<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=2&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-24T18:43:52+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>2</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="382" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4616">
                <text>Exploration for Shipwrecks off Sunchi Reef, Goa, West Coast of India</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4617">
                <text>Sila Tripati</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4618">
                <text>A. S. Gaur</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4619">
                <text>Sundaresh Bandodker</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4620">
                <text>S. N. Bandodker</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4621">
                <text>Feb., 2001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4622">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4623">
                <text>Sila Tripati</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4624">
                <text>A. S. Gaur</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4625">
                <text>Sundaresh Bandodker</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4626">
                <text>S. N. Bandodker</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4627">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="153">
            <name>ISSN</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4628">
                <text>00438243</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="154">
            <name>Abstract Note</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4629">
                <text>Archival records show that a number of ships have sunk in the waters off Goa, on the west coast of India, as a result of foul weather, warfare and human error. Explorations were carried out in 1997-9 to locate shipwrecks using a boat-towed metal detector and visual surveys in 3 to 9m water depth off Sunchi Reef. A wreck was discovered and its investigation revealed guns, a shot, potsherds, glass bottle pieces, a broken rudder and dressed granite stone blocks. These finds suggest that the wreck dates from the Portuguese period (seventeenth to eighteenth century AD) and was therefore a wooden-hulled ship. The most probable cause of the wrecking was the shallow laterite shoals in the region. Although modest in scope, this project is important as one of the few underwater investigations yet to be undertaken by Indian archaeologists.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="155">
            <name>Access Date</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4630">
                <text>2009-11-28 07:14:12</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4631">
                <text>Feb., 2001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="188">
            <name>Extra</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4632">
                <text>ArticleType: primary_article / Issue Title: Shipwrecks / Full publication date: Feb., 2001 / Copyright Â© 2001 Taylor &amp; Francis, Ltd.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="196">
            <name>Issue</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4633">
                <text>3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="205">
            <name>Library Catalog</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4634">
                <text>JSTOR</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4635">
                <text>355-367</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="225">
            <name>Publication Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4636">
                <text>World Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4637">
                <text>Exploration for Shipwrecks off Sunchi Reef, Goa, West Coast of India</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="248">
            <name>URL</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4638">
                <text>http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.usc.edu/stable/827927</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4639">
                <text>32</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="337" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4013">
                <text>Sasanian Maritime Trade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4014">
                <text>D. Whitehouse</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4015">
                <text>A. Williamson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4016">
                <text>1973</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4017">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4018">
                <text>D. Whitehouse</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4019">
                <text>A. Williamson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4020">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4021">
                <text>1973</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4022">
                <text>29-49</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="225">
            <name>Publication Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4023">
                <text>Iran</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4024">
                <text>Sasanian Maritime Trade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4025">
                <text>11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="241" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="143">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/698ffaab552da9f86d8915e24515eae0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cf1be6134ac8eb198a59bbcc90e1a901</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2902">
                    <text>Reading of the contemporary social consciousness
through the shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury
Mr. A.M.A.Dayananda

Abstract
The shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury is buried on the southern coast of Sri Lanka very close to a
frequented tourist destination. It was run aground hitting on a rock at Akurala about three miles away
from the shore. In 1893 when sailing from Bombay to Diamond Island the ship sailed past Rangoon
through Colombo harbour after unloading charcoal. It is an iron build four mast sailing vessel. It
collided with a reef due to rough waves. Six of the crew drowned and 22 survived. The shipwreck
settled at a 50 foot depth. The incident was first reported in the The Ceylon Examiner Newspaper on
8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th of May 1893. The value of the vessel was estimated at Indian Rupees (Rs.)
300,000 at the time. In one article there is another steamer ship reported wrecked some years
previously. This paper includes details of the wreckage as are available from the newspaper reports.
What happened after her wreckage was an interesting story. The time was the British colonial period
in “Ceylon” (now Sri Lanka) during which time there was a growing general unrest against the colonial
masters. Some information reveals that this mindset may have influenced the rescuers during their
rescue efforts of the drowning crew. This paper it is going to elaborate on the story behind the
shipwreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury and investigate the social influences towards the wreck site then
and now.

Introduction
Even though Sri Lanka is a small island it is located at a geographically important
juncture which joins the sea routes of East and West in the Indian Ocean. It was
used as a trade centre within which goods were exchanged and as a resting place
for navigators after a long sea voyage. “This ship was built in 1883 and belonged to
the English firm The Browns and Sons” (Bruzelius 1996). A metallic vessel with four
masts and a contemporaneously superior ship on the company's registration (The
Ceylon Examiner Newspaper 08,05,1893). The ship had often arrived to the
Colombo harbour but was wrecked in 1893 in the southern ocean of Sri Lanka
marking its end of long sea voyages. The wreckage of the coal-transport ship is
located between Hikkaduwa and Akurala and 14 meters deep in the seabed.
Two of the newspapers, The Otago Daily Times and The Ceylon Examiner
(Figure 2) reported over several days of the ship's tragedy and the problematic
situation that the crew had to face after the wrecking. A minute detail of the reported
facts and the way that they have been reported exposes the social background and
the mentality of the social context.

Discovery and Recognition of the Ship ‘Earl of Shaftsbury’
The Earl of Shaftsbury attracted both local and foreign divers visiting Hikkaduwa It
was reported by Arthur C. Clerk in the 1960s (Clerk 1956-57:38). A very brief
introduction of it is also mentioned in his book The Reef of Taprobane.” We later
discovered, marked the resting place of the Earl of Shaftesbury, which ran on to the
Akurala Reef in 1893” (Clerk 1956-57:p,38). A formal survey on this place has not
been done since the diving activities conducted in the 1960s. This shipwreck not only
entails historic and archaeological value but bears great significance to bio diversity
as well. The ship which provides a place of living for different marine species of
various colours represents an important environmental system. The Maritime

�Archaeology Unit (MAU) in Galle, which is under the Central Cultural Fund, planned
for an archaeological exploration on the shipwreck. Archaeological investigations on
the ship first started in January 2008. The second step involved basic surveying
activities in March and April 2008 by the participants of the Asian Pacific Regional
Maritime Archaeology Training School established in association with the MAU
(Figure 1).

Figure 1. The group that assisted the exploration (Photo - R. Muthucumarana)

Scriptorium Research Work
Research was carried out on documents in search of the facts that had not yet been
revealed. The divers who lived close to the site were aware that the Earl of
Shaftsbury wrecked in 1893. The fact had been further proved by Clerk's book The
Reef of Taprobane. So steps were taken to carry out an archive search based on the
year 1893. Nishantha Kumara, an undergraduate who came to the MAU as a
volunteer was sent to search the old newspapers. The attempt was fruitful because
the Examiner reported the details of the shipwreck. This ship had been built in the
Leigh region in England by the firm Reimage and Ferguson. It was registered under
Lloyds, the authority on certificates of quality for ships. The Earl of Shaftsbury was of
the highest condition among the ships then registered under the firm(The Ceylon
Examiner news paper 08,05,1893).
The length of the ship was 289.6 feet (ft.) and the width of it was 42.01 ft, her
tonnage was 2079, and the dimension was 2869 ft. The owner of the ship was the
Brown and Sons in England. The estimated value of the ship was three hundred
thousand rupees in 1893. Out of the 28 members of staff onboard, six lost their lives
in the wreckage (The Ceylon Examiner News paper 08, 05,1893). The ship had
sailed to Bombay from New York harbour in America loaded with paraffin oil and
coal. The empty vessel, which had been reloaded with ballast stones for balance,
wrecked while sailing around Sri Lanka towards Diamond Island in Rangoon. At the
time of the wreck the captain may have possessed a large sum of money; the money
that the ship had earned from the goods unloaded at Bombay (Rasika 2010:06).

�Figure 2. Otago Daily Time 23/06/1893 The Ceylon Examiner News Paper 08,05,1893

The Present Situation of the nautical ship, the Earl of Shaftsbury
According to the initial research carried out in 2008, it was observed that the central
part of the naval ship had been severely damaged. Further investigations of the ruins
revealed that this was not only natural causes but also due to the activities of
treasure hunters and metal collectors, who had caused the destruction using
explosives. The bow and the stern sections are still in good condition and the
massive iron masts of the ship can be well recognized. The ballast stones that had
been used to balance the empty vessel are still lying around the ship. The ship which
lies inclining on its left maintains unity from the front to the back.

�Figure 3. The Ruins of the Earl of Shaftsbury (Photo - R. Muthucumarana)

Field Strategies
In 2008 the members of the MAU, did a survey on the wreck in a collaboration with
the UNESCO Bangkok office. The wreck was measured and recorded by the team
using 06 temporary control points fixed around the wreck. The site was divided in to
two parts (from bow to mid-ship and from stern to mid-ship) and the two parts were
measured separately. Each part was measured by using control points and the help
of the Site Recorder program (a software developed by the 3H Consulting/United
Kingdom). Also a base line was established covering the entire archaeological field.
It was about 60 meters long and measurements were taken in the off-set method.
For photographic records we used underwater digital still camera (Olympus C-770
camera with Ikelite housing) and video (Sony HC-90E camera with Ikelite housing).
The expected goals were not achieved by this limited surveying activities conducted
over four days(2008-03-27-29 and 2008-04-03) but they were enough to identify the
naval ship as the Earl of Shaftsbury (Figure 4).

�Figure 4. A Sketch of the wreck Earl of Shaftsbury (Drawing from the MAU archives)

The Last Few Hours of the Earl of Shaftsbury
The ship sunk due to natural hazards. The actual event was recorded by
Leyers in (The Ceylon Examiner Newspaper 09,05,1893):
After cruising around Sri Lanka the ship sailed to the right of Colombo harbour
towards the Diamond Island in the City of Rangoon. At about 3 a.m. the nature of the
sea turned extremely wild and brought howling storms along. The ship was
expeditiously glided forward and pushed up and down by the ferocious waves.
Suddenly something black appeared before the crew who were observing the route
in the front of the ship. Through intermittent flashes of lightening the crew identified a
reef. At once the crew on board started shouting. As the captain rushed out of his
cabin to examine the cry the ship collided on the rock with a big noise. The captain
was overwrought by this and rushed into the control cabin in attempt to take the ship
into the deep sea. His efforts were futile and the ship was repeatedly raised by the
harsh waves and thumped several times against the rock. The ship was ultimately
steered into the deep sea with the captain's efforts. The ship had been unfortunately
pierced by the knock against the rock and sea water rushed in. Soon it was filled
with water and descending in the sea. Before the navigators stationed in the lower
part of the ship's decks had time to think the ship started sinking (The Ceylon
Examiner News Paper 09, 05,1893).
Some other navigators who were saved from drowning, said the captain
watched the navigators fight for their lives against the harsh waves. The waves
threw the crew about as they hung on to the masts that had emerged out of water
and others clasped the wreckage of the ship. “The captain was spotted convulsing,
entering his cabin and locking himself in” (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper
10,05,1893) .Moreover, according to their revelations, at the moment of wrecking the
Second Officer of the ship had acted immediately and been successful in launching
a life saving boat. Fourteen navigators had boarded the lifeboat and headed towards
the coast. The Earl of Shaftsbury then buckled up throwing all on board into the sea
at about 150 meters from the coast. This unexpected incident made the tired crew
more miserable (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper 09,05,1893).

�There were also recorded some inconsistencies with the events around the
captain. This may be an indicator that the crew itself were largely unaffected by the
death of the captain. Perhaps the first entry to follow is indicative of the locals' mere
dismissal of the captain, while the second entry is more emotional and perhaps more
about the shocked tone of the crew.
The officers were housed by the special agent of the government until dawn
and then taken to the guest house in Ambalangoda. Three days later the body of the
captain, which had been badly destroyed, was carried to shore by the water. After
recognition of the body by the chief officer of the ship and the rest of the crew, it was
carried to Saint James church and buried with religious rituals (The Ceylon Examiner
news paper 11,05,1893).

The Otago Daily Times (Allen 26,01,2010). revealed an entirely different
story about the captain's death,
according to Mr. Jones, a rescued crew member of the Earl of Shaftsbury, the only
reason the captain died was because he fell off the lifeboat. The lifeboat had
loosened in its ties from the ship and had fallen on the captain's head while he was
swimming for his life which knocked him out.
In the aftermath of the unfortunate event, (Levers 08,05,1893) records the
reaction of the locals. This record is in fact a glimpse of the socio-politics at the time
and is symptomatic of the Sri Lankan anger towards the European oppression.
The survivors had no other option but to swim for their lives. They swam a
small distance and soon realized the European uniform they wore was a swimming
hindrance. They pulled them off and swam towards the coast. They were reported to
be mentally imbalanced and shocked, with bleeding wounds caused by being
knocked against the rocks close-in to shore. The locals provided the naked
navigators with native clothing. The surviving navigators later said that even though
they requested the locals to save the lives of those who are still hanging on the
masts and wreckage of the ship, they were denied with mentions that money was
needed if they are to be saved. Later, all the men hanging onto the wreckage were
saved by government special agents who were dispatched to the location. European
suits were sent from Colombo for those officers who were clad in native clothes. The
Examiner reported what a great shame for the Europeans to have been in native
clothes for the whole day until the arrival of European uniforms(The Ceylon
Examiner News Paper 09,05,1893).

The Names of the Drowned
Captain T.B Mayyard, aged about 56 years,
Second Mate. W.K Loyle, aged about 20 years.
Steward, E. Morentz, aged about 21 years.
Sail Maker. W perry, aged about 50 year.
Two coloured seamen, natives of St Helena and Fiji Islands.

The Survivors
Chief Mate, JL Jones
Carpenter, W Guest.
Apprentices, G.O Trofaint, O.E pokely, and Thomson 14 coloured able seamen, 2
boatswains and the cook. Altogether 22. (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper
09,05.1893).

�Reported Incidents After Sinking; Lack of Humanity?
The Earl of Shaftsbury was smashed and wrecked in a period when Sri Lanka was a
British colony (1815-1948). There had been no other shipwreck than the Earl of
Shaftsbury to have revealed the detail of the area's social background. The thoughts
and ambitions of the locals who were ruled by the Europeans and some of their
behaviours can be seen through these reports. “Humankind does not always
continue to exist with the same monotonous life style. Their thoughts and ambitions
do fluctuate with time. Exterior influences are mostly responsible for these
fluctuations”(Somarathne 1960 p,01). When studying social impacts and noting the
larger context in which people conduct themselves, projects like this one, can reveal
an underlying agency. To address this, newspaper records of the navigators'
comments were gathered in hopes to note the voice of a colonized society. Among
the reports that appeared on the wreckage the incident of not-saving crew members
is the most highlighted fact. The Examiner reported that even though the surviving
navigators had pleaded with the fishermen on shore to save the lives of the rest of
the crew, the fishermen had demanded a considerable amount of money if they were
to do so and would not otherwise. The newspaper report had highlighted that,
“natives showed their lack of humanity” (The Ceylon Examiner News Paper
09,05,1893).
In my personal view, the behaviour of the fishermen at a crisis like this could
never be appreciated and should not take place in any civilized society. Especially in
a great society that has been nurtured by Buddhist philosophies. Yet the reason for
such hard hearted people must be found out by a subtle and thorough case study.
The people in that society were under true agony from being oppressed with
revolutionary attitudes. The influence of three powerful European nationalities that
largely focused on economic advantages, from 1505 AD fostered a feeling of loss of
freedom and the consequential loss of their culture. Up to the time of the wreckage
there had been no other opportunity to record the deep-seeded anti-colonial feelings.
The fishermen, with the mentality for freedom, may have refused saving the
navigators due to their revolutionary attitudes caused by this anti-colonial sentiment.
They might have used this incident to show their frustration and envy towards the
colonists. They might have thought they would have been betraying their own nation
by rescuing their enemies. Furthermore they would have been reluctant to throw
their lives at risk by launching their small boats when the sea had become so violent
that even large ships, such as the Earl of Shaftsbury, were not safe.
The chagrin was not only visible in natives but also in Europeans. The report,
“The Captain, Europeans and two Coloured men Drowned”, ( The Ceylon Examiner
News Paper 08, 05,1893). highlights this, in that the report on the survivors and the
dead had grouped the black and Europeans separately. Navigators’ were in local
clothes until the European clothes were received and this was reported as an insult
to them. All the above mentioned facts reveal that there had been a social conflict
between the Europeans and the locals.

