UCH management are still
recent sciences, especially for training of underwater archaeologists. China should ask
the Scientific and Technical Advisory Body for developing of Chinese UCH excavation,
management and protection methods, even for academic training on underwater
archaeology, such as the Unit win network.
Conformity with the existing Chinese UCH laws and regulations
After consideration of the domestic relevant legislation and regulations, it can be
concluded that there will be no conflicting clauses in the context of the currently ratified
international cultural heritage agreements upon China’s ratification of the UNESCO
2001 Convention (including the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and
Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property,
ratified

in

1989,

the

1972

Convention

concerning

the

Protection

of

the

World Cultural and Natural Heritage ratified in 1985, the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on
Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects ratified in in 1996, the 2003 Convention for
the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage ratified in 2004 and the
2005 Convention

on

the

Protection

and

Promotion

of

the Diversity of Cultural Expressions ratified in 2007. Only the purpose of the
International Convention on Salvage (1989) is contrary to UNESCO 2001 Convention.
But recognizing the nature of UCH, China made a reservation on its Art. 30(1)(d)
upon its ratification in 1993: China reserves the right not to apply the provisions of this
Convention, “when the property involved is maritime cultural property of prehistoric,
archaeological or historic interest and is situated on the sea-bed”.
8

�China only needs to review the principle of non-commercial exploitation in its national
regulations in the light of the UNESCO 2001 Convention. The main problem is in the
1989 Chinese UCH regulation. It sets up the rule of exploitation and excavation
activities of UCH in Art.7 in the way that: “archaeological exploration and excavation
activities with respect to underwater cultural relics shall have, as their objective, the
protection of cultural relics and scientific research … with approval by SACH”. It seems
a prefect provision for regulating the excavation of the UCH for protection of cultural
relics and scientific research. But according to it the objective of exploitation should be
for instance scientific research under commercial excavation, such as the early
excavation of RMS Titanic (Zekala, 2012). Therefore, the 1989 Chinese UCH regulation
should confirm and clarify that any activities directed at UCH shall not consist of
commercial exploitation or excavation.
Conclusion
The UCH protection is a recent scientific as well as legal issue for every nation. After
analyzing the new developments in China, it becomes obvious that isolated national
UCH legal systems still face problems in the effective protection of UCH. Every State
should realize the significance of the exchange of the UCH legal and technical
information for national underwater cultural resources. The 2001UNESCO Convention
provides for its States Parties an effective international cooperation scheme. Therefore,
individual inadequate national legal protection systems for UCH are destined to result
into a cooperating international legal protection system. After evaluating the desirability
and feasibility of the UNESCO 2001 Convention in China, it is beneficial for a State, like
China, to protect national UCH under the legal instrument of the UNESCO 2001
Convention.
Acknowledgements
The author first likes to express her appreciation to “The China National Social Science
Fund” which supported her “Research on Jurisdiction and Ownership of Chinese UCH
(Project No. 13CFX094)”. The author also gratefully acknowledges valuable comments
from Prof. Vladimir Đuro Degan on a previous version.

9

�References
Christie's Auction Catalog , Amsterdam,
http://www.sunkentreasurebooks.com/catalogs.htm, accessed 30, Dec.,2013
Chunming, W., 2003. Shipwrecks around China marine zone----Ancient sailing boat,
ship technology and cargo. Jiangxi University Press, China.Jörg, C. J. A., 1986. The
Geldermalsen History and Porcelain. Kemper Publisher, Groningen.
Matthew, E. Zekala.,2012. Liability and Salvage: Titanic Jurisprudence in United States
Federal Court, p1103,
http://law.lclark.edu/live/files/11855-lcb163art8zekala.pdf, accessed 20 Dec 2013.
Regulations of the P. R. China on Protection and Administration of Underwater Cultural
Relics promulgated by Decree No. 42 of the State Council of the People's Republic of
China on Oct 20, 1989.
UNESCO, ‘Museums and tourism’,
&lt;http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-cultural-heritage/museumsand-tourism/&gt;, accessed on 20 Dec. 2013.
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/underwater-cultural-heritage/researchand-training/unitwin-programme/#c492115, accessed 20 Dec. 2013.
Underwater Archaeology Research Centre (China) et al., 2012. Major Discoveries of
Sino-Kenyan Cooperative Underwater Archaeological Survey in Coastal Areas of Kenya
in 2010. Journal of National Museum of China, Vol. 8: 88-99.
Yanhong, Cai., 2011. Grouping and well-organizing is the new trend of illicitly excavating
UCH in China, Legal Daily, Beijing, (15 Dec, 2011).
Chunming,Wu., 2003. Shipwrecks around China marine zone----Ancient sailing boat,
ship technology and cargo, Jiangxi University Press, China.
Biography
Liu Lina graduated with Master of Law from Aberdeen University, UK, and PhD in law
and Governance from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. Liu is a lecturer at Xi’an
Jiaotong University. Liu is currently engaged in a national research project entitled
“Research on Jurisdiction and Ownership of Chinese UCH” supported by The National
Social Science Fund of China.

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="64">
                  <text>Session 15: Legal Framework for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="65">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 15 chair Dr. Craig Forrest.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="66">
                  <text>The legal framework for the protection of the underwater cultural heritage has gained momentum throughout the Asia-Pacific with a number of States turning their attention to this issue. For some this is due to concerns raised though specific incidents that have damaged or destroyed the underwater cultural heritage or the information that could be gleaned from its excavation, whilst for others, it follows from consideration being given to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage.&#13;
This session considers the Legal Framework for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage in a number of Asia-Pacific states. The objectives of session are to explore the various national approaches and to seek aspects of commonality and uniformity that provide frameworks for other state that have not yet addressed the issue. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="67">
                  <text>Dr. Craig Forrest </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="518">
                <text>A Chinese Perspective on the International Legal Scheme for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="519">
                <text>With 18,000 km of coastline and plentiful streams and rivers, China has an extensive underwater cultural heritage (UCH), which preserves Chinese history and maritime civilization under the ocean as a kind of â€œtime capsuleâ€. After 20-years of development of underwater archaeology and the protection of UCH, China has set up a brand-new national protection system. This contribution first discusses the new development of the Chinese UCH legal system in the 21th century in three aspects: legal subject, legal object and legal content. Further it discussed the tremendous challenges faced by the Chinese legal system. Meanwhile, since its entry into force in 2009, the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (UNESCO 2001 Convention) has been gradually approved by more and more influential States who hold various and abundant UCH items. Part two explains the UNESCO 2001 Convention as the International Cooperation Scheme for Protection of UCH. Part three examines, from the Chinese perspective, the advantages and obstacles for a State that ratifies the UNESCO 2001 Convention. There is a final conclusion that argues that through the UNESCO 2001 Convention diverse national legal protection systems of the UCH have converged into an international cooperation legal instrument.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="520">
                <text>Liu Lina, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="521">
                <text>5/20/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 15 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="40" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="40">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/72c7a1775b5ce69e207f884688c8ca5a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7017b35e045b8f019abdf8e676faf161</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="599">
                    <text>The diffusion of the material culture in the early period of the trade globalization:
A preliminary study on silver coins and shipwreck porcelains found in East Asia
of the 16th and17th centuries
Liu Miao
Department of History, Xiamen University, No. 422, South Siming Road
Siming District, Xiamen 361005, China
Email: liumiao@xmu.edu.cn
Abstract
In the 16th-17th centuries, world trade patterns greatly changed. East and West entered
a period of an enormous amount of sailing since the 1500s. In the East, the traditional
Asian maritime trade network - which mainly relied on maritime merchants of Southeast
China, was gradually restored. After the discovery of the Americas in 1492 by the
Spanish kingdom of Castille, and the establishment of the Eastward passage to India by
the kingdom of Portugal in the late 1400s, both Spain and Portugal arrived in AsiaPacific in the 1500s and interacted with Eastern Asia local cultures. This set up the early
globalization process. The silk and porcelains from China, spices from Southeast Asia,
textiles from India, and coins from Mexico and Japan, were all important materials and
media in the global trade of this period. Dozens of shipwrecks dated to this period have
been identified as both East Asian maritime vessels (including Chinese junks) and
European exploration and trading vessels in Southern China, Vietnam, the Philippines,
Indonesia and Malaysia. Chinese porcelains were the main cargoes in all of them. We
also find a growing number of silver coins at the archaeological sites and shipwrecks of
this time period. These interesting maritime archaeological materials show early panPacific trading navigation between eastern Asia and the Western world. They help
reveal the early international maritime trading history between eastern Asia and the
West, early European colonization in eastern Asia, and resulting issues of expanding
globalization.
Key words: Shipwrecks, East Asia, Kraak porcelain, Zhangzhou wares, Early
globalization

Introduction
In the early 1500s both the Portuguese and Spanish of the Iberian kingdoms reached
Southeast Asia and burst into the traditional trade network of Asia. They interacted with
local cultures in East Asia and established the early global system through longdistance trading. Dozens of shipwrecks dated to this period have been identified in East
Asian seas as both East Asian maritime vessels (e.g., Chinese junks) and European
exploration and trading vessels. We also find a growing number of silver coins at the

1

�archaeological sites and shipwrecks of the same time. They help to reveal the early
international maritime trading history between East Asia and the West.
The Discovery of the Shipwrecks in East Asia
Shipwrecks of this era have been investigated in southern China, Vietnam, the
Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia. Chinese blue-and-white porcelains were the main
cargoes. After a preliminary analysis, we can put these shipwrecks into several groups
according to the time sequence.From the end of the15thcentury to the early 16thcentury,
just before the advent of Europeans, the pattern of trade in East Asia had changed. The
Lena Shoal wreck (Goddio et al., 2000) discovered off the Philippines, and the Brunei
wreck (L’Hour, 2001), are the representative remains of this period. The porcelains from
these wrecks are provincial wares of Jingdezhen, most of them belonging to the reign of
Hongzhi (1488-1505). They often have decorations of lotuses, other floral designs and
classic scrolls on them. The bowls and dishes are large, and many of the shapes, such
as pen boxes, covered boxes and the angular ewers, hint at the Moslem market. Many
of these vessels have been found in the Middle East and even in East Africa. Wares of
this type have also been found all over
Southeast Asia (Carswell, 2000). The next
group of shipwrecks include Niushijiao
shipwreck (Fujian) (Li, 2012), Panshiyu
shipwreck (Xisha Archipelago) (Zhao, 2012),
San Isidro shipwreck (Luzon, Philippines)
(Dizon

and

Orillaneda,

2002),

Xuande

shipwreck and Singtai shipwreck (Malaysia)

Fig.1 Jingdezhen Porcelain from Nan’ao No.1

(Brown, 2009). They include Chinese junks, Shipwreck. (Guangdong)
vessels

of

Southeast

Asia

and

also

Portuguese ships. The main cargoes are provincial blue and white wares from
Jingdezhen. But the dense patterning in sub-Yuan style which hints to the Islamic
market begins to diverge. We can also find the early productions of Zhangzhou wares.
Similar wares to those from the San Isidro Wreck also have been found in Southeast
Asia, such as in the Philippines (Kamer, 1963) and Indonesia (Umarah, 1999). The
chronology of these shipwrecks is around 1520s-1550s.
2

�The third group of shipwrecks include Nan’ao No. 1 Shipwreck (Guangdong) (Sun,
2012), Bei Jiao No.3 Shipwreck (Xisha Archipelago) (The Center for Underwater
Archaeology of National Museum of China, 2006) and Wreck 2 of the Royal Captain
Shoal (Philippines) (Goddio, 1998). Blue and white porcelains were also the main
cargoes of this group of wrecks. They included the thinly potted wares made of hard,
white porcelain with exquisitely drawn traditional Chinese motifs of happy propitious
implications, which were produced from the late Jiajing period through the early Wanli
period (Fig. 1). The style of the porcelains had already changed greatly. Certain types
were already being created for the export
market in Europe. A very popular kind of
plate had a central naturalistic motif with
decorated

rim,

usually

flat,

with

an

undecorated cavetto. Another noteworthy
phenomenon of this time was the abundant
emergence of Zhangzhou ware (Figs. 2-3).
They were the main cargoes of Nan’ao No.1
Shipwreck and Wreck 2 of the Royal
Captain

Shoal.

They

are

mainly

the

productions of Er Long kilns of Zhangzhou
(Fujian Museum, 1997). This type of ware
was also excavated from sites of Philippines
and Indonesia. A few similar wares were
found in the Manila galleon of San Felipe

Figs. 2-3 Zhanzhou wares from Nan’ao No.1
(1576) (Von Der Porten, 2008). The typical Shipwreck. (Guangdong)

Kraak panels were very scarce and only a few were designated early Kraak or protoKraak. The chronology of this group is around the 1560s to the 1580s.

3

�The fourth group include the vessel San Diego (Philippines, 1600) (Ongpin Valdes and
Diem, 1993), the BinhThuan Shipwreck (Vietnam, 1608) (Flecker, 2004) and the Wanli
Shipwreck (+1625) (Sjostrand and Syed Idrus, 2007). The San Diego vessel was a
Manila galleon that sank off the coast of Nasugbu in the province of Batangas. One of
the major items she carried on board was fine China, Kraak ware (Fig. 4), and also
large quantities of blue

Fig. 4 Kraak Porcelain from the vessel San
Diego. (Philippines, 1600)

Fig. 5 Kraak Porcelain from the Wanli
Shipwreck. (Malaysia)

and white porcelain and Zhangzhou ware, which was exported particularly to Southeast
Asia. The majority of the entire remaining cargo of the BinhThuan shipwreck, which had
a Chinese shipbuilding features, consisted of blue and white and over glazed enameldecorated Zhangzhou ceramics. The excavation of The Wanli Shipwreck in Malaysia's
territorial waters revealed the largest quantity of Chinese Kraak porcelain which
included a major cargo of some 37,000 pieces (Fig. 5). Kraak porcelain became
extremely popular in the European markets. From these data we can see that the
distinctive and paneled type of Kraak porcelain emerged abundantly in 1600 or so and
swiftly became very popular in the first part of the 17th century. Zhangzhou wares were
also produced and exported abundantly this time and much of them imitated the
paneled decoration of Kraak porcelain of Jingdezhen. The date of this group should be
the 1590s to the 1620s.

4

�The Destruction of the Traditional Trading System in Asia and the Early Global
Trading System
In the late 15th and early 16th centuries, just before the advent of the Portuguese, the
trade network dominated by the Islam in the Southern Seas had been set up. With the
Islamic culture spreading widely in Southeast Asia, some important Islamic regimes
were established successively, such as Malacca, Saltanah Sulu, Borneo, etc. The old
China was also included in the trade system. With the decline of Chinese official
maritime trade, the private merchant forces began to rise. The site of Penny's Bay
(Hong Kong) (Lam, 1989-1992) was an import private trade port of that time. As the
representative of the Islamic culture, the fine porcelains of Jingdezhen in the middle
Ming Dynasty were widely found in the sites and shipwrecks spread from East Africa to
Southeast Asia. With the coming of the Portuguese and Spanish who pillaged and
controlled the important trade of Southeast Asia at that time, the traditional trade system
in the South Seas was completely broken. Macao and Manila (Philippines) became the
important trade centers of this period. 1) In the beginning of 16th, the Portuguese
conquered and took the port Goa in India and Malacca in Southeast Asia to establish
presence for trade affairs. They gradually entered into the trade network in Asia. For a
long time before 1557 they also took contraband trade with Chinese private maritime
merchants in the islands near to the coast of southeast China, in the ports of Fujian,
Guangdong and Zhejiang (Teixeira, 2000). Chinese scholars discovered the site of
Shangchuan Island, Guangdong (Huang and Huang, 2010). Quite massive quantities of
16th century export ceramics were found, including some specially ordered wares for
Portuguese. This verified that Shangchuan Island played an extraordinarily important
role in the early Sino-Portuguese trade history during the 16th century, while the
Xuande Wreck is thought to be the direct evidence of the Portuguese smuggling
activities in the seas of East Asia before they settled in Macao in 1557.From the middle
16th century to the early 17th century Portuguese almost monopolized the trade routes
of the Far East. After they settled in Macao in 1557 and Nagasaki in Japan in 1571, the
Portuguese began their long distance and massive global trade. They took Macao as
the base to carry on a triangle trade in the East Asian seas, in which China was the
center. Macao rose in prosperity as it became the most important and largest
5

�commodity distributing center of Asia. Recently, a large quantity of Chinese export
porcelains was excavated in Macao. Most of them are Kraak porcelain shards, including
dishes and bowls with round and oval mouths, with reserved panels and protruding rims.
A small number of red and green shards of bowls and boxes dating from the Zhengde
and Jiajing periods which are similar to those of the samples found in Shangchuan
Island. They showed the important position of Macao in the cultural exchange between
East and West (Liu, 2010). There is also a large quantity of archaeological evidence
along the Indian Ocean route from Goa to Europe (Sila Tripati et al., 2011; Liu et al.,
2011; Castro, 2005).
In 1571 Spain founded Manila City to establish rule in the Philippines and partake in
Asian trade. They quickly established the trade with Chinese private merchants of
Southeast China and the Manila Galleon trade route was soon prosperous. It functioned
as a long distance and large-scale sea trade route connecting the Asian world with the
American Continent until the early 19th century. Many Asian goods such as silks and
porcelains were exported by the Spanish galleons and on the other hand, many New
World goods, including Mexican silver, were brought to the Asian world. Except those
from the shipwrecks of San Felipe and San Diego, the same style of blue-and-white
porcelain productions from the Jingdezhen and Zhangzhou kilns were also found in the
shell mounds of Indian Village sites at Drakes Bay, California (Shangraw and Von der
Porten, 1981). Recently, more and more Chinese ceramics of this time were excavated
from the archaeological sites of Mexico, Peru and other Latin American countries
(Kuwayama, 2002). Those Chinese ceramics imported into Latin America included high
quality productions from Jingdezhen. A large part of them were also pieces from
Southern Chinese kilns, especially Zhangzhou ware. Chinese vessels returned from
Manila always took back silver. This was clearly written in Chinese historical documents
(Zhang, 2000). The profitable trade to Manila was almost dominated by the maritime
merchants of South Fujian. Innumerable Mexican silver cargoes were brought into
China, especially to the south of Fujian and east of Guangdong. They were once used
as currency in people’s daily life in those places.
A total of four hundred and twenty eight silver coins were recovered from the San Diego.
Those that were cleaned were recognized as coins of Philip II (1556-1598), minted in
6

�Lima and Philip III (1598-1621), minted in Mexico City. Most of them are irregularly
shaped. People think this irregularity can mostly be attributed to the last stage of their
manufacture wherein the excess weight of the coins was clipped off by the assayer to
maintain their standard value. This early kind of silver coin is also found abundantly in
the sites of South Fujian, such as Quanzhou, Zhangzhou, Xiamen, etc. Most of them
were excavated from cellars, and also a few from tombs (Quanzhou Heritage
Management Committee, Quanzhou Maritime Museum, 1975; Chen and Shi, 1981;
Fang, 2011; Zhang, 1988). Most of these coins are also irregularly shaped (Fig. 6),
probably because they are the early type minted from the late 16th century to the first
part of 17th century. We can see the design of the Cruze Florenzada on the cross and
Great shield of the House of Hapsburg, Spanish coat of arms. According to the study of
British numismatic experts, most of them were minted in Mexico City, and others minted
in Potosi and Segovia, Spain. From these discoveries, we can often see that many of
the silver coins were cut into pieces; we can also see the using traces. This verifies the
historical record that they were once used as the circulation in people’s daily life. In
16th-17th centuries, with the arrival of Europeans and the large-scale intermediary trade
practices they brought, East Asia was entangled into the global trade network. Chinese
silk and porcelains, Southeast Asian spices, Indian textile, silver coin of Mexico and
Japan, and other materials were the important goods and mediums of the global trade
at that time. During this progress the style of the fine porcelains from Jingdezhen, as
luxury goods, changed greatly. They used to be representative of material
manufactured for the Islamic culture, but then changed to be products created for the
export market of Europe, such as Kraak ware. On the other hand, the evidence from
shipwrecks and other sites, for instance the lower quality products of Zhangzhou, shows
they were produced mainly for the Asian market. This change implied the establishment
of a new Asian trade system dominated by the Europeans.
The rise of Chinese private maritime merchants
Chinese ancient junk wrecks spread over the southeast coast of China and Southeast
Asia. It implied the further development of Chinese maritime merchants and they were
very active in maritime trade. With the opening of the Moon Port, Chinese maritime
merchants could trade abroad legally. With the arrival of the Europeans, they took large7

�scale intermediary trade with Malacca, Macao, Japan, Manila, and were involved into
the global trade network. They were active along Chinese waters from north of Japan to
the south into Southeast Asian, playing an important role in the early global trade of the
Westerners. They gradually became strong enough and changed into private armed
groups. Guns and cannons are usually discovered in Chinese shipwrecks of this time,
showing the conflict between private merchant groups and the government of the Ming
Empire. It also shows the relationship of cooperation and competition between the
Chinese merchants and the Westerners in 16th-17th centuries. At that time, the main
way of trade the western colonists took was to establish bases at those ports where
Chinese merchants often go and then transport the goods they shipped to the world
elsewhere for profit. So both Portugal and Spain had taken active measures to attract
Chinese merchants to trade. The early smuggling activities of Portugal along the coast
of southeast China were carried out with the private merchants of Southeast China.
During this process, Portuguese and private merchants of Southeast China, especially
those of Fujian, associated more and more closely. They gradually took the place of
Ryukyu and Malacca, to become the major trading powers in Asia (Ptak, 2003). After
the Portuguese settled in Macao in 1557, more and more merchants from Fujian and
Guangdong came and were enmeshed in the global trade.
After the Spanish set up colonial rule in the Philippines, the Philippines had few goods
to trade. Their supply mainly relied on Chinese businessmen. So the Spanish soon
established commercial relationship with Chinese merchants, actively encouraging
Chinese merchants to trade in Manila, and the number of Chinese ships sailing to
Philippines grew every year. The expanding trade in Manila based on the traditional
Chinese and Philippines’ commercial trade, became the real foundation of the Spanish
Galleon trade. With the prosperity of overseas trade and ports along the coast of China,
a series of handicraft and planting industries emerged and developed rapidly. The silk of
Zhejiang, porcelains of Jingdezhen and Fujian, and even sugar and fruits were all
produced and exported abundantly. Just as scholars have said, we should look at the
late Ming Dynasty with the vision of globalization. At that time, China was involved in the
process of economic globalization. Many European and American countries far away
have been involved into the long-distance trade with China. With Chinese commodities,
8

�mainly silk and porcelain, sold throughout the world, 1/3 or 1/4 of the world silver output
swarmed into China as the means of payment.
Conclusions
With the coming of the Westerners, the traditional trading system in Asia was destroyed,
while the Europeans trade in Asia relied greatly on the cooperation with Chinese
maritime merchants. It provided a broader overseas market for China along with the
production and exportation of a series of handicraft industries in South China, such as
silk and porcelain. So this progress also represents the rise of Chinese maritime
merchants, especially those of South Fujian. In the Asian trade system dominated by
Europeans, Chinese porcelain was an important good sold in Europe and in the interior
of Asia. The change in decorative style and in the number of exports reflected how
Europeans gradually deepened into Asian trade.
Acknowledgements
First of all, I am gratefully acknowledge the generous assistance and valuable
information provided by Professor Chun-Ming Wu who was once my supervisor and
now my colleague of Xiamen University. I would also like to extend my sincere gratitude
to those underwater archaeologists especially those of China. My research on this
paper based on the sources gained by their laborious task and many information and
photos were provided by them. At last, special thanks go to Professor María Cruz
Berrocal who kindly invited and helped me a lot for this conference.

