<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=32&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-25T12:50:41+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>32</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="424" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="216">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/eb606d5576d199f693a8ce1fc0ca3010.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e385fb9425a78ac03842c796a8738d45</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5197">
                    <text>Maritime Archaeology of Ships of Indian Ocean,
Southeast Asia and East Asia, the question of
bulkheads
Jeremy Green

Abstract
This paper will discuss the maritime archaeological work that has been carried out in the region,
looking at shipbuilding construction and what has been learned through this work. In Southeast
Asia the excavations in the 1980s by the Department of Archaeology of Thailand and the Western
Australia Museum on the Pattaya and Ko Si Chang 3 sites will be examined, with a discussion on
the construction techniques. In East Asia the significance of the Song dynasty ship from
Quanzhou will be discussed in relation to the Southeast Asian ship construction.
The whole of the geographical region dealt with in this paper is faced with the challenge
of dealing with treasure hunting and the exploitation of underwater cultural heritage for financial
gain. While maritime archaeological projects in the region have been limited, there is a need to
encourage countries to understand and protect their cultural heritage. This can only be done
through archaeological work, as there can be no real benefit from working for commercial
salvage. The paper will discuss the relative merits of archaeological investigations of shipwrecks
in the region compared with that of commercial salvage.

Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that simple archaeological methods,
when applied to shipwrecks, can produce important information. The paper
centres on the Pattaya shipwreck, a site in the Gulf of Thailand that was
completely looted in the 1970s. By examining the hull of the vessel a number of
important conclusions were made about the construction of Southeast Asian
ships. This was the first site in Southeast Asia where the construction of a vessel
was published. Comparisons can be made with the Song dynasty shipwreck from
Quanzhou, China. It is surprising that in spite of a number of non-archaeological
projects involving Southeast Asian vessels, almost no information has been
forthcoming on the construction and building of these vessels. It seems that the
commercial companies involved in these operations, even when they employ an
archaeologist, have neither the interest nor the inclination to study this aspect of
the site. No doubt based on the commercial consideration that such work has no
financial benefit.

Historical evidence
Needham (1971), in his encyclopaedic work Science and Civilisation of China
(Volume 4: Physics and Physical Technology, Part III: Civil Engineering and
Nautics) stated that ‘Geographical factors have had considerable influence in
differentiating the craft found along the coasts of China…Hsieh Chan-Jen,
commenting on a passage in the Jih Chih Lu (Daily Additions to Knowledge) of
Ku Yen-Wu, itself finished in +1673, wrote as follows:
The sea-going vessels of the Jiang-nan are named ‘sand-ships’ (sha chuan) for as
their bottoms are flat and broad they can sail over shoals and moor near

�sandbanks, frequenting sandy (or muddy) creeks and havens without getting
stuck…But the sea-going vessels of Fujian and Guangdong have round bottoms
and high decks. At the base of their hulls there are large beams of wood in three
sections called ‘dragon-spines’ (long gu). If (these ships) should encounter shallow
sandy (water) the dragon spine may get stuck in the sand, and if the wind and tide
are not favourable there may be danger in pulling it out. But sailing to the South
Seas (Nan-Yang) where there are many islands and rocks in the water, ships with
dragon-spines can turn more easily to avoid them. (Needham 1971, Vol. 4.3: 429).

It is unclear from this passage if Needham has confused the strengthening wales
with the true keel of deep hulled vessels. The earlier passage clearly indicates
this error, since it refers to the long gu getting stuck in the sand. Needham
(1971:409) also refers to the Tien Gong Wu (Exploitation of the Works of Nature)
by Song Ying Xing in 1637. Here a description of a canal grain-carrying vessel is
given and then his description of the shipyards:
The construction of the boat begins with the bottom. The strakes of the hull are
built up on both sides from the bottom to a height (equivalent to that of the future)
deck. Bulkheads are set at intervals to divide the vessel (into separate
compartments), [we may interpret this statement as an indication that the vessels
were built shell-first] and (the holds have) sheer vertical sides which are called
qiang…The horizontal bars (heng mu) which grasp the mast’s foot below this are
called ‘ground dragons’ (di long), and these are connected by components called
‘lion-tamers’ (fu shi), while underneath them lies another called a ‘lion-grasper’ (na
shi). Under the ‘lion-tamers’ are the ‘closure pieces’ (feng tou mu) otherwise known
as triple tie-bars (lian san fang)…

Another important source from the Song Dynasty is Marco Polo who resided in
China between 1275 and 1292. He wrote about Chinese river shipping and also
on sea-going vessels of Guangdong and Fujian. There are interesting variations
in the translation of The Travels of Marco Polo. The version translated by Latham
(1958) gives the following account at the beginning of Chapter Six: From China
to India:
They are built of a wood called spruce or fir. They have one deck; and above this
deck, in most ships, are at least sixty cabins, each of which can comfortably
accommodate one merchant. They have one steering oar and four masts.

Needham (1971) gives an alternative and unreferenced translation that will be
quoted here in full. Note the differences between the two versions:
…the merchants go and come into India through the Indian Sea. Now you may
know that those ships are made in such a way as I shall describe unto you.
I tell you that are mostly built of the wood which is called fir or pine.
They have one floor, which with us is called a deck, one for each, and on this deck
there are commonly in all the greater number quite 60 little rooms or cabins, and in
some, more, and in some, fewer, according as the ships are larger or smaller,
where, in each, a merchant can stay comfortably.
…Some ships, namely those which are larger, have besides quite 13 holds, that is,
divisions, on the inside, made with strong planks fitted together, so that if by
accident that the ship is staved in any place, namely that it either strikes on a rock,
or a whale-fish striking against it in search of food staves it in. And then the water

�entering through the hole runs to the bilge, which never remains occupied with
things. And then the sailors find out where the ship is staved and then the hold
which answers to the break is emptied into the others, for the water cannot pass
from one hold to another, so strongly are they shut in; and they repair the ship
there and put back the goods which were taken out.
They are indeed nailed in such a way; for they are all lined, that is, that they have
two boards above the other.
And the boards of the ship, inside and outside, are thus fitted together, that is, they
are in the common speech of our sailors, caulked both outside and inside, and they
are all well nailed inside and outside with iron pins. They are not pitched with pitch,
because they have none of it in those regions, but they oil them in such a way as I
shall tell you, because they have another thing that seems better than pitch. For I
tell you that they take lime and hemp chopped up small and they pound it all
together, I tell you that becomes sticky and holds like birdlime. And with this thing
they smear their ships and this is worth quite as much as pitch.
Moreover I tell you again that when the great ships wish to be decorated [?], that is
to be repaired, and it has made a great voyage or has sailed a whole year or more
and needs repair, they repair it in such a way. For they nail yet another board over
the aforesaid original two all round the ship without removing the former at all, and
then there are three of them over the whole ship everywhere, one nailed above the
other, and then when it is nailed they also caulk and oil it with the aforesaid mixture
and this is the repair which they do. And at the end of the second year at the
second repair they nail yet another board leaving the other boards so that there are
four. And this way they go each year from repair to repair until the number of six
boards, the one nailed on the other. And when they have six boards the one upon
the other nailed then the ship is condemned and they sail no more in her on too
high seas but in near journeys and good weather and they do not overload them
until it seems to them that they are of no more value and that can make no more
use of them. Then they are dismantled and broken up.

Marco Polo is the origin of the theory that Chinese ships had bulkhead
compartments that were completely watertight. Later writers, up to and including
Needham followed this suggestion. However, every Asian vessel with bulkheads
that has been archaeologically excavated shows evidence that the bulkheads,
although sealed with luting, had limbers to allow water to flow between the
compartments. Additionally, there has been no evidence of stoppers or bungs in
the limbers, indicating at the time of sinking the limbers were open. The
statement about the multiple planking provides historical evidence for a
technique that would be hard to understand from the archaeological evidence
alone.
Ibn Battutah (Gibb 1958), who was in China in 1347, noted that:
The Chinese vessels are of three kinds; large ships called chunks [in other
translations jonouq, in Needham chuan]…These vessels are built in the towns of
Zaytún and Sín-Kalán. The vessel has four decks and contains rooms, cabins, and
saloons for merchants; a cabin has chambers and a lavatory, and can be locked by
its occupant…This is the manner after which they are made; two (parallel) walls of
very thick wooden (planking) are raised and across the space between and
longitudinally and transversely by means of large nails, each three ells in length.
When these walls have thus been built the lower deck is fitted in and the ship is
launched before the upper works are.

�Southeast Asian examples of bulkheads
The Pattaya Pottery Site, in the Gulf of Thailand was discovered in about 1976
by sports divers and was the subject of continual looting. Howitz (1977: 14)
reported:
…to a very large extent treasure hunters had already looted valuable and goodquality items and had, as well, seriously damaged the remains of the ship itself.
There is evidence that they had used explosives to enter the cargo compartments,
and an airlift to blow away the mud and sand.

In 1982 a joint Thai–Australian team of maritime archaeologists carried out an
excavation of the site (Green &amp; Harper 1982). It provided, for a looted wreck site,
a large body of information. Evidence of looting included recently broken
stoneware storage jars littering the site and holes dug around the site. What was
of particular interest was the remaining hull structure, about 9 meters by 4
meters, which was protruding from the seabed. The excavation revealed a
remaining hull structure composed of eight strakes on either side of the keel, six
bulkheads and a mast step. The planking was edge joined with dowels, consisted
of three layers, an inner layer 70 millimeters (mm) thick and two outer layers of
40 mm. Six bulkheads, with two limbers 110 mm in diameter cut in the base next
to the keel, were supported by light frames. The bulkheads consisted of parallel
planks 70 mm thick, edge-joined with dowels. The frames were nailed to the
bulkhead and to the hull, with lateral and vertical iron nails. A mast step
consisting of large block of wood, shaped to fit the bottom of the vessel, sat
across the keel against the sixth bulkhead also had two limber holes.
The excavation also showed some evidence as to how the cargo was
arranged on the ship. Between bulkheads three and five on the starboard side of
the vessel was a very large concretion that was confined to a line 300 mm off the
centre line of the vessel. There was also evidence of bamboo dunnage
protruding from the concretion. The concretion appeared to be confined by a
partition to the starboard side of the vessel that may suggest internal
arrangement and explain the function of the watertight bulkheads and the
limbers. It is unclear why one would go to such lengths to seal the bulkheads
while having large limbers on the bilge. Marco Polo’s statement that the
compartments were watertight has been taken in the past to mean that the
compartments were sealed. However, every vessel with bulkheads has been
found to have open limbers. Some rational explanation is required to explain the
presence of sealed bulkheads with open limber holes. If the cargo completely
filled the compartment, how then does this work?
The evidence on this site that there was a space in the centre of the
compartment, about 600 mm wide that was kept clear. Presumably there was
some form of longitudinal partition to confine the cargo space. This would then
provide a narrow, but clear access to the limbers at the bottom of the bulkheads.
One possibility is that in the event of the vessel springing a serious leak, the crew
could gain access to the limbers and block them so that the leak could be
confined to the hold affected. In normal circumstances the limbers were free to
allow the movement of bilge water to the lowest point where it could be bailed or

�pumped out. If there were no limbers then the bilge water would collect in each
compartment, necessitating a bilge pump to be located or used in each
compartment.
However, this was not always the case. In the Ko Si Chang Three site
(Green, et al. 1987), a large concretion of iron and storage jars was located over
the keel area in one compartment, thus blocking the access to the limbers within
that compartment. Possibly, depending on the nature of the cargo and loading
arrangements, access (in these cases) was provided on alternate sides of the
bulkheads.

