<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=18&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-25T03:47:57+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>18</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="572" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="363">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/b7d2bcb398eb8f1e870c846e7d27df50.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4e8852abbc53cfdaedca4650a3f964d9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6322">
                    <text>Discussion on the Traces of an Early Phase Lashed-Lug Boats of Southeast Asia
Mr. Napat Piromrak (Underwater Archaeology Division, Thailand)
ABSTRACT
Lashed-lug boat-building techniques played a significant role in Southeast Asian trading networks. The previous studies reported
that approximately 20 boats in this category have been found. Indeed, an archaeological survey in Thailand during the 1990s had
reported the existence of several boats of this type, but the information was scarce and no excavation had been conducted. Not until
2019, a team of Thai underwater archaeologists carried out a survey along the Andaman Coast, the resources available to conduct
the work including the discovery of boat remnants which were assumed to be lashed-lug type. The first was a boat plank found at
Khlong Thom, the early port site in Krabi province, likely dating back to c. 1st – 5th century CE. The second was a boat plank found
at Pak-Klong Kluai beach, Ranong province, located in the area of Phukao-Thong archaeological site. Therefore, research on the
boat planks is needed in order to find out the technique of the boat-building and its age. The main purpose of the research is to
present an insightful analysis of the boat remnants. The analysis of boat-building techniques, a sample collection for AMS dating,
and a comparative studmanguiny were carried on. The result of the study reveals a significant aspect of an early phase lashed-lug
boats: planks were carved into protruding lugs with hollowed holes, the hull was secured using a palm rope and wooden wedge,
and no trace of a dowel hole are found. The AMS dating of a wooden sample from both sites provided a date of 1,856 ±25 BP and
2,303 ±29 BP. Comparatively, the boat structure is similar to the lashed-lug boat of Pontian (3rd – 5th century CE). However, the
hull of these boats bears a different technique of making from other boats (e.g. Butuan and Ban Khlong Yuan boats, 9 th century
CE). The discovery of the boat remnants in Thailand has shed new light on the early technique of constructing lashed-lug boats in
Southeast Asia, confirmed by the AMS dating. Furthermore, information on boat-building development is provided.
Keywords: Lashed-lug Boat, Mortise and Tenon Boat, Shell-based Boat, Sewn Plank Boat
List of figures
Figure 1. Map showing the shipwreck remains of Pak Khlong Kluai site between 2016-2019 : Courtesy of Decha Pornthai.
Figure 2. Evidence of lashed lug plank no. 20 from Test Pit three.
Figure 3. Lashed lug plank no. 4 (on top) and no. 5 (long piece) with ropes residue attached to each lug.
Figure 4. Lashed lug plank with a frame piece attached to it by ligature.

INTRODUCTION
“Lashed lug” is specifically used to describe a traditional boat-building technique that spread and was used
throughout Southeast Asia’s region. The technique consisted of a shell-based construction, in which the
hull planking is constructed first to create an outer shell by edge joining method using wooden dowels and
lacing ligatures to the pre-drill holes on the plank, sometimes only dowels are used. After the hull is
assembled, frames are added to strengthen the overall construction by lashing to the lugs carved on the
interior of the hull. Undoubtedly, the name “lashed lug” comes from the last procedure. Recent studies
showed over 20 vessels that were identified as lashed lug boats (Manguin 2019; McGrail 2001), all of them
were discovered both underwater and inland near the waterway of Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia,
Vietnam, and also Thailand. As a result, all have been dated between the fifth to the sixteenth centuries CE
(Lacsina 2019, 40).
Previous studies by several scholars have suggested a similar theory that early Southeast Asian boats might
have been joined exclusively by lacing (Horridge 1982, 1, 32–33, 56-58), or at least lacing as a primary
fastening and supplement with doweling (Manguin 1993, 260; McGrail 2001, 297). As Horridge (1982)
asserted the need for metal technology in order to drill the dowel holes on the plank edge, which the lacing
holes on the lug did not. Furthermore, Manguin (2019, 5) suggested the chronology of the development of
plank fastening vessels, he stated that lashed lug boats in the early first millennium relied more on lacing
than doweling. Then, during the second half of the first millennium, boatbuilders began to rely on dowelling
than lacing, and toward the end of the millennium lacing were completely disappear. However, it is
uncertain to conclude whether lashed lug plank fastening is evolving from exclusive lacing to exclusive
doweling, without additional evidence on a much earlier plank-built boat (Lacsina 2016, 38).
1

�The earliest well-known evidence of watercraft assembled with lashed lug is the remains of Pontian boat
found in Peninsular Malaysia, dating between 260 – 430 CE (Manguin 1993, 256). Traces on the plank
show sign of lacing with a small number of doweling. Moreover, in 1985, Pierre-Yves Manguin (1993,
257) investigated a similar boat’s plank construction to the one at Pontian, which had been recovered and
displayed at Wat Khlong Thom Museum, Krabi, Thailand. The planks are badly damaged and had no
radiocarbon dating, however, relative dating suggested the age of the planks is between the fifth to the
seventh centuries CE. Interestingly, the plank showed an identical lug design to its relative, the Pontian
boat. Although, there is no sign of supplementing dowels, as the planks are badly degraded and were found
in such a small length.
The discovery of the Pontian boat and its relative, Khlong Thom plank could represent, what assume to be
an early-stage lashed lug boat. However, the available evidence is scarce and incomplete. Nonetheless, a
recent survey along the coastal port sites of Khlong Thom, Krabi and Phukao Thong, Ranong, located in
the Southwestern coast of Thailand had discovered a few boat remnants that can reveal a new example of
an early-stage lashed lug boat.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES OF LASHED-LUG BOATS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
Archaeological evidence of vessels that were built using lashed lug technique number more than 20
throughout the region (Manguin 2019; McGrail 2001; Lacsina 2019). Despite the main concept of lashed
lug construction, there is a distinctive difference in each construction. The major difference is the way
planks are fastened, lashed lug vessels in the early period showed that plank stitching or lacing was a
primary fastening method and supplemented with a dowel, this included the archaeological evidence of the
Pontian Boat(3rd-5th CE), the Kolam Pinisi Boat (5th-7th CE), the Sambirejo Boat (7th-8th CE), the Punjulharjo
Boat (7th-8th CE), and Ban Khlong Yuan Boat(early 9th CE). Later period vessels such as the five Butuan
Boats (8th-10th CE), the Chau Tan shipwreck(9th CE), the Cirebon shipwreck(10th CE), the Paya Pasir
timbers (12th-14th CE), the Sha Tsui Boat (13th-15th CE), the Gujangang shipwreck (15th-16th CE), and the
San Isidro shipwreck (16th CE), only show evidence of doweling, discarded the practice of lacing (Manguin
1993; McGrail 2001; Liebner 2014; Lacsina 2016, 2019; Mochtar 2020). Archaeological finds supported
that lashed lug technique evolved from primary plank lacing and gradually adapted to doweling (Manguin
2019; McGrail 2001).

HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS
There are very few historical accounts describing boats in Southeast Asia. As Southeast Asian most likely
pass their knowledge through oral tradition (Lacsina 2016: 23). Most of the accounts are written by nonSoutheast Asian. Indeed, only a few describe insight detail of ship construction.
A fourth-century Chinese book on Southeast Asian floral describes that sugar palm bark (Arenga pinnata)
can be made into rope, which is used by Southeast Asian boatbuilders to bind timber together (Manguin
1993, 261). Another Chinese record from an eighth-century source describes the large ship of kunlun people
(people beyond the barrier which refer to Southeast Asians) which they called “bo”. The source stated that
this ship can reach 60 meters and can transport up to 1,000 passengers. The ship is bound together using
the bark of coconut trees with no use of iron nails or clamps. There are several planks and sails (Manguin
1993, 262). A smaller size vessel was recorded by Wang Ta Yuan, a Chinese traveler that visit Madura
during the fourteenth century. He stated that the boat was made using split rattan and plug the seam with
cotton wadding (Scott 1982, 340, as cited in Lacsina 2016).

2

�More detailed accounts were produced during the arrival of the Europeans in the region beginning in the
sixteenth century CE. The first Portuguese source described the Sumatra trading ship as junco, the word is
derived from the Malay and Javanese word jong (Manguin 1993, 266), which appeared in Javanese
inscription as early as the eleventh century (Manguin 1993, 266; Brandes 1889). The jong is large ship
comparable in size to the Portuguese, which can carry between 350-500 tons deadweight (Manguin 1993,
266). The plank and frame were exclusively fastened with dowels and assembled multiple layers of
planking. The jong used at least two masts and used two lateral rudders (Manguin 1993, 266–267). Another
Portuguese account written by Gabriel Rebello described a boat building in Moluccas Sea in 1569. He
described that the planks are drilled at the seam and were assembled using a mallet. The construction is so
tight that the seam is barely visible. Then, the boatbuilders tied the interior (component) to the lug or cleat
with ropes made from root (Manguin 2019). Indeed, the first-hand account of lashed-lug boat building is
the record by Francisco Alcina, a Spanish priest who recorded step-by-step boat-building techniques in the
Philippines during the seventeenth century CE. He wrote that after the keel was attached to the stem and
stern post, the suitable length of wood was chosen for the planks. Only two planks can be produced from a
single tree, the boat-builders reduces the thickness of the plank using adzes and left a series of lug or
tambuku (Alcina 2005 [1668], 169, as cited in Lacsina 2016; 2019).

STUDY OF EARLY LASHED LUG BOATS IN THAILAND
Pak Khlong Kluai Shipwreck Site
In 2016, a local fisherman discovered a large scale of wood remnants and pottery on the beach of Pak
Khlong Kluai, Ranong province (Figure 1). The site is exposed during low tide, fortunately after the found
he contact the authorities, which finally led to the Thai Fine Art Department conducting a slow process of
unearthing and conserving the remains.
The Fine Arts Department including the 15th Regional Archaeology Office (Phuket) and the Underwater
Archaeology Division (UAD) conducted several archaeological surveys and site mappings from August to
November of 2016. The remnant was identified as a shipwreck, due to a large amount of what was assumed
to be wooden planks with a mortise and tenon fastening technique, the evidence also showed many scarf
joints. The individual plank has an estimated dimension of 500 centimeters in length, 30-40 centimeters in
width, and 10 cm in thickness. The overall structure was 20 meters long and eight meters wide. The plank
analysis from the laboratory reveals that it is Terminalia nigrovenulosa Pierre which is commonly found
in Sri Lanka, Burma, and Thailand. The tenon was made of Dialium cochinchinese Pierre and the dowel
was made of Cassia sp. AMS dating of the plank sample came out between BC 170-180 (Cal BP 2120±30,
BP 2140±30) (The FAD 2017)
The site location is near Bang Kluai Canal which is linked to an early coastal archaeological site of Phukao
Thong, a site that play an important role as a port, stone, and glass ornament production dating around 2,000
years ago. Unfortunately, the wooden structure was in poor condition, and an attempt to reduce the
deterioration using Geotextiles and sandbags did not work. As a re-examination show the structures couldn’t
withstand the wave. So, the recovery excavation was planned in order to recover the main part of the wreck.

3

�Figure 1. Map showing the shipwreck remains of Pak Khlong Kluai site between 2016-2019: Courtesy of Decha Pornthai.