Conclusions
The only iron vessel with four masts so far found in Sri Lanka territorial waters is the
wrecked Earl of Shaftsbury. This is an important research station for any marine

�archaeologist studying ship building technology. Although there are so many laws
and conventions enacted internationally and locally in order to protect these
monuments, there are many practical difficulties in implementing them. One of the
main difficulties is to find funding for archaeological projects. We had to depend on
funds allocated by the state under the national budget. So it has become a common
feature for a developing nation like Sri Lanka to depend on funds from other sources.
However, I emphasize that archaeological sites of this nature shall be further studied
and shall be protected for the use of future generations. As a place of archaeological
importance for more than 100 years this wreck site is protected by archaeological
law (Department of Archaeology 1940; Department of Archaeology 1998). Besides,
steps are been taken to declare this site as protective monuments under purview of
Government of Sri Lanka and thereby will get a blanket coverage for the site.

Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the organizers of the Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater
Cultural Heritage for giving me an opportunity to participate. I also extended my gratitude to
professor Mark Staniforth and professor Nimal de Silva, The Director General (Central
Cultural fund) for encouraging me to publish this report.

Bibliography
Allen, T.,
2010
Bruzelius, L.,
1996
Clerk, A.C.,
1956-1957
Department
of Archaeology
1940
Department
of Archaeology
1998
Levers, R.W.,
1893

"Wreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury six Lives Lost", in Otago Daily
Times
23
June
Viewed
03
October
2011
http://www.wrecksite.eu/wreck.aspx?138941/&gt;.
Earl of Shaftesbury, Viewed 04 October , 2011.
http://www.bruzelius.info/Nautica/Ships/Fourmast_ships/Earl_of_S
haftesbury(1883).html
The reefs of Taprobane, printed in the united states of America,
Harper and Brother publishers, New York.
Antiquities ordinance No 9
Amendment to the Antiquities ordinance No 9 of 1940 (21st May
1998)

"Total Loss of The Ship Earl of Shaftsbury Off Akurella, Near
Ambalangodde", in The Ceylon Examiner News Paper,
08,09,10,11, May.
Dalanidu Magazine Vol II. Akurala verele Kedavachakaya Earl of
Rasika, M.,
2010
Shaftsbury, Maritime Archaeology Unit Central cultural fund.
Somaratne, W., A Modern Ceylon and world history, Ceylon publishing
1960
cooperation.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2897">
                <text>Reading of the contemporary social consciousness through the shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2898">
                <text>Session 2&#13;
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2899">
                <text>The shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury is buried on the southern coast of Sri Lanka very close to a frequented tourist destination. It was run aground hitting on a rock at Akurala about three miles away from the shore. In 1893 when sailing from Bombay to Diamond Island the ship sailed past Rangoon through Colombo harbour after unloading charcoal. It is an iron build four mast sailing vessel. It collided with a reef due to rough waves. Six of the crew drowned and 22 survived. The shipwreck settled at a 50 foot depth. The incident was first reported in the The  Ceylon Examiner Newspaper on 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th of May 1893. The value of the vessel was estimated at Indian Rupees (Rs.) 300,000 at the time. In one article there is another steamer ship reported wrecked some years previously. This paper includes details of the wreckage as are available from the newspaper reports. What happened after her wreckage was an interesting story. The time was the British colonial period in â€œCeylonâ€ (now Sri Lanka) during which time there was a growing general unrest against the colonial masters. Some information reveals that this mindset may have influenced the rescuers during their rescue efforts of the drowning crew. This paper it is going to elaborate on the story behind the shipwreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury and investigate the social influences towards the wreck site then and now.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2900">
                <text>A.M.A.Dayananda</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2901">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="24">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="186" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="79">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/ef7955cb803dfa73bcb8f85e2aff694a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8048bc7ffe7a48f78d1130b7e3700af3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2305">
                    <text>Marine Archaeological Investigations on Tamil Nadu Coast,
India: An Overview
Sundaresh and A.S. Gaur1

Abstract
Ancient ports such as Kaveripattinam, Nagapattinam, Korkai, Alagankulam, Periyapattinam, all on
Tamil Nadu coast have played a dominant role in the transoceanic trade and commerce with many
countries since the beginning of the Christian Era (CE, starting from year one on the Georgian
Calendar). Many such port towns that existed on the coastal region vanished or were submerged in
the sea probably due to coastal erosion, sea level changes and neo-tectonic activity and other
causes.
Poompuhar, a flourishing port town, played a major role in maritime activities in the beginning
of the Christian Era. The Sangam literature vividly describes its location, habitation and town
planning. The marine archaeological explorations around Poompuhar brought to light the remains of
terracotta ring wells, brick structures, and storage jars in the inter-tidal zone. The brick structures,
stone structures, and pottery from offshore explorations support the existence of the ancient
settlement.
Mahabalipuram is said to have been a seaport right from the beginning of the Christian Era.
Geophysical survey and underwater exploration revealed structural remains including a fallen wall
running about 10 metres (m) in length, scattered dressed stone blocks, a few steps leading to a
platform and many other structural remains at various locations between 4 and 8 m water depth. The
available data confirms that a large area comprising of a building complex have been submerged.
These remains could be part of submerged structures and caused by severe coastal erosion in this
area.
The data collected at the above sites support the literary evidence to prove their existence as
ports. The major cause for the submergence of these port towns was due to shoreline changes
caused by coastal erosion.

INTRODUCTION
Ancient ports are the source of information to understand the strategic locations of
ports, maritime trade, routes, material exchange and the socio-economic conditions
of the contemporary period.
Important ports such as Kaveripattinam,
Mahabalipuram,
Nagapattinam,
Korkai,
Alagankulam,
Arikamedu
and
Periyapattinam all on the Tamil Nadu coast have played an important role in the
transoceanic trade from the beginning of the Christian era. The Periplus2 has
mentioned the ports on Tamil Nadu coast such as Camara, (Kaveripattinam) and
Sopatma, (Mamallapuram), had maritime contacts with Roman countries during
early centuries of Christian era (Ramaswami 1989:17). Many such port towns that
existed on the coastal region vanished or were submerged in the sea, maybe due to
coastal erosion, sea level changes and neo-tectonic activities. Ancient literary
sources exist that provide possible explanations for the loss of these littoral
settlements: like the Sangam literature which refers to the submergence of
Poompuhar; or the popular beliefs regarding the submergence of the temples of
Mahabalipuram; and the “Kumari Kandam” traditions of Tamil Nadu. It may well be
impossible to search for their roots or find proof that such beliefs are based on facts.
Nevertheless, many archaeological explorations have been taken up in an attempt to
verify the historicity of these traditions.
1

National Institute of Oceanography, Council of Scientific &amp; Industrial Research, (CSIR), Dona Paula,
Goa 403 004.
2
Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, a sailor’s manual written by a Greek of Alexandria dating to 1st
Century AD and deals with the trade, commerce &amp; ports from Red sea to Bay of Bengal.

1

�Sangam3 literature gives ample historical accounts on maritime trade and
mentions the flourishing port town of Poompuhar, the capital of the early Cholas4
culture (Pillai 1989:13). The Manimekhalai5 mentions that Poompuhar was
swallowed up by the sea due to the wrath of goddess Manimekhalai, for not
celebrating the festival of Indra (Na Mu, et al. 2007:353,365-6). Though the
reference is only to a supernatural incident, it may be taken as an echo of some
actual sea erosion due to some high tidal wave surge(s) that engulfed the city.
Mahabalipuram was well known to earlier mariners as ‘Seven Pagodas’. It is
generally believed that out of seven temples originally constructed, all but “Shore
temple” were submerged by the sea over a period of time. European travellers in the
18th and 19th century have recorded this folk tradition (Ramaswami 1989:48).
Captain M.W. Carr (1984:11) refers to the account given by William Chambers
(1869:11,1-29) after his second visit to Mahabalipuram in 1776 about the traditions
on the submergence of pagodas.
Marine archaeological explorations have been carried out at Poompuhar and
Mahabalipuram (Figure 1) by scholars at the National Institute of Oceanography,
Goa, to find out the extent of the submerged evidence on the famous port towns.
The underwater investigations have revealed information on submerged structures
and also data on shoreline changes. The details of the findings are described below.

3

Sangam literature refers to a body of classical Tamil literature, is a collection of more than 2381
poems composed by Tamil poets during 3rd Century BC and 3rd Century AD, from various professions
and classes of society about the marriages, dress, ornamentation, culinary fare, war and religious life
of the early Tamils.
4
Cholas were one of the most dominant political forces in the Tamil country. The early Cholas of the
Sangam era ruled from their capital Urayur and Kaveripattinam. Medieval and later Cholas (848 AD1279 AD) ruled from their capitals Thanjavur and Gangaikondacholapuram . Their empire consists of
Tamil country, part of modern Karnataka and part of Sri Lanka.
5
Manimekhalai is considered to be one of the great epics of Tamil literature, the sequel to the
Shilapaddikaram, tells the story of the conversion to Buddhism of the daughter of Kovalan and
Madhavi, which has been dated by various scholars between the 2-6th centuries AD. It is a poem in
30 cantos, describing about Puhar.
Manimekalai which states as ;
madavaral nallaai ninthan maanagar, kadal vayiru pukkadu kaaranam keelai (25:176-77) ..............
aninagar thannai alaikadal kolkena, ittanal saabam pattathu ithuvaal (25:200-01)
Meaning, the city Kaveripumpattinam was engulfed by the sea (200:176-77) since the festival for
Indra was not performed the Godess Manimeekala cursed "may the city is eaten by the sea" (25:200201).

2

�Figure 1. Location map of the sites explored on Tamil Nadu coast (Map: prepared by
R. Uchil, NIO, Goa).

POOMPUHAR
Poompuhar also known as Kaveripattinam, is situated on the northern bank of the
river Kaveri on the Tamil Nadu coast. Sangam texts, specifically the Silappatikaram
(Pillai 1989:13), Pattinapalai, Manimekhalai and Ahananaru vividly describe
Poompuhar as the port capital of the early Cholas (Ramachandran 1974:8; Chandra
1977:107).
Land excavations at Kilaiyur brought to light two brick structures that have
been described as wharves (Rajan 1994:25; Rao 1991a:6,5-20; Athiyaman 1999),
possibly located on an ancient channel of the river Kaveri, an inlet channel to a
reservoir at Vanagiri and Buddha Vihara at Pallavaneswaram (Rajan 1994:23,2632).
3

�Coastal archaeological explorations
Coastal archaeological explorations have been carried out between Poompuhar and
Tranquebar in the inter-tidal zone to find out the remains of archaeological
evidences.

Poompuhar
During the course of explorations in the inter-tidal zone at Poompuhar the following
were exposed: a brick structure of eleven layers running parallel to the coast with
dimensions 1.2 m width, 1.2 m height and 4 m length; and a terracotta ring well with
dimensions 25 centimetres (cm) high, 4 cm thick at the rim, and a diameter of 75 cm
with three courses (Figure 2). Further, four brick structures of 25 m length, 3.4 m
width aligned in a straight line, were noticed at a water depth of 1 m, opposite to
present Cauvery temple at Poompuhar. The size of the bricks is 22x13x6 cm.

Figure 2. Terracotta ring well exposed in the intertidal zone at Poompuhar (photo:
Mr. SN Bandodker, NIO, Goa)

Vanagiri
Vanagiri is located on the coast about 1 km south of Poompuhar. The 11th century
Yellaiyamman temple was found. It had collapsed and the remains are scattered in
the inter-tidal zone. Three terracotta ring wells (75 cm diameter, 15 cm high and 6
cm thick at the rim) were exposed about 300 m south of the Yellaiyamman temple.
A neatly paved structure made of bricks (probably the floor of a house) was exposed
in the inter-tidal excavation.

Chinnavanagiri
Chinnavanagiri is located on the coast about 3 km south of Poompuhar. A terracotta
ring well with rings of 25 cm height, 5 cm rim thickness and 115 cm diameter, was
found surrounded with burnt bricks, associated with megalithic black and red ware
and beads of terracotta and semi-precious stones. The other important finds are a
potsherd with an inscribed Brahmi letter ‘Ma’, an early Chola square coin (completely
eroded), and later Chola coins.
4

�Findings of brick structures, terracotta ring wells, storage jars and brick-paved
platforms prove the existence of a settlement in the inter-tidal zone. The pottery from
Chinnavanagiri suggests that the ring well could be dated to the 2nd century Before
Christ (BC) – Anno Domini (AD)6. The other ring wells found at Vanagiri and
Poompuhar are of the same period. Similar kinds of ring wells found at Arikamedu
and Vasavasamudram are dated to the 2nd century BC to the 3rd century AD (Rao, et
al. 1995-96:15,7-22). The size of the bricks is 36x18x6 cm and closely corresponds
to the bricks used in the Buddha Vihar at Kaveripattinam.

Tranquebar
Tranquebar, a principal port during Danish rule (1620 AD-1845 AD), is situated about
15 km south of Poompuhar. The 13th century Masilamani temple is partly collapsed
and the remains are found scattered in the inter-tidal zone (Figure 3). Two brick
wells were found exposed in the inter-tidal zone. There is also evidence on the
destruction of modern houses due to the encroachment of the sea (Sundaresh, et al.
1997:595, 593-98).

Figure 3. Partly collapsed Masilamani temple at Tranquebar (photo: SN Bandodker,
NIO, Goa)
A careful study of the ‘Historic map of Danish colony Tranquebar and Fort Dansborg,
1700 AD’, which is displayed at Dansborg museum at Tranquebar, suggests that
Tranquebar was well protected by a fort wall with a distance of 50 m from the
6

BC and AD are designations of the Georgian Calendar. BC refers to the years before the birth of
Jesus Christ of Nazareth from year -1 and continues backwards, whereas AD refers to the years after
his birth from year 1 with years added as time progresses.

5

�shoreline. The Masilamani temple was located sufficiently landward about 250 m
from the fort wall. This observation unequivocally suggests that the shoreline has
transgressed about 300 m in the last 300 years, therefore infringing at an average
rate of one metre per year.