Chinese bulkheads
The Song dynasty shipwreck found near Quanzhou, in Fujian Province of China
(known as the Quanzhou Ship), has been the subject of a number of studies. It
was the first Chinese vessel to be completely excavated and as such it is
extremely interesting in relation to the question of bulkheads. In the Song ship
the bulkheads are constructed from planks about 80 mm thick, skew nailed
together. The skew nails were driven downwards and were inserted from both
forward and aft faces of the bulkheads. Unlike the plank shell skew nails, they
are very irregularly spaced (&lt;100 mm–400 mm). The few scarfs in the planks that
make up the bulkheads are complex and carefully made.
On the side of each bulkhead closest to mid ships there are half frames.
The half frames are on the aft side of bulkheads 1–6 and the forward side of
bulkheads 7–11. There are no half frames at bulkhead 12. One immediately
obvious difference in the construction of the bulkhead is the presence of iron
brackets, that are cut through the hull and serve to support the bulkheads on the
opposite to the frames. Brackets have not been found on any Southeast Asian
vessel (defined by edge joining with dowels), but are common on Chinese
vessels (Ningbo (Shimin 1991), Fa Shi (Yingfan 1985) and Shinan (Green 1983)
ships).
Limbers are about 250 mm high and 90 mm wide and their presence
make it clear that neither the bulkheads nor the frames could have been strongly
fastened to the keel; therefore, it is highly unlikely that they were set up before
the plank shell was assembled. Remains of a layer of lime putty, containing very
fine jute fibres, inside and out of the hull. This once again raises the question of
the function of the limbers in relation to the bulkheads. Every Asian shipwreck
with bulkheads has been found with open limber holes. There is conflicting
evidence in the two Southeast Asian vessels, where in one case, at least one
compartment between the bulkheads was completely filled with cargo, and in the
other there is evidence that a central area between the two sides of the
compartment was kept clear.

Discussion
The evaluation of the sites discussed suggest the following:
• Both Chinese and Southeast Asian vessels shared common features, in
particular the bulkheads and the frames that supported the bulkheads.

�•
•

•
•
•
•

Bulkheads were luted to make them watertight but had limber holes that
were open at the time of the loss of the vessels.
Southeast Asian vessels were edge joined with dowels whereas Chinese
vessels were fastened with iron nails.
Chinese vessels often had a form of stiffeners that penetrated the hull and
attached to the opposite of the bulkhead to the frames to support the
bulkheads.
The main mast step was similar in both Chinese and Southeast Asian
vessels, indicating a tabernacle arrangement.
The location of the frames against the bulkheads, on either side of the
mast step was similar in both Chinese and Southeast Asian vessels.
There is evidence for multiple layers of planking, with the innermost layer
being the thickest, in both Chinese and Southeast Asian vessels.
There is evidence that both Chinese and Southeast Asian vessels were
built shell first with the bulkheads inserted after the construction of the
main hull shell.

Bibliography
Gibb, H.A.R., 1958
Green, J.N,
Harper, R. &amp;
Intakosi, V.,
1987
Green, J.N. &amp;
Harper, R.,
1982
Green, J.N.,
1983
Green, J.N.,
1983
Howitz, P.C.,
1977
Latham, R.,
1958
Lin Shimin, Du
Genqui and Green,
J.N.,
1991
Needham, J.,
1971
Wang Gungwu,

The travels of Ibn Battuta A.D. 1325-1354. Hakluyt Soc.,
Cambridge. (Second Series).
The maritime archaeology of shipwrecks and ceramics
in Southeast Asia and the Ko Si Chang Three shipwreck
excavation. Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology
Special Publication, No. 4.
The excavation of the Pattaya wreck site and survey of
three other sites, Thailand 1982. Australian Institute for
Maritime Archaeology Special Publication, No. 1.
The Shinan excavation, Korea: an interim report on the
hull structure. International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, 12. 4: 293–302.
The Song Dynasty shipwreck at Quanzhou Fujian
Province, People’s Republic of China. International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 12. 3: 253–261.
Two ancient shipwrecks in the Gulf of Thailand: a report
on archaeological investigations. Journal Siam Society,
65.2: 1–22.
The travels of Marco Polo. Penguin Books.
Waterfront excavations at Dongmenkou, Ningbo, Zhe
Jiang Province, PRC. International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, 20.4: 299–311.
Science and Civilisation of China (Volume 4: Physics
and Physical Technology, Part III: Civil Engineering and
Nautics). Cambridge University Press.
The Nanhai trade, a study of the early history of Chinese

�1958
Xu Yingfan,
1985

trade in the South China Sea. Journal of the Malayan
Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 31.2: 1–135.
Origin and technique of gua ju (iron cramp) connections
in wooden craft construction. Transactions of CSNAME
Marine History Research Group, No. 1.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5193">
                <text>Maritime Archaeology of Ships of Indian Ocean, Southeast Asia and East Asia, the Question of Bulkheads</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5194">
                <text>        This paper will discuss the maritime archaeological work that has been carried out in the region, looking at shipbuilding construction and what has been learned through this work. In Southeast Asia the excavations in the 1980s by the Department of Archaeology of Thailand and the Western Australia Museum on the Pattaya and Ko Si Chang 3 sites will be examined, with a discussion on the construction techniques. In East Asia the significance of the Song dynasty ship from Quanzhou will be discussed in relation to the Southeast Asian ship construction.&#13;
&#13;
	The whole of the geographical region dealt with in this paper is faced with the challenge of dealing with treasure hunting and the exploitation of underwater cultural heritage for financial gain. While maritime archaeological projects in the region have been limited, there is a need to encourage countries to understand and protect their cultural heritage. This can only be done through archaeological work, as there can be no real benefit from working for commercial salvage. The paper will discuss the relative merits of archaeological investigations of shipwrecks in the region compared with that of commercial salvage.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5195">
                <text>Jeremy Green</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5196">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="25">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="139" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1653">
                <text>Maritime Archaeology: Historical Descriptions of the Seafarings of the Kalingas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1654">
                <text>Sila Tripati</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1655">
                <text>Kaveri Books</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1656">
                <text>2000</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1657">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1658">
                <text>Sila Tripati</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1659">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1660">
                <text>2000</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1661">
                <text>New Delhi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1662">
                <text>Kaveri Books</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1663">
                <text>Maritime Archaeology: Historical Descriptions of the Seafarings of the Kalingas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="138" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1643">
                <text>Maritime Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1644">
                <text>10:16:20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1645">
                <text>Web Page</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1646">
                <text>Web Page</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="155">
            <name>Access Date</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1647">
                <text>2011-10-07 10:16:20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1648">
                <text>10:16:20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1649">
                <text>Maritime Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="248">
            <name>URL</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1650">
                <text>http://www.maritimeasia.ws/</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="254">
            <name>Attachment Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1651">
                <text>Maritime Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="255">
            <name>Attachment URL</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1652">
                <text>http://www.maritimeasia.ws/</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="673" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="465">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/6baf4997e7d62ee092083ef6a7d794b5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5023227a0eda0d4fa3edc8d55cf76f67</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="65">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7187">
                  <text>2021 Session 2: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7188">
                  <text>Session 2 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7189">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 2 of the 2021 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7190">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7191">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7192">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7193">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="58">
              <name>Date Copyrighted</name>
              <description>Date of copyright.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="7194">
                  <text>2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7249">
                <text>Maritime Cultural Landscapes and Seascapes in Prehistoric Japan:  The Entangled Sea of the Yayoi Period&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7250">
                <text>The developments in underwater archaeology and heritage in East Asia has gained momentum over the past decades spurred on by the wealth of related material in the archaeological record generating a plethora of new data. Simultaneously, different theoretical frameworks can and should be applied to anchor this data within a broader framework. Therefore, this paper seeks to address archaeological material pertaining to the maritime world of the Yayoi Period as well as several theoretical frameworks within which this material can be interpreted and tied to the underwater cultural heritage of East Asia and how to combine material and theory in a meaningful way. Although the most conspicuous witnesses of maritime connectivity - i.e. shipwrecks - are so far missing from the Yayoi Period, there is sufficient evidence on land that attests to the embeddedness of Japan within the broader maritime world of East Asia. This land-based focus of maritime archaeology is in concordance with the concept of maritime cultural landscape developed by Christer Westerdahl, presented in an eponymous article in 1992 where the terrestrial aspect is always dominant. The concept of seascape, on the other hand, places the focus on the sea itself, an intrinsic part of all maritime studies, and stresses the perceptions of the sea as a cultural entity which possesses agency. Despite valid attempts to put the sea at the center of anthropological and archaeological research, for instance in the Pacific or - more recently - the Mediterranean - there is still an imbalance within the research putting the focus more on the land than on the sea.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7251">
                <text>Anja Krieger</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7252">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="91">
            <name>Rights Holder</name>
            <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7253">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7254">
                <text>Krieger, Anja. 2021. “Maritime Cultural Landscapes and Seascapes in Prehistoric Japan: The Entangled Sea of the&#13;
Yayoi Period.” Edited by Brian Fahy, Hans Van Tilburg, Bill Jeffery, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Riley Smith. In Proceedings of&#13;
Fourth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Keelung,Taiwan, and Virtual, November&#13;
1-5, 2021. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology URL: https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/exhibits/show/apconf-muchproceedings/item/673</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="274" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="194">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/5df5e09f6b217b3038a4d027d42a9979.pdf</src>
        <authentication>18b80206bf82db574b7b27b419c19e8c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3221">
                    <text>Maritime History of Steamship Companies Impact
in Modern China, 1840-1911
Han Qing

Abstract
This paper aims to provide evidence of historical documents in Chinese steamship industry and how
these materials may provide context to better understand the underwater cultural heritage. What were
the economic impacts of steamship industry on China’s littoral landscape? Through a discussion on
maritime policies the following examples are noted:
a) Assistance Policy – In 1876 Japan ordered a cessation on Chinese steamships from entering
Japan to purchase coal. In response the Chinese government enacted the September 1876 Decree
for Coal Aggregate Industry in Kai Ping in support of the first national coal mining industry. This
caused great changes in the littoral landscape with the building of mining infrastructure.
b) Preferential treatment – The 1872 Royal Act declared the development of the first Chinese
steamship company. The China Merchants Steam Navigation Company gained monopoly of the
inland-waterway systems (Yangtze River – Shanghai to Hankou to Chong Qing). In support of its
development the policy entailed the following:
i. Raised high-prices on freights with the implementation of a tax to twice their value;
ii. Private company taxes were increased but taxes reduced on the steamship company.
iii. prohibition on other competitive steamship companies until 1896.
These historical records can help to interpret maritime archaeology by providing reasons for
ship-type shifts in cargo assemblages. When the government stepped in with these raised freights
and taxes then the private companies operating junks were ousted by the national steamship
company. This could explain why a shipwreck would encase high-valued merchandise along the
canal system. The cargo could be misinterpreted to represent a pirate ship. However, knowledge of
the relevant policy clarifies the fact that working steamships would have been the preferred vessel to
carry cargoes of high-value.

Introduction
In this discussion of policy I will first start with the definition of keywords and their
context. 'Supportive Shipping Policy' means the governing state provides the
national shipping companies privileges in finance, tax, operation and loans. Foreign
shipping companies do not have the same privileges under these policies. The
policies are an impetus for encouraging new ship building and the expansion of new
and/or developing national shipping companies.
In the 19th century the world market expanded on a large scale after the
Industrial Revolution. Private investments were made in attempts to adapt to the
growing trade that brought about the increased demands of shipping transportation.
National governing bodies, in countries geographically located in the western
hemisphere, noted these dynamics in world economics and instated regulations to
support their national shipping companies.
At the forefront of global maritime activities was Britain. The 1651 Navigation
Act restricted trade by foreign ships between England (in 1701 under the Acts of
Union became 'Great Britain') and its colonies. The goal was to force colonial
development into Liners favourable to England and stop direct colonial trade with the
Netherlands, France and other European countries. The original ordinance of 1651
was renewed during the Sovereign Restoration (1660's), in 1660 and 1663, and
subsequently subject to minor amendment. These Acts formed the basis for British
overseas trade for nearly 200 years.

