<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=33&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-25T13:28:06+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>33</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="412" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5023">
                <text>A Resurvey of Roman Contacts with the East</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5024">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5025">
                <text>Marie-FranÃ§oise Boussac</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5026">
                <text>Jean-Francois Salles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5027">
                <text>Manohar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5028">
                <text>1995</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5029">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5030">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5031">
                <text>Marie-FranÃ§oise Boussac</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5032">
                <text>Jean-Francois Salles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5033">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5034">
                <text>Athens, Aden, Arikamedu: Essays on the Interrelations between India, Arabia, and the Eastern Mediterranean</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5035">
                <text>1995</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5036">
                <text>97-114</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5037">
                <text>New Delhi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5038">
                <text>Manohar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5039">
                <text>A Resurvey of Roman Contacts with the East</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="594" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="385">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/498c5d5afc374db8fb745e2b096f9606.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e8037153f11bdf6c5d380d58461e1952</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6529">
                    <text>Delivering scientific diver training for underwater archaeology: international best practice
in education and a micro-credential case study
Jonathan Benjamin, Hiro Yoshida, John McCarthy, Mark Polzer, Wendy van Duivenvoorde
Maritime Archaeology Program, Flinders University
ABSTRACT
Delivering education in underwater archaeology is challenging for a variety of reasons, including the requirements to
prepare archaeology students to become professional scientific divers. In practice, the discipline blends traditional
academic and commercial archaeology with maritime sectors and diving industries. This paper discusses the principles
of conducting safe underwater archaeology by trained divers and presents a case study of applied specialist training
for diving maritime archaeology students at Flinders University, South Australia. We have developed an accredited
micro-credential qualification in Professional Scientific Diving that meets the standards for both Australian Standards
and the American Academy for Underwater Sciences (AAUS), enabling graduates to be classified as diving-workers
under legal regimes where qualifications and professionalization are required. Delivery of this educational component
within a maritime archaeology program is now critically important for career progression in underwater archaeology.
We discuss the challenges of teaching diving for archaeology in a modern university with complex health and safety
requirements and regulatory frameworks. We consider the barriers facing educators, students and professionals and
how to create a safe and inclusive culture of scientific diving, critical to modern maritime archaeology and marine
science in the coming decades.
KEYWORDS: Scientific Diving, Professional Practice, Underwater Archaeology, Diver Education

INTRODUCTION
In 2016, at the annual general meeting of the UNESCO UNITWIN Network for Underwater Archaeology,
network members undertook a workshop on Reducing Barriers to International Partnership Working. The
workshop identified a number of potential barriers to diving for archaeology, including Compliance Cultures
(and working across different bureaucracies), Safety Cultures (a relative term that carries cultural
implications), Diving Insurance (i.e., financial risk management for individual divers and their institutions)
and Defining the ‘Professional Archaeological Diver’ (competencies, qualifications, experience). These
challenges collectively create a substantial administrative burden for university training of archaeological
divers. To mitigate this, a project was initiated to create a model code of practice for the UNITWIN Network
to reduce the challenges for staff and students to undertake partnership research and educational
programmes that involve diving for archaeology.
Early examples of UNESCO work in this space include the first Code of Practice for Scientific Diving:
Principles for the Safe Practice of Scientific Diving in Different Environments (Flemming and Max 1988)
and a short section on diving safety and compliance considerations in the UNESCO Manual for Activities
Directed at Underwater Cultural Heritage (Maarleveld et al. 2013). Since the UNITWIN Model Code of
Practice was first discussed in 2016, Flinders University has hosted two single-day symposium events in
Adelaide, South Australia—in 2017 and 2022.
After three years of discussions between Network Members, the Model Code of Practice for Safe Diving
Operations (Benjamin et al. 2019) was published online in June 2019. Importantly, it received the
endorsement of the UNITWIN Network and ICOMOS ICUCH, whose members were invited to respond to
early drafts. The document provides a non-prescriptive model, with consistent practice and common
language related to scientific archaeological diving, to serve as a starting point for network members to be
able to dive safely, particularly members and aspiring members who do not already have a diving procedure
1

�or code of practice in place (Benjamin et al. 2019, 4). The model code of practice, now published online in
English and Japanese (www.underwaterarchaeology.net), is 20 pages in length and covers, among other
things, background, tools, roles, training and testing, medical fitness, dive planning and record keeping.
CASE STUDY FROM FLINDERS UNIVERSITY MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGY PROGRAM
In 2022, the Flinders University Maritime Archaeology Program (FUMAP) celebrated its 20th anniversary
of providing postgraduate degrees. Throughout that time, archaeological diving in Australia has been
complicated by several factors, including regulatory requirements that vary from state to state and a national
standard for scientific diving (AS/NZS 2299.2) that has not been updated since 2002, despite changing
regulations. For many organisations with a role in underwater heritage, including universities, government
agencies and heritage professionals, the questions of who is allowed to dive for archaeology and which
qualifications are fit-for-purpose have been confusing and inconsistently resolved. This has only served to
deter archaeological training and project work, which has stunted the development of the discipline,
particularly in training underwater excavation methods (see also Benjamin and Mackintosh 2016).
A sustainable maritime archaeological community requires a culture focused on safe diving and an
understanding of the responsibilities that come from diving while classified as a worker. The late Professor
George Bass, who authored the benchmark Archaeology Under Water in 1966, is often credited for having
said it is easier to teach an archaeologist to dive than it is to teach a diver to become an archaeologist, an
observation also made by Professor John Goggin in 1959 (Goggin 1960, 350). The discipline of maritime
archaeology today requires professionalism in both diving and archaeological training and must consider
qualifications, competencies, compliance and work health and safety regulations that Bass would not have
encountered at the beginning of his career as a diving archaeologist.
It is now clear that recreational diving qualifications may be suitable for entry-level, restricted student
divers, but that more serious consideration of responsibilities as part of the workforce requires further
training and experience. In Australia, the most common vocational training pathway for ‘occupational
divers’ (which meets the Australian Standard series 2815 referenced in most state regulations) has typically
been undertaken by private commercial diving schools that have been accredited through a private
‘Registered Training Organization (RTO)’, which in turn is accredited under the Australian Qualification
Framework and the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA).
Commercial diving training, however, does not necessarily prepare one for a career in underwater
archaeology or marine science. Skills, risks and pressures are different, and the culture of the sectors and
overall approach to diving are often contrasting. For the most part, scientific divers and underwater
archaeologists work on SCUBA, using small hand tools and light powered water dredges or airlifts.
Certainly, there are risks associated with these kinds of activities, and these must be managed in line with
regulations and cultural expectations, but it is refreshing to see some movement in this space, with more
interest in a revitalized scientific diving sector than in past decades and a promise of new scientific diving
standards over the horizon. There is also a newly recognised way for universities to include accredited
qualifications under the Australian Qualification Framework, Tertiary Education Quality and Standards
Agency (TEQSA).
The TEQSA pathway enables universities to create an accredited program for qualifications, and this can
include scientific diving. The most recent occupational diving standards in Australia have now included this
in the training standard; a pathway to recognised professionalism that had been omitted previously. Since
Flinders University is a TEQSA Registered University, FUMAP staff were able to undertake a multi-year
project to develop a curriculum that best serves the program’s graduates, meets the Australian 2815-series
Standard and has embedded within it the American Academy of Underwater Sciences training program.
2

�This not only ensures international best practice, but also provides a widely accepted international scientific
diver training qualification for our graduates working outside of Australasia.
Scientific Diver Training Structure and Delivery Guidelines
The Professional Scientific Diver micro-credential (MICR-PSDC) certification ensures the competency
requirements of the graduate, as defined in Australian Standard 2815.6, and is internationally aligned with
and meets AAUS Standards (2019), ANZSDA guidelines and the UNESCO UNITWIN Network for
Underwater Archaeology Model Code of Practice for Safe Diving Operations (Benjamin et al. 2019).
Flinders University has a long history of teaching underwater skills. In recognition of this existing activity,
MICR-PSDC remains student-focused, formally acknowledging the skills and competencies of our
graduates. Flinders has never taught non-divers how to dive, and we have maintained this stance. Within
the new micro-credential, we only teach existing, competent SCUBA divers to become professionals,
capable and qualified to undertake scientific diving for professional research and educational purposes under
Australian Standard 2299.2 Scientific Diving Operations (Figure 1).

Figure 1. MICR-PSDC delivery and implementation

The primary educational aim of this micro-credential is to provide students with theoretical and practical
knowledge and confirm that they have the competencies necessary to conduct research and educational
activities under water as a professional scientific diver. MICR-PSDC also aims to introduce students to the
basics of techniques for underwater archaeology and marine science, present students with opportunities to
apply their practical and interpretive skills during problem-solving exercises and provide students with a
certification that aligns to recognised standards for industry recognition.

3

�Upon completion of this micro-credential, students are able to apply compliance and safety requirements to
undertake scientific diving per Australian Standard AS2299.2 and AS2815.6; minimise their impact on the
underwater cultural heritage and environment through improved diving skills and proper control of
buoyancy, stability and trim; explain how to conduct underwater archaeology and marine science as a
Scientific Diver; apply the practical and theoretical skills for scientific diving to future research and
educational projects; and distinguish Scientific Diver training from Recreational and Commercial training
pathways.
Roles and Responsibilities of Personnel
MICR-PSDC is delivered by a team in the College of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), which
is the home college of FUMAP (Figure 2). Nevertheless, following the initial rounds of internal
implementation and curriculum development in 2021, staff and students from other colleges at Flinders
University with an interest in scientific diving have also been invited to participate.

Figure 2. Involvement of roles in MICR-PSDC delivery

The Academic Coordinator of MICR-PSDC has overall responsibility for administering and delivering the
course content and for student assessment and completions. The Academic Coordinator must be a suitably
experienced Scientific Diver with training and experience in all aspects of training to be delivered (i.e., must
hold qualifications that meet all competencies outlined in AS 2815.6), have competencies of a professional
diving instructor (i.e., be at least an Assistant SCUBA Instructor per ISO 24802-1), be registered as a
Flinders University Diver and be authorised as a Dive Coordinator.
The Lead SCUBA Instructor (LSI) is the delegated technical SCUBA Diving instructor and must hold
qualifications that meet all competencies outlined in AS 2815.6 and be able to certify Autonomous SCUBA
Divers (i.e., be a SCUBA Instructor per ISO 24802-2).
An Approved Instructor / Assistant Instructor (AI) is a supportive Academic or Professional Staff who is
qualified and experienced to oversee and instruct elements delivered in MICR-PSDC. An AI must hold
4

�qualifications that meet all competencies outlined in AS 2815.6. The individual must also hold qualifications
that meet all competencies outlined in ISO 24802-1 OR they must meet all competencies outlined in
ISO24801-3 (e.g., Divemaster) plus have formal qualification in training and assessment from higher
education or vocational education pathways (e.g., Flinders Foundations of Teaching or Certificate IV in
Training and Assessment). An AI must also be listed as a Registered Diver and Dive Coordinator in the
Flinders Diver Register.
The Maritime Safety Dive Officer (MSDO) in Flinders University’s organisational system is the specialist
diving and boating officer employed by the University’s Work Health and Safety Office. The MSDO is
charged with assisting all dive management tasks and providing advice to staff and students on university
policy and procedures as they relate to safe diving. The MSDO undertakes audits of diving practices to
ensure compliance with relevant standards, adequate assessment of all divers’ competencies and proper
record keeping. The MSDO is responsible for ensuring that staff and students undertaking diving activities
are appropriately trained and competent for the diving to be undertaken, and for approving Dive Plans prior
to any diving activity commencing. The MSDO approves all new divers, all assigned diver categories and
the status of all dive coordinators for Flinders University diving operations.
Student Registration and Certification Process
Onboarding of the students takes place through the College administration, with formal approval from the
Academic Coordinator. Once prerequisites are confirmed and students are registered, they are given access
to the MICR-PSDC site on the Flinders Learning Online (FLO) platform and provided with their
Professional Scientific Diver Training Record Book, or ‘Workbook’. Minimum prerequisites to enrol in the
micro-credential are Rescue Diver certification from a recognized recreational diver training agency (e.g.,
PADI, SSI, TDI); 40 hours of logged dives; a valid medical certificate of diver fitness (per Australian
Standard AS 2299.1 supplement); and valid First Aid, CPR and Emergency Oxygen Provider certifications.
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) is the process for assessing an individual’s relevant prior learning,
including formal, informal and non-formal learning. It is a legal requirement and an important part of MICRPSDC. Generally, we will permit RPL for individual competencies when provided evidence for three times
what is required in the standard (AS2815.6). Thus, if a student is requesting to receive RPL for diving
experience, they must show verifiable evidence for three times the minimum number of dives and minutes
at depths specified by the standard. Verification may entail written, logged or trusted communication, or
may require physical verification. A student may be required to sign a statutory declaration to confirm, in
legal terms, that they have completed the activities for which they apply. In practical terms, all skills and
competencies are verified in person by a qualified instructor.
Theory is delivered online and in class, and all materials are available via FLO. International best practice
in Scientific Diving is ensured through third-party audits by the Australia/New Zealand Scientific Diving
Association (ANZSDA), which undertook an independent review of the curriculum and confirmed that it
meets all Safework and Australian Standard AS 2815.6 requirements. A series of theoretical learning
modules and short examinations are provided to the students as resources, with students required to achieve
100 per cent on the dive planning exam and 70 per cent or higher on all other exams to pass the theoretical
modules.
Practical training activities (experience-based learning) are documented in the Workbook. This is the main
record of competencies achieved through a combination of training and verified RPL, which comprise all
competencies required for compliance with AS2815.6. All individual activities must be completed and
signed off by the Academic Coordinator, the Lead SCUBA Instructor or Approved Instructors for the
workbook to be completed. A Workbook is only complete when the student has achieved all listed

5

�competencies AND made at least 50 logged dives in total. It can then be uploaded for review for
certification. The AAUS modules must also be completed through the online AAUS training platform.
Certification is possible once a student successfully completes all theoretical and practical training and their
Workbook is reviewed and approved by the Lead SCUBA Instructor and Academic Coordinator. Records
are sent to the MSDO for compliance, auditing and record-keeping purposes. Academic marks are required
and, in this case, are issued as Pass/Fail. They are sent to College Student Administration Services for
processing and academic record-keeping. A certification card is generated by the Academic Coordinator on
behalf of the College. It includes the date of issue, the diver’s depth limit, any other restrictions or
supplemental endorsements and the following statements:
1. this certification meets the requirements of AS2815.6 and AAUS Standards;
2. this certification card is valid only with a valid diving medical issued within 12 months; and
3. it is the responsibility of the named diver, and any institutional dive officer deploying the diver, to
ensure the card holder does not operate beyond their training.
Supplemental endorsements are undertaken and administered in a similar manner as the core theoretical and
practical competencies (Figure 3). Supplemental endorsement competencies are not required to achieve
MICR-PSDC certification, but they are required to be granted the relevant endorsements listed on the
certification card.

Figure 3. The use of a water dredge during field school represents one possible ‘supplemental endorsement’ for the certified
Professional Scientific Diver. (Jonathan Benjamin)

6

�Record-keeping is carefully maintained, with records kept by the College and centrally by the MSDO for at
least seven years. Records may be shared externally for purposes of reciprocity and verification. Students
are instructed to keep their Workbook and records of all activities in perpetuity. The MSDO undertakes
regular reviews and audits to confirm that the course continues to be compliant with relevant standards.

IMPACTS AND CONCLUSION
The Professional Scientific Diver micro-credential is now in its third year at Flinders University. Although
not quantifiable, staff and students have already noticed a marked improvement in the quality of our student
divers. This is important, especially for our maritime archaeology field schools. Since MICR-PSDC student
divers are already trained in and devoted to diving and safety through their existing training and practice,
they can better focus on the archaeological tasks, underwater field methods and learning outcomes rather
than on diving-specific components at the cost of their archaeological practice. Students who have taken the
micro-credential are noticeably more competent and confident, in and out of the water. Diving routine is
almost second nature, so they tend not to waste time during equipment preparation, safety checks, briefings
and acclimation to the submerged environment. MICR-PSDC students also teach, both directly and
indirectly and to the benefit of both, the less experienced restricted student divers, and in this way both the
culture during field schools and standards of diving are noticeably improved.
Diving is not a prerequisite for postgraduate studies in maritime archaeology at Flinders; however, there is
a new generation of graduates who are divers and who will leave our maritime archaeology postgraduate
program with an accredited qualification as a Professional Scientific Diver embedded in their degree (Figure
4). Aligning the diving qualification to both Australian Standards and the internationally recognised AAUS
(American) Standard means that the program facilitates the best opportunities for our graduates to work
safely and professionally around the world where, increasingly, they will be asked to produce evidence that
they are suitably trained, competent and qualified as professionals in both archaeology and scientific diving.

Figure 4. Our first graduating class of Professional Scientific Divers in 2021. (Hiro Yoshida)

7

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS). Standards for Scientific Diving Manual. Mobile, Alabama: AAUS, 2019.
Bass, George F. Archaeology Under Water. Ancient Peoples and Places 48. London: Thames &amp; Hudson, 1966.
Benjamin, Jonathan, and Mackintosh, Robert. “Regulating scientific diving and underwater archaeology: legal and historical
considerations.” International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 45, no. 1 (2016): 153-169.
Benjamin, Jonathan, Underwood, Chris, and Sturt, Fraser, (eds.). Model Code of Practice for Safe Diving Operations. Adelaide,
South Australia: UNESCO UNITWIN Network for Underwater Archaeology, 2019.
Flemming, Nicholas C., and Max, Michael D., (eds.). Code of Practice for Scientific Diving: Principles for the Safe Practice of
Scientific Diving in Different Environments. Compiled and edited by the Scientific Committee of the Confédération Mondiale des
Activités Subaquatiques (CMAS). UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 53. Paris: UNESCO, 1988.
Goggin, John M. “Underwater archaeology: its nature and limitations.” American Antiquity 25, no. 3 (1960): 348-354.
Maarleveld, Thijs J., Guérin, Ulrike, and Egger, Barbara, (eds.). Manual for Activities Directed at Underwater Cultural Heritage:
Guidelines to the Annex of the UNESCO 2001 Convention. Paris: UNESCO, 2013.

