<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=39&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-25T17:48:50+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>39</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="163" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1973">
                <text>Ports of the Red Sea and the Arabia-India Trade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1974">
                <text>Steven E. Sidebotham</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1975">
                <text>Vimala Begley</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1976">
                <text>Richard Daniel De Puma</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1977">
                <text>University of Wisconsin Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1978">
                <text>1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1979">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1980">
                <text>Steven E. Sidebotham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1981">
                <text>Vimala Begley</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1982">
                <text>Richard Daniel De Puma</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1983">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1984">
                <text>Rome and India: The Ancient Sea Trade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1985">
                <text>1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1986">
                <text>12-38</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1987">
                <text>Madison</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1988">
                <text>University of Wisconsin Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1989">
                <text>Ports of the Red Sea and the Arabia-India Trade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="342" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4086">
                <text>Ports, Merchants, Chieftains and Eunuchs: Reading Maritime Commerce of Early Guangdong</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4087">
                <text>Chin James K</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4088">
                <text>Shing MÃ¼ller</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4089">
                <text>Thomas O. HÃ¶llmann</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4090">
                <text>Putao Gui</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4091">
                <text>Harrassowitz Verlag</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4092">
                <text>2004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4093">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4094">
                <text>Chin James K</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4095">
                <text>Shing MÃ¼ller</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4096">
                <text>Thomas O. HÃ¶llmann</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4097">
                <text>Putao Gui</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4098">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4099">
                <text>Guangdong: Archaeology and Early Texts (Zhou-Tang)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4100">
                <text>2004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4101">
                <text>217-239</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4102">
                <text>Wiesbaden</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4103">
                <text>Harrassowitz Verlag</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4104">
                <text>Ports, Merchants, Chieftains and Eunuchs: Reading Maritime Commerce of Early Guangdong</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="15" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="15">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/b9289d86897ce8fb8377070c26fb8c6c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>fd02242cb2a6259f3ace223f5079cf84</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="461">
                    <text>Portuguese Naus on Namban Screens: A study of the first European ships on
paintings from the late 16th to early 17th centuries in Japan

Kotaro Yamafune
Texas A&amp;M University, College Station
USA 77843
Email: goldfloor@tamu.edu
Abstract
Namban screens, a well-known Japanese art form, were painted by skillful Japanese
artists from the late 16th century to the 17th centuries. Approximately 90 of these
screens have been handed down up to the present. Not only they show some important
historical scenes of European commercial activities in the Far East for the first time, but
they also depict representational pictures of Portuguese ships during the Age of
Discovery. Although the ships’ images on the screens are roughly acceptable, the
details are often strangely anachronistic. The same images could be found in some
Western maps in the 16th century. Judging from the similarity, perhaps, Japanese
painters, who had never seen actual ships themselves in ports, did manage to copy the
images from ones on those maps, which were brought to Japan by the
wellknownTensho embassy. This was the first Japanese embassy that was sent to
Europe; the diplomats left Japan in 1582 and arrived at Portugal in 1584. They met with
Pope Gregory XIII and his successor, Pope Sixtus V, in Rome, and then returned back
to their homeland in 1590. In the following year the embassy members succeeded in
seeing HideyoshiToyotomi, who was the leading political ruler in Japan at that time.
They gave him some souvenirs from Europe, including the maps. It seems that some
official court painters had a chance to see those gifts, from where Japanese artists
could have obtained an idea of the ships’ images that appear in the Namban screens.
Keywords:Namban Screen, Japan, Portugal, Ships, Naus,

Introduction
In the early 14th century, Japan was introduced to the European world as an Island of
Gold by the Venetian explorer Marco Polo. Portuguese sailors finally reached these far
away lands in 1543, more than 200 years after Marco Polo’s first publication and the
introduction of Zipangu. In the following century, Portuguese merchants enjoyed the
lucrative Japanese trade. Today, we know a lot about this first interaction between the
Europeans and Japanese from both contemporary Latin and Japanese chronicles and
journals; however, among all primary sources, the most intriguing and visually-pleasing
information appears on Namban screens, a famous Japanese art form, which was
1

�produced at the end of the
16th

century

throughout

the

and
17th

century in Japan (Fig. 1).
Namban

screens

are

regarded

as

the

first

Japanese

artworks

that

depicted Europeans and
their ships visiting Japan.
The original goal of the
author’s research was to
identify

the

Portuguese

ships that travelled to the
Far East and to illuminate Fig. 1 Namban Screen: Version A of Kyushu National Museum
their nature and the details (Important Cultural Property). Top is Right Panel and Bottom is
Left Panel (154.5 X 363.2 cm each). (M. Sakamoto)

of their upper structures.
However, during this research, the author recognized that the ships that were depicted
on many of the screens were implausible representations of oceangoing ships, and that
some of the ships represented on the screens looked very similar to the ships
represented in contemporary European art. While considering these facts, the author
realized that one important historical event might be the 16th century link between
Japan and Europe.
Namban Screens
Namban screens were produced by various artists from the end of 16th century and
throughout 17th century (Sakamoto, 2008). The word “Namban” was derived from the
old Chinese worldview. In ancient China, its inhabitants considered their country to be
the center of the world, and the only civilized nation on earth. Chinese people called
surrounding regions “Hokuteki”, “Toui”, “Seikai”, and “Namban”; or Northern Savages,
Eastern Savages, Western Savages, and Southern Savages (Sakamoto, 2008). By the
16th century, these terms were also in use in Japan, and the Europeans who came to
Japan from the southern sea were called Namban people.
2

�The Namban people first met the Japanese in 1543, when three Portuguese merchants
drifted into one of the southwestern small islands of Japan on a Chinese junk. Soon
after the discovery of Marco Polo’s legendary islands, European merchants and
missionaries began to visit Japan regular bases. This interaction with the Western
World caused cultural changes far beyond the introduction of firearms. One important
realm where European influence can be observed is that of the Japanese art. New
trends in Japanese art appeared at the end of the 16th century and throughout the 17th
century (Sakamoto, 2008). In addition, many Japanese artists drew Portuguese people
and ships in their paintings. Namban screens were a part of this. More than 90 screens
survive, produced primarily between the end of the 16th century and throughout the
17th century. Some of the earliest screens were painted by well-known artists, known
as the Kano-school (Sakamoto, 2008). In 2008, the most complete inventory so far was
published in a book, NambanByobu Shusei (Sakamoto, 2008).
Ships
Portuguese Nau
The most important element relevant to this study that can be seen on Namban screens
are the European ships, the main subject of the present research. The ships on the
screens represent Portuguese merchantmen; Portuguese naus was probably the most
common type of European merchant ship to sail in Asia at that time, and were employed
in the China and Japan trade (Okamoto, 1955; Sukeno, 1960).
Naus grew in size during the 16th century and were engaged on the East India route.
By the beginning of the 17th century the overall size of the East India naus was larger
than ever, at about 1,100 tons of displacement, while bow and stern castles were
lowered for better sailing performance (Castro, 2005).
Ships on the Namban Screens
From the 90 surviving Namban screens, we can discern several different typologies of
ships. As often happens in the art of the western world, it appears that Japanese artists
sometime drew their Namban ships based on ships that they saw on other Namban
screens, rather than from seeing the actual ships (Russell, 1983). An analysis of the
collection of screens suggests that through a sequence of copying older images, the
accuracy and detail of the Namban ships gradually deteriorated. Fortunately, several
3

�scholars of Japanese Art History and connoisseurs of Japanese art have studied all
known Namban screens and completed brief timelines of screen production (Sakamoto,
2008). The timelines are based on the screen’s historical accounts and the styles of
painting.

Fig. 2 NambanShips on Namban Screen (Version aof Kobe City Museum, Naizen Version [Late 16th –
Early 17th century] by Kano Naizen). (M. Sakamoto)

When analyzed in this light, most images of ships on the screens seem to be copies of
previous images, often from other screens. The author made a catalog of all 73 ship
images known, and classified them according to their quality and date of production.
Fifteen groups or families were identified, seemingly 15 strings of copies of 15 original
images. Once it was completed, this catalog allowed the author to make a surprising
statement: none of these 15 ship types seems to have been painted directly from
observation of actual European vessels in Japanese ports.
Questions
Question1: Why are the Depictions of the Ships so Inaccurate?
The first and biggest question about the origin of the Namban screens pertains to the
inaccuracy of the ship representations.

The most conspicuous mistakes are the

implausible widths of the hull planks, which when scaled properly sometimes reach
approximately two meters in width (Fig. 2).

No less inconspicuous are the rigging

arrangements. Although most ships display masts, yards, sometimes sails, and most
times some standing rigging supporting the masts, the quality of the rigging
4

�representations is always bad and diminishes in time. For instance, ships represented
after the 1630s rarely display ratlines. Running rigging is rarely represented, and in a
few cases ships do not even have masts and yards.
Other interesting mistakes can be observed on the representations of gun ports. By the
16th century, most European merchant ships were armed. The primary weapons of
these vessels were heavy guns, since naval battles were shifting from hand-to-hand
combat into bombardment battles, and indeed many of ships display cannons. However,
these are represented as simple pipes protruding from the hull planking, instead of the
muzzles of cannons and gun ports represented in contemporaneous European
iconography.
These are gross mistakes that are in obvious contrast with the quality of the
representations of houses, trees, or persons, in the same screen. Namban ships seem
to be depicted with less attention to accuracy than many other features in these screens.
Most Japanese scholars explain this lack of accuracy by saying that Namban ships
were not an important portion of the screens and that artists might stylize the ships
because it did not really matter much for the end result (Okamoto, 1955; Sakamoto,
2008). However, this explanation is not acceptable because all other features on the
screens were depicted in minute detail, as we can see for instance on people’s faces,
houses, trees, and even the waves of the sea. Moreover, many of the early screens
were produced by the Kano school, one of the most famous groups of artists in
Japanese history. The Kano school was composed predominantly of the master Kano’s
lineage. Their painting techniques and styles were only taught to close family members
and other relatives (Matsuki, 1994; Takeda, 1995). The Kano school appeared in the
15th century and continued until the 19th century. During these 400 years its artists
produced many works of art that have been labeled National Treasures and Important
Properties of Japan (Yamashita, 2004). Kano school masters served many Tennou,
Daimyo, Taiko, Shogun, and other powerful authorities in each period of Japan’s history.
The fame of the Kano school reached its peak in the Azuchi-Momoyama Era (15671600), when Nobunaga Oda and HideyoshiToyotomi ruled Japan.

The Japanese

culture of this era was named the Azuchi-Momoyama Culture, and the paintings
produced by Kano school artists represent masterpieces ofAzuchi-Momoyama arts
5

�(Kano, 2007). The Kano school’s art is characterized by precision and attention to
details, and precisely for this reason it is interesting to analyze the reasons behind the
poor representations of ships on their screens.
Question 2: Anachronism: Beginning of the Production
Another relevant question that arose during the analysis of the Namban screens
concerns the period of their production. Specialists believe that one of the earliest
pieces may have been produced as early as the 1590s. Nonetheless, the Portuguese
had begun their Japanese trade in the 1550s, and there are good documental sources
that suggest that they used Portuguese-built ships. In the later part of 16th century, the
Portuguese visited Nagasaki and Hirado annually, sometimes even other ports around
Kyushu.

Japanese people, including artists, had many opportunities to see actual

Portuguese vessels.

Nobody knows why there are no contemporary depictions of

European ships by Japanese artists until the Namban screens appeared. Moreover,
most of the surviving Namban screens were actually produced between the 1620s and
the 1640s. By this time more than half of foreign trading vessels had been replaced by
Japanese Shu-in Ships, and Chinese cargo carriers.

Both Japanese and Chinese

merchants used junk-type vessels on this trade (Nagazumi, 2001). The conception,
structure, and configuration of the junks were very different from those of European
vessels (Green and Kim, 1989; Green and Burningham, 1998). Moreover, when Ieyasu
opened his country to foreign trade, he concentrated it in Nagasaki and Hirado, in order
to manage all the incoming and outgoing vessels. This fact certainly limited the number
of people who actually saw European ships at anchor with their own eyes, even though
large numbers of Namban screens were produced during this period. Several more
screens were painted after the third Shogun Iemitsu prohibited all foreign trade, except
that with Dutch and Chinese merchants at Dejima.
Originality of the Ships on Namban Screens
These circumstances suggest that the ships represented in Namban screens were not
drawn from the real ships, but copied from illustrations of ships.

The later

representations seem to have been largely copied from earlier, similar screens, but the
origin of the earlier depictions, represented on the screens produced by the Kano
school in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, are harder to pinpoint. For the reasons
6

�exposed above, it seems likely that Portuguese ships were a rare sight in Japanese
harbors most of the time.

By the time they were first painted, these were largely

unknown in Japan. The author has seen, however, vessels similar to those represented
on the Namban screens on other contemporary images: European maps of the Age of
Discovery.
Hypothesis: From European Maps to Namban Screens
The author has studied world maps produced in Europe during the 16th and early 17th
centuries, and found vessels similar to each one of the types shown on the screens as
depictions of Namban ships (Fig. 3). The similarities between these drawings are often
worth notice, sometimes striking, and it appears likely that all European vessels
represented on Namban screens were copied from the decorative ships shown on late
16th century European maps.
In the 16th century cartography encompassed a number of disciplines that aimed at the
production of accurate maps, and many of these disciplines were scientific in their
nature. In this period maps were updated regularly, every time explorers returned from
their voyages with news of discoveries. But knowledge of the world was incomplete and
the blank spaces were often illustrated with appropriated drawings, depicting the flora
and fauna, or the peoples inhabiting the lands represented, and often the seas were
embellished with representations of the ships of their time (Unger, 2010). The trend of
depicting ships on maps became fashionable in the middle of 16th century, and the
fashion reached its zenith in the work of the competent French cartographers of the
Dieppe school. From this period onwards, the oceans of most of the world maps were
filled with small ships and imaginary creatures (Swift, 2006; Wigal, 2007). This fashion
continued well into the 17th century, when the greater amount of geographic information
available produced a style shift into precise depictions of the interior of continents.
European artists drew good and bad images of ships on the maps being made in their
time. Sometimes the quality of the ships represented on 16th century maps is excellent,
other times ships maps are simplified and stylized, often for lack of space. The rigging
was especially simplified due to the small scale at which it was sometimes represented.
It is almost certain that Japanese artists copied these images, often without ever having
seen the actual ships, let alone understanding the complex arrangement of the rigging.
7

�This fact explains the mistakes on Namban screen paintings described in previous
sections of this work, especially in the rigging of the Namban ships.

Fig. 3 Iconography of Ships from 16th Century’s European Maps. Author: M. Swift. (A) From Ortelius’s
1595 Map of Japan; (B) From Ortelius’sAmericaeSive Novi Orvis, Nova Descriptio; (C) From
Hondius’sMap of the Islands of the East Indies; (D) From Ortelius’sAmericaeSive Novi Orvis, Nova
Description; (E) From John Goghe’sMap of Ireland, 1567; (F) From Ortelius’ TheatrumOrbisTerrarum,
1595; (G) From Pierre Desceliers’s (Cartographer of the Dieppe-school) Map of the World, 1550; (H)
From John Goghe’sMap of Ireland, 1567; (I) Diego Homen’sMap of the Indian Ocean, 1558; (J) From
Ortelius’s 1595 Map of Japan; (K) From Pierre Desceliers’s (Cartographer of the Dieppe-school) Map of
the World, 1550; (L) Johannes and Martin’s Map of Americas, 1520.

8

�Discussion: The Origin of Namban Screens
We know that many European art works were brought to Japan once trade with
Portuguese merchants began (Nishimura, 1958). The primary purpose of this influx of
European artworks was to spread Christianity. Missionaries brought European religious
paintings and non-religious paintings to Japan and some taught European art
techniques to Japanese artists, in order to help the Japanese paint religious figures
themselves.

In 1583, the Jesuit missionary Giovanni Niccolo came to Japan and

opened a European Art School (Nishimura, 1958). As a result, Japanese Christian
painters developed a particular style and imitating European painting became an art
form between 1592 and 1615 (Nishimura, 1958). Some of the pieces of art produced in
this period survive today. Well known examples are: Taisei-Oko-Kiba-Zu (drawing of the
western kings on horses), Yonkakoku-Tojo-Byobu (screen with pictures of four
capitals),Rebanto-Kaisen-Zu (screen with the battle of Levant), or Sekaizu-Byobu
(World map screen) (Fig. 4). It is likely that a large number of European paintings and
prints came to Japan around the period in which the Namban screens were produced.
Moreover, Japanese painters also produced world maps around this time. Today, 20 of
those world map screens survive in Japan (Kirishitan Bunka Kenkyukai, 1964), and
three or four display small ships. Since Japan did not have the knowledge to produce
original world maps based on the sea voyages or its own mariners, it is certain that
these maps were copies of European world maps.

According to Taku Nakamura

(Kirishitan Bunka Kenkyukai, 1964), a scholar who carefully studied Namban world map
screens, they were all produced from the late 16th century and throughout the 17th
century.

Fig. 4 Sekaizu-Byobu (Kobe City Museum Version). (T. Miyoshi,and K. Onoda)
9

�Nishimura believes that this influx of European artworks was largely a result of the
Tensho Embassy (Nishimura, 1958). The Tensho Embassy was welcomed by Pope
Gregory XIII and by many Italian city states, because their arrival in Rome meant that
Christianity had reached the edge of the known world (Wakakuwa, 2008). On the way
back to Lisbon from Rome, the Embassy visited Padua. While there, a nobleman
presented

four

expensive

books

to

them.

Two

of

these

books

were

CivitatesOrbisTerrarum and TheatrumOrbisTerrarum (Nishimura, 1958; Fróis et al.,
1941). CivitatesOrbisTerrarum (Cities of the World) is a book that compiles drawings of
cities, maps of several regions of the world, and its people (Braun et al., 2008) (Fig. 5).
TheatrumOrbisTerrarum is the so-called first world atlas (Broecke, 1996) (Fig. 6). Both
books have hundreds of depictions of small ships, most very accurate and seemingly
typical of each region.
The Tensho Embassy returned to
Japan in 1590.

However, they

had to stay in Nagasaki for three
years before Hideyoshi permitted
them to visit the capital in 1593.
While

they

were

staying

in

Nagasaki, many Daimyos and
merchants visited them to hear
stories of the travels to Rome.
Fróis noted that the visitors
enjoyed the European maps and
globes
Finally,
allowed

(Wakakuwa,
in
to

1593,
visit

they

2008).
were

Hideyoshi’s

palace. This visit was the march
of Capitão-mor and the scene
Fig. 5: CivitatesOrbisTerrarum. (A) Lisbon. (B) Venice. (C) that is depicted
Rome. (D) Constantinople. (G. Braun,F.Hogenberg, S.Fussel, Namban Screens.
and B.Taschen)
10

on

many

�An interesting additional fact is that Naizen Kano, who drew one of the earliest Namban
Screens, served as Hideyoshi’s painter (Yamashita, 2004; Kano, 2007). Perhaps he
witnessed the reception of the returning Tensho Embassy? Or perhaps Taiko Hideyoshi
asked him to paint the original screen? These are merely the author’s hypotheses, but
they would tie these important events and artwork together in a simple way.

Fig. 6: TheatrumOrbisTerrarum. (A) World Map, 1570. (B) World Map, 1586. (C) Americas, 1570. (D)
Italy, 1570. (E) Northern Europe, 1570. (F) Asia, 1567 and 1570. (M. P. R. V. D. Broecke)

11

�Conclusion
Not all the Namban ships were necessarily based on ships from CivitatesOrbisTerrarum
and TheatrumOrbisTerrarum.

We don’t know what other European sources were

available in Japan at the time. The members of the Tensho Embassy were invited to
many Italian cities, for instance, Florence, before Rome, and after that other cities,
including Milano, Venice, Padua (where they received the books already mentioned).
There were many printed books and images in Italy at the time. As mentioned above,
maps with drawings of cities and ships were common as a result of the flourishing of the
Dieppe-school decades earlier.

It is likely that the four Japanese members of the

Tensho Embassy purchased or were given maps and paintings for their Christian
fellows in Japan and for Japanese rulers, like Hideyoshi. And it is likely that other
European missionaries and merchants also brought maps and paintings to Japan.
Historical records tell us that the members of the Tensho Embassy brought maps and
globes to Nagasaki, Japan, although there are no historical accounts describing the
members of the Tensho Embassy presenting maps to Hideyoshi. The records say that
“among the gifts, Hideyoshi liked an Arabian horse.” But it is a fact that it was after this
visit that Hideyoshi’s personal artist and his school produced the first Namban screens.
Whether or not this is true, the Namban screens are still rightly considered Japanese
Important Cultural Property and records of the first interactions between Europe and
Japan, between West and Eastern Christians, and represent an interesting symbiosis
between Renaissance European and Japanese traditional arts.
References
Braun, G., Hogenberg, F., Fussel, S., and Taschen, B., 2008.CivitatesOrbisTerrarum =
Cities of the World: 363 Engravings Revolutionize the View of the World: Complete
Edition of the Colour Plates of 1572-1617. Taschen, Colongne.
Broecke, M. P. R. V. D., 1996.

Ortelius Atlas Maps: An Illustrated Guide. HES

Publishers, Utrecht.
Castro, F. V. D., 2005. The Pepper Wreck: a Portuguese Indiaman at the Mouth of the
Tagus River. Texas A &amp; M University Press, College Station.
Frois, L., Okamoto, Y., Bernard, H., and Pinto, J. A.,1941 Kyushu Sanko Keno Shisetsu
Koki (The Travel of the Tensho Embassy). Toyodo, Tokyo (in Japanese).
12

�Green. J., and Kim Z.G., 1989. The Shinan and Wando Sites, Korea: Further
Information. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 18 (4): 33-41.
Green.J., and Burningham, N., 1998.

The Ship from Quanzhou, Fujian Province,

People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 27 (4): 277301.
Kano, H., 2007. MomoyamaKaiga no Bi: Tensai,Isai, Kisai no KareinaruSekai (The
Beauty of Momoyama Paintings). Heibonsha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Kirishitan Bunka Kenkyukai., 1964. KirishitanKenkyu Dai 9-shu (Study of The Japanese
Christian). Yoshikawa Kobunkan, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Matsuki, H., 1994. Goyoeshi Kano-ke no Chi to Chikara (Power and Lineage of KanoSchool). Kodansha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Miyoshi, T., and Onoda, K., 1999.ZusetsuSekaiKochizuKorekushon(Collection of
Cartography). KawadeShobo Shin-sha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Nagazumi, Y., 2001.

Shuin-sen (Red-Seal Ships). Yoshikawa Kobunkan, Tokyo (in

Japanese).
Nishimura, T., 1958.NanbanBijutsu (Namban Arts). Kodan-sha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Okamoto, Y., 1955.

NanbanByobuko (Namban Trade). Sho Shin-sha, Tokyo (in

Japanese).
Russell, M., 1983.Visions of the Sea: Hendrick C. Vroom and the Origins of Dutch
Marine Painting. Leiden University Press, Leiden.
Sakamoto, M. (Ed.), 2008.NanbanByobu Shusei (Inventory of the Namban Screens).
Chuo KooronBijutsuShuppan, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Sukeno, K., 1960. KirishitanFudoki. BekkanKenkyuhen (Study of Japanese Christians).
Hobunkan, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Swift, M., 2006.Mapping the World.Chartwell Books, Edison.
Takeda, T., 1995.Kano-ha Kaigashi (Arts of Kano-school). Yoshikawa Kobunkan, Tokyo
(in Japanese).
Unger, R. W., 2010.

Ships on Maps: Pictures of Power in Renaissance Europe.

Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York.
Wakakuwa, M., 2008.KuatoroRagattsi: TenshoShonenShisetsu to Sekai Teikoku 2 (The
Tensho Embassy and the Portuguese World Empire). Shuei-sha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
13

�Wigal, D., 2007.Historic Maritime Maps.Confidential Concepts, New York.
Yamashita, Y., (Ed.), 2004. Kano-ha Ketteiban (Art of Kano-school).Heibon-sha, Tokyo,
Japan (in Japanese).
Biography
Kotaro Yamafune completed his BA in History at Hosei University (Japan) in 2006 and
started his MA in the Nautical Archaeology Program at Texas A&amp;M University in
2009and completed his MA in 2012. His research interests are Portuguese shipbuilding
and seafaring in the 16th and the 17th centuries and the reconstruction of the Medieval
and Post Medieval shipwrecks. He is currently (2014) enrolled in the Nautical
Archaeology Program as a PhD student. His dissertation focuses on the 3D
reconstruction of Portuguese India trading ships of the 16th and 17th centuries.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="12">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="40">
                  <text>Session 9: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="41">
                  <text>Interview with Session 9 chair Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="42">
                  <text>East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia.&#13;
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities. Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="43">
                  <text>Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="457">
                <text>Portuguese Naus on Namban Screens: A study of the first European ships on paintings from the late 16th to early 17th centuries in Japan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="458">
                <text>Namban screens, a well-known Japanese art form, were painted by skillful Japanese artists from the late 16th century to the 17th centuries.  Approximately 90 of these screens have been handed down up to the present.  Not only they show some important historical scenes of European commercial activities in the Far East for the first time, but they also depict representational pictures of Portuguese ships during the Age of Discovery.  Although the shipsâ€™ images on the screens are roughly acceptable, the details are often strangely anachronistic.  The same images could be found in some Western maps in the 16th century.  Judging from the similarity, perhaps, Japanese painters, who had never seen actual ships themselves in ports, did manage to copy the images from ones on those maps, which were brought to Japan by the wellknownTensho embassy.  This was the first Japanese embassy that was sent to Europe; the diplomats left Japan in 1582 and arrived at Portugal in 1584. They met with Pope Gregory XIII and his successor, Pope Sixtus V, in Rome, and then returned back to their homeland in 1590.  In the following year the embassy members succeeded in seeing HideyoshiToyotomi, who was the leading political ruler in Japan at that time.  They gave him some souvenirs from Europe, including the maps.  It seems that some official court painters had a chance to see those gifts, from where Japanese artists could have obtained an idea of the shipsâ€™ images that appear in the Namban screens. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="459">
                <text>Kotaro Yamafune, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="460">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="589" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="380">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/a330ded6600f75867c4bef6a22643144.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a0a07bb3901c35ece4ab288ed2eba5a6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6483">
                    <text>Potential Climate Change Threats to underwater cultural heritage
Sirine Saad El-Dine Ghiye (Lebanese Archeologist, Diver)
Msc Student, Ulster University Ghiye-S@ulster.ac.uk / ghsirin@gmail.com
Abstract
Climate change is our greatest challenge. The paper is looking for the impact on underwater cultural heritage
(UCH), deep oceans, and coastal zone through literature reference and case studies. It will discuss the causes of
climate change, the results, with a focus on the sea surface temperature (SST) changes in the Mediterranean Basin
and the Pacific. SST will be calculated using Landsat 8 which is equipped by two bands of thermal infrared sensor
(TIRS). It is suitable for coastal zone monitoring due to its high resolution. The study depends on the use of
Landsat 7 which carried the Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) sensor. Both images are interpreted and
analyzed on the QGIS to calculate the radiance and reflectance of each image to conclude the value of SST. The
paper will finish by presenting the cycle factors which threaten the UCH and summarize the relationship between
the change of climate and the UCH and how they help researchers understand climate in the past and the
adaptation by humans in past.
Keywords: climate change, SST, UCH, satellites imagery
List of Abbreviations
Carbone dioxide …. CO2
Normal Difference Vegetation Index …. NDVI
Operational Land Imager …. OLI
Sea surface temperature …. SST
Sea surface salinity …. SSS
Thermal Infrared Sensor …. TIRS
Thematic Mapper …. TM

U.S. Geological Survey …. USGS
Underwater cultural heritage …. UCH
List of figures
Figure 1. Lebanese land map
Figure 2. Chekka area with the cements factory’s location (Landsat 8, 2022)
Figure 3. Temperature during summer, Landsat 8, 2021, Temperature during summer, Landsat 7 1999
Figure 4. SST during the last 20 years ago during the winter

4
5
7
8

INTRODUCTION
The topic of this paper fits best within this Session “Major Threats to Underwater Cultural Heritage and
its environment,” because it will discuss the main disturbances and problems facing the maritime
archeological sites and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) due to climate change. This paper defines
the relation between climate and seas and oceans health, where the relationship is strong and
interdependent.
Climate can be defined into two levels: local climate, which is related to a specific area, city or country;
and global climate of Earth. The global climate is the connected system of sun, land and oceans, wind,
rain and snow, forests, deserts and savannas, and human activity (Lange 2020). All these local factors
are connected and responsible for the balance of ecosystems; any change in one ecosystem leads to
change in global climate. For example, global warming which is increasing of heat or energy in the
atmosphere of the Earth led to climate change (Rockman and Hritz 2019). Rising temperature of the
atmosphere led to melting of the ice in the poles which led to sea level change, this event was recognized
at the beginning of 19th century (Kennedy et al. 2002).
Anthropogenic factors are the main factor of climate change at a population of 7.8 billion people (World
Bank 2023). This is well defined and explained by the assessment reports of the Intergovernmental
1

�Panel on Climate Change which describe the influence of human activities that lead to warmer
atmosphere. Urbanization, development, and lots of industrial businesses accelerate the deterioration of
seas and oceans due to illegal infringement on the coast, increased illegal fishing, and toxic gas
emissions, all those led to change the main property of climate. One of results of climate change is the
increasing of the sea surface temperature, which led to change the chemical property of salt water
(Splading 2011). The paper presents the changes of sea surface temperature (SST) in Chekka, Lebanon
with satellites imagery on QGIS.

CASE STUDIES
The case studies under consideration are the following regions: the Mediterranean and the Pacific
basins. This paper detects the changes in sea surface temperature in the Mediterranean basin through
focusing in one example taking from Lebanon: Chekka area- North Lebanon (Figure 1). The aim of
taking this example is to prove how the human activity next to the sea, lead to change and increase in
the SST and land surface temperature in general. Chekka is a coastal area located in the Lebanese
northern provenance facing the Mediterranean Sea (Figure 2). Chekka provides two potential locations
for harbours, one to the north and one to the south of the headland of Chekka and its harbour is
mentioned when it was occupied by the Arwad’s fleet1 (Safadi 2014). The town was covered by olive
trees and salt marshes on the coast. These conditions of the town have been changed after the
construction of the first cement factory in the area dated back to 1931 CE followed by another company
after two decades. The coastline changed becoming heavily populated and many agricultural areas
vanished.
The main reason of this paper is to detect and monitor the changes of SST in the Chekka area as a
typical example for human activity effect on the seas and oceans health. The study is going to compare
the SST during summer and winter seasons during the last 20 years. This will be using satellites imagery
of Landsat program is the longest-running enterprise for acquisition of satellite imagery of Earth. It is
a joint NASA / USGS2 program and launched on 23 July 1972.
The study is also looking at the changes in SST of Pacific region and identifying the main reason for
these changes. The North Pacific has a temperature higher than the South, and that is because of the
ratio of land to sea areas is larger in the Northern Hemisphere and because Antarctica and the Southern
Ocean also influence water temperature (Cotter et. al. 2023). From the studying of those two regions,
the paper is identifying the results and consequences of changes in SST and the effect on the ocean, and
therefore to determine the effects on the maritime sites in seas and deep oceans. Radiance and
reflectance of images captured by the thematic sensor of Landsat are essential to calculate the value of
temperature. This will be explained in detail in the methodology.

1

It developed into a trading city in the Bronze Age, as did most of the Phoenician cities on this coast. It had a powerful
navy, and its ships are mentioned in the monuments of Egypt and Assyria (Safadi 2014).
2 The U.S. Geological Survey is the nation's largest water, earth, and biological science and civilian mapping agency (USGS
website)

2

�Med. Sea

Figure 1. Lebanese land map

3

�Med. Sea

Figure 2. Chekka area with the cements factory’s location (Landsat8 2022)

METHODOLOGY / RESOURCES
The use of remote sensing and geographic information system as the QGIS free and open source,
becomes a new technique used in studying many marine (Ramdani et al. 2021).
The paper studies the changes in SST through satellites imagery, calculate and measure the temperatures
on QGIS tools, in reason the detect the increasing of temperature during the last 20 years taking into
consideration the seasons: winter and summer. The study is based on literature and previous study on
the effect of climate change on the maritime sites, and how the maritime resource becomes a factor to
understand the climate change.
The algorithm created on ERDAS imagery 2014 for calculating the land surface temperature (LST), it’s
the same concept for SST (Advan and Jovanovska 2016). The layers used in the project are raster and
vector interpret and analyzed on QGIS version 3.6. The main coordinate system used is the WGS84
UTM zone 36N, ESPG: 32636.
The Landsat 8 which is working on infrared radiometer band 10 and 11 provides huge data covered the
Lebanese land. The sensors deployed on satellites imagery Landsat8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)
and the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) instruments allow to assess water parameter efficiently.
Through TIRS we can measure the land temperature in two thermal bands with a new technology that
applies quantum physics to detect heat. The process worked by measuring the amount of infrared light
emitted from the earth and the radiant temperature of water bodies (Bourouhou and Salmoun 2021).
Both sensors are covered the landmass with 30m of resolution (visible, NIR, SWIR); 100 meters
(thermal); and 15 meters (panchromatic). The primary features on Landsat 7 include a panchromatic
band with 15-meter spatial resolution, an onboard full aperture solar calibrator, five percent absolute
4

�radiometric calibration, and a thermal infrared channel with a four-fold improvement in spatial
resolution over Thematic Mapper (TM) (NASA, 2021).
Steps of calculating SST
1. Calculating the Top of Atmosphere radiance which is the raw images captured by sensor of
satellites, the radiance is the amount of radiation coming from the area, surface and cloud.
2. Calculating top of atmosphere reflectance which provides the ratio of radiation reflected to the
incident solar radiation on a given surface, and also from the cloud and atmospheric aerosols and
gases.
3. The brightness temperature is the measurement of radiance of the microwave radiation traveling
upward from the top of atmosphere to the satellites.
The process continues in progression to find the emissivity Ɛ of each pixel to convert the brightness
temperature into land surface temperature or in the other hand the sea surface temperature. The
emissivity is originated from the value of Normal Difference Vegetation Index NDVI which is provided
by the visible red and near infrared bands. The result returns the maximum and minimum values of
NDVI which are used in finding the proportion of vegetation in reason to rescale the NDVI between
values representing bare soil and total vegetation.
The operation is going to show the difference of temperature during the last 20 years with taking into
consideration the same seasons, where the result section interprets the analysis value through literature
resources of the impact of SST changes on UCH.

RESULTS
The results observed after calculating the SST through the Landsat images present an increasing of
temperature by almost 1 ºC during the last 20 years. Extracting results from maps shows the increasing
of temperature on the coastline near the cement factory, where the SST in the middle of sea become
more less. Figure 3 present clearly these changes, where the temperature on the coastline during summer
in 1999 was 24ºC -25 ºC, and it was almost 23 ºC far from the coast, but today the temperature on the
coastline in 28 ºC-29 ºC, and it’s almost 27 ºC far from the coast.
The results are also extracted from the SST map during the winter season for 2000 and 2021, where the
average temperature in Chekka area increased 2 ºC during the last 20 years (Figure 4).

5

�Figure 3. Summer temperature today (TOP, Landsat8 2021).
Summer temperature 20 years ago (BOTTOM Landsat7 1999)

6

�Figure 4. Winter SST today (left) and 20 years ago (right) (Landsat8 2021; Landsat7 1999).

This example describes the changes in SST due to the rising of toxic gases from the cement factories
next to the coastline. The main issue is to understand how the increasing of SST effect on the seas and
oceans health, thus on the maritime and coastal sites. There are an estimated three million shipwrecks
on the floors of the world’s oceans (Gregory et al. 2022), and more than 1000 coastal sites are under
threat and damage because of sea level rise (Reiman et al. 2018)
Increasing of CO2 in the atmosphere due to pollution and toxic gases, it leads to increase the
temperature of air, thus, to melt the ice of poles where this lead to rise the sea level. Research confirms
the rise of sea level by 1m by the end of 21st century, together with an increase in ocean surface
temperatures (i.e., water to a depth of approximately 100m) of between 0.2 and 0.5°C (Gregory et al.
2022). In summary, rising of sea level led to many unprecedented weather events which impact directly
on the coastal sites and erosion of coastline due to high tides. (Sesana et al. 2020). The effect of sealevel rise led to flooding and storms especially during the heavy rainfall, where the coastal sites become
underwater sites with time. The effect of sea level not only on culture heritage but also on the marine
boundary higher level will result in legal maritime boundaries become less well defined (Perez-Alvaro
2016).
In addition, the submerged sites will be affected by the sea level rise because adding more water led to
put the UCH under more depth, and more mass of water quantity on the shipwreck lying on the seabed
which may be more than they can withstand (Sesana et al. 2020). Furthermore, the most recent IPCC
report indicates not only an impact on surface ocean, temperatures but also on the deep ocean, with
increases of 0.6–2.0°C chemical reaction rates double for every 10°C increase in temperature (Kennedy
et al. 2002). This would reduce the amount of time a diver can remain underwater.
Increased CO2 in the atmosphere, which is absorbed by the oceans, leads to increase in the acidification
of seas and oceans where the PH of water decrease and influences the iron and steel of shipwrecks by
7

�increasing the rate of corrosion (Perez-Alvaro 2016; Wright 2016). With more evaporation and
precipitation and formation of sea ice lead all together to increase the salinity in water and change the
chemical and physical property of sea and ocean, that will create new bacteria and new organisms,
which affect and threaten the archeological features especially the shipworms, causing damage to
underwater wooden structures (Sesana et al. 2020).
This study shows the high impact of climate change and the relation with the UCH, which became a
main part of marine environment, the changes of sites help to understand the changes in climate.

CONCLUSION / DISCUSSION
We conclude that climate change will directly affect coastal and underwater sites, including the
deterioration of our UCH. The relation between climate change and maritime archeological sites is very
connected because shipwrecks become part of the marine environment such as artificial reefs.
Today, maritime archeology help researchers to understand the past climate and the human past
adaptation with climate change, where maritime and coastal sites illustrate the environmental changes.
Several projects provide the opportunity for maritime archaeology research on climate in the past and
then educate humanity to better understand the climate crisis. For example, several studies that focus
on the human-environment interaction such as migration in ancient periods, and human uses of aquatic
environment may inform what may happen in the future. It is important to involve cultural heritage in
climate action because heritage includes the identity of people that they want to pass to future
generations, and which may be at risk due to climate change.

8

�Bibliography
Advan and Jovanovska 2016
Bourouhou I., and Salmun F. Sea surface temperature estimation using remotely sensed imagery of Landsat 8 along the
coastline of Tangier - Ksar Sghir region, The International Conference on Innovation, Modern Applied Science &amp;
Environmental Studies (ICIES2020), Vol 234, 2021.
Bardach, Cotter and Morgan. Pacific Ocean,
https://www.britannica.com/place/Pacific-Ocean

Encyclopedia

Britannica.

Accessed

17

March

2023

URL

Gregory, Dawson, Elkin, Van Tilburg, Underwood, Richards, Viduka, Westley, Wright, Hollesen. Of time and tide: the
complex impacts of climate change on coastal and underwater cultural heritage, Journal of Antiquity 96, no. 390 (2022):
1396–1411.
Kennedy, Twilley, Kleypas, Cowan, Hare. Coastal and marine ecosystems and global climate change: potential effects on US
Resources, Journal of Environment, Pew Centre on Global Climate Change. 2002.
Lange M. Climate Change in the Mediterranean: Environmental Impacts and Extreme Events, European Institute of the
Mediterranean, In: IEMED URLhttps://www.iemed.org/publication/climate-change-in-the-mediterranean-environmentalimpacts-and-extreme-events/. 2020.
Perez-Alvaro, E. Climate change and underwater culture heritage: Impacts and challenges, Journal of Culture Heritage 21,
(2016): 842-848.
Ramdani, Wirasatriya, Jalil. Monitoring the Sea Surface Temperature and Total Suspended Matter Based on Cloud Computing
Platform of Google Earth Engine and Open-Source Software, Conf. The 6th International Conference on Tropical and Coastal
Region Eco-Development, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 750, 2021.
Reimann, Vafeidis, Brown, Hinkel, Tol. Mediterranean UNESCO World Heritage at risk from coastal flooding and erosion
due to sea-level rise, Journal of Nature Communications 9, no. 4161 2018. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-01806645-9
Reul, Grodsky, Arias, Boutin, Catany, Chapron, Amico, Dinnat, Donlon, Fore, Fournier, Guimbard, Hasson, Kolodziejczyk,
Lagerloef, Lee, Le Vine, Lindstrom, Maes, Mecklenburg, Yueh. Sea surface salinity estimates from spaceborne L-band
radiometers: An overview of the first decade of observation (2010–2019), Journal of Remote sensing of Environment Vol.
242, no. 111769. 2020. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720301395
Rockman M., Hritz C. Expanding use of archaeology in climate change response by changing its social environment,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 15, (2019): 8295–8302. URL
https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1914213117
Safadi C. Bronze age and Iron age Levantine harbor: an evaluation of their maritime accessibility and protection [Thesis],
Southampton University 2014.
Sesana E., et al., Climate change impacts on cultural heritage: A literature review, Ed: Carter T, et all., Journal of Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews 12, no. 42020,
Splading M. Perverse Sea change: underwater culture heritage in the ocean is facing chemical and physical changes, culture
heritage &amp; art review. 2011.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="49">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="247">
                  <text>2023 Session 13: Major Threats to Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="248">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 13 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="249">
                  <text>Session 13 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="250">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="251">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="252">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="253">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="254">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="255">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6476">
                <text>Potential Climate Change Threats to Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6477">
                <text>Climate change is our greatest challenge. The paper is looking for the impact on underwater cultural heritage&#13;
(UCH), deep oceans, and coastal zone through literature reference and case studies. It will discuss the causes of&#13;
climate change, the results, with a focus on the sea surface temperature (SST) changes in the Mediterranean Basin&#13;
and the Pacific. SST will be calculated using Landsat 8 which is equipped by two bands of thermal infrared sensor&#13;
(TIRS). It is suitable for coastal zone monitoring due to its high resolution. The study depends on the use of&#13;
Landsat 7 which carried the Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) sensor. Both images are interpreted and&#13;
analyzed on the QGIS to calculate the radiance and reflectance of each image to conclude the value of SST. The&#13;
paper will finish by presenting the cycle factors which threaten the UCH and summarize the relationship between&#13;
the change of climate and the UCH and how they help researchers understand climate in the past and the&#13;
adaptation by humans in past.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6478">
                <text>Sirine Saad El-Dine Ghiye</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6479">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6480">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6481">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6482">
                <text> Ghiye, Sirine Saad El-Dine. 2023. “Potential Climate Change Threats to underwater cultural heritage.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Elena Perez-Alvaro, and Ole Varmer. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="55">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 13 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="269" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="186">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/fdb0a720f37183e3f34b0a7a9cd5acc1.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d91ca93cfb06e2f35f5605d2f3f18de9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3171">
                    <text>Potential for Spanish Colonial Archaeology in the
Northern Mariana Islands
Jennifer F. McKinnon and Jason T. Raupp

Abstract
Spanish cultural heritage continues to play a role in social, cultural and political developments in
Micronesia and can contribute to a broader understanding of Indigenous and Spanish histories in
the Pacific. Thus, Spanish cultural heritage should be appropriately identified and incorporated
into a cultural heritage management and research framework in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Unfortunately, this is not the case and Spanish cultural
heritage is long overdue for serious investigation and research in the CNMI.
This paper is the result of a preliminary project conducted in 2009 into the potential for
research on Spanish cultural heritage in the CNMI. This project aimed at facilitating the process
of documenting Spanish cultural heritage by identifying known and potential heritage recorded in
disparate sources such as grey literature, primary and secondary historical sources located in
library, archive and museum holdings and conversations with heritage practitioners. The
methodology used during this survey included a thematic assessment framework whereby the
known and potential Spanish cultural heritage was categorised into research themes. It is hoped
that this approach will contribute to evaluating the significance of Spanish cultural heritage for
research and management purposes in the CNMI.

Introduction

This year marks the 490th anniversary of the first recorded landing of the Spanish
in the Mariana Islands. This occurred when Ferdinand Magellan became the first
European to visit the islands on 6 March 1521 and named the archipelago Islas
de los Ladrones (Islands of the Thieves) due to a misunderstanding in trade
practices (Russell 1998). Over a century later in 1667 Spain officially claimed the
island chain and named it Las Marianas in honour of Queen Mariana of Austria
(Coomans 2000). Spanish occupation of the islands began in 1668, a point at
which the lives of both the colonizing Spaniards and the Indigenous Chamorro
peoples who had inhabited the islands for thousands of years were forever
altered (Hezel 2000). The Marianas served as a strategic provisioning location
for Spanish trading ships voyaging between Manila and Acapulco for 250 years
and were vital to the success of Spain’s commerce system (Cushner 1971). The
islands remained a Spanish colony until 1898 when Guam was taken by the
United States (U.S.) in the Spanish-American War and the Northern Mariana
Islands were transferred to Germany (Carrell 2009).
For over two hundred years (1668-1898) Spanish colonists interacted with
the Chamorro peoples and constructed forts, ports, towns and missions in the
Mariana Islands. As a result, these islands demonstrate a rich and diverse
Spanish cultural heritage. Spanish cultural heritage places in the Marianas
represent some of the most culturally and archaeologically significant European
heritage places in Micronesia. However today, these sites are poorly understood
from an archaeological perspective and very little is known about where they
were located or specifically what may be preserved in the archaeological record.

�To date, no comprehensive archaeological survey of Spanish cultural heritage
sites in the Northern Mariana Islands has been conducted.
Nevertheless, a small network of historians has researched the history of
Spanish heritage in the archipelago over the last thirty years. The Micronesian
Area Research Center (MARC) on Guam has translated an astonishing amount
of primary documents and produced secondary histories on individuals and
events from the Spanish period (Brunal-Perry, et al. 2009; Driver 1987; Driver
1990; Driver 1993a; Driver 1993b; Driver 1994). In addition, Francis Hezel’s
(2000) publication From Conquest to Colonization: Spain in the Mariana Islands
1690 to 1740 reviews primary source documents related to this period and has
introduced this subject to a larger audience and confirmed the need for more
research. The research of both Marjorie Driver and Hezel, among others, has
provided the basis for historical investigations into the Spanish period in the
Mariana Islands.
While this time period has been the interest of historians, the archaeology
of these events and interactions has yet to be explored. In other areas of the
world such as the south-eastern United States (Florida, Georgia, Texas,
Louisiana), the southwest and west coast of the United States (New Mexico,
Arizona, California) and \ Latin America, the archaeology of Spanish cultural
heritage is well-developed. The Pacific region, with the exception of the
Philippines (Skowronek 2009), has some distance to go in terms of catching up
with current scholarship on this subject and remains open for long-term
investigations and research (see Orillenada and Ronquillo this volume).
The recognition of Spanish heritage in Micronesia continues to play a role
in socio-political developments in the Marianas. Much like in Latin America, there
are descendant communities who are interested in the circumstances of their
historical roots. They want to understand how their ancestors resisted,
embraced, negotiated, transformed and were transformed through the processes
of colonisation and to what extent their families and communities are still involved
in this process. Therefore, it would be expected that Spanish cultural heritage
should be appropriately recognized in the cultural heritage management and
research framework of the Northern Mariana Islands. Serious academic research
on this topic is long overdue.
A preliminary investigation was conducted in 2009 into the potential for
identifying Spanish cultural heritage in the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands (CNMI). These investigations aimed at facilitating the process of
documenting Spanish cultural heritage by identifying known and potential
heritage that has been recorded in disparate sources such as grey literature (i.e.
reports, site files), as well as primary and secondary historical sources located in
library and museum holdings. This paper presents a summary of those findings
and should be used simply as a guide for potential Spanish colonial research in
the CNMI.