�In 1837 the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company (P&amp;O) won a
contract from the British Admiralty to deliver mail to the Iberian Peninsula. This was
the first mail contract awarded to a commercial shipping company. Later it was paid
by the Royal Post Office. The mail contracts provided P&amp;O with a degree of financial
security and a major source of revenue for more than 100 years until the outbreak of
the Second World War. Other contracts, similar in nature, were awarded to other
shipping companies, especially Alfred Holt`s Ocean Steamship Company.
Japan and other western states such as America, France and Germany
followed this example and made similar steps towards the development of national
shipping companies.

Forms of supportive shipping policies
Ship-building Subsidy
To encourage national shipping companies to build new vessels governments
provided money towards the costs of construction. The amount was calculated
according to load-tons.
For example, in 1881 France adopted ship-building subsidy acts which entailed
offers of 25.10 francs per ton for iron boats, 11.58-15.44 francs per ton for wooden
boats and 5.80 francs per 100 kilograms (kg) for new engines, boilers and affiliated
parts.
On 1st October 1896 Japan enacted the Navigation Encouragement Law for
vessels ranging in size from 700 to 1000 tons. The subsidy offer was 12 yen per ton.
Larger vessels were offered 20 yen per ton. Additionally, the Japanese authority
offered 5 yen per indicated horsepower (ihp) for machines made in Japan.

Mail Allowance or Navigation Bounty
Rapid expansion of new Liners and national mail shipments were encouraged and
indeed occurred with the aide of subsidies towards national shipping companies.
These subsidies were usually a contract between authority and company, not an act
or regulation.
In the introduction I discussed how Britain was the initial country to enforce
these policies, which was later followed by other countries. I will here introduce the
initiatives of France, America and Germany respectively.
In 1851 the French state agreed on a subsidy to Messageries Nationales (in
1871 renamed the Compagnies des Messageries Maritimes) for the postal service of
an annual subsidy of 300,000 gold francs. This original agreement was guaranteed
for ten years (Ramona 2001).
On 25th August 1865 the American Congress authorized a subsidy to the
Pacific Mail Steamship Company (PMSS) for transporting mail to Yokohama and
Hong Kong. From 1867 the initial subsidy was $500,000 for twelve round trips a year,
to the total sum of $4,500,000 over nine years.
The German government provided support to Norddeutscher Lloyd with an
annual subsidy of 4,400,000 deutsch marks to cover three routes of mail service.
This initial contract lasted for 15 years.

Government supported capital or loans
At times the government has built up new shipping enterprises with government
funds and then turned it over to renowned business groups to operate it. Otherwise,
in order to develop its maritime enterprises, governments have bought steamers for

�specific shipping companies free of charge, and/or they provided loans to be paid
back in instalments. Japan's government has the reputation for providing the most to
the development of its steam-shipping.
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) and Nisshin Kisen Kaisha (NKK) were
founded by the Japanese government. In August 1872 the Japanese government
gave 15 ships to NYK at the price of 250,000 yen, this was lower than the original
cost to build steamships. Further, the company could repay the money by
instalments. In September 1875 the Japanese government bought 13 steamships
(total tonnage 11,174) and gave the ships to NYK without imposing any fee. In
October of the same year the government lent $810,000 to NYK. With this money
NYK purchased four steamships (total tonnage 6761) from the American company
PMSS's Yokohama-Shanghai line, this sale included shore properties.
NKK or Janpa-China Steamship Company was established in March 1907.
Originally there were four Japanese shipping companies that conducted business on
the Yangtze River. They were a direct competition with British, German, French and
Chinese firms. The Pass Letter Province of Japan decided that a merger of these
companies would enable stronger competition against foreign companies. The new
company (NKK) was formed with approximately 46% of shares held by OSK, 41%
by NYK, 10% by shareholders of Hunan Kisen Company, and 2.5% by Daiton Kisen
Company interests.

Reducing tax burden
The government took over the responsibility of covering the costs for shipping
companies to operate on their routes. They started special tax policies to provide
national shipping enterprises money towards custom charges, port dues, tonnage
tax, transit duty, etc. This allowed for the companies to operate virtually free of
charge along their transit. For example, when the Suez Canal was completed and
opened for shipping traffic the British government covered the Canal transit dues for
British shipping companies.

Cabotage right (Coastal transportation right)
Cabotage originally is the transport of goods or passengers between two ports in the
same country by a vessel. Cabotage has since been expended to now cover
aviation, railways and road transport.
‘Cabotage rights’ are defined as the right-of-passage of company ship(s) owned
by one country to trade or transport in the waters of another country. Most countries
do not permit cabotage by foreign companies, however in the late Ch’ing Dynasty,
after the second Opium War, foreign shipping companies had this right. Only a few
countries in the world have currently renounced this right.

Speed rate allowance
Only Japanese shipping companies operated the speed rate allowance. When the
Japanese ships transported between foreign ports the Japanese government
provided an allowance of 25 yen per 1,000Miles per ton. This came into action under
the 1896 Navigation Encouragement Law. It was limited to vessel(s) with a gross
tonnage over 100, which had the capacity to sail at a speed of over ten knots, and
the age of the vessel was under 15 years old. The allowance would increase by 10%
for every additional 500 gross tons, with a further 20% increase for every extra knot
of speed it could achieve. The highest limit was 6,000 gross tons and 17 knots.
However, this policy had a fatal flaw in that in order to get the allowance the shipping

�companies focused on building larger and faster vessels in spite of hold capacity
and economic benefit (Wray 1984:305).
Inspired by these policies the shipping companies quickly controlled many main
lines of the world. For example, the shipping market of China was monopolized by
foreign companies.
Chart 1.Tonnage percentage of foreign flag ship entered and cleared in the ports of
China (1864-1911) (data from Yang, et al. 1931)
%
80.00
70.00
60.00

BRITAIN

50.00

AMERICA
GERMAN

40.00

FRANCE
30.00
JAPAN
20.00
10.00
0.00
1864

1869

1874

1879

1884

1889

1894

1899

1904

1909

YEAR

China Merchant Steam Navigation Company (CMSNC) was the pioneer
Chinese-flag steam shipping venture. It was formed at the end of 1872 and began
official operations on the 17th January 1873. It changed the situation that Chieseflag shipping shared no more than 1% in the overall Chinese shipping market. The
new company was a serious intervener and rival with the foreign lines. Unlike foreign
companies the Ch’ing Dynasty government did not have any special law or
regulation to support it. CMSNC mainly relied on the idea of its initiator---Li Hungchang. Hung-chang’s support chiefly entailed the following four forms:

1. Government Loans and moratorium
The Ch’ing Dynasty government provided loans to CMSNC and postponed the
return on the captial. In 1873 the initial total capital for CMSNC was Tls.1400,000;
Tls.134,000 of which was a government loan 2 . In 1876 CMSNC experienced
difficulties under the pressure of their rivals Shanghai Steam Navigation Company
(SSNC), China Navigation Company (founded by Butterfield &amp; Swire) and China
Coast Steam Navigation Company (founded by Jardine, Matherson &amp; Co.). Li Hungchang lent Tls.500,000 from the Navy and Land expenditures, along with taxes

1 Tls, Shanghai Tael silver, Chinese monetary unit, one Tls approximately equals one-third Great
British Pound in 1870`s.
2
This was drawn from the military expenditure of Chilli province.

�collected from Yantai customs. In January 1877 the company purchased the entire
fleet and shore properties of SSNC for Tls.2,220,000. This included an initial
payment of Tls.1,000,000, this was obtained from a government loan. It was the
largest loan in company’s history. In 1878 the government loans reached its height
in the company’s history at Tls.1,960,000.
In 1885 CMSNC was to repay the last government loan of Tls.770,000.
Simultaneously more than Tls.1,000,000 of the foreign loan was to be repaid.
Without doubt it was difficult to repay both loans at the same time so Hung-chang
decided to the foreign loan should be repaid first. Once this was accomplished the
Chinese government loan was to be repaid. This meant that the Chinese
government loan was postponed by 5 years, and was not repaid until 1890.

2. Monopolization of transport “tribute rice”
Tribute rice is a special tax for the eight provinces along the littoral of the Grand
Canal 3 (Shandong, Henan, Anhui, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan and Hubei).
The eight provinces were to transport different amounts of rice along the Grand
Canal to Beijing by sampan every year. The amount of tribute rice was
4,000,000Picul4 per annum. The concession of transport tribute rice was a privilege
reserved solely for CMSNC. Hung-chang explained to the Ch’ing Dynasty
government on 23rd of October 1872, the reason for the build of a new steamship
company. His points included transport tribute rice and the challenge of the foreign
monopoly of steam ship companies in China. In 1873 CMSNC transported 20% of
the tribute rice with a rapid increase to 40-50%.
Transporting tribute rice had great affect on the development of CMSNC in its
early stage. Its freight was a stable source of income. This was due to the fact that
the Ch’ing Dynasty government paid higher freights. Before 1879 the freight was
Tls.0.5615833 per Picul and was later reduced by 10%, a fee for the Sea
Transportation Office, and 5%, a fee for all daily costs. The net profit of it was
Tls.0.4773. Additionally, the government paid Tls.0.15 per Picul for repairs. This
included waste rice allowance and a 20% fee tax for carrying other cargo when ships
returned from Tianjin, so the freight was in fact higher than it was for junks to
conduct the same activity. Through the 1880’s the freight declined to Tls.0.531 per
Picul, although essentially remaining higher. The following quote provides evidence
of this:
For the transport of tribute rice from Shanghai to Tientsin,the government for many
years paid Tls.0.55 per Picul---a rate at least twice as high as that charged by foreign
firms for moving cargo between the two ports (Liu 1959:443).

Some foreign shipping companies never attempted to transport tribute rice. In 1875
SSNC proposed to transport the tribute rice by Tls.0.1 per Picul. The freight was
lower than the cost of the goods. A writer for the Shanghai News (16th March 1875)
commented, "it was astonishing to hear this news and forced everyone have to think
about what was the reason behind it". This may signify that there was no doubt that
the manager of SSNC wanted to drive out CMSNC. In 1884 a German named
Flexsys offered another proposal. He wanted to transport the tribute rice for ten
years by seven steamships. His proposal included the fee of Tls.0.6 per Picul, at no

3
4

The Grand Canal refers to ports along the north-south oriented River from Beijing to Hangzhou.
Picul, Chines unit of weight, one picul equals 71.616 kilograms.

�less than 800,000 Picul annually; if, however, this amount was not reached he
offered to pay Tls.0.3 per Picul for any sum that lacked. In return for this contract he
would give seven steamships to China as a gift in kind. Li hung-chang said, “now in
China, there are only two privileges of transport: for the Chinese shipping company
one is tribute rice, and another is salt……It is obviously a bait [for the seven
steamships], we should not believe this offer and instead politely refuse it” (Wu
1905-1908: 4-6). The tribute rice market did not open to foreign shipping companies
for its entire duration.
Transporting tribute rice brought considerable profits to CMSNC. From 1873 to
1884 the net profit of transporting tribute rice totalled Tls.2,600,000. This did not
include the subsidy for repairs and free taxes. The annual average calculation of the
tribute rice freight was 18% of the total income. In 1874 the income from the rice
tribute totalled one-third of the company’s income at Tls.155,000 (Zhang 1988). The
privilege of transport tribute rice became a sharp weapon for CMSNC in the rivalry
with foreign steamship companies.

