<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=42&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-26T21:01:40+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>42</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="43" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/14c8f3ea381590237f3f41e259b4b766.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d3965fcb793511b47d282a0415f9f200</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="614">
                    <text>The outfitting and sailing of early sixteenth-century vessels in the Pacific:
The Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions (1525-1536)
Jose Luis Casabán
Nautical Archaeology Program
Department of Anthropology
Texas A&amp;M University
College Station, TX, 77843-4352
USA
Email: jlcasaban@tamu.edu
Abstract
This paper examines the information provided by primary written sources in relation to
the outfitting and sailing of the ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions,
which took place between 1525 and 1536. On July 24, 1525, seven vessels, under the
command of Garcia Jofre de Loaysa, departed from La Coruña, Spain, to take the
Moluccas for the king of Spain, Charles I. Only one nao reached its destination where
the Spanish managed to thwart the Portuguese for several years with the help of the
natives. In 1527, Hernán Cortés sent Alvaro de Saavedra with three ships from New
Spain to find Trinidad, a ship from the Magellan’s expedition, and to find out the
outcome of the Loaysa expedition. He never returned. A close examination of eleven
documents written by survivors of both expeditions revealed one hundred and twelve
references regarding the use of nautical technology and operational aspects of
seafaring in the Pacific Ocean in the early sixteenth century. This data includes ship
typology, rigging, navigation techniques, equipment, provisions and containers, ballast,
hull maintenance, seagoing disasters and their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare.
This type of information is useful for nautical archaeologists since it can be compared
with the data provided by contemporary nautical and shipbuilding treatises and be used
to interpret the archaeological data. The analysis of such primary documents is
analogous to the way an archaeologist approach an excavation site – the data is
gathered and then interpreted by the nautical archaeologists.
Keywords: Loaysa, Pacific Ocean, Outfitting, Saavedra, Sailing

Introduction
This paper examines the information provided by primary written sources in relation to
the outfitting and sailing of the ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions,
which took place between 1525 and 1536. Between 1825 and 1837, Martín Fernández
de Navarrete, a Spanish Navy Officer and historian, published a collection of five
volumes about the voyages and discoveries of the Spanish since the fifteenth century.
1

�The original documents used for this collection were compiled and transcribed by
Navarrete in different Spanish archives and libraries since 1789.The Loaysa and
Saavedra expeditions were narrated in the fifth volume published in 1837. The account
was based on the original manuscripts written by members and survivors of both
expeditions and published as an appendix in the same volume. Navarrete cited thirtyseven documents to narrate both expeditions although only eleven of them provided
references related to ship outfitting and sailing in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Table
1). The data gathered includes references to ship typology, rigging, navigation
techniques, equipment, provisions and containers, ballast, hull maintenance, seagoing
disasters and their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare.
Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions (1525-1536)
On July 24, 1525, seven vessels, under the command of García Jofre de Loaysa,
departed La Coruña, Spain, where a Casa de las Especias (House of Spices) was
briefly established (Spate, 1979). The objective of the expedition was to occupy the
Moluccas and to control the spice trade. The expedition was a succession of disasters
and only one ship, the nao Victoria, reached its destination where the Spanish managed
to thwart the Portuguese for several years with the help of the natives. In 1527, Hernán
Cortés sent Alvaro de Saavedra with three ships from New Spain to find the nao
Trinidad, a ship from the Magellan’s expedition, and to find out the outcome of Loaysa’s
expedition. He never returned. In 1532, the Spanish survivors learned through the
Portuguese that king Charles I had sold his rights on the Spice Island to the king of
Portugal in exchange for 350.000 ducats in 1529 (Pigafetta, 2002). Between 1534 and
1535, the last survivors of both expeditions were taken to Cochin (India) and from there
to Lisbon, where they finally arrived in 1536.

Types of ships
The ships that took part in Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions are the typical oceanic
vessels of this period such as naos and caravels although there are also a pataje and a
bergantín (brigantine) (Table 2). However, the term nao (ship) is also applied to all
these vessels in a generic manner. Moreover, the caravel Parral is defined as a galleon
in some documents while Saavedra’s ship, Florida, is named caravel in another
document (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). With respect to the other two ships of
2

�Saavedra expedition, they are simply called navíos (vessels) without providing any
other details about them (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).The documents also refer to
two fustas built at the Moluccas by the Spanish, and one galera (galley) used by the
Portuguese in a naval combat. The variety of definitions for the same types of vessels
reminds us that the debate about sixteenth-century ship typology still needs to be
addressed. Additionally, the Spanish and Portuguese also adapted local boats from the
Moluccas such as paroles (prahu) and caracoras (kora-kora).

Sails
The types of sails mentioned in the documents are the main, fore and mizzen sails.
These references provide useful information about the sailing techniques during this
period. For instance, all ships used the fore course for sailing while the nao Victoria’s
main mast or Parral’s mizzen mast were repaired (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
Moreover, the nao Victoria sailed 20 leagues only using the fore and mizzen sails while
crossing the Pacific Ocean due to the bad weather (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).The
documents also inform us about the sailcloth carried on board the ships. The nao San
Gabriel transported cañamaza (hemp canvas) and holandesa (Dutch canvas) which
might be used to tailor new sails during the voyage (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
During this period sailcloth was known in Spain as olona because a large proportion of
sails mentioned on shipbuilding contracts came from Brittany’s towns such as Nantes
and Olone (Smith, 1993). The word holandesais indicating a Dutch origin for this
material. The San Gabriel’s pilot also tells us about the ship’s rigging lifespan that he
estimates up to seven years (Smith, 1993).

Navigation
In his logbook, the pilot of the nao Victoria mentions that the position of the sun was
measured every day at noon to determine the latitude. This routine was only interrupted
when the sun was not visible because of the clouds. However, he does not indicate the
type of instrument used for the observations, probably an astrolabe. In the same
document there are several references to the use of sounding leads. This instrument
was used to measure the depths and to identify the type of seabed. This data was
crucial when ships navigated close to shore and it also helped to establish the position
of the ship in relation to the coast (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
3

�An emergency communication system was proposed by Elcano before the fleet crossed
the Atlantic (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). If any ship got separated from the fleet
before reaching the Strait of Magellan because of the weather, or any other reason, it
would have to wait for twenty days at All Saints’ Bay (Brazil). After that time, a letter
would be placed inside a clay pot buried under a cross placed on a visible spot. Then
the ship would continue the voyage until the next meeting point where it would leave
another message. This system was employed by the pataje Santiago which left a letter
at Santa Cruz River that was found by the naos Victoria and San Gabriel. The letter
informed the other ships that the Santiago and the rest of the fleet were on their way to
the Cape of the Eleven Thousand Virgins (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).The same
system was employed in the Pacific by Saavedra. On his way to the Moluccas he left a
letter buried in an island of the Marshals where his ship got separated from the rest of
his fleet (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Richard Hawkins used a similar system
during his expedition to the South Sea in 1593. He left the messages inside a musket
barrel place on the top of a hill instead of in a pot (Hawkins, 1970).

Ships equipment
The documents often mention the ships’ pumps although they do not indicate their type.
Pumps are normally cited in plural so it is possible that the ships were equipped with
two pumps or carried a spare pump in case the main one failed during the voyage. Two
pumps were recovered from the Sancti Spiritus wreck at the Cape of the Eleven
Thousands Virgins (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837), and the nao Victoria used two
pumps while crossing the Pacific Ocean because of the heavy leaking of its hull
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).It has to be noted that the House of Trade issued an
ordinance during the reign of Charles I which made mandatory for oceanic vessels to
carry two pumps, one of them as a spare (Consejo de Indias, 1943). On the other hand,
archaeology provides examples of ships equipped with two operational pumps such as
the Highborn Cay shipwreck, an early sixteenth century caravel, and the Emanuel Point
I wreck dated in 1559 (Oertling, 1996). Saavedra also mentions how exhausting was
working at the pumps and how he had to transfer men to his ships to helpwith the work
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). In the same way, the naos San Gabriel and
Victoriakidnapped natives from various islands to work at the pumps (Fernández de
4

�Navarrete, 1837). This could indicate that the ships were equipped with burr pumps that
require a lot of manpower to ensure their effectiveness in comparison with the suction
pumps.
The documents also include references to small service boats such asesquifes and
bateles. According to O’Scanlan (1974), these terms were equally used to name both
types of boats although bateles were larger than esquifes. During the Loaysa
expedition, esquifes were used to carry people and messages between ships, to
explore the shore and provisioning, and to transport materials and equipment from one
ship to another such as during the salvage of the Sancti Spiritus remains (Fernández de
Navarrete, 1837). The loss of a small boat meant that the crew of a ship could not go
ashore to get provisions because the larger ships were unable to anchor in shallow
waters. In that case, the crews depended on the natives to get food and supplies which
was often uncertain. That was the case of Saavedra’s first attempt to return to New
Spain across the Pacific. He had to return to the Moluccas because of the contrary
winds and the loss of the batel that prevented him to get provisions during the journey
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Moreover, various ships had to share one esquife
after theirs were lost during a storm in Bay of la Victoria (Fernández de Navarrete,
1837).
The references to the ground tackle provide information about the number of anchors
carried on board the ships, their effectiveness, and strength. In several occasions,
anchors started to drag even when more than one had been deployed. That was the
case of the nao Victoria that ran ashore in Bay of la Victoria despite deploying five
anchors (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). A few days later, the same ship was at risk
again in Gallegos River when its anchor broke near the stock and had to set sail to
Santa Cruz River (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Saavedra’s ship also experienced
difficulties with its ground tackle while anchoring at the Marshalls. In this case, two
anchor cables were damaged due to the rocky bottom and the ship had to kedge off to
abandon the anchorage (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Moreover, a few days later
the natives stole one of the two anchors he had deployed without a marker buoy
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). On the other hand, there are no references to the
weight and dimensions of the anchors.
5

�Table 1. List of documents containing references to ships outfitting and sailing.
(Navarrete, 1837)

6

�Provisions, containers and ballast
These types of ships could not carry all the provisions needed by the crews to sail
across the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. The documents tell us how the Loaysa’s fleet
had to get provisions from various islands before crossing the Atlantic and once they
reached the American coast, the crew of nao Victoria killed a sea lion in Santa Cruz
River to get fresh meat (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). After leaving the Strait of
Magellan, the fleet got separated. The crew of the pataje Santiago realized that part of
their provisions was carried on board the nao Victoria because its hold as too small. The
ship only carried four quintales of biscuit and eight pipas of water that were insufficient
for a journey of 2,200 leagues (12,100 km) across the Pacific Ocean. Moreover, the
ship had lost its esquife getting provision before arriving at the Moluccas seemed almost
impossible. For that reason the crew decided to abandon the expedition and to sail to
New Spain that was only 1,000 leagues away (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Finally,
when Saavedra arrived at the Marshalls, he ordered to fill some pipas with saltwater to
be used as variable ballast (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). This was an unusual
procedure because this type of ballast generally consisted of cobbles and pebbles of
rock, or even sacks of sand (Smith, 1993).

Hull maintenance
Although the documents indicate that emergency repairs were carried out on the ships
of both expeditions, these references are not common. The lack of facilities such as
shipyards, tools and materials limited the type of repairs that could be made. For
example, the nao Victoria had to be abandoned in Moluccas because its hull was so
damaged that it could not be repaired. Frames and knees were broken after running
aground at Bay of la Victoria, the seams between planks were opened while navigating
across the Pacific, and the vibrations produced when the naval ordinance was fired on
board (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Additionally, the documents also indicate that
the ships carried materials for hull maintenance such as the cauldron of pitch that
caught fire on board the nao Victoria (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).On the other
hand, the expedition members adapted local materials to repair their ships or to build
new vessels. That was the case of the solution provided to mitigate the effects of the
ship worms on the hull of Saavedra’s ship before departing from the Moluccas to New
7

�Spain. A sacrificial planking layer was added to the ship’s hull with a coat of local
bitumen used by the natives to caulk their own boats (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).

Table 2. Types of ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions. (Navarrete, 1837)

Seagoing disasters and their remedies
The demanding sailing conditions of the oceanic voyages increased the chances of
seagoing disasters. The texts provide several examples and also show the vital
importance of the ships’ carpenters in these expeditions. Carpenters were sent on
8

�anesquife from the Sancti Spiritus to fix the mainmast of the nao Victoria when it broke
after departing from La Gomera. It took them three days to repair it. Meanwhile, the nao
Victoria rammed the stern the caravel Santa Maria del Parral and, once again, an
esquife with carpenters and planks was sent to repair the ship (Fernández de
Navarrete, 1837).
Storms could also disperse damage or sink the ships. The caravel Lesmes was driven
south by a storm before arriving at the Cape of the Eleven Thousand Virgins, and
probably saw Cape Horn before rejoining the fleet (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The
nao Victoria run aground during a storm near the Cape of the Eleven Thousand Virgins
and damaged the rudder, keel and sternpost. The carpenters used planks and lead
sheathing to fix the keel and sternpost and put the rudder back in place (Fernández de
Navarrete, 1837). This situation demonstrates that these ships carried on board enough
spare materials to face this type of incidents, at least for limited period of time. Finally,
another storm separated the Victoria, Lesmes, Parral and Santiago when they were
leaving the Strait of Magellan (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837), and due to rough seas,
the hull of the nao Victoria started to leak. In fact, the crew worked continuously at
pumps until the ship reached the Moluccas Islands. Various members of the crew died
of exhaustions due to the work and the food shortage (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).