�Conceptual and Methodological Approach
This project consisted primarily of an intensive literature review to identify and
compile pertinent information into a searchable database that can be queried to
develop heritage type profiles by which a thematic research framework could be
created. The heritage type profiling is aimed at examining the full range of
Spanish cultural heritage on the islands of Saipan, Tinian and Rota. Spanish
cultural heritage ranges in size, location and features, and includes the richness
and diversity of cultural materials from both European and Indigenous cultures. It
may include tangible heritage such as landscapes, structures, burials,
shipwrecks or ceramics, or intangible heritage such as place names, oral
traditions or customs.
Thematic frameworks have proven to be successful in the assessment of
cultural heritage values and the subsequent application of research and
conservation strategies (ICOMOS 2005; Smith and Jones 2007). Thematic
frameworks outline major themes and concepts that help identify, describe and
analyse the multiple layers of human culture and interaction. The thematic
research framework for this project was formulated on the basis of heritage type
identification. The benefit of this framework is threefold:
• It can be used by future researchers to capture the complexity and
meaning of human interaction and experience during culture contact
events;
• It can be used by the CNMI Historic Preservation Office (HPO) or other
regulatory agencies to evaluate the significance of such cultural heritage
and to make efficient and effective decisions regarding its management
and conservation; and
• It can be used by the island community to better understand this
interesting and complex history and the unique interaction that occurs
when two cultures made contact in the first instance.

Data Collection Strategy
The Mariana archipelago is located east of the Philippines, north of New Guinea,
and south-southeast of Japan (see McKinnon this volume). From north to south
the CNMI includes the islands of Farallon de Pajaros, Maug, Asuncion, Agrihan,
Pagan, Alamagan, Guguan, Sarigan, Anatahan, Farallon de Medinilla, Saipan,
Tinian, Aguijan, and Rota (Figure 1). Guam is part of the Mariana Islands but not
part of the CNMI as it is an unincorporated territory of the United States. Thus,
this study area only includes data concerning the islands in CNMI which from this
point forward will be referred to as the Northern Mariana Islands.

�Figure 1. The Mariana Islands (Perry-Castañeda Library).
The data collection strategy was designed on a basic principle of
identifying and documenting known and previously unknown Spanish cultural
heritage in the Northern Mariana Islands. The information recovered during this
data capture project included information about heritage locations, heritage
descriptions, excavation reports, photographs, archival material, and oral

�histories. This data was collected through visits to the HPO on Saipan and Rota.
HPO is the agency charged with managing and protecting cultural heritage
in the Northern Mariana Islands. As a result, they maintain the archaeological site
files and reports from all archaeological surveys that have been conducted in the
islands. At present these site files are not digitized and only paper copies are
available for review. Five days were spent in the site files of Saipan and one day
was spent in the site files of Rota. During these visits, a database query was
conducted by searching for keywords such as “Spanish” for sites that were
related to Spanish heritage. Identified file numbers were then investigated further
for content. Locations, descriptions, dates, artefact descriptions, and additional
information were recorded into a project database. In addition to the site files, all
archaeological reports on file were reviewed for Spanish colonial heritage sites.
The main methodology was to review the table of contents for relevant key words
and to review the appendices or final chapters for discussions of Spanish
heritage. Pertinent information was extracted and added to the project database.
In addition to the HPO visits, project personnel visited local museums,
including the Northern Mariana Islands Museum of Culture and History on Saipan
and the Cave Museum on Rota, to note and photograph relevant Spanish
heritage material and speak with curators about their collections and provenance.
Local historians and consulting archaeologists also were contacted for
discussions concerning their knowledge of sites and the potential for
investigating Spanish colonial period sites on the islands. Finally, some site visits
were made to specific Spanish colonial sites to investigate research potential.
One limitation worth noting relates to the HPO site files. In the 1980s a fire
destroyed many of the archaeological site files and reports stored at the Saipan
HPO. While the HPO made attempts to retrieve copies of those reports from
consultants and other offices, not all could be recovered. Thus, some files and
reports prior to the 1980s were unavailable for review during this project.

Database development of heritage type profiles
A database was created using Microsoft Excel which consisted of multiple
categories of data including: heritage type, name, location, time period, features,
description, sources, dates investigated and comments. In addition, an Endnote
database of bibliographic data was created in order to cross-reference data with
sources. Once the databases were complete, heritage types were assigned and
then organised into a thematic research framework which can be assessed for
potential research areas and management considerations.

Results
Seventy heritage “sites” (including tangible and intangible heritage) were
identified during this project. Of those 70, 25 were located on the island of Tinian,
21 on Rota, 14 on Saipan, four on Agrihan, four on Pagan, and two were located
in the general vicinity of the Mariana Islands. It is unlikely that these numbers
reflect the amount and type of activities that occurred in relation to the Spanish

�colonial period but may be a better reflection of the amount of archaeological
survey conducted on each island. The heritage ranged in nature from intangible
heritage, such as the introduction of non-native foods and oral histories, to the
tangible physical remains of Indigenous and Spanish activities. Table 1 includes
a list of the heritage types recorded.
Table 1. Heritage types.
Indigenous site/ Latte site
Shipwreck
Mission
Cemetery
Government Building
Church
Leprosarium
Ranchero
Anchorage/Harbour/Port
Village/Settlement
Rock art
Burial
Artefact/ artefact scatters
Oral story or tradition
Landing
Bridge/Road/Trail/Wall/Navigational
direction
Disease
Food/Subsistence
Temple
Salt production
Garrison
Encampment/house
Shipwreck survivor camp
Convento
Chapel
Rectory
Seminary
House
Barrack
Well
Hunting area
Warehouse
From these heritage types a thematic research framework was developed
and several thematic research areas were identified in an effort to understand the
activities and processes associated with this tangible and intangible heritage.
The development of a thematic research framework should be grounded in
existing areas of scholarship in the field of Spanish colonial research from other

�parts of the world, but also account for an understanding of local and regional
issues. For that reason, two recent publications were considered crucial to the
development of a research framework in the Northern Mariana Islands: Russell
Skowronek’s (2009) On the Fringes of New Spain: The Northern Borderlands
and the Pacific and Mary Van Buren’s (2010) The Archaeological Study of
Spanish Colonialism in the Americas. These two articles offer current reviews of
both the general and more specific (Pacific) Spanish colonial research that has
been conducted by archaeologists in the last half-century. Thus they provide a
starting point for identifying key thematic research areas in the Northern Mariana
Islands.
While the thematic areas identified in this project are inclusive of many
activities and their resulting material culture, they are not exclusive and some
heritage and genres of studies may fit within and overlap multiple areas. Further,
these themes can be edited, expanded upon or further subdivided as necessary
in the future. Below is a discussion of just five of the thematic research areas
identified in this project.

Theme 1: Culture Change and Identity
The concepts acculturation, creolization, transculturation, and ethnogenesis have
been used by archaeologists to explore and understand the process of culture
change and identity in relation to colonisation from the culture and community
scale to specific individuals (see Van Buren 2010 for a discussion of this subject).
These same processes occurred in the Mariana Islands from the point of first
contact, through the process of occupation and colonial construction, Indigenous
resistance and warfare, missionization, Indigenous negotiation, changes in
demographics, colonial collapse and post-colonial deconstruction. Two foci of
research that may be useful in the Mariana Islands with regard to culture change
and identity would be the investigation of spatial organisation and material
culture. The landscape and seascape itself and the built environment of the precontact, colonial and post-colonial periods and the maintenance and changes
that were made are ripe for investigation; specifically, the movement to different
islands, centralization, and resistance of Indigenous Chamorro peoples, the
introduction of Filipino and Carolinian groups, and the Spanish private,
commercial and government construction and control of the area (Figure 2).

�Figure 2. The Spanish government building located on Rota (J. McKinnon).
For example, through the process of colonisation and missionization,
restrictions were imposed on Chamorro people which eventually resulted in a
loss of knowledge about the construction and use of ocean-going canoes, a
tradition that had been around for thousands of years (Russell 2009:85). These
restrictions particularly affected the cultural tradition and potential heritage and
knowledge of watercraft construction within the Chamorro culture – an effect that
is felt to this day with regards to the maintenance of a maritime identity. This
example also demonstrates the wider view that needs to be taken in relation to
control, in that it does not stop at the water’s edge or with the building of
structures, fences or walls; instead it extends onto the vast expanses of the water
surrounding these islands. Thus, control over water transport and marine
resources must be considered within the setting of Pacific island groups if
archaeologists are to understand the whole picture.
Material culture with regards to culture change and identity is in immediate
need of research. The location and function of the Mariana Islands as a
provisioning station and a strategic holding raises some interesting questions
concerning the availability of goods and the need for self-reliance. The
combination of multiple culture groups in the form of Spanish, Chamorro,
Carolinian, Filipino and visitors in the form of whalers, beche-de-mer fishers,
scientific expeditions and traders creates an interesting case study for material
culture and exchange. In the Marianas, there exists obvious evidence of a
synthesis of Indigenous and Spanish ceramics in the form of colonoware, the
reuse of Spanish shipwreck materials by Indigenous peoples such as clavos
(decorative nails) for coconut oil lamps, and the decorative use of specie

�collected from shipwrecks by the Chamorro peoples (Figure 3). Unfortunately, as
of yet, no attention has been given to these types of material culture studies or
studies of spatial organisation with relation to culture change and identity on the
Northern Marianas.

Figure 3. Clavos (decorative nail heads) from the Santa Margarita wreck in
collections at the Cave Museum on Rota. Local Chamorros salvaged clavos and
used them as coconut oil lamps (J. McKinnon).

Theme 2: Missionization
An area of research that dominates Spanish colonial archaeology is the process
of missionization. No archaeological research has been conducted to date on
missions in the Northern Mariana Islands; thus baseline data needs to be
acquired including site locations and assessment of preservation. Beyond this,
addressing larger questions, the Marianas missions are an excellent opportunity
for comparative research within the islands and with other areas of the world
such as Florida, whose mission system was ongoing at the same time (McEwan
1993).
Within the Marianas were missions operated by Jesuit Orders; some of
which were “successful” from the standpoint of Spanish administration (i.e. Rota
mission), while others were resisted violently (i.e. Saipan) (Hezel 2000). While
most of the missionaries on Guam where Spanish, other missionaries sent to the
hinterlands were not Spanish but Bohemian, Dutch and Austrian, among others
(Hezel 2000:25). Did the difference in cultural background have any effect on the
missions’ successes or failures? Questions surrounding these issues could be

�addressed through investigating mission architecture and layout, burial practices,
economic strategies that paralleled the mission process such as food production,
and the indigenization of missionaries through ethnohistorical accounts and
material culture studies at missions.

Theme 3: Changing Nature of Economic Activities
While much archaeological research with regards to Indigenous political and
social economies has been conducted in the Marianas, little of that has focussed
on the colonial or post-colonial periods. Chamorro peoples no doubt had a
system of political and social organisation that was altered upon Spanish colonial
occupation. Through disease and resettlement, the two-caste matrilineal system
was disrupted (Carrell 2009). Further the repopulation of the islands with
neighbouring Indigenous island groups (Carolinians) who were allowed to
maintain a “maritime” lifestyle (i.e. continued tradition of boatbuilding and
seafaring) would have also altered these economies. Additionally, the material
remains of imported and assimilated non-native foods including livestock (i.e.
cattle, pigs, deer) and other food products such as corn, as well as the coerced
labour required to maintain the production of these resources, is an area of
immediate interest with regards to changes in diet, production and export (Figure
4).
Alongside Indigenous economies, questions concerning production of
goods for Spanish economies, specifically supplies for the Manila galleon trade,
would be particularly interesting, as would the political structure of the Marianas
and comparisons between urban cores (i.e. Guam) and rural outposts (i.e.
Saipan, Rota, Tinian), and at a larger scale between the Philippines, Mexico and
the Marianas.

Figure 4. Metate used for grinding corn identified by HPO archaeologists on
Saipan. Site unknown. (CNMI HPO).

Theme 4: Maritime Sphere
Having a maritime archaeological interest, a research area that cannot be
overlooked is that of the maritime sphere. The very fact that travel to, from and

�within the Mariana Islands necessitates watercraft, indicates that the material
culture available relating to maritime activities is ever-present. Though the
potential for investigating Manila galleon wrecks has been overshadowed by
commercial treasure hunting enterprises, all is not lost with regards to research in
this area (see Junco this volume). Shipwrecks of Spanish and other colonial
nations have yet to be located and salvaged by treasure hunters; thus
information concerning economy, illicit trade and contraband, intra-island
transport, and colonial ship construction is available. The study of ports,
harbours, maritime infrastructure, and trade routes can provide a vast amount of
information about contemporary knowledge of seafaring, actions and reactions to
environment, and defence. Further, understanding the distinctive situation
created by Spanish authorization of Carolinian movement and the restriction of
Chamorro in intra-island trade, communication and commerce would provide a
unique area of research. The maintenance of a maritime identity for the
Chamorro peoples is a contemporary concern of living populations on the islands
today and an area where archaeology might play a key role in teasing out that
process.

Theme 5: Indigenous Histories
Two areas of research that significantly overlap and contribute to Spanish
colonial archaeology are ethnohistory and ethnoarchaeology. Much of the
historical research that has been conducted on this period in the Mariana Islands
has included translation of Spanish accounts, journals, and travel diaries. These
sources are a wealth of information for archaeologists looking for a more holistic
interpretation of the archaeological record. They may allow archaeologists to,
“look sideways, so to speak, rather than just up and down, to examine the
interaction of people who were not distinguished primarily by differences in
power” (Van Buren 2010:179). Further in reaching the Indigenous experience,
ethnoarchaeological approaches can fill in the gaps in our knowledge of the past
and present, as well as helping us to understand continuity and changes in
tradition. Indigenous peoples of the Northern Mariana Islands maintain a strong
tradition of oral history and there are many, many stories about the Spanish
period that have yet to be recorded and linked with material culture and heritage
sites.

Conclusion
While this paper is only a brief introduction to cultural heritage associated with
the Spanish colonial period of the Mariana Islands, it provides evidence that this
heritage still very much exists in both tangible and intangible forms. While many
colonial occupiers passed through the Mariana archipelago, there still exists
today a strong connection with the history of the Spanish colonial period which
appears in every aspect of island life from food to religion (i.e. Catholicism). A
more intensive and holistic archaeological investigation of this heritage will not
only provide protection through identification and recognition of sites, it will
provide the community of the Marianas with a fuller understanding of their shared

�heritage – a heritage shared not only between Spanish and Chamorro peoples,
but of all the culture groups who lived in the islands during this period.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the staff of the CNMI Historic Preservation Offices for your
kindness and support in allowing us to access your site files. We would particularly like to thank
Ronnie, J.P. and Diego for taking time out of their schedule to assist us with finding the data we
needed. We’d also like to thank Antonelli Santos for his assistance with recording the Spanish
administration building and the memorable tour of Rota. This project was made possible by
funding from Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

Bibliography
Brunal-Perry, O.,
Driver, M.G., and
L. Carrell, T.,
2009

Carrell. T.,
2009

Coomans, P.,
2000

Cushner, N.P.
1971
Driver, M.G.,
1987

Driver, M.G.,
1990
Driver, M.G.,
1993a
Driver, M.G.,
1993b

Early European Exploration and the Spanish Period in the
Marianas 1521-1898. In Maritime History and Archaeology
of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
edited by T. Carrell, pp.95-142. Submitted to the CNMI
Department of Community and Cultural Affairs, Division of
Historic Preservation. Ships of Exploration and Discovery
Research, Inc., Texas.
Maritime History and Archaeology of the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands. Submitted to the CNMI
Department of Community and Cultural Affairs, Division of
Historic Preservation. Ships of Exploration and Discovery
Research, Inc., Texas.
History of the Mission in the Mariana Islands, 1667-1673,
Translated by Rodrique Lévesque, Occasional Historical
Papers Series, No. 4. Division of Historic Preservation,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan.
Spain in the Philippines from Conquest to Revolution,
Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines.
Navigation Data for the Mariana Islands, Published by the
Spanish Hydrographic Office, Madrid 1863, Micronesian
Area Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao,
Guam.
Guam Diary of Naturalist Antonio de Pineda, 1792,
Micronesian Area Research Center, University of Guam,
Mangilao, Guam.
Fray Juan Pobre in the Marianas 1602, Miscellaneous
Series, No. 8. Micronesian Area Research Center,
University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam.
"Mariana de Austria", in (ed) Emilie.G. Johnson, Father San
Vitores: His Life, Times, and Martyrdom, pp. 5–12.
Publication Series, No. 6. Micronesian.
Area Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao,
Guam.

�Driver, M.G., and
Brunal-Perry, O.,
1994
Hezel, F. X.,
2000

ICOMOS,
2005

McEwan, B.,
1993
Skowronek, R.K.,
2009

Smith, A. and
Jones, K.,
2007
Van Buren, M.,
2010

Architectural Sketches of the Spanish Era Forts of Guam,
Micronesian Area Research Center, University of Guam,
Mangilao, Guam.
From Conquest to Colonization: Spain in the Mariana
Islands 1690 to 1740, Occasional Historical Papers Series
No. 2, Division of Historic Preservation, Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan.
The World Heritage List: Filling the Gaps – an Action Plan
for the Future, ICOMOS, viewed 12 August 2009,
&lt;http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity590-1.pdf &gt;
The Spanish Missions of La Florida, University Press of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
"On the Fringes of New Spain: The Northern Borderlands
and the Pacific", in (eds) Terisita Majewski and David
Gaimster, International Handbook of Historical Archaeology,
pp. 471-505, Springer Press.
Cultural Landscapes of the Pacific Islands. ICOMOS
Thematic Study, accessed 12 August 2009,
&lt;http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity5-2.pdf&gt;
“The Archaeological Study of Spanish Colonialism in the
Americas”, in Journal of Archaeological Research, 18,
pp.151-201.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3165">
                <text>Potential for Spanish Colonial Archaeology in the Northern Mariana Islands</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3166">
                <text>Session 9&#13;
Spain and the Asia-Pacific region</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3167">
                <text>Spanish cultural heritage continues to play a role in social, cultural and political developments in Micronesia and can contribute to a broader understanding of Indigenous and Spanish histories in the Pacific. Thus, Spanish cultural heritage should be appropriately identified and incorporated into a cultural heritage management and research framework in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Unfortunately, this is not the case and Spanish cultural heritage is long overdue for serious investigation and research in the CNMI.&#13;
&#13;
This paper is the result of a preliminary project conducted in 2009 into the potential for research on Spanish cultural heritage in the CNMI. This project aimed at facilitating the process of documenting Spanish cultural heritage by identifying known and potential heritage recorded in disparate sources such as grey literature, primary and secondary historical sources located in library, archive and museum holdings and conversations with heritage practitioners. The methodology used during this survey included a thematic assessment framework whereby the known and potential Spanish cultural heritage was categorised into research themes. It is hoped that this approach will contribute to evaluating the significance of Spanish cultural heritage for research and management purposes in the CNMI.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3168">
                <text>Jennifer F. McKinnon</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="3169">
                <text>Jason T. Raupp</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3170">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="29">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="213" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="93">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/2eb81b4f95ff8b0e702985eb7864f5d3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>383349ec5e53fda45658b91f8ff141c2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2582">
                    <text>Pre Hispanic Navigation: Iconographic Evidence in
Moche Fine Line Painting
Carlos Ausejo

Abstract
Navigation in pre-Hispanic times in the Andean region has been a topic of discussion among
researchers for years. Different sources of information lead us to believe that at least one
type of marine craft was in use and involved in long distance trade at the arrival of the
Spaniards. However, the debate surrounding earlier periods is stronger due to the lack of
evidence in archaeological records. Most evidence consists of iconographic or sculptural
depictions on pottery; wall friezes; and, ultimately, references gathered by chroniclers – but
not a single remain of any kind of vessel.
This situation has lead researchers to believe that marine crafts like the “Caballito de
Totora” (“reed horse”) were just simpler tools without any further development. However, one
particular type of watercraft represented in the Moche iconography apparently contradicts this
idea, the “reed boat”. Moche fine line paintings portray this particular type of vessel, which
differs from the traditional “reed horse” vessel, and seems to be capable of holding
considerable cargo and occupants. Although the use of totora constitutes the oldest tradition
for constructing rafts and boats along the coast and in the Titicaca region, unfortunately, as
mentioned above, there is no evidence of such rafts or boats in the archaeological record
apart from the iconographic depictions.
In spite of this, we suggest that “reed boats” represented a real boat just as other real
Moche characters were represented in their iconography, such as the “Lord of Sipan” or “The
Priestesses of San Jose de Moro”. Moreover the reed boats were a technological innovation,
which filled particular needs to perform rituals in times of ecological distress and to procure
certain sumptuary items.

The Moche
The Moche civilization developed on the north cost of Peru between 100 and
800 Anno Domini (A.D1) during the Early Intermediate2 period (Donnan and
McClelland 1999:13). The geographical area occupied by the Moche can be
divided into Northern and Southern regions, separated by the Pampa de
Paijan. The success of the Moche society was based on controlling the rivers
through the construction of a complex network of irrigation canals, which
supported successful large-scale agriculture (Shimada 1994:52-56; Bawden
1996:87-92). Furthermore they managed to exploit the large resources of
marine and coastal fauna combined with the use of domesticated llamas,
guinea pigs and ducks (Bawden 1996:86-87; Donnan and McClelland
1999:14-15). The success of food production allowed the Moche to maintain a
highly stratified and dense population, and therefore to assign large number of
workers to the construction and maintenance of pyramids, palaces, temples,
and irrigation canal systems (Bawden 1996:76-107; Donnan and McClelland
1999:14).
As in any other Andean society, they didn’t have a writing system;
instead they left a stunning artistic record of their beliefs and activities in
Modelled and Painted ceramics (Bawden 1996:23; Donnan and McClelland
1

Georgian Calendar designation that starts at year one, fromt he birth of Jesus Christ of
Nazareth, with every year since added by one.
2
Between 400 B.C. and 600 A.C. (Rowe 1945:265-284)

1

�1999:15). Rafael Larco Hoyle developed Moche chronology in 1948 based on
the stirrup spout bottle. He identified five phases, each thought to last around
100 to 200 years (Donnan and McClelland 1999:21). However, during the last
ten years, researchers combined individual phases into three historical
periods (Bawden 2004:23,116-129): Early3 (Phase I – II), Middle4 (Phase III –
IV), and Late Moche5 (Phase V).
Moche potters were consummate masters of three-dimensional
sculpture and also produced ceramics with low-relief depictions of figures and
activities, geometrical and pictorial scenes with fine line painting (Donnan and
McClelland 1999:15-17). On the other hand it seems that Moche
representations had a limited representation of specific events or activities,
which are referred to as themes (Donnan and McClelland 1979:5).
Phase V shows a clear change in fine line painting evolution from
previous phases; the change to abstract and distorted, heavy emphasis being
placed on supernatural rather than human activities, and ultimately a focus on
marine creatures and environment (Donnan and McClelland 1999:178-183).
We can also find innovations in layout, characters and narrative techniques as
well as pottery shape (Donnan and McClelland 1999:166). Although artistic
cannons are mostly the same as preceding phases, there are changes; the
layout consists of half and half, spiral layout, and a new scheme using the
burial theme (Donnan and McClelland 1999:182-183). It is in this context that
Reed boats are more frequently depicted than in previous phases, but for a
completely different function. Rather than being portrayed for fishing activities
they are depicted carrying elaborately dressed individuals (Donnan and
McClelland 1999:179).

Iconography versus Archaeological Evidence
Over the last two decades, archaeological evidence has been demonstrating
that the Moche practiced several activities portrayed in fine line painting. They
also demonstrated that dignitaries as shown in iconographic representations
wore clothes and accessories (Bourget 2005:89-109; Castillo 2000:307-332;
Donnan and McClelland 1999:23; Verano 2005:111-125).
In that sense Christopher Donnan and Donna McClelland (Donnan and
McClelland 1979:6-10) propose the burial scene theme as four distinctive
activities: burial, assembly, conch-shell transfer, and sacrifice. Double and
parallel lines indicate that the activities were separate events, which did not
occur at the same time but were associated with the burial of one extremely
important individual and suggest that all depictions referred to the same
individual (Donnan and McClelland 1979:13). The evidence found in Huaca
Rajada is similar to the depictions (Alva 2004:101-116), but instead of one,
there are at least three high status individuals buried at three different times
with similar types of offerings. Moreover the caskets had a rigid structure of
reinforced heavy canes wrapped in cloth, which covered the cane and the
faces shown on the caskets may be hammered metal masks and attached to
the cloth wrapping (Donnan and McClelland 1979:7). Moreover the goods
depicted in the burial theme are frequently found in Moche and Sican graves,
3

Early Moche aproximately 200 A.D. – 400 A.D.
Middle Moche aproximately 400 A.D. – 600 A.D.
5
Late Moche aproximately 600 A.D. – 800 A.D.
4

2

�along with different kinds of ceramic vessels, gourd bowls filled with food and
conch shells (Alva 2004:86-99).
Symbolic representation is also evident in the belongings of high status
personages; they usually appear wearing gold alloy masks and are
accompanied by specific emblems representing their status and role (Donnan
2008:77). The paraphernalia resembles the images contained in Moche
friezes and ceramics, where it accompanies performers in the activities being
depicted (Alva 2004;Donnan and Castillo 1992,1994). Specific individuals can
be traced to the rituals depicted, which were acted out and performed exactly
as they were depicted (Bawden 1996:25). That is the case of “the Priestess of
San Jose de Moro” [Priestess] (Castillo 2000:307-332), where two female
burials were found with distinctive paraphernalia corresponding to the
Priestess from the Sacrifice scene, the female occupant of the reed boats
(Cordy-Collins 1999:21; Donnan and McClelland 1979:7) and the net shirt
personages form the burial scene (Donnan and McClelland 1979:7). Moreover
the goblets found in burials, similar to those in the San Jose de Moro, tested
positive for human blood traces (Bourget 2005:89-109). This reinforces the
possibilities of actual blood rites during Moche times (Bawden 1996:154155;Bourget 2005:89-109). In that sense, the war and sacrifice rites depicted
can also be related to archaeological evidence, such as the finding of human
remains in the Huaca de la Luna, which show evidence of decapitation,
defleshing and head trauma, among other signs of violence (Bourget 2005:89109; Verano 2005:111-125).

