<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=41&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-25T19:05:56+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>41</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="341" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4071">
                <text>Qanaâ€™ (Yemen) and the Indian Ocean: The Archaeological Evidence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4072">
                <text>A.V. Sedov</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4073">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4074">
                <text>Jean-Francois Salles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4075">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4076">
                <text>Conference Paper</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4077">
                <text>A.V. Sedov</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4078">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4079">
                <text>Jean-Francois Salles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4080">
                <text>Conference Paper</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="175">
            <name>Conference Name</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4081">
                <text>International Seminar â€œTechno-Archaeological Perspectives of Seafaring in the Indian Ocean, 4th cent. B.C.-15th cent. A.D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4082">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4083">
                <text>11-35</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4084">
                <text>New Delhi February 28-March 4, 1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4085">
                <text>Qanaâ€™ (Yemen) and the Indian Ocean: The Archaeological Evidence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="162" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1960">
                <text>Queen Hatshepsutâ€™s expedition to the Land of Punt: The first oceanographic cruise?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1961">
                <text>El-Sayed, Sayed Z</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1962">
                <text>Spring 1995</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1963">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1964">
                <text>El-Sayed, Sayed Z</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1965">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="155">
            <name>Access Date</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1966">
                <text>2005-09-21</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1967">
                <text>Spring 1995</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="196">
            <name>Issue</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1968">
                <text>1</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="225">
            <name>Publication Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1969">
                <text>Quarterdeck</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1970">
                <text>Queen Hatshepsutâ€™s expedition to the Land of Punt: The first oceanographic cruise?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="248">
            <name>URL</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1971">
                <text>www-ocean.tamu.edu/Quarterdeck/QD3.1/Elsayed/elsayed-hatshepsut.html</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1972">
                <text>3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="450" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="245">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/432af427947dccb9b5ad175773098259.jpg</src>
        <authentication>97dbdec1110d132dc516cb5a039248da</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="68">
                  <text>Poster Session 2014</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="69">
                  <text>Posters presented at  the Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples of still images are: paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps.  Recommended best practice is to assign the type "text" to images of textual materials.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="7">
          <name>Original Format</name>
          <description>If the image is of an object, state the type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="5324">
              <text>Poster</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5319">
                <text>Re-examining the Butuan Boats Pre-colonial Philippine Watercraft</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5320">
                <text>Poster Session </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5321">
                <text>Poster presented at the 2014 Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5322">
                <text>Ligaya Lacsina</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5323">
                <text>7/9/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="38">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="241" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="143">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/698ffaab552da9f86d8915e24515eae0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cf1be6134ac8eb198a59bbcc90e1a901</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2902">
                    <text>Reading of the contemporary social consciousness
through the shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury
Mr. A.M.A.Dayananda

Abstract
The shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury is buried on the southern coast of Sri Lanka very close to a
frequented tourist destination. It was run aground hitting on a rock at Akurala about three miles away
from the shore. In 1893 when sailing from Bombay to Diamond Island the ship sailed past Rangoon
through Colombo harbour after unloading charcoal. It is an iron build four mast sailing vessel. It
collided with a reef due to rough waves. Six of the crew drowned and 22 survived. The shipwreck
settled at a 50 foot depth. The incident was first reported in the The Ceylon Examiner Newspaper on
8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th of May 1893. The value of the vessel was estimated at Indian Rupees (Rs.)
300,000 at the time. In one article there is another steamer ship reported wrecked some years
previously. This paper includes details of the wreckage as are available from the newspaper reports.
What happened after her wreckage was an interesting story. The time was the British colonial period
in “Ceylon” (now Sri Lanka) during which time there was a growing general unrest against the colonial
masters. Some information reveals that this mindset may have influenced the rescuers during their
rescue efforts of the drowning crew. This paper it is going to elaborate on the story behind the
shipwreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury and investigate the social influences towards the wreck site then
and now.

Introduction
Even though Sri Lanka is a small island it is located at a geographically important
juncture which joins the sea routes of East and West in the Indian Ocean. It was
used as a trade centre within which goods were exchanged and as a resting place
for navigators after a long sea voyage. “This ship was built in 1883 and belonged to
the English firm The Browns and Sons” (Bruzelius 1996). A metallic vessel with four
masts and a contemporaneously superior ship on the company's registration (The
Ceylon Examiner Newspaper 08,05,1893). The ship had often arrived to the
Colombo harbour but was wrecked in 1893 in the southern ocean of Sri Lanka
marking its end of long sea voyages. The wreckage of the coal-transport ship is
located between Hikkaduwa and Akurala and 14 meters deep in the seabed.
Two of the newspapers, The Otago Daily Times and The Ceylon Examiner
(Figure 2) reported over several days of the ship's tragedy and the problematic
situation that the crew had to face after the wrecking. A minute detail of the reported
facts and the way that they have been reported exposes the social background and
the mentality of the social context.

Discovery and Recognition of the Ship ‘Earl of Shaftsbury’
The Earl of Shaftsbury attracted both local and foreign divers visiting Hikkaduwa It
was reported by Arthur C. Clerk in the 1960s (Clerk 1956-57:38). A very brief
introduction of it is also mentioned in his book The Reef of Taprobane.” We later
discovered, marked the resting place of the Earl of Shaftesbury, which ran on to the
Akurala Reef in 1893” (Clerk 1956-57:p,38). A formal survey on this place has not
been done since the diving activities conducted in the 1960s. This shipwreck not only
entails historic and archaeological value but bears great significance to bio diversity
as well. The ship which provides a place of living for different marine species of
various colours represents an important environmental system. The Maritime

�Archaeology Unit (MAU) in Galle, which is under the Central Cultural Fund, planned
for an archaeological exploration on the shipwreck. Archaeological investigations on
the ship first started in January 2008. The second step involved basic surveying
activities in March and April 2008 by the participants of the Asian Pacific Regional
Maritime Archaeology Training School established in association with the MAU
(Figure 1).

Figure 1. The group that assisted the exploration (Photo - R. Muthucumarana)

Scriptorium Research Work
Research was carried out on documents in search of the facts that had not yet been
revealed. The divers who lived close to the site were aware that the Earl of
Shaftsbury wrecked in 1893. The fact had been further proved by Clerk's book The
Reef of Taprobane. So steps were taken to carry out an archive search based on the
year 1893. Nishantha Kumara, an undergraduate who came to the MAU as a
volunteer was sent to search the old newspapers. The attempt was fruitful because
the Examiner reported the details of the shipwreck. This ship had been built in the
Leigh region in England by the firm Reimage and Ferguson. It was registered under
Lloyds, the authority on certificates of quality for ships. The Earl of Shaftsbury was of
the highest condition among the ships then registered under the firm(The Ceylon
Examiner news paper 08,05,1893).
The length of the ship was 289.6 feet (ft.) and the width of it was 42.01 ft, her
tonnage was 2079, and the dimension was 2869 ft. The owner of the ship was the
Brown and Sons in England. The estimated value of the ship was three hundred
thousand rupees in 1893. Out of the 28 members of staff onboard, six lost their lives
in the wreckage (The Ceylon Examiner News paper 08, 05,1893). The ship had
sailed to Bombay from New York harbour in America loaded with paraffin oil and
coal. The empty vessel, which had been reloaded with ballast stones for balance,
wrecked while sailing around Sri Lanka towards Diamond Island in Rangoon. At the
time of the wreck the captain may have possessed a large sum of money; the money
that the ship had earned from the goods unloaded at Bombay (Rasika 2010:06).

�Figure 2. Otago Daily Time 23/06/1893 The Ceylon Examiner News Paper 08,05,1893

The Present Situation of the nautical ship, the Earl of Shaftsbury
According to the initial research carried out in 2008, it was observed that the central
part of the naval ship had been severely damaged. Further investigations of the ruins
revealed that this was not only natural causes but also due to the activities of
treasure hunters and metal collectors, who had caused the destruction using
explosives. The bow and the stern sections are still in good condition and the
massive iron masts of the ship can be well recognized. The ballast stones that had
been used to balance the empty vessel are still lying around the ship. The ship which
lies inclining on its left maintains unity from the front to the back.

�Figure 3. The Ruins of the Earl of Shaftsbury (Photo - R. Muthucumarana)

Field Strategies
In 2008 the members of the MAU, did a survey on the wreck in a collaboration with
the UNESCO Bangkok office. The wreck was measured and recorded by the team
using 06 temporary control points fixed around the wreck. The site was divided in to
two parts (from bow to mid-ship and from stern to mid-ship) and the two parts were
measured separately. Each part was measured by using control points and the help
of the Site Recorder program (a software developed by the 3H Consulting/United
Kingdom). Also a base line was established covering the entire archaeological field.
It was about 60 meters long and measurements were taken in the off-set method.
For photographic records we used underwater digital still camera (Olympus C-770
camera with Ikelite housing) and video (Sony HC-90E camera with Ikelite housing).
The expected goals were not achieved by this limited surveying activities conducted
over four days(2008-03-27-29 and 2008-04-03) but they were enough to identify the
naval ship as the Earl of Shaftsbury (Figure 4).

�Figure 4. A Sketch of the wreck Earl of Shaftsbury (Drawing from the MAU archives)

The Last Few Hours of the Earl of Shaftsbury
The ship sunk due to natural hazards. The actual event was recorded by
Leyers in (The Ceylon Examiner Newspaper 09,05,1893):
After cruising around Sri Lanka the ship sailed to the right of Colombo harbour
towards the Diamond Island in the City of Rangoon. At about 3 a.m. the nature of the
sea turned extremely wild and brought howling storms along. The ship was
expeditiously glided forward and pushed up and down by the ferocious waves.
Suddenly something black appeared before the crew who were observing the route
in the front of the ship. Through intermittent flashes of lightening the crew identified a
reef. At once the crew on board started shouting. As the captain rushed out of his
cabin to examine the cry the ship collided on the rock with a big noise. The captain
was overwrought by this and rushed into the control cabin in attempt to take the ship
into the deep sea. His efforts were futile and the ship was repeatedly raised by the
harsh waves and thumped several times against the rock. The ship was ultimately
steered into the deep sea with the captain's efforts. The ship had been unfortunately
pierced by the knock against the rock and sea water rushed in. Soon it was filled
with water and descending in the sea. Before the navigators stationed in the lower
part of the ship's decks had time to think the ship started sinking (The Ceylon
Examiner News Paper 09, 05,1893).
Some other navigators who were saved from drowning, said the captain
watched the navigators fight for their lives against the harsh waves. The waves
threw the crew about as they hung on to the masts that had emerged out of water
and others clasped the wreckage of the ship. “The captain was spotted convulsing,
entering his cabin and locking himself in” (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper
10,05,1893) .Moreover, according to their revelations, at the moment of wrecking the
Second Officer of the ship had acted immediately and been successful in launching
a life saving boat. Fourteen navigators had boarded the lifeboat and headed towards
the coast. The Earl of Shaftsbury then buckled up throwing all on board into the sea
at about 150 meters from the coast. This unexpected incident made the tired crew
more miserable (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper 09,05,1893).

�There were also recorded some inconsistencies with the events around the
captain. This may be an indicator that the crew itself were largely unaffected by the
death of the captain. Perhaps the first entry to follow is indicative of the locals' mere
dismissal of the captain, while the second entry is more emotional and perhaps more
about the shocked tone of the crew.
The officers were housed by the special agent of the government until dawn
and then taken to the guest house in Ambalangoda. Three days later the body of the
captain, which had been badly destroyed, was carried to shore by the water. After
recognition of the body by the chief officer of the ship and the rest of the crew, it was
carried to Saint James church and buried with religious rituals (The Ceylon Examiner
news paper 11,05,1893).

The Otago Daily Times (Allen 26,01,2010). revealed an entirely different
story about the captain's death,
according to Mr. Jones, a rescued crew member of the Earl of Shaftsbury, the only
reason the captain died was because he fell off the lifeboat. The lifeboat had
loosened in its ties from the ship and had fallen on the captain's head while he was
swimming for his life which knocked him out.
In the aftermath of the unfortunate event, (Levers 08,05,1893) records the
reaction of the locals. This record is in fact a glimpse of the socio-politics at the time
and is symptomatic of the Sri Lankan anger towards the European oppression.
The survivors had no other option but to swim for their lives. They swam a
small distance and soon realized the European uniform they wore was a swimming
hindrance. They pulled them off and swam towards the coast. They were reported to
be mentally imbalanced and shocked, with bleeding wounds caused by being
knocked against the rocks close-in to shore. The locals provided the naked
navigators with native clothing. The surviving navigators later said that even though
they requested the locals to save the lives of those who are still hanging on the
masts and wreckage of the ship, they were denied with mentions that money was
needed if they are to be saved. Later, all the men hanging onto the wreckage were
saved by government special agents who were dispatched to the location. European
suits were sent from Colombo for those officers who were clad in native clothes. The
Examiner reported what a great shame for the Europeans to have been in native
clothes for the whole day until the arrival of European uniforms(The Ceylon
Examiner News Paper 09,05,1893).

The Names of the Drowned
Captain T.B Mayyard, aged about 56 years,
Second Mate. W.K Loyle, aged about 20 years.
Steward, E. Morentz, aged about 21 years.
Sail Maker. W perry, aged about 50 year.
Two coloured seamen, natives of St Helena and Fiji Islands.

The Survivors
Chief Mate, JL Jones
Carpenter, W Guest.
Apprentices, G.O Trofaint, O.E pokely, and Thomson 14 coloured able seamen, 2
boatswains and the cook. Altogether 22. (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper
09,05.1893).

