<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=11&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-24T23:39:49+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>11</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="590" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="381">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/1bcda376a910a9e09dd68952d56563fc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>eb8bdf725bebbacf088e37cf8c3023bb</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6491">
                    <text>Development and State of Research on Conservation Treatment of Underwater Cultural
Heritage in Korea
Bo-hyun Lee (Conservation Science Research Curator, National Research Institute of
Maritime Cultural Heritage)
ABSTRACT
Conservation treatment of large waterlogged wooden historic ships improved gradually as historic ships were
excavated one after another. After 40 years, exhibition halls and conservation treatment centers have been
established and in operation in Mokpo and Taean. Taean is equipped with Asia's largest vacuum freezer and
Mokpo conservation treatment place with a long history is being transformed into a new conservation treatment
center. In addition, the National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, which has Korea's only
underwater cultural heritage conservation and treatment facility, has been publishing treatment reports and
guidelines for many years. However, as the acidic aging was discovered on the Sinan shipwreck like the Vasa
and Mary Rose, it has become an issue and various studies were conducted to identify the cause and treatment
method accordingly. It is unreasonable to apply the results of test pieces in the laboratory directly to the entire
Sinan shipwreck, which was restored and displayed at the exhibition hall. Therefore, it is planned to conduct a
partial test gradually to find a method that can handle exhibition and treatment at the same time.
Keywords: underwater cultural heritage, conservation treatment, research status, challenges
List of Tables
Table 1. State of conservation treatment of historic ships recovered from underwater (as of May 2023)
Table 2. List of publications on conservation of underwater cultural heritage

INTRODUCTION
This study deals with overall matters related to the conservation treatment of underwater cultural
heritage (UCH) in Korea which started in 1976.
The research was partially addressed in Conservation Treatment of Historic Ships Collected from the
Sea published by the National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage (NRIMCH) in 2021.
This study intends to deal with the current state of research on conservation science of UCH in Korea
in detail from more various perspectives. In addition, this study intends to highlight the current
research projects and future tasks.
We will examine the process of development before touching upon the current state of conservation
science of UCH in Korea.
DEVELOPMENT OF CONSERVATION TREATMENT OF UNDERWATER CULTURAL
HERITAGE IN KOREA
Conservation treatment of UCH in Korea began with the excavation of the Sinan shipwreck in 1976.
However, excavation of the Sinan shipwreck which started in the sea, a special environment, presented
many challenges from the beginning. There was no infrastructure to speak of such as professionals,
budget and treatment facility and there was a big problem of how to treat super-large wooden historic
ships. At that time conservation treatment technology of Japan was more advanced than that of Korea
but the conservation treatment technology for wooden historic ships in East Asia was not comparable
to that of Europe. Accordingly, Korea started direct exchanges with museums in many parts of Europe
including Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and the UK in order to learn Europe’s historic
ship conservation treatment method and restoration technology in 1983. Korea dispatched domestic
experts to international courses for wooden cultural heritage conservation sponsored by UNESCO and
ICCROM and started forming academic exchanges. Thanks to this, the current state of wooden

1

�historic ships in Europe and various treatment methods became widely known in Korea. In the 1990s,
the waterlogged wooden conservation treatment area took its root firmly in Korea’s cultural heritage
conservation science.
In addition, PEG-2 step treatment method was applied to the Sinan shipwreck through joint basic
experiment and research conducted together with the German Maritime Museum. PEG-2 step is a
method of impregnating a low-molecular PEG400 solution at a low concentration, and then heating the
high-molecular solid PEG4000 at 40-45 °C and impregnating it to a high concentration (Kim Ik-joo
2004, 68-69). This method still works for submerged shipwrecks.
Table 1. State of conservation treatment of historic ships recovered from underwater (as of May 2023)
No.

Name

Size (length x
width (m)) /
No. of pieces

Treatment
method

Date of treatment
period

Treatment
status

Location

1

Sinan shipwreck

34 x 11 /
1, 729 pieces

1981-2004

Exhibition

Mokpo
Museum

2

Wando shipwreck

9 x 3.5 /
1, 81 pieces

1984-1998

Exhibition

Mokpo
Museum

3

Dalido shipwreck

10.5 x 2.7 /
1, 33 pieces

Jul. 1995- Dec. 2009

Exhibition

Mokpo
Museum

4

Sipyidongpado
shipwreck

7 x 2.5 /
1, 14 pieces

2004-2016

Exhibition

Mokpo
Museum

5

Jindo shipwreck

16.8 x 2.3 /
1, 2 pieces

Jun. 1992-present

Dried

Mokpo
Conservation
Center

6

Anjwado
shipwreck

14.7 x 4.5 /
1, 39 pieces

Aug. 2005-present

Dried

Mokpo
Conservation
Center

7

Daebudo
shipwreck

6.6 x 1.4 /
1, 7 pieces

Dec. 2006-present

Dried

Mokpo
Conservation
Center

8

Taean shipwreck

8.2 x 1.5 /
1, 7 pieces

May 2008-present

Reinforced
(70%)

Taean
Conservation
Center

9

Mado
no. 1

shipwreck

10.8 x 3.7 /
1, 40 pieces

Oct. 2009-present

Reinforced
(70%)

Taean
Conservation
Center

10

Mado
no. 2

shipwreck

12.8 x 5 /
1, 41 pieces

-

Oct. 2010-present

Desalinated

Taean
Conservation
Center

11

Mado
no. 3

shipwreck

12 x 8 /
1, 21 pieces

-

-

Conserved
on site

-

12

Yeongheungdo
shipwreck

6 x 1.5 /
1, 3 pieces

-

Jul. 2013-present

Desalinated

Mokpo
Conservation
Center

13

Mado
no. 4

12 x 5 /
1, 22 pieces

-

-

Conserved
on site

-

14

Daebudo
shipwreck no. 2

9.2 x 2.9 /
1, 50 pieces

-

Jul. 2015-present

Desalinated

Mokpo
Conservation
Center

15

Jebudo shipwreck
no. 1

9.2 x 2.9

-

-

Conserved
on site

-

16

Jebudo shipwreck
no. 2

9.2 x 2.9

-

-

Conserved
on site

-

shipwreck

PEG
2-Step
method
(400/4000)

2

�The Sinan shipwreck was unveiled in 2004 after 18 years of conservation treatment and 10 years of
hull restoration.
After excavation of Sinan shipwreck, historic ships were discovered one after another in the West Sea
of Korea, including Wando shipwreck (1984), Jindo Pyokpari Tongnamu Pae (1992), Dalido
shipwreck (1995), Sipyidongpado shipwreck (2004), Anjwado shipwreck (2005), Daebudo shipwreck
(2006), Taean shipwreck (2008), Mado shipwreck no. 1 (2009), Mado shipwreck no. 2 (2010), Mado
shipwreck no. 3 (2011), Yeongheungdo shipwreck (2013), Mado shipwreck no. 4 (2014), Daebudo
shipwreck no. 2 (2015), Jebudo shipwreck no. 1 (2016) and Jebudo shipwreck no. 2 (2016). Table 1
summarizes where these ships have been treated for conservation or in the process of conservation
treatment, while some are conserved on site.
As historic ships have been excavated continuously, Korea’s underwater archeology and conservation
treatment technology of historic ships have grown remarkably. The conservation treatment
infrastructure, organization and budget have become one of the top in Asia.
The NRIMCH, which started in Mokpo Conservation Center in 1982, is now operating museums in
Mokpo (Jeollanam-do) and Taean (Chungcheongnam-do) respectively and has its own conservation
treatment facility. Mokpo conservation center, which started with two employees about 42 years ago,
has now ten employees in Mokpo and five in Taean. Taean conservation center has installed and run
test operation of Asia's largest vacuum freezer.
CURRENT STATE OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE FOR UCH IN KOREA
Cultural heritage excavated from water is very diverse in materials such as metal, ceramics, wood, and
stone. Various kinds of artifacts are excavated from ships as ships are a carrier of transport goods,
which contains living space on the ship. Therefore, conservation methods should be applied differently
depending on materials.
Korea has already prepared guidelines on conservation treatment by material with dividing artifacts
into those excavated from land and those from underwater and has treated them by referring to these
guidelines.
Recovered Artifacts so far are mainly made of wood (hull components, etc.) and ceramics (transport
goods), so the proportion of conservation treatment for historic ships and ceramics is high.
Out of 50,762 artifacts excavated, 47,036 pieces are ceramics, accounting for more than 93 per cent. In
addition, all five pieces which are nationally designated cultural property and in possession are
ceramics.
Natural scientific analysis of ceramics excavated from the sea began in earnest in the early 2000s.
Depending on the excavation site and function, various analyzes have been conducted, such as the
base soil, firing temperature, minor components, and estimation of the production site. Starting from
this year, research is being conducted to scientifically reveal the relationship between the production
and the consumption areas, and the correlation between the times and materials based on the existing
research results.

3

�Table 2. List of publications on conservation of UCH
Major content

No
.

Title

Date

1

Guideline on
Conservation
Treatment of
Artifacts
Excavated from
Underwater

2013

A guideline on conservation treatment of
artifacts excavated from underwater including
treatment cases.

2

Conservation
Manual of
Maritime
Archaeological
Objects in Korea

2014

English version of the guideline on conservation
treatment of artifacts excavated from
underwater, introducing how to treat wooden
artifacts, ceramics and metal artifacts.

3

Conservation
Treatment of
Ceramics
Excavated from
Underwater

2020

Classifying pottery which was excavated the
largest in volume into pottery, celadon and white
porcelain and reporting treatment methods and
cases.

4

Conservation
Treatment of
historic Ships
Excavated from
Underwater

2021

Containing the process of conservation
treatment for Sinan shipwreck, Wando
shipwreck, Jindo shipwreck, Dalido shipwreck
and Sipyidongpado shipwreck and natural
scientific analysis details.

5 Comprehensive
Report on Sinan
Ship
Conservation
Project

2022

Summarizing the research on analysis on aging
of Sinan shipwreck and conservation treatment
method comprehensively.

Cover

ISSUES REGARDING CONSERVATION SCIENCE OF UCH IN KOREA
Korea's historic ship conservation treatment can be divided into two fields. First, conservation
treatment of waterlogged wood using PEG and infrastructure. Second, neutralization treatment of
acidic aging that occurs in historic ships treated with PEG.
First, the conservation of waterlogged wood with PEG is to treat the wood using PEG-2 step method
as mentioned earlier. Reinforcement treatment is done with PEG 400-PEG 4000 and not vacuum
lyophilization but control drying is done for conservation. Taean conservation treatment room is
equipped with the latest vacuum lyophilizer that can treat 10 m. The Mokpo Conservation Center
needs facility replacement as it was established in 1981.
Conservation treatment of waterlogged wood using PEG and infrastructure
The hull varies in length from about 2 m to 10 m for each member and a specially designed tank is
required for reinforcement treatment. The tank should be made of stainless steel with strong corrosion
resistance, and a heat source (boiler hot water and electric coil) and temperature sensor should be
attached to maintain a constant temperature. In addition, in order to mix the high molecular weight

4

�PEG well, a solution circulation pump facility that can exchange the upper and lower solutions is
required. Moreover, boiler, expansion tank, and hot water pipe facilities should be in place in the boiler
room upon heating treatment using boiler hot water.
Assuming that the hull members are 5-6 m long, 0.1 m thick, and 0.5 m wide, the weight usually
reaches 300 kg. Hoists, cranes, and lifts that can lift and move these members safely and easily are
essential. Therefore, in order to conserve and treat large-sized timbers such as hulls, a large-scale
processing facility should be established.
The NRIMCH started seismic construction of PEG reinforcement treatment in 2022, and planned PEG
reinforcement treatment internal construction (water drainage, piping, electricity, etc.) and tank (10 m
x 1 m x 1 m * 1 unit, 6 m x 1 m x 1 m * 6 units), desalination treatment room improvement in 2025
and drying treatment room improvement in 2026.
Acidic aging of historic ships treated with PEG
Acidic aging is caused by the presence of iron compounds in wood and prolonged exposure, and the
same phenomenon has already appeared in foreign ships such as Vasa, Mary Rose, and Batavia, and
efforts have been made to solve this problem.
The Sinan shipwreck experienced acidic aging since 2010 and various methods were tried inside and
outside the laboratory to solve the problem. Constant temperature and humidity monitoring has been
conducted to secure raw data and the aging condition of the hull has been recorded with 3D scanning
using 3D digital methods. After that, surface contaminants were removed through dry cleaning, and a
deterioration map was also prepared to compare changes in surface conditions. Integrated Pest
Management is being implemented to prevent harmful organisms in exhibition halls and storage areas
and to establish a stable conservation environment. Various acidic aging treatment experiments were
conducted in the laboratory and the Comprehensive Report on Sinan Ship Conservation Project that
contains the results of experiments was recently released. This experiment is the result of the
experiment on a test piece carried out in the laboratory, but it is difficult to practically apply chemical
treatment to the 924 m2 exhibition room. Therefore, the Heritage Science Team of the NRIMCH plans
to expand the treatment area in the future, starting with a direct spot test on the Sinan shipwreck,
which was exhibited from this year. Our future task will be how to open the exhibition site to the
audience safely as the conservation treatment is underway in the exhibition hall.

Acknowledgements
I would like to thank organizers and committee members for making a decision for Korea to host APConf 2023. I would also
like to express my gratitude to my seniors and colleagues who have worked hard for conservation science at the NRIMCH.
Bibliography
Kim, Ik-Joo. “Conservation of Waterlogged Ancient Ship in Korea.” The Conservation and Restoration of Shinan Ship, the
20 Years History (2004): 58-71 (In Korean).
NRIMCH. Conservation Manual of Maritime Archaeological Objects in Korea, Series of Research Report of NRIMCH 31.
Mokpo: NRIMCH, 2013 (In Korean).
NRIMCH. The Conservation of Ceramics Excavated from Underwater, Series of Research Report of NRIMCH 61. Mokpo:
NRIMCH, 2020 (In Korean).
NRIMCH. The Conservation of Shipwrecks Excavated from Underwater, Series of Research Report of NRIMCH 63. Mokpo:
NRIMCH, 2021 (In Korean).
NRIMCH. The Comprehensive Report on Conservation Project of Sinan Shipwreck, Series of Research Report of NRIMCH
74. Mokpo: NRIMCH, 2022 (In Korean).

5

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="50">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="256">
                  <text>2023 Session 14: Conservation Treatment of Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="257">
                  <text>Session 14 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="258">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 14 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="259">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="260">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="261">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="262">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="263">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="264">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6484">
                <text>Development and State of Research on Conservation Treatment of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Korea</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6485">
                <text>Conservation treatment of large waterlogged wooden historic ships improved gradually as historic ships were&#13;
excavated one after another. After 40 years, exhibition halls and conservation treatment centers have been&#13;
established and in operation in Mokpo and Taean. Taean is equipped with Asia's largest vacuum freezer and&#13;
Mokpo conservation treatment place with a long history is being transformed into a new conservation treatment&#13;
center. In addition, the National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, which has Korea's only&#13;
underwater cultural heritage conservation and treatment facility, has been publishing treatment reports and&#13;
guidelines for many years. However, as the acidic aging was discovered on the Sinan shipwreck like the Vasa&#13;
and Mary Rose, it has become an issue and various studies were conducted to identify the cause and treatment&#13;
method accordingly. It is unreasonable to apply the results of test pieces in the laboratory directly to the entire&#13;
Sinan shipwreck, which was restored and displayed at the exhibition hall. Therefore, it is planned to conduct a&#13;
partial test gradually to find a method that can handle exhibition and treatment at the same time.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6486">
                <text>Bo-hyun Lee</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6487">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6488">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6489">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6490">
                <text> Lee, Bo-hyun. 2023. “Development and State of Research on Conservation Treatment of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Korea.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Juhee Kim. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1961 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="56">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 14 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="279" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="199">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/707ae011556d3dbcccfa406a39d840fb.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4c76ac592ca3b4428ebb1bb20f30f169</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="3252">
                    <text>PROTECTING AND PRESERVING THE UNDERWATER
CULTURAL HERITAGE IN THE PHILIPPINES:
A BACKGROUND PAPER
Bobby C. Orillaneda1 and Wilfredo P. Ronquillo2

Abstract
The archipelagic nature of the Philippines and its strategic maritime location in the South
China Sea gives an indication of the country’s significant underwater cultural heritage. Indigenous
rd
and foreign watercraft dating from the 3 century C.E. has been discovered, excavated, exhibited
and published by the National Museum of the Philippines and in collaboration with local and
foreign research entities.
However, the management and protection of this cultural heritage is far from perfect.
Inadequate financial support from the government, weak legislation and enforcement and lack of
qualified personnel are cited as some of the reasons. This is coupled with the ever active threat of
pillage and destruction from treasure hunters, illegal fishing methods and the dive tourism
industry. As such, the National Museum’s role as the leading government agency tasked with the
conduct and management of the country’s underwater cultural heritage and the advance of
underwater archaeology to an academic practice remains a challenge.
The introduction of the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater
Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region through the Regional Workshop in Hong Kong in
2003 with the aim of ratification has been an uphill battle, with Cambodia the only country to ratify
the said convention in the Southeast Asian region thus far. This paper examines the impact of the
2001 Convention in the Philippines and examines the prospects for its ratification.

INTRODUCTION
The Philippines is an archipelago composed of approximately 7,107
islands, with a coastline of 36,289 kilometers, the fifth longest coastline in the
world and surrounded by large bodies of water; the West Philippine Sea (South
China Sea) on the west, the Philippine Sea that stretches to the Pacific Ocean on
the east, the Sulu Sea on the southwest and the Celebes Sea on the south.
There are 31 principal river basins and over 50 lakes scattered all over the
archipelago (Cuevas et al. 2004). Considering the distribution of different land
masses over vast waterways that have been utilized as a source of livelihood,
migration, exchange, trade and other maritime cultural activities, it is unsurprising
that the country has a rich underwater cultural heritage.
Archaeological excavations inside Callao Cave in Peñablanca, Cagayan
Valley, Northern Luzon unearthed the earliest human evidence dated to 67,000
years ago (Mijares et al. 2010). During the Neolithic period, after about the 4th
1

Museum Researcher II, Underwater Archaeology Section, Archaeology Division, National
Museum of the Philippines, bobbyorillaneda@yahoo.com
2
Scientist II and Curator II, Archaeology Division, National Museum of the Philippines,
wpronquillo@yahoo.com

�millennium BCE (Before Common Era), Austronesian speaking people began
occupying the Philippines bringing with them material culture consisting of pottery
and stone artefacts (Bellwood 1997; Solheim 1994-95).
The oldest archaeological evidence of indigenous watercraft in the
Philippines are wooden lashed-lug, planked-boats termed balangay that was
excavated in Butuan, northeastern Mindanao in the late 1970s (Scott 1982;
Ronquillo 1989). Radiocarbon dates from one of the boats yielded a date
between 260 to 550 CE (Common Era) while a similar vessel gave a date of
1270 to 1410 CE after calibration. The earlier radiocarbon date is purported to be
unreliable, but further tests have yet to be conducted to validate or disprove this.
Analysis of the boat building technology identified the Butuan boats as used for
transporting people and goods over short-distance, inter-island travel that did not
venture from the coast. By the 9th century, the Belitung shipwreck (Flecker 2000;
Flecker 2001; Guy 2001-2002) excavated off Indonesia showed the development
of maritime trade between Arab, Indian and Persian states with China. The West
Philippine Sea used as a maritime highway along which they may have utilized
the Philippines as a victual stop and a site for low level trade and exchange. The
10th century Chinese texts, specifically the official Sung History for the year 972
CE, mentioned trade relations with Ma-i, thought to be located in the present day
Mindoro Island in southwest of the archipelago. Tribute bearing missions from
Luzon and Butuan journeyed to China less than a hundred years later (Scott
1984). Chinese and Southeast Asian shipwrecks have been located in Philippine
waters beginning with the 13th century CE until the early 16th century CE,
indicating the participation of the Philippines in the regional Southeast Asian
maritime trade network prior to the advent of the Europeans.
The arrival of a Spanish expedition led by Portuguese captain Ferdinand
Magellan in 1521 CE ushered in the colonial period and the fabled galleon trade
that lasted 250 years (1565 – 1815 CE). During this period, indigenous watercraft
and foreign ocean-sailing commercial vessels carried spices, forest and sea
products, textiles and ceramics from all over the Philippine archipelago, China,
Japan and other Southeast Asian countries to Manila and then brought these to
Acapulco in Mexico, the entry point for the transshipment of goods for Spain via
the naos de china or the ‘Manila Galleons’. In exchange, the galleons’ return
voyage primarily carried silver metal mined from South America that was in high
demand in China and Southeast Asia as currency (Schurtz 1985).
The post galleon trade era during the 19th century saw the rise of
Philippine exports such as sugar, abaca, tobacco and coffee that accounted for
about 90 percent of the total export volume during that period (Legarda 1999).
The commercial role of colonial Spain diminished and was replaced by trading
partners such as Great Britain, the United States of America and China. This
continued until the Philippine revolution in the last years of the 19th century.
During the Second World War, the Philippines became the site of
numerous naval engagements between the United States of America and Japan
that resulted in huge loss of life and ships. To date, hundreds of World War II
shipwrecks are scattered all over the Philippines.

�HISTORY OF UCH MANAGEMENT
Although the country’s Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) consists of varied
material deposits from diverse sites such as an underwater cemetery in
Camiguin, stone boat-shaped burials in Batanes (Dizon et al. 1995-1997) and
reported submerged habitation sites and structures, research and management
of UCH have been largely confined to shipwrecks.
The earliest recorded shipwreck investigation occurred in 1967 at Santo
Domingo, Albay in southeast Luzon (Lopez 1967), and then again in the 1970s
(Conese 1989), but these early forays were purely salvage efforts unsupervised
by qualified personnel or institution. In an effort to preserve and protect the
country’s cultural properties, the Philippine government formulated Republic Act
(RA) 4846, Cultural Properties Preservation and Protection Act, passed on June
18 1966. It was later amended by Presidential Decree (PD) 374, Amending
Certain Sections of Republic Act No. 4846, Otherwise Known as the ‘Cultural
Properties Preservation and Protection Act’ on January 10 1974. The National
Museum was appointed as the lead government agency in implementing the
provisions of these laws, including archaeological research and management.
The Underwater Archaeology Unit (UAU) was created in 1979 with
support from the Southeast Asian Minister of Education Organization Special
Projects in Archaeology and the Fine Arts (SEAMEO-SPAFA) (Ronquillo 1989).
In the absence of an underwater archaeologist or a diving archaeologist, UAU
was staffed with people from other disciplines such as zoology and engineering
with scuba diving skills. The practice of collaborating with private entities that
could financially support exploration and excavation projects in exchange for a
share of recovered materials started, reflecting the fact that the government
could not provide funds for fieldwork and stop the rising incidence of shipwreck
looting.
The bases for such collaborative agreements between the National
Museum and private proponents were stated in the Underwater Archaeology
Policy Guideline. Contained in the guidelines were the rules and regulations for
the issuance of permits for parties who wished to engage in underwater
archaeological activities within the archipelago’s maritime territory, as well as
establish guidelines on the methodology of survey, exploration, excavation and
post excavation activities that should be strictly adhered to. These guidelines
have been improved and expanded to its present form as the Rules and
Regulations for Underwater Archaeology in Exploration and Excavation in
Philippine Waters. Appended in the rules and regulations is a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) that serves as the binding legal instrument between the
National Museum and the proponent.
The first project of the UAU was the excavation of the 16th century
Marinduque3 shipwreck in 1982 (Conese et al. 1981; Alba 1999). This was
followed by survey and exploration projects around the country and the
3

The shipwrecks listed in this text that have not been identified have adopted titles based on nearby placenames and so are not italicized. Italics indicate known ship names.

�excavations of the following: Puerto Galera wreck in Mindoro in 1983 and 1989
(Conese 1983; Conese 1989; Alba 1984; Ronquillo 1998); the Royal Captain
Junk, a 16th century Asian trade vessel in 1985, (Goddio and Jay 1988; Ronquillo
1998); the British East Indiaman Griffin (1761) that sunk off Basilan Island from
1985 – 87 (Goddio and Jay 1988); the Nuestra Señora de la Vida (1620) that
sunk off Isla Verde, Mindoro from 1985 - 88 (Conese 1989); and the San Jose
galleon (1694) that sunk off Lubang Island Mindoro from 1986 – 88 (Sorapora
and Michael 1987; Cuevas 1988; Conese 1989; Ronquillo 1998).
In 1988, UAU was renamed the Underwater Archaeology Section (UAS),
headed by archaeologist Eusebio Z. Dizon. UAS members participated in
advanced underwater archaeology training in Thailand (Conese 1989). Fittingly,
the primary project of UAS was the re-investigation of the Marinduque shipwreck
in 1989 (Henson 1989; Alba 1990). The objective was to improve excavation and
recording methodology and undertake first-aid conservation treatment of
recovered archaeological specimens.
The 1990s was considered the ‘peak’ of Philippine underwater
archaeology following the excavation of a number of important shipwrecks and
the creation of a university program in archaeology:
• in 1990 and 1991 The Breaker Reef (Dupoizat 1994) and Investigator
Shoal shipwrecks (Goddio 1997; Dizon 2003), both dated to the 13th
century;
• in 1991 and 1992 the San Diego (Goddio 1996), a nao that was converted
into a warship that sunk on December 14, 1600 during the naval
engagement with the Dutch ship Mauritius off Nasugbu Island in
Batangas;
• in 1993 the mid-15th century Pandanan shipwreck, a trade vessel that
contained more than 70% of Vietnamese ceramics (Diem 1996; Dizon
1996);
• in 1996 the San Isidro, a 16th century trade vessel (Goddio 1997a);
• and in 1997 the Lena Shoal shipwreck, another trade vessel (Goddio
2002; Orillaneda 2003);
• in 1996 the creation of the Archaeological Studies Program at the
University of the Philippines (UP-ASP) at Diliman, Quezon City that offers
a diploma and masters program in archaeology (Barretto 1997). This is of
particular importance because this marked the entry of university-trained
archaeologists into underwater archaeology.
• In 1999 two vessels were excavated: Royal Captain, a British East
Indiaman vessel that sunk in the Royal Captain Shoal, West Philippine
Sea in 1773 (Goddio et al. 2001); and the Española underwater site where
Chinese and Southeast Asian ceramics along with metal, wood and
animal bones were recovered but the ship itself was not found (Dizon et
al. 2000; Orillaneda 2000; Orillaneda 2004).
• At the turn of the century, the first major project during this period was the
excavation of the late 15th – early 16th century Santa Cruz shipwreck.
Revealed to be a trading vessel that carried mostly porcelain and

�stoneware ceramics from China, Thailand, Vietnam and Myanmar that
was excavated off Santa Cruz municipality, Zambales.
• The last major project, thus far, was the excavation of the Tagbita Bay
shipwreck, a late 19th century European vessel discovered off the shores
of Sitio Tagbita, Barangay Taburi, Rizal Municipality, southwestern
Palawan from 2003 – 07 (Santiago 2003; Santiago et al. 2006; Orillaneda
2007).
There were other non-shipwreck projects that occurred during this period:
the investigation of reported submerged stone ruins of former towns of Batangas
Province beneath the waters of Lake Taal (Lacsina and Faylona 2002) and the
investigation of a deep underwater cave site in Mactan Island, Cebu in March
2005 (Batoon and Lacsina 2005) and its subsequent mapping and excavation in
May 2011 in collaboration with archaeologist John Peterson. Despite the difficulty
in collecting sediment samples in a relatively deep underwater environment, an
adequate number of sediment, core and rock samples were taken and sent to a
laboratory for dating and environmental analysis and studies (Lacsina and
Orillaneda 2011).
The new UAS staff also underwent training to further enhance their
understanding and skill in underwater archaeology. In January 2003, the primary
author of this paper and Sheldon Clyde Jago-on, another National Museum
archaeologist, attended an underwater training workshop on “Archaeology:
Principles and Practice” sponsored by SEAMEO-SPAFA in Chonburi Province,
Thailand.
In September 2009, a workshop on underwater archaeological artefact
collections and management was held in Manila as part of the Collections Asia
(COLLASIA) 2010 initiative (Lacsina and Orillaneda 2010). Sponsored by
SEAMEO-SPAFA and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation
and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM), with funding from the Getty
Institute, COLLASIA’s aim was to address specific challenges facing Southeast
Asian countries in managing and conserving their rich and diverse heritage
collections originating from underwater archaeological sites. One of the
objectives of the workshop was the upgrade of storage facilities.