Reed boats Iconography6
Reed boats in phase V are portrayed mainly in a half and half layout, they
look larger than those depicted before and appear to have cargo decks
carrying people and large ceramic jars. On one half the sacrifice Priestess is
portrayed, on the second half a character is portrayed with a paddle-like
object (Donnan and McClelland 1999:178-179; McClelland 1999:77-78).
Phase V reed boats depictions appear with arms and legs, as well as the socalled floaters, contrary to Phase IV reed boats. Some artists replace the boat
with the bottle equator or use a crescent moon shape similar to the reed boat.
This type of representation is called the “Crescent Boat” and seems to be a
simplification of the more complex reed boat scene (McClelland 1999:77-78).
Whether it is represented in detailed reed boats carrying prisoners and
jars; simply depicted on a crescent boat; participating in a complex sacrifice
scene or in the Burial scene, it seems quite clear that the depiction of the
Priestess, or at least a female character, is closely related to navigation
scenes. Since these are all new scenes, or at least represented differently, we
can presume that the boats represented in Phase V pottery may be a new
type of reed vessel used in rituals and activities, perhaps as a response to
changes in the ecological environment associated with the end of the Moche
civilization around 800 A.D. (Donnan and McClelland 1999:184-185).
6

The research sample comes from drawings and photos from published sources, mostly by
Christopher Donnan and Donna McClelland. The proveniences of the vessels were traced
when possible, however most Moche pottery came from looted graves and therefore only a
rough area of provenance is available in most cases (Donnan and McClelland 1999:17-18)

3

�Researchers separate them into two types: Crescent Boats and Reed
Boats (Donnan and McClelland 1999:179), the first group refers to vessels
representing a female seated on a boat, the boat is represented by a crescent
shape form or using the angled equator to insinuate the boat, this group have
been excluded from research due to be a simplified representation. The
second group includes all the representations without making any distinction
between raft and boat (Cordy-Collins 1999:17-33).
Donnan and McClelland (1999:272) use the term reed boats for any
representation of Moche watercraft, however these could be divided into two
different types of representation, Reed Rafts and Reed Boats, which will be
described as follows:

Reed Rafts
Unfortunately we were unable to gather all known iconographic examples but
we believe that only a few are missing. The corpus is composed of six
examples of reed rafts and looks very similar to today´s “Caballito de Totora”.
The construction seems to be made up of bundles of Totora, which is tied
together and fastened with simple or double ropes, all depicting an animal
head on the upturned bow and stern, following a direction from left to right.
They are single manned by a human figure holding a fishing line, wearing
a shirt and a headdress adorned with feathers, an animal head, or simple
lines. Usually the occupant stands over a bundle of nets. All reed rafts appear
associated with fish, seashells, marine mammals and sea birds, which are
usually very realistic. However in some cases they portray anthropomorphised
sea birds pulling the reed raft.

Reed Boats7
Reed boats are more frequently found in the northern area (Donnan and
McClelland 2007:22), reed boats look in a similar way to the rafts but seem to
use massive bundles of totora, over them a simple structure, which seems to
create two different decks, one for cargo and a second for occupants. The
occupants shown, on each half of the bottle is a Paddler holding a long stick
or paddle and a female occupant usually identified as the Priestess (Donnan
and McClelland 1999:178-179; Cordy-Collins 1999:17-33). The corpus of
images is composed of the representation of thirty-seven reed boats,
including four with the spiral narrative.
To differentiate the variety of depictions, we have identified five main
attributes: Direction, Anthropomorphic characteristics, number of occupants,
type of cargo and finally the ratio and number of animal heads described as
follow:
• The first attribute is the direction of the scene; reed boat
depictions can be presented following a direction to the left or right.
• The second attribute is the anthropomorphic characteristics;
most of the depictions appear with arms or legs, and sometimes both.
There is only a small number without arms or legs.
• The third attribute is the number of occupants, which may vary
from one to three; only in a few cases, the number of occupants is

7

We believe to have most examples known, with just a few found in the last years.

4

�more than two. The rest of the sample presents only one occupant per
boat.
• The fourth attribute is the type of cargo; most cases present a
cargo consisting of pottery jars or rounded objects tied with ropes,
while the other type carries not only pottery jars but tied up prisoners.
• The last attribute is the ratio of animal heads on the boat.
Most reed boats show one or two animal heads in the bow and stern (#
in bow / # in stern), the distribution can be mainly 1 / 2 or 2 / 1, a few
exemptions appear where the distribution is 2 / 2, or 1 / 1.

Reed Boats Group Descriptions
After reviewing the corpus using these attributes, we can divide them into two
main groups. With an extra third group conformed by the spiral narrative,
however the boats represented on them belong to the type described on
group two.
Group 18: In general the depictions are represented similarly to the previous
phase. The main activity of the boats is transporting people and cargo, in only
one case the paddler is fishing instead, with the help of his companion. The
reed boats are following a left direction and all of them show arms, usually
holding a rope on the bow, and legs. Over the boat there is a single framed
structure that creates two decks: the cargo deck hold prisoners tied to their
necks and ceramic jars and the upper deck where the occupants stand9. The
animal head usually has a relation of 1 / 2 and the boat itself looks similar to
the reed rafts but the curve is less pronounced. All show the principal
occupants, the paddler and the Priestess, accompanied by one or two more
characters, and appear to be standing. The companions are
anthropomorphised seabirds holding a similar object to the paddler.
Group 210: the boats are very similar to the group ones although they have a
major number of reed bundle fasteners. A new addition to the depiction is a
circular net object attached to the bow and stern, with a few exceptions. All
boats are travelling to the right and the cargo deck seem to be more
elaborated or planned, it is represented as two double lines with a net in
between, creating a more defined cargo. The cargo varies from ceramic jars;
round objects suspended from the deck, probably gourd vessels, and some
stylized round suspended objects. None show more than one occupant in the
boats, likewise the occupants remain the same. Some changes can be seen
in the priestess´ attributes, which in most cases appear holding an open bag,
or having an oblong object on her dress, or holding a cup. The ratio of animal
heads on the boats is not relevant in this group.
Group 311: This group depicts the navigation scene in a ritual context using a
spiral narrative. The boats are represented in a similar way to the group
although they show four boats instead of two. The third boat holds an animal
8

This group is conformed of six cases.
In this group, one particular case is a bit different than the other, the ceramic jars and
prisoners are close to the bow, and in the priestess boat seems to be on two different levels.
10
This group is made up of twenty-six cases.
11
This group is composed of four cases.
9

5

�warrior in procession with the paddler and the female occupant, a fourth boat
is shown at the beginning of the narration without occupants and apparently
with some kind of object over the deck. The narration starts at the bottom of
the chamber, with animated objects fighting human warriors; a male figure
with a crescent headdress is watching the combat. Following the spiral, a
female stands in front of bundles of weapons and the animated objects
approach her. Further up the spiral, a procession of three reed boats appears
with the paddler, the female occupant, and an animal warrior carrying
containers. The boat arrives at a structure where part of the sacrifice
ceremony is being performed while an anthropomorphized club and shield
holds a goblet.

Discussion
Donnan (Bawden 1996:25) has a very interesting explanation of Moche
iconography using the analogy of Christian artistic symbolism. In Christian art,
the fullest depictions of the crucifixion included the cross and the flanking
counterparts, but specific components can be used separately in religious art
to symbolize aspects of the Christian dogma without losing meaning. The
religious content in Moche iconography is similar, with full narrative
compositions including fully identifiable participants, which can also be
represented alone or in an abbreviated portion of the larger composition.
Therefore, work as "symbolic" referents to the content and meaning were
embodied in the major theme and identified as such by Moche People
(Bawden 1996:25).
Likewise we can interpret reed boats and crescent boats, as part of two
different and new scenes in Moche depictions, the Burial Scene and the Spiral
Navigation Scene Narrative, where boats played an important role
transporting the Priestess who was in charge of the blood goblet. The
relationship between them is based on the Priestess, and they might belong
to a brotherhood therefore appearing as a group represented by the Net
Shirts, figures wearing net shirts and a tiered item of attire extending down his
back, appearing as a group on the burial scene (Cordy-Collins 1999:17-33).
The same type of personage appears again on the reed boats and crescent
boats. Other objects that are similar in boat representations are the jars that
appear on the burial scene and an odd oblong object. Possibly both objects
are brought to the grave by the net shirts (Donnan and McClelland 1979:7).
These changes can also be seen on the reed boats occupants in Group 1,
where the female occupant has the attributes of the Priestess, the feathers
and clothes, and then in the Group 2 where the female occupant holds a
goblet or an open bag.
The perception of the ocean may have changed into a place where
prisoners and cargo are being transported (Hocquenguem 1999:65). Maritime
scenes may illustrate actual rituals just like other rituals in which religious
dignitaries act out the myths of Moche society in order to reaffirm social
foundations and continuity (Bawden 1996:75). If these rituals were actually
performed as demonstrated in the archaeological evidence (Bourget 2005:89109; Castillo 2005:307-332; Verano 2005:111-125), the maritime scenes
might therefore also leave an archaeological record. It does not seem that
reed boats were involved in long distance trade for sumptuary goods.
6

�However they may have been involved in transporting guano12 from the
islands offshore, a valuable resource as a fertilizer, the Chincha Islands being
the largest of these islands groups, located on the southern Peruvian cost and
possibly visited by the Moche (Bawden 1996:41-51; Kubler 1948:29-50); or
perhaps Spondylus Princeps, Strombus Galeatus, important in rituals and
ceremonies and found in archaeological contexts associated with those
activities along the North Coast region (Bawden 1996:42; Shimada 1987:133144). In spite of this, we haven’t found any Moche fine line paintings depicting
boats transporting such goods.
The fall of the Moche society is associated with a catastrophic Niño13
event by 800 A.D. and this might be the reason for the change of Moche
depictions to marine related scenes (Donnan and McClelland 1999:184-185),
and the change in the perception of the sea (Hocquenguem 1999:65), where
propitiatory rituals involving the safe transport of prisoners to offshore islands
and high status individuals required a different and more complex system of
navigation like the reed boat.
Finally, differences between the reed boats, of Group 1 and 2, in the
type of cargo they carry, could be easily explained as a simplification of a
greater scene, as a referent of a greater meaning. Moreover those changes
and the distortion of the representations follow the same path as Phase V
pottery. Therefore the absence of evidence of an actual reed boat and the
argument that only a few representations seem to depict a larger boat
carrying cargo and prisoners (Makowski 2006:10-11) is not a strong argument
against the existence and use of complex boats.

Conclusion
Reed boats and Crescent boats, as two representations of a single specific
type of marine vessel capable of transporting cargo, prisoners and/or liquid
containers, is possible. However the characteristics and activities are quite
distinctive from previous representations. It is also clear that both reed boats
and crescent boats are part of the same context of transporting blood
offerings to/from the islands where they will be engaged in a larger ritual of
sacrifice or burial.
It is also clear that most of the ceremonies, rituals and objects depicted
in Moche iconography have a real counterpart that has been found over the
last two decades, suggesting that reed boats could be found in the
archaeological record. Secondary data (Bawden 1996:75,77,79,101-102)
other sources suggests firstly, that fishing communities were particularly
separate from other groups, keeping their own identity and costums and
secondly, that the reed boat tradition was related to Moche rituals and
12

Guano is the excrement of seabirds and seals found in the offshore islands of the Peruvian
coast. It is an effective fertilizer due to its high levels of phosphorus and nitrogen (Shimada
1994:45-46)
13
El Niño events is a frequent long-term impact event that commence in Christmas season
involving drastic changes in the marine environment of the Andean cost. Is a disruption of the
prevailing currents and associated climatic conditions. This change can devastate the marine
life interrupting the normal flow of nutrients and microorganism that support the prolific
Peruvian coastal food chain. The phenomenon also affects the land by heavy precipitations;
this brings several flooding’s causing widespread destruction (Bawden 1996:58).

7

�replaced by a northern balsa log raft tradition as well. Therefore looking for
reed boats in burials has proved to be the wrong approach to the problem.
Consequently, it would be feasible to find archaeological evidence of reed
boats closer to the shore and islands, either on land or underwater. In that
sense it would be likely to find archaeological evidence close to the main site
where the reed boat depictions come from, and also where Moche presence
has been reported in offshore islands. Moreover, it would be necessary to
cross-reference with information such as sea currents and possible ports to
identify a possible navigational route.

Bibliography
Alva, W.,
2004
Bourget, S.,
2005

Bawden, G.,
1996
Bawden, G.,
2004
Castillo, L.,
2005

Sipán: Descubrimiento e Investigación, Edición del
autor, Lima.
"Rituals of Sacrifice: Its Practice at huaca de la Luna
and Its Representation in Moche Iconography", in (ed.)
J. Pillsbury, Moche Art and Archeology in Ancient Peru,
Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
The Moche, Blackwell, Oxford.

"The Art of Moche Politics", in (ed) Helaine Silverman,
Andean Archaeology, Blackwell, Malden.
"The Last of the Mochicas: A View from the
Jequetepeque Valley", in (ed.) J. Pillsbury, Moche Art
and Archeology in Ancient Peru,, Yale University Press,
New Haven
Cordy–Collins, A.,
"La sacerdotisa y la Ostra: Queda resuelto el enigma
1999
del Spondylus?", in A. Cordy-Collins, et. al., Spondylus:
ofrenda sagrada y simbolo de paz, Fundación
Telefonica, Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera,
Lima.
Donnan, C.B.,
"Noche Masking Traditions", in (eds) Steve Bourget
2008
and Kimberly L. Jones, The art and archaeology of the
Moche : an ancient Andean society of the Peruvian
North Coast, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Donnan, C.B., and "Finding the tomb of a Moche Priestess", in
Castillo L.J.,
Archaeology 45, 6, pp.38-42
1992
Donnan, C.B., and "Excavaciones de tumbas de sacerdotisas moche en
Castillo L.J.,
San José de Moro, Jequetepeque", in (eds.) Santiago
1994
Uceda, Elías Mujica, Moche : propuestas y
perspectivas : actas del Primer Coloquio sobre la
Cultura Moche, Trujillo, 12 al 16 de abril de 1993 / -Trujillo : Universidad Nacional de la Libertad; Lima :
IFEA : Asociación Peruana para el Fomento de las
Ciencias Sociales.
Donnan, C.B., and The burial theme in Moche iconography, Dumbarton
McClelland, D.,
Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University, Washington.
1979

8

�Donnan, C.B., and Moche Fineline Painting: Its evolution and Its Artists,
Los Fowler Museum of Cultural History, UCLA, Angeles.
McClelland, D.,
1999
Hocquenghem,
"En torno al Mullu, Manjar Predilecto de los Poderosos
A.M.,
Inmortales", in A. Cordy-Collins, et. al., Spondylus:
1999
ofrenda sagrada y simbolo de paz, Fundación
Telefonica, Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera,
Lima.
Kubler, G.,
“Towards Absolute Time: Guano Archaeology”, in
1948
American Antiquity, XIII, 4, pp.29-50.
Larco Hoyle, R.,
Cronología arqueológica del norte del Perú, Sociedad
1948
Geográfica Americana, Buenos Aires.
Makowski, K.,
"Orígenes Rituales de la Navegación en el Perú", in
2006
Gaceta Cultural del Perú,no. 22.
McClelland, D.,
"A Maritime passage from Moche to Chimu", in (eds.)
1990
M.E. Moseley, A. Cordy - Collins, (Organizers) M.
Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, M.E. Moseley, The
Northern dynasties: kingship and statecraft in Chimor: a
symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 12th and 13th October
1985, Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and
Collection, Washington, D.C.
Rowe. J.,
"Absolute Chronology in the Andean Area", in American
1946
Antiquity, Vol 10, pp 265-284
Shimada, I.,
Pampa Grande and the Mochica Culture, University of
1994
Texas Press, Austin.
Shimada, I.,
"Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Prehistoric
2005
Status in Northern Peru", in (eds.) J. Hass, S.
Pozorsky, T. Pozorsky, The origins and development of
the Andean state, Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge.
Verano, J.,
"War and Death in the Moche World: Osteological
2005
Evidence and Visual Discourse", in (ed.) J. Pillsbury,
Moche Art and Archeology in Ancient Peru, Yale
University Press, New Haven.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2577">
                <text>Pre Hispanic Navigation: Iconographic Evidence in Moche Fine Line Painting</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2578">
                <text>Session 11&#13;
Diversity in approaches to maritime archaeology, underwater cultural heritage and related areas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2579">
                <text>Navigation in pre-Hispanic times in the Andean region has been a topic of discussion among researchers for years. Different sources of information lead us to believe that at least one type of marine craft was in use and involved in long distance trade at the arrival of the Spaniards. However, the debate surrounding earlier periods is stronger due to the lack of evidence in archaeological records. Most evidence consists of iconographic or sculptural depictions on pottery; wall friezes; and, ultimately, references gathered by chroniclers â€“ but not a single remain of any kind of vessel.&#13;
&#13;
This situation has lead researchers to believe that marine crafts like the â€œCaballito de Totoraâ€ (â€œreed horseâ€) were just simpler tools without any further development. However, one particular type of watercraft represented in the Moche iconography apparently contradicts this idea, the â€œreed boatâ€. Moche fine line paintings portray this particular type of vessel, which differs from the traditional â€œreed horseâ€ vessel, and seems to be capable of holding considerable cargo and occupants. Although the use of totora constitutes the oldest tradition for constructing rafts and boats along the coast and in the Titicaca region, unfortunately, as mentioned above, there is no evidence of such rafts or boats in the archaeological record apart from the iconographic depictions.&#13;
&#13;
In spite of this, we suggest that â€œreed boatsâ€ represented a real boat just as other real Moche characters were represented in their iconography, such as the â€œLord of Sipanâ€ or â€œThe Priestesses of San Jose de Moroâ€. Moreover the reed boats were a technological innovation, which filled particular needs to perform rituals in times of ecological distress and to procure certain sumptuary items.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2580">
                <text>Carlos Ausejo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2581">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="27">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="32" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="32">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/985784694be97847b3193fe9e35472b2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a03b5891136c4deb2d2215b0af13b756</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="558">
                    <text>Pre-Hispanic Navigation in the Andean Region

Carlos Ausejo
Centro Peruano de Arqueología Marítima y Subacuática (CPAMS)
Lima18
Perú
Email: causejo@cpams.org.pe
Abstract
Offshore and inland waters in the Andean region were crossed by boats of various
types made of different materials. These were related mainly to fishing activities, but
also were involvedin long-distance trade of luxury goods, rituals, passengers and even
war.Construction technologies and development of these vessels varied depending on
available resources and the capacity of societies to solve navigational problems. In that
sense a variety of types and forms of vessels have been identified, and although not all
boats are "complex" as the Europeans, it is clear that they evolve and had changes over
time that perfected them.Despite this plentiful of technologies, the archaeological record
of actual watercraft is almost nonexistent. As a result the approach to these
technologies is through other evidence as the iconography fund on pottery, textiles and
wall friezes, as well as sculptural referencesnot to mentionreferences recorded by
Spanish chroniclers and ultimatelypost- Conquest survivals.The aim of this paper is to
recount these technologies through indirect evidence and elaborate some hypotheses
about the use and success of the same in the pre -Hispanic Andean world and its
survival after the conquest.
Keywords: Prehispanic, Navigation, raft, boat, andean

Introduction
The Peruvian coastal environment consists of two related ecological zones, the Pacific
Ocean with its adjacent shoreline and the river valleys that wind through the coastal
desert creating linear oases. The coast of Peru, due to its complex natural environment
generates a constantly renewed of marine food supply. The source of this large supply
is the Peruvian Coast Current, also known as Humboldt Current, which is the
easternmost segment of the counter clockwise circulation of the Pacific Ocean
(Bawden, 1996). The archaeological evidence for the Middle Archaic (6000-3000 BC1)
in the Andean area allows us to think that sedentary groups develop in the Andean
valleys and the slopes each with their own neolithisation process. These societies

1

�depended on mixed economies however the coastal ones placed greater emphasis on
the extraction of marine products (Shady, 2003b). The particular richness of the
Peruvian coast allows the subsistence of larger groups of people and early complex
coastal societies in pre-ceramic times as suggested by Moseley. Evidences of these
can be found in Caral, Supe, and other sites, from the same period such as Huaynuna,
Las Haldas, Ancon and La Paloma (Bearez and Miranda, 2003).Ever since the large
marine resources could support the development of early complex societies, an
increasing amount and more efficient marine exploitation was critical causing the
development of new technologies to go further into the sea and complement the
shoreline exploitation. Shellfish, Sea Mammals, Fish, and later the guano from off shore
islands and long distance trade of sumptuary items, require a constant evolution and
specialization on, fishing hooks, fishing nets and ultimately marine vessels
(Rostworowski, 1989).
Evidences for navigation
The invention of floating devices in pre-Hispanic times is not a matter of discussion
even though the lack of direct archaeological evidence of such devices. All evidences
related with ancient navigation are based on historic and etnohistorical references,
experimental archaeology and indirectarchaeological evidences such as iconography,
models and artifacts. All of these sources face their own validation problems and
subsequent debate.
From all these sources it is clear that along the Andean region rafts of different
complexity were the principal navigation tool, with the exception of the reed boat for
Moche2times in the northern coast and Titicaca Lake3 (Ausejo, 2011).
Archaeological evidence
Actual rafts or boats have been elusive for archeologists, however the best evidence for
them can be seenin a collection of wooden raft models found in southern Peru and
northern Chile dated to the Late Intermediated Period (1000 – 1350 AD), belonging to
the Chiribaya culture. The models are found on individual burials as burial offerings
among others (Ortiz,2003).