Ships ordnance and naval combats
The members of Loaysa’s and Saavedra’s expeditions fought during several years
against the Portuguese at the Moluccas with the help of the natives. For that reason,
there are also references to ship’s ordnance and naval combats in the documents.
While sailing across the Pacific, the ordnance was probably stored in the hold of the nao
Victoria and it was only put on deck when they were approaching the Moluccas, in case
they encountered the Portuguese (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The ordnance had
no use in the Pacific because the possibility of finding enemy vessels was highly
unlikely. In addition, if the artillery was carried in the hold, its weight improved the ship’s
stability. The documents also mention the combat between the nao Victoria and various
Portuguese vessels, including one fusta, one batel and several prahus. The vessels
were equipped with pieces of artillery as they intended to sink the Spanish ship. Part of
the ship’s ordnance had been disembarked to defend the Spanish base on land
9

�(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The lack of weight made the ship’s deck float too high
on the water, making its artillery quite ineffective despite of the crew spending twelve
quintales of gunpowder in firing the cannons. The cannon recoil caused more damage
to the already weakened ship’s structure than the three shots taken from the
Portuguese (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). After this combat, the nao Victoria was
abandoned and two fustas were built using local timbers (Fernández de Navarrete,
1837). The Spanish carpenters ignored the characteristics of the local timbers and only
one fusta was finally used because the other rotted before being launched (Fernández
de Navarrete, 1837).The documents also refer another naval combat between the
Spanish fusta and a Portuguese galley. This reference includes the typical pieces of
artillery of this period such as bronze pedreros, sacres, versos as well as iron versos,
large falconetes, and culebrinas (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The ordnance was
very versatile and could be used in different types of ships or on land. Finally, during the
sixteenth century, the proportion of foreign condestables and gunners in the Spanish
fleets was important although the number of Spanish gunners increased by the end of
the century (Pérez-Mallaína, 1998). This situation is also reflected by the documents
which mention the presence of Flemish constables between the Spanish crew
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
Conclusions
The analysis of these eleven documents written by the survivors of the Loaysa and
Saavedra expeditions reveal numerous references regarding the use of nautical
technology and operational aspects of seafaring in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean in the
early sixteenth century. This data includes ship typology, rigging, navigation techniques,
equipment, provisions and containers, ballast, hull maintenance, seagoing disasters and
their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare. On the other hand, most of the information
is provided in an indirect manner because the authors do not intend to teach us
outfitting methods or techniques. They were just describing the situations in which they
become involved and how they solve the difficulties encountered while traveling to the
other side of the world. This type of information is extremely useful for nautical
archaeologists because it can be compared with the data provided by contemporary
nautical and shipbuilding treatises and archaeological data. The accounts also contain
10

�practical descriptions about the use and maintenance of numerous elements of the
ship’s outfitting. However, the data is not provided in a direct manner as a nautical
treaty does. The analysis of such primary documents is analogous to the way an
archaeologist approach the excavation of an archaeological site – the data is gathered
and then interpreted by the nautical archaeologists.
References
Consejo de Indias, 1943. Recopilación de leyes de los reynos de la Indias, mandadas
imprimir y publicar por la Magestad Católica del Rey don Cárlos II. Nuetsro Señor. 4
impresión. Gráficas Ultra S.A., Madrid.
Hawkins, S. R., 1970. The Observations of Sir Richard Hawkins. Da Capo Press, New
York.
Fernández de Navarrete, M., 1837. Colección de los viajes y descubrimientos que
hicieron por mar los españoles desde fines del siglo XV. Volumen V. Expediciones al
Maluco, viages de Loaisa y de Saavedra. Imprenta Real, Madrid.
O’Scanlan, T., 1974. Diccionario marítimo español: que además de las definiciones de
las voces con sus equivalentes en francés, inglés e italiano, contiene tres vocabularios
de estos idiomas con las correspondencias castellanas: redactado por orden del Rey
nuestro señor. Museo Naval, Madrid.
Oertling, T. J., 1996. Ships’ Bilge Pumps: a History of Their Development, 1500-1900.
Texas A&amp;M University Press, College Station.
Pérez-Mallaína, P. E., 1998. Spain’s Men of the Sea: Daily Life on the Indies Fleets in
the Sixteenth Century. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Pigafetta, A., 2002. Primer viaje alrededor del mundo. Dastin, Madrid.
Smith, R. C., 1993. Vanguard of Empire: Ships of Exploration in the Age of Columbus.
Oxford University Press, New York.
Spate, O. H. K., 1979. The Spanish Lake. University of Minessota, Minneapolis.

11

�Biography
Jose Luis Casabán is a PhD candidate in the Nautical Archaeology Program at Texas
A&amp;M University. His dissertation research focuses on the study of the 16th century
Spanish seafaring and shipbuilding technology. He is also specialized in the
applications of photogrammetry for underwater mapping and GIS. Since 2012, Jose is
one of the co-directors of the Finisterre Project, whose objectives are the underwater
survey, mapping, recording, and study of the remains of 1596 Armada shipwrecks
discovered near Cape Finisterre, in the northwest of Spain.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="610">
                <text>The outfitting and sailing of early sixteenth-century vessels in the Pacific: The Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions (1525-1536)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="611">
                <text>This paper examines the information provided by primary written sources in relation to the outfitting and sailing of the ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions, which took place between 1525 and 1536. On July 24, 1525, seven vessels, under the command of Garcia Jofre de Loaysa, departed from La CoruÃ±a, Spain, to take the Moluccas for the king of Spain, Charles I. Only one nao reached its destination where the Spanish managed to thwart the Portuguese for several years with the help of the natives. In 1527, HernÃ¡n CortÃ©s sent Alvaro de Saavedra with three ships from New Spain to find Trinidad, a ship from the Magellanâ€™s expedition, and to find out the outcome of the Loaysa expedition. He never returned. A close examination of eleven documents written by survivors of both expeditions revealed one hundred and twelve references regarding the use of nautical technology and operational aspects of seafaring in the Pacific Ocean in the early sixteenth century. This data includes ship typology, rigging, navigation techniques, equipment, provisions and containers, ballast, hull maintenance, seagoing disasters and their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare. This type of information is useful for nautical archaeologists since it can be compared with the data provided by contemporary nautical and shipbuilding treatises and be used to interpret the archaeological data. The analysis of such primary documents is analogous to the way an archaeologist approach an excavation site â€“ the data is gathered and then interpreted by the nautical archaeologists. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="612">
                <text>Jose Luis CasabÃ¡n, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="613">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="125" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1474">
                <text>Part III Civil Engineering and Nautics</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1475">
                <text>Joseph Needham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1476">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1477">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1478">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1479">
                <text>Joseph Needham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1480">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1481">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1482">
                <text>Cambridge</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1483">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="236">
            <name>Series</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1484">
                <text>Science and Civilization in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1485">
                <text>Part III Civil Engineering and Nautics</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="259" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="165">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/0bcaa6a4fbff3cc85187fa646e41d65c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cf7829962d072ed65d8cc003e45a353d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3044">
                    <text>Human Resources Development in Indonesia's
Underwater Archaeology
Judi Wahjudin

Abstract
The Indonesian archipelago position is located in a very strategic position at the crossroads of
world maritime trade between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. According to archaeological and
historical research, there is evidence that Indonesia has had a maritime nautical culture since
prehistoric times. Some evidence of Indonesian maritime cultural civilization can still be found
scattered on the ocean floor, including approximately 463 ancient ship location points according
to
data
from
the
Ministry
of
Maritime
Affairs
and
Fisheries.
The Ministry of Culture and Tourism, which is the Indonesian government agency that
handles the field of culture, now has approximately 80 staff divers. Only a fraction of that number
have competence in the field of underwater archaeology, so it is necessary to improve the
knowledge and skills, not only in the field of diving but also the ability to conduct surveys,
mapping, data recording excavation, and conservation. In the last five years, efforts to increase
human resources in underwater archaeology in Indonesia continue to be done through various
education and training, whether conducted in Indonesia or abroad facilitated by the United
Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), such as in Thailand, Sri
Lanka, and the Philippines. The effort is certainly not optimal and systematic, so it is necessary to
develop appropriate strategies both in quantity and quality. Indonesia needs an underwater
archaeological development centre that will prepare a teaching module, instructor, certification
and partnerships (networking), as well as supporting facilities and infrastructure. Through this
institution we can expect human resources of underwater archaeologists to have the following
abilities: (1) diving, (2) various regulations relating to underwater cultural heritage, (3)
development of management plans, and recording and documenting sites, (4) procedures,
methods, principles and ethics of underwater archaeology, (5) artifact conservation and storage,
(6) traditional knowledge, and (7) publications and exhibitions. In the last five years we have
implemented several training programs to further underwater archaeology in Indonesia where
participants have acquired skills in diving, survey and conservation. More skills would greatly
empower Indonesians in managing their underwater cultural heritage, particularly at an advanced
underwater archaeology theory and practice level.

Introduction
Indonesia as an archipelago has a vast territory that stretches from 95 ° to 141 °
East Longitude and between 60 ° N latitude and 110 ° LS. The total area of the
Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone's marine waters are approximately 7.9
million square kilometers (km2). When calculated, the length of the beach that
surrounds the entire archipelago was recorded at approximately 81,000 km, and
the number of people living in coastal areas are more than 40 million. Based on
existing data on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982
(UNCLOS '82), Indonesia covers an area of waters of the ocean area covering
3.1 million km2, which consists of the archipelagic waters and an area of 2.8
million km2 of sea area covering 0.3 million km2. The position of Indonesia is as a
very strategic island nation, which is located at the crossroads between lanes of
traffic and world trade, between the Pacific and Indian Ocean (Pramono 2005:2).
Based on Djoko Pramono's (2005: 3-6) study of archeology and history,
there is evidence that the nation of Indonesia since prehistoric times has been

�recorded in the nautical culture sailboat paintings found in prehistoric caves in
the rock islands of Muna, Seram, and Arguni which are estimated to have been
made in the year 10 000 BC. On the note of historical development of culture
Nusantara civilization later found various kingdoms in the archipelago that has
the basic maritime cultural values, such as the Kingdom of Sriwijaya and
Majapahit Kingdom. Srivijaya kingdom was based on mastery of the political
kingdom lanes and trade routes and control of strategic areas that are used as a
base power of the sea. Majapahit kingdom established in the region Pull Raden
Wijaya, the Brantas River near Port Canggu Sea (now in the eastern city of
Mojokerto). Majapahit are renowned for their strength and fame as a maritime
empire. Majapahit's political strategy was to unify the archipelago under his rule
and prioritize the construction of a formidable navy. Maritime policy of the strong
Majapahit had been confirmed in Amukti Palapa Oath of Gadjah Mada
Mahapatih that essentially wanted to unite the whole archipelago under the
Majapahit.
At present most evidence of Indonesia's maritime culture peak is still
scattered on the ocean floor, including sunken ships and cargo. According to
data from the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. There are around 463
points of known ancient ship locations based on information from: Chinese
historians, in the tenth - twentieth centuries around thirty thousand Chinese ships
sailed into the territory of Indonesia but did not return; and archives in the
Netherlands, which hold records of 245 Verenidge Oost Compagnie (VOC) ships
sunk in Indonesian waters (Directorate of Underwater Archaeology 2011). These
data must be verifiable by conducting surveys and field mapping conducted by
staff who are professionals in the field of underwater archeology.
The Indonesian government institution in-charge of culture, namely the
Ministry of Culture and Tourism, currently has approximately eighty divers. Only
a fraction of that number have competences in the field of underwater
archeology, so it needs to improve knowledge and skills, not just in the diving but
also the ability to conduct surveys, mapping, excavation data recording, and
conservation.
The government of Indonesia has made efforts to increase human
resources in the field of underwater archeology through various education and
training programs. Facilitated by UNESCO these programs have occurred within
Indonesia and abroad, such as in Thailand, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines. The
effort is certainly not optimal and systematic, so it needs proper human resources
(HR) development strategies both in quality and quantity. For that Indonesia
needs to development a center in underwater archeology. This institute will
prepare teaching modules, instructors, certification and hierarchy, partnerships
(networking), as well as supporting facilities and infrastructure. Through this
institution it is expected that successful HR will entail the following:
 have knowledge and skills of diving,
 understand the various regulations related to Underwater Cultural
Heritage (locally, nationally, and internationally),
 understand and be able to create a management plan and site plan,

�

understand and be able to implement procedures, methods, basic
principles and ethics of underwater archeology,
 understand and are able to conserve, document. manage and store
 publications and public outreach, such as: exhibitions and mass media
(print and electronic).
In the last five years, the Government of Indonesia has conducted training
programs gradually and continuously to improve HR in the field of underwater
archeology, but this is still limited due to the need to improve skill and abilities in
the field of diving, survey, and conservation.

A rich maritime Archaeological resource
Indonesian waters have become a graveyard of ships from ancient times. Based
on data from the Directorate of Underwater Heritage (2010) estimated there were
1234 ships sunk, and until now only 463 known location. Referring to these data,
the government of Indonesia has conducted surveys in several locations. Tables
1 and 2 provide the details of when and where the survey has occurred, as well
as what was found and at what depth.
Table 1. Survey Data (Directorate of Underwater Archaeology 2010)
NU*

YEAR

1

2006

2

2006

3

2007

4

2008

5

2009

6

2009

7

2009

8

2009

9

2009

10

2010

11

2010

12

2010

13

2010

14

2010

LOCATION
Selayar, South Sulawesi
Barang Lompo, South
Sulawesi
Pesisir Selatan, West
Sumatera
Sagori, Buton, Southeast
Sulawesi
Nangka Islands, Bangka
Belitung
Wayame, Ambon Bay
Lembe straits, Bitung, North
Sulawesi
North Halmahera, North
Molucas
Tidore, North Molucas
Genting Islands,
Karimunjawa, Central Java
Seruni Islands, Karimunjawa,
Central Java
Kemojan Islands,
Karimunjawa, Central Java
Parang Islands, Karimunjawa,
Central Java
Kumbang Islands,
Karimunjawa, Central Java

DEEP

FINDING

21 m

Chinese ship

32 m

Japanese ship

22 – 28 m

Iron ship

7m

VOC ship

28 m

Iron ship

17 – 35 m

Aquila ship

20 – 28 m

War ship (Mawali)

3-7m

Tosimaru ship

50 m

Iron ship

2m

ceramics

10 m

Iron ship

15 m

Indonor ship

34-38 m

Timber ship

2-13 m

Iron ship

�15

2010

16

2010

17

2010

Taka Manyawakan Islands,
Karimunjawa, Central Java
Geleang Islands,
Karimunjawa, Central Java
Menjangan Kecil Islands,
Karimunjawa, Central Java

3-9 m

Iron ship

48 m

Timber ship

28-30 m

Timber ship

Table 2. The survey by the National Committee (Directorate of Underwater
Archaeology 2010)
NU

