<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items/browse?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=16" accessDate="2026-10-25T02:34:29+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>16</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>700</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="550" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="341">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/46e352444f0e75ce38da9cffebf0f619.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3de433b4a692b905d29bb18bf5d20b93</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6144">
                    <text>Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong: a collection of living maritime cultural
heritage and oral history
Shadi Kalantar (PhD candidate at University of Naples “L’Orientale”, skalantar@unior.it)
Zeinab Hadi (PhD student at University of Tehran, zeinab.hadi@ut.ac.ir)

ABSTRACT
Bandar-e Kong is a port-town located in the Iranian coasts of the Persian Gulf, which flourished in the 17th
century CE with the presence of the Portuguese. Since then, Bandar-e Kong has been a departure point for
Iranian ships sailing the triangle trade to India, Africa, and the Persian Gulf. The topic of this paper fits best
within the Session: Collections-Based Research because this paper aims to introduce Bandar-e Kong’s living
maritime heritage through the Ethnological Museum’s collections.
The Ethnological Museum collections were donated by the town residents. It was founded in 2011 by retired
captains and mariners of Bandar-e Kong, sailors themselves to Africa and India. These sailors turned curators
preserve the UNESCO’s intangible heritage of Traditional Skills of Building and Sailing Iranian Lenj Boats in
the Persian Gulf. In 2020 the authors were funded by the Municipality of Kong to document the objects curated
at this museum.
Our holistic approach recorded all vessels and related tools. All objects underwent morphological analysis, and
each sailor-curator was interviewed to amass oral histories on the construction and use of the objects. These
details together ultimately produced an oral history of the port-town of Bandar-e Kong during August and
September of 2020.
*All letters and wording not in Latin alphabet are Persian.
Keywords: intangible cultural heritage, maritime ethnography, Persian Gulf, Bandar-e Kong
List of Pictures:
Picture 1: top: the Portuguese remains on the coast of Kong (copyright permission by Ayub Zarei); bottom: boatyard of
Kong looking to the east (recorded by Shadi Kalantar).
Picture 2: left: Nakhoda Ḥạ̣ mūd (copyright permission by Ali Bahri); right: Sarhang (copyright permission by Mohammad
Ḥasanzade).
Picture 3: top left: a jahle, a jar which is also used as a drum (accession number KEM-309); top right: a wooden mortar made
in Africa (KEM-138); bottom left: a fragrance burner for cloths, probably made in India (KEM- 206); a tambūre or tanbūn
which is used in spiritual ceremonies (KEM-095). All images recorded by authors.
Picture 4: top left: qādūfs (accession number KEM- 22-23); top middle: Indian oars (KEM- 24-25); top right: mīdāf (KEM35); bottom left: a glass buoy (KEM- 71); bottom right: mokassar (KEM- 26). All images are recorded by authors.

1

�INTRODUCTION
The Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong is a public effort to safeguard the national intangible
heritage of navigation and ship/boat building in Iran. Objects are donated, entrance is free and
curators volunteer. These curators are retired mariners from the triangle trade between the Persian
Gulf, India, and Africa. Their presence and conversation play integral roles in the museum
collections.
In 2020 the authorities of the Municipality of Kong funded the authors to create an inventory form
and accession each object in the museum collection. The outcome resulted in eight overarching
categories. This process of collections management and the ensuing discussion on our select objects is
why our paper fits best within the Collections-Based Research Session.
Of the 491 objects recorded, we narrow our discussion to four. We selected the four objects as
examples of the richness of intangible heritage in our recording process. Following is a short
introduction to the port-town of Kong, the creation of the Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong,
our inventory framework and results, and discussion of four objects from the collection.

BANDAR-E KONG
Bandar-e Kong or “Kong Port” (‫)بندر کنگ‬, is a town in the west of Hormozgan province, on the
Iranian coast of the Persian Gulf. Today, Kong is approximately 6.5 Km² with a +20,000 population.
The Portuguese had their main port on the island of Hormuz until 1622 when Iranians repossessed it
(Lorimer 1915, 23-27; Al-Salimi and Jansen 2015, 223-235; Vosuqi and Khayrandish 2005).
Subsequently, the Portuguese attacked Iranian coasts to recoup their losses. In response, Iran’s king,
Shah Abbas the Great, agreed the Portuguese could settle along the coast (pointedly not on an island)
(Floor 2006, 238-239) (1625 CE). The Portuguese chose Kong and remained there until 1721-22 CE
(Stiffe 1899, 297; Floor 2006, 429-439; Habibi and Vosuqi 2008, 13-16). The Portuguese presence is
still visible with the castle ruins (picture 1 top) with more likely to the east, based on geomagnetic
survey (Mohammadkhani 2020, 95-99).
Aside from the Portuguese, Kong remained an active port for Iranian ships sailing to Africa, India and
west of the Persian Gulf (Tavernier 1678, 94-95; L’Estrang 1686, 157; Lorimer 1908, 1041;
Noorbakhsh 1996; Hassannia and Bahri 2018). This continues to the present day; the Mihandūst ( ‫میهن‬
‫ )دوست‬voyage from Dubai to Mombasa that Kaplan reported is a good instance (trip completed in
1974 Kaplan 2015). There is still an active traditional (wood) boat-building yard (picture 1 bottom), at
33 hectares (calculated in Google Earth) possibly the largest along the Persian Gulf. The wooden
ships, known as lanj/lenj in Iran, are still built, repaired, and sailed thus continuing nautical traditions.

2

�Picture 1: top: the Portuguese remains on the coast of Kong (copyright permission by Ayub Zarei); bottom: boatyard
of Kong looking to the east (recorded by Shadi Kalantar).

The living knowledge and practice of lanj building, in addition to the high number of old and retired
mariners concentrated in this little town, characterises Kong as a centre for traditional maritime
heritage. So, naturally the Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong’s collection of ship and boat
related objects and traded goods were gathered by retired sailors, captains and boatbuilders. These
mariners continue to carry their maritime cultural knowledge. Some ethnographic and oral history
studies have been previously done, which attempted to record the oral maritime history and intangible
maritime heritage of Bandar-e Kong, specifically the terminology and function of maritime and
navigational tools curated in the museum (Noorbakhsh 1996; Parsa 2013; Hassannia and Bahri 2018;
Hassannia and Zarei 2020).

3

�ETHNOLOGICAL MUSEUM OF BANDAR-E KONG
History of the building
The Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong (‫ ) موزه مردم شناسی بندر کنگ‬is in a building located on the
property of Hadj Mohammad Rashedan (‫ )حاج محمد راشدان‬and descendants. This building was a tradehouse of goods from Africa, India, and the southern countries of the Persian Gulf. After decades of
abandonment, in 2011, captain Ali Bahri (‫)علی بحری‬, better known as Nakhoda Ḥamūd (‫)ناخدا حمود‬
attempted to establish the museum. Serendipitously, Traditional Skills of Building and Sailing Iranian
Lenj Boats in the Persian Gulf was inscribed on the UNESCO’s “List of Intangible Cultural Heritage
in Need of Urgent Safeguarding” (Nomination file No. 00534). So, through the public attempt to
safeguard national maritime heritage the Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong came into
existence.
Nakhoda Ḥamūd, along with the former mayor of the town Ayoub Zarei (‫)ایوب زارعی‬, worked to
support our project funded by the Municipality of Bandar-e Kong. In 2020 the authors documented
the museum collections and recorded oral history of maritime Bandar-e Kong in interviews with the
retired sailors who now volunteer as curators at the museum.

THE PROJECT OF DOCUMENTATION
Our project saw the value of the storytelling of the sailor/shipbuilder-curators. They gather together
every evening for tea or coffee and share stories from their travels to India and Africa. Bystanders,
including researchers or visitors, can listen to their experiences and guidance on the use of the
museum collections. The collections were donated and include a variety of everyday-life objects to
maritime and navigation tools.
Framework
The aim of our project was to document the museum collections for scholarly use and to create an
inventory list for authorities and curators of the museum. This project was carried out from 15 August
2020 to the end of September 2020 on site, over four weeks, and an additional +two weeks to digitise
and edit the pictures. In total 491 objects were measured, photographed and described in the inventory
forms we created; in some cases, drawings were also made.
The utility of many objects, especially boat and ship related objects, were unknown to the authors,
therefore, interviews with the mariners-curators were carried out to figure out the utility as well as
terminology of maritime objects and other unknown elements. Here, the challenge was that these
maritime terms are in the local dialect of Hormozgan which is called bandari (Pelevin 2010) and they
mostly have no synonym in standard Persian. So, it was decided to document the objects with their
bandari terms in the inventory list and define them. As mentioned, bandari maritime terms have been
studied before (Eqtedari 1963; Mohebbi 1996; Noorbakhsh 1996, 86-106; Tabibnezhad 2011; Parsa
2013, 145-150; Hassannia and Bahri 2018, 111-118), however, the terms that were previously
undocumented are now written in the inventory list. In addition, the name of the donator, where
available, is recorded in the inventory list with the accession number.
To record the objects’ function Ali Baḥri /Nakhoda Ḥamūd (picture 2 left) and Mohammad
Hasanzade (‫( )محمد حسن زاده‬picture 2 right), better known as Sarhang (‫ )سرهنگ‬were interviewed.
Ali Baḥri, on the one hand, is a retired captain and his father, whose nickname was Ḥamūd, was a
captain too. Nakhoda (‫)ناخدا‬, could be translated as both captain and shipowner in the past (Tibbetts
1971, 58; Agius 2008, 415), however, today it only refers to captain. In this article, Ali Baḥri, who is
referred to in this article by his reputation as Nakhoda Ḥamūd, was born in 1936 in Kong. Since his
4

�father was a well-known nakhoda as well, he always kept his father’s company onboard as a child. He
soon started to work on a fishing craft and later became a nakhoda himself.

Picture 2: left: Nakhoda Ḥ̣amūd
(copyright permission by Ali Bahri); right: Sarhang (copyright permission by
̣̣
Mohammad Ḥasanzade).