Offshore explorations
Offshore survey was conducted between Tranquebar and Poompuhar with small
grids of 250 m. The survey revealed several isolated objects such as rock boulders
at a depth of 7-8 m and 11-13 m opposite to the Masilamani temple (Rao 1992:17,
17-22; Rao 1991b:22,21-31; Rao and Rao 1991:128,127-129). Off Poompuhar, three
major sites of interest were observed at water depths of 5.5 to 10.5m and 23m. A
few dressed stone blocks measuring 90x40x15 cm, a semi circular stone with an Lshape cut on its surface and many other irregular blocks of sandstone were noticed
in 5 to 8 m water depth off the river Cauvery's mouth. The other findings observed
during airlifting operations were rolled bricks and early historic pottery of black and
red ware, Red ware, Buff ware and Grey ware, found 1 m below the seabed (NIO
Technical Report 1993:30).
Explorations on the north of Poompuhar revealed a few dressed stone blocks
in three general dimensions (30x20x5 cm, 65x40x10 cm and 60x35x10 cm), and
brought to light potsherds of grey ware and storage jars. The echograms of the subbottom profiler revealed a submerged palaeo-channel of the river Cauvery on the
north of Poompuhar at 10 to 15 m water depth, with a width of 300 m to 500 m,
buried 20 m below the sea bottom (NIO technical report 1997:15).
Three structures identified with the help of side scan sonar surveys between
22 and 24 m water depth off Poompuhar were later confirmed by diving (Vora
1987:161,159-161). The first structure (in an oval shape) was located about 3.5 km
offshore at 23 m water depth. The total periphery of the object is 140 m. About 40 m
north of the abovementioned object, two smaller objects are found lying in east-west
orientation within a distance of 10 m. The circumference of each object is not more
than 15 m and their height is about 2 m (NIO Technical report 1995:22; NIO
Technical report 1997:18).
The archaeological evidence recovered in the inter-tidal zone as well as
offshore, are of the Sangam period (3rd century BC to 3rd century AD). Evidence in
the inter-tidal zone, hydrographic charts, and the 17th century map at Tranquebar all
confirm the shoreline recession is at an average rate of one meter per year. If the
same rate continued for the last 2000 years, then ancient Poompuhar must have
definitely been extended much further towards the sea from the present coastline.

MAHABALIPURAM
Mahabalipuram is famous for its architectural marvels such as the Shore Temple, the
Chariots, Arjuna’s Penance, bas relief and several cave temples built by the Pallava7
king Narasimha Varman during the 8th century. It is situated about 55 km south of
Chennai and presently a World Heritage Monument.

7

The Pallava dynasty was a Tamil dynasty of South India which ruled the northern Tamil Nadu region
and the southern Andhra Pradesh region with their capital at Kanchipuram, the largest capital of the
sovereign nation Tondai Nadu of Tamilakkam. The early Pallavas had established themselves as a
rd
th
notable rising power in the region during beginning of 3 – 4 Century AD. The later Pallavas came in
th
to prominence during early 5 Century AD and continued to rule till late 9th Century AD.

6

�Mahabalipuram is said to have been a seaport right from the beginning of the
Christian era. The Periplus has mentioned the Roman trade from Damirica to
Sopatma (Mahabalipuram) by very large vessels, made of single logs bound
together, called Sangara (Ramaswami 1989:17). A few Roman coins of Theodosius
(4th century AD) support this trade contact with the Roman world (Dayalan 1992:52).
An 8th century Tamil text written by Tirumangai Alwar described this place as Kadal
Mallai where ships rode at anchor (Ramaswami 1980:11). The epigraphical sources
mention that the Pallava kings had an active contact with Sri Lanka, China and
Southeast Asia. The Pallava king Sihmavarman lead two expeditions by embarking
ships from Mamallapuram. The Pallava embassy and Vajradanthi, a Buddhist monk
sailed, to China from the port of Mamallapuram (Ramaswami 1980:12). The huge
buried remains of structures and ceramic varieties of the early historic and early
medieval period found at Punjeri, about 1.5 km west of Mahabalipuram, on the
western bank of the Bunkingham canal prove its flourishing existence in the past
(Dayalan 1992:54).

Underwater Findings
The underwater explorations were carried out by geophysical surveys followed by
diving. The seabed off Mahabalipuram, in depths ranging from 6 to 15 m, is highly
undulating with variations in height from 1 to 6 m. Granitic rocks with patches of
coarse-grained sand, carpet the floor.
Several rectangular and square shaped structures appeared on most of the
sonographs, particularly in the northern part, showing groups and clusters of blocks
arranged in a systematic pattern. Strong reflections of the images suggest that they
are massive hard bodies that are well shaped. It appears from the sonographs of the
entire study area that some significant parallel discontinuous rocky structures exist
on the seafloor at some places in addition to the dominant occurrence of natural rock
outcrops. Based on the sonographs the following five major sites of interest were
observed between the water depth of 5 and 13 m.

Site A
A structure was found about 700 m on the eastern side of the Shore Temple at 6 m
water depth which comprised of several small structures on a raised platform. The
upper portion of the structure is above the sea surface during low tide. The structure
covers an area of approximately 75x35 m. The structure is broader on the northern
side where a heap of stone blocks are also observed, while on the southern side
scattered small stone structures of various sizes were observed. The structure has
several north-south oriented wall sections.

7

�Figure 4. Stone block with a joinery projection found off Mahabalipuram (Photo: SN
Bandodker, NIO, Goa)
Dressed granite blocks were used for the construction of this structure. A wall
about 250x65 cm with two to four courses is noticed. Huge rectangular blocks
measuring approximately 2x1x1.5 m were also noticed on the central upper portion
of the structure. Another wall measuring about 5.4 m in length was seen on the
northern side along with two parallel walls on the southern side of the main structure,
with a stair-like structure leading upwards. Further on the northern side, the remains
of a wall extend up to 15 m in length. The length of some of these six walls varies
from 7 to 32.5 m; the other walls being shorter in length. A floor measuring 2x2.5 m
was also noticed towards the north-western side of the structure. The entire structure
has thick marine growth of sponges, shells, barnacles and mussels; a few blocks
were cleaned and chisel marks were observed. One of the blocks shows that it has
joinery projections for interconnecting the blocks (Figure 4; Sundaresh, et al.
2004:1233).

Site B
Another interesting site was located about 200 m on the north-north-eastern side of
Structure A at a depth between 5 - 8 m. The site has the remains of a wall, 2 m wide
and 5 m in length running from east to west and many fallen dressed stone blocks
found scattered around it. Another wall was found running more than 10 m with a
width of 2.5 m. Some of the stone blocks appear to have figurines carved on them;
however, identification was not possible due to thick marine growth.
Apart from the above there were many more structural remains such as fallen
walls, L-shaped connecting walls (Sundaresh, et al. 2004:1234), dressed square and
8

�rectangular stone blocks and a square platform reached by a flight of steps were
found at different locations (NIO Technical Report 2003:22).
The plan of the structures indicates that this construction could be part of a
big complex, as the huge stone blocks and several fallen walls were noticed in situ. It
appears that construction had been carried out on a raised platform with several
walls and a floor made of granite blocks. An opening from the southern side between
two walls with steps has been noticed which may be the entrance to the complex.
The natural rock boulders noticed on the southwest side are similar in shape and
size to those found on land on the hill at Mahabalipuram. Similarly, the construction
style observed underwater is identical to that observed on adjacent land. It was not
possible, however, to verify the binding material of the underwater structure due to
thick marine growth and their damaged condition. There were many wall sections
observed at different locations including the “quarry area” on a huge rock. The
dressed stone blocks required for the construction were probably extracted from the
quarry found nearby. In fact, most of the religious or ceremonial constructions,
including the present shore temple at Mahabalipuram, have been built with granite.
The sand stone and granite was extensively used for the construction of temples
during Pallava rule (Srinivasan 1983: 28-67).

Dating of Underwater Structures
The archaeology of Mahabalipuram commenced from the early centuries of the
Christian era. A few Roman, Chinese and Pallava coins have been reported from
Mahabalipuram (Ramaswami 1980:4). One of the inscriptions of Narasimha I
mentions that he (Narasimha I) is the first person to introduce the construction of
cave temples made of granite. N.S. Ramaswami (1980:27) refers to several accounts
of Europeans who recorded the submergence of the city and the tradition that, "a
large city and six magnificent pagodas have been swallowed up at this place by the
sea". William Chambers (1869:11,1-29), Graham Hancock (2002:121), P.M. Mohan
and Victor Rajamanickam (2002:78,77-79) believe that out of seven temples carved
out of granite during the 8th century AD only one has survived and the rest are
submerged. Based on the facts that the rock art sculpture was encouraged by the
Pallavas at this place and most of them were constructed during that period, it is
inferred that these temples may not be less than 1200 years old.

Possible Causes of Submergence
M.S. Krishnan (1968:523), S.P. Mahapatra and M. Hariprasad (2002:134,132-136)
have pointed out that the major and important factor affecting the Mahabalipuram
coast is erosion, as severe erosion at Kalpakkam (south of Mahabalipuram) was
observed due to long-shore sediment drift (Krishnakumar, et al. 1994:45,41-45). A
recent study suggests the rate of coastal erosion in and around Mahabalipuram is 55
cm/year (Ramaiyan, et al. 1997:1179,1177-1181). If the same rate has prevailed
since the last 1200 years then the shoreline at that time might have been around 800
m eastward and all the structures noticed underwater would have been on the land.
The excavations at Saluvankuppam about 1.5 km north of Mahabalipuram,
about 150 m from the sea coast, revealed three phases of construction belonging to
8-9th century AD, 6-8th century AD and 4th century AD at a depth of 3.2 m below the
present ground level. Evident from the stratigraphy these structures were destroyed
by the coastal flooding during 950 AD and between 320-560 AD (Rajendran, et al.
2006:1246,1242-1247). Therefore it may be mentioned here that the coastal erosion
might have played a major role in the submergence of these structures.

9

�The underwater structures, especially the long walls having 2 to 3 courses,
the scattered dressed stone blocks of various sizes, and the stones with projections
are considered to be man-made. They may well be the remains of huge complexes
or the temples of the so-called “Seven pagodas”. As the Pallavas encouraged temple
architecture at Mahabalipuram during the 8th century, these structures may be
assigned to the same period. Mahabalipuram served as a port during the Pallava
period. Part of the earlier Mahabalipuram town may have been submerged in the
sea.

CONCLUSIONS
The marine archaeological explorations on Tamil Nadu coast have brought to light
the submerged structural evidence at Poompuhar and Mahabalipuram. The
traditions mentioning the submergence of these port towns have been partially
confirmed with the evidence from underwater. These structures may have been
submerged due to coastal erosion followed by shoreline changes. As evident from
Mahabalipuram excavations, these sites might have been submerged due to large
coastal flooding.

Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Director, NIO for his support and encouragement. Thanks are also due
to Shri. KH Vora for critical review of the manuscript and constant support, our colleagues Sila Tripati,
SN Bandodker, SB Chitari for their help in fieldwork, Dr Mohan Rao and Shri Prem Kumar for their
bathymetric study and finally Shri R. Uchil for line drawings. This is the NIO contribution no. 5068.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Athiyaman, N.,
1999

"Two Wharves at Poompuhar: A Technical Study", paper
presented at Second International Conference on Marine
Archaeology, held at Thane, 8-10 January.
Carr, M. W., (ed.),
The Seven Pagodas on the Coromandel Coast, Asian
1984
Educational Services, New Delhi, (first published in 1869 by
same publisher).
Chambers, W.,
"Some account of the sculptures and ruins at Mavelipuram, a
1869
place a few miles north of Sadras, and known to seamen by
name of the Seven Pagodas", in (ed.) Captain M. W. Carr,
Descriptive and Historical papers relating to The Seven
Pagodas, on the Coromandel coast Asian Educational
Services, New Delhi, pp. 1–29.
Dayalan, D.,
"Punjeri – A Pallava sea port near Mamallapuram", (ed.)
1992
Natana Kashinathan, Seminar on Marine Archaeology, State
Department of Archaeology, Madras, 52-56.
Hancock, G.,
Underworld: the flooded kingdoms of the Ice Age, Penguin
2002
Books, London, pp.741.
Krishnan, M. S.,
Geology of India and Burma, 5th edition, Higginbotham,
1968
Madras, pp.536.
Krishnakumar, V., “Preliminary Investigations on Transient Erosion at
Vethamony, P., and Kalpakkam beach, East Coast of India during June 1990” in
Narayana Swamy, Mahasagar 27, 1, pp 41-45.
G.,
10

�1994
Mahapatra, S. P., "Historical sea level changes in relation to Archaeological
and Hariprasad, M., structures on the East Coast of India", in Proceedings Volume
2002
of National Seminar: Four Decades of marine Geosciences in
India, A retrospect, Special Publication no. 74, Geological
Survey of India, 132 – 136.
Mohan, P.M., and "Importance of Studies on the recent sea level changes in the
Rajamanickam, V., southern part of East coast of India", in Proceedings Volume
2002
of National Seminar: Four Decades of marine Geosciences in
India, A retrospect, special publication no. 74, Geological
Survey of India, Kolkata, pp 77-79.
Moti, C.,
Trade and Trade routes in Ancient India, Abhinav
1977
Publications, New Delhi, p. 259.
Venkatasamy
Coolavaanikan Cattanaar in Manimeekalai Moolamum
Nattar, N, M., and Uraiyum Saratha Pathippakam, Chennai (First edition 1951),
Duraisami
Pillai, pp. 353, 365-366.
A.S.,
2007
NIO
Technical Marine Archaeological Explorations in Poompuhar waters,
Report,
National Institute of Oceanography, Goa. No. NIO/SP/13/93,
1993
pp. 42.
NIO
Technical Marine Archaeological Explorations in Poompuhar waters,
Report,
National Institute of Oceanography, Goa No. NIO/SP/13/95,
1995
pp. 34.
NIO
Technical Marine Archaeological Explorations in Poompuhar waters,
Report,
National Institute of Oceanography, Goa. No. NIO/SP/13/97,
1997
pp. 37
NIO
Technical Underwater explorations off Poompuhar and Mahabalipuram,
Report,
Tamil Nadu, National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, No.
2003
NIO/SP-2/2003, pp. 39
Pillai.R.S.,
Cilappatikaram, Tamil University Thanjavur publications,
1989
Thanjavur, pp. 150.
Rajan
Soundara, "Kaveripattinam Excavations 1963-73, (A port city on the
K.V.,
Tamil Nadu coast)", in Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey
1994
of India No. 90, New Delhi. pp 151.
Rajendran,
C.P., "Evidence of ancient sea surges at the Mamallapuram coast
Rajendran,
K., of India and implications for previous Indian Ocean tsunami
Terry Machado, T., events", in Current Science, 91, 9, pp. 1242-1247.
Satyamurthy,
T.,
Aravazhi, P., and
Jaiswal, M.,
2006
Ramachandran,
Ahananuru in its Historical Setting, University of Madras
C.E,
Publications, Madras, pp.149.
1974
Ramaiyan,
M., "Shoreline oscillation of Tamil Nadu coast", in the
Krishna Prasad, E., Proceedings of Second Indian National Conference of
and Suresh, P. K.,
Harbour and Ocean Engineering, (INCHOE - 97), held at
1997
Thiruvanathapuram ,7-10 December, pp. 1177-1181.
Ramaswami, N. S., Mamallapuram, An Annotated Bibliography, New Era
1980
Publications, Madras, pp. 120.
11