3. Tax concessions
The company also benefited from certain government tax concessions.
(1) Free tax of cargo. If the company`s steamship succeeded in transporting
tribute rice to Tianjin and carried cargo from the three opened northern ports: Tianjin,
Yingkou and Yantai, when it returned, the export duty of the 20% of the total weight
of tribute rice would be free. In 1876 this policy extend to transport relief food and
the cent-tax5 was free.
(2) Taxation of tea cargoes was another outstanding example of favouritism.
In 1873 Li Hung-chang proclaimed that tea brought by Chinese steamers to Tianjin
would be forwarded to Zhangjiakou (Kalgan) for the Mongolian and Russian markets.
These would not endure any payment of inland duties. The export duty of tea was
usually Tls.2.5 per 100Jin 6 but it declined to Tls.0.6 when tea cargoes were
transported by CMSNC and this included free the coast duty.
(3) Tonnage tax was initially free for the company when it entered and left
some ports. In 1877 after purchasing SSNC, the fleet of the company was enlarged.
The Tonnage Tax started initially with a fixed tax at Tls.1000 per month for the whole
fleet for all ports of China, thereby providing a savings of approximately Tls.30004000 every year.
(4) Free Transit Dues for foreign companies were only ever provided to the
CMSNC.

4. Forbiddance of any other new company to be built
Before the Sino-Japan War (1894) the Ch’ing Dynasty government did its best to
keep the CMSNC as a monopoly over Chinese shipping companies. Any one who
wanted to operate a new steamer line were thwarted.
In 1895 Japan forced the Ch’ing Dynasty government to sign the unfair Treaty
of Shimonoseki. In which it was agreed that Japanese steamships could sail
alongside the Grand Canal from Shanghai to Suzhou and Hangzhou. This was the
first time that China opened inland steam navigation to foreigners. Foreign shipping
companies seized this opportunity to extend their business to inland waterways.
5

Cent-tax, one of business tax. In 1853, the Ch'ing Dynasty government collected tax on overland
cargo transport. At first the tax was 1% of the value.
6
Jin, Chinese weight, one Jin equals 596.8 grams.

�With the power and capacity of steamships as well as the privilege of taxes they
robbed the traditional junks` business in no time. This situation aroused some
Chinese to set up national shipping companies. Forced by peerage pressure the
Ch’ing Dynasty government had to change their attitude. On 13th July 1898 the
government issued the regulations of inland steam navigation which permitted
Chinese people to set up their own steam shipping companies. This was the end of
the CMSNC’s reigning era.

Conclusion
Though the Ch’ing Dynasty government took the above mentioned steps to support
the CMSNC it was limited and insufficient. This could largely be attributed to the
contemporaneous weak government. The CMSNC gave up ocean transportation
first, the purpose of which was to improve the situation along the Chinese coastal
trade and inland shipping markets so they were not monopolized by foreign
companies. However, we can conclude from Chart 2 that these efforts received
limited change.
Chart 2. Percentage of numbers &amp; tonnage of Chinese flag ships that entered and
cleared in the ports of China (1864-1911)7 (data from Yang, et al. 1931)
80.00

%

70.00
60.00
50.00
percentage of ship
numbers

40.00

percentage of
tonnage

30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1864

1869

1874

1879

1884

1889

1894

1899

1904

1909

YEAR

The government's preference tended towards steamships over junks,
although the change was slow. Largely, CMSNC initiated the privatized sector of
modern historical Chinese maritime culture which of course has left its imprint in
underwater cultural heritage. It was the first to have its own commercial ship's flag,
develop infrastructure for steamship dockyards, build steamship dockyards, build
Chinese steamships, and lose a steamship in a shipwreck. From 1873-1877 the
7

The sudden rise of ship numbers in 1904 is because the statistics included junks from this year,
however, we can see the percentage of tons decline.

�tonnage percentage increased quickly from 1% to 33%, later the percentage
declined due to the increase in shipwrecks.
The demands of War were another important factor. The three low points in
Chinese steamship development during this period was caused by the following
three wars: Sino-France War (1883), Sino-Japan War (1894) and the Boxer War
(1900).
The CMSNC, the first Chinese steamship company, was also the impetus for
new Chinese industries such as: the fuel support of Kaiping Coal Mining (started
September 1876), the first Chinese business to offer insurance of goods and ships
by the Renhe Insurance Company, communication development and independence
with the Tianjin Telegraph Office and the first higher-education institution in maritime
studies the Shanghai Industrial College of Ministry of Posts and Telegraph (started
in 1909).
To appreciate the potential of Chinese underwater cultural heritage during the
modern historical period we must turn to the development in maritime history of
privatized industry. The first step of which was to compete with the fast globalized
trade that was only possible with the advanced technology used in steamships. This
paper attempted to lay out the history of that development through historical records
and bring together the information in comparative charts. The next step would be to
conduct critical analysis of specific sites related to this industry in China.

Bibliography
Great Britain.
Parliament
1877
Liu, K.C.,
1959
Ramona, P.,
2001
Wray, W. D.,
1984
Wu, R.L.,
1905-1908
Yang, C., Hau, H.B.,
and others
1931
Zhang, H.Q,
1988

Commercial Reports from Her Majesty’s Consuls in
China,1876, Harrison and Sons, London.
"Early enterprise in Nineteenth-Century
China", in
Journal of Asia Studies, Association for Asia studies,
Vol.18, No.4, pp. 442-443．
Paquebot vers L'Orient, Editions Alan Sutton, ProvenceAlpes-côte-d’Azur.
Mitsubishi and the N.Y.K. , 1870-1914: business strategy
in the Japanese shipping industry, Harvard University
Asia Centre, Boston.
Document Record of Li hung-chang, Nanjing Press,
Vol.16.
Statistics of China Foreign Trade During the Last SixtyFive Years, Monograph no. 4, National Research Institute
of Social Sciences, Academia Sinica.
History of China Merchant Steam Navigation Company,
People's Transport Press, Beijing.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3216">
                <text>Maritime History of Steamship Companies Impact in Modern China, 1840-1911&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3217">
                <text>Session 11&#13;
Diversity in approaches to maritime archaeology, underwater cultural heritage and related areas</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3218">
                <text>This paper aims to provide evidence of historical documents in Chinese steamship industry and how these materials may provide context to better understand the underwater cultural heritage. What were the economic impacts of steamship industry on Chinaâ€™s littoral landscape? Through a discussion on maritime policies the following examples are noted:&#13;
&#13;
a) Assistance Policy â€“ In 1876 Japan ordered a cessation on Chinese steamships from entering Japan to purchase coal. In response the Chinese government enacted the September 1876 Decree for Coal Aggregate Industry in Kai Ping in support of the first national coal mining industry. This caused great changes in the littoral landscape with the building of mining infrastructure.&#13;
&#13;
b) Preferential treatment â€“ The 1872 Royal Act declared the development of the first Chinese steamship company. The China Merchants Steam Navigation Company gained monopoly of the inland-waterway systems (Yangtze River â€“ Shanghai to Hankou to Chong Qing). In support of its development the policy entailed the following:&#13;
&#13;
	i. Raised high-prices on freights with the implementation of a tax to twice their value;&#13;
	ii. Private company taxes were increased but taxes reduced on the steamship company.&#13;
	iii. prohibition on other competitive steamship companies until 1896.&#13;
&#13;
These historical records can help to interpret maritime archaeology by providing reasons for ship-type shifts in cargo assemblages. When the government stepped in with these raised freights and taxes then the private companies operating junks were ousted by the national steamship company. This could explain why a shipwreck would encase high-valued merchandise along the canal system. The cargo could be misinterpreted to represent a pirate ship. However, knowledge of the relevant policy clarifies the fact that working steamships would have been the preferred vessel to carry cargoes of high-value.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3219">
                <text>Han Qing</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3220">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="27">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 11</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="470" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="262">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/cfa098913665dc154fddf76dd74aa421.pdf</src>
        <authentication>26911d5cb3f7987668cdd7f2ea6eb048</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5439">
                    <text>Maritime Means and Mountain Ends: the origin of
stoneware jars in mid 15th CE burial complexes of the
Southern Cardamom Ranges, Cambodia.
Peter Grave
Archaeology &amp; Palaeoanthropology
University of New England, NSW Australia 2351
email: pgrave@une.edu.au
orcid.org/0000‐0001‐5076‐2386
Lisa Kealhofer
Anthropology/Environmental Studies
Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA USA 95053
orcid.org/0000‐0002‐8308‐462X
N. Beavan
Institute of Environmental Science and Research,
Kenepuru Science Centre,
Kenepuru, Porirua 5022, New Zealand
orcid.org/0000‐0001‐5649‐0430
Tep Sohka
Royal University of Fine Arts, Cambodia
Miriam Stark
University of Hawai’I‐Manoa, Honololulu, USA 96822‐2223
orcid.org/ 0000‐0003‐1700‐4406
Ea Darith
APSARA Authority
Siem Reap, Cambodia
Abstract
Southeast Asia during the first half of the second millennium CE. Their
hegemony is particularly apparent in lowland areas throughout the Lower
Mekong basin, expressed in both architecture and ceramics. How strongly
this control was exercised in more geographically marginal regions – and
what the nature of power was after the capital moved southward -- has
not been explored. In this paper we present the results of a geochemical
analysis of ceramics from absolutely and comprehensively dated mid-15th
century CE burial complexes in the Southern Cardamom Ranges of
southeastern Cambodia and a nearby contemporary shipwreck. The

�wreck assemblage was typical of a Southeast Asian maritime trader.
Comparison of burial and shipwreck ceramic compositional data enables
us to confirm a provenance for some of the jars and fine wares from
production centres in central Northern Thailand. A second group, not
represented in the wreck assemblage, is from a yet unidentified source
that we suggest is located in the adjacent Cambodian lowlands. The
results of this provenience analysis highlights both the role of the relatively
well-known maritime trade, as well as a previously unsuspected continuity
in local Cambodian stoneware production. This window into 15th c
exchange networks expands our understanding of the context of
subsequent European 16th-17th c engagement during the Early Modern
Period, is one piece of the broader picture needed to more closely define
the processes of economic transformation.
Key words: Southeast Asia, ceramics, geochemical analysis, shipwreck,
Cardamom Mountains
Introduction
The dramatic expansion of archaeology across mainland Southeast Asia
in the last twenty years is beginning to provide the level of detail needed
to evaluate previous models of exchange and interaction (e.g., Bronson
1977; Reid 1988). The role of maritime interaction and trade has long
been argued to be a critical factor in the development of coastal polities
throughout the region (Manguin 2000). However, this perspective has
relied heavily on historical data, much of which begins in the Early Modern
period for this region. This historical bias has focused attention on
economic and political development for the coastal regions and the Early
Modern period as an instant of economic and political rupture (Wallerstein
1974). It has also promoted an externalist bias in how mainland political
and economic transformations are viewed. Arguably, our understanding
of the posited economic and political ruptures in the region remains
hampered by the still relatively sparse direct archaeological evidence of
the local economic trajectories across the transition (Stark 2010).