Mohammad Ḥasanzade, on the other hand, used to be a sarhang onboard. Sarhang, which is also
known as mojaddami (‫ )مجدمی‬and moqaddami (‫)مقدمی‬, oversees all the sailing tasks onboard such as
landing and docking (Tibbetts 1971, 58; Agius 2008, 419, 178-181). Ḥasanzade, himself, says:
‘sarhang gets orders directly from nakhoda and he should know everything about a sailing ship, every
piece of it. He supervises sails, docking, landing, rising, lowering and changing the directions of the
sails’. He is thus referred to, in this article, as Sarhang. He was born in 1945 in Kong and when he
was eleven or twelve years old, he went on his first sea voyage on a sailing ship with his father. They
travelled to Abadan on the west of the Iranian coast of the Persian Gulf and then to Tanzania in Africa
and back to Kong. Sarhang started working on a ship as an unpaid young trainee and slowly, over
time, advanced to the position of being a sarhang.
Now that we’ve introduced our main interviewees, we will explain how we documented oral histories.
The authors posed questions to these sailor-curators, amongst others, at their daily gathering. The
authors followed the conversation amongst them in relation to the question. The questions sometimes
led to disagreements so, different opinions and points of views on a subject were compared. In this
article, where information is provided by Sarhang or Nakhoda Ḥamūd, it is quoted by their names and
where the information is gained from a group’s conversation, it is mentioned as “group-discussion”.
Collections and Objects
The museum’s collections were categorised into seven classifications: Boat and Ship Related ( ‫اجزاء و‬
‫)الحاقات قایق و کشتی‬, Boat and Ship Models (‫)مدل قایق و کشتی‬, Handicrafts (‫)صنایع دستی‬, Vessels (‫)ظروف‬,
Modern Items (‫)اشیاء مدرن‬, Musical Instruments (‫ )آالت موسیقی‬and Others (‫ )متفرقه‬for those that could
not be categorised to any of the above mentioned ones.
The Boat and Ship Related Collection includes paddles and oars, sailing affiliations, navigational
tools, crew’s personal boxes and other tools such as glass buoys (picture 4 bottom left). Boat and Ship
Models is a small collection of few locally made dhow models and some made in India. Vessels
5

�Collection has a variety of locally produced potteries (picture 3 top left), to Chinese and European
fine ceramics and glasses, jars for carrying Indian pickles, and African mortars (picture 3 top right)
that have been traded around the Indian Ocean in the 20th century. Handicrafts Collection has a variety
of locally produced items to Indian and African items that sailors brought as souvenirs from their
voyages (picture 3 bottom left), with handicrafts, such as baskets, that mariners made onboard during
sail. Modern Item Collection includes radios, televisions, phones and clocks that mostly are bought
and brought from Dubai and Kuwait in the second half of the 20th century. The Musical Instruments
Collection mostly has local drums and one tambūre (‫ )تمبوره‬or tanbūn (‫ ) تنبون‬which is a string
ceremonial instrument (picture 3 bottom right). We selected four objects from the Boat and Ship
Related Collection to narrow our discussion.

Picture 3: top left: a jahle, a jar which is also used as a drum (accession number KEM-309); top right: a wooden
mortar made in Africa (KEM-138); bottom left: a fragrance burner for cloths, probably made in India (KEM- 206);
a tambūre or tanbūn which is used in spiritual ceremonies (KEM-095). All images recorded by authors.

Paddles and Oars
Three pairs of wooden oars, one pair of wooden paddles and one single paddle are available in the
Boat and Ship Related Collection. All the three paddles are the same type, but the oars are two
different types. Sarhang and Nakhoda Ḥamūd recalled their names as following and other mariners in
the group-discussion confirmed them: paddles are called qādūf ( ‫( )قادوف‬picture 4 top left) or African
paddle ( ‫)پاروی اِفریقایی‬, one pair of oars are called Indian oar ( ‫( )پاروی هندی‬picture 4 top middle) and
the other two pairs are mīdāf ( ‫( )میداف‬picture 4 top right).
The shafts of qādūfs vary from 170 to 172 cm among the three qādūfs and the widest part of the blade
is 60-61 cm. This type of paddle has an arrowhead shaped blade and in the top of the shaft has a
handle to hold the paddle (grip). The paddles are carved out of wood in one piece and there is no joint

6

�in them. We were informed in a group-discussion that this kind of paddle was purchased in African
ports such as Mombasa. Sarhang remembers that qādūf, or the African paddle, was only used for
paddling on a canoe. The Indian oars, as qādūfs, are carved from the trunk in one piece and the only
joint part is the grip. The shaft is 140 cm and the blade, which is round, is 30 cm. Mīdāf, from which
two pairs are available, has a longer shaft, approximately 200-220 cm, and the blade, unlike the
previous ones, is attached to it with iron nails.
This study brought up a contradiction with previous terminological studies over the terms mīdāf and
qādūf. In Parsa’s glossary for Bandari maritime terms (2013, 234) mīdāf is mentioned as an equivalent
for jaddāf which refers to the wooden structure which is built out of water for ships to stay still when
they are not in the water. Ghādūf or ghādif (qādūf), on the other hand, according to Agius (2008, 183184, 406) means sailor (lit. rower). In addition to that, we faced another controversy, this time among
the mariners in the group-discussion, about the usage of the Indian oars. Some described the objects
as oars, while others described the objects used both as oars for small boats and as paddles for canoes.
Mīdāfs, however, are certainly oars, as Sarhang recalled a song that they used to chant while rowing
with mīdāfs to synch the rhythm of rowing, which is the repetition of two words: ‘hele, yāmāl’ (in
Persian ‫ یامال‬،‫)هله‬.

Picture 4: top left: qādūfs (accession number KEM- 22-23); top middle: Indian oars (KEM- 24-25); top right: mīdāf
(KEM- 35); bottom left: a glass buoy (KEM- 71); bottom right: mokassar (KEM- 26). All images recorded by authors.

Mokassar
Mokassar (‫( )مکسّر‬picture 4 bottom right) is a tool which, according to Sarhang, is for making ropes
from date palm’s fibres or coconuts’ husks. The Arabic word means broken so maybe it refers to the
shape of this tool which has four grooves on the four sides. Linguistic analysis of these words’
etymology requires further study and was not intended for our current study.
7

�Mokassar is 70 cm high and has a quadrangular shape and its lower part is wider than its upper part
like a pyramid with a flat top; the lower part is 15 cm wide, and the upper part is 10 cm. There are
four grooves on the four corners in which fibres cross and there is a hole on the upper part from which
this tool is hung and spun. Rope is made from the spinning fibres. To make thicker ropes, thinner
ropes would be spun together.

CONCLUSION
Cultural heritage belongs to nations and people. They are the best guardians of one’s heritage,
especially intangible heritage. The Ethnological Museum of Kong is a good example of how people,
in a public effort, can preserve their own heritage and without much money for support. Unlike many
great ethnological museums that exhibit collections from locations at a great distance from their
heritage, the Ethnological Museum of Bandar-a Kong is located in its local context and has the
capability of providing close interaction for visitors with the living carrier of intangible maritime
heritage - the knowledge-keepers of traditional sailors and ship-builders. This project is an attempt to
conserve the traditional maritime knowledge and contribute to the body of maritime oral histories.

Acknowledgement
This project was funded by the municipality of Kong which we are grateful for. We especially thank our interviewees,
Mohammad Hasanzade and Ali Baḥri for being very patient and helpful as well as other mariners of Bandar-e Kong that
were present at our group-discussions. We also acknowledge the support of Ayoub Zarei, former mayor of Kong who is an
admirer of maritime cultural heritage.

Bibliography:
Agius, Dionisius. Classic Ships of Islam From Mesopotamia to the Indian Ocean. Leiden. Boston: Brill, 2008.
Al-Salimi, Abdulrahim and Jansen, Michael (eds.). Portugal in The Sea of Oman Religion and Politics. Vol. 5. Hildesheim.
Zurich. New York, 2015.
Eghtedari, Ahmad “‫ محمد علی سدید السلطنه کبابی بندر عباسی‬:‫ ”اصطالحات کشتی در جنوب ایران و رساله اوزان چو تألیف‬In ‫نشریه فرهنگ ایران‬
‫زمین‬. Vol. 11 (1963): 135-154
Floor, Willem. The Persian Gulf: a political and economic history of five port cities. Washington DC: Mage, 2006.
Habibi, Hasan and Vosuqi, Mohamman B. The Historical, Political and Social Study of Bandar Abbas Documents. Tehran:
Iranshenasi, 2008.
Hassannia, Mohammad and Bahri, Yaqub. ‫دریانوردی و لنج سازی بندر کنگ با تاکید بر بوم مسی‬. Tehran: Jonub Publications, 2018.
Hassannia, Mohammad and Zarei, Ayub. Lasting Heritage of Sailors and Lanj Builders. Tehran: Jobub Publications, 2020.
Kaplan, Marion. So Old a Ship Twilight of the Arab Dhow. London: Harriman House, 2015.
L’Estrang, R.O (ed.). Travels of Monfieur Thevenot into The Levants. London: Printed by H. Clarck, 1686.
Lorimer, J.G. Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, Oman and Central Arabia. Vol. 1. Calcutta: Superintendent Government
Printing, 1915.
Lorimer, J.G. Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, Oman and Central Arabia. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Superintendent Government
Printing, 1908.
Mohammadkhani, Kurosh. “Magnetic survey in the Portuguese castle of Kong” In Human and the Sea: a Review of
Thousands of Years of Relationship between Humans and the Sea in Iran edited by Fereidoun Biglari, Jebrael Nokandehm,
Abdolmajid Naderi Beni and Ali Hozhabri, 95-99. Tehran: National Museum of Iran and Ports and Maritime Organization of
Iran, 2020.