�Reported Incidents After Sinking; Lack of Humanity?
The Earl of Shaftsbury was smashed and wrecked in a period when Sri Lanka was a
British colony (1815-1948). There had been no other shipwreck than the Earl of
Shaftsbury to have revealed the detail of the area's social background. The thoughts
and ambitions of the locals who were ruled by the Europeans and some of their
behaviours can be seen through these reports. “Humankind does not always
continue to exist with the same monotonous life style. Their thoughts and ambitions
do fluctuate with time. Exterior influences are mostly responsible for these
fluctuations”(Somarathne 1960 p,01). When studying social impacts and noting the
larger context in which people conduct themselves, projects like this one, can reveal
an underlying agency. To address this, newspaper records of the navigators'
comments were gathered in hopes to note the voice of a colonized society. Among
the reports that appeared on the wreckage the incident of not-saving crew members
is the most highlighted fact. The Examiner reported that even though the surviving
navigators had pleaded with the fishermen on shore to save the lives of the rest of
the crew, the fishermen had demanded a considerable amount of money if they were
to do so and would not otherwise. The newspaper report had highlighted that,
“natives showed their lack of humanity” (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper
09,05,1893).
In my personal view, the behaviour of the fishermen at a crisis like this could
never be appreciated and should not take place in any civilized society. Especially in
a great society that has been nurtured by Buddhist philosophies. Yet the reason for
such hard hearted people must be found out by a subtle and thorough case study.
The people in that society were under true agony from being oppressed with
revolutionary attitudes. The influence of three powerful European nationalities that
largely focused on economic advantages, from 1505 AD fostered a feeling of loss of
freedom and the consequential loss of their culture. Up to the time of the wreckage
there had been no other opportunity to record the deep-seeded anti-colonial feelings.
The fishermen, with the mentality for freedom, may have refused saving the
navigators due to their revolutionary attitudes caused by this anti-colonial sentiment.
They might have used this incident to show their frustration and envy towards the
colonists. They might have thought they would have been betraying their own nation
by rescuing their enemies. Furthermore they would have been reluctant to throw
their lives at risk by launching their small boats when the sea had become so violent
that even large ships, such as the Earl of Shaftsbury, were not safe.
The chagrin was not only visible in natives but also in Europeans. The report,
“The Captain, Europeans and two Coloured men Drowned”, ( The Ceylon Examiner
News Paper 08, 05,1893). highlights this, in that the report on the survivors and the
dead had grouped the black and Europeans separately. Navigators’ were in local
clothes until the European clothes were received and this was reported as an insult
to them. All the above mentioned facts reveal that there had been a social conflict
between the Europeans and the locals.

Conclusions
The only iron vessel with four masts so far found in Sri Lanka territorial waters is the
wrecked Earl of Shaftsbury. This is an important research station for any marine

�archaeologist studying ship building technology. Although there are so many laws
and conventions enacted internationally and locally in order to protect these
monuments, there are many practical difficulties in implementing them. One of the
main difficulties is to find funding for archaeological projects. We had to depend on
funds allocated by the state under the national budget. So it has become a common
feature for a developing nation like Sri Lanka to depend on funds from other sources.
However, I emphasize that archaeological sites of this nature shall be further studied
and shall be protected for the use of future generations. As a place of archaeological
importance for more than 100 years this wreck site is protected by archaeological
law (Department of Archaeology 1940; Department of Archaeology 1998). Besides,
steps are been taken to declare this site as protective monuments under purview of
Government of Sri Lanka and thereby will get a blanket coverage for the site.

Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the organizers of the Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater
Cultural Heritage for giving me an opportunity to participate. I also extended my gratitude to
professor Mark Staniforth and professor Nimal de Silva, The Director General (Central
Cultural fund) for encouraging me to publish this report.

Bibliography
Allen, T.,
2010
Bruzelius, L.,
1996
Clerk, A.C.,
1956-1957
Department
of Archaeology
1940
Department
of Archaeology
1998
Levers, R.W.,
1893

"Wreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury six Lives Lost", in Otago Daily
Times
23
June
Viewed
03
October
2011
http://www.wrecksite.eu/wreck.aspx?138941/&gt;.
Earl of Shaftesbury, Viewed 04 October , 2011.
http://www.bruzelius.info/Nautica/Ships/Fourmast_ships/Earl_of_S
haftesbury(1883).html
The reefs of Taprobane, printed in the united states of America,
Harper and Brother publishers, New York.
Antiquities ordinance No 9
Amendment to the Antiquities ordinance No 9 of 1940 (21st May
1998)

"Total Loss of The Ship Earl of Shaftsbury Off Akurella, Near
Ambalangodde", in The Ceylon Examiner News Paper,
08,09,10,11, May.
Dalanidu Magazine Vol II. Akurala verele Kedavachakaya Earl of
Rasika, M.,
2010
Shaftsbury, Maritime Archaeology Unit Central cultural fund.
Somaratne, W., A Modern Ceylon and world history, Ceylon publishing
1960
cooperation.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2897">
                <text>Reading of the contemporary social consciousness through the shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2898">
                <text>Session 2&#13;
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2899">
                <text>The shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury is buried on the southern coast of Sri Lanka very close to a frequented tourist destination. It was run aground hitting on a rock at Akurala about three miles away from the shore. In 1893 when sailing from Bombay to Diamond Island the ship sailed past Rangoon through Colombo harbour after unloading charcoal. It is an iron build four mast sailing vessel. It collided with a reef due to rough waves. Six of the crew drowned and 22 survived. The shipwreck settled at a 50 foot depth. The incident was first reported in the The  Ceylon Examiner Newspaper on 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th of May 1893. The value of the vessel was estimated at Indian Rupees (Rs.) 300,000 at the time. In one article there is another steamer ship reported wrecked some years previously. This paper includes details of the wreckage as are available from the newspaper reports. What happened after her wreckage was an interesting story. The time was the British colonial period in â€œCeylonâ€ (now Sri Lanka) during which time there was a growing general unrest against the colonial masters. Some information reveals that this mindset may have influenced the rescuers during their rescue efforts of the drowning crew. This paper it is going to elaborate on the story behind the shipwreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury and investigate the social influences towards the wreck site then and now.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2900">
                <text>A.M.A.Dayananda</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2901">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="24">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="430" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="222">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c523833a25bb03cde5fb458c778031d7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>39f063505a1ab66bbff69c2fbc9a12a7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5226">
                    <text>Recent Efforts in Underwater Cultural Heritage Management
on the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf

Dave Ball
Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Camarillo, California 93010, USA
Email: david.ball@boem.gov
Abstract
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is responsible for managing
the nation’s energy and mineral resources on the federal Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS). These resources include conventional energy (oil and gas), renewable
energy (wind and hydrokinetic) and sand and gravel extraction for beach
restoration. As with any federal action or undertaking, an assessment of potential
impacts to the environment, including cultural resources, is required to make an
informed decision. The BOEM Pacific OCS Region is taking a proactive
approach to cultural resources management on the OCS by funding research
efforts that provide baseline information on known and potential underwater
cultural resources, and by identifying best practices for incorporating information
from indigenous communities in the planning process.
Key words: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Cultural Landscape, Offshore
Renewable Energy, Outer continental Shelf, Submerged Landform, Tribe
Introduction
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is responsible for managing over
1.76 billion acres of seafloor off the coast of the United States (U.S.) and is charged
with regulatory oversight of offshore conventional energy (oil and gas), renewable
energy (wind, wave and ocean currents) and marine minerals (primarily sand and gravel
resources for coastal restoration). The Bureau’s jurisdiction begins 3 nautical miles
offshore and extends approximately 200 nautical miles, to the extent of the Exclusive
Economic Zone1. BOEM’s authority over conventional energy and marine minerals was
established through the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) of 1953, which
gave the Secretary of the Interior authority over mineral exploration and development on
the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). Through the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005
BOEM (then operating as the Minerals Management Service) also has authority over
offshore renewable energy. The EPAct significantly expanded the bureau’s offshore
energy responsibilities and renewed interest in energy development on the Atlantic and
Pacific OCS. For any federal action or undertaking within the Bureau’s authority, BOEM
1

�must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) and other legislative and regulatory environmental
requirements. Included in those requirements is the obligation to consult with federally
recognized tribal governments, as mandated through Executive Order 13175 and
Secretarial Order 3317. Additionally, the NHPA requires consultation with federally
recognized tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations for cultural resources that are
considered eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. As BOEM’s
offshore renewable energy program has developed, and applications for construction of
offshore facilities are increasing, it is important that the Bureau properly engage with the
nation’s coastal indigenous communities.

To ensure that the Bureau is consulting

properly, BOEM is funding several projects that seek to be more proactive in developing
the best practices for identifying appropriate information gathering protocols and survey
measures in order to avoid or mitigate adverse effects during development on the OCS.
Each of these projects is rooted in the cultural landscape concept, which seeks to
develop a more holistic understanding of areas that could be affected by a proposed
action

or

undertaking

by

integrating

environmental

science

with

historical,

archaeological and traditional knowledge.
Cultural Landscape Approach
The concept of cultural landscapes is not new.

According to the United Nations

Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), “[I]n 1992, the World
Heritage Convention became the first international legal instrument to recognize and
protect cultural landscapes” (Mitchell et al., 2009: 19). UNESCO defines a cultural
landscape as embracing…
“…a diversity of manifestations of the interaction between humankind and
its natural environment.
Cultural landscapes often reflect specific
techniques of sustainable land-use, considering the characteristics and
limits of the natural environment they are established in, and a specific
spiritual relation to nature…Cultural landscapes are illustrative of the
evolution of human society and settlement over time” (Mitchell et al., 2009:
19-20).
In recent years the cultural landscape approach has also gained traction and
acceptance within the federal historic preservation program in the U.S. For example,
the U.S. National Park Service’s Bulletin 36 defines a cultural landscape as, “a
2

�geographic area, including both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife or
domestic animals therein, associated with a historic event, activity, or person or
exhibiting other cultural or aesthetic values” (NPS, 1994). More recently, the U.S.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas
Federal Advisory Committee issued a white paper in 2011, which recommended
incorporating a cultural landscape approach to “strengthen conservation of resources
that cross the land/sea interface, promote sustainability of those resources and improve
the socio-economic resilience of communities which depend upon them” (MPAFAC,
2011: 4). Additionally, in 2011 the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
released the Native American Traditional Cultural Landscapes Action Plan, which is
designed to:


Promote the recognition and protection of Native American traditional
cultural landscapes both within the federal government and the historic
preservation community



Address the challenges of the consideration of Native American
traditional cultural landscapes in the Section 106 review process as
well as in NEPA reviews (ACHP, 2012).

This plan was adopted by the ACHP in November 2011 and announced by the White
House on June 28, 2012 (Donaldson, 2012).
BOEM Environmental Studies
Established in 1973 under the former Minerals Management Service, the Environmental
Studies Program (ESP) is an applied science program that was created to develop,
conduct and oversee scientific research specifically to inform policy decisions regarding
offshore energy and marine minerals activities on the OCS.

Research conducted

through the BOEM ESP covers physical oceanography, atmospheric sciences, biology,
protected species, social sciences and economics, submerged cultural resources and
environmental fates and effects. The primary goal of the ESP is to provide information
needed for the assessment and management of environmental impacts on the human,
marine and coastal environments of the OCS and the potentially affected coastal areas.
As a result, BOEM is a leading contributor to the growing body of scientific knowledge
about the nation’s marine and coastal environment. Through BOEM’s ESP, baseline
3

�analysis of underwater cultural heritage resources has been updated off the Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico and Pacific coasts (Pearson et al., 2003; TRC, 2012; ICF International et
al., 2014, respectively). Each of these studies includes a database of identified and
reported historic shipwrecks and a predictive model of high probability areas that could
be associated with submerged prehistoric landforms, areas that would have been
exposed thousands of years ago during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Additionally,
in support of potential offshore renewable energy development, initial baseline
assessments have been completed along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of historic
properties that could be affected by alteration of the seascape from construction of
offshore facilities (TRC, 2012; ICF International et al., 2014, respectively).
BOEM held the first commercial offshore renewable energy lease sale for an area off of
Rhode Island in July 2013, and a second sale was held off Virginia in September.
Interest for developing offshore renewable energy has also been expressed elsewhere
on the Atlantic OCS, as well as off the coasts of Hawaii and Oregon within the BOEM
Pacific OCS Region. Offshore renewable energy siting could have an affect on
submerged prehistoric sites and coastal sites that are important to indigenous groups.
Expected impacts to the seafloor will occur from the installation of individual wind, wave
or ocean current generators and associated transmission cable corridors. Additionally,
wind turbines, which can stand 300-500 feet above the ocean surface, will have a
definite visual signature. Depending on how far offshore wind turbines are constructed,
many of these facilities will be visible to some extent from the coast, and therefore will
have some level of affect to the offshore view.
Therefore, as BOEM reviews applications for offshore renewable energy projects, it is
critical that the Bureau not only develop protocols that honor the unique relationship
between the federal government, sovereign tribal nations and indigenous communities,
but also incorporates traditional knowledge and oral tradition into the decision-making
process. To meet these challenges, BOEM has awarded several research studies that
seek to develop best-practices protocols for working with federally recognized tribes and
Native Hawaiian communities, as well as incorporating information from these groups
into the analysis of offshore geophysical survey data. Some of these projects are briefly

4

�highlighted below and two of these efforts will be detailed further in this session by
Valerie Grussing and Hans Van Tilburg.
Submerged Paleocultural Landscapes Project
Off the Atlantic coast of the U.S., where interest in offshore wind energy has been more
prominent, BOEM has entered into a cooperative agreement with the University of
Rhode Island, in partnership with the Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation
Office, to develop a science-based, standardized best practices methodology for
incorporating tribal knowledge into a predictive model for identifying submerged
landforms.