LEGAL PROTECTION OF UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE
IN THE PHILIPPINES
Republic Act (RA) 4846 and Presidential Decree (PD) 374 recognize the
importance of the Philippines’ cultural heritage as well the threats it faces from
illegal excavations and cultural property commercialization. Section 2 of both
laws states that, “It is hereby declared to be the policy of the state to preserve
and protect the important cultural properties and National Cultural Treasures of
the nation and to safeguard their intrinsic value.” Under Section 3, “ships or boats
in part or in whole,” are part of the definition of cultural properties. Section 4
designates the National Museum as, “the agency of the government which shall
implement the provisions of the Act.” Part of Section 12 of both laws states that:

�It shall be unlawful to explore, excavate or make diggings on archaeological or
historical sites for the purpose of obtaining materials of cultural historical value
without the prior written authority from the Director of the National Museum. No
excavation or diggings shall be permitted without the supervision of an
archaeologist certified as such by the Director of the National Museum, or of
such other person who, in the opinion of the Director, is competent to supervise
the work, and who shall, upon completion of the project, deposit with the
Museum a catalogue of all the materials found thereon, and a description of the
archaeological context in accordance with accepted archaeological practices.

Also contained are the penal provisions for violations of the law.
Republic Act 8492, the National Museum Act of 1998, defines the role of
the National Museum in the cultural development of the Filipino people. Section 4
establishes the National Museum Complex that included the Executive House
Building, the Department of Tourism Building and the Finance Building. Section 7
defines the duties and responsibilities of the National Museum. Sections 7.8
through 7.9 emphasizes in the definition of archaeology to include research
through controlled archaeological excavations on land and underwater,
monitoring and regulation of archaeological activities and the collection of a
national archaeological collection. Sections 7.15 through 7.23 mention
information, dissemination and exhibition activities as well as establishing
linkages with similar institutions to promote Philippine culture.
The Cultural Properties Division (CPD) of the National Museum
implements laws on the protection of the Philippine cultural heritage and
conducts information dissemination activities throughout the country. To further
strengthen the implementation of its mandate, the National Museum coordinates
with other Philippine government agencies such as the Philippine Navy,
Philippine Coast Guard, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and Local Government Units (LGUs) that could be tapped for policing, monitoring
and management purposes. The National Museum is also a member of the
National Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee (NALECC), Sub-Committee
on Environment and Natural Resources, composed of directors of concerned
government agencies. This is a venue for discussing environmental and cultural
concerns at the senior level for immediate action.
The latest legislation related to UCH is Republic Act 10066, the National
Cultural Heritage Act of 2009, this was approved on March 26, 2010. Article III
Section 11 is a very important amendment to the previous laws since it states:
No cultural property shall be sold, resold, or taken out of the country without first
securing a clearance from the cultural agency concerned. In case the property
shall be taken out of the country, it shall solely be for the purpose of scientific
scrutiny.

Article VI Section 23d further strengthens the previous section:
The grant of permit export shall be based on the following conditions: (i) the
cultural property is exported on a temporary basis; and (ii) the export of cultural
property is necessary for scientific scrutiny or exhibit.

�These provisions led to modified policies embodied in the National
Museum Office Order 2011-108 entitled Guidelines Governing Categorization
and Dealings of Archaeological and Traditional Ethnographic Materials. Section 5
of the Office Order categorizes archaeological and traditional ethnographic
materials and assigns ‘grades’ based on levels of significance with the aim to,
"rationalize the system of categorization," and, "provide appropriate guidelines for
dealings of cultural property and disposition," while protecting the interest of the
cultural heritage of the Filipino people. Grade I materials are National Cultural
Treasures with the highest significance, Grade II are Important Cultural
Properties while Grade III are Cultural Properties. The National Museum defines
the criteria for the categorization. Article III Section 11 and Article VI Section 23d
of RA 10066 are applicable to Grades I and II, while Grade III materials may be
taken out of the country with the Permit to Export issued by the National
Museum. These provisions aim to limit parties who wish to engage in
archaeological projects with commercial intentions.
Section 29 empowers the National Museum to, "recover or retrieve cultural
properties which are under the custody of foreign nationals or entities and to
bring these properties back to Philippine custody". Section 30, much like the RA
4846 and PD 374, assigns the National Museum to, "regulate and control
archaeological exploration, excavation and research and to deputize other
agencies to protect archaeological sites".

THE UNESCO 2001 CONVENTION on the Protection of
Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention)
On the international level, the Philippines, along with other countries, has actively
participated in drafting an international treaty that deals with the protection of
UCH. This effort began in 1993 and was spearheaded by the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). This culminated in
the 2001 UNESCO General Convention that aimed to write a comprehensive
framework of rules for the protection of the UCH. In the Asia-Pacific Workshop in
Hong Kong in November 2003, a Philippine delegation was sent composed of
Alberto Encomienda, then Secretary General of the Maritime and Oceans Affair
of the Department of Foreign Affairs, UAS Head Dr. Eusebio Z. Dizon, Maharlika
Cuevas, Deputy Director for Operations of the National Museum of the
Philippines as well as Attorneys Rose Beatrix Cruz-Angeles and Wylie Paler,
ICOMOS representatives. Another UNESCO Experts Meeting on the Protection
of Underwater Cultural Heritage held in Galle, Sri Lanka from 9th to 11th April
2007 was attended by Ms. Corazon S. Alvina, then Director of the National
Museum. In this meeting the Philippines, through the Museum, made the position
of actively preparing for the ratification of the 2001 Convention. In a recent
UNESCO meeting in December 2009, Director Alvina was named as part of the
technical working group to examine closely the text and implementation of the
2001 Convention. In 2010, Dr. Eusebio Z. Dizon was assigned to write on Rule

�26 on Documenting a Site, and Rule 27 on Documentation Standards, of the
2001 Convention Annex on the Rules Concerning Activities Directed at
Underwater Cultural Heritage.
One of the main objectives of the Convention is developing heritage
professionals through training and research programs. In line with this, UNESCO
sponsored three Foundation Courses (October 2009, March 2010 and February
2011) and one Advanced Course (September 2010) in the newly established
Regional Training Centre in Chanthaburi, Thailand under the auspices of the
Underwater Archaeology Division of Thailand and funded by the Royal
Government of Norway (Orillaneda and Lacsina 2010). The training program was
entitled Safeguarding the Underwater Cultural Heritage of Asia and the Pacific:
Building Regional Capacities to Protect and Manage Underwater Archaeological
Sites through the Establishment of a Regional Centre of Excellence Field
Training Facility and Programme of Instruction. The Philippines sent five
participants to these courses, including the secondary author of this paper who
was a participant of the first Foundation Course and who afterwards became a
resource speaker on the 2nd and 3rd Foundation Course and assistant dive
supervisor during the 3rd Foundation Course.
Thus far, the courses have produced 72 graduates from 17 countries in
Southeast Asia, South Asia, Africa, Central Asia and the Pacific. These
graduates are expected to advance the goals and objectives of the 2001
Convention to their respective countries.
The 2001 Convention provides a comprehensive framework for the
protection of UCH and the Philippines recognizes its importance. However, its
ratification and implementation in the Philippines remains a difficult task with the
following reasons. Firstly, the timeliness of ratification by the Philippine
government needs to be considered. This involves not only the National Museum
but also the Department of Foreign Affairs, the Office of the President, and the
Philippine Senate. Preliminary talks between these agencies have been carried
out after the 2001 Convention but have been put on hold due to what were
reported as more pressing matters. The National Museum is currently reestablishing links to stimulate talks on the 2001 Convention. Secondly, the
National Museum does not have adequate resources to carry out underwater
archaeology projects on its own. This is a perennial problem for developing
countries where funds for cultural research come second to economic priorities.
There is also an urgency to protect submerged sites from fishermen and treasure
hunters who are discovering and looting sites at an alarming rate4.
This increasing incidence of uncontrolled looting has forced the National
Museum into a dilemma. On the one hand, letting commercially-motivated
individuals and companies destroy everything in the absence of funding or, on
the other hand, reach a compromise with private entities that can bear the
exploration and excavation costs in exchange for a share of the recovered
pieces. The second scenario was adopted because it was deemed more
advantageous to the National Museum and the UCH of the Philippines. This
4

This is based on numerous reports that the National Museum received but there has not been a specific
study regarding numbers of looting activities.

�arrangement at least guaranteed that the method of recovery followed
archaeological procedures during excavation and post-excavation research
contrary to letting aggressive treasure hunters and unaware fishermen destroy
underwater sites for economic reasons.
However, with the passing of RA 10066 and the possible adoption of the
2001 Convention by the Philippines, it is expected that there will be a shift from
undertaking joint projects with profit-oriented proponents to collaborative projects
with academic institutions and non-profit, research-geared, agencies and
organizations in the management, preservation and protection of UCH. The
National Museum would strongly welcome and support such an outcome.

SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS
As shown above, the Philippines possess a rich and significant UCH that has
been managed by the National Museum. However, the present framework needs
to be improved and the Philippines has taken necessary measures in the form of
strengthened legislation and training of personnel to conform to the principles
and standards set forth in the 2001 Convention. However, the adoption of the
2001Convention remains challenging. Socio-political and economic problems will
continue to influence decision making in undertaking underwater archaeological
projects. At this time, no work on shipwreck preservation and protection,
management and monitoring has yet been undertaken. There are numerous
shipwrecks from the turn of the century to Second World War wrecks that are
very vulnerable to looting and other forms of destruction. These submerged
cultural resources need to be managed in conjunction with other stakeholders,
such as the diving industry and local communities.
There is a need to enhance information dissemination and public
awareness through the Internet, television, books, journals, magazine articles
and other media in order to reach a wider audience. Some National Museum
projects have been televised but not widely or during primetime. More projects
that have media coverage can be expected to provoke more public interest.
The scuba diving community is a very important resource that needs to be
tapped. In many cases divers possess first-hand information about shipwreck
locations and most have the best intentions but not the knowledge of the process
of shipwreck research and protection. This group has the most exposure to
shipwrecks and can be a very valuable ally against UCH destruction if made
more aware of the benefits of the preservation of heritage and if they can be
involved in preservation programs.
Finally, as the Philippines and the rest of the world face the challenges
and opportunities in the preservation and protection of UCH, it is hoped that this
Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage and similar
meetings will be instrumental to formulating effective plans, establishing links and
forming partnerships that could save this very important, but highly threatened,
cultural resource.

�Bibliography
Alba, L. A.,
1999
Alba, L.A.,
1988

Barretto, G.,
1997
Batoon, L. M.
and Lacsina, L.
SP.,
2005
Bellwood, P.,
1995

Brown, R.,
2004
Conese, E. T.,
2001
Conese, E. T.,
1997
Conese, E. T.,
1989
Conese, E., F.
Aromin f., Jr.,
Palpal-latoc V.,
and de Celis, A,
1981
Crick, M.,
2001

Cuevas, M.,
Ronquillo, W.,
and Santiago,
R.,
2004
Diem, A. I.,
1996

Maritime Trade in Southeast Asia. Unpublished Manuscript.
National Museum, Manila
A Preliminary Report on the 1985 Royal Captain Shoal
Expedition. Paper presented to the Second International
Conference of the Association of Southeast Asian
Archaeologists in Western Europe, Paris.
The Establishment of the Archaeological Studies Program at
the University of the Philippines, Diliman. SPAFA
Conference. National Museum, Manila.
Marigondon Underwater Cave Archaeological Investigation.
Unpublished Manuscript. National Museum, Manila.

"Austronesian prehistory in Southeast Asia: Homeland,
expansion and transformation", in (eds.) Peter Bellwood,
James J. Fox, and D.T. Tryon, The Austronesians:
Comparative and Historical Perspectives, Department of
Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies,
Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 96-111.
The Ming Gap and Shipwreck Ceramics of Southeast Asia.
A dissertation for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Art
History. University of California, Los Angeles.
Hermana Menor Underwater Archaeological Excavation
Report. Unpublished Manuscript. National Museum, Manila.
A Report on Western and Southern Palawan Archaeological
Site Survey. Unpublished Manuscript. National Museum,
Manila.
Underwater Archaeology in the Philippines. Unpublished
Manuscript. National Museum, Manila.
Report on Marine Archaeological Exploration Conducted in
Gaspar Island, Marinduque Province. Unpublished
Manuscript. National Museum, Manila.

The Santa Cruz Wreck 2001: Preliminary Archaeological
Report and Ceramic Cargo Study, Far Eastern Foundation for
Nautical Archaeology. Unpublished Manuscript. National
Museum, Manila.
Boat Building Traditions in Pre-18th Century Philippines. A
paper read at the ASEAN-COCI Symposium and Publication
on Maritime and Waterways, Ministry of Culture, Arts and
Heritage, Kuala Lumpur.
Relics of a Lost Kingdom: Ceramics from the Asian Maritime
Trade, Asiatype, Inc., Makati City.

�Dizon, E. Z.,
2003
Dizon, E. Z.,
1996
Dizon, E.Z,
Santiago, R.,
and Bolunia,
M.J.L.,
1995 – 1997
Dupoizat, M.F.,
1994

Flecker, M.,
2001
Flecker, M.,
2000
Goddio, F.,
2002
Goddio, F.,
1997
Goddio, F.,
1997a

Goddio, F.,
1996

Goddio, F., Iltis
G., Gerigk C.,
and Kraft, M.M.,
2001
Goddio, F., and
Jay, E.,
1988
Guy, J.,
2001-2002
Lacsina, L. SP.,
and Faylona
P.G.,
2002

Underwater and Maritime Archaeology in the Philippines, in
Philippine Quarterly of Culture &amp; Society, 31, pp. 1-25.
Anatomy of a Shipwreck: Archaeology of the 15th Century
Pandanan Shipwreck. Asiatype, Inc., Makati City.
"Report on the Archeological Activities in Ivuhos and Sabtang
Islands from February to March 1996", in Ivatan Studies
Journal, Vol II, III &amp; IV, pp. 30-63.

"The Ceramic Cargo of a Song Dynasty Junk Found in the
Philippines and its Significance in the China-South East Asia
Trade", in Southeast Asia &amp; China: Art, Interaction &amp;
Commerce, Colloquies on Art &amp; Archaeology in Asia, Percival
David Foundation of Chinese Art, University of London,
London.
"A 9th-century AD Arab or Indian shipwreck in Indonesia: first
evidence for direct trade with China", in World Archaeology,
32/3, pp. 335-354.
"A 9th-century Arab or Indian shipwreck in Indonesia waters",
in The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 29/2
(August), pp. 199-217.
"The Wreck on the Lena Shoal", in the Strange Route of the
Lena Shoal Junk, Periplus London.
Weisses Gold, Steidl Verlag. Gottingen. In German.
San Isidro Wreck ’96: Excavation’s Preliminary Report and
Ceramic Cargo’s Study. Unpublished Site Report. Far
Eastern Foundation for Nautical Archaeology (FEFNA),
National Museum of the Philippines, Manila.
"The Scientific Mission", in Treasures of the San Diego,
Association Française d'Action Artistique Ministere des
Affaires Estangeres, Elf Foundation &amp; National Museum of
the Philippines, Manila.
Royal Captain, A Ship Lost in the Abyss, Periplus, London.

18th Century Relics of the Griffin Shipwreck, World Wide First
and Ayala Museum of History and Iconographic Archives,
Manila and Makati.
"Early Asian Ceramic Trade and the Belitung ('Tang') Cargo",
in Transactions of the Oriental Ceramic Society, 66.
"A Preliminary Report on Lake Taal, Talisay, Batangas: A
Maritime Archaeological Survey", in Hukay: Official Bulletin of
the Archaeological Studies Program, University of the
Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, 4(1).

�Lacsina, L. SP.,
And Orillaneda,
B.,
Lacsina, L. SP.,
and Orillaneda,
B.,
2010
Legarda, B. J.
1999
Lopez, P.T. Jr.,
1967
Manguin, P. Y.,
2003
Mijares, A.S.,
Détroit, F.,
Piper, P., Grün
R., Bellwood,
P., Aubert, M.,
Champion, G.,
Cuevas, N.,
DeLeon, A., and
Dizon, E.
2010
Mundardjito,
et.al.,
2008

National
Museum Office
Order 2011-108
Orillaneda, B.,
2008

Orillaneda, B.,
2006

Orillaneda, B.,
2003

A Brief Report on the Marigondon Cave Underwater Project.
Unpublished Manuscript. National Museum. Manila
CollAsia2010 International Course on “Conservation of
Underwater Archaeological Collections” September 7-25,
2009 Participant Report. Unpublished Manuscript. National
Museum of the Philippines, Manila.
After the Galleons, Ateneo de Manila Press, Manila.
Marine Archaeology in the Philippines. Unpublished
Manuscript. National Museum, Manila.
Trading Networks and Ships in the South China Sea, In Lost
for 500 years... Sunken Treasures of Brunei Darussalam, in
(ed.) Dick Richards, Art Exhibitions Australia.
New evidence for a 67,000-year-old human presence at
Callao Cave, Luzon, Philippines, Journal of Human Evolution,
Elsevier.

"Bab II: Latar Belakang Eksplorasi", in Kapal Karam, abad
ke-10 di Laut Jawa Utara Cirebon, (ed) Bambang Budi
Utomo, Panitia Nasional, Pengangkatan dan Pemanfaatan,
Benda Berharga Asal Muatan Kapal yang Tenggelam,
Jakarta.
Guidelines Governing Categorization and Dealings of
Archaeological and Traditional Ethnographic Materials.
The Santa Cruz, Zambales Shipwreck Ceramics:
Understanding Southeast Asian Ceramic Trade during the
Late 15th Century C.E. A Master’s Thesis submitted to the
Archaeological Studies Program, University of the
Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City.
Long Distance Ceramic Trade in Southeast Asia during the
15th Century: Evidence from Shipwrecks in the Philippines,
Thailand and Brunei. Unpublished Manuscript.
Archaeological Studies Program, University of the
Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City.
"A Status Report of Philippine Underwater Archaeology from
1996-2003", in Proceedings of the Society of Philippine
Archaeologists, Katipunan Arkeologist ng Pilipinas, Inc.
(KAPI), Quezon City.

�Orillaneda, B.,
and Lacsina, L.
SP.,
2010
Republic Act
(RA) 4846

Republic Act
(RA) 8492
Republic Act
(RA) 10066
Ronquillo, W.
P.,
1998
Presidential
Decree (PD)
374
Ronquillo, W.
P.,
1989

Santiago, R. A.,
2004
Santiago, R. A.,
2003
Santiago, R. A.,
Orillaneda, B.,
and Peñalosa,
A.,
2005
Schurz, W. L.,
1985
Scott, W. H.,
1982
Scott, W. H.,
1984
Solheim,W.G. II,
1984-85

A Report on the Regional Training Workshop on Underwater
Cultural Heritage in Chanthaburi, Thailand. Unpublished
Manuscript. National Museum of the Philippines, Manila.
An Act to Repeal Act Numbered Thirty Eight Hundred
Seventy Four, and to Provide for the Protection and
Preservation of Philippine Cultural Properties
(as Amended by P.D. 374)
National Museum Act of 1998
National Cultural Heritage Act of 2009
Philippine Underwater Archaeology: Present Research
Projects and New Developments, Plenum Press, New York
and London.
Amending Certain Sections of Republic Act No. 4846,
Otherwise Known as The "Cultural Properties Preservation
and Protection Act"
"The Butuan Archaeological Finds: Profound Implications for
Philippine and Southeast Asian Pre-history", in (ed.) Roxanna
M. Brown, Guangdong Ceramics from Butuan and Other
Philippine Sites, Oriental Ceramic Society of the Philippines,
Makati, pp. 61-69.
Field Report. Tagbita Shipwreck, Palawan. Unpublished
Manuscript National Museum of the Philippines, Manila.
The Tagbita Bay Shipwreck. Unpublished Manuscript.
National Museum of the Philippines, Manila.
The Tagbita Shipwreck Excavation Report: The 2004-2005
Season. Unpublished Manuscript. National Museum of the
Philippines, Manila.

The Manila Galleon, Historical Conservation Society, Manila.
"Boat Building and Seamanship in Classic Philippine
Society", in Philippine Studies, 30, pp. 335–76.
Prehispanic Source Materials for the Study of Philippine
Prehistory, New Day Publishers, Quezon City.
"The Nusantao Hypothesis", in Asian Perspectives, 26, pp.
77-88.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3246">
                <text>Protecting and Preserving the Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Philippines: A Background Paper &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3247">
                <text>Session 12:&#13;
Some Challenges and Issues in Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3248">
                <text>The archipelagic nature of the Philippines and its strategic maritime location in the South China Sea gives an indication of the countryâ€™s significant underwater cultural heritage. Indigenous and foreign watercraft dating from the 3rd century C.E. has been discovered, excavated, exhibited and published by the National Museum of the Philippines and in collaboration with local and foreign research entities.&#13;
&#13;
However, the management and protection of this cultural heritage is far from perfect. Inadequate financial support from the government, weak legislation and enforcement and lack of qualified personnel are cited as some of the reasons. This is coupled with the ever active threat of pillage and destruction from treasure hunters, illegal fishing methods and the dive tourism industry. As such, the National Museumâ€™s role as the leading government agency tasked with the conduct and management of the countryâ€™s underwater cultural heritage and the advance of underwater archaeology to an academic practice remains a challenge.	&#13;
&#13;
The introduction of the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region through the Regional Workshop in Hong Kong in 2003 with the aim of ratification has been an uphill battle, with Cambodia the only country to ratify the said convention in the Southeast Asian region thus far. This paper examines the impact of the 2001 Convention in the Philippines and examines the prospects for its ratification.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3249">
                <text>Bobby C. Orillaneda</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="3250">
                <text>Wilfredo P. Ronquillo</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3251">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="22">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="471" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="263">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/bec21e9afef5b6a4311e1faeeb70dffe.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7fb9acd932134d309993980df547c6e4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5450">
                    <text>The Blues of the Santa Cruz: A study of porcelain color
and composition
Ellen Hsieh
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA
ellenhsieh@g.ucla.edu
Christian Fischer
UCLA/Getty Conservation Interdepartmental Program
chrisfischer@ucla.edu
Bobby C. Orillaneda
National Museum of the Philippines
bobbyorillaneda@yahoo.com
Abstract
For the study of ceramics found in a shipwreck, stylistic and provenance
analysis are two approaches that can provide critical information about
period and trade route of the vessel. In this paper, we investigate the
characteristics of trade ceramics from the well-preserved Santa Cruz
shipwreck, which sunk along the west coast of Luzon Island in the
Philippines. Underwater excavation has brought to light more than 15,000
ceramics, mainly Chinese Jingdezhen blue-and-white porcelain and
Longquan celadon of the Hongzhi period (1488-1505 CE) as well as other
wares from Thailand, Vietnam, and Burma. Here, we have focused on the
Jingdezhen blue-and-white porcelain and selected twelve dishes with
similar decorative patterns, but showing different tones and shades of the
blue color. The dishes were most likely produced in the same workshop
or within a small region and the primary goal was to investigate production
variability. The chemical composition of the ceramics and the
characteristics of the blue pigment were studied non-invasively with
portable X-ray fluorescence pXRF) and fiber optics reflectance
spectroscopy (FORS). Results have shown that pXRF data are relatively
homogeneous which reflects some constancy in term of raw materials
procurement usage. On the other hand, although the blue pigment was as
expected a cobalt-based material, FORS spectral profiles present
significant differences which might be due to variations in the pigment
composition and/or firing conditions, while for others, they could also be

�related to weathering. From an archaeometry perspective, this research
provides some insight on production standardization in Jingdezhen as well
as on subsequent modifications that can affect ceramics found in an
underwater archaeological context.
Key words: Ceramics, shipwreck, Philippines, blue-and-white, pXRF

Introduction
Chinese blue-and-white porcelain was one of the most popular
commodities during the pre-modern and early modern periods, and it was
frequently found along the maritime trade routes. Because the decorative
patterns of blue-and-white porcelain changed over time, the artistic style
of this type of material is usually the primary research focus for clarifying
dating issues. However, the chronology of Chinese blue-and-white
porcelain was established based on fine wares made mostly for the court,
and the variability of the production was relatively ignored. Regarding the
color of the decoration observed with naked eyes, there is a broad range
of “blues” on blue-and-white porcelain, ranging from blue, green, purple,
gray, and sometimes even black.1 In this research, we have used scientific
analysis to investigate the causes of the color difference among a selected
set of blue-and-white porcelain from a shipwreck. This archaeological
context provides a particular opportunity for this research: loaded in the
same boat as merchandise, a same kind of mass-produced cargo was
most likely made around the same time and was even from the same or
nearby workshops.
The artifacts were selected from the cargo of the Santa Cruz shipwreck
that sunk about ten nautical miles off the northern Zambales coast on
Luzon Island. This shipwreck is one of the representative fifteenth-century
vessels in maritime Asia (Fig. 1). The underwater excavation was
conducted in 2001 by the National Museum of the Philippines in

�collaboration with the Far Eastern Foundation for Nautical Archaeology.
The vessel was about twenty-five meters long and six meters wide and
was built following the so-called South China Sea Tradition of
shipbuilding. The structure itself is well preserved as 80 percent of the
lower hull was discovered and the cargo was still loaded in the 16
transverse bulkheads. A variety of materials were found in the Santa Cruz
including ceramics, metal products, glassware, wooden and stone
materials. Among these artifacts, more than 15,000 ceramics were
recovered during the campaign, including Chinese and Vietnamese blueand-white porcelain, Chinese celadon, as well as Thai and Burmese
stoneware (Orillaneda, 2008, 2016). Mainly based on the style analysis of
the ceramics, the Santa Cruz shipwreck could be dated to the Hongzhi
period in Ming China (1488~1505 CE). The discovery of the Santa Cruz
shipwreck and its cargo is an important piece of evidence for the so-called
Dongyang (Eastern Sea, from the Chinese perspective) trade route during
the “Age of Commerce” in Southeast Asia (Reid, 1988, 1993).
Additionally, the vast amount of late fifteen-century CE Jingdezhen blueand-white porcelain on board marked the end of the “Ming Gap” (Brown,
2009) and the revival of the trade of Chinese ceramics in Southeast Asia.
This research therefore, not only contributes to the general issue of color
variation among blue-and-white porcelain but also sheds light on the
production process and trade of Chinese porcelain during this particular
period.