�Here we add to a growing body of material evidence that Southeast Asia
was a large scale, internally complex and integrated exchange system
prior to European engagement (e.g., Carter 2013; Manguin 2004;
Manguin 2014). Ceramic compositional data from exceptionally well dated
mid-15th c burial sites in the Cardamom Mountains of Cambodia, as well
as from a contemporary shipwreck just off the west coast of Cambodia,
are analyzed to better understand these local maritime/coastal economies
outside the main political centers, in the decades prior to the Early Modern
period engagement in SE Asia and the Pacific.
Maritime exchange spheres in mainland SE Asia
The organization of trade and exchange systems in Southeast Asia is a
key research area for archaeologists and historians of the region. In the
1970s, Bronson suggested a dendritic model integrating coastal and
inland sites (Bronson 1977), while others have focused on maritime
patterns over time (Cartier 1988; Evers 1988; Manguin 1993). These
earlier models heavily relied on historical data and ethnographic
comparisons, but with a few exceptions, little direct archaeological data
(e.g., Junker 1993; Junker 1998). More recent terrestrial archaeology
across both island and mainland Southeast Asia has greatly expanded
our understanding of the development of polities and their interaction
beginning in the first millennium CE (Hendrickson 2010; Hendrickson
2011; Manguin 2004; Manguin 2014; Murphy and Stark 2016; Stark 2010;
Stark 2006).
Two main types of evidence are used to reconstruct pre-modern trade and
exchange in the region: shipwrecks and trade goods. Shipwreck data
allow us to track the expansion of maritime trade (and technology).
Beginning with the 9th c. Belitung shipwreck in Indonesia, with cargo from
China and the Middle East, the shipwreck evidence increases through the

�early second millennium CE. The Gulf of Thailand, in particular, has a
shipwreck record of extensive local trade from the 13th-15th c. CE (Brown
2004; Green and Harper 1987). Wrecks like the 15th c. Pandanan, in the
South China Sea, reveal the extensive exchange between island and
mainland SE Asia, and with points to the west (Diem 1998). In terms of
ceramics, these wrecks commonly include a range of jars and fine
tablewares (typically glazed bowls and plates) from a wide range of
production centres in Southeast Asia and China (Grave and Maccheroni
2009).
With the improvement and expansion of both regional archaeological
databases and archaeometric analyses, we can begin to evaluate the
regional trajectories of trade across SE Asia. In addition to site
excavations and surveys, specific trade goods, such as carnelian beads
from burials, provide some evidence of the direction, scale, and intensity
of interaction across mainland SE Asia (Carter, et al. 2016; Carter 2015;
Carter and Dussubieux 2016; Theunissen, et al. 2000). Patterns of
exchange and emulation of South Asian religious items and iconography
have also provided insights into inland and maritime exchange networks
(Brown 1996; Shaffer 2015).
Large scale changes in economic and political relationships SE Asia took
place in the 10th-11th c. CE. These included the development of the
Khmer Empire and the expansion of interaction with China (Wade 2009).
Chinese interaction and exchange is apparent through both technological
adoption and trade goods. Manguin (Manguin 2000) argues that the 10th13th c CE is one the major phases of intensified maritime exchange that
promoted the growth of coastal polities (Baker 2003). However, while the
Khmer traded with the Chinese, and expanded northward in mainland SE
Asia, their production and exchange appear to have remained internal.

�The 15th c CE was a critical nexus in both political and economic
reorganization in SE Asia. Documentary sources suggest the Khmer
Empire collapsed by the mid-15th c. CE. Post-Angkorian power migrated
south to a series of 15th-18th c capitals that flanked the Tonle Sap lake
(Srei Santhor, Bakan [Pursat] and then to the Oudong and Longvek area
that lies c. 35 km NW of Phnom Penh). At the same time, other polities
emerged across the region during this time (Grave 1995), and the
expansion of maritime trade was supported by a network of entrepôts
(e.g., Melaka, in the Malacca Straits).
Chinese records suggest that 15th c Cambodia was a sea power in close
relations with China (Vickery, et al. 2004:43). Despite Ming Dynasty trade
restrictions, 15th c private Chinese ships continued their active trade
throughout Southeast Asia (Hall 2016:406-409; Wade 2004:19-27). At
least one previously-established Ming trade route through Southeast Asia
included Siam (Ptak 1998:27), and maritime research on 15th c shipwreck
sites offer ample evidence of durable Southeast Asian goods, including
high-fired ceramics from kiln complexes in central northern Thailand
(Flecker 2001:225-226).
The onset of the Early Modern period, in the 16th c. with the European
intervention in the region, arguably, caused a major rupture, redefining
production, exchange and scale of interaction. While current research
projects are beginning to address the nature of this transformation, we
argue that the political and economic relationships of the 15th-16th c. CE
in Southeast Asia are critical elements for understanding the impact of the
Early Modern economic transformation in SE Asian societies. Our use of
two Cambodian case studies allows us to trace one such relationship:
mid-15th century commodity flows across the region.

�Here we make use of contemporary evidence from mid-15th c. CE
isolated burial sites in the Cardamom Mountains as well as a
contemporary shipwreck on an adjacent coastline to assess exchange
networks on the eve of the Early Modern Period. Our Cardamom Mountain
samples derive from work at “Jar and Coffin burial sites” whose artifacts
and bioarchaeology has been reported previously (e.g., (Beavan, et al.
2012a; Carter and Beavan 2014; Halcrow, et al. 2014).
Using Neutron Activation Analysis [NAA] we characterize ceramics from
both the burial and shipwreck sites, and compare these results with legacy
stoneware data sets from both well dated shipwrecks and production
centers in Thailand and Cambodia. These analyses allow us to begin to
evaluate the economic relationships of these upland communities with
coastal shipping and elsewhere at this key historical juncture.

Background: The Sample &amp; Context
A relatively small sample of seventy one ceramics were selected for
geochemical profiling from fragmentary material in four contemporary mid15th c CE archaeological assemblages (i.e. three burial sites in the
Cardamom Range and the shipwreck Koh Sdech assemblage)(Fig 1). A
total of fifty samples were selected from the three burial sites and 21
samples came from the shipwreck (Table 1). Both the burial sites and the
shipwreck included earthenware and stoneware samples. Due to the
disparity in sample populations between the burial sites the burial sites
are combined into a single Southern Cardamom group to compare with
both the shipwreck assemblage and other reference NAA datasets. The
contemporaneity of these sites facilitated this grouping.

�Fig. 1: Study area and general location within mainland Southeast Asia
(inset) showing locations of burial sites and shipwreck discussed in the
text.

�Table 1: Summary of the NAA geotechnical results for the Cardamom
and Shipwreck samples organized by ware type
(stoneware/earthenware) and by compositional group (A-D for

S. Cardamom

A
B
C
C1
C2
D
E
100
200
210
300
400
500
S
SW
EW

N
20
4
2
1
1
11
1
4
3
2
5
12
5
71
40
31

Koh Sdech Shipwreck

Earthenware

Stoneware

Group

stoneware, E refers to the celadon singleton; 100-500 for earthenware).

12
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
21
14
7

8
3
1
1
1
11
1
4
3
0
0
12
5
50
26
24

The earthenwares include cooking pots, kendis, water jars, while the
glazed stoneware are mainly storage jars but also includes a few fine
glazed and decorated bowls. The glazed stoneware jar assemblage
includes brown, black, and green glazes, and potentially some unglazed
samples.
The shipwreck site is located in the Gulf of Thailand near the island of Koh
Sdech (20 km off shore). Radiocarbon dating of a piece of short-lived
cargo (bamboo core lacquerware box) established a mid-15th c CE date
for this assemblage (Beavan, et al. 2012b). The shipwreck included a
large assemblage of small, medium and large stoneware jars,

�predominantly from Singburi / Maenam Noi (based on typology (Cort
2017), as well as basins, bowls, mortars, kendis and Sisatchanalai and
Sukkhothai bowls (black under-painted and green glazed/celadons).
Earthenware types included cooking pots, lids, and stoves. Only a few
Chinese ceramic bowls were found, and were interpreted as the private
items of the ship crew (Sokha 2013). Non-ceramic items included
lacquerware, ‘picul’ (lead tokens), a betel box, ingots, a cannon, two ivory
tubes, and some sandstone.
The three burial sites, all with secondary interments, are distributed in a
cluster within the southern Cardamom Mountain range, 150-700 m asl,
ca. 40 km inland from the east coast of the Gulf of Thailand. Both log coffin
and jar inhumations are present at these sites. Through an extensive
program

of

radiocarbon dating

these burials

have

also

been

chronologically bracketed within the mid-15th c. CE (Beavan, et al. 2012a;
Beavan, et al. 2015). Other trade goods present in the burials include
simple copper finger rings and glass beads (Carter, et al. 2016). The glass
beads are consistent with types circulating in the maritime trade of SE
Asia at the time.
Methods
The ceramic samples were processed at UNE, and shipped to Maxxam
Labs, Ontario Canada for NAA. Processing included documentation,
photography prior to sampling. Subsamples were cleaned and crushed to
homogenize the sample, and submitted for analysis.
NAA results were structured and grouped using an iterative combination
of non-parametric multivariate procedures (PCA) and hierarchical cluster
analysis (Ward’s method).

�The compositional data from the ceramics were compared with two
general reference stoneware compositional data sets from Thailand and
Cambodia.

For

Thailand

the

production

sites

include

Sisatchanalai/Sawankhalok, Sukkhothai, and Suphanburi (n=24); the
production sites from Cambodia, dating to the Angkorian period, include:
Tani, Sar Sei, Thnal Mrech, Bangkong, Khnar Po, Torp Chey, Chong
Samrong, Veal Svey, and Cheung Ek (n=877). Several of these kiln sites
are closely clustered and have similar compositional fingerprints (e.g., Sar
Sei/Thnal Mrech as one group, and Torp Chey/Chong Samrong/Veal
Svey as another). Our sample of five stoneware samples from the
Suphanburi kilns are of unglazed grey stamped jars.
The excavated shipwreck assemblage included a large number of jars of
various, all attributable to the Maenam Noi kiln complex in the Singburi
province of central Thailand. While we could not include reference results
from the Maenam Noi kilns in Singburi, we suggest that that there is a
common geochemical profile for Singburi and Suphanburi (75 km to the
southwest), reflecting the geographic proximity of these two Thai
production centres in the same geochemically undifferentiated (?) alluvial
plain.
Results
The Cardamom Mountains and Shipwreck data (Table 1)
Analysis of the NAA dataset for the combined Cardamom Mountains
burial and shipwreck assemblages shows that it is highly compositionally
structured with multiple discrete groups. We identified six earthenware
groups (n=31) and four stoneware groups (n=40) including one singleton
outlier

(Group

E;

a

fine

ware

celadon,

typical

Sisatchanalai/Sawankhalok, central Northern Thailand)(Table 1).

of

�The largest stoneware group (Group A, n=20) is split between burial (n=8)
and shipwreck (n=12) samples. The samples in the second largest
stoneware group, (Group D n=11), are from burial sites only, and include
several samples previously identified as dark brown glazed “Angkorian”
jars.
Four of the six earthenware groups are from burial sites only, and are
dominated by cooking pots. None of these have compositional matches
or external parallels and therefore are treated here as locally produced in
the Cardamom Mountains area. The other two earthenware groups are
exclusive to the shipwreck samples and include a range of vessel types.
Therefore, the distribution of earthenwares in this sample shows no
evidence of maritime trade in earthenwares.
Comparison with all SE Asian production centers (Table 2)

�Table 2: In this table we compare the burial and shipwreck
stonewasamples with the reference kiln ceramics from Thailand and
Cambodia. The data presented are a subset of the data illustrated in
Figure 2, focusing on the groups found only in the Cardamom Mountain
burials and the shipwreck. Singleton samples have also been excluded.

Cambodia Thai.