YEAR

LOCATION

1

2004

Tegal Waters, Central Java

2

2004

Cirebon Waters, West Java

3

2005

Sumpat Bay, North Bintan

4

2005

Natuna Waters, Thousand Islands

5

2005

Maspari Waters, South Sumatera

6

2006

Selayar Waters, South Sulawesi

7

2007

Karang Baginda, South Bangka

8

2007

Karimata Waters, West Kalimantan

9

2008

Karang Baginda, South Bangka

10

2008

Tanjung Menjangan, South Sumatera

11

2008

Cermin coast, North Sumatera

12

2008

Belitung Waters, East Belitung

13*

2008

Mandalika Waters, Jepara Central Java

14*

2008

Kerawang Waters, West Java

15

2009

Gelasa strait, Bangka Belitung

16

2009

Subang Waters, West Java

17

2010

Bangka Belitung Waters

Survey activities conducted by the Directorate of Underwater Heritage, the
Ministry of Culture and Tourism, (see Table 1) helped to establish a framework of
cultural resource preservation potential under water. If the survey has significant
value to science, history and culture, then the existence of such sites must be
preserved and protected by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11
Year 2010 on Heritage Act, which was published to replace the Law of the
Republic of Indonesia No. 5 of 1992 on Cultural Heritage Objects. Meanwhile,
the survey by the National Committee Appointment and Use of Valuable Cargo
Ships Sink origin (see Table 2) was performed in order to determine the potential
of underwater cultural resources for the sake of exploration. If the survey results
have indicated high economic value, then they were followed up with the
activities of the appointment. National Committee Appointment and Use of
Valuable Cargo Ships Sink origin was established by Presidential Decree. 43 of

�1998. Under this rule, the appointment must first be selected for the collection of
State and deposited at the museum. The rest can be traded and resulting income
partly added to the state treasury. Since the opening of the first appointment until
the last, there have been no sales activity in which the results benefit the
Government of Indonesia. The appointment of activities that have been done are
as follows.
Table 3. Removal of Ceramic Data
(Directorate of Underwater Archaeology 2010)
NU

LOCATION

THE NUMBER
OF TILES

1

Crocodile Islands, Riau

16.031

2

Batu Hitam, Belitung and Tuban

10.757

3

Thousands Islands (Eks Intan Cargo)

664

4

Blanakan Islands, Subang, West Java

13.590

5

Karimata Bay (Karang Cina)

31.029

6

Java Sea, North Cirebon

271.834

7

Karang Heliputan Waters,. Riau

21.521

8

Sumpat Bay, Riau

15.461

9

Java Sea, North Karawang

14.814

10

Java Sea, North Karawang

6.442

11

East Belitung Waters

34.680

12

Ujung Waters , Pamanukan

18.469

13

Gelasa Strait, Bangka Belitung

32.150

14

Jepara, Central Java

328
Total

487.770

The magnitude of the potential of underwater cultural resources in
Indonesia attract many foreign and local businessmen. They assume the
archeological remains under water are a treasure trove of unknown owners.

Underwater Cultural Heritage
Management of underwater cultural heritage in Indonesia has not been done
optimally. This condition is caused by several things, as follows:
 Harmony between some regulations related to the handling of UCH. Law of
the Republic of Indonesia No. 5 of 1992 on Cultural Heritage Objects was
formed to mandate the use of education, science, culture, religion, and
tourism; while the Presidential Decree No 43 of 1998 on the National
Committee for Salving and Exploiting Valuable Objects Retrieved from
Shipwreck gives permission for exploitation activities of UCH for monetary

�reward. Institutionally, there are several government organizations that are
not synergistic in the management of UCH. For example: the government
agency in charge of culture and environmental conservation prioritize aspects
of sustainability, while the government agency in charge of fisheries and
maritime affairs, as well as local governments, prioritize commercial use.
Efforts have been made the rectify these inconsistencies by the Government
of Indonesia in the recently issued Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number
11 Year 2010 on Heritage, in lieu of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 5 of
1992 on Cultural Heritage Objects. In which law? (Article 1, point 1), "the
cultural heritage that is protected by law is not only the land but also in the
water (including under water)". In addition it is also mentioned in (Article 1,
point 33) that, "its use should still maintain its sustainability". Mandate of this
law in accordance with the UNSCO 2001 Convention on the Protection of the
Underwater Cultural Heritage, in particular related to the Annex of the general
principles (rule 1) which states, "in situ conservation is a priority", and (rule 2)
that, "the UCH can not be bought and sold as commercial goods, nor be of
other uses that could undermine its sustainability".


Community understanding of the responsibilities and mandate of the
Underwater Heritage Directorate is still limited. The high level of violations on
UCH indicates that the level of understanding about the importance and
variety of regulations have not been socialized with optimal management, so
various efforts need to be done to improve it. The Government of Indonesia
has been working with stakeholders (government agencies, universities,
museums, and community). It has conducted various activities both in the
form of exhibitions and publication.



More synergy in the management programs on UCH among government
agencies, academia, and society. The Government of Indonesia is working to
improve coordination and cooperation with various parties. Our more
successful improvement of HR competencies in the field of underwater
archeology have been through collaboration with universities and professional
divers. 1) Mapping and survey have been done in cooperation with the
Coordinating Agency for Surveys and Mapping, Ministry of Maritime Affairs
and Fisheries, Indonesian University, Hasanuddin University, Gadjah Mada
University, Diponegoro University, and fishing communities. 2) Protection of
UCH has been coordinated through cooperation with the Ministry of Forestry,
the Navy (Indonesian Military), Local Governments, and the fishing
communities. 3) Public awareness involves cooperation amongst museums,
mass media, local government, and society.



Our HR competence in the field of underwater archeology is still limited. Until
recently the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, particularly in institutions that
deal with UCH, has a total diver count at 87 people: consisting of level 1 (42
people), level 2 (37 people), and level 3 (8 people) . 30 persons of the divers

�are trained in underwater archeology. Likewise, the equipment for underwater
archeology is still limited to the diving equipment and some survey tools,
documentation, and conservation.
To enhance human resource capacity in the field of underwater archeology
Government of Indonesia since 2006 has conducted various training
initiatives (see table 4). It also collaborates with several universities in
Indonesia and sent several people to follow the Underwater Cultural Heritage
Training, UNESCO.
Table 4. Training Activities Data (Directorate of Underwater Archaeology 2010)
NU

YEAR

1

2006

2

2007

3

2008

4

2008

5

2009

6

TRAINING

PARTICIPANTS
26

2009

Diving
Underwater Archaeology
Excavation
Underwater Archaeology
Photography
Conservation
Underwater Archaeology
Photography
Ship Identification

7

2010

Diving

16

8

2010

Conservation

25

27
20
25
15
15

In 2012 the Directorate of Underwater Heritage is working on realizing the
concept of establishing a formal training center for underwater archeology in
Indonesia.

Underwater Archaeology Training Center
In 2011 the Government of Indonesia is preparing the establishment of the
Underwater Archaeology Training Center (Training Center) aimed at improving
the ability of archaeologist and conservationist personnel in the handling of UCH.
The Training Center is expected to generate HR who not only have the
capabilities in the protection of UCH, such as data recording, conservation, and
case study management but who are also capable of conducting activities
towards the development and information sharing for the benefit of society.
Specifically, people who can work on development activities through research
programs, publications and exhibitions. Public awareness could be more
engaging through cooperation with educational institutions and tourism. This is
due to the fact that UCH has a value of history, science, and culture. It can be
studied by research and education institutions, as well as having recreational
value and the draw of adventure. All these activities still have to prioritize
conservation so that sustainability is maintained
The framework plan for the establishment of the Training Center include:

�a. Subject Matter and Trainers
Course subject matter being prepared is not only related to diving and
underwater archeology, but includes material about the various regulations
concerning the protection of UCH. The course subjects under consideration
include: management and site plans, nautical-architecture, history, anthropology,
museology,
and
publications.

b. Participants' Criteria
The minimum criteria for people to participate are that they must be able-bodied,
have interest in the development of knowledge and skills in UCH and its
preservation, and are actively working in the field of the protection of UCH. The
criteria should be determined carefully so that the output of the training is in
accordance with the principle of 'the right man on the right place', so it can
improve performance in the field of the preservation of UCH.

c. Equipment and Accommodation
The equipment must be prepared not only to support practical activities (such as
diving, survey, excavation, removal, documentation, and conservation) but also
include data processing equipment, transportation, and communications.
Accommodation for the various needs of the Training Center need to be
prepared including: classrooms, laboratories, equipment rooms, data processing
space, artifacts storage space, teaching rooms, and dormitories.

d. Education Level and Time
Level and time for training is being arranged. Given the output of this training is
focused on the development of skills, the time will be focused largely on practical
field
training
than
on
classroom
learning.

e. Location
Location must be strategic for accessibility and security. The criteria for location
includes access to convenient transportation, close to the various supporting
agencies (such as museums, research institutes, hospitals, navy, and rescue
teams), not far from underwater archaeological sites. Thus the participants can
practice on site.

Conclusions
Territory waters of Indonesia have UCH rich and valuable for science, history,
and culture, so its existence must be protected and utilized for various purposes
that are not in conflict with sustainability.
For that we need regulatory harmonization efforts coordinated under the
Underwater Heritage Directorate management, so there are no rules that overlap
or contradict each other. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 Year 2010
on Heritage expressly states that cultural heritage protected by law includes
UCH. When working with this valuable material we must always consider the

�best method to ensure its sustainability. This is in accordance with the 2001
Convention, in particular, to the Annex which gives priority to conservation in situ
and bans commercial sale of objects.
We aim to improve networking among stakeholders, both domestically and
abroad, in the form of cooperation programs in the field of human resource
capacity building, provision of equipment underwater archeology, dissemination
and publication, as well as monitoring and securing the Underwater Cultural
Heritage.
Regulation and networking will not run properly without the support of
competent HR. For that we have increased efforts towards HR in the field of UCH
management according to the needs and potential of UCH in Indonesia. The
establishment of a training center is our method to increase capacity building in
HR specialized in the field of underwater archeology who have the ability to
protect, develop and utilize the UCH based on principles of conservation and for
the overall benefit of society.

Bibliography
Directorate
of Directorate of Underwater Archaeology Profile, Directorate
Underwater
General of History and Archaeology, Ministry of Cultural
Archaeology
and Tourism, Jakarta (not yet published)
2011
Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of The Year
Ministry of
2010 Concerning items of Cultural Property
Cultural and
Tourism
2010
Budaya Bahari, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Pramono, D.,
2005
Convention on The Protection of The Underwater Cultural
UNESCO
Heritage
2001
Presidential Decree No. 43 of 1989 on the National
Presidential
Committee for Salving and Exploiting Valuable Objects
Decree No. 43,
Retrieved from Shipwreck
1989

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3039">
                <text>Human Resources Development in Indonesia's Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3040">
                <text>Session 6&#13;
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3041">
                <text>The Indonesian archipelago position is located in a very strategic position at the crossroads of world maritime trade between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. According to archaeological and historical research, there is evidence that Indonesia has had a maritime nautical culture since prehistoric times. Some evidence of Indonesian maritime cultural civilization can still be found scattered on the ocean floor, including approximately 463 ancient ship location points according to data from the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.&#13;
&#13;
The Ministry of Culture and Tourism, which is the Indonesian government agency that handles the field of culture, now has approximately 80 staff divers. Only a fraction of that number have competence in the field of underwater archaeology, so it is necessary to improve the knowledge and skills, not only in the field of diving but also the ability to conduct surveys, mapping, data recording excavation, and conservation. In the last five years, efforts to increase human resources in underwater archaeology in Indonesia continue to be done through various education and training, whether conducted in Indonesia or abroad facilitated by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), such as in Thailand, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines. The effort is certainly not optimal and systematic, so it is necessary to develop appropriate strategies both in quantity and quality. Indonesia needs an underwater archaeological development centre that will prepare a teaching module, instructor, certification and partnerships (networking), as well as supporting facilities and infrastructure. Through this institution we can expect human resources of underwater archaeologists to have the following abilities: (1) diving, (2) various regulations relating to underwater cultural heritage, (3) development of management plans, and recording and documenting sites, (4) procedures, methods, principles and ethics of underwater archaeology, (5) artifact conservation and storage, (6) traditional knowledge, and (7) publications and exhibitions. In the last five years we have implemented several training programs to further underwater archaeology in Indonesia where participants have acquired skills in diving, survey and conservation. More skills would greatly empower Indonesians in managing their underwater cultural heritage, particularly at an advanced underwater archaeology theory and practice level.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3042">
                <text>Judi Wahjudin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3043">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="28">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="621" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="412">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/f3aad38b7722f3ead8359debc883f444.pdf</src>
        <authentication>08fba8438cd399df3769458227b1c591</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6753">
                    <text>Excavation, conservation, and preservation of the Mt Gambier underwater fossil
deposits
Julien Louys (Associate Professor, Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith
University, Brisbane Australia)
ABSTRACT
This paper will examine the history of underwater fossil research in the Mt Gambier region, Australia, focusing
on ongoing efforts to study, conserve, and protect underwater resources found in the freshwater sinkholes and
limestone caves of the region; as such, the topic of this abstract fits best within the session The Archaeology of
Submerged Landscapes and Inland Waters because it is concerned with cave sites that have become flooded. I
will describe the considerable past efforts that were undertaken to extract fossils from Green Waterhole, as well
as recently successful efforts to have this site registered as a South Australian Heritage Listed site, ensuring
legislated protection for the cave and its deposits into the future. In addition, a new research program funded by
the Australian Research Council and in collaboration with the Cave Divers Association of Australia and the
South Australian Museum will be presented. The new work includes efforts to successfully recover fossils with
as much contextual information as possible, especially geochronological and environmental data. Using these
data, we expect to determine the geological age of the extinct megafauna recovered from the sites and the
environments they inhabited; data critical for determining the degree to which humans or environmental change
contributed to their demise. We will also evaluate the impact of such research on the preservation of the caves,
ongoing efforts to conserve the geoheritage potential of the sites, and means of educating the public on the
unique underwater resources they represent.
Keywords: megafauna, Pleistocene, geoheritage, South Australia
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ARC – Australian Research Council
CDAA – Cave Divers Association of Australia
ka – thousand years

INTRODUCTION
The topic of this paper fits best within the Session Archaeology of Submerged Landscapes and Inland
Waters because the underwater caves of the Mt Gambier region are freshwater deposits in a young,
terrestrial karstic landscape (Figure 1). The Mt Gambier caves are found in the latest Eocene to
Miocene limestones of the Gambier Limestone within the Gambier Basin, although rarer younger
caves are also formed in the Quaternary dune calcarenites (Grimes et al. 1999; Webb et al. 2010). The
limestones are relatively soft and weakly consolidated, and both limestones and calcarenites show
synergetic karst features such as development of solution pipes and calcreted caprocks (Grimes et al.
1999).
Collapse dolines are frequently recorded in the Mt Gambier region, and those that fall below the
waterline form cenotes. These are up to 125 m deep, and generally circular, sheer-walled, and floored
by large rubble cones (Webb et al. 2010). Cave and cenote dissolution is thought to be the result of
volcanogenic CO2 acidified groundwater resulting from Pleistocene–Holocene volcanic eruptions, in
particular the 28 ka Mt Gambier eruption (Webb et al. 2010). The phreatic caverns formed by this
dissolution collapsed possibly during the low sea levels of the Last Glacial Maximum (Webb et al.
2010), forming sites such as Hells Hole, Umpherstons, The Sisters, Little Blue Lake, One Tree, and
Gouldens; The Shaft is a rare example of cave dissolution with a solution pipe entrance that has not
yet collapsed (Grimes et al. 1999). Flooding of the cenotes is thought to have occurred approximately
8 ka based on radiocarbon dates associated with a stromatolite from Black Hole (Kelly 1998). There
does not appear to be any hydrological or speleological connection between the cenotes and the
phreatic caves of the region (Webb et al. 2010).