2

�Other evidences are depictions of seafarers on mud friezes and sculpture or painted
pottery. Depictions of seafarers on friezes are very rare, however Huaca Las Balsas,
part of the Tucume complex in La Leche valley, dated prior to the arrival of the Chimu
rule over the area shows a frieze (2.20m x 1.60 m) with two reed boats or rafts, each
with two figures holding oars or paddles(Heyerdahl, 1995).Another wall frieze shows a
similar depiction with four figures, two over a balsa log raft and two divers collecting
spondyllus shell (Vicente Cortez, personal communication). The balsa raft appears to
have sails. Likewise Mochefineline paintings on pottery show navigation depictions with
complex reed boats (Ausejo, 2011). Besides the Moche other societies also
represented navigation related representations such as the Sican, Chimu and Chancay
(Cordy-Collins, 1990).
The final archaeological evidence, which implies navigation, is the presence of
archaeological remains in the off shore islands during the extraction of guano4 on the
second half of the XIX century. The most interesting finds are wooden figures
representing nude seated prisoners associated with Moche pottery (Kubler 1948). For
San Lorenzo Island in the central coast, extensive cemeteries with complex burials have
been reported, as well as hunting and fishing stations (Hudtwalcker and Pinilla, 2006).
Historical Records
The body of these records is composed by the chroniclers’ accounts, administrative and
judicial documents and travellers’ accounts from the XVIII and XIX century. Despite the
variety of information available from them, these records must be used with care and
analysed critically; the chronicles, -texts written by Spanish observers- where written at
a time when the indigenous people were seen as idolaters or sub-humans, therefore the
preconceptions preclude any reasonable understanding of the Andean culture (Bawden,
1996).
The earliest report come from Fray Bartolome de las Casas, around 1512, provided by
the son of a Kuna5 chief telling about people from a rich kingdom, other than the
Spaniards navigating with ships or vessels a little smaller using sails and paddles
(Heyerdahl, 1995). The second and more famous report is from 1527, by Bartolome
Ruiz, Pizarro’s pilot, aboutthe encounter with a little vessel tacking northward against

3

�the Northern current. The vessel was already passing the Ecuador when the Spaniards
following the current southward into unknown waters intercepted it (Heyerdahl, 1995).
Evidently the balsas were still in use and even of importance at the arrival of the
Spaniards and during the rule of the Incas (Heyerdahl, 1995). Therefore some
chroniclers and administrative documents refer to times before and during the Inca’s
rule. An account classified as historical, but without references, is the naval battle fought
by Atahualpa, who allied with the Curaca of Tumbes to declare war against the Puná
Island. Having been defeated and wounded, Atahualpa withdrew to Quito and Tumbes
was conquered and burned by the Curaca of Puná. That is why Pizarro changed the
name of Tumbes to Puerto Quemado (Burned Harbour) (Rostworowski, 1999).Another
account is related with a brief conversation between Pizarro and Atahualpa he asked
the Inca ruler why the Curaca of Chincha was carried on a stretcher, and he responded
that it was a very good friend and great man of the coast, and he had available a
hundred thousand rafts at sea (Hocquenguem, 1999; Rostworowski, 1989)
The most interesting and controversial document is a manuscript file, called “Aviso”,
from the Royal Palace of Madrid; the document mention that before the Inca expansion,
the Chincha lordship had thirty thousand farmers divided in twelve thousand farmers,
ten thousand fishermen and six thousand "traders in the Indian way", each with
reasonable wealth (Rostworowski, 1999). They used two routes, a land to highland,
from Chincha to Cusco and Collao and another maritime, on rafts to Mantas and Puerto
Viejo in Ecuador (Rostworowski, 1989).The controversy is because Rostworowski
interpret the “traders in the Indian way” as merchants engage in maritime long distance
trade and therefore the use of boats capable of long distance travel, such as described
byBartolome Ruiz of the raft and the specificity of the contentssimilar to those referred
in the “Aviso”(Rostworowski, 1989).
Etnohistorical Evidence
The Incas, as well as other previous societies, didn’t have a writing system, so they rely
in oral tradition to keep records of their history. The Spaniards later recorded these
Story’s or legends during the earlier years of the conquest or later. Therefore just like
the historical records, and because they refer to events several years before the arrival

4

�of the Spaniards, legends recorded by the chroniclers must be use with discretion and
critically.
The northern coast of Peru before the Inca rule in the area have two foundations myths
about the Chimu, very similar with each other but with different port of arrival, Naylamp
arrives to Lambayeque and Tacaynamo to Trujillo (Rostworowski 1999). On either case
the myth refers to a group capable of navigation systems and probably long distance
traffic.
Miguel Cabello de Balboa describes Naylamp arrival to the Lambayeque valley
(Ravines, 1980):"The natives of Lambayeque say, that in ancient times who cannot
number them, came from the northern part of this Piru with large fleet of rafts with a
father of campaigns, a man of great value and quality called Naylamp and brought
many concubines, but the principal wife was called Ceterni, brought within his company
many people who as captain and leader were following him, but what was the most
valuable among them were officers who were forty ... " (Cabello Balboa, [1576] 1951:
327-330).
Another myth, in this case referred to the God Viracocha, is of particular interest. The
God after finishing the creation of the world leaves to Ecuador, apparently Manta or
Puerto Viejo, and embarks with his servants into a sea voyage without return
(Hocquenguem, 1999).
In the case of the Inca’s we found only two specific stories specifically related with
Tupac Yupanqui, an Inca ruler several years before the arrival of the Spaniards.The first
story is related with the use of balsa log rafts in the tributaries of the Amazons River
transporting large number of soldiers and people with success. The second, and the
famous, is his journey into the Pacific Ocean to the legendary islands of Auachumbi and
Nina Chumbi. Apparently by the experimental use of balsas it seems that the islands
referring in the Tupac Yupanqui story are Easter Island (for Ninachumbi) and Kava (for
Avachumbi) according with the information of distance and direction provided by
Sarmiento (Heyerdahl 1995). What’s more interesting is the references in Polynesian
manuscripts noted by Sir Peter Buck, about a visitor in Mangareva called Tupa, and
also tells that Tupa before going back to his country told them it was a vast land full of
people and ruled by powerful kings (Heyerdahl, 1995).
5

�Type of Vessels
In this section we’d like to discuss and define the type of navigation vessels use at the
time and before the arrival of the Spaniards. The main problem we face typifying and
defining marine, as well as lake or river, vessels is that some writers, weather is a reed
or balsa log boat, use the term “Balsa” “Boat” or “Raft” indifferently to any kind of marine
or

water

vessel

they

encountered

and

reported

(Cordy-Collins

personal

communication). So to keep clear the terms we will use the definition of raft as a nonwatertight made of individual floating elements (McGrail, 1985). Although all pre –
Hispanic vessels can be describe into this definition, we’ll make one exemption with a
specific reed craft, called Tule Boat (Cordy Collins, 1972), or Reed Boat (Donnan and
McClelland, 1979), found only in iconography depictions. The differences between a raft
and a boat are base in comparisons with similar complex reed crafts use nowadays in
the Titicaca Lake. After reviewing the available resources of information we can identify
at least five types of vessels define by their building materials.
Gourd Rafts
The simplest vessel is made of gourds tied to each other, although it isn’t mentioned it
should have some kind of simple deck; apparently it was used to cross rivers in flood
seasons or particular coastal rivers with a constant and high flow the whole year
(Rostworowski, 1981). Such is the case of the Santa River, south of Chao, the longest
and mightiest of coastal rivers. Since the sixteenth century, is mentioned as “the
greatest river, the toughest of these valleys and plains, it is cross using ugly rafts of
gourds called mates ... " (JudioPortugués, 1958: 27 in Ravines, 1980)
Skin Raft
Another simply vessel is made with sea lions skins inflated as floating devices, they are
reported between Ica, in Peru, and San Antonio, Chile (Paez 1986). This practice has
been lost in the whole area, however in 1958 Hans Niemeyer reported one last man
who remembered the construction technique of these vessels. The construction was
simple, made of two inflated sea lion skins tied together with leather straps. A set of
beams connected the skins, and over them wooden planks formed a simple deck
(Rostworowski, 1981). A single person seated or kneeing with a double bladed paddle

6

�manned it. These raft were use for fishing, carrying goods and passengers, as well as
Niter Paez, 1986).
Balsa Log Raft
The balsa logs vessels are the most common type of deep - sea vessel found by the
Spaniards (Fig. 1 - 4). These traditions cover an area that includes Ecuador, Peru and
northern Chile (Valdivia 1974). They are made of thick long logs of balsa wood (Genus
Ochroma) tie together with ropes.

Figure 1:Wall frieze of balsa log raft at Huaca Las Figure 2: Wall frieze of balsa log raft with sail and
Balsas, northern coast of Perú. (Photo by: Vicente divers at Huaca Las Balsas, northern coast of Perú.
Cortez)
(Photo by: Vicente Cortez)

Figure 3: Modern balsa log raft at mancora, Figure 4: Modern balsa log raft at mancora,
northern coast of Perú. (Photo by: Ericka Cicchini)
northern coast of Perú. (Photo by: Carlos Ausejo)

The logs are always in odd numbers, being the middle log the longest, and over them
other logs as crosspieces to tight the construction. Over the logs a framework of canes
was laid and provisions and cargo were kept in an elevated cabin to protect it from the
7

�sea washouts (Heyerdahl, 1995).The balsa logs vessels size seem to be variable, but
most accounts reveal that could carry a considerable cargo in men and horses and also
carried stone anchors resembling millstones on the deck (Heyerdahl, 1995).

Two different kinds of sails were
use with the balsa log vessel:
First, the lateen or triangular
sail, as reported by Fernandez
de Oviedo; and second, the
square sail on a double mast,
both types survived until modern
times. The square sail on a
bipod mast is also found in reed
vessels on the Titicaca Lake
(Heyerdahl, 1995).
One last technology to note on
the balsa logs vessels, and
perhaps the more interesting is
described first by the Dutch
admiral Spilbergen about the
use of broad boards inserted
vertically in the cracks of the
logs.

The

“Guaras”

was

system
use

called
by

the

Figure 5:Totora Raft known as “Caballito de Totota” o “Totora indigenous people for deep Reed Horse”. (Photo by: Vicente Cortez)
sea navigation. But it was in

1736 when two Spanish naval officers, G. Juan and A de Ulloa, describe in a better way
the guara system and their advantages (Heyerdahl, 1995):
“Hitherto we have only mentioned the construction and the uses they are applied;
but the greatest singularity if this floating vehicle is that it sails, tacks, and works
as well in contrary wind as ships with keel, and makes very little leeway. This
8

�advantages derives from another method of steering than by a rudder; namely,
by some boards, three or four yards in length, and half a yard in breadth, called
guaras, which are placed vertically, both at the head and stern between the main
beams, and by thrusting some of them deep in the water, and raising others, they
bear away, lift up, tack, lay to, and perform all the other motions of a regular
ship.”
Reed Raft
The raft is a single or double manned vessel made of a reed fiber called Totora
(ScirpusCalifornicus), it grew in abundance in marshes and lakes, natural or artificial,
along the coast (Rostworowski, 1981) and It is also known in modern days as “Caballito
de Totora” or Reed Horse (Fig. 5). They seem to had different characteristics according
to the area, for example Huanchaco, north coast, have only the bow pointed upward
and turn up; in Lurin, central coast, three bundles were made with the central bundle
being slightly longer than the others. In the case of Moche and Chimu ceramics
representation they seem to have both pointed ends upwards (Rostworowski, 1981).
Strong continuities of this tradition exist, as shown by the survival of the “Caballito de
Totora” in the north coast, and have been convincingly shown through ethnographic
research into modern and recent societies of the north coast region (Bawden, 1996).
Reed Boat
This type of boat can only be seen at the Titicaca Lake nowadays (Fig. 6). This
particular reed craft, although by definition might be considered as a raft, will be
considered a boat in this paper. It consists of massive bundles of Totora forming a high
floating hull (although it’s not empty and not watertight), over the “hull” the surface is dry
and protected contrary to the washed surfaces of rafts. Depending on the size it could
carry several people as mentioned by Cobo which described that major balsas were
made over gathering reeds bundles on which they could sail up to twelve people and
when they were joined two it was able to carrying cattle and beasts (Rostworowski,
1981). Larger boats can be made by sewing two of these and have a second deck
made of lighter cane as well as sails. This is the type of craft being represented in
Moche pottery as double deck reed boats capable of transporting cargo and in some
cases passengers (Cordy-Collins, 1999; Ausejo 2011). This boat building tradition didn’t
9

�survive in the coast like it did in the Titicaca Lake probably replaced by the balsa log
vessel tradition (Ortiz, 2006) However, it is unclear yet the origin of this construction
technique in the Titicaca lake. Nevertheless complex reed crafts have proven to be
worthless for long distance sea travels during the voyage made by Gene Savoy in 1969
from the Salaverry port in Peru to (Rostworowski, 1981).
Figure 6:Totora read boat in Lake
Titicaca, southern highlands, between
Perú and Bolivia. (Photo by: Vicente
Cortez)

Conclusion
As we can see societies in the Andean region successfully developed different types of
watercraft using available resources for construction and adapted for different activities.
Although archaeological evidence has been hard to find or identify most of these
traditions are still alive as proof of their efficiency and success. This paper is a summary
of most watercraft known for the Andean region and as such it’s an invitation for further
research in the topic. We still have the great question of where can we find these
vessels in the archaeological record, and then for every type of vessel we still have
unanswered questions like when and where the sail appeared. Or why the reed boats
disappeared in the northern coast, etc. The topic is broad and we haven’t even looked
at the watercraft traditions in the Amazon basin.

Acknowledgements

10

�I’d like to thank the organizing committee of the 2014 APCONF, especially to Hans Van
Tilburg and Veronica Walker, and the session presenters, for making possible this
session.
Endnotes
1.

Georgian Calendar designation that starts at year one, from the birth of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, with every
year since added by one.

2.

Between 400 B.C. and 600 A.C. (Rowe, 1945)

3.

The Titicaca Lake is located in the border of Peru and Bolivia in the Altiplanic region.

4.

Guano is the excrement of seabirds and seals found in the offshore islands of the Peruvian coast. It is an
effective fertilizer due to its high levels of phosphorus and nitrogen (Shimada, 1994)

5.

The Kuna lived in northern Colombia and the Darien region of Panama at the arrival of the Spaniards
(Bartolomé and Barabas,2004).

References
Ausejo, C., 2011.Pre-Hispanic Navigation: Iconographic Evidence in Moche Fine Line
PaintingIn. In M. Staniforth, Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific regional conference on
Underwater Cultural Heritage. 8-12 Nov 2011, Manila: 969-979.
Bartolomé, A and A. Barabas. 2004. Recursos culturales y autonomía étnica. La
democracia participativa de los Kuna de Panamá. En Amérique Latine Histoire et
Mémoire 10.
Bearez, P., Miranda, L., 2003. Análisis arqueo ictiológico del sector residencial del sitio
arqueológico de Caral – Supe, Costa Central del Perú. In R. Shady, and C. Leyva
(Eds.),La Ciudad Sagrada de Caral – Supe: Los orígenes y la formación del Estado
Prístino en el Antiguo Perú. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Cultura – Proyecto Especial
ArqueológicoCaral – Supe: 123-132.
Bourguet, S., 1994. El mar y la muerte en la iconografía Moche. In: Uceda, S., Mujica,
E. (eds). Moche: propuestas y perspectivas: Actas del Primer Coloquio sobre la cultura
Moche, Trujillo, 12 al 16 de abril 1993. Lima: Universidad Nacional de La Libertad –
Trujillo.
Bawden, G., 1996. The Moche. Cambridge: Mass, Oxford: Blackwell.
Cabello de Balboa, Miguel. 1951 [1576] MisceláneaAntártica: unahistoria del
Perúantiguo:Seminario de Historia del Perú – Incas Instituto de Etnología.

11

�Cordy – Collins, A. 1990.FongaSigde, Shell Purveyor to the Chimu Kings. In: Moseley,
ME, Cordy - Collins, A. (eds)., Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, M, Moseley, ME.
(organizers). The Northern dynasties: kingship and statecraft in Chimor: a symposium at
Dumbarton Oaks, 12th and 13th October 1985. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks
Research Library and Collection.
Cordy – Collins, A., 1999.La sacerdotisa y la Ostra: Queda resuelto el enigma del
Spondylus?. In: Cordy-Collins, A. et. al. 1999. Spondylus: ofrenda sagrada y símbolo de
paz. Lima: Fundación Telefónica, Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera.
Donnan, CB., Castillo, L., 1994. Excavaciones de tumbas de sacerdotisas Moche en
San José de Moro, Jequetepeque. In: Uceda, S., Mujica, E. (eds). Moche: propuestas y
perspectivas. Lima: Universidad Nacional de La Libertad – Trujillo.
Donnan, CB., McClelland, D., 1979. The burial theme in Moche iconography.
Washington: Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University.
Casas, B. de las.1956 [1512].Historia de lasIndias/ Fray Bartolome de las
Casas.Ediciónpreparadapor la Fundación “InstitutoBartolomé de las Casas” de los
Dominicios de Andalucía.
Heyerdahl, T., 1995.Chapter 1.In: Heyerdahl, T., Sandweiss, D., Narváez, A. (eds).
Pyramids of Túcume: The quest for Peru's forgotten city. London: Thames and Hudson.
Hocquenghem, AM., 1999. En torno al Mullu, Manjar Predilecto de los Poderosos
Inmortales. In: Cordy-Collins, A., Rostworowski, A., Hocquenghem, A., Pillsbury,
J.1999. Spondylus : ofrenda sagrada y símbolo de paz. Lima: Fundación Telefónica,
Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera.
Hudtwalcker, J., Pinilla, J., 2006. La historia cultural de la Isla San Lorenzo.Gaceta
Cultural del Perú 22, 20-21.
Kubler, G., 1948. Towards Absolute Time: Guano Archaeology. American Antiquity
XIII/4, 29-50.
McClelland, D. 1990.A maritime passage from Moche to Chimu. In: Moseley, ME, Cordy
- Collins, A. (eds)., Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, M, Moseley, ME. (organizers). The
Northern dynasties: kingship and statecraft in Chimor: a symposium at Dumbarton

12

�Oaks, 12th and 13th October 1985. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research
Library and Collection.
McGrail, S., 1985. Towards a classification of water transport: World Archaeology,Vol
16. Issue 3: 298-303
Ortiz, J., 2003. Navegación en la Zona Sur Andina:Derroteros de la Mar del Sur.N˚11:
123-135.
Ortiz, J., 2006. Tecnología de exportación. Gaceta Cultural del Perú 22, 12-13.
Paez, R., 1986. Balsas de cuero de lobo en la segunda mitad del Siglo XIX:
Antecedentes cuantitativos para el norte de Chile.RevistaChungara N˚ 16-17:412-418.
Ravines, R., 1980. Chanchán: metrópoli Chimú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos:
Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica Industrial y de Normas Técnicas.
Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, M., 1981. Recursos naturales renovables y pesca,
siglos XVI y XVII. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, M., 1989. Costa peruana prehispánica. Lima: Instituto
de Estudios Peruanos.
Rostworowski, M., 1999. Intercambio Prehispánico del Spondylus. In: Cordy-Collins, A.,
Rostworowski, A., Hocquenghem, A., Pillsbury, J. 1999. Spondylus: ofrenda sagrada y
símbolo de paz. Lima: Fundación Telefónica, Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco
Herrera.
Rowe. J.,1946. Absolute Chronology in the Andean Area.American Antiquity. Vol 10:
265-284
Shady, R., et al. 2003a. Los orígenes de la civilización en el Perú: el áreaNorcentral y el
Valle de Supe durante el Arcaico Tardio. In: Shady, R., Leyva, C. (eds). La Ciudad
Sagrada de Caral – Supe: Los orígenes y la formación del Estado Prístino en el Antiguo
Perú. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Cultura – Proyecto Especial ArqueológicoCaral –
Supe: 93-100
Shady, R., 2003b. El sustento económico del surgimiento de la civilización en el Perú.
In: Shady, R. and Leyva, C. (eds). La Ciudad Sagrada de Caral – Supe: Los orígenes y
la formación del Estado Prístino en el Antiguo Perú. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Cultura
– Proyecto Especial ArqueológicoCaral – Supe:101-106
13

�Shimada, I.,1994. Pampa Grande and the MochicaCulture.Austin: University of Texas
Press
Valdivia, L., 1974. Pesca de arrastre con balsas en playa de Arica. RevistaChungara N˚
4:55-60.
Biography
Carlos Ausejo is an archaeologist specialized in underwater archaeology, since 2006
he has taken part on several underwater Archaeology Projects in Peru. In 2009 he
finished his degree in Maritime Archaeology at University College London, and in 2010,
with other colleagues he founded the “Centro Peruano de ArqueologíaMarítima y
Subacuática” (CPAMS). He is currently working as general manager at Hatunqucha, a
CRM company that specializes in underwater and public archaeology, and also as
Director at the (CPAMS), and part time professor in archaeology at the Pontificia
Universidad Católica del Perú.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="17">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="60">
                  <text>Session 14: Pre-Hispanic Navigation </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="61">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 14 Chair Carlos Ausejo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="62">
                  <text>Navigation was not unknown in the Americas, at the Spaniards arrival different kind of vessel were in use both in the Pacific and the Atlantic shores, as well as in lakes or rivers. Canoe, reed rafts, balsa log raft and others skin based watercraft have been described mainly on historical records and gave us an idea of this technologies. Although it is clear that long and short distance maritime trade routes were in use and watercraft were also involve in war activities and other maritime activities, archaeological evidence related with actual boats has been elusive to find. Still some of these traditions have survived time and in use with some changes and others were incorporated to European navigation traditions.&#13;
During the last decades an increasing interest among researchers in addition to new and different approaches from a broad spectrum of perspectives, including archaeology, history, ethnohistory and ethnography, has brought new and better understanding about these technologies. In spite of this, venues of dialogue to present and discuss about these traditions has been practically inexistent.&#13;
The aim of this session is to show research advances on this topic mainly in the Pacific shores and inland waters through different perspectives up to the Spanish arrival. It will focus primarily in the Andean and Mesoamerican region, however other regions would be accepted. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="63">
                  <text>Carlos Ausejo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="554">
                <text>Pre-Hispanic Navigation in the Andean Region</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="555">
                <text>Offshore and inland waters in the Andean region were crossed by boats of various types made of different materials. These were related mainly to fishing activities, but also were involvedin long-distance trade of luxury goods, rituals, passengers and even war.Construction technologies and development of these vessels varied depending on available resources and the capacity of societies to solve navigational problems. In that sense a variety of types and forms of vessels have been identified, and although not all boats are "complex" as the Europeans, it is clear that they evolve and had changes over time that perfected them.Despite this plentiful of technologies, the archaeological record of actual watercraft is almost nonexistent. As a result the approach to these technologies is through other evidence as the iconography fund on pottery, textiles and wall friezes, as well as sculptural referencesnot to mentionreferences recorded by Spanish chroniclers and ultimatelypost- Conquest survivals.The aim of this paper is to recount these technologies through indirect evidence and elaborate some hypotheses about the use and success of the same in the pre -Hispanic Andean world and its survival after the conquest.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="556">
                <text>Carlos Ausejo, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="557">
                <text>5/16/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="8">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 14 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="581" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="372">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/167845435431d0e11a9c6cfcbce5c821.pdf</src>
        <authentication>35043b80c0f8652a8ab01976aed09ee7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6409">
                    <text>Prehistoric Community, Maritime Interaction, and the Development of Southeast Asian
Shipbuilding: A Case Study from Material Cultures Discovered in Thailand
Sira Ploymukda1
1

Center of Maritime Archaeology, University of Southampton, UK.

Corresponding Author - sp2u14@soton.ac.uk

ABSTRACT
Southeast Asian people have been involved in maritime interaction since prehistoric times. Although Neolithic
archaeology in mainland Southeast Asia revealed that people might have sailed in open seas for marine resource
gathering, second century Before Common Era (BCE) watercrafts were considered the oldest empirical evidence of
sailing in the Thai-Malay peninsula. Elsewhere in the Bronze-Iron Age of Southeast Asia, there was an adoption of
bronze-iron production technology. This was confirmed by the presence of bronze drum crucibles from Nong Nong
Hor, Thailand, and the geographical distribution of third century BCE iron smelting sites in northern Thailand.
Shipwrecks made from local and foreign building techniques dating back to approximately the second century BCE
have been found in the Thai-Malay peninsula.
This research is designed to provide supported evidence with regards to the approach that, apart from an intensive
cross-continent maritime interaction in the early stages, by integrating technologies, cultures, and materials of
prehistoric communities played an important role in the development of Southeast Asian shipbuilding. To achieve
the research question, boats, boat burials, dugout coffins, bronze-iron tools, and material culture from bronze-iron
production sites, as well as ethnographic research in Southeast Asia, have been accounted for. As a result, the study
confirms Southeast Asian people were skilled craft specialists as they made use of simple metal implements for their
carpenter work. Further, insights in either boatbuilding or bronze and iron production also yield an understanding of
relevant factors of cultural development within the Thai-Malay peninsula.
Keywords: Southeast Asian shipbuilding, Shipwright tools, Iron-bronze age, Traceology

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
PKK
Pak Khlong Kluay
KSK
Khao Sam Khaew
PKT
Phu Khao Thong
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: A sample image of preserved identification at the Pak Khlong Kluay Shipwreck

1. INTRODUCTION
In Southeast Asian waters, archaeological research at the Kok Phanom Di and Nong Nor sites revealed a
large number of marine resources during the Neolithic period at around 4,500 BP (Higham 2004, 42).
Linguistic studies by diffusionism point out that the massive cross-ocean migration of Neolithic people
who speak Austro-Asiatic and Austronesian languages into mainland Southeast Asia was done using
watercraft (Bellwood 2004, 29). However, it can be argued that at this moment, there is no empirical
evidence of a pre-Metal Age Southeast Asian ship older than around the second century BCE (Ploymukda
2020, 57). Moreover, the development of Southeast Asian shipbuilding has usually been linked to
maritime contacts when the region played an important role in establishing maritime trade networks
(Kimura 2022, 99). Although ancient port sites in the Thai-Malay peninsula have developed within this
1

�period, as well as the presence of shipwrecks dated to the second century BCE (Ploymukda 2020, 57;
Bellwood et al. 2007, 16; Kimura 2022, 98), questions can be proposed, such as what factors should be
counted as major considerations in Southeast Asian shipbuilding development. This paper intends to
expand an understanding of how metal tools contributed to the development of Southeast Asian
shipbuilding technology during the transition from prehistoric to historical periods.