�Ramaswami, N. S., 2000 years of Mamallapuram, Navrang, New Delhi, pp. 372.
1989
Rao, S.R.,
“Marine archaeological explorations of Tranquebar1991a
Poompuhar region on Tamil Nadu coast”, in Journal of Marine
Archaeology, Society for marine archaeology, Goa, 2, pp.520.
Rao, T.C.S.,
“Marine archaeological surveys off Kaveripattinam for
1991b
archaeological investigation”, in Journal of Marine
Archaeology, Society for marine archaeology, 2, pp.21-31.
Rao, T.C.S., and "Marine Archaeological surveys off Tranquebar, Tamil Nadu –
Mohan Rao K.,
Preliminary Results", in Recent Advances in marine
1991
archaeology, Society for marine archaeology, Goa, pp. 127129.
Rao, T. C. S.,
“Marine Geophysical surveys off Kaveripattinam for
1992
Archaeological Investigations”, in (ed.) Natana Kashinathan,
Seminar on Marine Archaeology, State Department of
Archaeology, Madras, pp. 17-22.
Rao, S. R., Rao, T. “Underwater explorations off Poompuhar”, in Journal of
C. S., Gaur, A. S., Marine Archaeology, Society for marine archaeology, Goa, 5Tripati
S., 6, pp. 7-22.
Sundaresh
and
Gudigar, P.,
1995-96
Srinivasan, K. R.,
“Pallavas of Kanci: Phase I”, in (ed.) Michael W. Meister,
1983
Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, South India,
Lower Dravidadesa, 200 BC-1324 AD, American Institute of
Indian Studies, University of Pennsylvania Press,
Philadelphia, pp. 23-79.
Sundaresh, Gaur, "Our Threatened Archaeological Heritage: A Case Study from
A.S., Nair, R.R.,
Tamil Nadu Coast", in Current Science, 73, 7, pp.593-98.
1997
Sundaresh, Gaur, "Underwater Investigations off Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu,
A.S., Tripati, S., India", in Current Science, 86, 9, pp. 1231-1237.
and Vora K.H.,
2004
Vora, K. H.,
“A note on the geophysical explorations for marine
1987
archaeology of Tamil Nadu coast, India”, in International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology, London, 16, 1, pp.159-164.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2299">
                <text>Marine Archaeological Investigations on Tamil Nadu Coast, India:  An Overview</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2300">
                <text>Session 2&#13;
&#13;
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2301">
                <text>Ancient ports such as Kaveripattinam, Nagapattinam, Korkai, Alagankulam, Periyapattinam, all on Tamil Nadu coast have played a dominant role in the transoceanic trade and commerce with many countries since the beginning of the Christian Era (CE, starting from year one on the Georgian Calendar). Many such port towns that existed on the coastal region vanished or were submerged in the sea probably due to coastal erosion, sea level changes and neo-tectonic activity and other causes.&#13;
&#13;
Poompuhar, a flourishing port town, played a major role in maritime activities in the beginning of the Christian Era. The Sangam literature vividly describes its location, habitation and town planning. The marine archaeological explorations around Poompuhar brought to light the remains of terracotta ring wells, brick structures, and storage jars in the inter-tidal zone. The brick structures, stone structures, and pottery from offshore explorations support the existence of the ancient settlement.&#13;
&#13;
Mahabalipuram is said to have been a seaport right from the beginning of the Christian Era. Geophysical survey and underwater exploration revealed structural remains including a fallen wall running about 10 metres (m) in length, scattered dressed stone blocks, a few steps leading to a platform and many other structural remains at various locations between 4 and 8 m water depth. The available data confirms that a large area comprising of a building complex have been submerged. These remains could be part of submerged structures and caused by severe coastal erosion in this area. &#13;
&#13;
The data collected at the above sites support the literary evidence to prove their existence as ports. The major cause for the submergence of these port towns was due to shoreline changes caused by coastal erosion.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2302">
                <text>Sundaresh</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2303">
                <text>A.S. Gaur</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2304">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="24">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="252" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="157">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/057f2b28fbb1d5bba3d04aa9a82d48f2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c24516f4c28cb0ce0b4718bd32c19a62</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2996">
                    <text>Maritime Archaeology of Gujarat:
Northwest coast of India
A.S. Gaur and Sundaresh

Abstract

rd

The evidence of maritime activity in India may be traced back to the Bronze Age (early 3
nd
millennium BC to mid- 2 millennium BC). The excavation of several Harappan sites including
Lothal, Kuntasi, Padri, Nageshwar, Bagasra and many others have conclusively demonstrated an
advance maritime culture during the third millennium Before Christ (BC). During the historical
period several coastal towns had international trade and commerce including Bet Dwarka,
Somnath, Hathab, Vallabhi, and Bharuch. Maritime activity reached it’s zenith in Gujarat during
th
th
the Medieval period (8 to 14 century AD) when Arab traders dominated the Indian Ocean for
over a millennia. Underwater investigations have been carried out at various places along the
Saurashtra coast and a large number of stone anchors were found.
This paper also discusses the effect of tide when using jetties and anchoring points along
various parts of the west coast India. The archaeological evidence indicates that two gulfs along
the Gujarat coast (Gulf Kachchh and Gulf of Khambhat) witnessed the hectic maritime activities in
the past. Both gulfs have very high tidal ranges. The Gulf of Khambhat has the highest tidal range
in India (11 meters). Ancient texts such as Vishnu Puran and Periplus of the Eruthreanean Sea
vividly describe the tidal range and its uses in navigation. The discovery of the large number of
stone anchors in the inter tidal zone along the gulf region support the above references.

Introduction
Maritime activities along the Gujarat coast dates back to the Harappan period
and extensive excavations at Lothal (Rao 1974:70), Kuntasi (Dhavalikar, et al.
1996:76), Nageshwar (Hegde, et al. 1990:152), Bagasra (Sonawane, et al.
2003:41) and Nagwada (Bhan and Gowda 2003:51-80) have yielded conclusive
evidence on maritime practices during the 3rd millennium BC. During the
historical period (3rd century BC to 4th century AD) a series of ports existed all
along the Gujarat coast and important among them were Nani Rayan (Irani and
Dandekar 2003:91-97) Bet Dwarka (Gaur and Sundaresh 2003:57-66), Dwarka
(Ansari and Mate 1966), Vallabhi, and Hathab (Pramanik 2004:133-140).
Whereas by the Medieval period (8th to 14th century AD) the entire Gujarat coast
had series of ports.
Gujarat coast is punctuated with several creeks and seasonal rivers that
facilitated safe harbours all along the coast. The waters around the Gujarat coast
are also rich in marine resources, such as shells which were used as food as well
as export products. Conch shell have been a major economy source for many
fishermen in Gujarat (Pota and Patel 1991:445-450).
The important sites of the maritime archaeological investigations along the
Gujarat coast include Dwarka, Bet Dwarka, Miyani, Visawada, Somnath, Kodinar
and Ghogha (Figure 1). The brief descriptions of the findings from these sites are
provided in the following paragraphs.

�Figure 1. Map showing archaeological sites mentioned in the manuscript along
Gujarat coast (Prepared by. S.B. Chitari)

Dwarka
Dwarka was the first site in India where marine archaeological exploration
commenced and investigations continued for almost two decades (Rao 1988:4753; Gaur, et al. 2004:1256-60). A number of artifacts were discovered during
offshore explorations between 3 and 16 m water depths. Several stone structures
were noticed off Dwarka and they are of various shapes and sizes. A few
semicircular structures are partially intact and have jointed with hard binding
material. The semicircular structures were constructed by using L-shaped blocks
with provision for dowels (Gaur, et al. 2008:16). Besides semicircular blocks, a
large number of rectangular blocks have been noticed in this area. They are
scattered over a vast area and do not follow any regular plan. These blocks are
found close to the semicircular structures, which indicate that these might have
been parts of a larger structure. The circular and semicircular structures are
presumably the bases of pillars and rectangular and square dressed blocks are
of a main jetty structure that ran from shore into the water and continued until
300 m offshore. Hasmukh Sankalia (1966:10) has mentioned that “Sayajirao
Gaekwad of Baroda had built a dock along the Gomati creek and a landing place
on the opposite side, with huge stone pillars to facilitate tying the ship”. It is quite

�likely that the remains lying on the shore and offshore regions are remains of the
same dock. The presence of stone anchors that are lying along these structures
also supports this hypothesis.
Along with stone structures a large number of stone anchors of different
shape and sizes were noticed between the inter-tidal zone and 16 m water depth,
the concentration of them being in 6 to 8 m water depth (Sundaresh, et al.
1999:229-252). Broadly these anchors have been divided into three groups,
a)
Composite anchors: majority of the anchors have been chiseled out
of a thin limestone block triangular in shape but often the narrower
portion has a half circle with a circular hole known as rope hole and
two rectangular or square holes on the wider side called fluke hole.
The biggest anchor of this variety has a length of 1.8 meter and
maximum width 86 centimeters (cm) and the estimated weight is 496
kilograms (kg) (Figure 2). The smallest anchor weighs 16 kg.
b)
Indo-Arabia type of anchors were cut from a hard and long stone
block with a tapering on one side and a circular hole and the other
side with two rectangular or square holes on either face of the block
(Gaur, et al. 2004a:134-51). The biggest anchor has a length of 2.37
m, a width of 40 cm and an estimated weight of 668 kg while the
smallest anchor with its shape fully preserved has an estimated
weight of 82 kg.
c)
Ring stone anchors: twenty-four ring stone anchors have been found
from Dwarka water and they are of various sizes (Gaur, et al. 2002:
390-404). The biggest has a height of 50 cm and diameter 52 cm
and an estimated weight of 245 kg whereas the smallest ring stone
weighs 20 kg. Similar types of ring stones have been reported from
Oman waters (Vosmer 1999: 301).

�Figure 2. Dwarka: Composite type stone anchor
(Photo by S.N. Bandodkar in 2001)

Bet Dwarka
Bet Dwarka is an island situated in Okhamnadal and at the entrance of the Gulf
of Kachchh. The area is also referred to as the Gulf of Barake in the Greek sea
guide, the Periplus Maris Erythraei (Schoff 1912:38). However, Ptolemy
mentioned Barake as an Island in the Gulf of Kanthi, which has been identified as
the Gulf of Kachchh (McCrindle 1885:36).
In the 17th century BC the late Harappan people had established their
settlement on the northwest part of the Island (Gaur and Sundaresh 2003:57-66).
They used rich marine resources available around the Island such as the variety
of fishes and shells (Gaur, et al. 2005:941-46). A large fishhook (Gaur and
Sundaresh 2004:512-14) and shell artifacts are the testimony of the above
statement. The scanty habitation deposit suggests that the site was abandoned
after a couple of centuries (Gaur and Sundaresh 2003:57-66). The Island was
again inhabited during the 8th century BC on the southeastern coast of the Island.
Maritime activities reached it’s zenith during the historical and the medieval
periods. The Island continued to be an important center of maritime activity until
the emergence of the Okha port in the Okhamandal area.
The underwater explorations were carried out near the present Bet
Dwarka passenger jetty in two seasons (2001 and 2002). A large number of
artifacts including sherds of amphorae, lead anchors, lead ingot, a hand-mill of

�stone, besides 45 stone anchors, were noticed from this area between water
depth of 5 and 8 m.
There are 42 stone anchors lying in Bet Dwarka waters close to the
present Bet Dwarka jetty, in 6-8 m water depth. They are of two types: A)
composite type: majority of them were cut from locally available limestone blocks.
The circular hole (rope hole) is often found broken whereas two square/
rectangular holes on other side are preserved. The anchors are very similar to
those reported from Dwarka and other places in Saurashtra. B) Indo-Arab type
anchor are made of hard rock such as basalt and sometimes sandstone. The
stone anchors have been dated between the historical and medieval periods.

Pindara
The ancient temple site of Pindara is situated close to the Northern Saurashtra
coast in the Gulf of Kachchh about 36 km west of Khambhalia and 24 km from
Kalyanpur. On the west of Pindara is a vast marshy land known as Okha Rann.
Pindara is a well sheltered area, free from open sea waves. It is comprised of
mud flats up to a distance of 2 km from the high waterline with a gentle slope.
The average tidal range in the region is 1 to 4 m.
A huge temple complex (10 X 10 m) is exposed during low tide in Pindara
at about 300 m from high water line (Gaur, et al. 2007:733-35). Presently, the
floor area is made of dressed lime stone blocks (Figure 3), it is well preserved,
while the superstructure has been destroyed and the stone blocks have been
washed/ taken away. This temple was dedicated to the Lord Shiva, as a yoni1 is
present in the middle of the temple complex. The majority of the stone blocks
measure 60 X 45 X 25 cms. The remaining part of the sanctum (Garbha griha)
measures 4.75 X 4.5 m. The yoni measures 40 X 40 cms. The architectural
feature of the submerged temple corresponds more or less with existing temple
on the shore of Pindara. The size of the submerged temple must have been as
big as other surviving temples in Pindara’s group of temples dating back to the
7th to 10th century AD. The evidence indicates that the Saurashtra coast
shoreline has changed significantly during the last 1000 years.

1

Yoni is symbol of creation and worshipped across the Indian subcontinent since the antiquity.

�Figure 3. Pindara: An ancient temple complex exposes during low tide
(Photo by A.S. Gaur, 2006)

Miyani
Miyani is situated about 40 km east of Dwarka. This area is famous for ancient
temples dating back to the 10th century AD (Sampura 1968: 87). On the coast of
Miyani a temple is dedicated to a Goddess (locally known as Harshadmata). It is
situated on a high hill. A vast creek known as Meda Creek runs a few miles into
the hinterland, which has been used as a shelter in the harbour for local small
craft, particularly fishing vessels.
Underwater explorations were undertaken about 1 km offshore of Harshad
Mata temple. Archaeological findings comprised of twelve stone anchors of
various types.

Visawada
The small town of Visawada lies about 40 km west of Porbandar and about 20
km east of Miyani. The Hindu pilgrimage center and a temple dedicated to the
Lord Krishna, is situated in the middle of the town. Kindari Creek runs a long
distance up to Kindar Kheda (a Harappan town) and perhaps the creek’s name is
derived from this particular ancient town. The western side of the coast is
represented by a high cliff while the eastern coast consists of sandy beaches.
Explorations were undertaken off the Kindari Creek as a baseline, it is
located about 500 m from the coastline. Features and artefacts were
concentrated between 5-6 m water depths. A total of 14 stone anchors were

�found and
types.

represent three varieties: composite, Indo-Arabia and ring stone

Somnath
The archaeological excavations on land at Prabhasa by the Baroda University
and Deccan Collage Pune have yielded evidence of a township dated to 2000
BC (Rao, et al. 1992:13-16). The temple of Somnath nearby is dedicated to Lord
Siva and the linga2 is counted among the 12 Jyotirlingas of India mentioned in
various Puranas.
The explored area in Somnath water is located at a distance of 400 m
south-west of the Somnath temple. Somnath waters contained the largest
occurrence of ring stones anchors (Figure 4). Out of the 43 total anchors
discovered, 80% are ring stone. The water depth varies from 7 m to 15 m. The
ring stones observed shallower than 8m water depth had seaweed growth,
however ring stones of deeper depths have a layer of greyish marine growth.