References
Brown, R., 2009. The Ming Gap and Shipwreck Ceramics in Southeast China: Towards
a Chronology of Thai Trade Ware. The Siam Society under Royal Patronage: 153-158.
Carswell, J., 2000. Blue &amp; White: Chinese Porcelain around the World. British Museum
Press, London: 131-134.
Castro, F., 2005. The Pepper Wreck: Nossa Senora dos Martires, Lisbon, Portugal. In
G.F. Bass (Ed.), Beneath the Seven Seas: Adventures with the Institute of Nautical
Archaeology, Thames and Hudson Ltd, London: 148-151.
Chen, P., and Shi, X., 1981. Discussion on the Spanish silver coins excavated in Fashi,
Quanzhou. Maritime History Studies, Vol. 3: 113-118.
9

�Dizon, E., and Orillaneda, R., 2002. Ming Blue and Whites Found from Shipwrecks in
the Philippines. In X.You (Ed.), Yuan and Ming Blue and White Wares from Jiangxi,
Jointly presented by Jiangxi Provincial Museum and the Art Museum, The Chinese
University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: 218-220.
Fang, Zh., 2011. Foreign coins of Ming Dynasty excavated from Yunxiao, Fujian.
Collections, Vol. 7: 107.
Flecker, M., 2004.The BinhThuan shipwreck archaeological report. Christie's Australia,
Melbourne.
Fujian Museum, 1997. Zhangzhou Kilns. Fujian People's Publishing House, Fuzhou: 6991.
Goddio, F., 1998. Discovery and Archaeological Excavation of a 16th century Trading
Vessel in The Philippines. Kyodo Printing Co.Inc., Manila.
Goddio, F., Pierson, S., and Crick, M., 2000.Sunken Treasures: Fifteenth Century
Chinese Ceramics from the Lena Cargo. Periplus Publishing London Limited, London.
Huang, W., and Huang, Q., 2010. Shangchuan Island and Early Sino-Portuguese Trade
in the Sixteenth Century. In P-k. Cheng (Ed.), China Westward: Early Sino-Portuguese
Trade of Chinese Ceramics. Chinese Civilisation Centre, City University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong: 59-87.
Kamer Aga-oglu., 1963. Ming Porcelain from sites in the Philippines. Archives of the
Chinese Art Society of America, Vol. 17: 7-19.
Kuwayama, G., 2002. Chinese Ceramics in Colonial Latin America. A dissertation
submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
(History of Art) in the University of Michigan.
Lam, P., 1989-1992. Ceramic Finds of the Ming Period from Penny's Bay - An
Addendum. JHKAS, Vol.13: 79-90.
L’Hour, M., 2001. La mémoire engloutie de Brunei. Textuel, Paris.
Li, J., 2012. China’s Underwater Excavations of 16th-17th centuries Chinese e Export
Porcelain. In P-k. Cheng (Ed.), Proceedings of the International symposium: Chinese
Export Ceramics in the 16th and 17th Centuries and the Spread of Material Civilization,
Chinese Civilization Centre, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: 77-80.
Liu, Y., Qin, D., and Kiriama, H., 2011. The Chinese Porcelains unearthed at Gedi Ruins
10

�in Coast Province, Kenya. Wenwu, Vol. 8: 37-60
Liu, Zh., 2010. Kraak Porcelain found in Macao. In P-k. Cheng (Ed.), China Westward:
Early Sino-Portuguese Trade of Chinese Ceramics. Chinese Civilisation Centre,
University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: 13-34.
Ongpin Valdes, C., and Diem, A. I., 1993.Saga of the San Diego (AD1600). National
Museum, Inc., Manila.
Teixeira, M., 2000. A Porcelana No Comércio Luso-Chinês. In Zh-L. Wu (Ed.),
International Symposium on East-West Cultural Interflow. Macau Foundation. Macao:
209.
Ptak, R., (Tr.), Zhao Dianhong, collated by Qian Jiang, 2003. The Fujianese, Ryukyuans
and Portuguese (c. 1511 to 1540s): Allies or Competitors. Jinan historiography, Vol. 2:
319-335.
Quanzhou Heritage Management Committee, Quanzhou Maritime Museum, 1975. Five
batch of foreign coins unearthed from Quanzhou, Fujian. Kaogu, Vol. 6: 352-379.
Shangraw, Clarence., and Von der Porten, E., 1981. The Drake and Cermeño
Expeditions’Chinese Porcelains at Drake’s Bay, California, 1579 and 1595. Santa Rosa
Junior college and Drake Navigator Guild, California.
Sila Tripati., Pande, R., Rao, V. G., 2011. Study of Chinese Porcelain sherds of Old Goa,
Indicators of Trade Contacts. Man Environment, Vol. 36 (2): 107-116.
Sten Sjostrand and Sharipah Lok Lok Syed Idrus., 2007. The Wanli Shipwreck and its
Ceramic Cargo. Department of Museums, Malaysia.
Sun, J., 2012. The Nan’ao No.1 Shipwreck of the Ming Dynasty in Guangdong Province
and the Overseas Maritime Trade in Southeastern China. In Ch Wu (Ed.), Maritime
Cultural Heritage and Archaeology in Seas surrounding China. Science Press, Beijing:
155-169.
The Center for Underwater Archaeology of National Museum of China, 2006.The
Discoveries of Underwater Archaeological Investigations in Xisha Islands (1998~1999).
Science Press, Beijing: 150-185.
Umarah, A., 1999. Zhangzhou (Swatow) Ceramics: Sixteenth to Seventeenth Centuries
Found in Indonesia. The Ceramic Society of Indonesia, Jakarta: 42.
Von Der Porten, E., 2008. Identifying the Sixteenth century Ship on a Beach in Baja
11

�California. San Francisco.
Zhang Xie ( 张 燮 ), 2000. Dongxiyangkao ( 东 西 洋 考 ) (Study on China and West).
Zhonghuashuju, Beijing: 132.
Zhang, Zh., 1988. Foreign silver coins unearthed from Dongshan, Fujian. China
Numismatics, Vol. 3: 74.
Zhao, J., 2012. The new discovery of underwater archaeological investigations in Xisha
islands in 2009-2010. In Ch. Wu (Ed.), Maritime Cultural Heritage and Archaeology in
Seas Surrounding China. Science Press, Beijing: 176-178.
Miao Liu (b. 1976) working as an associate Professor of Department of History, College
of Humanities, Xiamen University and mainly engages in the research of Maritime
Archaeology and Chinese export porcelain. She leads the project “Chinese Export
Porcelain and the Maritime Culture” awarded by Chinese National Social Science
Foundation. She is the member of the Editorial Board “The Shipwrecks Archaeology
Report of Dinghai Bay, Fujian” (Science Press, Beijing: 2011) and published “The export
of Chinese porcelains under the ban of maritime trade policy in the early Ming Dynasty”
(Kaogu, 2012). “The Islamic Cultural Factors of the Blue-and-White Porcelains in the
Early Ming Dynasty” (Journal of Xiamen University Arts Social Sciences, 2008), etc.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="8">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="24">
                  <text>Session 5: Early Modern Colonialism in the Asia-Pacific Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="25">
                  <text>Introduction interview with session chair MarÃ­a Cruz Berrocal and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26">
                  <text>Research on early modern colonialism in the Asia-Pacific region makes a fundamental contribution to the study of Global History. In the last decades, historians are highlighting the region's relevance in the transformation of global economy through its role in far-reaching trade networks. The early beginnings of colonialism in the region, as well as the role of non-Angloamerican colonial agents in the shaping of modern world have been also highlighted.&#13;
Although these debates have been driven largely from history, archaeology must become more prominent for the study of early modern colonialism in the Asia-Pacific region through the study of consumption patterns, environmental effects, demographic impacts, transformation of gender systems brought about by contact, the role of material culture in these first colonial endeavours, and specifically, the important evidence that maritime archaeology can bring to the fore. It is argued in this session that new lines of evidence and argumentation will be found through a history- archaeology joint collaboration. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="27">
                  <text>Dr. MarÃ­a Cruz Berrocal</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="595">
                <text>The diffusion of the material culture in the early period of the trade globalization:&#13;
A preliminary study on silver coins and shipwreck porcelains found in East Asia of the 16th and17th centuries</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="596">
                <text>In the 16th-17th centuries, world trade patterns greatly changed. East and West entered a period of an enormous amount of sailing since the 1500s. In the East, the traditional Asian maritime trade network - which mainly relied on maritime merchants of Southeast China, was gradually restored. After the discovery of the Americas in 1492 by the Spanish kingdom of Castille, and the establishment of the Eastward passage to India by the kingdom of Portugal in the late 1400s, both Spain and Portugal arrived in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s and interacted with Eastern Asia local cultures. This set up the early globalization process. The silk and porcelains from China, spices from Southeast Asia, textiles from India, and coins from Mexico and Japan, were all important materials and media in the global trade of this period. Dozens of shipwrecks dated to this period have been identified as both East Asian maritime vessels (including Chinese junks) and European exploration and trading vessels in Southern China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia. Chinese porcelains were the main cargoes in all of them. We also find a growing number of silver coins at the archaeological sites and shipwrecks of this time period. These interesting maritime archaeological materials show early pan-Pacific trading navigation between eastern Asia and the Western world. They help reveal the early international maritime trading history between eastern Asia and the West, early European colonization in eastern Asia, and resulting issues of expanding globalization.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="597">
                <text>Liu Miao, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="598">
                <text>5/13/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="9">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 5 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="498" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="289">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/a5abc9ca81b4ad21cb6e9d761268bd5b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>14e82aadf2c299c3d4c2e718fa36c821</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5684">
                    <text>Trade in Ceramics on Guam in the Wake of the Manila
Galleon
Lon E. Bulgrin
Archaeologist/Cultural Resources Manager Navy Base Guam
Abstract
Various colonial factors led to the Mariana Islands being one of the most
economically isolated areas of the Pacific from the late 17th century until
the late 18th century. This isolation is reflected in the dearth of artifacts of
European and Asian origin in the archaeological record. Starting in the
late 18th century rules on public trade were relaxed and outside goods
became more readily available in the Marianas, if still uncommon. This
paper considers the ceramic collection from the Rosario House located in
Hagatna, Guam. The Rosario House has the largest data set of imported
Euro-American and Asian historical artifacts that has been discovered in
the Mariana Islands to date. The collection is dominated by Provincial
Chinese porcelains and stonewares but also includes a sample of refined
European earthenwares.
Key words: Guam, Pacific Islands, Manila Galleon, Ceramics

Introduction
The Mariana Islands are some of the most geographically isolated islands
in the Western Pacific. They lie on the western periphery of Oceania,
located approximately 1200 miles southeast of Japan and 1500 miles east
of the Philippines (Fig. 1). Spanish colonial policies of the late 17th
century further isolated the Chamorro people of the Marianas from other
indigenous polities in the Pacific. This solitude and segregation from the
rest of Oceania would last through the late 19th century. This isolation
extended to economic exchange even as they acted as a key nexus in the
Manila Galleon trade. This paper will examine Guam’s place in world trade

�at the end of the Manila Galleon trade through archaeologically recovered
ceramics.

Fig. 1: Map of the Mariana Islands. (Mike Carson)
Historic Background
Guam was the first landfall in the Pacific of an occupied island by Magellan
and his exhausted scurvy-ridden crew in his quest to reach the Spice
Islands. When Magellan and his crew made anchor on Guam on that first
long trek across the Pacific they felt both saved and threatened in the
initial lifesaving exchanges of food and water that were made with
indigenous Chamorro inhabitants. The day after contact Magellan’s men
launched an assault on a Chamorro village and burnt most of it down in
the course of recovering a ships boat needed to sound future anchorages.
Yet, at the same time that these Europeans were conducting a raid
against one Chamorro village they were busy trading for fresh food and
water with others. This ambiguity involving violence continued through the
early Manila Galleon trade (Rogers 1995; Giraldez 2015).

�For the next 150 years or so, the Mariana Islands were common stopping
places on the southern leg of the Manila Galleon route to take on water,
fruit, and fresh food. Trade was done at a distance with laughing
Chamorros making sea-borne trades of rice and other victuals that often
turned out to mostly consist of baskets of rocks and sand or coconut oil
heavily diluted with seawater (Pigafetta 1521 and Legaspi 1564 in Barratt
2003: 56 and 61-62). The Chamorros had to maintain a safe distance from
the Spanish ships or they might them find themselves impressed as
involuntary translators for future voyages or worse yet working the pumps
all the way to Manila in the stinking, over heated bilges of leaking galleons
(Giraldez 2015:49).
The Spanish mission and the colonization that rapidly followed in the
Marianas were directly related to the glimpses of the islands from the
passing galleons that inflamed the imaginations of various churchmen
who saw them as fertile fields for the harvest of souls (Driver 1989). The
Spanish crown showed initially little interest in acquiring a string of tiny
islands without spice, textile, or mineral resources. Zealous religious first
jumped ship to convert the Chamorro. After a campaign conducted by the
politically connected Father San Vittores a Jesuit mission was established
(McDonough 2004; Coomans 1997). The Marianas mission rapidly found
itself embroiled in cultural and political conflict with local power structures
and called for protection from the Crown (Lesveque 1995; Levesque
1996). However, the military companies sent for their protection were “like
a rich armor worn in heat of day that scalds with safety” (Shakespeare
Henry IV PtII.). The churchmen spent much of the next century or so
complaining about the character and behavior of the troops and their
captains. Still without the military presence the Catholic Church would
have been unable to further their mission of conversion. The Spanish

�controlled islands became safe harbors for galleons battered by typhoons
or just poorly captained or incompetently crewed in the Acapulco crossing.
These islands were also a welcome stop to take on fresh fruit and
vegetables during the Manila crossing.
Prior to European Contact the Chamorro people had maintained limited
trading contact and social ties with the Caroline Island groups of Chuuk
and Yap to the south and with the Philippines to the west (Farrell
2011:211; Quimby 2011). The punctuated natures of these trade ties are
reflected in the sparse evidence of long distance trade in the
archaeological record. Linguistic and historic accounts have been
interpreted to represent a limited trade in iron with the Philippines (Quimby
2011) and perhaps iron fragments discovered at the Obyan latte site
(Spoehr 1957) on Saipan may reflect a Pre-Contact trade in iron.
Ethnohistoric evidence and historical accounts of the Carolinian contacts
with the Marianas, however, are clear on the trade and interaction. The
descendents of migrants from the outer islands of Yap and Chuuk make
up a small but significant population of the Northern Mariana Islands and
their relatives still visit Saipan using the traditional navigation chants to
guide their way. At some time in the late 17th century the navigation routes
disseminated and controlled by chants between the islands to the south
to Guam were magically closed by the master navigators of the Carolines
in response to stories of Spanish cruelty related by Guam Chamorros
(Smith 2003:79; Farrell 2011:211). The Marianas were now isolated from
their traditional Pacific trade partners.
By the early 19th century Spanish policies of isolation, the Catholic
mission, and the relentless hammering taken by the Chamorro people
from introduced European and Asian diseases had eliminated the limited
ties that once had bound them with their neighbors in the Pacific (Farrell

�2011). The Spanish mission in the Marianas concentrated not only on the
introduction of the Catholic faith but also inculcation and enforcement of
European social and gender roles (Russell 1998). A primary goal was to
eliminate the animistic beliefs and ancestor worship of the Chamorro. To
this end, indigenous songs, dances, and oral histories were actively
discouraged by the Jesuit Fathers. Indigenous knowledge systems that
did not explicitly find favor with the Church rapidly eroded. Proprietary
knowledge of all kinds was made vulnerable by the need to limit
transmission to chosen heirs, the association with non-Catholic ancestors,
and the unpredictable appearances of diseases that swept away the living
repositories. Seafaring and navigational knowledge and expertise were
heavily impacted by this social revolution. A people capable of making
rapid voyages up and down the Marianas chain and of delivering
passengers from Guam to Manila in 4 to 6 days as late as 1704 were
barely capable of sailing beyond the northern tip of Guam by 1819
(Freycinet 2003, Originally 1827).
The Spanish were interested in maintaining this isolation for geo-political
as well as religious reasons, primarily to deny access to rival European
powers. The Marianas were an important stop off point for the Manila
galleons making their voyages between Manila and Acapulco, carrying
New World silver in exchange for the spices, silks, and gold of Asia. The
Pacific route of the galleons was composed of extremely empty distances
with very few points where fresh water and food could be brought on
board. The galleon routes could be approached by pirates from only a
few points and the Spanish wanted to limit this. Denying access to the
Marianas was a way to keep English and Dutch at bay. Accordingly the
Spanish crown did not allow trade with foreign nationals in the Marianas.
They maintained their own garrison and mission on Guam with an annual

�situado or subsidy (Farrell 2011:192) that arrived on a very irregular basis.
A series of venal governors usually managed to reacquire the majority or
entirety of this subsidy before they were recalled, actively cheating their
troops as well as the local subjects. The economies on the inhabited
islands of Guam, Rota, and Saipan were subsistence based with limited
internal trade and no outside trade to speak of. Local people saw little to
no benefit from the galleon trade or the government (Rogers 1995).
After the political unrest and revolutions in South and Central America
starting in 1808, the Spanish money making machine, trading silver mined
by encomienda labor in the New World for Asian gold and goods in the
Philippines totally broke down (Giraldez 2015). The structural position of
the Mariana Islands changed for the Spanish crown. No longer were the
islands an essential supply stop and defensive shield for the Manila
galleons located within a “Spanish lake”. Now they were at the ends of
the earth, just beyond the Philippines, and a fiscal drain. Accordingly, the
yearly situado, of New World silver, that provided payment for the Mission
and the garrison was radically reduced (Rodgers 1995:93). Economically,
changes had already been made in the trade policy in the Marianas before
the revolutions. Governor Cerain, 1776-1786, had issued a proclamation
allowing both internal trade as well as trade with passing ships. This was
due to a deteriorating economy and the increase of foreign whaling
vessels in the Pacific.
The 19th century saw a slow opening and reintegration of the Marianas
with the rest of the world. The Pacific whaling fleet composed primarily of
U.S. and British vessels consistently wintered a few ships at Guam and
Saipan. Sailors came ashore looking for leisure, fresh food, liquor and
companionship, not necessarily in that order. The 19th century also saw
a reappearance of Carolinians in the Marianas. The chief and master-

�navigator Aghurubw reopened the navigational ways to the Marianas and
led a fleet of canoes of Carolinean families north (Driver and Brunal-Perry
1996; Smith 2003).
settle on Saipan.

The governor of Guam gave them permission to
More canoes would come north in the continuing

decades and would help to spur interisland trade. The Marianas remained
underdeveloped with land ownership becoming more concentrated in the
hands of the Church and elite families (Rogers 1995:75). Many of the
smaller landholding families slipped into debt peonage (Rogers 1995).
During the stay over on Saipan and Guam, many whalers lodged with
local families and presumably paid primarily in goods for room and board.
The annual supply ship from the Philippines usually also wintered in the
Marianas until the trade winds were steady. Some wealthy families also
contracted with visiting ships to provide provisions. Providing fresh foods
and salt meats would have required large land holdings so presumably
only those families with significant crown grants would have been major
players in the trade (Madrid 2006:14). Regardless of the participants this
trade would have decreased, as the whaling fleets declined, through the
mid to late 19th century (Rogers 1995:105).
The lives of average Chamorro families were not much affected by these
economic changes. They continued in their yearly rounds of religious
festivals. They conducted small scale agriculture, fished and hunted,
collected wild foods, and practiced limited animal husbandry.

Most

Chamorros retained two residences under the Spanish. During the week
they lived on small farms called lancho and returned to their formal
residence on the weekend to attend religious services (Madrid 2006:8;
Rogers 1995).
In 1898 the United States seized Guam during the Spanish American War.
Following its defeat Spain sold the remainder of the archipelago, the

�Northern Mariana Islands, to Germany.

Japan seized the Northern

Marianas from Germany in 1914 during World War I and Guam from the
U.S, in 1941during World War II. The United States took Saipan, Tinian,
and Guam in amphibious assaults in 1944 and retained the entire
archipelago after WWII (Rogers 1995).

Historical Archaeology and Rosario House
Historical archaeological investigations into the Spanish Period in the
Marianas have been limited. Almost all investigations have focused on
the island of Guam where the vast majority of the population, the Catholic
Mission, and colonial government were located.

There are two principle challenges in conducting historical archaeology in
the Mariana Islands. The first is the paucity of identifiable historic artifacts
and the second is the direct involvement of the island chain in the ground
combat of World War II.
The paucity of identifiable historic artifacts is rooted in two separate
factors. The primary factor is the economic isolation of the archipelago
previously discussed. The second is the hostile preservation conditions.
High heat and humidity, acidic soils and high levels of salt combined with
termites, mildew, and periodic typhoons, rapidly decay most materials
including metal.
The effects of WWII can not be overemphasized in the historic
archaeology of the Marianas. The majority of Saipan and Tinian and a
significant portion of Guam were subjected to naval and aerial

�bombardment and combat ground operations. More importantly, post
battle cleanup and the WWII logistical buildup subjected huge portions of
the islands to the not so tender mercy of the Seabees, who never did
anything with hand tools when it could be done mechanically. Their “Can
Do” spirit was a war winning attitude but it wreaked havoc on the
archaeological sites of the Marianas. This damage was particularly acute
because of the aforementioned lancho residence system.

The three

largest towns and commercial centers on Guam; Hagatna, Sumay, and
Agat were destroyed and built over, as was Garapan, the largest town on
Saipan. In the case of Hagatna significant portions were bulldozed into
the sea to create additional land.

Garapan also suffered extreme

earthmoving. These actions eliminated most of the formal residences in
the Marianas where imported materials were present for archaeologists to
study. Asian and European artifacts have been discovered at former
lancho sites but they are not common finds and they are present in low
densities.
The Rosario House (Fig. 2) is one of the few surviving Pre-WWII buildings
and intact archaeological sites remaining in Hagatna on Guam. The site
was investigated by archaeologists from Micronesian Archaeological
Research Services in 1988 (Moore et.al. 1993). The largest historic
ceramic collection discovered in the Marianas was recovered from these
excavations. In 2009 the Guam Preservation Trust funded the cataloging
of this important collection (Bulgrin 2010).

�Fig. 2: The Rosario House. (Guam Preservation Trust)
Stratigraphical interpretation of the excavations at the Rosario House
indicates historical processes that caused disturbance and soil mixing in
the areas tested. A leaching field and potential excavation for garbage
disposal appear to have mixed PreContact and historical deposits.
Laboratory analyses agreed with these interpretations. Uncertain contexts
have limited chronological interpretations so the collection needs to be
addressed as a totality.
The Rosario House Ceramic Collection
A large variety of European and Asian ceramics were recovered from the
initial testing at the Rosario House. The vast majority of the ceramics
dated from the late 18th century to the late 19th century.

European

ceramics made up 24% of the Rosario House collection and were
dominated by wares manufactured in the United Kingdom. This is no
surprise given the English domination of ceramic production at that time
(Tames 1995:39).

Asian ceramics present at Rosario House were

manufactured in both China and Japan. The Chinese ceramics, porcelain
and stoneware, composed 71% of the collection and tended to cluster in
the late 18th to mid-19th century. Japanese porcelain and stoneware made

�up the remaining 5% of the collection and dated from the late 19th century
to the 20th century.

Fig. 3: European Ceramics. (Adapted from Bulgrin 2010)
European ceramics (Fig. 3) are uncommon finds on historic sites in the
Marianas and the Rosario House is unique in the quantity and richness of
their discovery. European refined earthen wares present were produced
for food service or hygienic purposes. The more utilitarian earthenwares
of the time produced for food preparation and storage such as yellow
ware, Rockingham glazed yellow wares, and annular whitewares were
present but in very low numbers.
Decorated

refined

earthenwares

predominated.

Creamwares,

pearlwares, whitewares, and a very few semi-porcelain sherds were
recovered. The only wares that were not decorated were the creamwares
and a single tin glazed earthenware sherd. These are presumably some
of the earliest European ceramic type introduced into the Marianas (other
than a very few majolica vessels, none of which were discovered at the
Rosario House). Decoration ranges from inexpensive shell edged wares

�and sponge stamped wares to transfer prints.

Transferprints were

recovered in all colors produced, but blue was the most common. Plates
and large serving or hygienic vessels predominated as vessel forms with
cups and bowls making up the majority of the rest of the collection.
Unusual vessel types include an open vegetable dish, a chamber pot or
spittoon, a child’s chamber pot, a possible candlestick and a teapot.
Importantly, none of the recovered ceramics matched any other within the
collection and it appears that they were acquired individually.

Two

unusual finds include a copper luster sherd and a fragment of an animal
figurine.
Chinese porcelains and stonewares made up by far the largest proportion
of the ceramics collected from excavations at Rosario House. This study
does not address the large quantity of utilitarian stoneware recovered at
the site. Asian stoneware jars of various makes and national origins were
ubiquitous in trade within Southeast Asia and the Manila Galleons, being
the shipping containers of their day.
Almost all of the Chinese porcelain (Fig. 4) present was of the type
commonly referred to as Provincial ware whose production was centered
in Fujian province (Macintosh 1977; Sheaf and Kilburn 1988). These
wares were produced for Asian tastes rather than European and are of a
different quality and aesthetic to the porcelain exported to the West.
Porcelain bodies were a uniform light grey. Glazes ranged from pale blue
through pale grey for most sherds. More unusual glaze tints included pale
greenish grey and pale cream colored. Most vessels were decorated with
blue underglaze handpainting but there are examples of underglaze block
printing and overglaze hand painting as well. Unglazed rings on both the
interior and exterior are another common technique present. Unglazed
footrings and sand adhesions are also common. Several sherds were

�clearly of inferior production runs as they appeared to be over oxidized
perhaps due to an early opening of the kiln.

Fig. 4: Chinese Porcelain. (Adapted from Bulgrin 2010)
A small number of porcelain sherds were clearly produced for the
European export trade based on quality, form, and painting style. One
sherd has characteristics of early 19th century English porcelain and
another higher quality painted sherd has an Empire Shape lobed body
(Berthoud 1990:105).
Many porcelain sherds from Rosario House are identical to ceramics
recovered from the wreck of the Junk Tek Sing that sank in 1822 (Pickford
and Hatcher 2000). These include motifs such as stylized peach sprays,
stylized Sanskrit printing, floral sprays, and lingzhi fungus and flower
heads within a spiral or bloom. Koh (2013) has identified the majority of
the porcelain from the Tek Sing as Dehua Blue and White. Dehua blue
and white porcelains were a lesser quality ware that was principally
marketed to Southeast Asia. Koh (2013) has also proposed that the Tek
Sing

cargo

serves

as

a

reference

collection

for

the

late

�Qianlong/Daoguang period (late 18th century – 1850). Nevertheless, the
variety of glazes present and different painting techniques and quality
among the porcelain collection make it unlikely that all of the collection is
the product of the Dehua kilns.
Porcelain

vessel

types

are

overwhelmingly

for

food

service,

predominantly bowls and cups. The general impression from working with
the collection is that sets of bowls and cups are present at the site but this
can not be stated with certainty due to the small size of most of the sherds
recovered and the few cross mends that could be made. A number of
sherds from small plates with a dark blue edge with lotus blossoms was
found in two of the excavation units and were almost certainly a set.
Similar decorated plates are dated from 1825-1850 (Mudge 1986:182).
Block printed “debased Sanskrit” pattern bowls are another possible set
present in the assemblage. The availability of these as sets is reinforced
by block printed “Sanskrit” bowl sherds recovered from excavations at the
Governor’s palace at Hagatna (Schuetz 2007:139).