1

�Figure 1. Location of some of the major cave diving locations in the Mt Gambier region. Adapted after Lewis and
Stace 1982.

The phreatic caves of the Mt Gambier region are shallow, horizontal, joint and bedding-plane
controlled systems (Grimes et al. 1999; Webb et al. 2010). Passages are primarily epiphreatic,
fissure-style, and solution features associated with previous water table levels such as incuts and
undercuts are frequently observed (Grimes et al. 1999; Webb et al. 2010). The bulk of the cave
systems are underwater, and some have been heavily modified by breakdown, forming collapse domes
and rubble filled passages (Grimes et al. 1999). These sometimes reach the surface, such as Green
Waterhole (Fossil Cave). There are over 50 caves recorded around Mt Gambier (Webb et al. 2010),
many of which have been mapped and/or discovered by the CDAA; the most extensive cave system in
the region is Tank Cave with over 10 km of passages, one of which was recently (2018) connected to
Green Waterhole.
Fossils from the underwater caves in Mt Gambier were first reported to palaeontologists in the 1960s.
The following history is recounted from Pledge (1980) and Horne (1988). In 1964 G. McKenzie
passed some possum and sthenurine (extinct short-faced kangaroos) fossils he found from Green
Waterhole to amateur palaeontologist and caver F.W. Aslin, who subsequently passed them on to B.
2

�Daily at the South Australian Museum. In 1965 Daily collected kangaroo and pig remains from near
the entrance to the cave that probably represent more modern specimens. In 1968 divers B. Brawley
and G. McKenzie recovered substantial sthenurine material including crania in ‘excellent condition’.
A second extraction occurred later that same year, with a third expedition in 1969 yielding
considerable postcranial material. Fossil material had also been recovered at some point from the
Pines Cave, but this material was only discovered in the Australian Museum in 1968, and it is not
clear in Pledge (1980) or Horne (1988)’s accounts when or by whom this was collected. The fossil
collecting exploits of some divers, however, was sensationalised in the 15 February 1969 issue of Pix
magazine. In 1974 a further extraction took place from Green Waterhole after reports of
‘unauthorised’ divers in this cave who were planning on returning; presumably these divers were
interfering with the fossil deposits.
Further dives in 1978 by cave divers from Flinders University recovered more bones, which were
passed on to R. Wells, palaeontologist at Flinders. This resulted in the first systematic efforts to
recover bones from Green Waterhole, as described by Horne (1988). At the end of 1978 a grid system
was laid out across the southern exposures of fossils, and much material was again collected, this time
however with more specific locality information preserved. In 1987 and 1988, through the South
Australian Underwater Speleological Society (SAUSS) and Flinders University, further collection of
fossil material in reference to the grid system was made. The results of these collections are described
in Horne (1988) and Newton (1988).
Fossils representing extinct and extant Quaternary vertebrate faunas have also been reported from
numerous other cenotes and caves from the Mt Gambier region (Figure 1); however, unlike those
from Green Waterhole (Fossil Cave), none have been subject to systematic or extensive excavations.
Underwater sites yielding fossils include Ewen’s Ponds, Ten-Eighty Sinkhole, Goulden’s Hole, Tank
Cave, Engelbrecht Cave, Blue Lake, Kilsby’s Sinkhole (Reed and Bourne 2000). Nevertheless, there
has been little published in the scientific literature concerning the underwater fossils of Mt Gambier.
Pledge (1980) provided descriptions of the initial finds from Green Waterhole, and the birds from the
site were published by Baird (1985). Baird (1991) also discussed some aspects of the taphonomy of
the site. Reed and Bourne (2000) summarised what was then known about the fossil taxa found in the
Mt Gambier caves. Green Waterhole was listed as one of the most important Australian fossil sites in
Australia’s Fossil Heritage (The Australian Heritage Council 2012).
In late 2018, further megafauna fossils were discovered in pristine condition in the Bone Room
chamber of Tank Cave (Green 2018). This represented one of the most significant finds of this kind in
Mt Gambier since the excavations of Green Waterhole in the 1980s. Unfortunately, these finds
coincided with reports of unauthorised fossil extractions in Green Waterhole. The history and
potential of the fossil deposits in the Mt Gambier region, the dearth of published scientific studies, and
the recent finds and incidences have highlighted the need to (1) conduct further scientific study of the
underwater fossil deposits; and (2) ensure adequate protection and conservation of the cave systems
and the fossils therein.

CASE STUDIES
The case studies under consideration are the following: (1) An Australian Research Council Linkage
Project between Griffith University, CDAA, South Australian Museum, the University of Adelaide,
and the University of Queensland, aimed at undertaking new scientific analyses and excavations of
the fossil underwater deposits of the Mt Gambier Region. (2) The South Australian Fossil Heritage
Working Group and their efforts to add Green Waterhole and Tank Cave fossil deposits to the state
heritage list.

3

�RESOURCES
The resources available to conduct the work include funding from the ARC, the CDAA, Griffith
University, as well as the expertise and time from these organisations and those from University of
Adelaide, University of Queensland, Flinders University, South Australian Museum, South Australia
Department for Environment and Water (DEW). Griffith University and partners were awarded
$268,529 in March 2022 by the ARC for a project entitled Deep time extinctions and environments in
Australian underwater caves.

FRAMEWORK
ARC Linkage Project Deep time extinctions and environments in Australian underwater caves
The following summarises the goals of this project (from Australian Research Council, 2019):
This project aims to investigate the unique submerged Mt Gambier fossil deposits to determine the
role environmental change had on large Australian mammal extinctions. By using a combination of
technical diving and scientific expertise to study untouched fossil deposits from underwater caves,
this project expects to provide greater understanding of past ecosystems and animals,
advancements in geochronological techniques, and data critical to prepare Australians for action in
protecting our biological heritage. Expected outcomes include insights into cave conservation and
protection of underwater cave systems, updated policies on cave management, and promotion of
our understanding of Australian geo-heritage through education and displays.
This project consists of a partnership between Griffith University, CDAA, South Australian Museum,
the University of Adelaide, and the University of Queensland to undertake new studies on the
underwater fossil deposits of the Mt Gambier region, with results feeding back directly to the CDAA,
the South Australian Museum, and other interested parties for education and conservation purposes, in
addition to the scientific contributions. The focus of this project is on four caves and cenotes:
Gouldens, Engelbrect’s East, Green Waterhole, and Tank Cave. It will combine new excavations as
well as novel (for the region and underwater setting) sampling, namely geochronological
(uranium-series, optically stimulated luminescence, electron spin resonance dating) and palynological,
alongside underwater palaeontological sampling and analyses. To prepare for this project, a thorough
review of current underwater palaeontological techniques was published (Louys 2018), and pilot data
were collected.
Since the award of ARC funding, the project has grown to include photogrammetry analyses in
collaboration with the CDAA and Flinders University. The production of 3D models of the
underwater systems will not only be of enormous benefit to the taphonomic and speleological
analyses planned, but can also be fed directly into current cave conservation efforts, such those of the
Project Baseline team monitoring Tank Cave (https://projectbaseline.org/), and displays and
educational resources for the South Australian Museum. The project has also embraced new
methodologies, such as environmental DNA studies, with recent efforts successful in securing
additional funding for these analyses.
The South Australian Fossil Heritage Working Group
This group was set up in recognition of the need to establish a collaborative group of palaeontologists,
conservationists, speleologists, and government members to further the protection of natural sites with
significant fossil deposits in South Australia. South Australia has a strong and proud tradition of fossil
conservation at the world and state level, exemplified by the World Heritage Listing of the Naracoorte
cave system (alongside Riversleigh, as the Australian Fossil Mammal Sites; Bourne and Reed 2009),
as well as State Heritage nominations of individual caves and multi-site areas in the Naracoorte Caves
4

�National Park (Lewis 2019). Although the heritage importance of Green Waterhole had been
recognised for some years (Australian Heritage Council 2012; Lewis 2019), the initiation of a new
research program through the ARC Linkage Project and the new finds made in Tank Cave in 2018
provided the impetus for the formation of the group and the nomination of Green Waterhole – Tank
Cave complex for State Heritage Listing. Members of the working group included representatives
from Griffith University, CDAA, University of Adelaide, the South Australian Museum, Flinders
University, and the South Australia Department for Environment and Water (see Acknowledgements
for individuals involved).
The South Australian State Heritage Register is a list of areas protected under the Heritage Places Act
1993 from alteration, damage, or removal without formal prior consultation and permission (South
Australian State Heritage, https://www.environment.sa.gov.au/topics/heritage/sa-heritage-register).
State Heritage listing provides legal protection to fossil sites that would otherwise not be provided
even if such sites are designated Geological Heritage Sites by the Geological Society of Australia
(Lewis 2019). Current federal or state laws in Australia do not provide adequate or consistent
protection for fossils (Percival 2014). Significant education and awareness training for cave divers has
been in place for decades (e.g., Louys 2019), however, recognition of the State Heritage Register of
the importance of the caves will, it is hoped, add impetus and focus on their preservation.
Like the nomination of the Naracoorte Caves National Parks to the State Heritage Register linked to
the Natural (as opposed to Built) environment, the nomination of the Green Waterhole – Tank Cave
Complex was orientated towards Geological, Archaeological, Palaeontological and Speleological
heritage (GAPS heritage; Lewis 2019), and was a multi-site nomination. Specifically, it focused on
the palaeontological, speleological, and geological significance of the caves and their deposits, as
follows (South Australian Heritage Register 2022):
The Green Waterhole - Tank Cave Fossil Complex contains the only known extensive underwater
vertebrate fossil deposits in Australia. This unique freshwater depositional environment has ensured
the preservation of extinct species not found anywhere else, with several additional species new to
science recovered and awaiting description. The underwater deposits have also resulted in a
completeness and preservation of fossil assemblies almost unique for Australia. This provides an
important opportunity to investigate the evolution of South Australian mammals and birds. The
impacts of this type of site on the age and nature of the fossil remains have yet to be fully studied.
The complex represents unusual geological formations including the occurrence of a shallow fresh
waterhole not usually found in sinkholes in the South East, and evidence of rare volcanogenic
influences in the formation of the cave system. The cave complex also demonstrates rare
speleological features, including length of cave passageways, clarity of water, underwater
speleothems, and being a type locality for stygofauna. The complex also holds importance for the
development of cave diving in the country and is closely associated with the Cave Divers
Association of Australia. It is also acknowledged as a place of significance for the Boandik people.

The nomination was assessed under the following criteria under Section 16 of the Heritage Places Act
1993: (b) it has rare, uncommon or endangered qualities that are of cultural significance; (c) it may
yield information that will contribute to an understanding of the State’s history, including its natural
history; and (g) it has a special association with the life or work of a person or organisation or an
event of historical importance. These criteria recognise both the palaeontological (and associated
geological and speleological) features of the caves, but also the history and connection with
Indigenous groups as well as more recently, the cave divers.

RESULTS
The first field season from the project Deep time extinctions and environments in Australian
underwater caves took place over 10 days in early April 2023. The season had three primary
5

�objectives. First, collect surface samples and associated geochronological samples from the
megafaunal deposits in Engelbrecht’s East deposits. These are unique for the project in that they
represent a fissure fill deposit actively eroding out in a dry section of the cave. It is included in this
project because it requires diving through an underwater passage to access, but more importantly is
actively eroding into a wet section of the cave. This provides significant contextual data for the
taphonomic aspects of the project seeking to determine whether skeletal elements were deposited in
wet settings pre or post fossilisation.
Second, three sample cores, one optically stimulated luminescence, one pollen, and one eDNA, were
collected from each of the three sites of interest, Gouldens, Green Waterhole, and Engelbrecht’s East
from the underwater passage mentioned above; previous pilot data had suggested that sediments in
this section could be as old as 95 ka (Arnold, pers comm., 2021). To preserve stratigraphic integrity
within these cores, as well as any viable DNA, all cores collected during this season were frozen in
the orientation in which they were taken. Sampling was made considerably more difficult in Green
Waterhole and, to a lesser extent, Gouldens, due to the amount of fine particulates on the cave floor.
Once disturbed, these sediments became suspended in the water column and reduced visibility to
almost nothing, and most of the sampling and exit from the cave was done via tactile signalling.

Figure 2: The author examining a cow femur, Green Waterhole, Mt Gambier (image courtesy of Steve Trewavas).