The table notes the total number of samples for each assemblage (N)
followed by percentage membership in each compositional group. The
letters following groups 3 and 4 refer to group identifications defined in
Table 1 (e.g., 3(A)). The matches in the greyed blocks are suggested to
be misleading, see Discussion section. The matches in black boxes
indicate matches between assemblages. For example, for Group 3,
matches are between the Cardamom and shipwreck jars and a
production center in Suphanburi/Singburi; the greyed block for Cheung
Ek indicates an apparent, but rejected, connection to the Group 3 burial
and shipwreck

Site
S. Cardamom burials
Koh Sdech Shipwreck
Suphanburi
Sisatchanalai
Chong Samrong
Torp Chey
Veal Svey
Cheung Ek

N
26
14
5
16
117
53
41
145

% Jars
W.ware
3 (A) 4 (D)
2.9
42
42
4
93
--100
---69
19
-98
--100
--98
-92
---

Given the size of the region with potential production centres, and the
strong likelihood there were many more production centers in operation
than we have reference material for, we undertook a further comparative
analysis to provide more general provenience information. This combined
analysis is useful for allowing a better understanding and differentiation of
shared or unique geological settings.

�We combined the compositional data from the nine Khmer and two Thai
ceramic production complexes (n=799). In this analysis, five general
geochemical groups were identified (Table 2) which were most clearly
distinguished by systematic variations in Fe (iron) and Sb (antimony)(Fig.
2). Four singletons are discounted due to small sample size (with the
exception of two fine ware bowls: Sukhothai underpainted and
Sisatchanalai celadon sample). The groups and sites with singleton
matches, or with production groups not matched in our burial and
shipwreck assemblages, are excluded from Table 2.

�3.

Antimony (Sb)
ppm

3

5
2
1

4

2.9
Iron (Fe) %
Fig. 2: Five compositional groups for stoneware samples identified in the
combined NAA dataset (n=839) defined by Fe/Sb concentrations in the
Southern Cardamom burial sites, the Koh Sdeach shipwreck assemblage,
Thai production centres at Sisatchanalai and Suphanburi, and nine Khmer
production centres (Bangkong, Cheung Ek, Chong Samrong, Khnar Po,
Tani, Thnal Mrech, Torp Chey and Veal Svey). Note group 2 is composed
entirely of whitewares from residual clays in the Kulen hills and is not
represented in the burial or shipwreck assemblage. It is also distinct from
white wares from Sisatchanalai (group 2.9). The singleton 3.9 is the only
example of a fine ware bowl produced at Sukhothai (inset) from the
Cardamom burials.

�At this scale, these groups represent the broad differences in chemical
composition of stoneware clays across the region. In some cases, specific
kiln complexes can be identified within specific groups, but more
commonly where complexes shared geologically similar settings, multiple
kiln complexes are grouped together (as noted above). For example, one
group combines kiln samples from Torp Chey, Chong Samrong, Veal
Svey, and Sisatchanalai although these can be differentiated at a finer
level of analysis.
Evaluation of the shipwreck and burial assemblages within this combined
analysis of production centers, shows that all of the burial and shipwreck
samples can be assigned to four of five general compositional groups
(Groups 1, 3-5; Table 2, Fig 2). (The fifth group [Group 2] is composed
entirely of whitewares from the Kulen hills which are absent in the
shipwreck and burial assemblages.)
Group 3, which matches with the Suphanburi kiln samples, includes both
shipwreck and burial site samples. In addition to the Suphanburi reference
samples, Group 3 also includes all the Cheung Ek samples. We discount
Cheung Ek as a source for this material for several reasons. First, a more
detailed separate analysis of Group 3 shows that Group A samples group
separately from Cheung Ek reference material. Second, the Cheung Ek
kilns date to the 11th c. CE, centuries before the Cardamom Mountains
burials. Lastly, there is no evidence for Cheung Ek jars, or any Khmer jars,
in Southeast Asian shipwreck assemblages.
However, the burial sites also match a second source (Group 4) that is
not found in the shipwreck assemblage. In addition to samples from the
burial sites, Group 4 includes the proxemic Angkorian production centers
of Torp Chey/Chong Samrong/Veal Svey (also the latest dated Angkorian
production center 14th c CE). While not direct support for an origin in these

�specific complexes, it does suggest an origin in a similar geological setting
within the region.
We would note that Group 4 also includes samples from the Thai
reference group of Sisatchanalai/ Sawankhalok. We suggest that the
Cambodian reference groups provide a more likely source region for two
main reasons. First, Sisatchanalai jars are not found in the shipwreck
assemblages; and second, the burial samples are compositionally closer
to the Cambodian reference samples when Group 4 is analyzed
separately.
Archaeological perspective
Burial site assemblage: The earthenwares from the burial sites are
predominantly cooking pots. Their compositional differentiation into
multiple groups is likely to reflect local production groups.
The stoneware samples from the burial sites include matches with both
the Suphanburi and the Sisatchanalai reference samples (jars and bowls;
Groups 3 and 2.9). A further group of jar samples (n=10), is not
represented in the shipwreck assemblage and only broadly/generically
matches our Thai reference groups. This group (Group 4) includes the
“Angkorian” jars and compositionally is better approximated by the
geographically proximate Cambodian centres of Torp Chey/Chong
Samrong/Veal Svey.
Shipwreck assemblage: The earthenware groups identified in the
shipwreck assemblage only occur in the shipwreck. We do not have
sufficient data to posit any origin for these earthenware samples. The
shipwreck stoneware sample, including typical Maenam Noi jar types, are
strongly

dominated

by

one

compositional

group

(93%),

which

�approximates the Suphanburi grouping, supporting a likely origin in this
region (Singburi).
Discussion
The unusually fine chronological resolution of these data, based on an
extensive dating program of multiple materials from multiple sites, allows
a high degree of certainty about the mid-15th c. single generation use of
the Cardamom burial sites (Beavan, et al. 2012a; Beavan, et al. 2015). In
addition to this inland assemblage, the shipwreck assemblage is also
firmly dated to the mid-15th c. from short-lived cargo (Beavan, et al.
2012b). In combination these two assemblages provide an unparalleled
window on exchange dynamics between inland and maritime trade.
The shipwreck assemblage is typical of other contemporary local trading
vessels within the Gulf of Thailand: with a few exceptions, the cargo is
composed of locally produced (mainly Thai) goods, cooking pots, multiple
jar types, and fine ware bowls (Brown and Sjostrand 2002). The
composition of the stoneware samples from the shipwreck are consistent
with production from a single complex, in this case jars that are readily
typologically attributed to Maenam Noi, Singburi province. The Cardamom
Mountains burial assemblage includes locally produced earthenwares,
fine wares and jars from Thailand (Sukkhothai, Singburi, and
Sisatchanalai), but also a typologically unmatched stoneware jar type.
This distinctive stoneware jar type has no parallels in the shipwreck
assemblage, either in form or composition. However, geochemically it is
consistent with stoneware samples from the 14th c. Angkorian kiln
complexes (Torp Chey/Chong Samrong/Veal Svey) east of Angkor. As
the likelihood that this group reflects heirlooming of old jars is small given
the number of jars represented (n=11), we suggest this compositional type

�was probably produced in a similar geological zone (near Torp Chey?) in
the 15th c.. The combination of both maritime and inland trade goods in
the Cardamom Mountain burials supports a scenario where upland groups
are providing goods in both directions as part of a larger regional
interaction sphere.
This is better documented in Northern Thailand where upland and lowland
groups were closely connected through an inland exchange economy in
the 13th-16th c..

Lowland urban elites controlled production of

stonewares, both emulating exotic types and innovating new ceramic
types (Grave 1995). Upland groups, thought be harvesting and
exchanging forest goods (Wheatley 1959), consumed both these
regionally produced ceramics as well as relatively large volumes of
maritime trade wares. Again the combination of local and exotic
stoneware ceramics were critical to the operation of Northern Thai inland
economic networks.
A further parallel is the similar and distinctive mortuary practices of the
Cardamom Mountain and upland northern Thai groups, particularly in
relation to stoneware consumption. These comparable patterns of
consumption suggest that while historically invisible, groups in the upland
and inland regions across mainland Southeast Asia engaged in extensive
interaction networks which supported local lowland production centers
and their controlling elites (in this case, stoneware production, but likely a
wider range of goods).
Conclusion
Historians have presented the transition from the premodern to Early
Modern period in Southeast Asia primarily through the lens of maritime
trade (Reid 1993). Arguably, the greatest impact of this transition is in the

�production and consumption dynamics of groups in the interior of
Southeast Asia, who remained beyond the reach of historical sources.
While as yet relatively rare (e.g., Grave 1995), archaeological research on
the Early Modern period in inland areas offers the potential to understand
the interior dynamics of this transition.
Our data provide insight into an economy that was apparently still
functional within and beyond the Greater Angkor region after the collapse
of the Khmer Empire. This economy utilized (at least) local stoneware
production to articulate with a large regionally integrated economy. We
conclude that local lowland elites in Cambodia found ways to engage with
the larger regional exchange economies after the political collapse of
Angkor Wat. How these inland groups negotiated the transformations of
the Early Modern period of the following century is now the challenge and
opportunity for future fine-grain, chronologically high resolution studies.
Acknowledgments
We thank Cambodia’s Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts for permission to
undertake field investigations that collected data used in this project.
Analytical research for this project was supported by the Australian
Research Council (DP140103194). Our Khmer Production and Exchange
Project is a collaboration between APSARA Authority, University of New
England, Santa Clara University, and the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.
We thank Don and Toni Hein for Thai reference material used in this study.
We also thank the conference organizers for the opportunity to present
our research.
References Cited
Baker, Chris 2003 Ayutthaya rising: from land or sea? Journal of
Southeast Asian Studies 34(1):41-62.

�Beavan, Nancy, et al. 2012a Radiocarbon dates from jar and coffin burials
of the Cardamom Mountains reveal a previously unrecorded mortuary
ritual in Cambodia's late-to post-Angkor period (15th–17th centuries AD).
Radiocarbon 54:1-22.
Beavan, Nancy, et al. 2015 Radiocarbon dates from the highland jar and
coffin burial site of Phnom Khnang Peung, Cardamom Mountains,
Cambodia. Radiocarbon 57(1):15-31.
Beavan, Nancy, et al. 2012b Field note: A Radiocarbon Date for the Koh
S’dech Shipwreck, Koh Kong Province, Kingdom of Cambodia. Freer
Sackler Gallery, SEA Ceramics Library, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, DC.
Bronson, B. 1977 Exchange at the upstream and downstream ends: notes
toward a functional model of the coastal state in Southeast Asia. In
Economic exchange and social interaction in Southeast Asia:
perspectives from prehistory, history, and ethnography. C. Hutterer, ed.
Pp. 39-52. Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia. Michigan: Ann
Arbor.
Brown, Robert 1996 The Dvaravati Wheels of the Law and the
Indianization of South East Asia. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Brown, Roxanna M, and Sten Sjostrand 2002 Maritime archaeology and
shipwreck ceramics in Malaysia: Published on the occasion of the
exhibition Malaysian Maritime Archaeology by Dept. of Museums &amp;
Antiquities in collaboration with Nanhai Marine Archaeology Sdn. Bhd.
Brown, Roxanna M. 2004 The Ming Gap and shipwreck: Ceramics in
Southeast Asia: University of California, Los Angeles.
Carter, A. K., L. Dussubieux, and N. Beavan 2016 Glass Beads from
15th–17th Century CE Jar Burial Sites in Cambodia's Cardamom
Mountains. Archaeometry 58(3):401-412.
Carter, Alison 2013 Trade, exchange, and sociopolitical development in
iron age (500 BC – AD 500) mainland Southeast Asia: an examination of
stone and glass beads from Cambodia and Thailand Anthropology,
University of Wisconsin.