Fig. 5: Chinese Stoneware. (Adapted from Bulgrin 2010)

�Chinese stoneware (Fig. 5) makes up a small proportion of the Rosario
House collection. Two distinct types are present in the collection. The first
type has a buff body and cream colored glaze. Decoration consists of
crimson overglaze painting. The second type has a body varying from
grey to pale buff to pinkish buff, glazes ranging from pale greyish blue to
cream, and underglaze blue painting.
The ceramic collection from Rosario House seems to be a direct reflection
of economic opportunities for an elite family on Guam.

The earliest

architectural remains at Rosario House date to approximately 1750 but
there are no imported artifacts from that period. Upon legalization of
private trade, foreign artifacts immediately appeared but in low quantities.
With the advent of the whalers quantities increase and more varied goods
are available. European ceramics appear to be individually acquired and
may reflect lodging and board transactions for whaling crews. Chinese
ceramics are available in greater quantity and possibly in sets. However,
the porcelain’s quality is low and lower quality stoneware copies are
sometimes substituted for porcelain vessels.

Provincial porcelain is

difficult to date, particularly as fragmented as it is in the Rosario House
collection. However, the porcelain recovered from the Rosario House site
is extremely similar in style to the cargo recovered from the Tek Sing
wreck of 1822 (Pickford and Hatcher 2000). Logically the porcelain at both
location dates to approximately the same date. Given that cargoes may
have been assembled over time from wares in storage a time frame of the
late 18th century – 1830s seems appropriate for the porcelain. Ceramics
at Rosario House dating to the late 19th century and early 20th century are
almost entirely Japanese stenciled porcelains.
Two different ceramic types, Chinese Provisional porcelain and English
refined earthenwares are predominant in the Rosario House collection.

�Clearly these ceramics were manufactured in two different areas of the
world under very different conditions and their distribution in tandem is
unlikely. It is also interesting that European ceramics appear to have been
acquired singly while Chinese ceramics were available in sets or small
lots of similar decoration. These patterns indicate two different streams
of availability.
It is likely that the European ceramics were acquired in serial transactions
with Euro-American sailors as payments for lodging, meals, or
commodities such as dried meat, coffee or tobacco, that were locally
available. Whaling ships may have carried ceramics as part of a suite of
trade goods to reprovision and refit ships over the whaling voyage. It is
possible that crews were able to draw from these against future wages for
their needs or they may have brought their own trade goods in their sea
chests against future need.
Chinese porcelain availability in sets (Fig. 6) indicates a different kind and
direction of trade. These were available for trade or purchase in bulk, if
not necessarily on a regular basis. Provincial porcelain was produced for
and marketed to the Southeast Asian market. It is unlikely that whaling
ships would have chosen to load these ceramics in bulk at their home
ports in New England or the United Kingdom when cheaper industrially
produced English earthenwares were available. It is also unlikely that
these ceramics are tied to the Manila Galleon. These porcelains would
have been readily available in Manila but in order to be transported to
Guam via the galleon trade they would have had to be trans-shipped
through Acapulco and back to Guam. This is an unlikely scenario as
separate taxes and fees would have had to be paid and the ceramics
could have already been sold for a substantial profit in Mexico. In addition,
the bulk of the Provincial porcelain in the Rosario collection postdates the

�Manila Galleon. Therefore, it appears that these ceramics were being
shipped directly from the Philippines to Guam, most likely by the annual
supply ship or mail schooners. It is ironic that the demise of the galleon
trade actually led to an increased availability of consumer goods on
Guam. It is not clear whether this was speculative trade or orders put in
by local consumers or retailers for delivery.

Fig. 6: Porcelain Patterns. (Adapted from Bulgrin 2010)
Conclusion
Several preliminary conclusions on consumer choice can be made for the
family that lived at the Rosario House given the caveats of limited sample
size. The first is that the end of the galleon trade and the political turmoil
of the South and Central American revolutions expanded the availability
of foreign commodities on Guam. This supposes that other non-preserved
commodities such as fabric that presumably made up the bulk of trade
followed the pattern for ceramics. The second is that options on the
products available were still limited. Large serving bowls and other serving
vessels, and hygienic vessels such as ewers and basins and chamber

�pots were probably only available when European or American ships were
in port. This hypothesized punctuated availability likely extended to other
commodities as well. Rarity and inherent fragility possibly indicate use of
these vessels primarily for display and prestige purposes. In the case of
imported ceramics, there was a preference for food service vessels such
as cups, bowls and plates, over utilitarian vessels such as pans, mixing
bowls, bottles, and jars. Presumably food storage and preparation
functions were being taken up by more durable though heavier
stonewares. In the case of European ceramics, there was a preference
for decorated wares and this continued over time. This is in contrast to
the general trend by European manufacturers of producing plainer, whiter
vessels such as molded ironstones. There was also a preference for blue
decorated wares over other colors. Finally, even when broken, imported
ceramics retained some value as there are multiple examples of broken
sherds rechipped into circular gaming or tally pieces. Hopefully, more
archaeological testing will be conducted at the Rosario House in
conjunction with planned rehabilitation and these hypotheses can be
tested with additional data.
(Please note that this research was conducted privately by the author
under Guam Preservation Trust Grant GPTG-08-01 and does not
represent the opinion or the policy of the U.S. Navy)

References
Barratt, G., 2003 The Chamorros of the Marianas Islands, Early European
Records, 1521-1721. Occasional Historical Papers Series No. 10, CNMI
Division of Historic Preservation: Saipan.
Berthoud, M.,1990
A Compendium of British Cups. Micawber
Publications: Shropshire.

�Bulgrin, L., 2010 Catalog of the Non-Utilitarian Ceramics from the Rosario
House Site, Hagatña, Guam. Report prepared under Guam Preservation
Trust Grant GPTG-08-01
Coomans, P., 2000
1667-1673.

History of the Mission in the Marianas Islands,

Occasional Historical Papers Series No. 4, CNMI Division of Historic
Preservation: Saipan.
Driver, M., 1989 Fray Juan Pobre in the Marianas, 1602. Richard Flores
Taitano Micronesian Area Research Center, University of Guam:
Mangilao.
Driver, M. and O. Brunal-Perry (eds), 1996 Carolinians in the Mariana
Islands.
Richard Flores Taitano Micronesian Area Research Center, University of
Guam: Mangilao.
Farrell, D., 2011 History of the Mariana Islands To Partition. Public School
System, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan.
Freycinet, L., 2003 An Account of the Corvette L’Uranie’s Sojourn at the
Mariana Islands, 1819. Translated by Glynn Barratt, Occasional Historical
Papers Series No. 13, CNMI Division of Historic Preservation: Saipan.
Giraldez, A., 2015 The Age of Trade: The Manila Galleons and the Dawn
of the Global Economy. Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham,MD.
Koh, N.K., 2013 Dehua Blue and White. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from
http://kohantique.com/Dehua/dehua_blue_and_white.htm
Levesque, R. (ed), 1995 History of Micronesia: Vol. 6 Revolts in the
Marianas.
Les Editions Levesque: Quebec.
Levesque, R. (ed), 1996 History of Micronesia: Vol. 7: More Turmoil in
the Marianas. Les Editions Levesque: Quebec.
Macintosh, D., 1977
Charles Ltd: London.

Chinese Blue and White Porcelain. David and

�Madrid, C., 2006 Beyond Distances: Governance, Politics and
Deportation in the Mariana Islands from 1870 to 1877. Northern Marianas
Council for Humanities, Saipan.
McDonough, J. A. S.J. (ed), 2004 The Life and Martyrdom of Diego Luis
De San Vitores, S.J. MARC Monograph Series No. 3, Richard Flores
Taitano Micronesian Area Research Center, University of Guam:
Mangilao.
Moore, D., J. Amesbury, R. Hunter-Anderson, and E. Wells, 1993
Archaeological Excavations at Rosario House, Agana, Guam. Report
prepared for Tanaguchi-Ruth-Smith and Associates. Micronesian
Archaeological Research Services: Mangilao
Mudge, J., 1986 Chinese Export Porcelain in North America. Clarkson N.
Potter Inc,: New York.
Pickford, N. and M. Hatcher, 2000 The Legacy of the Tek Sing. Granta
Editions: Cambridge.
Quimby, F., 2011 The Hierro Commerce: Culture Contact, Appropriation
and Colonial Entanglement in the Marianas, 1521–1668. Journal of Pacific
History, Vol. 46, No. 1.
Rogers, R., 1995
of Hawai’i: Honolulu.

Destiny’s Landfall: A History of Guam. University

Russell, S., 1998 Tiempon I Manmofo’na: Ancient Chamorro Culture and
History of the Northern Mariana Islands. Micronesian Archaeological
Survey No.32, CNMI Division of Historic Preservation: Saipan.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="21">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="75">
                  <text>2017 Session 1: Underwater and Maritime Archaeology and Capacity  Building in the Pacific Islands</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="76">
                  <text>The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) spanning human history from the Stone Age to the atomic age.  Since the first Pacific UCH Workshop held in Solomon Islands in 2009, the Pacific island nations have been progressing in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme by awareness raising, research and capacity building activities through inter-disciplinary cooperation and promoting synergy with the Pacific World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Programmes. Notable progresses include, among others, the SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA) Outcome Document of the 3rd UN International Cooperation on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) (Samoa, 2014) that contains references to the importance of UCH for sustainable development of SIDS and SIDS ratification of the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001), as well as the enhanced cooperation between universities in the Pacific islands and professional training institutions through UNESCO University Twinning and Networking Programme (UNITWIN) for Underwater Archaeology. &#13;
&#13;
With this as its background, the session â€œUnderwater and maritime archaeology and capacity building in the Pacific Islandsâ€ will be held with the aims to: i) share information on recent progress in awareness raising, research and capacity building activities in underwater and maritime archaeology in the Pacific Islands, ii) identify priority actions, iii) foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.  The session especially welcomes presentations focusing on the protection and management of UCH belonging to indigenous community shared UCH in the Pacific, addressing challenges and opportunities facing Pacific SIDS in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme and the promotion of the UCH Convention, presenting good practice in ensuring the effective engagement of Pacific island countries and community in UCH management for their sustainable development, and proposing collaborative projects in this area.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="77">
                  <text>Akatsuki Takahashi&#13;
UNESCO Office for the Pacific States, Samoa</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="78">
                  <text>Andrew Viduka, Maritime and Commonwealth Heritage, Australian Government,</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="79">
                  <text>Nicolas Bigourdan, Western Australian Museum</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5678">
                <text>Trade in Ceramics on Guam in the Wake of the Manila Galleon </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5679">
                <text>Various colonial factors led to the Mariana Islands being one of the most economically isolated areas of the Pacific from the late 17th century until the late 18th century.  This isolation is reflected in the dearth of artifacts of European and Asian origin in the archaeological record.  Starting in the late 18th century rules on public trade were relaxed and outside goods became more readily available in the Marianas, if still uncommon. This paper considers the ceramic collection from the Rosario House located in Hagatna, Guam. The Rosario House has the largest data set of imported Euro-American and Asian historical artifacts that has been discovered in the Mariana Islands to date.   The collection is dominated by Provincial Chinese porcelains and stonewares but also includes a sample of refined European earthenwares. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5680">
                <text>Lon E. Bulgrin </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5681">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5682">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5683">
                <text>Lon E. Bulgrin </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="39">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 1 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="30" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="30">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/3ceb07a24f543cc8b5b46ce8dd13002b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2d99555f3dc1582d9d23aceaa929545d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="548">
                    <text>Hollowing out the canoe: a reflection of the society

Luz Elena G. Cervantes
Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia (ENAH)
Distrito Federal, Mexico, 04360
Mexico
E-mail: luz_elena_c@hotmail.com
Abstract

The dugout canoe is an important element in a lot of maritime societies all over the
world. It’s not only a small boat made by hollowing a tree with particular characteristics,
but it is the reflection of the society in which the canoe was made. A canoe represents
the interaction of ideology, tradition, economics and purpose, as well as environment
and material resources. Mexico is no exception; the canoe was the best aquatic
transport in pre-Hispanic communities, both for coastal and inland waters. So, the
canoe can bring us a lot of archaeological information about pre-Hispanic cultures, its
traditions and its environment.
It is impossible to access the social explanation of the canoe if we are not able to
describe it formally. So, a registration strategy will give us the possibility to store data for
a social explanation of the boat. In addition, using this strategy, it is possible to
accumulate general and specific data from which it can be proposed a typology of
dugout vessels. This research is a step forward of a typology proposal for dugout
canoes in Mexico, which aims to grow as more canoes are found, both in archaeological
contexts and inside public and private institutions, museums and private collections.

Key words: Americas, dugout, ethnography, methodology, Mexico, nautical

1

�Introduction

The presence of water bodies as part of the ancestors life, made them to develop ways
to take advantage of these resources. They needed a transport that allowed them to
travel through the water. In most of the maritime communities, the canoe was the
aquatic transport by excellence, for both, coastal and inland waters. This is the case in
many of the pre-Hispanic communities in Mexico. Usage of the dugout canoe, the one
made by hollowing out a single wooden trunk, has great importance in pre-Hispanic
societies, as it is reflected on written and pictorial sources of information, as well as the
preservation of several specimens found in actual communities. Therefore, the canoe
could provide us with much archaeological information about pre-Hispanic cultures, as
well as of their traditions and environments.
How can the canoe be the reflection of the society in which it was built?
The dugout canoe is an important element for maritime societies all over the world. It’s
not only a small boat made by hollowing a tree with particular characteristics, but it is
the reflection of the society in which the canoe was made.
For this, Adams (2001) mentioned that the manufacturing process observed in each
canoe, reflects the complex social activity around this. The boats can be seen as a
manifestation of the maritime needs and aspirations of society, this is achieved by
considering the characteristics that represents the interaction of ideology, tradition,
economics, purpose, environment and material resources, which are reflected in the
shape, structure, appearance and use of each vessel.


In terms of ideology and tradition, Adams notes that on the boat you can see a
set of ideas about what ships mean for society, the importance they have and
how they should be designed and constructed. That's why they have their own
characteristics in terms of the design parameters and the ways in which they
carry out various aspects of construction. In this work, despite failing to fully
understand the tradition of a canoe, due to the scarce archaeological information
about dugout canoes in Mexico, it can be observed similarities and differences in
the physical properties of these vessels, which helps us to infer periods and
2

�geographic regions in which the canoes were built. It is like this how we can
identify "types" of boats and with these, building traditions.


The economy, understood in terms of manpower and wealth can be reflected in
the construction of vessels, both in size and materials used, and specific
characteristics of the boat. These features have a close relationship with the
material resources and with the purpose.



The purpose, understood as the function of the boat, is also observable in the
physical characteristics of the vessel. The canoe has multiple functions in the
indigenous life: transportation (of people, goods, materials, and ideas), resource
exploitation (hunting and fishing), ceremonies, rituals and military confrontations.



Regarding the environment for which the boat is manufactured, it is reflected in
the dimensional characteristics of the vessel, as if a boat is built for lakes or
protected coasts, you will not need the same properties of stability and
robustness that you need for a boat built for open water. Similarly, the canoe has
architectural features which are defined by the place for navigation.



Finally, material resources, both natural and manufactured. This means that the
available resources in part determine the size of the vessels, and also provide
properties relating to the buoyancy and shipload capacity. That is how the
material resources maintain their close relationship with the purpose of the boat.
Similarly, manufactured material resources (such as tools) define some specific
manufacturing features of the canoe; it is another feature that can provide us with
information about timing and place of construction.

It is impossible to access the social explanation of the canoe if we are not able to
describe it formally. So, a registration strategy will give us the possibility to store data for
social explanation of the boat. In addition, registration under this strategy, it is possible
the accumulation of general and specific data, from which it can be proposed a typology
of dugout vessels.
How to approach the canoe?
There are some specific problems in Mexica n archaeology which has resulted in an
underdeveloped study of the canoes. A common problem has been to consider the
canoe as a perishable material, and other important issue has been the inability to
3

�recognize the different objects frequently found in archaeological contexts. Because of
this, it is very difficult to study the dugout canoe from an archaeological approach.
While the lack of specific studies can be explained from the apparent absence of
materials in archaeological contexts, there are different strategies with which to have a
closer knowledge about the manufacture of canoes of indigenous tradition and with this,
try to give a social explanation around the canoe. In addition to the ethnography and the
study of written sources, you can use the direct study of dugout canoes located in
museums, institutions and private collections, from which to obtain information about
their manufacturing. Also, with this strategy, a classification can be developed based on
the specific construction elements of each canoe, generating increasingly complex
types. This is why apart of this strategy, a recording methodology which allows us to
formally describe the canoe and recognize both their manufacturing characteristics,
including structural elements, and the way it was manufactured, is proposed.
This methodology is divided into four stages:
A) The first is to fill a description and identification form of each canoe. These forms
were made in the context of the methodology proposal described here. The information
recorded in the files is as follows:


Identification canoe information.



Type of vessel.



Traditional Name.



Information on who performs the registration



Registered date.



Identification of photographs and drawings.



Location (institution or individual custody, responsible and place of origin)



General measures (Length, Width and Depth)



Building materials.



General method of construction.



Number of stems.

4

�

Nailing.



Diameter of the wick stick
(sail propulsion)



Evidence of manufacture.



Evidence of construction
elements.



Evidence of propulsion.



Decoration.



Repairs.

Fig. 1 Axes for the Topographic survey, based on the



State of preservation.

Anderson’s lines. Author: Luz Cervantes



General Sketch.

B) The second step is to make a record as detailed as topographical surveys. That is,
sampling point is done from calculated measurements from three axes (X, Y and Z),
which, together, make a three-dimensional model of the canoe. The distribution of these
axes is based on survey lines of Anderson (1988): Water lines, which are horizontally
distributed along the canoe, parallel to the water or flotation line; Buttock lines, which
are distributed vertically along the canoe, parallel to the major axis, and Sections which
intersect the canoe perpendicular to the major axis or length. (Fig. 1) This data is stored
in registration forms to have a good control and management.
C) The third step is to perform a specific photographic record, with which the previous
information will be complemented. For the photographic record the following strategy is
proposed. It is important to place a scale, the orientation of the canoe relative to the
bow or the stern and an identification chalkboard. Obviously, if the boat is into an
excavation context, in addition to the guidance on the bow and stern, it must be indicate
the orientation from north. The scale is needed to show the size of the canoe. The
orientation fits to better locate the features described in relation to the archived images.
And the board is the best resource for material identification; here it is included
information of where the canoe is located, the date on which it was registered, the
person who registered, and identification number of the piece.

5

�The strategy for the photographic record consists in how to take the photos. This has
been done in two phases. The first consists in photographs of general views, which is to
archive the shape and size of the boat. The second includes specific detail views to
note building elements, decorations, manufacturing marks and repairs, if they exist. For
the first phase of the photographic record, the following photographs are proposed (Fig.
2):

Fig.2 General views for photographic record. Author: Luz Cervantes



A photograph taken in front of the bow and stern, respectively, from which the
entire rim line is observed, it is taken at the height of a standing person. If the
canoe is larger, and the rim cannot be observed, shall be taken from above, with
the help of a ladder or bank.



A totally front photograph, where observe only the bow or stern and bands
perspective. This will be taken at the height of a person kneeling or squatting. If
the canoe is larger, shall be taken with the person standing.

6

�

A side view photograph of port and starboard, where canoe maximum length can
be observed. This photo is usually taken kneeling or squatting, to appreciate the
canoe in full.



A photograph taken in an isometric perspective, usually from the bow, loaded
into one of the bands. The purpose of this view is to perceive the construction
details of bow and stern height relative to the length and width of the canoe.

The second phase consists of photographs of details (Fig. 3), it is important to portray
all possible elements of construction, use and repairs. These photographs must be
taken with a scale and in a macro mode, so can be appreciated the most possible
characteristics.
D)

The

fourth

step

methodology

is

to

registration

survey

of

the

make

a

on

a

technical drawing. The purpose
is

to

provide

sufficient

information to facilitate analysis,
help

design

possible future

and

develop

reconstruction

and maintenance of the vessel.
Fig. 3 Photographs of details. Author: Luz Cervantes

The drawing must contain a
representation in plan, profile

and the body of the boat. The drawing should be clearly indicated by its size
dimensions, the scale must be indicated, it should contain a record field (identification,
date and name of the artist) and the three projections are needed to provide more
information about the canoe (Fig. 4).
For drawings of boats is proposed the scale 1:10, because at this it can be possible to
appreciate the details of the vessel, and a very large format and unwieldy paper is not
required.

7

�With these drawings, in addition to fact charts and specific pictures, it is possible to
make a comparison between canoes belonging to the recorded simple and propose
different types of boats.

Fig. 4 Example of drawing. Author: Luz Cervantes

A preview of the type proposed for the dugout boats in Mexico, which aims to grow as
found more evidence is found, both in archaeological excavations, and public and
private institutions, museums and private collections is presented in Fig. 5.
This typology is completely open to be improved or modified, as pre-Hispanic navigation
studies within archaeology, will increase.
What is happening with the canoes in Mexico?
After this analysis of dugout canoes of indigenous tradition, it is necessary to talk about
this "apparent" absence of canoes as archaeological material in Mexico. For this, two
dilemmas arise: the first of them leads us to ask if there really is an absence of any
archaeological material belonging to canoes in Mexico. If this were the case, why is
there a record of canoes with the same characteristics in other parts of the world? And
why are there archaeological features of the same material of the canoes (wood) in
many regions of the country? The second, focusing in the term archaeological material,
are there no canoes as archaeological material in Mexico? If this were the case, all the
canoes no longer used that have been abandoned in the mangroves, in shipyards, in
museums, in public institutions and in many more places should be taken into account.
Michael Schiffer considers that every element at the end of its life, assuming that is not
reused, becomes waste so it changes from its systemic context (use) to an
8

�archaeological

context

(non-use).

So,

I

believe that these “unused” canoes have not
been

studied

from

an

archaeological

perspective because they have not being
"found"

in

archaeological

underground

contexts, and they have been discarded and
not included as archaeological material.

Conclusions
As mentioned at the beginning of this work,
archaeology in Mexico has been focused on
investigations of other aspects, such as the
monumental sites, and has been ignored
small aspects, but these are of great
importance to past societies. One of these
aspects that archaeology has left aside is the
water transport in and out of the country's
land. The canoe in Mexico is considered as
the "transport by excellence" because the
water in its various forms, was distributed
throughout the country and in the case of
rivers, connects together large regions.
Thus, here is reflected the importance of
vessels in prehispanic Mexico, therefore the
registration of these at an archaeological
Fig. 5 Typology. Author: Luz Cervantes

level, requires the necessary specialization
to understand this importance.

That´s how, this work it aims to raise awareness among Hispanic culture researchers in
Mexico to the relevance of studying indigenous tradition on canoe construction and use.
At the same time, it tries to demonstrate that there are methodological tools which help

9

�us to get closer to objects and materials that unfortunately in Mexico have been
understudied due to their scarce presence in archaeological excavations.

References
Adams, J, 2001. Ships and Boats as Archaeological Source Material. World
Archaeology, Vol. 32 (3): 292-310.
Anderson, R., 1988.Guidelines for recording of historical ships,National Park Service,
U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
Béat, A., 1995.Pirogues monoxylesd'Europecentrale  construction, typologie, évolution,
us e cantonal d arch ologie (Archéologieneuchateloise), Francia.
Biar, A., 2011. La navigation Mexica Dans la lagune de Mexico : navigation et prise du
pouvoir.Thèse de Master, Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, Francia.
Greenhill, B., 1976.Archaeology of the boat. A new introductory study, Adam and
Charles Black, London.
Lira, N., s/a. Canoas monóxilas en el centro-sur de Chile. Navegando sobre los árboles.
Memoria para optar al título profesional de arqueólogo, Departamento de Antropología,
Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile.
Schiffer, M., 1990.ContextoArqueológico y ContextoSistémico, Boletín de Antropología
Americana, Num. 22: 81-93.
Torres, L., 1964.

Tratamiento empleado para la conservación de una canoa

prehispánica, Boletín de Antropología, INAH, Num18: 10-13, México.
Wendt, C., 2007. Los olmecas, los primeros petroleros. Arqueología Mexica naNum 87:
56-59 , México.
Biography
Luz Elena G. Cervantes is an archaeologist who graduated from the Escuela Nacional
de Antropología e Historia in Mexico and she`s member of the Nautical Archaeology
Society. She has taken some courses in maritime archaeology and she has dedicated
her studies to pre-Hispanic navigation, specifically of water transport. She is making a
dugout canoes compilation, in order to form a complete typology of canoes in Mexico.