2. METHODOLOGY
This paper concerns the integration of multi-disciplinary subjects in maritime archaeology. First,
mainland Southeast Asian archaeological records and publications during the metal period and early-stage
settlement at around the second century BCE had been assessed, and historical archives were reviewed.
Secondly, an investigation into ethnographic resources provides many aspects of shipbuilding sequences
and tools among people who can be traced back through their language use and their unique sea trail
culture through time. Furthermore, a comparative study between samples of actual tools recovered from
ancient port sites and the traceology of tools from shipwrecks has been done simultaneously. Traceology,
the study of preserved tool marks from shipwrecks, wood, and timber, might provide insights into the
measurements of the marks, angle of marks, direction of marks, and depth of marks (Maragoudaki 2017,
236). The discipline aids archaeologists in identifying or reconstructing types, dimensions, and functions
of shipwrecks (Maragoudaki and Kavvouras 2012, 205-207). However, this paper presents only reviews
of specific sites and time scales from the Metal Age to early-stage settlement within the Thai-Malay
peninsula. The results from traceology will be confined to the basics such as shapes, dimensions, and
functions. The results beyond these points will be mentioned in the future, as the research is still being
developed at this moment.

3. RESULTS
3.1 Southeast Asian shipbuilding from prehistoric-protohistoric communities
In northern Vietnam, a fifth century BCE (Before the Common Era) Vietkhe boat-shaped coffin has been
discovered. The coffins and associated finds revealed a link between the coffin and the Dongson culture
(Van Liem 2007, 117- 119). Moreover, the Dongxa boat burial also in Northern Vietnam illustrated the
recycling of the dugout boat by turning the actual boat into a coffin. Significantly, a boat dated to 200
BCE represents the use of a mortise and tenon joint with a peg at its’ gunwale edge (Bellwood et al. 2007,
16- 17).
Another example of pegged mortise and tenon can be found in the second century BCE planked boat
discovered in 2019 at the Pak Khlong Kluay (PKK) site in Ranong province, Thailand. The boat has been
found near the ancient port site called Phu Khao Thong (Ploymukda 2020, 42; Kimura 2022, 100). Both
the port site and the ship shared the same chronological order. The ship featured 10cm width x 24cm
height x 2cm thickness tenons with 2- 2.5cm diameter pegs. Moreover, wood identification revealed that
all ship components have been made from Southeast Asian wood species (Ploymukda 2020, 49-50).
Despite the idea of wood jointing by mortise and tenon, as can be seen from the Han Dynasty architecture
in China (Jiao 2007, 1021-1022), the mortise and tenons do not show the exact same characters compared
to the boat joints (Bellwood et al. 2007, 19).
2

�The PKK joinery seems completely matched to the technique in various shipwrecks in the Mediterranean
region as well as the Han dynasty boat in at Wei River in Shaanxi, China (Shaanxi Academy of
Archeology 2015, 3). The joinery and tools have been depicted in terrestrial sites, for example, the Tomb
Ti Saqqara dated to the twenty-fifth – twenty-fourth century BCE in Egypt (McGrail 2015, 4-5), the
Khufu I boat burial deck house (Cheops), (Lipke 1984, 106; McGrail 2015, 5; Ward 2004, 14), The
Mersa/Wadi Gawasis timber from around the nineteenth century BCE, (Ward and Zazzaro 2010, 27), in
Egypt. Moreover, the fourteenth century BCE Uluburun shipwreck has a pegged mortise and tenon
technique adopted for its plank fastening (Bass 1986, 270; Pulak 2012, 870). This technique in the
Mediterranean lasted until around the seventh century CE and was used in many shipwrecks. For
example, Kyrenia (fourth century BCE) (Katzev and Swiny 2019, 8), Ma’agan Mikhael (fifth century
CE), (Kahanov, Doherty, and Shalev 1999, 277-278), and Yassi Ada (seventh century CE) (Bass and Van
Doorninck 1982, 4).
3.2 Tools from boat-shaped log coffin cultures
In Mae Hongson, Thailand, boat-shaped log coffin culture and carpenter tools left marks in the shape of
axes, adze, chisels, and picks (Shoocongdej 2014, 88) have been discovered within the site of a fifth
century BCE – first century CE (Wannasri, Pumijumnong, and Shoocongdej 2007, 11-13; Gorman 1970,
93). These tools may have belonged to the people of log coffin culture who specialized either in
woodworking skill or tool handling ability (Shoocongdej 2014, 75), as the coffins had been decorated by
curving technique into animal figures (Anantawetayanon 1987, 53). They were produced by wrought iron
that had been smelted by the direct smelting technique (Shoocongdej 2014, 90). Moreover, within the area
of 50 km from where the boat-shaped log coffin culture settled, a massive cluster of 50 iron smelting sites
were condensed at Li- Ban Hong Basin, Lamphun (Sukkasem 2022, 16). These sites consist of furnace
constructions, waste smelting slags from the direct smelting process, and iron ores, which can be dated
back to the third century BCE (Sukkasem 2022, 16). Another 230 BCE boat-shaped log coffin and iron
implements had been detected inside the Ong Ba cave (Sorensen 1973, 138; Anantawetayanon 1987, 33).
Iron implements have been found in the shape of an ax, adze, chisel, hack, and pick (Sorensen 1973, 159 163). Significantly, a fragment of the Heger type 1 Dongson drum has been found within the cave, which
shows the possibility of either local bronze production (Sorensen 1973, 168), or internal contact within
Southeast Asia. Even though Dongson’s iconic drums can be found across the region, some types of
Dongson drums have been made locally. The crucible from the Non Nong Hor archaeological site
matches perfectly with the actual drum found in the same area. These findings pointed out that
commodities and metal production technology were transferred during the Bronze - Iron Age at around
the third century BCE within Southeast Asia (Sanguanwong 2021, 48).
3.3 Tools from ancient port sites
In 200 BCE, at the Khao Sam Kaew ancient port site in Chumphon, Thailand (Pryce, Bellina-Pryce, and
Bennett 2006, 297), iron smiting slags were recovered from the excavation alongside 60 tools (Biggs et al.
2013, 312). The multiple shapes of Khao Sam Kaew’s tools made from iron and bronze implements
consist of an axe, an adze, and a pick (Pryce, Bellina-Pryce, and Bennett 2006, 298 - 300). An in-depth
study of the tool’s chemical identity reveals that the tools were made from direct smelting processes; thus,
the tools might have been smitten at the site (Biggs et al. 2013, 326). It is important to note that at both
the Khao Sam Khaew (KSK) and Khaosek sites, there have been fragments of bronze drums found within

3

�these ancient port sites (Pryce and Bellina-Pryce, 2017, 2; Pryce, Bellina-Pryce and Bennett 2006, 303 –
304; Murillo-Barroso et al. 2010, 1765).
At the Phukhao Thong archaeological complex, a cluster of archaeological sites was identified as an
ancient second-century BCE port site (Chaisuwan and Naiyawat 2009, 129 – 139; Kangked 2009, 126).
The excavations revealed the mixing of local artifacts with foreign artifacts from India, Persia, and China
(Kangked 2009, 49 – 50; Chaisuwan and Naiyawat 2009, 107). Apart from iron implements made from
the direct smelting process, a nail has been recovered from the sites that were chemically analyzed. The
result shows that the nail has been made of the supplied iron smelted in an indirect process (Biggs et al.
2013, 326). In the Khao Ta Plai (KTP) hinterland port site, the excavations reveal multiple periods of
human occupation from 13,000 BP (Before the Present) to 2,230 BP (Bowonsachoti 2023, 53). The site
consisted of numerous imported artefacts such as glass beads, stone beads, potteries, and iron implements
in the shape of a chisel, knife, and pick (Bowonsachoti 2023, 4).
3.4 Sea Gypsies, boats, and tools
Ethnographic research from living sea people, or sea gypsies, in this case referred to Moken, Moklen, and
Urak Lawoi. Although they are people who live and spend most of their life at sea, they have their own
culture, beliefs, lifestyle, and wisdom (Arunotai et al. 2006, 1-2). The significance of these sea gypsies
has been confirmed by tracing their language, as they speak a branch of Austronesian and Austro-Asiatic
language (Dancause et al. 2009, 86). Moklen’s boat (Kabang boat) is characterised by a distinctive
notched bow and stern (Ivanoff and Bountry 2017; Hogan 1972, 222-223). The Moken made use of
simple tools for boat building. The axe is one of the most multi-purpose tools, as it has been used for
cutting trees, felling trees, splitting logs, plank shaping, and clearing pathways. Adze has been used for
dugouts and shaping the timber by removing any waste or excess from the middle of the canoe. Notably, a
side-folded adze has been used for trimming or smoothing the timber in the final phase of building.
Although the Moken made use of measuring sticks and measuring lines, they invented their measuring
system based on their body parts. For instance, arms, fingers, and the height of the body. Moreover, they
also use tree leaves as an indicator for the log roasting process (Na Pompetch, Arunotai, and Bantaotook
2006, 17-29). To sum up, ethnography illustrated a clear vision of the process of boatbuilding and
provided beneficial insights into the shipwright tool kit of the Thai-Malay peninsula.
3.5 Traceology of preserved marks
At this stage of the research, the paper discusses preserved marks from one shipwreck, which is the PKK
shipwreck. These marks provided rough details of tools as they depicted blade shapes, blade
measurements, angles, dimensions, and locations (Maragoudaki and Kavvouras 2012, 200; Maragoudaki
2017, 239).
3.5.1 Pak Khlong Kluay shipwreck
Adze marks featured a flat 4-5 cm, blade width and 0.5 mm depth. The angle of mark is remarkably
noticeably less than ten degrees; this points out that the handling position of adzes is almost aligned
side-by-side with the timber, which can be deduced that adzes function as the tool for smoothening in the
finishing stage of building (See Figure 1 PKK1-2M5). Turning to the mark of the chisel, two different
sizes of flat shape with 1 cm and 2 cm blade marks have been recorded. The marks showed that the tools
had been handled vertically while the boat was built, as they left a 90-degree angle mark with 1.5-2 mm.
4

�depth of the wood. The function of a chisel with a narrow blade (1 cm) is to cut across the wood grain.
For example, mortises require cutting deep holes (See Figure 1 PKK1-2M7). The wider chisel (2 cm) may
function as a shaping tool or digging tool (See Figure 1 PKK1-2M2). Marks from gouges with a 5 – 1 cm
blade have been detected around the peg holes (See Figure 1 PKK1-2M6). They have been specifically
designed for hole-cutting purposes, as the trace showed gouge marks settled around only the rim of the
peg hole.

Figure 1: A sample image of preserved mark identification at the Pak Khlong Kluay Shipwreck, Thailand

4. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY
The paper raised the possibility of Southeast Asian shipbuilding development, which, although it could
develop within the time period when Southeast Asians adopted iron production technology from either
India or China through maritime contact. The integration of local and foreign technology through
maritime exchanges should be included as a major consideration that pushed Southeast Asia to become a
more complex society. This can be seen for many reasons, as follows: First, tools made of iron from the
direct smelting technique were discovered within mainland Southeast Asia, showing that the production
technique was considered comparable with an Indian iron smelting technique and an early-stage Chinese
iron smelting tradition (Higham 2014, 198).

5

�However, the nail from the Phu Khao Thong (PKT) site has probably been linked to Chinese indirect
smelting technology (Biggs et al. 2013, 326). Secondly, due to a lack of evidence on the development
stage of bronze production in Southeast Asia, the bronze product showed a significantly high level of
complexity at the beginning, which is considered an obvious indicator of an adoption of matured
technology from China (Higham et al. 2011, 264). Throughout Southeast Asia, both bronze artefacts and
their technology probably have been transferred, as bronze drums were distributed within the region.
Simultaneously, bronze production in Thailand has been confirmed by crucibles from the Non Nonghor
site in northeast Thailand (Sanguanwong 2021, 48). Furthermore, since the third century BCE, several
iron production sites have been reported to exist within Thailand, such as the Mae-Lan, and Lamphun
sites (Sukkasem 2022, 16). This can be roughly as follows: at least during the fifth century BCE, iron
production technology has been adopted, regardless of its origins. Iron implements, boat burials, and
boat-shaped coffins from log coffin cultures illustrate that the craft specialisation of highland people have
been done by using just simple carpenter tools as coffin decorations but showing high woodworking
quality (Shoocongdej 2014, 75). This means that iron implements have been widely built and used by
prehistoric people in Southeast Asia for a long period of time, since at least the third century BCE. The
proposal can be drawn that the development of bronze and iron production in Southeast Asia occurred a
bit before or at the same time when the region fully stepped into the rich transoceanic exchange network
since the second century BCE, as evidenced by the many ancient port sites found during this period
(Pryce, Bellina-Pryce, and Bennett 2006; Chaisuwan and Naiyawat 2009; Bowonsachoti 2023; Kangked
2009). Somehow, foreign mortise and tenon shipbuilding techniques from the Dong Xa boat burial and
PKK shipwreck have been considered indicators for maritime exchanges (Kimura 2022, 100). Wood
identification pointed out that these ships have been constructed from Southeast Asian wood species
(Ploymukda 2020, 42). This can be implied that Southeast Asian people integrated new imported boat
building technology with simple tools and materials that had been taken locally, as they not only made use
of watercrafts but were skilled carpenters and boat builders. The traceology from shipwrecks revealed that
simple tool kits in the shape of an axe, adze, chisel, and gouge have been used in various shipbuilding
sequences. This also supports the proposal for the development of shipbuilding technology within the
region that there is no requirement for the use of advanced tools for shipbuilding technology in the early
stages of Southeast Asia, as these simple tool kits adequately provide practical functions to serve either
locally developed or adopted shipbuilding technology in cases of dugouts, and mortise and tenon. This
can be seen from the similarity of the tool shapes that have been observed at different archaeological sites
across the region. Furthermore, ethnography provided a reasonable perception of the tool’s function as it
points out that sea people made use of simple tools for their boat building (Ivanoff and Bountry 2017; Na
Pompetch, Arunotai, and Bantaotook 2006, 17-18). This might indicate the integration of cultures,
wisdom, insights, materials, and technologies of people who settled in mainland Southeast Asia during
the early stages of settlement.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anantawetayanon, Surasak. “A Typology Study of Dugout Canoe Discovered In Tham Lod, Soppong District, Muang, Mae Hong
Son Province.” Bangkok: Silpakorn University, 1987. (In Thai)
Arunotai, Narumon, Paladej Na-Pompetch, A Farther, and Jirawan Bantaotook. “Moken: Way of Life.” Bangkok, 2006.
www.andaman.cusri.chula.ac.th.

6

�Arunotai, Narumon, Paladej Na-Pompetch, and Jirawan Bantaotook. Toyting Project: Document No. 1. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Bangkok:
SAC, 2013.
Bass, F, George. “A Bronze Age Shipwreck at Ulu Burun (Kaş): 1984 Campaign.” American Journal of Archaeology 90, 3
(1986): 269–96.
Bass, George Fletcher. and Frederick H. Van Doorninck. Yassi Ada. Institute of Nautical Archaeology: Texas A &amp; M University
Press, 1982.
Bellwood, Peter. “The Origins and Dispersals of Agricultural Communities in Southeast Asia.” In Southeast Asia from Prehistory
to History, edited by Ian Glover and Peter Bellwood, 20–40, 2004.
Bellwood, Peter, Judith Cameron, Nguyen Van Viet, and Bui Van Liem. “Ancient Boats, Boat Timbers, and Locked
Mortise-and-Tenon Joints from Bronze/Iron-Age Northern Vietnam.” International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 36, 1
(2007): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.2006.00128.x.
Biggs, Lynn, Bérénice Bellina, Marcos Martinón-Torres, and Thomas Oliver Pryce. “Prehistoric Iron Production Technologies in
the Upper Thai-Malay Peninsula: Metallography and Slag Inclusion Analyses of Iron Artefacts from Khao Sam Kaeo and Phu
Khao Thong.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 5, 4 (2013): 311–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-012-0115-2.
Bowonsachoti, Jutinach. “Cave Dweller at Khao Ta Phlai, the Hinterland Site: Their Communication to People of Coastal Areas
in the Thai-Malay Peninsula.” NakornSrithammarat, 2023.
Chaisuwan, Boonyarit, and Rarai Naiyawat. Thung Tuk: A Settlement Linking Together the Maritime Silk Route. 1st ed.
Songkhla: Trio Creation, 2009. (In Thai)
Dancause, Kelsey Needham, Chim W. Chan, Narumon Hinshiranan Arunotai, and J. Koji Lum. “Origins of the Moken Sea
Gypsies Inferred from Mitochondrial Hypervariable Region and Whole Genome Sequences.” Journal of Human Genetics 54, 2
(2009): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2008.12.
Gorman, Chester F. “Excavations at Spirit Cave, North Thailand: Some Interim Interpretations.” Asian Perspectives Vol. 13 (1970).
https://about.jstor.org/terms.
Higham, Charles. “Mailand Southeast Asia from the Neolithic to the Iron Age.” In Southeast Asia from Prehistory to History,
edited by Ian Glover and Peter Bellwood, 41–87. Oxford: Routledge, 2004.
———.. Early Mainland Southeast Asia. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Bangkok: River Books, 2014.
Higham, Charles, Thomas Higham, Roberto Ciarla, Katerina Douka, Amphan Kijngam, and Fiorella Rispoli. “The Origins of the
Bronze Age of Southeast Asia.” Journal of World Prehistory 24, 4 (2011): 227–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10963-01.
Hogan, David W. Men of The Sea: Coastal Tribes of South Thailand’s West Coast. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Bangkok: Siam Society, 1972.
Ivanoff, Jaques, and Maxime Bountry. “Moken Sea-Gypsies.”, 2017.
Jiao, Jiu J. “A 5,600-Year-Old Wooden Well in Zhejiang Province, China.” Hydrogeology Journal 15, 5 (2007): 1021–29.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0157-6.
Kahanov, Yaacov, Chris Doherty, and Sariel Shalev. “Technical Communication: The Metal Nails from the Ma’agan Mikhael
Ship.” The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 28 (1999): 277–88.
Kangked, Narumol. “The Ornaments Discovered at Phu Khao Thong Thong Archaeological Sites and Vicinities in, Ranong Provi
Nce.” Master of Arts, Bangkok: Silpakorn University, 2009.
Katzev, Womer, Susan, and Wylde, Helena Swiny. The Kyrenia Ship Final Excavation Report, Volume I: History of the
Excavation, Amphoras, Pottery and Coins As Evidence of Dating. Oxbow Books, 2009.
Kimura, Jun. “Archaeological Evidence of Shipping and Shipbuilding Along The Maritime Silk Road.” In The Maritime Silk
Road: Global Connectivities, Regional Nodes, Localities, edited by Franck Billé, S. Mehendale, and J. W. Lankton, 97–127.
Amsterdam University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722247_ch04.

7

�Liem, Bui Van. “A study of boat-shaped coffins from dongson sites in vietnam.” In The 17th Congress of the Indo-Pacific
Prehistory Association Taipei, Vol. 25, Taiwan, 2007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v25i0.11923.
Lipke, Paul. The Royal Ship of Cheops. edited by R. A Hands and R. D Walker. Vol. 9. Greenwich: Bar, 1984.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves. “Trading ships of the south china sea Shipbuilding Techniques and Their Role in the History of the
Development of Asian Trade Networks” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 36, 3 (1993): 253- 280.
Maragoudaki, Elena, and Panayiotis K Kavvouras. “Mycenaean Shipwright Tool Kit: Its Reconstruction and Evaluation.”
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 4, 3 (2012): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-012-0091-6.
Maragoudaki, Elena. “Shipbuilding Tools from the Bronze Age Boatbuilder to the Traditional Shipwright: Tracing the Evidence
in the Mediterranean Basin.” Egyptian Seafaring 49 (2017): 233–48.
McGrail, S. Early Ships and Seafaring: Water Transport Beyond Europe. Pen &amp; Sword Books Limited, 2015.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aJRICgAAQBAJ.
Murillo-Barroso, Mercedes, Thomas Oliver Pryce, Bérénice Bellina, and Marcos Martinón-Torres. “Khao Sam Kaeo - an
Archaeometallurgical Crossroads for Trans-Asiatic Technological Traditions.” Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 7 (2010):
1761–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.036.
Na Pompetch, Paladej, Naruemon Arunotai, and Jirawan Bantaotook. “Local Wisdom: Moken Boat Building.” Bangkok, 2006. (in
Thai)
Ploymukda, Sira. “Shipwreck of the Ancient Trans-Oceanic Trades from the Andaman Sea.” In Ancient Maritime Cross-Cultural
Exchanges Archaeological Research in Thailand, edited by Amara Srisuchat and Wilfried Giessler, 1st ed, 248–63. Bangkok:
Fine Arts Department, Ministry of Culture, Thailand, 2019.
———. “Pak khlong kluay shipwreck site : evidence-based shipbuilding technology and marine interaction across the andaman
in early history period.” Silpakorn Journal 63, 5 (2020): 43–58. www.finearts.go.th. (In Thai)
Pryce, Thomas Oliver, and Bérénice Bellina-Pryce. “High-Tin Bronze Bowls and Copper Drums: Non-Ferrous
Archaeometallurgical Evidence for Khao Sek’s Involvement and Role in Regional Exchange Systems.” Archaeological Research
in Asia 13 (2017): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2017.07.002ï.
Pryce, Thomas Oliver, Bérénice Bellina-Pryce, and Anna T. N. Bennett. 2006. “The Development of Metal Technologies in the
Upper Thai-Malay Peninsula: Initial Interpretation of the Archaeometallurgical Evidence from Khao Sam Kaeo.” Bulletin de
l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient 93, 1 (2006): 295–315. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.2006.6040.
Pulak, Cemal. “Uluburun Shipwreck.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Bronze Age Aegean, edited by H, Cline Eric, 862–76.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199873609.001.0001.
Sanguanwong, Merika. “Bronze Kettle Brums In The Mekong River Basin.” Silpakorn Journal 64, 2 (2021): 48–57. (In Thai)
Shaanxi Academy of Archeology. (2015). An ancient ship unearthed from the ruins of the Beiwei Bridge in Hanchang’an City,
Xi’an. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. (In Chinese)
Shoocongdej, Rasmi. “Craft-Specialization in Iron Age Log Coffin Culture on Highland Pang Mapha District, Mae Hong Son
Province.” Damrong Journal 13, 1 (2014): 73–106.
Solheim, Wilhelm G. 1964. “Further Relationships of the Sa-Huỳnh-Kalanay Pottery Tradition.” Asian Perspectives. Vol. 8
(1964).
Sorensen, P. “Prehistoric Iron Implements from Thailand.” Asian Perspectives 16, 2 (1973): 134–73.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/42927805.
Sukkasem, Yoddanai. “Ban Mae Lan Ancient Smeltery: Latest Discovery of Lanna Land’s Metallurgical Site in Early Iron Age.”
Silpakorn Journal 65, 2 (2022): 5–18. (In Thai)