Figure 4. Somnath: Ring-stone anchor (S.N. Bandodkar in 2001)

Kodinar (Mul Dwarka)
A small coastal village known as Mul Dwarka near Kodinar in the district of
Junagad is one of the claimants of the original Dwarka of Mahabharata. The
proximity with Junagadh hills on the north and the sea on the south situate the
town as being associated with Dwarka (Sankalia 1966:7). An ancient temple is
situated on raised land close to the sea. The temple is dilapidated and not under
worship. The shrine is dated to the post 10th century AD (Sampura 1968:113). A
circular structure situated close to the ancient temple is about 4 m in height and
2

Linga is a phallus symbol worshipped across the Indian subcontinent since the antiquity.

�constructed with a similar type of dressed limestone blocks as that of the temple.
Locally this structure is called as Diva Dandi which means a lighthouse (Gaur, et
al. 2010:418-422). If this structure served as a lighthouse then this may be the
oldest lighthouse remains on the Saurashtra coast. An ancient well was noticed
near the jetty which is still used as a drinking water source.
The exploration in the inter tidal zone yielded a composite stone anchor.
The anchor is exposed during low tide. It is made of sedimentary rock. The
anchor is similar to those reported from Dwarka (Gaur, et al. 2008:23-57) and Bet
Dwarka (Gaur, et al. 2005:113-129) and dated between the historical and the
medieval periods.
The underwater investigations in and around Mul Dwarka (Kodinar) have
been of significance in respect to understanding the archaeology of this region.
Now the data of underwater explorations from all the three Dwarka on the
Saurashtra coast are available and the most common aspects of them is the
presence of similar types of stone anchors, therefore, the tradition of Dwarka at
these places might have been existed contemporaneously (around 7th - 8th
century AD). Another common aspect of these sites is the presence of Harappan
(mid 3rd millennium BC) and late Harappan (early 2nd millennium BC) settlement
within close proximity to each other. For example, Nageshwar and Bet Dwarka
near Okhamandal Dwarka, Kindar Kheda near Mul Dwarka (Visawada) and
Kanjetar and Kaj near Mul Dwarka (Kodinar). All the three Dwarka have ancient
temples dated to the 10th -12th century AD. Nonetheless, these sites were busy
ancient ports and perhaps temples were served as coastal marker points for
navigators, as well as for worship before embarking on long voyages.

Mithi Virdi
The small village Mithi Virdi is situated about 30 km south east of Talaja, a taluka
headquarter. The village is lying on a raised plateau close to the seashore. A
small seasonal river merges with the sea on the western side of the village. The
archaeological site is located about one km west of the village in an agriculture
field.
Five stone anchors are lying on agricultural land (ground nuts are the
important crop of this field) about 1 km north of the seashore. Three anchors are
lying together at a distance of 10 m and oriented in the east-west direction (Gaur,
et al. 2005:110-14) The fourth anchor is laying partially buried north of the other
three and oriented in the east west direction.
All the anchors are similar to each other in shape and size. The anchors
have rectangular cross-sections and trapezoidal longitudinal sections. These
have sharp edges and chisel marks on them are clearly noticed. They have been
cut from conglomeratic sedimentary grit rock, which is dark brown in colour and
small gravel can be noticed. The anchors have two lower rectangular holes and
an upper circular hole is absent in all the anchors.

Ghogha
The town of Gogha is located on the mid western coast of the Gulf of Khambhat
in Bhavnagar district of Gujarat. A famous Gujarati proverb, “Lankani lari ane

�Ghoghono var” (Bride of Lanka and groom of Ghogha) indicates direct overseas
relation between Gogha and Sri Lanka in the past (Chaukasi 1989: 634). The
presence of ancient Jaina temples at Gogha dating back to the 10th – 11th
centuries suggest that this was a religious center also. The earliest Arabic
inscription from Gogha dates to 1170 AD (Oza 1885: 2). During the British period
ships up to 1500 tons were laden here (Habib 1982: 23).
The exploration at Gogha was undertaken during low tide and findings
were recorded with still photography and drawing. A large number of stone
anchors were recorded between 100 and 200 m distance from the high water line
(Gaur 2010:146-155). The majority of the anchors belong to the Indo-Arab type
and nearly about 40% anchors are fragmented. Interestingly, the fresh surface of
broken parts suggests that fragmentation of the anchors took place during the
manufacturing stage and not during the anchoring processes. A composite
anchor made of lime stone was found at the site. A few unfinished anchors were
found from Gogha and Hathab. However, these anchors were submerged in 5 to
7 m water depth during high tide. Thus, it indicates that big boats were anchoring
at this point during high tide. The author of the Periplus of the Erythrenean also
refers to such activities detailing that during low tide boats rest on the seabed.
The exploration in the inter tidal zone has also yielded several sherds of
the glazed ware in the vicinity of stone anchors. These include a jar with
internally and upper half externally glazed; and the rest of the sherds are glazed
internally only. There are three main types of glazed ware (i.e. green, blue and
brown). These are very similar to the Islamic glazed ware found from various
parts of the country (Mohammad 1985:105). The medieval period glazed ware at
Hastinapur (Lal 1954-55:5-151) was found in association with coins of Balban
(1206-87 AD). The sherds recovered from the inter-tidal zone of Ghogha are very
similar to those reported from another medieval period site at Lashkarshah in
Khambhat which have been dated to 14th-16th century (Bhan 2006: 90-95). Thus
the glazed sherds Ghogha may also be dated to the late medieval period.

Hathab
Hathab an early historical site is referred to as Astacampra in the Periplus of
Erythrenean Sea (Schoff 1912: 40). On shore excavation yielded rich antiquities
of the historical period and maritime contact with the west. It is located about one
km into the hinterland. The exploration in the inter tidal zone of Hathab yielded
two anchors similar to those of the Indo-Arab type and one anchor with a wide
groove wrapped around the middle of the anchor. This is very similar to those
reported from Japan and Chinese waters (Yang 1990:113-121).
The remains of a jetty were noticed at the mouth of the river Shetrunji near
the village Sultanpur. This was primarily a wooden jetty now abandoned due to
emergence of other ports in the vicinity.

Conclusions
Coastal and maritime archaeological investigations along the Gujarat coast have
conclusively proven that it holds the earliest evidence of the maritime activity in

�the Indian subcontinent. Archaeological set up of the Kachchh region provide
enough indication that the Rann of Kachchh was a navigable body during the
third millennium BC. During the historical period Gujarat witnessed hectic
maritime activities and boats from various regions including the Mediterranean
Sea. The maritime activity reached its zenith during the Indo-Arabia trading
network of the medieval period and a large number of evidence indicates that
Gujarat played an important role in the Indian Ocean trade system during this
period. Marine archaeological investigations during the last two and half decades
have brought out a number of potential sites along the Indian coast which include
ancient ports, jetties, and shipwrecks. The extensive explorations of the
Saurashtra coast revealed several ancient ports and jetties. Interestingly,
archaeological discoveries suggest that natural phenomena like tidal variations
have been very effectively used in the Gulf of Kachchh and the Gulf of Khambhat
in the past.

Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Mr. K.H. Vora for providing various comments and suggestions in the
manuscript. Thanks also due to other colleagues in marine archaeology centre for various help
during the field work. Mr. S.B. Chitari prepared line drawing for the manuscript.

Bibliography
Ansari, Z.D. and Mate,
M.S.,
1966
Bhan, K.K. and Gowda,
D.,
2003
Bhan, K.K.,
2006
Chaukasi, U.M.,
1989
Dhavalikar, M.K., Raval,
M.R., Chitalwala, Y.M.,
1996
Gaur, A.S., Sundaresh,
Sila Triapti, Bandodkar,
S.N.,
2002
Gaur, A.S. and
Sundaresh,
2003
Gaur, A.S. and
Sundaresh,

Excavations at Dwarka, Deccan College Postgraduate
and Research Institute, Pune.
"Shell working at Nagwada (North Gujarat) with special
reference to Shell Industries of the Harappan Tradition in
Gujarat", in Man and Environment, XXVIII, 2, pp.51-80.
"Towards an Understanding of Medieval Glazed Pottery
Manufacture from Lakshkarshah, Khambhat, Gujarat", in
Man and Environment, XXXI, 2, pp.90-95.
Gazetteer of Bhavnagar District (in Gujarati),
Government of Gujarat, Ahmedabad.
Kuntasi: A Harappan emporium on West Coast, Deccan
College Post-Graduate Research Institute, Pune.
"Ring stone anchors from Gujarat", in The Mariner's
Mirror, 88, 4, pp.390-404.

"Onshore excavation at Bet Dwarka Island, in the Gulf of
Kachchh, Gujarat", in Man and Environment, XXVIII, 1,
pp.57-66.
"A late Bronze Age Copper Fish-hook from Bet Dwarka,
Gujarat: An evidence on the Advance fishing

�2004
Gaur, A.S., Sundaresh
and Sila Tripati,
2004
Gaur, A.S., Sundaresh,
and Sila Tripati,
2004a
Gaur, A.S., Sundaresh
and Vardhan Patankar,
2005
Gaur, A.S. Sundaresh
and Bharat Kumar,
2005
Gaur, A.S. and
Sundaresh,
2007
Gaur, A.S.,
2010

Technology", in Current Science, 86, 4, pp. 512-514.
"Dwarka: an ancient harbour", in Current Science,
86, 9, pp.1256-60.

Gaur, A.S., Sunadaresh,
Rao, B.R. Sila Tripati,
Khedekar, V.D.,
2010
Habib, I.,
1982
Hourani, G.F.,
1975
Hegde, K.T.M., Bhan,
K.K., Sonawane, V.H.,
Krishnana, K., Shah,
D.R.,
1990
Irani, A.B.,
2002

"A Possible Medieval Lighthouse at Mul Dwarka
(Kodinar), Saurashtra Coast, India", in International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 39, 2, pp.418-422.

Lal, B.B.,
1954-55
McCrindle, J.W.,
1885
Mohammed, K.K.,
1985
Oza, V.G.,
1885
Pota, K.A. and Patel, M.I.

"Grapnel anchors from Saurashtra: Remnants of IndoArab Trade route in Indian Ocean", in Mariner's Mirror,
90, 2, pp.134-151.
"Ancient shell Industry at Bet Dwarka", in Current
Science, 89, 6, pp.941-946.
"The biggest stone anchors from Mithi Virdi", in Journal
of Indian Ocean Archaeology, 2, pp.110-114.
"Evidence of Shoreline changes in the Gulf of Kachchh,
based on the submerged temple complex at Pindara", in
Current Science, 92, 6, pp.733-35.
"Gogha: An Indo-Arab trading Post in the Gulf of
Khambhat (Cambay)", in International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, 39, 1, pp.146-155.

An Atlas of the Mughal Empire, Oxford University Press,
Delhi.
Arab Seafaring in the Indian Ocean in ancient and Early
Medieval Times, Octangon Books, New York.
Excavation at Nageswar Gujarat: A Harappan Shell
working site on the Gulf of Kutch, Maharaja Sayajirao
University of Baroda, Baroda.

"Mandovi: an Early Historic Sea Port near the Gulf of
Kachchh, Western India", in Man and Environment
XXVII, 1, pp.69-72.
"Excavations at Hastinapura and Other Explorations in
Upper Ganga and Sutlej Basins", in Ancient India, 10-11,
pp.5-151
Ancient India as described by Ptolemy (Reprinted in
1985), Today &amp; Tommarrow’s Printers and Publishers,
New Delhi.
"Glazed ware in India", in Puratattva, 15, pp.105-110.
Old research collection of Bhavnagar, Bhavnagar.
Exploitation of Chanks from the Gulf of Kutch in Bulletin

�1991
Pramanik, S.,
2004
Rao, S.R.,
1973
Rao, S.R.,
1988

Rao, S.R., Sila Tripati,
and Gaur, A.S.,
1992
Sankalia, H.D.,
1966
Schoff, W.H.,
1912

Sonawane, V.H.,
Ajithprasad, P., Bhann,
K.K., Krishnan, K.,
Prathapachandran, S.,
Majumdar, A., Patel,
A.K., and Menon, J.,
2003
Sundaresh, Gaur, A.S.,
Gudigar, P., Sila Tripati,
Vora, K.H., and
Bandodker, S.N.,
1999
Vosmer, T.,
1999

Yang, Q.Z.,
1990

of Centre of Marine Fisheries Research Institute, 42:445450
"Hathab: An Early Historic Port on the Gulf of
Khambhat", in Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology, 1,
pp.133-140.
Lothal and the Indus Civilization, Asian Publishing
House, New York.
"Excavation of Submerged Ports –Dwarka a case study",
in (ed.) Shikaripur Ranganath Rao, Marine Archaeology
of Indian Ocean Countries, National Institute of
Oceanography, Goa, pp. 47-53.
"A Preliminary Exploration of Prabhasa-Somnath",
Journal of Marine Archaeology, 3, pp.13-16.
Dwarka in Literature and Archaeology, Excavations at
Dwarka (Ansari and Mate), Deccan College
Postgraduate and Research Institute, Pune.
The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in
the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the 1st century., New
York, (Reprinted in 1974), Oriental Books Reprint
Corportaion, New Delhi.
"Excavations at Bagasra-1996-2003: A Preliminary
Report", in Man and Environment, XXVIII, 2, pp.21-50.

"Stone anchors from Okhamandal region, West coast of
India", in International Journal of Nautical Archaeology,
28, 3, pp.229-252.