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="17">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="60">
                  <text>Session 14: Pre-Hispanic Navigation </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="61">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 14 Chair Carlos Ausejo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="62">
                  <text>Navigation was not unknown in the Americas, at the Spaniards arrival different kind of vessel were in use both in the Pacific and the Atlantic shores, as well as in lakes or rivers. Canoe, reed rafts, balsa log raft and others skin based watercraft have been described mainly on historical records and gave us an idea of this technologies. Although it is clear that long and short distance maritime trade routes were in use and watercraft were also involve in war activities and other maritime activities, archaeological evidence related with actual boats has been elusive to find. Still some of these traditions have survived time and in use with some changes and others were incorporated to European navigation traditions.&#13;
During the last decades an increasing interest among researchers in addition to new and different approaches from a broad spectrum of perspectives, including archaeology, history, ethnohistory and ethnography, has brought new and better understanding about these technologies. In spite of this, venues of dialogue to present and discuss about these traditions has been practically inexistent.&#13;
The aim of this session is to show research advances on this topic mainly in the Pacific shores and inland waters through different perspectives up to the Spanish arrival. It will focus primarily in the Andean and Mesoamerican region, however other regions would be accepted. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="63">
                  <text>Carlos Ausejo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="544">
                <text>Hollowing out the canoe: a reflection of the society</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="545">
                <text>The dugout canoe is an important element in a lot of maritime societies all over the world. Itâ€™s not only a small boat made by hollowing a tree with particular characteristics, but it is the reflection of the society in which the canoe was made. A canoe represents the interaction of ideology, tradition, economics and purpose, as well as environment and material resources. Mexico is no exception; the canoe was the best aquatic transport in pre-Hispanic communities, both for coastal and inland waters. So, the canoe can bring us a lot of archaeological information about pre-Hispanic cultures, its traditions and its environment.&#13;
&#13;
It is impossible to access the social explanation of the canoe if we are not able to describe it formally. So, a registration strategy will give us the possibility to store data for a social explanation of the boat. In addition, using this strategy, it is possible to accumulate general and specific data from which it can be proposed a typology of dugout vessels. This research is a step forward of a typology proposal for dugout canoes in Mexico, which aims to grow as more canoes are found, both in archaeological contexts and inside public and private institutions, museums and private collections.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="546">
                <text>Luz Elena G. Cervantes, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="547">
                <text>5/20/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="8">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 14 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="464" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="256">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/cc40182a66743896eac80d7b831c14e2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ecda582982239ac6e21c8293f0db38ae</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5383">
                    <text>Lata’s Wayfinding System and Climate Science

M. George
Vaka Taumako Project
Abstract
The cultural vision and history of Taumako extends far beyond their Duff
Islands, the SE Solomons region, or the western Pacific. According to the
people of Taumako, their ancestor Lata, was the first person to build and
sail a voyaging canoe. Taumakans today are unique among Polynesian
and Austronesian people in that they still build and navigate voyaging
canoes using only the ancient designs, materials, and methods of Lata.
Lata/Laka/La’a/Rata/Raka, etc, is a Culture Hero across Polynesia, and
at least some islands where the ancient Austronesian migrants settled
thousands of years ago.
Lata’s successes and mistakes help
Taumakans, and us, learn who we are, and what to do and not do as we
face global climate change and cultural wars. Taumako is full of sites
where episodes of the Story of Lata happened…the islet where Lata was
born, the rock Lata’s father killed the father eel, the place where Lata stood
with Hina to see if the tree he cut down was actually on Hina’s land, the
stones where Lata moored his voyaging canoe, where he sailed out and
Hina blocked the entrance so he could not come back, where Lata picked
his crew from out of the ocean, etc. Taumako was a crossroads of early
Papuan settlers and Lapita pottery-making, migrants, and canoe
technology that combines both Polynesian and Micronesian design
features. The Story of Lata is lived today in the practice of the ancient
Pacific voyaging arts. How can all this help them break out from colonialist
borders and policies, make a living at the bottom level of the global
economy, and/or survive climate change? What can we learn from Lata?
Key words: Lata, Pacific, ethnography, Austronesian
Introduction
Climate researchers use data about the past to understand what is
changing now. Today, climate scientists lack ground-truthed data for
natural phenomena of the Indian and Pacific oceans (BioScience, 2011).

�However Austronesian voyagers colonized Oceania millennia before
Europeans arrived, and some of their descendants still practice
knowledge systems that offer useful data for climate science.
Taumakan Islanders of the Duff Islands of SE Solomons practice an
ancient system of knowledge in everyday life on their island and in
voyaging to other islands. That system is based on ecological and
environmental patterns, and relationships between patterns of natural
phenomena, as well as between Taumakans and natural elements.
Today the people of Taumako are isolated from the outside world by lack
of electricity, phone service, WIFI, anchorage, or airstrip. So, they still
depend upon ancient cultural ways to meet everyday needs. They speak
Polynesian language and practice Polynesian customs. They are the only
Polynesians who still make and sail voyaging canoes using only ancient
designs, materials, methods, and tools. They are heirs of an ancient
system of deep sea navigation that uses knowledge of natural phenomena
rather than modern instruments. This ancient system provides data of rare
specificity and complexity about relationships between patterns of wind,
sea, sky, and spirit that are little known to science.
The Heirs of Lata
After European diseases killed all but 37 Taumakans in 1919, and colonial
controls arrived in 1922, the number of voyaging canoes in the region
dwindled from two hundred active vessels to a few relics in the 1960s.
Extensive partnerships and networks between islands were lost.
The history and cultural vision of Taumakans extends far beyond their Duff
Islands, the SE Solomons region, or the Western Pacific. Three thousand
years ago, Taumako was a crossroads of Lapita pottery-making migrants
(Leach and Davidson, 2014). Today Taumakan voyaging canoes and

�navigation methods combine both Polynesian and Micronesian design
features.
According to the people of Taumako, their ancestor, Lata, was the first
person to build and sail a voyaging canoe (vaka). Lata is a voyaging
Culture Hero to the people of thousands of Pacific and Indian Ocean
islands. Lata’s name varies, as Laka, La’a, Rata, Raka, etc. Today, some
of the variants are known today as male, and others as female. Today,
some places like Hawai’i, only remember short episodes in the Story of
Lata. Taumakans tell the Story of Lata hour after hour, year after year,
during building of vaka, and while making voyages to other islands.
Taumakans live their lives as characters in their Story of Lata. As such
they are the present generation of an uninterrupted line of voyagers.
Lata’s successes, mistakes, and spiritual relationships with natural
phenomena, help Taumakans learn who they are, and what to do, and not
do, in life.
Duff Islands are full of sites where episodes of the original Story of Lata
happened. These include the seaward platform on Tohua, and islet where
Lata was born, the Kahula stream lava-rock home of the father eel who
Lata’s father killed and whose tail Lata suckled on after his parents died,
the mountaintop where Lata stood with Hinora to look down and see if the
tree he already cut down was actually on his or her ancestral land
(kainga), the black stones beside Tohua where Lata moored his voyaging
canoe, the entrance to TeVeni, a hole in the reef where Lata sailed out
and Hinora blocked so he could not come back, the ocean outside of
TeVeni where Lata picked his crew from after their canoe fell apart from
being tricked by Lata telling them the wrong plant to use for their lashings,
etc (George, 1999).

The interactions of the characters, the natural

phenomena they deal with, and the places, episodes, and themes of the

�Story of Lata, are critical to Taumakan decisions about gardening,
performing rituals, building voyaging canoes, and for way finding at sea.
Taumakan voyaging canoes (vaka) are made in the image of Lata and
other characters in the Story of Lata. Each end of the vaka is carved into
facial features of Te Ube, the bird who Lata befriended, and the teeth of
Lata, which securely hold the carving of Te Ube into the back of which the
mast is stepped (Fig. 1). The sail has slender extended tips, which are
Lata’s arms held overhead to catch the wind (Fig. 2). The entryway to the
shelter is where the current day Lata (most senior wayfinder) sits in
supervision of the crew and the elements.

Fig. 1(left): Photo of Chief Kaveia
instructing crew how to rig Te
Puke voyaging canoe. (Michael
Tauchert and Vaka Taumako
Project)

�Fig. 2: Photo of carving of Te Ube bird at end of Te Puke. (Michael
Tauchert and Vaka Taumako Project)
Since the 1970’s islanders from Hawaii, New Zealand, Cook Islands, and
other more commercially developed islands have taken voyages using
navigation methods that did not include modern instruments, such as
compass, sextant, or electronics. Their “non-instrument” methods are
traditionally inspired, and have centered on use of star paths to know the
direction to islands. But the specific star path methods that most of these
revival voyagers have used were created by Nainoa Thompson and Will
Kyselka in Bishop Planetarium in the 1970’s. They also rely on
meteorology for their weather, engage modern vessels to escort them
everywhere in case rescue is needed, and they construct their vessels
with nylon, Dacron, fiberglass, epoxy, chainsaws, etc. These voyagers
have

traveled

far,

correcting

several

centuries

of

denial

and

misrepresentation of the true history of oceanic voyaging, and reviving
pride among island peoples for the brilliant achievements of their
ancestors. But it is clear that they cannot, or do not intend to, make
voyages using only Lata’s technology.

�Taumakans today are unique among Polynesian and Austronesian
peoples in that they still build their vessels and navigate using only Lata’s
technology. But Lata’s vessels are only good for sailing interisland during
certain seasons. If Lata’s crew sails to another island then they must stay
there until the right season comes to sail back to their island, which could
be nine months later. Who will feed them and what will they do while they
are waiting? How will they earn money to pay school fees for their
children? Who will maintain their vessel if they are lucky and a ship comes
that can bring them home? If and when they have transport to return to
their Vaka then how will they get money to harvest some trees to replace
certain parts, and to re-lash others?
Given these challenges, why do young Taumakans want to work hard at
learning the ancient ways, rather than going off-island to make money?
Don’t they want their children to go to secondary and tertiary schools?
Wouldn’t they like to have a permanent house with a toilet rather than a
leaf house and the ocean? How can their heritage help them cross
colonial nation-borders between them and nearby islands, and policies
that make it impossible for them to make a living at the bottom level of the
global economy? How will perpetuating ancient practices help them
survive climate change?
Furthermore, what can outsiders learn from the heirs of Lata? Can people
who are fully dependent on the global economy and its petrochemical and
electronic technologies, learn something to help them stop their polluting
and warlike ways, and possibly save what is left of the planet for all of our
children?

�Perpetuation of Lata’s Voyaging Vessels
In 1996, the Vaka Taumako Project was officially started as a research
project under the Ministry of Education of Solomon Islands. It was the idea
of the Paramount Chief of Taumako, Koloso Kaveia, who was a very
experienced voyager on Lata’s vessels, and then on a trading scow, for
many years. He, and other elders of Taumako, wanted to teach a new
generation how to build and sail a Te Puke, which is the design of vessel
that Lata is most known for. He also wanted that knowledge documented
for future generations.
In 1997 the Te Puke named “Vaka Taumako” was launched. In 1998 it
sailed to Nifiloli, in the Outer Reef Islands, and in 2000 it sailed back to
Taumako. The biggest challenges of those voyages included the lack of
safe places to keep the vessel on other islands. People of other islands
have more money-based economies, with ships coming monthly, airstrips,
and phone service. Taumakans needs their own transport to relieve their
isolation.
During his nineties Kaveia planned to lead a voyage from Taumako to
Vanuatu. But he passed away in 2009. Several voyages were made in
2012, and again in 2013, and another one in 2017. In every case there
was barely enough food for the crew, and the return transport to Taumako
was delayed for weeks. Despite the hardships they continued to work on
making new vaka and more voyages. The costs of delayed transport ate
up what had been set aside to pay the school fees of their children. So,
why do they persist?
The positive results of these voyages have included at least one interisland marriage by a crew member for each voyage, and some sort of
reconciliation (Heihei Lavoi) over events that took place generations back,

�when voyaging canoes were stopped by government and missionary
policies, WWII, and other colonial impacts. Another result is that through
voyaging each crew members gains, or proves, a good relationship with
patterned phenomena of the wind, sea, stars, and with their voyaging
ancestors. The leader of a voyage becomes a present day Lata.
Lata’s crew is celebrated for its accomplishments at home and throughout
Solomon Islands. Te Puke are featured on both provincial and national
icons, and Taumakans regard the leader of a voyage on a Te Puke, as
singularly qualified to be the Paramount Chief of Duff Islands.
Knowing what Lata knew qualifies one to give advice on gardening,
weather, fishing, social events, naming of newborns, spiritual activities,
and so many other disciplines that are practiced by Duff Islanders. Old
people reward voyaging students with appropriate knowledge and
resources for voyaging, because they know that voyaging can provide the
inter-island communications that are necessary to survival and the joy of
renewing ties with close relatives who may not have been contacted in
many decades. The voyagers themselves become responsible to share
their knowledge, and inform others of changes in natural patterns that they
observed.
When there are natural disasters, such as the King Tides and ferocious
cyclones that are coming more frequently, there is more need for a vessel
that can sail over the reef and right up onto the beach…to carry sago palm
leaves to roof and wall houses, betel nut for social sharing, pigs for
feasting events such as weddings and funerals, and many other goods
necessary to the wellbeing and relationships between people of different
islands and atolls.

�Children of Taumako are told bedtime stories whose characters are
navigational stars. Stories of the giants (Pakhola), the old woman of the
forest (Hinora), and the fresh water eel who was killed by Lata’s father,
are filled with references and meanings about voyaging. The winds that
come from different directions and bring different weather and plants and
animals into the center of Taumako life, are themselves main characters
in the Story of Lata. Though they are not often named as such in the
storytelling, the interrelationships of these winds with other phenomena
are critical to finding the way to other islands. They are also the basis for
correlating and calibrating many other natural phenomena that Lata used
to find the way.
Lata’s Navigation (Wayfinding) System
From the 1970’s onward, Pacific navigation researchers focused on the
use of stars as the basic method of finding land without modern
instruments (Lewis, 1972). More recently, some natural navigation
researchers have centered ‘stick charts’ and ‘wave piloting’ in the Marshall
Islands (Genz, 2016). They hypothesized that knowledge of swell patterns
between the Ratak and Ralik island chains were the primary phenomena
used for navigation there.
Although the Taumakan heirs of Lata use both stars and swell patterns
extensively, they organize their navigational technology differently. They
prioritize knowledge of wind, and its relationships with all other natural
phenomena. Taumakans regard winds, not stars, as primary, to their
navigation methodology.
Taumakans use a systematic model of way finding that does not privilege
asterisms (including stars, star groups, dark places in the sky, and star
paths) above other phenomena. Taumakans use Lata’s mental model to

�link the position of the wind around the horizon with phenomenal patterns
that occur (when the wind is in that position).
So by knowing the wind position a Taumakan wayfinder knows which
phenomena are useful for what voyaging routes, and which phenomena
work together or provide alternatives to others. Asterisms are important
because the wind positions that the asterisms rise and set in are indicative
of what other phenomena are useful.
Te Nohoanga Te Matangi
The organizational image, i.e. basic data organizer, of this ancient system
is a model of 32 named wind positions that are located equi-distant from
each other around the horizon (Fig. 3). From the geographically
widespread documentation of what English speakers have called “wind
compasses” throughout the Pacific and Indonesia, it seems likely that
voyagers figured out this system long ago.

Fig. 3: TNTM Diagram 8/16/32 Named Wind Positions.

�The Taumako wind-based system is called “Te Nohoanga Te Matangi”
(TNTM). TNTM translates into English as “the wind positioning system” or
“the life of the winds.” The eye of the wind can sit (noho) in, or move
through, the various positions. The 32 named TNTM positions surround
the observer around the horizon, and each TNTM position is located at
equal distances from its neighboring position.

TNTM Opposite Partners
Each TNTM wind position is paired with the position that is located
opposite to it on the horizon (Fig. 4). Taumakans do not learn the 32
positions one by one, sequentially in a circle. They learn them in opposite
pairs, or “partners.”
There are 16 partners in the 32 wind positions. But most people just deal
with the 4 partners that comprise the basic 8 wind positions. After a person
learns the relevant partners for any voyage, then they know what is in front
of them and behind them, no matter which position they are headed for.
Thus, the partner of Te Alunga is Te Haka Hiu, and the partner of Te
Tonga is Te Tokelau (Fig. 3).

�Fig. 4: TNTM Diagram opposite Pair. (Partners)

TNTM works like a slide rule (mechanical analog computer) that
recognizes patterns in a variety of natural phenomena, and organizes
those patterned natural phenomena into spatial, temporal, and spiritual
relationships.
The relationships contained in these TNTM linkages are based on
knowledge about natural and spiritual phenomena, and relationships
between them.
Such linkages include storm winds (natural) and beneficial or dangerous
interventions of ancestors (spiritual). For example, it is not surprising that
cyclonic west winds come in the strongest wind positions of the cyclone
season (Te Hakahiu to Te Tokelau) (Fig. 5). But if a Te Alunga or Te
Tonga winds are weak during the middle of the tradewind season, then it
indicates that there has been disrespectful behavior toward ancestors.
Ancestors include winds, rocks, stars, animals, and other natural

�elements. So disrespectful behavior to these elements can cause climate
change.

Fig. 5(left): .
TNTM Diagram
Sunrise and
Sunset Positions
Annually.

There are times when certain phenomena will happen, such as strong
winds. There are signs that herald new weather, such as a rainbow
showing where the wind will soon position itself. The TNTM slide rule
correlates and calibrates natural phenomena that can be both observed
and engaged with. The engagement is a spiritual endeavor, with many
layers and scales.
The late Te Alki Koloso Kahia Kaveia of Taumako told, and showed, me
these explanations of TNTM. As a master of TNTM, Kaveia did a lot of
“weather work,” e.g. prediction and modifications. Prediction included
telling when the best wind for a voyage would come the next year.
Modifications included stopping rain, and changing the wind position (but
not the season). He also used TNTM to control dangerous seas, heal
illnesses,

plan

ritual

events,

facilitate

gardening,

and

control

communications with colonial powers, (as Paramount Chief for about 35
years).

�Kaveia remembered all this information, without making diagrams. But he
invited and approved the diagrams I made. Furthermore he wanted them
shared with his descendants who want to learn how Lata made voyages,
and with anyone who wanted to learn how Lata found the way to other
islands. Here are diagrams that my colleague, industrial designer Daniel
Jackson, and I made to illustrate Kaveia’s teachings about TNTM.
The head position of the system is named Te Alunga, which translates in
English to “the pillow.” In other words, Te Alunga is where you lay down
your head. Te Alunga is also the defining wind position of the trade wind
season, and its location on the horizon is where the sun rises during the
winter solstice (Fig. 5). Te Tonga is a variation of what Hawaiians call
Kona (Hawaiian Kumu, Roselle K. Bailey, pers. comm.), but since Te
Tonga is a sunrise position it is not easy to know why it is linked with a
term that is used for the dry west side of Hawaiian islands. Perhaps it is
because when Te Tonga blows the west sides of island become dry. Te
Tokelau contains the work lau, which translates to English as “strong.”
The strongest winds occur in Te Tokelau. Taumakans I asked did not
know a translation for other wind position names. Kaveia thought that this
could be because they were very old names. In any case many of these
names were reported in ‘wind compasses’ reported throughout Polynesia
and Indonesia.
TNTM Annual Sunrise and Sunset Positions
There are eight wind positions that traditional Taumakan voyagers use to
keep track of at the sunrise and sunset positions during the year. Te
Alunga is the wind position that the sun rises in at the qinter solstice. When
the sun rises in Te Alunga it sets between Te Tokelau and Te Tokelau
Palapu. Later in the Trade wind Season, when the sun rises in Te Alunga
Tonga, it sets exactly in Te Tokelau. Later yet, when the sun rises in Te

�Tonga, it sets somewhere between Te Tokelau Haka Hiu and Te Haka
Hiu. Lastly, when the sun rises in Te Ulu Tonga, it sets somewhere
between Te Tokelau Haka Hiu and Te Haka Hiu.
The fact that when the sun rises in three out of four sunrise positions, the
sun is observed to set in a range of positions, rather than just one position
may not seem intuitive. However if one considers that the orbit of the sun
is not circular, but elliptical, then it may be that when the sun is closest to
the observer its movement along the horizon is more observable that
when it is farther away. So maybe Te Alunga Tonga sunrise sets exactly
in Te Tokelau because it is so far away and moving mostly away or toward
the sun around the pointy end of the orbit, then we cannot observe its
change of position along the horizon. Whereas when the sun rises in Te
Alunga and sets between (and including) Te Tokelau and Te Tokelau
Palapu, or when the sun rises in Te Tonga, or Te Ulu Tonga, and sets
anywhere between (and including) Te Tokelau Hakahiu and Te Hakahiu,
it is because we can actually see the change in position along the horizon
when the earth is nearer to the sun in its orbit. In any case, the naked eye
observations are correct.
TNTM Seasons, Solstices, and Equinoxes
According to TNTM, the tradewind season begins at the winter solstice
and ends at the spring equinox.

The cyclone season begins at the

summer solstice and ends at the autumn equinox.

The Gregorian

calendar, that is commonly used by European-derived cultures today, is
not useful when interpreting TNTM correlations. This is because the
particular dates when the sun is overhead is different at different latitudes.
So the actual month for making a particular voyage, or the length of a
particular voyaging season, or gardening season, varies too, But the

�solstices and the equinoxes never change. Thus these comprise the
calendric structure of TNTM seasons.

Fig. 6: TNTM Diagram Seasons, Solstices and Equinoxes.
The tradewinds start when the wind sits briefly in Te Tokelau Tu, and then
moves clockwise to sit firmly in Te Alunga (Fig. 6). Te Alunga is regarded
as the base position for the Trade wind Season. Any wind position from
Te Alunga, Te Tonga, Te Ulu, and Te Laki are trade wind positions. During
the period of time from the Winter Solstice to the Spring Equinox, the eye
of the wind will shift gradually from Te Alunga to Te Tonga, Te Ulu, or
even to Te Laki, and then shift back again to Te Alunga. But as the Trade
wind Season progresses, the wind will sit for prolonged periods in Te
Tonga. Toward the end of the season, the wind starts to sit in Te Ulu, and
then moves into Te Laki before coming back to Te Tonga or Te Ulu.
During the cyclone season, from the summer solstice to the autumn
wquinox, the wind sits between Te Hakahiu Laki and Te Palapu. As
weather fronts move through, the wind position moves clockwise from
position to position, returning to Te Hakahiu Laki early in the season, and

�then only returning to Te Tokelau, then only to Te Palapu, and finally
moves into Te Tokelau Tu when the tradewind season is beginning again.
Taumako Model of Wind Patterns, and Human Modifications
The ancient model of seasonal and inter-seasonal wind shifts is that there
is a person who, like Lata, stands in the middle of all the wind positions
(Fig. 7). This person, according to Taumakans, is like anyone who has an
interactive relationship with the elements, like wind. That is, anyone can
modify the positions of the wind, as Lata did, and Lata’s descendants, do
today.

Fig. 7: TNTM Diagram Lata Pushing the Wind Back.
When the wind sits down in the primary positions of the Trade wind or the
cyclone season (i.e. Te Alunga for the tradewind and Te Hakahiu for the
cyclone) then the person waits for the wind to move clockwise to other
positions. Each time it does this, the person pushes the wind back

�(counterclockwise) to Te Alunga or Te Hakahiu (depending on the
season).
But as the season progresses the Lata-like person in the middle (which is
identified as a “man” in the diagram, but is not necessarily gendered) is
not able to push the wind all the way back to the starting position of each
season. So, for a long time the person can only push the eye of the wind
back to Te Tonga (for the trade wind season), or back to Te Tokelau (for
the cyclone season). Eventually, when it is getting close to the next
equinox or solstice, the person will be unable to push the wind back to Te
Tonga or Te Tokelau…or even back to Te Ulu or Te Palapu. So then, the
wind will eventually move past Te Hakahiu and out of the tradewind
season positions, or past Te Palapu, and out of the cyclone season
positions. Then the man (probably Lata) will have to turn 180 degrees
around and begin to push the wind back to the base position of the next
season. So the person who pushes the wind back turns his/her own body
clockwise twice a year to keep modifying the wind positions and the
seasons. This person is spiritually skilled in relationship to weather, and
has the ability to modify, but not completely control weather patterns.
This model recognizes that some people have useful relationships with
weather. This model is also very like the meteorological model of the way
systems moving through a location during seasons. As the location of
highs and lows shift with time during a season the wind rose positions
experienced at any location in the southern hemisphere tend to shift in
just the way the Taumako model describes.
TNTM Voyaging Routes between Islands
Sailing vessels need to have the wind come from favorable directions and
not be too stormy to sail to other islands. Taumako voyagers choose wind

�positions that are most reliable and that come from the side of, or from
behind, the vessel (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8: TNTM Diagram Inter-Island Routes.
Routes between islands are linked with wind positions needed for those
routes. TNTM way finders set off on a given route only when the wind sits
(noho) in the right position for that voyage. For example, to voyage from
Taumako to Tikopia or Vanikoro, the wind must come from Te Palapu,
and it must come sometimes in November. No other wind position is
reliable for that route. But for voyaging from Taumako (Duffs) to Reefs,
any wind position from Te Alunga through Te Tonga is good, and these
occur during the trade wind season.
Rises and Sets of Asterisms Useful for Navigation
The rises and sets of asterisms (stars, star groups, dark cloud shapes, or
other celestial bodies) occur in certain wind positions (Fig. 9). When
various asterisms are in these wind positions they are useful for
navigation. Each of the named asterisms is the lead asterism in a star path

�comprised of other un-named asterisms that rise and set in the same wind
positions. Each of them also has an opposite partner asterism. When one
of the partners rises higher above the horizon the other is falling closer to
the horizon, or is below it. But some asterisms are used for way finding
during some of the months when they are not seen above the horizon at
all…such as Hetu Mdavo (the Pleiades).

Fig. 9 (left): TNTM Rises
and Sets of Asterisms
Useful for Wayfinding.

The opposite partners Takelo (Orions belt on far right) is going to set, while
Salo Lavoi (top 7 stars of Scorpio on far left) has just risen (Fig. 10). In
this diagram there are note about the weather that occurs when some of

�these asterisms rise or set, such as the rises or sets with specific wind
positions and weather.

Fig. 10: TNTM Asterisms/TNTM Miles-High View Diagram.
Conclusion
Interrelationships have been briefly presented here that are part of a body
of knowledge of Taumaka voyagers. These relationships are between
wind positions and weather, rises and sets of asterisms, (including the
sun, the stars and star groups, and the solstices and equinoxes), seasons,
and specific routes between islands. There is specificity, complexity, and
layering of natural patterns, and there are spiritual relationships between
the voyagers and the elements. These are correlated and calibrated in the
mental model of Lata’s TNTM wayfinding system (Fig. 11).

�Fig. 11: TNTM Diagram Combination of Diagrams 3-10.