The excavation was conducted in 2019, and the GPR (ground penetrating radar) was used in order to detect
underground anomalies across 800 m². Test pits and trenches were planned based on this information to
cover the study area. Due to the condition of the site as the wreck is exposed during low tide, the excavation
process needs to be finished in one day. So, the trenches were divided into 17 long, narrow trenches and
five test pits.
As a result, the main wooden structure of 60m² (the volume of the structure reduced significantly based on
the 2016 report) is identified as a ship plank, the length varies, the width is between 30-40 cm, and has 10
cm thickness. It was joined edge to edge and used mortise and tenon fastening techniques and supplemented
with dowels to lock the joint. Wood identification was carried out for the second time, planks were made
from Terminalia nigrovenulosa Pierre, tenons were made of Dialium cochinchinese Pierre and dowels
were made of Tectona grandis L.f. (the fifteenth Regional Office of Archaeology 2016) Traces on the plank
show at least six scarf joints and two rectangular shape holes. During the recovery process, various sizes of
logs are found under the structure, some showed signs of rough-cut marks and were assumed not relevant
to the ship’s parts, which could suggest the wrecks were likely abandoned. 80 percent of the pottery
excavated from the site are orange-brown jar-shaped earthenware, decorated with cord marks. The rest of
the potteries are bowl-shaped and has a variety of decoration such as impressing and polishing inside with
black ash. All of them have a similar style to pottery found in Phukao Thong early historic site nearby. The
AMS dating of the plank came out to be 200-140 BCE (Ploymukda 2020, 54), which is relative to artifacts
found at Phukao Thong site. The remnant of mortise and tenon planks found at Pak Khlong Kluai site
represent a few of these techniques that are found in Southeast Asia. However, it still remains unclear if it
is part of a hull or other part, since, no further evidence of a keel or frame is found.
Surprisingly, the excavation on test pit three (including the adjoined area of trench one, and trench three)
revealed different ship construction to the main wreck. The test pit is 10 meters Southwest of the wreck.
Timbers lying on test pit three show clear evidence of lashed lug construction, in addition, the lug design
is relatively similar to the Khlong Thom boat plank and Pontian Boat which will be discussed more in detail.
A total of three distinctive timbers were found in test pit three. They were all identified as a hull plank of a
lashed lug-type vessel, as the timber is carved to create a protruding lug (Figure 2). Even though they were
4

�Figure 2. Evidence of lashed-lug plank no. 20 from Test Pit thee.

found in the same area, planks were lying separated from one another. It was hard to consider if they were
an adjacent plank or even came from the same vessel.
The most complete one is plank number 20, which is 230 cm in length, and 40 cm in width, it has six cm
of plank thickness and the same lug thickness. The lug shape is relative to Pontian and Khlong Thom Boat
as it shows favorable use of a rectangular design, in which lugs are almost wide as a plank and are aligned
to one side, leaving an edge protruding out about three cm, hence overlapping with the adjacent plank,
overlapped part is made slightly slope down to the edge. However, there are some distinctive features that
appear on this broken plank, there seems to be no sign of doweling or lacing hole on the seam as appeared
on other plank-lacing vessels and the lug pattern is also quite different, the evidence on this plank shows
only one rectangle-shaped hole on each lug and a combination of wide and narrow lugs with a continuous
ridge connected between them, though, there are some holes on the seam of this ridge, but it seems not
enough. AMS dating of this plank (D-AMS 034770) was dated to 2,303 BP ±29 or 408-357 cal BCE
(Piromrak 2020, 41). This is considered the oldest lashed lug-type vessel in Thailand and probably in
Southeast Asia.
The longest piece is plank number 19, which is 320 cm in length, and 60 cm in width, the thickness of the
plank is four cm, the same as the lug. The condition of this piece was badly degraded; however, the evidence
showed the favorable design of a rectangular lug with a single hole. On the other hand, wide lugs (dimension
of 60 cm) only appear with a spacing of 60 cm, and no traces of continuous ridge, doweling holes, or plank
lacing holes were found.
The last piece is plank number 17, which is the smallest 120 cm in length, 25 cm in width, and eight cm in
thickness. The plank showed evidence of a center ridge lug with two holes bored through the width,
however, one end has a slightly protruded lug roughly the width of the plank with six holes bored to the
5

�surface of the lug, these holes were not drilled through the plank but bored one and a half cm deep. There
was also no sign of plank-fastening methods. This timber part was unidentified which part of the vessel it
was, as no evidence of this kind has ever been found before.
Evidence found at Pak Khlong Kluai site is rare and significant. The wreck’s identification suggested that
at least two vessels were found, one favored a mortise and tenon technique, and another favored a lashed
lug technique. The dating of both wrecks suggests that both boat-building techniques existed in the same
period and also related to Phukao Thong site, which played a major role as an early port site, artifacts found
at this site were Indo-Roman merchandise such as granulated gold beads, precious stone carved to a lionshape, ring carved into Roman figure and rouletted wares. The wood identification also indicated the use
of Southeast Asia region woods, both vessels could be built in the region. Furthermore, sediment analysis
from test pits one and four indicates that the geology of the site might be a shore instead of a sea bed
(Ploymukda and Piromrak 2019, 197).
Khlong Thom Archaeological Site
In 1985, Pierre Manguin investigated boat planks displayed at Wat Khlong Thom Museum, the planks were
found by a local and had been given to the museum. It was identified as lashed lug type, and features on
the plank are relatively similar to Pontian boat, though no traces of dowel holes are found. The planks were
relatively dated between the fifth to the seventh century CE as it is associated with the early port and beads
production site of Khlong Thom (Manguin 1993, 257). Although Khlong Thom’s timbers are remarkably
rare, they have been overlooked for decades.
In 2019, Thai UAD conducted a survey along the canal where the plank was found in order to find more
evidence about this vessel. The area along the canal is known as Khlong Thom Site (Kuan Luk-pad), an
early port site on the Andaman coast that indicates an intensive overseas connection. The survey focused
mainly on the canal where they were reported. As a result, the survey team found 12 damaged planks
slightly buried under the sediment, the alignment was scattered and presumed not in situ. However, several
planks were also found intact on the canal bank, they were assumed to have more archaeological context,
however, no excavation had been conducted, but it is highly recommended in the future.
Timbers recovered from the site are identified as lashed lug type. As it was submerged in a water-logged
condition, which helps preserve the organic material very well, all still have ropes residue intact (Figures 3
and 4). All of the planks were classified into two main parts, hull plank, and keel plank (Piromrak 2020,
35–41).
The hull plank
The longest piece that was recovered is 150 centimeters in length, the width is around 25 centimeters, and
ten centimeters in thickness (including the plank body and the lug). Features on the plank consist of
rectangle lugs measured around 40x20 centimeters, each lug has two sets of trapezoid holes (five
centimeters wide) bore through the edge. These holes are lashing points for the frame as one sample of
plank still has what assume to be a broken piece of frame intact and several pieces still have rope residues
loosely bonded.
Each lug is 40 centimeters apart, though, one sample has a ridge connected to the others. The design of the
lugs shows the intention for plank overlapping as one edge of the lug protrudes out from the plank body. In
addition, the cross-section view of the lug also indicates inclination from the overlapped section to the other,
which is assumed to follow the curvature of the hull. Furthermore, each corner of the lug appears to have
two sets of L-shaped holes drilled through the seam of the plank, these holes acted as a plank fastening

6

�Figure 3. Lashed lug plank no. 4 (on top) and no. 5 (long piece) with ropes residue attached to each lug.

point with ligatures, as ligature is passed through each hole on the adjacent plank to create a tensioned knot,
and then supplemented with a wooden wedge bored into the knot space to create a tighter fit. However, no
traces of plank doweling are found, which puts into question the strength of this vessel.
The keel planks
Two planks were identified as keel planks, as the design of the lug is distinct from the others. Lugs are
placed in a fairly central position as opposed to hull planks that are adjacent to one edge. Evidence on plank
#004 indicates a center ridge lug with large two holes bored through, on one end of the lug also showed Lshape lacing holes. The dimension of the fragment is 53 cm long, 28 cm wide, and 10 cm thick. This design
is similar to Pontian’s keel plank (Gibson-Hill 1952, 114) and Butuan 5 keel plank which were referred as
carinate or ridged keel (Green et al. 1995, 185–186; Lacsina 2016, 116–117).
Another one is plank #003, the fragment piece is 49 cm long, 27 cm wide, and nine cm thick. The feature
on this plank has a rectangle lug with a continued ridge. Unlike other planks, this one has L-shaped holes
drilled through one side of the lug and a large hole bored through the ridge. Though the piece is very small
in dimension and wasn’t showed continuous evidence, the lug pattern is relatively similar to Ban Khlong
Yuan Boat and Butuan Boat 4 (Lacsina 2016, 190).
Unlike the Pontian Boat, an investigation showed that the Khlong Thom plank has no evidence of doweling,
the only method used for plank fastening is lacing the plank through L-shaped holes along the edge and
supplementing with a wooden wedge. The use of wooden wedges is common in this vessel, as it is found
in all spots that consisted of knot tightening, the relatively similar evidence of wedges was also found at
Punjulharjo Boat, Indonesia.
7

�Figure 4. Lashed-lug plank with a frame piece attached to it by ligature.

AMS dating by Direct AMS, USA, was conducted not long after the recovery of the plank. A sample of the
wooden wedge (D-AMS 034772) was dated to 1,856 BP or 85-229 cal CE (calibrated with Oxcal 4.3)
(Piromrak 2020, 41).
Timbers used in building Khlong Thom boat were identified into three species. The hull plank is made from
Hopea species, the frame and wedge are made from Mesua ferrea L., and the seam wadding was identified
as Payena acuminate (Blume) Pierre. Moreover, ropes used for frame lashing and plank lacing were
identified as Arenga Pinnata. As a result, all identified timbers are commonly grown in a wet tropical area
and are of Southeast Asia origin.
Other sites
Previous reports between the 1990s-2000s recorded the discovery of several lashed lug vessels found in the
Southern and up to the Central part of Thailand, unfortunately, most of them were brief and lost their
archaeological context due to the unwitting recovery of the locals.
The first one is remnants of boat timbers discovered at Ban Kok Yang, Trang province. The evidence
showed a well-preserved early lashed lug boat recovered from an alluvial deposit. The report noted the
existence of planks with integrated rectangle lugs, frames, and bulkheads, with the practice of plank lacing
by ropes. No dating was ever conducted, the examination from photographs shows the relation to the
Pontian boat and Khlong Thom timbers. Unfortunately, the remnants were demolished (Vatcharangkul
2001, 47).
The second one is lashed lug planks found in Khlong Ta-Noo canal, Ban Koh-Takien, Chanthaburi. The
report by Thai UAD in 1997 recorded that two planks were found buried under the canal bed, and being
covered by bamboo branches. Due to the bad visibility, the diver found only two planks with no associated
artifacts (Parnfuk 1997, 3-5). No radiocarbon dating or wood identification was conducted, however, planks
are relatively similar to the Panjulharjo and Ban Khlong Yuan Boat, with evidence of laced holes and dowel
8