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="56">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="310">
                  <text>2023 Session 20: Effective Ways to Deliver Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="311">
                  <text>Session 20 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="312">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 20 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="313">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="314">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="315">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="316">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="317">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="318">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6518">
                <text>Delivering scientific diver training for underwater archaeology: international best practice&#13;
in education and a micro-credential case study&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6519">
                <text>Delivering education in underwater archaeology is challenging for a variety of reasons, including the requirements to&#13;
prepare archaeology students to become professional scientific divers. In practice, the discipline blends traditional&#13;
academic and commercial archaeology with maritime sectors and diving industries. This paper discusses the principles&#13;
of conducting safe underwater archaeology by trained divers and presents a case study of applied specialist training&#13;
for diving maritime archaeology students at Flinders University, South Australia. We have developed an accredited&#13;
micro-credential qualification in Professional Scientific Diving that meets the standards for both Australian Standards&#13;
and the American Academy for Underwater Sciences (AAUS), enabling graduates to be classified as diving-workers&#13;
under legal regimes where qualifications and professionalization are required. Delivery of this educational component&#13;
within a maritime archaeology program is now critically important for career progression in underwater archaeology.&#13;
We discuss the challenges of teaching diving for archaeology in a modern university with complex health and safety&#13;
requirements and regulatory frameworks. We consider the barriers facing educators, students and professionals and&#13;
how to create a safe and inclusive culture of scientific diving, critical to modern maritime archaeology and marine&#13;
science in the coming decades.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6520">
                <text>Jonathan Benjamin </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6521">
                <text>Hiro Yoshida  </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6522">
                <text>John McCarthy  </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6523">
                <text>Mark Polzer </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6524">
                <text>Wendy van Duivenvoorde</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6525">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6526">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6527">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6528">
                <text>Benjamin, Jonathan, et al. 2023. “Delivering scientific diver training for underwater archaeology: international best practice and a micro-credential case study.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Bill Jeffery. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1965 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="67">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 20 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="380" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4586">
                <text>Funaosa Nikki: A Captain's Diary: Jukichi's Four-year Odyssey Across the Pacific, Through California, Alaska, Kamchatka, and Back to Japan, 1813-1817</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4587">
                <text>Hirochika Ikeda</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4588">
                <text>Chunichi Publishing Company</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4589">
                <text>2005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4590">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4591">
                <text>Hirochika Ikeda</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4592">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="152">
            <name>ISBN</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4593">
                <text>4885192595</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4594">
                <text>2005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="205">
            <name>Library Catalog</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4595">
                <text>OCLC WorldCat FirstSearch</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="212">
            <name>Num Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4596">
                <text>131</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4597">
                <text>Nagoya-shi, Japan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4598">
                <text>Chunichi Publishing Company</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="241">
            <name>Short Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4599">
                <text>Funaosa Nikki</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4600">
                <text>Funaosa Nikki: A Captain's Diary: Jukichi's Four-year Odyssey Across the Pacific, Through California, Alaska, Kamchatka, and Back to Japan, 1813-1817</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="21" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="21">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/3a56ec375721c034b2f9ad7c1004906e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8600b4d8264937914de2fe128bdea2ce</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="500">
                    <text>Examining Coastal Shipping Processes around Shodo Island during the
Tokugawa Period
Kotaro Mogi
Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan, 610-0394
Email: moooosha@gmail.com
Hiroomi Tsumura
Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan, 610-0394
Email: Tsumura_Mobile@htsumura.msoutlookonline.net
Abstract
Shodo Island in the Seto inland sea used to be the major entrepôt of wall stones, which
were taken to the Osaka castle, gathered from some islets around this island. The
processes of constructing Japanese castle walls are composed of three processes, viz.
quarrying stones, shipping or transporting them, and heaping them up. While many
historians have studied upon quarrying and piling them, no comprehensive research
has been done as for shipping or transporting them, mainly because no historical
document exits. In order to throw light upon seaborne stone transportation from Shodo
Island to Osaka, therefore, underwater surveys around this island were carried out on
seabed As a result, many submerged wall stones, as well as a submerged stone called
“Kamome Ishi”, on which an old stone post was stood, succeeded in being found on the
bottom of the sea; this mooring post is said to be built by ship owners who carried wall
stones to the Osaka castle, and these waters could serve the most important mooring
port of Shodo Island for wall stone transportation. To prove this historic event, a tide
simulation on the basis of survey data was analyzed and a reconstructed model for
mooring and loading wall stones around the mooring post was hypothesized, which was
verified by current fieldworks. Although millions of mariners have been working in the
Seto inland sea since the ancient times, a new maritime and navigational technique
seems to be emerged from Shodo Island and its surroundings early in the 17th century.
Key words: Shodo Island, Tokugawa Period, Kamome Ishi, Seto inland sea, Yaana
Introduction
This paper will examine the shipping processes of stone used to build Osaka Castle's
wall in the Tokugawa period. Shodo Island in the Seto inland sea used to be the major
entrepôt of wall stones, which were taken to the Osaka castle, gathered from some
islets around this island. This entrepôt has been recognized coastal areas of the Seto
inland including Settu Ashiya or Mikage other than Shodo Island. It is discussed from
historical and archaeological viewpoints through analysis of castle history about the
actual conditions of "job site" as processing stone and the "daimyos" who managed it. It
1

�may be said that the east Seto Inland sea where Shodo Island is located is a "field of
action", having various cultural landscapes since ancient times. Above all, in this field,
cultural behavior mainly on "the stone" has been carried out. For instance, the
fabrication methods of chipped stone tools called "Setouchi blade" in antiquity, was the
stone used for Osaka castle's wall in the medieval period, and contemporary stones
used for modern building. It goes without saying that "the stone" used as tools to
support local life continue supporting our culture now. "The stone" is the remarkable
keyword if we intend to establish a cultural landscape in the eastern Seto inland sea.
Based on the above, in this study, "the stone" that is constructing Osaka castle's wall as
the target, we want to reevaluate the technical examination. Thus far, the processes of
constructing Japanese castle walls are composed of three processes, viz. quarrying
stones, shipping or transporting them, and heaping them up. While many historians has
studied upon quarrying and piling them, no comprehensive research has been done as
for shipping or transporting them, mainly because no historical documents exit.
Therefore, the focus of this study is evaluating and examining the shipping process by
carrying out an underwater investigation which has not been done in a conventional
study. The research area is the Tenguiwaiso job site located at Iwagatani, on east coast
in Shodo Island. We attempt a construction of the data from the basis of an
environmental view point by cyclopedically analyzing the whole area between the shore
and the sea. There are few similar examples of the practice of using of the underwater
archaeology in such a manner. Particularly, the direction through such practices can
bring up new questions, and it becomes a methodological approach to propose the
clarifying facts between the relations of human and technology on maritime culture. The
important point in this study is how to take the sea into account. In a conventional stone
wall study, it relies mostly on the political description about each daimyos who managed
job site and a technical description about how to break stones or to construct the castle,
however, it is necessary to interpret this as "how they shipped the stones" to assume
that the people who carried and engaged it. Technical invention can overcome this
special environment like a sea is a major premise used to know this environment. We
estimate the technique ("the knowledge") from investigation of environment and
archaeological structure.
2

�Research in Tenguiwaiso Job Site
There

are

Minamidani,

Tenguiwa,

Tenguiwaiso,

Tofu,

Kamesaki, and Hachininishi Job sites in Iwagatani on the
east coast of Shodo Island, and scattered wall stones on
each sites. These sites were designated as national historical
sites in 1972. The study was of a number of stones, classified
with processing marks called "Yaana" in Japanese, and
arranged with the carved seal of the daimyos was researched
as that time. The Tenguiwaiso job site is a curved site
Fig. 1 Research area division comprising of a whole shoreline of white sand (the seaside).
of the project. (K. Mogi).
The area is lined with ship setting stones faced with the

“Yanna” seal on this beach. The Tenguiwa job site is located in the western mountains
from the Tenguiwaiso job site; hence it appears that it is the geographical location where
a quarry was established. Stone from the area was removed and taken to the
Tenguiwaiso job site. A torrential downpour by typhoon No. 8 in 1974 caused a landslide
which flowed down onto the shore. Reports that some stones fell down with this
landslide has been documented. Therefore, we must take the geographical change of
the site into account both before and after the disaster. Grasping the present state of it
is the first priority, and the construction of such a site will be an important model to be
analyzed later.
Investigation Method
The basic purpose of this investigation is to obtain data that is topographical and
understanding the stone distribution in the whole range of the shore area (both above
and below water). The number of stones and the drawings has been recorded by the
administrative report, yet the information of which stones are left and in which position
and environment was not documented. In this investigation, we acquired data that
considered the position of stones, their location on the site and in which kind of
environment they were found. In addition to all the stone distribution, it is necessary to
obtain the topographical and environmental information.
Acquisition Data of Topographical and Distribution of Stones on the Shore
To grasp more objectively the shape and distribution of the stones, we conducted
3

�photography from a high elevation of where the stones appeared by using a 5 m,
expandable surveying staff with a camera clamp attached to the upper part of the staff.
We contrived a system of linking positional information (coordinates) and the
photograph, to determine the scale and a direction of the photograph. Photos were
taken mainly of wall stones, big stones, and granite blocks. Given the large area and
multitude of objects on the site, the methodology that was used would have a more
quantitative sample. By using such a scientific example, the site would be easy to
reproduce. In getting a topographical data, a total station (TS) is used at every
surveying site today. It calculated the distance and the height to collimation point (prism)
from the machine point (TS), by collimating at a change point of topography and other
points in a random order. Each position and elevation was then derived from calculated
coordinate data, which made a basic contour map from the data. In addition, we
acquired data which was used for the position, scale, and directional information for the
photographical surveying mentioned above. To understand the geographical feature, it
could help verify the distribution of stones under each kind of environment, and allowed
us to determine where the natural and artificial topographies lied on the site.
Acquisition data of topographical and
distribution of stones underwater
Based on the results of the investigation in
2012, we determined the rough distribution of
stones in all underwater areas by viewing via
snorkeling. By this confirmation, we divided
the area where stones were distributed
conspicuously,
Fig. 2 "Kamome Ishi". (K. Mogi)

and

subsequently

investigated these areas (Fig. 1). Between

each area was a sandy area where stones had not been observed. There is a
submerged rock of approximately 3 m in height named "Kamome Ishi" (Fig. 2), on which
an old stone post stood at research area II in the open circle of Fig. 1. In local transition,
it may be a mooring post that was said to be built by ship owners who carried wall
stones to the Osaka castle. "Kamome Ishi" was examined mainly in 2012. It was
hypothesized as a mooring post and modeled as such, however, it was not conclusive,
4

�thus a reevaluation of the area was deemed necessary. Each section was then divided
up via measuring tape into 50×50 m blocks. We then checked the distribution of the
stones by scanning the bottom of the sea using animation photography (HERO3 of
GoPro). A mark was made at every 1m interval, and at each interval, a photo was taken
(Fig. 3). A gap in the image when it was composed was the blurring of the camera
position, and the bob weight on the camera was taken in the angle of view. It blurred at
the time of photography by setting up an angle to deserve gaps of image, and we
compensated for this (Fig. 4). The process provided direction, scale and position of the
image by yielding a coordinate on the initial point, middle point, and terminal point on
each 1 m measurement line. Based on such a procedure, we acquired consistent
underwater data sets to collate with the topographical data gathered from the shoreline.
The acquisition method of the
underwater

topographical

data was used as well as the
surveying

method

at

the

shore area stated earlier. We
measured the topography at
random to the spot about 300
m ahead from the shore.
Collimation (prism) attached
top of the measurement staff,
Fig. 3 Underwater Photographing Method. (K. Mogi)

calculated distance and height of

the collimation point from the machine point (TS). We stabilized the collimation and the
staff by two scuba divers and one snorkeler manning each at bottom of the sea position,
middle position, and surface of the water position. The diver at the sea bed selected a
change point of the topography at approximately 5-10 m and at random, and the diver at
the surface determined the direction of movement. In addition, a research member on
the ship acted as contact to the operator on the shore. Each position and elevation of
collimation are derived from calculated coordinate data, it matched data of the shore
area, and made a basic contour model. The measurements between the ship using
sonar or multi-beam is common for an ocean study and the method of making a counter
5

�map at the bottom of the sea, is necessary completion with the land since this area is
the full coastal zone in this study. For that reason, we think that bringing a land method
into practice underwater brings yields valuable information, since we are able to obtain
data with a more detailed approach using
such a method.
Reduction and Analysis of Acquisition
Data
Topographical Data in the Shore and
the Underwater
To coordinate topographical data at the
shore and the underwater area using the
practice mentioned above and extract
latitude

and

longitude,

we

made

a

topographical map (contour) of the whole
research area by Kriging method used in
Fig. 4 Method of Control and Revision of the geology (Fig. 5). Reproduction of the
Camera Position. (K. Mogi)
shore and the seafloor topography was

compiled to match and supplement both data sets of these environments. In
consideration of Fig. 5, the shore topography makes curves like a bow and in
perspective we know that it formed a gentle topography to measure points at the off
side at approximately 300 m. In addition, the shore area represents a beach with a
sandwiched concavity in both the north and the south of the site. The port and the
breakwater have shore protection at present. From a narrower perspective, it is
confirmed that the large shallow area in the north coastal zone, and the irregular
sequences on the contour line which in the center of coastal zone are consistent with
the location of "Kamome Ishi". Please note that the two dales in the northeast side (the
shore side) from its area. This has been confirmed on site; the erosion traces by the
wave could be seen on the lower part it. These two dales formed a geographical
placement that suggests relation with the Tenguiwa job site as a quarry located in the
mountains place of the northeast side.
Additionally, the dale topography is around a 10 m deep on the southeast side. This
6

�may be a part of the site influenced by the disaster in 1974; it could show which area
was affected my observing mudflow sediment. Depending upon the size of the disaster,
the landslide sediments left traces we can observe. Yet the sediment is not present. It is
possible that the landslide sediment disappeared via the erosion of water from the
disaster. Undoubtedly, an area along the shore that is predominantly affected by waves,
tidal flow, and topography, it is obvious that the natural and physical phenomenon such
as the erosion forms chaotic natural molding for the beach topography and the
landscape. However, it does not lead to the generalization of the natural phenomenon in
the shore area when compared with a study of hydrology or engineering science in the
region these days, so it is suggested that a "Critical transition" occurred (Marten
Scheffer, 2009) which represents dramatic chaos on the site which change some
parameters. To consider such a background, while taking a wave and a flow of the sea
into account, it must push forward by discussing this as an interpretation of the shipping
process based on the analysis of the
data.
Distribution of Stones in the Shore
and Underwater Area
To

coordinate

the

distribution

of

stones from both on the shore and
underwater, we digitized the shape of
Fig. 5 Topographical Map in Shore and under Water. each stone via enforced geometry
(K. Mogi)
correction,
stored
in
a
GIS

(Geographic Information System). It distinguished the stones from the sand, and other
objects (e.g. noise) by checking color tone and image, and subsequently made a
distribution map of the stones (Fig. 6). We are analyzing it now, making a distribution
map of stones in the whole investigation area.
Stones left on the job site without being carried to Osaka castle were labelled as
"Unfortunate Stones". Nevertheless, it is strange that many of the stones were recorded
underwater. It has our assumption that the stones underwater were stones which fell
into the sea, and were left without being recovered. This practice could have propelled
the myth of "the fall of the castle" used in local folklore. To understand it better, see Fig.
7

�5, where stones are concentrated, appearing that they have a consistent arrangement.
As mentioned before, the sandy area is devoid of stones. The distribution of stones
would be scattered everywhere in a more random pattern if they were not picked up
because it would mean "the fall of the castle". Therefore, in this study, we doubt the
claim of these stones being called" Unfortunate Stones", and put forward the theory that
the distribution of stones underwater as "intentional".
Suggestion of the Shipping Process
First, as the examination of "Kamome Ishi" (Fig. 2) mentioned above, authors have tried
modeling the shipping process completely dependent on high and low tides. In particular,
because it made a hole in the top surface of "Kamome Ishi" and a stone pillar was
embedded in it, it was assumed as a mooring post. The "Moyai" in the Sea of Japan is a
similar example, and it could be said that the “Kamome Ishi” has a similar structure to
the mooring post. However, including an example of the Sea of Japan, the mooring post
for ships docking at old ports was typically made in most of the sea cliffs or the wave cut
bench which have an enclosed cape or a cliff facing the sea. In contrast, the "Kamome
Ishi" is located in the sea at approximately 2 m depth on the average. It is unique that
the post is placed directly ahead of the shore. Authors have measured and investigated
the "Kamome Ishi" from 2012, and examined and evaluated its function. Assuming the
"Kamome Ishi" serves the function of mooring a ship, it becomes necessary that the
post is always higher than the height of the water surface. Tidal analysis was conducted
on the region between the years 1619 CE (the year the Osaka castle began
construction) to 1630 CE (the year the Osaka castle was completed). The data allowed
us to deduce that waves never surpassed more than upper parts on "Kamome Ishi" of
approximately 320 cm height. Therefore the stone pillar was always higher than water
surface. From this, it could be said to some degree of certainty that the "Kamome Ishi"
did indeed function as a mooring post. One interpretation in this is, viz. A ship, such as a
flatboat arrived between the land and the "Kamome Ishi" at high tide. It then it moored
the ship using its anchor and the stone pillar of "Kamome Ishi". The ship ran aground at
low tide and used a board as a gangplank between the land and the ship. After loading
the stones it waited until high tide (when the ship refloated), and started sailing. This
process is an assumed hypothesis. Since historical documents and records are poor
8

�pertaining to shipping or transporting this material, we can only hypothesize a scenario
such as this one.
Secondary, the authors paid close attention to the near shore current system in the area.
The shore topography forms the curves like a large bow over the area. Generally, the
near shore current system forms a circulatory system where the shore is nearer than
the sea area as has the relatively same flow as the shore ward currents flowing onto
shore, Long shore currents flow along the shore, while Rip currents flow seaward from
the shoreline. Rip currents have a particularly strong flow in the near shore current
system and forms a regular circulating flow style. Depending on this system, the cusp
topography which formed the arch-formed shoreline was affected rhythmically occur
and has been confirmed in the Tenguiwaiso job site where the team investigated. It was
often chosen as a place ("current") to begin rowing unconsciously, so that a big wave is
hard to flow at the place that Rip currents are being produced. Therefore, we can
consider that a ship laden with the Osaka castle wall stones starting to sail through the
mechanism of the Rip currents. . The conditions that Rip current occur and concentrates
are a sandy coast, a shoreline bended into an arc form, a surface wave flow on top of
sandy coast, and a near structure such as breakwaters which stuck out from shore.
Based on the above information and the checked topography in Tenguiwaiso (Fig. 5),
these

are

very

present

in

this

environment.
There are two dales on the northeast
side of the shore area. These two
dales play a big role in the Rip
currents' formation. Looking at the
topography data, the sandy coast
topography formed a fold, not a
straight line. On the other hand, while
the wave characteristically diffracts to
Fig. 6 Distribution Map of Stones. (K. Mogi)

the shallow direction, it is concentrated

on a pointed part topographically. Hence, we can understand this two dales have
topographical characteristics to form Rip current. Where the "Kamome Ishi" is located, it
9

�forms a line at right angles to the shore. An Irregular sequence is observed near this
rock and "Kamome Ishi" by topographical data (Fig. 5). In particular, Rip currents are
particularly faster near the structure, so it is our opinion that a ship moored at the
"Kamome Ishi" can benefit from these extra rapid Rip currents. In light of these Rip
currents and topography data, it was suggested that the ships landing here exploit this
process when sailing from I and II in Fig. 1 in particular.
Conclusion
This paper examined coastal shipping process of wall stones by evaluating environment
around the area and investigating underwater structure and stones. And we gave a new
suggestion against it was inarticulate manner. Although it may not wish that is over a
level of "the interpretation", it is necessary more procedural analysis that mainly
investigation or field work and method to the interpretation in case of treating such
several ways and estimations are accomplished. There are still a lot of challenges for
the future; however we think that can give a new suggestion for the wall stones study
mainly political and technical. It is necessary to let method of investigation and
environmental evaluation more deepen hereafter.
Acknowledgements
My heartfelt appreciation goes to Prof. Tsumura whose comments and suggestions
were of inestimable value for my study. I am also indebt to Prof. Iwabuchi, Prof. Nakada
and anonymous reviewers whose comments made contribution to my thesis.
References
Board of Education in Utsumi town., 1979. Conservation Management of A Historical
Site Osaka Castle's Wall Stones Job Site, Kagawa: 4-7, 17-19, (in Japanese).
Hiroomi, T., 2013.