8

�Wannasri, Sineenart, Nathtuda Pumijumnong, and Rasmi Shoocongdej. “Teak Log Coffin Head Styles in Northern Thailand:
Time Sequencing with Dendrochronology.” Science Asia 33, 1 (2007): 47–56.
https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2007.33.047.
Ward, Cheryl. “Boatbuilding in Ancient Egypt.” The Philosophy of Shipbuilding, (2004): 12–24.
Ward, Cheryl, and Chiara Zazzaro. “Evidence for Pharaonic Seagoing Ships at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis, Egypt.” International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology 39, 1 (2010): 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.2009.00229.x.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6402">
                <text>Prehistoric Community, Maritime Interaction, and the Development of Southeast Asian&#13;
Shipbuilding: A Case Study from Material Cultures Discovered in Thailand&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6403">
                <text>Southeast Asian people have been involved in maritime interaction since prehistoric times. Although Neolithic&#13;
archaeology in mainland Southeast Asia revealed that people might have sailed in open seas for marine resource&#13;
gathering, second century Before Common Era (BCE) watercrafts were considered the oldest empirical evidence of&#13;
sailing in the Thai-Malay peninsula. Elsewhere in the Bronze-Iron Age of Southeast Asia, there was an adoption of&#13;
bronze-iron production technology. This was confirmed by the presence of bronze drum crucibles from Nong Nong&#13;
Hor, Thailand, and the geographical distribution of third century BCE iron smelting sites in northern Thailand.&#13;
Shipwrecks made from local and foreign building techniques dating back to approximately the second century BCE&#13;
have been found in the Thai-Malay peninsula.&#13;
This research is designed to provide supported evidence with regards to the approach that, apart from an intensive&#13;
cross-continent maritime interaction in the early stages, by integrating technologies, cultures, and materials of&#13;
prehistoric communities played an important role in the development of Southeast Asian shipbuilding. To achieve&#13;
the research question, boats, boat burials, dugout coffins, bronze-iron tools, and material culture from bronze-iron&#13;
production sites, as well as ethnographic research in Southeast Asia, have been accounted for. As a result, the study&#13;
confirms Southeast Asian people were skilled craft specialists as they made use of simple metal implements for their&#13;
carpenter work. Further, insights in either boatbuilding or bronze and iron production also yield an understanding of&#13;
relevant factors of cultural development within the Thai-Malay peninsula.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6404">
                <text>Sira Ploymukda</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6405">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6406">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6407">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6408">
                <text>Ploymukda, Sira . 2023. “Prehistoric community, Maritime Interaction, and the development of Southeast Asian shipbuilding: Case study from material cultures discovered in Thailand.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Bobby C. Orillaneda, and Wijerathne Bohingamuwa. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1952 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="64">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 8 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="548" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="339">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/da154ba2b3e3912f4f06212f4c3ace65.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4a25e1d4ec099176701fde633d4ccf0e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6127">
                    <text>Preliminary analysis of the early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of
the pre-colonial Philippines, c.1400 – c.1600
NM Austero1,2, BC Orillaneda1, LM Neri2
1
2

Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Division, National Museum of the Philippines
School of Archaeology, University of the Philippines, Diliman

ABSTRACT
This study presents seven early handheld guns also known as “handgonnes” or hand cannons recovered from
shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines. In this paper, three guns HHG-001, HHG-002, and
HHG-003, feature shorter and stubby barrels with prominent reinforced sections, bulbous breech regions, and
flared muzzles. The flared muzzles of these guns are typical of a blunderbuss type and or dart-firing guns of the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The remaining handheld guns HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and
HHG-007, on the other hand, are tapered gun barrels without prominent reinforcement rings, and unflared
muzzles that are probably designed for a single bullet and long-range firing. The smallest unflared muzzle gun
HHG-005 measures only 39.1 cm long with a 1.31 cm bore diameter. While HHG-007 is the heaviest with a
prominently thick gun barrel probably designed to withstand more powder charges.
Compositional analysis using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy showed that most of these guns were
made of leaded tin bronze alloys. Comprised mainly of 37.77% to 83.57% copper, 3.11% to 22.41% tin, and
0.87% to 47.72% lead with other trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, nickel, and manganese, among
others. The discovery of these guns in various merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and
Lena Shoal shipwrecks is clear evidence of their use by the early seafaring merchants. The use of pXRF also
revealed traces of possible black powder elements such as sulphur and potassium thereby suggesting the actual
usage of these guns that warrants further investigation. Despite their size and offensive functions against pirates
and crews of enemy ships, firing them would have been intimidating.
Keywords: Seagoing firearms, handheld guns
Lists of Figures
Figure 1. Early handheld guns with flared muzzles.
Figure 2. Early handheld guns with unflared muzzles.
Lists of Tables
Table 1. Early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines with
their gun lengths and bore diameters.
Table 2. Percent composition of major and minor elements of the seven early handheld guns using portable
X-Ray Fluorescence analysis.

INTRODUCTION
Small artillery pieces are among the few of the vast number of archaeological materials discovered
from most of the maritime and underwater sites in the Philippines. The archaeological excavation of
the San Diego shipwreck in Fortune Island, Batangas for example, yielded thousands of lead musket
balls, along with a few corroded iron pieces, barrels of rifles, harquebuses, and spring shots
(Reverseau 1996; Alba et al. 1993; Alvarez 1992; Conese 1992; Cuevas 1992). San Diego was a
Manila galleon sunk by the Dutch ship Mauritius during their naval battle on December 14, 1600.
Interestingly, historical accounts have mentioned the vessel’s long-range, large artillery became
inconsequential as the fighting occurred onboard using hand-to-hand combat, thereby employing small
firearms such as harquebuses and rifles along with the other handheld weapons (Desroches et al.

1

�1996). Several projectiles and small caliber firearms were also discovered in other shipwreck sites in
the country.
These early handheld guns served as pieces of evidence that provide insights into how these firearms
were possibly manufactured and used onboard the merchant vessels plying the seas during the
pre-colonial period of the Philippines. The case studies discussed here include significant guns from
the Pandanan, Lena Shoal, and Santa Cruz shipwrecks. First is a bronze early handheld gun from the
Pandanan shipwreck, a middle to late fifteenth century Southeast Asian merchant vessel (see
Orillaneda 2016a, 2016b; Tanaka and Dizon 2011; Dizon 1996, 1994; Peralta 1996; Cuevas 1995;
Alba 1995). Second, are five early handheld guns, recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck, a
possible Chinese-Southeast Asian hybrid junk that sank around 1490 off the island of Busuanga in the
Philippines (see Orillaneda 2016a; Dizon 2003; Conese 1997; Goddio 2000; Lopez-Martin 2002). The
third and final is a bronze early handheld gun from the Santa Cruz shipwreck, a possible late fifteenth
to early sixteenth century hybrid ship of the South China Sea Shipbuilding Tradition (see Orillaneda
2016a, 2016b, 2012, 2008).
In this study, compositional analysis using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (pXRF) aimed
to reveal the materials used in manufacturing these guns. Moreover, the discovery of these guns on
board merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and Lena Shoal shipwrecks suggests
their usage by early seafaring merchants. Hence, the use of pXRF also aimed to determine possible
evidence of their usage.

METHODOLOGY
Seven early handheld guns were measured to determine length, width, diameters, and calibers:
HHG-001, HHG-002, HHG-003, HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and HHG-007. The gun length was
measured with rulers, tape measures, and a digital caliper (Fujiwara) with a nominal accuracy of ±
0.01 mm. The terms hand cannon and hand gonne and sometimes handgonnes or handguns are already
used interchangeably in the past referring to the early small-caliber handheld guns (e.g. Peralta 1996).
To avoid confusion, the abbreviation HHG for “handheld guns” were used to code each artifact from
HHG-001 to HHG-007.
X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Analysis
The composition analysis of the early handheld guns was conducted using portable X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectroscopy (pXRF) of Olympus Vanta C Series Philippines with rhodium and tungsten
anodes at 50 KeV. The analysis was conducted at the Lithics Laboratory of the University of the
Philippines School of Archaeology (UPSA). For guns, HHG-001, HHG-002, and HHG-003, the
data/spectra were recorded for approximately 180 s directly at the surfaces of the tiller, bulbous region,
barrel, and muzzle. For guns HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and HHG-007, the spectra were also
recorded for approximately 180 s on the surfaces of the tiller, the reinforcement region, the barrel, and
the muzzle. Additionally, spectra were also recorded for approximately 180 s on the surfaces of the
touch holes, handles, sights, and 5th reinforcement rings for all the guns where applicable.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This paper presents the early handheld guns recovered from the Pandanan, Lena Shoal, and Santa Cruz
shipwrecks as shown in Table 1. These guns were categorized into two groups based on their possible
usage: 1) close-range guns – these guns feature shorter and stubby barrels with prominent reinforced
sections, bulbous breech, and flared muzzle regions, including HHG-001, HHG-002, and HHG-003;
and, 2) long-range guns – these guns feature relatively longer and tapered gun barrels without
prominent reinforcement rings, and unflared muzzles probably designed for a single bullet and
long-range firing, including HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and HHG-007.

2

�Table 1. Early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the
pre-colonial Philippines with gun lengths and bore diameters.
Gun lengths (cm)

Sample
Code

Shipwreck Site

HHG-001

Pandanan Shoal

HHG-002
HHG-003

Bore Diameter (cm)
Barrel

Chamber

Tiller

Total

2.37

19.3

5.2

2.6

27.1

Lena Shoal

2.51

20.9

7.6

4.8

33.3

Lena Shoal

3.26

20.8

5.4

9.2

35.4

2.33

40.2

12.7

8.2

61.1

9.0

4.1

39.1

3.2

64.8

3.9

60.7

Lena Shoal
HHG-004
Len
HHG-005

Lena Shoal

1.31

26.0

HHG-006

Santa Cruz

2.08

45.2

16.4
Len
HHG-007

Lena Shoal

2.78

40.4

16.4

Descriptions of the Guns
Early Handheld Gun No. 1 (HHG-001)
Recovered from the Pandanan shipwreck, this gun (Fig. 1, left) was thought to belong to small caliber
cannons such as the lantakas and rentakas among others as most of its features are typical of the early
handheld guns (Peralta 1996). The gun is about 27.1 cm long with a 2.37 cm bore diameter with
prominent reinforcement rings. The tiller at the rear end is approximately 2.6 cm in length with only
about 1.2 cm deep socket. This is too shallow to hold the tiller firmly without falling off, suggesting
the gun was probably stocked-mounted (Peralta 1996). Wooden tillers, however, were mostly secured
by iron straps or slotted into the end of the breech (Lepage 2005). Houston and Stroyan (2014) also
described a similar hand cannon fired with a trestle-like stand. In that case, the tiller no longer needed
to carry the entire weight of the gun; instead, it served as a handle when the cannon tube became too
hot to hold after firing several shots (Lepage 2005). The flared muzzle of the gun is also indicative of
other small caliber cannons such as a blunderbuss type and or dart-firing guns of the fourteenth and
fifteenth centuries CE (Lopez-Martin 2002; Peralta 1996; Powell 2010, 1095).
Early Handheld Gun No. 2 (HHG-002)
This gun is approximately 33.3 cm in length with a 2.51 cm bore diameter, recovered from the Lena
Shoal shipwreck (Fig. 1, middle) (Lopez-Martin 2002). Similar to HHG-001, it is a muzzle-loading
gun with prominent wide bands of reinforcement rings from the tiller toward the muzzle (see
Lopez-Martin 2002). Also similar to HHG-001, its flared-shaped muzzle is indicative of dart-firing
guns used from 1464-1496 CE on China’s interior frontiers and in merchant junks against pirate
attacks (Lopez-Martin 2002, Powell 2010, 1095). The rear end is also fixed with a tiller of about 4.8
cm in length with a 2.0 cm deep socket, probably deep enough to hold the wooden tiller attachment
without falling off. In contrast to the HHG-001, however, this gun was also fixed with a “lug” or
handle to add ease in handling and or aiming targets.

3

�Figure 1. Early handheld guns with flared muzzles: HHG-001 (left), recovered from the Pandanan
shipwreck (IV-1993-V-1152), with prominent reinforcement rings and a “lug” probably as the gun’s rear
sight; HHG-002 (middle), recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck (IV-93-H-2901) with prominent
reinforcement rings and a handle; HHG-003 (right), recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck
(IV-93-H-4011) with prominent reinforcement rings.

Early Handheld Gun No. 3 (HHG-003)
This gun is approximately 35.4 cm in length with a 3.26 cm bore diameter and was recovered from the
Lena Shoal shipwreck (Lopez-Martin 2002). Similar to HHG-001 and HHG-002, it is a
muzzle-loading gun with prominent wide bands of reinforcement rings and a flared muzzle (Fig. 1,
right). Flared muzzles of early handheld guns were intended to scatter the shots at close range and to
ease loading (DK Publishing 2006, 247). However, HHG-003’s flared muzzle is narrower compared to
those of the HHG-001, and HHG-002, thereby suggesting this gun is probably more effective when
shot from a distance. Moreover, the rear end is also fixed with a prominent 9.2 cm tiller socket and a
“lug” or handle to add ease in handling and or aiming targets.

4

�Early Handheld Gun No. 4 (HHG-004)
This handheld gun measured about 61.1 cm long with approximately 2.33 cm bore diameter, also
recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck (Fig. 2a) (Goddio 2000). The barrel is slightly tapering
towards the muzzle with a maximum diameter of 3.7 cm and a minimum diameter of 3.1 cm. The vent
or the touch hole is located approximately 19.7 cm centimeters from the rear end with a simple
spherical reinforcement. The stock or tiller socket at the rear end is prominently longer, measuring
about 8.2 cm, suggesting a firm attachment of a wooden tiller. The remains of a possible wooden tiller
can still be seen attached inside the rear end socket proposing that the gun was not stock-mounted.
Early Handheld Gun No. 5 (HHG-005)
This gun was also recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck, measuring about 39.1 cm long with
approximately 1.31 cm bore diameter (Fig. 2b). The barrel is slightly tapering towards the muzzle with
a maximum diameter of 2.0 cm and a minimum diameter of 2.2 cm. The vent or the touch hole is
located approximately 4.2 centimeters from the rear end with a simple leaf-like or diamond shape
design. The stock or tiller socket at the rear end is relatively longer, measuring 4.1 cm also suggesting
a firm attachment of a wooden tiller. A tiny sized-gun can surely be easier to aim and fire.
Early Handheld Gun No. 6 (HHG-006)
The early handheld gun recovered from the Santa Cruz shipwreck is similar to the gun recovered from
the Lena Shoal shipwreck, HHG-004. This gun is the longest, measuring about 64.8 cm long with
approximately 2.08 cm bore diameter (Fig. 2c). The larger barrel is also slightly tapering towards the
muzzle with a maximum diameter of 3.58 cm and a minimum diameter of 2.84 cm. The touch hole is
approximately 3.2 cm centimeters from the rear end with a leaf-like or diamond-shaped reinforcement.
The remains of the tiller socket at the rear end seem to have been broken, measuring only about 3.2
cm. The tiller socket was possibly longer for a firm tiller attachment.
Early Handheld Gun No. 7 (HHG-007)
This gun is the heaviest and largest of all five guns recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck (Fig.
2d). It measures about 60.7 cm long and has a 2.78 cm bore diameter. The gun barrel is relatively
thick, about 1.71 cm, which is probably designed to withstand more powder charges to propel a
relatively bigger caliber bullet. The touch hole is approximately 3.9 cm centimeters from the rear end
with a leaf-like or diamond-shaped reinforcement similar to that of HHG-006. The tiller socket is also
short, suggesting a need for reinforcement straps and or added support stand when firing. A similar
gun of Chinese origin from the fourteenth to fifteenth centuries was also found in the Molucca Sea in
the Dutch Indies (McLachlan 2010).

5

�Figure 2. Early handheld guns with unflared muzzles: HHG-004 (A), recovered from the
shipwreck (IV-93-H-0342) with a tapered gun barrel; HHG-005 (B), recovered from the
shipwreck (IV-93-H-3417) with a tapered gun barrel; HHG-006 (C), recovered from the
shipwreck (III-2001-Z-NA) with a tapered gun barrel; HHG-007 (D), recovered from the
shipwreck (IV-1993-H-NA) with a relatively thick gun barrel and of a higher caliber.

6

Lena Shoal
Lena Shoal
Santa Cruz
Lena Shoal

�X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) Analysis
Results from compositional analysis using pXRF revealed most of these guns were primarily a ternary
alloy of Cu, Pb, and Sn (e.g. Pollard and Liu 2023). Comprised mainly of 37.77 percent to 83.57
percent copper, 3.11 percent to 22.41 percent tin, and 0.87 percent to 47.72 percent lead with other
trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, nickel, and manganese, among others (Table 2). Pollard and
Liu (2023) also noted that the sum of all three metal components of ternary alloys is usually around 98
percent. Our research, however, provided a range between the sums of 94.20 percent to 98.38 percent.

Table 2. Percent composition of major and minor elements of the seven early handheld guns using pXRF.

Percent Composition of Elements (Barrel)
Sample Code

Cu

Sn

Pb

As

Bi

Ni

Mn

OE

0.05

0.01

1.04

0.09

0.03

1.31

0.88

0.09

0.04

0.74

22.41
22.4095
HHG-001

40.71

31.76

0.26
2.89

1.91

22.4095
22.4095

HHG-002

83.57

12.65

0.87

11.31

4.59

0.45
0.59

HHG-003

81.75

0.88

14.70
HHG-004

74.91

8.77

&lt;LOD

0.66

0.06

0.02

0.07

0.02

1.30

&lt;LOD

&lt;LOD

0.01

1.59

&lt;LOD

0.03

0.01

1.59

0.83
HHG-005

HHG-006

HHG-007

77.81

14.31

5.40

37.77

8.71

47.72

47.48

3.11

47.05

0.26

4.20

0.82

Note: Copper (Cu), Tin (Sn), Lead (Pb), Arsenic (As), Bismuth (Bi), Nickel (Ni), Manganese (Mn), and Other Elements (OE).

7

�Interestingly, the use of pXRF also revealed traces of possible black powder elements thereby
suggesting the actual usage of these guns and warranting further investigation into firing guns and
recording residue. Trace amounts of sulphur and potassium were recorded on the surfaces of the
muzzle and tiller of the early handheld gun HHG-001. Traces of sulphur were also recorded on the
surfaces of the touchhole, handle, and muzzle of the early handheld gun HHG-003. These results
further showed the importance of gunpowder and its use in most seagoing firearms (e.g., Kozari and
Vizy 2013; McLachlan 2010; Khan 2004; Andaya 1992). The discovery of the early handheld guns
from the shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines affirms the use of seagoing
firearms. Records on the use of these light guns against pirates and crews of enemy ships were already
known in merchant ships as early as the fourteenth century (Lepage, 2005). Their discovery onboard
various merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and Lena Shoal shipwrecks is clear
evidence of their use by the early seafaring merchants. Despite their size and offensive functions
against pirates and crews of enemy ships, firing them would have been intimidating (McLachlan 2010;
Lepage 2005).

Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the National Museum of the Philippines (NMP) through the Maritime and Underwater Cultural
Heritage Division (MUCHD) and the UP School of Archaeology (UPSA) of the University of the Philippines, Diliman for
their unwavering support for this research. The Department of Science and Technology – Grants-in-Aid Program
(DOST-GIA) for Biak na Bato, Bulacan Project for the portable X-Ray Fluorescence (pXRF) instrument used during the
conduct of this research.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alba L. “Pandanan Underwater Archaeological Project Report. Pandanan Island, Balabak, Palawan. Third Preliminary
Report.” National Museum of the Philippines, (1995):1-6.
Andaya LY. “Interactions with the Outside World and Adaptation in Southeast Asia.” In The Cambridge History of Southeast
Asia from early times to c. 1800, edited by N. Tarling, 345-395. Singapore, Cambridge University, 1992.
Cuevas MA. “Pandanan Island Underwater Archaeological Project: Inspection of a Reported Site.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (1993): 1-12.
“Pandanan Island Underwater Archaeology Project: Second Preliminary Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (1995):1-6.
Dizon EZ. “Status of Philippine Underwater Archaeological Researches from 1989-91: Prospects for 1992.” Bulletin of the
Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology (1992), 16(1): 41-47.
“A Decade of Archaeological Research in the Philippines.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture &amp; Society, (1994),
22(3):197-222.
“The Archaeology of a 15th century A.D. Shipwreck, located off Pandanan Island, Southern Palawan Philippines.”
National Museum of the Philippines, (1996): 1-29.
“Philippines”. In British Museum Encyclopedia of Underwater and Maritime Archaeology, edited by Delgado,
303–305. British Museum Press, London. 1997.
“Underwater and Maritime Archaeology in the Philippines.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, (2003),
31(1/2): 1-25.
DK Publishing. “Weapon: a visual history of arms and armour.” New York, Dorling Kindersley Linited, 2006.
Goddio F, Pierson S, Crick M (Eds.). Sunken treasures: Fifteenth-century Chinese ceramics from the Lena Cargo. London:
Periplus Publishing London Limited. 2000.

8

�Honasan A. “The Pandanan Junk.” In The Pearl Road: Tales of Treasure Ships in the Philippines, edited by Loviny, 13-23,
1996.
Khan IA. “Early use of Cannon and Musket in India: A.D. 1442-1526.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the
Orient 24, 2 (1981): 146-164.
Keith DH, de Bry J. “Artillery.” In La Belle, The Archaeology of a Seventeenth-Century Ship of New World Colonization,
edited by Bruseth, A&amp;M University Press, Texas, 2017.
Kelly J. “Gunpowder. Alchemy, Bombards, &amp; Pyrotechnics: The History of the Explosive that Changed the World”. Basic
Books (2004): 3-18.
Kozari J, Vizy S. “The development of infantry firearms and its impact on army tactics.” Acta Acad. Agriensis, Sectio
Historriae XLI (2013): 185-195.
Lacsina LSP. “The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Sixth Progress Report”. National Museum of the
Philippines (2004): 1-6.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Seventh Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines (2005a):1-4.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Eighth Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines (2005b): 1-4.
Lepage JGG. “Medieval Armies and Weapons in Western Europe. An Illustrated History.” North Carolina, McFarland and
Company Inc., (2005): 248-266.
Lopez-Martin J. “Cannon.” In Lost at Sea: The strange route of the Lena Shoal junk, edited by Goddio F, Pierson S, Crick M,
239-241. Periplus Publishing Limited, London, 2002.
McLachlan S. “Medieval Handgonnes. The First black powder infantry weapons.” Osprey Publishing, (2010): 82 Pp.
Orillaneda BC. “The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: A Field Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004a), 1-8.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: A Progress Report.” National Museum of the Philippines,
(2004b), 1-4.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Second Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004c), 1-5.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Third Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004d), 1-8.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Fourth Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004e), 1-5.
“A Brief Report on the Sharing of the Santa Cruz Shipwreck Ceramic Artifacts.” National Museum of the Philippines,
(2005), 1-2.
“The Santa Cruz, Zambales Shipwreck Ceramics: Understanding Southeast Asian Ceramic Trade during the Late 15th
Century C.E, ” Master’s thesis, University of the Philippines, Diliman, 2008.
“Of Ships and Shipping: The Maritime Archaeology of the Fifteenth Century CE Southeast Asia.” In Early Navigation
in the Asia-Pacific Region. A Maritime Perspective, edited by Chunming Wu, 29-57, Singapore: Springer Science +
Business Media, 2016a.
“Maritime Trade in the Philippines During the 15th Century CE.” Mousssons 27 (2016b): 83-100.
“The Santa Cruz shipwreck excavation: A reflection on the practice of underwater archaeology in the Philippines.” In
Innovation and adaptation: Marine archaeology in Southeast Asia, edited by Noel Tan, 86–102. Singapore: Asian
Civilisations Museum, 2012.
Peralta JT. “Anatomy of a Shipwreck: Archaeology of the 15th-century Pandanan Shipwreck.” In The Pearl Road: Tales of
Treasure Ships in the Philippines, edited by C. Loviny, 63-94. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asiatype and C Loviny,
1996.
Pollard AM, Liu R. “Predicting bronze casting recipes in Ancient China: ternary copper-lead-tin alloys and the “unit sum
problem”.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2023): 15:55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01747-y
Powell J. (Ed.). Weapons and Warfare, revised version. California, Salem Press. 2010.
Reverseau JP. “Weapons: Small arms.” In Treasures of the San Diego, edited by Desroches JP, Casal G, Goddio F., 192-197.
Association Française d'Action Artistique, Paris, 1996
Tanaka K, Dizon Z. 2011. “Shipwreck Site and Earthenware Vessels in the Philippines: Earthenware vessels of the Pandanan
Shipwreck Site.” The MUA Collection, (2011), 1-11, http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1234 (Accessed
December 27, 2021).