There are many more types of phenomena included in TNTM voyaging
knowledge, including swell patterns, Te Lapa (George, 2012), signs by
animals, plants, and atmospheric phenomena, as well as complex
protocols involving respectful spiritual behaviors.
As scientists seek to further define the causes and effects of climate
changes, the systematic knowledge of ancient voyaging cultures has
value as baseline data about natural patterns and events, including
relationships between spiritual knowledge and natural phenomena.

References
Dow, K. Ebi, K. Kunkel, K. Mearns. K, Mearns. Melillo, J. 2012.
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/response-strategies/research-

�Genz, J. H. 2016. Resolving Ambivalence In Marshallese Navigation:
Relearning,
Reinterpreting, and Reviving the “Stick Chart” Wave
Models. Structure
and Dynamics, 9(1) University of Hawai′i at Hilo.
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/43h1d0d7
George, M. 1999. July. “The Return of Lata” Sailing New Zealand Vol. 38.
George, M. 2012. “Polynesian Navigation and Te Lapa – “The Flashing”
Time and Mind: The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture.
Vol 5 Issue 2. pp. 135-174
Leach, F. and Davidson, 2014. J. Archaeology on Taumako: A Polynesian
Outlier in the Eastern Solomon Islands. Archaeology Laboratory, Museum
of New
Zealand, Te Papa, Tongarewa
Lewis, D. H. 1996 (1972). We, the Navigators: The Ancient Art of Pacific
Landfinding in the Pacific, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press
Alexander, C. Bynum, N. Johnson, E. King, U. Mustonen, T. Neofotis, P.
Oettle, N. Rosenzweig, C. Sakakibara, C. Vyacheslav, S. Vicarelli, M.
Waterhouse, J. Weeks. 2011. “Linking Indigenous and Scientific
Knowledge of Climate Change” BioScience (2011) 61 (6): 477-484.
https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.10
Biography:
Marianne “Mimi” George, Ph.D, a remote-ocean sailor and cultural
anthropologist, who supports revival of ancient voyaging practices that
enable sustainable and peaceful interactions. George researched
spiritual power and female imagery in the ritual cycle of an Austronesian
people in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea, the experience of a small,
mixed gender, group, in prolonged isolation, wintering-over a sailboat in
Antarctic sea-ice to do science, the spiritual connections of sea-hunters
and herders across Bering Straits, and the efforts of SE Solomon Islands
Polynesian elders and their students to build and navigate using only
ancient materials, designs, and methods, and re-establish voyaging
networks to share and maintain resources.

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="21">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="75">
                  <text>2017 Session 1: Underwater and Maritime Archaeology and Capacity  Building in the Pacific Islands</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="76">
                  <text>The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) spanning human history from the Stone Age to the atomic age.  Since the first Pacific UCH Workshop held in Solomon Islands in 2009, the Pacific island nations have been progressing in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme by awareness raising, research and capacity building activities through inter-disciplinary cooperation and promoting synergy with the Pacific World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Programmes. Notable progresses include, among others, the SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA) Outcome Document of the 3rd UN International Cooperation on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) (Samoa, 2014) that contains references to the importance of UCH for sustainable development of SIDS and SIDS ratification of the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001), as well as the enhanced cooperation between universities in the Pacific islands and professional training institutions through UNESCO University Twinning and Networking Programme (UNITWIN) for Underwater Archaeology. &#13;
&#13;
With this as its background, the session â€œUnderwater and maritime archaeology and capacity building in the Pacific Islandsâ€ will be held with the aims to: i) share information on recent progress in awareness raising, research and capacity building activities in underwater and maritime archaeology in the Pacific Islands, ii) identify priority actions, iii) foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.  The session especially welcomes presentations focusing on the protection and management of UCH belonging to indigenous community shared UCH in the Pacific, addressing challenges and opportunities facing Pacific SIDS in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme and the promotion of the UCH Convention, presenting good practice in ensuring the effective engagement of Pacific island countries and community in UCH management for their sustainable development, and proposing collaborative projects in this area.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="77">
                  <text>Akatsuki Takahashi&#13;
UNESCO Office for the Pacific States, Samoa</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="78">
                  <text>Andrew Viduka, Maritime and Commonwealth Heritage, Australian Government,</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="79">
                  <text>Nicolas Bigourdan, Western Australian Museum</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5377">
                <text>Lata's Wayfinding System and Climate Science </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5378">
                <text>The cultural vision and history of Taumako extends far beyond their Duff Islands, the SE Solomons region, or the western Pacific. According to the people of Taumako, their ancestor Lata, was the first person to build and sail a voyaging canoe. Taumakans today are unique among Polynesian and Austronesian people in that they still build and navigate voyaging canoes using only the ancient designs, materials, and methods of Lata.   Lata/Laka/Laâ€™a/Rata/Raka, etc, is a Culture Hero across Polynesia, and at least some islands where the ancient Austronesian migrants settled thousands of years ago.  Lataâ€™s successes and mistakes help Taumakans, and us, learn who we are, and what to do and not do as we face global climate change and cultural wars. Taumako is full of sites where episodes of the Story of Lata happenedâ€¦the islet where Lata was born, the rock Lataâ€™s father killed the father eel, the place where Lata stood with Hina to see if the tree he cut down was actually on Hinaâ€™s land, the stones where Lata moored his voyaging canoe, where he sailed out and Hina blocked the entrance so he could not come back, where Lata picked his crew from out of the ocean, etc. Taumako was a crossroads of early Papuan settlers and Lapita pottery-making, migrants, and canoe technology that combines both Polynesian and Micronesian design features. The Story of Lata is lived today in the practice of the ancient Pacific voyaging arts.  How can all this help them break out from colonialist borders and policies, make a living at the bottom level of the global economy, and/or survive climate change?  What can we learn from Lata?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5379">
                <text>M. George</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5380">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5381">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5382">
                <text>M. George</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="39">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 1 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="46" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="46">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/24588eecd4fbf2d12022196d20ddd53f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6196beedd0b120b4215b1cef5ca263f5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="629">
                    <text>Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain Collection
M. S. Jessica Lally
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Washington 98908
USA
Email: lally.js@gmail.com

Abstract
An assemblage of 1577 porcelain sherds associated with a historically recorded but
unidentified shipwreck on the north Oregon coast was analyzed to determine the age
and intended destination of the ship and its cargo. Prior to this study, only a limited
number of studies of Asian export porcelain to the New World were available, and even
fewer studies of their occurrence in the Pacific Northwest. This study provides a date
range for the manufacture of the porcelain and information on the nationality of the
Beeswax Wreck. The presence of the shipwreck, known locally as the Beeswax Wreck,
has been documented through both historic sources and archaeological research.
Archaeological materials associated with the wreck are consistent with a Manila galleon
bound for Acapulco.
Keywords: Beeswax, Chinese porcelain, Galleon, Oregon coast

Introduction
This study details the analysis of an assemblage of 1577 porcelain sherds thought be
directly associated with a historically recorded but unidentified shipwreck on the north
Oregon cost. The shipwreck, known locally as the Beeswax Wreck, has been
documented through both historic sources (Franchere, 1967; Gibbs, 1993; Hult, 1968;
Lee and Frost, 1968; Marshall, 1984) and archaeological research (Williams, 2007).
Previous archaeological research indicates that the archaeological materials associated
with the wreck are consistent with a Manila galleon bound for Acapulco. The purpose of
this study was to analyze the assemblage of sherds in order determine the age,
nationality, and intended destination of the ship and its cargo (Lally, 2008).
Methodology
The Beeswax Wreck porcelain collection consists of 1577 porcelain sherds, with 1442
recovered through the beachcombing efforts of one individual over a period of more
than 15 years from five separate locations near Manzanita, Oregon (Lally, 2008; Lally,
1

�In Press). The majority of the sherds are from Oswald West State Park (OWSP) and
Nehalem Bay, with a small number of sherds collected from Tillamook Head, Tillamook
Bay, and Nehalem Falls (map?). Also within the collection are 127 sherds collected from
two archaeological sites, 35-TI-1 and 35-TI-4, curated at the University of Oregon
Museum of Natural and Cultural History and Tillamook County Pioneer Museum (Table
1). Analysis of chronological and stylistic attributes of decoration style, motif type, and
marks was conducted. Sherds were measured and identified to vessel element (base,
rim, body) and vessel type (open-form, closed-form, cups, vases, etc). Degree of
erosion, glaze, and cobalt tone were noted. A date range for the porcelain’s
manufacture was determined based on 15 attributes and porcelain types to suggest a
date range using South’s (2002) model of visual interpretation. Additionally, 13
attributes and types were used to establish a mean ceramic date for the collection using
South’s (2002) equation. Those attributes and types excluded from the visual
interpretation and mean ceramic date calculation were later compared to both methods
in order to confirm or refine the date generated.
Results
Porcelain attributes identified during the analysis provide data on the manufacturing
date. Examined independently, these attributes suggest a wide date range, indicating
manufacture from both the Ming (1368-1644 AD) and Qing (1644-1911 AD) Dynasties.
However, in many instances this apparently wide date range is due to the continued use
of traditional Chinese motifs through time. Considered together, though, these attributes
strongly suggest a date of manufacture for the collection between the later portion of the
Transitional Period (1620 and 1683) and Kangxi Reign (1662-1722 AD). The visual
interpretation model supports this, providing a date range between 1670 and 1700, as
did the calculated mean ceramic date of 1690. Calculation of both is discussed in detail
below. Analysis of sherd type identified six attributes and vessel types to which a date
could be assigned. Grooved-foot rims were observed exclusively on monochrome white
porcelain. This feature is particularly important in regard to the porcelain’s date of
manufacture as the grooved foot rim was only produced between 1644 (Butler, 2002;
Butler and Curtis, 2002; Curtis, 2002; Donnelly, 1967; Harrisson, 1995; Mudge, 1986)
and 1690 (Harrison, 1995). A beveled foot rim, thought to be a feature unique to the
2

�Kangxi reign (1662-1722) (Vermeer, 2005), was observed on a single sherd (Sherd
8692). In addition, six sherds were identified as klapmutsen, or wide flat rims, generally
attributed to production between 1620 and 1680 (Fischell, 1987), though possibly as
early as 1613 (van der Pijl-Ketel, 1982).
Sherds of lidded vessels, lidded cups, and lids were identified among the collection. The
sherds are similar in measurement, potting, and decoration, indicating that the lids were
likely intended for the lidded cups. Similar lidded cups were observed among the Vung
Tau cargo of 1690 (Jorg and Flecker, 2001). In addition to the cups, 19 sherds were
identified as compressed globular boxes (or lids). Two of the compressed globular box
sherds have unglazed bases, discolored slightly from exposure to kiln heat and curdled.
Donnelly (1967) noted that during the post-Transitional Period and height of the Dehua
kiln production, similar small globular boxes with unglazed, curdled bases were
produced. These unique unglazed, curdled bases are indicative of origin at the Dehua
kilns between 1675 and 1725 (Donnelly, 1967), when unglazed bases were out of
fashion for other porcelain vessels (Butler, 2002). Four monochrome white sherds
represent a variety of more unusual vessel types typical of manufacture at the Dehua
kilns between 1675 and 1725. Sherd NH386 bears a striking resemblance to Marco
Polo Censers that Donnelly (1967) dated between 1675 and 1725. Sherd NH88 is a
molded European figure. Sherd NH657 is a molded petal, possibly from a Quan Yin
figure.
Decoration Attributes and Ware types
The majority of the collection consists of porcelain sherds decorated with cobalt
underglaze-blue outline-and-wash. Cobalt attributes are highly indicative of transitional
Period (1620-1683 AD) or Kangxi Reign (1662-1722 AD) date of manufacture, being
violet to violet-blue in color and lacking classic Ming Dynasty attributes such as the
“heaped and piled” cobalt application. Ming Dynasty glaze characteristics are also
absent from the collection. Two sherds clearly appear to be Chinese Imari (Numbers
LL2/18, LL2/43), displaying gold gilt pine branches with red overglaze and underglazeblue. Chinese Imari remained popular from the late-1600s to the mid-1700s, and in
general, red overglaze on Chinese porcelain was imported to Mexico in quantity during
the late 1600s (Mudge, 1986). Two sherds in the collection (NH359 and NH532) are
3

�identified as Batavian ware, having brown slip applied to the exterior of the sherds and
interiors decorated with underglaze-blue motifs. Batavian ware was only produced
during the Kangxi Reign, specifically the late-seventeenth century to the early
eighteenth century (Donnelly, 1967; Fuchus and Howard, 2005; Mudge, 1986; Sheaf
and Kilburn, 1988). The Beeswax Wreck collection also contains monochrome white
sherds with molded ribbing, strikingly similar to Donnelly’s (1967) examples of wine
cups and Rhinoceros Horn Cups made at Dehua kilns between 1650 and 1750.
Motif Attributes
Floral themes are the most common motif and accounted for 13 percent of the
collection. A total of 39 Prunus blossom or Prunus plant motifs were identified, depicted
in underglaze-blue, incised motif, and applied decoration. Two sherds (NH029, NH334)
have Prunus blossoms depicted in white on a blue cracked-ice background (Fig. 1).
This was an exceptionally popular motif, especially on Hawthorn Jars, during the Kangxi
Reign (Frank, 1969; Kerr, 1986). Also among the Prunus motifs are several
monochrome sherds that, based on examples provided by Donnelly (1967), Mudge
(1986), and Bass (2005), appear to date between 1675 and 1710. Sherd NH392 can be
assigned a specific date range based upon the chronology provided by Donnelly: it is
decorated with a high-relief, molded
and applied Prunus plant blossom,
stem, and leaves, with a plain-centered
flower with long petals and a single vein
running

the

length

of

the

petal.

Donnelly dated this style from 1675 to
1725.
The collection also contains a number
of sherds decorated with peach and
peony

blossoms.

While

utilized
Fig. 1 Sherd NH29, Prunus blossoms depicted in

throughout the production of Chinese white on a blue cracked-ice background. (J.
porcelain, these motifs strongly support Lally)
a Shunzhi (1644-1661 AD) or Kangxi Reign (1662-1722 AD) date of manufacture (Lally,
2008; Lally, In Press) as both motifs experienced a period of increased popularity during
4

�those Reigns (Macintosh, 1977). Underglaze-blue floral scroll motifs also provide strong
indications of manufacture date. A total of 143 sherds were decorated with tiger lily
scroll, a motif Frank (1969) identifies as exclusive to Kangxi Reign export porcelain. Ten
of the tiger lily scroll sherds include a four-petal flower often associated with the tiger lily
motif (Lally, 2008; Lally, In Press) having been observed among shipwreck cargos
dating between 1690 (Jorg and Flecker, 2001: 72, figure 65) and 1735 (Chiến, 2002:
figure 156). The tiger lily four-petal flower was also observed on three sherds absent
tiger lily scroll. The tiger lily four-petal flower was depicted in similar fashion in the Vung
Tau (1690) (Jorg and Flecker) shipwreck cargos, and reference examples dating
between the late-seventeenth or early-eighteenth centuries (Harrisson, 1995: 33, figure
38; Valenstein, 1989: 224, figure 217).
Six sherds display a variation of
floral scroll, described among some
sources as lion and plant design.
Butler

(2002:18)

and

Harrison

(1995:45) provide examples of lion
and

plant

design

on

porcelain

vessels dating between 1650 and
1670.

Boneless

common

style

floral
of

scroll,

under

a

glaze

painting utilized in the Chenghua
Reign

(1464-1487)

and

also

prevalent on Kangxi imitations of
Fig. 2 Sherd NH483, hundred boys motif or the
Chenghua Reign porcelain (Frank,
scholars motif. (Jessica Lally)

1969), was identified on two sherds
(NH218 and NH351). Thirteen sherds have human figure motifs. Six sherds (NH022,
NH483, NH661, NH660, LL2/18/39a and LL2/18/39b) appear decorated with the
hundred boys motif or the scholars motif (Fig. 2). A traditional motif utilized throughout
Chinese porcelain production, the hundred boys and scholars motif were of immense
importance during the Reign of Shunzhi (1644-1661) and Kangxi Reign (1662-1722)
(Curtis, 2002: 50). Further indication of this time period is the manner in which the figure
5

�motifs are painted, being more typical of the Shunzhi Reign or Kangxi Reign, with fine
outline and violet-blue cobalt. The seven remaining human figure sherds are also
painted in Shunzhi Reign or Kangxi Reign-style and depict human figures in
combination with landscape elements and lattice fences, common motifs in both Reigns
(Curtis, 2002; Frank, 1969; Mathers et al., 1990).
Paneled motifs are present on 12 sherds. Seven paneled sherds resemble the paneled
motifs of the Vung Tau (1690) (Jorg and Flecker, 2001), the Ca Mau (1723-1735)
(Chiến, 2002) and the Geldermalsen (1752) (Sheaf and Kilburn, 1988) wrecks. Five
sherds, however, appear kraak-like, having specific attributes typical of kraak porcelain:
decorative motif; v-shaped, inward-sloping footrim; “moth-eaten” edges (areas where
the glaze is receded from the rims); and apricot colored foot rims. The quickly executed
manner of decoration on these sherds may be indicative that the vessels were made
during the height of porcelain production, post-1600. Several border motifs were
identified within the collection. Three sherds depict the zigzag border motif, utilized
during the 1640s or 1650s but used no later than 1675 (Butler, 2002). A single sherd
(NH 235) was decorated with the stonewall or cracked ice border, which Butler
attributes to the same time frame as the zigzag border. Sheaf and Kilburn (1988),
however, suggest an even narrower time frame for the stonewall border, anywhere from
1660 to 1670. “Blobby dots,” were also identified on three sherds (NH44, NH226, and
NH608). This motif was utilized as a background motif as well as a border motif and is
generally attributed to manufacture between 1645 and 1660 (Butler, 2002; Curtis, 2002:
44). The collection contained 47 rim sherds with brown dressing, a trait that did not
appear within the Chinese domestic or export market until the 1640s-1660s. It was
eventually discontinued in early Kangxi and was not utilized again until the eighteenth
century (Butler, 2002: 23).
Marks
A total of 32 sherds in the collection had hallmarks or symbol marks. Among identifiable
marks were a single Artemisia leaf mark and three swastika marks. Both were symbols
of good fortune used during the Kangxi Reign (1662-1722) in place of the nein-hao, or
reign mark (Macintosh, 1977; Mudge, 1986). Sherd NH482 contained a partial hallmark
that translated as “of (the) beautiful jade” (Penglin Wang, personal communication April
6

�17, 2008). Although utilized during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) (Butler and Curtis,
2002:108), marks containing reference to the Jade Hall were particularly fashionable
during the Shunzhi Reign (1644-1661) (Curtis, 1995; Curtis, 2002:42) and rarely used
during the Kangxi Reign (Butler and Curtis, 2002:108).
Date range determination
Attributes and ware types within the collection tend to suggest a Transitional Period
(1620-1683), Shunzhi (1644-1661), or Kangxi Reign date (1662-1722). To determine a
narrower date range, analysis of attributes and vessel types was conducted. First, a
visual interpretation of attributes and porcelain types associated with specific date
ranges were conducted, using the model provided by South (2002). Second, a set of
attributes was selected for determination of the mean ceramic date, again following
South’s model (2002). This model is designed to examine occupation periods among
sites, and unlike the visual interpretation method, takes into account the frequency of
attributes by using a weighted average. Time frames, attributes, and types were
adapted for the purposes of this study to reflect Chinese porcelain attribute dates. The
mean ceramic date and visually interpreted date range were compared to known dates
concerning the Chinese porcelain trade, the dates of two shipwrecks that Williams
(2007) suggested as likely to be the source of the porcelain, and the collection attributes
not included in the aforementioned calculations. These attributes were used to refine,
narrow, or invalidate the dates suggested. Not all attributes and types were suitable for
inclusion in the visual interpretation of attributes and mean ceramic date, and so were
omitted either for lack of definitive information or for lack of consensus among existing
porcelain literature.
Often, existing Chinese porcelain literature refers to dates by nonspecific periods such
as “late-seventeenth century” or “early 18th century.” In order to produce a mean
ceramic date as well as a visual interpretation of attribute date ranges, more precise
dates are needed. Therefore, for the purposes of this study, the most commonly agreed
upon attribute date among existing research was used. When porcelain attributes and
types were given a date range of “late,” “middle,” or “early” in the century, they were
defined in this study as follows: early - turn of the century through the 30s, middle - 40s
through the 60s, and late - 70s to the end of the century. A total of 15 dateable
7

�attributes and ware types identified among the collection were determined to have
enough documentation among resources to be included in determining a date range
(Table 2). The attributes and porcelain ware types are graphed on a timeline (Fig. 3). To
determine the date range of the attributes, South (2002) suggests that at least half of
the attributes coincide with the earliest time period marker. Similarly, at least half must
coincide with the latest time period marker. However, the latest period marker must at
least touch the beginning of the latest attribute observed. Thus, given 15 attributes and
types, it was necessary that 8 7.5 (half of 15 or

15

∕2) of them corresponded with each

date range marker. As shown by Fig. 3, this provides a date range for the collection
between 1670 and 1700, indicated by the solid vertical lines. A mean ceramic date was
then calculated for the collection, providing a weighted average for attributes identified
(Table 3). The mean ceramic date was calculated using the following equation (South,
2002: 217):
Y=
where n = the number of attributes identified, Xi = the median date for each attribute,
and fi = the frequency at which it occurred in the collection.
Utilizing the documented date range, a median date was calculated for each attribute.
The median date was multiplied by the number of times the attribute occurred within the
collection. The total sum of the frequency column was then divided into the total sum of
the product column, resulting in a mean ceramic date. A total of 13 attributes and types
were used, resulting in a mean ceramic date of 1690. That date falls closer to the later
portion of the visually interpreted date range (1670-1700 AD), and supports the
shipwreck identities proposed by Williams (2007). The indication is that the majority of
features identified in the collection correspond to the later portion of the date range
suggested by the visual interpretation model. Attributes and types not included in the
mean ceramic date calculation or the visually interpreted date range support the dates
generated by the two models. These include klapmutsen-style or wide flat rims (16201680 AD) (Fischell, 1987); evidence of Dehua kiln production (1675-1725 AD)
(Donnelly, 1967; Gordon, 1977); human figure elements (1644-1722); the Prunus
blossoms with cracked-ice motif (Kangxi Reign, 1662-1722 AD) (Frank 1969), lidded
8

�cups (circa 1690) (Jorg and Flecker, 2001), an Artemisia hallmark (Kangxi Reign, 16621722) (Macintosh, 1977; Mudge, 1986), and non-kraak panel motifs (1690 - 1752) (Kerr,
1986: 65; Jorg and Flecker, 2001; Chiến, 2002; Sheaf and Kilburn, 1988).
Several attributes among the collection sherds are associated with dates earlier than
the visually interpreted date range (1670-1700). Such motifs include the peach motif
(Jiajing Reign, 1522-1566 or Shunzhi Reign, 1644-1661 AD) (Bai, 2002; LionGoldschmidt, 1978), hallmark reference to “the beautiful jade” (Shunzhi Reign) (Curtis,
2002: 42), lion and plant design-floral scroll (1650-1660) (Butler, 2002: 18, figure 3), and
boneless floral scroll (1465-1487) (Frank, 1969). Considering these attributes along with
early attributes used in both the mean ceramic date calculation and the date range
determination, it is apparent that there is also a population among the collection sherds
(approximately 5% of the total sherd population) that suggests an earlier date, possibly
during the Shunzhi Reign. The presence of earlier attributes is a relatively minor issue
as motifs were reused and older styles imitated in later reigns. Furthermore, such finds
are not uncommon among shipwrecks. Often during the excavation and analysis of
shipwreck porcelain cargoes, porcelain has been discovered that does not fit the time
period of the shipwreck, or the time period suggested by the bulk of the porcelain cargo
(Sheaf and Kilburn, 1988). They have, in large part, simply been considered anomalies.
The appearance of a few “earlier” porcelain sherds among a collection of later sherds
may, however, simply reflect a lack of information regarding export porcelain. Dates for
only a few specific attributes are known for certain, or agreed upon among the existing
literature. It is quite possible that many of the attributes considered to be early attributes
in this study coexisted with later attributes.
Discussion and Conclusion
The Beeswax Wreck collection exhibits porcelain attributes and types typical of export
types common to the markets in New Spain. The presence of monochrome porcelain,
likely from the Dehua kilns, including ribbed and molded porcelain, Marco Polo censers,
Batavian ware, and a sherd with a European face, are all indicators of European export.
More specifically, large quantities of monochrome-white porcelain, as well as the
identification of lidded cups and Middle-Eastern influences among the collection sherds,
indicate that the ship was a Spanish vessel involved in the Manila trade. This supports
9

�the finding of Williams's (2007) research that indicates that the Beeswax wreck was a
Manila galleon carrying quantities of porcelain, beeswax, and other goods from Manila
to Acapulco. After consideration of attributes and porcelain types among the collection
sherds, the visually interpreted date range (1670-1700), and the mean ceramic date
(1690), it is apparent that the majority of evidence strongly indicates that the porcelain
found on the Nehalem-Manzanita coast is from a Spanish Manila galleon that wrecked
during the Kangxi Reign, specifically between 1670 and 1700. The date of the collection
is not likely later as many late-Kangxi porcelain attributes are absent. Therefore, the
identity of the shipwreck responsible for the porcelain deposition is not likely the 1705
wreck of the San Francisco Xavier. Rather, analyses conducted in this study strongly
indicate that the Beeswax Wreck was the Santo Cristo de Burgos, lost in 1693.

Fig. 3 Visually interpreted date range for the collection porcelain attributes. (Jessica
Lally)

10

�Table 1. Number of Sherds in the Beeswax Collection by Provenience.

11

�Table 2. Attributes Used for Visual Interpretation of Date Range.