"Cultural Landscape" of Maritime People Understanding from

Investigated Underwater Archaeological Feature in Tenguiwaiso. Symposium of Stones
Attraction Creating in Shodo Island, in Ministry of Strategy and Finance Shodo island
Kagawa: 61-67, (in Japanese).
Kotaro, M., and Yuichi, T., 2013. Tide Simulation and Inquiring of Shipping Process in
Coastal Zone, Shodoshima. The 30th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society for Science
Studies on Cultural Property Abstracts, in Society for Science Studies on Cultural
Property Hirosaki: 118-119, (in Japanese).
10

�Kyoji, Y., 2002.

About Mooring port remaining Moroyose Fishing port.

Board of

Education in Hamasaka town Press, Hyogo: 5-11, (in Japanese).
Marten, S., 2009. Critical Transition in Nature and Society. Princeton University Press,
New Jersey: 11-15.
Yuichi, T., Tappei, M., Keisuke, F., and Kotaro, M. 2013.

Application of Scanning

Surveying Technique for Archaeological Features Using Phtogrammetry.

The 30th

Annual Meeting of the Japan Society for Science Studies on Cultural Property Abstracts,
in Society for Science Studies on Cultural Property Hirosaki: 146-147, (in Japanese).
Biography
Kotaro Mogi is perusing his Masters in the Graduate School of Culture and Information
Science at Doshisha University in Japan. He is interested in Spatiotemporal Informatics,
Cultural Anthropology, Maritime Archaeology, and Information Science. Especially, study
is that interaction water environment including sea and human in principal objective, and
human behavior in the space. It is intended to evaluate the human behavior from the
information to be provided the investigation in underwater cultural heritage and analysis
environment around it. Main research areas are the Seto inland Sea, Egypt, Motosu
Lake, and Maldives.
Hioomi Tsumura is the Associate Professor in Faculty of Culture and Information
Science, and Director of the Research Center for Knowledge Science in cultural
heritage, Doshisha University in Japan. He is specialized in are Spatiotemporal
Informatics and Human ecology. His past work includes: The E-way into the four
Dimensions of Cultural Heritage (Archeopress, 2004), Site-Catchment Analysis of
Prehistoric Settlements by Reconstructing Paleoenvironments with GIS; "GIS-Based
Studies in the Humanities and Social Science" (Taylor and Francis, 2005), and
"Geography Information Science Dictionary" (Asakura Press, 2004).

11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="12">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="40">
                  <text>Session 9: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="41">
                  <text>Interview with Session 9 chair Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="42">
                  <text>East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia.&#13;
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities. Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="43">
                  <text>Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="495">
                <text>Examining Coastal Shipping Processes around Shodo Island during the Tokugawa Period </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="496">
                <text>Shodo Island in the Seto inland sea used to be the major entrepÃ´t of wall stones, which were taken to the Osaka castle, gathered from some islets around this island.  The processes of constructing Japanese castle walls are composed of three processes, viz. quarrying stones, shipping or transporting them, and heaping them up. While many historians have studied upon quarrying and piling them, no comprehensive research has been done as for shipping or transporting them, mainly because no historical document exits.  In order to throw light upon seaborne stone transportation from Shodo Island to Osaka, therefore, underwater surveys around this island were carried out on seabed  As a result, many submerged wall stones, as well as a submerged stone called â€œKamome Ishiâ€, on which an old stone post was stood, succeeded in being found on the bottom of the sea; this mooring post is said to be built by ship owners who carried wall stones to the Osaka castle, and these waters could serve the most important mooring port of Shodo Island for wall stone transportation.  To prove this historic event, a tide simulation on the basis of survey data was analyzed and a reconstructed model for mooring and loading wall stones around the mooring post was hypothesized, which was verified by current fieldworks.  Although millions of mariners have been working in the Seto inland sea since the ancient times, a new maritime and navigational technique seems to be emerged from Shodo Island and its surroundings early in the 17th century.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="497">
                <text>Kotaro Mogi</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="498">
                <text>Hiroomi Tsumura, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="499">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="529" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="320">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/cb1c161bbaa7a450fc48bc6ab05269e8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8a93e7c3d3312637a6e064514b83e3e6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5942">
                    <text>ARCHAEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF WORLD WAR II JAPANESE
AIRCRAFT IN AUSTRALIA: THE CASE STUDY OF HAJIME TOYOSHIMA’S
ZERO
Hiroshi Ishii (Flinders University, MA Student)

ABSTRACT
During World War II, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) and Army (IJA) carried out a series of air raids on
northern Australia. The Bombing of Darwin by the IJN on 19 February 1942 was the most significant foreign
attack in mainland Australia since the colonisation of Australia by the British Empire. One of the IJN Zero
fighters flown by a petty officer, Hajime Toyoshima, was force-landed on Melville Island, north of Darwin. The
pilot was subsequently captured by an Indigenous man, Matthias Ulungura, and became the first Japanese
prisoner of war on Australian soil. This study examines historical records and remains of Toyoshima’s Zero and
related materials currently displayed in three museums around Darwin to answer the research questions of why
and how the utilisation of the wreckage of Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials have changed over time.
Close examination with 3D photogrammetry recording of the wreckage shows characteristics of the early model
of Mitsubishi M6A2b Type 0 Model 21 carrier fighter and evidence of use of this aircraft wreckage.
Examination of related materials also indicate debatable authenticities. Despite the questionable legitimacies of
these related materials, exhibitions of museums utilize them in their attempted recreations of the past event.
Furthermore, those materials reflect the social value shifts that those items went through. This study focuses on
interactions between Australians, which includes the Indigenous people, and the IJN aircraft.

KEYWORDS: World War II, Aviation, Japan, Australia
LIST OF IMAGES
Figure 1. Toyoshima’s Zero, force-landed on 27 February 1942 (Photograph: Australian War Memorial).
Figure 2. 3D-rendered orthographic view of the Zero (Created by the author, November 2022).
Figure 3. A close-up of the Type 14 pistol, which is exhibited at the Darwin Military Museum as Toyoshima’s pistol
(Photograph: Author, 4 December 2021).
Figure 4. A bronze statue of Matthias Ullungura (left) and a three-blade propeller (right) outside the Patakijiyali Museum
(Photograph: Wendy Van Duivenvoorde, 27 May 2021).

INTRODUCTION
World War II (WWII) significantly impacted Australia, as it was the first time in postcolonial Australian history that foreign forces attacked the country. From 1942 to 1945, the Imperial
Japanese Navy (IJN) and Army (IJA) conducted a series of air raids in northern Australia
(Lewis and Claringbould 2020), combined with naval attacks by the Japanese and German navies
in Australian waters (Lewis 2010; McCarthy 2009a, 2009b, 2011; Smith 2008), which greatly
influenced the country’s establishment of a national identity independent from the British Empire.
The Bombing of Darwin on 19 February 1942 was the first and largest Japanese air raid in Australia.
During the raid, a Mitsubishi A6M2b Model 21 Zero (Zeke) fighter flown by Petty Officer
Hajime Toyoshima and launched from IJN aircraft carrier Hiryu, was forced to land on Melville
Island. Toyoshima became the first prisoner of war (POW) in Australia (Alford 2011, 38–39). The
remains of the aircraft and related materials, including the propeller, Toyoshima’s pistol and a
statue of the Indigenous man, Matthias Ulungura, who captured the pilot, are displayed in three
museums in Darwin and Bathurst Island, serving as significant mementoes of the war for Australian,
Indigenous, and Japanese history. This study focuses on how Australians and Indigenous people
have utilised the wreckage of the Japanese aircraft and related materials.

1

�RESEARCH QUESTION
As a research question, this study will focus on why and how utilisations of the wreckage of
Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials have transformed over time. This research pursues the
following four avenues to address the question. Firstly, historical documents and records of
Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials will be examined. Secondly, the current condition of the Zero
in the Darwin Aviation Museum will be recorded and analysed to observe any trace of utilisations.
Thirdly, related materials and displays in three museums (the Darwin Aviation Museum, the
Patakijiyali Museum, and the Darwin Military Museum) will be observed. Lastly, the gathered data
will be interpreted to understand human behaviours towards materials related to the war.
THE BOMBING OF DARWIN
The Bombing of Darwin occurred on 19 February 1942, several days after the fall of Singapore, and
was a combination of two raids. The first raid was carried out by IJN and led by Vice Admiral
Chuichi Nagumo and his First Mobile Striking Force (‘Mobile Fleet’). Even though the Mobile Fleet
is often called the ‘Nagumo Force’, later historians evaluate Nagumo as a ‘largely passive and not
terribly innovative’ commander (Parshall and Tully 2005, 17). Nagumo was, however, fortunate to
have talented young officers such as Commander Minoru Genda, who designed this raid as well as the
Pearl Harbor attack (Lewis and Ingram 2013, 50–51).
The first raid involved 188 IJN aircraft, including 36 Mitsubishi A6M2 ‘Zero (Zeke)’ fighters, 71
Aichi D3A1 ‘Val’ dive bombers, and 81 Nakajima ‘Kate’ bombers. Launched from four carriers –
Hiryu, Soryu, Kaga and Akagi – the aircraft attacked Darwin in the morning (Lewis and Ingram 2013,
286). The Kates and Vals dropped a total of 82,800 kg of bombs (Lewis and Ingram 2013, 88). Their
primary targets were merchant and navy ships in the harbour and port facilities, such as Stokes Hill
Wharf and oil tanks. Some bombs hit the city area and destroyed a post office, possibly because of
overshoots (Lewis and Ingram 2013, 82–83). Twenty-one ships in the harbour were heavily damaged
or sunk during the raid. The exact number is uncertain, but at least 252 people were killed, and 350
were injured during the first raid (Alford 2011, 34).
IJA carried out the second raid, which involved 54 land-based bombers, a combination of 27
Mitsubishi G4M1 ‘Betty’ bombers from Kendari in Sulawesi and 27 Mitsubishi G3M1 ‘Nell’
bombers from Ambon on the Maluku Islands in the Netherlands East Indies, attacking Darwin over an
hour after the first raid, at noon. The Nells and Bettys dropped a total of 32,050 kg of bombs and
primarily targeted the airport (Lewis and Ingram 2013, 233).
DESK ASSESSMENT AND FIELD SURVEY
Desk-based research was conducted before a field survey in Darwin to gather historical records,
photographs, and films to understand the interactions between people and the Zero. Primary sources,
such as historical photographs, films, and archived official documents and reports, were collected to
achieve historical accuracy, along with secondary sources like published books, websites, and
newspapers. The Heritage Branch, Northern Territory Government, and a local historian, Bob Alford,
kindly provided unpublished reports.
The collected data was utilised to aid the field survey in three museums: the Darwin Aviation
Museum, the Darwin Military Museum, and the Patakijiyali Museum on Bathurst Island. The Darwin
Aviation Museum exhibits the majority of the portion of Toyoshima’s Zero and is run by the Aviation
Historical Society of the Northern Territory (AHSNT) (Darwin Aviation Museum 2017). The Darwin
Military Museum is run by the Northern Territory branch of the Royal Australian Artillery
Association (RAAA) and has Hajime Toyoshima’s pistol in their theatre-like exhibition (Australian
Charities and Not-for-profits Commission [ACNC] 2022). The Patakijiyali Museum is run by the
Tiwi people and has a propeller from Toyoshima’s Zero and a bronze statue of Matthias Ulungura
2

�(O’Toole and La Cana 2017). As the examined materials were displayed in publicly accessible areas,
no permission was needed except for recording the Zero at the Darwin Aviation Museum.
EXAMINATION AND 3D RECORDING OF THE ZERO
The photographic examination and 3D recording of Toyoshima’s Zero, which are exhibited in the
Darwin Aviation Museum, were planned to analyse the identification, current condition and traces of
past utilisation of the aircraft. Permission to survey the remains of the Zero was granted by the
committee of AHSNT in May 2021.
3D recordings and modelling of cultural heritages and archaeological sites are technologies that have
recently been rapidly and widely adopted among researchers, especially maritime archaeologists
(McCarthy et al. 2019, 1–2). These technologies are applied to recordings of aircraft wrecks and
restored aircraft (Lickliter-Mundon 2018, 36).
For this research, photogrammetry was chosen as a 3D recording technique for three reasons. The first
reason is that photogrammetry requires neither any contact nor the destruction of recording objects
since it only requires photo shooting. The second reason is that photogrammetry can produce the
desired accuracy and data resolution for this research. Finally, photogrammetry only requires low-cost
equipment and one operator to record a feature.
HAJIME TOYOSHIMA ON MELVILLE ISLAND
Several Tiwi people’s testimonies mention their encounters with Hajime Toyoshima on Melville
Island. One Indigenous woman who first encountered Toyoshima on the island, Missus Aloysius,
described her encounter with Toyoshima in her letter to a friend. She described that Toyoshima tried
to communicate with them and even offered his watch to a boy they were taking care of (Lockwood
2013, 95). Although Toyoshima’s approach to the Indigenous people was peaceful, Matthias Ulungra
(Ngapiatilawai)’s disarming of Toyoshima as the first Japanese POW on Australian soil symbolises
their encounter with Toyoshima (Riseman 2018, 138). Matthias described the event details when he
approached Toyoshima from behind and told him, ‘Hands up!’ He took his revolver and a map
(Lockwood 2013, 96). Without any resistance, Toyoshima was captured, and his flying suit, his
Belgian .32 inch (8.1 mm) automatic pistol and his map were taken by Matthias. Later he was taken to
the Australian Army on Bathurst Island and handed to Australian Army Sergeant Les Powell (Piper
1995, 58). Toyoshima said he was an air gunner from Ambon, and his name was Tadao Minami. He
died during the infamous Cowra prison breakout in New South Wales on 5 August 1944 (Powell
2007, 91).
THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE’S INVESTIGATIONS OF THE ZERO IN 1942
Despite Toyoshima’s temptation to hide his identity and the existence of his wrecked Zero, Tiwi
people traced his movements and found the wreck site. In early March 1942, a team of Royal
Australian Air Force (RAAF) led by Indigenous men visited the site (see Figure 1). This was the first
time in WWII that the Allies captured a fully intact Zero (Piper 1995, 60). Squadron Leader Sergeant
Allan Beatty, one of the No. 13 Squadron (RAAF) from Darwin, led the investigation team and wrote
his report on 7 March 1942 (NAA 1942).
Since it was impossible to carry the whole Zero with their manpower, the RAAF intelligence team
partially dismantled the Zero, including all armaments, the engine, the rear fuselage and instruments.
Those parts of the Zero were later manhandled to the coast and then shipped to Darwin for further
inspections (Piper 1995, 60). Around 1983, the team leader – Sergeant Allan Beatty – described his
‘finding the empty oil tank of the fighter with a single hole and some metal about the size of a .303
bullet inside’, which might be the cause of the Zero’s malfunction and wrecking (NAA 1942). Beatty
kept ‘the small drogue from the pilot’s parachute’ from the site as a souvenir until 1993, the year in
which he donated it to the Darwin Aviation Museum (Piper 1995, 63).
3

�Figure 1. Toyoshima’s Zero, force-landed on 27 February 1942 (Photograph: Australian War Memorial).

REDISCOVERY OF THE ZERO
In September 1960, during the development of a road on Melville Island, the Zero was rediscovered.
The director of the Welfare Branch, Northern Territory Administration, Harry Christian Giese,
recognised the Zero as the first Japanese aircraft shot down on Australian soil and advised that it be
secured for future usage in a museum or similar facility. Eventually, the Zero was stored in a secure
area at Snake Bay, Melville Island (NAA 1971). From 1962 to 1969, the Returned Sailor’s, Soldier’s
and Airmen’s Imperial League of Australia (RSSAILA) Darwin Sub Branch and the RAAA Northern
Territory branch showed their interest in obtaining Toyoshima’s Zero to the Administrator of the
Northern Territory. The Tiwi people, however, refused to provide the wreckage (NAA 1971).
In late October 1977, after lengthy negotiations, the Milikapiti (Tiwi) Council agreed to lend the Zero
to AHSNT under a formal agreement. The remaining aircraft parts were shipped to Darwin and
secured in an AHSNT facility (Piper 1983).
THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE ZERO
During the field survey for this research on 3 December 2021, 1,401 images of Toyoshima’s Zero
were taken with a Nikon D5600 digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) at Darwin Aviation
Museum. All images were successfully aligned with Agisoft Metashape, and a high-quality 3D
scanned model of the remains of Toyoshima’s Zero was created. Further, the 3D model of the Zero
4

�with one-metre scale bars was rendered with the 3D software Blender for analysis and display
purposes (see Figure 2). The round-shaped oil tank in front of the fuselage is a characteristic of an
early model of Zero, such as Model 11 or 21 (Hara 2001, 169). Furthermore, the wingtip from the port
wing displayed in the Darwin Aviation Museum shows folding and locking mechanisms. Assuming
the wingtip belongs to the front fuselage of the same Zero, it indicates either a Model 21 or 22 (Hara
2001, 277). Therefore, the Zero in the museum is likely identified as a Model 21 Zero.
The remaining parts of the engine mount on the Zero are physical evidence of the salvage operation
by the RAAF salvage team at the end of February 1942. Other missing characteristics of this
wreckage, such as the engine, the rear fuselage and instruments, match with information from the
RAAF salvage team’s report. Thus, this Zero can be identified as Toyoshima’s Zero.

Figure 2. 3D-rendered orthographic view of the Zero (Created by the author, November 2022).

TOYOSHIMA’S PISTOL
Although Matthias Ulungura described Toyoshima’s pistol as a ‘revolver’, Piper (1995, 58) and
Alford (1991, 20–21) describe Toyoshima’s pistol as a .32 Belgian automatic pistol with seven rounds
fully loaded in its magazine. This description of the .32 Belgian automatic pistol probably comes from
Australian Army Sergeant Lew Powell’s testimony. Since Powell was military personnel, it is
unlikely that he misidentified the calibre and characteristics of the pistol, while he would not have
gained any benefits from a false description. It is easy to identify the model of Toyoshima’s pistol as
the FN Model 1910 based on Powell’s specific description (Gorenstein 2022, Chapter 10).
A Japanese Type 14 pistol, however, is displayed as Toyoshima’s at the Darwin Military Museum.
This pistol is not likely to come from Toyoshima. The manufacturing year and month for a Type 14
pistol were engraved near its grip. In the case of the pistol in the Darwin Military Museum, the
manufacturing year and month can be read as ‘昭18.4’, which means ‘April 1943’ (Shōwa 18) (see
Figure 3), and it is more than a year after the capture of Toyoshima. There is a record that a
Mitsubishi Ki-46 Type 100 Command Reconnaissance Aircraft – the Allied codename Dinah – flown
by IJA Lieutenants Saburo Shinohara and Hideo Ura crashed north of the Bathurst Island Mission on
17 August 1943. Their bodies were buried near the crash site (Lewis and Claringbould 2020, 112).
The pistol currently exhibited as Toyoshima’s at the Darwin Military Museum likely belongs to either
Shinohara or Ura.
5

�Toyoshima’s pistol often appears in many stories and museums, such as the statue of Matthia, because
it is the direct physical evidence of his surrender. Since Toyoshima is the first Japanese POW
captured on Australian soil, the identity of who disarmed him later became a historical matter, and his
pistol symbolised the event. Since the social value of the event increased over time, Powel attempted
to reclaim the credit for the disarming of Toyoshima much after the war (Bellamy 1995, 63).