Third, surface reference material, much of recent age (specifically, less than about 200 years old as
represented by European domesticates) was collected from Gouldens and Green Waterhole (Figure 2).
These were collected to provide modern baselines for faunal dating and taphonomic analyses. Species
recovered thus far include sheep, cow, and murids. In addition to these objectives, the
photogrammetry surveys were begun in all three caves. These will require numerous dives and trips to
complete.
With regards to the protection of the sites, the Green Waterhole - Tank Cave Fossil Complex was
officially confirmed as a State Heritage Place in the SA Heritage Register on 23 June 2022. The South
6

�Australian Fossil Heritage Working Group continues their work listing other fossils sites on the
registry; however, to date none of any additional sites relate to underwater fossil deposits.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Cave Divers Association of Australia have been integral to this project and their immense contribution is acknowledged
here. In particular, many thanks Peter Wolf who was instrumental in setting up the Linkage Project, and Joseph Monks who
has since been intimately involved with the planning and execution of the project and fieldwork. The CDAA National
Directors are thanked for their ongoing support. Dive field support was graciously provided by Joseph Monks, Damian
Bishop, Ellyse Klein, Hiro Yoshida, Tim Featonby, Steve Trewavas, and Kelvin Ball, with surface support provided by Meg
Walker, Gilbert Price, and Jody Kreuger. Scientific support was provided by Lee Arnold, Martina Demuro, and Liz Reed.
The members of the South Australian Fossil Heritage Working Group involved in the listing of Green Waterhole – Tank
Cave complex (Julien Louys, Peter Wolf, Peter Horne, Liz Reed, Diego Garcia-Bellido, Mary-Anne Binnie, Neville Pledge,
Trevor Worthy, Rod Wells, Gavin Prideaux, Ian D. Lewis, Steve Bourne, and Anna Pope) are warmly thanked for their
tremendous efforts in having the site entered in the State Heritage Register. Funding for this project is provided by ARC
Linkage LP210200704 and The Australia Pacific Science Hermon Slade Research Fund HSF23047.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Australian Heritage Council. Australia's Fossil Heritage: A Catalogue of Important Australian Fossil Sites. Canberra:
CSIRO Publishing, 2012.
Australian Research Council, 2019. LP210200704 — Griffith University (funded by Australian Research Council).
https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/RGS/Web/Grants/LP210200704, accessed 28/4/2023.
Baird, R.F. “Avian fossils from Quaternary deposits in ‘Green Waterhole Cave’, south-eastern South Australia.” Records of
the Australian Museum 37, no. 6 (1985): 353-370.
Baird, R.F. “Taphonomy of late Quaternary cave localities yielding vertebrate remains in Australia.” In Vertebrate
Palaeontology of Australasia, edited by Patricia Vickers-Rich, J.M. Monaghan, R.F. Baird and T.H. Rich, 267–309.
Melbourne: Pioneer Design Studio and the Monash University Publications Committee, 1991.
Bourne, Steve, Reed, Liz. “Australian Fossil Mammal Sites (Riversleigh/Naracoorte).” World Heritage 52 (2009): 46-47.
Green, Selina. 2018. “Cave diver finds prehistoric bones in 'new room' of underwater cave network.” ABC News 13th
December 2018. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-13/cavediver-finds-large-fauna-bones-south-australia/10599218
Grimes, Ken, G., Mott, K. and White, S. “The Gambier karst province.” Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Conference on
Cave and Karst Management (1999): 1-7.
Kelly, M.D. Freshwater Stromatolites as Potential Environmental Indicators: A Case Study from Lower Southeast South
Australia. B.Sc. Hons thesis, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle, 1998.
Lewis, Ian, D. “South Australian geology and the State Heritage Register: an example of geoconservation of the Naracoorte
Caves complex and karst environment.” Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 66, no. 6 (2019): 785-792.
Lewis, Ian, Stace, Peter. Cave Diving in Australia, Revised Edition. Adelaide: Ian Lewis and Peter Stace, 1982.
Louys, Julien. “Practice and prospects in underwater palaeontology.” Palaeontologia Electronica 21, no. 2 (2018): 1-14.
Louys, Julien. “A cave diver’s guide to fossil discoveries – our obligations.” Guidelines 148 (2019): 12-15.
Percival, I.G. “Protection and preservation of Australia’s palaeontological heritage.” Geoheritage 6, no. 3 (2014): 205-216.
Pledge, Neville S. “Macropodid skeletons, including: Simosthenurus Tedford, from an unusual “drowned cave” deposit in
the south east of South Australia.” Records of the South Australian Museum 18 (1980): 131-141.
South Australian Heritage Register. Department for Environment and Water, Government of South Australia, 2022.
https://maps.sa.gov.au/heritagesearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=28119
Reed, Elizabeth H. and Bourne, Steven J. “Pleistocene fossil vertebrate sites of the South East region of South Australia.”
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 124 (2000): 61-90.
Webb, J.A., Grimes, K.G. and Lewis, I.D. “Volcanogenic origin of cenotes near Mt Gambier, southeastern Australia.”
Geomorphology 119, nos. 1-2 (2010): 23-35.

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="51">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="265">
                  <text>2023 Session 15: The Archaeology of Submerged Landscapes and Inland Waters</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="266">
                  <text>Session 15 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="267">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 15 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="268">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="269">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="270">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="271">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="272">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="273">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6746">
                <text>Excavation, conservation, and preservation of the Mt Gambier underwater fossil deposits</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6747">
                <text>This paper will examine the history of underwater fossil research in the Mt Gambier region, Australia, focusing&#13;
on ongoing efforts to study, conserve, and protect underwater resources found in the freshwater sinkholes and&#13;
limestone caves of the region; as such, the topic of this abstract fits best within the session The Archaeology of&#13;
Submerged Landscapes and Inland Waters because it is concerned with cave sites that have become flooded. I&#13;
will describe the considerable past efforts that were undertaken to extract fossils from Green Waterhole, as well&#13;
as recently successful efforts to have this site registered as a South Australian Heritage Listed site, ensuring&#13;
legislated protection for the cave and its deposits into the future. In addition, a new research program funded by&#13;
the Australian Research Council and in collaboration with the Cave Divers Association of Australia and the&#13;
South Australian Museum will be presented. The new work includes efforts to successfully recover fossils with&#13;
as much contextual information as possible, especially geochronological and environmental data. Using these&#13;
data, we expect to determine the geological age of the extinct megafauna recovered from the sites and the&#13;
environments they inhabited; data critical for determining the degree to which humans or environmental change&#13;
contributed to their demise. We will also evaluate the impact of such research on the preservation of the caves,&#13;
ongoing efforts to conserve the geoheritage potential of the sites, and means of educating the public on the&#13;
unique underwater resources they represent.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6748">
                <text>Julien Louys</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6749">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6750">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6751">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6752">
                <text>Louys, Julien . 2023. “Excavation, conservation, and preservation of the Mt Gambier underwater fossil deposits.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Jennifer McKinnon. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1993 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="69">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 15 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="217" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="110">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/81e6302632d27e2faf778087c394cb31.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e74d5f9b2ee817fef53db8922606964a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2694">
                    <text>East Asian shipbuilding traditions
and its historical evolvement
Jun Kimura

Abstract
The archaeological study of excavated ships can contribute to knowledge and understanding of
past seafaring and maritime activities. Such study includes the assessment of the hull structure
and construction methods. This paper highlights technological innovations evidenced by the
remnants of ships in China, Korea, and Japan. Based on data of the excavated ships from the
tenth century onwards, this paper addresses the significance of the bulkhead in oceangoing ships
in the light of technological innovations, diffusion, and hybridization. This contributes to further
understanding of the relationship between the “Yellow Sea shipbuilding tradition,” the “East China
Sea shipbuilding tradition,” and the “South China Sea shipbuilding tradition.” The “South China
Sea shipbuilding tradition” has been presented by earlier researchers as a hybrid ship building
technology. This paper highlights the integration of the technologies from the Yellow Sea and
East China Sea into the South China Sea tradition by tracing specific hull components, such as
bulkhead(s) used for East Asian seagoing ships. The “Yellow Sea shipbuilding tradition” is
exhibited by ships operating in the northern waters of East Asia. Traditionally, these ships have
flat bottoms but variations are represented by the early Tang Dynasty riverine ships and Goryeo
Dynasty ships, and in later periods by Ming Dynasty ships excavated in Penglai, China.
Recent archaeological inspections conducted on the Quanzhou ship, Shinan shipwreck,
and ship timbers from the Takashima Underwater site established that these ships were built in
the “East China Sea shipbuilding tradition”. V-shaped bottoms, keel and bulkheads, and multiplelayered hull planking with iron fastenings, characterise this tradition. The ships built according to
these two traditions came to be used in seaborne activities within and beyond East and
Southeast Asia. The chronological linkage of three shipbuilding traditions developed in two
regions will be pursued.

Introduction
The research on the hull is one of the most important themes in shipwreck
archaeology as it offers us a better understanding of historical seafaring and
human interaction with waters. It has been noted that the increase of the
underwater archaeological expeditions in China, Korea, and Japan occurred
through the last few decades, and this has resulted in facilitating accesses to the
data of excavated ships in these countries. The Shipwreck ASIA project has
lately demonstrated a basic data collection on the excavated hulls (Kimura 2010).
The collective data allows a comparative analysis on the hull to clarify the
development of East Asia shipbuilding tradition. Such an approach developed
with a theoretical idea underlying technological innovations and integration of hull
components. The East Asian shipbuilding tradition was explicit in previous
researches in comparison with Southeast Asian shipbuilding technologies,
focusing on the distinctive hull components of shipwrecks from the two adjacent
regions (Green 1990; Manguin 1993). Pierre-Yves Manguin (1984; 1993)
suggested that the emergence of the technological difference and similarity in
these two regions are attributed to the inherence of technological hybridization
observed in the historical development of shipbuilding and explained the “South

�China Sea shipbuilding tradition”. Based on the appreciation of inherent nature in
historical shipbuilding, this paper overviews the creation of East Asian
shipbuilding traditions over centuries that were formed in the two areas: the
“Yellow Sea shipbuilding tradition”, “East China Sea shipbuilding tradition”.

Context
In many colonial and Asian societies, hybridity tended to be applauded in cultural
terms (under labels like association or acculturation) even while disdained in
racial ones,…(Reid 2010)
One of the themes in the study of shipbuilding technologies is the identification of
technological innovations in its history that tend to generate from endogenous
growth as well as exogenous factors. In this context an approach to a
technological hybridization observed on the hull components is important.
Manguin’s studies on the early-mid 15th century Bukit Jakas site found at Bintan
Island in the Riau archipelagos of Indonesia has presented an example of the
hybridization of shipbuilding technology (Manguin 1993; Manguin 2010); the main
structure of the hull consists of a keel and bulkheads with planks that are edgedjoined with wooden dowels, while the hull planking is fastened to sturdy frames
by square iron nails. The use of wooden dowels for hull planking is recognized as
Southeast Asian indigenous shipbuilding tradition, yet the use of bulkheads as
main transversal structure for the hull and iron fastenings are regarded as of
Chinese origin. A few excavated ships in the water of the South China Sea show
a similar construction method, according to a different principle from the above
mentioned two distinctive shipbuilding traditions. These ship remains reveal the
features of hybrid ships, identified as the “South China Sea shipbuilding
tradition”.
Since the 16th century when European expansion to East Asia and
Southeast Asia began the technological hybridization on the ship structure
probably became more apparent than during the previous periods. This is evident
in iconographical and historical resources. A drawing of a Japanese ship known
as an Araki bune sailing to Vietnam depicts a hybrid feature in its rig and hull
from European, Chinese, and Japanese traditions (Figure 1). The Europeans
during colonization periods recognised the involvement of hybrid ships in
Southeast Asian waters, though they used the Spanish term mestizo, instead of
the English term hybrid. The fact that the Europeans applied the term mestizo to
describe ships that had mixed features in their construction is recorded in the
historical Japanese text titled Zoho Kai Tsushoko (Studies on the Intercourse and
Trade with the Chinese and Foreigners) written in 1708 by Nishikawa, Joken
(Ishii 1995: 72-76). A Siam ship depicted on the Japanese scroll painting is
further evidence of the existence of the mestizo ship in Thailand around the 18th
century (Figure 2).

�Figure 1. Historical painting depicting the Red Seal Ship known as Araki bune
sailing to Vietnam. Courtesy of Museum of Maritime Science

Figure 2. Siam ship from the Japanese scroll painting (Tosen no Zu) depicted
probably around the 18th century. At a glance its configuration is similar with the
other seven Chinese ships drawn on the same scroll yet the rigs and stern
structure of the Siam ship are different from them. Photo by author, Courtesy of
Matsura Historical Museum

�Structural features defined as being of the South China Sea shipbuilding
tradition in archaeological sources are correspondent with iconographical and
historical records. What all this evidence indicates is the existence of a
technological cluster consisting of hull components and associated construction
methods from different origins. Individual technologies that are composed of the
cluster are further examined to clarify their role in a long-term formation of a
shipbuilding tradition. The excavated hybrid ships, for instance, use bulkheads in
their interior structure and the bulkhead is located as one of the most important
components as it has consistently been used in the structure of the East Asian
oceangoing ships over centuries. The shipbuilding traditions in East Asia are
dated to an earlier period than the appearance of the South China Sea
shipbuilding tradition. This needs to be further pursued to locate the point of
integration of technologies in the history of shipbuilding development.

Chronology of technological hybridization in East Asian
shipbuilding
The data of excavated ships in East Asia is presented in chronological order.
These data focus on the remains of coastal and oceangoing ships with
substantial structure rather than primitive watercraft. The examination on the hull
and construction methods in this section intends to lead to three distinctive
traditions which have been linked with Manguin’s studies the idea of
technological hybridizations.

In the Yellow Sea’s area
In China, the use of bulkhead traces is identified in excavated ships dating to the
tenth century during the Tang Dynasty (618-907 A.D.) (Kimura 2010; Xi, et al.
2004). Bulkheads initially appeared in the structure of riverine ships before their
adaption to oceangoing ships. The bulkheads, which have been perceived as
representative of Chinese shipbuilding tradition, were originally used for a flat
bottom hull with no keel suitable for riverine ships. Two Tang Dynasty ships have
been discovered inland of the Jiangsu Province. Such flat bottom ships, however,
could have been used for sail out to sea. The province faces the Yellow Sea
which is known for its shallow waters where people could probably embark using
flat bottom ships which were originally designed as riverine ships. The Jiangsu
Province and southerly adjacent Zhejiang Province had ports for ships
conducting distant voyages before the tenth century. Many ships were involved in
early maritime activities between the Chinese continent and Japan during the
Tang Dynasty as evidenced by the delegation of envoys, including envoy ships
(Reischauer 1940). To date, there are no ships that have been identified that are
known to have been specifically designed for seafaring and dated to that period,
therefore we can only deduce that the structure of those ships that people used
to sail into the East China Sea were opposed to the structure and construction
methods identified in the riverine ships. For example, in much later periods the
Sha-chuan (sand ships) represented a Hangzhou Bay trader, or ship from
Nanjing. These are still perceived as ships used for riverine and oceangoing

�purposes in the Yellow Sea and northern East China Sea (Oba 1974). Early
stage shipbuilding of oceangoing vessels in the northern coasts of China can be
regarded as more similar to technology in-use for the construction of riverine
boats at the same time.
The keel-less ship was not the only prevalent type in riverine ships. In
early East Asian shipbuilding technology (i.e. during the Goryeo Dynasty 9181392 A.D.) we have an example with the Wando ships, which consist of flat
bottom hulls (Green and Kim 1989). These ships were discovered offshore along
the west coasts of the Korean Peninsula. The fundamental structure identified on
the Wando ships is perceived to be a long-term technology that used beams not
bulkheads (Sasaki and Lee 2010). The shipbuilding technology developed in the
Korean Peninsula, represented by baulks for longitudinal structures and athwart
beams for transverse structures, resulted in the construction of ships with
sufficient seaworthiness to sail in East Asian waters, especially, in the shallow
waters of the Yellow Sea. This could have facilitated the dominant role of
merchants who originated from the Korean Peninsula in maritime trade between
the Korean Peninsula and Japan.
The advent and evolution of the flat bottom ships, represented by the
early northern Chinese ships for riverine use and the Goryeo Dynasty’s coastal
traders, is identified as an ancestral form of seagoing ships. Consequently, the
definition of the “Yellow Sea shipbuilding tradition” encompasses the shipbuilding
technologies that are identified in two distinctive shipbuilding technologies from
northern China and the Korean Peninsula. Technological interactions and mutual
influences that might have occurred in shipbuilding between these two regions
are still speculative. There were many distinctive features in the construction
methods and structural elements between the two traditions. Differences in the
usage of distinctive fastenings and different materials for them, for example,
represent less similarity, which lead to a perspective that two major traditions are
distinctively identified in early East Asian shipbuilding tradition.