Developing

Protocols

for

Reconstructing

Submerged

Paleocultural

Landscapes and Identifying Ancient Native American Archaeological Sites in
Submerged Environments seeks to enhance and refine the Bureau’s understanding of
submerged paleocultural landscape distribution on the Atlantic OCS and to better
understand and identify paleocultural landscapes of importance to regional tribes
through collaborative research. Specifically, the project is designed to incorporate
Narragansett Indian Tribal oral history and traditional knowledge with remote sensing
surveys off the coast of Rhode Island in order to develop a geospatial predictive model
that will identify offshore environments with varying archaeological sensitivity for
containing ancient Native American archaeological resources.
The first phase of the project was completed in the spring of 2013, which consisted of a
2-day workshop between invited tribal representatives and archaeologists from Europe
and the U.S. The workshop reviewed current theories on submerged landform
identification and discussed how to respectfully engage Native American tribes. The
second phase of the project will synthesize the information obtained at the workshop,
along with published sources, to develop a methodology aimed at incorporating tribal
knowledge into best practices protocols for developing a model to identify submerged
landforms. Once a working model is developed, researchers will conduct field
investigations and data acquisition, combined with tribal traditional knowledge in order
to validate the model and create a more complete understanding of the paleocultural
landscape off Rhode Island. The project also includes an outreach component with the
Narragansett Tribe and will develop training materials and a documentary film. This
project was awarded as a cooperative agreement through the North Atlantic Coast
5

�Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit in July 2012 and should be completed in
September, 2016.
Characterization of Tribal Cultural Landscapes
At the time of this writing, the BOEM Pacific OCS office has received two applications
for offshore renewable energy projects off the Oregon coast. These proposed projects
include a commercial floating wind lease off of Coos Bay and a marine hydrokinetic
(MHK) research lease off of Newport. Prior to receiving these lease requests, the BOEM
Pacific OCS office entered into an interagency agreement with NOAA’s Marine
Protected Areas Center and the Maritime Heritage Program to develop best practices
protocols for working with west coast tribes to incorporate information on tribal cultural
landscapes into the Bureau’s decision-making process. The goal of this project,
Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes, is to develop a proactive approach to
working with Native American communities in order to identify areas of tribal
significance that need to be considered in the planning process.

A more detailed

discussion of this project is provided elsewhere in this session by Dr. Valerie Grussing
in her paper, Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes for Resource Preservation and
Protection.
Hawaii Maritime Heritage
The BOEM Pacific OCS Region office has not yet received any completed applications
for renewable energy projects offshore Hawaii, however, interest has been expressed
for offshore wind development. In May 2012, the BOEM Pacific OCS Region signed an
inter-agency agreement with NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries to provide
baseline information on underwater cultural heritage resources off the eight main
Hawaiian Islands. The project, Assessing Historic Properties and Cultural Resources in
the Main Hawaiian Islands, will develop a database of underwater and land-based
cultural resources that could be affected by construction of offshore renewable energy
facilities. The project also seeks to develop a best practices methodology for engaging
Native Hawaiian communities, similar to the Tribal Cultural Landscapes project, so that
information important to Native Hawaiians is included in the planning and review
process for any future offshore renewable energy applications. This is the first cultural
resources-related project that BOEM has undertaken for Hawaii and the information
6

�collected through this effort will provide critical information for taking into consideration
the effects of offshore renewable energy development on cultural resources near the
eight main Hawaiian Islands. Further information on this effort is discussed elsewhere
in this session by Dr. Hans Van Tilburg in his paper, Assessing Historic Properties and
Cultural Resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands.
Submerged Landforms on the Pacific OCS
With the completion of the updated baseline study on underwater cultural heritage for
the BOEM Pacific OCS Region, BOEM developed this follow-up study to further
investigate submerged landforms off the U.S. west coast and to refine the predictive
model for where these landforms might be expected. Archaeological and Biological
Assessment of Submerged Landforms off the Pacific Coast is a multi-disciplinary effort
that will examine existing data sets from areas off the southern California and central
Oregon coastlines that have been identified as having a high potential to be associated
with previously exposed landforms. The project will develop and field test a geospatial
model that will aid in the identification and classification of potential submerged cultural
landforms from existing remote sensing data and seafloor maps in areas along the
Pacific coast. Similar to the Narragansett project on the Atlantic OCS, this project will
evaluate existing remote sensing data and review current theories on sea level rise
during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) on the Pacific OCS in order to identify high
probability areas for further testing. Biological indicators, such as hard-bottom features,
will also be assessed to see if these features correlate with possible submerged
landforms. The project will also conduct fine-scale survey and ground-truthing of
identified features and analyze new data for possible indicators of prehistoric human
activity. This project should be completed in 2017.
Pacific Region Ocean Uses Atlas
The last project that the BOEM Pacific Region office is currently undertaking, which has
the potential to incorporate cultural use information from indigenous communities, is the
Pacific Region Ocean Use Atlas (PROUA). The PROUA project was developed through
an inter-agency agreement with NOAA’s National Ocean Service and is designed to
document where coastal communities use the ocean across a full range of typical
human activities and sectors. The primary objective of the project is to enhance ocean
7

�planning for offshore renewable energy development and inform other ocean planning
strategies that require insight on how and where ocean areas are used for recreational,
commercial and industrial types of activity. One component of this project is to conduct
interactive participatory mapping workshops in order to capture the knowledge of
community experts about the patterns of ocean uses occurring off the coasts of Hawaii,
Oregon and Washington. Though the previously discussed efforts have not yet been
completed to fully develop protocols for engagement with coastal indigenous
communities, efforts have been made to invite these groups into the process
appropriately.
Conclusion
With the passage of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, BOEM’s mandate over offshore energy
and marine minerals expanded to include offshore renewable energy. In an attempt to
improve BOEM’s environmental review process and better fulfill the Bureau’s obligation
to consult with federally recognized tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations, BOEM is
developing a more proactive approach to engage indigenous communities in the
decision-making process in support of offshore renewable energy. Information on each
of the studies described in this paper, as well as other research funded by the Bureau,
can be found on our website at: www.boem.gov\studies\.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the research projects identified above has been provided through the
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

The author would like to thank the Tribal

Historic Preservation Offices of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, the Makah
Tribe, and the Yurok Tribe for their efforts on the Tribal Cultural Landscapes project, as
well as the Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office for their efforts on the
Submerged Paleocultural Landscapes project.
Endnote
1

OCSLA and the Submerged Lands Act define the OCS as all submerged lands lying seaward of state
coastal waters. For most coastal states federal waters begin 3 nautical miles past the mean low tide line,
the exception to this rule includes offshore Texas and the west coast of Florida, whose state waters
extend 9 nautical miles offshore.

8

�References
ACHP (Advisory Council on Historic Preservation), 2012. The ACHP’s Native American
Traditional Cultural Landscapes Action Plan. http://www.achp.gov/traditional-culturallandscape.pdf, accessed 05 December 2013.
Donaldson, M. W., 2012.Native American Traditional Cultural Landscapes Action Plan –
Better

Decisions

for

Historic

Properties.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/06/28/native-american-traditional-culturallandscapes-action-plan-better-decisions-histo-0, accessed 05 December 2013.
ICF International Davis Geoarchaeological Research and Southeastern Archaeological
Research, 2013. Inventory and Analysis of Coastal and Submerged Archaeological Site
Occurrence, Pacific OCS. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Pacific OCS, Camarillo, CA OCS Study BOEM 2013-0115, pp. 363.
Mitchell, N., Mechtild Rössler, and Pierre-Marie Tricaud., (Eds.), 2009. World Heritage
Cultural Landscapes: A Handbook for Conservation and Management
http://whc.unesco.org/documents/publi_wh_papers_26_en.pdf, accessed 04 December
2013.
NPS (National Park Service), 1994. Bulletin 36 Protecting Cultural Landscapes:
Planning,

Treatment

and

Management

of

Historic

Landscapes.

http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/preservedocs/preservation-briefs/36PreserveBrief-Landscapes.pdf, accessed 04 December 2013.
MPAFAC (Marine Protected Areas Federal Advisory Committee), 2011. White Paper
and Recommendations of Managing Marine Resources across the Land/Sea Interface.
http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov/pdf/helpfulresources/mpafac_rec_protected_landsea_12_11.pdf, accessed 04 December 2013.
Pearson, C. E., James, Jr., S. R., Krivor, M. C., El Darragi, S. D., and Cunningham, L.,
2003. Refining and Revising the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf Region HighProbability Model for Historic Shipwrecks: Final Report. U. S. Dept. of the Interior,
Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA. OCS
Study MMS 2003-060, 2003-061, 2003-062, 3 Volumes.
TRC Environmental Corporation, 2012. Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site
Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of
9

�Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA. OCS
Study BOEM 2012-008, pp. 324.
Dave Ball is the Pacific Region Historic Preservation Officer and Diving Safety Officer
for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). Before joining BOEM he worked
for several archaeological firms in the Pacific Northwest. He received a BA in
anthropology from Sonoma State University in 1992 and an MA in anthropology from
Florida State University in 1998. Dave has over 20 years’ experience in archaeology
and has directed field research on both terrestrial and underwater archaeological sites
across the country, including inundated prehistoric sites, World War II shipwrecks, and
deepwater shipwrecks in the Gulf of Mexico. He is currently serving on the Board of
Directors for the Advisory Council on Underwater Archaeology.

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="13">
                  <text>Session 2: New Approaches in UCH Management in the US</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="14">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 2 chair Dr. Hans Van Tilburg and links to the papers included in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="15">
                  <text>In 2009, responding to the effort to protect the significant natural and cultural resources within the marine environment for the benefit of present and future generations, the U.S. National Marine Protected Areas Center formed a Cultural Heritage Resources Working Group to provide expert advice on improving the conservation and management of maritime heritage resources. The resulting White Paper provided a series of recommendations to both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Department of the Interior, including new definitions for cultural heritage, marine cultural resources, tribes, indigenous peoples, and cultural landscapes. Central to these recommendations was a strong endorsement for the Cultural Landscape Approach in the understanding and management of maritime heritage resources (or UCH). Subsequently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationâ€™s (NOAA) Maritime Heritage Program has adopted the recommendations of this paper and is implementing a â€œmaritime cultural landscapeâ€ approach to the management of cultural resources within the National Marine Sanctuary System. Also as a part of this initiative, NOAA and the Bureau of Ocean Energy and Management (BOEM) have teamed up to support maritime cultural landscape studies of heritage resources by Native American Tribes and Native Hawaiian communities in the Pacific region. These projects on the U.S. West Coast and in the Hawaiian Islands demonstrate the necessity of adapting a broader range of recognized cultural resources and a more inclusive and participatory management and preservation process. Charismatic resources like historic shipwrecks will always provide unique information for archaeologists and historians, but we do ourselves a disservice if we focus solely on these types of properties, and neglect other perspectives and the broader nature of all types and traces of human existence that lie underwater.&#13;
Participants in this session will focus on the status of these ongoing ground-breaking projects, the advantages of a broader and more inclusive approach compared to the previous cultural heritage management paradigm in the U.S., and the challenges that this creates.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16">
                  <text>Dr. Hans Van Tilburg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5222">
                <text>Recent Efforts in Underwater Cultural Heritage Management&#13;
on the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5223">
                <text>The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is responsible for managing the nationâ€™s energy and mineral resources on the federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). These resources include conventional energy (oil and gas), renewable energy (wind and hydrokinetic) and sand and gravel extraction for beach restoration. As with any federal action or undertaking, an assessment of potential impacts to the environment, including cultural resources, is required to make an informed decision. The BOEM Pacific OCS Region is taking a proactive approach to cultural resources management on the OCS by funding research efforts that provide baseline information on known and potential underwater cultural resources, and by identifying best practices for incorporating information from indigenous communities in the planning process.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5224">
                <text>Dave Ball, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5225">
                <text>5/13/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="36">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="212" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="92">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/551877d374d308fe7dd63dd1a7e57ffb.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a900805d210982110759d494dc35410a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2576">
                    <text>Recent Research in the Southeast Sumatran Region
John N. Miksic

Abstract
Since 2010, a new threat to the maritime heritage of Southeast Asia has arisen in the form of
looting of the bed of the Musi River in Palembang, site of the capital of the maritime kingdom of
Sriwijaya in the ninth century. Port archaeology in Southeast Asia is a gravely underdeveloped
field. This river has been a major artery of commerce for 2,000 years. The local adaptation to the
area’s swampy, flood-prone environment has been to live on stilt houses over water, on ships,
and on rafts. This pattern of settlement presents special problems for archaeologists. It is likely
that a major proportion of the area’s archaeological heritage lies on the riverbed. Recent items on
the antiquities market include a wide range of items, including Chinese porcelain of the ninth and
subsequent centuries, local pottery, and a wide range of metal items including statuary, coins,
and jewelry. This source of archaeological data has never been systematically explored, and
unless something is done urgently, it will be lost forever. This paper explores the nature of the
problem, demonstrates the importance of the subject for maritime archaeology, and proposes a
potential methodology for exploring the area.

Riverbeds and Harbors as Sites of Underwater Cultural Heritage
The study of underwater cultural heritage in this panel focuses mainly on cargoes
of shipwrecks beneath salt water. Shipwreck archaeology in Southeast Asia has
experienced major advances in the last 15 years, but the archaeology of ports
and other sites at the place where land and sea meet, such as shipyards, lags far
behind. In Sumatra, seaports can be located over 100 kilometers (km) from the
mouths of rivers and estuaries. The east coast of Sumatra is largely tidal
swampland, and the influence of the tides extends to these ports. Palembang,
ancient capital of Sriwijaya, one of Southeast Asia’s greatest maritime kingdoms,
lies 90 km up the Musi River. At this point the river is one km wide. Muara Jambi
might be considered its sister; it was the capital of the kingdom of Malayu which
flourished between the 9th to 13th centuries. This site lies 120 km up the
Batanghari. The coastal plain narrows progressively as one moves north, but
other ancient ports such as Kota Cina in northeast Sumatra are still 10 km inland.
On the eastern side of the Straits of Melaka, in the state of Kedah, Malaysia, the
port sites of Pengkalan Bujang, Sungai Mas, and Sungai Batu, are 10-15 km up
the Muda River. The same phenomenon can be observed for sites such as Bago
(formerly known as Pegu), Syriam, and Mrauk U in Myanmar.
Very little archaeological research has been carried out in Southeast
Asian ports. Such sites pose special challenges to archaeology. Stratigraphy of
such sites is rarely well-preserved. Environmental factors include floods, tides,
tsunamis, rapid sedimentation interspersed with erosion, river course change,
and human activity such as construction of piers and warehouses, which are
often built of temporary materials subject to rapid weathering, constant repairs,
expansion, and other alterations. The most common artifacts found at ports are
pottery fragments and organic materials. Large quantities of such remains are
needed in order to draw accurate statistical inferences about the past.