"Maritime Archaeology, Ethnography and History in the
Indian Ocean: An Emerging Partnership", in (ed.)
Himanshu Prabha Ray, Archaeology of Seafaring: The
Indian Ocean in the Ancient Period, Pragati Publication,
Delhi, pp. 291-312.
South Song Stone Anchors in China, Korea and Japan in
International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 19.2:113121.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2990">
                <text>Maritime Archaeology of Gujarat:  Northwest coast of India&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2991">
                <text>Session 2&#13;
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2992">
                <text>The evidence of maritime activity in India may be traced back to the Bronze Age (early 3rd millennium BC to mid- 2nd millennium BC). The excavation of several Harappan sites including Lothal, Kuntasi, Padri, Nageshwar, Bagasra and many others have conclusively demonstrated an advance maritime culture during the third millennium Before Christ (BC). During the historical period several coastal towns had international trade and commerce including Bet Dwarka, Somnath, Hathab, Vallabhi, and Bharuch.  Maritime activity reached itâ€™s zenith in Gujarat during the Medieval period (8th to 14th century AD) when Arab traders dominated the Indian Ocean for over a millennia. Underwater investigations have been carried out at various places along the Saurashtra coast and a large number of stone anchors were found.&#13;
&#13;
This paper also discusses the effect of tide when using jetties and anchoring points along various parts of the west coast India. The archaeological evidence indicates that two gulfs along the Gujarat coast (Gulf Kachchh and Gulf of Khambhat) witnessed the hectic maritime activities in the past. Both gulfs have very high tidal ranges. The Gulf of Khambhat has the highest tidal range in India (11 meters). Ancient texts such as Vishnu Puran and Periplus of the Eruthreanean Sea vividly describe the tidal range and its uses in navigation. The discovery of the large number of stone anchors in the inter tidal zone along the gulf region support the above references. &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2993">
                <text>A.S. Gaur </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2994">
                <text>Sundaresh</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2995">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="24">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="341" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4071">
                <text>Qanaâ€™ (Yemen) and the Indian Ocean: The Archaeological Evidence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4072">
                <text>A.V. Sedov</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4073">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4074">
                <text>Jean-Francois Salles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4075">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4076">
                <text>Conference Paper</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4077">
                <text>A.V. Sedov</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4078">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4079">
                <text>Jean-Francois Salles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4080">
                <text>Conference Paper</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="175">
            <name>Conference Name</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4081">
                <text>International Seminar â€œTechno-Archaeological Perspectives of Seafaring in the Indian Ocean, 4th cent. B.C.-15th cent. A.D.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4082">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4083">
                <text>11-35</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4084">
                <text>New Delhi February 28-March 4, 1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4085">
                <text>Qanaâ€™ (Yemen) and the Indian Ocean: The Archaeological Evidence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="158" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1908">
                <text>Shio to kamisama to sono genryuu å¡©ã¨ç¥žæ§˜ã¨ãã®æºæµ</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1909">
                <text>å®è³€å¯¿ç”·</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1910">
                <text>1997</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1911">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1912">
                <text>å®è³€å¯¿ç”·</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1913">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1914">
                <text>1997</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1915">
                <text>109 - 56</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="225">
            <name>Publication Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1916">
                <text>Nihon engyou no kenkyuu æ—¥æœ¬å¡©æ¥­ã®ç ”ç©¶</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1917">
                <text>Shio to kamisama to sono genryuu å¡©ã¨ç¥žæ§˜ã¨ãã®æºæµ</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1918">
                <text>25</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="197" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2426">
                <text>Trade Relations between Bahrain and Iraq in the Middle Ages: A Commercial and Political Outline</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2427">
                <text>Abdel Jabbar Naji</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2428">
                <text>Abdullah bin Khalid al-Khalifa</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2429">
                <text>Michael Rice</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2430">
                <text>Kegan Paul</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2431">
                <text>1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2432">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2433">
                <text>Abdel Jabbar Naji</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2434">
                <text>Abdullah bin Khalid al-Khalifa</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="2435">
                <text>Michael Rice</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2436">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2437">
                <text>Bahrain through the Ages: The History</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2438">
                <text>1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2439">
                <text>423-44</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2440">
                <text>London</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2441">
                <text>Kegan Paul</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2442">
                <text>Trade Relations between Bahrain and Iraq in the Middle Ages: A Commercial and Political Outline</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="623" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="414">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/6255004e5893a8cbb3576e84f743f0cc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1ca69512ee981942c8419ceec0d1b4e6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6783">
                    <text>Underwater Archaeological Remains in Matano Lake, South of Sulawesi, Indonesia:
Evidence of Iron Age Civilization
Muslim Dimas Khoiru Dhony1, Shinatria Adhityatama2, R.R. Triwurjani3, Dida Yurnaldi4,
Ahmad Surya Ramadhan5, Joko Wahyudiyono6, Aldhi Wahyu Pratama7, Suryatman8, Abdullah
Abbas9, Alqiz Lukman10, David Bulbeck11
1Master Student of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah
Mada, Underwater Archaeologist
2Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research, PhD Candidate and Archaeologist
3Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Pusat Riset Arkeologi Prasejarah dan Sejarah at Organisasi Riset Arkeologi,
Bahasa dan Sastra, Senior Researcher
4Pusat Survei Geologi Bandung, Geologist
5Sentra Selam Jogja, Underwater Archaeologist
6Pusat Survei Geologi Bandung, Geologist
7RIJANG Research Institute, Archaeologist
8Universitas Hasanuddin, Lecturer and Archaeologist
9Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Sulawesi Selatan, Underwater Archaeologist
10Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional , Pusat Riset Arkeologi Maritim, Lingkungan dan Budaya Berkelanjutan at
Organisasi Riset Arkeologi, Bahasa dan Sastra, Archaeologist
11Department of Archaeology and Natural History at the Australian National University, Visiting Senior
Lecturer

ABSTRACT
Matano Lake is a natural freshwater lake located in South Sulawesi, Indonesia that has a depth of roughly 590 m,
making this lake the deepest lake in Southeast Asia. The existence of cultural heritage in land surrounding
Matano Lake was revealed in 1998, based on research conducted by OXIS projects, which found a quantity of
artifacts dated approximately between the 6th and 16th. From 2016 to 2022 The National Research Centre of
Archaeology Indonesia (now the Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional) conducted research in underwater and
terrestrial observation relating to submerged landscapes in the Matano Lake environment. This research reveals
the civilization of the iron age that has been developed since during much of the second millennium CE
regarding mass iron production and iron smelting in Matano Lake. The agency utilized several approaches such
as geography and geology as well as the method to collect primary archaeological data in terrestrial excavation
and geology survey and also underwater observation using SCUBA (Self Contained Underwater Breathing
Apparatus) to directly identify archaeological remains on the bottom of the lake.
Based on the survey, literature study, and spatial analysis utilizing ArcGIS, there are five sites
consisting of Sebengkuro, Pulau Ampat, Pontada, Sukoiyo, and Onetengka with various of human cultural
remains such as iron tools , iron slag, pottery, tuyere, wooden poles, ore, charcoal, and fragments of an animal
tooth which were laying on the bottom of the lake in 4 to 20 m. The result of the archaeological remains and
geological analysis reveals that each site has a different type, contour, and period. Furthermore, based on a
literature study, the existence of mass iron production was mentioned in Nagarakrtagama (a Javanese poem in
the 14th century) proving iron production in Matano has been exported from Sulawesi Island to Java Island.
Keywords: Matano Lake, Underwater Archaeology, Submerged Landscapes, Iron age, Indonesia
List of Figures
Figure 1. Maps of the distribution of underwater archaeological site in Matano Lake.
Figure 2. The divers take archaeological remains for analysis sample.
Figure 3. Variations of cultural remains in Pulau Ampat site.
Figure 4. Maps of grid baseline and spread of wooden poles in Pontada Site.

1

�INTRODUCTION
The topic of this abstract fits best within this Session 18 (The Archaeology of Submerged Landscapes
and Inland Waters) because of the current existence of underwater archaeological sites in Matano Lake
that sank due to natural disasters. Underwater archaeological research on the lake has not been
conducted in Indonesia before. Matano Lake is located in Malili Region, South Sulawesi Province,
Indonesia and has a depth of approximately 590 m and 382 m above sea level with an area of 16,408
ha. This became Matano Lake, the eighth deepest lake in the world and the deepest lake in South East
Asia (Herder 2006). Based on a geology survey and map, Matano Lake is considered to be 1-4 million
years old and lies on the Matano Fault Zone which is still active with tectonic movement of roughly 2
cm per year (Tamuntuan et al. 2010).
Previous archaeological research in Matano Lake was conducted in 1998 by the OXIS project which
involved Indonesian and foreign researchers. The research revealed that mass iron production and iron
smelting was developed on the northern shore during much of the second millennium CE and the
western shore of the lake dating from 1500 to 1900 (Bulbeck and Caldwell 2000). From that, the
National Research Center for Archaeology (Now Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional) carried out
research on the lake in terrestrial and underwater to collect various archaeological data. Beginning in
2016 to 2021, the research demonstrated that there are five underwater archaeological sites with
cultural remains. This research attempted to elaborate on the causes of the sunken sites and the age of
iron tools discovered underwater.

CASE STUDIES
The research project explores five underwater archaeological sites which are distributed in Matano
Lake namely Sebengkuro, Pulau Ampat, Pontada, Sukoiyo, and Onetengka (Figure 1). Each site has
different characteristics and forms of archaeological data which is still in situ within the context.
Sebengkuro, Pulau Ampat, and Pontada are located on the southern shore of the lake. However, all
these sites have a variety of types and shapes. For instance, in Sebengkuro, underwater archaeologists
found cultural material at a depth of about 5 to 7 meters consisting of pottery fragments, clamshells,
and a stone beater fragment. In Pulau Ampat and Pontada, the archaeological remains are more
complex in a depth of 4 to 8 meters including fragments of pottery, accumulated iron slag, dispersed
charcoal, tuyeres from a smelting furnace, iron tools, wooden poles, animal teeth, and bone, as well as
stone flakes (Triwurjani et al. 2018-2021).
Sites on the north shore of the lake including, Sukoiyo and Onetengka did not reveal as much cultural
material as the southern shore sites. However, in these sites, there is evidence of tectonic activity in the
past; geologists called the evidence graben (Subsidence areas) (Triwurjani et al. 2019). It is proven
that the location of Matano Lake in the main Matano Fault which is still active today makes the
environment around the lake become more dynamic.

2

�Figure 1. Maps of the distribution of underwater archaeological site in Matano Lake (Muslim Dimas KD).

RESOURCES
This research has been carried out from 2016 to 2022. During the research project, team members
conducted surveys and excavations in terrestrial and underwater for collecting the archaeological data.
After collecting, the team also did database recording and documentation of the samples for further
analysis. The archaeological data consist of fragments of pottery, iron tools, animal teeth and bone,
charcoal, flakes of stone, tuyeres, and a stone beater fragment which are kept in storage at Pusat
Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional (now Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional).
Moreover, for spatial analysis, the team utilized ArcGIS to show the distribution of underwater
archaeology sites and the existence of the site in a geology map. In addition, we also studied literature
related to mass iron production in Matano in the ancient text of Negarakertagama, a Javanese poem in
the 14th century. Within the text it was written that the Majapahit Empire had imported the iron tools
from the Matano Lake region (Mulyana 2006; Robson 1995).

FRAMEWORK
This project exerts underwater archaeology and submerged landscape studies to understand the cause
of the sinking of the archaeological site in Matano Lake. Furthermore, this research uses inductive
reasoning which in archaeology means taking material culture as the primary evidence (Tanudirjo
1995). Explorative and comparative-descriptive approaches were conducted focusing on primary
archaeological data with the context of the remains in terrestrial and underwater environments. The
observation was conducted by diving, using SCUBA (Self Contained Underwater Breathing
3

�Apparatus) equipment for underwater objects and an underwater camera for documenting
archaeological objects and landscapes. The team also recorded and measured using underwater
archaeological techniques such as the baseline and quadrant methods (Bowens 2009). Moreover,
database recording was also done to achieve complete archaeological data collection of the findings at
Matano Lake. The team also employed ArcGIS for spatial analysis, to demonstrate the distribution of
archaeological remains and sites in Matano Lake and three dimensional photogrammetry recording
and analysis on objects and sites located at the bottom of the lake.
RESULTS
Description of each site
● Sebengkuro
This site is located on the southern shore of the lake. The underwater team conducted surveys in 2019
and 2022 for collecting archaeological remains and observation of the environment on the bottom of
the lake with a depth of approximately five to eight meters. From the survey, the team succeeded in
finding several kinds of remains such as pottery fragments, clamshells, iron slag, and a stone beater
fragment (Figure 2). In addition, regarding the environment, the contour is quite declivous with sand
material covered by grass on the bottom of the lake.

Figure 2. The divers take archaeological remains for analysis sample (Triwurjani et al. 2019 and 2022).

4

�● Pulau Ampat
Pulau Ampat is 2 kilometers to the east of the Sebengkuro site. This site has an area of about 4,6 ha
with plenty of archaeological remains on the bottom. Based on observation by the team, the remains
consist of fragments of pottery, accumulated iron slag, dispersed charcoal, tuyeres from a smelting
furnace, iron tools, animal teeth and bone, and flakes of stone lying in a depth roughly 3 to 10 meters
(Figure 3). Thus, the underwater team made a 10 by 10-m baseline and quadrant crossing the
concentration of finds and recorded it by taking 3D photogrammetry for analysis (Adhityatama et al.
2022). In this site, it was interesting to observe the stone flakes that are spread on the bottom in
context within iron slag and metal artifacts. Based on research analysis, the stone flakes were used by
the Matano indigenous iron smelters for strike-a-lights and in particular for the combustion of fuel for
iron smelting (Suryatman et al. 2021). Regarding the environment, the material is sand with rock
boulders on steep slopes. In order to know the age of the site, the sample of charcoal was sent to the
Bandung PSG laboratory for processing by the C14 calendar. The calibrated results show that samples
date from between mid-7th and mid-8th centuries (Adhityatama et al. 2022)

Figure 3. Variations of cultural remains in Pulau Ampat site (Triwurjani et al 2018).

●

Pontada

Located about 12 kilometres to the east of the Pulau Ampat site, the 14th century Pontada site has
evidence of people and iron production (Adhityatama et al. 2023). Compared to the two sites before,
Pontada Site is a more complex related form of material culture in a depth of about 2 to 8 meters with
material sand covered by grass. Due to the density of archaeological remains, the underwater team
made a grid baseline for recording and taking samples. Based on the observation, the remains were
still intact within the context; for instance, a machete was found with fragments of pottery, charcoal,
and tuyere. Additionally, there are wooden poles which had not been discovered on the previous
investigations (Figure 4).
5

�Figure 4. Maps of grid baseline and spread of wooden poles in Pontada Site (Adhityatama et al 2023).

●

Sukoiyo

This site is located on the northern shore of the lake. Regarding archaeological data, this site is not as
abundant as the sites on the southern shore of the lake. Based on the survey, the team found several
pottery fragments exposed on the slopes of the rocks in depths of 15 to 20 meters.
●

Onetengka

During this research project, this site was visited twice for documenting and taking samples for
geology analysis. It is located five kilometres to the west of the Sukoiyo Site. Based on observation,
there is no cultural material on this site. However, at a depth roughly from 20 to 30 meters there is
evidence of tectonic activity which geologists called graben (Subsidence areas).
Geological interpretation
According to geologists’ interpretations, Matano Lake was formed due to the pull-apart mechanism,
where two opposite segments move apart. Thus, the mechanism will affect the middle to form a basin
or graben. Then this graben will fill with water and form a lake (Triwurjani et al. 2018). Lake Matano
is estimated to be one to four million years old and is a crypto depression lake, that is, a lake whose
bottom is deeper than the seabed nearby (Tamuntuan et al. 2010). Concerning underwater
archaeological sites, the availability of sites that sank on the shore of the lake is due to the location
being in the Matano fault zone (Tamuntuan et al. 2010). The fault which is active with tectonic
movement and is prone to major earthquakes in the past and present.