Figure 3. A close-up of the Type 14 pistol, which is exhibited at the Darwin Military Museum as Toyoshima’s pistol
(Photograph: Author, 4 December 2021).

STATUE OF MATTHIAS ULLUNGURA AND PROPELLER ON BATHURST ISLAND
As a plaque on the statue of Matthias Ullungura in Patakijiyali Museum indicates, the Northern
Territory Government built this statue in 2016 to commemorate the contributions of Matthias and the
Tiwi people during WWII (Figure 4). Despite Matthias mentioning Toyoshima’s pistol as a
‘revolver’, his statue holds an FN Model 1910 pistol which Lew Powell’s description influenced. It is
questionable whether the Tiwi people requested or benefited from this statue, given the oral history
and dance they have developed to represent this part of their history (Davidson 2015). It is more likely
that the statue is the government’s way of indicating interest in the Tiwi people and the shared past.
Though more research is required, a brief inspection of the picture of the propeller near the
Patakijiyali Museum attributed to Toyoshima’s Zero by Ken Lai, a curator of the Darwin Aviation
Museum, suggests the association is unlikely for two reasons. First, the propeller reduction gear and
the propeller shaft, which appear in the propeller on Bathurst Island, are still visibly intact on the
wreckage of Toyoshima’s Zero in the historical picture (see Figure 1). The propeller reduction gear of
Toyoshima’s Zero is still covered with a metal housing and surrounded by the cowling in the picture.
Second, the propeller should be bent backwards, since Toyoshima’s Zero force-landed. The propeller
on Bathurst Island (Figure 4), however, is bent forwards, indicating the propeller hit ground or water
from the side or back but not from the front. It is challenging to identify whether the propeller on
Bathurst Island originated from either a Japanese or an Allied plane because Sumitomo Metal
6

�Industries was licenced by American company Hamilton Standard in 1934, and the company started
to manufacture hydromatic propellers in 1938 for Zeros (Yoshida 2019, 76–78).

Figure 4. A bronze statue of Matthias Ullungura (left) and a three-blade propeller (right) outside the Patakijiyali
Museum (Photograph: Wendy Van Duivenvoorde, 27 May 2021).

SOCIAL VALUE CHANGES
From this research, historical narratives of Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials can be observed.
The Darwin Aviation Museum uses Toyoshima’s Zero as a medium to recreate the 1942 Bombing of
Darwin. The Darwin Military Museum pistol and the Patakijiyali Museum propeller are used to lend
legitimacy and authenticity to the host institutions. Meanwhile, status of Matthias Ulungura serves as
a tourist attraction. These narratives suggest that the social values of Toyoshima’s Zero and related
materials have also changed over time. Parallels can be observed elsewhere, as in the case of USS
Arizona in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. During the war, the wreckage of the USS Arizona was utilised for
war efforts. After the war, the wreckage was heavily salvaged for relic collecting until the time came
in the 1960s when the wreck became a war memorial (Delgado 1992).
RE-CREATING THE PAST WITH MEDIUMS
All museums surveyed during this research attempt to re-create the event by utilising Toyoshima’s
Zero and related materials to some degree. In other words, those materials work as mediums to
connect visitors and the past event – the Bombing of Darwin. In the case of the Darwin Aviation
Museum, Toyoshima’s Zero is a medium to re-create past events. The pistol in the Darwin Military
Museum and the propeller at Patakijiyali Museum also serve as a medium through which to provide
legitimacy and authenticity to the respective museums, despite the questionable credibility of those
artefacts. Further, the creation of related materials, which are fabricated mediums, occurred in the
7

�cases of the Patakijiyali Museum (i.e., the statue of Matthias Ulungura). These cases illustrate how
mediums are significant in experiencing a past event and are also used for tourist attractions.
CONCLUSION
This study attempted to answer the main research question: Why and how have utilisations of the
wreckage of Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials changed over time? Four research aims were
addressed to answer this research question.
The first aim was to examine historical documents and records of Toyoshima’s Zero and related
materials. Through analysis of historical documents, value shifts towards Toyoshima’s Zero over time
were observed. The aircraft had value as an enemy aircraft during the war. After the war, it was
forgotten until its rediscovery. After its rediscovery, several stakeholders were interested in obtaining
the aircraft as a war relic and tourist attraction.
The second aim was to record and analyse the current condition of the Zero in the Darwin Aviation
Museum to observe any trace of utilisations. With the recording and analysis of the Zero in the
Darwin Aviation Museum, this study successfully identified the model of the Zero as an early Model
21 flown by Toyoshima; this study also examined traces of salvage attempts.
The third aim was to observe related materials and displays in three museums. With the observation of
museum displays, this research found the credibility of artefacts claimed to be Toyoshima’s pistol and
the propeller from his Zero questionable. Overall, the survey concluded that all three museums
attempted to re-create the event by utilising artefacts to some degree and I noted social value changes
over time.
The final aim was to interpret collected data to understand human behaviour towards materials related
to the war. As explained above, the social value of Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials has
changed over time. Historical records and the current condition of the Zero reflect these shifts.
Moreover, museums utilise Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials as mediums to connect visitors
with the re-created past event.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the Aviation Historical Society of the Northern Territory (AHSNT), Bob Alford and Ken Lai, for the
permission to examine Toyoshima’s Zero. I would also like to thank David Steinberg from the Heritage Branch, Northern
Territory Government, for his support of this project. This paper is based on the author’s thesis research. Thanks to my thesis
supervisor, Wendy Van Duivenvoorde.

8

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alford, Bob. Darwin’s Air War 1942–1945: An Illustrated History. Darwin: Colemans Printing, 1991.
Alford, Bob. Darwin’s Air War, 1942–1945: An Illustrated History Commemorating the Darwin Air Raids, 2nd edn. Darwin:
Aviation Historical Society of the Northern Territory, 2011.
Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission “Royal Australian Artillery Association (Northern Territory)
Incorporated.” Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission. 2022. Accessed October
31, 2022. https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/c7f8d255-3aaf-e811-a95e-000d3ad24c60/profile
Bellamy, C. “The question of Hajime.” honours dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1995.
Darwin Aviation Museum “About the Darwin Aviation Museum.” Darwin Aviation Museum. 2017. Accessed October 31,
2022. https://www.darwinaviationmuseum.com.au/about/
Davidson, Helen. “ N.T. prepares to honour Indigenous people’s efforts in second world war.” The Guardian. October 14,
2015. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/oct/14/nt-prepares-to-honourindigenous-peoples-efforts-in-darwin-bombing
Delgado, James P. “Recovering the past of USS Arizona: Symbolism, myth, and reality.” Historical Archaeology 26, no. 4
(1992): 69–80.
Gorenstein, Nathan. The Guns of John Moses Browning: The Remarkable Story of the Inventor Whose Firearms Changed
the World. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2022.
Hara, Katsuhiro. Zerosen hiroku = The Zero fighter. Tokyo: KK Besuto Serāzu, 2001.
Lewis, Tom. Darwin’s Submarine I-124. Kent Town: Avonmore Books, 2010.
Lewis, Tom, and Michael Claringbould. The Empire Strikes South: Japan’s Air War against Northern Australia 1942–45.
Kent Town: Avonmore Books, 2020.
Lewis, Tom, and Peter Ingman. Carrier Attack Darwin 1942: The Complete Guide to Australia’s Own Pearl Harbor. Kent
Town: Avonmore Books, 2013.
Lickliter-Mundon, M.E. “Aviation archaeology: History, theory, practice and direction.” PhD dissertation, Texas A&amp;M
University, 2018.
Lockwood, Douglas. Australia under Attack: The Bombing of Darwin 1942. London: New Holland Publishers, 2013.
McCarthy, John., Jonathan. Benjamin, Trevor. Winton and Wendy van Duivenvoorde “The rise of 3D in maritime
archaeology.” In 3D Recording and Interpretation for Maritime Archaeology, edited by John. McCarthy, Jonathan.
Benjamin, Trevor. Winton and Wendy van Duivenvoorde, 1–10. Cham: Springer, 2019.
McCarthy, Michael. “Towards an understanding of the importance of the HMAS Sydney II and HSK ‘Kormoran’ sites. Part
1: The genesis and evolution of the controversies.” The Journal of the Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology 33,
no. 1 (2009a): 72–78.
McCarthy, Michael. “Towards an understanding of the importance of the HMAS Sydney and HSK ‘Kormoran’ sites. Part 2:
The inordinate delay in commencing a search.” The Journal of the Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology 33, no. 1
(2009b): 79–85.
McCarthy, Michael. “Archaeology and the HMAS Sydney.” The Journal of the Australasian Institute for Maritime
Archaeology 35, no. 1 (2011): 18–27.
National Archives of Australia [NAA]. Report of Japanese aircraft crashed on Melville Island, A9695, 468, Remains of
Japanese Zero on Melville Island, 7 March 1942. National Archives of Australia, 1942. Accessed December 1, 2022.
https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/SearchScreens/BasicSearch.aspx

9

�National Archives of Australia [NAA]. Remains of Japanese Zero on Melville Island, F1, 1971/7282, Remains of Japanese
Zero on Melville Island. National Archives of Australia, 1971. Accessed December 1, 2022.
https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/SearchScreens/BasicSearch.aspx
O’Toole, Kate. and Xavier. La Cana. “Sister Anne Gardiner hands over keys of Patakijiyali Museum to Tiwi Islanders to
run.” The ABC News. March 18, 2017. Accessed October 31, 2022. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-18/sister-annegardiner-hands-over-keys-of-patakijiyali-museum/8366298
Parshall, Jonathan. and Anthony P. Tully. Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway. Dulles: Potomac
Books, 2005.
Piper, Robert. "Epitaph for a Darwin Raider". The Canberra Times. February 12, 1983, 13.
Piper, Robert. The Hidden Chapters: Untold Stories of Australians at War in the Pacific. Carlton: Pagemasters, 1995.
Powell, Alan. The Shadow’s Edge: Australia’s Northern War. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press, 2007.
Riseman, Noah. 2018 “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander military service in the Second World War”. Journal of Military
and Strategic Studies 19, no.2 (2018): 137–156.
Smith, Tim. “Managing an Australian midget: The Imperial Japanese Navy type a submarine ‘M24’ at Sydney”. The Journal
of the Australasian Institute for Maritime Archaeology 32, no. 1 (2008): 79–89.
Yoshida, Hideo. “History of the aluminum technology from duralumin to extra super duralumin (part 5). Extra super
duralumin and Zero Fighter (2). Application of extra super duralumin to Zero Fighter”. UACJ Technical Reports 6, no.
1(2019): 67–80.

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="40">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="166">
                  <text>2023 Session 4: Underwater Cultural Heritage of World War II in the Asia-Pacific Region: Discoveries, Opportunities &amp; Challenges</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="167">
                  <text>Session 4 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="168">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 4 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="169">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="170">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="171">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="172">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="173">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="174">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5935">
                <text>Archaeology and Anthropology of World War II Japanese Aircraft in Australia: the Case Study of Hajime Toyoshima's Zero&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5936">
                <text>During World War II, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) and Army (IJA) carried out a series of air raids on&#13;
northern Australia. The Bombing of Darwin by the IJN on 19 February 1942 was the most significant foreign&#13;
attack in mainland Australia since the colonisation of Australia by the British Empire. One of the IJN Zero&#13;
fighters flown by a petty officer, Hajime Toyoshima, was force-landed on Melville Island, north of Darwin. The&#13;
pilot was subsequently captured by an Indigenous man, Matthias Ulungura, and became the first Japanese&#13;
prisoner of war on Australian soil. This study examines historical records and remains of Toyoshima’s Zero and&#13;
related materials currently displayed in three museums around Darwin to answer the research questions of why&#13;
and how the utilisation of the wreckage of Toyoshima’s Zero and related materials have changed over time.&#13;
Close examination with 3D photogrammetry recording of the wreckage shows characteristics of the early model&#13;
of Mitsubishi M6A2b Type 0 Model 21 carrier fighter and evidence of use of this aircraft wreckage.&#13;
Examination of related materials also indicate debatable authenticities. Despite the questionable legitimacies of&#13;
these related materials, exhibitions of museums utilize them in their attempted recreations of the past event.&#13;
Furthermore, those materials reflect the social value shifts that those items went through. This study focuses on&#13;
interactions between Australians, which includes the Indigenous people, and the IJN aircraft.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5937">
                <text>Hiroshi Ishii</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5938">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5939">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5940">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5941">
                <text>Ishii, Hiroshi. 2023. “Archaeology and Anthropology of World War II Japanese Aircraft in Australia: The Case Study of Hajime Toyoshima’s Zero.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Alexis Catsambis. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1898 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="54">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="681" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="473">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/b132e608ddeb4621ef677cee49bc72a3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a38313bd835f0d572e9e4bcccec4e521</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="68">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7325">
                  <text>2021 Session 6: The Maritime Archaeology of Trade and Exchange in East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7326">
                  <text>Session 6 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7327">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7328">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7329">
                  <text>November 2021</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7330">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7331">
                <text>"Gang(綱)" of letters on ceramics written in ink found in maritime archaeological excavations</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7332">
                <text>Ceramics are one of the major artefact types that are found in maritime archaeological excavations. Some of these ceramics have letters written in ink on them. Tthese letters are categorized as “Gang (綱)”. “Gang” is an important historical material to "Gangshou (綱首)", which is the name of a group of leading trade merchants operating during the Song dynasty in the literature records. Gang written on ceramics have several types, such as “gang”, “family name + gang”, “gangsi (綱司)”, and “family name + gangsi”. These “Gang” ceramics have been found in ruins on Hakata (博多)  and in northern Kyushu in Japan, Mado (馬島) underwater ruins in Korea, and Penghu Island (澎湖島) ruins in Taiwan. It was also collected from under the sea near Hong Kong. In mainland China, these are also excavated from the Nanhai I Shipwreck (南海), Shipwreck of Quanzhou(泉州) Bay, Strata of Song Dynasty in the Nanyue (南越) Palace ruin, and in Guangzhou(広州). This study examines merchant excavation locations of "Gang" identified ceramics within the maritime archeological context.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7333">
                <text>Hisako Ishiguro </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7334">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7335">
                <text>November 2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7336">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="91">
            <name>Rights Holder</name>
            <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7337">
                <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7338">
                <text>Ishiguro, Hisako. 2021. “"Gang(綱)" of letters on ceramics written in ink found in maritime archaeological&#13;
excavations.” Edited by Brian Fahy, Hans Van Tilburg, Bill Jeffery, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Riley Smith. In Proceedings of&#13;
Fourth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Keelung,Taiwan, and Virtual, November&#13;
1-5, 2021. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology URL: https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/exhibits/show/apconf-muchproceedings/item/681</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="83">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2021</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="622" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="413">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c3ef358232376f6bacefe915e670a91d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>64b4f9c08837516700ea70c958d00d92</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6765">
                    <text>Searching for the evidence of disaster from the sunken village of Lake Hibara, Japan
Randy Sasaki (Associate Professor, Teikyo University Research Institute of Cultural Properties)
Wataru Tanikawa (Senior Researcher, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)
Jun Kimura (Associate Professor, Tokai University)
Hisashi Nakagawa (Curator, Toyohashi City Museum of Art and History)
Shintaro Yamasaki (Associate Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University)
Yuhji Yamamoto (Professor, Kochi University)
ABSTRACT
In 1888, the eruption of Mount Bandai in the Fukushima prefecture of northern Japan created a dammed lake,
resulting in the submergence of the entire village of Hibara. A multi-disciplinary research team has been
organized to extract both archaeological and historical information as well as environmental information. The
focus of the research is not only on the material culture, but also on topics such as the process of submergence
and how people's lives were affected. The study of the submerged village of Hibara is a unique opportunity to
gain a deeper understanding of the impact of natural disasters on human settlements. To locate the periphery of
the site, the team is using remote sensing technology including Side Scan Sonar, Sub-bottom Profiler, and
underwater drones. Additionally, soil coring is being used to study the event sequence and the environment, and
archaeological techniques are being used to record the material culture. This is one of the first studies of its kind
conducted in Japan, and the team aims to develop methodologies for investigating submerged sites. Ultimately,
this research will contribute to the study of local history and enhance our understanding of cultural heritage.