�Figure 1. Early Southeast Asian Ports (drawn by Dr. G.Y. Goh)

Archaeology of Ports in Southeast Asia
Bali
There are a few exceptions to this generalization. Excavations at Sembiran in
north coastal Bali have yielded important remnants of port activity on a sandy
beach which is now being rapidly eroded. Discoveries include fragments of
Romano-Indian rouletted ware made in south India during the period 200 Before
Christ - Anno Domini (BC-AD)1 200. Diribonucleic acid (DNA) of a 2,000-year-old
skeleton found at Sembiran has been identified as possibly Indian, although this
conclusion has been disputed (I Wayan Ardika, et al. 1997; Lansing, et al. 2004;
Lansing, et al. 2006; McLaughlin and Thomas 2006). In southern Thailand the
site of Khao Sam Kaeo has yielded evidence of port activity as early as the 3rd
century BC (Bellina-Pryce and Silapanth 2006). The site of Oc-èo in south
Vietnam, Southeast Asia’s largest port of the early historic period (3rd- early 7th
centuries AD) was investigated in the 1940s, and again in the 1990s (Manguin
1998). This site lies 15 km from the ocean, to which it may have been connected
by a canal. It lies in a swampy flood-prone area, where some organic remains
were fortunately preserved.
1

Georgian Calendar designation with the year one starting at the birth of Jesus Christ of
Nazareth, years in BC are -1 with a negative year added for every year before the birth of Jesus;
years in AD are added progressively one by one for each year after his birth.

�Malaysia
The oldest dated boat found in Southeast Asia was discovered in peninsular
Malaysia, at the site of Pontian, Pahang, where it seems to have been preserved
by a sudden slumping of soil of a riverbank in a river about a mile from the coast
(Evans 1927:94). The timbers of the Pontian ship belong to varieties found from
Cambodia to the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia (Gibson-Hill 1952).
Radiocarbon analysis found that the trees for building the ship were felled
between 260 and 430 AD (1657±60) (Manguin 1993:256). In Malaysia the Kuala
Selinsing site has been under investigation since the 1920s. Recent excavations
at this site, which consists of mounds surrounded by mangrove swamp, have
shown that the area was inhabited approximately 2,000 years ago, and continued
in use for a millennium (Nik Hassan Shuhaimi bin Nik Abdul Rahman in press).
The Pengkalan Bujang site near the foot of Kedah Peak was investigated in the
1950s; this was apparently an important port in the 12th century, but only a
preliminary report was ever published (Lamb 1961). In 2010 the Malaysian
government allocated a sizeable quantity of funds for research in south Kedah.
The site of Sungai Batu has yielded major new discoveries, including large brick
structures which Malaysian archaeologists believe were used as landing stages
for boats. These seem to date from the early to mid-first millennium AD. The
Bujang Valley Museum displays a number of well-preserved hulls from sites in
south Kedah. No radiocarbon dates on them have yet been published; this data
would be of great potential significance. The boats are of the lashed-lug design
characteristic of early Austronesian boat-building.

Java
In the coastal plain of west Java, the site of Batujaya is another waterlogged site
which has yielded significant evidence of Buddhist activity in the early first
millennium AD (Manguin and Agustijanto 2006). No evidence of a port or nonreligious activity has however yet been located there.

Singapore

In Singapore, numerous sites of 14th-century activity have been studied. One of
these sites, named Empress Place after the colonial-period building which stands
there and which is now the Asian Civilisations Museum, lay on the ancient bank
of the Singapore River. The area excavated in 1998 consisted of the intertidal
zone. Artifacts recovered included a wide range of ceramics, metal objects, and
some organic materials including poles which had perhaps been used for tying
up boats.

Kota Batu, Brunei
The former capital of the Sultanate of Brunei was a trading site and capital from
around 1400 to 1580, when a Spanish attack destroyed it (Harrisson 1970).
Further study of the site could yield important new understanding of the economy
of one of the most important Southeast Asian trading kingdoms of the fifteenth
century.

�Sumatra
Malayu/Jambi
Somewhere in the Batanghari valley, possibly at a location now called Muara
Jambi, the site of the capital of this very rich and cosmopolitan kingdom must
exist. Archaeological research in the province has been focused on the site of
Muara Jambi, about 25 kilometers down the Batanghari from the modern capital
of Jambi Province, where 39 candi or brick temples have been recorded (M.
Nazir 1980/81:23). Archaeological evidence of trade in Jambi consists of Chinese
porcelain ranging from the Five Dynasties through the Yuan period (9th through
13th centuries), scattered over a number of sites between Muara Jambi and the
sea (Edwards McKinnon 1982a; Edwards McKinnon 1982b; Edwards McKinnon
1992; Abu Ridho 1992; Abu Ridho 1995). A survey project in 2006 concentrated
on looking at exposures in the banks of the river at low tide, and identified
numerous sites of the 11th and 12th centuries (Miksic N.D.).
Kota Cina
This site lies near the mouth of the Deli River in northeast Sumatra. Abundant
remains of entrepot activity of the late 11th through mid-13th century were
recovered, including Buddhist and Hindu brick structures, stone statuary,
Chinese coins and pottery, and local ceramics. Preserved house posts and many
post molds were recorded. Unfortunately the probable location of the port itself, a
silted-in harbor, was destroyed through excavation of soil for a modern
construction project. Remains of ceramics of the 11th-13th centuries, and
associated ship timbers were observed (Edwards McKinnon 1984; Miksic 1979).
Barus
This is the only known early port yet excavated on the west coast of Sumatra.
The center of activity seems to have shifted between several locales within this
general area. Artifacts found here date from the 10th through 14th centuries, and
include many imports from the Persian Gulf and India (Guillot 1998; Guillot
2003).
Karangagung
In the lowlands of southeast Sumatra, the oldest site which may have been that
of a port of the period between AD 1 and AD 500 has been located at
Karangagung, between the Musi and Batanghari rivers (Endang 2002; Erwan, et
al. 2008). Excavations there since 2001 have provided important new data for the
study of pre-Srivijayan commercial activity. Many artifacts such as beads and
gold had been looted from the site, but jewellery, bronze and glass bangles,
pendants, and preserved house pillars found in excavations indicate that a large
settlement or series of settlements existed here, dated by radiocarbon to 220-440
CE (Manguin 2004:287-288). Artifacts recorded include beads of carnelian, rock
crystal, a shiny black stone which may be onyx, and glass beads of several
styles.
The discovery of this site has had the salutary effect of inspiring the head
of the archaeological office for South Sumatra, Mr. Nurhadi Rangkuti, to establish
a website devoted to the development of Wetland Archaeology

�(http://nurhadirangkuti.blogspot.com/ 2009_05_10_archive.html; accessed 30
August 2011). This website and its reports of archaeological research gives
important recognition to the identification of wetlands in Indonesia as a specific
focus of archaeological research; the website reads in part:
Lahan basah yang mencakup rawa pasang surat, rawa gambut, rawa bekalang
sungai, hutan bakau, danau, lagun, dataran banjir sungai dan lainnya pernah
menjadi tempat bermukim manusia masa lalu. Pusat peradaban kuna jug muncul
dari lahan basah. Penelitian, pelestarian dan pemanfaatan situs-situs arkeologi di
lahan basah sudah waktunya diprioritaskan untuk mengungkap kejayaan
maritime bangsa Indonesia” (Wetlands which comprise tidal swamps, swamps
with acid soil, back swamps, mangrove forests, lakes, lagoons, flood plains etc.
in the past were locales of human habitation. Ancient centers of civilization also
arose from wetlands. It is time that research, conservation, and exploitation of
archaeological sites in wetlands be given priority to expose the success of
Indonesian maritime people.)

This proclamation surely deserves commendation and support where
possible.

Palembang and the Musi Riverbed
Much of Srivijaya's material culture may be permanently lost due to the use of
perishable materials and habit of living on rafts or stilt houses above flowing
water (Manguin 1987). Enough archaeological remains have now been
discovered in and around Palembang to confirm the earlier assumption that
Palembang was Srivijaya’s capital (Manguin 1992; Manguin 1993) from the
seventh to eleventh centuries. Between 682 CE and 686 CE, several large
inscriptions were set up in Palembang and vicinity (Manguin 1987). The wetlands
around Palembang have yielded remains of two boats of the first millennium AD:
one dated to 610-775 CE, with a length estimated to have been 26 meters, and
one dated 434-631 CE. Another ship found at Butuan, Mindanao, south
Philippines, dating from 1270-1410 CE, is estimated to have been 20 meters long
(Manguin 1993:256-258).
Archaeology on dry land has yielded rather unprepossessing results,
which do not seem commensurate with the glowing descriptions found in Indian
and Chinese sources of a wealthy port kingdom here (Bronson and Wisseman
1976; Wolters 1979). Much settlement of the left bank (termed the hilir area in
Palembang nomenclature) next to Pulau Kemaro is now occupied by a huge urea
fertilizer plant owned by PT Pupuk Sriwijaya (Pusri), the state fertilizer company.
Indonesian archaeologists are convinced that the site of the factory was formerly
a major area of Sriwijayan activity (Dr. Mundardjito pers. comm.).
Much of the remaining archaeological potential of Palembang probably
lies beneath the Musi River. History and ethnography show that whereas the
nobility of Sriwijaya lived on dry land, much of Sriwijaya’s population lived on
water, either on stilt houses or on rafts (van Sevenhoven 1825; Wallace 1869).
Evidence of their existence as well as port activity such as warehousing and
transshipping of cargo therefore is likely to be in the mud beneath the river.

�Figure 2. Musi River, Palembang (Phot by author, June 1, 2011)
In recent years a large quantity of artifacts is reported to have been
recovered by local fishermen from the riverbed. A reconnaissance trip to
Palembang in May 2011 indicated that a wide range of artifacts is still within easy
reach on the riverbed, but that the supply is diminishing. Local men dive in the
Musi River, using primitive equipment, when tidal flow is slack, to obtain ancient
artifacts. During this trip we were shown a wide assortment of ceramics, beads,
bronze articles, coins, old wooden implements, and gold objects. As news of the
presence of foreign visitors spread through the neighborhood, groups of divers
came to visit to offer wares that they had obtained through diving in the river. It
seems that the number of men who pursue this occupation as a regular activity is
significant, using only goggles and a hose by which they are fed compressed air.
They probe the muddy bottom with iron rods which often cause serious damage
by fracturing Chinese porcelain.
We also visited two sites – Candi Gede Ing Suro and Candi Penembahan
-- where brick structures dating from the 14th century have been converted into
graves for Islamic-period rulers and their consorts. These sites are located next
to the fertilizer plant noted above. During our visit, laborers were busily erecting a
brick wall next to Candi Gede Ing Suro which will form a barrier between the site
and the fertilizer plant. We were able however to walk through a gap in the wall
and view a complex of earthen ramparts of substantial extent, bounded by a
stream which leads directly to the Musi River. This may have been part of an
ancient site. As far as we could discern, no research has been directed at this
feature.

�Archaeological Remains
It is probable that we were only shown the least valuable items, including broken
ceramics. The more salable items were no doubt quickly disposed of through
networks leading to Jakarta, where the majority of Indonesian antique collectors
and people of means live. Yet even among what are probably the dregs of the
treasures lying under 20 meters of water and a meter of river mud are many
objects which hold the potential to clarify many details of our knowledge of early
shipping activity in Southeast Asia.
The divers had acquired a range of small gold items. Sumatra was known
as Suvarnadvipa (“Golden Island”) in ancient India (Wolters 1979), and
numerous sources of gold are known to exist in the hinterland of Palembang.
These items, including locally-made coins and pieces of jewelry, belong to types
found in central Java and dated to the late first millennium AD. Their collections
also contained large quantities of beads of glass and stone in addition to gold
examples.

Illustration 3. Gold ear ornament, 2 cm high
(Palembang,Sumatra; no catalogue number)
Religious objects included numerous items associated with Buddhism. In
addition to bronze statues of Buddha, there were examples of what appear to be
stamps used to print Buddhist texts on clay. More research on these is needed to
clarify their significance.

�Illustration 4. Head of Buddhist deity, stone. Height approximately 13 cm
(Palembang,Sumatra; no catalogue number)
Decorative bronze items were also present, among them several faces of
Kala, mirrors, and bells with vajra handles for use in esoteric Buddhist rituals.
Cylindrical amulet containers meant to be suspended from strings hung around
the neck were made of gold. Other rolled-up pieces of heavier metal may have
been tin or lead votive objects inscribed with sacred formulae. Utilitarian objects
included scale weights. Large quantities of Chinese coins were also collected.
Porcelains spanned a wide range of types of Chinese export wares, from
Tang Yue bowls through cobalt blue decorated wares of the middle Ming period.
Some examples of fine-paste earthenware, probably from southern Thailand,
were also in the assemblage. Quite probably many more examples could be
found on the riverbed, but since these are not generally salable, they were
probably left there.

Prospects for Future Research
The form of salvage archaeology project involving the local branch of the
Indonesian archaeology department in a controlled dredging operation may be
the best way to proceed. The field of underwater excavations in rivers is
uncharted territory in Southeast Asian archaeology. Such research would face
considerable technical and financial challenges. The conventional approach used
by marine archaeologists would be to lay out a grid on the riverbed and excavate
using an airlift. Whether this would be feasible in the Musi River would need to be
investigated. An alternative which could be considered would be to adopt
methods analogous to those used in salvage archaeology, where time is an
important factor. Looting of the Musi riverbed in Palembang is rampant, as we
observed, and it may be more efficient to use mechanical excavation employing
dredging equipment to expedite the recovery of artifacts.