�Fig. 1: Map of East and Southeast Asia with the location of the Santa
Cruz Wreck (left) and images taken during the excavation (right).
Materials and methods
Blue-and-white porcelain
Twelve blue-and-white dishes were analyzed with a particular focus on
the different tones and shades of the blue color (Tab.1; Fig. 2). The
porcelain ware was loaded in piles mostly at the port side of the boat, and
the dishes were distributed in bulkhead 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 (Orillaneda, 2008).
The locations of these samples show that those from the same bulkhead
did not necessarily share similar appearance or quality (e.g. III-2001-Z2963 and III-2001-Z-3245). The selected dishes are all saucer-shaped
and of similar size: diameter of the mouth rims is about 26cm, height is
about 4cm, and the diameter of the foot rim is about 13cm. Most of them

�are entirely decorated with the same kind of casual-style patterns (e.g.,
flora and rock, deer and pine tree). The blue decoration was applied on
both the interior and exterior of the dishes. To leave the foot rim unglazed,
the transparent glaze was applied separately at the bottom of the dishes.
In many cases, the glaze applied on the bottom looks different from the
glaze in the other parts. While all dishes have been cleaned and
desalinated after the excavation, some still show shell encrustations.
Methods
Two non-invasive technologies were used in this study: portable X-ray
fluorescence (pXRF) and fiber optics reflectance spectroscopy (FORS).
Previous research has shown that these two techniques are suitable for
the compositional analysis of blue-and-white porcelain and details of the
settings used here for the two instruments can be found in the
corresponding paper (Fischer and Hsieh, 2017). For pXRF, soil mode was
used to acquire data on minor and trace elements from both the blue and
white areas while mining mode was used for major elements from the
transparent glaze. Measurements on the blue areas (glaze + blue
pigment) were all taken on the main decoration at the center of the plate.
As to the white area, due to the difference of the glaze application
mentioned above, measurements were taken on two locations: one on the
area next to the blue decoration and another one at the bottom.
Depending on the size of the ‘white’ areas, the location of the first
measurement was sometimes on the external side of the dishes.
Compositional data of the body was collected on the only dish with a bare
bottom (i.e. III-2001-Z-7026). Regarding FORS, measurements were
taken on the blue decorated areas and on the ‘white’ at the bottom
because there was not enough space for the measuring probe in between
the blue decor.

�Fig. 2: The dishes selected and analyzed in this study, with the color
references of the decorations.

�Table 1. Characteristics of the selected blue-and-white porcelain dishes

Results and discussion
Visual observations
The selected blue-and-white dishes share general characteristics
regarding size, form and decoration styles. The shape of the foot rims and
the way of applying the glaze show that the manufacturing process might
be similar. In general, the glaze is quite transparent though a bit grayish,
but for a few dishes, it shows a milky and opaque appearance that
influence the visibility of the blue pigment beneath. Cracks and dewetting
features related to shrinkage are also commonly observed. In some
cases, these characteristics are only visible on one side of the dish,
suggesting that the variations of glaze might be mainly due to firing
conditions, such as the temperature of the kilns and where the plates were
loaded in kilns. The surfaces of the glaze are weathered to various
degrees after staying hundreds of years under the sea. In some cases, it
is however hard to tell whether the opaque aspect of the plates is due to

�their inferior quality or weathering at first glance. The blue areas are
generally dull and look greenish or grayish with the naked eye. The
primary motifs are outlined and filled with light colors, whereas the small
leave patterns were drawn directly with thicker pigments favoring the
formation of darker spots after firing. Sometimes, a brownish material can
be observed on the top of those dark blue areas, which is most likely due
to weathering.
Chemical composition and production kilns
Chemical composition data obtained with pXRF on the transparent glaze
indicate that the blue-and-white plates were produced in Jingdezhen
based on the concentrations of some discriminative elements such as
zirconium, thorium and titanium (Tab. 2), a result consistent with the
stylistic analysis and historical context. Values for these elements are
close to the ones measured in previous studies despite the different time
periods (Fischer and Hsieh, 2017; Ma, et al. 2012) and such compositional
similarities could correspond to a relative constancy in the procurement of
raw materials and processing technologies from the middle to late-Ming
period. However, variations in rubidium levels, i.e. the higher values
reported in the present study, also found for the Guanyinge and other
unspecified late-Ming kiln sites (Rb: 428±78 ppm, Zhu et al. 2016; Rb:
436±84 ppm, Ma et al. 2012) compared to the lower averages measured
on Jingdezhen blue-and-white ware from the Nan’ao One shipwreck in
China (Rb: 270 ppm, Zhu et al. 2016) and sherds from the Philippines
and Indonesia (315±40 ppm, Fischer and Hsieh 2017) dated to the lateMing and early-Qing periods, might reflect some intra-site variability
among the numerous kilns in Jingdezhen.
Based on the analyzed elements2, the chemistry of the glaze measured in
the ‘white’ area, corresponds to an alumino-silicate glassy network

�containing calcium and potassium added as fluxing agents and network
modifiers. The composition of the glaze is relatively homogeneous,
independently of its degree of transparency, making it difficult to identify
the origin of the opacity which could be linked to the firing process,
underwater weathering, or both. For some dishes, calcium levels are low
and such levels, associated with lower firing temperatures in some areas
of the kiln, could indeed contribute to opacify the glaze. On the other hand,
almost invisible defects in the glaze induced by composition and firing
conditions could favor the weathering in an underwater environment as
well, and explain the lack of transparency for the glaze of some dishes.
Also noticeable are some differences in the composition of the glaze
applied to the base which shows lower calcium and higher iron and
titanium in comparison to the ‘white’ and decorated areas. Although this
trend is not systematic (see e.g. III-2001-Z-3245), it could suggest usage
of a slightly different recipe for the glaze applied to the bottom. Finally, it
can be mentioned that the desalination process was rather effective as
the levels of chlorine and sulfur, not reported here, are generally low, apart
may be for the dish with reference III-2001-Z-14679.

�Table 2. Compositional data from pXRF and FORS analysis.
Major (% oxides)
Accession N°
Spot
CaO
K2 O
III-2001-Z-256
blue
white
4.4
5.2
base
3.9
5.1
III-2001-Z-789
blue
white
6.1
4.0
base
5.5
4.0
III-2001-Z-1269 blue
white
5.4
5.0
base
3.4
5.0
III-2001-Z-2797 blue
white
6.9
4.2
base
5.8
4.3
III-2001-Z-2963 blue
white
6.6
3.9
base
5.7
4.0
III-2001-Z-3245 blue
white
5.4
4.2
base
5.5
4.3
III-2001-Z-3851 blue
white
8.1
4.1
base
6.6
4.1
III-2001-Z-5135 blue
white
5.6
4.2
base
5.0
4.7
III-2001-Z-7026 blue
white
5.9
4.2
base** 4.1
3.5
III-2001-Z-13671 blue
white
5.9
4.8
base
4.4
4.6
III-2001-Z-14679 blue
white
5.9
4.3
base
4.9
4.5
III-2001-Z-14878 blue
white
5.9
4.6
base
4.9
4.1

Selected Elements from pXRF Analysis
Minor and Trace (ppm)
Fe
Ti
Mn Rb Sr Zr
Co
Cu
2546 -- 7265 408 87 46 1276 47
2104 116 340 412 95 45
-28
84 495 403 71 58
-28
4019 128 3035 385 99 44 279 37
3585 125 348 411 97 50
-27
139 391 406 101 48
-19
2996 103 3038 385 82 57 442 54
2553 251 326 392 87 53
-33
187 254 395 62 63
-28
3375 115 1796 448 109 45 275 51
2697 116 295 408 136 40
-32
228 371 475 122 56
-37
4678 -- 3840 307 100 45 611 45
4591 -440 318 95 53
-37
95 464 326 72 59
-26
3484 -- 2150 322 111 48 343 58
2997 156 262 335 97 54
-33
133 233 334 73 63
-29
3408 -- 8910 333 94 50 1047 112
3194 148 602 331 112 49
-52
229 439 361 78 62
-32
3376 285 2011 417 106 49 186 113
3131 81 229 457 84 53
-47
151 327 492 71 58
-37
2925 105 1305 573 88 39 133 48
2835 202 240 601 92 48
-24
266 310 669 42 57
-19
3884 133 3543 392 92 50 355 56
3061 191 428 394 91 52
-49
117 398 414 66 55
-29
3416 103 2516 400 54 52 356 34
2561 214 438 391 71 50
-35
172 528 415 49 61
-27
4335 129 3169 539 84 45 166 71
3752 142 347 567 85 54
-66
255 607 655 57 66
-43

Th
11
8
17
10
10
9
11
11
12
9
-15
9
10
14
9
12
14
12
12
16
9
10
10
8
-18
12
10
13
10
8
14
21
10
13

FORS Analysis
Spectral absorptions (nm)*
Co (II)
Ni Mn(II) Mn(III)
H2O
341 421w 491vw 519w 583s 678s
-71
244 422m 491w 517m 582s 673m
--206 420m 489vw 521vw 584m 679s +++
83
57
115 424w 493w 520m 585s 676s
67
77
415 422w 491w 517m 583s 677m
107
83
281 423w 491w 521m 581s 665br ++
-54
237 423w 491w 520m 583s 677s
87
82
164 426w 491vw 522m 585s 675s ++
-86
218 421m 491w 519m 583s 670s ++
--465 421m 492w 520m 581s 672m
111
64
351 421w 490w 518m 584s 671m +
88
-701 422m 492w 522m 586s 655br
93
56

* Absorptions: vw: very weak, w: weak, m:medium, s: strong, br: broad

** body

Composition and color variations of the blue decorations
The pXRF analysis of the blue decorated areas has shown that the cobaltbased pigment contains high levels of manganese, low iron and significant
amounts of nickel as well as traces of copper. After subtraction of the
manganese and iron contribution from the transparent glaze (white area),
normalized percentages of Mn, Co and Fe are similar to the blue pigment
analyzed on other export blue-and-white porcelain produced in
Jingdezhen (Fig. 3). This compositional profile is consistent with the
results of previous studies (Chen et al., 1978; Cheng et al., 2005; Fischer

�and Hsieh, 2017; Wen et al., 2007) and also supports the use of Mn-rich
asbolite ores in folk kilns during the Hongzhi period of the Ming dynasty.

Fig. 3: Ternary plot showing the blue pigment composition based on the
relative proportions of Co, Mn and Fe.
FORS analysis provided colorimetric data using the 1964 CIE 10° XYZ
standard which were converted to visible references, confirming the
variability of the blues based on visual observations (Fig. 2). Spectral
profiles obtained with FORS on the blue decorated areas (Fig. 4, left)
show the characteristic absorptions of Co2+ in tetrahedral coordination
with the triplet located around 520, 580 and 670 nm (Ceglia et al., 2012;
Fischer and Hsieh, 2017). For some plates, darker colors translate in an
overall lower spectral reflectance in the visible, but the cobalt absorptions
are always present though with variable intensities (Tab. 2). However, in
these darker areas obvious signs of weathering are often visible (Fig. 4,
right) and the associated brownish color is most likely due to an oxidation

�of Mn and Fe phases. Moreover, the grayish or blackish hue of the
decoration might be correlated with high levels of manganese in the
composition of the pigment, combined with redox firing conditions favoring
the crystallization of Mn-rich oxide phases (Wen et al., 2007). Some
analogy can be made with ‘black’ glasses containing several percent of
MnO making the glass appear black to the human eyes (Möncke et al.,
2014). Similar dark colors were also found on blue-and-white from the
Chenghua period (1465 ~1487 CE) though the amount of manganese in
the blue pigment was not analyzed (Qu et al., 2014). In the FORS spectra,
the presence of Mn-rich phases might be associated with the absorption
of Mn(II) at 420 nm and a broad but weak Mn(III) absorption around 490
nm (Tab. 2), although the latter attribution would need to be confirmed by
further research on reference materials. Finally, in the near infrared
spectral range, some plates show a strong and asymmetrical combination
band around 1910 nm which seems to be correlated to the degree of
opacity and can be attributed to the presence of water adsorbed in the
glaze and/or in the body that might result from the weathering and/or
indirectly reflect a more porous body and lower firing temperatures.

�Fig. 4: FORS spectra of the blue decorated area from selected dishes
(left) and weathering features of the glaze and dark spots concentrated
in blue pigment. (III-2001-Z-14878, right)
In this preliminary study, the variability of the blue colors of blue-and-white
porcelain from Santa Cruz shipwreck was explored by using pXRF and
FORS. Factors associated with composition, recipe and production
process as well as underwater conditions can all affect the appearance of
the excavated ware, the most critical ones being the recipe of the glaze,
the firing conditions and the weathering induced by water. The results of
the pXRF data have shown that regardless of the appearance variability,
the chemical composition of the selected dishes share the characteristics
of middle and late Ming blue-and-white porcelain produced in Jingdezhen.
The pXRF data also shed light on some aspects of production processes
of the dishes. FORS provided colorimetric data which are well correlated
with the visual perception and variability of the ‘blue’ colors. Also, the
spectral profiles and related absorptions have given some insight on the
potential causes for the darker colors. To further examine the variability of
the blue-and-white porcelain loaded in the Santa Cruz, it would be

�necessary to investigate a larger set of dishes and if possible, compare
dishes from the same pile.
Endnotes
1

It is worth noting that the Chinese name of blue-and-white porcelain is
“Qinghua,“ meaning “patterns with qing color.” And qing can refer to
colors ranging from green, blue and black.
2

For major elements, values for Si and Al are considered qualitative and
not reported in Table 2.
References
Brown, R. M., 2009. The Ming Gap and Shipwreck Ceramics in Southeast
Asia: Towards a Chronology of Thai Trade Ware. The Siam Society Under
Royal Patronage, Bangkok.
Ceglia, A., W. Meulebroeck, K. Baert, H. Wouters, K. Nys, H. Thienpont
and H. Terryn, 2012. Cobalt absorption bands for the differentiation of
historical Na and Ca/K rich glass. Surface and Interface Analysis, Vol.
44:219-226.
Chen, Y.-c. , Y.-y. Kuo and T.-g. Chang, 1978. An
investigation
on
Chinese blue-and-white ware and its blue pigment. Journal of the Chinese
Ceramic Society, Vol. 1978(4): 225-241.
Cheng, H. S., B. Zhang, D. Zhu, F. J. Yang, X. M. Sun and M. S. Guo,
2005. Some new results of PIXE study on Chinese ancient porcelain.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam
Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 240(1-2): 527-531.
Fischer, C. and E. Hsieh, 2017. Export Chinese blue-and-white porcelain:
compositional analysis and sourcing using non-invasive portable XRF and
reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 80:1426.
Ma, H. , J. Zhu, J. Henderson and N. Li, 2012. Provenance of Zhangzhou
export blue-and-white and its clay source. Journal of Archaeological
Science, Vol. 39(2012): 1218-1226.

�Möncke, D., M. Papageorgiou, A. Winterstein-Beckmann and N.
Zacharias, 2014. Roman glasses coloured by dissolved transition metal
ions: redox- reactions, optical spectroscopy and ligand field theory.
Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 46: 23-36.
Orillaneda, B. C., 2008. The Santa Cruz, Zambales Shipwreck Ceramics:
Understanding Southeast Asian Ceramic Trade during the Late 15th
Century C.E., Archaeological Studies Program, The University of the
Philippines, Diliman.
Orillaneda, B. C., 2016. Of Ships and Shipping: The maritime archaeology
of fifteenth century CE Southeast Asia. In C. Wu (ed.), Early Navigation in
the Asia-Pacific Region: A Maritime Archaeological Perspective, Springer,
Singapore: 29-57.
Qu, Y., J. Xu, X. Xi, C. Huang and J. Yang, 2014. Microstructure
characteristics of blue-and-white porcelain from the folk kiln of Ming and
Qing dynasties. Ceramics International, Vol. 40: 8783-8790.
Reid, A., 1988 Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450-1680,
Volume One: The Lands below the Winds. Yale University Press, New
Haven and London.
Reid, A., 1993 Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450-1680,
Volume Two: Expansion and Crisis. Yale University Press, New Haven
and London.
Wen, R., C. S. Wang, Z. W. Mao, Y. Y. Huang and A. M. Pollard, 2007.
The chemical composition of blue pigment on Chinese blue-and-white
porcelain of the Yuan and Ming dynasties (AD 1271-1644). Archaeometry,
Vol. 49(1): 101-115.
Zhu, J., H. Ma, N. Li, J. Henderson and M. D. Glascock, 2016 The
provenance of export porcelain from the Nan'ao One shipwreck in the
South China Sea. Antiquity, Vol. 90(351): 798-808.
Bios
Dr. Ellen Hsieh is a research affiliate at National Chengchi University in
Taiwan. She started her archaeological career from Neolithic Asia and
then switched to concentrate on historical archaeology. She received her
PhD degree in archaeology at the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at the

�University of California, Los Angeles. Her research interests include
maritime archaeology, historical archaeology, global history,
archaeometry and cultural heritage. She has worked on archaeological
projects in Taiwan, China, the Philippines and Cambodia and has
published several articles about trading networks, colonialism, and
scientific analysis of trade ceramics.
Dr. Christian Fischer received a PhD in Geochemistry and Physical
Chemistry from the Louis Pasteur University in Strasbourg. After years of
scientific research in the private sector in France and China, he returned
to academia in 2001. At UCLA since 2005, he has been teaching on
various topics including archaeometry, conservation science and stone
conservation as well as spectroscopy for the analysis of archaeological
materials. He conducts research on raw materials sourcing and
conservation of cultural artifacts, particularly of stone in Cambodia and
neighboring countries in collaboration with the École Française
d’Extrême-Orient (EFEO), Chinese export blue and white ceramics in
Southeast Asia, and is involved in other projects in Cyprus, Chile and
Mexico. Dr. Fischer is also the co-director of the Archaeomaterials group
and the Molecular and Nano Archaeology Laboratory at UCLA as well as
a scientific consultant for UNESCO on the preservation of cultural
heritage.
Bobby Orillaneda is a Museum Researcher at the Maritime and
Underwater Cultural Heritage Division, National Museum of the
Philippines. He is also finishing his doctoral studies at the Oxford Centre
for Maritime Archaeology, University of Oxford in England. He has been
involved in maritime archaeology since 1999 and has worked in a number
of projects in the Philippines, Egypt, Thailand, Indonesia and Sri Lanka.
He was also part of a training team that carries out underwater training
programs in Thailand and Indonesia. His areas of interest include
Southeast Asian maritime history, Asian ceramics and World War II
shipwrecks.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="23">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="83">
                  <text>2017 Session 3: Ceramic trade and cross-cultural exchange from Asian-Pacific region to the world</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="84">
                  <text>Ceramics are the crucial cultural materials for understanding the cross-cultural exchange from Asian-Pacific region to the world.  This session will discuss how interdisciplinary approaches such as archaeology, art, history, geophysics, and material science can broaden our horizons on the study of ceramic trade and cross-cultural exchange. Second, we will discuss the connection of ceramic trade and exchange between the early age of commerce (c.900-1300 C.E.) and the age of commerce (1450-1680 C.E.) in Southeast Asia and other regions. This established some challenges in ceramic trade including the influence for new creativity and production development, such as in Europe where some trademarks were developed under the Chinese influence. Our goal is to deepen our knowledge on the application of interdisciplinary approaches on the study of ceramic trade and cross-cultural exchange across the two historical periods.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="85">
                  <text>Sharon Wong Wai-yee &#13;
Department of Anthropology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T. &#13;
Hong Kong </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5440">
                <text>The Blues of the Santa Cruz: A study of porcelain color and composition </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5441">
                <text>For the study of ceramics found in a shipwreck, stylistic and provenance analysis are two approaches that can provide critical information about period and trade route of the vessel. In this paper, we investigate the characteristics of trade ceramics from the well-preserved Santa Cruz shipwreck, which sunk along the west coast of Luzon Island in the Philippines. Underwater excavation has brought to light more than 15,000 ceramics, mainly Chinese Jingdezhen blue-and-white porcelain and Longquan celadon of the Hongzhi period (1488-1505 CE) as well as other wares from Thailand, Vietnam, and Burma. Here, we have focused on the Jingdezhen blue-and-white porcelain and selected twelve dishes with similar decorative patterns, but showing different tones and shades of the blue color. The dishes were most likely produced in the same workshop or within a small region and the primary goal was to investigate production variability. The chemical composition of the ceramics and the characteristics of the blue pigment were studied non-invasively with portable X-ray fluorescence pXRF) and fiber optics reflectance spectroscopy (FORS). Results have shown that pXRF data are relatively homogeneous which reflects some constancy in term of raw materials procurement usage. On the other hand, although the blue pigment was as expected a cobalt-based material, FORS spectral profiles present significant differences which might be due to variations in the pigment composition and/or firing conditions, while for others, they could also be &#13;
related to weathering. From an archaeometry perspective, this research provides some insight on production standardization in Jingdezhen as well as on subsequent modifications that can affect ceramics found in an underwater archaeological context. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5442">
                <text>Ellen Hsieh</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5443">
                <text>Christian Fischer </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5444">
                <text>Bobby C. Orillaneda </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5445">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5446">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5447">
                <text>Ellen Hsieh</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5448">
                <text>Christian Fischer </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5449">
                <text>Bobby C. Orillaneda </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="41">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 3 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="48" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="48">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/559faca3d210e85b7892a2c75884b232.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b3a652b025647a012f023591600d30c1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="639">
                    <text>Maritime Trade in Southeast Asia during the Early Colonial Period

Bobby C. Orillaneda
Underwater Archaeology Section
National Museum of the Philippines
P. Burgos Street, Manila
Philippines 1000
Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Email: bobbyorillaneda@yahoo.com

Abstract
The arrival of naval expeditions in the Philippines and Melaka from Spain and Portugal
respectively during the early sixteenth century CE created profound transformations in
patterns of Southeast Asian maritime trade as European markets became available to
Southeast Asian products and vice versa. The production and distribution of Southeast
Asian natural and manufactured products intensified in response to increased supply
and demand. This subsequently led to the discovery of raw material sources and
production centres as well as the emergence and development of maritime polities that
serve as ports of call by various types of watercraft vessels. This paper will present the
archaeological excavation results of sixteenth century shipwrecks in Malaysia (Xuande
and Wanli), the Philippines (San Isidro and Royal Captain junk) and Thailand (KoSamui
and KoKradat) in an attempt to analyse maritime trade patterns as the Southeast Asian
region transitioned from its previous intraregional-focus on maritime trade to participants
of the global trade economy.

Keywords: Shipwrecks, Southeast Asia, Maritime trade, Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand

Introduction
The Southeast Asian region played an important role in the development of global
maritime economy in the sixteenth century. Anthony Reid’s thesis on the ‘Age of
Commerce’ highlighted the economic prosperity in Europe, the eastern Mediterranean,
1

�China, Japan and perhaps India from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries (Reid,
1988, 1990, 1993). The ‘long sixteenth century,’ Wallerstein (2004) noted, is the period
‘during which our modern world-system came into existence as a capitalist worldeconomy.’ The raison d'etre for this commercial boom was largely the demand for
spices (pepper, cloves, nutmeg, and camphor) and other exotic marine and forest
products in India and Southeast Asia (Reid, 1980, 1993). Although the spice trade
intensified in the fifteenth century, the arrival of the Europeans in Southeast Asia
created new market opportunities and reoriented maritime network circuits as the region
accommodated the new players in addition to the Southeast Asian, Chinese, and Indian
Ocean merchants (Reid, 1980). This led to the emergence of insular and mainland
Southeast Asian-controlled trade centres such as Aceh, Banten, Makassar, Demak,
Gresik, Surabaya, and Hoi An that catered mostly to international seaborne trade (Reid,
1989, 1999; Lockard, 2010). The Europeans later established their own port cities, with
the Portuguese in Melaka and the Spanish in Manila and, a century later, the Dutch in
Batavia (Doeppers, 1972; Andaya, 1992; Thomaz, 1993). Reid (1993: 23) summarised
the range and diversity of exchanged trade commodities in Southeast Asia: “The pattern
of exchange in this age of commerce was for Southeast Asia to import cloth from India,
silver from the Americas and Japan and copper-cash, silks, ceramics and other
manufactures from China, in exchange for its exports of pepper, spices, aromatic
woods, resins, lacquer, tortoise shell, pearls, deerskin, and the sugar exported by
Vietnam and Cambodia”. For non-Southeast Asian traders, Indian cloth and silver were
crucial commodities as these are what Southeast Asians wanted in exchange for spices
and other natural and manufactured products (Lieberman, 2009).
The Southeast Asian Scene in the Sixteenth Century
At the beginning of the sixteenth century, Ayutthaya and Melaka became dominant
trade centres in Southeast Asia (Reid, 1999; Andaya and Andaya, 2001; Lockard,
2010). Melaka underwent a difficult transition as the Portuguese takeover in 1511
caused the exodus of Malay rulers and maritime trade was diverted to other areas. The
Muslim traders who felt the discriminatory policies of the Christian Portuguese opted to
dispatch their goods at Brunei, Johor, Aceh, Patani and Perak (Reid, 1989; Lieberman,
2009). The setback in the Indonesian archipelago was, however, compensated with the
2

�establishment of a trading concession in Macau in 1557 that led to the Portuguese
being the sole carrier of the China and Japan trade that exchanged Chinese silk and
gold with Japanese silver bullion (Boxer, 1953). Ayutthaya benefited from Melaka’s
difficulties in the early part of the century and became the focus for the China,
Southeast Asia and Muslim trade (Reid, 1995; Lockard, 2010). The kingdom’s
expansionist ambitions led to war with the Toungoo rulers of Burma who seized and
destroyed the Thai capital in 1569, transferring the lucrative China trade to Cambodia
(Wade, 2000). Meanwhile China, incognizance of the ineffective implementation of the
previous overseas trade restrictions during the early Ming period, officially lifted its
maritime ban in 1567 and opened the Yuegang ports in Fujian to foreign trade (Lockard,
2010). In its early stages, “fifty junks per year were licensed to trade at first, but this
figure grew to 88 by 1589 and to 117 by 1597” (Reid, 1993: 18). Majority of the Chinese
trading vessels were destined to Southeast Asian markets1.
When the civil wars in Japan came to an end in the middle sixteenth century the
Japanese opened its ports to international trade (Andaya, 1992). The Japanese
merchants sailed into Southeast Asian waters using the Red Seal permit with
accompanying letters and gifts from the shogun. The foreign enterprise was, however,
short lived as the ports were closed again in 1635 due to the Tokugawa government’s
restrictive overseas policy although the Japanese-Siam trade remained open and
continued until the eighteenth century (Lieberman, 2009).
The Entry of the Europeans
The Portuguese appearance in Melaka and the Spanish in the Philippines in the early
sixteenth century was a consequence of European territorial, economic and religious
ambitions in Southeast Asia (Dixon, 1991). Both countries were primarily driven by the
desire to acquire Southeast Asian spices and other natural and manufactured produce
that were in growing demand in Europe (Boxer, 1953; Phelan, 1959). The Portuguese
reached Southeast Asia via the western route through the Cape of Good Hope and
India, establishing trading outposts along the way. By 1511, Afonso de Albuquerque
captured Melaka, Southeast Asia’s premier city in the 15th century in order to take
control of Southeast Asia’s maritime trade (Boxer, 1953; Hall, 2004; Leiberman, 2009).
By the middle sixteenth century, Andaya (1992: 355) notes, “Portuguese trade had to all
3