8

�Mohebbi, “Parvis. A Persian Nautical Glossary from ca. 1900” In Iran. Vol. 34 (1996): 129-133
Noorbakhsh, Hossein. Koung Port: the city of navigators and shipbuilders in the Persian Gulf. Second edition. Tehran:
Tabatabai, 1996.
Parsa, Ali, ‫بادبانهای جنوب‬. Tehran: Nashre No, 2013.
Pelevin, Mikhail. “Materials on the Bandari Dialect” In Iran &amp; the Caucasus. Vol. 14 (2010): 57-78
Stiffe, A.W. “Former Trading Centres of the Persian Gulf: Kung” In The Geographical Journal, No. 13 (1899): 294-297
Tabibnezhad Motlaq, Abdolmajid. ‫ فرهنگ لغلت و اصطالحات صیادی و دریانوردی بوشهر و خلیج فارس‬:‫خیران‬. Bushehr: Bushehr
Publications, 2011.
Tavernier, John Baptista. Voyages. London,1678.
Vosuqi, Mohammad B. and Khayrandish, Abd al-Rasul. Jarūn Name. Tehran: Miras-I Maktub, 2005.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="59">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="337">
                  <text>2023 Session 23: Collections-based Research</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="338">
                  <text>Session 23 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="339">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 23 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="340">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="341">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="342">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="343">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="344">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="345">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6136">
                <text>Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong: a Collection of Living Maritime Cultural Heritage and Oral History </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6137">
                <text>Bandar-e Kong is a port-town located in the Iranian coasts of the Persian Gulf, which flourished in the 17th&#13;
century CE with the presence of the Portuguese. Since then, Bandar-e Kong has been a departure point for&#13;
Iranian ships sailing the triangle trade to India, Africa, and the Persian Gulf. The topic of this paper fits best&#13;
within the Session: Collections-Based Research because this paper aims to introduce Bandar-e Kong’s living&#13;
maritime heritage through the Ethnological Museum’s collections.&#13;
The Ethnological Museum collections were donated by the town residents. It was founded in 2011 by retired&#13;
captains and mariners of Bandar-e Kong, sailors themselves to Africa and India. These sailors turned curators&#13;
preserve the UNESCO’s intangible heritage of Traditional Skills of Building and Sailing Iranian Lenj Boats in&#13;
the Persian Gulf. In 2020 the authors were funded by the Municipality of Kong to document the objects curated&#13;
at this museum.&#13;
Our holistic approach recorded all vessels and related tools. All objects underwent morphological analysis, and&#13;
each sailor-curator was interviewed to amass oral histories on the construction and use of the objects. These&#13;
details together ultimately produced an oral history of the port-town of Bandar-e Kong during August and&#13;
September of 2020. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6138">
                <text>Shadi Kalantar</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6139">
                <text>Zeinab Hadi</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6140">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6141">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6142">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6143">
                <text>Kalantar, Shadi  and Zeinab Hadi. 2023. “Ethnological Museum of Bandar-e Kong: a collection of living maritime cultural heritage and oral history.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Michelle Damian. Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1920 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="50">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 23 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="549" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="340">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/783e11a20265edc73c816f763522b079.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a9cd0317c6c8144dd4d4a131e22ef128</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6135">
                    <text>15th century carnelian bead cargo of the Indian Ocean World: a conversation starter on
collections-based research in the Asia-Pacific
Jennifer Craig (APConf5 Committee Member, Publication Lead Coordinator)

ABSTRACT
The topic of this abstract fits best within the Collections-based Research Session because existing museum
collections of carnelian beads from two archaeological shipwreck sites were analyzed. The sites include different
ship constructions located at the far ends, to the north and south, of the Philippines; and they carried comparable
artefacts. Both the Pandanan (1460-1487 CE) and Santa Cruz (1488-1505 CE) shipwrecks carried cargoes of
similar ceramics (i.e. Chinese Jingdezhen and Thai Maenam Noi) and black glass beads (i.e. west India soda
alumina); yet these sites also carried dissimilar cargo in both the ceramics and glass beads. Both sites also carried
disproportionate carnelian beads. The resources to conduct the work to study carnelian are the morphological
analysis of measurement and descriptors, technological analysis of SEM and compositional analysis of LA-ICPMS. My research questions ask what geographic patterns these analyses indicate of the carnelian beads: What is
the source of the carnelian? Where were the bead workshops? What sailing routes did the carnelian move over to
ultimately shipwreck off the Philippines? The expected results are that riverine systems that connected interior
Indian carnelian were used to move raw material to west India bead workshops, via the Indian Ocean, Bay of
Bengal into the Straits of Malacca to Southeast Asian entrepôt.
Keywords: Collections-based research, rigor, connectivities, shipwreck
List of Tables and Figures:
Table 1 lists the Santa Cruz and Pandanan carnelian cargo average concentrations and standard deviations for
the elements used in the statistical analysis with samples in parts per million converted to log10 values.
Table 2 Agate/Carnelian artefacts analyzed in this study and their primary predicted group memberships from
Canonical Discriminant Analysis.
Figure 1 A Principal Component Analysis scatterplot of the agate/carnelian geologic sources and the
agate/carnelian artifacts plotted by their first and second components.
Figure 2 A biplot of the agate/carnelian geologic sources with the agate/carnelian artifacts plotted by their first
two discriminant functions.

INTRODUCTION
In January 2023 I attended the Society for Historical Archaeology conference. This North American
focused conference included a luncheon on Collections and Curation that invited practitioners of
Collections-based Research. Wondering if I might be an oblivious participant, as someone who had
recently completed a PhD dissertation on shipwreck beads collections stored in the National Museum
of the Philippines, in the luncheon I found that there was a very clear definition of what collection-based
research entailed for the North American Archaeologist/Curator, “using existing collections to pose and
answer scholarly questions/it is a form of archaeological excavation in its own right. Searching through
the contents of boxes and old catalogs found deep in repositories is a process full of
discoveries/collections that can be generated over a period of decades by academic institutions,
museums, volunteer organizations, and cultural resource management firms” (King 2014). This led me
to think that if I was unaware of this definition then perhaps it is because it is not a concept in the Asia
Pacific Region. I was curious to discuss with colleagues in the APConf 2023 of our ideas of collectionsbased research, including how might we like to define our own regional version, and I also wanted to

1

�share what remained to published of my work on the NMPL collection of carnelian beads from two
shipwrecks.
The topic of this paper fits best within this Session 23 on Collections-based Research because my case
studies are museum collections of carnelian beads from two archaeological shipwreck sites in the
Philippines. My research questions and methodologies are grounded in maritime archaeology,
linguistics and museology. I wanted a space to explore what epistemologies I bring to collections-based
research within a session of peers doing work on “collections''. My archaeology epistemology intersects
with maritime-historical –indigenous-material science archaeology. Maritime archaeology in that my
theoretical framework is the maritime cultural landscape, connecting artefacts and places across land
and water. Historical archaeology in that I mostly work with objects made within the second millennia,
with a slant of Art History in that I work across decades. Finally, built out of my exploration of linguistic
methodologies to study cultural concepts and a human worldview, I am guided professionally by
Indigenous-feminist archaeology. I use heart-centered practices: (1) show care for the living and the
dead; (2) recognize we are all emotional and social as well as intellectual beings; (3) act upon our needs
for responsible relationships with each other, with a range of communities, and with archaeological
records, and; (4) emphasize rigor (Supernant, Baxter, Lyons, &amp; Atalay 2020). Archaeometry contributes
to the rigor of my answers to research questions on connectivities across large areas in short periods of
time.

CASE STUDIES
The case studies under consideration are the shipwrecks Pandanan (1460-1487 CE) and Santa Cruz
(1488-1505 CE). The first was a Vietnamese-Chinese barge located in south-west Philippines and the
second a South China Sea Tradition open-ocean vessel located in north-west Philippines. Aside from
the hull design and location, several differences exist between the cargoes. The Pandanan cargo included
Chinese Longquan celadon, Jingdezhen and Guangdong with Burmese Twante, Vietnamese Chu Dau
and Thai Si Satchanalai; High magnesium black glass beads morphologically identical to black west
India soda alumina (in similarities); Small and long red west India soda alumina glass beads; three agates
(one pendant, two rough cornerless cube/pentagon). The Santa Cruz cargo included Minyao Chinese,
blue and white Cham and Go Sanh Cham wares, Sukhothai fish plates; Waxy yellow east India glass
beads; Potash high potassium blue wound glass beads; 54-106 hexagonal prism carnelians/agates; 2684 small lozenge carnelian/agates; one cornerless hexagon quartzite. Despite these differences the
shipwrecks also carried three similar types of cargo: Chinese Jingdezhen and Thai Maenam Noi
ceramics; black glass beads (i.e. west India soda alumina) (Craig 2021; Craig &amp; Dussubieux 2022). I
return to these details later as I consider context and connectivities across vast water bodies of the Indian
Ocean and the seas in the Southeast Asia Region. This paper narrows into the discussion on the carnelian
beads.
Carnelian beads
The range of carnelian/agate quantity comes from the inventory notes at the time of excavation and my
morphology analysis results. The Pandanan excavation report included three agates. My morphological
analysis recorded one pendant, and two rough cornerless cube/pentagon. The Santa Cruz inventory
included 190 carnelians/agates beads. My morphological analysis recorded 54 hexagonal prisms and 26
small lozenge carnelian/agates.

2

�RESOURCES
The resources available to conduct the work include the National Museum of the Philippines directors
Jeremy Barns and Angel Baptiste, staff in the Archaeology Division Mary Jane Bolunia and Eusebio
Dizon, staff in the Underwater Archaeology Division Clyde Jago-on and Bobby Orillaneda, and staff
from the Records Section Nida Curvas. During fieldwork I appreciated the research assistance by Emil
Bersamira and Bobby Orillaneda. The fieldwork was supported by the Social Science and Research
Council of Canada MCRI, Society for Nautical Research, Brasenose College and Oxford University
Meyerstein. The stone beads were exported for compositional analysis with Laser ablation inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), this details the elemental “recipe” (periodic table) of
the stone to compare with known geological sources, by Laure Dussubieux (Chicago Field Museum,
Elementary Analysis Laboratory) with funds from the National Science Foundation (BCS 1321731) and
the Bruce and Barbara Trigger Award of the Anthropology Department McGill University; and
statistical analysis and training supported by MITACS Research Training Award (2020). En route a
fortuitous encounter with Dennys Frenez (Università di Bologna, Department of History and Cultures,
Prehistory and Protohistory of Asia), Mark Kenoyer and Randall Law (University of Wisconsin–
Madison, Department of Anthropology) with permission from NMPL colleagues, led to technical
analysis of the bead bore putty impression samples at different magnifications (300X, 100X, 50X, 20X)
with SEM- Hitachi 570 (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Laboratory of Experimental Archaeology).
The technological analysis unanimously pointed to Indian craftsmanship where long faceted hexagonal
beads are generally drilled with larger diameter diamond drills, and the smaller tabular lozenge shaped
faceted beads are generally drilled with thinner diamond drills (Kenoyer pers. comm. 25 April 2017).
Randall used statistical analysis with program SPSS [Table 1] using canonical discriminant analysis
(CDA) to compare the Pandanan and Santa Cruz carnelian compositions to known agate sources (Carter
&amp; Dussubieux, 2016; Law et al., 2013).
Table 1 lists the Santa Cruz and Pandanan carnelian cargo average concentrations and standard deviations for the
elements used in the statistical analysis with samples in parts per million (PPM) converted to log10 values. These are
compared to the four geologic sources Ratanpur, Mardak, Shahr-i-Sokhta and Ban Khao Mogul (reproduced/adapted
from Carter and Dussubieux 2016:327, Table 3). When comparing these tables it is possible to see the difference between
the elements and their ranges to notice how some line up but most are out of range. This indicates possible shared
geography of source material but currently outside these locations. For example, with select elements the bead 1170E
fits within the PPM range for Scandium (Sc) and Uranium (U) but not otherwise.