�Bibliography
Abu Ridho,
1992
Abu Ridho,
1995

Bellina-Pryce, B.
and Silapanth, P.,
2006

Bronson, B. and
Wisseman, J.,
1976
Edwards McKinnon,
E.,
1982a
Edwards McKinnon,
E.,
1982b
Edwards McKinnon,
E.,
1984
Edwards McKinnon,
E.,
1992
Endang Sri Hardiati
Soekatno,
2002
Erwan Suryanegara
bin Asnawi
Jayanegara et al.,
2008
Evans, I.H.N.,
1927
Gibson-Hill, C.A.,
1952
Guillot, C. ed.
1998
Guillot, C., ,
Dupoizat, M.F.,
Perret, D., Sunaryo,

Survey Keramik di D.A.S. Batanghari. PemdaTingkat I
Propinsi Jambi and Kantor Wilayah, Depdikbud Propinsi
Jambi, Jambi
“Penelitian Keramik di Situs-Situs Arkeologi Provinsi
Jambi”, in Laporan: Hasil Penelitian Arkeologi dan
Geologi Propinsi Jambi 1994-1995. Pemerintah Daerah
Tingkat I Provinsi Jambi, Jambi, pp. 198-231.
“Weaving cultural identities on trans-Asiatic networks:
upper Thai-Malay
peninsula: an early socio-political landscape,” in Bulletin
de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient. Vol. 93, pp. 257293.
“Palembang as Srivijaya: the lateness of early cities in
southern Southeast Asia”, Asian Perspectives Vol. 19, No.
2, pp. 220-239.
"A Brief Note on Muara Kumpeh Hilir: an Early Port Site
on the Batang Hari," in SPAFA Digest, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.
37-40.
“Early polities in southern Sumatra: some preliminary
observations based on archaeological evidence,” in
Indonesia, Vol. 40, pp. 1-36.
Kota Cina: Its Context and Meaning in the Trade of
Southeast Asia in the Twelfth to Fourteenth Centuries.
Cornell University Ph.D. Dissertation, Ithaca.
“Malayu Jambi: interlocal and international trade (11th to
13th centuries),” Paper presented at the Seminar Sejarah
Malayu Kuno, Jambi, 7-8 December.
"Catatan tentang temuan manik-manik dari situs
Karangagung, Sumatera Selatan," Paper presented to
Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi IX, Kediri.
Kerajaan Sriwijaya. Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Sumatra
Selatan, Palembang.

“Notes on the remains of an old boat from Pontian,
Pahang.” Journal of the Federated Malay States
Museums, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 93-96.
“Further notes on the old boat found at Pontian, in
southern Pahang.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society,
Malayan Branch, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 111-133.
Histoire de Barus: Le Site de Lobu Tua. I. Études et
Documents. Cahiers d'Archipel Vol. 30, Paris.
Histoire de Barus Sumatra. Le Site de Lobu Tua. II.
Étude archéologique et Documents.
Cahiers
d’Archipel 30, Paris.

�U., Surachman,
Fadillah, M.A.,
Kalus, L., Riyanto,
S., and Wibisono,
S.C.,
2003
I Wayan Ardika, P.
Bellwood, I Made
Sutaba, and K.C.
Yulati
1997
Lamb, A.,
1961
Lansing, J.S., A.J.
Redd, T.M. Karafet,
J. Watkins, I Wayan
Ardika, S.P.K.
Surata, J.S.
Schoenfelder, M.
Campbell, A.M.
Merriwether, M.F.
Hammer,
2004
Lansing, J.S., A.J.
Redd, T.M. Karafet,
J. Watkins, I Wayan
Ardika, S.P.K.
Surata, J.S.
Schoenfelder, M.
Campbell, A.M.
Merriwether, M.F.
Hammer,
2006
Nazir, M.,
1980-81
Manguin, P.-Y.,
1987
Manguin, P.-Y.,
1992

Manguin, P.-Y.,

“Sembiran and the first Indian contacts with Bali: an
update,” Antiquity, Vol. 71, pp. 193-195.

“Miscellaneous papers on early Hindu and Buddhist
settlement in northern Malaya and southern Thailand,” in
Federation Museums Journal New Series, Vol. 6.
“An Indian trader in ancient Bali?,” in Antiquity, Vol. 78,
pp. 287-293.

“Reply,” in Antiquity, Vol. 80, p. 307.

Benda-Benda Arkeologi Klassik Daerah Jambi, Proyek
Pengembangan Permuseuman Jambi, Jambi.
“Palembang et Sriwijaya: anciennes hypothèses,
recherches nouvelles,” in Bulletin de l’École Française
d’Extrême Orient, Vol. 76, pp. 337-402.
“Excavations in South Sumatra, 1988-1990: new evidence
for Sriwijayan sites,” in I.C. Glover, ed, Southeast Asian
Archaeology 1990: Proceedings of the Third Conference
of the European Association of Southeast Asian
Archaeologists, University of Hull, Centre for Southeast
Asian Studies, Hull, pp. 63-73.
“Palembang and Sriwijaya: an early Malay harbour-city

�1993
Manguin, P.-Y.,
1993

Manguin, P.-Y.,
1998
Manguin, P.-Y.,
2004
Manguin, P-Y., and
Indrajaya, A.,
2006

McLauchlan, R. and
Thomas, R.G.,
2006
Miksic, J.N.,
1979
Miksic, J.N.,
Unpublished Report.
Nik Hassan
Shuhaimi bin Nik
Abdul Rahman
in press

Van Sevenhoven,
J.L.,
1825
Wallace, A.R.,
1869
Wolters, O.W.,
1979

rediscovered.” Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the
Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 66,No. 1, pp. 23-46.
"Trading ships of the South China Sea: Shipbuilding
techniques and their role in the history of the development
of Asian trade networks," in Journal of the Economic and
Social History of the Orient, Vol. 36, pp. 253-280.
Mission Archéologie du Delta du Mékong. Rapport sur la
Campagne 1998. EFEO, Paris.
“The early maritime polities,” in I. Glover and P. Bellwood,
eds., Southeast Asia from Prehistory to History,
RoutledgeCurzon, London, pp. 282-313.
“The archaeology of Batujaya (West Java, Indonesia): an
interim report,” in E. A. Bacus, I. C. Glover and V. C.
Piggott Uncovering Southeast Asia’s Past. Selected
Papers from the 10th International Conference of the
European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists,
NUS Press, Singapore, Vol. 2, pp. 45-257.
“Indian traders in ancient Bali: a reconsideration of the
evidence,” in Antiquity, Vol. 80, pp. 307.
Archaeology, Trade, and Society in Northeast Sumatra,.
Cornell University, Ph.D. Dissertation. Ithaca.
Report on the Survey of the Lower Batanghari River,
2006, N.D.
“The archaeology of later prehistoric ports and preMelakan entrepots and evidence of inter-regional trade in
Malaysia,” in (eds.) John Miksic and G.Y. Goh, The
Archaeology of Early Southeast Asian Harbours, SPAFA,
Bangkok, accessed 30 August 2011:
(http://nurhadirangkuti.blogspot.com/
2009_05_10_archive.html)
“Beschrijving van de hoofdplaats van Palembang,” in
Verhandelingan van het Bataviaasch Genootschap voor
Kunsten en Wetenschappen, Vol. 9, pp. 41-126.
The Malay Archipelago, Macmillan, London.
“Studying Srivijaya,” in Journal of the Malaysian Branch
of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol 52,No. 2, pp. 1-32.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2571">
                <text>Recent Research in the Southeast Sumatran Region</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2572">
                <text>Session 4&#13;
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2573">
                <text>Since 2010, a new threat to the maritime heritage of Southeast Asia has arisen in the form of looting of the bed of the Musi River in Palembang, site of the capital of the maritime kingdom of Sriwijaya in the ninth century. Port archaeology in Southeast Asia is a gravely underdeveloped field. This river has been a major artery of commerce for 2,000 years. The local adaptation to the areaâ€™s swampy, flood-prone environment has been to live on stilt houses over water, on ships, and on rafts. This pattern of settlement presents special problems for archaeologists. It is likely that a major proportion of the areaâ€™s archaeological heritage lies on the riverbed. Recent items on the antiquities market include a wide range of items, including Chinese porcelain of the ninth and subsequent centuries, local pottery, and a wide range of metal items including statuary, coins, and jewelry. This source of archaeological data has never been systematically explored, and unless something is done urgently, it will be lost forever.  This paper explores the nature of the problem, demonstrates the importance of the subject for maritime archaeology, and proposes a potential methodology for exploring the area.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2574">
                <text>John N. Miksic</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2575">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="25">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="247" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="152">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/408c6b696503dcb0ad2d9a18773efb3b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>14759500d63d9ebe5ad97e2519c30663</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2962">
                    <text>Recoding the Nautical Archaeology:
Virtual Museum of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Turkey
Dr. Guzden VARINLIOGLU1

Abstract
The preservation of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) requires availability and access to data
produced by nautical archaeology alongside tools for analysis, visualization and communication.
Although numerous archaeological surveys and excavations have been carried out in the past
decades in Turkey, there is no publicly available information system integrated to nautical
archaeology. This paper proposes a framework of a virtual museum of UCH. For the creation of this
framework, a data collection methodology for underwater surveys has been formulated and a webbased information system has been designed to store the collected data. This paper explores the
methods of analysis, visualization and communication embedded in this online system towards the
development of a virtual museum.
Virtual museum (VM) incorporates the practices of collection, preservation, research,
visualization and exhibit, thus offering new approaches to the preservation of cultural heritage. In this
paper, a web-based information system has been developed for a model of a virtual museum using
the data collected during underwater surveys conducted on the coastal region of Kaş, Turkey in 20072010. Divers from a variety of professional backgrounds followed the practice of in situ preservation.
They collected visual, geographical and descriptive data using structured datasheets. Through the
analysis of these non-destructive methods, an open-content information system is designed aiming the
contribution of all interested parties in a collaborative manner. The system currently contains
information on 22 sites in the form of sketches, measurements, drawings, photographs of finds.
Combined with Google Maps, the database illustrates the initial technological steps towards the
development of a virtual museum.
Divers, archaeologists and other interested users of this information system participate in the
musealization of information through separately applied analysis, visualization and communication
tools by open software programs. These initial steps demonstrate the methods for the automation of
data analysis and visual documentation, the visualization of information and the communication of this
knowledge. Futuristic concepts of automated, immersive and interactive design redefine the virtual
museum of UCH as well as offer different approaches to the discipline of nautical archaeology.

Keywords: nautical archaeology/ underwater cultural heritage/ database/ digital/
virtual museum/ information system /in situ preservation/ museology/ Kaş.

Research aims
The research responds to the lack of systematic methodology for the collection,
preservation and dissemination of data in cultural heritage studies. Although
numerous underwater archaeological surveys and excavations have been carried out
in Turkey since the 1960’s (Bass 2005), there is no publicly available information
system for nautical archaeology. This work comes within the context of research
conducted as part of the Ph.D. thesis entitled “Recoding the Nautical Archaeology:
Virtual Museum of Underwater Cultural Heritage” (Varinlioglu 2011). The author
proposes the creation of a virtual museum, in other words, a framework of a digital
repository of underwater cultural heritage. Within this framework, a data collection
methodology for underwater surveys has been formulated. Data collection using this
1

Güzden Varinlioğlu, PhD, Bilkent University, Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture; Principal
Manager of Kaş Archaeopark Projects on behalf of SAD (Sualtı Araştırmaları Derneği, Ankara, Turkey,
(Underwater Research Society), e-mail: arkeopark@sad.org.tr.

�methodology is stored in a web-based information system specifically designed for this
purpose. Furthermore, the methods of analysis, visualization and communication are
explored to enable the development of a virtual museum in the second phase of the
project. The virtual museum is not in place yet, however, basic information on the field
studies called Kaş Archaeopark Projects is publicly online on www.sanalmuze.org.tr.
In the near future, a model of the system is expected to be online on this webpage.

Introduction
The widespread use of information technologies brought new challenges to the
preservation of cultural heritage as well as to museology. A new concept of virtual
museum has emerged from a need to acquire, store, research, communicate and
exhibit the digital heritage data. Drawing parallel lines between the virtual and
underwater environments, this paper aims to explore the conceptual framework for a
virtual museum of underwater cultural heritage. The objectives of the study are to
formulate a framework for the collection of data on underwater cultural heritage using
the non-destructive process of in situ preservation methodology and documentation,
and explore the methods of transferring, storing and sharing the collected data in the
digital domain. The information system is designed to store various types of data and
also allows collaborative analysis, visualization and communication. Furthermore, at a
conceptual level, the digital technologies of the future are explored to promote a
framework of a virtual museum and to develop a tool for the archaeology.

Theoretical framework
This paper questions the so-called “brick and mortar” (Schweibenz 2004:3) museum
and its practices. The International Council of Museums (ICOM) founded in 1946
defines the museum as a “non-profit, permanent institution in the service of society
and its development, open to public, which acquires, conserves, researches,
communicates and exhibits for the purposes of education, study and enjoyment”
(ICOM 2010). These activities of musealization include the collection, conservation
and research of museum objects through exhibition for better communication with the
public. Separated from its context, however, is isolated from its meaning; the cultural
heritage is enclosed in a single place, which may be termed a heterotopian space
(Foucault 1998:178). Once an object is detached from its original context and placed
in a museum environment, the archaeologists categorize, classify, and derive meaning
in order to impose a new order on artifacts.
As an alternative to this decontextualization, a virtual museum is proposed as a
product of the revolutionary changes in digital reproduction, which led to the
emergence of new definitions in the field of museology (Kalay 2008). The digital
reproduction of the heritage is one of the most attractive ways in which computer
technology can be employed in the field of archaeology (Forte 1997). The use of this
technique allows visual reproduction of the data through representation, modeling, and
display. These methods of display allow the creation of virtual exhibitions in the web
environment. The virtual domain, unlike the “brick and mortar” museum, is a flexible
medium for sharing information in various formats, such as digital images, video
recording, hyperlinked texts, etc. Moreover, the digital domain recodes the way the
information is displayed in such a way to move it from a passive to a more interactive
style.