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="59">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="337">
                  <text>2023 Session 23: Collections-based Research</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="338">
                  <text>Session 23 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="339">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 23 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="340">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="341">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="342">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="343">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="344">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="345">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6118">
                <text>Preliminary analysis of the early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines, c.1400 – c.1600</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6119">
                <text>This study presents seven early handheld guns also known as “handgonnes” or hand cannons recovered from&#13;
shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines. In this paper, three guns HHG-001, HHG-002, and&#13;
HHG-003, feature shorter and stubby barrels with prominent reinforced sections, bulbous breech regions, and&#13;
flared muzzles. The flared muzzles of these guns are typical of a blunderbuss type and or dart-firing guns of the&#13;
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The remaining handheld guns HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and&#13;
HHG-007, on the other hand, are tapered gun barrels without prominent reinforcement rings, and unflared&#13;
muzzles that are probably designed for a single bullet and long-range firing. The smallest unflared muzzle gun&#13;
HHG-005 measures only 39.1 cm long with a 1.31 cm bore diameter. While HHG-007 is the heaviest with a&#13;
prominently thick gun barrel probably designed to withstand more powder charges.&#13;
Compositional analysis using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy showed that most of these guns were&#13;
made of leaded tin bronze alloys. Comprised mainly of 37.77% to 83.57% copper, 3.11% to 22.41% tin, and&#13;
0.87% to 47.72% lead with other trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, nickel, and manganese, among&#13;
others. The discovery of these guns in various merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and&#13;
Lena Shoal shipwrecks is clear evidence of their use by the early seafaring merchants. The use of pXRF also&#13;
revealed traces of possible black powder elements such as sulphur and potassium thereby suggesting the actual&#13;
usage of these guns that warrants further investigation. Despite their size and offensive functions against pirates&#13;
and crews of enemy ships, firing them would have been intimidating.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6120">
                <text>NM Austero</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6121">
                <text>BC Orillaneda</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6122">
                <text>LM Neri</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6123">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6124">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6125">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6126">
                <text>Austero, Nero M., BC Orillaneda, LM Neri. 2023. “Preliminary analysis of the early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines, c.1400 – c.1600.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Michelle Damian. Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1917 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="50">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 23 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="185" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="78">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/19b6abb9f37e5d8b013f90d8faf75a8d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>56461cb3b96b38e611cf8b5239a332ad</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2298">
                    <text>Preservation and Management of
Underwater Archaeological Resources:
Role of Agency
Sunny O. Ngirmang and Calvin T. Emesiochel1

Abstract
Underwater archaeological resources within the Republic of Palau (henceforth referred to as the
Republic) cover a wide array of types from famous World War II wrecks, to Yapese stone money disks
which sank to the bottom of the sea during their transport, and to traditional sites - which includes but not
limited to semi-submerged docks/piers, fish traps, burials, and a sunken city mentioned in traditional
folklore. These resources are protected under the Cultural and Historical Preservation Act (henceforth
referred to as Title 19) mandated by the Palau Bureau of Arts &amp; Culture (henceforth referred to as the
Bureau). More specifically, Chapter 3 of Title 19 known as the "Palau Lagoon Monument" is exclusively
reserved for all submerged and semi-submerged foreign vessels located within the Republic’s territorial
waters. Tour agencies play a proactive role in monitoring the health and condition of the wrecks, report
new site locations, and notifies the Bureau of possible looting activities. A Geographic Information System
database maintained by the Survey &amp; Inventory/Archaeology Section within the Bureau keeps an
inventory of underwater sites obtained from earlier works plus data from affiliated tour agencies.
This paper will examine the current situation within the Bureau and its subdivisions particularly
the Survey &amp; Inventory/Archaeology Section. It will provide detail of their efforts and goals, challenges,
and gaps pertaining to the preservation and management of underwater archaeological resources. In
addition, present case studies where the "Palau Lagoon Monument" clause was enacted. Lastly, we will
discuss the measures and other aides available within the Bureau aimed towards assisting the state
government establish medium-term goals for preservation and management plus effective long-term
objectives beneficial for their state in terms of underwater cultural resources.

Palau Island Brief History, Geography &amp; Geology
The Palau Island is the westernmost archipelago in the Caroline chain approximately 7
degrees North of the equator, consisting of six island groups totaling more than five
hundred high and low islands (only 16 of which are inhabited) including World War II
battleground of Peleliu and world-famous mushroom shaped rock islands.
The inhabited islands of Palau including from north to south is Kayangel,
Babeldaob, Koror, Peleliu, Angaur and the Southwest Island groups. Most of the Islands
are encompassed in a barrier reef that stretches for approximately 105 kilometers
except for the Southwest Islands
Palau lies on a subduction zone causing Babeldaob, the largest island to
submerge about a half millimeter per year. Consequently, it is hypothesized according
to paleoenvironmental studies that the earlier colonization and settlement sites along
the coast of Babeldaob are underwater (Dickinson and Athens 2007). More
archaeological data are needed from other possible sites for examination and
identification pending comparative analysis. The possibility to access other sites around

1

Bureau of Arts &amp; Culture, Palau Historic Preservation Office, Koror, Republic of Palau 96940

�Palau Pg - 2 - of 8

Micronesia is needed for a further reexamination to cement together proposed
hypothesis of early settlement and exclude others.

Bureau of Arts &amp; Culture
The Bureau is a branch of the Palau National Government responsible for identifying,
documenting, protecting, preserving and managing all cultural and historical resources
within the Republic
First established in 1978, then called the Division of Cultural Affairs and is
presently the Bureau of Arts and Culture through Executive Order No. 203 since 2001,
is a Palau governmental entity under the Ministry of Community &amp; Cultural Affairs, which
mandates a framework for the adequate protection of archaeological sites and tangible
cultural resources (Emesiochel 2008:4).
Additionally, the Bureau implements Section 106 of the US National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The Bureau helps in the implementation of
acceptable historic preservation laws in the 16 states of the Republic of Palau.
The Bureau receives funds from the Palau National Government and the Historic
Preservation Funds from the U.S. National Parks Service, Department of the Interior.
The Bureau has a total of 11 staff members. It operates with the advice and assistance
from the 16-member Palau Historical and Cultural Advisory Board, 16-member Society
of Historians, and 5-member Technical and Professional Review Committee.
The mission of the Bureau is to protect and preserve all the Republic’s cultural
and historical resources to enhance, enrich, and foster the Palauan heritage now and
into the future. To achieve this mission, the Bureau had four main goals: First to
preserve and foster cultural and historical resources for the benefit of Palauan people;
Second, to preserve and educate Palauan tradition that are threatened with extinction;
third, to protect cultural and historical resources from destruction; and finally, to
preserve culture and tradition in the face of inevitable increasing foreign contact and
interaction.

A. Historical &amp; Cultural Preservation Act 19 PNC § 102
Created in 1974, the Palau Historic Preservation Act (PNC Title 19) is administered by
the Bureau that is intended to serve as the official inventory of all those historical sites
and tangible cultural properties which are deemed of significance to the Palauan people
and culture hence worth preserving, plus be protected from destruction and impairment.
The Palau Register is the legal instrument to ensure that registered properties or
properties that may be eligible, threatened by public or private development will be
subject to comment and review in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law.
19 PNC § 134: Each state (and national government) reserves to itself the exclusive
right and privilege of ownership and control over historical sites and tangible cultural
property located on the lands and waters owned or controlled by the state.

A.1 Survey, Inventory and Archaeology
The Survey, Inventory and Archaeology Section are the leading responsible for the
identification and inventoried of all cultural and historical resources within the Republic.

�Palau Pg - 3 - of 8

To carry out this responsibility, we have divided our survey into three phases: First,
Babeldaob survey, second, rock island survey then underwater survey. The basis of
determining and prioritizing our survey in this way was based on economical,
developmental, policy, as well as not enough staff, training and funding to do both
surveys at one time. Especially Underwater Cultural Heritage that require more
technical skills.
Even though data haven’t input into the database, the information of underwater
cultural heritage but we do have readily available hard copies that provide descriptive
information including coordinates, maps, drawings, and photos. There are records of
more than 60 wreck sites are submerged around the Palau lagoons. Some of these
sites are very popular for tourist diving spots which are shown on the map. Diving tour
companies are really strict as to preserve these sites for their own benefit. They usually
report to our office as they found new wrecks or even suspicious action of looting.
The issue of Geographic Information System (henceforth referred to as GIS) in
Palau and future plan is to centralize a main information office that manages all data.
Each government agency should be interconnected to the Information office and have
their own GIS program they manage and provide data to the central office. This will
allow all agencies to share and upload files from different agencies. But due to lack of
funding, only few government offices and NGOs are able to acquire GIS program.
Right now, the office of PALARIS - Palau Automated Land and Resource
Information System is the office that has well trained and full GIS operation staff. This
office is the one that supposedly be the central GIS information office.
Short-term Goals
• Revisit identified underwater archaeological sites/resources for further analysis
of: site condition, assessment, and verification of information, and inventory
• Identify immediate threat (deterioration, looting, etc) affecting underwater
cultural resources
• Develop community and local state government interest and collaboration
Long-term Goals
• Method of conservation and preservation
• Establish a database for underwater archaeological sites/resources
• Create a underwater cultural resources management plan to be implemented at
the state and national level
• Continuous management, protection, and preservation of underwater cultural
resources
This section assist in public education in “disseminating information and
educating the public through presentations and site visits, in order to foster awareness
and importance of protecting, preserving, and conserving our cultural heritage that is
our national identity for our future generations” (Emesiochel 2008: 8).

B. Palau Lagoon Monument 19 PNC § 306
It is hereby declared that it is a policy of the Republic to preserve forever
historic landmarks, structures, and other sites and objects of significance to
the Republic of the Trust Territory situated within the jurisdiction of the
Republic for the inspiration and benefit of the people of the Republic.

�Palau Pg - 4 - of 8

All ships, other vessels and aircraft, and any and all parts and contents
thereof, which formerly belonged to or were part of the armed forces or
commercial fleet of Spain, Germany, Japan, and the United States or any
other nation, which were sunk to or otherwise deposited on the bottom of the
Palau Lagoon and its territorial waters, subject to applicable salvage laws,
shall be and hereby are set apart as monuments which shall be collectively
called the Palau Lagoon Monument.

The administration, protection, and development of the monument shall be
exercised under the direction of the President of the Republic or his duly authorized
representatives. The strictness of this law, give us enough time to seek assistance and
trainings to accomplish the survey and inventory of the underwater cultural heritage of
Palau.
In order to convict someone for violating the Palau Lagoon Monument, the
government must prove that the individual (1) removes, appropriates, damages, or
destroys (2) ships, other vessels or aircraft (or parts thereof), which formally belonged to
the armed forces or commercial fleet of any nation and which are at the bottom of the
Palau lagoon.

C. Types/Categories of Underwater Cultural Resources
The most notable types of UCH sites within the Republic are the WWII wrecks located
mostly in the Southern Lagoon. There are more than 60 WWII ship and aircraft wrecks
sites in Palau. The wrecks sites are popular tourists dive spots. Tourists who decide to
dive the wrecks are educated in the types of ship, ship content, and their components.
Captain Wilson’s shipwreck of 1783 off the Coast of Ulong Island is also a well-known
site. The Antelope shipwreck site is under the control of the Koror State Government.
Some of the ship’s remnants can be seen during low tide.
Other UHC sites are locally known by the form of myths and folklore for instance
is the sunken City of Ngibtal. Fish trapping sites, stone docks/piers, underwater burial
sites, and submerged landmarks are known UCH sites which are found in different parts
of Palau – all are protected under Title 19.
Other known but not fully documented is the numerous Yapese stone money
disks which sank to the bottom of the sea during their transport from Palau to Yap.
These large stones or “megaliths” were quarried in Palau by Yapese islanders prior to
European contact (Hazell and Fitzpatrick 2006:12). During their several hundred
kilometers of oceanic voyage to Yap, some vessels transporting the money disks
capsized, leaving a trail of money disks from several trips on the ocean floor. It is not yet
certain where exactly these money disks are located. There has yet to be a full
documentary, mapping, and surveying of the Yapese stone money disks under the
waters of Palau.
Recent work by Scott M. Fitzpatrick in the management and protection of the
quarry sites provides the opportunity for the local communities in Palau and Yap to take
lead in the preservation of such sites. The proposed management plan covers sites
located inland. Sites or money disks underwater are also given the same amount of
attention and protection it deserve once the sites have been identified. One of Palau’s
local community leader and well-known scuba diver Francis Toribiong takes lead in the
advocacy and protection of UCH sites in the Republic.

�Palau Pg - 5 - of 8

As part of public education and outreach, the Bureau in collaboration with Palau
Visitors Authority, the Belau National Museum, and local state government aims to
promote community awareness on the types of underwater cultural heritage. From the
shipwrecks to sunken city and to the Yapese megaliths, Palau aims to increase the
fascination and value into the preservation and conservation of UCH sites.

D. Tourism, location, and accessibility
Palau was the headquarters of the Japanese command in Micronesia and was heavily
fortified by the Japanese in the years leading up to WWII in the Pacific. Malakal Harbor
was a major forward supply base for Japanese shipping.
On March 31, 1944 U.S. dive-bomber strikes from aircraft carriers Yorktown and
Bunker Hill, of Carrier Task Force 58 destroyed over 50 warships and airplanes of the
Japanese Imperial Forces, making Palau's western lagoon their final resting place.
Most of the wrecks are located within a few minutes of Sam's Tours dive center
and remain in excellent condition for diving. Each year in March, Sam Scott of Sam's
Tours hosts Palau Wreck Week to mark the anniversary of the sinking of the Japanese
fleet.
WWII shipwreck sites are mainly located in Palau’s Southern Lagoon in Koror,
the states of Peleliu and Angaur and other sites around the coast of Babeldaob. Most of
Palau’s dive shop, naming for instance Sam’s Dive Tour offer services, kayak, and
dives to the WWII wrecks. Provided in the tour, the dive operator educates the tourist
basic information of the wreck. There are 10 popular wreck dive sites which Sam’s Tour
takes their clients for diving. Accessibility to the sites is not restricted; tour operators can
freely access the wreck for photo taking, kayak, and other recreational activities.

E. Current legislation, Preservation and Management of Underwater
cultural resources
Aside from PLM, local conservation legislations and regulations pertaining to the
protection and management of UCH sites are very minimal. The permits or MOA’s
administered by the office of the President of stipulations of the management and
treatment of UCH sites are only created in the event such salvage, research, etc arises.
With the exception of Title19 and PLM, the Protected Areas Network Act
(henceforth referred to as PAN) and the Micronesia Challenge established in 2007 aims
to protect not only terrestrial cultural heritage but up to 20% of marine areas including
where such UCH sites are located. Since there is not a definite line where the 20%
occupies, it would be logical to deduce that such percentage be broken accordingly to
where high concentration of UCH sites are found. Included in the 20% however should
be reserved also for the protection and preservation of high marine biodiversity areas.
To be protected under PAN, local state government endorses the PAN Act and agrees
to the stipulations and guidelines under PAN to ensure full resource safeguarding. In
turn, the sites designated by the states as PAN sites are eligible for funding and other
opportunities for the effective management of the sites.
Local state governments take full responsibility in the protection of the UCH sites
located within their municipal boundaries. Such legislation, rules and regulations or
guidelines must address the proper protection, monitoring, and research around the
areas. Special cases such as the salvage of a particular vessel or parts thereof will be

�Palau Pg - 6 - of 8

under the unified consensus and understanding between the foreign entity, the state
government, and the President with the cooperation and guidance from the Bureau.

F. Threats
The ever changing climatic changes, erosion, and oil spills are potential yet inevitable
threats to marine cultural heritage. The supposed submerged landscape such as the
City of Ngibtal is prone to heavy silt erosion due to development projects inland. As
Palau is eagerly searching for economic and financial stability during this present-day
world financial crisis, Palau may explore other sources of renewable sources of energy
such as water currents which could inevitably have serious impacts to UCH sites.
The lack of or minimal legislation in place which specifies the integrity of UCH
sites makes these sites at risk of improper handling and inadequate recording or data
recovery.
Salvage of particular artifacts, relics, or components of a UCH site when exposed
to the elements may oxidize hence damage to the object. This possibility will hinder any
salvage attempts but will not impede any foreign entity to reclaim their objects.
The parts of some vessels of WWII ships are exposed during low tide. This
exposure speeds up oxidation and the deterioration. More attention needs to be made
from the administrative center in charge of and mandates UCH sites within the
Republic.

G. Status of Salvage
Any foreign entity wishing to salvage parts of or contents of any submerged vessel shall
comply with the provisions outlined in the rules and regulations of the Palau Lagoon
Monument section of Title 19. A signed memorandum of agreement between the foreign
entity and the Republic of Palau government must agree to the outlined stipulations in
the memorandum. Usually before any salvage, proper research and documentation of
the wreck site, the parts, and contents to be salvage are conducted.
Salvage instances seldom occurs in Palau. The expense of research and data
recovery rests on the foreign entity wishing to repatriate their artifacts. Entities wishing
to repatriate goes through a series of negotiation with the Palau Government stating
intention and the need of such artifacts being returned.

H. Case Study
Republic of Palau (plaintiff) v. Cameron James Avenell, Matthew Young,
Richard Sumor, David Tansey, and Ian McCombie; ROP vs. Avenell, 13 ROP
272 (Tr. Div. 2006) Criminal Action No. 06-072
Mr. Cameron Avenell and Mr. Matthew Young, the remaining defendants where
charged for removing pieces of artifacts from shipwrecks. These shipwrecks have been
declared by low to be preserved as “Palau Lagoon Monument”. The Government
charged the defendants for their conduct with counts based on the Palau Lagoon
Monument Act. The divers took artifacts from Amatsu Maru wreck, Chuyu Maru wreck,
Ryuku Maru wreck and an unidentified forth wreck. Amongst the artifacts found during
the search resulted in the recovery of a porthole, a compass, a frame, lanterns, light
bulb covers, and porthole frames. The artifacts were recovered from the Lionwind
vessel operated by divers.

�Palau Pg - 7 - of 8

Francis Toribiong and the Republic of Palau (plaintiffs) v. John C. Gibbons,
Koror State Executive Administrator, et al. Civil Action No. 451-91; 24
September 1993
Plaintiffs allege that Koror Sate intends to dismantle or remove a World War II Zero
fighter airplane which is located under the Palau lagoon at the depth of approximately
sixty feet. They allege that such removal would violate the provisions of 19 PNC § 301
et seq. because the Zero is part of the Palau Lagoon Monument. The relief sought by
the Plaintiffs is a declaratory judgment that Koror State may not remove or dismantle
the Zero without complying with the Lagoon Monument Act and that it be permanently
enjoined from the removing or dismantling the Zero unless it obtains a permit to do so
pursuant to the Lagoon Monument Act. Plaintiffs have proven by a preponderance of
the of the evidence that the airplane at issue herein is a Zero formerly a part of the
armed forces of Japan and that is has been sunk or otherwise deposited on the bottom
of the Palau lagoon. Section 304 of the Lagoon Monument Act requires that, before a
person may gain access to a monument aircraft to examine it or gather objects from it, a
permit must be obtained from the President of his duly authorized representatives.
Similarly, section 306 provides for penalties for any person who removes such aircraft
or any part thereof without first obtaining permission from the President. Koror State
contends that it does not have to comply with the Lagoon Monument Act by obtaining a
permit to gain access to or otherwise deal with the Zero because (1) under Article I,
Section 2 of the ROP Constitution, Koror State is the owner of the Zero, and the owner
can “do what he pleases with what he owns”; (2) the Republic of Palau’s regulatory
power are limited by Koror State’s right to own and derive revenues from exploiting
state resources; (3) the Lagoon Monument is unconstitutional as sought to be applied
here because, without compensation, it takes away Koror State’s right to exploit and
derive revenues from the Zero; and (4) absent regulations, the Republic of Palau has no
rights under the Lagoon Monument Act.

Conclusion
Currently, there is only three staff within the Bureau with adequate training on maritime
archaeology. The minimal expertise available within the Bureau reduces the speed of
anticipated surveys and monitoring.
In addition, there is no other available expertise on island particularly in maritime
archaeology. Due to a very few certified trainees in underwater archaeology and
courses on island, the support of such discipline is minimal. Public interest is high
however there is a lack of available resources for the proper education and awareness
of underwater archaeology. The Bureau is always looking for opportunities plus
welcomes any opportunity that offers the adequate training, education, and the right
tools in assessing, monitoring, and managing UCH sites.
The Palau Community College offers a course in archaeology but short of the
resources to expose students in underwater archaeology. The college aims to seek
available programs that are geared towards the protection of marine cultural heritage
which is a much needed field in Palau. In addition, such opportunity will help increase in
the public awareness and advocacy and the potential push needed to help create new

�Palau Pg - 8 - of 8

or strengthening existing legislations for the protection of UCH sites at the state and
national level.

Bibliography
Bailey, D. E.,
1991
Dickinson, W.
R., and Athens
J. S.,
2007
Fitzpatrick, S.
M.,
2008

Flatman, J.,
2009
Emesiochel, C.
T.,
2008
Hazell, L. C.,
and Fitzpatrick,
S. M.,
2006
Liston, J.,
2009
Olsudong, R.,
(M.A.) et al.,

Palau National
Code Title 19
1982
Sam’s Tours

WWII Wrecks of Palau, North Valley Diver Publications, California.
Holocene Paleoshoreline and Paleoenvironmental History of Palau:
Implications for Human Settlement. Journal of Island and Coastal
Archaeology 2(2):175-196
Maritime interregional interaction in Micronesia: Deciphering multigroup contacts and exchange systems through time. Journal of
Anthropological Archaeology 27 (2008) Pp. 131-147
Preservation and management for Yapese Stone Money sites in
Palau and Yap.
Editorial. Conserving Marine Cultural Heritage: Threats, Risks, and
Future Priorities. Conservation and Management of Archaeological
Sites (11):1 Pp. 5-8
Palau County Report: Training Course on Cultural Heritage
Protection: Research, Analysis and Preservation of Archaeological
Sites and Remains. Nara: Japan
The maritime transport of prehistoric megaliths in Micronesia.
Archaeol. Oceania 41 (2006) Pp. 12-24

Cultural Chronology of Earthworks in Palau, Western Micronesia.
Archaeol. Oceania 44 (2009) Pp. 56-73
Draft: Inventory of Cultural Sites and Oral History in Melekeok and
Irai. Palau: Bureau of Arts &amp; Culture (1997)
Draft: Inventory of Cultural &amp; Historical Sites and Oral History in
Ngarrard State. Vol. I: Inventory of Cultural and Historical sites. Palau:
Bureau of Arts &amp; Culture (2000)
Cultural and Historical Preservation Act

www.samstours.com, accessed Oct 11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2292">
                <text>Preservation and Management of  Underwater Archaeological Resources:  Role of Agency&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2293">
                <text>Session 8&#13;
Pacific Islands region: Building UCH Capacity</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2294">
                <text>Underwater archaeological resources within the Republic of Palau (henceforth referred to as the Republic) cover a wide array of types from famous World War II wrecks, to Yapese stone money disks which sank to the bottom of the sea during their transport, and to traditional sites - which includes but not limited to semi-submerged docks/piers, fish traps, burials, and a sunken city mentioned in traditional folklore. These resources are protected under the Cultural and Historical Preservation Act (henceforth referred to as Title 19) mandated by the Palau Bureau of Arts &amp; Culture (henceforth referred to as the Bureau). More specifically, Chapter 3 of Title 19 known as the "Palau Lagoon Monument" is exclusively reserved for all submerged and semi-submerged foreign vessels located within the Republicâ€™s territorial waters. Tour agencies play a proactive role in monitoring the health and condition of the wrecks, report new site locations, and notifies the Bureau of possible looting activities. A Geographic Information System database maintained by the Survey &amp; Inventory/Archaeology Section within the Bureau keeps an inventory of underwater sites obtained from earlier works plus data from affiliated tour agencies.&#13;
&#13;
This paper will examine the current situation within the Bureau and its subdivisions particularly the Survey &amp; Inventory/Archaeology Section. It will provide detail of their efforts and goals, challenges, and gaps pertaining to the preservation and management of underwater archaeological resources. In addition, present case studies where the "Palau Lagoon Monument" clause was enacted. Lastly, we will discuss the measures and other aides available within the Bureau aimed towards assisting the state government establish medium-term goals for preservation and management plus effective long-term objectives beneficial for their state in terms of underwater cultural resources.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2295">
                <text>Sunny O. Ngirmang  </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2296">
                <text>Calvin T. Emesiochel</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2297">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="23">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 8</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