8829
A

8829
B

8829
C

8829
D

8829
E

1170
A

1170
B

1170
C

1170
D

1170
E

B

23.31

23.15

41.12

6.61

24.42

B

10.51

33.41

15.45

24.89

16.08

Ni

3.39

1.95

2.66

2.94

1.78

Ni

2.66

1.55

1.44

1.56

1.15

Sb

1.16

0.48

1.16

0.66

1.19

Sb

1.00

3.78

0.28

2.11

0.88

Sc

2.86

2.19

2.28

2.85

2.00

Sc

2.21

2.12

1.96

1.88

1.81

U

0.06

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.05

U

0.35

0.09

0.01

0.02

0.01

1389
Ei

1389
Fi

1389
Gi

1389
Hi

1389
Mi

1389
Ni

1389
Oi

1389
Pi

1389
H

1389
I

1389
J

1389
K

1389
L

1389
M

1389
N

B

9.28

9.48

12.97

3.52

15.02

4.05

32.18

6.21

20.23

58.89

12.41

37.05

18.21

26.78

12.98

Ni

0.76

3.54

0.69

0.2

1.97

1.98

1.96

1.90

4.86

2.50

1.91

2.61

1.74

0.96

0.92

Sb

1.51

1.32

1.14

1.21

1.66

1.50

1.62

0.64

4.52

2.97

0.73

1.72

1.55

2.32

1.38

Sc

1.58

1.40

1.22

1.32

2.12

1.96

1.42

1.34

2.59

2.84

2.29

1.97

1.95

1.58

1.62

U

0.55

0.95

0.12

0.04

0.08

0.18

0.10

1.02

0.08

0.04

0.14

0.06

0.08

0.01

0.03

3

�FRAMEWORK
My research questions ask what geographic patterns these compositional, morphological, technological
analyses indicate of the carnelian beads: What is the source of the carnelian? Where were the bead
workshops? What sailing routes did the carnelian move over to ultimately shipwreck off the Philippines?
The results indicate the first two questions are well researched and relatively clear routes can be drawn,
while the third question points to gaps in the literature.

RESULTS
The expected results are that riverine systems that connected interior Indian carnelian were used to move
raw material to west India bead workshops, via the Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal into the Straits of
Malacca to Southeast Asian entrepôt.
My compositional results are that the Santa Cruz carnelian was sourced from an unknown location
(Figure 1/TABLE 2), likely along the Deccan Traps of India (Carter &amp; Dussubieux 2016). Perhaps there
was some overlap with Ratanpur and Shahr-i-Sokhra but that's largely speculative (Figure 2).
Technological analysis results of Indian craftsmanship adds details on the workshop location likelihood.
The bead workshops near Ratanpur were in Limodara during the sixteenth century. The initial process
of drying the stone and changing its colour by heating continued in Limodara (Dames 1918, 143; Lunde
&amp; Craig 2015, 22). Kenoyer, Vidale &amp; Bhanet (1991, 45) show the location of agate bead production
exclusively in Gujarat with raw materials from Ratanpur and Limodra, both situated along the Narmada
River, flowing into the sea downstream of Broach (Lunde &amp; Craig 2015, 27).
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
Shahr-i-Sokhra

0.05

Ratanpur (I)
0

Mardak Bet (I)
Santa Cruz

-0.05

-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Figure 1 A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) scatterplot of the agate/carnelian geologic sources and the
agate/carnelian artifacts plotted by their first and second components (created 23/6/2016). This graph shows Santa Cruz
carnelian of largely unknown source. Perhaps some overlap with Ratanpur andd Shahr-i-Sokhra but that's largely
speculative.

4

�Table 2 Agate/Carnelian artefacts analyzed in this study and their primary predicted group memberships (PGM) from
Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA). CDA assumes that all groups (sources) are present in the dataset when
generating PGMs. That is, it will provide an assignment even if the true source is not present because data is expected
to anchor to centroids.
Site name and dates
Santa Cruz 1488-1505 CE

Pandanan 1460-1487 CE

Database ID

Agate/Carnelian

Predicted Group Membership

8829_D

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

8829_B

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

1170_C

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

8829_A

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

8829_C

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

8829_E

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

1170_E

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

1170_A

Agate

Mardak Bet (MB), India

1170_B

Agate

Shahr-i-Sokhta (SiS), Iran

1170_D

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Mi

Carnelian

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Ni

Agate

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Oi

Carnelian

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Pi

Agate

Shahr-i-Sokhta (SiS), Iran

11389_Ei

Carnelian

Shahr-i-Sokhta (SiS), Iran

11389_Fi

Carnelian

Ban Khao Mogul (BKM), Thailand

11389_Gi

Carnelian

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Hi

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Ii

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Ji

Carnelian

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Ki

Carnelian

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Li

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Ai

Carnelian

Mardak Bet (MB), India

11389_Bi

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Ci

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Di

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_Qi

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_I

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_J

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_K

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_H

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_L

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_M

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

11389_N

Carnelian

Ratanpur (RTP), India

3043_A

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

3043_B

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

1087_F

Agate

Ratanpur (RTP), India

5

�Figure 2 A biplot of the agate/carnelian geologic sources with the agate/carnelian artifacts plotted by their first two
discriminant functions. The four labeled artifacts are outliers from those that have either a primary or secondary PGM
assignment. All four were predicted to belong to one Indian source. Of those four, one had a PGM in the Thai source
and three had PGMs in the Iran source.

The importance of ports in the transport system is significant because the Gujarat area was strategically
placed along the main shipping route. Early 16th century records by Ludovico di Varthema (travelled
from 1503 to 1508), mentions the agate/carnelian trade of Cambay and the wide web of foreign markets,
reached by ‘Mohammedan sea-faring traders’ along the Red Sea, East Coast of Africa, the
Mediterranean and the Far East (Arkell 1936, 299). For the carnelian/agate source Shahr-i-Sokhra the
port of Hormuz was likely. During the years 1325-1622 CE, the bulk of the India trade passed through
Hormuz, and continued to do so even after the Portuguese took the city in 1514 CE (Lunde &amp; Craig
2015, 26). Hormuz had a significant advantage over Aden, its main rival. “Ships out of Hormuz could
sail to Gujarat almost all the year round, hugging the coasts of Makran and Sind, while Yemeni and Red
Sea ships were completely dependent on the monsoon system, with narrow windows of opportunity for
safely crossing the Indian Ocean.” (Lunde &amp; Craig 2015, 26).
Contemporary to the dates of the shipwrecks Pandanan and Santa Cruz, the port Rander (destroyed by
Portuguese in 1530 CE) was described by Duarte Barbosa in 1514 CE as trading with Malacca, Bengal,
Tenasserim, and Pegu. Prior to the silting of the estuary to Rander in the 16th century, stone beads were
shipped out of Cambay by Portuguese and Gujarati merchants along with glass beads from Broach. The
importance of Bharuch from the turn of the millennium through the 18th century, located 25 nautical
miles from the sea on the north bank of the Narmada River (Maqbul Ahmad 1960, 58; Lunde &amp; Craig
2015, 24), indicates the heavy riverine traffic of the Narmada River. Narmada River to Limodara and
6

�on to Bharuch/ Broach on southeast of Cambay’s estuary and Tapi River to Rander share a baseflow
source in the Deccan Plateau grabens (Vanderkluysen et al. 2011). This is to say the mineral content of
the geology is similar (Das, Krishnaswami &amp; Kumar 2006).

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, presumably stone beads exported via Broach were along the river systems or in the
saltwater on shallow lightering-craft. The archaeological and historical text evidence together indicates
that bead production and port location were inextricably linked in Gujarat (Lunde &amp; Craig 2015, 27).
However, large gaps in the literature still remain for the story on how carnelian beads may have moved
through the Bay of Bengal into the Straits of Malacca to Southeast Asian entrepôt.
Returning to my raison d’etre of creating this session for discussion in our APConf 2023, on ideas of
collections-based research, including how we might like to define a version in the Asia Pacific region. I
consider the beads and Rey Santiago as I go into this question. Rey was my bead mentor. He curated the
records and objects of bead collections in the NMPL, cultivated methodology of their study, (and the
part that hooked me onto these small finds) extrapolated the stories of each bead from water and land.
With these intangible and tangible inputs to my collections-based research, I propose that we, “pose and
answer scholarly questions/it is a form of archaeological excavation in its own right. Searching [with
mentors/ghosts/spirits/colleagues] through the contents of boxes and old catalogs found deep in
repositories is a process full of discoveries[/magic/kinship-making/affirming that include] collections
that can be generated over a period of decades by academic institutions, museums, volunteer
organizations, and cultural resource management firms [so as to gather stories and storytell]” (King
2014; Supernant 2020; Supernant, Beisaw, Garrison, &amp; Surface-Evans 2020).
Acknowledgements
To all of you mentioned in this text – Thank you! This includes the people who directly handled the beads, conducted paperwork
to support this research, funded me and who produced the publications referenced below.
Namely my thanks goes to Andre Costopoulos and Gwyn Campbell. Jeremy Barns, Angel Baptista, Mary Jane Bolunia, Clyde
Jago-on and staff, Nida Curvas and staff, Dr Eusebio Dizon, Mauro Alvarez. I really appreciated the people who worked with
me on a regular basis Bobby Orillaneda, Emil Bermisera, Vergil San Mateo, Allan Quinto, Paolo Tabirao, Larry Alba, Amelia
Alhambra, Rey Bautista, Marcelo Cercado.
Rey Santiago for his bead analysis training in 2011 and for providing access to photograph his Bead Typology Plates A - K.
Nick Burningham for his mentorship and our long discussions and shared writing on ship construction technique. Along with
Tom Vosmer, Eric Staples, Alessandro Ghidoni for our discussions on Arabian Sea People’s shipbuilding
Laure Dussubieux for her compositional analysis of the beads at the Chicago Field Museum and
dive buddy Mike Knight for his security in Chicago.
Mark Kenoyer and Randall Law for their study of my stone beads after a chance meeting in an Oman Workshop on Shared
Archaeological Heritage of Oman, India and Pakistan; and Dennys Frenez for helping me to learn how to conduct and record
a technological analysis of bead bores.
Financial support was provided by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (specifically Major
Collaborative Research Initiative / Indian Ocean World Center), the Nautical Research Society’s Tomlin Award, National
Science Foundation administered by Elemental Laboratory Chicago Field Museum, and twice awarded Bruce Trigger Award
from the Anthropology Department McGill University, McGill Faulty Excellence Award, Statistical training supported by
Mitacs Research Training Award.
Professional training in Museum Studies at the Western Australia Maritime Museum’s Department of Maritime Archaeology
with the support of the prestigious Australia Endeavour Award.
Many thanks go to Francisco Urbie of the Inter-Library Loans department at McGill University.
Friends who worked with me along the way are namely Charlotte Pham, Veronica Walker Vadillo, Clifford Pereira, Brian
Fahy, Kris Farmen, Kendra Besinger. This extends to my office colleagues and friends of the Indian Ocean World Center,
McGill University: Lori Callahan, Tyler Yank, Omri Bassewitch Frenkel, Peter Hynd, Eric Bell, Rebekah McCallum, Caroline
Seagle, Joseph Howard, Carl Hughes and Lillian Fradin, Pablo Arroyo.