�Carter, Alison Kyra 2015 Beads, Exchange Networks and Emerging
Complexity: A Case Study from Cambodia and Thailand (500 bce–ce
500). Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25(04):733-757.
Carter, Alison Kyra, and Laure Dussubieux 2015 Geologic provenience
analysis of agate and carnelian beads using laser ablationinductively
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): A case study from Iron
Age Cambodia and Thailand. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
6:321-331.
Cartier, M. 1988 Le commerce de l'Ocean Indien vu de Chine. In
Marchands et hommes d'affaires asiatiques dans l'Ocean Indien et la Mer
de Chine 13e-20e siecles. D. Lombard and J.Aubin, eds. Pp. 125-127.
Paris: Edit.de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Soc. Cort, Louise
Ceramics in Mainland Southeast Asia: Maenam Noi (Singburi) Kilns, Vol.
2017. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Diem, Allison I 1998 2001,“The Significance of Pandanan Shipwreck
Ceramics as Evidence of Fifteenth Century Trading Relations within
Southeast Asia”. Bulletin of the Oriental Ceramic Society of Hong Kong
(12):28-26.
Evers, H.-D. 1988 Traditional trading networks in Southeast Asia. Archipel
35:89-100.
Grave, Peter 1995 Beyond the Mandala: Buddhist landscapes and
upland-lowland interaction in Northwest Thailand AD 1200-1650. World
Archaeology 27(2):243-365.
Grave, Peter, and Michael Maccheroni 2009 Characterizing Asian
Stoneware Jar Production at the Transition to the Early Modern Period
(1550-1650 C.E.). Scientific Research on Historic Asian Ceramics. ,
Washington D.C., USA, 2009. Vol. Proceedings of the Fourth Forbes
Symposium at the Freer Gallery of Art, pp. 186-204. Smithsonian Institute.
Green, J., and R. Harper 1987 The maritime archaeology of shipwrecks
and ceramics in Southeast Asia. In Australian Institute for Maritime
Archaeology. J. Green and R. Harper, eds. Pp. 1-38: Victorian
Archaeology Survey.

�Gutman, Pamela 2001 The Martaban trade: An examination of the
literature from the seventh century until the eighteenth century. Asian
Perspectives 40(1):108-118.
Hendrickson, Mitch 2010 Historic routes to Angkor: development of the
Khmer road system (ninth to thirteenth centuries AD) in mainland
Southeast Asia. Antiquity 84(324):480-496.
— 2010 A transport geographic perspective on travel and communication
in Angkorian Southeast Asia (ninth to fifteenth centuries ad). World
Archaeology 43(3):444-457.
Manguin, P. Y. 1993 Trading ships of the South China Sea. J. Econ. Social
Hist. Orient 36:253.
Manguin, Pierre-Yves 2000 City-states and city-state cultures in pre-15th
century Southeast Asia. A comparative study of thirty city-state
cultures:409-16.
— 2004 The archaeology of early maritime polities of Southeast Asia.
Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History:282-313.
— 2014 Early Coastal States of Southeast Asia: Funan and Śrīvijaya. Lost
Kingdoms: HinduBuddhist Sculpture of Early Southeast Asia:111.

Murphy, Stephen A, and Miriam T Stark 2016 Introduction: Transitions
from late prehistory to early historic periods in mainland Southeast Asia,
c. early to mid-first millennium CE. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
47(3):333-340. Orillaneda, Bobby C 2016 Maritime trade in the Philippines
During the 15th century CE. Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines
sur l’Asie du Sud-Est (27):83-100.
Phraichanchit), Sāyan Phraichānčhit (Sayan 1988 Rāi ngān kānsamrūat
lae khutkhon Tao Mǣnam Nǭi: Tambon Chœng Klat, Amphœ Bang
Račhan, Čhangwat Singburī (Report on the survey and excavation of the
Maenam Noi kilns, Bang Rachan town, Sing Buri province). Krom
Sinlapākǭn (Fine Arts Department).
Ptak, Roderich 1998 From Quanzhou to the Sulu Zone and beyond:
questions related to the early fourteenth century. Journal of Southeast
Asian Studies 29(2):269-294.

�Reid, A. 1988 Southeast Asia in the age of commerce 1450-1680: the land
below the winds. 2 vols. Volume 1. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shaffer, Lynda Norene 2015 Maritime Southeast Asia, 300 BC to AD
1528: Routledge.
Sokha, Tep Discovery of Ceramics from the Koh Sdach Shipwreck, Koh
Kong province, Cambodia, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo,
V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.), The MUA Collection, accessed
October 13 2017, http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1620.
Stark, Miriam T 2010 From Funan to Angkor. After Collapse: The
Regeneration of Complex Societies:144.
Stark, Miriam T. 2006 Early Mainland Southeast Asian Landscapes in the
First Millennium A.D. Annual Review of Anthropology 35(1 %R
doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123157):407-432. Theunissen,
Robert, Peter Grave, and Grahame Bailey
2000 Doubts on diffusion: challenging the assumed Indian origin of Iron
Age agate and carnelian beads in Southeast Asia. World Archaeology
32(1):84-105.
Wade, Geoff 2004 Ming China and Southeast Asia in the 15th Century: A
Reappraisal: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
Wallerstein, I 1974 The modern world system: capitalist agriculture and
the origins of the European worldeconomy in the sixteenth century.
Academic Press, New York.
Chārưk Wilaikǣo 1990 Tao Mǣnam Nǭi 2 [Maenam Noi Kilns, part 2].
Krom Sinlapākǭn (Fine Arts Department).
— 2002 Taikoku Shinburi-ken Noigawa yōsekigun hakkutsu chōsa
hōkokusho [Excavation report on the Maenam Noi kiln group, Singburi
province, Thailand] Kansai kinsei kōkogaku kenkyū (Kansai early modern
archaeological research) 10:185-209.

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="23">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="83">
                  <text>2017 Session 3: Ceramic trade and cross-cultural exchange from Asian-Pacific region to the world</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="84">
                  <text>Ceramics are the crucial cultural materials for understanding the cross-cultural exchange from Asian-Pacific region to the world.  This session will discuss how interdisciplinary approaches such as archaeology, art, history, geophysics, and material science can broaden our horizons on the study of ceramic trade and cross-cultural exchange. Second, we will discuss the connection of ceramic trade and exchange between the early age of commerce (c.900-1300 C.E.) and the age of commerce (1450-1680 C.E.) in Southeast Asia and other regions. This established some challenges in ceramic trade including the influence for new creativity and production development, such as in Europe where some trademarks were developed under the Chinese influence. Our goal is to deepen our knowledge on the application of interdisciplinary approaches on the study of ceramic trade and cross-cultural exchange across the two historical periods.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="85">
                  <text>Sharon Wong Wai-yee &#13;
Department of Anthropology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T. &#13;
Hong Kong </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5423">
                <text>Maritime Means and Mountain Ends: the origin of stoneware jars in mid 15th CE burial complexes of the Southern Cardamom Ranges, Cambodia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5424">
                <text>Southeast Asia during the first half of the second millennium CE. Their hegemony is particularly apparent in lowland areas throughout the Lower Mekong basin, expressed in both architecture and ceramics. How strongly this control was exercised in more geographically marginal regions â€“ and what the nature of power was after the capital moved southward -- has not been explored. In this paper we present the results of a geochemical analysis of ceramics from absolutely and comprehensively dated mid-15th century CE burial complexes in the Southern Cardamom Ranges of southeastern Cambodia and a nearby contemporary shipwreck. The &#13;
wreck assemblage was typical of a Southeast Asian maritime trader. Comparison of burial and shipwreck ceramic compositional data enables us to confirm a provenance for some of the jars and fine wares from production centres in central Northern Thailand. A second group, not represented in the wreck assemblage, is from a yet unidentified source that we suggest is located in the adjacent Cambodian lowlands. The results of this provenience analysis highlights both the role of the relatively well-known maritime trade, as well as a previously unsuspected continuity in local Cambodian stoneware production. This window into 15th c exchange networks expands our understanding of the context of subsequent European 16th-17th c engagement during the Early Modern Period, is one piece of the broader picture needed to more closely define the processes of economic transformation. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5425">
                <text>Peter Grave</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5426">
                <text>Lisa Kealhofer </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5427">
                <text>N. Beavan </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5428">
                <text>Tep Sohka</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5429">
                <text>Miriam Stark </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5430">
                <text>Ea Darith </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5431">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5432">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5433">
                <text>Peter Grave</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5434">
                <text>Lisa Kealhofer </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5435">
                <text>N. Beavan </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5436">
                <text>Tep Sohka</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5437">
                <text>Miriam Stark </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5438">
                <text>Ea Darith </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="41">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 3 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="582" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="373">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/21b85026ba78a611e6393862e2c057a8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>17a017301c97ef5a4a9beba050d6669d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6417">
                    <text>Maritime Ritual Ruins of Korea
Tahk Kyung-Baek¹
¹National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, Korea.
Corresponding Author: jsa461@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
Since ancient times, the sea has been an important transportation route and a place where food can be obtained.
However, there were various dangers, which were personified as a fear of supernatural beings. As supernatural
beings were gradually elevated to gods who ruled over danger, humans relieved their fears and gained comfort for
themselves through the rituals. Rituals include all activities of praying for a wish to a god they are reasonable (Yu
1997, 1-2). The space where the ritual ceremonies took place is the ritual rite site, and the ritual site related to the
sea can be called the maritime ritual ruins. The remains of marine ritual ruins are formed by a tangible space where
sacrifices are held while worshiping gods, and a jejang (a limited site related to sacrifice), an intangible space
around it. So far, studies on the remains of ritual ruins have been conducted, focusing on archaeological sites,
historical records, excavated artifacts, and intangible elements of ritual ruins. However, only the intangible space
was maintained as a heritage of the village community, and the altar and other facilities were changed several
times, so research on them was difficult to conduct. However, the sacred building continued to be maintained
despite the change in appearance. Accordingly, this study focused on the rituals and identified the meaning of the
ritual ruins along with the rituals by dividing them into one-building and two-building types.
Keywords: Maritime, Ritual ruins, Altar, Records

LISTS OF TABLE
Table 1: Characteristics of ritual ruins

1. INTRODUCTION
Since ancient times, maritime rituals have been performed in the area of maritime activities. People
wanted to overcome danger by praying for safety and a good catch of fish. The space where the ritual
ceremonies took place is the ritual rite site, and the ritual site related to the sea can be called the maritime
ritual ruins.
In Korea, many maritime ritual ruins have been confirmed along the coast, showing many forms of ritual
faith. Maritime ritual sites can be classified into three types: sites where ritual ruins are held at sea:
remains where ritual ruins are held in the open air on land close to the sea; ruins where ritual rites are
held in designated spaces with buildings such as altars. Archaeological excavations of the ruins of
Susungdang in Jukmak-dong, Buan, revealed ritual ceremonies had been performed from the second
half of the third century to the present.
A sacred building where the god is believed to have settled was constructed close to where the ritual
ceremonies were held. Two types were adopted: one-building and two-building types. These systems
were found within the ruins of Jukmak-dong of Buan, Oryongmyo shrine, Sangdea harbor ruins, etc.
The systems involved construction with mostly one- or two-sided three-fronts. It was minimal in size
compared to traditional Korean buildings. However, the space of influence is extended towards the sea
in addition to the space where the ritual ceremony is held, and it appears as a sacred space with
considerable dominance. The sacred building had an important role in maritime ritual ruins and can be
considered central to maritime ritual heritage.