6

�CONCLUSION
The archaeological research project in Matano Lake is significantly important to identify the
chronology and development of the iron age civilization in Indonesia. By showing the cultural material
as evidence of mass iron production activity and the result of the radiocarbon dating, people in Matano
Lake had been conducting iron smelting since the early first millennium. In Addition, the chronology
of the Matano Lake formation has a long dynamic process that lies on the Matano Fault Zone.
Therefore, the underwater archaeological sites that are located on the shore of the lake were prone to
destruction and sinking which is caused by tectonic movement and earthquakes.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adhityatama, Shinatria, Triwurjani, R.R., Suryatman, Priyatno Sulistyarto, Utomo, Bambang Budi.” Underwater
Archaeological Study on Prehistoric Material Culture in Matano Lake, South Sulawesi, Indonesia”. Journal of Southeast
Asian Archaeology, no 37 (2017): 37–49.
Adhityatama, Shinatria, Triwurjani, R.R., Yurnaldi, Dida, Janssen, Renee, Dhony, Muslim Dimas Khoiru, Suryatman, Abbas,
Abdullah, Lukman, Alqiz, Bulbeck, David. “ Pulau Ampat site: A submerged 8th century iron production village in Matano
Lake, South Sulawesi, Indonesia”. Archaeological Research in Asia, no 29 (2022).
Adhityatama, Shinatria, Triwurjani, R.R., Yurnaldi, Dida, Wahyudiono, Joko, Ramadhan, Ahmad Surya, Dhony, Muslim
Dimas Khoiru, Suryatman, Abbas, Abdullah, Darfin, Lukman, Alqiz, Pratama, Aldhi Wahyu, Bulbeck, David. “ The
Mid-Second Millennium A.D. Submerged Iron Production Village of Pontada in Lake Matano, South Sulawesi, Indonesia” .
Asian Perspectives: The Journal of Archaeology for Asia and The Pacific (2023) (Preprint).
Bowens, A. (Ed.). Underwater Archaeology: The NAS Guide to Principles and Practice, Second edition. Nautical
Archaeology Society, London, 2009.
Bulbeck, David, Caldwell, Ian. Land of Iron: The Historical Archaeological of Luwu and the Cenrena Valley. The University
of Hull, Centre for South-East Asian Studies, Hull, 2000.
Herder, Fabian, et al. “Preliminary checklist of sailfin silversides (Teleostei: Telmatherinidae) in the Malili Lakes of Sulawesi
(Indonesia), with a synopsis of systematics and threats”. Band 5 ,139–163, Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fürIchthyologie,
2006.
Mulyana, Slamet. Tafir Sejarah Nagarakrtagama. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Pelangi Aksara, 2006.
Robson, Stuart. DeśaWarnana (Nāgarakŗtāgama) by Mpu Prapanca. Translation. Leiden: KITLV Press Koninklijk Instituut
voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 1995.
Suryatman, Triwurjani, R.R, Adhityatama, Shinatria, Bulbeck, David, Yurnaldi, Dida, Murdihastomo, Ashar, Wahyudiono,
Joko, Abdullah, Dhony, Muslim Dimas Khoiru. “Flaking stone activity in the tradition of iron smelting from the 8th to 17th
centuries AD in the Matano region, South Sulawesi, Indonesia”. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, no 36 (2021).
Tamuntuan, Gerald, Bijaksana, Satrioa, Gaffar, Eddy, Russell, James, Safiuddin, La Ode, Huliselan, Estevanus Kristian. “The
magnetic properties of Indonesian lake sediment: a case study of a tectonic lake in South Sulawesi and Maar Lakes in East
Java”. ITB J. Sci, no 42 (1) (2010): 31–48.
Tanudirjo, Daud. Theoretical trends in Indonesian archaeology. In: Ucko, P.J. (Ed.), Theory in Archaeology:A World
Perspective, 61-75. Routledge, London, 1995.
Triwurjani, R.R, Shinatria Adhityatama, Priyatno Hadi Sulistyarto, Suryatman, Dida Yurnaldi, Hendra, Abdullah Abbas,
Muslim Dimas Khoiru Dhony. Mengungkap Peradaban Danau Matano, Sorowako, Masa Paleometalik Hingga Masa
Sejarah, Di Kabupaten Luwu, Sulawesi Selatan. Laporan Penelitian Arkeologi, Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, 2018.
Triwurjani, R.R, Shinatria Adhityatama, Sukmandaru Prihatmoko, Trinirmalaningrum, Suryatman, Abdullah Abbas, Joko
Wahyudiono, Ashar Murdihastomo, Muslim Dimas K.D, Joko Dermawan. Mengungkap Peradaban Zaman Besi dan Mitigasi
Bencana Gempa di Danau Matano, Sulawesi Selatan Melalui Kajian Arkeologi. Laporan Penelitian Arkeologi, Pusat
Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, .2019.

7

�Triwurjani, R.R, Shinatria Adhityatama, Alqiz Lukman, Suryatman, Dida Yurnaldi, Muslim Dimas Khoiru Dhony, Indah
Permatasarie Tjan.. Mengungkap Peradaban Besi di Kawasan Danau Matano, Sulawesi Selatan. Laporan Penelitian
Arkeologi, Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, 2020.
Triwurjani, R.R, Shinatria Adhityatama, Dida Yurnaldi, Joko Wahyudiono, Suryatman, Abdullah Abbas, Ahmad Surya
Ramadhan, Joko Wahyudiono, Alqiz Lukaman, Muslim Dimas K.D, Indah Permatasarie Tjan, Aldhi Wahyu Pratama, Putra
Hudlinas Muhammad. Mengungkap Peradaban Zaman Besi dan Mitigasi Bencana Gempa di Danau Matano, Sulawesi
Selatan Melalui Kajian Arkeologi. Laporan Penelitian Arkeologi, Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, 2021.

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="51">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="265">
                  <text>2023 Session 15: The Archaeology of Submerged Landscapes and Inland Waters</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="266">
                  <text>Session 15 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="267">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 15 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="268">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="269">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="270">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="271">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="272">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="273">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6766">
                <text>Underwater Archaeological Remains in Matano Lake, South of Sulawesi, Indonesia: Evidence of Iron Age Civilization&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6767">
                <text>Matano Lake is a natural freshwater lake located in South Sulawesi, Indonesia that has a depth of roughly 590 m,&#13;
making this lake the deepest lake in Southeast Asia. The existence of cultural heritage in land surrounding&#13;
Matano Lake was revealed in 1998, based on research conducted by OXIS projects, which found a quantity of&#13;
artifacts dated approximately between the 6th and 16th. From 2016 to 2022 The National Research Centre of&#13;
Archaeology Indonesia (now the Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional) conducted research in underwater and&#13;
terrestrial observation relating to submerged landscapes in the Matano Lake environment. This research reveals&#13;
the civilization of the iron age that has been developed since during much of the second millennium CE&#13;
regarding mass iron production and iron smelting in Matano Lake. The agency utilized several approaches such&#13;
as geography and geology as well as the method to collect primary archaeological data in terrestrial excavation&#13;
and geology survey and also underwater observation using SCUBA (Self Contained Underwater Breathing&#13;
Apparatus) to directly identify archaeological remains on the bottom of the lake.&#13;
Based on the survey, literature study, and spatial analysis utilizing ArcGIS, there are five sites&#13;
consisting of Sebengkuro, Pulau Ampat, Pontada, Sukoiyo, and Onetengka with various of human cultural&#13;
remains such as iron tools , iron slag, pottery, tuyere, wooden poles, ore, charcoal, and fragments of an animal&#13;
tooth which were laying on the bottom of the lake in 4 to 20 m. The result of the archaeological remains and&#13;
geological analysis reveals that each site has a different type, contour, and period. Furthermore, based on a&#13;
literature study, the existence of mass iron production was mentioned in Nagarakrtagama (a Javanese poem in&#13;
the 14th century) proving iron production in Matano has been exported from Sulawesi Island to Java Island.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6768">
                <text>Muslim Dimas Khoiru Dhony</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6769">
                <text>Shinatria Adhityatama</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6770">
                <text>R.R. Triwurjani</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6771">
                <text>Dida Yurnaldi</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6772">
                <text>Ahmad Surya Ramadhan&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6773">
                <text>Joko Wahyudiyono&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6774">
                <text>Aldhi Wahyu Pratama&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6775">
                <text>Suryatman&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6776">
                <text>Abdullah Abbas&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6777">
                <text>Alqiz Lukman&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6778">
                <text>David Bulbeck</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6779">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6780">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6781">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6782">
                <text>Dhony, Muslim Dimas Khoiru, Shinatria Adhityatama, R.R. Triwurjani, Dida Yurnaldi, Ahmad Surya Ramadhan, Joko Wahyudiyono, Aldhi Wahyu Pratama, Suryatman, Abdullah Abbas, Alqiz Lukman,  and David Bulbeck. 2023. ‘‘Underwater Archaeological Remains in Matano Lake, South of Sulawesi, Indonesia: Evidence of Iron Age Civilization.’’ Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Jennifer McKinnon. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1995 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="69">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 15 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="240" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="142">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/106a403852134c0d3828659ef8ab9c09.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b60170b018329ef80a2951e70ae1096e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2896">
                    <text>Can tourism exploitation of Underwater Cultural
Heritage (UCH) be incompatible with the UNESCO
2001 Convention?
Abhirada Komoot1

Abstract
Tourism is a major factor of economic growth in many countries especially in developing
countries. In 2010, tourism accounted for about 6% of Thailand’s GDP. In a way tourism is
commercial exploitation. But is it against Annex Rule 2 of the UNESCO 2001 Convention on
Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention)? In the Annex, only active
commercial exploitation –trading, selling, buying and bartering– of cultural material is
obviously forbidden. Yet, there might be other passive commercial exploitations like tourism
which are not stated.
Can tourism be an alternative source of funds that can be utilised for UCH site
protection and management? Because of the country’s commercial benefits gained from
promoting tourism, it can be argued that tourism exploitation is one of the commercial
exploitations implied in Annex Rule 2. Additionally, for tourism, the sites have to be opened
for public which may cause the tension to in situ preservation and physical protection of sites.
Also, it could create direct effects, such as damage to the sites by divers souvenir hunting
and treasure hunting, etc.
On the other hand, tourism can be a successful tool to get people involved and raise
awareness which is essential in safeguarding UCH. Furthermore, under Rule 7 of the Annex,
it allows knowledge sharing with the public but only when it is not incompatible with the proper
protection and management of the sites. In other words, public approach could possibly be
applicable only in appropriate ways. However, it does not expressly mention exploitation
through tourism.
Tourism can bring good fortune to countries as well as many advantages for UCH.
Therefore, the prohibition may lead to absurd and even contradictory results. Countries may
find it difficult to find financial subsidy and raise pubic awareness for sustainable protection of
UCH. Simultaneously, the public is unable to enjoy leisure activities and gain knowledge from
the conserved sites.

The commercial exploitation of underwater cultural heritage for trade or speculation or its
irretrievable dispersal is fundamentally incompatible with the protection and proper
management of underwater cultural heritage. Underwater cultural heritage shall not be
traded, sold, bought or bartered as commercial goods—Annex Rule 2, UNESCO 2001
Convention.

1

Ms. Abhirada Komoot is an undergraduate student. She has obtained two bachelor degrees
one from the Faculty of Archaeology, Silpakorn University and another one from the Faculty
of Law, Thammasat University. She aims to combine her two specialties as a cultural heritage
manager with legal background in order to perform her management task more effectively in
legal scheme and make legal issues more understandable among other stakeholders. And
she has a strong passion for UCH. She has gained her experience on UCH by working as
administrative assistant to the UNESCO foundation courses on UCH in Thailand. Now she is
accepted by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University in the Netherlands for the course
starting in February 2012.

�UCH in Concern
Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) was, a long time ago, a cargo or
passenger vessel, village, primitive fish trap, dike or any other human trace.
Many of them were faced tragic moments like sinking, inundation, and
ultimately destruction. Until, they were swallowed by water and lying
undisturbed in some cases for centuries. All of them contain some cultural,
historical or archaeological values of human existences. In the case of the
ship, it was sailing between continents on a sea route. Then, it was hit by an
unavoidable disaster like heavy storms, or sometimes overweight cargo made
the ship lose its balance so that it was capsized. After the chaotic moment of
trying to survive, no one could ever see it again. It had been sleeping on the
sea-floor calmly and undisturbed since then. A century later2, it becomes a
significant evidence of human history. It is full of the story of the past. For
example, what was the purpose of the finds? How was it built? Why did
people have to make the journey? What was the cause of the wreck?
Generally, there are some precious objects left behind. These sites
attract those who are hunting for treasure among the remains. Classically, the
salvage companies encourage individuals from all over the world to invest in
the venture promising high financial returns. Although the careless salvage
activity can be dangerous and expensive, it is still often worthwhile to do so.
The treasure hunters traditionally only expose the site for its pricey items and
lack of concern for human history. Their actions result in an irretrievable loss
of knowledge. This is not what we, as heritage protectors use to define the
value of cultural objects by the price. They are priceless! This legacy reflects
the traces of human link with on-land heritage. Therefore, these priceless
inheritances should be preserved as and for the benefits of mankind and the
completion of human history.
Besides, an unavoidable natural disaster, there is also, undeniably
human impacts on UCH. Even though the heritage, located under water, is
more difficult to access than a land site; it does not mean it is impossible to do
so. By the wisdom of mankind, more sophisticated diving equipment has been
developed, so that, they can widen the possibility of accessibility to the UCH.
In other words, it is easier to get to the site and be able to stay longer under
water with modern diving gear. Therefore, it is no longer possible for the site
to remain undisturbed but it is now easier to be interfered with. More people
are able to reach the sites, not only the treasure hunters, but also recreational
divers, researchers, archaeologists, scientists and so on. So the intrusive
activities are slightly growing.
Among recreational divers, they can create two kinds of impacts on
UCH sites; those who care for and are respectful to where and what they are
visiting and understand the value of the heritage and those who pay less
attention to how fragile and important the site is, only taking a snapshot and
collecting some meaningful items from the site as souvenirs to prove they
once visited there (Stanley 2006:2-4).

2

Based on the UNESCO 2001 convention, the historical objects is at least 100 years (See
Article 1 of the convention). In some countries it cane be determined differently.

�Additionally, some accidental damage occurs because of the lack of
diver’s ability to control buoyancy, usually novice and newly qualified divers.
Indirectly, another human threat is air pockets, especially on the metal
materials. In the case of a penetration dive, it can cause two kinds of
corrosion to the sites: loss of concretion through mechanical damage and the
build up of oxygen concentration inside a shipwreck’s confined spaces
(Viduka 2006:61-63). With the carelessness and lack of awareness of
numerous dive tourists and operators, our UCH is suffering from these human
habits. Even experienced and skilful underwater archaeologists, can also
disturb the site by careless excavation, lack of documentation and leaving the
site behind without taking any measures to protect it.
Due to the increase of the common threats to UCH and the raising of
awareness of this heritage within the international community, the UNESCO
2001 Convention was elaborately constituted to mainly protect this heritage
from those stresses. One of the core principles of the UNESCO 2001
Convention is the prohibition of commercial exploitation of UCH that is in
Article 2 paragraph 7, Article 4 and the Annex. In particular, Rule 2 of the
Annex, the integral part of the Convention, states clearly about the kinds of
the active commercial exploitation of the finds which are trading, selling,
buying and bartering. These activities are obviously banned by the
Convention and its Annex.
However, in my view the UCH nowadays is in the spotlight, it is
becoming more interesting among people, not only to the scientists or
archaeologists, but also the public. In some countries they have gained a
great deal of benefits not only from the forbidden activities but also from
passive ways. The passive commercial exploitation can also be received from
other activities like ‘tourism’. Nevertheless, it is not included in the
Convention. We still have to put more concern on this issue as tourism is a
double-edge sword. It can be tools of potential awareness raising or greedy
exploitation. The mitigation between the dirt safeguarding and the dollar
earning should be brought to the international stage in order to develop the
best methods of managing tourism related to our heritage.