7

�Bibliography
Arkell, A.J. “Cambay and the Bead Trade”, Antiquity 10, no. 39, (1936): 292-305.
Carter, A.K. &amp; L, Dussubieux. “Geologic provenience analysis of agate and carnelian beads using laser ablation-inductively
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): A case study from Iron Age Cambodia and Thailand'', Journal of
Archaeological Science, (2016): 321-331.
Craig, J. “Refining the chronology and distribution of mid-fifteenth to mid-seventeenth century Indian Ocean world glass”,
Antiquity, (2021): 1-6.
Craig, J. &amp; L, Dussubieux. “Shifting patterns of glass bead cargo of 15th – 17th century Philippines shipwrecks.” In Glass
Bead Technology, Chronology, and Exchange, LA-ICP-MS Glass Compositions from the Field Museum's Elemental Analysis
Facility edited by Heather Walder and Laure Dussubieux, 177-195. Leuven: Catholic University of Leuven, 2022.
Dames, M.L. (ed. and trans.). The Book of Duarte Barbosa, Volume 1. London: Hakluyt Society, 1918.
Das, A., S. Krishnaswami, and A. Kumar. “Sr and 87Sr/86Sr in rivers draining the Deccan Traps (India): Implications to
weathering, Sr fluxes, and the marine 87Sr/86Sr record around K/T.” Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 7, no 6 (2006): 114.
Kenoyer, J. M., M. Vidale, and K. K. Bhan. “Contemporary Stone Beadmaking in Khambhat, India: Patterns of Craft
Specialization and Organization of Production as Reflected in the Archaeological Record.” World Archaeology 23, (1991): 4463.
Law, R., A. K. Carter, , B. Kuldeep, A. Malik, and M. D. Glascock. “INAA of agate sources and artifacts from the Indus,
Helmand and Thailand regions”, In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the European Association of South
Asian Archaeology, edited by D. Frenez and M. Tosi. Italy: Archaeopress, 2013.
Lunde, P. and J. CRAIG. “Translocations of Mediaeval Ports in the Northern Indian Ocean and their Impact on Gujarat's
Maritime Trade in Beads.” In Port Towns of Gujarat edited by Sara Keller and M.N. Pearson. 19-30. Gujarat: Darshak Ithihas
Nidi, 2015.
Maqbul S. Ahmad, India and the Neighbouring Territories in the Kitāb Nuzhat al-Muštāq fi’Ikhtirāq al-’Āfāq of al-Sharīf alIdrīsī. Leiden: Brill, 1960.
Supernant, K., J. E. Baxter, N. Lyons, and S. Atalay. Archaeologies of the heart. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020.
Supernant, K. “From Haunted to Haunting: Métis Ghosts in the Past and Present.” In Blurring Timescapes: Subverting
Erasure: Remembering Ghosts on the Margins of History, edited by S. Surface-Evans, A. Garrison, and K. Supernant, 85-103.
New York: Berghahn, 2020.
Supernant, K., A. M. Beisaw, A. E. Garrison, and S. Surface-Evans. “Epilogue: Ghosts, Haunting, and Refusals to Erasure.”
In Blurring Timescapes: Subverting Erasure: Remembering Ghosts on the Margins of History, edited by S. Surface-Evans, A.
Garrison, and K. Supernant, 185-195. New York:Berghahn, 2020.
Vanderkluysen, Loÿc, John J. Mahoney, Peter R. Hooper, Hetu C. Sheth, and Ranjini Ray. “The Feeder System of the Deccan
Traps (India): Insights from Dike Geochemistry.” Journal of Petrology 52, 2, (2011): 315–343.

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="59">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="337">
                  <text>2023 Session 23: Collections-based Research</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="338">
                  <text>Session 23 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="339">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 23 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="340">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="341">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="342">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="343">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="344">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="345">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6128">
                <text>15th century carnelian bead cargo of the Indian Ocean World: a conversation starter on collections-based research in the Asia-Pacific</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6129">
                <text>The topic of this abstract fits best within the Collections-based Research Session because existing museum&#13;
collections of carnelian beads from two archaeological shipwreck sites were analyzed. The sites include different&#13;
ship constructions located at the far ends, to the north and south, of the Philippines; and they carried comparable&#13;
artefacts. Both the Pandanan (1460-1487 CE) and Santa Cruz (1488-1505 CE) shipwrecks carried cargoes of&#13;
similar ceramics (i.e. Chinese Jingdezhen and Thai Maenam Noi) and black glass beads (i.e. west India soda&#13;
alumina); yet these sites also carried dissimilar cargo in both the ceramics and glass beads. Both sites also carried&#13;
disproportionate carnelian beads. The resources to conduct the work to study carnelian are the morphological&#13;
analysis of measurement and descriptors, technological analysis of SEM and compositional analysis of LA-ICPMS. My research questions ask what geographic patterns these analyses indicate of the carnelian beads: What is&#13;
the source of the carnelian? Where were the bead workshops? What sailing routes did the carnelian move over to&#13;
ultimately shipwreck off the Philippines? The expected results are that riverine systems that connected interior&#13;
Indian carnelian were used to move raw material to west India bead workshops, via the Indian Ocean, Bay of&#13;
Bengal into the Straits of Malacca to Southeast Asian entrepôt. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6130">
                <text>Jennifer Craig</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6131">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6132">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6133">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6134">
                <text>Craig, Jennifer. 2023. “15th century carnelian bead cargo of the Indian Ocean World.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Michelle Damian. Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL:https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1918 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="50">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 23 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="548" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="339">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/da154ba2b3e3912f4f06212f4c3ace65.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4a25e1d4ec099176701fde633d4ccf0e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6127">
                    <text>Preliminary analysis of the early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of
the pre-colonial Philippines, c.1400 – c.1600
NM Austero1,2, BC Orillaneda1, LM Neri2
1
2

Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Division, National Museum of the Philippines
School of Archaeology, University of the Philippines, Diliman

ABSTRACT
This study presents seven early handheld guns also known as “handgonnes” or hand cannons recovered from
shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines. In this paper, three guns HHG-001, HHG-002, and
HHG-003, feature shorter and stubby barrels with prominent reinforced sections, bulbous breech regions, and
flared muzzles. The flared muzzles of these guns are typical of a blunderbuss type and or dart-firing guns of the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The remaining handheld guns HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and
HHG-007, on the other hand, are tapered gun barrels without prominent reinforcement rings, and unflared
muzzles that are probably designed for a single bullet and long-range firing. The smallest unflared muzzle gun
HHG-005 measures only 39.1 cm long with a 1.31 cm bore diameter. While HHG-007 is the heaviest with a
prominently thick gun barrel probably designed to withstand more powder charges.
Compositional analysis using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy showed that most of these guns were
made of leaded tin bronze alloys. Comprised mainly of 37.77% to 83.57% copper, 3.11% to 22.41% tin, and
0.87% to 47.72% lead with other trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, nickel, and manganese, among
others. The discovery of these guns in various merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and
Lena Shoal shipwrecks is clear evidence of their use by the early seafaring merchants. The use of pXRF also
revealed traces of possible black powder elements such as sulphur and potassium thereby suggesting the actual
usage of these guns that warrants further investigation. Despite their size and offensive functions against pirates
and crews of enemy ships, firing them would have been intimidating.
Keywords: Seagoing firearms, handheld guns
Lists of Figures
Figure 1. Early handheld guns with flared muzzles.
Figure 2. Early handheld guns with unflared muzzles.
Lists of Tables
Table 1. Early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines with
their gun lengths and bore diameters.
Table 2. Percent composition of major and minor elements of the seven early handheld guns using portable
X-Ray Fluorescence analysis.

INTRODUCTION
Small artillery pieces are among the few of the vast number of archaeological materials discovered
from most of the maritime and underwater sites in the Philippines. The archaeological excavation of
the San Diego shipwreck in Fortune Island, Batangas for example, yielded thousands of lead musket
balls, along with a few corroded iron pieces, barrels of rifles, harquebuses, and spring shots
(Reverseau 1996; Alba et al. 1993; Alvarez 1992; Conese 1992; Cuevas 1992). San Diego was a
Manila galleon sunk by the Dutch ship Mauritius during their naval battle on December 14, 1600.
Interestingly, historical accounts have mentioned the vessel’s long-range, large artillery became
inconsequential as the fighting occurred onboard using hand-to-hand combat, thereby employing small
firearms such as harquebuses and rifles along with the other handheld weapons (Desroches et al.

1

�1996). Several projectiles and small caliber firearms were also discovered in other shipwreck sites in
the country.
These early handheld guns served as pieces of evidence that provide insights into how these firearms
were possibly manufactured and used onboard the merchant vessels plying the seas during the
pre-colonial period of the Philippines. The case studies discussed here include significant guns from
the Pandanan, Lena Shoal, and Santa Cruz shipwrecks. First is a bronze early handheld gun from the
Pandanan shipwreck, a middle to late fifteenth century Southeast Asian merchant vessel (see
Orillaneda 2016a, 2016b; Tanaka and Dizon 2011; Dizon 1996, 1994; Peralta 1996; Cuevas 1995;
Alba 1995). Second, are five early handheld guns, recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck, a
possible Chinese-Southeast Asian hybrid junk that sank around 1490 off the island of Busuanga in the
Philippines (see Orillaneda 2016a; Dizon 2003; Conese 1997; Goddio 2000; Lopez-Martin 2002). The
third and final is a bronze early handheld gun from the Santa Cruz shipwreck, a possible late fifteenth
to early sixteenth century hybrid ship of the South China Sea Shipbuilding Tradition (see Orillaneda
2016a, 2016b, 2012, 2008).
In this study, compositional analysis using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (pXRF) aimed
to reveal the materials used in manufacturing these guns. Moreover, the discovery of these guns on
board merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and Lena Shoal shipwrecks suggests
their usage by early seafaring merchants. Hence, the use of pXRF also aimed to determine possible
evidence of their usage.