�holes. The plank is 250 cm in length, 30 cm in width, and 10 cm in thickness. It was identified as a hull
plank of a lashed lug boat and shows the uses of a scarf joint.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Recent studies of early watercraft in Thailand have revealed interesting evidence of lashed lug vessels with
their planks exclusively laced together and with no traces of dowel holes. They support the theory which
suggested that lashed lug boats in the early period are primarily laced together. These features are associated
with the absolute dating of the plank which came out to be earlier than the Pontian Boat, lashed lug
watercraft which represent a transitional phase between exclusively lacing to a combination of both
methods. Indeed, the site of Pak Khlong Kluai indicated an association between mortise and tenon ship
construction and lashed lug vessels, a more intensive study should address this relation. Therefore, the
discovery of exclusive plank-laced vessels has inspired more curiosity about their appearance and
construction, whether they are raft-type vessels or hull-plank vessels.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Evan, Ivor Hugh Norman. “Notes on the Remains of an Old Boat Found at Pontian.” Journal of the Federated Malay States Museum
12, (1927): 93-96.
Fine Arts Department. Rai Ngan Kan Samruat Ruea Boran Hat Pak Khlong Kluai Mu 4 Ban Phukao Thong Tambon Kumpuan
Amphoe Suk Samran Changwat Ranong. Samnak Silppakorn thi Sipsong, Nakorn Si Thammarat, (The Archaeological Survey of
Pak Khlong Kluai Shipwreck Site Ranong Province), In Thai, 2017.
Gibson-Hill, Carl Alexander. “Further Notes on the Old Boat from Pontian.” Journal of the Malayan Branch, Royal Asiatic Society
25, no. 1, (1952): 111-133.
Green, Jeremy, Tom Vosmer, Paul Clark, Ray A. Santiago and Mauro Alvarez. “Interim Report on the Joint Australian -Philippines
Butuan Boat Project, October 1992. The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 24, no. 3 (1995): 177-188.
Green, Jeremy, Tom Vosmer, Paul Clark, Ray A. Santiago and Mauro Alvarez. “Interim Report on the Joint Australian -Philippines
Butuan Boat Project, October 1992.” Western Australian Musuem.
Horridge, Adrian. The lashed-lug boat of the Eastern Archipelagoes, the Alcina MS and the Lomblen Whaling Boat. Maritime
Monographs and Reports. Trustees of the National Maritime Museum, 1982.
Lacsina, Ligaya. “The Butuan Boats of the Philippines: Southeast Asian Edge-Joined and Lashed-Lug
the Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology 39, (2015): 126-132.

Watercraft.” Bulletin of

Lacsina, Ligaya. “The Same-Same Boatbuilding Tradition? Looking at the Different Examples of Lashed-lug Boats from the
Southeast Asian Region.” In Past Present and Future of ASEAN Maritime Heritage, Proceeding of International Symposium 15 th16th June 2017, 38-53. The Underwater Archaeology Division, Fine Arts Department, Ministry of Culture, 2019.
Lacsina, Ligaya. Examining Pre-Colonial Southeast Asian Boatbuilding: An Archaeological Study of the Butuan Boats and the
Use of Edge-Joined Planking in Local and Regional Construction Techniques, Department of Archaeology, Flinders University,
Adelaide, 2016.
Liebner, Horst. The Siren of Cirebon, University of Leeds, 2014.

9

�Manguin Y. Pierre. “Asian Ship-Building Tradition in the Indian Ocean at the Dawn of European Expansion.” In The Trading
World of the Indian Ocean 1500-1800, Volume 3 Part 7, edited by Om Prakash, 597-629. Delhi: Pearson India, 2001.
Manguin, Y. Pierre. “The Southeast Asian Ship: An Historical Approach.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 5, no. 2 (1980): 266276.
Manguin, Y. Pierre. “Trading Ship of the South China Sea. Shipbuilding Techniques and Their Role in the History of the
Development of the Trade Networks.” Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 36, no. 3 (1993): 253-280.
Manguin, P.‐Y. “Sewn Boats of Southeast Asia: The stitched‐plank and lashed‐lug tradition.” International Journal of Nautical
Aarchaeology 48 (2019): 400–415.
McGrail, Sean. Boats of the World From the Stone Age to the Medieval Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Mochtar, S. Agni. “Recommendations on Cultural Heritage Site Management Plan for the Punjulharjo Boat in Rembang, Central
Java.” Berkala Arkeologi, Volume 40, no. 2, (2020):243-266.
Parnfuk, Veera. Rai Ngan Kan Samruat Bueang Ton Ruea Koh Khwang, Klum Ngan Boranna Khadi Tai Nam, Prachinburi, (The
Archaeological Survey of Koh Khwang Wreck Site), Prachinburi, The Underwater Archaeology Office, 1997, In Thai.
Piromrak, Napat. “Sak Ruea Jom Khlong Thom: Lak Than Ruea Phuk Yuk Raek Roem Thi Phop Nai Prathet Thai.” (Khlong
Thom Wreck: Evidence of Early Lashed-Lug Boat Found in Thailand). Silpakorn Journal 63, no. 5 (2020): 30-41, In Thai.
Ploymukda, Sira and Piromrak Napat. Rai Ngan Kan Kud Khon Tang Boranna Khadi Laeng Ruea Jom Pak Khlong Kluai Amphoe
Suk Samran Jangwad Ranong, (The Excavation of Pak Khlong Kluai Shipwreck Site), The Underwater Archaeology Office, 2019,
In Thai.
Ploymukda, Sira. “Laeng Ruea Jom Pak Khlong Kluai Lak Than Choeng Prachak Dan Theknoloyi Kan To Ruea Lae Patisamphan
Thang Thale Chai Fang Samai Raek Roem Prawat Sat. ” (Pak Khlong Kluai Shipwreck Site: Evidence-Based Shipbuilding
Technology and Marine Interaction Across the Andaman Coast in Early History Period). Silpakorn Journal 63, no. 5 (2020): 4257, In Thai.
Vatcharangkul, Erbprem. Prawat Sat Kan Panitnavy Thai Samnak Boranna Khadi Lae Phiphittaphantha Sathan Haeng Chat, Krom
Silpakorn, (History of Thai Maritime Trading), The Fine Arts Department, 2001, In Thai.

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="42">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="184">
                  <text>2023 Session 6: Lashed-lug boats: Emerging research from Southeast Asia and the Pacific</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="185">
                  <text>Session 6 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="186">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 6 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="187">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="188">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="189">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="190">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="191">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="192">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6315">
                <text>Discussion on the Traces of an Early Phase Lashed-Lug Boats of Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6316">
                <text>Lashed-lug boat-building techniques played a significant role in Southeast Asian trading networks. The previous studies reported&#13;
that approximately 20 boats in this category have been found. Indeed, an archaeological survey in Thailand during the 1990s had&#13;
reported the existence of several boats of this type, but the information was scarce and no excavation had been conducted. Not until&#13;
2019, a team of Thai underwater archaeologists carried out a survey along the Andaman Coast, the resources available to conduct&#13;
the work including the discovery of boat remnants which were assumed to be lashed-lug type. The first was a boat plank found at&#13;
Khlong Thom, the early port site in Krabi province, likely dating back to c. 1st – 5&#13;
th century CE. The second was a boat plank found&#13;
at Pak-Klong Kluai beach, Ranong province, located in the area of Phukao-Thong archaeological site. Therefore, research on the&#13;
boat planks is needed in order to find out the technique of the boat-building and its age. The main purpose of the research is to&#13;
present an insightful analysis of the boat remnants. The analysis of boat-building techniques, a sample collection for AMS dating,&#13;
and a comparative studmanguiny were carried on. The result of the study reveals a significant aspect of an early phase lashed-lug&#13;
boats: planks were carved into protruding lugs with hollowed holes, the hull was secured using a palm rope and wooden wedge,&#13;
and no trace of a dowel hole are found. The AMS dating of a wooden sample from both sites provided a date of 1,856 ±25 BP and&#13;
2,303 ±29 BP. Comparatively, the boat structure is similar to the lashed-lug boat of Pontian (3rd – 5&#13;
th century CE). However, the&#13;
hull of these boats bears a different technique of making from other boats (e.g. Butuan and Ban Khlong Yuan boats, 9th century&#13;
CE). The discovery of the boat remnants in Thailand has shed new light on the early technique of constructing lashed</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6317">
                <text>Napat Piromrak</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6318">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6319">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6320">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6321">
                <text>Piromrak, Napat . 2023. “Discussion on the Traces of an Early Phase Lashed-Lug Boats of Southeast Asia.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, Ligaya Lacsina, Agni Mochtar, and Pierre-Yves Manguin. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1943 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="63">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="23" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="23">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/231744352e9eb7e78476d7891b3fa1e9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4c85726b986801e0aa27851018bd6a3b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="512">
                    <text>Distributional Survey of Underwater Cultural Heritage and its
Experimental Presentation in the Ryukyu Archipelago
Chiaki Katagiri
Okinawa Prefectural Museum and Art Museum, Naha, Japan, 900-0006
Email: katgiric@pref.okinawa.lg.jp
Yuji Yamamoto
Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, Fukuoka, Japan, 812-0041
Email: yamamoto@f-creer.com
Yumiko Nakanishi, Osaka Prefectural Government, Osaka, Japan, 559-0034
Email: NakanishiYum@mbox.pref.osaka.lg.jp
Abstract
The Ryukyu Archipelago is located at the northwestern Pacific, between the islands of
Formosa and Kyushu of southern Japan. It consists of 199 islands of all dimensions and
the total range of its accurate distribution lengthen is approximately 1,200 km. Since the
first human beings settled down on the archipelago during the Pleistocene, they have
been living close by the sea there. The local populations have recognized maritime
resources as a main and important nutritious food since the prehistoric era, while the
Ryukyu kingdom used to be prosperous unprecedentedly in terms of seaborne oversea
trade among Japan, China, and Southeast Asia. In the Ryukyu archipelago, the
distributional survey of underwater cultural heritage has lately been conducted by the
Nansei Islands Underwater Cultural Heritage Study Group, the Okinawa Prefectural
Archaeological Center, the Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, and
Kagoshima University, in order to assess its numbers, typologies, actual conditions, and
so on. According to the research, 235 sites of underwater or maritime cultural heritage
have already been confirmed: 9 shipwrecks, 33 submerged ports, 15 places where boat
cargos are scattered on the seabed, 72 places where old boat cargos and other
remains are found along the coasts, 30 stone anchors and cargos on land, 28 quarries,
45 stone tidal weirs, and 3 salt works. In 2011, as a result of the survey, an underwater
cultural heritage presentation or guidance tour was carried out in Kume Island.
Presumably, this experimental trial will lead the public to having the sense to
acknowledge and protect underwater cultural heritage in the future.
Key words: Ryukyu Archipelago, Ryukyu Kingdom, Transit trade, Distributional Survey,
Open day
Introduction
The Ryukyu Archipelago consists of 199 islands of various sizes ranging about 1,200
km between Kyushu Island, the southernmost island of the Japanese Archipelago, and
1