List of Abbreviations
SSS Side Scan Sonar
JpGU Japan Geoscience Union
Keywords: Japan, Fukushima, Submerged Landscape, Natural Disaster
INTRODUCTION
This article discusses the scientific potential of studying disaster sites located on an inland lake.
So-called disaster archaeology at submerged archaeological sites is not a well-known topic of research
in Japan. In 2022, to promote the study of underwater disaster archaeology at inland lakes, researchers
from various fields came together to conduct an archaeological expedition. This paper focuses on a
research project led by Senior Researcher Wataru Tanikawa, being conducted at the submerged site of
Hibara Village in Fukushima Prefecture. The village was submerged by the formation of a dammed
lake following the 1888 eruption of Mt. Bandai (Central Disaster Management Council 2005, 1). The
site records the tangible heritage of village life, the mechanisms of a disaster, and how people reacted
to the disaster. The project is a joint effort by archaeologists and natural scientists to extract records of
disasters by investigating historical records, archaeological remains, as well as acquired data from
remote sensing technologies and soil science technologies.
The importance of understanding past disaster sites is apparent because such studies not only provide
an understanding of our past but also contribute to today’s policy-making in better disaster prevention.
Disasters, such as volcanic eruptions, change the landscape drastically and the lives of people. The
study of submerged landscapes and the material culture left behind underwater due to a disaster can
provide insight into our past interaction with the environment. Research in this sub-field has been
challenging because of the small number of investigated sites, the lack of uniting themes, and how to
glean information through available scientific methodologies. The team hopes to create momentum for
further research on disaster archaeology at submerged sites by providing possible themes and research
methods to be followed. This paper discusses the history of Hibara Village, how the research came
about, results from the 2022 season, and as a conclusion, a plan for future research. The preliminary
results of the 2023 fieldwork will be discussed in the presentation.
1

�HISTORY OF HIBARA VILLAGE
Hibara village is strategically located along an East-West path in a mountainous region of northern
Japan. The major development came during the Edo period (1603-1867 CE) when the village was
designated as a post town or Shukuba-Machi, on the Aizu-Yonezawa Highway. The village has little
farmland, but it flourished as an “inn” for merchants and travelers. However, in the Meiji era
(1868-1912 CE), when the highway system was abolished, the town declined in its importance.
Despite losing its function as a station, the village was a well-known spot along the highway for rest
(Kita-Shiobara Village Board of Education 2018, 1-2).
On 15 July 1888, the sudden eruption of Mt. Bandai changed the course of the village forever. This
was the first major disaster that received international attention in the Meiji period. A part of the
mountain collapsed and the avalanche buried several villages, killing close to 500 people (Sato 2021,
49-50). Hibara village first appeared to have been saved from the devastation, as the debris from the
collapsed mountain did not reach the village. However, the debris from the mountain dammed the
existing streams creating lakes. The water level began to rise slowly, and after several months, the
government ordered the villagers to evacuate and the village was relocated to a higher ground. The
newly formed Hibara Lake eventually swallowed the entire village (Kita-Shiobara Village Board of
Education 2022, 36).
The location of the village was not forgotten. The focal point for the villagers then and now is the
shrine, located at the ridge of a hill, above the current water-level. The passageway, or the approach to
the shrine, is marked by rows of trees. After the submergence, these trees were cut down, leaving the
tree stumps behind partially submerged. These stumps can be seen today along the two Torii gates,
leading up toward the shrine. One Torii gate is standing close to the current shoreline and another Torii
is in the lake. The water level of the lake is controlled, and seasonal fluctuation is high due to the
heavy snowfall in the area. Usually, the water-level is kept low during winter. During summer seasons,
one of the Torii is completely below water, but when the water level is low, one can walk beyond this
Torii on dry land.
The submerged section of the village has been designated as a known site by the local municipality
(Kita-Shiobara Village Board of Education 2022, 35). In 2000, Hosei University carried out a
preliminary diving survey around the village and found several ceramic fragments. Hosei University
organized further research in 2002, and they recorded some features, including rock foundations and
raised ground. The work was done by the university's Explorer Club and not by trained archaeologists
(Tanikawa 2021). The video and the drawings they made, however, provided clues about what to look
for during research. In addition to these underwater expeditions, the Kita-shiobara village conducted
an in-depth walking survey during a historic low tide in 2016; they found gravestones and other
stone-built structures, as well as some artifacts including ceramics and iron objects (Kita-Shiobara
Village Board of Education, 2022).
HOW THE RESEARCH CAME ABOUT
For years, Tanikawa had a vague idea of studying past disasters and their impacts on human society by
combining natural and social sciences. Between 2015-2019, Tanikawa investigated "Kuroda-gori," a
village in Kochi Prefecture that is believed to have been submerged by the Hakuho Earthquake of 684
(Tanikawa et al. 2016, 17-18). Based on historical documents and sedimentation history, several areas
in Kochi Prefecture were surveyed, finding underwater remains, such as blocks of stones and stone
pillars (Tanikawa et al. 2019). However, it was not possible to identify direct links between the
features, sedimentology data, and written records. Tanikawa realized the need for collaborative
research, especially from the archaeological community. Randall Sasaki, hearing the story of
Tanikawa’s research, offered help. To discuss the possible collaboration of research, a session titled
`Natural hazard and human activity recorded in underwater geoarchaeological structure` was
organized at the Japan Geoscience Union and American Geophysical Union joint meeting held at
2

�Makuhari, Japan (JpGU Session H-QR05, 2020). At this session, the need to investigate a known
submerged site as joint research was proposed, and Hibara village was selected as a case study. The
research team, mainly from three different fields, was formed. Besides the archaeological team, one
team focuses on remote sensing surveys to gather an overall image of the site, and another team
conducts scientific analysis including the soil profile. The Lake Hibara underwater site is a suitable
location for research for several reasons. Written records of the disaster are available and the reason
for the submergence is known. The location of the site is certain and the local municipality is eager to
support the project.

Figure 1. A Historic Map (Azaippitsukagirichizuchou, Hibara-Mura) of Hibara Village,
displayed at the Local Museum (Photographed by the research team)

In 2021, the team gathered at Hibara Lake for a preliminary investigation; a sonar survey, snorkel
survey, and underwater monitoring by a drone were conducted. The sonar survey revealed rows of tree
stumps along the approach and showed some strong reflections. The snorkel survey identified rows of
trees and some building blocks. The underwater drone survey revealed stone structures, and possible
locations of a temple by the presence of gravestones. The main source for identifying the general plan
of the village is the land allocation map (Azaippitsukagirichizuchou, Hibara-Mura) from the early Meiji
period (Aizu -Yonezawa Kaido Main Road, Hibara Historical Museum). It depicts streets, canals,
housing blocks, and important buildings including a shrine, a temple, and administrative buildings
(Figure 1). The results from the 2021 season appeared to correspond well with the allocation map. A
meeting with the local municipal office was held, sharing the results and discussing the research plan.
Based on the results, the team was able to draw a research plan. The team applied for a research grant
and was approved, starting a four-year project in 2022 (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) Clarification of underwater ruins of Lake Hibara and the volcanic disaster that caused the submergence
of the lake).
THE 2022 SEASON
This was the first main season of the research and was focused on gleaning information from various
methods to see the overall picture of the site and fine-tune the research plan for the coming seasons.
The team conducted various remote sensing surveys and diving investigations. Soil samples and wood
samples were also collected for analysis.
3

�Remote Sensing Survey
The success of underwater archaeology is all about knowing where to look, and this study is to know
the general distribution or the plan of the village. The above-mentioned allocation map is an important
source; the map contains information on the length/size of the village blocks. Remote sensing was
planned to orient and adjust the map to be used for archaeological surveys (Figure 2).

Figure 2 A Photo of the Lake, the Torii Gate, and the
Team Conducting a Survey (Photographed by the research team).

Sonar surveys were conducted on several occasions using Side Scan Sonar (SSS) (Imagenex Model
872 YellowFin: 800 kHz). The images showed reflections from the submerged Torii, rows of trees,
stone walls and foundations, intersecting roads, and some other unknown features. Approximately an
area of 0.2㎢ was surveyed, and a mosaic image was generated. The SSS image appears to correspond
well with the land allocation map, showing some of the building blocks with sharp corners. A general
land formation and small streams can be vaguely seen but require a visual inspection to identify
(Figure 3).
A Sub-bottom Profiler survey (SyQwest Bathy 2010-PC: 3.5 kHz) was conducted to investigate the
features buried below the lake sediment. The survey focused on the proposed village area; transact
lines were made from both north-south and east-west directions. The result showed that the site was
covered by about 20-30 cm thick soft lacustrine sediment. The land slopes downwards towards
west-northwest directions and appears to show a greater change in elevation at the edge of the village,
which is also seen in the SSS data. All water sources run from west to east, following the natural land
formation. The irrigation channel made at the village followed this natural drainage direction.

4

�Figure 3 A Side Scan Sonar Mosaic Image overlayed;
Showing the Outlines of the Village in Reflections (image provided by the research team)

A magnetometer survey (OH Marine Magnetics SeaSpy2) was also conducted. Around the supposed
village, 12 magnetic anomalies were found, mainly concentrated in the northern part of the survey
area. These anomalies could potentially be associated with iron artifacts discarded by villagers when
leaving.
Archaeological Investigation
The underwater investigation was conducted to see if the SSS data corresponded with the map and the
accuracy of the map. If the team can “learn” how underwater features appear, it may be able to
reconstruct the village by looking at the SSS data, and also be able to pinpoint the location to dive.
Silt accumulation is the main problem for an archaeological diving survey. The visibility becomes
close to zero, if divers are not careful to disturb the bottom surface. The datum was set at the
submerged Torii, and a 100 m line was established extending out from the approach. Since this survey
was a preliminary expedition, this is a temporary datum and a fixed datum point will be established in
the following season. The submerged Torii is about 71 m offshore. The resident informed the team that
these Torii gates were constructed about 40 or 50 years ago, close to the original locations.
Stacked Stone Wall
The diving survey revealed the remains of a two-story stacked stone structure with an L-shaped plan,
located 120 meters offshore (about 50 m from the datum). This is thought to be the junction of the
approach and the main highway. The structure was composed of rectangular stones measuring roughly
70 cm x 30 cm. The feature is partially buried, especially showing heavy accumulation towards the
west. The wall was at least two stones high, 18 stones lined north-south (along the approach), and at
least five stones east-west (along the main highway). This wall can be seen clearly on the SSS image.
Rock Accumulation
A wide area of gravel accumulation was discovered approximately 15 meters from the datum. The
exact extension is unknown, and the size and the shapes are irregular. Several stones were cut to make
into shapes, and a circular hole was drilled in at least one of the stones, which is broken in half. It is
5

�considered to be the foundation of the Torii. The feature appears as cloudy reflections in the SSS
image.
Earthen Embankment
An elongated earthen embankment was discovered parallel to the east of the approach road, extending
approximately 25 m in length. The embankment was made primarily of sand mixed with gravel. The
embankment measures four meters wide and has a low rise of two meters. To the north of this feature
is an area with scattered rocks and the remains of building foundations. Based on the land allocation
map, a temple was located at the northern end of the embankment. The embankment may be an access
road to the temple. The feature is shown as a mix of spotted strong and weak reflections in the SSS
image.
Landform
The SSS image shows an abrupt change in color at several locations, and these correspond well with
the elevation change. A slanted S-shaped change in landform seen in the image can also be seen in the
land allocation map. The abrupt change in the elevation was confirmed during the diving survey as
well. The houses, or village blocks were built along this ridge. The main highway runs along the lower
edge of this ridge. Some houses, a shrine, and a temple were built on the upper ridge and the rest of the
town below.
Core Samples Wood Species analysis
The core samples were taken at four locations, two samples each (Samples A and B), counting eight
cores in total. Samples A were subjected to destructive analysis while Samples B were only used for
non-destructive analysis. The baseline for collecting samples was set along the approach to the shrine,
establishing the zero point at the submerged Torii. The core sample was collected at 30m (Core I),
52m (Core II), 70m (Core III), and 100 m (Core IV) from the zero point. Core samples were collected
by divers pounding polycarbonate pipes directly into the lake bottom. Samples up to 35 cm in
length/depth were collected. Nondestructive observations of internal structure in lake sediments were
made using X-ray computed tomography. Density and magnetic susceptibility measurements were
made using a nondestructive multi-sensor core logger, density and porosity measurements were made
using the nitrogen gas displacement method, grain size analysis using laser diffraction, and mineral
identification using powder X-ray diffraction.
All cores had fine-grain sediments in the shallow/top layer (Layer I) and mixed sediment with some
angular gravel in deeper layers (Layer II). Layer I had a lower bulk density, magnetic susceptibility,
percentage of grains larger than 1 mm in diameter, and dispersion of grain size distribution. In terms of
bulk density, a clear physical property gap was observed between the layers. Layer I showed a larger
proportion of diatoms and volcanic glass and a smaller proportion of quartz than Layer II. In addition,
no illite or chlorite, both of which are andesitic origin, was found in Layer II. The results indicate that
Layer I is a soil layer deposited after the formation of Hibara Lake.
To our surprise, pottery fragments were found in Core IV. These pottery sherds had engraved stripes
on the interior, suggesting that it is a fragment of mortar for grinding, which is a typical artifact found
in a site dating to the Early Modern period or later. Core IV showed higher porosity, indicating heavy
land use. Perhaps, this area was used as farmland or trash pits existed nearby. Core III, which is
located near the intersection of the approach and the main highway, showed compacted soil.
Rows of trees along the approach create the key scenes of the site. To identify the species and to date
the tree, core samples were drilled into several trees. The species were identified as cedar. The trees
date to around the mid-19th century from the radiocarbon dating. The date confirms that the growth of
trees stopped soon after submerging.
6

�CONCLUSIONS AND 2023 SEASON PLAN
Interdisciplinary investigation of the Lake Hibara underwater site is a challenging and complex
endeavor, but the first season shows promising results. The research team hopes to obtain a
comprehensive understanding of natural disaster mechanisms as well as the people’s interaction with
the event. With the data and knowledge gathered in the first season, the research team is
well-positioned to find out more about the complex dynamics of the underwater site, and the wider
implications of natural disasters.
During the 2023 season, small-scale excavations both on land and underwater are being planned. This
may provide an insight to the changes in material culture before and after the village was relocated.
The detailed season plan has not been finalized at this point of writing, but the season's preliminary
results will be introduced at the conference.   

Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research for funding our project. We are deeply grateful for numerous
individuals and groups whose contributions were essential to their success. Particularly, appreciation should be given to the
residents and municipal officers for their hospitality and invaluable support, which greatly facilitated our research.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aizu -Yonezawa Kaido Main Road, Hibara Historical Museum “Azaippitsukagirichizuchou, Hibara-Mura” A photo-copy of
Historical Map 字一筆限地図帳　第四大区七小区　岩代國耶麻郡 檜原村, Author not recorded, Date Unknown,
(Photographed by the research team)
Central Disaster Management Council. 1888 Mt.Bandai Eruption Report, Tokyo:Central Disaster Management Council,
2005.
Kita-Shiobara Village Board of Education. Kita-Shiobara Village Excavation Report, No. 5, Fukushima: Kita-Shiobara
Village Board of Education, 2022.
Kita-Shiobara Village Board of Education. Historic Road, Aizu-Yonezawa Highway - Hibara History Trail, Fukushima:
Kita-Shiobara Village Board of Education, 2018.
Sato, Hiroshi. “Eruption of Mount Bandai in 1888 and Recovery from Disaster.” Water Science 65, no. 3 (2021): 45-69.
Tanikawa, Wataru. Collaborative Research and Meeting of Natural Hazard Science and Archaeology for Submerged Ruins.
Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University, Kyoto: Kyoto University, 2021.
Tanikawa, Wataru., Go-ichiro Uramoto, Yohei Hamada, Masafumi Murayama, Yuhji Yamamoto, Takehiro Hirose, Osamu
Tadai, Kouki Tanaka, Hiromasa Ozaki, Minoru Yoneda, and Hidekazu Tokuyama. “Provenance of submerged stone pillars in
an earthquake and typhoon hazard zone, coastal Tosashimizu, southwest Japan: A multidisciplinary geological approach.”
Marine Geology 415 (2019) 105962.
Tanikawa, Wataru., Go-Ichiro Uramoto, Hidekazu Tokuyama, Masafumi Murayama, and Yuhji Yamamoto. “A Review on
Estimation of Subsidence Records of Nankai Earthquakes from the Tradition of the Submerged Village Kuroda-gori.” Rekishi
Jishin 31 (2016):17-26.

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="51">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="265">
                  <text>2023 Session 15: The Archaeology of Submerged Landscapes and Inland Waters</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="266">
                  <text>Session 15 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="267">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 15 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="268">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="269">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="270">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="271">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="272">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="273">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6754">
                <text>Searching for the evidence of disaster from the sunken village of Lake Hibara, Japan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6755">
                <text>Randy Sasaki &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6756">
                <text>Wataru Tanikawa &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6757">
                <text>Jun Kimura &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6758">
                <text>Hisashi Nakagawa &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6759">
                <text>Shintaro Yamasaki &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6760">
                <text>Yuhji Yamamoto</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6761">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6762">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6763">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6764">
                <text>Sasaki, Randy,  Wataru Tanikawa, Jun Kimura, Hisashi Nakagawa, Shintaro Yamasaki, Yuhji Yamamoto. 2023. “Searching for the evidence of disaster from the sunken village of Lake Hibara, Japan.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Jennifer McKinnon. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1994 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="69">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 15 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="486" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="278">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/6a275ffeef37f06e94530ed5134b2791.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c2dbaf85d61bbd705bbb1f792d2e8a97</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5587">
                    <text>The Historical Transition of Lakefront Environment and
Use in Lake Biwa, Japan

Hisashi Nakagawa
Toyohashi City Museum Art and History
nakagawa_134@yahoo.co.jp

Abstract
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan. It has approximately
4,000,000 years of history, and many people have lived on this lake. More
than 90 underwater archaeological sites exist here, and we are able to
understand the subtleties of history. As an example, the Awazu-bottom
site,is dated to the middle of the Jomon period approximately 5,000 years
ago, and is the largest freshwater shell mound in Japan. It was formed
near the lakefront at first, but now submerged on the bottom of lake. The
Shiozu-port site is a late Heian period dated to 800 years ago, and is one
of the oldest harbor sites in Japan. It was constructed to reclaim the lake,
and prospered as water transport area. Many important remains, not only
port facilities but also shrines and more, have been excavated, but it
disappeared in the 12th century. The causes of this sites’ submergence
is closely related an environmental transition of the lakefront. The water
balance is particularly important problem. Approximately 460 rivers flow
into this lake, but the discharge is only through the Seta-River. Therefore,
the water level is greatly fluctuated by the sedimentation situation of the
riverbed. According to the old historical documents, many floods have
occurred. Therefore, sometimes dredging is carried out by the
government to this day. Not only are water levels problematic, but ground
sedimentation is as well. The lakefront is convenient for fishery and water
transportation, but on the other hand, the land is soft. In a certain study,
the ground water level is slightly 20cm higher than water level of lake. As
a result of this, serious damage to the settlements have occurred by
earthquakes. The extreme effect of this has settlements bring submerged
to the bottom of lake by lateral Flow; landslide by the soil liquefaction. In
this paper, I would like to study a historical transition of the lakefront
environment and its use.
Key words: landscape, Lake, Japan, riverine

�Introduction
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan and many people have
lived on this lake. There are more than 90 underwater or lakeside
archaeological sites that exist here. As it has approximately 4,000,000
years of history, its form has been changed due to a variety of factors such
as crustal deformations or sediment depositions. In recent years, the
relation between these geographical or geological changes and lives of
the local people has gradually been revealed by a lot of archaeological
materials acquired through some investigations of the submerged sites
(Nakagawa, 2016). In this paper, the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen in Nagahama city is discussed in order to describe the
natural and historical environmental changes at Lake Biwa from the
ancient times to the middle age.
General Description of the Site
The underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen site is located at
the bottom of Lake Biwa in front of the town of Gion in Nagahama city,
which is in northeastern part of Shiga Prefecture. Local oral tradition tells
us that ‘the village called Nishihama formerly existed here, but it was
submerged into the bottom of lake by a big earthquake during the Kansho
year of the Muromachi period (1460-1466)’.
Before examining historical facts, first of all, some current aspects of the
bottom topography found from survey maps and sedimentation situations
have to be shown. The investigation area is shallow off shore; around
100m. It is less than 1.5m deep and more than 82.8 m of altitude. There
3 topographical elevated points are characteristically observed (Fig. 1).
These points have been named A, B, and D as each survey ward (Fig. 2).
In addition, the survey ward of C has no elevation, and a medieval

�graveyard does not have any elevated peaks, either. In more than 80m
of offing, the more clay-like topography regarded as former ground is still
spread. Its average bottom attitude is less than 82.8m (about more than
1.5m deep). In this very peculiar area, old withered trees have been
excavated. Because some botanical analyses prove that its soil contains
large amounts of plant opals from bamboo grasses, this area was certainly
dry land in earlier times.

Fig. 1: Topographical lakebed map around the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen.