�intents and purposes become a part of the Asian system”. Melaka continued its role as
a trade entrepôt under Portuguese authority for more than a century albeit in gradually
declining capacity before the Dutch successfully seized the city in 1641 (Dixon, 1991).
Spain’s arrival in the Philippines in 1521 was an extension of its colonial policies that
began in the Americas in the fifteenth century (Phelan, 1959). After initial occupations in
Cebu and Panay, Miguel Lopez de Legazpi finally settled in Manila in the late sixteenth
century (Doeppers, 1972; Reed, 1979). Manila became the commercial centre of the
world in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries due primarily to the galleon trade that
linked the trading commodities of the east and west (Schurz, 1985; Fish, 2011). The
galleon trade would run for 300 years, from 1565 to 1815. The Chinese demand for
American silver from the trade brought Chinese merchants to Manila to trade silk,
porcelain and other manufactured merchandise in exchange for the precious metal
(Phelan, 1959; Andaya, 1992). This is evidenced by the large number of Chinese junks
licenses (wen-yin) to Manila during the period 1589 and 1592 (Reid, 1995). Japanese
merchants also sailed to Manila to exchange their silver for Chinese silk and Southeast
Asian spices and bulk foods. Other Southeast Asian port cities brought spices and other
natural and manufactured produce to Manila in exchange for Chinese, Japanese and
American commodities.
The Shipwrecks
The proliferation of port cities meant new shipping routes and shipping destinations. It is
also logical to assume that the number of ships increased in direct proportion to the
greater demand of foodstuffs, staples and merchandise. Below are the ships that were
excavated in Southeast Asian waters dated to the sixteenth century (Brown, 2009):
The San Isidro
The San Isidro wreck was found in 1996 during an underwater survey approximately
nine km from the shore of San Isidro, Cabangan, Zambales (Goddio, 1997; Dizon and
Orillaneda; 2002). Subsequent excavation of the site in the same year revealed a
shipwreck with predominantly Chinese ceramic cargo. The Chinese ceramics were
predominantly blue and white porcelains of the Zhangzhou ware type, otherwise known
as “Swatow” wares that were dated to the early sixteenth century, during the reign of
4

�Chinese emperor Zhengde (1506 - 1521 CE) (Goddio, 1997; Tan et al., 2007). The
other ceramic wares were two stoneware jarlets from the Sisatchanalai kilns in Thailand
and a blue and white box possibly from the Chu Dau kilns of Vietnam. Other artefacts
included iron bars that may have been used as ballast, iron-cooking cauldrons, a knife,
betel nuts that were found in a small jar, a coconut a sap of the Agathisphilippinensis
Warb or almaciga tree used for caulking.
Initial measurements of the timber remains estimated that the length of the ship could
be 15 m and ‘clinker’ ship construction type, with the planks connected with ropes made
from plant fibers (Goddio, 1997). Much of the hull was constructed using material
commonly found in the Philippines. Analysis of the hull structure and the wood
composition indicated that the San Isidro ship may have been a local boat used to
transport trading commodities from bigger trading ships to land-based merchants and
equipped with sails, no outriggers and similar to the indigenous Garay, Parao and
Barangay Philippine boats (Santiago, 1997; Tan et al., 2007).
The Xuande
The Xuande site was found in 1996 between the coasts of Malaysia and Pulau Tionam
(Brown and Sjostrand, 2002; Sjostrand et al., 2006). Chinese blue and white porcelains
and monochrome white-glazed wares were found, as well as Thai ceramics from the
Sisatchanalai kilns and the Sukhothai kilns (Sjostrand et al., 2006). Other finds include
bracelets and glass beads that were found inside a stoneware jar. It is notable that no
shipwreck remains were found despite deeply probing the seabed and sub bottom
profiling. This could be due to the soft wood composition of the vessel (Brown and
Sjostrand, 2002). The cargo mound, however, formed on the outlines of a ship that led
to estimation that the shipwreck could have measured 28 m long and 8 m wide. The
initial fifteenth century date of the site based on the Xuande reign marks turned out to
be misleading (Brown, 2009). The presence of sixteenth century blue and white
ceramics along with two bronze cannons that could not have been manufactured earlier
than 1520 CE revealed that the shipwreck was 100 years later than previously assumed
(Brown and Sjostrand, 2002; Sjostrand et al., 2006). The porcelains with Xuande reign
inscriptions were actually copies made by potters who worked during the reigns of later

5

�Chinese emperors, most probably during the Zhengde (1506 - 1521 AD) and Jiajing
(1521 – 1567 AD) reigns (Brown, 2009).
KoKradat
This shipwreck was discovered in 1977 by a Thai-Danish team and excavated in 1979
and 1980 as part of a training course in maritime archaeology sponsored by the
Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Project in Archaeology and Fine
Arts (SEAMEO-SPAFA) (Green et al., 1981; Prishanchit, 1996). The site lies near
KoKradat Island, Trat Province, southeast Thailand (Green et al., 1981). The ship
remains comprised fragments of the lower hull, its planks edge-joined by wooden
dowels, indicating Southeast Asian shipbuilding construction (Green et al., 1987). The
wood was also identified as of the genus Terminalia found in Africa and Southeast Asia
(Prishanchit, 1996). Approximately 35 tons of ballast stones were found scattered
around the site. The majority of the recovered artifacts comprised of Thai stone wares
from the Sisatchanalai kilns and earthen wares from possibly Thai kilns, as well as
different types of Chinese blue and white porcelains. Based on the stylistic analysis of
the ceramic cargo, the shipwreck was dated to the mid-sixteenth century (Brown, 2009).
After examination of the circumstances of the wreck and its cargo, Green (1981:42)
concluded that ‘the vessel may have been carrying an additional light cargo, or, she was
returning home in ballast, with a small proportion of her cargo unsold, or undischarged’.
The site was deemed significant as it showed the association of Sisatchanalai wares
with Chinese blue and white materials, indicating the continued operation of the Thai
kilns well into the sixteenth century (Green et al., 1987).
KoSamui
The KoSamui shipwreck was excavated by the Thai Fine Arts Department in 1984 off
the shores of SuratThani (Intakosi, 1984). The wreck contained mostly earthenware
pots, lids, stove, kendi, from local Thai kilns as well as small and large stoneware jars
and celadon bowls, plates, bottles and jarlets from the Sisatchanalai kilns (Green et al.,
1987). A few pieces of Chinese blue and white wares were also recovered. Similar large
storage jars were also found in other 15th and 16th centuries shipwrecks in Thailand
such as the Pattaya, Ko Si Chang III, and KoKhram. The meagre amount of large
6

�Sisatchanalai jars were found in the shipwreck, indicating that these were utility wares
and not used for trade. Storage jars from the Mae Nam Noi kiln site in Singburi Province
were also recovered (Charoenwongsa and Praicharnjit, 1990). The ship was reported to
be double planked and without a keel.
The Wanli
A fisherman accidentally discovered the site in 1997 approximately six nautical miles off
Tanjong Jara, in the state of Terengganu, on the east coast of Malaysia (Sjostrand et
al., 2006; Sjostrand and Idrus, 2007). Exploration and cargo recovery in 2004 revealed
a site extensively damaged by fishing trawlers and as high as 90% of the ceramics have
been damaged (Sjostrand et al., 2006). The blue and white ceramic pieces were of the
‘Kraak’ type wares, manufactured in the kilns of Jingdezhen. Other artefacts included
two iron cannons, various bronze and brass objects, a sounding lead, and tons of
ballast stones (Sjostrand and Idrus, 2007).The parts of the wooden ship found appeared
to be joined by iron nails (Sjostrand and Idrus, 2007). Based on the measurements, the
ship was approximately 18 m long and 6 m wide and constructed with a ribbed
framework, suggesting a European style of shipbuilding. However, the wood used was a
tropical type most frequently found in the Philippines and India. It appeared that this is a
European type vessel that had been built in South-East Asia or India and had later
additional ‘sacrificial’ planks added in China to compensate for woodworm damage
(Sjostrand et al., 2006). Sjostrand (2006) surmised that the ship belonged to a
Portuguese merchant based in Macao and may have been used on the Estado de India
route that serviced the Macao, Melaka, Goa and Manila route and may have carried the
whole range of Chinese ceramics that were traded during the period. It is believed that
the Kraak wares were primarily destined for Europe; while others could be traded in
local South-East Asian markets.
The Royal Captain Junk
The Royal Captain junk, found in 1985, was located west of Palawan Island in the
Philippines (Alba, 1988; Goddio, 1988). A wide range of ceramic wares, predominantly
blue and white porcelain wares of various shapes, sizes and decoration was recovered
along with stoneware jars, coloured glass beads, bronze gongs, iron bars, copper
7

�bracelets, and other metal objects. Goddio (1988: 115) concluded that “(the style of the
ceramic wares) very clearly points to the Wan Li Period (1573 - 1620 AD)”. The nature
of the recovered material evidence indicated the Royal Shoal junk to be an Asian vessel
despite the very meagre wooden remains. Its small size meant it travelled shorter
distances, possibly from Borneo to Manila, carrying trade goods in exchange for other in
demand merchandise back to its home port (Goddio, 1988).
Conclusion
The study of shipwrecks and its associated cargo is just a part, albeit an important one,
in untangling the complex and multi-layered maritime trade of sixteenth century
Southeast Asian maritime trade. Based on the shipwreck material evidence, two general
themes are examined:
The ships
The ships enumerated in this paper are of a wide range of type, size and construction.
The information gathered from documents is insufficient to generate conclusive
statements about vessel types and destinations but some information can be gleaned
from them. The San Isidro, KoKradat and KoSamui wrecks appears to be examples of
local, coastal traders that engaged in commercial activities within their immediate
sphere. The San Isidro ship may have transported merchandise from bigger junks to
local ports and carried out local trade between small ports and polities within the
Philippines. The KoSamui ship was reportedly double-planked with no keel, an
indication that the vessel is not built for long-distance, ocean-going voyage, as keels are
needed to survive in a more hostile open sea environment. The KoKradat, meanwhile,
is constructed using the local Southeast Asian tradition as evidenced by the use of
wooden dowels in edge-joining the planks. Both the KoSamui and the KoKradat also
carried predominantly local Thai ceramic wares. The Wanli, on the other hand, was
constructed with a ribbed framework; a diagnostic European style of shipbuilding built
for long distance trade. Sjostrand (2006, 2007) posited that the vessel serviced the
Macao, Melaka, Goa and Manila route. The Royal captain junk and the Xuande did not
yield any wooden vestiges due to various reasons. It is speculated that the Xuande was
constructed using soft wood that deteriorated over time while the Royal Captain timber

8

�remains also deteriorated and widely dispersed as it sits on top of a shallow reef and
exposed to natural elements.

The cargo
Although historical documents emphasise the importance of spices as the primary
driving force of the global maritime economy, the enumerated shipwrecks also show
other types of artifacts that have been circulated and exchanged throughout Southeast
Asia. Ceramic wares, mostly porcelain and stone wares from China seemed to be an
important trading commodity as all the ships contained significant amounts in its holds.
This gives tangible evidence of the re-exportation of these wares for Southeast Asian
markets and beyond. From the late fourteenth century and most of the fifteenth century,
these wares were largely absent outside China when the country restricted overseas
trade and economic exchange can only be carried out through official and diplomatic
foreign missions. The European demand for Chinese ceramics is also apparent in the
Wanli shipwreck that carried porcelains made for the European market. There are also
significant amounts of Thai stone wares but are mostly storage jars that contain liquids,
foodstuffs and spices except for the Thai ceramics found in the KoSamui with
Sisatchanalai celadon bowls, plates, bottles and jarlets and the Xuande that consisted
of jarlets from Sisatchanalai and bowls from Sukhothai kilns that may be for trade. The
presence of the Thai wares in sixteenth century shipwrecks also meant that some Thai
kilns were still in operation during this century. The Wanli shipwreck on the other hand,
carried predominantly Chinese blue and white porcelains destined for Europe that, at
this time, was in great demand for Chinese ceramics. Iron bars were also found in the
lower hulls of most ships as paying ballast and are used to manufacture other metal
objects. Other items of trade included copper bracelets, glass beads and bronze gongs.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology (OCMA) especially my
supervisor, Dr. Damian Robinson, for allowing me to engage in a research that, at first
glance, may be outside the immediate scope of my thesis topic but is also equally
important in terms of Southeast Asian maritime trade elucidation. Thanks also to my
9

�colleagues at the Thailand Underwater Archaeology Division (UAD) for permitting me
access to their valuable shipwreck data and most importantly to the National Museum of
the Philippines for permitting me to go on study leave to pursue my graduate studies.
Endnote
Reid (1993:19) further noted: “roughly half the Chinese junks in 1589 were licensed for the “Southern
Seas”—the Philippines and Borneo. Spanish-controlled Manila was an important destination due to the
galleon trade that brought American silver that the Chinese highly desired (Andaya, 1992). Of the half
licensed for the “western seas,” the principal destinations were west Java (8), Cochin-China (8), southern
Sumatra (7), Siam (4), Cambodia (3), and Champa (3). Japanese merchants began engaging in maritime
trade in the fifteenth century, bringing silver to Chinese and Southeast Asian markets (Lockard, 2010).

References
Alba, L., 1988. A preliminary report on the 1985 Royal Captain Shoal expedition. Paper
read at the Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists in Western Europe Second
International Conference, Paris, Musee Guimet on 19 - 23 September 1988.
Andaya, L. Y., 1992. Interactions with the outside world and adaptation in Southeast
Asian Society 1500-1800.The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, 1(Part 2),
Cambridge University Press, England: 345-95.
Andaya, B. W., and Andaya, L. Y., 2001. A History of Malaysia. University of Hawaii
Press, Hawaii.
Boxer, C. R., 1953. The Portuguese in the East, 1500-1800. Portugal and Brazil: An
Introduction. With the assistance of W. J. Entwistle, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 185-247.
Brown, R. M., 2009. The Ming Gap and Shipwreck Ceramics in Southeast Asia:
Towards a Chronology of Thai Trade Ware. Siam Society. The Siam Society under
Royal Patronage, Bangkok.
Brown, R. M., and Sjostrand, S., 2002. Maritime archaeology and shipwreck ceramics in
Malaysia. Dept. of Museums and Antiquities and Nanhai Marine Archaeology Sdn. Bhd.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Charoenwongsa, P., and Praicharnjit, S., 1990. Underwater Archaeology in Thailand II:
Ceramics from the Gulf of Thailand. (In Thai with English summaries), Department of
Fine Arts, Bangkok.
Dixon, C., (Ed.), 1991. Southeast Asia in the world economy (No. 16), Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.

10

�Dizon, E., and Orillaneda, B., 2002. Ming Blue and Whites found from Shipwrecks in the
Philippines. In Yuan and Ming Blue and White Ware from Jiangxi, Jiangxi Provincial
Museum and the Art Museum and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong kong:
211-223
Doeppers, D. F., 1972.The development of Philippine cities before 1900. Journal of
Asian Studies, Vol. 31(4): 769-92.
Fish, S., 2011. The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific: With
an Annotated List of the Transpacific Galleons 1565-1815. Author House. Bloomington,
Indiana.
Goddio, F., 1988. Discovery and archaeological excavation of a 16th century trading
vessel in the Philippines. World Wide First, Lausanne, Switzerland
Goddio, F., 1997.San Isidro Wreck ’96: Excavations’ preliminary report and ceramic
cargo’s study. Unpublished excavation Report, National Museum of the Philippines,
Manila.
Green, J. N., Harper, R., and Prishanchittara, S., 1981. The excavation of the KoKradat
wreck site, Thailand 1979-1980. Special Publication, Dept. of Maritime Archaeology,
Western Australian Museum.
Green, J. N., Harper, R., and Intakosi, V., 1987. The Maritime Archaeology of
shipwrecks and ceramics in Southeast Asia (No. 4). Australian Institute for Maritime
Archaeology, Vol. 4: 1-36.
Hall, K. R., 2004. Local and International Trade and Traders in the Straits of Melaka
Region: 600-1500. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 47 (2):
213 – 260.
Intakosi, V. 1984. The Excavations of Wreck sites in the Gulf of Thailand. SPAFA
Consultative Workshop on Research on Maritime Shipping and Trade Networks in
Southeast Asia, I-W7, Cisarua, West Java, Indonesia, November 20-27, 1984,Spafa
Co-Ordinating Unit.
Lieberman, V., 2009. Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context 800-1830.
Mainland Mirrors: Europe, Japan, China, South Asia and the Islands, Vol. 2, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.

11

�Lockard, C. A., 2010. "The Sea Common to All": Maritime Frontiers, Port Cities, and
Chinese Traders in the Southeast Asian Age of Commerce, ca. 1400–1750. Journal of
World History, Vol. 21(2): 219-247.
Phelan, J. L., 1959. The hispanization of the Philippines: Spanish aims and Filipino
responses, 1565-1700. University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.
Prishanchit, S., 1996. Maritime Trade during the 14th to 17th Centuries: Evidence from
the Underwater Archaeological Sites in the Gulf of Thailand. In Ancient Trades and
Cultural Contacts in Southeast Asia, Bangkok: 275-300.
Reed, R. R., 1979. The Foundation and Morphology of Hispanic Manila: Colonial
Images and Philippine Realities. In D. K. Basu (Ed.), The rise and growth of the colonial
port cities in Asia. Center for South Pacific Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz:
169- 177.
Reid, A., 1980.The structure of cities in Southeast Asia fifteenth to seventeenth
centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 11(2): 235-250.
Reid, A., 1988.Southeast Asia in the age of commerce. Yale University Press, New
Haven, Connecticut.
Reid, A., 1989. The organisation of production in the pre-colonial Southeast Asian
polity. In F. Broeze (Ed.), Brides of the Sea: Port Cities of Asia from the Sixteenth to the
Twentieth centuries, (Vol. 1), University of Hawaii Press, Hawaii: 56-74.
Reid, A., 1990. An 'Age of Commerce’ in Southeast Asian History. Modern Asian
Studies, Vol. 24 (1): 1- 30.
Reid, A., 1993.Southeast Asia in the age of commerce, 1450-1680. Expansion and
crisis, Vol. 2.Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Reid, A., 1995. Documenting the Rise and Fall of Ayudhya as a Regional Trade Centre.
In Reid, A. (Ed.), Charting the shape of Early Modern Asia. University of Washington
Press, Washington: 85 – 99.
Reid, A., 1999. Charting the shape of early modern Southeast Asia. University of
Washington Press, Washington: 39- 55.
Santiago, R., 1997. Preliminary Observation of the San Isidro Wreck. In San Isidro
Wreck’96: Excavations’ preliminary report and ceramic cargo’s study. Unpublished
Excavation Report, National Museum of the Philippines Schurz, Manila.
12

�Sjostrand, S., Bin Haji Taha, A., and Bin Sahar, S., 2006. Mysteries of Malaysian
shipwrecks. Ministry of Culture, Arts and Heritage Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Sjostrand, S., and S. LokLok., Syed, I., 2007. The Wanli shipwreck and its ceramic
cargo, Malaysia. Dept. of Museums Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Schurz, W. L., 1985. The Manila Galleon. Historical Conservation Society.
Tan, R. C., Li, J. A., Dizon, E. Z., and Orillaneda, B. C., 2007. Zhangzhou ware found in
the Philippines: "Swatow" export ceramics from Fujian 16th-17th centuries. Art Post
Asia, Malaysia.
Thomaz, L.F.F.R., 1993. The Malay Sultanate of Melaka. In Anthony Reid (Ed.),
Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power, and Belief. Cornell University
Press, Ithaca: 69-75.
Wade, G., 2000. The Ming shi-lu as a Source for Thai History Fourteenth to
Seventeenth Centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 31(2): 249-294.
Wallerstein, I. M., 2004.World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press,
Durham, North Carolina.
Biography
Bobby C. Orillaneda is currently studying for a doctorate degree in maritime
archaeology at the Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology in the University of Oxford.
He is also a Museum Researcher at the Underwater Archaeology Section of the
National Museum of the Philippines and has been involved in underwater
archaeological projects since 1999 and has worked in the Philippines, Thailand,
Indonesia, Taiwan Sri Lanka and Egypt.

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="635">
                <text>Maritime Trade in Southeast Asia during the Early Colonial Period </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="636">
                <text>The arrival of naval expeditions in the Philippines and Melaka from Spain and Portugal respectively during the early sixteenth century CE created profound transformations in patterns of Southeast Asian maritime trade as European markets became available to Southeast Asian products and vice versa. The production and distribution of Southeast Asian natural and manufactured products intensified in response to increased supply and demand. This subsequently led to the discovery of raw material sources and production centres as well as the emergence and development of maritime polities that serve as ports of call by various types of watercraft vessels. This paper will present the archaeological excavation results of sixteenth century shipwrecks in Malaysia (Xuande and Wanli), the Philippines (San Isidro and Royal Captain junk) and Thailand (KoSamui and KoKradat) in an attempt to analyse maritime trade patterns as the Southeast Asian region transitioned from its previous intraregional-focus on maritime trade to participants of the global trade economy. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="637">
                <text>Bobby C. Orillaneda, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="638">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="587" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="378">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/cdab29076868a5703fbfd2725db7a918.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ab88a71ea1821c93b33b3ca108ccd0c4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6467">
                    <text>Developing a zooarchaeological approach to studying the impacts of the Manila Galleon
Trade on the landscapes and cultures of the Philippines
Joan Quincy Lingao1, Eduardo Corona-M.2, Grace Barretto-Tesoro1, Patrick Roberts3,4, Maricar
Belarmino5, Mary Jane Louise Bolunia5, Bobby Orillaneda5, Leee Anthony Neri1, Victor Paz1,
Noel Amano3,6, Juan Rofes1,5,7
1

School of Archaeology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines.
Centro INAH Morelos &amp; Seminario Relaciones Hombre-Fauna, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia,
México.
3
isoTROPIC Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745
Jena, Germany.
4
School of Social Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
5
National Museum of the Philippines, P. Burgos Drive, City of Manila 1000, Philippines.
6
Zooarchaeology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745 Jena,
Germany
7
Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique : Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements (AASPE, UMR 7209), CNRS/MNHN,
CP56, 55 rue Buffon, 75005, Paris, France.
2

ABSTRACT
After the discovery of the tornaviaje, or return trip to New Spain (Mexico), numerous galleons sailed from the
Philippines to Mexico and back again for nearly two and a half centuries (1565–1815 CE). The Manila Galleon
Trade played a major role in solidifying a maritime trade network between East and Southeast Asia and the
Americas during the Spanish colonial period, stimulating the introduction of plants and animals that had major
ramifications for the environments, economies, and societies of the Philippines. However, formal archaeological
analyses of animal remains from the Spanish colonial period remain limited. Most studies related to the Manila
Galleon Trade focus on shipbuilding, tradeware ceramics, and plants. Historical accounts have provided clues as
to what animals may have been introduced to the Philippines during the Manila Galleon Trade and how they were
integrated into the local economy and society. Demonstrating these introductions archaeologically is nevertheless
an ongoing effort. By undertaking zooarchaeological research (study of faunal materials), we seek to improve the
level of detail about the animals that arrived on Philippine shores during this time period. We recommend that
extending the study of the Manila Galleon Trade to explore its impact on the landscape and culture of the
Philippines will yield novel insights to animal translocations, animal husbandry practices, land-use, and changes
in dietary preferences during the Spanish colonial period.
Keywords: Galleon Trade, zooarchaeology, maritime archaeology, underwater archaeology, Spanish colonial
period
List of Figures
Figure 1. Map of the sites and other relevant locations.
Figure 2. Faunal remains from the San Diego wreck
Figure 3. Faunal remains from the Intendencia ruins

INTRODUCTION
The Philippines was under Spanish rule for more than 300 years (1565–1898 CE), and this period
witnessed major changes in the economies (e.g., Legarda 1999), cultures (e.g., Dakudao 1992; BarrettoTesoro 2015), and landscapes (e.g., Amano et al. 2021; Findley et al. 2022) of the Philippines. After
Ferdinand Magellan reached the Philippines in 1521 CE (Field 2006), Spain had sent several expeditions
to the archipelago, with an initial goal of penetrating the spice trade in Southeast Asia (Iaccarino 2011).
These expeditions saw an already existing maritime trade network between China (as well as other
1

�southeast and east Asian regions) and some islands in the Philippines, highlighting the benefits of a trade
network with China to European colonizers (Blair and Robertson 1903). By the 1570s, Spanish explorers
led by Miguel López de Legazpi headed to Manila and designated it as the capital of its new colony of
the Spanish East Indies (Iaccarino 2011). Fray Andrés de Urdaneta, one of the members of López de
Legazpi’s expedition, also successfully mapped the tornaviaje, or the eastbound return trip to Mexico,
which shortened the voyage from the Philippines to the Americas. This ushered the beginning of the
Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade: a 250-year (1565–1815 CE) trans-Pacific maritime trade network that
bridged together the two Spanish colonies (Legarda 1999; Reyes 2017).
Archival records provide accounts of faunal introductions to the Philippines through the Manila Galleon
Trade (Morga 1609; Iaccarino 2011; Javellana 2015). The thriving maritime trade in the Philippines at
that time, particularly in Manila, not only welcomed plants and animals from New Spain (Mexico) but
also from other East and Southeast Asian countries such as China and Cambodia (Alcina 1668; Legarda
1999; Javellana 2015; Amano et al. 2021). Animal husbandry practices and incorporation of the
introduced taxa into the local diet were present in the archival records as well (Alcina 1668; Javellana
2015; Doeppers 2016). However, formal archaeological studies on these topics are limited.
The historical archaeology of the Spanish occupation of the Philippines has tended to focus on buildings
(e.g., churches and stone-based houses), shipyards, and tradeware (Barretto-Tesoro 2015; 2021; Jagoon and Orillaneda 2019). In contrast, there are limited zooarchaeological studies covering this period,
including the Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade (Amano et al. 2021). The information provided by
archival records only offers glimpses of the past, sometimes with conflicting accounts from different
historical documents (Morga 1609; Dizon 1993; Goddio 1996a). Direct analysis of archaeological
materials, especially animal remains, will not only complement and contrast archival records but may
also provide new insights not explicitly indicated in historical documents (Amano et al. 2021).
Zooarchaeological studies in general can offer inferences on the interaction of humans with their
environment (Reitz and Wing 2008). Incorporating zooarchaeology within an historical framework will
add to our current understanding of the historical archaeology of the Manila Galleon Trade and its legacy
in the maritime trade networks in Asia during the Spanish occupation of the Philippines. Formal
zooarchaeological analysis of faunal remains also serves as preparation for future in-depth analysis of
animal remains using biomolecular approaches such as stable isotope analysis and ancient DNA (e.g.,
Guiry et al. 2015; Díaz-Lameiro et al. 2022), which can contribute to improving the resolution of our
inferences regarding animal translocation, husbandry practices, and land use during the Spanish colonial
period.

SELECTED HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF ANIMAL TRANSLOCATION TO THE
PHILIPPINES
Several historical accounts of the early Spanish colonial period have mentioned various animals that
were translocated to the Philippines. Antonio de Morga noted large scale cattle farms reared in several
parts of the archipelago, with breeds coming from China and New Spain. In addition, he mentioned other
animals and their introduction to the Philippines: ‘There are no ewes or rams, for though frequently
brought from New Spain, they never increase because so far the climate and pasturage seem unsuitable.
There were neither horses, mares nor asses in these islands until the Spaniards had them brought over
from China and New Spain’ (Morga 1609, 255). However, there may have been horses already present
in the Philippines before the colonial introductions, especially in Mindanao (Bankoff 2004; Amano et
al. 2021). Morga also mentioned that ‘tame buffaloes, geese like swans in appearance; horses, mules,
and donkeys, even caged birds some of which talk, while other sing, and make them play lots of tricks’
(Morga 1609, 306) were brought to the Philippines from China before loading them into the galleons
bound for Acapulco.
2

�Similarly, Fr. Ignacio Francisco Alcina (or Alzina), a Jesuit friar who recorded a detailed natural history
of the Visayas in the seventeenth century (Arcilla 1996), recorded that several animals were brought to
the Philippines during the early Spanish colonial period, likely via the Galleon Trade. Some of the
animals include cattle, goats, donkeys, and horses. He also mentioned how some of these animals were
not readily accepted by the people in the islands and how some did not survive in their new environment.
Alcina also mentioned that the cattle from New Spain interbred with those from China (Alcina 1668).
Doeppers (2016, 137) mentioned that the “local breed of horse evolved in the archipelago in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries from larger imported stock and, though small, was well adapted to
the available forage supply”. The resulting breed was described as medium-sized, strong, vigorous, and
hard workers (Bankoff 2004). This is in comparison to those from China, which Morga described as
“small, strong, long steppers, but treacherous, vicious and ill conditioned” (Morga 1609, 255).

RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
The initial objective of this study was to identify the animal taxa present in colonial sites and infer from
the faunal assemblages the taxa that could have been translocated to the Philippines, based on available
historical data and chronological information. With this goal in mind, faunal remains from the 2020
Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) of the Intendencia Ruins, Intramuros, Manila (Paz et al. 2020)
and some bones from the 1992 and 1993 excavations of the San Diego wreck (Desroches, Casal, and
Goddio 1996) were examined. Skeletal elements with diagnostic features were identified to the highest
taxonomic level using the available comparative reference collection at the University of the Philippines
School of Archaeology (UPSA) Zooarchaeology Laboratory, atlases, and online databases (e.g.,
“Anthro - Dynamic Imaging Engine” n.d.; “Digital Resource Platform for Archaeozoology” n.d.;
Cornwall 1956; Gilbert, Martin, and Savage 1985; O’Connor 2000; Reitz and Wing 2008).
To improve the resolution of the taxonomic identification, measurements of diagnostic features (Driesch
1976; Gilbert, Martin, and Savage 1985) were also taken using a digital calliper, and the summarised
values were compared with those in the literature. In cases of limited features that can be used to identify
a specimen, taxonomic identification was performed to the genus, or at least the family, level. The faunal
remains were also subject to in-depth taphonomic examination to identify the presence of anthropogenic
modifications (e.g., cut marks, chop marks, and burning). The specific taphonomic features were
compared with those from the collection in the UPSA Zooarchaeology Laboratory as well as those
available in atlases and other literature (e.g., Behrensmeyer 1978; Fernández-Jalvo and Andrews 2016).

3

�CASE STUDIES

Figure 1. Map of the sites and other relevant locations. (Left) Map of the Philippines. (Inset) The San Diego wreck and
Intendencia ruins are marked with a yellow pin.

San Diego Wreck (Nasugbu, Batangas, Philippines)
The San Diego wreck site is located northeast of Fortune Island, off the coast of Nasugbu, Batangas
(Figure 1). San Diego was initially a merchant ship that was retrofitted into a warship during the battle
against the Dutch led by Oliver van Noort in December 1600. The San Diego was commanded by
Antonio de Morga, whose accounts of the event were scrutinized for their inaccuracy and exaggeration
(Dizon 1993; Goddio 1996a; 1996b).
An initial survey and exploration were conducted in 1991 to determine the site of the wreck, as there
were contradicting historical accounts as to the approximate location where the vessel sunk (Dizon 1993;
Goddio 1996a). The first phase of the excavation was undertaken in 1991 followed by the recording of
the ship hull in 1993. The diving activities were headed by Franck Goddio with the supervision of the
National Museum of the Philippines, who did the accessioning, cataloguing, inventory, and recording
of the archaeological materials recovered. Hundreds of ceramics (in the form of dishes, plates, bottles,
pots, and jars), some cannons and muskets, navigational instruments, silver coins, two anchors, and
many bone fragments were recovered from this site (Ronquillo 1993; Cuevas 1996).
For this study, a fraction of the animal remains from the San Diego wreck were accessed from the
repository of the National Museum of Anthropology. Of the reported 2,727 skeletal remains (combined
number of animal and human bones), only 44 were accessed and confirmed as animal bones; some of
the animal bones were fragmented and commingled with human bones, which made it difficult to sort
them, while some of the bones may have been stored elsewhere.
Among the bones analysed, 14 were pig bone fragments (Figure 2A), likely from the species Sus scrofa.
The third lower molar (Figure 2A, topmost) is a good anatomical feature for identifying this species
(Ingicco et al. 2017). The bovines in the assemblage were entirely represented by rib fragments (Figure
2B). Interestingly, anthropogenic modifications in the form of cut and chop marks (Figure 2B, arrows)
were mostly observed on these bones, suggesting that bovines may have been butchered before they
were loaded onto the galleon. The meat from the butchered animals was usually preserved in either brine
or salt and then stored in barrels or jars (Guiry et al. 2015; Migaud 2011). Aside from pig and bovine
bones, chicken (Gallus gallus) bones were also present in the faunal assemblage of the San Diego.
Complete long bones of these birds were recovered from the site, with abrasions of the epiphyseal ends
being observed due to the preservation underwater.
4

�Figure 2. Faunal remains from the San Diego wreck. (A) Pig skeletal remains, likely Sus scrofa (not necessarily from
the same individual): (from top to bottom of panel A) a left mandible fragment with an intact third lower molar (m3),
a humerus distal end, and a thoracic vertebra. (B) A bovine rib fragment with chop marks (arrows) at the sternal end.
(C) A complete chicken (Gallus gallus) femur.

Given the limited number of bones available from the original collection, it is difficult to make further
inferences regarding the site. In the reports from the San Diego wreck survey and excavation, Secuya
(1993) and Migaud and Pérez (in Veyrat 1996) provided insights into life on board the San Diego based
on historical records and the initial analysis of the faunal remains from the site. According to the list of
provisions for the San Diego, which consisted of live chickens and preserved pork and beef, there was
a “certain predilection for pork hams, sides of beef, and chicken drumstick” (Veyrat 1996, 174). The
presence of live chickens, specifically laying hens, was demonstrated by the presence of remains of a
chick and eggshells, the major cortical ossification of certain long bones, as well as the accounts of the
battle (Veyrat 1996). However, the initial zooarchaeological analyses focused only on the life on board
the ship and did not provide possible explanations on the source of these animals (i.e., whether they were
raised in the vicinity of the port, or transported from nearby provinces) and any clues on animal
husbandry practices of that time (Migaud 2011; Veyrat 1996). More information regarding the origin of
these animals may be generated using biomolecular approaches such as ancient DNA and stable isotope
analyses.

Intendencia Ruins (Intramuros, City of Manila)
Not all shipwrecks will yield faunal remains for systematic zooarchaeological analysis. Aside from the
San Diego wreck, other underwater excavations in the Philippines recovered mostly ceramics and
metals, with almost no mention of faunal remains (Jago-on and Orillaneda 2019). Aside from the
difficulty in recovering and collecting animal bones underwater, they may not always be preserved
because they can be significantly eroded by tides and sea currents and are often used as substrate by
certain aquatic organisms (Migaud 2011). In addition, faunal remains from shipwrecks may not
necessarily represent the animals meant as livestock, but food rations and supplies of the passengers of
the galleon. Thus, it is also necessary to investigate inland and coastal sites to expand our understanding
of animal translocations and integration of introduced taxa to Philippine landscapes.
5

�In December 2020, an AIA was done on the Intendencia building inside Intramuros (Figure 1) to guide
the reconstruction and development plan of the National Archives of the Philippines. Intendencia, or a
building for offices, is a structure inside the Intramuros of Manila initially built as an aduana (customs
house) in the nineteenth century. The excavation revealed some artefacts from the nineteenth century
such as ceramic sherds, tiles, metal implements, coins, and faunal remains (Paz et al. 2020).
The Intendencia Ruins faunal assemblage consists of several animal taxa including pig, cattle, buffalo,
dog, and chicken. Furthermore, bones recovered from this site include a right tibiotarsus belonging to a
wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) (Figure 3A). Currently, there is only limited evidence of an early
introduction of turkey in the Philippines prior to the American period. Several turkey bone fragments
were excavated from an AIA in Sta. Ana, Manila, although these were likely modern based on the
associated materials in the sediment layer (Barretto-Tesoro et al. 2018). The discovery of a much older
turkey bone from a nineteenth century site suggests an earlier introduction of this animal to the
Philippines, possibly from the Americas which is considered the center of domestication for this bird
taxa (Manin et al. 2018). The presence of cut marks (not shown in the figure) suggests consumption of
this animal as early as the nineteenth century (Doeppers 2016).

Figure 3. Faunal remains from the Intendencia Ruins. (A) Right tibiotarsus of a turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). (B) A
bovine tibia with chop marks (arrows).

The abundance of bovine bones, either from cattle (Bos taurus) or water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis),
was also observed in the faunal assemblage of the Intendencia Ruins. Evidence of butchery such as cut
and chop marks (Figure 3B, arrows) on the bovine bones was also recorded. However, it is yet to be
elucidated whether these animals were reared within or in the vicinity of Intramuros, or were supplied
from nearby provinces such as Batangas and Laguna (Doeppers 2016). It will be important to explore
archaeologically whether the practice of importing cattle and buffaloes from nearby provinces was in
place since the early Spanish colonial period, if not before, and if this network of inland trade had
supplied the food provisions of the Manila Galleons.

6

�Summary, Recommendations, and Future Analyses
Historical accounts record the introduction of certain animal taxa, such as cattle and horses, to the
Philippines during the Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade. Currently, there is limited direct archaeological
evidence for these introductions, as this aspect of Philippine history is yet to be explored and examined
from the perspective of zooarchaeology. This academic paper presents two pilot studies of
zooarchaeological assemblages of potential relevance to the Manila Galleon Trade; however, it is
imperative to do further analyses of colonial sites, especially those of the early Spanish colonial period,
regardless of whether the archaeological materials come from underwater/coastal sites or from inland
sites. In addition, archaeological sites of the later Spanish colonial period should also be explored
because they may provide archaeological records of the adoption/rejection of certain animal taxa. Such
studies will provide a bigger picture of the extent of animal translocations and will improve the
resolution of our inferences about the integration of introduced taxa to local environments and human
lifestyles in the Philippines (Amano et al. 2021). Genetic studies will also help in tracing the ancestry of
the domestic animals from colonial sites, given the historical accounts of interbreeding of animals,
whereas isotopic data can provide insights to animal husbandry practices and how these contributes to
changing landscapes (e.g., Manin et al. 2018; Thornton, Emery, and Speller 2016; Conrad 2022;
Morandi et al. 2021; Freiwald and Pugh 2018; Guiry et al. 2015).

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following for their help in realizing this study: Rachelle Ureta of the Maritime and
Underwater Cultural Heritage Division of the National Museum of Anthropology (NMA), for assisting in accessing the reports
and materials from the San Diego wreck; Marian Reyes of the Archaeology Division of the NMA, for doing the initial
assessment of the bones from the San Diego wreck in their repository; Jane Carlos of the UP School of Archaeology (UPSA),
for coordinating the access to the animal remains from the Intendencia Ruins; Ian Cartalaba of the UPSA for taking photos of
some bones presented in this paper; and Diego Rebato, Jr. for sharing several reference materials on the Manila Galleon Trade.
This study is also supported by a thesis grant from the European Research Council through the PANTROPOCENE Project of
the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alcina, Francisco Ignacio. 1668. History of the Bisayan People in the Philippine Islands: Evangelization and Culture at the
Contact Period. Edited and translated by Lucio Gutiérrez and Cantius J. Kobak. Vol. 2. 3 vols. UST Publishing
House.
Amano, Noel, Greg Bankoff, David Max Findley, Grace Barretto-Tesoro, and Patrick Roberts. 2021. “Archaeological and
Historical Insights into the Ecological Impacts of Pre-Colonial and Colonial Introductions into the Philippine
Archipelago.” The Holocene 31 (2): 313–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683620941152.
“Anthro - Dynamic Imaging Engine.” n.d. Accessed February 7, 2023. https://boneswall.iri.isu.edu/.
Arcilla, José S. 1996. “Jesuit Historians of the Philippines.” Philippine Studies 44 (3): 374–91.
Bankoff, Greg. 2004. “Bestia Incognita: The Horse and Its History in the Philippines 1880–1930.” Anthrozoös 17 (1): 3–25.
https://doi.org/10.2752/089279304786991873.
Barretto-Tesoro, Grace. 2015. “The Application of the Laws of the Indies in the Pacific: The Excavation of Two Old StoneBased Houses in San Juan, Batangas, Philippines.” International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19 (3): 433–63.
———. 2021. The Ruins of Pinagbayanan: A Photo-Essay on the Archaeology of a Late Nineteenth-Century Philippine
Town. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.
Barretto-Tesoro, Grace, Andrea Dominique Cosalan, Ian C.V. Lipardo, Jana Andrea Santos, Jonnah Marie Dagaas, Kate Lim,
Emil Charles Robles, and Rebecca Ferreras. 2018. Archaeological Impact Assessment of the Ascentia Residences
Site, New Panaderos Street, Sta. Ana, Manila. School of Archaeology.
Behrensmeyer, Anna K. 1978. “Taphonomic and Ecologic Information from Bone Weathering.” Paleobiology 4 (2): 150–62.
Blair, Emma Helen, and James Alexander Robertson, eds. 1903. The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898. Vol. III. 55 vols.
Cleveland: The Arthur H. Clark Company.
Conrad, Cyler. 2022. “Contextualizing Ancestral Pueblo Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo spp.) Management.” Journal of
Archaeological Method and Theory 29 (2): 624–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-021-09531-9.
Cornwall, I. W. 1956. Bones for the Archaeologist. London: Phoenix House Ltd.
Cuevas, Maharlika A. 1996. “The San Diego Wreck Site off Fortune Island, Philippines.” Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific
Prehistory Association 14 (January): 197–202. https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v14i0.11603.

7

�Dakudao, Michaelangelo E. 1992. “The Development of Cemeteries in Manila Before 1941.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture
and Society 20 (2/3): 133–50.
Desroches, Jean-Paul, Gabriel Casal, and Franck Goddio, eds. 1996. Treasures of the San Diego. Paris and New York:
Association Française d’Action Artistique, Fondation Elf, and Elf Aquitaine International Foundation, Inc.
Díaz-Lameiro, Alondra M., Jennifer G. L. Kennedy, Stephanie Craig, William H. Isbell, Peter W. Stahl, and D. Andrew
Merriwether. 2022. “Ancient DNA Confirms Crossbreeding of Domestic South American Camelids in Two PreConquest Archaeological Sites.” Journal of Archaeological Science 141 (May): 105593.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2022.105593.
“Digital Resource Platform for Archaeozoology.” n.d. ArchéoZoothèque. Accessed February 7, 2023.
https://www.archeozoo.org/archeozootheque/.
Dizon, Eusebio Z. 1993. “War at Sea: Piecing Together the San Diego Puzzle.” In Saga of the San Diego, 21–26. VeraReyes, Inc. Philippines.
Doeppers, Daniel. 2016. Feeding Manila in Peace and War, 1850-1945. Wisconsin, USA: The University of Wisconsin
Press.
Driesch, Angela von den. 1976. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Harvard University
Press.
Fernández-Jalvo, Yolanda, and Peter Andrews. 2016. Atlas of Taphonomic Identifications: 1001+ Images of Fossil and
Recent Mammal Bone Modification. Dordrecht: Springer.
Field, Richard J. 2006. “Revisiting Magellan’s Voyage to the Philippines.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society 34
(4): 313–37.
Findley, David Max, Stephen Acabado, Noel Amano, Andrea U. Kay, Rebecca Jenner Hamilton, Grace Barretto-Tesoro,
Greg Bankoff, Jed O. Kaplan, and Patrick Roberts. 2022. “Land Use Change in a Pericolonial Society:
Intensification and Diversification in Ifugao, Philippines between 1570 and 1800 CE.” Frontiers in Earth Science
10 (March). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.680926.
Freiwald, Carolyn, and Timothy Pugh. 2018. “The Origins of Early Colonial Cows at San Bernabé, Guatemala: Strontium
Isotope Values at an Early Spanish Mission in the Petén Lakes Region of Northern Guatemala.” Environmental
Archaeology 23 (1): 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2017.1297012.
Gilbert, B. Miles, Larry D. Martin, and Howard G. Savage. 1985. Avian Osteology. Missouri Archaeological Society.
Goddio, Franck. 1996a. “The Beginning of an Adventure.” In Treasures of the San Diego, 28–69. Paris and New York:
Association Française d’Action Artistique, Fondation Elf, and Elf Aquitaine International Foundation, Inc.
———. 1996b. “The Scientific Mission: Search and Excavation.” In Treasures of the San Diego, 72–115. Paris and New
York: Association Française d’Action Artistique, Fondation Elf, and Elf Aquitaine International Foundation, Inc.
Guiry, Eric J., Mark Staniforth, Olaf Nehlich, Vaughan Grimes, Colin Smith, Bernice Harpley, Stéphane Noël, and Mike P.
Richards. 2015. “Tracing Historical Animal Husbandry, Meat Trade, and Food Provisioning: A Multi-Isotopic
Approach to the Analysis of Shipwreck Faunal Remains from the William Salthouse, Port Phillip, Australia.”
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 1 (March): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2014.10.001.
Iaccarino, Ubaldo. 2011. “The ‘Galleon System’ and Chinese Trade in Manila at the Turn of the 16th Century.” Ming Qing
Yanjiu 16 (01): 95–128. https://doi.org/10.1163/24684791-01601005.
Ingicco, Thomas, Philip Piper, Noel Amano, Victor Paz, and Alfred Pawlik. 2017. “Biometric Differentiation of Wild
Philippine Pigs from Introduced Sus scrofa in Modern and Archaeological Assemblages.” International Journal of
Osteoarchaeology 27 (5): 768–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2592.
Jago-on, Sheldon Clyde B., and Bobby C. Orillaneda. 2019. “Archaeological Researches on the Manila Galleon Wrecks in
the Philippines.” In Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaports and Early Maritime Globalization, edited by
Chunming Wu, Roberto Junco Sanchez, and Miao Liu, 129–45. The Archaeology of Asia-Pacific Navigation.
Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9248-2_7.
Javellana, Rene. 2015. “Global Exchange: Glimpses of an 18th Century Colonial Kitchen in Manila.” Kritika Kultura 0 (24).
https://ajol.ateneo.edu/kk/articles/76/787.
Legarda, Benito Justo. 1999. After the Galleons: Foreign Trade, Economic Change &amp; Entrepreneurship in the Nineteenth
Century Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Manin, Aurelie, Eduardo Corona-M, Michelle Alexander, Abigail Craig, Erin Kennedy Thornton, Dongya Y. Yang, Michael
Richards, and Camilla F. Speller. 2018. “Diversity of Management Strategies in Mesoamerican Turkeys:
Archaeological, Isotopic and Genetic Evidence.” Royal Society Open Science 5 (1): 171613.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171613.
Migaud, Philippe. 2011. “A First Approach to Links between Animals and Life on Board Sailing Vessels (1500-1800).”
International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 40 (2): 283–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.2011.00315.x.
Morandi, L. F., D. Frémondeau, G. Müldner, and R. Maggi. 2021. “Sequential Analyses of Bovid Tooth Enamel and Dentine
Collagen (Δ18O, Δ13C, Δ15N): New Insights into Animal Husbandry between the Late Neolithic and the Early
Bronze Age at Tana Del Barletta (Ligurian Prealps).” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 13 (9): 147.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01418-w.
Morga, Antonio de. 1609. Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas. Edited and translated by J. S. Cummins. Second Series, Vol. 140.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Connor, Terry. 2000. The Archaeology of Animal Bones. United Kingdom: Sutton Publishing.
Paz, Victor, Joel Rico, Jane Carlos, Roel Flores, José Alain Austria, Ian C.V. Lipardo, Fairuz Bangahan, Jana Andrea Santos,
Justin J. B. Marfil, and Douglas Wong. 2020. Report on the Archaeological Impact Assessment of the Intendencia
Ruins, National Archives of the Philippines Building Site (NCR-1996-Y2). Diliman, Quezon City.
Reitz, Elizabeth J., and Elizabeth S. Wing. 2008. Zooarchaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. New York,
NY: Cambridge University Press.

8

�Reyes, Raquel A. G. 2017. “Flaunting It: How the Galleon Trade Made Manila, circa 1571–1800.” Early American Studies
15 (4): 683–713.
Ronquillo, Wilfredo. 1993. “The Archaeology of the San Diego: A Summary of Activities from 1991 to 1993.” In Saga of the
San Diego, 13–20. Vera-Reyes, Inc. Philippines.
Secuya, Vicente III. 1993. “Life At Sea: Circa 1600 AD.” In Saga of the San Diego, 27–28. Vera-Reyes, Inc. Philippines.
Thornton, Erin, Kitty F. Emery, and Camilla Speller. 2016. “Ancient Maya Turkey Husbandry: Testing Theories through
Stable Isotope Analysis.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10 (December): 584–95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.011.
Veyrat, Elisabeth. 1996. “Life on Board: Chronicle of a Forgotten Way of Life.” In Treasures of the San Diego, 160–83.
Paris and New York: Association Française d’Action Artistique, Fondation Elf, and Elf Aquitaine International
Foundation, Inc.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="48">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="238">
                  <text>2023 Session 12: The Archaeology of the Manila Galleon at the APCONF: past, present and new interpretations.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="239">
                  <text>Session 12 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="240">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 12 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="241">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="242">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="243">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="244">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="245">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="246">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6450">
                <text>Developing a zooarchaeological approach to studying the impacts of the Manila Galleon Trade on the landscapes and cultures of the Philippines</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6451">
                <text>After the discovery of the tornaviaje, or return trip to New Spain (Mexico), numerous galleons sailed from the&#13;
Philippines to Mexico and back again for nearly two and a half centuries (1565–1815 CE). The Manila Galleon&#13;
Trade played a major role in solidifying a maritime trade network between East and Southeast Asia and the&#13;
Americas during the Spanish colonial period, stimulating the introduction of plants and animals that had major&#13;
ramifications for the environments, economies, and societies of the Philippines. However, formal archaeological&#13;
analyses of animal remains from the Spanish colonial period remain limited. Most studies related to the Manila&#13;
Galleon Trade focus on shipbuilding, tradeware ceramics, and plants. Historical accounts have provided clues as&#13;
to what animals may have been introduced to the Philippines during the Manila Galleon Trade and how they were&#13;
integrated into the local economy and society. Demonstrating these introductions archaeologically is nevertheless&#13;
an ongoing effort. By undertaking zooarchaeological research (study of faunal materials), we seek to improve the&#13;
level of detail about the animals that arrived on Philippine shores during this time period. We recommend that&#13;
extending the study of the Manila Galleon Trade to explore its impact on the landscape and culture of the&#13;
Philippines will yield novel insights to animal translocations, animal husbandry practices, land-use, and changes&#13;
in dietary preferences during the Spanish colonial period.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6452">
                <text>Joan Quincy Lingao</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6453">
                <text>Eduardo Corona-M </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6454">
                <text>Grace Barretto-Tesoro </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6455">
                <text>Patrick Roberts </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6456">
                <text>Maricar Belarmino </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6457">
                <text>Mary Jane Louise Bolunia &#13;
 </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6458">
                <text>Bobby Orillaneda </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6459">
                <text>Leee Anthony Neri &#13;
 </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6460">
                <text>Victor Paz &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6461">
                <text>Noel Amano</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6462">
                <text>Juan Rofes</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6463">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6464">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6465">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6466">
                <text> Lingao, Joan Quincy, Eduardo Corona-M, Grace Barretto-Tesoro, Patrick Roberts, Maricar Belarmino, Mary Jane Louise Bolunia, Bobby Orillaneda, Leee Anthony Neri, Victor Paz, Noel Amano, and Juan Rofes. 2023. “Developing a zooarchaeological approach to studying the impacts of the Manila Galleon Trade on the landscapes and cultures of the Philippines.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Roberto Junco. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1958 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="66">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 12 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="462" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="254">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/0ecded04c2d4bd894dcdace419031d91.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8ff215a6c69c8d921e9b65a3d22e7134</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5369">
                    <text>Reinterpretation of Stone Fish Weirs mentioned to
Freycinet in 1819 on Guam
Boyd Dixon
CARDNO GS Inc.
Tamuning, Guam
Abstract
In 1819 the French Corvette L’ Uranie anchored off Apra Harbor on Guam
where its captain Louis Claude de Freycinet was told of the former
presence of stone fish weirs, no longer in use. Archaeological surveys of
Apra Harbor tidal flats identified several low-walled coral enclosures at the
mouth of two freshwater estuaries. Controlled excavation of small sites
adjacent to one of these complexes yielded late Latte Period pottery and
wood charcoal radiocarbon dated with a Bayesian calibration to A.D.
1645-1725. Besides Chamorro fishermen using the weirs to feed local
populations, it is plausible they were expanded to feed visiting sailors
during the seasonal arrival of the Manila Galleons. More challenging to
former notions of Colonial domination is archaeological evidence
documenting the continuity of communal aquaculture practices well after
sustained Contact. The apparent resistance of Chamorro fishermen to La
Reduccion circa 1700 is provocative, especially after the introduction of
Eurocentric food ways and enforced settlement patterns.
Key words: Guam, Fishing Weirs, Pacific, Radiocarbon
Introduction
In 1998, an archaeological survey for the U.S. Navy of Outer Apra Harbor
tidal flats on the Micronesian island of Guam (Fig. 1) identified several
low-walled coral enclosures at the mouth of a freshwater estuary (Dixon
et al. 2013), first recorded in 1991 (Wylie and Madsen 1991). Piles of
WWII-era bottles of Japanese manufacture and discarded bivalve shells
were also found on the surface at these shoreline sites, suggesting that
the walls themselves may have been constructed to foster shellfish
production by forced native labor known to have been used to expand

�wartime rice fields nearby. However, interviews with a local Chamorro
resident who abandoned the area with his family in 1941 yielded no
memory of the walls in Apra Harbor during their periodic harvesting of
shellfish before the war1.