�Taiwan in the northwestern coastal Pacific. The first humans reached there in the late
Pleistocene and have long been living a life highly connected to the sea since then.
Marine resources had been their major food source in prehistory, and the islands have
prospered because of overseas exchanges using ships and the sea from the Gusuku
Period to the Sanzan Period (from the latter half of 11thcentury to 1429 AD). The tidal
zone was actively utilized for production activities until 1879, when the Ryukyu Kingdom
became an independent state. Recent research accumulation revealed the numbers
and types of underwater cultural heritage in this region by the Nansei Islands
Underwater Cultural Heritage Study Group, the Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological
Center, the Okinawa Prefectural Museum and Art Museum, the Asian Research
Institute of Underwater Archaeology, Kagoshima University, Tokai University and
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, and so on. It is notable that such
researches include a whole series of different kinds
of methods, such as collection of oral histories,
interviews, archival researches, walking survey of the
coastal area and the seabed, and the like.
Based on the results of such researches, we have an
underwater site open day in Kumejima Island in
Okinawa for its experimental presentation on 11th
September 2011 and 28th September 2013. On
those days, we invited the willing public to visit and
see underwater sites under the supervision and

Fig.
1
Location
of
Archipelago.
(C.
Katagiri)
guidance by the experts. The Ohajima Underwater

Ryukyu

Site was selected for the subject of this experimental presentation as it was the most
suitable site on many reasons. We have collected the data regarding the interest of the
visitors, trying to justify the validity of the method we have adopted. The research aims
to lead to the protection and utilization of underwater cultural heritage.
Types and numbers of the sites holding Underwater Cultural Heritage
As shown in the Table 1, the area of sea around the Ryukyu Archipelago holds a wide
variety of underwater cultural heritage. 9 shipwreck sites, 15 seabed artifact scattering
sites (loads only, no hull found), 33 submerged ports, 72 coastal artifact scattering sites,
2

�76 production sites (28 quarries, 45 stone tidal weirs, an 3 salt pans), and 30 sites with
findings on land, such as stone and iron anchors are so far found and categorized.
type

number

contents

a Shipwreck sites

9

Shipwreck

b Sseabed artefact scattering sites

13

Only cargo, Almost ceramics

c Ports

33

artefacts of various periods

d Coastal artefact scattering sites

71

artefacts of various periods

e Quarries

28

Sites to cut out stone

f

45

Stationary fishing gear

g Soltworks

3

Sites to produced the salt

h Related underwater cultural heritage

30

Aimost Anchor of the ship

Ⅰ Sites due to the marine accidents

Ⅱ　Site formed by the frequent use of the sae
and coasal areas

Ⅲ　Sites due to production activities

Ⅳ　Others

Stone tidal weirs

合計

232

Table 1.Aggregation of Underwater Cultural Heritage of the Ryukyu Island. (C. Katagiri)

Sites due to the Marine Accidents
Shipwreck sites (a): Often only the wreckage and pieces of ships found. They are
disturbed by natural phenomena like a typhoon or human disturbance like recovery after
having been stranded or sunk. Seabed artifact scattering sites (b): Generally formed by
loads thrown away from the ships, but sometimes caused by the wreck. Hard to
distinguish either unless wrecked hull pieces are found.
Sites formed by the Frequent Use of the Sea and Coastal Areas
Ports(c): Proving that the area had been used as a port, with anchors and artifacts of
various periods are found. Occasionally formed by the ship anchored there which
accidentally sunk? Coastal artifact scattering sites (d): Formed as a result of utilization
of the coastal area those who were living in the settlements there, such as cooking and
discarding which are distinguished from the ports.
Sites due to Production Activities
Found in the tidal zone. Quarries (e) are well-recognized and well-preserved while salt
pans(g) and stone tidal weirs(f) formed with the small pebbles piled are not preserved in
a good state. Such structures are meant to be constantly used and repaired, and will be
naturally destroyed once stopped being used. Many sites of this kind had been existed
3

�in the past, but the numbers dramatically decreased and hardly seen now. It is exigency
to record those sites.
Others
Artifacts that used to be on the seabed are often recovered on land and conserved as
cultural properties (h). Stone and iron anchors often apply to this case providing the clue
to the identification of the ships sailing in the area at that time.
Major characteristics of Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Region
Table 2 shows an overview of typical underwater cultural heritage in the Ryukyu
Archipelago and Fig. 2, Representative underwater cultural heritage of the Ryukyu
archipelago.
Underwater Cultural Heritage Related to Overseas Trades during the Gusuku
Period (between the 12th and 13th Centuries AD)
The

Amamioshima-kurazaki

underwater site (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site
No. 2, Ukenson Board of Education,
1999)

and

the

Kumejima-

nakanohama underwater site (Fig. 2,
Table 2, Site No.13, Miyagi et al.,
2004; Tezuka et al., 2005; Katagiri,
2007) are known to be holding
underwater cultural heritage formed
by

the

shipwreck

or

the

load

discarded from the ship, dated back
to the latter half of the 12th century to
the 13th century. In both cases,
Chinese ceramics are densely found
on the seabed, which provide a great
deal of information related to the
trading in the early Gusuku Period.

Fig. 2Representative Underwater Cultural Heritage of the
Ryukyu Archipelago. (C. Katagiri)

4

�Underwater Cultural Heritage Related to Overseas Trade from the Sanzan Period
(the 14th Century AD) to the Ryukyu Kingdom Period (from 1429 AD to 1879)
From the latter half of the 14th century to the beginning of the 15th century, a crucial
turning point in the history of the region occurred regarding the transition of political
power when the sovereign was centered during the establishment of the Ryukyu
Kingdom. Ohajima Underwater site in Kumejima Island is one of the major sites during
this period (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.12, Miyagi et al., 2004; Tezuka et al., 2008; Katagiri,
2007). Large amount of celadon of the early Ming Dynasty China is found. Moreover, 2
Chinese stone anchors have been identified in Kumejima Island. Kumejima Island and
the surrounding sea area must have played a significant role in oversea trades during
the early Gusuku Period and Sanzan Period, proved by the density of underwater sites
and stone anchors dated back then.The Ryukyu Kingdom was in its heyday from the
15th century to the mid 16th century. The king resided in Shuri-jo Castle served as the
sovereign ruler and the centralized nation was formed then. Nagura-shitadaru site
(Underwater site) dated back to the mid to late 15th century is located in Ishigakijima
Island and large amount of Chinese celadon discovered from the site (Fig. 2, Table 2,
Site No. 22, Sakishima Culture Research Institute, 2009). Miyakojima Island holds
Kurimajima Underwater site dated back to the first half of the 16th century. Chinese
ceramics found from sites has been changing then, from the predominantly celadon
before to the gorgeous flowery blue and white porcelain (Fig. 2, Table2, Site No.19,
Katagiri, 2009).After the invasion of the Satsuma clan in 1609, Tokara-retto Islands
became a territory of Satsuma. An underwater sites indicating the maritime accident at
that time is identified in Tairajima Island of Tokara-retto Islands. Clusters of Chinese
porcelains of the Qing Dynasty dated to the 18th century found in the area, which would
have been formed by the ship sunken or the ship loads discarded (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site
No. 1, Kagoshima University, The Faculty of Law, Economic and Humanities et al.,
2010).
Sunken Shipwrecks Revealing Ikoku-sen (the Western Ships) during the Last
Years of the Ryukyu Kingdom
In the last years of Ryukyu Kingdom, many West European ships called Ikoku-sen has
constantly been around the sea area of the Ryukyu Archipelago.It is obvious that Asian
5

�intrusion and interference by the great powers of the West Europe came to influence so
far as the Ryukyu Kingdom. Many shipwrecks found in the area can provide us the
great deal of information on Western ships at that time. An English ship, Providence,
sunken in Yaebishi in Miyakojima Island in 1776 was discovered (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site
No.16, Katagiri, 2009). On top of the Providence, another English ship, Indian Oak,
owned by East India Company sunken in 1776 was found in Chatan-cho in Chatan Oki
(Fig. 2, Table2, Site No.9, Nakamura, 1994). In 1853, the same year with when Mathew
Calbraith Perry arrived at Uraga Port, an English ship sank off Yoshino Kaigan in
Miyakojima (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.20, Katagiri, 2009) and a Dutch Ship, Van Bosse off
Takada Kaigan in Taramason Village in 1857 (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.21, Katagiri, 2009).
In 1872, when the Ryukyu Kingdom was inclining on verge of collapse, an English ship,
Benares sank off Ginama in Kunigamison Village (Fig. 2, Table2, Site No.4, Katagiri,
2013), as well as a foreign ship of unknown nationality sank off Minamiukibarujima in
Uruma City (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.8, Katagiri, 2010). Wrecks and loads left by those
foreign ships still remain on the seabed of those areas.
Underwater Cultural Heritage Related to the Domestic Commodity Circulation
within the Ryukyu Kingdom.
In 1879, the Meiji Government abolished the Ryukyu Kingdom. The Kingdom became
extinct on the map and came to be called “Okinawa Prefecture”. The ships called
“Maran-sen” were playing significant role of carrying the supplies to many remote
islands in Okinawa at that time. Agonoura Underwater site located in Zamamijima Island
(Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.11, Miyagi et al., 2004), Yaebisi Underwater site Cluster in
Miyakoshoto Islands (Fig. 2, Table2, Site No.2-3, Katagiri, 2009), Yarabu Underwater
Site in Ishigakijima Island (Fig. 2, Table2, Site No.23, Katagiri, 2010, Ono et al., 2013),
Sekiseishoko Underwater site Cluster in Yaeyamashoto Islands (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site
No.24-26, Katagiri, 2009, Ono et al.,2013) are so far identified underwater sites dated to
this period. A wide variety of Tsuboya-yaki pottery produced in Naha City in
Okinawajima Island are found in those sites, accompanied with some Chinese Qing
Dynasty Porcelain in some cases. Those sites and artifact scatterings were formed due
to the accident of the ships which were transporting pottery produced at Tsuboya in
Naha City of Okinawajima Island to the smaller islands around Okinawajima Island,
6

�such as Miyako and Yaeyama Shoto Islands, either by the hull being submerged or the
loads abandoned on their way. In case of Sekiseishoko Underwater site Cluster, Point
No. 3 (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No. 26), the submerged hull is identified. Moreover, fourarmed anchors that had never seen on land in Okinawa are discovered at Yarabu
Underwater site (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No. 23) in Ishigakijima Island, which provides us
significant information to reveal the appearance and characteristics of the ships at that
time (Katagiri, 2010; Ono et al., 2013).
Submerged Port Sites
Underwater sites showing evidence of having been the ports with frequent use are
Shirasegawakako (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.14,
Toma and Sakuda, 1999) and Majako (Fig. 2,
Table 2, Site No.15, Katagiri, 2007; 2010) in
Kumejima Island, Agonoura in Zamamijima
Island (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No. 11, Katagiri,
2007),

Sesokojima

Underwater

site

in

Motobucho of Okinawajima Island (Fig. 2, Table
Fig. 3 Landscape of Ohajima Underwater 2, Site No. 7, Katagiri, 2005). Majako Port had
Site (A Large Amount of China Ceramics
of the Late 14th on the Seabed) and Sea been a famous port known to be used for
Area that Held a Tour. (C. Katagiri)
tributary trades. There is a warehouse overseer

near the site and stone anchors are found from the nearby settlement. A wide variety of
artifacts dated back to from the medical to pre-modern and modern period are scattered
on the coast and seabed in this area, which support that the area had long been used
as a port (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.15). Combined investigations of such a site and
previously mentioned Nakanohama underwater site and Ohajima underwater site that
show the traces of maritime accidents will provide us with large amount of information to
evaluate the site. Agonoura of Zamamijima Island is also known as a port related to the
tributary trade.Many kinds of artifacts, such as the 15th century celadon, as well as the
pre-modern and modern pottery produced in Okinawa, have been discovered on the
seabed of the area (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.11).
Sesokojima Sea area had also long been used as port on the trade route, which
resulted in many artifacts findings especially on the east coast of Sesokojima Island. A
7