�Fig. 2. Research areas of the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen.
In the survey ward of A, its highest bottom elevation is approximately
83.7m (about 0.6m deep). This relatively elevated ward is situated on the
western part of the investigation area, measuring about 40m from east to
west and 60m from south to north. Around the survey ward of A, the
gentle collapse-like topography which was caused by the power waves
from the offing direction could be seen (survey ward of A’). In the survey
ward of B, its highest bottom elevation is approximately 83.75m (about
0.55m deep). This relatively elevated ward is situated on the east part of
the investigation area, measuring about 40m from east to west and 50m
from south to north. Around the survey ward of B, as A, the gentle
collapse-like topography could be seen (survey ward of B’). In the survey
ward of C, the average bottom elevation is approximately 83.3m (about
1m deep). It is on the western part of the investigation area along the
lakeshore, measuring about 80m from east to west and 15m from south
to north.
In the survey ward of D, its highest bottom elevation is approximately
83.4m (about 0.9m deep). This relatively small and oval elevated ward is
situated at the centre of the investigation area, measuring about 35m from

�east to west and 15m from south to north. Around the survey ward of D
as well, as A and B, the gentle collapse-like topography could be seen
(survey ward of D’). The survey ward of a medieval graveyard is situated
about from 50m to 70m off the lakeside, and its average bottom altitude is
83.1m (about 1.2m deep). There many stone materials, most of which
used to be grave stones, are found; each medieval grave consisted of
many stones, which were nearly a size larger than a fist of a grown-up
man or smaller than human skull, forming a rectangular section or a cairn.
The bottom material at the flat part (less than 83.2 m of altitude) at the
investigation area consists of small grains of sands. They seem to have
been brought there later by wave action or longshore currents. The
survey ward of a medieval graveyard is buried under these sands by half.
Contra to this, the bottom material of elevated wards of A, B, and D
consists of round-shaped small river stones, each of which is from
approximately 5cm to 10cm in diameter. Although one of the survey ward
of C consists mainly of such river stones, many bigger stones, each of
which is from 20cm to 30cm in diameter, are also observed sporadically
on this ward.
As for the reason why there are some topographical elevated points there,
as this area used to be a river delta. Because of this fact, small river
stones are found in the elevated wards of A, B, and D. Each ward still
looks like the shape of a river delta. Judging from the survey map, around
four tributary branches might have flowed into Lake Biwa, but the direction
of water flows may have been altered in later years. So presumably the
river was about 250m wide at the mouth.

�Historic Environmental Transition Judging from Old Topographies
and Relics
Development Process of the Sites
Figure 3 shows the graphic chart of the number of excavated relics from
this site for each century. Obviously its peaks were the 8th and the 12th
centuries while only one relic from the 14th century was found. Since the
15th century, this site seems to have restarted as a new site.

The

tendencies at the 12th and the 13th centuries look similar, but almost all
relics from the 12th century consist mainly of unglazed pottery named
‘yama cha wan’, which disappeared before the first quarter of the 13th
century. In the survey ward
C, the remains of a well was found which seems to be abandoned
deliberately during the 13th century. The cultural discontinuation of this
underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen could be observed
around the 13th century; this place itself was deserted with awareness.

Fig. 3: Numbers of excavated relics.
Only one relic from the 14th century at the survey ward of C is either air
ring of a five-ring stone pagoda. It was originally made in the 14th century,

�but later after the 15th century it was reutilized as a tomb stone. In the
same elevated zone as the pagoda was found, an elected stone Buddha
statue from the 16th century was also found.

The end time of the

underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen might be the latter
half of the 16th century, because only one relic, i.e. a cup made from
celadon porcelain, from the 17th century was found there.
The transition period of the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen could be divided into three or four phases, viz. Phase I
around the 8th century, Phase II in the 12th century which was the most
flourishing time of this site, Phase of Rupture from the middle of the 13th
century to 14th century, and Phase III from the 15th to 16th centuries when
the site had been revived.

Distribution Situation of Relics Every Investigation Area
Then, is such situation universal at the whole survey wards of the site?
Figure 4 shows the graphic chart of the number of excavated relics for
each survey ward for each century. Before Phase I, all wards had relics
although its number was relatively small.

This trend seems to have

continued until the 10th century. Because this investigation area used to
be a river delta, these small relics were flowed there together with
sediment along the river branches. At first, it was the secondary centre to
accumulate broken relics.

Some relics, in particular, from the 10th

century, are not broken at all and not obliterated; the original places of

�those relics would not have been so far away. Perhaps, they might be
used directly above this site.

Fig. 4: Numbers of excavated relics at each research area.

�Phase II is completely different from Phase I. Almost all relics from this
phase were found only around the survey ward of B, although only one
relic was found around the survey ward of A. Relics from the 11th century,
as well as ones from the 13th century, have been excavated only at the
survey ward of B. This distribution of relics does not seem to be originated
from the natural sedimentation but from real human activities.

After Phase of Rupture, this site might have been developed as a new
zone at Phase III after the 15th century. Relics belonging to this period
were mainly distributed over the survey ward of a medieval graveyard and
the offshore places of each survey ward. As no relic is found in the survey
wards of A and B and the survey ward of a medieval graveyard is situated
between the survey wards of A and B, the site of Nishihamasengen had
been changed into land or from drying at Phase III.

Constitution of Relics and Land Use in Phase II
At Phase II around the peak period of the 12th century, what kind of
human activities were observed on the site? When did its rivers run dry?
The compositions of relics from the survey wards of B are shown in Figure
5. Most of the relics are things for offering only, while ones for boiling or
for storing do not exist. Therefore, the survey ward of B at Phase II was
not a waste site of general daily necessaries near commoners’ hamlets,
but maybe it would have had several mounds of Buddhist scriptures.
Because some sutra cases or substitute inkstones are excavated, literate
people, which differed from common villagers, might be living there at
Phase II.

�Fig. 5 (left): Relics at the research area
of B from the 12th to 13th Century.

In former days, men of weight who wished for peaceful death built mounds
of Buddhist scriptures in order to bury the scriptures under the mounds.
The height of prosperity of this custom was the 12th century in Japan
(Sugiyama, 2007); this historical fact may correspond to the case of the
site of Nishihamasengen. As for substitute inkstones, they started to be
used in the latter half of the 11th century in Japan. Literate people
intentionally built mounds of Buddhist scriptures at the survey ward of B,
because at the time of Phase II, which extended over 150 years from the
latter half of the 11th century to the first quarter of the 13th century, the
survey ward of B was dryland, not half-submerged land. This fact is also
proved by the restricted size of ward, measuring about 40m from east to
west and 50m from south to north; throwing sutra cases and substitute
inkstones away from the lakeshore is the out of question.
The concentration of the relics and its conglomeration at the survey ward
B suggest that this zone began to become dry before the middle of the
11th century. A study of historical geography (Mizuno, 2011) says that

�during the Hoen period (1135-1141) the shrine territory of the Gion Shrine
was established around this investigation area and its territorial landsubdivision would have been spread far into under the current Lake Biwa
(Fig. 6).

It could also be imagined that sutra cases and substitute

inkstones from the survey ward B would have been used by some men of
weight who managed this shrine territory and conducted its religious
activities.

Fig. 6: Land division of the Medieval Period. (S. Mizuno)
New Development after Phase III
It is after 15th century that human beings restarted to live around the site
of Nishihamasengen. No relic has been excavated at all at the survey
wards of A and B, while at the survey wards of a medieval graveyard, C
along the lakeshore, and offshore sinking parts of each ward small amount
of relics have been found. These consist of not only stone material
cultures but also old china plates, earth pottery plates, pots, grinding
bowls, many variations of receptacles. On the grinding bowls some usewear is observed, which proves the existence of real human living there
at this time.

�The medieval graveyard must not have built on the submerged land but
on the riverbed of some flow channels when the survey wards A, B, and
C were formed as a river delta at the beginning, which was not suitable
for plotting rice fields. This ward seemed to have been looked like the
actual banks of hell at the middle age.

According to some botanical

analyses and natural scientific dissections of lakebed soil, much larger
offshore areas of the current underwater site of Nishihamasengen were
used for dryland agriculture at Phase III after the 15th century.
Some oral traditions and historical materials tell us that there used to have
been a village named ‘Nisihama-mura’.

The relics discovered in the

underwater site of Nishihamasengen prove that the village of Nisihamamura was founded after the 15th century. The oldest and first historical
material titled Eikyo Shichinen Kanjin Sarugaku Hogacho which
mentioned this village was written in 1435. Since the number of relics
near the lakeshore is relatively small, the village centre at that time might
have been on more offshore place among agricultural fields.
Cause of Its Submergence and Time
What was the actual cause of the submergence of the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen and when? From the 15th to the
16th centuries, undoubtedly, the water level of Lake Biwa varied from 84.2
m 84.7m approximately above sea level (Nakagawa, 2017).
Judging from many aspects of the excavated relics from the site of
Nishihamasengen, Phase III was terminated at the latter half of the 16th
century. Although some stone materials were sometimes reutilized, no
relics from the Edo period was found and the newest one is from the first
half of the 17th century. During Phase III, the highest peak attitude of the
ward of a medieval graveyard is 83.2m (about 1.2m deep). If its ground

�attitude nowadays were the same as one in the middle age, villagers had
built their graveyard on the bottom of Lake Biwa. Indeed, the water level
fluctuation of Lake Biwa is about 1m throughout the year all through the
ages, but its fluctuation could not explain why a medieval graveyard is
now under Lake Biwa. Some botanical analyses also tell us that around
the graveyard the ground was dry at that time. Therefore, the ground
subsidence must have happened between the end of the 16th century and
the beginning of the 17th century.
The most probable movement of the earth's crust was the big earthquake
occurred on 18th January 1586.

According to Luís Fróis, a Jesuit

missionary, because of this earthquake many ground cracks ate
thousands of houses and villagers, and the remaining ones were
destroyed by fires. He also described its ground liquefactions, saying that
from ground cracks black and liquid soil was coming out (Ida, 1987). The
legendary village of Nisihhama-mura or the contemporary underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen was submerged under Lake Biwa
in 1586.
Conclusion
Lakeshore and seashore has changed due to water fluctuation, soil
sedimentation, crustal movement, and so on. Underwater archaeology
could investigate some causes of those changes, studying submerged
sites. In Japan, however, most think that underwater archaeology is the
study of shipwrecks and not many archaeologists are interested in the
historical transitions of waterfront environment or underwater settlement
sites. In the Japan archipelago, on the other hand, there are still to be
many unknown underwater sites, which are similar to the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen. Researching upon them will be
able to cast a new light on the history of Japan or human beings generally.

�References
Ida, K., 1987. History of Tensho Big Earthquake. Nagoya University
Press, Nagoya.
Mizuno, S., 2011. Historical environment of Lake Biwa and human
beings. In S. Mizuno (Ed.), Environmental History of Lake Biwa and
Human Beings, Iwata, Tokyo: 5-26.
Nakagawa, H., 2017. Archaeological study of water level fluctuation at
Lake Biwa: some phases from the end of the ancient times to the middle
age. Busshitsu Bunka, Vol. 97:113-154.
Nakagawa, H., (Ed.), 2016. The Site of NIshihamasengen: Surveys and
Studies of Submerged Sites at Lake Biwa, Sunrise, Shiga.
Sugiyama, H., 2007. Kyo-zutsu. In M. Ono et al. (Eds.), Great
Encyclopaedia of Historical Archaeology, Yoshikawakobunkan, Tokyo:
339-340.
Biography
Hisashi Nakagawa was born in Aichi Prefecture in 1988. During the
undergraduate level, he learned underwater archaeology and supervised
by Prof. Hiromichi Hayashi at the University of Shiga Prefecture (20072011). Prof. Hayashi did study underwater
archaeology from Prof. Yoshio Oe, who is respected
as "Father of Underwater Archeology in Japan". In
2013 he completed the master program (Human
Culture) at the University of Shiga Prefecture, and
then, he had been a PhD candidate in the same
university, and a Research Fellow of Japan Society
for the Promotion of Science (2013-2016). He works
now at the Toyohashi City Museum Art and History.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5581">
                <text>The Historical Transition of Lakefront Environment and Use in Lake Biwa, Japan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5582">
                <text>Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan. It has approximately 4,000,000 years of history, and many people have lived on this lake. More than 90 underwater archaeological sites exist here, and we are able to understand the subtleties of history.  As an example, the Awazu-bottom site,is dated to the middle of the Jomon period approximately 5,000 years ago, and is the largest freshwater shell mound in Japan. It was formed near the lakefront at first, but now submerged on the bottom of lake.  The Shiozu-port site is a late Heian period dated to 800 years ago, and  is one of the oldest harbor sites in Japan. It was constructed to reclaim the lake, and prospered as water transport area. Many important remains, not only port facilities but also shrines and more, have been excavated, but it disappeared in the 12th century.  The causes of this sitesâ€™ submergence is closely related an environmental transition of the lakefront. The water balance is particularly important problem. Approximately 460 rivers flow into this lake, but the discharge is only through the Seta-River. Therefore, the water level is greatly fluctuated by the sedimentation situation of the riverbed. According to the old historical documents, many floods have occurred. Therefore, sometimes dredging is carried out by the government to this day.  Not only are water levels problematic, but ground sedimentation is as well. The lakefront is convenient for fishery and water transportation, but on the other hand, the land is soft. In a certain study, the ground water level is slightly 20cm higher than water level of lake. As a result of this, serious damage to the settlements have occurred by earthquakes. The extreme effect of this has settlements bring submerged to the bottom of lake by lateral Flow; landslide by the soil liquefaction.  In this paper, I would like to study a historical transition of the lakefront environment and its use.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5583">
                <text>Hisashi Nakagawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5584">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5585">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5586">
                <text>Hisashi Nakagawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="19" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="19">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/30be8c594a6dcf9b9795653867c8c44c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f1201a47b83389a459e6091035bf016d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="488">
                    <text>Submerged Archaeological Sites in the Lake Biwa, Japan

Hisashi Nakagawa
University of Shiga Prefecture
Hikone
Japan, 522-8533
Email: nakagawa134@gmail.com
Abstract
Lake Biwa, the largest in Japan, is in the heart of Shiga Prefecture, occupying an area
of 670 square kilometers. Because the lake has about 4,000,000 years of history, it has
been closely related to local people's everyday lives which have largely depended upon
its freshwater and fishery resources. In addition, it has served as a strategic zone for
waterborne transportation for many years in Japanese chronicles. According to an old
proverb, those who succeed in controlling Shiga Prefecture could reign the world.
Geologically, on the other hand, the poor subsoil of the lakeside has frequently caused
large-scaled landslides by earthquakes, as well as the high fluctuation of the water level
and strandline due to climate change; many villages and settlements are said to have
been submerged beneath the lake.
At present, as many as 90 underwater
archaeological sites have already been identified in the Lake Biwa by the researchers.
Those sites vary in type; from shell mounds during the prehistoric era to material
remains of dwellings or bridge piers of the modern period. As a leading research body,
the Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage and academic organizations
such as the University of Shiga Prefecture have long investigated and researched these
areas. Here we present the newest research results with some future plans for
preserving the archaeological sites around Lake Biwa in order to inform the world
academic circle of them.
Keywords: Japan, Underwater archaeology, Lake Biwa, Shiga, Earthquake

Introduction
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan.

It occurred in the Ueno basin

approximately 60 km away from where it lies today, moved by sedimentation and
diastrophism over 4 million years ago. About 400,000 to 300,000 years ago, it arrived at
its current position. The Lake had never been connected to the sea in history, and a
rich and unique ecosystem exists. There are more than one thousands of animals and
plants that inhabit the ecosystem and the many endemic species exist here now. Many
people gathered these resources for a long time.

More than 90 underwater

archaeological sites are known (Fig. 1), and it becomes approximately 120 sites if
1

�incorporated with lakefront ones.

About half of

those sites is from the Jomon period (Prehistoric
era in Japan). Huge shell mounds are found here
therefore people at the time strongly depended
upon the Lake. In the historical age, Lake Biwa
comes to play a socially important role due to its
geographical characteristics.

Mainly, it links the

capital city (Kyoto) to the eastern and northern
country. One must travel through the Shiga
Prefecture to go between the two areas and cross
the “Kara-bridge”. In many cases, the bridge was
often reconstructed over the years, and it is
Fig. 1 Distribution Map of the Sites. discovered through excavation and old historical
(H. Nakagawa)
documents. However, water transport was the most

important means for carrying supplies and materials, therefore, many ports flourished
and a lot of people and information came through here from all over the country. From
such a social importance, it was said that those who succeed in controlling Shiga
Prefecture could reign the world and persons of power always put this lake under their
control. For example, the ancient government constructed large barrows (an ancient
burial mound, square at the front and rounded in the rear) near the lake, and made it
local symbols (Youda, 2007). Nobunaga Oda (1535-1582) who was the most famous
person living in the Age of Civil Wars constructed the Azuchi-Castle in the shore
mountain as a base of the national unification. Similarly, he made vassals construct
castles (Sakamoto-Castle, Nagahama-Castle, and Oomizo-Castle), and ruled the water
transport (Nakai, 1997). Of course, many ordinary people gathered and established
villages and engaged in fishery and transport and others. On the other hand, the poor
subsoil of the lakesides has frequently caused large-scale landslides by earthquakes
and many villages and settlements are said to have been submerged beneath the lake.
In addition, approximately 460 rivers flow into this lake, but its only discharge is the
Seta-River; therefore, the water level is greatly fluctuated by the sedimentation situation
of riverbed.
2

�The History of the Underwater Archeology around Lake Biwa
In Japan, underwater archaeology lags behind compared with other maritime nations.
However, the Shiga Prefecture is known as an area where the concern is exceptionally
high. The history of the Shiga Prefecture’s underwater archaeology can be divided into
3 terms.
Term Ⅰ: Pioneering Studies (From Early Modern times to 1960s)
In Japan, concern about underwater cultural heritage goes back to the Edo period. The
Edo period is the early modern times of Japanese history (1603-1868). Mr. Sekitei
Kiuchi was a collector of unusual stones and came from Shiga Prefecture. While
recording the collected stones in his writings a stone spear was given to him. The spear
was raised by fisherman, and this record is the first concern about the underwater
cultural heritage of Japan. The first academic concern is in 1928. Prof. Sadahiko
Shimada had been set out to examine the origin of underwater archaeological sites; for
example, the Tsuduraosaki-bottom site is well-known (Shimada, 1928). After that, Ph.D.
Yoshio Oe rendered distinguished service. He was from Shiga Prefecture and made an
effort for prevention of the scattering of relics raised from the Tsuduraosaki-bottom site.
Moreover, he introduced underwater archeology to Japan for the first time, and typified
underwater archaeological sites (Oe, 1950). As a result of these achievements, he is
known as the "Father of Underwater Archaeology of Japan". As previously stated, the
Tsuduraosaki-bottom site attracted attention most in those days. This site is unique; it is
at a depth between 10 and 80 m, but almost all of other sites are between 1 and 10 m.
Incidentally, the water level is converted into the standard water level (T. P: 84.371 m)
because it keeps changing every day in Lake Biwa. In 1924, at the end of the Taisho
period, Jomon wares (straw-rope pattern pottery) were raised by fisherman, which
interested archaeologists. In addition, Yayoi period potteries and ancient potteries,
dating between approximately 2,800 to 900 years ago, were raised. Approximately 140
potteries were recovered presently, and many complete shapes are included. Various
hypotheses about origin of this site are suggested. For example, (a) The hypothesis
that land sites were washed out by a rise in water level, (b) The hypothesis of pottery
being thrown away that was used in facilities on the lakefront, (c) The hypothesis to be
burial at sea, (d) The hypothesis that the ground sank by an earthquake, however, the
3

�issue is not yet settled (Shiga Prefectural Azuchi Castle Archaeological Museum, 2009).
TermⅡ: Progress of the Investigation and Study with Lake Biwa Comprehensive
Development Program (Since 1972 to 1997)
The Lake Biwa Comprehensive Development Program was carried out for the purpose
of exploring water resources and the maintaining the social infrastructure.