�Literature Review
In the field of heritage preservation, five digital repositories stand out with their
applications of the practice of virtual repositories: Historical American Building Survey
(HABS) dealing with acquisition of building documentation data in the US (Burns
2004); Turkish Archaeological Settlements Project (TAY) focusing on the conservation
of archaeological data through archival documentation of publications in Turkey
(TAY 1998); Nautical Archaeology Digital Library (NADL) designed as a research tool
on multilingual manuscripts in Texas A&amp;M University, Nautical Archaeology Program
(Castro 2006); Institute for the Visualization of History (VIZIN) projects about
visualization of the artifacts discovered in various archaeological excavations (VIZIN
2003); and Virtual Museum of Canada (VMC), a user-centered virtual museum
network of the Canadian museums (CHIN 2009). These digital projects illustrate the
diverse applications of cultural heritage management.
The digital repositories focusing on three main types of underwater
remains, namely anchors, amphoras, and sites are respectively Big Anchor (NAS
2008), Roman Amphorae (Keay 2005) and VENUS (2006) projects. Although none of
these three examples can be considered within the category of virtual museum, it is
worth mentioning that these three are the most prominent information systems on
nautical archaeology. Their assessment is a useful exercise to conceptualize the
information system for the virtual museum of underwater cultural heritage.
A digital cultural heritage repository of a virtual museum is a medium that
allows the heritage professionals to preserve, manage, and make the data accessible
to the public. Even though the digitization of the repositories challenges the heritage
professionals in technical terms, these issues are being gradually solved with
technological progress. The construction of knowledge in virtual space involves
hyperlinks between different types and aspects of information, which is, in essence,
groups of data. Within this general framework, a model in virtual space illustrates
the concept of the museum as an interactive, recurrently re-interpretive, and
experimental experience. The aim here is to form a platform of knowledge building
through the collaboration of multiple authorities with different backgrounds and a
variety of interests. In order to achieve this aim, the initial stage of operation is forming
a web-based information system.

Information System
The deficiencies and drawbacks of information systems currently used in the field of
cultural heritage are related to the establishment of databases for archaeological sites
using collection methods other than in situ preservation. Currently, there is no
information system satisfying the needs of this data collection methodology.
Furthermore, the analysis and visualization of the collected data through a
collaborative method necessitated an online system of data storage and sharing. The
idea was then to propose an information system for underwater cultural heritage,
which aimed notably to avoid the difficulties mentioned before. By the help of three
computer programmers, a tool was developed for the management of the data
collected during the surveys conducted since 2007. Essentially an online database for
systemic data collection, description, and interpretation, the system currently contains
information on approximately 600 finds through sketches, measurements, drawings,
and photographic entries of individual finds, in addition to regional descriptions and
observations made by divers. Combined with the GPS locations of sites and findspots,
the result of integrating the database with Google Maps illustrates the distribution of

�sites along the Kaş shoreline. The process of gathering and recording data for the
Virtual Museum has been interactive and continually increasing.

Figure 1. Screenshot from the information system showing the distribution map of the
findspots (G. Varinlioglu based on Google Maps)

Field Studies
The field surveys were preceded by the introductory training of the divers on the
survey and documentation methodology to be followed. After this brief introduction,
divers from a variety of disciplines were assigned various tasks in order to fill
datasheets, test the database, and collect visual data. These field surveys were
followed by primary data analysis. This was the first interaction between divers and
archaeologists. As a result of this evaluation, datasheets and database were modified
according to user needs. Following the data produced by field surveys, the information
system was designed and developed. As a result of the comprehensive research on
and study of available tools, financial and technological contingencies, the information
system was selected to be used as a tool for the virtual museum implementation.
With the participation of almost one hundred divers, the author and her team
developed a data collection system for recording, preserving, sharing, presenting and
analyzing the underwater cultural heritage in the coastal region of Kaş (Varinlioğlu
2011). Considering the costly nature of research on the sea and underwater, the
project intends to rely on a team of divers using simple and standard tools for
scanning the bottom profile and recording underwater features in datasheets.
While using these data collection methods, the main concern was the in situ
preservation. The constraints of in situ preservation without dislocating the material
culture helped to develop optimized solutions to data collection methodology
(UNESCO 2001). These constraints are considered as challenges for the design and
realization of a unique archaeological survey all along Kaş coastal area.

A Model of Virtual Museum
As mentioned before, the virtual museum is not in place yet. However, basic methods
necessary for the creation of the virtual museum are investigated as well as the
methods that are followed and the examples that are created by online users working
in collaboration. Thus, the users of this information system participated in the
musealization of information through independently used open source analysis,

�visualization and communication tools such as Gimp, QCAD, Picasa, Hugin, SketchUp
etc. The first step in the data analysis is the definition of the sites and finds, the
analysis of the collected data, the distribution maps of the finds and the statistical
study of these maps.

Figure 2 Panoramic view of a cargo site discovered during the surveys (G. Varinlioglu
based on Hugin software)
Once meaningful information is driven from these analyses using different
software programs, the data was visualized. The drawings and 3D models were driven
from the measurements and typological data. The images were created using digital
darkroom that is processing and enhancing photographs through digital photo editing
programs. In addition, photogrammetric, panoramic and photomosaic images were
generated from of the photographs. The last step was the communication of data
through geo-referenced maps.

Figure 3 Solid modeling of an amphora (G. Varinlioglu based on Google SketchUp
software and handdrawings ).
Analysis of the systematically collected data is a necessity for further research
in the field of archaeology. As analysis tools are not yet integrated to the system, the
analysis is driven manually from the information system. The archaeological questions
answering the distribution map of the findspots and of the find types, some statistical
approaches to distribution maps and to dating of the artifacts, description of the sites,
environment, and finds should have adequate query mechanisms.
The comments of users showed that collected data should be displayed on the
same page. As the system stores and displays all the collected data, there are
inconsistencies between the measurements and observations of different users.
Archaeological measurements have discrepancies related to the skills of divers
measured objects and measurement tools. As separately stored entities, these
ambiguities and inconsistencies should not be eliminated, but rather, a statistical
mechanism should be integrated to standardize the data. Similarly, the visualizing of

�the data should have some automated tools for producing drawings, for enhancing
photographs, and for stitching images to create the photogrammetric representation of
the sites and objects.
The application of visualization tools to archaeological data is part of both
analysis and exhibition of the artifacts. Initially the applications are implemented by
computer-knowledgeable interested parties. Advances in experimenting with these
tools show that archaeologists tend to replace the traditional conventions with new
recording strategies. As the ease of use of adequate software programs is taken into
account, these tools would be largely used not only for visualization but also for
analysis and interpretation. Automated 3D tools, as well as panoramic and
photomosaic, would enhance the level of interaction with the depicted objects.
To date, there is no exhibition tool integrated to the information system. The
Google Maps, listing tools, and preview images of the visual materials such as
photographs, images, sketches, and drawings are used as the main navigation pattern
in the information system. However, a variety of exhibition strategies should be added
to the system, coupled with an interactive interface that will attract the attention of the
users from different backgrounds.

Conclusion
The survey on the Kaş shoreline followed closely the principles of in situ preservation,
which prohibits the dislocation of material culture. This constraint introduced
challenges in designing and conducting an archaeological survey. Hence, it
necessitated the development of optimized solutions for data collection, which led to
the creation of a unique methodology. The survey relied on a team of recreational
divers rather than archaeologists. For this reason, during the project, most of the
developed techniques were quotable by different groups of divers. Keeping the
methods simple helped to cover more nautical miles along the coast. The participation
of recreational divers and the local people living in Kaş raised the awareness about
cultural heritage. This will ensure the sustainability of the project for the preservation
of the underwater cultural heritage.
The information system discussed in this paper was the first web-based
collaborative and open-content platform for raw data of nautical archaeology in
Turkey. In this respect, it was a pioneering and unique project for local
underwater cultural heritage preservation. Based on the analysis of the
datasheets and later the database, this information system met the majority of
the needs of archaeologists; hence the possibility of its use should be considered
by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey (MoCT), which aims to put a
regulation similar to the currently available information systems into practice.
Thus, the archaeological data collected during the surveys can be used to prepare an
official underwater archaeological repository of Turkey. Although the components of
the information system were designed according to the material remains found in
Turkey, with little modification it can be adapted to other remains of material culture in
different countries.
Users of this information system participated in the collaborative process by
using a limited number of open source software programs that are not integrated to
the information system. In visualizing the data, the emphasis was on
photogrammetry because of its ease of use and availability. The 3D modeling was
done at a basic level, as “blank” models. However, three-dimensional digital models
are required in applications of inspection, navigation, object identification, visualization

�and animation. In 3D modeling, photogrammetry has limited use. Therefore, in
addition to reconstructions, archaeological documentation data and the
photogrammetric depictions should be included in the system.
The interactive user interface that will be designed in the future should include all
these features. Further research will include these applications of advanced
technology for modeling and immersion tools for an interactive user interface. Once a
fully integrated system is created, the user analysis should be evaluated for the impact
of the system on the users.

Bibliography
Bass, G.,
2005
Burns, J. A.,
HABS, HAER &amp;
HALS
2004
CHIN,
2009
Forte, M.,
1997
Foucault, M.,
1998
ICOM,
2010
Kalay, Y. E.,
Kvan, T. &amp;
Affleck, J.,
2008
Keay, S.,
2005
NADL,
2006
NAS,
2008
Schweibenz, W.,
2004
TAY,
1998
UNESCO,
2001
Varinlioglu, G.,
2011

Beneath the seven seas: adventures with the Institute of Nautical
Archaeology, Thames and Hudson, London.
Recording Historic Structures, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, N.J.

Virtual Museum of Canada (VMC), Canadian Heritage
Information
Network,
viewed
24
March
2011,
&lt;http://www.museevirtuel-virtualmuseum.ca&gt;.
”Introduction”, in Forte, M. &amp; Siliotti, A. (eds.), Virtual
Archaeology: Great Discoveries Brought to Life Through Virtual
Reality, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 9-13.
”Different Spaces“. Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984.
Penguin Books, London.
Key Concepts of Museology, in Desvallées, A. &amp; Mairesse, F.
(eds.). Armand Colin ICOM International Committee for
Museology.
New heritage: new media and cultural heritage, Routledge, New
York.

Roman Amphorae: a digital resource, Archaeology Data Service
(ADS),
viewed
21
June
2010,
&lt;http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/resources.html?amphora2005&gt;.
Nautical Archaeology Digital Library (NADL), Texas A&amp;M
University, viewed 26 June 2010, &lt;http://nadl.tamu.edu&gt;
Big Anchor Project, Nautical Archaeology Society, viewed 28
June 2010, &lt; http://www.biganchorproject.com&gt;
”The development of virtual museums“, Icom News, vol. 57, no.3,
pp. 3.
TAY Archaeological Settlements of Turkey, viewed 23 June
2010, &lt;www.tayproject.org&gt;.
Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural
Heritage,
viewed
28
June
2010,
&lt;http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001260/126065e.pdf&gt;
”Data Collection for Virtual Museum on the Underwater Survey at
Kaş“, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, vol. 40, pp.
182-188.

�VENUS,
2006
VIZIN,
2003

Virtual Exploration of Underwater Sites, viewed 1 March 2011,
&lt;http://sudek.esil.univmed.fr/venus&gt;
The Institute for the Visualization of History, The Institute for the
Visualization of History, viewed 30 June 2010, &lt;
http://www.vizin.org&gt;

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2957">
                <text>Recoding the Nautical Archaeology: Virtual Museum of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Turkey</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2958">
                <text>Session 10&#13;
Technology and Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2959">
                <text>The preservation of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) requires availability and access to data produced by nautical archaeology alongside tools for analysis, visualization and communication. Although numerous archaeological surveys and excavations have been carried out in the past decades in Turkey, there is no publicly available information system integrated to nautical archaeology. This paper proposes a framework of a virtual museum of UCH. For the creation of this framework, a data collection methodology for underwater surveys has been formulated and a web based information system has been designed to store the collected data. This paper explores the methods of analysis, visualization and communication embedded in this online system towards the development of a virtual museum. &#13;
&#13;
Virtual museum (VM) incorporates the practices of collection, preservation, research, visualization and exhibit, thus offering new approaches to the preservation of cultural heritage. In this paper, a web-based information system has been developed for a model of a virtual museum using the data collected during underwater surveys conducted on the coastal region of Kas, Turkey in 2007- 2010. Divers from a variety of professional backgrounds followed the practice of in situ preservation. They collected visual, geographical and descriptive data using structured datasheets. Through the analysis of these non-destructive methods, an open-content information system is designed aiming the contribution of all interested parties in a collaborative manner. The system currently contains information on 22 sites in the form of sketches, measurements, drawings, photographs of finds. Combined with Google Maps, the database illustrates the initial technological steps towards the development of a virtual museum.&#13;
&#13;
Divers, archaeologists and other interested users of this information system participate in the musealization of information through separately applied analysis, visualization and communication tools by open software programs. These initial steps demonstrate the methods for the automation of data analysis and visual documentation, the visualization of information and the communication of this knowledge. Futuristic concepts of automated, immersive and interactive design redefine the virtual museum of UCH as well as offer different approaches to the discipline of nautical archaeology.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2960">
                <text>Dr. Guzden Varinlioglu </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2961">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="34">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 10</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="345" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="202">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/9bba08e219f080e6008b5359073b6261.pdf</src>
        <authentication>82a3b79e218b1cc1bbd2a0f31f7a5bac</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="4138">
                    <text>Julie Mushynsky, Herman Tudela, Genevieve Cabrera, and Jennifer McKinnon
(from Butler and De
Fant 1991:6)

Saipan (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands) has an extensive seascape history. The first group of people to
populate the island, the Chamorro, possessed both the skills to build ocean-going watercraft and the knowledge of
seafaring. For the first 2,000 years Chamorro communities lived exclusively in settlements at coastal sites and nearly every
endeavour involved interaction with water. The sea was an important part of economic and social life and their main source
of food came from catching pelagic, inshore fishes, crabs and clams by netting, spear fishing, and constructing fish traps.
The sea also influenced village and settlement patterns set up on a hierarchical system where by coastal groups were of
higher status. Chamorro people have also had a long history of contact with Carolinian people who sailed to and settled on
Saipan in the 1800s. Carolinians have an extensive connection with the sea having their own traditions of seafaring and
watercraft construction.
Seascape approaches view the sea as connective rather than divisive and recognise the sea as part of forming social and
cultural identity. Studying seascapes can help describe the relationship people have with the sea, how the sea influences
culture and how it can be manipulated into a cultural space. Seascape studies have largely focussed on Indigenous
interaction with water and the sea, in contrast to maritime cultural landscape studies which primarily focus on historical,
Western heritage. Maritime cultural landscape studies investigate the combination of terrestrial and underwater heritage
related to maritime activities. This approach erases the artificial boundary at the water’s edge to look at maritime culture
in a more holistic way. This project borrows concepts and methods from both approaches to investigate the Indigenous
maritime heritage of Saipan.