Terminology and Tourism
The term ‘tourism’, in general, has various meaning. According to the World
Tourism Organization (UNWTO), the definition of tourism can be indicated as
follows: (1) Tourism is about displacement from usual environment. (2) The
purpose of the tourism can be anything, like leisure or business or both, other
than being remunerated from the visited place. (3) The maximum of duration
is not more than a consecutive year. So, tourist is a person who does such
activity.
Since the beginning of the human history, people had travelled around
to neighbouring places for many purposes, for instance, food, shelter, war,
etc. They started to make a journey mostly for basic needs. Then, as the
improvement of the technology, the transportation had been developed. It was
easier for them to make a distant trip. And the purpose of the travel had also
been changed according to the endless curiosity and needs of recreational
activities.
At the time of the Roman Republic, the Romans were ecstatic persons.
We can see through works of art. They thought they should, once in a lifetime,

�visit the great wonder place of the history and myths like the ruin of Troy,
Acropolis, Alexandria and some places in Asia Minor. Heritage is still the
reason for people to travel today. They want to see the exotic ruins of empires
and the glory of the past. Then, in the seventeenth and eighteenth century the
‘Grand Tour’ had been developed. It was more or less like the journey in
Roman period. The wealthy European would traditionally travel to the ruins of
the ancient Roman Empire to appreciate the cultural legacy of the Classic
antiquity and Renaissance, including the great structures and works of art
such as delicate marble sculptures and masterpiece paintings. It served as an
rite of passage (Wokloer 2007:205-222).
After the Industrial Revolution, transportation had immensely and
rapidly improved. Then, the traditional journey extended to the middleclass
since they became concerned about the importance of holiday. This allowed
bourgeoisies to travel for leisure purpose on their free time.
Thus far, people are still keen to see new things. They need to enjoy
the benefits of the relaxing time and gain knowledge. There have been
numerous emergences of niche or specialty tourism including cultural tourism,
nautical tourism, medical tourism, etc. Therefore, tourism had become the
popular activity for most people since then. And as the population rapidly
grew, the need for relaxation has also increased dramatically. Tourism has
had a huge impact on the world’s economic sector.

Dirt or Dollars
The traces of human existence, lying under water for a long time, acts like a
time machine. It is often well preserved by nature as if time stood still from
when it was swallowed by the water. It can keep people close to the past. But
WHY do we have to get close to the past? What is the value in caring for the
dirt? If it can make a cent of dollar to feed the starving lives, maybe this is the
reason.
Tourism is an attractive activity to most countries in the world as it can
generate a great deal of money to improve the standard of living. In the world
economy, tourism has played a vital role in economic growth. It became one
of the rapidest growing sectors over decades. According to UNWTO’s
information, in 2010, international tourism generated US$ 919 billion (€ 693
billion) in export earnings. Similarly, Thailand has also gained a valuable
benefit from tourism. The overall economic growth of the country is 8% of
GDP or THB 905 trillion (US$ 584 billion) in 2010. Tourism is one of the main
industries making Thailand’s economy in progress, growing by 6% of GDP,
after automobiles and automotive parts (11%), financial services (9%) and
electric appliances and components (8%).
To exploit in the form of tourism can bring many benefits to the
economic sector. On the website of Coastlearn organization it explained that
tourism can be used as a nation’s economic improvement tool including
foreign exchange earnings, contribution to government revenues, employment
generation, stimulation of infrastructure investment and contribution to local
economies. Likewise, it happens the same way to Thailand.
As informed by Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT), Thailand
welcomes over 550,000 dive tourists and is home to over 80,000 certified
divers of its own. And the number of recreational divers is growing since 1985
according to the report from Department of Marine and Coastal Resources.

�Under the Thai sea, it can provide tourists not only the natural resources but
also cultural heritage. Consequently, UCH can be a good source of tourism as
well. From the figure, it shows that if the promotion of tourism is applied to
UCH sites, the possibility to widen the divers’ interest on the heritage
resources will be bigger. Precisely, UCH is a kind of product sold for
foreigners who are seeking unusual experiences. More tourists is a money
generator.
In a way, tourism can make a lot of money to the host countries and
has human’s effects; it can create both direct and indirect damage to this
heritage as well. It can cause harmful impacts to the site such as village
expansion, constructions, anchoring, looting, treasure hunting, salvaging, etc.
So, is tourism exploitation included in the term of ‘commercial exploitation’ in
Annex Rule 2 of the UNESCO 2001 Convention?
However, tourism, the way to exploit it for wealth and prosperity for the
countries and their people is not the bad thing to do. Unromantically, who can
live without financial support? “No profit, end of dreams! Even non-profitable
organizations survive on donations from other people’s earning and revenues,
which are generated by the profit” (Stanley 2006:2-4).
In addition to an alternative source of funds, tourism can make a great
amount of money from diving enterprises, tourists, shops and other business
sectors, involving the UCH. This financial benefit can effectively contribute to
heritage management projects and local sector. For example, when locals
learn that they can maximize benefits by providing a boat trip to visitors who
wish to experience the shipwreck, then, they will care more about the site as it
now becomes their tools of earning and improving their quality of life. They will
be more concerned about the site. And all the benefits gained can encourage
local people and governments to care more about the legacy. The awareness
and good policy for sustainable UCH will be raised. Without dirt, there will be
no more dollars.
So, dirt and dollars on UCH’s aspect is something that relies on each
other. It cannot survive alone. And it is difficult to choose only one of them.
But the possible way is to find a middle point. Only be careful of overexploitation and unawareness of mass tourism.

Education Not Prohibition
Indeed, in the term of the sustainable and successful management of
Underwater Cultural Heritage, what we need is an education, not prohibition.
The site will become more interesting for the public only when they know
something about it like how important the site is. Nevertheless, no legal
scheme mentions about how tourism will work on UCH. In Rule 7 of the
Annex in UNESCO 2001 Convention states about the public access. It can be
implied that the promotion of knowledge sharing of the heritage shall be
promoted in the parallel way with the proper site management. Moreover, in
Article 20, it is a state’s obligation to raise public awareness by any practical
ways. However, it is still not clear enough to apply that tourism is permitted by
this Convention. Only case studies will be able to bring it to light.
In many waterfront countries, tourism is also a possible tool to raise
public awareness and provide education about UCH to extent public interests.
To educate and encourage people about the importance of UCH is the greater
positive benefits for all mankind. Because when we can build the inner

�passion of people, they will eager to learn how to protect and safeguard this
precious patrimony by themselves. Importantly, it is the right way to build a
good cooperation between stakeholders; government, local community,
archaeologist, tour operator and so on.
In Thailand the popularity of wreck diving is becoming famous among
recreational divers but most of sites are decommissioned warships,
intentionally sunk for growing marine life, or new sunken ships. SW, Bangkok,
5 August 2011, he is the professional dive instructor, operating in Pattaya.3
He said, according to his experience, most of divers who visiting the wreck
around Pattaya waters only enjoy their diving with corals and marine
creatures. Their knowledge on wreck sites is very limited or none. The similar
result is received from a professional underwater archaeologist, EV, Bangkok,
20 august 2011. He said that there is a small group of wreck divers who are
enthusiastically interested in UCH diving. They are also researchers. They
visit the sites not only for leisure activities but they are also keen to learn.
They are monitoring the deterioration of the sites and do some publication.
Even they are in the private sector, they can be watchdogs of UCH.
Still, the visitation to UCH sites is limited compared to the number of
amateur divers coming to Thailand each year and the number of UCH
publications. The group of interested divers is still small but qualified. They
have a strong interest and conduct on-going research on the wreck. After they
distribute their publication, then, here is becoming well-known among
advanced divers. The example is ‘Hardeep’ or ‘Suthathip’, the most famous
Thailand’s shipwreck, and it is UCH. It is put in the diving route. The gradually
increasing of tourism and educated divers on the sample site is a positive sign
for an appropriate growing of tourism on UCH in Thailand. Unfortunately,
there is no official record.
In other cases, the application of tourism has given a good result in
knowledge distribution to many other countries in the form of tourism. For
example, the SS Maori in South Africa, Florida’s Maritime Heritage Trail in
USA, and Maritime Heritage Trail in Cayman Islands.

Freedom of Movement
Freedom of movement is the fundamental right of humanity which is
respected in the constitution of many countries. For example, it is stated in the
section 34 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. It includes the
liberty to travel. A person shall enjoy the liberty of travelling. However, a
person shall enjoy their freedom and liberty within the respect of the rights of
others.
In the term of tourism, it is also a way to promote respect of human
rights. To be able to move freely does not encompass the rights to enter
another country. But in the UCH perspective, it so means the rights to access
the site. Tourists, in order to appreciate the heritage and gain knowledge,
shall not be prohibited to approach the site. At the same time, they have
obligations to venerate the rights of others as well. They shall not do any harm
to the site and keep in their mind that the UCH is the heritage of mankind not

3

Pattaya is the well-known diving spot and tourist attraction in Thailand and located in
Chonburi province.

�the personal belongings. They shall do no harm to the site including but not
limit to looting, souvenir collecting, or even treasure hunting.
Rights always come with obligations. This legacy is a shared heritage,
so it is our duty to safeguard it in every way we move. Therefore, a person
who enthusiastically admires the UCH shall enjoy his/her freedom and liberty
of movement and travelling to the UCH site under the limitation of other’s
rights and liberty.

World without Tourism
Most of the UCH sites are lying in the open area, under the sea or river. It is
impossible to lock up all the sites and apply strict rules. If we choose to keep
the site secret and forbid public access, there will be the secret access as
well. This can be more problematic because the intention might go wrong.
In general, people travel for many purposes including leisure and
learning. Without tourism there will be no real knowledge of the ancient
wisdom gained at first hand. Only an unreal source of education such as
books, television and Internet can be accessible but no physical appreciation.
In other words, Tourism is a joyful way to develop public understanding and
raise their attention, which are the key part to promote the sustainability of the
UCH safeguarding.

Conclusion
In many ways, tourism is a potential tool to help increasing the public
awareness and financial source, the core instruments of sustainable
development of UCH. Restrictive accessibility to the UCH is the way to keep
the site intact but it cannot educate people particularly locals. Without
awareness, the blanket legislative protection cannot be enforced effectively.
And without profit, all the dream projects become useless. Additionally, it
becomes a human rights’ violation instead of respect. Even tourism can
create some negative impacts, pros and cons are needed to be weighed. As
the idea of the traces of humanity, the issue needs to be brought to the
international phase in order to find a chance of hope for sustainable and
effective management of tourism on UCH.

Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge the help of people who contribute to this work. I am grateful to Dr.
Mr. R. Rujaya Abhakorn, the Director of SPAFA, for giving me a great opportunity and
support. And this would not have been possible without the assistance of my friends, Mr.
Erbprem Vatcharangkul, Mr. Chris Underwood, Mr. Martijn Manders, Mr. Andrew Viduka, Mr.
Takahiko Makino, Mr. Saiklang Jindasu, Mr. Siwat Worachananan, and Ms. Pimolpan Wong
A-ram.

Bibliography
Bureau of
Committee 3, The
Secretariat of the

Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E.2550
(2007), Bureau of Printing Services, Bangkok.

�House of
Representatives,
2007
Coastlearn,

Benefits Of Sustainable Coastal Tourism, CoastLearn,
viewed
23
August
2011,
&lt;http://www.coastlearn.org/tourism/why_economicbenefi
ts .html&gt;.
Manders, M. R., Managing Cultural Heritage Underwater. Publication no.
Oosting, R. and 3, Educom BV, The Netherlands.
Brouwers,
W.,
(eds)
2009
Ministry of Foreign Tourism, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, viewed 12
Affairs,
October2011, &lt;http://www.mfa.go.th/web/20.php&gt;
2011
Stanley, R.,
“It's All about 'P'”, in Heritage @ Risk 2006 - Special
2006
Edition: Underwater Cultural Heritage at Risk: Managing
Natural and Human Impacts, pp. 2-4 International
Council on Monuments and Sites / Conseil International
Des Monuments Et Des Sites, viewed 18 August 2011,
&lt;http://www.international.icomos.org/risk/2006/index.htm
l&gt;.
Sorabella, J.,
"The Grand Tour", in Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History,
2000
New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–,
viewed
12
October
2011,
&lt;http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/grtr/hd_grtr.htm&gt;.
Towner, J., and "History and Tourism." Annals of Tourism Research. Vol.
Wall, G.,
18, pp. 71-84.
1991
Tourism Authority
Tourism Authority of Thailand News Room, Tourism
of Thailand,
Authority of Thailand, viewed 22 August 2011,
&lt;http://www.tatnews.org/latest_update/detail.asp?id=526
4&gt;.
UNESCO,
Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural
2001
Heritage, downloaded November 2009,
&lt;unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001260/126065e.pdf
UNESCO,
"Underwater Cultural Heritage." in Museum International
2008
LX, No.4/240. pdf.
UNESCO,
Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania. Print, Paris.
2010
UNWTO,
Why Tourism?, UNWTO, viewed 4 August 2011,
&lt;http:www2.unwto.org/en/content/why-tourism&gt;.
Viduka, A.,
“Managing Threats to Underwater Cultural Heritage
2006
Sites: The Yongala as a Case Study”, in Heritage @
Risk 2006 - Special Edition: Underwater Cultural
Heritage at Risk: Managing Natural and Human Impacts,
pp. 61-63, International Council on Monuments and
Sites / Conseil International Des Monuments Et Des
Sites, viewed 18 August 2011,

�Walker, P.,
2005

Wokler, R.,
2007

&lt;http://www.international.icomos.org/risk/2006/index.htm
Hardeep Wreck, Thailand Wreck Diving, Thai Technical
Diving and Dive Software, Thai Shipwrecks, viewed 4
August
2011,
&lt;http://www.thaiwreckdiver.com/hardeep_wreck.htm&gt;.
‘Rite of passage and the grand tour, discovering,
imaging and investing European civilization in the Age of
Enlightenment’, in Anthony Molho and Diego Ramada
Curto (eds.), Finding Europe: discourses on margins
communities, images, Berghahn Books, USA, pp. 20522.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2891">
                <text>Can tourism exploitation of Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) be incompatible with the UNESCO 2001 Convention?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2892">
                <text>Session 12&#13;
Some Challenges and Issues in Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2893">
                <text>Tourism is a major factor of economic growth in many countries especially in developing countries. In 2010, tourism accounted for about 6% of Thailandâ€™s GDP. In a way tourism is commercial exploitation. But is it against Annex Rule 2 of the UNESCO 2001 Convention on Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention)? In the Annex, only active commercial exploitation â€“trading, selling, buying and barteringâ€“ of cultural material is obviously forbidden. Yet, there might be other passive commercial exploitations like tourism which are not stated.&#13;
&#13;
Can tourism be an alternative source of funds that can be utilised for UCH site protection and management? Because of the countryâ€™s commercial benefits gained from promoting tourism, it can be argued that tourism exploitation is one of the commercial exploitations implied in Annex Rule 2. Additionally, for tourism, the sites have to be opened for public which may cause the tension to in situ preservation and physical protection of sites. Also, it could create direct effects, such as damage to the sites by divers souvenir hunting and treasure hunting, etc.&#13;
&#13;
On the other hand, tourism can be a successful tool to get people involved and raise awareness which is essential in safeguarding UCH. Furthermore, under Rule 7 of the Annex, it allows knowledge sharing with the public but only when it is not incompatible with the proper protection and management of the sites. In other words, public approach could possibly be applicable only in appropriate ways. However, it does not expressly mention   exploitation through tourism.&#13;
&#13;
Tourism can bring good fortune to countries as well as many advantages for UCH. Therefore, the prohibition may lead to absurd and even contradictory results. Countries may find it difficult to find financial subsidy and raise pubic awareness for sustainable protection of UCH. Simultaneously, the public is unable to enjoy leisure activities and gain knowledge from the conserved sites.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2894">
                <text>Abhirada Komoot</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2895">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="22">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