12

�Table 3. Attributes Selected for Mean Ceramic Date.

Acknowledgements
There are many who deserve thanks for their involvement and contribution to my
research: Steve Hackenberger, Pat Lubinski and Scott Williams who provided guidance
and support; Penglin Wang; Lise Zimmerman; and the Tillamook County Pioneer
13

�Museum; and Pam Endzweig and the University of Oregon Museum of Natural and
Cultural History and John Dubé.
References
Bai, Q., 2002. Inscriptions, Calligraphy, and Seals on Jingdezhen Porcelains from the
Shunzhi Era. In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an Unknown Reign: Shunzhi
porcelain 1644-1661, Art Services International, Alexandria, VA: 24-34.
Bass, G. F., (Ed.), 2005. Beneath the Seven Seas: Adventure with the Institute of
Nautical Archaeology. Thames and Hudson, New York.
Beals, H. K., and Steele, H., 1981. Chinese Porcelains from Site 35-TI-1, Netarts Sand
Spit, Tillamook County, Oregon. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 23,
University of Oregon, Portland, OR.
Butler, M., 2002. Introduction. In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an Unknown
Reign: Shunzhi Porcelain 1644-1661, Art Services International, Alexandria, VA: 12-23.
Butler, M., and Curtis, J. B., 2002. Catalogue. In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an
Unknown Reign: Shunzhi Porcelain 1644-1661. Art Services International, Alexandria,
VA: 82-244.
Chiến, N. D., 2002. The Ca Mau Shipwreck: 1725-1735. Há Nôi, Viet Nam: Ca Mau
Department of Culture and Information, the National Museum of Vietnamese History.
Curtis, J. B., 1995. Chinese Porcelains of the Seventeenth Century: Landscapes,
Scholars’ motifs and Narratives. China Institute Gallery, New York.
Curtis, J. B., 2002. Shunzhi styles: The decoration and iconography of porcelains from
Jingdezhen, 1644-61, In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an Unknown Reign:
Shunzhi Porcelain 1644-1661, Art Services International, Alexandria, VA: 42-55.
Donnelly, P. J., 1967. Blanc de Chine: The porcelain from Têhua in Fukien. Praeger,
New York.
Fischell, R., 1987. Blue and White China: Origins/Western Influences. In J. Esten (Ed.),
Little Brown, Boston.
Franchere, G., 1967. Adventure at Astoria, 1810-1814. In H. C. Franchere (Ed.),
University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
Frank, A., 1969. Chinese Blue and White. Walker, New York.

14

�Fuchus, R. W. II, and Howard, D. S., 2005. Made in China: Export Porcelain from the
Leo and Doris Hodroff Collection at Winterthur. University of New England, Winterthur,
DE.
Gibbs, J. A., 1993. Pacific Graveyard. (4th edition), Binford &amp; Mort, Portland, OR.
Gordon, E., 1977. Collecting Chinese export porcelain. Main Street Press, New York.
Harrisson, B., 1995. Later Ceramics in South-East Asia: Sixteen to Twentieth Centuries.
Oxford University Press, New York.
Hult, R. E., 1968. Lost Mines and Treasures of the Pacific Northwest. Binford &amp; Mort,
Portland, OR.
Jorg, C. J. A., and Flecker, M., 2001. Porcelain from the Vung Tau Wreck: The
Hallstrom Excavation. Sun Tree, Singapore.
Kerr, R., 1986. Chinese Ceramics, Porcelain of the Qing Dynasty 1644-1911. Victoria
and Albert Museum, London.
Lally, J., 2008. Analysis of the Chinese Porcelain Associated with the Beeswax Wreck,
Nehalem, Oregon. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Central Washington University.
Lally, J., In Press. Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain Collection, HarvardYenching Institute, Oregon, USA.
Lee, D., and Frost, J., 1968. Ten Years in Oregon. Ye Galleon Press, Fairfield, WA.
Lion-Goldschmidt, D., 1978. Ming Porcelain. K. Watson (Tr.), Rizzoli International, New
York.
Macintosh, D., 1977. Chinese Blue and White Porcelain. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle.
Marshall, D., 1984. Oregon Shipwrecks. Binford and Mort, Portland, OR.
Mathers, W. M., Parker, H. S., and Copus, K., 1990. Archaeological Report; The
recovery of the Manila Galleon Nuestra Senora de la Concepcion. Pacific Sea
Resources, Sutton, V.
Mudge, J. M., 1986. Chinese Export Porcelain in North America. Clarkson and N.
Potter, New York.
Sheaf, C., and Kilburn, R., 1988. The Hatcher Porcelain Cargoes: The Complete
Record. Phiadon, Oxford.
South, S., 2002 Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology. Percheron Press, New
York.
15

�Valenstein, S. G., 1989. A handbook of Chinese Ceramics. The Metropolitan Museum
of Art, New York.
van der Pijl-Ketel, C. L., (Ed.), 1982. The Ceramic Load of the Witte Leeuw: (1613).
Jijks Museum, Amsterdam.
Vermeer,

M.,

2005.

Glossary,

undercut.

Retrieved

August

1,

2008,

from

http://gotheborg.com/glossary/glossaryindex.htm
Wang, P., (April 17, 2008). Personal communication.
Williams, S., 2007. A Research Design to Conduct Archaeological Investigations at the
Site of the Beeswax Wreck of Nehalem Bay, Tillamook County, Oregon. Unpublished
report on file at Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, Salem, OR.
Williams, S., In Press. The Beeswax Wreck, a Manila Galleon in Oregon. HarvardYenching Institute, USA.

Biography
Jessica Lally began her analysis of the Beeswax Porcelain Collection in 2007, as a
portion of her graduate research project. Her work on the subject has continued,
documenting additional finds and associated museum collections. Since 2008, Jessica
has worked as an archaeologist for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama
Nation in Washington State. She specializes is regulatory compliance, documentation of
Traditional Cultural Properties, and documenting traditional lifeways of indigenous
peoples. Her professional interests are varied, including many aspects of proto-historic
and prehistoric archaeology of the Pacific Northwest.

16

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="626">
                <text>Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain Collection </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="627">
                <text>An assemblage of 1577 porcelain sherds associated with a historically recorded but unidentified shipwreck on the north Oregon coast was analyzed to determine the age and intended destination of the ship and its cargo. Prior to this study, only a limited number of studies of Asian export porcelain to the New World were available, and even fewer studies of their occurrence in the Pacific Northwest. This study provides a date range for the manufacture of the porcelain and information on the nationality of the Beeswax Wreck. The presence of the shipwreck, known locally as the Beeswax Wreck, has been documented through both historic sources and archaeological research. Archaeological materials associated with the wreck are consistent with a Manila galleon bound for Acapulco.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="628">
                <text>M. S. Jessica Lally, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="659" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="450">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/a27063130be244b6e912d6f6b748285f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a4ff15a63ab8a016d911bf273fbfc86b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="7115">
                    <text>Anthropology Museums and the Maritime and underwater cultural heritage of Capiz
(Placuna Placenta) artisanal dive fishery in the Philippine Archipelago
Ma. Arve B. Bañez, PhD (University of the Philippines Mindanao, mbbanez@up.edu.ph)
ABSTRACT
My paper examines the maritime and underwater cultural heritage of the Capiz (Placuna placenta) artisanal dive fishery.
There are three types of collections of the material culture of the Capiz dive fishery. These include the Capiz artisanal
diving fishery materials i.e., improvised diving gears and apparel; the Capiz shells and shell craft commodities classified
according to use and function and other secondary data about the Philippine Capiz shell industry, and the map showing
the distribution of Placuna beds around the Philippine archipelago. The string of agents, the socioecological practices
and the social relations likewise encompass the material life of fishing households engaged in Capiz artisanal dive
fishery. ‘Follow the thing’, a geographical approach allows me to conduct multi-sited ethnographies covering the source
communities of Trapiche and Botong, Oton, Iloilo, the natural habitat of Placuna placenta. And Banica, Roxas City,
Capiz’s shell craft manufacturer Kapis atbp. The museum visits and online capiz shell craft sellers encompass the diverse
sites to further document and describe the uses and function of the capiz. The local ecological knowledge embodies the
intangible maritime and underwater cultural heritage of Capiz artisanal dive fishery. Thus, integrating the narratives of
the development of fishing households, their labour and livelihoods. To analyze the significance of anthropology
museums in the preservation of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery maritime and underwater cultural heritage, I applied
three theories, namely: materialism, the biographies and itineraries of things, and object-oriented ontology (OOO).
Keywords: artisanal dive fishery, Capiz (Placuna placenta), anthropology museums, maritime and underwater
cultural heritage
List of Figures
Figure 1 The distribution of Placuna beds in the Philippine Archipelago author commissioned map (Talavera and
Faustino 1931).
Figure 2 Placuna placenta (Linnaeus 1758) Photograph by Ma. Arve B. Bañez, March 28, 2019.
Figure 3 The material objects of capiz artisanal dive fishery
Figure 4 Capiz (Placuna placenta) commodities and museum material objects

1. INTRODUCTION
The material life of Capiz artisanal dive fishery
'Museums are institutions devoted to the collecting, preservation, exhibition, study, and interpretation of
tangible artefacts,' according to Stocking (1985 4; see Gathercole (1989), cited in Haas 1996, 11). My
research focuses on the material culture of the Capiz (Placuna placenta) artisanal diving fishing as a subject
of maritime and underwater cultural heritage. I propose collecting, preserving, exhibiting, studying, and
interpreting material objects as well as the local ecological knowledge in the Capiz artisanal dive fishery.
Capiz shell crafts, as well as the commodities and artefacts made from shells, are part of the material culture
of the Capiz artisanal dive fishing. The evolution, transitions, and developments in modern diving methods,
as well as the narratives of fishing households about their lives and livelihoods, compose the Capiz artisanal
dive fishery's lifeworld.

1

�Figure 1 The distribution of Placuna beds in the Philippine Archipelago author
commissioned map (Talavera and Faustino 1931).

Placuna placenta (Linnaeus 1758) is a windowpane oyster, a bivalve marine mollusc with thin mica-like
translucent shells. Capiz is a marine bivalve with high economic value for the Philippine shells and shell
craft industry. (Talavera and Faustino,1931; Magsuci, Conlu, and Aypa-Moyano, 1980; Sotto and von
Cosel, 1982; Young and Serna, 1982; Rosell, 1984; Woods and Wells, 1995; Adan, 2000; Floren 2003;
Miagao, 2007; Laureta, 2008; Baňez, 2019) The common names of Placuna Placenta include window shell,
Chinese window shell, window oyster. The local names of Placuna Placenta vary across the Philippine
archipelago: in Tagalog, it is called Capiz or Kapis; Bicol, kalampinay or katipay; and lampirong in
Visayan. Talavera and Faustino. (1931, 339-344). Specifically, in Capiz province, Panay Island, it is called
pios. (Bañez 2021)
A collection of artefacts and materials used in Capiz artisanal dive fishing contains maritime and
underwater cultural heritage. The tangible objects of Placuna Placenta's maritime submerged cultural
heritage can be categorized into three interwoven collections. The first set consists of the Capiz artisanal
diving fishery material collection. These include improvised diving clothing and equipment such as diving
fins ('panyapak'), half-masks ('tempered'), gloves ('gwantes'), and diving belts ('pamato'). The recycled
2

�materials used, the design, maintenance, and repair, as well as the predicted worth or cost, are extensive
descriptions of the above. The first collection also includes the material things used to gather and harvest
Capiz, such as the compressor and the makeshift breathing apparatus- hose tube pipe, the mesh net ('sibut')
and the wicker basket ('bala-bala'), as well as the motorized boat used for the diving expedition. The
compressor's thorough description, as well as the connected hose tube pipe’s average length, the length and
dimensions of the mesh net and the wicker basket. The three varieties of dredging rakes used to collect
Capiz shells in the 1990s, causing damage to the Placuna beds, are also conserved.

Figure 2 Placuna placenta (Linnaeus 1758) Photograph by Ma. Arve B. Bañez, March 28, 2019.

The Capiz shells and shell craft commodities are classified based on their use and function. The second set
of collections includes information about international trade exports, various shells and shell craft
manufacturers, and the distribution of Placuna beds around the Philippine archipelago. These data sets were
gathered through archival research, the review of related literature, and online searches.
The material life of fishing households is entangled in their livelihoods at sea. The socio-ecological
practices, the history, shifts and changes in the diving practices, the social relations of the string of agents
or the key actors, and the narratives of fishing households about their lives and livelihoods embody the
lifeworld of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery. The third set of the collection represents the people, the social
practices and relations; their recorded voices and fishing labour portrayed in photographs and videos.
Essentially, the narratives of fishing communities that depend on the sea as a source of food and a place of
labour encompass their maritime and underwater cultural heritage.
According to Anita Herle (2016 6), the development of relational models within anthropology shifted the
focus away from objectified and fixed entities exclusively owned by individuals and institutions to a more
nuanced understanding of the dynamic links between people and things. A central premise is that entities
(both people and objects) are given substance, meaning, and value through their enmeshed relations.
[Emphasis mine] Rather than simply being seen as static items of material culture, objects can be understood
and analyzed as materializations of social relations, a dynamic process involving interweaving human
actions, beliefs, skills, and materials to create physical objects (Bell &amp; Geismar 2009).

3

�The museum comes from the Greek ‘museion’ and its original meaning derived from the Muses, the nine
sister goddesses of Greek mythology to watch over music, the arts, poetry, and the sciences. The museum
was a place dedicated to the Muses (Murray 1984; Wittlin 1970 cited in Haas 1996, 11), so it seems,
etymologically speaking. To muse also denotes thinking or studying. The material objects reproduce the
socioecological practices, and subsequently, engender the social relations in Capiz artisanal dive fishery
and vice versa. Practically, the material culture and non-material culture perpetuate the lives and livelihoods
– the lifeworld of artisanal fishing communities at present and in the future. I am musing about the Capiz
artisanal dive fishery, for the maritime and underwater cultural heritage preservation in the Philippines and
the Asia Pacific.

Figure 3 The material objects of capiz artisanal dive fishery

2. CASE STUDIES
The multi-sited ethnographic case studies for consideration focused on the coastal barangays of Trapiche
and Botong, Oton, Iloilo, Panay, Philippines. Primarily, I obtained the first set of data from my dissertation
Unod kag Panit: The narratives of the development of the artisanal lampirong (Placuna placenta) fishery
of Oton, Iloilo. The second set of data was gathered from the two source communities, namely: Oton, Iloilo
and Banica, Roxas City, Capiz. I documented the benda- porma process of Capiz shell craft making at
Kapis atbp., in the latter. From online research, I generated digital photographs of the Capiz shell craft
items sold, recording their extensive uses, monetary price, and function. My online research resulted in a
meet-up with the owner of Capiz Flowers and Antiques. They create a bouquet made of Capiz shells. The
third set of data also were collected from Oton, Iloilo where I generated information about the lives and
livelihoods of fishing households engaged in the Capiz artisanal dive fishery.
I visited two public museums at the National Museum of Philippine Maritime History and the National
Museum of Western Visayas in Iloilo City. The third museum is privately owned, the Camiña Balay na
Bato, which is open to tourists and showcases the famous bahay-na-bato built with the Capiz sliding panel
windows, dividers, chandelier, and other home furniture made from Capiz shells.
A ‘polysemy of spaces’ of the source community Oton, Iloilo, the natural habitat of Placuna placenta;
Banica, Roxas City’s Kapis atbp., the Capiz shell craft manufacturer; the public and private Museums with
Placuna placenta and Capiz shell craft curated items exhibited; and cyber communities selling online Capiz
shell crafts. These offline and online sites are platforms of the enmeshed relations of people, places, and
4

�the capiz (Placuna placenta). The marine bivalve metamorphoses into a maritime heritage cultural material
object of the Philippine archipelago.

Figure 4 Capiz (Placuna placenta) commodities and museum material objects

3. RESOURCES
The resources available to conduct the research include secondary data sources, the data collected from my
fieldwork in Oton, Iloilo and Banica, Roxas City, and online sources. The information on the distribution
map of Placuna beds across the Philippine archipelago was based on the 1931 published journal article of
Faustino and Talavera. The tables with information about the 1920s Philippine export of Capiz shells and
shell craft also were based on Faustino and Talavera’s research. The social media platform Facebook carried
the online pages of sellers of the Capiz shells and shell crafts. International Capiz shell craft industriesmaintained web pages that I accessed using the Google search engine.
4. FRAMEWORK
My study inquiries into the maritime and underwater cultural heritage of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery.
In particular, the maritime submerged tangible and intangible heritage of Placuna placenta and the material
culture of Capiz artisanal dive fishery as a subject of anthropology museums. What comprises the maritime
and underwater cultural heritage of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery? Why are the narratives of the
development of artisanal fishing households engaged in Capiz dive fishery included in the maritime and
underwater cultural heritage of the Philippines? What is the significance of anthropology museums in the
preservation of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery maritime and underwater cultural heritage?
To frame my analysis and interpretation, I am appropriating the materialism conceived by Marx and Engels
(1845-6), stating, “practice, activity, production and the conditions of life are all characterized as material…
real individuals, their activity and the material conditions of their life and state that by producing their
means of subsistence men are indirectly producing their material life.” (31) The socioecological practices,
the marine and coastal ecology, and the labour in capiz artisanal dive fishery reproduce not only the social
5

�relations of production but the material life in a fishing community. This conception of materialism is
integrated, and appropriate in describing and analyzing the labour and the material objects in capiz artisanal
fishery including the commodities they produce.
Moreover, Marx and Engels (1845-6, 36) treat the ‘production of ideas, of conceptions, of consciousness’,
too, as a form of societal practice. These activities are, as they put it, ‘directly interwoven with the material
activity and the material intercourse of men’. Thus, the ingenious improvisation of the diving gears and
apparel and the careful selection of recycled materials, the design, maintenance and repair of the compressor
and hose tube pipe breathing apparatus, which are conceived from local ecological knowledge constitute
the material life of capiz artisanal dive fishery.
The biographies and itineraries of objects and things frame my analysis of the Placuna placenta on display
at the National Museum in Western Visayas and the capiz shell crafts exhibited in the National Museum of
Maritime History. Essentially, to ‘follow the thing’ permits me to conduct a multi-sited ethnography. Thus,
tracing the itinerary of the submerged Placuna placenta from the seafloor to divers collecting and putting
them inside a mesh net. Then, unloading the sackful of capiz shells on the seashore, the post-diving
activities of shucking shells (panala), steaming, fermenting, and selling the seafood in the roadside sheds,
or the intricate and laborious process of capiz shell making, selling the shell craft commodities in retail
shops and online sites, export the global capiz shell craft commodities comprise the itineraries of the capiz
(Placuna placenta). The capiz sliding panel window is iconic and an architectural feature of Gabaldon
school buildings and the bahay-na-bato. The capiz farol/parol or lantern is a sought-after commodity during
the Christmas season. Using the object-oriented ontology (OOO) theory, these material objects made of
capiz shells do not only have a biography and an itinerary but possess attributes agential in character. The
capiz sliding panel window evokes nostalgia for the 19th-century Spanish colonial period in the Philippines.
The Gabaldon school buildings with capiz panel windows remind us of the public school system established
during the American colonial period in the Philippines. The capiz parol or lantern is symbolic of the festive
Christmas season in the Philippines.
To summarize, three relevant frameworks apply in my analysis and interpretation of the material culture of
capiz artisanal dive fishery, Marx and Engels’s conception of materialism, the biography and itinerary of
things, and the object-oriented ontology theory. These theories meld a meshwork of analysis and
interpretation of the maritime and underwater cultural heritage of the capiz in the Philippines.
5. RESULTS
The three types of collections of the material culture of Capiz artisanal dive fishery are:
1) the Capiz artisanal diving fishery materials i.e., improvised diving gears and apparel;
2) The Capiz shells and shell craft commodities classified according to use and function and other
secondary data about the Philippine Capiz shell industry, and the map showing the distribution of
Placuna beds around the Philippine archipelago; and,
3) The third set of the collection represents the people, the socioecological practices and social
relations of fishing households engaged in Capiz artisanal dive fishery.
These material collections are shown below in photographs, tables, graphs and digital illustrations and are
curated with captions and descriptions. Analysis and discussion of these material cultures seek to answer
the following research questions:

6

�1. What comprises the maritime and underwater cultural heritage of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery?
2. Why are the narratives of the development of artisanal fishing households engaged in Capiz dive
fishery included in the maritime and underwater cultural heritage of the Philippines?
3. What is the significance of anthropology museums in the preservation of the Capiz artisanal dive
fishery maritime and underwater cultural heritage?
The analysis and discussion are framed according to the three theories, namely: materialism, the biographies
and itineraries of things, and object-oriented ontology (OOO).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I am grateful to the fishing households in Barangay Trapiche and Botong, Oton, and Iloilo and the local government officials of
the six coastal communities that participated in the study. Cynthia N. Zayas, PhD, Takashi Tsuji, PhD, Rintaro Ono, PhD and
Rosalinda Tomas, PhD, Prof Tomasito T. Talledo and my panel at the Ateneo de Davao University for their steadfast support that
allowed me to finish my dissertation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adan, R. I. Y. "The window-pane (kapis shell) industry." SEAFDEC Asian Aquaculture 22, no. 4 (2000): 23-31.
Baňez, M.A.B. “Unod kag Panit: The narratives of the development of the lampirong (Placuna placenta) fishery of Oton, Iloilo.”
PhD diss., Ateneo de Davao University, 2021.
Baňez, Ma Arve B. "Compressor fishing practices among fisher-divers of lampirong (Placuna placenta) and their associated health
risks in a coastal municipality in Panay, Philippines." Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 23, no. 3 (2019):
31-38.
Bell, Joshua A., and Haidy Geismar. "Materialising Oceania: New ethnographies of things in Melanesia and Polynesia." The
Australian Journal of Anthropology (2009).
Blumenthal, Arthur R. "Alma S. Wittlin: Museums: In Search of a Usable Future: 300 pp., 50 ill., Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 1970." (1971): 94-95.
Eogan, George, Helen Roche, Finbar McCormick, Emily Murray, Kerri Cleary, and Francis John Byrne.
"Excavations
at
Knowth." Dublin: Royal Irish Academy, 1984. Fishery Statistics 1985-1994. Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Agricultural Statistics,
Quezon City, Philippines, September 14, 1995.
Floren, Adonis S. "The Philippine shell industry with special focus on Mactan, Cebu." Coastal
Project of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2003).

Resource

Management

Fontijn, David, H. P. Hahn, and H. Weiss. "Epilogue: Cultural biographies and itineraries of things: Second thoughts." Mobility,
Meaning and Transformations of Things: shifting contexts of material culture through Time and Space (2013): 183-96.
Gathercole, Peter. "The fetishism of artefacts." Museum studies in material culture (1989): 73-81.
Gosden, Chris, and Yvonne Marshall. "The cultural biography of objects." World Archaeology 31, no. 2 (1999): 169-178.
Haas, Jonathan. "Power, objects, and a voice for anthropology." Current Anthropology 37, no. S1 (1996): S1-S22.
Herle, Anita. "Objects, agency and museums." Museum Objects: Experiencing the Properties of Things (2012): 295.
Hidalgo y Rodriguez, J. G. "Obras malacológicas. (4ª Parte) Estudios preliminares sobre la fauna Malacológica de las islas Filipinas:
Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas." Físicas y Naturales de Madrid 21 (1903): 1-400.
Hidalgo, Joaquín González. Catálogo de los moluscos testáceos de las Islas Filipinas, Joló y Marianas: Moluscos marinos. Vol. 1.
la" Gaceta de Madrid, 1905.
Homans, George Caspar, and Robert King Merton. Social behaviour: Its elementary forms: Reprint: Chapter 4, p. 51-82. Harcourt,
Brace and World, 1961.