If you were to break it down into western and
local perspective you’d say oceans divide, but
for us oceans unite. You say typhoons are
devastations, yes it is devastation, but it’s also
a blessing for us. Without those storms we
wouldn’t get our fair shares of our [fish] runs,
our oceans will not shift, provide us with our
annual [fish] runs
Herman Tudela - 2011

Communication and consultation between community members and archaeologists occurred at all stages of research.
During fieldwork, Indigenous researchers identified sites significant to them and decided which sites should be
archaeologically recorded. Collaboratively, sites were recorded, photographed and mapped. This joint effort allowed for
sites of importance and value to the community to be clearly identified and their significance to be recorded.

Many Chamorro and Carolinian people feel that their maritime heritage is being impacted by human and natural
interference. Thus, the more oral stories and traditions that can be recorded for future generations to read, the better. The
goal of this project is to work with the community of Saipan to record their heritage and explain their long standing
relationship with the sea. Historical, ethnographic and archaeological data is being recorded to understand the maritime
cultural landscape and seascape of Saipan. Two field seasons (2010 and 2011) have focussed on this effort and the results,
although preliminary, demonstrate a longstanding and strong connection with the sea and varied related sites and material
culture.

Traditional Carolinian
watercraft

“Chumming device, fish and
clavicle bone” rock paintings in
Kalabera Cave

References
Cabrera, Genevieve S.
2005 Historic and Cultural Sites of the CNMI: The National Register Sites. The Division of Historic Preservation, Saipan.
Russell, Scott
1998 Tiempon I Manmofo’na. Micronesia Archaeological Survey No.32, CNMI, Saipan.
Butler, Brian M. and David G. De Fant
1991 Archaeological Survey on the Leeward Coast of Saipan: Garapan to Oleai. Micronesian Archaeological Survey Report Number 27, Saipan.

Navigational features in
topography

Many Chamorro feel that the more
information pertaining to Indigenous
culture that can be put down on paper
for young people to read, the better
Genevieve Cabrera - 2011

Maritime themed petroglyphs

Tangible and intangible links of Indigenous relationships with the sea are demonstrated through a number of types of
heritage including: fish traps, caves with rock art depicting maritime themes, canoe access points, ancient coastal latte
sites, Indigenous fishing locations, oral traditions and a number of navigational features in the island’s topography.
Researchers were able to establish continuity, demonstrating how the past seascape still manifests itself today in fishing
practices, rituals and issues surrounding sea tenure.

Possible fish weir in Laulau Bay

Latte pillar at Unai Bapot Latte
Site

Sagua (channel/canoe track)
in Laulau Bay

“Netting site”

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="203">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/bc7064d4e4fe2b664aa636e60d6ec177.jpg</src>
        <authentication>cde6e1cc1eb43b9e191146f5eeb10909</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="6">
            <name>Omeka Image File</name>
            <description>The metadata element set that was included in the `files_images` table in previous versions of Omeka. These elements are common to all image files.</description>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="106">
                <name>Width</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="4139">
                    <text>268</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="107">
                <name>Height</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="4140">
                    <text>237</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="108">
                <name>Bit Depth</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="4141">
                    <text>8</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="109">
                <name>Channels</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="4142">
                    <text>3</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4131">
                <text>Recording the Indigenous Maritime Cultural Landscape and Seascape in Saipan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4132">
                <text>The goal of this project is to work with the community of Saipan to record their heritage and explain their long standing relationship with the sea. Historical, ethnographic and archaeological data is being recorded to understand the maritime cultural landscape and seascape of Saipan.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4133">
                <text>Julie Mushynsky</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4134">
                <text>Herman Tudela</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4135">
                <text>Genevieve Cabrera</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4136">
                <text>Jennifer McKinnon</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4137">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="26">
        <name>Asia-Pac Poster</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="340" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4056">
                <text>Records of the Grand Historian</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4057">
                <text>Sima Qian</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4058">
                <text>Burton Watson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4059">
                <text>Renditions-Columbia University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4060">
                <text>1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4061">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4062">
                <text>Sima Qian</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="147">
            <name>Translator</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4063">
                <text>Burton Watson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4064">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4065">
                <text>1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="185">
            <name>Edition</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4066">
                <text>Rev. ed.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="214">
            <name>Number of Volumes</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4067">
                <text>2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4068">
                <text>New York</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4069">
                <text>Renditions-Columbia University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4070">
                <text>Records of the Grand Historian</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="568" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="359">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/a87f2e86f9fd917bc87bc3be80372224.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ff2d174625828b66b640412bbbd12ed5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6290">
                    <text>Regional Identity and Local Variety: Plank Configurations in Lashed-lug Boatbuilding
of Southeast Asia
Ligaya Lacsina (University of the Philippines)
Abhirada Pook Komoot (CSEAS, Kyoto University)

ABSTRACT
This short paper is suitable for session 6. It is written to report the result of the recent survey of the lashed-lug
boatbuilding technology in the Southeast Asian region. In addition to desk-based assessments, investigations were
undertaken at Khlong Thom in the south of Thailand, Chau Tan remains in central Vietnam, and Butuan in the
south of the Philippines. This project aims to observe the variety of the lashed-lug boatbuilding to better
understand meaningful, technical connections.
Keywords: lashed-lug boatbuilding, Southeast Asia nautical knowledge, ship comparison
List of Figures
Figure 1. Distribution of archaeological ship remains in Southeast Asia (illustrated by Abhirada Komoot)
Figure 2 Diagram of plank configurations: A) Khlong Thom, B) Punjulharjo, C) Chau Tan and D) Ban Khlong
Yuan (illustrated by Abhirada Komoot)
Figure 3 Diagram of Butuan boat remains, from top: (A) Butuan 1, (B) Butuan 5, (C) Butuan 2, (D) Butuan 4
(illustrated by Ligaya Lacsina).
Figure 4. Conjectural lug-lashing of Butuan 2 and other exclusively doweled planks based on the Punjulharjo boat
lashing example that crosses planks (illustrated by Ligaya Lacsina).
List of Tables
Table 1. Khlong Thom wood ID (UAD report 2019)
Table 2. Punjulharjo wood ID (Abbas 2010; Nugroho 2010)
Table 3. Ban Khlong Yuan wood ID (UAD report 2019)
Table 4. Butuan 1 Wood ID (Lacsina 2016)
Table 5. Butuan 5 Wood ID (Lacsina 2016)
Table 6. Butuan 2 Wood ID (Lacsina 2016)
Table 7. Butuan 2 Wood ID (Lacsina 2016)
Table 8. Plank Configurations

INTRODUCTION
Lashed-lug construction is a distinctive nautical technology that facilitated Southeast Asian regional
networks from the early 1st to the late 2nd millennium CE. It refers to a boatbuilding technique in which
the planks were cleated with lugs and assembled by individual stitching and/or wooden dowels. The
seams of stitches, if any, were only visible inboard. The remains of lashed-lug vessels are distributed
over coastal areas linking mainland and island subregions (Figure 1). Yet, each of the vessels reflect
the unique personality of the boatbuilders. This paper thus hopes to highlight the techno-cultural
diversity and links to realise the complexity that shapes the way our region is today.
Plank features are the most prominent attribute for understanding hull assemblage. The details of the
keel plank designs are focused and have been previously noted (Lacsina and Mochtar 2019). Regarding
plank fastenings, an earlier hypothesis by Adrian Horridge (1982, 1; 32–33; 56–58) posited that the
oldest plank-built boats were held by stitching or sewing without the use of edge dowels. He based this
on the assumption that dowel holes could not be produced without the aid of metal tools, though it must
be noted when he wrote this, no plank boat remnants had been found that predate the use of metals in
Southeast Asia. Pierre-Yves Manguin (1993; 2021) and Sean McGrail (2001) surmised that edge
dowelling was incorporated to supplement stitching, leading to dowelling supplemented by stitching,
until stitching was set aside entirely for exclusive dowel fastening. The reason for shifting to an
exclusive reliance on dowelling is unclear, whether this was the result of technological or arbitrary
choices. Our observations thus present a review of this aspect by sharing the results of a preliminary
1

�comparison of the fastening methods in several examples. It hopes to contribute to the growing dataset
of lashed lug boats and lead to greater insights into their construction.

REGIONAL VARIATION OF PLANK CONFIGURATIONS
This section provides information gathered from existing research and field survey in Thailand,
Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam. Eight examples of lashed-lug remains were selected for this
comparison. They are classified into two main categories – those with no edge dowels present and those
with edge dowels. The utilisation of dowels is divided into three distinct methods, stitched-dowelling,
pinned-dowelling, and exclusive dowelling. Illustrative diagrams are produced to present a schematic
configuration of the lashed-lug planking. It should be noted that they are based on approximate
measurements and authors’ observations (Figures 2 and 3).
No Edge Dowels
Khlong Thom (KT)
The remains studied in this paper are based on the report written by the Thai Underwater Archaeology
Division (UAD) during the 2019 investigation (Piromrak 2019). The timber fragments were removed
from the sandy-clay bed of Khlong Thom, near Kuan Luk Pad archaeological site in Krabi Province,
Thailand. Khlong Thom is a waterway giving access to the inner land from the Andaman Sea.
Figure 2A illustrates how the planks feature a narrow face of about 20 centimetres in width and a
thickness of about three centimetres. Lugs are almost the same width but double in thickness. The total
thickness of plank ranges from 9 to 12 centimetres, including lug. Lugs were made at about 40
centimetres gap without a link, except for the keel plank of which the centre was carved into a
longitudinal, narrow ridge linking with the rectangular ones. On the moulding face of the central ridge,
there is an oval-shaped hole. The rectangular shape lugs have a pair of square holes diagonally chiselled
near the upper edge. This differs from the lugs on the keel plank with round holes. The row of lugs
seems to be carved off-centre. The base of the lug is longer than the plank on one side, suggesting a
locking function. On either side of the lugs are a pair of rounded, L-shaped holes, not visible outboard.
The cordage remaining in the holes indicates that planks were secured by stitching with a cross and

2

�Figure 1. Distribution of archaeological ship remains in Southeast Asia (illustrated by Abhirada Komoot).

wrap pattern. A small wedge was hammered in to ensure the knots were tight. No indication of dowels
are seen throughout. Between lugs, the remaining stitching exhibits cordage with a delicate braiding
technique tightened by a piece of wedge.
Table 1. Khlong Thom wood ID (UAD report 2019)
Samples
Descriptions
1
Wooden wedge
2
Caulking/ luting
3
Plank

Species
Mesua ferrea L.
Payena acuminate (Blume) Pierre
Hopea sp.

With Edge Dowels and Stitches
Punjulharjo
The Punjulharjo boat is located on the northern coast of Rembang District, Central Java. It was
accidentally discovered by local villagers during the rehabilitation of the salterns and was investigated
archaeologically between 2008 and 2009 by the Yogyakarta Archaeological Center. An open building
was built in place with an elevated floor to house the wooden remains after Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)
impregnation treatment was done.
A comprehensive diagram of plank configuration is drawn following the measurement conducted by
Agni Mochtar (2018). Figure 2B demonstrates the hull of the Punjulharjo was assembled mainly by
edge dowels and stitching. Tenon and mortise joints also appear in the mix. Mochtar (2018) reports that
the keel plank is 15.6 metres long and has a maximum width of 56 centimetres. It was tapered on both
3

�Figure 2. Diagram of approximate plank configurations of: A) Khlong Thom, B) Punjulharjo, C) Chau Tan and D)
Ban Khlong Yuan (illustrated by Abhirada Komoot).

4

�ends to receive wing-ends. The lugs are mostly flat and rectangular. The largest lug size is 40 by 25
centimetres at midship. Pairs of the rounded holes appear on lugs and next to lugs. On the edge, there
are dowelling holes with uneven intervals. There are sets of several dowelling holes (3-4 holes)
alternating with two pairs of stitching holes. There is no report on the length of dowels or dowel holes.
For the purpose of this paper, the Punjulharjo’s dowel holes in Figure 2C are based on the finding in
CT and BKY, but remain conjectural.
Notably, the documented construction of the Punjulharjo boat depicts the lug-lashing that secured
frames, stringers, beams, and other parts also fastened two adjacent planks to one another,
supplementing the stitching and dowelling (see Manguin 2019, Figure 7a and 7c; Mochtar 2018, Figure
5-10).
Table 2. Punjulharjo wood ID (Abbas 2010; Nugroho 2010)
Samples
1
2
3

Descriptions
Wooden dowels
Plank
Stringer

Species
Melaleuca leucadendron
Palaquium gutta
Scorodocarpus borneensis

Chau Tan (CT)
The Chau Tan ship remains were found by local fishermen off the coast of Quang Ngai, Central
Vietnam. The remains were discovered by accident during a fishing activity in 2011 and are now kept
in a shed at the house of a local collector, Mr. Lam. There is no scientific documentation of the original
context of the site. A team of Japanese researchers processed post-salvage documentation of the
recovered timbers and published their findings in 2017 and 2018 reports (Noriko et al. 2017). The
reports reveal the ship date to be between 663 and 715 CE. This paper adds to existing information
based on the authors’ survey in January 2023.
The Chau Tan planks are relatively large, as seen in Figure 2C, and long. The keel plank measures 41
centimetres at the maximum width and about 22 metres in length. The width of the lugs is almost the
same as the plank width, although the size of the lugs was carved with tapering ends. All holes are round
and about 2.5 to 3 centimetres in diameter. The lug interval is about 40 centimetres, except for the midsection, where the break is about 150 centimetres. Lugs on the keel plank were connected to a narrow
ridge of 14 centimetres maximum width. A pair of through holes are on the ridge at the interval of lugs.
The fastening technique of the Chau Tan boat is stitching and dowelling. A pair of stitching holes appear
on the sides of lugs, alternating with a row of dowels.
Ban Khlong Yuan (BKY)
Ban Khlong Yuan is located east of the peninsula, facing the Gulf of Thailand. It is under the
administration of Chaiya District, Surat Thani Province. The boat remains were found buried in the
terrestrial area, away from the sea. There are 84 pieces of boat remains that were recovered by the
landowners during the reservoir construction in 2002. They are now transferred to the UAD office in
Chantaburi for further analysis. The ship was reported with an approximate dating between 768 and
890 Cal CE (Rahotan 2019).
The diagram (Figure 2D) shows that the broadest part of the keel plank measures about 30 centimetres.
Lug thickness is about 2 centimetres, while the overall thickness of the plank is about 5-6 centimetres.
Lugs were carved along the length with regular intervals of about 35 centimetres and linked by a 10centimetre wide ridge in the middle. Ligature and dowelling holes are round and about 1.5-2 centimetres
in diameter. A pair of ligature holes present next to lugs alternating with rows of dowelling holes. Some
dowels are still intact in the holes.