In the East China Sea’s area
In middle and southern China the details of early shipbuilding tradition before the
10th century has not been clarified. Contemporary historical records of Chinese
Buddhist pilgrim w indicate the use of Southeast Asian indigenous ships to cross
the South China Sea (Hall 1985; Wang 1958). Before the 10th century some
cities from southward of Hangzhou Bay (around Ningbo) to southern China
(Guangzhou), which face the East China Sea and South China Sea, were the
focal area of trade by foreign merchants from Persia and Arabia. It is unclear the
influence of the shipbuilding traditions from outside of East Asia on existent
shipbuilding industries in the middle and southern Chinese coasts. The next
phase of substantial technological development is suggested to have occurred
during the Song Dynasty (960-1279 A.D.), particularly southward around
Hangzhou Bay and coasts around the Taiwan Straits. This may be represented
as the advent of constructing oceangoing ships in the “East China Sea
shipbuilding tradition”. It is recognized as an innovation that bulkhead structure

�and construction methods evolved to a keel. However, uncertainty exists as to
how the keel was introduced into, or evolved from, existent hull components.
The Quanzhou ship from China (dated to the second half of the 12th
century) and the Shinan ship from Korea (dated to the first quarter of the 14th
century) are archaeologically excavated ships that will here be considered in
detail to address the structural characteristics of East China Sea shipbuilding
tradition (Figure 3). They represent a standardization of the structure of these
periods’ oceangoing ships (Figure 4). This is interpreted as one stage of the
completion of technological integration or clustering of hull components. The keel
and hull planking synergistically contribute to longitudinal strength. The keel is
composed of three members and thick garboards are fixed. The hull planking that
extends from the garboards form a steep deadrise angle. The hull planking is
edge-fastened by skew nailing with rabbeted seams. The system of multiple
layered hull planks has also been standardised for the purpose of the inner
planks’ protection, and possibly to the shell hull planking itself for longitudinal
strength. The bulkheads function in providing transverse strength. Large half
frames are attached to secure the bulkheads’ planks, fixing them into the hull
planking with brackets. A comparative study will develop in the future with the
progress of research on the other ship remains that have recently been
excavated in Chinese waters, including the Nanhai No.1 and Huaguang Reef
No.1 shipwrecks (Kimura 2010).
Archaeological examination on ship construction materials, specifically
ship nails and timbers, has been practiced. A sample iron nail was collected from
a hull plank of the Shinan shipwreck for analysis and the result reported (Lee, et
al. 2010). The CT scan and X-ray images of the nail revealed the configuration of
the nail is skewed. Since the nail has been fully degraded its original metal
structure could not be identified. A similar degradation of nails was identified in
the timber remains of the Takashima underwater site in Japan. This site is known
as the late 14th century naval battle site associated with the Mongol Empire
(Yuan Dynasty) invasion of Japan. The nails used for the Shinan shipwreck and
Takashima underwater site are possibly produced through similar manufacturing
procedures based on the microscopic image of the cross-section of the nails.
These nails could have been manufactured from thin bar iron ingots with a
square cross-section. Those iron ingots were as-cast products that were being
widely produced in the iron industries and showed a substantial growth during
the Song Dynasty (Hartwell 1962; Hartwell 1966). In order to be used as ship
nails, the quality of the iron of these ingots needed to be soft ended and made
more pliable through the process of decarbonisation (Lee, et al. 2010). For these
processes, annealing work was conducted in the smithy and iron workshops,
which could probably be built on the shipyards.
Wood species identification has been conducted recently on specimens
of ship timber from the Quanzhou ship (Noshiro and Abe 2010). Three major
species were identified including Pinus massoniana, Lamb known as the Chinese
pine; Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.), Hook known as the Chinese fir; and
Cinnamomum camphora (L.), Presl known as the camphor tree. The result is
comparable to wood used in the hull of the Shinan shipwreck and the ship timber

�of the Takashima underwater site. Pinus massoniana is a dominant species used
for most of the hull components of the Shinan shipwreck. The timber analysis
data from the Takashima underwater site shows, that despite the wood taxa
being diverse, Cinnamomum camphora and Cunninghamia lanceolata occupy
the majority of the assemblage. From the comparative study there is a pattern in
the use of specific wood types for distinctive hull components. The keel, for
instance, consists of Pinus massoniana and Cinnamomum camphora which are
harder than Cunninghamia lanceolata that were used for hull planks.
Cunninghamia lanceolata are found as sheathing planks of the Shinan
shipwreck, probably due to the wood being softer and lighter and relatively easy
to be cut and worked and it has relevant resistance against marine borers.

Figure 3. Cross-sections of the Quanzhou ship (above) and the Shinan
shipwreck (bottom). Produced by author, Courtesy of the Western Australian
Museum and the National Research Institute

Evidence of technological hybridization in East Asia
Excavated ships dating to the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 A.D.) show different
features from the previous periods’ ocean-going traders. As an example of the
distinctive structural feature, multiple layered hull planking is hardly identified on
the hulls of the Ming Dynasty’s ships, including the Xiangshan Ming Dynasty
shipwreck from Ningbo and the ship remains discovered at Penglai (Kimura
2010; Xi, et al. 2004). These ships similarly have longer hulls in the length/beam

�ratio than the hulls identified in previous periods, such as the Quanzhou ship and
the Shinan ship. The Xiangshan ship appears to have been used around the
East China Sea area and the Penglai ships were used around the Yellow Sea,
but the similarity of these ships is emphasized.
Of the four discovered ships in Penglai, the basic structure and
construction methods of the two ships (Penglai No. 3 and No.4) are identical with
the features of the Goryeo Dynasty’s Korean ships (Cultural Relics and
Archaeological Institute of Shandong Province, et al. 2006) (Figure 4). In
addition, the species of the woods of these two ships are clearly distinctive from
the other Penglai ships of Chinese origin. While most characteristics of the two
ships are correspondent to the Korean shipbuilding tradition, their transverse
components are bulkheads (traditionally used in Chinese ships) not beams
(traditionally used in Korean ships). The structural features of the Penglai ships
evidence hybridization between the Chinese shipbuilding technology and Korean
technology; by the period of the Ming Dynasty an interaction of shipbuilding
technologies between the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea could widely have
occurred.

Figure 4. Ship lines of the Shinan shipwreck from Korea, involved in overseas
trade between China and Japan. Produced by author

Shipbuilding traditions
The focus on hull components and construction methods helps in the
development of a chronological sequence on East Asian shipbuilding traditions. It
is suggested that the utilization of the bulkhead as a structural element in hull
construction probably derived from its use in fluvial ships before the 10th century
in China. Some of these ships could have been used to sail along coasts,
perhaps even in early blue-water seafaring. The bulkhead came to be used in the

�structure of the Song Dynasty’s oceangoing ships. The innovation of this is linked
with keel-use. These regions in the sphere of the South China Sea historically
had relationships with Southeast Asia and were probably the focus of exportation
of East Asian shipbuilding traditions. Potentially, during the Yuan Dynasty to
become more prominent during the Ming Dynasty, the South China Sea
shipbuilding tradition gradually formed under the strong influence of technology
from the middle and southern Chinese coasts.
Table 1. Structural principle of East Asian shipbuilding traditions
used for oceangoing ships.
Yellow Sea shipbuilding tradition
Technologies are evidenced in the following: 1) Excavated Tang Dynasty’s riverine ships before
the 10th century that might have been used for seafaring, show flat bottom and uses bulkheads
and iron fastenings; 2) Excavated Goryeo coastal traders of the 11th to 14th centuries that
show the hull of the floor with chines and use beams for transverse components and wooden
fastenings; 3) Excavated Yuan and Ming Dynasties’ ships that have a keel and show round
bottom, and the hull is constructed by single layered planking (baulks) and use bulkheads; 4)
Excavated flat bottom keel-less ships that are constructed by Goryeo shipbuilding technologies
use bulkheads and both iron and wooden fastenings.
East China Sea shipbuilding tradition
Technologies are evidenced in the following: 1) Excavated oceangoing ships of the 13th and
14th centuries that show V-bottom deadrise by the use of a keel and garboards. The transverse
component composes bulkheads that are secured by half frames and brackets to the hull
planking. The hull is constructed by layered planking and uses various types of iron fastenings;
2) Excavated ships dating from the Song to Ming Dynasty show a round bottom that uses a
keel. The hull is constructed by single layered planking (baulks) and uses bulkheads.
South China Sea shipbuilding tradition
Technologies are evidenced in several shipwrecks, mostly dated to the 14th century and
afterwards, found in Southeast Asian waters. They use a keel, showing a round bottom. The
transverse components use bulkheads and, likely, half frames. The hull planking is multiple
layered and the main planking (innermost planking) use wooden fastenings with compensatory
uses of iron fastenings.

Conclusion
Based on the data of the hull components of the excavated ships in East Asia,
this paper has outlined the formation of regional shipbuilding traditions. The
concept that technological hybridizations were inherent in the regional
shipbuilding history is of importance to explain the chronological development of
traditions in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea. This
approach introduced the hypothesis that around the 13 th - 14th centuries
innovations of the “East China Sea shipbuilding tradition” in the region was an
impact-factor to the advent of the “South China Sea shipbuilding tradition”. Both
the growth of indigenous technology and innovations from outside of the region
underlay the formation of regional shipbuilding traditions and their linkage over
time.

�Bibliography
Cultural
Relics
and
Archaeological Institute of
Shandong Province, Yantai
Municipal Museum, and
Cultural Relics Bureau of
Penglai City
2006
Church, S. K.,
2010

Ancient ships from Penglai, Wenwu Press,
Beijing.

“Two Ming Dynasty shipyards in Nanjing and
their infrastructure”, in Shipwreck ASIA: Thematic
Studies in East Asian maritime archaeology, (ed.)
Jun Kimura, Maritime Archaeology Program,
Adelaide, pp. 32-49.
Green, J.,
“Maritime archaeology in Southeast and East
Asia”, in Antiquity, 64, pp.347-363.
1990
Green, J., and Kim, Z. G., “The Shinan and Wando sites, Korea: further
information”, in the International Journal of
1989
Nautical Archaeology, 18 (2), pp. 33-41.
Maritime trade and state development in early
Hall, K. R.,
Southeast Asia, University of Hawaii Press,
1985
Honolulu.
Hartwell, R.,
“A revolution in the Chinese iron and coal
1962
industries during the Northern Sung, 960-1126
A.D.” in the Journal of Asian Studies, 21(2):153162.
Hartwell, R.,
Markets, technology, and the structure of
1966
enterprise in the development of the eleventhcentury Chinese iron and steel industry, in the
Journal of Economic History 26 (1):29-58.
Wasen II (A Japanese vessel II). 3 Aufl. Mono to
Ishii, K.,
ningen no bunkashi (Cultural history of materials
1995
and human), Hosei daigaku syuppankyoku
(Hosei University Press), Tokyo.
Kimura, J.,
“Historical
development
of
shipbuilding
technologies in East Asia”, in Shipwreck ASIA:
2010
Thematic Studies in East Asian maritime
archaeology, (ed.) Jun Kimura, Maritime
Archaeology Program, Adelaide, pp. 1-25.
Lee, C.-H., Osawa, M., and “Iron nails recovered from the plank of the Shinan
shipwreck”, in Shipwreck ASIA: Thematic Studies
Kimura, J.,
in East Asian maritime archaeology, (ed.) Jun
2010
Kimura,
Maritime
Archaeology
Program,
Adelaide, pp. 50-55.
Manguin, P.-Y.,
“Relationship and cross-influence between
1984
Southeast Asia and Chinese shipbuilding
traditions”, in SPAFA consultative workshop on

�research on maritime shipping and trade
networks in Southeast Asia, Cisarusa, West
Java, Indonesia.
Manguin, P.-Y.,
“Trading ships of the South China Sea:
1993
shipbuilding techniques and their role in the
history of the development of Asian trade
networks”, in the Journal of the Economic and
Social History of the Orient, 36 (3), pp. 253-280.
Manguin, P.-Y.,
“New ships for new networks: trends in
2010
shipbuilding in the South China Sea in the 15th
and 16th centuries”, in Southeast Asia in the
fifteenth century: the China factor, (eds.) Geoff
Wade, and Sun Laichen, NUS Press Singapore,
pp. 333-358.
Noshiro, S and Abe, H., “Identification of materials of the Quanzhou ship
and Samed Nagam ship”, in Shipwreck ASIA:
2010
Thematic Studies in East Asian maritime
archaeology, (ed.) Jun Kimura, Maritime
Archaeology Program, Adelaide, pp. 74-77.
Oba, O.,
“Scroll painting of Chinese junks which sailed to
1974
Nagasaki in the 18th century and their
equipment”, in the Mariner's Mirror, 60 (4), pp.
351-362.
Reischauer, E. O.,
“Notes on T'ang Dynasty Sea Routes”, in
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 5 (2), pp. 1421940
164.
Reid, A.,
“Hybrid identities in the 15th-century straits”, in
Southeast Asia in the fifteenth century: the China
2010
factor, (eds.) Geoff Wade, and Sun Laichen,
NUS Press, Singapore, pp. 307-332.
Sasaki, R., and Lee, C. H., “Goryeo Dynasty (918-1392), shipwrecks in
Korea”. in Shipwreck ASIA: thematic studies in
2010
East Asian maritime archaeology, (ed.) Jun
Kimura,
Maritime
Archaeology
Program,
Adelaide, pp. 56-73.
Wang, G.,
“The Nanhai trade: a study of the early history of
1958
Chinese trade in the South China Sea”, in
Journal of the Malayan Branch Royal Asiatic
Society XXXI (2), pp. 1-135.
Xi, L., Yang, X., and Tang, Zhongguo kexue jishu shi: jiaotong juan (The
history of science and technology in China:
X., (eds)
transportation), Science Press, Beijing.
2004