Fig. 1: Location of Gigao on Guam. (Modified from Dixon, et al.
2017:196)

Another archaeological survey of Inner Apra Harbor tidal flats in 2002
identified more low-walled coral enclosures at the mouth of two freshwater
estuaries, many overgrown by mangroves or half-buried by silt, thus
bringing archival documents in the Micronesian Area Research Center
(MARC) at the University of Guam (UOG) under new scrutiny. A rereading
of Captain Louis Claude de Freycinet’s account of his 1819 visit to Apra

�Harbor aboard the French Corvette L’ Uranie suggested these sites might
be the stone fish weirs or gigao mentioned by Chamorro residents.
On March 17, 1819, the French corvette L’ Uranie anchored off Apra
Harbor in Guam on a three year scientific mission to the Pacific which
eventually circumnavigated the globe (Freycinet 2003), finishing the
voyage in the vessel Physicienne (Arago 2013). While surveying the
island and its inhabitants’ customs, Captain Louis de Freycinet was told
of the former presence of stone fish weirs no longer in use. Most
archaeologists and historians assumed that Freycinet was misinformed or
such features had not survived the frequent typhoons that affect the
region, as well as the ravages of WWII and subsequent U.S. Navy harbor
construction.
WWII therefore seemed the most logical date of origin for these walls
(Dixon et al. 2013), until scholars of Japanese history on Guam who were
consulted found no record of non-military construction projects along the
shores of Apra Harbor during the 1941-1944 occupation. A more thorough
examination of archaeological and historical literature from across
Micronesia housed at the Micronesian Area Research Center then
revealed

close

parallels

between

construction

methods

and

environmental settings in Apra Harbor and traditional stone fish weirs
recorded in coastal Yap, Pohnpei, and Kosrae. Marine science literature
housed at the Marine Science Laboratory of UOG also confirmed the
former use of fenced fish weirs by Chamorro residents near Apra Harbor
from before WWII until the 1970s when such methods were outlawed.
Freycinet’s informants therefore appear to be vindicated by the
convergence of archaeological, historical, and circumstantial evidence.
So besides Pre-Contact fishermen using the weirs to feed local
populations before the arrival of Ferdinand Magellan in 1521, it is
hypothesized they were expanded to exchange fish and shellfish for metal

�and trade goods with visiting sailors during the seasonal arrival of the
Manila Galleons, perhaps until well after the arrival of Jesuit missionaries
in 1668. Traditional sailing techniques, ancestor veneration, ritual
cohabitation, matrilineal land tenure, herbal healing specialists, and
communal redistribution of natural resources were by then all discouraged
in favor of Spanish Colonial norms of behavior and economy. In contrast,
the gigao might have been maintained until after the forced relocation of
northern Guam residents into traditional southern Guam villages like
Sumay during La Reduccion circa 1700 and even the subsequent
development of Apra Harbor to accommodate periodic Spanish shipping
before Freycinet’s arrival.
More challenging to former notions of Colonial domination is
archaeological evidence for continued traditional aquaculture methods
and pottery production radiocarbon dated generations after the Spanish
entrada, generally perceived as the end of the traditional era (Dixon et al.
2017). Documenting the continuity of subsistence practices from before
until well after initial Contact and the apparent resistance of Chamorro
fishermen to La Reduccion is provocative, especially after the introduction
of Eurocentric food ways and settlement patterns.
Archaeological Identification of Fish Weirs around Apra Harbor
During the first survey in the mangroves along the edge of Outer Apra
Harbor in 1998 (Dixon et al. 2013), a complex of 14 previously unrecorded
low-walled coral enclosures and nearby sites was encountered on the
coral shelf and within the
low tide area (Fig. 2), near fresh water seeps situated between the mouths
of two small estuaries. At irregular intervals along the shoreline opposite
this wall system were scatters of late Latte Period style prehistoric
ceramics and marine bivalve shells (Fig. 3), mostly of Anadara sp. with
fewer Gafrarium sp. Site 1 on-shore appeared to be the battered remains

�of a low latte set or raised Latte Period habitation with midden, Site 4 was
a coconut hummock located about 50 m inland with shell midden and
more pottery, and Sites 2, 3, and 5 contained the stone enclosures off
shore. Site 15 was a natural limestone hill with WWII Japanese defenses
dug into the hillside. A subsequent survey of a segment of the Inner Apra
Harbor shoreline in 2002 (Dixon et al. 2013) revealed another complex of
seven walled constructions on the coral shelf near the mouth of another
small estuary.

Fig. 2: Outer Apra Harbor Fish Weir Map. (Dixon, et al. 2013:360)

�Fig. 3 (left): Outer Apra Harbor Site 3, Shell Midden and Pottery, View to
the Southeast. (Dixon, et al. 2013:359)
Fig. 4 (right): Outer Apra Harbor Site 3, Coral Wall, view to the
Northwest. (Dixon, et al. 2013:358)
The walled enclosures of Outer Apra Harbor were composed of irregularly
shaped, medium to large coral heads (Fig. 4), removed from inside the
enclosures and piled directly on the tidally inundated coral substrate
without the aid of mortar or fill. While some stacking was evident, the
walls were very porous and today attract mangrove growth due to their
stability and entrapment of sediment from the small estuaries flowing into
the features. The outer walls of the roughly rectangular shaped enclosures
measured approximately 3 m wide and 90 cm tall, accounting for some
collapse after years of abandonment and typhoon damage, while some of
the inner walls were less substantial. Many of the walls did not reach the
modern shoreline during high tide, and much of their interiors were
exposed during low tide. Controlled excavation adjacent to one of these
complexes at Site 2 (Fig. 5) yielded late Latte Period pottery and wood

�charcoal radiocarbon dated with a Bayesian calibration to A.D. 1645-1725
(Fig. 6).

Fig. 5: Outer Apra Harbor Site 2, TU. 2, East Profile. (Dixon, et al.
2013:363)

�Fig. 6: Radiocarbon Dating Results, Site 2, TU.2. (Dixon, et al.
2013:365)

Regional Context of Fish Weirs on Guam within Micronesia
A regionally appropriate comparison with the Apra Harbor walled
enclosures in design and construction may be made with other
Micronesian islands that have undergone less impact from modern
development (Moore 1987), and hence maintained traditional prehistoric
fish weirs into modern times. Low islands as far away as the Gilberts and
Nauru farmed juvenile milkfish in artificial interior ponds for later harvest
(Alkire 1972). On Kosrae, stone holding pens for turtles and fish were built
along the mangrove-lined coastline near chiefly residential complexes
indicating their ownership by specific high-ranking families over time
(Cordy 1981). On Pohnpei, basalt stone weirs were constructed near
shore to trap fish driven into the mangroves by high tides of the tradewind
season from December to February. Weirs of coral were longer and more

�irregular in shape, constructed closer to the deeper water lagoon to enable
their incorporation in group fish drives to generate chiefly tribute (Ayers et
al. 1979).
The Micronesian island group best known for their fish weir diversity is
Yap, where several varieties of offshore construction provide the best
comparison for interpreting the function of the Apra Harbor enclosures.
The arrow trap may be the oldest technique employed on Yap, where a
V-shaped enclosure with a central shaft is built facing away from the shore
toward the direction of the outgoing tide and the reef, although some were
built facing deeper channels and holes within the lagoon (HunterAnderson 1981). Baskets were placed at the ends and apex of these weirs
to trap fish attempting to escape. Another type of multiple V-shaped trap
was built just inside the reef to catch fish running both in and out with the
tide, while other Z-shapes traps were built on the crest of the reef pointing
in both directions for a similar purpose. Rock and coral piles were also
constructed in relatively clear areas of the lagoon to provide refuge for
certain fish before they were speared or netted, although the yield of such
features was lower than the V-shaped constructions. Closer to shore and
along main channels were rectangular surrounds which reportedly
functioned as corrals or holding pens for fish captured in deeper waters,
as well as foundations for guardhouses associated with the more
productive V-shaped arrow traps owned by chiefly families.
Conclusions
After comparison of the walled enclosures within Apra Harbor on Guam to
their regional counterparts in Micronesia, it appears that the majority of
features recorded archaeologically likely functioned as holding pens or
corrals for high tide fish collection in deeper waters and as traps for fish
stranded as the tide receded. The partial arrow-shaped wall extending
seaward from the west end of Site 5 in the Outer Apra complex suggests

�its function in trapping fish returning to the reef at low tide as seen in
Yapese constructions. Its spatial proximity to a set of rectangular walls in
Site 3 that do not reach the shore suggests a similar function. Given the
holding capacity of these pens, it is reasonable to expect that deeper
water features similar to those on Yap also existed in mid-harbor (i.e. rock
or coral piles) or nearer the reef (i.e. V- or Z-shaped traps).
It is possible that 19th century Spanish Colonial sailors may have found
some aquaculture features at shallower depths within Outer Apra Harbor
to be an obstacle to safe entry and mooring, although many vessels
remained in deeper anchorage or at Umatac. The organization of
Chamorro labor by local alcaldes to clear such impediments as payment
of labor tax in the late 17th and early 18th century would have been
challenging however, given native participation in numerous revolts
against Spanish demands (Lon Bulgrin, personal communication 2017).
Almost yearly visits by the Manila-bound situado ship from Acapulco by
the 1580s and at least 24 Dutch and English visits by 1686 also noted the
increasingly poor health of many inhabitants (Levesque 1997). Instead, if
these deeper aquaculture features indeed existed at mid-harbor then
many may have been dismantled to build Fort Santa Cruz in 1801 (Driver
and Brunal-Perry 1994), a generation or more after their use had been
discontinued by native fishermen when Freycinet arrived. The shoreline
pens nevertheless, could still have been useful settings for family fishing
even with declining population and Colonial entanglement, until mangrove
growth reclaimed them in the 20th century.
Forms of indigenous resistance in the face of Spanish Colonial influences
were varied in the 16th through 18th century Pacific, but included the
maintenance and transformation of native food ways in coastal California
missions: “European-introduced foods… were prepared and cooked…
according to traditional native prescriptions…” (Lightfoot 2005:196).

�Reuse of European objects was another method of resisting their intended
uses: “instead of using the objects in the European fashion as ceramic
and glass tableware, the people transformed them into native objects such
as pendants, beads, scrapers, and projectile points” (Lightfoot 2005:196).
Traditional political structures and marriage patterns did change as native
populations suffered catastrophic mortality rates from introduced disease,
but religious dances continued and Catholic symbols and rituals were
incorporated into native belief systems (Lightfoot 2005).
Similarly, one might expect Chamorro use of the near-coastal fish holding
pens in Apra Harbor to continue for a generation or more after La
Reduccion circa 1700, albeit in smaller scale family collection endeavors
not inviting Colonial taxation. The continued use of specific coastal
settings for aquaculture in the Mariana Islands thus emphasizes the
longevity of cultural memory as encoded in marine resource exploitation
practices, even in the face of sustained Colonial enculturation. Cultural
revitalization movements as expressed in the maintenance of traditional
fishing practices remain active in the region today in the face of new
challenges, as they appear to have been after the initial shock of Spanish
contact in the Mariana Islands. Further archaeological evidence remains
to be sought in Guam’s other embayments, as well as off the west coast
of Saipan that represents a much larger lagoon system of equal antiquity.

_________________________________________________________
_____
1

This manuscript in no way reflects the opinions of the U.S. Navy or its
contractors. Permanent site locations are not revealed here for their
protection.

�References
Alkire, W. 1972. An Introduction to the Peoples and Cultures of
Micronesia. In W. Alkire, editor, The Peoples and Cultures of Micronesia,
Addison-Wesley Publications, 1-56, Canada.
Arago, J. 2013. Narrative of A Voyage Round the World IN the Uranie and
Physicienne Corvettes, Commanded by Captain Freycinet, During the
Years 1817, 1818, 1819, and 1820 Cambridge University Press, London.
Ayers, W., A. Haun, and C. Severance. 1979. Ponape Archaeological
Survey: 1978 Research. Micronesian Archaeological Survey Report
Number 4, Historic Preservation Office, Trust Territory of the Pacific
Islands, Saipan.
Cordy, R. 1981. Archaeological Survey of Inem, Okat and Loal Kosrae
Island. Micronesian Archaeological Survey Report Number 7, Historic
Preservation Office, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, Saipan.
Dixon, B., L. Gilda, and T. Mangieri. 2013. Archaeological Identification of
Stone Fish Weirs Mentioned to Freycinet in 1819 on the Island of Guam.
Journal of Pacific History 48(4):349-368.
Dixon, B., A. Jalandoni, and C. Craft. 2017. The Archaeological Remains
of Early Modern Spanish Colonialism on Guam and their Implications. In
M. Cruz Berrocal and C. Tsang, Historical and Archaeological
Perspectives on Early Modern Colonialism in Asia-pacific and the Pacific,
Volume 1, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, in press.
Driver, M., and O. Brunal-Perry. 1994. Architectural Sketches of the
Spanish Era Forts of Guam. MARC, University of Guam, Mangilao.
Freycinet, L. C. de. 2003.
An Account of the Corvette L’Uranie’s
Sojourn at the Marianas Islands, 1819. Occasional Historical Papers No.
13, CNMI Division of Historic Preservation, Saipan.
Hunter-Anderson, R., 1981.
Perspectives 24(1): 81-91.

Yapese

Stone

Fish

Weirs.

Asian

Levesque, R. 1998. Accounts of Early Contact: Non-Spanish Visitors to
Guam before 1830. In Guam History: Perspectives Volume Two. L.
Carter, W. Wuerch, and R. Carter Editoris, pp. 37-66, MARC Educational
Series No. 22, University of Guam, Mangilao.

�Lightfoot, K. 2005.
Indians, Missionaries, and Merchants The Legacy
of Colonial Encounters on the California Frontiers. University of California
Press, Berkeley.
Moore, J. 1987. Current Fishing Practices and Use of Marine Resources
in the Outer Islands. Yap State Fishing Authority, Manuscript of file at
MARC, Mangilao.
Wylie, J., and D. Madsen 1991. Guam’s Excess Military Lands:
Opportunities for the Multiple-Use and Protection of World-Class Natural
and Cultural Resources. Department of Agriculture – Division of Forestry
and Soil Resources, Territory of Guam.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to extend his appreciation to Jeannette Simons and
Dr. Eric West, then of NAVFACPAC, and Jennings Bunn and Lon Bulgrin
of NAVFACMAR who freely gave advice and council during the field
surveys and technical reporting. The assistance of Journal of Pacific
History editor Vicki Lucker with an earlier interpretation of this paper is
also greatly appreciated as is the sage advice of Professor Bill Jeffery at
UOG.
Biography
Dr. Boyd Dixon is a Senior Archaeologist
for the Cardno GS office in the U.S.
Territory of Guam. With over 40 years of
archaeological experience in North
America, Latin America, Western Europe,
and the Pacific Basin, his interests are
equally varied. They embrace prehistoric
and historic patterns of settlement, subsistence, interaction, power, and
conflict.

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="21">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="75">
                  <text>2017 Session 1: Underwater and Maritime Archaeology and Capacity  Building in the Pacific Islands</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="76">
                  <text>The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) spanning human history from the Stone Age to the atomic age.  Since the first Pacific UCH Workshop held in Solomon Islands in 2009, the Pacific island nations have been progressing in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme by awareness raising, research and capacity building activities through inter-disciplinary cooperation and promoting synergy with the Pacific World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Programmes. Notable progresses include, among others, the SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA) Outcome Document of the 3rd UN International Cooperation on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) (Samoa, 2014) that contains references to the importance of UCH for sustainable development of SIDS and SIDS ratification of the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001), as well as the enhanced cooperation between universities in the Pacific islands and professional training institutions through UNESCO University Twinning and Networking Programme (UNITWIN) for Underwater Archaeology. &#13;
&#13;
With this as its background, the session â€œUnderwater and maritime archaeology and capacity building in the Pacific Islandsâ€ will be held with the aims to: i) share information on recent progress in awareness raising, research and capacity building activities in underwater and maritime archaeology in the Pacific Islands, ii) identify priority actions, iii) foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.  The session especially welcomes presentations focusing on the protection and management of UCH belonging to indigenous community shared UCH in the Pacific, addressing challenges and opportunities facing Pacific SIDS in the implementation of the Pacific UCH Programme and the promotion of the UCH Convention, presenting good practice in ensuring the effective engagement of Pacific island countries and community in UCH management for their sustainable development, and proposing collaborative projects in this area.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="77">
                  <text>Akatsuki Takahashi&#13;
UNESCO Office for the Pacific States, Samoa</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="78">
                  <text>Andrew Viduka, Maritime and Commonwealth Heritage, Australian Government,</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="79">
                  <text>Nicolas Bigourdan, Western Australian Museum</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5363">
                <text>Reinterpretation of Stone Fish Weirs mentioned to Freycinet in 1819 on Guam</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5364">
                <text>In 1819 the French Corvette Lâ€™ Uranie anchored off Apra Harbor on Guam where its captain Louis Claude de Freycinet was told of the former presence of stone fish weirs, no longer in use. Archaeological surveys of Apra Harbor tidal flats identified several low-walled coral enclosures at the mouth of two freshwater estuaries. Controlled excavation of small sites adjacent to one of these complexes yielded late Latte Period pottery and wood charcoal radiocarbon dated with a Bayesian calibration to A.D. 1645-1725. Besides Chamorro fishermen using the weirs to feed local populations, it is plausible they were expanded to feed visiting sailors during the seasonal arrival of the Manila Galleons. More challenging to former notions of Colonial domination is archaeological evidence documenting the continuity of communal aquaculture practices well after sustained Contact. The apparent resistance of Chamorro fishermen to La Reduccion circa 1700 is provocative, especially after the introduction of Eurocentric food ways and enforced settlement patterns.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5365">
                <text>Boyd Dixon</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5366">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5367">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5368">
                <text>Boyd Dixon</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="39">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 1 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="67" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="67">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/2963bb29b78f7c5b7fcaf9a015fe093e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4fb38873c315e1d2814cfd3e3aec8b8f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="756">
                    <text>Influencing the contemporary narrative on whaling heritage
Bradley W. Barr
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, 175 Edward Foster Road, Scituate, MA 02066, USA
Email: Brad.Barr@noaa.gov
Abstract
Whaling heritage is a significant part of the world’s maritime history, and its landscape
footprint is global. In the 19th Century, the Pacific and adjacent Arctic waters were the
epicenter of whaling, where both many of the most productive whaling grounds were
located as well as the primary ports that serviced this industry. The most compelling
stories of whaling heritage occurred in these waters, and the names of the storied
whaling ships, and the perils they encountered, are well known. These are stories that
not only illuminate significant events in our collective maritime past, but contain lessons
learned that can inform and offer knowledge relevant to current, yet similar, problems
we face today. The contemporary whaling narrative is dominated by the more recent
history of whaling, and the divisive atmosphere created by the controversy surrounding
the few countries that continue to have active commercial whaling industries. Efforts
need to be directed at changing this contemporary narrative, perceptions of the public
that whaling heritage is more than killing these giants of the sea. Increasing awareness
of the many influences, positive and negative, that whaling, throughout its history, has
had on shaping our geo-political system, societies, cultures, economies, and even
expanding our knowledge of the oceans and their resources is essential. Through this
expanded awareness and appreciation of how whaling helped shape the world we
know, we can acquire some needed support for continued historical research and
documentation of this part of our maritime heritage. Changing this narrative may also
help in preserving the significant places in our global whaling heritage landscape, and
hopefully inform wiser decisions about contemporary issues through learning from the
past.
Key words: Whaling Heritage, Global Whaling Heritage Landscape, Contemporary
Narrative, Public Acceptance, Lessons Learned

Introduction: Blood in the Water
The predominant perception of whaling in modern society is all about killing whales,
animals viewed as intelligent and social creatures that are brutally murdered for no
particularly good reason. Except for a dwindling number of cultures, we no longer kill
whales for meat, have little contemporary use of the oil rendered from their blubber, and
have persisted in pursuing leviathan largely for political reasons related to preserving
1

�nationalistic prerogatives and traditional subsistence. This perception of whaling is a
surprisingly recent phenomenon (Epstein, 2008), arising quite rapidly from a confluence
of

ideas,

and

a

well-crafted

campaign

by

environmental

non-governmental

organizations, related to the worldwide emergence of an ecological ethic in the mid1960’s. Epstein (2008) suggests that “Save the Whales” became a syllogism for the
idea of saving the environment more generally, which led to this rapid and paradigmatic
shift in the prevailing perception of whaling, and its nearly universal adoption by both
society and particularly countries that had previously been very active advocates for the
whaling industry throughout its history. When we think of whaling, what some see in
their mind’s eye is the blood in the water. However, the whaling industry has,
historically, contributed much to society and our collective well being. It has given us
products that have illuminated our cities at a time when urban crime was epidemic
(Starbuck, 1878), made the machines of the industrial age run smoothly and efficiently,
and significantly influenced the global geo-political landscape. It was one of the first truly
global industries, was a driver for opening up international trade and diplomatic
relations, and was an economic engine for the global economy throughout most of the
19th Century.
Whalers, somewhat like the Internet today, connected the world, and made it seem a bit
smaller. The public learned about the world vicariously through the whalers’
experiences, covered extensively in the newspapers and magazines of the time. The
whaling ships brought with them goods from their home countries and infusions of
money to ports around the world to supply their operations and service their ships. They
took away from these ports both local products and information about these places and
their life ways. Popcorn, for example, is likely one of those products brought back to
America by the whalers (Smith, 1999). They helped to increase our understanding of
not just whales, but the oceans they live in and the other creatures that share these
waters, illuminating a deeper knowledge of ocean currents and winds, weather and
climate.

They were, as described by Rozwadowski (2005), the first blue-water

oceanographers. Not all the historical contributions of the global whaling industry were
positive. In many far-off ports and places whalers put ashore to resupply, they
introduced diseases to aboriginal cultures and often the deleterious effects of alcohol on
2

�these societies were exacerbated by visits from whaling ships.

For example, it is

believed that, quite unintentionally, the American whaling ship Wellington introduced
mosquitos to Hawaii while restocking their water supplies during a visit to the islands in
1827 (Sedgwick, 1901). The introduction and influence of alcohol in Hawaii, after the
first whalers began to arrive in Hawaii in 1819, was identified as a increasingly
significant problem in Hawaii’s whaling ports through the latter part of the 19th Century,
and has been attributed, beyond simply the intoxication of both Hawaiians and sailors,
as a contributory factor in colonialism and its effects on Native Hawaiian society in this
period (Brown, 2011). And, indeed, whale populations were decimated in many places
around the world, leaving a legacy of impacts that remain on still recovering
populations, which now face other challenges. In their wake, whalers undeniably left a
host of environmental and societal impacts that often had severe and long-term
deleterious effects. However, this was balanced, to one degree or another, by the
economic benefits and geopolitical implications of their activities in these places.
The dominant and powerful contemporary discourse surrounding whaling is quite
definitively negative, as Epstein (2008) has observed. Notwithstanding whether the
whaling industry is deserving of this widely-held public perception or not, one of the
challenges this creates is that it makes raising public awareness about the positive
aspects of whaling heritage far more challenging. To achieve some success in
effectively reaching contemporary audiences with this more expansive, comprehensive
and balanced view of whaling heritage, to help them be more open to receiving
information that conflicts, perhaps deeply and with moral and ethical implications, with
this prevailing discourse, offering some historical context is essential. To understand
and appreciate the past, and to learn the important lessons this history offers, we need
to find a way to overcome this contemporary perception of whaling as simply “blood in
the water”.
Whaling heritage and places
Maury’s 1851 map whaling grounds and the more recent map of whaling voyages and
species observed by Smith et al., (2012), taken from 19th logbooks and other
documents, clearly demonstrate the global geographic reach of whaling in the 19th
Century. While the extent of whaling during this period may have been global, it is the
3

�particular places in this landscape that help to tell the story of whaling heritage. The
whaling grounds, such as the Japan Grounds, the Sea of Okhotsk, and the Western
Arctic, were the places the whalers travelled to in search of whales, and spent time at
sea catching and processing their quarry. These are places visited when the whales
were plentiful and the profits were favorable, and inextricably linked with the storied
whaling ports like Honolulu and Lahaina in Hawaii. Such port cities served the industry,
offered provisioning supplies, ship repair and maintenance facilities and skilled
craftsmen, often men to supplement whaling crews, and other less socially acceptable
amenities, like grog-shops and prostitution (Daws, 1967). These ports, and all the
whaling grounds, are places where whaling is a part of their history and heritage. As
Barr and Delgado (in press) have suggested:
...we live in a world of places, created in the perceptions of people who are
often deeply attached to these places and imbue them with special
meaning. The landscape of whaling heritage and the significant places that
are part of that landscape therefore also warrants some consideration in our
collective efforts to interpret and inform, to educate and excite the
imaginations of the public, as well as to increase and expand the
awareness and appreciation of the importance of whaling heritage in our
collective history.
To effectively preserve and protect these places, we will need to be aware of and
address the prevailing contemporary perception of whaling.
Hawaii’s Whaling Heritage: What whaling contributed......
It has been suggested that whaling had a profound effect on the economic, cultural and
social history of Hawaii (Barr and Delgado, In Press; Lebo, 2010; Raupp and Gleason,
2010). In the late 18th Century, as whaling began its global expansion, larger whaling
ships began to be built that we capable of multi-year trips to new whaling grounds. With
the discovery of the “Offshore Grounds” off Peru, the Sperm whaling grounds off Japan
(LaCroix, 2002), the “Kodiak Grounds”, off Southeast Alaska (Burcin, 2005), and
ultimately the Western Arctic whaling grounds North of the Bering Strait (Bockstoce,
1986), trips from the New England home ports to the Pacific were routinely three to four
years by the mid-1800’s (Davis et al., 1987). Given such long voyages to the Pacific,
4

�the Hawaiian Islands were strategically located to provide ports to service this growing
fleet. By 1822, approximately 60 whaling ships were routinely visiting Hawaiian ports,
and by 1846, almost 600 ships were arriving each year (Juvik et al., 1998). While this
impact gradually diminished over the next fifty years (Raupp and Gleason, 2010) it left a
legacy of change in Hawaii.
During the 1820’s to the 1830’s, the population of Honolulu tripled, from 3000 to 9000,
and with this came the building of roads, housing, and other needed infrastructure
(Daws, 1967). The waterfront area of Honolulu harbor also expanded: “The harbor
made the town...by the middle of the 19th century Honolulu had grown from a tiny
village to a busy Pacific port of call, the metropolis of the islands and the capital of the
kingdom” (Daws, 1967). Given the substantial quantities of fresh water needed by ships,
the first water supply system in Hawaii was installed in Honolulu harbor (Nellist, 1951).
The existing water supply in Honolulu had become “impoverished and polluted” (Daws,
1967) and this new water system offered not only potable water to the ships, but to the
residents of the harbor area. Whaling became an economic engine for Honolulu and
the Islands (Daws, 1968; cf Raupp and Gleason, 2010). One of the most important
interactions between the whalers and the Native Hawaiians was their service as crew
on these ships. Lebo (2010) reports that by 1860, Native Hawaiians comprised upwards
of one half of such crews in the Pacific and Arctic.
As the influence of the expressed needs of the whalers for resupply of types of foods
familiar to Yankee crews increased, the agriculture of the islands also began to change.
The Hawaiian economy of the 1820’s was transformed from a trade-based to cashbased system. While not an uncommon occurrence in colonial systems (Feyrer and
Sacerdote, 2006; Settles, 1996), this transition to the cultivation of foods to supply the
whaling fleets visiting Hawaii changed the face of Hawaii’s agricultural landscape. One
interesting example, offered by Daws (1967), of the impact of changing cultivation
practices related to the increase in use, for a period of time in the 1840’s, of the port of
Lahaina. Maui had begun to grow white potatoes, which were favored by the whaling
crews over the native sweet potato. While there were other factors that contributed to
the enhanced use of the port Lahaina, particularly the more liberal nature of the port
with regard to prostitution and grog-shops, now that “Lahaina sported both the potato
5

�and the prostitute...the combination was all but irresistible” (Daws, 1967).