5

�Table 3. Ban Khlong Yuan wood ID (UAD report 2019)
Samples
1
2

Descriptions
Wooden dowels
Plank

Species
Terminalia mucronata Craib &amp; Hutch.
Hopea sp.

Pinned-dowelling
Butuan 1
The Butuan boat 1 was the first of several lashed-lug boats found in Butuan City, north-eastern
Mindanao, Philippines. It was discovered by salvagers in 1976. A site museum was constructed to house
Butuan Boat 1 in 1980, where it remains to this day. A report states that the wood received Wolmanized
treatment, a pressure treatment used for commercial lumber.
The lugs of Butuan 1 are unique in known lashed lug boats to date. Figure 3A illustrates that they have
three pairs of L-shaped lashing holes on relatively wide lugs. On the keel plank are also three pairs of
lashing holes but on three sets of lugs. Plank fastening was by dowels, with roughly every alternate
dowel locked in place with a wooden pin. The boat remains were measured at a maximum of 10.2
meters in length. The longest piece is the keel plank at 9.74 meters.
Table 4. Butuan 1 Wood ID (Lacsina 2016)
Samples
Descriptions
1
Wooden dowel
2
Plank
3
Wing end

Species
Vatica sp.
Petersianthus quadrielatus, Shorea sp., Vatica sp.
Shorea sp.

Butuan 5
Butuan 5 was first unearthed in 1985, and then recovered in 1986 as part of a regional training course
on archaeological conservation organised by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN
1986). The final ASEAN report describes Boat 5 timbers as being so fragile that they could not be lifted
in one piece. They were cut into fragments, which were reportedly labelled and soaked in a tank of fresh
water in Butuan until PEG could be acquired. Unfortunately, when researchers visited to examine Boat
5’s timbers, they found the water had dried and the wood was warped and dissociated from their labels.
Boat 5 also seems to have unique features, particularly in the lashing holes on the lugs, which run
through the breadth of the lugs (Figure 3B). Its keel plank is also unique in that it does not have
individual lugs, only a continuous ridge that runs the length of the keel plank through which lashing
holes are also bored breadthwise. The hull parts are badly degraded and warped. When Butuan 5 was
excavated, the remains measured 11.5 metres in length, the same as its keel plank. It was found with
eight strakes on one side and seven strakes on the other. Like Butuan 1, some of Butuan 5’s dowels are
locked with wooden pins driven from the inboard of the plank.
Table 5. Butuan 5 wood ID (Lacsina 2016)
Samples
Descriptions
1
All hull parts
2
Frames
3
Wing ends
4
Dowel

Species
Pistacia chinensis
Dimocarpus sp., Vitex parviflora
Pterocarpus indicus
Dimocarpus sp.

Exclusive Dowelling
Butuan 2
The Butuan 2 remains were found by pot hunters in 1977, several months after Butuan 1 was unearthed.
The excavation was carried out by the National Museum of the Philippines in 1977. Butuan 2 was found
6

�Figure 3. Diagram of approximate plank configurations of: (A) Butuan 1, (B) Butuan 5, (C) Butuan 2, (D) Butuan 4
(illustrated by Ligaya Lacsina).

within several metres of Boats 4 and 9, and reportedly Boat 3, though this has yet to be confirmed. It is
currently in storage at the National Museum in Manila, where it was previously on display before the
gallery that contained it was dismantled.
The planks of Butuan 2 only show evidence of dowelling and no apparent locking feature to keep the
planks from separating. Lacsina (2016, 208) has suggested that lashed lugs, as they were applied in the
Punjulharjo Boat, might have also been used here to compress planks together, though this cannot be
7

�Figure 4. Conjectural lug-lashing of Butuan 2 and other exclusively doweled planks based on the Punjulharjo boat
lashing example that crosses planks (illustrated by Ligaya Lacsina).

confirmed due to limited evidence of ligatures in Butuan. The keel plank is the longest piece and
measures 11.3 metres. It has two sets of lugs and two pairs of L-shaped holes (Figure 3C). Individual
lugs on the planks also have two sets of L-shaped holes.

Table 6. Wood ID of Butuan 2 (Lacsina 2016)
Samples
Descriptions
1
All hull parts
2
Wing ends

Species
Hopea sp.
Pterocarpus indicus

Butuan 4
Butuan 4 was found several meters from Butuan 2. A looter’s pit was extended by archaeologists in
2012 to find the remains of this Boat, half of which appear to be missing; the keel plank is sawn cleanly
at this point.
So far, the planks of Butuan 4 appear to only use dowels. There are two pairs of L-shaped lashing holes
on the individual lugs. The keel plank lugs are connected by a continuous ridge running the length of it
Figure 3D.
Table 7. Wood ID of Butuan 4
Samples
Descriptions
1
All hull parts

Species
Vatica sp.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
While its prominent feature is the protruding lug on the inboard planks, arranged in traversal rows for
fitting and locking frames, our investigation conducts a comprehensive review of the characteristics of
plank modification and assembling methods in several examples in Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, and
the Philippines. In closely observing lashed-lug boat remains of the currently documented examples,
the result demonstrates a variety of planking techniques and configurations (Table 8).
Keel plank configurations are notable as they are generally carved in different designs than the other
planks (Lacsina and Mochtar 2019). The most common variation is an individual lug joined by a raised
ridge. The greatest variation can be seen in the Butuan assemblage which include two and three sets of
lugs, a raised edge with no lugs, and the aforementioned lugs joined by a ridge. No raised ridge is
presented in the Punjulharjo’s keel plank. The size of keel planks range between 20 and nearly 40
centimetres. As presented, the Butuan boats’ planks and lugs are narrower compared to others. The keel
8

�plank on the KT is also narrow but lugs were uniquely carved to lock with adjacent planks. All holes
were predrilled and mostly round, except for the KT remains. Lashing holes on the KT lugs feature
square but ligature holes for stitching on the planks, are round.
Lugs were transversely aligned to fasten the full frames. Manguin (2021) provides a technical
proposition that lug lashing on frames, the increased edge dowels and pinning could be a compensation
for plank stitching that disappeared completely from the lashed-lug vessels at the beginning of the 2nd
millennium CE.
Figure 4 presents a hypothetical illustration of the lug lashing based on a key surviving example. The
evidence from the Punjularjo boat reveals cross-plank lashing, in contrast to ethnographic examples
that show lug-lashing is isolated to individual lugs and planks (Horridge 1982, 15, 16). This fastening
technique is believed to have assisted to strengthen the hull and would provide especially significant
reinforcement to exclusively dowelled vessels.
This paper also found that the lashed-lug vessels had the most configurative variation during the late
1st millennium CE. Exclusive stitching was used in the 1st century (KT), even as dowels were used to
supplement stitching in other vessels (Manguin, 2019). An increased use of dowels as a main fastening
occurred toward the second half of the 1st millennium. The use of dowelling appeared in the CT and
Pubjulharjo in the 8th century and the BKY of the 9th century. Only the boats found in Butuan did not
have stitching, only dowelling throughout the 8th and 10th centuries. This finding brings a question of
regional variation: what could be a driving force for these differences? More inclusive approach to
consider materials (i.e., type of wood) and plank modification (i.e., different lug shapes and size of
plank) is necessary.
The variations observed here need further study to learn about the technical performance and
effectiveness of each. A closer observation of the elements of hull construction, scrutinising their
characteristics for previously unnoticed qualities and, if possible, understanding the efficiency of each
fastening technique should follow. In the future, it is hoped to better understand how the technical
variety contributes to the understanding of technological development.
Table 8. Plank Configurations
Dates
Sites
Central ridge on
keel plank
85-229 CE

Khlong
Thom

Vertical ridge,
standing up right

Lugs/ligature holes Ligature
holes on
planks
Narrow/square and Round
round

660-780 CE

Punjulharjo

No ridge

Round

663-715 CE

Chau Tan

Flat with 2 lashing Broad/round
holes on every
interval

Round

715-940 CE

Butuan 2

No. 2 sets of lugs

Round

-

768-890 CE

Ban Khlong
Yuan

Flat with no
lashing holes

Broad/round

Round

775-973 CE

Butuan 4

777-971 CE

Butuan 5

777-988 CE

Butuan 1

Yes, with
Round
individual lugs
Yes, no individual Round
lugs
No. 3 sets of lugs Round

Round

-

9

Plank
assembling

Special
features

2 pairs of
stitching holes
and wedgedstitching
2 pairs of
stitching holes
alternated by a
row of dowels
2 pairs of
stitching holes
alternated by a
row of dowels
Exclusively
dowelled

-Locking
lugs
- visible
wedges
Tenon and
mortise

2 pairs of
stitching holes
alternated by a
row of dowels
Exclusively
dowelled
Pinneddowelling
Pinneddowelling

-

Tenon and
mortise
(wing end)
-

-

�ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our sincere gratitude is extended to Suvarnabhumi Studies Center under the auspices of the Thai Ministry of Higher Education,
Science, Research and Innovation for funding this project. Our partners at the National Museum of the Philippines, and local
authority in Vietnam and Indonesia are appreciated for their assistance.

BIBLIOGRAPGHY
ASEAN. Report on the third intra-ASEAN Archaeological Excavation and Conservation Butuan City, Philippines 16
November–10 December 1986. Manila: ASEAN, 1986.
Horridge, Adrian. The lashed-lug boat of the eastern archipelagoes, the Alcina MS and the Lomblen whaling boats. Maritime
Monographs and Reports. Greenwich: Trustees of the National Maritime Museum, 1982
Lacsina, Ligaya. "Examining pre-colonial Southeast Asian boatbuilding: An archaeological study of the Butuan Boats and the
use of edge-joined planking in local and regional construction techniques." PhD diss., Flinders University, School of
Humanities and Creative Arts, 2016.
Lacsina, Ligaya, and Agni Sesaria Mochtar. ‘The Lashed-Lug Tradition Beyond the Commonalities: A Closer Examination
of Variations in Keel Design within Southeast Asian Shipbuilding Tradition’. In Advancing Southeast Asian Archaeology
2019: Selected Papers from the Second SEAMEO SPAFA International Conference on Southeast Asian Archaeology, Bangkok,
Thailand 2019, edited by Noel Hidalgo Tan. Seameo-Spafa, 2020.https://www.spafajournal.org/index.php/spafapub/issue/
view/136.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves. “Trading ships of the South China Sea. Shipbuilding techniques and their role in the history of the
development of Asian trade networks.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 36, no.3 (1993): 253–280.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves. Sewn Boats of Southeast Asia: The Stitched-Plank and Lashed-Lug Tradition. International Journal
of Nautical Archaeology, 48(2), 2019, 400-415. doi:10.1111/1095-9270.12367
Manguin, Pierre-Yves. “The assembly of hulls in Southeast Asian shipbuilding traditions: from lashings to treenails”, in Giulia
Boetto, Patrice Pomey &amp; Pierre Poveda (Eds), Open Sea / Closed Sea: Local and Inter-Regional Traditions in Shipbuilding
(Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology, Marseille 2018, ISBSA 15),
Archaeonautica, 21, 2021, pp. 135–138.
Mcgrail, Sean. Boats of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Mochtar, Agni Sesaria. "The Seventh-Century Punjulharjo Boat from Indonesia: A study of the early Southeast Asian lashedlug boatbuilding tradition." PhD diss., Flinders University, College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2018.
Noriko, Nishino, Toru Aoyama, Jun Kimura, Nokami Takenori, and Le Thi Lien. Nishimura Masanari’s Study of the Earliest
Known Shipwreck Found in Vietnam. Asian Review of World Histories, 5, no. 2 (2017): 106-122.
Piromrak, Napat. Report on the Survey of Lashed-Lug Remians in Khlong Thom Tai Subdistrict, Khlong Thom District, Krabi
Province 2019, Research Unit, Underwater Archaeology Division, Fine Arts Department, 2019 (in Thai and unpublished).
Rahotan, Wongsakorn. Preliminary Report on the Survey of Lashed-Lug Remains in Ban Klong Yuan, Surathani Province
2019, Research Unit, Underwater Archaeology Division, Fine Arts Department, 2019, (in Thai and unpublished).

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="42">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="184">
                  <text>2023 Session 6: Lashed-lug boats: Emerging research from Southeast Asia and the Pacific</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="185">
                  <text>Session 6 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="186">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 6 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="187">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="188">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="189">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="190">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="191">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="192">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6282">
                <text>Regional Identity and Local Variety: Plank Configurations in Lashed-lug Boatbuilding&#13;
of Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6283">
                <text>This short paper is suitable for session 6. It is written to report the result of the recent survey of the lashed-lug&#13;
boatbuilding technology in the Southeast Asian region. In addition to desk-based assessments, investigations were&#13;
undertaken at Khlong Thom in the south of Thailand, Chau Tan remains in central Vietnam, and Butuan in the&#13;
south of the Philippines. This project aims to observe the variety of the lashed-lug boatbuilding to better&#13;
understand meaningful, technical connections. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6284">
                <text>Ligaya Lacsina</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6285">
                <text>Abhirada Pook Komoot</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6286">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6287">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6288">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6289">
                <text>Lacsina, Ligaya and Abhirada Pook Komoot. 2023. “Regional identity and local variety: Plank Fastening Techniques in Lashed-lug Boatbuilding of Southeast Asia.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Ligaya Lacsina, Agni Mochtar, and Pierre-Yves Manguin. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1939 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="63">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