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2689">
                <text>East Asian shipbuilding traditions&#13;
and its historical evolvement</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2690">
                <text>Session 4&#13;
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2691">
                <text>The archaeological study of excavated ships can contribute to knowledge and understanding of past seafaring and maritime activities. Such study includes the assessment of the hull structure and construction methods. This paper highlights technological innovations evidenced by the remnants of ships in China, Korea, and Japan. Based on data of the excavated ships from the tenth century onwards, this paper addresses the significance of the bulkhead in oceangoing ships in the light of technological innovations, diffusion, and hybridization. This contributes to further understanding of the relationship between the â€œYellow Sea shipbuilding tradition,â€ the â€œEast China Sea shipbuilding tradition,â€ and the â€œSouth China Sea shipbuilding tradition.â€ The â€œSouth China Sea shipbuilding traditionâ€ has been presented by earlier researchers as a hybrid ship building technology. This paper highlights the integration of the technologies from the Yellow Sea and East China Sea into the South China Sea tradition by tracing specific hull components, such as bulkhead(s) used for East Asian seagoing ships. The â€œYellow Sea shipbuilding traditionâ€ is exhibited by ships operating in the northern waters of East Asia. Traditionally, these ships have flat bottoms but variations are represented by the early Tang Dynasty riverine ships and Goryeo Dynasty ships, and in later periods by Ming Dynasty ships excavated in Penglai, China.&#13;
&#13;
Recent archaeological inspections conducted on the Quanzhou ship, Shinan shipwreck, and ship timbers from the Takashima Underwater site established that these ships were built in the â€œEast China Sea shipbuilding traditionâ€. V-shaped bottoms, keel and bulkheads, and multiple-layered hull planking with iron fastenings, characterise this tradition. The ships built according to these two traditions came to be used in seaborne activities within and beyond East and Southeast Asia. The chronological linkage of three shipbuilding traditions developed in two regions will be pursued.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2692">
                <text>Jun Kimura</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2693">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="25">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="371" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4455">
                <text>Kaigai Jouhou to Kyushu (Overseas Information and Kyushu) æµ·å¤–æƒ…å ±ã¨ä¹å·ž</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4456">
                <text>Jun'ichi Himeno</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4457">
                <text>Kyushu Daigaku Shuppankai</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4458">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4459">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4460">
                <text>Jun'ichi Himeno</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4461">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4462">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4463">
                <text>Fukuoka</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4464">
                <text>Kyushu Daigaku Shuppankai</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4465">
                <text>Kaigai Jouhou to Kyushu (Overseas Information and Kyushu) æµ·å¤–æƒ…å ±ã¨ä¹å·ž</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="136" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1616">
                <text>Memories of Wind and Waves: A Self-Portrait of Lakeside Japan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1617">
                <text>Junichi Saga</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1618">
                <text>Kodansha Intanashonaru</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1619">
                <text>2002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1620">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1621">
                <text>Junichi Saga</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1622">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="152">
            <name>ISBN</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1623">
                <text>4770027583</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1624">
                <text>2002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="188">
            <name>Extra</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1625">
                <text>External Resources: Find this item at Abebooks.com (Bookseller) Find this item at Alibris (Bookseller) Find this item at Antiquarian Booksellers Association of America (Bookseller) Find this item at Biblio (Bookseller) Cite This Item Search for versions with same title and author | Advanced options ...
More About This In: Books in Print (Publication status and optional reviews)
Uniform Title: Kasumigaura fudoki. English
Edition: 1st ed.
Language: English (Show non-Roman characters)
Geographic: Japan -- Social life and customs.
Note(s): Map on lining papers.
Class Descriptors: LC: GT3470; Dewey: 952.009734
Responsibility: Junichi Saga ; translated by Juliet Winters Carpenter ; illustrated by Susumu Saga.
More Records: Show record information
Vendor Info: Baker &amp; Taylor YBP Library Services (BKTY YANK) 24.00 Status:             active
Entry: 20021106
Update: 20070311
Provider: OCLC</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="205">
            <name>Library Catalog</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1626">
                <text>OCLC WorldCat FirstSearch</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="212">
            <name>Num Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1627">
                <text>258</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1628">
                <text>Tokyo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1629">
                <text>Kodansha Intanashonaru</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="241">
            <name>Short Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1630">
                <text>Memories of Wind and Waves</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1631">
                <text>Memories of Wind and Waves: A Self-Portrait of Lakeside Japan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="540" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="331">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/8cb2358c19528ea076a5ca02c4832296.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2dd5bc09eb01eb01409102a38ebd5571</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6052">
                    <text>Antimicrobial hydrogel patches for deacidification and conservation of waterlogged
archaeological wood
Xiaohang Suna, Junjie Chena, Xuanwei Zhangb, Qiang Chena*
a

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai Campus,
Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China 519082
b

Marinetime Silk Road Museum of Guangdong, HVFF+3H3, Jiangcheng District, Yangjiang,
Guangdong Province, China, 529536
*E-mail: chenqiang3@mail.sysu.edu.cn

ABSTRACT
The Nanhai No. 1 hull, a Chinese merchant ship sank during the Southern Song dynasty and excavated from the
South China Sea, is an example of underwater cultural heritage waterlogged wood that has been preserved in
situ for centuries. Although the overall structure of the wooden artifacts is still intact they are severely degraded
and acidified. It is now urgent to explore effective approaches for its conservation, we explore the feasibility of
antimicrobial hydrogel patches. Antimicrobial hydrogel patches dispersed with antibacterial and deacidification
nanoparticles simultaneously deacidify, moisturize, and reinforce both antibacterial and mechanical aspects of
waterlogged wood. In the construction of the antimicrobial hydrogel patches, the double network hydrogel was
used to prepare the hydrogel substrate with stretch and mechanical strength. We have successfully applied the
antimicrobial hydrogel patches to the waterlogged wood from Nanhai No. 1, with the support of the Maritime
Silk Road Museum of Guangdong. We demonstrate here the advantages of hydrogel patches to protect
waterlogged wood with testing in deacidification, compression and antimicrobial.
KEYWORDS: Underwater cultural heritage waterlogged wood; Antibacterial (preserve); Nanhai No. 1;
Deacidification; Antimicrobial (preventative); Mechanical support (protect against the harsh external conditions)

INTRODUCTION
In 2007, the 800-year-old Nanhai No.1 shipwreck hull was raised from the seabed and moved to the
Marine Silk Road Museum, where it was conserved (Z. Liu et al. 2018). Early studies of the wood at
the museum showed that the structural damage of the underwater cultural heritage (henceforth UCH)
waterlogged wood, composed of softwoods, was severe to not withstand long-term spray
deacidification and moisture retention (Huang et al. 2021; R. Li et al. 2022; Z. Liu et al. 2018; Yin et
al. 2019). As the archaeological excavation continues on the Nanhai No. 1, like other conservation
efforts the severe acidification and salt deposition on the surface is an important challenge for the
protection of the UCH (Amornkitbamrung et al. 2015; Babiński et al. 2017; Baglioni and Giorgi 2006;
Cavallaro et al. 2017; Chelazzi, Giorgi, and Baglioni 2006; Dong et al. 2010; Durán et al. 2016;
Eriksen, Gregory, and Matthiesen 2017; Giorgi, Chelazzi, and Baglioni 2005; Giorgi et al. 2002; L.
Liu et al. 2019; Mahltig et al. 2008; Majka, Babiński, and Olek 2017; Piotrowska and Konieczny
2015; Poggi et al. 2016; Sandström, Fors, and Persson 2003; Sandström et al. 2002; Schofield et al.
2011; Walsh-Korb 2022; Walsh-Korbs and Avérous 2019; Y. Li et al. 2022; Zelinka 2014; Zhou,
Wang, and Hu 2021). Temperature, salinity, fungi, and bacteria are the cause of the severe cell wall
decay (Capretti et al. 2008; Colombini et al. 2009; Hoffmann and Jones 1989. To neutralize the
sulfuric acid and add antimicrobial protection for UCH waterlogged wood we prepared and applied an
antimicrobial hydrogel patch. Antimicrobial hydrogel patches dispersed with antibacterial and
deacidification nanoparticles simultaneously deacidify, moisturize, and reinforce both antibacterial
and mechanical aspects of waterlogged wood (Gong 2014; Gong et al. 2003). This antimicrobial
hydrogel patch served as mechanical support, deacidification, and antibacterial functions, during
post-excavation conservation and prior to the addition of consolidates (Bai et al. 2019). We conducted
1

�a thorough literature review of shipwreck conservation of waterlogged woods; here we demonstrate in
collaboration with the Maritime Silk Road Museum of Guangdong the advantages of antimicrobial
hydrogel patches to protect waterlogged wood on the Nanhai No. 1 hull with testing in
deacidification, compression, and antimicrobial.
EXPERIMENTS
Materials
The UCH waterlogged wood from the Nanhai No. 1 shipwreck was generously provided by the
Maritime Silk Road Museum of Guangdong with a maximum moisture content of around 529%. The
UCH waterlogged wood was stored in 0.5wt% isothiazolinone solution and washed with excess
amount of water three times prior to conservation. The following chemicals were purchased:
Acrylamide (AR, 99.0%) and sodium citrate (98%) from Aladdin; Potassium persulfate (GR, 99.9%),
potassium bicarbonate (AR, 99.5%), and N,N,N',N'-Tetramethylethylenediamine (99%) from
Macklin; N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (MBAA,98%) from Maya Reagent; Silver nitrate (99%) from
Alfa Aesar; Calcium Sulfate (97%) from Rhawn; and sodium alginate (AR, 98%) from RYON. All
chemicals were used directly without additional purification.
Method
We prepared the antimicrobial hydrogel patches and performed three tests: deacidification,
compression and antimicrobial.
Preparation of antimicrobial hydrogel patches
12.44grams (g) of acrylamide and 1.56g of sodium alginate were dissolved in deionized water to form
an acrylamide solution with a water content of 60-80 per cent by weight (wt%). After degassing the
solution for one day, we added 0.0018g and 0.0036g of silver nitrate and 0.2g sodium citrate. Then we
added 0.5g potassium persulfate, 0.0074g MBAA, 0.031g tetramethylethylenediamine and potassium
bicarbonate (KHCO3) at 1.5g, 2.5g, and 3.5g. The solution was transferred to a transparent mold and
exposed to UV light (254nanometers (nm), 8 watts (W) power output) for one hour. The resulting
hydrogel was carefully removed from the molded and immersed in calcium sulfate solution for 20-40
minutes.
Deacidification test
The Nanhai No. 1 UCH waterlogged wood was wrapped for three hours with the antimicrobial
hydrogel patch (see recipe above). The pH of the UCH waterlogged wood was measured by soaking
1g in 30g of deionized water for 30 minutes and measuring the pH of the soaking water (Mettler
Toledo, FE28). The pH meter was calibrated with a standard solution before use.
Compression test
A compression test was conducted using a universal tensile tester (Haida Instrument, HD-A513). The
displacement as a function of force was measured for the synthesized hydrogels with the KHCO3
concentration at 1.5g, 2.5g, and 3.5g and compression speed of 116 millimeters per minute (mm/min).
Antimicrobial test
The antimicrobial performance of the hydrogels was measured via disk diffusion test based on Oxford
cup method. Briefly, the prepared agar medium was sterilized at 121°C for 15 minutes, and cooled to
about 55-50°C before pouring into a petri dish to form the bottom layer of agar gel. Then, E. coli
culture grown in sterilized lysogeny broth (LB) media was applied on the surface of the agar media.
2

�After one day when the E. coli culture completely covers the agar media, the prepared hydrogel was
grinded into a flowable state and added dropwise into an Oxford cup. With 37°C and one day
incubation, the antimicrobial performance was evaluated based on the zone of inhibition around the
Oxford cup.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this paper, an antimicrobial hydrogel patch used in the early stages of UCH waterlogged wood
conservation was prepared using weak alkaline compounds. Fig. 1a shows a sample of the
waterlogged wood. Water was sprayed routinely to maintain the water content of the waterlogged
wood. Waterlogged wood, on the hull of Nanhai No.1 shipwreck, in some areas show heavy
precipitation and bacterial decomposition (Fig. 1b 1c and 1d).

Figure 1 waterlogged wood (a) with precipitation cleaned; (b) on the hull of Nanhai No.1 shipwreck; (c) and (d) with
severe bacterial decomposition.

Another advantage of the hydrogel deacidification material is that it is soft and easily stretches to
change shape. The tensile and compression properties were measured. Fig. 2a and 2b are photographs
of released and stretched hydrogel, respectively. More than 1000% elongation was achieved with the
polyacrylamide/alginate hydrogel with silver nanoparticles dispersed.

3

�Figure 2 polyacrylamide/alginate hydrogel (a) at rest; (b) tensioned and elongated; (c) graph of compression with
different KHCO3 concentrations.

The hydrogels with 0.5% and 2.5% KHCO3 are close in Young’s modulus, while the hydrogel with
2.5% KHCO3 has higher Young’s modulus (Fig 2c), which might be caused by the difference in ionic
crosslinking of silver and potassium ions. The hydrogel with potassium percarbonate was used to
wrap the waterlogged wood (Fig. 3a-c). The weak alkaline KHCO3 neutralized the sulfuric acid in the
waterlogged wood, which resulted in a pH increase from 4.0 to 7.2 (Fig 3d). It was also confirmed
that above 0.5% KHCO3 concentration, the increase in KHCO3 did not contribute to the pH increase
remarkably. Gentle adhesion of the hydrogel to the wood neutralization occurs immediately, which
lead to fast and significant pH increase. We suspect this is due to the large water content of the
hydrogel, while also performing the adhesion underwater, is homogeneous.

Figure 3 antimicrobial hydrogel (a) patch (b) patch and waterlogged wood (c) wrapped around waterlogged wood;
(d) bar graph of pH test with different KHCO3 concentrations.

The results of hydrogel antibacterial experiments proved it can protect waterlogged wood from
bacterial degradation. When 30 μg/mL silver nitrate in the hydrogel was converted to silver
nanoparticles, the antimicrobial properties of the hydrogels became sufficient to prevent bacterial
degradation. Comparing Fig 4b and 4c, we see the increase of the silver nanoparticles from 30 μg/mL
4

�silver nitrate converted to silver nanoparticles to 60 μg/mL silver nitrate converted to silver
nanoparticles had less effect on the increase in antimicrobial properties.