They

constructed a breakwater and dredged for a lake-line. However, it was evident that
many underwater archaeological sites will be destroyed by these developments;
therefore, many investigations were carried out by Shiga Prefectural Association for
Cultural Heritage.

Many techniques were accumulated in these investigations, for

example, excavation via airlift, and underwater photography greatly contributed to the
development of underwater archaeology in
Japan. The investigation method was to make
the underwater sites dry up using steel boards
and a drainage pump, labelled as the "Lake
Biwa method" produced especially good results
(Fig. 2). Finally, more than 200 investigations
were carried out over a total excavation l area
of 240,000 square kilometers.

Fig. 2 Excavating by "Lake Biwa Method" in
The Awazu-bottom site is one of the most Harie-Shore Site. (Shiga Prefectural Azuchi
Castle Archaeological Museum)

famous sites that were excavated at this time
by the "Lake Biwa method". This site is the largest fresh water shell mound in Japan,
and located in depth of water of approximately 2 to 3 m. Three shell mounds are known,
but only the No. 3 shell mound was excavated. All shells, earth and sand were sorted
by floatation; therefore, small remains were collected in this manner. The site is mainly
attributed to the early phase of the middle of Jomon period (ca. 4,500 BC). As well as
shellfish and animal bones, many foodstuffs were excavated. For example, there are
nuts such as chestnut and buckeye, plants such as gourd and perilla which form a layer,
therefore a lifestyle of hunting and gathering was restored.

In addition, organic

materials such as net baskets, lacquering products and earthenware vessels of various
parts of Japan were recovered. As a result, the Awazu-bottom site became an historical
source of the highest value in the Jomon period (Shiga Prefectural Association for
4

�Cultural Heritage, 1997).
The Kara-bridge site located on the bottom of Seta-River is the only river flowing out of
the lake. Excavation and research was carried out by the "Lake Biwa method". The
bridge piers were discovered during this excavation research, and as a result of
studying, it was found that the remains of that stage are from the Zinshin-Civil-War (672
AD); it was the biggest war in Japanese ancient history. After that, other remains were
confirmed off the coast and a full-scale excavation by the diving team was carried out
from a view of flood prevention and the ship navigation. As a result of this, the bridge
piers, including the Nara period (710-794 AD), the Kamakura period (1185-1333 AD),
the Muromachi period (1336-1573 AD), and the Edo period were excavated.

This

bridge was a strategic point which connects the eastern and northern country to the
capital city (Kyoto) since ancient times, and old historical documents inform us that the
bridge was a battle setting many times over; these descriptions were supported by
excavation and research (Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage, 1992).
The Harie-shore site, located 200 to 400 m off of the lakefront, was considered mainly
an early Yayoi period site.

The Yayoi period (ca. 300 BC-250 AD) is one of the

prehistoric eras in Japan next to the Jomon period. In the investigation, a full picture of
village was excavated and the discovery of the earthquake traces attracted attention.
The earthquake was estimated at a magnitude of approximately 7.5, with sand boiling
and liquefaction phenomena destroying the remains; this is regarded as reason for the
village extinction (Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage, 1990). The
Akanoi-bay sites locate from lakefront to bottom of the lake. Approximately 80 pieces of
tiles, old coins, and other items were excavated from the lakefront, and these remains
date to the Asuka period (592-710 AD). It is thought that this site resembles a loss of
cargo or a sinking of the ship were made this situation since almost all tiles were
unused and heaped up.

There are few sunken ships in this Lake except for the

prehistoric times; therefore, this site is important for looking into ancient water transport
(Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage, 1998).

5

�TermⅢ：After the Lake Biwa Comprehensive Development Program (Since 1992
～)
A variety of investigative organizations did work here after the Lake Biwa
Comprehensive Development Program. In particular, the investigation conducted by the
University of Shiga Prefecture is important.

Lake Biwa has legends; villages and

settlements that once existed here yet now
submerged on the bottom of the lake. PhD
Hiromichi

Hayashi had

legends since 1992.

investigated

the

For example, the

Naoesengen site was portrayed in old
drawing in 1291 (Kamakura period), and it
was traced to the Edo period (Fig. 3).
Currently, a part of the land disappeared,
therefore it is said that it sank down by an Fig. 3 Old Drawing of Naoesengen Site and its
earthquake.

In his research, for example, Environs. (T. Hayashi and others)

pottery and tiles of the 12th century were recovered. In addition, a barrow from the 7th 8th centuries and the wreckage of the stone wall in the 18th century was discovered
from a depth between of 1.4 m to 4.1 m. The existence of barrows were portrayed in
the old drawing, therefore the discovery was the important evidence for proving the
legend. At the same time, PhD Toshitaka Kamai (Disaster Prevention Research Institute
Kyoto University) and Assoc. PhD Tsuyoshi Hraguchi (Graduate School of Science /
Faculty of Science Osaka City University) carried out the joint investigations, and as a
result of this, traces of the earthquake were confirmed from on the land and bottom of
the lake.

The same traces were confirmed from other sites, for example

Shimosakahamasengen site and Mitsuyasengen site.

It made clear that many

underwater archaeological sites on the bottom of Lake Biwa were formed by local
landslides (Lateral Flow – Ground flow due to liquefaction) that occur due to
earthquakes.
In addition, these investigations were important activities for educational institutions.
Currently, there are few institutions where students can learn underwater archaeology in
Japan. Nevertheless, students have participated as staff in these investigations, and the
6

�author received a degree in the discipline since a university admission. As a result of
such steady instructional activity, a research group with which author acts as a
representative continues this investigation.
As other example, Okinoshiraisi, a remote and lonely rock island, was investigated by
ARIUA (Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology) and Research Institute of
Underwater Archaeology. The island is located at the center of Lake Biwa, therefore,
sailors had regarded it as traffic sign since ancient times.

Currently, the clear

archaeological remains have not been found, yet future study on the island is expected.
In addition, a joint-investigation by PhD Kenichi Yano (Archaeology) and PhD Sadao
Kawamura (Engineering) of Ritsumeikan University was carried out in the Tsuduraosakibottom site. It attracted a significant amount of attention since the investigation is
connected with advanced robot development and technology.

Fig. 4 The Exhumation Situation of Glazed
Pottery of the Early 10th Century. (H.
Nakagawa)

Fig. 5 The Exhumation Situation of a Part of FiveRing Pagoda.
(H. Nakagawa)

A Short Study of the Legends of Submerged Villages
The East Japan Earthquake Disaster, which occurred on March 3, 2011 made scholars
research the remains of the disaster and investigate old historical documents about the
natural disaster. Because of this, the legends of submerged villages attract attention. I
would like to show materials based on the latest investigation, and perform a short study.
The Society for Underwater Archaeological Sites in Lake Biwa, was inaugurated in 2011
by graduate and university students, and has been dedicated to the investigation of the
Nishihamasengen site. The site has a legend; a village called Nishihama existed here
7

�once, but it was submerged in the bottom of Lake Biwa by a severe earthquake
between 1460 to 1466 CE. We performed the site survey by scuba diving and skin
diving, and finally, investigated offshore 250 m, a range of lakefront line approximately
800 m, at a depth of approximately 1 to 2 m. At present, more than 200 pieces of
pottery (Fig. 4), the wreckages of pillars, and a graveyard of the medieval period have
been found. The pillars are considered to be what once was fences and sheds
(Nakagawa, 2012) (Nakagawa, 2013). The fences were made not only with timbers but
with bamboo, and the buildings were made with only timber. Additionally, all of timbers
were thin; less than 10 cm in diameter, which is a notable peculiarity. As the reason for
this, it is believed that the buildings were not houses, but were sheds. We will carry out
an additional investigation in the near future, to examine it in greater detail. The extent
of graveyard area is 38 m in the east-west direction and 26 m in the north-south
direction, and there are approximately 16 simple graves and that were constructed by
rocks and stones. The stone statue, Amitabha Tathagata and a part of Five-ring pagoda
(Fig. 5) was found, made by granite and a small plate of unglazed earthenware was
offered on the graves. In addition, household goods, big earthenware pots and
earthenware mortars and other material were excavated. The materials indicating the
last period of this site are earthenware goods and stone statues; the last settlement
patterns date the site to is the latter half of 15th century to early 16th century. From
these result, I would like to examine the origin of this site. The water level in the 15th
century to 16th century is considered to be 84 m to first half of 85 m (Hayashi, H.,
Kamai, T., and Haraguchi, T., 2012). The graveyard and pillars are located at 83.1 m
above sea level or less, in addition, the remains of the houses built on piles in lakes are
not prevalent in this region. Therefore, same as the legend, it is regarded that this
village, which was on the land, was submerged via ground change caused by an
earthquake. However, the year that an earthquake occurred seems to be different from
the legend. According to the legend, the Nishihamasengen site submerged into bottom
of the lake in the middle of the 15th century, yet, relics of the 16th century were
recovered.

Because of this, when we corroborate the old historical documents, a

severe earthquake which is estimated to be magnitude 7.8 in 1586 was written down;
swas called the Tensho-Severe-Earthquake, and occurred on January 18, 1586 (Iida,
8

�1987). According to the documents, there were 1000 houses in this region. Half of the
houses were destroyed by fire, and the other half were destroyed by collapse, therefore
it is assumed that the Nishihamasengen site was caused by this earthquake. Many sites
which were damaged by this earthquake were investigated.

For example, the

Shimosakahamasengen site, located to southeast 2.2 km of the Nishihamasengen site,
was caused by the earthquake and in past investigations and old photographs, remains
of submerged wells, and withered Japanese cedar via submergence were observed.
Additionally, a part of the Nagahama-Castle, located between Nishihamasengen site
and Shimosakahamasengen site, was submerged by this earthquake, and was
recorded in old historical documents. As a result of these, the possibility that a largescale landslide occurred over more than 2.2 km of the lakefront line and more than 500
m offshore is arguable. However, such a historical disaster record is not reflected by
former disaster prevention plans. This is an important problem about the disaster
prevention for not only Shiga Prefecture but also all of Japan due to our large shoreline.
Problems and Prospects
As mention above, many sites have been investigated for many years in Lake Biwa, and
Shiga Prefecture is admired as an advanced area of underwater archaeology in Japan.
However, the area still has many problems. Some examples will be highlighted below,
as well as addressing some of the future plans for the area. At first, the problems about
the research organization exist.

There is no public research organization and

technically no research worker who works on the underwater archaeology in Shiga
prefecture now.

In other words the current

investigations are carried out by a few
university teachers and graduate students. In
connection with this, educational problems
exist. There are few universities which teach
underwater archaeology in Japan, and there
is even no course offered in Shiga Prefecture.
The investigation by the University of Shiga
Prefecture is outside the regular academic Fig. 6 Current Condition of Nagasone-Port Site.
curriculum, and it is carried out by the author
9

(H. Nakagawa)

�and volunteer students; therefore the longevity of the program is in danger.
The legal recognition of sites is a concern as well. For example, the initial sites survey
is a basic excavation for material and research when sites are threatened by
development. Sites that are not registered as such, excavation cannot be conducted.
In Shiga Prefecture, many underwater archaeological sites are registered more than
other local self–governing bodies; nevertheless, there is an imbalance between
registered and unregistered sites. For example, most of the port sites which can be
dated to a period by old historical documents are not registered. One example among
many is the Nagasone-port site located in Hikone City. There is at least one breakwater
remnant and five pier remnants 1 kilometer away from Hikone Castle. We can confirm
their appearances easily when we look around Lake Biwa from the lakefront (Fig. 6). It
is considered that a part of these were constructed in the early Edo period from the old
historical documents, but it is not recorded on the site register. Needless to say, Japan
has not ratified the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage;
therefore there are many positions between each local self–governing bodies where
they recorded on modern period sites.

Registering sites dated to after the early

modern times are entrusted to local self–governing bodies. Nevertheless, Hikone City
aims at making Hikone Castle a World Heritage, and it was asserted that they are a
castle town as well as a castle (Hikone City HP). However, it is problem that even the
Nagasone-port site, which is clearly part of castle town, was not recorded as a site. It is
clear from this example that underwater archaeological sites are held to a lower regard
than land sites.
Yet all is not lost, things look like they are moving forward positively. For example,
associated old historical documents about Lake Biwa are being compiled, and research
is being conducted. Many sites exist in the shallows at a depth between 1 and 5 meters.
Because of this, we are able to investigate these sites easily by skin diving or beach
diving. The shallower the water, the more we can ensure safety, meanwhile, the basic
techniques do not change with the depth. Accordingly, I think Lake Biwa a great area to
learn the technical aspects of underwater archaeology. The establishment of a longterm study system by the public institution is necessary in the future, and a cooperation
system with an organization inside and outside of the prefecture will be necessary, as
10

�well.
Conclusion
Until recently, underwater archaeology had not been recognized sufficiently as a field of
archaeology, in Japan.

However recently, it is attracting attention because of the

discovery of sunken Mongolian Invasion Ships in the Takashima-Kouzaki site. Taking
advantage of this, it is expected that Japanese underwater archaeology will develop
greatly. Lake Biwa is the field which has been known since the old days in Japan but it
is almost obscure worldwide. However, many sites exist in the area, therefore it an
indispensable field for developing the Japanese underwater archaeological program. It
is an unexpected delight if I can tell the attraction of Lake Biwa to world researchers
through this paper.
Acknowledgment
I wish to express my appreciation for Prof. Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi, Prof. Tatsuya Nakada,
and the Publications Committee of APCONF 2014, as they gave me the opportunity of
writing this article and of presenting it in Hawaii.
References
Hayashi, H., Kamai, T., and Haraguchi, T., 2012. The Sunken Villages on the Bottom of
Lake by Earthquakes. Sunrise-shuppan, Shiga (in Japanese).
Iida, K., 1987.

The Archives of Tensho-Severe-Earthquake. Nagoya-daigaku-

shuppankai, Nagoya (in Japanese).
Nakagawa, H., 2012. Summary Report of Nishihamasengen Site. In Kamei, W., Takeda,
S., Yamane, S., Hirose, J., and Oohashi, M (Eds.), Human Cultures, Vol. 31. The
University of Shiga Prefecture School of Human Cultures, Shiga (in Japanese): 60-69.
Nakagawa, H., 2013. Natural Science Analysis of Nishihamasengen Site. In Kamei, W.,
Miyao, M., Hirose, J., Oguri, Y., and Oohashi. M., (Eds.), Human Cultures, Vol.33. The
University of Shiga Prefecture School of Human Cultures, Shiga (in Japanese):73-82
Nakai, H., 1997. The Castles in Omi. Sunrise-shuppan, Shiga (in Japanese).
Oe, Y., 1950.

Introduction into Prehistoric Potteries on the Bottom of Lake Biwa.

Gakuzidou-shuppan, Kyoto (in Japanese).
Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage., 1990.
Excavation Research in 1989, Shiga (in Japanese).
11

Summary Report of

�Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage., 1992. Kara-Bridge Site. Shiga (in
Japanese).
Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage., 1997. Awazu-Bottom Site No.3
shell mounds, Shiga (in Japanese).
Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage., 1998. Akanoi-Bay Site. Shiga (in
Japanese).
Shiga Prefectural Azuchi Castle Archaeological Museum., 2009.

The World of

Underwater Archaeolog,. Shiga (in Japanese).
Shimada, S., 1928. The Prehistoric Omi. Meicho-shuppan, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
Youda, M., 2007. The Barrows and the Many Groups of Barrows Surround with Lake
Biwa. Sunrise-shuppan (in Japanese).
Hikone City (2013). Hikone City Homepage. Retrieval December 15, 2013. From
http://www.city.hikone.shiga.jp/hikonejo/heritage/houkoku.html.
Biography
Hisashi Nakagawa was born in Aichi Prefecture in 1988. During the undergraduate
level, he learned underwater archaeology and was supervised by Prof. Hiromichi
Hayashi at the University of Shiga Prefecture (2007-2011). Prof. Hayashi did study
underwater archaeology from Prof. Yoshio Oe, who is respected as the "Father of
Underwater Archeology in Japan". With the retirement of Prof. Hayashi, he has
succeeded to the research around Lake Biwa since 2011. In 2013 he completed the
master program (Human Culture) at the University of Shiga Prefecture, and then since
2013 he has been a PhD candidate in the same university, and a Research Fellow of
the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="12">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="40">
                  <text>Session 9: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="41">
                  <text>Interview with Session 9 chair Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="42">
                  <text>East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia.&#13;
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities. Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="43">
                  <text>Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="484">
                <text>Submerged Archaeological Sites in the Lake Biwa, Japan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="485">
                <text>Lake Biwa, the largest in Japan, is in the heart of Shiga Prefecture, occupying an area of 670 square kilometers.  Because the lake has about 4,000,000 years of history, it has been closely related to local people's everyday lives which have largely depended upon its freshwater and fishery resources.  In addition, it has served as a strategic zone for waterborne transportation for many years in Japanese chronicles. According to an old proverb, those who succeed in controlling Shiga Prefecture could reign the world.  Geologically, on the other hand, the poor subsoil of the lakeside has frequently caused large-scaled landslides by earthquakes, as well as the high fluctuation of the water level and strandline due to climate change; many villages and settlements are said to have been submerged beneath the lake.  At present, as many as 90 underwater archaeological sites have already been identified in the Lake Biwa by the researchers.  Those sites vary in type; from shell mounds during the prehistoric era to material remains of dwellings or bridge piers of the modern period.  As a leading research body, the Shiga Prefectural Association for Cultural Heritage and academic organizations such as the University of Shiga Prefecture have long investigated and researched these areas.  Here we present the newest research results with some future plans for preserving the archaeological sites around Lake Biwa in order to inform the world academic circle of them. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="486">
                <text>Hisashi Nakagawa, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="487">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="565" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="356">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/e6a2d2b5dcd0ac8de14cf0b77112ed08.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0121e5d1e1cf626790d41f89f140ddc9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6265">
                    <text>Trading Ceramics: The Findings from the Shipwrecks along the Coast of Vietnam
Hoang Anh Tuan (History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, hoanganhtuan.btls@gmail.com)

ABSTRACT
The overland ‘Silk Road’ has served as the main conduit for the exchange of goods and culture between China,
Southeast Asia, and the West since the Han Dynasty. Its primary role has been diminished due to the establishment of
sea routes by the Tang Dynasty, thus Guangzhou (China) became one of the main gateways for maritime trade with
Southeast Asia and the West.
Southeast Asia is strategically situated at the passage of the maritime trade route, connecting the East and the West. It
has thus been known to be an area rich in precious metals, and luxury products such as pearls, rhino horn, tortoiseshells
and spices since ancient times. In addition, it is also used as an entrepôt complex on the maritime route between the
East and the West.
With a particularly favourable geographical situation, Vietnam's waters play a particularly important role in the
‘Maritime Silk Road’.
Over the past three decades, dozens of ancient shipwrecks have been discovered related to the ‘Maritime Silk Road’
in Vietnam's territorial waters. Those shipwrecks are evidence of the ceramics trade, which may have taken place for
centuries along the coasts of Vietnam.
This paper deals with the ceramic collections discovered on one of the shipwrecks in Vietnam's territorial waters, being
housed at the History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City. It is dated from the ninth to nineteenth centuries. It may
demonstrate the process of economic and cultural exchange from the East to the West at that time.
Keywords: shipwreck, ancient ceramics, maritime silk road, Vietnam's territorial waters.