1

�2. TYPES OF MARITIME RITUAL RUINS
There are many maritime ruins that can be classified into three types in Korea, which is surrounded by
the sea on three sides. Among them, there are ritual ruins revealed through excavation and research,
including shell mounds in Gungok-ri, Haenam, Neuk Island in Sacheon, Yongdam-dong in Jeju Island,
and Jukmak-dong in Buan (Jeonju National Museum 1995, 8-13).In addition, ritual ruins and various
auxiliary facilities are set up at Wondang on Dae-ri Wi Island, where ritual ruins related to the sea are
held, and at Yeongdang in Hwang Island’s Big Fish Festival. Or, using the difference between the high
tide and the low tide, some ritual ceremonies are performed in the open air on the seashore.
As such, maritime ritual sites can be classified into about three types: relics where ritual ceremonies are
held at sea; remains where ritual ceremonies are held in the open air on land close to the sea; The ruins
where ritual rites are held in designated spaces with buildings such as altars. Among them, buildings
such as altars were built, and where ritual ruins were held, they have been maintained by village residents
or groups praying to gods. It is mostly found on the west coast, and it is thought to be a phenomenon
that has been used as a sea route to China for a long time. Considering the excavated relics, Suseongdang
in Jukmak-dong can be known to have begun in the late third century. And it is possible to estimate the
time when the ritual started through the origin of the gods enshrined in some altars.

3. TYPES OF SPACES FOR ALTARS
The altar is a space where gods related to the sea are enshrined and where rituals are still held, and it is
the core space of the ritual ruins. However, until now, altars have been regarded only as a part of folk
religion, and research has been incomplete. The marine ritual ruins with nine altars were investigated,
and the ritual ruins built in these ritual remains will be reviewed.
3.1 Sizes and Structures
A total of 13 altars in nine ruins were identified, including cases where only one altar was installed in
the ritual ruins site and where two were installed. The number of bays generally does not exceed one to
three bays on the front and two bays on the side. However, when viewed from the side, Cheonghaejincastle, Wan Island, consists of a half-bay open to the outside, Wondang Dae-ri, Wi Island of a half-bay
divided into spaces from the inside, and Jeonhoeng Shrine in Dangsan, Oeyeon Island, of one and a half
bays. In particular, the smaller the altar is, the larger space is, and the case of one altar is generally larger
than the case of two.
Columnar brackets are mostly Mulikgong-style (undecorated in Korean), while Jangjwa-ri Cheonghae
Castle Shrine is Choikgong-style (one-sided decoration in Korean). Wondang, the main shrine of the
Yeongdang for the festival of good catching of fish is two-Ikgong-style (double-sided decoration in
Korean), and Sanshin-dang, the vice-shrine is Choikgong-style. However, it is somewhat difficult to
classify it as a typical columnar bracket form because the form is excessive and used as a subtraction.

2

�Table 1: Characteristics of ritual ruins

Location

Jukmak-dong, Buan

Name

Susungdang

Dongho-ri, Gochang Yeongshindang

Cheonghaejin-castle
Wan Island

Sadang

Size
(front×
side)

Size of
one bay
(m)

2×1

front:
2.1
side:
3.1

3 purlins

west

on the cliff

○

Gaeyanghalm
i
Grandmother

(1801)
1996

3×2

front:
1.85
side:
1

3 purlins

west

on the hill

○

Soulgod

1841

3×1.5

front:
1.5
side:
1/2.8

5 purlins

west

on the hill

×

Jang Bo-Go

2009

5 purlins

west

top of Mt.

○

8 gods

2000

Structure Direction Situation

OpenWorshiped Construction
air
god
date (CE)
altars

Dae-ri Wi Island

Wondang

2×1.5

front:
2.6/2.4
side:
1.1/2

Gyodong Island

Sashindang

1×1

unknown

unknown

north

on the hill

○

Oryongmyo
(Araetdang)

3×2

front: 1.8
side: 1.52

3 purlins

east

below the
ridge

×

Witdang

1×1

unknown

unknown

east

below the
ridge

×

Wondang

1×1

unknown

unknown

on the hill

×

Sanshindang

1×1

unknown

unknown

northwest
northwest

on the hill

×

Mt. god

After 1945

Jinridang
(Bd. Near gate)

3×1

unknown

3 purlins

north

on the hill

○

Danggaksi
Bride et al.

1938
2009

Yongshindang

1×1

unknown

unknown

east

on the hill

○

unknown

2009

Jeonhoeng sadang

1×1.5

front:
3.3
side:
0.6/1.6

3 purlins

unknow
n

in the
forest

×

Jeon Hoeng
et al.

1936

Sanjedang

3×1

unknown

3 purlins

unknow
n

in the
forest

×

unknown

unknown

Seonyu Island

Yeongdang Hwang
Island

Dangsan Heuksan
Island

Dangsan Oeyeond
Island

Jashindang
halabuji
1969
Grandfather
Ohguyuwan (Before 1123)
g king et al.
1947
Lim family
from
unknown
Naju City
Im GyeongAfter 1945
Eop General

While the structure is generally three purlins when the side has one bay, Yeongsindang in Dongho-ri,
Gochang has two sides but three purlins. In addition, Cheonghaejin castle, Wan Island, and Daeri
Wondang and Wi Island have a side of one and a half bays and a structure of five purlins. Gable roofs
are generally dominant, but Yeongsindang in Dongho-ri, Gochang, Oryongmyo in Seonyu Island, and
Wondang in Yeongdang andHwang Island have gablet roofs. Witdang in Seonyu Island has a hip roof,
and Sanshindang in Yeongdang, Hwang Island, has a pyramid roof.
3.2 Locations and open-air altars
The direction is generally westward, and the reason is assumed to be to look at the West Sea. However,
Sashindang on Gyodong Island faces north, and you can see the sea while looking at the altar. It is

3

�located on the top of a hill or mountain with a good view of the sea. Open-air altars are usually present
when only one altar is situated, but only Dangsan on Heuksan Island has two of those.
3.3 Records of constructions interpreted through worshiped god
The gods enshrined in the ritual ruins are different for each ritual rite, and the objects in the ruins vary
by region. First, a record indicates that Suseongdang was built in 1801, so the construction record is
different from the actual excavated artifacts. It is presumed that the ritual ruins were reused after they
stopped being used. Gaeyanghalmi’s grandmother is the main sea deity of the Chilsan Sea seen from
Suseongdang. Jangjwa-ri Shrine is said to have held ritual ceremonies with the portraits of great monks,
including Song Jing, Jeong Nyeon, and Hye Il, but it has now been changed to the portraits of Jang Bogo. The current altar was built in 2009, but its location is within Cheonghaejin Castle (installed in 828),
so its origin is presumed to be old. Wondang on Dae-ri Wi Island is located facing Suseongdang and is
also a place where ritual ceremonies are held to pray for a good catch in Chilsan Sea. Originally, there
were paintings of 11 gods, but now only paintings of eight gods remain (National Folk Museum 1984,
10). Oryongmyo on Seonyu Island, where Ohguyuwang, whose name means five dragons, is enshrined,
unlike other shrines that pray for the safety of the sails and success in trade. In particular, the record
remains in Xuānhwafengshi Gaolitujing (宣和奉使高麗圖經) (Seo 1124, 1-7). Originally, the main hall
of Yeongdang on Hwang Island was dedicated to the snake god, but it was changed to enshrine General
Im Gyeong-Eop in the seventeenth century. There are two theories: one that it was made after 1945,
when it was demolished during the Japanese colonial period, and the other that it has been there for 140
years. Dangsan on Oeyeon Island is related to Jeon Hoeng (? - BCE 202), and the current altar was built
in 1936.

4. CONCLUSIONS
So far, the value of cultural heritage has been relatively underestimated in Korea. In this paper, the
characteristics of nine altars were reviewed, and the records of their establishment were examined,
especially through the enshrined god. In the future, it is expected that the cultural heritage value of ritual
ruins in Korea can be re-evaluated by conducting research on ritual ruins throughout the country.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Seo, Gung. Xuānhwafengshi Gaolitujing, Hangzhou, 1024.
Ha, Hyo-Gil. Folklore of Wido Island-Ritual ceremony of Wondang, Dae-ri, Seoul: National Folklore Museum, 1984.
Jeonju National Museum. Relics of Ritual ceremony of Jukmak-dong, Buan, Jeonju: Jeonju National Museum, 1994.
Jeju National Museum. Sea and Ritual ceremony- Relics of Ritual ceremony of Jukmak-dong, Buan, Jeonju: Jeonju National
Museum, 1995.
National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage. Sea routes in the Southwest Sea region seen through maritime
exchanges, Mokpo: National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2014.
Yu, Byung-Ha. Sea god and ancestral rites of Relics of Jukmak-dong, Buan - Focused on a comparative review of the ancestral
rites-, Master's, Seoul: Seoul National University, 1997.
Korean Society of History and Folklore. History and Folklore, Seoul: Korean Society of History and Folklore, 2005.
Choi, Jung-Gi. Gyodongdo Island, Seoul: Folk Garden, 2015.

4

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6410">
                <text>Maritime Ritual Ruins of Korea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6411">
                <text>Since ancient times, the sea has been an important transportation route and a place where food can be obtained.&#13;
However, there were various dangers, which were personified as a fear of supernatural beings. As supernatural&#13;
beings were gradually elevated to gods who ruled over danger, humans relieved their fears and gained comfort for&#13;
themselves through the rituals. Rituals include all activities of praying for a wish to a god they are reasonable (Yu&#13;
1997, 1-2). The space where the ritual ceremonies took place is the ritual rite site, and the ritual site related to the&#13;
sea can be called the maritime ritual ruins. The remains of marine ritual ruins are formed by a tangible space where&#13;
sacrifices are held while worshiping gods, and a jejang (a limited site related to sacrifice), an intangible space&#13;
around it. So far, studies on the remains of ritual ruins have been conducted, focusing on archaeological sites,&#13;
historical records, excavated artifacts, and intangible elements of ritual ruins. However, only the intangible space&#13;
was maintained as a heritage of the village community, and the altar and other facilities were changed several&#13;
times, so research on them was difficult to conduct. However, the sacred building continued to be maintained&#13;
despite the change in appearance. Accordingly, this study focused on the rituals and identified the meaning of the&#13;
ritual ruins along with the rituals by dividing them into one-building and two-building types.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6412">
                <text>Tahk Kyung-Baek</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6413">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6414">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6415">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6416">
                <text>Kyung-Baek, Tahk . 2023. “Maritime ritual ruins of Korea.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Wijerathne Bohingamuwa. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1953 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="64">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 8 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="137" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1632">
                <text>Maritime Sector, Institutions, and Sea Power of Premodern China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1633">
                <text>Deng, Gang</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1634">
                <text>Greenwood Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1635">
                <text>1999</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1636">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1637">
                <text>Deng, Gang</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1638">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1639">
                <text>1999</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1640">
                <text>Westport, Conn.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1641">
                <text>Greenwood Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1642">
                <text>Maritime Sector, Institutions, and Sea Power of Premodern China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="361" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4332">
                <text>Maritime Sector, Institutions, and Sea Power of Premodern China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4333">
                <text>Deng, Gang</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4334">
                <text>Greenwood Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4335">
                <text>1999</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4336">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4337">
                <text>Deng, Gang</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4338">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4339">
                <text>1999</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4340">
                <text>Westport, Conn.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4341">
                <text>Greenwood Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4342">
                <text>Maritime Sector, Institutions, and Sea Power of Premodern China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="359" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4311">
                <text>Maritime Trade and State Development in Early Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4312">
                <text>Kenneth R. Hall</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4313">
                <text>University of Hawai'i Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4314">
                <text>1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4315">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4316">
                <text>Kenneth R. Hall</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4317">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4318">
                <text>1985</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4319">
                <text>Honolulu</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4320">
                <text>University of Hawai'i Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4321">
                <text>Maritime Trade and State Development in Early Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