�stone anchor was found at Anchi-hama Beach, probing the existence of the ships
anchored there (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.7, Katagiri et al., 2005). This stone anchor is
relatively small, but mocking Chinese stone anchor having produced during the time of
the Ryukyu Kingdom. The small stone anchors of this kind have recently been found at
several places all over Okinawajima Island, which would be significant information
source to reveal the structure of Maran-sen ships. Several stone anchors of this kind
holding similar form were also found from the seabed off Sanko Port of Tokunoshima
Island (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.3, Kagoshima University, The Faculty of Law, Economic
and Humanities et al., 2010). The area was tactically significant sea area for the port,
and geographical as well as historical significance of the area are to be revealed.
Production Site
Production

sites

are

generally

recognized in the tidal zones. Quarries,
stone tidal weirs and salt pans are the
representative sites of this kind. A huge
quarry

in

Kumejima

Island

of

Kumejimacho (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site
No.28, Katagiri, 2006), stone tidal weir
cluster

in

Kohamajima

Island

of

Taketomicho (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site
Fig. 4 Tour scene of the Snorkel in Ohajima No.29, Katagiri, 2009), a salt pan in
Underwater Site. (C. Katagiri)

Nakijinson Village of Okinawajima Island
and the like are so far identified (Fig.2, Table 2, Site No.31). Quarries are often well
preserved due to its structural characteristic, while stone tidal weirs and salt pans made
with small pebbles pile up are generally in disastrous preservation state. These types of
sites have to be constantly used and repaired. The site, once stopped being used,
would start to be reverted back to the original natural state and collapse due to the
natural force of waves and tide. There had been many salt pans and stone tidal weirs in
the past, which are hardly seen now. Recording of those sites is our urgent mission.

8

�No.

Underwater Site

Location

Classification

Contents

Age

1 Tairashima

Tokara, Tairashima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

18th

2 Kurakizaki

Amami, Amami Oshima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

12-13th

3 Sankou

Amami, Tokunoshima

Ⅱc

Port. Stone anchor

Middle Ages

4 Ginama

Okinawa, Okinawajima

Ⅰa

Wreck. UK, Benares

1873

5 Emons

Okinawa, Okinawajima

Ⅰa

Wreck. USA, Emons

1945

6 Wajikaigan

Okinawa, Iejima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

15th
Middle Ages -Modern

7 Sesokojima

Okinawa, Sesokojima

Ⅱc

Port. Okinawa stone anchor,
China Cermaics, Okinawa Pottery

8 Minamiukibarujima

Okinawa, Minamiukibarujima

Ⅰa

Ｗｒｅｃｋ

1876

9 Indian Oak

Okinawa, Okinawajima

Ⅰa

Wreck. UK, Indian Oak

1840

10 Nahakou

Okinawa, Okinawajima

Ⅱc

Port. China Cermaics

Middle Ages-modern

11 Agonoura

Okinawa, Kerama, Zamamijima

Ⅱc

Port. China Cermaics, Okinawa Pottery

Middle Ages-modern

12 Oha

Okinawa, Kumejima,Ohajima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

Late14th

13 Nakanohama

Okinawa, Kumejima, Hatenohama

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

12-13th

14 Sirasegawakakou

Okinawa, Kumejima

Ⅱc

Port. China Cermaics, Okinawa Pottery

Middle Ages-modern

15 Majakou

Okinawa, Kumejima

Ⅱc

Port. China Cermaics, Okinawa Pottery

Middle Ages-modern

16 Yabiji,No.1

Sakishima, Miyako, Yabiji

Ⅰa

Wreck. UK, Providence

1776

17 Yabiji,No.2

Sakishima, Miyako, Yabiji

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, Okinawa pottery

Early modern period

18 Yabiji,No.3

Sakishima, Miyako, Yabiji

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, Okinawa pottery

Early modern period

19 Kurimajima

Sakishima, Miyakojima, Kurimajima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

Early16th

20 Yoshinokaigan

Sakishima, Miyakojima

Ⅰa

Wreck. UK

1853

21 Takadakaigan

Sakishima, Taramajima

Ⅰa

Wreck. Netherlands, Van Bosse

1857

22 Nagurashitadaru

Sakishima, Ishigakijima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, China Ceramics

15th
Early modern period

23 Yarabu

Sakishima, Ishigakijima

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, Okinawa pottery.
Four claw iron anchor

24 Sekiseisyouko,No1

Sakishima, Sekiseisyouko

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, Okinawa pottery, China Ceramics

Early modern period

25 Sekiseisyouko,No2

Sakishima, Sekiseisyouko

Ⅰb

Boat cargos, Okinawa pottery

Early modern period

26 Sekiseisyouko,No3

Sakishima, Sekiseisyouko

Ⅰa

Wreck. Okinawa pottery

Early modern period-modern

27 Yomitanson,quarries

Okinawa, OKinawajima

Ⅲe

Production sites. Quarries

Early modern period-modern

28 Kumejima,kitahara,quarries

Okinawa, Kumejima

Ⅲe

Production sites. Quarries

Early modern period-modern

29 Kohamajima,stone tidal weirs

Sakishima, Kohamajima

Ⅲf

Production sites. Stone tidal weirs

Early modern period-modern

30 Iriomotejima,stone tidal weirs

Sakishima, Iriomotejima

Ⅲf

Production sites. Stone tidal weirs

Early modern period-modern

31 Wakugawa,soltworks

Okinawa, Okinawajima

Ⅲg

Production sites. Soltworks

Early modern period-modern

32 Amami Oshima,stone anchors

Amami, Amami Oshima

Ⅳh

8China stone anchors

Middle Ages

33 Uegusuku,stone anchor

Okinawa, Kumejima

Ⅳh

China stone anchor

Middle Ages

34 Yamadagusuku,stone anchor

Okinawa, Okinawajima

Ⅳh

China stone anchor

Middle Ages

35 Taramajima,stock anchor

Sakishima, Taramajima

Ⅳh

Western Europe Stock anchor

Early modern period

36 Yoshino,stone material

Sakishima, Miyakojima

Ⅳh

Stone material

Early modern period

37 Ikema,Iron products

Sakishima, Miyako, Ikemajima

Ⅳh

Iron products

Early modern period

Table 2.Overview of Typical Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Ryukyu Archipelago. (C. Katagiri)
9

�Underwater Cultural Heritage Raised on Land
There are some artifacts and parts of ship structure, which had been found on the
seabed, raised on land, and then preserved and reverted to the cultural properties.
Their information and use would be enhanced and its value increased by being
connected with underwater cultural heritage in the area that still remains to be
underwater. A stone anchor reused for the well of a Yamada Gusuku (Castle) in
Onnason Village (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.34, Katagiri, 2007), iron anchors in
Taramajima Island (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.35, Katagiri, 2009), stone materials found in
Yoshino Settlement in Miyakojima Island (Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.36, Katagiri, 2009),
iron products of Miyako-Ikemajima Island and the like are so far recognized of this kind
(Fig. 2, Table 2, Site No.37). They provide us the clue to figure out the ships sailing in
this sea area.
Experimental Site Open Day
After the 10 years of distributional survey in sea area of the Ryukyu Archipelago, as a
result, we now have a rough idea about the types and quantity of underwater cultural
heritage in the area. The next step forward is to search for a method for protection and
utilization of such cultural heritage bore in the beautiful sea in this region with high
degree of transparency formed by coral leaf. For this purpose, we have experimentally
undertaken a public site open day for underwater cultural heritage around Kumejima
Island in Kumejimacho (Katagiri et al., 2012).
Fig. 3 shows Landscape of Ohajima underwater site and sea area that held a tour.The
major attraction of the day was Ohajima Underwater Site with dense distribution of
Chinese pottery dated back to between the latter half of the 14th century and beginning
of the 15th century. For the better understanding of the nature and characteristics of
underwater cultural heritage, we had delivered a preliminary lecture for 30 minutes
before the site visit, as well as observation tour of the artifacts already raised on land,
such as pottery pieces collected from the seabed at Ohajima and a stone anchor found
at UeGusuku (castle) for 30 minutes. Furthermore, we organized a tour visiting related
cultural heritage sites on land, such as Tenkogu Site, Kuramoto-ato Site, Majako Port
Site, quarries, and the like, for an hour, which aimed at explaining why the underwater
site had been formed on seabed of Ohajima. We prepared 2 ways to visit for the actual
10

�visit of Ohajima Underwater site on seabed, both of which last for about an hour. We
organized 2 groups of people with 20 people each, one for visiting the site by snorkeling
and the other by a glass-bottom boat for those who are not willing to go into the water.
Fig. 4 shows the tour scene of snorkel in Ohajima Underwater Site. This attempt was
able to establish a model case for the site open day for the public visiting underwater
cultural heritage, which could be followed by the other sites in the Ryukyu Archipelago
although we still have to scrutinize this case to evaluate how far the case can be applied
to the other cases as well as to the wider public.
Conclusion
History and culture of the Ryukyu Archipelago have long been together with the sea.
Due to its few resources and small areas, it is often claimed that island areas provide
harsh environment for the life and survival of human-being. Nevertheless, there is a
distinctive maritime culture which have overcome and formed till now. The distinctive
characteristics and history of such culture has not yet been fully revealed and evaluated
even now. It needs further investigations. We believe that study of underwater cultural
heritage would be essential field of research for the future of this area around the
Ryukyu Archipelago. The researches so far done helped us to identify a wide variety of
underwater cultural heritage ranging from the medial to the pre-modern and modern
period. It is also found out that most sites tend to be related to the trade, port and
production activity. Now, after the distributional survey, further intensive investigation
on a particular area needs to be carried out. Even though we are still facing many
problems for conservation and utilization of the site, utilization of underwater cultural
heritage in the Ryukyu Archipelago has a bright future, we believe. Many people from all
over the world visit Okinawa to enjoy the observation of the seabed of the area by
marine sports and glass-bottom boats. As it has been undertaken in Kumejima Island,
the concept of establishing Seabed Site Museums is ideal way of utilization for such
environment with beautiful sea in the Ryukyu Archipelago. We further intend to promote
this attempt to the other sea area.
Acknowledgements
We are most grateful to Prof. Akifumi Iwabuchi of Tokyo University of Marine Science
and Technology for giving us such a great opportunity to present this paper at APCONF
11