METHODOLOGY
Seven early handheld guns were measured to determine length, width, diameters, and calibers:
HHG-001, HHG-002, HHG-003, HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and HHG-007. The gun length was
measured with rulers, tape measures, and a digital caliper (Fujiwara) with a nominal accuracy of ±
0.01 mm. The terms hand cannon and hand gonne and sometimes handgonnes or handguns are already
used interchangeably in the past referring to the early small-caliber handheld guns (e.g. Peralta 1996).
To avoid confusion, the abbreviation HHG for “handheld guns” were used to code each artifact from
HHG-001 to HHG-007.
X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Analysis
The composition analysis of the early handheld guns was conducted using portable X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectroscopy (pXRF) of Olympus Vanta C Series Philippines with rhodium and tungsten
anodes at 50 KeV. The analysis was conducted at the Lithics Laboratory of the University of the
Philippines School of Archaeology (UPSA). For guns, HHG-001, HHG-002, and HHG-003, the
data/spectra were recorded for approximately 180 s directly at the surfaces of the tiller, bulbous region,
barrel, and muzzle. For guns HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and HHG-007, the spectra were also
recorded for approximately 180 s on the surfaces of the tiller, the reinforcement region, the barrel, and
the muzzle. Additionally, spectra were also recorded for approximately 180 s on the surfaces of the
touch holes, handles, sights, and 5th reinforcement rings for all the guns where applicable.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This paper presents the early handheld guns recovered from the Pandanan, Lena Shoal, and Santa Cruz
shipwrecks as shown in Table 1. These guns were categorized into two groups based on their possible
usage: 1) close-range guns – these guns feature shorter and stubby barrels with prominent reinforced
sections, bulbous breech, and flared muzzle regions, including HHG-001, HHG-002, and HHG-003;
and, 2) long-range guns – these guns feature relatively longer and tapered gun barrels without
prominent reinforcement rings, and unflared muzzles probably designed for a single bullet and
long-range firing, including HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and HHG-007.

2

�Table 1. Early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the
pre-colonial Philippines with gun lengths and bore diameters.
Gun lengths (cm)

Sample
Code

Shipwreck Site

HHG-001

Pandanan Shoal

HHG-002
HHG-003

Bore Diameter (cm)
Barrel

Chamber

Tiller

Total

2.37

19.3

5.2

2.6

27.1

Lena Shoal

2.51

20.9

7.6

4.8

33.3

Lena Shoal

3.26

20.8

5.4

9.2

35.4

2.33

40.2

12.7

8.2

61.1

9.0

4.1

39.1

3.2

64.8

3.9

60.7

Lena Shoal
HHG-004
Len
HHG-005

Lena Shoal

1.31

26.0

HHG-006

Santa Cruz

2.08

45.2

16.4
Len
HHG-007

Lena Shoal

2.78

40.4

16.4

Descriptions of the Guns
Early Handheld Gun No. 1 (HHG-001)
Recovered from the Pandanan shipwreck, this gun (Fig. 1, left) was thought to belong to small caliber
cannons such as the lantakas and rentakas among others as most of its features are typical of the early
handheld guns (Peralta 1996). The gun is about 27.1 cm long with a 2.37 cm bore diameter with
prominent reinforcement rings. The tiller at the rear end is approximately 2.6 cm in length with only
about 1.2 cm deep socket. This is too shallow to hold the tiller firmly without falling off, suggesting
the gun was probably stocked-mounted (Peralta 1996). Wooden tillers, however, were mostly secured
by iron straps or slotted into the end of the breech (Lepage 2005). Houston and Stroyan (2014) also
described a similar hand cannon fired with a trestle-like stand. In that case, the tiller no longer needed
to carry the entire weight of the gun; instead, it served as a handle when the cannon tube became too
hot to hold after firing several shots (Lepage 2005). The flared muzzle of the gun is also indicative of
other small caliber cannons such as a blunderbuss type and or dart-firing guns of the fourteenth and
fifteenth centuries CE (Lopez-Martin 2002; Peralta 1996; Powell 2010, 1095).
Early Handheld Gun No. 2 (HHG-002)
This gun is approximately 33.3 cm in length with a 2.51 cm bore diameter, recovered from the Lena
Shoal shipwreck (Fig. 1, middle) (Lopez-Martin 2002). Similar to HHG-001, it is a muzzle-loading
gun with prominent wide bands of reinforcement rings from the tiller toward the muzzle (see
Lopez-Martin 2002). Also similar to HHG-001, its flared-shaped muzzle is indicative of dart-firing
guns used from 1464-1496 CE on China’s interior frontiers and in merchant junks against pirate
attacks (Lopez-Martin 2002, Powell 2010, 1095). The rear end is also fixed with a tiller of about 4.8
cm in length with a 2.0 cm deep socket, probably deep enough to hold the wooden tiller attachment
without falling off. In contrast to the HHG-001, however, this gun was also fixed with a “lug” or
handle to add ease in handling and or aiming targets.

3

�Figure 1. Early handheld guns with flared muzzles: HHG-001 (left), recovered from the Pandanan
shipwreck (IV-1993-V-1152), with prominent reinforcement rings and a “lug” probably as the gun’s rear
sight; HHG-002 (middle), recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck (IV-93-H-2901) with prominent
reinforcement rings and a handle; HHG-003 (right), recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck
(IV-93-H-4011) with prominent reinforcement rings.

Early Handheld Gun No. 3 (HHG-003)
This gun is approximately 35.4 cm in length with a 3.26 cm bore diameter and was recovered from the
Lena Shoal shipwreck (Lopez-Martin 2002). Similar to HHG-001 and HHG-002, it is a
muzzle-loading gun with prominent wide bands of reinforcement rings and a flared muzzle (Fig. 1,
right). Flared muzzles of early handheld guns were intended to scatter the shots at close range and to
ease loading (DK Publishing 2006, 247). However, HHG-003’s flared muzzle is narrower compared to
those of the HHG-001, and HHG-002, thereby suggesting this gun is probably more effective when
shot from a distance. Moreover, the rear end is also fixed with a prominent 9.2 cm tiller socket and a
“lug” or handle to add ease in handling and or aiming targets.

4

�Early Handheld Gun No. 4 (HHG-004)
This handheld gun measured about 61.1 cm long with approximately 2.33 cm bore diameter, also
recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck (Fig. 2a) (Goddio 2000). The barrel is slightly tapering
towards the muzzle with a maximum diameter of 3.7 cm and a minimum diameter of 3.1 cm. The vent
or the touch hole is located approximately 19.7 cm centimeters from the rear end with a simple
spherical reinforcement. The stock or tiller socket at the rear end is prominently longer, measuring
about 8.2 cm, suggesting a firm attachment of a wooden tiller. The remains of a possible wooden tiller
can still be seen attached inside the rear end socket proposing that the gun was not stock-mounted.
Early Handheld Gun No. 5 (HHG-005)
This gun was also recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck, measuring about 39.1 cm long with
approximately 1.31 cm bore diameter (Fig. 2b). The barrel is slightly tapering towards the muzzle with
a maximum diameter of 2.0 cm and a minimum diameter of 2.2 cm. The vent or the touch hole is
located approximately 4.2 centimeters from the rear end with a simple leaf-like or diamond shape
design. The stock or tiller socket at the rear end is relatively longer, measuring 4.1 cm also suggesting
a firm attachment of a wooden tiller. A tiny sized-gun can surely be easier to aim and fire.
Early Handheld Gun No. 6 (HHG-006)
The early handheld gun recovered from the Santa Cruz shipwreck is similar to the gun recovered from
the Lena Shoal shipwreck, HHG-004. This gun is the longest, measuring about 64.8 cm long with
approximately 2.08 cm bore diameter (Fig. 2c). The larger barrel is also slightly tapering towards the
muzzle with a maximum diameter of 3.58 cm and a minimum diameter of 2.84 cm. The touch hole is
approximately 3.2 cm centimeters from the rear end with a leaf-like or diamond-shaped reinforcement.
The remains of the tiller socket at the rear end seem to have been broken, measuring only about 3.2
cm. The tiller socket was possibly longer for a firm tiller attachment.
Early Handheld Gun No. 7 (HHG-007)
This gun is the heaviest and largest of all five guns recovered from the Lena Shoal shipwreck (Fig.
2d). It measures about 60.7 cm long and has a 2.78 cm bore diameter. The gun barrel is relatively
thick, about 1.71 cm, which is probably designed to withstand more powder charges to propel a
relatively bigger caliber bullet. The touch hole is approximately 3.9 cm centimeters from the rear end
with a leaf-like or diamond-shaped reinforcement similar to that of HHG-006. The tiller socket is also
short, suggesting a need for reinforcement straps and or added support stand when firing. A similar
gun of Chinese origin from the fourteenth to fifteenth centuries was also found in the Molucca Sea in
the Dutch Indies (McLachlan 2010).

5

�Figure 2. Early handheld guns with unflared muzzles: HHG-004 (A), recovered from the
shipwreck (IV-93-H-0342) with a tapered gun barrel; HHG-005 (B), recovered from the
shipwreck (IV-93-H-3417) with a tapered gun barrel; HHG-006 (C), recovered from the
shipwreck (III-2001-Z-NA) with a tapered gun barrel; HHG-007 (D), recovered from the
shipwreck (IV-1993-H-NA) with a relatively thick gun barrel and of a higher caliber.

6

Lena Shoal
Lena Shoal
Santa Cruz
Lena Shoal

�X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) Analysis
Results from compositional analysis using pXRF revealed most of these guns were primarily a ternary
alloy of Cu, Pb, and Sn (e.g. Pollard and Liu 2023). Comprised mainly of 37.77 percent to 83.57
percent copper, 3.11 percent to 22.41 percent tin, and 0.87 percent to 47.72 percent lead with other
trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, nickel, and manganese, among others (Table 2). Pollard and
Liu (2023) also noted that the sum of all three metal components of ternary alloys is usually around 98
percent. Our research, however, provided a range between the sums of 94.20 percent to 98.38 percent.

Table 2. Percent composition of major and minor elements of the seven early handheld guns using pXRF.

Percent Composition of Elements (Barrel)
Sample Code

Cu

Sn

Pb

As

Bi

Ni

Mn

OE

0.05

0.01

1.04

0.09

0.03

1.31

0.88

0.09

0.04

0.74

22.41
22.4095
HHG-001

40.71

31.76

0.26
2.89

1.91

22.4095
22.4095

HHG-002

83.57

12.65

0.87

11.31

4.59

0.45
0.59

HHG-003

81.75

0.88

14.70
HHG-004

74.91

8.77

&lt;LOD

0.66

0.06

0.02

0.07

0.02

1.30

&lt;LOD

&lt;LOD

0.01

1.59

&lt;LOD

0.03

0.01

1.59

0.83
HHG-005

HHG-006

HHG-007

77.81

14.31

5.40

37.77

8.71

47.72

47.48

3.11

47.05

0.26

4.20

0.82

Note: Copper (Cu), Tin (Sn), Lead (Pb), Arsenic (As), Bismuth (Bi), Nickel (Ni), Manganese (Mn), and Other Elements (OE).