Figure 4 antimicrobial hydrogel with silver nitrate converted to silver nanoparticles (a) control sample without;(b)
zones of inhibition caused by 30 μg/mL; (c) zones of inhibition caused by 60 μg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we explore the feasibility of using antimicrobial hydrogel patches with excellent
mechanical strength for conservation of waterlogged wood. We focused our testing on antimicrobial
hydrogels deacidification and antibacterial properties. We noted the prepared hydrogel patches match
well with weak alkaline and high water content properties to carry out ion exchange to reduce the
acidity. Double network polymer structure was utilized to increase the stretch of the hydrogel, which
provides mechanical support to the highly decayed softwood. These antimicrobial hydrogel patches
can perform targeted restoration and preservation as indicated by our research and testing of UCH
waterlogged wood from Nanhai No.1 with the help of the Maritime Silk Road Museum of
Guangdong.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Mailing address: School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University Zhuhai, Guangdong Province
519082 China; Email: chenqiang3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Xiaohang Sun, Junjie Chen, Xuanwei Zhang, Qiang Chen* contributed equally to this work. All authors have given approval
to the final version of the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51972264).

5

�Bibliography
Amornkitbamrung, Lunjakorn, Tamilselvan Mohan, Silvo Hribernik, Victoria Reichel, Damien Faivre, Adriana Gregorova,
Patricia Engel, Rupert Kargl, and Volker Ribitsch. “Polysaccharide Stabilized Nanoparticles for Deacidification
and Strengthening of Paper.” RSC Advances 5, no. 42 (2015): 32950–32961.
Babiński, Leszek, Ewa Fabisiak, Henryk P. Dąbrowski, and Piotr Kittel. “Study on Dimensional Stabilization of
12,500-Year-Old Waterlogged Subfossil Scots Pine Wood from the Koźmin Las Site, Poland.” Journal of Cultural
Heritage 23, (2017): 119–127.
Baglioni, Piero, and Rodorico Giorgi. “Soft and Hard Nanomaterials for Restoration and Conservation of Cultural Heritage.”
Soft Matter 2, no.4 (2006): 293.
Bai, Ruobing, Jiawei Yang, and Zhigang Suo. “Fatigue of Hydrogels.” European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 74,
(2019): 337–370.
Capretti, C., N. Macchioni, B. Pizzo, G. Galotta, Gianna Giachi, and D. Giampaola. “The Characterization of Waterlogged
Archaeological Wood: The Three Roman Ships Found in Naples (Italy).” Archaeometry 50, no. 5 (2008): 855–876.
Cavallaro, Giuseppe, Giuseppe Lazzara, Stefana Milioto, Filippo Parisi, and Fabio Ruisi. “Nanocomposites Based on
Esterified Colophony and Halloysite Clay Nanotubes as Consolidants for Waterlogged Archaeological Woods.”
Cellulose 24, no.1 (2017): 3367–3376.
Cavallaro, Giuseppe, Stefana Milioto, and Giuseppe Lazzara. “Halloysite Nanotubes: Interfacial Properties and Applications
in Cultural Heritage.” Langmuir 36, no.1 (2020): 3677–3689.
Chelazzi, David, Rodorico Giorgi, and Piero Baglioni. “Nanotechnology for Vasa Wood De-Acidification.” Macromolecular
Symposia 238, (2006): 30–36.
Colombini, Maria P., Jeannette J. Lucejko, Francesca Modugno, Marco Orlandi, Eeva Liisa Tolppa, and Luca Zoia. “A
Multi-Analytical Study of Degradation of Lignin in Archaeological Waterlogged Wood.” Talanta 80, no.1 (2009):
61–70.
Dong, Chunxu, John Cairney, Qunhui Sun, Orville Lee Maddan, Gaohong He, and Yulin Deng. “Investigation of Mg(OH)2
Nanoparticles as an Antibacterial Agent.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12, no.1 (2010): 2101–2109.
Durán, Nelson, Marcela Durán, Marcelo Bispo De Jesus, Amedea B. Seabra, Wagner J. Fávaro, and Gerson Nakazato.
“Silver Nanoparticles: A New View on Mechanistic Aspects on Antimicrobial Activity.” Nanomedicine:
Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 12, no. 3 (2016): 789–799.
Eriksen, Anne Marie, David John Gregory, and Henning Matthiesen. “The Importance of Cellulose Content and Wood
Density for Attack of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood by the Shipworm, Teredo Navalis.” Journal of Cultural
Heritage 28, (2017): 75–81.
Giorgi, Rodorico, David Chelazzi, and Piero Baglioni. “Nanoparticles of Calcium Hydroxide for Wood Conservation. The
Deacidification of the Vasa Warship.” Langmuir 21, no. 23 (2005): 10743–10748.
Giorgi, Rodorico, Luigi Dei, Massimo Ceccato, Claudius Schettino, and Piero Baglioni. “Nanotechnologies for Conservation
of Cultural Heritage: Paper and Canvas Deacidification.” Langmuir 18, no. 21 (2002): 8198–8203.
Gong, Jian Ping. “Materials Both Tough and Soft.” Science 344, no. 6180 (2014.): 161–162.
Gong, Jian Ping, Yoshinori Katsuyama, Takayuki Kurokawa, and Yoshihito Osada. “Double-Network Hydrogels with
Extremely High Mechanical Strength.” Advanced Materials 15, no. 14 (2003): 1155–1158.
Hoffmann, Per, and Mark A. Jones. “Structure and Degradation Process for Waterlogged Archaeological Wood.” In
Archaeological Wood, 35–65. American Chemical Society: Advances in Chemistry, 1989.
Huang, Xinduo, Yeqing Han, Jing Du, Peifeng Guo, Yu Wang, Kaixuan Ma, Naisheng Li, Zhiguo Zhang, Yue Li, and Jiao
Pan. “Inhibitory Effect of Cinnamaldehyde on Main Destructive Microorganisms of Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck.”
Applied Sciences 11, no. 11 (2021): 5262.
Li, Ren, Juan Guo, Nicola Macchioni, Benedetto Pizzo, Guanglan Xi, Xingling Tian, Jiabao Chen, et al. “Characterisation of
Waterlogged Archaeological Wood from Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck by Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Methods.”
Journal of Cultural Heritage 56, (2022): 25–35.

6

�Li, Yongdi, Hao Wu, Genxin Chen, Qiong Zhang, Beisong Fang, Yang Zhao, Yuping Liu, and Jiabing Ran. “Strong/Stiff
Exterior and Elastic Interior: An Effective Biomimetic Topological Structure for the Consolidation of Waterlogged
Wooden Archaeological Relics during Dehydration.” ACS Applied Polymer Materials 4, no. 11 (2022):
8543–8555.
Liu, Luqi, Lu Zhang, Bingjian Zhang, and Yulan Hu. 2019. “A Comparative Study of Reinforcement Materials for
Waterlogged Wood Relics in Laboratory.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 36: 94–102.
Liu, Zijun, Tongtong Fu, Cuiting Hu, Dawa Shen, Nicola Macchioni, Lorena Sozzi, Yue Chen, et al. “Microbial Community
Analysis and Biodeterioration of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood from the Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck during
Storage.” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 1–11.
Mahltig, Boris, Christiane Swaboda, Albert Roessler, and Horst Böttcher. “Functionalising Wood by Nanosol Application.”
Journal of Materials Chemistry 18, no. 27 (2008): 3180–3192.
Majka, Jerzy, Leszek Babiński, and Wiesław Olek. “Sorption Isotherms of Waterlogged Subfossil Scots Pine Wood
Impregnated with a Lactitol and Trehalose Mixture.” Holzforschung 71, no. 10 (2017): 813–819.
Piotrowska, Katarzyna, and Piotr Konieczny. “Sugar Conservation of Waterlogged Archaeological Finds in the Last 30
Years.” In Proceedings of the 2015 Conservation and Digitalization Conference, (2015)15–20.
Poggi, Giovanna, Nicola Toccafondi, David Chelazzi, Patrizia Canton, Rodorico Giorgi, and Piero Baglioni. “Calcium
Hydroxide Nanoparticles from Solvothermal Reaction for the Deacidification of Degraded Waterlogged Wood.”
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 473, (2016): 1–8.
Sandström, Magnus, Yvonne Fors, and Ingmar Persson. The Vasa’s New Battle : Sulfur, Acid and Iron. Stockholm: National
Maritime Museums [Statens maritima museer], 2003.
Sandström, Magnus, Farideh Jalilehvand, Ingmar Persson, Ulrik Gelius, Patrick Frank, and Ingrid Hall-Roth. “Deterioration
of the Seventeenth-Century Warship Vasa by Internal Formation of Sulphuric Acid.” Nature 415, no. 6874 (2002):
893–897.
Schofield, Eleanor J., Ritimukta Sarangi, Apurva Mehta, A. Mark Jones, Fred J.W. Mosselmans, and Alan V. Chadwick.
“Nanoparticle De-Acidification of the Mary Rose.” Materials Today 14, no. 7–8 (2011): 354–358.
Walsh-Korb, Zarah. “Sustainability in Heritage Wood Conservation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research.”
Forests 13, no. 1 (2022):18.
Walsh-Korbs, Zarah, and Luc Avérous. “Recent Developments in the Conservation of Materials Properties of Historical
Wood.” Progress in Materials Science 102, (2019): 167–221.
Yin, Liuyu, Yin Jia, Mei Wang, Huanhuan Yu, Ying Jing, Cuiting Hu, Fengyu Zhang, et al. “Bacterial and Biodeterioration
Analysis of the Waterlogged Wooden Lacquer Plates from the Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck.” Applied Sciences
(Switzerland) 9, no. 4 (2019): 1–13.
Zelinka, Samuel L. 2014. “Preserving Ancient Artifacts for the next Millennia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 111, no. 50 (2014): 17700–17701.
Zhou, Yihang, Kai Wang, and Dongbo Hu. “An Aqueous Approach to Functionalize Waterlogged Archaeological Wood
Followed by Improved Surface-Initiated ARGET ATRP for Maintaining Dimensional Stability.” Cellulose 28, no.
4 (2021): 2433–2443.

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="50">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="256">
                  <text>2023 Session 14: Conservation Treatment of Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="257">
                  <text>Session 14 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="258">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 14 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="259">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="260">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="261">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="262">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="263">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="264">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6042">
                <text>Antimicrobial hydrogel patches for deacidification and conservation of waterlogged archaeological wood&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6043">
                <text>The Nanhai No. 1 hull, a Chinese merchant ship sank during the Southern Song dynasty and excavated from the&#13;
South China Sea, is an example of underwater cultural heritage waterlogged wood that has been preserved in&#13;
situ for centuries. Although the overall structure of the wooden artifacts is still intact they are severely degraded&#13;
and acidified. It is now urgent to explore effective approaches for its conservation, we explore the feasibility of&#13;
antimicrobial hydrogel patches. Antimicrobial hydrogel patches dispersed with antibacterial and deacidification&#13;
nanoparticles simultaneously deacidify, moisturize, and reinforce both antibacterial and mechanical aspects of&#13;
waterlogged wood. In the construction of the antimicrobial hydrogel patches, the double network hydrogel was&#13;
used to prepare the hydrogel substrate with stretch and mechanical strength. We have successfully applied the&#13;
antimicrobial hydrogel patches to the waterlogged wood from Nanhai No. 1, with the support of the Maritime&#13;
Silk Road Museum of Guangdong. We demonstrate here the advantages of hydrogel patches to protect&#13;
waterlogged wood with testing in deacidification, compression and antimicrobial.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6044">
                <text>Xiaohang Sun</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6045">
                <text>Junjie Chen</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6046">
                <text>Xuanwei Zhang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6047">
                <text>Qiang Chen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6048">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6049">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6050">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6051">
                <text>Sun, Xiaohang , Junjie Chena, Xuanwei Zhangb, and Qiang Chena. 2023. “Antimicrobial hydrogel patches for deacidification and conservation of waterlogged archaeological wood.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok and T. Kurt Knoerl. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1909 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="56">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 14 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="413" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5040">
                <text>A Record of the Buddhist Religion as Practised in India and the Malay Archipelago (A.D. 671-695)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5041">
                <text>Yijing</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5042">
                <text>Junjiro Takakusu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5043">
                <text>Munshiram Manoharlal</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5044">
                <text>1896</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5045">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5046">
                <text>Yijing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="147">
            <name>Translator</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5047">
                <text>Junjiro Takakusu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5048">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5049">
                <text>1896</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="185">
            <name>Edition</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5050">
                <text>1966</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5051">
                <text>Delhi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5052">
                <text>Munshiram Manoharlal</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5053">
                <text>A Record of the Buddhist Religion as Practised in India and the Malay Archipelago (A.D. 671-695)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="17">
        <name>Southeast Asia</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="199" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="83">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/9c2940c1beda3be9f9dc0a2e2d3e41d0.jpg</src>
        <authentication>ab4ac569b5e2b270de08ef64f8f5ae5c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="6">
            <name>Omeka Image File</name>
            <description>The metadata element set that was included in the `files_images` table in previous versions of Omeka. These elements are common to all image files.</description>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="106">
                <name>Width</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2462">
                    <text>1230</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="107">
                <name>Height</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2463">
                    <text>870</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="108">
                <name>Bit Depth</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2464">
                    <text>8</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="109">
                <name>Channels</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2465">
                    <text>3</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples of still images are: paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps.  Recommended best practice is to assign the type "text" to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2454">
                <text>Crossing Cultures - Poster</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2455">
                <text>For the first time in the history of South West Coast of India, a variety of archaeological evidence for the long distance maritime exchanges was unearthed at Pattanam (N. Lat. 10Â° 09.434â€™; E Long 76Â° 12.587â€™). The ca 4 m thick cultural\ deposit of Pattanam may be defined into five cultural periods spanning three millennia since 1000 BCE. Four seasons of excavations by KCHR, in about 650 sq. m dug up area, produced 39,846 antiquities and about three million (29,83178) pottery sherds. The excavations also revealed remains of brick architecture -  warehouse, wharf/jetty and residential/industrial structures, wooden canoe and a plethora of biological remains.  The poster illustrates the major finds and cross cultural connections suggesting Pattanam could be part of the legendary port of Muziris.&#13;
&#13;
A full scale version of the poster can be downloaded from this location:&#13;
&#13;
https://rapidshare.com/files/721815335/Muziris_Poster_v_final2.pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2456">
                <text>P J Cherian</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2457">
                <text>K P Shajan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2458">
                <text>V Selvakumar</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2459">
                <text>M Nambirajan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2460">
                <text>K Rajan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2461">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="26">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