�as a session organizer, as well as to Dr. Tatsuya Nakata of Tokyo University of Marine
Science and Technology for very useful advice. Also wish to thank Director Kenzo
Hayashida of the Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, Mr. Hiroki
Miyagi of Nago City Board of Education who worked on the research project at the
Ryukyu Archipelago with us, Prof. Yoshiro Watanabe of Kagoshima University, and all
other friends who worked together.
References
Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology (Ed.), 2012. The Database of
Underwater Cultural Heritage and Promotion of Underwater Archaeology: Nansei
Islands. The Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, Fukuoka (in
Japanese).
Kagoshima University and Nansei Islands Underwater Cultural Heritage Study Group,
2010. The Report on Underwater Cultural Heritage around the Nansei Islands in Fiscal
2009. The Journal of Underwater Archaeological Studies, Vol. 3:5-31 (in Japanese).
Kagoshima University and Nansei Islands Underwater Cultural Heritage Study Group,
2011.The Report on Underwater Cultural Heritage around the Nansei Islands in Fiscal
2010. The Journal of Underwater Archaeological Studies, Vol. 4: 36-59 (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., Higa, N., and Sakihara, T., 2005. A Stone anchor found underwater near
the Anchi Beach in Sesoko Island, Motobu-cho. Bulletin of the Museum, Okinawa
Prefectural Museum and Art Museum, Vol.3: 61-70 (in Japanese）.
Katagiri, C., (Ed.), 2007. Distribution Survey Report of the Coastal Sites (I) – Volume
on Okinawa-honto and Surrounding Islands. Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological
Center, Naha (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., (Ed.), 2009. Distribution Survey Report of the Coastal Sites (II) – Volume
on Miyako of Yaeyama. Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center, Naha (in
Japanese).
Katagiri, C., (Ed.), 2010. Distribution Survey Report of the Coastal Sites (III) – Site
Map Volume. Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center, Naha (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., 2011. Attempt of Discovering Underwater, In Miyakojima City Board of
Education (Ed.) Report on Management Plan of Nationally Designated Place of Scenic
Beauty “Higashihennazaki”: 163 -168, (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., Miyagi, H., Arakaki, T., Yamamoto, Y., and Watanabe, M., 2013. Research
Studies of Ginama Foreign Shipwreck sites in Kunigamison, Okinawa, Japan. Bulletin of
the Museum, Okinawa Prefectural Museum and Art Museum, Vol.6: 31-53 (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., Yamada, H., Sakihara, T., Nakajima, T., Miyagi, H., and Watanabe, Y.,
2012.The Report of an Underwater Cultural Heritage tour in Kumejima- The Project of
‘The Museum of Underwater Cultural Heritage’. Bulletin of the Museum, Okinawa
Prefectural Museum and Art Museum, Vol.5: 19-36(in Japanese).
12

�Miyagi, H., Katagiri, C., Arakaki, T., and Higa, N., 2004. Preliminary investigation into
discovering sunken ships in the Southwest Islands: Underwater artifacts and marine
transportation. Bulletin of the Archaeological Study of Okinawa, Vol. 2: 43-60 (in
Japanese).
Miyagi, H., Katagiri, C., Higa, N., and Sakihara, T., 2005. Preliminary investigation into
discovering sunken ships in the Southwest Islands (II): Underwater artifacts and
marine transportation. Bulletin of the Archaeological Study of Okinawa, Vol. 2: 81-108
(in Japanese).
Nakamura, S., 1994. Stranded site of Indian-Oak. In Chatancho Board of Education
(Ed.), Chatancho no Iseki, p. 22 (in Japanese).
Ono, R., Katagiri, C., Sakagami, N., Kan, H., Miyagi, H. and Yamamoto, Y., 2013
Present and future of the Underwater Cultural Heritages in the Yaeyama Islands:
Perspective from the recent research of Yarabuoki, Proceedings of Yaeyama Museum,
Vol. 22: 20-43 (in Japanese).
Sakishima Culture Research Institute (Ed.), 2009.Report of the Joint Research Project
on Nagura Shitadaru Underwater Site. Sakishima Culture Research Institute, Ishigaki
(in Japanese).
Tezuka, N., (Ed.), 2005.Structural Analysis of Traded Ceramic Production and Demand
in Medieval Japan, Nakano-hama Beach in Kumejima Island, Okinawa, Fiscal 2003.
Research Report. Aoyama Gakuin University College of Literature Department of
History, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Tezuka, N., (Ed.), 2008.Structural Analysis of Traded Ceramic Production and Demand
in Medieval Japan, Nakano-hama Beach in Kumejima Island, Okinawa, Fiscal 20062007 Research Report. Aoyama Gakuin University College of Literature Department of
History, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Toma, S., and Sakuda, I., 1999. The remains Collected at the Mouth of the Shirase
River in Kume Islands. Bulletin of Culture Division Education Department Okinawa
Prefectural Government, No.15: 25-32(in Japanese).
Ukenson Board of Education (Ed.), 1999.KurakizakiKaitei Underwater Site.(in
Japanese).
Watanabe, M., 2009. Report 1, Research Report on Underwater Heritage in Nansei
Islands Vol. 6, document research Fiscal 2009. The Journal of Underwater
Archaeological Studies, No.3: 28-29 (in Japanese).
Biography
Chiaki Katagiri is the chief curator of the Okinawa Prefectural Museum and Art
Museum. He was born in Nagano, Japan in 1976, graduated from Okinawa
International University in 1999 majoring in archeology. From 2000 to 2011, he worked
as a Specialist in Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center and appointed to current
post in 2011. He is specializing in anthropology of the islands, carrying out
anthropological and archaeological fieldwork throughout Asia. He has been actively
13

�engaged in investigation and research of underwater cultural heritage in Ryukyu
Archipelago. His papers include Research Studies of Ginama Foreign Ship Wreck Sites
in Kunigamison, Okinawa (2012).
Yuji Yamamoto is an underwater photographer participating in several projects by
Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, as well as many other underwater
heritage projects. Having graduated from Fukuoka University, he was taking pictures of
Paris-Dakar Rally and F-1 races. He has participated in the investigation of Takashima
Underwater Remains since 1998 and successfully photographed parts of the ship hull,
tetsuhau, a helmet, the bundle of arrows of Mongolian Invasion discovered in muddled
water. His pictures are published serially in the diver’s monthly magazine “Gekkan Diver”
since 2014.
Yumiko Nakanishi is an archaeologist working at Osaka Prefectural Government. She
obtained M.Phill in Archaeology at Cambridge University in 2001 and is currently a PhD
candidate, specializing on heritage management and public archaeology, as well as the
final phase of Kofun Period in Kinki region of Japan. She is an Expert Member of
ICOMOS Committee for Archaeological Heritage Management (ICAHM). Her publication
includes, Theory and praxis of Cultural Heritage Studies in England, Journal of Heritage
Studies, Vol. 1: 47-5; The Great East Japan Earthquake and cultural heritage: towards
an archaeology of disaster, Antiquity, Vol. 87: 258-269.

14

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="12">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="40">
                  <text>Session 9: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="41">
                  <text>Interview with Session 9 chair Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="42">
                  <text>East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia.&#13;
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities. Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="43">
                  <text>Dr. Akifumi Iwabuchi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="506">
                <text>Distributional Survey of Underwater Cultural Heritage and its  Experimental Presentation in the Ryukyu Archipelago </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="507">
                <text>The Ryukyu Archipelago is located at the northwestern Pacific, between the islands of Formosa and Kyushu of southern Japan. It consists of 199 islands of all dimensions and the total range of its accurate distribution lengthen is approximately 1,200 km. Since the first human beings settled down on the archipelago during the Pleistocene, they have been living close by the sea there.  The local populations have recognized maritime resources as a main and important nutritious food since the prehistoric era, while the Ryukyu kingdom used to be prosperous unprecedentedly in terms of seaborne oversea trade among Japan, China, and Southeast Asia.  In the Ryukyu archipelago, the distributional survey of underwater cultural heritage has lately been conducted by the Nansei Islands Underwater Cultural Heritage Study Group, the Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center, the Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, and Kagoshima University, in order to assess its numbers, typologies, actual conditions, and so on.  According to the research, 235 sites of underwater or maritime cultural heritage have already been confirmed: 9 shipwrecks, 33 submerged ports, 15 places where boat cargos are scattered on the seabed, 72 places where old boat cargos and other remains are found along the coasts, 30 stone anchors and cargos on land, 28 quarries, 45 stone tidal weirs, and 3 salt works. In 2011, as a result of the survey, an underwater cultural heritage presentation or guidance tour was carried out in Kume Island.  Presumably, this experimental trial will lead the public to having the sense to acknowledge and protect underwater cultural heritage in the future.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="508">
                <text>Chiaki Katagiri</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="509">
                <text>Yuji Yamamoto</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="510">
                <text>Yumiko Nakanishi, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="511">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="500" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="291">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/d0457b75cc3f08656b7f52a01ee73741.mp4</src>
        <authentication>b31f29a255cc41f395884e81911c6b8c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="1">
            <name>Dublin Core</name>
            <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="47">
                <name>Rights</name>
                <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5697">
                    <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
              <element elementId="91">
                <name>Rights Holder</name>
                <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5698">
                    <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="3">
      <name>Moving Image</name>
      <description>A series of visual representations that, when shown in succession, impart an impression of motion.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5691">
                <text>Dr. Bill Jeffery </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5692">
                <text>Conference Organizing Committee Chair introduction</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5693">
                <text>Dr. Bill Jeffery introduces the conference and the online proceedings.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5694">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5695">
                <text>11/28/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5696">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="48">
        <name>Asia-Pac Chair 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="499" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="290">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/928756930b83aa685b1ab226a6c5d002.mp4</src>
        <authentication>a02b321fedaf924c178da546e2b79483</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="3">
      <name>Moving Image</name>
      <description>A series of visual representations that, when shown in succession, impart an impression of motion.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5685">
                <text>Dr. Le Thi Lien</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5686">
                <text>Keynote Speaker </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5687">
                <text>Dr. Le Thi Lien is senior researcher at the Institute of Archaeology (VASS). Her studies focused on Oc Eo culture in southern Vietnam, early cultural exchanges and interaction with Southeast Asia, India and China, and archaeology of the naval battle fields. Results of her research have been presented in several international conferences of the IPPA, the EurAsia, the SPAFA, and UNESCO â€¦ Her publications include a book on â€œNghá»‡ thuáº­t Pháº­t giÃ¡p vÃ  Hindu giÃ¡o á»Ÿ Äá»“ng báº±ng sÃ´ng Cá»­u long trÆ°á»›c tháº¿ ká»‰ 10 [Buddhist and Hindu art in the Cuu Long River Delta prior to 10th century AD]â€ (2006), Editing book: â€œDi sáº£n Lá»‹ch sá»­ vÃ  nhá»¯ng hÆ°á»›ng tiáº¿p cáº­n má»›i  [Historical Heritages and New Perspective]â€ (2011); and more than 80 chapters and papers in Vietnamese and English.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5688">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5689">
                <text>11/29/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5690">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="47">
        <name>Asia-Pac Keynote 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="84" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="915">
                <text>Drifting Toward the Southeast: Manjiro</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="916">
                <text>Ikaku Kawada</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="917">
                <text>; Spinner Publications</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="918">
                <text>2004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="919">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="920">
                <text>Ikaku Kawada</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="921">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="152">
            <name>ISBN</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="922">
                <text>0932027598</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="923">
                <text>2004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="205">
            <name>Library Catalog</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="924">
                <text>OCLC WorldCat FirstSearch</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="212">
            <name>Num Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="925">
                <text>144</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="926">
                <text>New Bedford, Mass.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="927">
                <text>; Spinner Publications</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="241">
            <name>Short Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="928">
                <text>Drifting Toward the Southeast</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="929">
                <text>Drifting Toward the Southeast: Manjiro</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="388" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4700">
                <text>Early Coastal Trade in the Bay of Bengal</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4701">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="4702">
                <text>Julian Reade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4703">
                <text>Kegan Paul</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4704">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4705">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4706">
                <text>Himanshu Prabha Ray</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="132">
            <name>Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4707">
                <text>Julian Reade</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4708">
                <text>Book Section</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="166">
            <name>Book Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4709">
                <text>The Indian Ocean in Antiquity</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4710">
                <text>1996</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4711">
                <text>351-64</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4712">
                <text>London</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4713">
                <text>Kegan Paul</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4714">
                <text>Early Coastal Trade in the Bay of Bengal</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="633" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="424">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/292b6ac489ef5a56d541f8b989d40fcc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3e2766957882237c92ff326ae8a7165e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6881">
                    <text>Early Coins from Kerala: Situating the trade networks with special reference to
Pattanam
Hari Sankar B (Research Scholar, Tamil University)
Dinesh Krishnan (Research Officer, Kerala Council for Historical Research)
ABSTRACT
The paper is intended for session 26, titled "Early Coins from Kerala: Situating the trade networks with special
reference to Pattanam.” The research problem of the paper is to understand the distribution of coins and their
role in understanding the trade network. The study would be based on the catalogue of coins from Kerala.
Kerala, being known for its spices from ancient times, was not a secret to the world. Merchants from different
parts of Europe, Arab countries, and Pacific regions came here for commercial activities, which resulted in
exchanges of ideologies and material culture. Pattanam, an early historic port site on Kerala's coast close to the
Arabian Sea, has produced evidence of commercial activities with foreign countries, indicated by the presence
of ceramics and other material remains in large volume. According to early literary evidence, the Cheras
controlled the region, and the presence of their coins from Pattanam also supports this. Apart from these Chera
coins, the surrounding regions of the Pattanam site have been reported with Roman Gold and Silver coins and
early Indian silver punch-marked coins in hoards. Interestingly, these coins were found in the sites connecting
the Pattanam region to the neighbouring early historic sites like Kodumanal, Keeladi, and Azhagankulam.
Hence, these sites can be considered part of the hinterland trade networks that connect the region with other
early historic port towns in southern India. This paper tries to discuss the hinterland trade network of the
Pattanam site and how these coins can be used to trace the early economic condition of the region and its
monetary exchanges.
Keywords: Coins, Trade, Hinterland, burials
List of Figures
Figure 1 Chera coins from Pattanam excavations
Figure 2 Location of coins
Figure 3 The coin hoard sites along with burials