Daws

concludes, “In the mid-50’s, the potato boom ended but the prostitutes remained. Other
things being equal, Honolulu's better shipping facilities prevailed again”.
Finally, a speculative argument could be made that this change in Hawaii’s agricultural
practices may have set in motion later changes, like the rise of the sugar, pineapple,
and coffee cultivation that brought even greater political influence of non-Hawaiian
interests that ultimately contributed to the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893.
Daws (1967) discusses the sociological phenomenon of the perception of the working
and personal habits of Native Hawaiians, and how this prevailing western perception
was used to influence the actions of the American government with regard to Hawaii
and its economic future. While clearly there were many other contributory social,
cultural, and economic factors that may have had considerably more impact
(Kuykendall, 1967), this fundamental change in the political power structure in Hawaii
may have been facilitated not only by this change in the agricultural landscape of the
Islands to accommodate the visiting whaling fleet, but also the subjugation of the Native
Hawaiians that resulted as part of the colonial occupation of Hawaii. There is little doubt
that Hawaii, and its essential ports of call, is a critically important place in the global
whaling landscape. Not all these stories of the interaction between the whalers and the
people of Hawaii may have represented particularly positive contributions, but they
undoubtedly had a significant influence on Hawaii and its history.
Whaling and Diplomacy
The 19th Century was a period in American history that saw the emergence of this new
country on a potential trajectory toward becoming a world power, foretelling the political
hegemony of the United States in the 20th Century. The diplomacy of this fledgling
country at the end of the 1700’s, right after its war of independence with England, was
just beginning to develop. However, the American whalers had already been traveling to
far off lands, making port calls with their ships, and forging commercial relationships
with their counterparts in these countries for many years. As Fredrick Jackson Turner
(1920) has suggested, it is the trader, what he called the “pathfinder of civilization”, that
most often is earliest at the threshold of the frontier, and in this whaling was no
exception. According to Starbuck (1878), the first ships sailing under the new American
6

�flag to enter a British port after the revolutionary war, in 1787, were the whalers
Bedford, Industry, and Speedwell, all out of Nantucket. They had gone to England to try
and recommence trade in whale oil and bone with the British. Starbuck (1878) also
makes mention of another event where whaling was driving American diplomacy (and
war). During War of 1812, Peruvian privateers, as allies of England in this war, were
seizing US whalers. The US deployed a “diplomatic” envoy to address this issue, but
securing the support of the Chilean army, the envoy led the fight to free captured
whalers from their captivity in Peru. The history of whaling is rife with stories of first
encounters with remote civilizations, sailing into unknown and uncharted waters, forging
commercial relationships with ports where no American ship had visited previously.
They were, indeed, Turner’s “pathfinders of civilization”. One particularly important
event that was largely driven by the need for the whaling fleets to have ports in the
North Pacific readily available was the opening of Japan by Admiral Perry in 1853.
Burcin (2005) summarizes the event, and the intimate connection between Perry’s
mission and the whaling fleets, which ultimately compelled the Japanese to permit
vessels from other countries to enter their ports. Burcin (2005) recounts that the
contemporary reports of the mission did indeed emphasize the importance of that
mission in meeting the pressing needs of the whaling industry, but in subsequent
historical analyses of the mission, the connection is often not mentioned or mentioned
only in passing. By the mid-1800’s, America had a virtual monopoly on whaling in the
Pacific, and with the Russians openly hostile to American whalers in their territorial
waters, access to the ports in Japan was strategically essential. Indeed, as Burcin
(2005) concludes “Commodore Perry’s expedition relied upon whalers’ experience in
Japan not only for information about a little understood society but also as a political
justification to sail into Edo Bay in July 1853”. Not only was whaling considered a
justification for Perry’s expedition, but also for two previous Naval missions to Japan in
1846 and 1849, and a key justification for the American Exploration Expedition in 1836
commanded by Charles Wilkes (Burcin, 2005). There is little doubt that America’s
whaling interests were driving diplomacy in the Pacific region. If American “whaling
hegemony” in the 19th Century (Basberg, 2006) did serve an important role in the

7

�development of the American political hegemony in the 20th Century, this is an
important story to tell.
Conclusion
Rudyard Kipling (1941) said, “If history were taught in the form of stories, it would never
be forgotten”. Therefore, telling the compelling stories of 19th Century whaling should
be an effective way to not only expand the awareness and appreciation of this influential
human activity that has helped to shape the modern world, but perhaps assist in
empowering the protection and preservation of the essential places in that history for
future generations. However, storytelling requires both a good story to tell, and a willing
and appreciative audience. There is little doubt that whaling can provide many suitable
stories, but finding a willing audience may present a more significant challenge.
This may be a bit of an overstatement, as places like the New Bedford Whaling
Museum, New Bedford Whaling Historic Park, and Mystic Seaport seem to attract many
visitors. Recent books on whaling, such as Dolan’s (2008) Leviathan, have received
multiple awards and are bestsellers, while readers young and old continue to be drawn
toward Melville’s (2001) story of Ahab and Ismael in Moby Dick.

Certainly, the

discovery of the Two Brothers near French Frigate Shoals in the Papahānoumokuākea
Marine National Monument attracted an extraordinary amount of press coverage and
generated considerable public interest. However, while it is one thing to attract visitors,
read a bestseller, or follow a news story, its quite another to recognize and act on
supporting the preservation of our collective whaling heritage, particularly to actively
support protecting the particularly important places in the global whaling landscape.
Perhaps encouraging public appreciation that whaling has helped to shape what the
world is today, and the many contributions this industry has made to society, our
economic well being, and to our rich maritime heritage, is the greatest challenge. There
are many things that have happened throughout history, viewed through the lens of
today that may not seem something about which we should be very proud. Through
these experiences, however, we have learned a great deal and should not dismiss
these lessons of history because contemporary perspectives diminish their perceived
importance. We, as the conservators of this heritage, should not just tell the stories, but
offer some sense of the historic context of the stories we are telling, helping the listener
8

�not only understand and interpret the implications of this powerful contemporary antiwhaling discourse on that history, but to suggest the need for acting to support and
encourage the preservation of the global whaling heritage landscape so that what
remains is not lost. Time is a powerful enough opponent in the efforts to preserve
heritage resources, as they are ephemeral, degrading through natural process in the
environment. However, the places in this global whaling heritage landscape, the stories
they tell and the lessons they provide, are enduring. They are also worthy of preserving
for future generations.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Jim Delgado and Hans van Tilburg for helpful comments and advice
regarding the ideas presented in this paper.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are solely the author’s, and do not reflect the views
of the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, NOAA, or the US Government.

References
Barr, B. W., and Delgado, J. P., (In Press). Preserving whaling heritage: The role of
marine protected areas as “museums of the sea”. Presented at the 4th Symposium on
Whaling and History, Commander Chr. Christensen’s Whaling Museum, Sandefjord,
Norway, 18-21 June, 2013.
Basberg, B. L., 2006. Two Hegemonies – Two technological regimes: American and
Norwegian whaling in the 19th and 20th century. Presented at the XIV International
Economic History Congress, Helsinki, August 2006, retrieval November 29, 2013, from
http://www.helsinki.fi/iehc2006/papers3/Basberg.pdf
Bockstoce, J. R., 1986. Whales, Ice, and Men: The History of Whaling in the Western
Arctic. University of Washington Press, Seattle WA.
Brown, M., 2011. ‘Äina Under the Influence: The Criminalization of Alcohol in 19th
century Hawai’i.
lili: Multidisciplinary Research on Hawaiian Well-Being, Vol. 7: 311339.
Burcin, T., 2005. Commodore Perry’s 1853 Japanese Expedition: How whaling
influenced the event that revolutionized Japan. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, retrieval October 13, 2013, from
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05132005
131722/unrestricted/MAThesis.pdf.
Davis, L. E., Gallman, R. E., and Hutchins, T., 1987. Productivity in American Whaling:
The New Bedford Fleet in the 19th century. Working Paper No. 2477, National Bureau
of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, retrieval April 13, 2012, from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w2477.pdf
9

�Daws, G., 1967. Honolulu in the 19th Century: Notes on the Emergence of Urban
Society in Hawaii. Journal of Pacific History, Vol. 2: 77-96.
Daws, G., 1968. Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Islands. University of Hawaii
Press, Honolulu.
Dolan, E.J., 2008. Leviathan: The History of Whaling in America. W. W. Norton and
Company, New York, NY.
Epstein, C., 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: The Birth of an AntiWhaling Discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Feyrer, J., and Sacerdote, B., 2006. Colonialism and modern income – islands as
natural experiments. Working Paper No. 12546, National Bureau of Economic
Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12546
Juvik, S. P., Juvik, J. O., and Paradise, T. R., (Eds.), 1998. Atlas of Hawaii. University
of Hawaii Press, Hilo, HI.
Kipling, R., 1941. The Collected Works of Rudyard Kipling. Ams Press, Brooklyn, NY.
Kuykendall, R. S., 1967. The Hawaiian Kingdom: 1874-1893: the Kalakaua Dynasty.
University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. HI.
Lacroix, S. J., 2002. The economic history of Hawai’i: A short introduction. Working
Paper No. 02-3, East-West Center, Department of Economics, University of Hawaii at
Manoa,
retrieval
October
10,
2013,
from
http://ideas.repec.org/p/hai/wpaper/200203.html
Lebo, S. A., 2010. Local Perspective of Hawaii's Whaling Economy: Whale Traditions
and Government Regulation of the Kingdom's Native Seamen and Whale Fishery.
Coriolis, Vol. 1: 3-37.
Melville, H., 2001. Moby Dick: or The Whale. Penguin Classics 150th Anniversary
Edition, Penguin Putnam, Inc., New York, NY.
Nellist, G. F., 1951. An Early istory of onolulu’s Water System. Board of Water
Supply, City and County of Honolulu, retrieval February 26, 2014, from
https://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10524/11867/1951-NellistEarly-History-of-Honolulu.pdf?sequence=1.
Raupp, J. T., and Gleason, K., 2010. Submerged whaling heritage in
Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Bulletin of the Australasian Institute
for Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 34: 66–74.
Rozwadowski, H. M., 2005. Fathoming the Ocean: The Discovery and Exploration of the
Deep Sea. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sedgwick, T. F., 1901. Chickens and their Diseases in Hawaii. Hawaii Agricultural
Experiment Station, Bulletin No. 1, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI,
retrieval
February 26, 2014, from http://books.google.com/books?id=bfJFAQAAIAAJ.
Settles, J. D., 1996. The Impact of Colonialism on African Economic Development.
University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects, retrieval December 12, 2013, from
http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/182
10

�Smith, S. F., 1999. Popped culture: A social history of popcorn in America. University
of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC.
Starbuck, A., 1878. History of the American whale fishery from its earliest inception to
the year 1876. (Reprinted 1989), Castle Books, Secaucus, NJ.
Smith, T. D., Reeves, R. R., Josephson, E. A., and Lund, J. N., 2012. Spatial and
seasonal distribution of American whaling and whales in the age of sail. PLoS ONE,
Vol. 7 (4): e34905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034905, retrieval October 22, 2013, from
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjourn
al.pone.0034905&amp;representation=PDF
Turner, F. J., 1920. The Frontier in American History. Henry Holt and Co., New York.
Biography
Brad Barr received a BS from the University of Maine, a MS from the University of
Massachusetts, and PhD at the University of Alaska. He is currently a Senior Policy
Advisor in the NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Adjunct Professor at the
School of Marine Sciences and Ocean Engineering at the University of New Hampshire,
and a Visiting Professor at the University Center of the Westfjords in Iceland. He is a
member of the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, the International
Committee on Marine Mammal Protected Areas, and IUCN Marine Mammal Protected
Areas Task Force.

11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="7">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="20">
                  <text>Session 4: Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="21">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 4 chair Akatsuki Takahashi and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="22">
                  <text>The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage. Underwater sites in Oceania span human history from the Stone Age to the Atomic Age. Due to the cultural richness of underwater heritage in the region and its complex history, the protection of these sites is of high importance for the region. Moreover, the potential for sustainable tourism in partnership with diving industry has been attracting a growing attention.&#13;
The first UNESCO regional workshop on the Pacific underwater cultural heritage took place in December 2009 in Honiara, Solomon Islands. As possible steps towards building a capacity for managing UCH, participants at the workshop identified the following needs; systematic recording and maintenance of a database of submerged and underwater sites; exploring licensing activities directed at underwater sites; and developing a training and education programme for managers. The papers presented by experts at the workshop were compiled, edited and published as "Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania" in 2010.&#13;
Based on the recommendations made at the Honiara workshop, a Feasibility Study on Pacific Capacity Building Programme was prepared by Flinders University with UNESCO support. The Study recommends a possible capacity building programme to be hosted by the University of the South Pacific (USP) in Fiji. The launching of the Pacific Heritage Hub (PHH), a regional facility for knowledge management, capacity building and partnership building, at USP in 2013 presents an opportunity for the actual implementation of the capacity building programme. UNESCO is also exploring the possibility of organising regional and national consultations in the Pacific focusing on cultural policy development.&#13;
The objectives of the session are to:&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Enhance understanding of characteristics of UCH in the Pacific.&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Identify priority actions.&#13;
&#13;
â€¢ Foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="23">
                  <text>Dr. Akatsuki Takahashi</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="752">
                <text>Influencing the contemporary narrative on whaling heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="753">
                <text>Whaling heritage is a significant part of the worldâ€™s maritime history, and its landscape footprint is global. In the 19th Century, the Pacific and adjacent Arctic waters were the epicenter of whaling, where both many of the most productive whaling grounds were located as well as the primary ports that serviced this industry. The most compelling stories of whaling heritage occurred in these waters, and the names of the storied whaling ships, and the perils they encountered, are well known. These are stories that not only illuminate significant events in our collective maritime past, but contain lessons learned that can inform and offer knowledge relevant to current, yet similar, problems we face today. The contemporary whaling narrative is dominated by the more recent history of whaling, and the divisive atmosphere created by the controversy surrounding the few countries that continue to have active commercial whaling industries. Efforts need to be directed at changing this contemporary narrative, perceptions of the public that whaling heritage is more than killing these giants of the sea. Increasing awareness of the many influences, positive and negative, that whaling, throughout its history, has had on shaping our geo-political system, societies, cultures, economies, and even expanding our knowledge of the oceans and their resources is essential. Through this expanded awareness and appreciation of how whaling helped shape the world we know, we can acquire some needed support for continued historical research and documentation of this part of our maritime heritage. Changing this narrative may also help in preserving the significant places in our global whaling heritage landscape, and hopefully inform wiser decisions about contemporary issues through learning from the past.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="754">
                <text>Bradley W. Barr, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="755">
                <text>5/13/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="14">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="431" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="223">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/5ed56c643dc7d77453175c2bbd02196c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b115931d4feda2bc01ae7229595aed48</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5231">
                    <text>Observations on developing a maritime cultural landscape approach to managing
US National Marine Sanctuaries
Bradley W. Barr
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries Scituate, Massachusetts 02066, USA
Email: Brad.Barr@noaa.gov
Abstract
Effectively managing marine protected areas requires considerable knowledge of these
special places people value and to which they are sometimes strongly attached.
Usually, this knowledge is limited to the present state of resources and changes
observed in the recent past, which is used to inform the development of management
actions to address current and emerging threats to biodiversity and underwater cultural
heritage (UCH) resources. However, while acquiring this “snapshot” of the current
status of natural and cultural resources is necessary, it is often not sufficient.
Understanding the longer-term history of that site, illuminating its “maritime cultural
landscape” (MCL), can provide critical context to interpreting that somewhat static
“snapshot”. MCLs represent the historical imprint of human interactions with these
special places, providing a deeper base of social and historical information to inform
and empower stewardship of natural and UCH resources. The National Marine
Sanctuary System (NMSS) sites are already managed as landscapes – through
ongoing implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) – and integrating
MCL approaches offers opportunities to expand and enhance our deeper understanding
of how these socio-ecological systems were formed, changed over time, and how
coastal communities adapted to, and influenced, these changes. Better understanding
these historical interactions can offer significant insights, integrated with knowledge
attained through EBM, that can inform and guide contemporary management decision
making. The NMSS has developed a vision and strategy for implementing an integrated
EBM/MCL approach to stewardship, and is in the process of implementing that strategy.
Key words: Maritime Cultural Landscapes, Underwater cultural heritage, Ecosystembased management, Marine protected areas, Stewardship
Introduction: Valued Places
We all have “special places”. Places that have deeper meaning to us, places that evoke
especially memorable activities or events, or places we seek out, either physically or in
our minds, when we need a retreat from the pressures of life. It is our deep connection
to these places that imbues our lives with meaning, defines who we are, and influences
our values and behavior. These places are, in turn, affected by our connection to them,
our reliance on them for physical and spiritual sustenance, our recreation and

1

�livelihoods. Senegalese conservationist Baba Dioum has written “in the end, we will
only conserve what we love”. Given this, it should not be too surprising that many of
these special places have been preserved by society under law and policy as protected
areas. It should also not be too surprising that the managers of these protected areas
would have a keen interest in this essential human/environment relationship, what
people find special about the place they manage, and how they can effectively preserve
whatever compels and elicits such connections. If we do not have some knowledge of
this relationship, of what people value about that place, how can we possibly offer the
stewardship such a special place deserves?
Protecting these special places in the coastal and ocean waters of the United States is
the mission of the National Marine Sanctuary System (NMSS). The National Marine
Sanctuaries Act (U.S.C. 16, Chapter 32, Sections 1431 et seq.), the principal statutory
authority for establishing and managing marine protected areas in the waters of the US
Exclusive Economic Zone, provides the framework for protection and management of
such special places. This authority extends to preserving both ecosystem biodiversity
and integrity, as well as maritime cultural heritage. The former is addressed in the
NMSS through the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM), generally
defined for the marine environment, by Leslie and McLeod (2007), as follows:
“Marine EBM is about interactions: interactions among different spatial and
temporal scales, within and among ecological and social systems, and
among stakeholder groups and communities interested in the present and
future health of coastal and marine areas”.
It is about explicitly integrating humans into management, recognizing and accounting
for the potential affect that humans have on ecosystem structure and function, but also
incorporating their interests and aspirations into how places are managed and what
strategies are used to accomplish management goals established collaboratively with
these communities.

As the authors clearly state, however, it is the communities’

interests in the “present and future” of these places that embodies EBM. It is largely
based on understanding the present state, the drivers that are currently influencing the
ecosystem and management strategies that lead to a future state that sustains, or
improves, the ecosystem over time. Conversely, preserving the cultural heritage of that
place is necessarily focused on the past, how humans have influenced these places

2

�through time, and how those communities have, in turn, been shaped by these places.
Understanding the cultural heritage of a place offers the knowledge and experience
acquired by the community over a broader sweep of history. It involves a deeper
understanding of how that community has responded to ecosystem changes in the past,
how their actions have altered the socio-ecological system over time, and perhaps
shedding some light on how resilient that community might be to adapting to future
changes. To effectively integrate this cultural heritage preservation component into the
management of national marine sanctuaries, the concept of maritime cultural
landscapes (MCL) was identified as a complementary mechanism to EBM that offers a
compatible framework for understanding, and ultimately more effectively managing,
these special places in the oceans and along the coasts.
What are “Maritime Cultural Landscapes?”
As described in Barr (2013), the concept of “maritime cultural landscapes” builds on the
older and more widely applied notion of cultural landscape in terrestrial environments.
As first suggested by Westerdahl (1992), maritime cultural landscapes (MCL) were
defined as “human utilization of maritime space by boat, settlement, fishing, hunting,
shipping and its attendant subcultures”. MCL “comprises the whole network of sailing
routes, old as well as new, with ports and harbors along the coast, and its related
constructions and remains of human activity, underwater as well as terrestrial”
(Westerdahl, 1992). Jensen et al., (2011) provided an eloquent definition of “cultural
landscapes”:
“Cultural landscapes capture the living past that surrounds us and give us
a better understanding of the links the natural history and human history of
a place. They illustrate how we have shaped the world, and how the
world’s natural environments have shaped us. Perhaps most importantly,
cultural landscapes can also provide us with valuable insights into the
future, such as the relationship between the heath of natural resources
and human well-being and prosperity. At their most basic, cultural
landscapes are specific places where combinations of human activity and
natural forces have left a discernable mark on the world. Cultural
landscapes are reservoirs of human experience that preserve undeniable
examples of human triumph and loss. Retaining the intangible as well as
the tangible parts of human culture, cultural landscapes can do what the
natural sciences alone cannot. They convey the human meaning of
places”.

3

�MCL encompasses not only this cultural history of the physical maritime environment,
but also the “cognitive landscape”, defined as “the mapping and imprinting of the
functional aspects of the surroundings in the human mind. Man in landscape, landscape
in man” (Lofgren, 1981; cf Westerdahl, 1992). It embraces both the changes observed
over time with regard to the physical environment and human use, but also the
perception of these changes by the people who have lived, and are living, in that place
throughout history. How this maritime and ecological landscape has shaped and been
shaped by the human activities that have occurred there throughout its history provides
the foundation for understanding, and ultimately more effectively preserving, these
cultural landscapes.
As Tuan (1974) has observed, geographic spaces become “places” when people imbue
them with meaning, a process that influences self-identity and affects the way in which
we perceive and behave toward these places. Understanding the maritime cultural
landscape of a place identifies not only our collective contributions to sustaining and
improving these places we have given meaning, but of how people have contributed to
what they have become, offering insights and experience acquired by the community
along the way. Such deeper knowledge of place is likely to be a valuable asset to guide
and inform place-based management. This last point is worthy of emphasis. This
deeper knowledge may indeed have considerable potential value that contributes to a
more holistic and effective management approach to preserving the natural and cultural
resources of an MPA, but a more traditional reading of the literature on cultural
landscapes suggests that there should be no direct connection between the process of
cultural landscape analysis and place-based management.

Cultural landscape

approaches are focused on engaging the various stakeholder and cultural communities
in acquiring knowledge about the human/environment relationship through time, and
offering a forum for this engagement.
Integrating EBM and MCL
EBM is about including the “human dimension” in sustaining ecosystem structure and
function through collaborative management, engaging the community in establishing
management goals for that place, and the strategies implemented to achieve those
goals. It is a prospective process, informed with knowledge of the current state of the
4

�ecosystem, and leading to some agreed upon desired future state. In most cases, EBM
utilizes various management tools and strategies, such as zoning, regulations, and
voluntary mechanisms to balance sustainable use and preservation. MCL approaches
also involve these same people as a key element in understanding and preserving
heritage resources of this valued place, but it is a retrospective process. It focuses on
the history of the human use of that place, illuminating what has happened, through
time, which has left an imprint of this use on the socio-ecological system. It identifies
how the system has changed over time, how human uses have changed, and how the
system has responded to those changes. MCLs also held to ascertain what attributes
and elements of the human/environment relationship are relevant and contribute to the
deeper meaning and value the communities ascribe to this place, thereby offering some
insight into which of these elements and attributes are most important to preserve and
protect. While EBM and MCL could be implemented independently - which would be an
easier path to follow - an integrated management approach involving both EBM and
MCL would seem to offer opportunities not readily available if executed separately.
Clearly, both EBM and MCL involve “taking a step back”, looking at the “bigger picture”
of why this place is valued, which human uses have (and are leaving) an imprint on the
environment.

The both have people as a central and important element of their

implementation.

MCL offers the opportunity to acquire deeper knowledge of place

through the lens of history (both remote and recent) to learn what the state of the
ecosystem is today, what human activities may have led to the current state, and what
knowledge was acquired as these communities adapted to, accommodated, and
caused environmental change. They appear to be quite complementary, and are likely,
as they both seek the active engagement of the interested and affected pubic, to
potentially offer some efficiency in implementing them together rather than individually
and separately.
With regard to the practice of MPA management, one other rationale to consider in this
integrated implementation of EBM and MCL is the potential to break down some of the
internal barriers between those MPA management staff focusing on natural resource
protection, and their counterparts that apply their energies to preserving cultural
heritage. In this age of specialization, when it is beyond the capabilities of anyone to
5

�become what used to be called a “Renaissance Man” (or woman), managers cleave to
their specialties, and organizations of MPA programs are almost always set up with
“natural resource” and “cultural resource” staff in different organizational units. Through
the integrated implementation of EBM and MCL, there is greater opportunity for
collaboration and knowledge sharing between these two usually isolated operational
units within an MPA program. If Young (2010) is correct in his assertion that institutions,
particularly environmental governance systems, are similar to other socio-ecological
systems in that they are made more resilient, adaptive, and more resistant to stress
through effective implementation of adaptive management and social learning, this sort
of interdisciplinary integration may contribute to not only successfully achieving the
mission of the program, but also to sustaining the organization over time, avoiding what
Olson (1982) has termed “institutional arthritis”.
“The Devil is in the Details”
Making such an integrated approach operational for an MPA program like the NMS
System is no small feat. There are institutional and practical challenges to effectively
integrating EBM and MCL. Seeking acceptance of the idea of broadening the way
managers think about their sites to include MCL, let alone integrating EBM and MCL,
represents a challenge to MPA Programs that have been in operations for decades and
where their approach to management has become rigid and somewhat inflexible (“the
way we’ve always done it...”). For an MPA system like the NMSS, which includes
fourteen sites operating largely under a single statutory authority but quite different in
composition and management focus, not all sites will embrace this change simply
because the leadership of the MPA program has decided it should be so. Not all sites
have the necessary staff with expertise relevant to cultural heritage preservation, and
the site budgets may be insufficient to consider the additional costs associated with the
background research and public engagement required to successfully implement an
MCL approach. Therefore, it has been determined that the implementation of this
approach should be on an opportunistic basis, with each site deciding whether they will
incorporate MCL, and the integration of MCL with EBM, into their management planning
when their site plans are being reviewed and updated.

If they choose to do this,

additional support will be provided to them from the national program, bringing needed
6

�expertise in history, archaeology, and relevant planning and public engagement support
from NOAA’s Maritime Heritage Program (MHP) and operating units from other sites
and headquarters who can offer such expertise.
For sites that express a willingness to begin the process, an MCL “synopsis document”
is developed that generally identifies the scope and elements of what the MCL for that
site would include, providing an overview of the historical human uses of the area, the
various cultures that were involved in that use, discussions of how those cultures left
their imprint on the ecosystem, both physically and cognitively (through such things as
place names and knowledge of differing perceptions of the cultural landscape among
the cultures who lived in that place). Such a “synopsis document” has been prepared by
the MHP for the proposed expansion of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Banks
National Marine Sanctuaries along the Northern California “Redwoods” coast (Delgado,
Unpublished MS). This document is made available to those who are developing the
proposed management planning documents for this possible expansion of these
sanctuaries, with the promise of further support should the sites agree to proceed with
the implementation of this MCL initiative.
Other opportunities may involve more targeted support toward implementation. There
has been some interest expressed by the State of Wisconsin for a possible sanctuary in
the waters of Lake Michigan off their coast. While a considerable amount of research
has been assembled on the shipwrecks of this region, this is the home lands and waters
of a number of maritime indigenous cultures, and little was known about their use and
habitation of this place over time. To begin to identify and collect relevant information
regarding this indigenous cultural landscape, a MHP Graduate Fellow was identified to
conduct this essential research (Tate, Unpublished MS). In this case, the more specific
focus on the Indigenous contribution to the MCL was essential, and the research
provides a starting point for better understanding and incorporating these cultures’
contributions to the MCL of this area that may be considered for sanctuary designation
at some point in the future. Where there are many cultures that value a place all need
to be heard and given the opportunity to contribute to our deeper understanding of that
place.

7

�It is expected that the implementation of an Integrated EBM/MCL approach to
management for the NMSS will be something that will take considerable time and effort,
but this will be addressed as opportunities arise. Budgets and staff resources, both
currently in short supply are contributing to this slow pace of implementation. However,
perhaps this is not the issue is might appear to be. Organizational cultures change and
adapt very slowly. Therefore, even if resources were not severely limited, it is likely that
the pace of adoption of this proposed change in the management approach for the
national marine sanctuaries across the System would only progress as the institutional
culture continues to evolve and adapt. We have built the trough, have filled it with fresh,
clean water, and have led the horse to it, but are prepared to wait until it gets thirsty
enough to drink.
Not another Solution in Search of a Problem
All too frequently, we encounter situations where, in times of great uncertainty, we
reorganize or begin another round of strategic planning. Neither should careful scrutiny
of our organizational structure nor strategic planning be considered unworthy endeavors
when there is a demonstrated need to engage in these actions. However, they are
pointless when the strategic plan for an organization is serving its purpose, and the
organizational structure is sufficient to get the job done. When we are resource limited,
we should spend what time and energy we have on addressing real problems, seeking
innovative and creative solutions to the many challenges we face. As Barr (2013) offers,
the oceans and coasts, and the communities that inhabit these areas, are facing many
complex and significant problems. Global climate change is increasing the severity and
frequency of storms. Coastlines are being altered, sometimes significantly, and there is
considerable damage to infrastructure from these storm events. While these has been
some recovery of the economy, coastal communities remain hard hit, with collapses in
fisheries, and the increasing reliance on tourism providing less well-paying jobs but also
resulting in seasonal surges in population and increasing demands for services. The
societal burdens from the continued economic pressures are being exacted on coastal
communities in these challenging times. To add to the challenges, these are “wicked
problems”, difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and
changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize (Skaburskis, 2008). Finding
8

�practical solutions will not be an easy task. Concurrently, as summarized by Barr (2013)
our governance system is also being challenged:
“...as the severity of these problems increases, potential management
responses that involve trade-offs and compromise are perceived as
unacceptable. Communities are deeply polarized by diminishing resources
and challenges that exceed our capacity to effectively address using more
traditional management approaches. There is also sometimes deep
mistrust of others who may have differing views and perspectives. In the
history of those places, however, similar challenges have confronted, and
these communities have successfully adapted to those changes, or
learned much by their failures. This history and experience has
considerable value in offering some hope for resolving problems being
encountered today”.
MCL can provide this historical context for our management of these special places. It
offers a forum for public engagement that involves not just addressing problems, but
speaks to the proud heritage of these communities, resilient places that have
“weathered the storms” and persisted. EBM is necessary, as incorporating the “human
element” in ocean and coastal stewardship has demonstrated its importance, but it may
not be sufficient. We can benefit considerably by “learning from the past”, so that we
are not “doomed to repeat it”. The effective integration of MCL and EBM in addressing
these challenges has the potential to be one of the creative and innovative solutions to
help “turn the tide” for coastal communities, and the MPA managers that work with them
to sustain their way of life.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Jim Delgado, Hans van Tilburg, and Paul Orlando for helpful comments and
advice regarding the ideas presented in this paper.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are solely the author’s, and do not reflect
the views of the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, NOAA or any of its sub-agencies,
nor of the US Government.
References
Barr, B. W., 2013.