List of Figures
Figure 1 Chinese ceramics dated in Kangxi reign around the seventeenth century from Hòn Cau Island shipwreck
preserved in the Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History.
Figure 2 Sawankhalok ceramics dated in the sixteenth century from the Hòn Dầm Island shipwreck preserved in the
Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History.
Figure 3 Chu Dau ceramics dated in the fifteenth century from the Cham Island shipwreck preserved in the Ho Chi
Minh City Museum of History.
Figure 4 Chinese ceramics dated in Yongzheng reign around the eighteenth century from Cà Mau shipwreck
preserved in the Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History.
Figure 5 Chinese ceramics dated in the Late Ming Dynasty around the seventeenth century from Bình Thuận
shipwreck preserved in Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History.
Figure 6 Chinese ceramics dated in the Tang Dynasty around the ninth century from waters of Southern Vietnam
preserved in Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History.

1

�INTRODUCTION
Chinese ceramics during the Kangxi reign of Qing Dynasty dated in 1690, from Hòn Cau Island
shipwreck, Vũng Tàu-Côn Đảo province
In 1990, a wreck measured 32.71 metre length with 9 metre width was discovered at a depth of 40 metres
below the sea surface, buried in sand 1 metres deep, located in the Cau Island area (Hòn Cau in Vietnamese),
Côn Đảo district; coordinates at N8°38’15” latitude, E108°48’50” longitude. The excavation was conducted
under the cooperation of Vietnam Salvage Joint Stock Company (henceforth Visal), with the multi-nations
of underwater archaeologists and divers from Canada, the US and the UK. More than 60,000 artefacts have
been recovered, most of which are Chinese ceramics, possibly destined for the European market, produced
from Chinese kilns such as Jingdezhen (Jiangxi province), Shantou and Dehua (Fujian province). Along
with the copper coins, two Chinese inksticks “墨” (Mò) marked with the characters “庚午” (GengWu)
were found, suggesting that the ship was built in the Kangxi reign of the Qing dynasty around 1690.
Besides the Chinese style items, European style objects were also found on the wreck, possibly porcelain
ordered from Chinese kilns. Their shape is a testament to their technical and artistic flair making them
admired all over the world.
The Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History has received from the Ministry of Culture and Sports 229
artefacts including the vases, jars, pen tubes, cups, plates, and the small statues.

Figure 1 Chinese ceramics dated in Kangxi reign around the seventeenth century from Hòn Cau Island shipwreck preserved in the
Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History. Left - Vase BTLS 10045, blue and white, MD: 12.6 cm, H: 21.5cm. Right - Dish BTLS
10.136, blue and white, MD: 12.9cm, H: 3.0cm.

Thai ceramics dated to the sixteenth century, from Hòn Dầm Island shipwreck, Kiên Giang province
The wreck was found at a depth of 10 metres below the sea surface, 5 kilometres far from the shore of Dầm
Island (Hòn Dầm in Vietnamese), Phú Quốc district, Kiên Giang province; coordinates at N9°59’00”
latitude and E104°02’00” longitude. The size of the shipwreck is nearly 30 metre length and 7 metre width,
divided into several bulkheads with a width of 1.8 metres each. More than 16,000 ceramics have been found,
mostly the celadon or green glazed, brown glazed, and underglaze black wares produced from Sawankhalok
(or Si Satchanalai) and Sukhothai (Sukhothai province, Thailand) kilns dated to the sixteenth century.
Thai style celadon or green glaze ceramics, also called “Đông Thanh” glaze in Vietnamese; and other
colours such as light grey, blackish brown or yellow, white and grey, included unglazed earthenware
utensils. The shape is mainly small jars, with or without handles, small bowls, plates, and other household
2

�items. Some reflections of the Vietnamese ceramic forms and decorative elements on blue-and-white wares
can be seen in the Thai underglaze black ceramics, specifically the boxes, kendi (known as a container of
Indian derivation using contain liquid with the mouth on the top for filling, neck for handle, and the spout
for pouring), and the covered jars painted black flowers on white slip background. Some other Thai large
celadon bowls also suggest that they had influenced from the Southern Song ceramic (南宋 1127–1279) in
the South China.
Glazed ceramic figurines are prominent among the other types of ceraics found on this shipwreck. They
include the figurines of a mother holding a baby, an elephant with a mahout and warriors protecting the
elephant feet, and other forms of animal, such as a hare with their own details being very vividly embossed.
The Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History owns 218 artefacts, of which nine have been transferred. Types
of artefacts kept by the museum include bowls, plates, covered boxes, jars, pots, elephant figurines, kendi.

Figure 2 Sawankhalok ceramic dated in the sixteenth century from the Hòn Dầm Island shipwreck preserved in the Ho Chi Minh
City Museum of History. Elephant BTLS 30.394, Celadon, MD: 18.5 x 10.7 cm, H: 19.4cm.

Chu Đậu ceramics from a Cham Island shipwreck, Hội An, Quảng Nam province, fifteenth century
The shipwreck was found at a depth of 70 metres below the sea surface, close to the Cham Island area on
coordinates at N16°16’08” latitude and E108° 27' 00” longitude. The excavation was conducted under the
cooperation of the archaeologists from the Vietnam History Museum in Hanoi, Visal, and Saga Horizon
Company (Malaysia) The project was carried out in three years, from 1997-2000 with joint-operations
between the archaeologists from the UK, Malaysia, and Slovakia.
240,000 ceramic items were recovered from a wreck measuring 29.4 metre length with 7.2 metre width,
divided into 19 bulkheads. The ceramic origins are likely Dai Viet, Champa, Thailand, and Chinese.
Ceramics made from kilns in Chu Đậu (Hải Dương province) and Thăng Long (Hanoi) are outstanding in
quantity, style, and type. These kilns are located in the north of Vietnam active in ceramic production since
the late fifteenth century onwards.
Ceramics found in the Cham Island shipwreck are mainly the housewares, containers, and utensils for eating
and drinking. Some designs are served as religious utensils such as incense burner, kendi.
These ceramics represent the development of export ceramics with varieties of decorative techniques
creating a distinct tradition of Vietnamese ceramics.
3

�The Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History currently keeps 4,675 artefacts. 4,366 objects were requested by
the Ministry of Culture and Information and the rest were transferred to the Police Department.

Figure 3 Chu Dau ceramics dated in the fifteenth century from the Cham Island shipwreck preserved in the Ho Chi Minh City
Museum of History. Kendi BTLS 16.956, cobalt blue pattern, DM: 18.6 cm, H: 15.1 cm. Covered boxes Collection of History
Museum.

Chinese ceramics during the Yongzheng reign of Qing dynasty dated to eighteenth century from the
Cà Mau shipwreck, Cà Mau province
An ancient shipwreck was found in the waters of Cà Mau province, coordinates at N7°41’12” latitude and
E105° 29' 18” longitude. The excavation on this shipwreck was cooperated between the National History
Museum in Hanoi, the Cà Mau Provincial Museum and the Visal. The excavation was conducted for two
phases, carried out from August 1998 to January 1999 and from April to October 1999. Although the wreck
is not intact at a depth of 35 metres below the sea surface, the remains suggest the wreck was 24 metre
length and eight metre width.
Nearly 50,000 recovered items are the ceramics including blue-and-white and overglaze enamel by multicoloured painting possibly from Chinese kilns such as the Jingdezhen (Jiangxi) and some kilns in
Guangzhou (Guangdong). Notably, there are some European-style porcelains such as milk bottles, wine
jugs with handles, plates decorated with flowers and a Dutch landscape. Inscriptions on some objects
suggest that they were probably made under the Yongzheng reign (雍正 1723–35) of Qing Dynasty. These
ceramics are thus assumed to be destined for the European market.
Excavations also found items belonging to merchants or sailors such as lamps, pots, boxes, seals, amulets.
Notably, Chinese metal coins of the Qing dynasty are the diagnostic finds to confirm the dating of this
shipwreck.
A total of 1,392 artefacts were transferred to the Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History: blue-and-white and
overglaze enamel wares in the forms of the chalk boxes, bowls, large plates, equestrian statues, baby
figurines, burnt lamps.

4

�Figure 4 Chinese ceramics dated in Yongzheng reign around the eighteenth century from Cà Mau shipwreck preserved in the Ho
Chi Minh City Museum of History. Left - Jarlet BTLS. 22.390, blue and white, DM: 8.3 cm, H: 7.4 cm. Center - Jar with cover
BTLS 22.008, blue and white, DM: 12.5 cm, H: 3.8cm. Right BTLS 22.010- Dish, blue and white, DM: 17 x 10.5cm, H: 3.0cm.

Chinese ceramics dated to the seventeenth century from the Bình Thuận shipwreck, Bình Thuận
province.
In 2001, a shipwreck was discovered at a depth of 40 metres below the sea surface about 65 kilometres from
the coast of Bình Thuận province, at coordinates N10°33’30” latitude, E108°35’55” longitude. The remains
suggest the wreck was a length of 23.4 metres and a width of 7.2 metres. The excavation was conducted
under the cooperation between Visal and the Vietnam History Museum in Hanoi during 2001-2002.
The recovered ceramics were mainly household items such as cups, plates, pots and jars decorated by blueand-white and overglaze enamelling from Chinese kilns such as Shantou (Guangdong province) and
Zhangzhou (Fujian province) dated to the early seventeenth century. The “Zhangzhou ware” or also called
as “Swatow ware” is heavy in weight, poor technical and poor artistic quality compared to the blue-andwhite and overglaze enamelling wares of Jingdezhen kilns in Jiangxi province those probably satisfied the
international markets, such as Southeast Asian and Japanese markets. The Zhangzhou wares are
characterised by the sand stuck on the bottom, which was the placing technique to prevent the glaze from
becoming stuck in a chamber during the firing process in the kiln.
The hypothesis is that the wreck was once property of the Chinese merchant I-Sin-Ho, who went missing at
sea on his way back from Southeast Asia. It is based on a report of the Dutch East India Company
(Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie:VOC) on 21 July 1608 referred to by Dr. Michael Flecker, an
underwater archaeologist who participated in the excavation.
The total numbers of ceramics kept at the History Museum include 117 ceramics, 15 ceramics were
purchased and donated, the rest are transferred by the Police Department, especially the bowls, jars, plates,
and the chalk boxes.

5

�Figure 5 Chinese ceramics dated in the Late Ming Dynasty around the seventeenth century from Bình Thuận shipwreck preserved
in Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History. Left - Covered box BTLS 28.033, blue and white, DM: 10.4cm, H: 6.4cm. Centre Dish BTLS 28.099, blue and White, DM: 26.8 cm, H: 5.2 cm. Right - Dish with overglazed enamels BTLS 23 911, DM: 25.8cm,
H: 5.0 cm.

Other unknown provenances
In 2019 many fishermen have discovered and recovered a lot of white glazed, copper green glazed and
splashed household ceramics from the Chinese kilns of Ding (Hebei province) and Changsha (Hunan
province) even some kiln in Zhejiang province during the Tang dynasty (618–907 AD). These Tang
ceramics were found in the waters of Southern Vietnam between the coast of Vung Tau and Con Dao Island.
Similar ceramics found in these underwater sites were previously found on the Belitung Island shipwreck
in the Java Sea. In 1998, more than 60,000 ceramics and other luxury objects of gold and silver were
recovered. This evidence found from the shipwreck and underwater sites provides the early evidence of
trade linked between China, Southeast Asia and the Middle East.
The Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History currently houses more than 30 ceramics, especially vases, bowls,
plates, cups, and cups with white glazed, copper green and splashed decorations.

Figure 6 Chinese ceramics dated in the Tang Dynasty around the nineteenth century from waters of Southern Vietnam preserved
in Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History. Left - Dish BTLS 35.450, green glazed, DM: 16.1 x 9.9cm, H: 2.1 cm. Centre - Dish BTLS
35.448, white glazed, DM: 14.0, H: 3.2 cm. Right - Bowl BTLS 35.453, DM: 11.8 cm, H: 4.2 cm.

Problems raised in the study of ceramics found on shipwrecks in the East Sea of Vietnam
The discoveries of Chinese, Vietnamese, and Thai ceramics on shipwrecks in the East Sea of Vietnam
among the collection of the Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History represent the important roles along the
maritime trade or called “Maritime Silk Road” originated from China and passed through the maritime route
in the East Sea of Vietnam. The Chinese ceramics of Tang Dynasty found from waters of Southern Vietnam
near the coasts of Vung Tau and Con Dao Island are a most recent discovery suggesting the early period of
international maritime trade between the East and the West.

6

�The ceramic collection also reflects the problems in the study of politics, economy, culture, society and
trade between the East and the West for a long period of history. Economic and cultural exchange through
the art and technologies of ceramic productions, art and trades suggested they were diverse between China,
Vietnam, Thailand, and other Western countries in different periods of time. They also show the important
role of maritime routes and ports in Vietnam along “Maritime Silk Road.”
Based on the discovery and excavation of ceramics from shipwrecks in the East Sea of Vietnam, the
awareness about underwater cultural heritage may actively conduct within a legal perspective and
international cooperation to ensure the protection, conservation and promotion of underwater cultural
heritage is sustainable and bringing the long-termed benefits to the community in Vietnam.

CONCLUSION
This article is an introduction on the collection of ceramics found from the shipwreck context in the East
Sea of Vietnam currently kept at the Ho Chi Minh City Museum of History. The maritime trade of Chinese,
Vietnamese and Thai ceramics demonstrated economic and cultural exchange activities between the East
and the West along the “Maritime Silk Road” especially in the Vietnamese waters from the 8th to the 18th
centuries.

Bibliography
Chien, Nguyen Dinh. Ca Mau Shipwreck 1723-1735. Hanoi: Vietnam History Museum Export, 2002.
Chien, Nguyen Dinh and Quan, Pham Quoc. Ceramics in Five Ancient Ships in Vietnamese Waters. Hanoi: Vietnam History
Museum Publishing House, 2008.
Chong, Alan and Murphy, Stephen A. (eds.). The Tang Shipwreck: art and exchange in the 9th century. Singapore: Asian
Civilisations Museum, 2017.
Stevenson, John, Guy, John and Cort, Louise Allison. Vietnamese Ceramics: a separate tradition. Chicago: Art Media Resources
Ltd, 1997.
Tuan, Hoang Anh. Ceramics on a Shipwreck Discovered in the Waters of Ba Ria-Vung Tau: new discoveries of archaeology in
2020. Hanoi: ???, 2019. (In Vietnamese)
Tuan, Hoang Anh. Ceramic Specimens of the Tang Dynasty Discovered under the Shipwreck in the Waters of Ba Ria-Vung Tau:
new discoveries of archaeology in 2020. Hanoi: ???,2020. (In Vietnamese)
Tri, Bui Minh and Long, Kerry Nguyen. Vietnamese Blue and White Ceramics. Hanoi: Social Sciences Publishing House, 2001.
Brown, Roxanna M. “History of shipwrecks in Southeast Asia.” In The Belitung Wreck: sunken treasures from Tang China, edited
by Jayne Ward and Zoi Kotitsa, 40–55. New Zealand: Seabed Explorations New Zealand Ltd, 2004.
Koh, N. K. “Shipwrecks with ceramics cargo found in Southeast Asia.” Last modified 12 January 2016. http://www.kohantique.com/shipwreck/shipwreck2.html.

7

�UNESCO. “The Belitung shipwreck,” accessed 22 June 2023. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/silk-road-themes/underwaterheritage/belitung-shipwreck.
Burchmore, Alexander. “Salvaging Southeast Asian history: shipwrecks and Chinese blue-and-white.” New Mandala, 22 October
2021. https://www.newmandala.org/salvaging-southeast-asian-history-shipwrecks-and-chinese-blue-and-white/.
Asia Society. “Secrets of the sea: a Tang shipwreck and early trade in Asia,” accessed 22 June 2023. https://asiasociety.org/newyork/exhibitions/secrets-sea-tang-shipwreck-and-early-trade-asia.
Boissoneault, Lorraine. “An 800-year-old shipwreck helps archaeologists piece together Asia’s maritime trade.” Smithsonian
Magazine, 17 May 2018. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/800-year-old-shipwreck-helps-archaeologistspiece-together-fragments-asias-maritime-trade-180969110/.

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="41">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="175">
                  <text>2023 Session 5: New Research Findings of Archaeological Ceramics from the Maritime Cultural Heritage of the Asia-Pacific Region</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="176">
                  <text>Session 5 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="177">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 5 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="178">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="179">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="180">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="181">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="182">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="183">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6258">
                <text>Trading Ceramics: The Findings from the Shipwrecks along the Coast of Vietnam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6259">
                <text>The overland ‘Silk Road’ has served as the main conduit for the exchange of goods and culture between China,&#13;
Southeast Asia, and the West since the Han Dynasty. Its primary role has been diminished due to the establishment of&#13;
sea routes by the Tang Dynasty, thus Guangzhou (China) became one of the main gateways for maritime trade with&#13;
Southeast Asia and the West.&#13;
Southeast Asia is strategically situated at the passage of the maritime trade route, connecting the East and the West. It&#13;
has thus been known to be an area rich in precious metals, and luxury products such as pearls, rhino horn, tortoiseshells&#13;
and spices since ancient times. In addition, it is also used as an entrepôt complex on the maritime route between the&#13;
East and the West.&#13;
With a particularly favourable geographical situation, Vietnam's waters play a particularly important role in the&#13;
‘Maritime Silk Road’.&#13;
Over the past three decades, dozens of ancient shipwrecks have been discovered related to the ‘Maritime Silk Road’&#13;
in Vietnam's territorial waters. Those shipwrecks are evidence of the ceramics trade, which may have taken place for&#13;
centuries along the coasts of Vietnam.&#13;
This paper deals with the ceramic collections discovered on one of the shipwrecks in Vietnam's territorial waters, being&#13;
housed at the History Museum in Ho Chi Minh City. It is dated from the ninth to nineteenth centuries. It may&#13;
demonstrate the process of economic and cultural exchange from the East to the West at that time.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6260">
                <text>Hoang Anh Tuan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6261">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6262">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6263">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6264">
                <text>Anh Tuan, Hoang. 2023. “Trading Ceramics: The Findings from the Shipwrecks along the Coast of Vietnam.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Atthasit Sukkham. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1936 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="62">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 5 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