1. INTRODUCTION
The passages connecting the settlements, territories, and landscapes are the pathways that are known
as trade routes, and they have been an important landscape feature in cultural interactions. Polities and
states were keen on developing and controlling trade routes or highways to improve connectivity and
interactions for their advantage (Selvakumar 2018, 3). South India emerged as a prominent trade and
exchange centre during the Early historical period, evident by the literary evidence and material
remains. The geographical location, long stretching sea coast, backwaters and rivers, and various
spices were the main reasons for developing trade and ports in Kerala. Ports like Nelcynda, Bacare,
Naura, Eli, and Muziris are mentioned in the Greco-Roman records. As part of the trade, monetary
exchanges became an inevitable factor. Pattanam was such a port that became prominent during the
Early historical period because of the overall favourable conditions. This can be ascertained from the
rich cultural deposits at the site, which include ceramics.
2. BACKGROUND
Pattanam is an archaeological site (N 10°09.434' E 76°12.587') in Vadakkekara village in Chittatukara
Panchayat in the Ernakulam district of Kerala. Archaeological investigations at the site revealed an
enormous amount of material and structural remains which are indicators of past economy and other
culture-related activities. The site, which is close to the Arabian Sea, falls within the Periyar river
delta, which provides an insight into the early history of Kerala, its economy, and its maritime
activities. The Arabian Sea is about 4 km west of the site; in between the sea and the western

1

�boundary of the site is located the Tattapally River or Munambam backwaters that run parallel to the
Arabian Sea (Cherian et al. 2015, 11-12).
The port was under the control of Cheras during the early historic period. Roman Empire and Kerala
had commercial links established through literary evidence of Pliny and Ptolemy and artefacts such as
ceramics and coins. Pattanam had the presence of Roman Amphora, Arretine ware, Rouletted ware,
which are Roman potteries, and other material remains, including cameos, intaglios, and gaming
pieces. There was no evidence of Roman coins from the site but had the presence of Chera coins. The
periplus and other literary evidence clearly showed that the spice trade, mainly pepper, was
considered a precious spice. The seven and a half kg black pepper found in the famous Early Historic
port town of Berenike in Egypt in an Indian storage jar with first-century CE context (Tomber 2008,
76-77) attests to the pepper trade from the region. It is stated that the western ships arrived in India
comparatively light in weight and that a substantial bulk of Indian commodities were exchanged for
Roman coins (Romanis 2020, 138). This indicates how large the pepper trade was. The presence of
beryl beads from the site indicated the internal trade. Beryl mines are found in the Kodumanal region,
which is the closest source of raw material. All these factors indicate the internal and external trade
networks of Pattanam.
The present study focuses on identifying and understanding the trade routes by locating the coins. The
study also looks at the hinterland sites which could be present along the routes leading to other
contemporary sites of Pattanam, such as Kodumanal, Keezhadi, and Azhagankulam.
3. THE COINS
Coins are part of the source material for historical studies, which helps explain the economic, social,
and political factors of the past formations. In Kerala, coins belonging to various dynasties from early
historic to modern times were found in various places. Their presence can be inferred as part of the
monetary exchange resulting from internal and external trade.
3.1 Chera coins
The earliest coins of the Sangam period are the Chera, small square copper coins with symbols like an
arched hill, elephant, trees, umbrella, river with fishes, swastika, sun, srivatsa, wheel (chakra), garland
and bull on the obverse, and bow and arrow, the dynastic symbol of the Cheras on the reverse. These
coins are die-struck. The Cheras in the Sangam age also issued silver coins with the symbols like the
Sun, square tank, caduceus, and sadacharachakra on the obverse and the dynastic symbol 'bow and
arrow' on both sides (Vijayaraghavan 2000, 28-31).
Three coins were reported from Alangad near North Paravur in the Ernakulam district of Kerala.
These were found in an earthen pot unearthed during digging for agricultural purposes—two of the
coins found were semicircular, and one with a square shape. The coins bear a bow and arrow symbol
on the obverse and an elephant figure on the obverse (Sreekumar 1999, 162). Copper Chera coins
were found from Pattanam during excavations lasting nine seasons from 2007, with a clear legend,
bow, and arrow on the obverse and elephant on the reverse. These coins are also found in Tamil Nadu
in Coimbatore, Karur, Perur, Vellalur, and Kodumanal.

2

�Figure 1. Chera coins from Pattanam excavations (Courtesy: KCHR coin collection)

3.2 Roman Coins
The Roman coins were found in various places within Kerala and outside, mainly in the form of
hoards. The Roman coin hoard was first found in Nellore in Andhra Pradesh in 1786, with around 40
gold coins (Berghaus 1996, 8). A die made of bronze from emperor Hadrian was reported from Karur
in Tamil Nadu, which shows the demand for Roman coins in exchange for goods (Krishnamurthy
1996, 43-48). These coins are found buried in many sites in Kerala, like Kottayam (Aurei of Augustus
Nero), Eyyal, and Poonjar (Aurei of Augustus) (Gupta 1965, 47).
Eyyal - Eyyal was the first Roman coin hoard discovered in Kerala in 1945. Located about 15 km
southeast of Kunnamkulam in Tallappalli taluk of Thrissur district in Kerala, the site is located on the
Highway between the ancient emporium of Tyndis and Muziris. The hoard contains about 117 coins,
of these, 71 were Gold, 12 were silver, and the rest of the 34 were punch marked coins. The coins of
this hoard cover a period of about 123 BCE to 117 CE. This hoard has Denarii of Octavian, Claudius,
and Tiberius found in highly worn condition and Aurei of Tiberius, Claudius Nero, and Trajan in a
well-preserved condition (Gupta 1965, 48).
Valluvally- The site is Located 6 km south of North Paravur in the Ernakulam district of Kerala. The
hoard was discovered by local people while digging for agricultural purposes in 1983. The hoard
contained thousands of coins, but only 252 were recovered by the local police (Sathyamurty 2011,
14). Most coins were in good condition with inscriptions.
Nedumkandam- Nedumkandam is located in Udumbanchola Taluk of Idukki district in Kerala. The
site is located near the Ghat route to Tamil Nadu. Over 50 silver coins were discovered from this
hoard in 1992, but the reported coins are few (Berghaus 1996, 31).
Poonjar- Poonjar is located along the Ghat route in the Kottayam district of Kerala, and the hoard had
about 5 Aurei (Sathyamurthy 1965, 4).
Idamaruku- Coins of the early Julio-Claudian period have been discovered at Idamaruku in the
Kottayam district of Kerala. Idamaruku is a place close to Poonjar (Turner 1989, 74).
Niranam- Another finding has been at Niranam near Tiruvalla in the Pathanamthitta district of Kerala
(Turner 1989, 74).
Puthankavu- About 50 aurei have been reported from Puthenkavu, located near Chengannur Taluk in
Alappuzha District. The exact number of coins is unavailable (Champakalakshmi 1996, 265).
Kumbalam- The Kumbalam hoard in Ernakulam district of Kerala has nine aurei (Berghaus 1993,
29-42).
3

�Figure 2. Location of coins (Roman in yellow, pmc in red, Chera in green) (Created with Google Earth)

Kothamangalam- The Roman coin from the eighth to tenth centuries was reported from
Kothamangalam in Ernakulam District of Kerala (Valath 1991, 68).
There are a few other stray finds in the Alappuzha district, Kilaloor in the Kannur district, and
Kadakavur in the Trivandrum district. However, the details regarding the coins are not available.
3.3 Punch-Marked coins
Punch-marked coins are the earliest coinage of India, and most scholars consider them of indigenous
origin. Punch-marked coins are generally known in silver and rarely in copper, with various sizes and
weights. The size of the coins varies according to shape and weight. These are made of silver and
copper and rectangular or square and sometimes irregular in shape. The term punch-marked comes
from the technique used for preparing coins where the symbols are stamped on them with punches.
They were in vogue when writing was not current in India and were rarely used (Goyal 1995, 79).
Symbols are one most conspicuous features of these coins and do not bear any legend or inscription.
Various forms of representations, like hills, birds, trees, animals, human figures, and floral and
geometrical patterns, appear on them. However, the exact importance still needs to be clarified and
remains as mysterious as ever (Vanaja 1983, 5).
Several silver punch-marked coins have been discovered in different parts of Kerala. Three hoards of
punch-marked coins were found from the region, which includes the Elikulamkara hoard in the
Kottayam district, the Eyyal hoard in Thrissur district and the Kodusserry hoard from Angamali in the
Ernakulam district (Department of Archaeology, Administrative Reports 1971-72, 75-76). The coin's
origin is considered to be of something other than Kerala origin. However, an interesting fact is the
discovery of punch-marked die from Karur, which can be used to mint coins (Murthy 1994, 51-56). A
total of 218 silver punch-marked coins were discovered from the first two hoards, Elikulamkara, and
Eyyal, in 1946. Of these, 184 coins were unearthed from Kottayam, and only 162 coins have been
classified. Rests of the 34 coins were reported from Eyyal (Gupta 1965, 5).
Kodussery- Kodussery is located near Angamaly in the Ernakulam district of Kerala. The coins were
found inside an earthen jar discovered while digging the foundation of a house. The hoard containing