7

�Jackson, Peter. "Commodity cultures: the traffic in things." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24, no. 1 (1999):
95-108.
Kapferer, Bruce, ed. Transaction and meaning: directions in the anthropology of exchange and symbolic behaviour. Vol. 1.
Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1976.
Katagman. Lampirong. http://katagman.com/lampirong/, updated on 10/21/2011 accessed on 11/21/2022
Kopytoff, Igor. "The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process." In Appadurai, A. (Ed.). The social life of things:
Commodities in cultural perspective 68 (1986): 70-73.
Laureta, Liberato V. Compendium of the economically important seashells in Panay, Philippines. University of the Philippines
Press, 2008.
Linnaeus, C. von. "Tomus I. Systems naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus,
differentiis, synonymis, locis." Editio decima, reformata. Holmiae. (Laurentii Salvii) 1 (1758): 1-824.
Madrones-Ladja, Jocelyn A., Eva T. Aldon, and Dan D. Baliao. "Broodstock transplantation: an approach for stock enhancement
of the 'kapis' shell Placuna placenta along Panay Gulf, central Philippines." Philippine Agricultural Scientist 95, no. 2 (2012): 192198.
Magsuci, H, Conlu, A and Aypa-Moyano. “The Window-Pane Oyster (Capiz) Fishery of Western Visayas”. Fisheries Research
Journal of the Philippines. (1980). 5 (2):74-80.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. "1845-6. The German Ideology." (1976).
Medina, Juan de O. S. A. "Historia de la Orden de S." Agustin de Estas Islas Filipinas (Manila: 1893 (1893): 175-77.
Rosell, N. C. "Mariculture of kapis, Placuna placenta: a pilot study." Fish. Res. J. Philipp 9 (1984): 32-44.
Sissons, David Carlisle Stanley. "The Japanese in the Australian pearling industry." Queensland Heritage 3, no. 10 (1979): 9-27.
Seale, A. "Notes on Philippine edible molluscs." Philipp. J. Sci 7, no. 4 (1912): 273-281.
Sotto, Filipina B., and Rudo von Cosel. "Some commercial bivalves of Cebu, Philippines." The Philippine Scientist 19 (1982): 43101.
Stocking, G. W., and G. W. Stocking. "Philanthropoids and vanishing cultures." Objects and others: Essays on museums and
material culture 3 (1985): 112.
Talavera, F. and Faustino, L. A. Industrial shells of the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science. Vol. 45. Bureau of Science
Manila, 1931.
Tringham, Ruth. "Engendered places in prehistory." Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 1, no. 2 (1994):
169-203.
Wood, Elizabeth, and Susan M. Wells. "Sustainable utilization." In The Conservation Biology of Molluscs: Proceedings of a
Symposium Held at the 9th International Malacological Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1986, no. 9, p. 41. IUCN, 1995.
Yano, Takao. "The prospects for fisherfolk culture in Panay. In Fishers of the Visayas. A Study of MaritimeCommunities, edited
by U. Iwao and CN Zayas, 3-51. Diliman, Quezon City: College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines,
1994.
Young, A. E. Serna. “Country Report from the Philippines”. F. Brian Davy, and M. Graham (Eds.). In Bivalve Culture in Asia and
the Pacific, Proceedings of the Workshop held in Singapore, 16-91 February, lDRC-200 e. 1982: 55-68.
Zayas, CN. “Pangayaw and Tumandok in the maritime world of the Visayan Islands”. In Fishers of the Visayas. A Study of Maritime
Communities, edited by U. Iwao and CN Zayas, 75-131. Diliman, Quezon City: College of Social Sciences and Philosophy,
University of the Philippines, 1994

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7108">
                <text>Anthropology Museums and the Maritime and underwater cultural heritage of Capiz (Placuna Placenta) artisanal dive fishery in the Philippine Archipelago</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7109">
                <text>My paper examines the maritime and underwater cultural heritage of the Capiz (Placuna placenta) artisanal dive fishery.&#13;
There are three types of collections of the material culture of the Capiz dive fishery. These include the Capiz artisanal&#13;
diving fishery materials i.e., improvised diving gears and apparel; the Capiz shells and shell craft commodities classified&#13;
according to use and function and other secondary data about the Philippine Capiz shell industry, and the map showing&#13;
the distribution of Placuna beds around the Philippine archipelago. The string of agents, the socioecological practices&#13;
and the social relations likewise encompass the material life of fishing households engaged in Capiz artisanal dive&#13;
fishery. ‘Follow the thing’, a geographical approach allows me to conduct multi-sited ethnographies covering the source&#13;
communities of Trapiche and Botong, Oton, Iloilo, the natural habitat of Placuna placenta. And Banica, Roxas City,&#13;
Capiz’s shell craft manufacturer Kapis atbp. The museum visits and online capiz shell craftsellers encompass the diverse&#13;
sites to further document and describe the uses and function of the capiz. The local ecological knowledge embodies the&#13;
intangible maritime and underwater cultural heritage of Capiz artisanal dive fishery. Thus, integrating the narratives of&#13;
the development of fishing households, their labour and livelihoods. To analyze the significance of anthropology&#13;
museums in the preservation of the Capiz artisanal dive fishery maritime and underwater cultural heritage, I applied&#13;
three theories, namely: materialism, the biographies and itineraries of things, and object-oriented ontology (OOO). </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7110">
                <text>Ma. Arve B. Bañez</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7111">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7112">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7113">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7114">
                <text>Bañez, Ma. Arve B. . 2023. “Anthropology Museums and the Maritime and underwater cultural heritage of Capiz (Placuna Placenta) artisanal dive fishery in the Philippine Archipelago.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Arjun Rao. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/2033 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="78">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 22 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="42" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="42">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/dca92f83a85a0f01eb068d1bed1705b9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7e81fbe181c07bc4ddaddd46f6883ec3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="609">
                    <text>Disaster in the High Seas:
The Spanish Expeditions in the Pacific in the Sixteenth Century
Ma. Luisa De Leon-Bolinao, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, History Department
University of the Philippines-Diliman
Quezon City, Philippines
Email: loudeleon@rocketmail.com
Abstract
The Pacific Ocean is the largest body of water on earth, measuring more than 165
million square kilometers. Although the first European to spot it was Vasco Nuñez de
Balboa in 1513, who named it Mar del Sur (South Sea) due to a miscalculation, it was
Ferdinand Magellan who named it Pacifico after taking notice of its calm waters.
This paper discusses the various disasters that sixteenth-century Spanish expeditions
encountered during their trips to and from the Philippines while crossing the vast Pacific
Ocean. It focuses on four events: (1) natural disasters like storms and gales; (2) health
hazards like diseases and spoiled food provisions; (3) man-made hazards like mutinies
and piracies; and, (4) other accidents like leaks and reef grounding. The study covers
the period from Magellan’s voyage of 1519 up to the trips of the galleons until the end of
the sixteenth century, and concludes with the lessons learned from a century of
traversing the Pacific.
Key words: disasters, Pacific Ocean, Spanish expeditions, galleon trade, Philippines
I. Introduction

A story on Walter McDougall’s (1993) book1 narrated the historic first eastward trip from
the Philippines to Acapulco.

Fray Andres de Urdaneta was on his way back to

Acapulco from the Philippines. He set a course north by northeast in the hope of
bypassing the trade winds and finding the westerlies back to the Americas. Forty-five
years earlier, Magellan first crossed the Pacific westward, but since then no one has
been able to make a tornaviaje (return trip) using the same route through the Pacific.
After a month, Urdaneta’s crew reached 320 north latitude, 1590 east longitude, the
same coordinates reached by Saavedra in 1528 but abandoned after a five-day storm
1

Walter A. McDougall (1993). Let the Sea Make a Noise: A History of the North Pacific from Magellan to
MacArthur. Basic Books, p. 25.

1

�crippled his ship, with his crew weakened by the cold and scurvy. Urdaneta then prayed
for the intercession of St. Peter, patron saint of his ship San Pedro, that the westerlies
would carry them back to Acapulco. The westerlies did pick up, the ship sailed eastward
until the California current caught them and carried them southward to Mexico. They
reached Acapulco on October 8, 1565 after sailing over twelve thousand miles in 130
days. Urdaneta unwittingly discovered the Kuroshio current2 flowing off Japan, the North
Pacific Current flowing towards California, and the tornaviaje route that eluded earlier
Spanish explorers.
Thus began Spain’s mastery of the Pacific Ocean. According to Greg Bankoff (2006),
“The Spanish Empire in the Pacific may have been motivated by ‘God, gold, and glory’
but its realization, in particular its extent and its pulse, was largely determined by the
Pacific wind system.”3 Spain may have built an empire, but it came with considerable
loss of life and property. The Pacific, contrary to Magellan’s initial impression of this
“Spanish lake”, was far from calm. It is the birthplace of numerous tropical storms, the
home of the world’s most active volcanoes and tectonic plates, and the regular site of
earthquakes and tsunamis.
II. Initial Travels to the Philippines: From Ferdinand Magellan to Miguel Lopez De
Legazpi, 1519-1565
Antonio Pigafetta, Magellan’s assistant and chronicler, kept a detailed account of the
events of the 1519 expedition. The fleet began its voyage to the largely unknown waters
in November 1520, with no clue as to direction or length of travel. Three months later,
the food had deteriorated, and morale was low. He notes,
“The tired crew only ate sea biscuits that were full of worms and smelled
of the urine from the rats that had already eaten the good parts. Some men
fought over old cowhides which they softened for four or five days in seawater
2

As described by Shirley Fish in her book, The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the
Pacific. Author House (2011), p. 64: “The Kuroshio Current begins off the coast of Taiwan and flows in a
circular, clock wise pattern as far north as Japan. The current then merges with the North Pacific Current
(NPC) which flows in a westerly pattern taking the ship towards the coast of Northern California and
Mendecino. The NPC is the Pacific’s counterpart of the Atlantic’s Gulf Stream. Once off the coast of
California, the galleon sailed south to Baja California and then to Mexico’s Cape Corrientes and
Acapulco.”
3
Greg Bankoff (2006). “Winds of Colonisation: The Meteorological Contours of Spain’s Imperium in the
Pacific, 1521-1898”, Environment and History 12, p. 67.

2

�before cooking them over a charcoal fire. Others caught and sold rats…and the
demand for this kind of fresh meat could not be met. Nineteen of them perished
from scurvy…”4
Scurvy is a disease that occurs due to the lack of Vitamin C and usually
accompanies malnutrition. Symptoms include pale skin, sunken eyes, and loss of teeth.
It was a common illness among sailors since the 15th century due to the absence of
fresh vegetables and fruits, especially citrus, in their diets. These foods are highly
perishable and cannot last for the several months that the sailors spend in long-distance
travel in ships. A second voyage led by Garcia Jofre de Loaisa, and assisted by Juan
Sebastian Del Cano [Elcano], was mandated by Carlos I to colonize the Spice Islands
for the Spanish Crown. Leaving Spain in 1525 with an impressive fleet of seven ships
and crew of 450, the Loaisa expedition barely survived the Atlantic crossing. Even
before they crossed the Pacific, they were already down to four ships. After the Pacific
voyage, only one ship reached the Spice Islands as three more ships were lost in the
storms, while Loaysa and Elcano both died 5 of scurvy in July 1526.The October 31,
1527 trip of Alvaro de Saavedra Ceron proved most favorable for the Spanish fleet. Not
only were the northeast trade winds strong enough to push them across the vast ocean,
thus making the trip faster, they also arrived in the Philippines after the typhoon season
was over.6 Of course, it helped that one of the captains of the ships was a member of
the earlier Elcano expedition and could have copies of the navigation charts. It was also
the first time that a Spanish fleet originated from Mexico, instead of Spain, which means
the food would remain fresher for a longer period of time during the Pacific crossing.
However, Saavedra could not escape the curse of the Pacific. Only two weeks
into the voyage, the crew discovered that the ship was leaking badly. Wright (1951)
wrote,7
“…The water was pouring into the bread storeroom in the stern of the
ship, in such quantities that the ship was settling rapidly. They hastened to
lighten her by throwing overboard thirty quintales [equivalent to fifty days ration

4

Rodrigue Levesque (trans.) The Philippines: Pigafetta’s Story of Their Discovery by Magellan (n.d.).
Levesque Publications, p. 14.
5
Ibid, p. 111.
6
Ione Stuessy Wright “Voyages of Alvaro de Saavedra Ceron” in R. S. Boggs (ed.) University of Miami
Hispanic-American Studies (1951). University of Miami Press, p. 17.
7
Ibid. p. 19.

3

�for forty men] of bread and meat and other foods, and set to work to get rid of the
water….”
On December 15, 1527, another misfortune happened to the crew. They encountered a
storm, developed rudder trouble, and were forced to wait out the bad weather in the
middle of the sea. Two other ships of the convoy – the Santiago and Espiritu Santo -continued on their journey, but after the storm passed, these two vessels were never
seen again.8
It was Saavedra who first attempted the tornaviaje in June 1528 by sailing
northeastward, but was apparently unprepared for the extreme weather condition and
more storms. He returned to the Moluccas and departed for a second attempt in May
1529, only to be attacked by the native islanders along the way. Saavedra himself fell ill
and died on the return voyage (estimated around October 1529), but barely out of the
western Pacific region. The crew returned to the Moluccas a second time, but was later
captured by the Portuguese and taken to Malacca. After the Spaniards surrendered
their arms to the Portuguese, they were sent to India and finally got back to Spain in
Portuguese ships.
By the time Ruy Lopez de Villalobos set sail in October 1542, a lot of things had been
learned about the Pacific. Captains were further instructed to keep a very detailed log of
each day’s journey, measured in leagues.
Despite all the preparation and the knowledge that went into the Villalobos expedition,
the usual problems surfaced – leaking boats, lack of drinking water, and the occasional
storms and gales, one of which caused one ship, the San Cristobal, to disappear.9 It
would later resurface in Mindanao and rendezvous with the rest of Villalobos’s fleet.
After several months in Mindanao, one of the ships -- the San Juan – would attempt to
return to Mexico via the Pacific Ocean. The Villalobos expedition may have been better
prepared for the journey this time around, but with the persistent lack of adequate
knowledge of wind direction and sea currents occurring in the Pacific, this attempt was
destined to fail. It would take Spain two more decades to figure this out before the
incredible feat of returning to Spain via the Pacific would be accomplished. Miguel

8

Ibid., p. 21.
Andre Gschaedler, “Mexico and the Pacific, 1540-1565: The Voyages of Villalobos and Legazpi and the
Preparations Made for Them”. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University, p. 52.
9

4

�Lopez de Legazpi had one very distinct advantage as he set sail across the Pacific in
November 1564 – he was assisted by Andres de Urdaneta, who, by this time, had been
the foremost expert in navigation. He had been crossing the Pacific since the Loaysa
and Saavedra expeditions, and that his knowledge of cosmography and navigation was
well known throughout the empire. He became an Augustinian friar in 1552, and stayed
in Mexico where he was exposed to more studies on seafaring, particularly on the
meteorological observations made along the coast of California.10
The November 21, 1564 departure of the Legazpi fleet would have spelled
disaster had it not been for the instructions of Urdaneta who outlined different sea
routes for (1) departures between Oct 1 to November 10; (2) departures between
November 10 and January 20; and (3) departures after January which should not
proceed until March.11 Simply put, for every Pacific voyage, timing is paramount; one
cannot take for granted prevailing winds and the sea currents at different times of the
year. Needless to say, the voyage proceeded without any incident, and Legazpi
reached Guam on January 26, 1565, and Samar on February 13, 1565.12 Urdaneta left
Cebu to return to Mexico on June 1, 1565 aboard the San Pedro. Although this was the
voyage that discovered the eastward route back to Acapulco, we do know now that out
of the original 200 people on board, only about 30 people were able to reach their
destination after four months. This fact, however, does not diminish the significance of
this return voyage, and it would serve as the route that the Manila galleons would follow
for 250 years.
III. The Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade
Conquering the Pacific didn’t end the disasters accompanying the subsequent Spanish
expeditions. According to Shirley Fish (2011):13
“After the arrival of the San Pablo in Mexico, it was followed by the San
Geronimo, which arrived at Cebu in October 1566. This proved to be a difficult
journey for all those aboard the vessel as a mutiny arose on the ship. The
captain was murdered by the mutineers and it was a miracle that the ship arrived
in the Philippines at all.”
10

Ibid., p. 84.
Ibid. p. 115-16.
12
Ibid., p. 149, 152.
13
Shirley Fish (2011). The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific. Author House, p.
65.
11

5

�Aside from mutinies, captains also faced the possibility of encountering pirates and rival
foreign ships when traveling over international waters. The galleons were part of the
Spanish Crown Trade Route (SCTR), a larger network of traditional merchant ships that
sailed
-routes. As discussed by Ruescas and Wrana (2012),14
“Thus, two lengthy maritime routes operated across the Atlantic and
Pacific Oceans simultaneously for over two centuries. Both of these lines
were in turn connected by an overland route between Acapulco and
Veracruz via Mexico City…. Through this overland route, the Atlantic and
Pacific lines were connected forming a single combined route that
stretched from Manila to Seville, linking Asia, America, and Europe….”
For both the Atlantic and Pacific fleets, the Spanish Government established a
highly-regulated system of laws that governed everything from cargo and
provisions to weaponry and crew. The schedule for the voyages had to be strictly
followed. Sailing to the Americas had to commence in the months of April or May
in order to arrive in Mexico before the hurricane season, while the Pacific fleets
can only start their voyage in October, but not later than January, to be assured
of calm waters and favorable winds.
The Atlantic waters were likewise used by vessels from other countries such as
the Dutch and British ships which were always hunting for Spanish galleons. That is
why as early as 1526, the King of Spain had decreed that vessels traveling to the
Americas would be escorted by war ships. In contrast, the Pacific galleons were not
accompanied by these vessels, but instead were fitted with cannons to be able to
protect themselves. 15 At times, an incoming Manila galleon was escorted from Baja
California to the port of Acapulco by additional armed warships.
Alas, such precautions proved far from foolproof. One such example was when the
Santa Ana was captured by Thomas Cavendish in 1587 off the coast of Baja
California.16 The Santa Ana was originally with the war ship San Francisco when they
left Manila, but both encountered a typhoon off Japan which considerably wrecked the
14

Javier Ruescas and Javier Wrana, “The West Indies and the Manila Galleons: The First Global Trade
Route” in Probing Philippine-Spanish Connections in History: Selected Papers, Philippine-Spanish
Friendship Day 2011 (2012). National Historical Commission of the Philippines and the History
Department, UP Diliman, p. 8.
15
Ibid., p. 28, 30
16
Ibid., p. 188.

6

�latter, leaving the Santa Ana to continue its voyage back to Acapulco alone and
unarmed. In November 1587, the Cavendish fleet spotted the lone galleon sailing
towards Baja California, chased it, and got control of the ship, the cargo, and the crew.
After picking the best of the lot from the ship, Cavendish set the Santa Ana on fire and
set off, leaving the burning ship which managed to drift to a nearby shore, eventually
getting salvaged by the remaining crew and brought back to Acapulco.17
The Dutch were the more aggressive attackers of the galleons, who constantly
dispatched ships to the Philippines. They had hoped to catch one of the incoming or
outgoing galleons by blockading either Manila Bay or the San Bernardino Strait. One
such encounter happened in December 1600 when Oliver van Noort led the attack in
Cavite, which unfortunately resulted with the sinking of the San Diego.18 It was this San
Diego that was later excavated by underwater archaeologists in 1993, and the artifacts
are presently housed in the National Museum of the Philippines and the Museo Naval in
Madrid (Spain).
Let me end this study with an incident from the seventeenth century. One of the worst
disasters for the Spanish flotilla was the tragedy that befell the Nuestra Señora de la
Concepcion. The Concepcion had quite a reputation as the largest, most indestructible
galleon of its time. It was built using the best tropical hardwoods in the Philippines and
measured 160 feet long, 50 feet wide, with a carrying capacity of 2,000 tons. It was
accompanied by the San Ambrosio, but had become separated from the Concepcion
due to the strong winds they encountered. The San Ambrosio was able to stay the
course and arrived in Acapulco safely; the Concepcion, however, did not.
17

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Cavendish#Capturing_a_Manila_galleon, Accessed October 5,
2013.
18
“Oliver van Noort’s Attack on Luzon” in Blair and Robertson, ‘Documents of 1600’, (Volume 11). The
Philippine islands, 1493-1803 : explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their
peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and
manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from
their earliest relations with European nations to the beginning of the nineteenth century / tr. from the
originals, ed. and annotated by Emma Helen Blair and James Alexander Robertson, with historical
introduction
and
additional
notes
by
Edward
Gaylord
Bourne.
55
Vols.
URL:
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/philamer/afk2830.0001.011/144?page=root;size=100;view=image;q1=blair.
Accessed October 5, 2013.
20
Fish, p. 3.
21
Ibid, p. 3-4.
22
Ibid., p. 11-15. An annotated list of Transpacific Galleons, 1565-1815, can also be found in Fish, pp
492-523.

7

�Fish (2011) relates that on September 20, 1638, the Concepcion encountered bad
weather and crashed into a reef off the southern coast of the Northern Marianas, where
it eventually capsized and broke to pieces. An investigation conducted in 1644
concluded that the ship’s disaster:
“…was brought about by a combination of bad weather and the lack of
vigilance on the part of the pilots in charge of the ship’s navigation. Apparently,
there was a disturbance on the galleon which had become so out of control that
the navigation of the ship was completely forgotten. Perhaps there was a fight
among the officers and crew or a mutiny was attempted with a planned takeover
of the vessel. Whatever happened on the galleon, it appears that no one was
paying attention to the ship’s course and the fact that it had been dangerously
drifting towards the reef.”
Eventually, the culpability was traced back to Manila and to the then
Governor-General Sebastian Hurtado de Corcuera, who was held responsible.
Fifty-nine charges were brought against Corcuera, among which were (1)
appointing his inexperienced nephew as Commander of the Concepcion which
was probably one of the factors that led to a near-mutiny aboard the ship; (2)
illegally-transporting personal cargo of jewelry, gold, and other items aboard the
galleons back to Mexico, to be sold for profit; and, (3) numerous violations of
Spanish trade laws. A recovery team was sent to Saipan by the Spanish
government in Manila in 1684, to at least retrieve the ship’s cannons. But it was
not until 1987 that an archaeological team led by William Mathers and his team
of thirty men and women recovered the riches that the Nuestra Señora de la
Concepcion buried off the waters of the Pacific for 375 years.
Conclusion
The Pacific Ocean had been the last frontier for the Spanish expeditions in the sixteenth
century; their final obstacle to reaching the coveted Spice Islands. Erroneously named
Pacifico by Magellan in 1520 which he based on its calm demeanor when he first saw
the vast ocean, the Pacific is anything but peaceful. For it is the birthplace of numerous
tropical storms, the home of the world’s most active volcanoes and tectonic plates, and
the regular site of earthquakes and tsunamis.
The first hazard they had to overcome was the weather and the ocean current. A ship
captain must possess enough skills and navigation know-how to even begin to sail the
large ocean to lands unknown. Initially a venture based on trial-and error, they had to
8

�leave Acapulco at a specific time of the year, and carefully keep a daily log of their
latitudinal position to even have any hope of surviving the months-long journey or
reaching an island to replenish supplies. Another challenge is rationing their food and
water supply and combatting physical diseases like scurvy, or emotional distress like
loneliness and boredom.
A second hazard is the violent climate. The Pacific is the birthplace of tropical storms, a
phenomena entirely new to citizens of an almost hurricane-free Europe. As such, coping
with shipwrecks, leaks, storms, and gales had become regular struggles for the hapless
sailors.
A third form of challenge was finding the tornaviaje route back to Acapulco. For some
reason, the Pacific waters behaved differently going back east than moving towards the
west. Sixteenth-century navigation meant relying on wind and sea currents in the
absence of modern instrumentation. It took Spain all of half a century before hitting the
Kuroshio Current off Japan which finally gave them that coveted return trip to Acapulco
with a shorter travel time. This historic discovery paved the way for Spain to master the
Pacific Ocean, establish their empire, and build a lucrative trade route for the galleons
for 250 years.
Finally, Spain had one last hurdle to overcome – piracy and attacks in the high seas.
Carrying untold fortune between Manila and Acapulco, the galleons are virtual magnets
to every daring treasure hunter with a sea vessel. The Portuguese had staked their
claim over the Spice Islands and its surrounding lands and waters, and had used this
ruse to capture Spanish vessels which wandered inside its territory. Meanwhile, the
Dutch and British ships lie in wait in pivotal water channels like the San Bernardino
Strait, Manila Bay, and Baja California. Although Spanish galleons frequently carry
cannons and firearms to protect themselves, the length of the travel time and distance
sometimes leave them weak and vulnerable to pirates and bounty hunters who maintain
close proximity to the shore and thus remain healthy and ready to pounce on weary
sailors.
The cost of conquering the Pacific may have been enormous for Spain in the sixteenth
century. The payback, however, was their enduring legacy in structuring the earliest
techniques for modern navigation and map-making, pioneering the methods to building
9

�a formidable, cross-continent empire, and ushering in the first global trade by linking the
largest landmasses of the earth – Asia, the Americas, and Europe.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bankoff, Greg, 2006. Winds of Colonisation: The Meteorological Contours of Spain’s
Imperium in thePacific, 1521-1898, Environment and History (12): 65-88.
Blair, Emma Helen and Robertson, Alexander (eds.). ‘Documents of 1600’, (Volume 11).
The

Philippinne

islands,

1493-1803:

explorations

by

early

navigators,

descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the
Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts,
showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those
islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the beginning of the
nineteenth century / trans. from the originals, ed. and annotated by Emma Helen
Blair and James Alexander Robertson, with historical introduction and additional
notes by Edward Gaylord Bourne. 55 Vols.
Fish, Shirley, 2011. The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific.
Author House.

Gschaedler, Andre,1953. Mexico and the Pacific, 1540-1565: The Voyages of Villalobos
and Legazpi and the Preparations Made for Them. PhD dissertation, Faculty of
Political Science, Columbia University.
Levesque, Rodrigue (trans.), n.d. The Philippines: Pigafetta’s Story of Their Discovery
by Magellan. Levesque Publications.
McDougall, Walter A.,1993. Let the Sea Make a Noise: A History of the North Pacific
from Magellan to MacArthur. Basic Books.
Morga, Antonio de, 1962. Historical Events of the Philippine Islands. Writings of Jose
Rizal Volume VI (Centennial Edition). Jose Rizal National Centennial
Commission.
Paige, Paula Spurlin (trans.),1969. The Voyage of Magellan: The Journal of Antonio
Pigafetta. Prentice-Hall International.
Ruescas, Javier and Wrana, Javier, 2012. The West Indies and the Manila Galleons:
The First Global Trade Route. In Probing Philippine-Spanish Connections in
10

�History: Selected Papers, Philippine-Spanish Friendship Day 2011. National
Historical Commission of the Philippines and the History Department, UP Diliman,
1-32.
Wright, Ione Stuessy, 1951. Voyages of Alvaro de Saavedra Ceron. In R. S. Boggs (ed.)
University of Miami Hispanic-American Studies. University of Miami Press.
Online Sources:
“The Philippine Islands, ”
http://philhist.pbworks.com/w/page/16367055/ThePhilippineIslands
“Thomas Cavendish”,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Cavendish#Capturing_a_Manila_galleon
Biography
Maria Luisa de Leon Bolinao is an Associate professor at the University of Philippines
Diliman. Her area of specialization is Asian History, particularly Southeast Asian History
and West Asian History. She teaches the Contemporary Period (Post-War Philippine
History), and her field of specialization is Environmental History.