Understanding and managing marine protected areas through

integrating ecosystem-based management within maritime cultural landscapes: Moving
from theory to practice. Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 84: 1984-192.
Delgado, J. P., (Unpublished Manuscript). The “Redwood Coast:” The maritime cultural
landscape of the potential expansion of Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones
9

�National Marine Sanctuaries. NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Maritime
Heritage Program.
Jensen, J. O., Mather, R., and Gray, J., 2011. Viewing the future through the lens of
maritime cultural landscapes. Sanctuary Watch, Vol. Fall: 2-3.
Leslie, H. M., and McLeod, K. L., 2007. Confronting the challenges of implementing
marine ecosystem-based management. Front. Ecol. Environment, Vol. 5: 540-548.
Lofgren, O., 1981.Manniskanilandskapet-landskapetimanniskan. In L. Honko, and O.
Lofgren (Eds.), Tradition OchMiljii, Lund, Sweden: 235e261.
Olson Jr., M., 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press, New
Haven, CT.
Skaburskis, A., 2008. The origin of “wicked problems”. Planning Theory and Practice,
Vol. 9 (2): 277-280.
Tate, S., (Unpublished Manuscript). Native American Cultural Presence and Usage of
Wisconsin’s Lake Michigan Coasts.

NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries,

Maritime Heritage Program.
Tuan, Y. F., 1974. Topophilia: a Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and
Values. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Westerdahl, C., 1992. The maritime cultural landscape. International Journal of
Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 21 (1): 5-14.
Young, O., 2010. Institutional dynamics: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptability in
environmental and resource regimes. Global Climate Change, Vol. 20: 378-385.
Brad Barr received a BS from the University of Maine, a MS from the University of
Massachusetts, and PhD at the University of Alaska. He is currently a Senior Policy
Advisor in the NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Adjunct Professor at the
School of Marine Sciences and Ocean Engineering at the University of New Hampshire,
and a Visiting Professor at the University Center of the Westfjords in Iceland. He is a
member of the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, and the International
Committee on Marine Mammal Protected Areas/IUCN Marine Mammal Protected Areas
Task Force.

10

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="13">
                  <text>Session 2: New Approaches in UCH Management in the US</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="14">
                  <text>Video interview with Session 2 chair Dr. Hans Van Tilburg and links to the papers included in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="15">
                  <text>In 2009, responding to the effort to protect the significant natural and cultural resources within the marine environment for the benefit of present and future generations, the U.S. National Marine Protected Areas Center formed a Cultural Heritage Resources Working Group to provide expert advice on improving the conservation and management of maritime heritage resources. The resulting White Paper provided a series of recommendations to both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Department of the Interior, including new definitions for cultural heritage, marine cultural resources, tribes, indigenous peoples, and cultural landscapes. Central to these recommendations was a strong endorsement for the Cultural Landscape Approach in the understanding and management of maritime heritage resources (or UCH). Subsequently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationâ€™s (NOAA) Maritime Heritage Program has adopted the recommendations of this paper and is implementing a â€œmaritime cultural landscapeâ€ approach to the management of cultural resources within the National Marine Sanctuary System. Also as a part of this initiative, NOAA and the Bureau of Ocean Energy and Management (BOEM) have teamed up to support maritime cultural landscape studies of heritage resources by Native American Tribes and Native Hawaiian communities in the Pacific region. These projects on the U.S. West Coast and in the Hawaiian Islands demonstrate the necessity of adapting a broader range of recognized cultural resources and a more inclusive and participatory management and preservation process. Charismatic resources like historic shipwrecks will always provide unique information for archaeologists and historians, but we do ourselves a disservice if we focus solely on these types of properties, and neglect other perspectives and the broader nature of all types and traces of human existence that lie underwater.&#13;
Participants in this session will focus on the status of these ongoing ground-breaking projects, the advantages of a broader and more inclusive approach compared to the previous cultural heritage management paradigm in the U.S., and the challenges that this creates.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16">
                  <text>Dr. Hans Van Tilburg</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5227">
                <text>Observations on developing a maritime cultural landscape approach to managing US National Marine Sanctuaries</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5228">
                <text>Effectively managing marine protected areas requires considerable knowledge of these special places people value and to which they are sometimes strongly attached. Usually, this knowledge is limited to the present state of resources and changes observed in the recent past, which is used to inform the development of management actions to address current and emerging threats to biodiversity and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) resources. However, while acquiring this â€œsnapshotâ€ of the current status of natural and cultural resources is necessary, it is often not sufficient. Understanding the longer-term history of that site, illuminating its â€œmaritime cultural landscapeâ€ (MCL), can provide critical context to interpreting that somewhat static â€œsnapshotâ€. MCLs represent the historical imprint of human interactions with these special places, providing a deeper base of social and historical information to inform and empower stewardship of natural and UCH resources. The National Marine Sanctuary System (NMSS) sites are already managed as landscapes â€“ through ongoing implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) â€“ and integrating MCL approaches offers opportunities to expand and enhance our deeper understanding of how these socio-ecological systems were formed, changed over time, and how coastal communities adapted to, and influenced, these changes. Better understanding these historical interactions can offer significant insights, integrated with knowledge attained through EBM, that can inform and guide contemporary management decision making. The NMSS has developed a vision and strategy for implementing an integrated EBM/MCL approach to stewardship, and is in the process of implementing that strategy.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5229">
                <text>Bradley W. Barr, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5230">
                <text>5/13/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="36">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 2 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="105" public="1" featured="0">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1201">
                <text>Agriculture</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1202">
                <text>Bray, Francesca</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1203">
                <text>Joseph Needham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1204">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1205">
                <text>1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1206">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
      <elementSet elementSetId="8">
        <name>Zotero</name>
        <description/>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="122">
            <name>Author</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1207">
                <text>Bray, Francesca</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="145">
            <name>Series Editor</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1208">
                <text>Joseph Needham</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="149">
            <name>Item Type</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1209">
                <text>Book</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="178">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1210">
                <text>1984</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="217">
            <name>Place</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1211">
                <text>Cambridge</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="226">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1212">
                <text>Cambridge University Press</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="236">
            <name>Series</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1213">
                <text>Science and Civilisation in China</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="237">
            <name>Series Number</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1214">
                <text>2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="246">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1215">
                <text>Agriculture</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="251">
            <name>Volume</name>
            <description/>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1216">
                <text>6</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="15">
        <name>China</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="188" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="81">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/85787d79fe25897696333f4f59acf9d4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d23766701a0d68d28066eaedc2683cdb</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="2317">
                    <text>Cricket run or Home run? Can a correlation between
Emporia and non-Emporia based trade be made using
the wreck of the Lena Shoal?
Brian Fahy

Abstract
Is it possible to look at a shipwreck like the Lena Shoal and investigate patterns of emporia and
non-emporia trade throughout Southeast Asia? Was the boat simply ferrying cargo from one
specific port to another specific one, or was the trade a linear, multi-legged run? By looking at the
artifactual assemblage of the boat and its cargo, its construction, as well as the socio-political and
th
economic climate of 15 Century Southeast Asia and China, it is the goal of this paper to assess
what trading might have looked like from a boat like the Lena Shoal.
Both types of trading were most likely happening simultaneously, but there may certain
characteristics that the Lena Shoal wreck possessed that may stress a specific role or function
that it had in the smaller (or larger) scheme of Southeast Asian trade. Construction methods and
ship size of the boat may reveal details into the boats’ intended role in maritime trade. Can
correlations be made between ships of specific sizes having specific purposes? An attempt at
comparing ship size and cargo of similar wrecked vessels that share a similar temporal space in
the area will be necessary and vital to ascertain such qualities.
Much, but not all of the cargo was Chinese, the whole of which may help reflect a
particular course of trade through the area. Planned testing of the metals excavated at the site
will hopefully help promote the need for a complete database of metallurgical sources in the
th
region, to help further understand the role that the Lena Shoal played in 15 Century Southeast
Asian Maritime trade.

Introduction
Shipwrecks are often referred to a “time capsules,” whereby the moment a ship
sinks and comes to rest on the ground; it produces a pseudo-effect of an event
“trapped” outside of time. Everything on that ship (including cargo and hull) in
that moment gives us a font of information most importantly due to their
connection with each other. Since all these items onboard were deposited in situ
at the same time, then they have relatability to one another. While fieldwork
methods of mapping, excavating and cataloguing the artifacts will yield a large
amount of data, there are a number of other inferential corollaries to be made
with the finds. Richard Gould (2000:12) notes that these, “so-called events (the
moment a ship wrecks, becoming a potential archaeological site) prove to be
embedded in ongoing processes linked to social, economic, and even symbolic
activities”. There is valued information to be gained not only from looking at the
moment of the wreck, but also from the various circumstances preceding and
proceeding it. Shipwrecks are part of larger social and cultural landscapes; they
are not without a wider set of interpretive contexts.
In the instance of the Lena Shoal wreck (or Busuanga), there is a great
deal of artifactual evidence to process. Dated to approximately 1490 CE, the
wreck carried a various array of materials: metal ingots and cannons, ivory, glass
beads with the bulk of the cargo being a large assemblage of Chinese and
Southeast Asian ceramics.

�The objective of this paper is to attempt to describe the environment of
15 century production and exchange in Southeast Asia, as it possibly relates to
the Lena Shoal, to put the wreck back into the social, cultural and economic
systems that created it. Can inferences be made on the cargo of a wreck to
determine whether the cargo practicing direct trade between two ports (making a
sort of “cricket run”, between two bases), or will the cargo tell us a tale of a linear,
port-to-port circuit trade known as “tramping” (like a batter traveling around the
bases in baseball)? I plan on addressing this in a two ways; the artifactual
assemblage, (ceramics and metals) as well as the material used in the
construction of the ship. Other sources located within the assemblage give
supporting claims to regional provenances, but are not as concrete as the
ceramic wares. Items like ivory tusks, brass arm bangles, brass and iron
cannons, bronze gongs and tin ingots reveal their presence in the remains, yet
are less distinct in the details. In these cases traditional typological studies can
reveal vague regions of production rather than specific production centers.
This paper is also intended to stress the strict need for metallurgical
surveys and X-ray Florescence (XRF) catalogues throughout the region, to aid in
distinguishing provenances of the ingots (both the iron and tin) and well as the
brass workings in the collection.
To achieve these goals, it will be necessary to understand the concepts of
what is and what is not an emporium, how this affects and directs trade routes
and connectivity, and whether the classical definition of the term applies to the
ports of trade in Southeast Asia.
th

The wreck of the Lena Shoal
The wreck was discovered in 1996. The book, Lost at Sea by Goddio, et al.
(2000) relates the discovery and subsequent archaeological excavation through
the following facts. The research vessel Kaimiloa, en route to another
archaeological site, was waylaid by reports of fisherman bringing up ceramic
shards in their fishing nets. A quick scan and reconnaissance dive by the
vessels’ crew revealed a large swath of ceramics and elephant tusks at a depth
of about 48 meters. After an impressive feat of organization and logistics, in a
matter of weeks the team managed to secure the site, map the wreck in
commendable detail, and bring up thousands of artifacts from the wreck.
The bulk of the cargo seems to have been ceramic in nature. Monique
Crick (2002:86) notes that there were blue and white porcelains, celadon ware,
monochrome and Fahua porcelains from China within the wreckage. The cargo
also consisted of Thai Sawankhalok and Tao Maenam Noi jars, Siamese
Celadons and Vietnamese stonewares. These items clearly have a specific
provenance in their creation; ones which archaeologists are able to correlate to
definite kiln sites throughout Southeast Asia and China.
Other items uncovered within the wreck include; bronze arm bangles,
bronze and iron cannons, iron pots, tin ingots and pig iron, as well as laquerware,
iron needles, elephant tusks, glass beads , stone/shell objects and pepper.

�Comparative analysis was done on the remainder of the hull (left in situ) to
determine the materials used in its construction, and spectrographic samples of
the tin, brass and beads were performed.

Concepts of Emporia
There are varying definitions for the word “emporia”. At its barest definition, the
word was used merely as a synonym for “port” (Rouge 1966); Its’ other
minimalistic meaning was known as a “place where ships are built” (Rouge
1966). This acts as a “stepping off” point, to be able to define the term in a more
elaborate manner. Defined from a purely economical position, emporia is
characterized by historian and Indologist Deitmar Rothermund (1991:3) as a:
(M)arket place in which a variety of goods is more or less continually available and in
which a plurality of buyers and sellers can meet without undue restraint under
predictable conditions of supply and demand.

A synthesis of these base definitions were made by Alain Bresson (1993), using
translations and writings from Greek geographer Strabo and analyses of Strabo
from Michel Casevitz (1993). He notes the necessity to include geographical
terms in the definition of emporia, notably the need for its connectivity to water
(i.e. river, canal, and sea). This is useful because it includes both a market
function AND connectivity. With the exception of Rothermund, these authors are
referring to emporia in the Mediterranean during the Roman period, yet I believe
there are similarities in the terms and universals in the concepts that can be used
to define emporia globally. Obviously there are some differences in defining
Asian emporia and Mediterranean emporia, as well as temporal differences in
entrepots between the Roman era (27 BCE - 476 CE) and the Medieval Era (10th
- 15th centuries), further research is needed to properly compare and contrast the
two.
In the case of Southeast Asia, an attachment to the sea certainly applies
here. The regions’ major centers of civilization come from water rich areas.
Riverine locales promoted an agricultural boon and the use of the rivers as trade
routes imply that early cities established on these coastal tributaries may embody
the very nature of emporia (see Hall 2011).
Strabo notes there are specific activities and structures that contribute to
the identity of emporia. Obviously, commercial activity is one aspect that defines
an emporium. He stresses that trade can have a single axis (i.e. one way trade,
tribute), or dual axes (i.e. forms of exchange, barter). With these commercial
activities come commercial structures; buildings like trade offices, storage
facilities and market halls. From an agricultural standpoint, it would be necessary
to have grain storage of some sort not only for the local populace, but as a
tradable commodity.
Technically, an emporium would benefit from places to build or repair
one’s ship as well as fabricate certain items. Certain religious structures would be
present to cater to the various religions of the local populace as well as the
passing sailor and traveler. Institutional and bureaucratic structures like tax

�offices and administrational centers would be in place to facilitate profit for the
state and establish diplomacy in state matters.
Emporia in Southeast Asia certainly had some of these structures and
processes in place to varying degrees. These structures may take form as a
“Bund”, built similarly like Shanghai’s port that was established during the 18 th
century steamship era, or something more organic, whereby structures and
processes were erected and established in a port as they were needed, and
wherever they could fit them. However, some of these structures may not have
been necessary in Southeast Asia, certainly depending upon how large or small
the emporium was. There are theories in maritime economics that propose
varying degrees of emporia, based upon region of connectivity. Some emporia
may cater to a local, riverine population; other mid-level emporia operate within
small seas or cities along a stretch of coast line, while other, even larger emporia
may provide interactions from a multitude of continents. Martin Stopford
attempts to place these emporia into different sizeable contexts, based on type of
maritime trade. He proposes that there are some ports that specialize in either
Interregional trade, Short sea trade, and/or Land/River/Canal based trade.
(1988:39) The models are applied by Stopford in a modern framework, defining
Interregional trade (or “Deep-Sea shipping”) as economic exchange between
continental landmasses; Short Sea trade is defined as the coastal distribution of
the cargo delivered to major ports by Deep Sea shippers. Local/River/Canal
transport is small scale, localized trade within a series of waterways or river
network (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Stopford’s Models of Modern Sea Trade

�There are certainly emporia that do some or all of these types of trade,
but within these types of emporia one trade method is usually more popular than
the others. Within the region of Southeast Asia, and using Stopford’s models of
trade I suggest breaking and splitting Interregional trade into Inter-regional
emporia and Intra-regional emporia (Figure 2). I believe that these terms would
easily assist in defining which ports were catering to ports mostly within (Intra)
Southeast Asia and those emporia whose region of trade and contact was
between two regions (Inter). Stopford’s “Short Sea” shipping model can apply to
vessels that operate Intra-regionally, because the largely common practice of
following the coast applies to Most of Southeast Asia. Examples of Inter-regional
emporia would be cities along the straits of Moluccas and Java in the West and
the Chinese cities of Guangzhou and Quanzhou in the East. There are other
regional emporia which had some degree of inter-regional contact, depending
upon politics and security at that time. Entrepots that typically operate as Intraregional emporia are those that are mostly engaged in trade within the South
China, Sulu and Java Seas, including the Gulf of Thailand (Hall 2011).

Figure 2: Augmented Inter/Intra regional model
for within Southeast Asian context.

�Reflections on the wreck of the Lena, as it relates to Southeast
Asian emporia
The ship
It is important to note that while the design of the Lena may be Chinese in nature,
the ship itself is not. Identification of the planking reveals the type of wood to be
a variety of Shorea (Shorea sp.) It is a tropical hardwood belonging to the family
Dipterocarpaceae, and found most commonly in Indonesia, Malaysia and the
Philippines. Two taxa of Shorea are found in China, but both are rare, and not
located near the coastal China.
The pegs/treenails used to connect the planking were identified as GuttaPercha (Palaquium sp.) of the family Sapotaceae. Again, this is a wood primarily
native to Southeast Asia and Northern Australasia. These factors point to a ship
that was most likely constructed in Southeast Asia, in the Southeast Asian junk
tradition, and most likely called its home port somewhere in the region.

The cargo
The wreck contained items from all over Southeast Asia and China, the majority
of the cargo coming from China. Franck Goddio (2000) surmises that the Lena
Shoal most likely overshot its port of call in the Philippines, after visiting ports of
China, Vietnam and Thailand (in that order), and while attempting to come
around, grounded itself along the Palawan Coast. It is most likely that the ships’
next port of call was the Philippines. A nearly identical list of commodities that the
Philippine elite were importing was documented by E.P. Patanñe (1996:59) in
The Philippines in the 6th through 16th Centuries, he states,
(t)he elite [of Tanjay] also possessed [in their burial contexts] status-symbolizing
goods such as trade porcelains from China , Annam and Siam, iron and bronze
weaponry, brass and copper gongs and drums, silks and fine cotton textiles,
elaborate basketry, beaded and gold ornaments.

This shows that there is a clear corollary between the marketable commodities
popular in the Philippines at that time, and the cargo on the Lena Shoal, deemed
as product that never made it to its intended destination.

Further Study
It is conjectured that the Lena arrived and traded at ports in China, Vietnam and
Thailand before making its last leg of the trip to the Philippines – tramping (Figure
3; Goddio, et al. 2000:259).

�Figure 3. Emporia based “Direct trade” example vs. Non-emporia, “Tramping”
model (adapted from Goddio, et al. 2000:259).
I wish to propose an alternative pattern of trade that the Lena may have
taken before its untimely end. As mentioned earlier, the tin was (expertly)
analyzed by Energy Dispersive Spectrometer. Without going into great scientific
detail about the process, an elemental spectrum is created of the sample, and,
with the help of other measured metallic spectra, there may be a chance to
source the material being analyzed. The goal is to look at sources of tin
throughout Southeast Asia, with the hopes of locating where the tin on the Lena
Shoal came from.
The island of Mendo Barat, in Indonesia is one of the largest, if not the
largest sources of tin in the region. If analysis of these sources of tin is
catalogued, then we can cross reference the data from Mendo Barat with the tin
ingots found within the Lena cargo.
The same holds true for the Brass bracelets located within the wreck.
Spectrographic analysis gives us a detailed look at the copper, zinc and tin
elements in the arm bangles. Again, if accurate analyses of said sources were
measured and catalogued, it might reveal useful information about the arm
bangle and bracelet trade as well as the ship(s) that carry them. At that time,
India held the largest sources of zinc, and if the spectrographic analysis matched
sources from there, it would reveal significant insight into the metallurgy trade of
the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia.

�If the tin was from Mendo Barat, it could suggest that the Lena Shoal had
docked there previously. The ship could have made its way up from Srivijaya,
through Thailand and Vietnam, up into China and on its way to the Philippines
when it overshot its port. It still remains plausible that the Lena’s next port was in
the Philippines, quite possibly with the intent to unload the whole of its cargo.
However, the sheer volume of high quality blue-and-white ceramics on the boat
does not coincide with the social atmosphere in 15th century Philippines. Studies
done by John Miksic (2006) and Laura Junker (1999) show an increase in the
demand of high quality porcelain, but not to the extent of what the Lena Shoal
was carrying. It lends credence to the possibility that the Philippines was at least
the intended port of call for a portion of the blue-and-white, with the bulk of the
Chinese ceramics destined for points farther West. In that regard, we may
envision a ship whose route was forever clockwise, possibly engaging in a
cyclical trade pattern throughout Southeast Asia and Southern China.
Clearly identified trading routes would certainly contribute to such a
scenario. Goddio (2000:8) put forth the claim of a maritime trading route up and
down the Western Palawan coast, stating that although there are no textual
sources that mark a trade route via this corridor, he believed that it was a
frequently used route since the eleventh century. He backed that up with finding
and documenting other wrecks along the coast, showing that indeed the route
was a popular one. An original map of the region, recently rediscovered in the
Bodleian Library Special Collections in Oxford, dating to the mid-16th century
further supports his theory.

Figure 4. Selden Map. Orientation - North is to the right
(photo by author, copyright Ashmolean Museum).

�The “Selden Map”, is a detailed map of Southern China and Southeast
Asia in the 17th Century (Figure 4). Dated to 1653, it was allegedly made by
Chinese cartographers and captured during a British military operation. There
were two documented independent ventures from Britains to China around that
time; One by Henry Bornford made in 1635 and another made in 1637 by William
Corteen’s Association. Both were going to Macao, but no mention of the map
was in either record (Riddick 2006). The map appears to have been made in
Quanzhou, as it appears to be the start of all the sea routes on the map. The
map clearly shows Goddio’s suggested Palawan Strait route, supporting his
theory regarding that coastal trade route. The map also reveals a direct trade
route from Quanzhou to the Philippines, which may help bolster the cyclical route
of the Lena Shoal.
Certainly, there are a great many other factors to be taken into account to
help support this claim. Agents like weather patterns, politics and maritime
logistics need to be, and will be, studied to bolster this theory (Fahy in prep). I
hope though that the paper shows the necessity for a more complete
metallurgical spectroscopy catalogue, and a need for continued collaboration
supporting the field of maritime archaeology in Southeast Asia.

Bibliography
“Flora of China, 2004-2010”, in The Flora of China Project,
Missouri Botanical Garden Press, accessed June 17 th 2011:
http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/.
Bresson, A., and L’Emporion, De Boccard, Paris.
Rouillard,
P.,
1993
Cricket Run or Home Run: Emporia and non-Emporia based
Fahy, B.,
trade in Southeast Asia, unpublished DPhil thesis, Oxford
In preparation
Centre for Maritime Archaeology, University of Oxford.
Sunken Treasure: Fifteenth Century Chinese Ceramics From
Goddio, F.,
the Lena Cargo, Periplus, London.
Pierson, S., and
Crick, M.,
2000
Goddio, F., Crick, Lost at Sea: The Strange Route of the Lena Shoal Junk,
M., Pierson, S., Periplus, London.
and Scott, R.,
2002
Archaeology and the Social History of Ships, Cambridge,
Gould, R. A.,
2000
Cambridge University Press.
A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and
Hall, K. R.,
Societal Development, 100-1500, Rowman and Littlefield,
2011
Maryland.
Raiding, trading, and feasting: the political economy of
Junker, L. L.,
Philippine chiefdoms, University of Hawai`i Press, Honolulu.
1999
Brach, A. R.,
2011

�“Chinese Ceramics and the Economics of Early Southeast
Asian Urbanisation, 14th to 16th Centuries”, in Bulletin of the
Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 26, pp.147-153.
The Philippines in the 6th through 16th Centuries, LSA Press,
Patanñe, E.P.,
1996
San Juan.
The History of British India: a chronology, Praeger
Riddick, J. F.,
2006
,Connecticut.
Rothermund, D., “Asian Emporia and European Bridgeheads” in (eds.)
Roderich Ptak and Dietmar Rothermund, Emporia,
1991
commodities and Entrepreneurs in Asian Maritime Trade,
C.1400-1750., Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.
Recherges sur L’organisation du Commerce Maritime
Rouge, J.,
Mediterranee sous L’empire Romain, Service d'Edition et de
1966
Vente
des Publications de l'Education
Nationale
(S.E.V.P.E.N.) , Paris.
Selden Map of MS Selden Supra 105], Map Collection, Bodleian Library,
Southern China University of Oxford, Oxford.
and
Southeast
Asia,
1653
Stopford,
M., Maritime Economics, Unwin Hyman, London.
1988
Miksic, J. N.,
2006

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2312">
                <text>Cricket run or Home run? Can a correlation between Emporia and non-Emporia based trade be made using the wreck of the Lena Shoal?</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2313">
                <text>Session 4&#13;
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2314">
                <text>Is it possible to look at a shipwreck like the Lena Shoal and investigate patterns of emporia and non-emporia trade throughout Southeast Asia? Was the boat simply ferrying cargo from one specific port to another specific one, or was the trade a linear, multi-legged run? By looking at the artifactual assemblage of the boat and its cargo, its construction, as well as the socio-political and economic climate of 15th Century Southeast Asia and China, it is the goal of this paper to assess what trading might have looked like from a boat like the Lena Shoal. &#13;
&#13;
Both types of trading were most likely happening simultaneously, but there may certain characteristics that the Lena Shoal wreck possessed that may stress a specific role or function that it had in the smaller (or larger) scheme of Southeast Asian trade. Construction methods and ship size of the boat may reveal details into the boatsâ€™ intended role in maritime trade. Can correlations be made between ships of specific sizes having specific purposes? An attempt at comparing ship size and cargo of similar wrecked vessels that share a similar temporal space in the area will be necessary and vital to ascertain such qualities. &#13;
&#13;
Much, but not all of the cargo was Chinese, the whole of which may help reflect a particular course of trade through the area. Planned testing of the metals excavated at the site will hopefully help promote the need for a complete database of metallurgical sources in the region, to help further understand the role that the Lena Shoal played in 15th Century Southeast Asian Maritime trade.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2315">
                <text>Brian Fahy</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2316">
                <text>November 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="25">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 4</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