7

�Interestingly, the use of pXRF also revealed traces of possible black powder elements thereby
suggesting the actual usage of these guns and warranting further investigation into firing guns and
recording residue. Trace amounts of sulphur and potassium were recorded on the surfaces of the
muzzle and tiller of the early handheld gun HHG-001. Traces of sulphur were also recorded on the
surfaces of the touchhole, handle, and muzzle of the early handheld gun HHG-003. These results
further showed the importance of gunpowder and its use in most seagoing firearms (e.g., Kozari and
Vizy 2013; McLachlan 2010; Khan 2004; Andaya 1992). The discovery of the early handheld guns
from the shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines affirms the use of seagoing
firearms. Records on the use of these light guns against pirates and crews of enemy ships were already
known in merchant ships as early as the fourteenth century (Lepage, 2005). Their discovery onboard
various merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and Lena Shoal shipwrecks is clear
evidence of their use by the early seafaring merchants. Despite their size and offensive functions
against pirates and crews of enemy ships, firing them would have been intimidating (McLachlan 2010;
Lepage 2005).

Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the National Museum of the Philippines (NMP) through the Maritime and Underwater Cultural
Heritage Division (MUCHD) and the UP School of Archaeology (UPSA) of the University of the Philippines, Diliman for
their unwavering support for this research. The Department of Science and Technology – Grants-in-Aid Program
(DOST-GIA) for Biak na Bato, Bulacan Project for the portable X-Ray Fluorescence (pXRF) instrument used during the
conduct of this research.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alba L. “Pandanan Underwater Archaeological Project Report. Pandanan Island, Balabak, Palawan. Third Preliminary
Report.” National Museum of the Philippines, (1995):1-6.
Andaya LY. “Interactions with the Outside World and Adaptation in Southeast Asia.” In The Cambridge History of Southeast
Asia from early times to c. 1800, edited by N. Tarling, 345-395. Singapore, Cambridge University, 1992.
Cuevas MA. “Pandanan Island Underwater Archaeological Project: Inspection of a Reported Site.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (1993): 1-12.
“Pandanan Island Underwater Archaeology Project: Second Preliminary Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (1995):1-6.
Dizon EZ. “Status of Philippine Underwater Archaeological Researches from 1989-91: Prospects for 1992.” Bulletin of the
Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology (1992), 16(1): 41-47.
“A Decade of Archaeological Research in the Philippines.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture &amp; Society, (1994),
22(3):197-222.
“The Archaeology of a 15th century A.D. Shipwreck, located off Pandanan Island, Southern Palawan Philippines.”
National Museum of the Philippines, (1996): 1-29.
“Philippines”. In British Museum Encyclopedia of Underwater and Maritime Archaeology, edited by Delgado,
303–305. British Museum Press, London. 1997.
“Underwater and Maritime Archaeology in the Philippines.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, (2003),
31(1/2): 1-25.
DK Publishing. “Weapon: a visual history of arms and armour.” New York, Dorling Kindersley Linited, 2006.
Goddio F, Pierson S, Crick M (Eds.). Sunken treasures: Fifteenth-century Chinese ceramics from the Lena Cargo. London:
Periplus Publishing London Limited. 2000.

8

�Honasan A. “The Pandanan Junk.” In The Pearl Road: Tales of Treasure Ships in the Philippines, edited by Loviny, 13-23,
1996.
Khan IA. “Early use of Cannon and Musket in India: A.D. 1442-1526.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the
Orient 24, 2 (1981): 146-164.
Keith DH, de Bry J. “Artillery.” In La Belle, The Archaeology of a Seventeenth-Century Ship of New World Colonization,
edited by Bruseth, A&amp;M University Press, Texas, 2017.
Kelly J. “Gunpowder. Alchemy, Bombards, &amp; Pyrotechnics: The History of the Explosive that Changed the World”. Basic
Books (2004): 3-18.
Kozari J, Vizy S. “The development of infantry firearms and its impact on army tactics.” Acta Acad. Agriensis, Sectio
Historriae XLI (2013): 185-195.
Lacsina LSP. “The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Sixth Progress Report”. National Museum of the
Philippines (2004): 1-6.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Seventh Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines (2005a):1-4.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Eighth Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines (2005b): 1-4.
Lepage JGG. “Medieval Armies and Weapons in Western Europe. An Illustrated History.” North Carolina, McFarland and
Company Inc., (2005): 248-266.
Lopez-Martin J. “Cannon.” In Lost at Sea: The strange route of the Lena Shoal junk, edited by Goddio F, Pierson S, Crick M,
239-241. Periplus Publishing Limited, London, 2002.
McLachlan S. “Medieval Handgonnes. The First black powder infantry weapons.” Osprey Publishing, (2010): 82 Pp.
Orillaneda BC. “The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: A Field Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004a), 1-8.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: A Progress Report.” National Museum of the Philippines,
(2004b), 1-4.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Second Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004c), 1-5.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Third Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004d), 1-8.
“The Santa Cruz Underwater Archaeological Exploration: The Fourth Progress Report.” National Museum of the
Philippines, (2004e), 1-5.
“A Brief Report on the Sharing of the Santa Cruz Shipwreck Ceramic Artifacts.” National Museum of the Philippines,
(2005), 1-2.
“The Santa Cruz, Zambales Shipwreck Ceramics: Understanding Southeast Asian Ceramic Trade during the Late 15th
Century C.E, ” Master’s thesis, University of the Philippines, Diliman, 2008.
“Of Ships and Shipping: The Maritime Archaeology of the Fifteenth Century CE Southeast Asia.” In Early Navigation
in the Asia-Pacific Region. A Maritime Perspective, edited by Chunming Wu, 29-57, Singapore: Springer Science +
Business Media, 2016a.
“Maritime Trade in the Philippines During the 15th Century CE.” Mousssons 27 (2016b): 83-100.
“The Santa Cruz shipwreck excavation: A reflection on the practice of underwater archaeology in the Philippines.” In
Innovation and adaptation: Marine archaeology in Southeast Asia, edited by Noel Tan, 86–102. Singapore: Asian
Civilisations Museum, 2012.
Peralta JT. “Anatomy of a Shipwreck: Archaeology of the 15th-century Pandanan Shipwreck.” In The Pearl Road: Tales of
Treasure Ships in the Philippines, edited by C. Loviny, 63-94. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asiatype and C Loviny,
1996.
Pollard AM, Liu R. “Predicting bronze casting recipes in Ancient China: ternary copper-lead-tin alloys and the “unit sum
problem”.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2023): 15:55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01747-y
Powell J. (Ed.). Weapons and Warfare, revised version. California, Salem Press. 2010.
Reverseau JP. “Weapons: Small arms.” In Treasures of the San Diego, edited by Desroches JP, Casal G, Goddio F., 192-197.
Association Française d'Action Artistique, Paris, 1996
Tanaka K, Dizon Z. 2011. “Shipwreck Site and Earthenware Vessels in the Philippines: Earthenware vessels of the Pandanan
Shipwreck Site.” The MUA Collection, (2011), 1-11, http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1234 (Accessed
December 27, 2021).

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="59">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="337">
                  <text>2023 Session 23: Collections-based Research</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="338">
                  <text>Session 23 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="339">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 23 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="340">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="341">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="342">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="343">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="344">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="345">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6118">
                <text>Preliminary analysis of the early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines, c.1400 – c.1600</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6119">
                <text>This study presents seven early handheld guns also known as “handgonnes” or hand cannons recovered from&#13;
shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines. In this paper, three guns HHG-001, HHG-002, and&#13;
HHG-003, feature shorter and stubby barrels with prominent reinforced sections, bulbous breech regions, and&#13;
flared muzzles. The flared muzzles of these guns are typical of a blunderbuss type and or dart-firing guns of the&#13;
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The remaining handheld guns HHG-004, HHG-005, HHG-006, and&#13;
HHG-007, on the other hand, are tapered gun barrels without prominent reinforcement rings, and unflared&#13;
muzzles that are probably designed for a single bullet and long-range firing. The smallest unflared muzzle gun&#13;
HHG-005 measures only 39.1 cm long with a 1.31 cm bore diameter. While HHG-007 is the heaviest with a&#13;
prominently thick gun barrel probably designed to withstand more powder charges.&#13;
Compositional analysis using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy showed that most of these guns were&#13;
made of leaded tin bronze alloys. Comprised mainly of 37.77% to 83.57% copper, 3.11% to 22.41% tin, and&#13;
0.87% to 47.72% lead with other trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, nickel, and manganese, among&#13;
others. The discovery of these guns in various merchant ships such as those of the Santa Cruz, Pandanan, and&#13;
Lena Shoal shipwrecks is clear evidence of their use by the early seafaring merchants. The use of pXRF also&#13;
revealed traces of possible black powder elements such as sulphur and potassium thereby suggesting the actual&#13;
usage of these guns that warrants further investigation. Despite their size and offensive functions against pirates&#13;
and crews of enemy ships, firing them would have been intimidating.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6120">
                <text>NM Austero</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6121">
                <text>BC Orillaneda</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6122">
                <text>LM Neri</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6123">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6124">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6125">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6126">
                <text>Austero, Nero M., BC Orillaneda, LM Neri. 2023. “Preliminary analysis of the early handheld guns recovered from shipwrecks plying the seas of the pre-colonial Philippines, c.1400 – c.1600.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Michelle Damian. Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1917 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="50">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 23 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="547" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="338">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/8d87d78d46c3dca6c0a564b0ba97b372.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4201c17d4aab2a18c96a9a725fb4b32e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6117">
                    <text>The Potential of Maritime Archaeology (Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine
Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical Narrations in Tidore, North
Moluccas, Indonesia
Wisnu A. Gemilang1
Nia N. H. Ridwan1
Guntur A. Rahmawan1
Ulung J. Wisha2
1

Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, Ministry of Marine Affairs and
Fisheries
Jl. Raya Padang-Painan Km. 16, Bungus, Padang, West Sumatera, 25245
2
National Research and Innovation Agency

ABSTRACT
The potential of shipwreck site resources in “Spice Routes,” Ternate-Tidore, reflects several historical pieces of
evidence relating to archaeological remains from the Portuguese and Spanish eras in the surrounding sea and
coastal areas. In the 1990s, a plethora of archaeological remains were salvaged. An integrated archaeological
study is an initial step to optimize the use of underwater archaeological resources in the area of interest. The
survey consisted of local coordination, expert consultation, literature study, field surveys and underwater
observations, mini excavations using water dredging, artefact samplings site measuring and documentation,
artefact desalination, and C14 carbon dating analysis for wooden materials found within the site. Moreover, the
water quality survey for marine tourism interests and Trinidad ship reconstruction is significant in supporting
500 years of circumnavigation of the earth by Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano and supporting
publication and dissemination. Based on the present study, it is observed that Soasio and Tongowai sites have
the potential to be developed as the centre of integrated marine ecotourism with maritime archaeology-based
sites. This consideration is due to plenty of historical artefacts and tourism feasibility assessments. Therefore,
local and regional regulations relating to regional spatial planning are crucial before implementing the
ecotourism project in this area.
Keywords: Maritime archaeology, shipwreck sites, sustainable marine tourism, Tidore
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1: The distribution of underwater archaeology sites in Tidore Islands. Source: Field survey, Research
Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, 2021.
Figure 2: The distribution map of historical sites in Tidore Islands.
Figure 3: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; shipwreck indication (a); ceramic findings (b); jars and
earthenware findings (c); bird’s eye view of Soasio site (d).
Figure 4: Biodiversity in the surrounding Soasio site; coral covers (a); fish ecosystem (b), sediment substrate (c).
Figure 5: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; underwater cannon finding (a); excavated cannon from
Tongowai site (b); A pile of earthenware (c); coral covers and ecosystem in Tongowai site (d).
Table 1: The formulation of the underwater heritage trail development strategy.