11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="605">
                <text>Disaster in the High Seas: The Spanish Expeditions in the Pacific in the Sixteenth Century </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="606">
                <text>The Pacific Ocean is the largest body of water on earth, measuring more than 165 million square kilometers. Although the first European to spot it was Vasco NuÃ±ez de Balboa in 1513, who named it Mar del Sur (South Sea) due to a miscalculation, it was Ferdinand Magellan who named it Pacifico after taking notice of its calm waters.  This paper discusses the various disasters that sixteenth-century Spanish expeditions encountered during their trips to and from the Philippines while crossing the vast Pacific Ocean. It focuses on four events: (1) natural disasters like storms and gales; (2) health hazards like diseases and spoiled food provisions; (3) man-made hazards like mutinies and piracies; and, (4) other accidents like leaks and reef grounding. The study covers the period from Magellanâ€™s voyage of 1519 up to the trips of the galleons until the end of the sixteenth century, and concludes with the lessons learned from a century of traversing the Pacific.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="607">
                <text>Ma. Luisa De Leon-Bolinao, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="608">
                <text>5/14/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="613" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="404">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/361c8fba9d747e636de118d5d7008455.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ccc39a87fd2c065c60b3bef56ceb97f9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6683">
                    <text>The ceramic and porcelain collections on shipwreck in Vietnam Sea at History Museum
in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam): History, Preservation and Promotion.
MA. Nguyen Thi Huynh Nhu – History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City - Vietnam

ABSTRACT
In Vietnam, underwater cultural heritage is a new field developed in the late twenty century until now. Interest in
this field began with the discovery of shipwrecks in Vietnamese waters in the 1990s. Through international
cooperation as well as the support of modern equipment, Vietnam has approached and explored ancient
shipwrecks in Hòn Dầm (Phu Quoc), Hòn Cau (Con Dao), Cà Mau, Cù lao Chàm (Quang Nam), and in recent
years, the ancient shipwrecks Chau Thuan Bien in Quang Ngai. From 1993 to 2000, The History Museum in Ho
Chi Minh City received more than 7000 artifacts from these shipwrecks assigned from the Ministry of Culture
and Sports of Vietnam. Most of these archaeological materials are Chinese ceramics dating from the Ming to Qing
Dynasties, some Thai ceramics such as Sawankhalok ceramics, Sukhothai ceramics, and Vietnamese Chu Dau
ceramics dating from the 15th century. In this paper, we would like to give a brief introduction to these collections,
preservation and promotion agenda alongside the History Museum in Ho Chi Minh city. Accordingly, the article
will include three parts: the first is an overview of the historical museum and underwater heritage collections
which include the number and types of artifacts. In the second part, we will present about our museum’s actual
preservation and exhibition covering the difficulties and limitations that we are facing. In the discussion part, we
will present possible ideas about cooperation on exhibition, communication and conservation of the UCH
collection in our museum case.
Keywords: Cu Lao Cham ceramic, Chu Dau ceramics, History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamese
shipwrecks
Table of Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Cu Lao Cham collection in The History Museum in Ho Chi Minh city
Figure 2. Some objects of Ca Mau shipwreck collection in the Museum
Figure 3. Some of objects of Hòn Cau shipwreck collection in the Museum
Figure 4. Hòn Dầm shipwreck ceramics found in in the Museum: Sawankhalok (left), Sukhothai (right)
Figure 5. Cu Lao Cham storage view; Checking and detecting the damaged objects by salt intrusion; Treatment
Figure 6. Market exhibiting thematic "Trading ceramics on the East Sea trade route" at History Museum in 2022
Table 1. Distribution chart of UCH collection kept at History Museum.
Table 2. Cu Lao Cham collection detail

Part 1: MUSEUM BACKGROUND WITH UNDERWATER CULTUAL HERITAGE
The History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City is a large museum and has a long history of development in
South Vietnam. Located in the heart of the city, the Museum is a popular destination for both domestic
and international visitors. The exhibition content includes two main parts: Part one introduces
Vietnamese culture and history from the Primitive period to 1945 CE. Part two introduces some typical
ancient cultures in Southeast Asia such as Oc Eo culture and Champa culture. In addition, there are a
number of galleries on Asian arts such as Buddhist statues,ceramics, and stone sculpture.
The first milestone was that the museum had access to the UCH artifacts in 1993. The museum received
a group of 97 excavated artifacts at Hon Cau. In 1994, the museum continued to receive 49 artifacts
which had been excavated at Hon Dam. In 1995, the Museum received 229 artifacts from Hon Cau.
Those were the early milestones of the museum's work on accessing the UCH from shipwrecks. In 2000,
the museum received 4366 artifacts which were excavated in Cu Lao Cham shipwrecks. This was the
biggest UCH collection that the museum had before. Since then, the History Museum has had a colorful
UCH collection with the number of about 7000 artifacts; mainly were Vietnamese, Chinese and Thai
ceramics.
1

�About UCH collections
The history of underwater archeology in Vietnam began in the late twentieth century. Up to now, after
30 years, there were six shipwrecks that have been officially discovered and excavated in Vietnam: Hon
Cau, Hon Dam, Cu Lao Cham, Ca Mau, Binh Thuan and Binh Chau. In addition, as there are more
newly discovered underwater archaeological sites, agencies and organizations also conduct small-scale
salvage excavation.
The History Museum in HCM city is one of the major museums in Vietnam, the museum was honored
to receive nearly 7000 artifacts which were of good quality, some of them also were rare objects from
shipwrecks. They were displayed and exhibited in various museums in the country and abroad. The
most typical collection is Chu Dau export ceramics that was found in Cu Lao Cham shipwrecks.
Table 1. Distribution chart of UCH collection at History Museum.
Display number of objects in collection and percentage of total.

Cu Lao Cham shipwreck collection
Kien Giang
217 / 3%

Binh Thuan
116 / 2%

Vung Tau
418 / 6%

Ca Mau
1414 / 20%
Cu Lao Cham
4757 / 69%

Cu Lao Cham

Ca Mau

Kien Giang

Binh Thuan

Vung Tau

The shipwreck was found at a depth of 70 metres below the sea surface, coordinates at N16o16'08"
latitude and E108o27'00" longitude, in Cu Lao Cham area. The excavation was conducted under the
cooperation of the archaeologists from the Vietnam History Museum-Hanoi, Vietnam Salvage Joint
Stock Company (Visal), and Saga Horizon Company (Malaysia); the project has also brought together
archaeologists from the United Kingdom, Malaysia and Slovakia. The project was carried out in three
years, from 1997-2000. 240,0001 ceramic items were recovered from the wreck. Those items came from
Vietnam, Thailand, and Chinese. The date of the shipwreck has been debated. Vietnamese researcher
believe the vessel dated from the mid-to late-fifteenth century during the Le dynasty while some other
researcher suggested of late fifteenth to early sixteenth century date (Butterfields 2000, 107; Guy 2000,
125-128)
There were five museums designated by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism to receive, manage
and display: The Hanoi National Museum, The History Museum in HCM city, Vietnam Fine Arts
Museum, Hai Duong Museum and Quang Nam Museum was assigned 4366 artifacts on 24 March 2000.
In addition, from 2000 up to now, the museum has added 385 objects from various sources, bringing

1

Organization of excavations of the ancient shipwreck of Cu Lao Cham (2000), Excavating the Cu Lao Cham
shipwreck (1997 – 1999), New discoveries in archeology in 2000 in Vietnam, page 549
2

�the total number to 4751 objects. Collection content mainly daily ceramics such as dishes, bowl, ewer,
cup; some of them are religious objects.

Figure 1. Cu Lao Cham collection in The History Museum in Ho Chi Minh city
Table 2. Cu Lao Cham collection detail

Name

Amount

Brief introduction

Dishes

368

They have many different sizes, from 25 to 48cm in diameter. Mostly blue drawing of
flowers, animals and landscapes. A few were drawn colorfully, combined gold inlaid
on the decoration.

Bowl

1731

This was a large number, different sizes from 7cm to 15cm in diameter. Decorative
patterns are mainly painted in blue on the outer wall and bottom with floral and animal
themes, a few are smooth.

Container

1501

The containers include kettles, vases, jars which used in daily life; some used in religion
such as vial of vial, kendi. In the group, jars in spherical shaped painted with flowers
or plain decorating accounted for a large number of 1376 artifacts. Especially, there
were some vases shaped like animals such as birds, fish, turtles, monkeys, toads.

Small
boxes

1146

They have spherical shaped, an average diameter of 5cm to 8cm and were shaped like
a mangosteen fruit, or petal-shaped, flattened sphere. Decorative patterns are mainly
blue drawings of flowers, animals, and human landscapes.

Others

05

There are some blocks of dent and chip plates and cups that were stuck together due to
fire in shipwreck.

These ceramic artifacts reflect the development of export ceramics with rich glaze colors, designs and
patterns; creating a distinct tradition of Vietnamese ceramics. This was a spectacularly demonstration
that Vietnamese ceramics was participation in asian international trade in the fifteen and early sixteen
century (John Guy 2005, 107).
Cà Mau shipwreck collection
A shipwreck was found in the sea of Cà Mau province, coordinates at N7o41'12'' latitude and
E105o29'18'' longitude. The excavation were carried out from August 1998 to October 1999. Nearly
1130,000 items recovered were ceramics, including blue-and-white or multi-colored glaze, possibly
from Chinese pottery such as Jingdezhen (Jiangxi) and Guangzhou (Nguyen Dinh Chien 2005, 359).
Notably, there were some European-style porcelains such as milk bottles, wine jugs with handles, plates

3

�decorated with flowers and a Dutch landscape. Inscriptions on some objects suggest that they were
probably made under the Yongzheng reign (Chinese character: ‘雍正’), Qing Dynasty (1723-1735).
On 25 June 2002, the Museum received 1051 artifacts from the Ba Ria - Vung Tau Museum. From
2002 up to now, this collection has added 363 artifacts from the following sources: the customs police
transferred and the museum collected, bringing the total number of collections to 1,414 objects.

Figure 2. Some objects of Ca Mau shipwreck collection in the Museum

These objects were used in daily life: 1333 artifacts including cups, bowls, plates, kettles, dishes, ewers.
Decorative patterns are mainly Chinese traditional arts such as flower, landscapes. Group of flat round
chalk boxes painted with stylized flowers and leaves: 54 artifacts. Sevaral statues: human shaped, horseriding mandarins shaped, toad shaped: 25 artifacts.
Hòn Cau shipwreck collection
The Hon Cau shipwreck was located under 40 meters of water, and was submerged in the sand layer
from 0.6m to 1m, about 15km from Hon Cau island. The shipwreck was excavated in 1990 - 1991,
obtained 63,856 artifacts including: 28,556 ceramics, 34,710 porcelains, 70 stonewares, 448 bronzes,
18 wooden objects, 25 other material artifacts and 39 specimens (Nguyen Quoc Hung 2005, 293).
On 23 January 1995, the Museum received 229 artifacts which were delivered by Ba Ria - Vung Tau.
Before that, in 1993, the Museum had received 97 objects of this collection from the Fine Arts Museum.
In addition, the Museum also collects more objects from different sources, so far this collection now
has 418 artifacts.
The main of collection are traditional Chinese ceramics and Chinese ceramics according to European
orders. The dating were in Kangxi Emperor (Chinese character: ‘康熙’), Qing Dynasty (1654-1722).
Traditional Chinese motifs such as chrysanthemums, orchids, peonies, and landscapes are arranged in
diagonal, vertical or subdivision strips. European-style themes are the way of drawing flowers and
leaves with criss-cross lines, checkered, a type of decoration on 18th century European fabric and silk
(Nguyen Dinh Chien, Pham Quoc Quan 2008, 25-27).

4

�Figure 3. Some of objects of Hòn Cau shipwreck collection in the Museum.

Most of the artifacts were chipped because the ceramic was thin and light, so they are easy to be
damaged and impacted by external forces. A few were in fairly intact condition with little intrusion of
sea salt.
Hòn Dầm (Kien Giang) shipwreck collection
The shipwreck was found at a depth of ten metres below the sea surface, five kilometres far from the
shore of Dầm Island (Hòn Dầm in Vietnamese) in Kiên Giang province; coordinates at N9o59'00'
latitude and E104o02'00' longitude. More than 16,000 ceramics have been found, mostly celadon and
brown glaze, such as Sawankhalok ceramics and Sukhothai ceramics dating back to the fifteen century.

Figure 4. Hòn Dầm shipwreck ceramics: Sawankhalok (left), Sukhothai (right).

Some reflect the Vietnamese blue-and-white styles such as boxes, kendi, lidded jars painted blue
flowers on white enamel. Some other large celadon bowls reflect the style of the Southern Song dynasty
(南宋 1127–1279) in South China.
This collection is not as large and rich as the above collections, with only 217 artifacts, but it is also
possible to review a full representation of the types which were excavated in Hòn Dầm shipwreck.

5

�Part 2: PRESERVATION AND PROMOTION
Preservation: Since 1993, when the first excavated artifacts from the shipwreck was carried out, the
museum has made efforts in classifying, inventorying and building storage areas for these special
collections. In particular, the Cu Lao Cham collection is the largest collection: we have built a
distinguished storage which separates the excavated artifacts from other collections. The artifacts are
classified by period and type for better management.

Figure 5. Cu Lao Cham storage view (top), Checking and detecting the damaged objects by salt intrusion (middle),
Treatment method (bottom)

However, due to the limited staff of experts in underwater archeology, lack of knowledge in
preservation about UCH objects, the museum preservation work faces certain difficulties. Currently,
we have only one person for the management of this collection which also makes us haven’t done well
in taking care of the collection, some damaged artifacts haven’t been detected and treated in time.
In training: Every year in Vietnam, museum staff are allowed to participate in many training courses
on preserving objects which are organized by the Department of Heritage as well as international
organizations such as ICCROM. They gave us the knowledge of basic preservation on various materials
such as wooden, bronze, stone, textile, ceramic. But the limitation of foreign languages was a barrier
that prevented us from accessing cooperation and training projects of foreign experts/organizations.
6

�Technically equipment condition: Artifacts are managed and kept by a wooden cabinets and shelves
system and don’t have specialized equipment for preservation attached. The management and care of
artifacts is done mainly by manual methods.
Preservation treatment: Because this is a specific type of excavated artifacts, of which they were soaked
in sea for a long time, so a huge amount of salt has been accumulated in the ceramic core. The
management by manual methods couldn’t control the damaged artifacts. Every year, the museum’s
preservation team regularly treats this problem by soaking these damaged objects in fresh water and
exchanging water many times until the salt inside object amounts gets low. Each batch, we perform an
average immersion of about 100 artifacts for a period of about three months with many water changes.
The preservation team has treated heavy damaged artifacts by desalination methods in fresh water. For
the remaining ones, we managed by regular checking without technical equipment supporting. We
realized that we still didn't have a good way to preserve and developed a roadmap for the sustainable
preservation of this UCH collection.
Promotion
From 1993 to 2000, the Museums were assigned to manage the collections and built a plan to display
this collection to people. The museum also has carried out many exhibitions and displayed at the
Museum. In addition, the Museum also performs well in coordinating exhibitions at many other
museums in the country and abroad.
Exhibition in Vietnam: At beginning, the Museum mainly carried out thematic introduction of artifacts
from shipwrecks in Vietnam Sea. The exhibition attracted the attention of the people in the city. In the
following years, the Museum collaborated with other museums such as Hue Royal Museum, Khanh
Hoa Museum to display on the sea festivals occasion. This was a good occasion for UCH artifacts to be
widely introduced to the public and international visitors.
In recent years, with strong development of various digital initiatives, access to information on
underwater archeology has helped the Museum update its display methods and build the story in
exhibition. The display content have not only introduced objects in UCH collection, but has more
scientific research to outline the itinerary, location of the ship, and the role of Vietnamese sea in
international trade.

Figure 6. Market exhibiting thematic "Trading ceramics on the East Sea trade route" at History Museum in 2022

Abroad exhibition: Cu Lao Cham shipwreck ceramics collection is not only a large underwater heritage
collection of the Museum, it’s also a Vietnamese particularly famous export ceramic in the fifteen
century. In 2009, its ceramics were displayed at the Houston Fine Arts Museum - USA with the theme
"Arts of Ancient Vietnam" (Nancy Tingley 2009, 292-298). In 2010, some of them were displayed in
Busan - Korea with the theme "Vietnam from the Hong River to the Mekong" on the occasion of the
7

�fifteen anniversary of the twinning between the two cities of Busan and Ho Chi Minh. (Busan Museum
2010).
Part 3: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Since the Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage was established in 2001 by
UNESCO. Many coastal countries that owned UCH have developed the Protection of Underwater
Cultural and education programs. Some countries in Asia have been doing well, they are Korea,
Thailand, Philippines, Singapore. In Vietnam, with 30 years history, the field of underwater archeology
was still in the formative stage and had a lot of difficulties. Currently, there is only an underwater
archeology institution with some staff and has difficulties in operating funding which compared to the
rich marine resources and the underwater cultural heritage. Research articles on underwater archeology
are still modest compared to other research contents on culture and history. Every year, the Vietnam
Archeology Institute publishes new archaeological discoveries, the number of articles about UCH
accounts is small. Statistics are as follows: in 2018 there were 11/322 articles, in 2019 there were 11/360
articles, in 2020 there were 15/339 articles, in 2021 there were 18/349 articles2.
In our museum case, as presented in part two, we realize that our efforts have not been able to preserve
and promote the UCH collection well. In preservation, our difficulties are lack of knowledge,
experience, facilities, and funding for management UCH collection. In the exhibition and promotion,
the total number of UCH artifacts displayed on the museum's exhibition system is small, about 250
artifacts, accounting for 3.6 percent of the Museum UCH collection. Although we have made great
efforts to communicate about UCH, we have found that public awareness of underwater heritage is still
limited. For changing, there should be synchronous policies and programs from the government,
education system and research agencies.
Underwater cultural heritage is not only the property of the countries that own it, but has become a
world heritage. Measures, policies, and the very implementation of maritime cultural heritage policies
need to align with the overall global developments and not just Vietnamese, but scholars from any AsiaPacific regions, must work together with regional partners who might share similar challenges.
Therefore, we realized that positive value from international programs to protect underwater heritage
and these activities need to be continued on a more national scale. It's necessary in building awareness
of underwater heritage for countries. In our museum case, we think that we were late to access
international programs on UCH, we have missed several opportunities to absorb knowledge and
experience from many countries around the world. We also found that the collaborations abroad
exhibiting underwater heritage was a good and meaningful activity in disseminating heritage outside
the country which we have previously collaborated with Busan Museum and Houston Fine Arts
Museum. Our collection is quite large and we are ready for exhibitions not only abroad but also in the
country.

2

Institute of Archaeology, Conference to Announce New Findings on Archeology (2018 – 2021), Ha Nọi
8

�Bibliography
Organization of excavations of the ancient shipwreck of Cu Lao Cham (2000), Excavating the Cu Lao Cham shipwreck (1997
– 1999), New discoveries in archeology in 2000 in Vietnam.
Busan Museum, Vietnam from the Hong River to the Mekong, Special Exhibition celebrating the 15th anniversary of sister-city
affiliation between Busan &amp; Ho Chi Minh City, Busan, 2010.
Butterfields, Treasures from the Hoi An Hoard. Important Vietnamese ceramics from a Late 15th early 16th century cargo,
Auction Catalogue, Vol 1 &amp; 2, 2000.
Guy, John. The Hoi an (Cu Lao Cham) Shipwreck cargo and Asian ceramics trade, in Proceedings of the International
Conference: Chinese Export Ceramics and Maritime Trade, 12 th-15th centuries, Chief Editor: Pei-kai Cheng, Editors Guo LiChui Ki Wan, Zhonghua Shu Ju, Xianggang, 2005.
Guy, John, Vietnamese ceramics from the Hoi an Excavation: The Cu Lao Cham ship cargo”, Orientation, 2000.
Tingley, Nancy. Arts of Ancient Viet Nam from River plain to open sea, Asia Society the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, 2009.
Nguyễn Đình Chiến, “Archaeological excavation of the Ca Mau shipwreck”, in A century of Vietnamese archeology, part 2,
Ha Noi, 2005.
Nguyễn Đình Chiến, Phạm Quốc, Ceramics in five shipwreck, The National museum in Ha Noi, Ha Noi, 2008
Nguyễn Quốc Hùng, “More than a decade of underwater archeology excavations in Vietnam”, in A century of Vietnamese
archeology, part 2, Ha Noi, 2005.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6676">
                <text>The ceramic and porcelain collections on shipwreck in Vietnam Sea at History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam): History, Preservation and Promotion.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6677">
                <text>In Vietnam, underwater cultural heritage is a new field developed in the late twenty century until now. Interest in&#13;
this field began with the discovery of shipwrecks in Vietnamese waters in the 1990s. Through international&#13;
cooperation as well as the support of modern equipment, Vietnam has approached and explored ancient&#13;
shipwrecks in Hòn Dầm (Phu Quoc), Hòn Cau (Con Dao), Cà Mau, Cù lao Chàm (Quang Nam), and in recent&#13;
years, the ancient shipwrecks Chau Thuan Bien in Quang Ngai. From 1993 to 2000, The History Museum in Ho&#13;
Chi Minh City received more than 7000 artifacts from these shipwrecks assigned from the Ministry of Culture&#13;
and Sports of Vietnam. Most of these archaeological materials are Chinese ceramics dating from the Ming to Qing&#13;
Dynasties, some Thai ceramics such as Sawankhalok ceramics, Sukhothai ceramics, and Vietnamese Chu Dau&#13;
ceramics dating from the 15th century. In this paper, we would like to give a brief introduction to these collections,&#13;
preservation and promotion agenda alongside the History Museum in Ho Chi Minh city. Accordingly, the article&#13;
will include three parts: the first is an overview of the historical museum and underwater heritage collections&#13;
which include the number and types of artifacts. In the second part, we will present about our museum’s actual&#13;
preservation and exhibition covering the difficulties and limitations that we are facing. In the discussion part, we&#13;
will present possible ideas about cooperation on exhibition, communication and conservation of the UCH&#13;
collection in our museum case. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6678">
                <text>MA. Nguyen Thi Huynh Nhu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6679">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6680">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6681">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6682">
                <text>Thi Huynh Nhu, Nguyen . 2023. “The ceramic and porcelain collections on shipwreck in Vietnam sea at History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam): History, Preservation and Promotion.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, and T. Kurt Knoerl. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1984 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="72">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 7 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="694" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="489">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/0a36a3b45e4521e7f15f2f6bed1be635.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7c44b92117a636ce61329265eb46c3ee</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="72">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7468">
                  <text>2021 Session 11: Maritime and Underwater Archaeology of the Indian Ocean Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7469">
                  <text>Session 11 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7470">
                  <text>Abstract&#13;
&#13;
Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as ‘underwater’, ‘marine’ and ‘nautical’ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports.&#13;
&#13;
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to ‘Underwater Archaeology’, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature ‘Hydro-archaeology’ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organizations.&#13;
&#13;
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome.&#13;
&#13;
Session Organizer:&#13;
&#13;
Sila Tripati</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7471">
                  <text>November 2021</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7472">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7473">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7490">
                <text>Two Arabic Epigraphs found from the Ancient Port at Ambalangoda, Sri Lanka</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7491">
                <text>The ancient port Ambalangoda is located in No 85 – Patabandimulla Grama Niladari Division (GND) of Ambalangoda Secretariat Division (SD), Galle District, Southern Province, Sri Lanka. Three groups; the Archaeology, Maritime Archaeology, and the Harbour Development Project have worked on the Maritime Archaeological activities in the Ambalangoda port from 1998 to 2012. The Ambalangoda harbor development project was carried out in 2007. While digging the sea bed they unearthed several types of artifacts, discovering 5 copper alloy plates, which were a remarkable find from the site. &#13;
A notable thing which can be seen is two Arabic epigraphy in the reverse of the copper plates number 2 (2007/SL/S/AMBA/02) and 5 (2007/SL/S/AMBA/05). The Translation of the Epigraphy is (Arabic) (منح له سيد عبد الرب / Manehe Lahu Sayyid Abdul Rabb) “Mr. Abdul Rabb Awarded to him”. &#13;
Ceylon was early known to the Arabs on account of its pearl-fisheries and trade in precious stones and spices; Arab merchants had formed commercial establishments there centuries before the rise of Islam. This Arabic letter had been written without dotting, it reveals an early era before Islam, because after Islam is introduced, dotting to Arabic was introduced to make it easy to recite the Holy Quran. Here this Arabic letter was written without dotting, its meaning is: “Mr. Abdul Rabb Awarded to him”, (منح له سيد عبد الرب), (Manehe Lahu Sayyid Abdul Rabb). Therefore, these Epigraphical evidences reveals the historical maritime relationships between Ceylon and Arabic countries.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7492">
                <text>Mahinda Karunarathna, &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="7493">
                <text>Mohamed Sulthan Mohamed Saleem</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7494">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7495">
                <text>November 2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7496">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="91">
            <name>Rights Holder</name>
            <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7497">
                <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7498">
                <text>Karunarathna, Mahinda, and Mohamed Sulthan Mohamed Saleem. 2021. “Two Arabic Epigraphs found from the&#13;
Ancient Port at Ambalangoda, Sri Lanka.” Project and Oceanic Environmental Education Program.” Edited by Brian&#13;
Fahy, Hans Van Tilburg, Bill Jeffery, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Riley Smith. In Proceedings of Fourth Asia Pacific Regional&#13;
Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Keelung,Taiwan, and Virtual, November 1-5, 2021. The Museum of&#13;
Underwater Archaeology URL: https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/exhibits/show/apconf-muchproceedings/item/694</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="87">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11 2021</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