4

�783 silver punch-marked coins is now kept in the Numismatics Study Center, State Department of
Archaeology, Nedumangad, Thiruvananthapuram (Satyamurthy 1994, 45).
4. TRACING THE HINTERLAND SITES AND TRADE ROUTES
The three varieties of coins from the early historic period were found in various places over Kerala.
Their distribution pattern will be traced to understand the trade routes and hinterland sites. The
Pattanam site has Chera coins, but Roman and punch-marked coins are absent. These coins are found
in large numbers outside the site. Foremost, the location of these coins and theIron age- early historic
sites can be combined to get further information about hinterland trade and networks. The interesting
fact regarding combining the iron age-early historic site data and of the coin hoards is that there is no
evidence of well-recognised settlements identified, or even large mounds which are found in many
parts of India in the region except at Pattanam and a few sites like Anakkara and Nachivayal.
However, megalithic burials are found all over the area. (Krishnan 2017, 111). An important point
highlighted here is that a burial cannot exist without the settlements. So naturally, nearby the burial
sites, settlements must have existed. However, the issue is that we cannot recognise them because of
the topographic features, continuous habitation, landscape modification, habitation remains, and the
environmental conditions of Kerala, mainly seasonal floods. Therefore, we can assume that each
burial site refers to a habitation. However, people definitely lived nearby since the vast material
culture represented in the burials cannot come from nowhere. 
Secondly, the traded materials, mainly pepper, can also be used in this context to understand the
hinterland sites. As noted in Sangam and Classical texts, black pepper was one of the important
products shipped out in vast quantities. It is possible to produce such a large amount of pepper only in
the high ranges as it requires vast areas for cultivation, geographical conditions, trade, and
communication for such large-scale trade. The Tamil inscription of Rajendra Chola found on a
megalithic menhir stone near Rajakumari in the upper Periyar valley indicates spice production
centres and the trade route passed through the region in the later periods also (Kumar 2017, 78-85). In
modern days this region is also known for spice cultivating, especially pepper. Considering this,
production of the resources must have taken place in the hinterland settlements and neighbouring
regions and then transported to Pattanam for external trade.
Furthermore, the port town Azhagankulam on the northern bank of river Vaigai in Tamil Nadu must
have trade relations with Pattanam. Both these sites might have connected through the highland area
of the Western Ghats and Madurai. Mainly there are two routes connecting these regions, one through
the Bodinayakanur pass via Kothamangalam, Adimali, Munnar, Rajakkad, Theni, and Madurai. The
second is through Cumbum pass via Kothamangalam, Idukki, Kumly, Cumbum, Theni, and Madurai.
The Roman coin hoard found from the Nedumkandam and Poonjar is located in the same region,
which indicates that trade and transport prevailed in the region.
Another critical aspect being considered here is that in certain burials, there is the presence of
carnelian beads where the raw materials are not locally available. Their presence in these burials is a
big question unless there is a great trade network or communication. The literature says that the
products from South India reached the Ganges. They also mention that export items such as products
of semi-precious stones might have come from the Kongu region of Tamil Nadu. The region is known
for the mines of stones and production centres of various stone objects. The semi-precious stones raw
materials, such as carnelian, chalcedony, agate, and beryl from Pattanam, might have come from these
regions (Krishnan 2017, 252).

5

�Figure 3. Coin hoard sites along with burials and modern road ways
(coins in yellow, burials in red), (created with Google Earth)

The Eyyal hoard of coins with Roman and punch-marked coins is also found along the route to
Kodumanal in Tamil Nadu, an early historic site with Roman contacts glimpsed from the excavations.
The Palakkad gap is a natural pass leading to the Coimbatore region and then to Kodumanal, famous
for beryl mines. Roman coins from Coimbatore and Palakkad and the beryl beads and raw materials
from Pattanam indicate trade and transportation between the sites and Eyyal being on the route. The
Roman coin hoards are found in various places of Tamizhakam, such as Pollachi, Karur, Vellalur,
Kalayamuttur, Madurai, Coimbatore, Yesvantpur, Pudukkottai, Eyyal, Kottayam, Valluvalli,
Panangadu, and Puthenchira indicates the commercial contacts from region to region (Krishnan 2017,
190).
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The Roman coin hoards, the Chera coins, and punch-marked coins belonging to the Early historic
period were recovered from various places in Kerala. The discovery of coins, a medium of exchange,
means there were internal and external trade contacts. The material from Pattanam also supports this
statement. Many artefacts belonging to the Romans, such as different varieties of pottery and beads,
were found at the site. No Roman or punch-marked coins have been recovered from the site, which is
a matter of question as they were found in surrounding places. The Chera coins were found at the site
and from a nearby site, indicating internal trading activities. The Roman coins were found on the route
to other contemporary sites in Tamil Nadu, such as Kodumanal, Karur, Azagankulam, and Keeladi.
All these sites, along with intermediate sites, have the presence of Roman coins indicating the trade
networks. It is clear that the development of the Pattanam site as an urban centre is based on maritime
contacts with foreign countries as well as local interactions and development. The Iron Age people,
who lived in the interior areas, supported the development of the port town of Pattanam. The
commodities exported from the Pattanam site might have come from these interior locations where the
local people cultivated or collected them. The coins might be part of this exchange system for goods
found in several places.

6

�Considering the factors mentioned above, it can be assumed that the coins were found on the trade
routes or nearby hinterland settlements/ burials which supported the port town of Pattanam. The coins
came as part of the trade network and communication between these sites and Pattanam. However, the
monetary value of the coins cannot be traced with limited literary evidence.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank KCHR for providing coins for the study. We also express our gratitude to Dr Selvakumar V of Tanjavur
University and Sarath Chandrababu for their suggestions and kind support.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Berghaus, Peter. “Roman Aurei from Kumbalam, Ernakulam District, Kerala”. in Studies in South Indian Coins 3. Edited by
Narasimha Murthy. (1994): 29–42. Madras, India: New Era publication.
Berghaus, Peter. “Roman coins from south India”. in Studies in South Indian Coins. Edited by Narasimha Murthy. Vol. 6.
7–14. Madras, India: New Era publication, 1996.
Champakalakshmi, Radha. Trade, Ideology, and Urbanization: South India 300 BC to AD 1300. Oxford University Press,
USA, 1996.
Chedambath, Rajan. An Investigation into the Megalithic and Early HistoricPeriod of the Periyar and Ponnani River Basins
of Kerala, Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute, 1998.
De Romanis, Federico. The Indo-Roman Pepper Trade and the Muziris Papyrus. Oxford University Press, USA, 2020.
Goyala, S. The Coinage of Ancient India. Jodhpur, India: Kusumanjali Prakashan, 1994.
Gupta, Parmeshwari Lal. The Early Coins from Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram, India: Department of Archaeology,
Government of Kerala., 1965.
Krishnamurthy, R. “A Roman coin die from Karur, Tamilnadu”. in Studies in South Indian Coins. Edited by Narasimha
Murthy. Vol. 6. 43-48. Madras, India: New Era publication, 1996.
Menon, A. Sreedhara. A Survey of Kerala History. D C Books, 2007.
Sathyamurthy, T. Catalogue of Roman Gold Coins. 2nd ed. Department of Archaeology, Thiruvananthapuram, 2011.
Sathyamurthy, T. “Nedumkandam hoard of Roman Dinarii”. in Studies in South Indian Coins. Edited by Narasimha Murthy.
Vol. 6. 31-42. Madras, India: New Era publication, 1996.
Sathyamurthy, T. “Angamali hoard of silver punch marked coins”. in Studies in South Indian Coins. Edited by Narasimha
Murthy. Vol. 4. 45-50. Madras, India: New Era publication, 1995.
Sathyamurthy, T. Catalogue of Roman Gold Coins in the Collections of Department of Archaeology, Kerala,
Thiruvananthapuram, India: Department of Archaeology, Government of Kerala,1992.
Satyamurthy, T. Angamali Hoard of Silver punch-marked coins in Studies on South Indian Coins IV (1994): 45-50,
Selvakumar, V. “Ancient trade routes and inscriptions of Tamizhagam” in Epigraphical society of India-XLIII Annual
session ( 2018): 3-39. Kozhikode, Kerala.
Sidebotham, Steven E., and Willeke Wendrich. Berenike 1999/2000: Report on the Excavations at Berenike, Including
Excavations in Wadi Kalalat and Siket, and the Survey of the Mons Smaragdus Region. ISD LLC, 2007.
Sreekumar, K.S. Travancore Archaeological Series Vol. 5. Thiruvananthapuram: Department of Cultural Publications,
Government of Kerala, 1999.
Turner, Paula J. Roman Coins from India. Routledge, 2016.
Vanaja, R. Indian Coinage. New Delhi: National Museum, 1983.

7

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="364">
                  <text>2023 Session 26: General session</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="365">
                  <text>Session 26 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="366">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 26 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="367">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="368">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="369">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="370">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="371">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="372">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6874">
                <text>Early Coins from Kerala: Situating the trade networks with special reference to Pattanam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6875">
                <text>Hari Sankar B &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6876">
                <text>Dinesh Krishnan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6877">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6878">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6879">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6880">
                <text> Krishnan, Dineesh and Hari Sankar B . 2023. “Early coins from Kerala: Situating the trade networks with special reference to Pattanam.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Elena Pérez Álvaro. Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/2005 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="71">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 26 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="83" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="904">
                <text>Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="905">
                <text>Romila Thapar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="906">
                <text>University of California Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="907">
                <text>2002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="908">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="909">
                <text>Romila Thapar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="910">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="911">
                <text>2002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="912">
                <text>Berkeley</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="913">
                <text>University of California Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="914">
                <text>Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="18">
        <name>India</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="387" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4689">
                <text>Early Indonesian Commerce: A Study of the Origins of Srivijaya</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4690">
                <text>O.W. Wolters</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4691">
                <text>Cornell University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4692">
                <text>1967</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4693">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4694">
                <text>O.W. Wolters</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4695">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4696">
                <text>1967</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4697">
                <text>Ithaca</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4698">
                <text>Cornell University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="4699">
                <text>Early Indonesian Commerce: A Study of the Origins of Srivijaya</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="17">
        <name>Southeast Asia</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="82" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="892">
                <text>Early Medieval trade on Japan's Southern Frontier and its Effect on Okinawan State Development: Grey Stoneware of the East China Sea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="893">
                <text>Richard J Pearson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="894">
                <text>2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="895">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="896">
                <text>Richard J Pearson</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="897">
                <text>Journal Article</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="898">
                <text>2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="196">
            <name>Issue</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="899">
                <text>2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="215">
            <name>Pages</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="900">
                <text>122-151</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="225">
            <name>Publication Title</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="901">
                <text>International Journal of Historical Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="902">
                <text>Early Medieval trade on Japan's Southern Frontier and its Effect on Okinawan State Development: Grey Stoneware of the East China Sea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="903">
                <text>11</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="16">
        <name>Japan</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