1

�INTRODUCTION
Tourism is an essential aspect for a country, which can increase state and local government revenue
(Runtunuwu 2020, 1). Tidore Island is becoming the preferred ecotourism destinations in North
Maluku Province. Exotic natural panoramas combined with cultural-historical sites create an
enchanting paradise in eastern Indonesia (Wijayanti et al. 2022, 1). Tidore Island is worthy of further
development due to its strategic position and many mesmerizing coastal areas as a potency for
supporting marine tourism. However, in developing the tourism potency of this region, many aspects
should be considered since there many existing problems (Kader 2017, 20), such as the local facility
and the low awareness of the underwater cultural heritage UCH importance (Fahri &amp; Alhadar 2022, 2;
Runtunuwu 2020, 2).
The existence of two underwater archaeological sites, Soasio and Tongowai Sites, highlight the
potential for underwater archaeology in the Tidore Islands. Aside from high biodiversity within the
sites, these two primary sites have a historical value related to the shipping and international trade in
the 15-17 centuries AD (Rahmawan et al. 2021, 173). Therefore, the further development should be
supported by a tourism development strategy. Local tourism management and third party’s authorities
should contribute to conserve the remains by establishing policies and protections (Masberg and
Morales 1999, 290). Therefore, this research article on "The Potential of Maritime Archaeology
(Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical
Narrations in Tidore, North Moluccas, Indonesia" is significant to support the development of
underwater historical tourism in the Tidore Islands.

CASE STUDY
Based on information from the local community and local government in Ternate and Tidore, around
the 1990s, there was a lot of goods looting in several archaeological sites in Tidore waters. The lack of
knowledge of the local government and the community about the existence of UCH makes the remains
more vulnerable and less protected (Rahmawan et al. 2021, 170). Therefore, identification of
underwater archaeological potential in Tidore waters is essential as a basis for further conservation,
development, and decision-making in terms of protecting the underwater archaeological remains. In
addition, this study is expected to promote the potential of the site for marine tourism and other
preservation strategies in dealing with the vulnerability of the site and its aquatic environment.

RESOURCES
As mentioned earlier, the primary location of this study is in the Soasio and Tongowai sites, Tidore
Island, North Maluku Province (Figure 1). Many historical objects have been managed as an attraction
for supporting the tourism aspect, such as the Tidore Sultanate Palace, Torre Fort, Tahula Fort,
Sonyine Malige Museum, Sultan Nuku Tomb, Sultan Mosque and Sultan Pier (Sosmiarti and Fahlefi
2019, 282). However, the Tidore Islands underwater history is less promoted and even rarely visited
due to the lack of local awareness regarding the importance of UCH. Therefore, in this study we will
exhibit the underwater archaeological resources in Tidore and further development planning to
promote and manage the remains.

2

�Figure 1. The distribution of underwater archaeology sites in Tidore Islands.
Source: Field survey, Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, 2021.

FRAMEWORK
The primary data of this study were obtained from a research report by the Research Institute for
Coastal Resources and Vulnerability (RICRV) in 2019 and 2021. The research activities included:
mapping bathymetry, hydro-oceanography, geology, and diving to observe archaeological sites' photos
and videos, and the quality of the ecosystem and aquatic environment (Irani et al. 2022, 3). In addition,
local interviews with the government, village officials, and communities around the site were also
carried out.
Masberg and Morales (1999, 290) suggest that five factors are included in ecotourism development:
(1) an integrated approach; (2) planning and a slow start; (3) Education and Training; (4) maximizing
local benefits and (5) evaluation and feedback. Outcomes are for a successful and viable ecotourism
development; these five factors ensure the objectives are achieved.
Artefact data analysis identified UCH from the Soasio Site and the Tongowai Site (Figure 1). We
aimed to determine artefacts type, age, and the place of origin of production. In addition, observations
of the position of the sites and GPS tracking data of important historical sites along the coast near the
Soasio and Tongowai sites were also carried out, which were analysed to know the spatial distribution
in relation to the two sites.
3

�RESULTS
Historical Tourism and Underwater Archaeological Sites in Tidore Islands
The oceanography of the Soasio site is characterized by relatively weak currents so divers can dive
anytime. Aside from the underwater archaeological remains, clear seawater with various types of coral
reefs and fish are attractions. The Soasio seabed has a slope of about 130 degrees. The distribution of
artefacts in ship wood, ballast stone, and ceramics is 15-20 m deep (Rahmawan et al. 2021, 175).

Figure 2: The distribution map of historical sites in Tidore Islands.

Another site is situated in Tongowai Village where the cannon was found at a depth of 37-42 m
(Figure 2). According to local interviews, the cannon had previously been lifted along with other
artefacts by a salvage company in 1998. This was done by Japanese investors, as proved by the
existence of two drums and ropes tied to the cannon, which were used to lift the cannon. The artefacts
discovered in 1998 are stored in a Central Halmahera Guesthouse in Itagapura. The lifting of the
artefacts at the Tongowai Site occurred when Tidore Islands was under the Halmahera Tengah
Regency.
The Significance of Underwater Archaeology in Tidore Islands
Underwater Archaeology in Soasio
The presence of shipwrecks at the Soasio site was known based on findings of four meters of wood in
an inclined position at the depth of 12 meters. The remains are mostly covered by coral reefs and
sediment deposits (Figure 3a). According to the historical records and local interviews, only Spain and
4

�Portugal colonized Tidore Island. Therefore, initial suspicions were that the ship was a Spanish or
Portuguese ship anchored in the port of Tidore. However, the results of the C14 analysis show the
oldest wood sample is from 1054 AD, and the youngest is from 1379 AD.
The ceramics found at the Soasio site are categorized as porcelain and stoneware. Ceramics made from
porcelain have a white glaze and blue-white colour under the glaze. One intact plate is known as
Swatow blue and white porcelain, which was produced during the Wanli period (1575 – 1659 AD) of
the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 AD), and a bowl fragment is known as blue-white porcelain from the
time of Emperor Tianqi (1621 – 1627 AD) of the Ming Dynasty (Figure 3b).
The findings of earthenware jars based on their size consist of large and small jars. There are seven
large jars and two small jars. The jars are glazed brown, and three of them have four ears. The jars are
all incomplete (Figure 3c). In the water area of the Soasio Site, there are interesting remains in the
form of rock formations deliberately arranged from ancient times that look like wave breakers or
beach protectors (Figure 3d).

Figure 3: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; shipwreck indication (a); ceramic findings (b); jars and
earthenware findings (c); bird’s eye view of Soasio site (d)

The ecosystem around the Soasio site is covered by coral reefs, of about 60% (good condition) at a
depth of 4-15 m, with the basic contour being a reef slope. The coral reef genera found included:
Acropora sp, Merulina sp, Giniastrea sp, Montipora sp, Porites sp, Pectinia sp, Symphyllia sp, Favia
sp, Astreopora sp, Montastrea sp, and Diploastrea sp (Figure 4a). Meanwhile, the types of fish found
were indicator fish or associated fish and target/economic fish such as grouper, snapper, and pelagic
5

�fish (Figure 4b). The seafloor substrate consists of rubble/dead coral rubble, sand deposits and
sediment resulting from landslides around the coast (Figure 4c). Based on the results of the calculation
of the tourism suitability index, the Soasio site is included in the quite suitable category with a value
of 73.02%. The suitability index value is based on the water brightness parameter, coral community
cover, life forms, types of reef fish, archaeological site depth, current velocity, and reef depth.

Figure 4: Biodiversity in the surrounding Soasio site; coral covers (a); fish ecosystem (b), sediment substrate (c).

UCH in Tongowai Site
The Tongowai site at a depth of 37-42 m is where the cannon was discovered. The artefacts found at
the Soasio site are more scattered than at the Tongowai site. According to locals documented in
Rahmawan et al. (2021, 175), the observed cannon was an artefact left over from salvage conducted in
1998 (Figure 5a). Another cannon, earthenware, and ceramics were removed in 1998 by a Japanese
company and are in the government house of Halmahera Tengah Regency (Figure 5b). The condition
of the pottery was not conserved, so a white surface was observed due to salting (Figure 5c).
The brightness or visibility on the seabed of the Tongowai Site reaches 25 m. The bottom contour of
the Tongowai waters is made up of reef flat and reef slope, with the bottom substrate consisting of
dead coral fractures and sand deposits. Coral reefs are found at depths from 1 - 25 m with
concentrations of dense coral cover at depths of 2 - 10 m. Percentage Cover (PC) of live coral reaches
6

�50 % (Good Condition…Figure 5d). The coral genera that can be found include: Acropora.sp,
Montipora sp., Seriatopora sp., Oxipora sp., Porites sp., Stylopora sp., Pectinia sp., Psammocora sp.,
Galaxea sp., Fungia sp., Pocillopora sp., Favia sp. and Hidnopora sp., Goniastrea sp., and there are
sponges, soft corals, and sea fans/Gorgonians. Based on the results of the tourism suitability index
calculation, the Tongowai site's location is categorized into entirely appropriate for tourism with a
value of 77.8%.

Figure 5: Documentation of UCH in Tidore Islands; underwater cannon finding (a); excavated cannon from
Tongowai site (b); A pile of earthenware (c); coral covers and ecosystem in Tongowai site (d).

Maritime and Underwater Heritage Trail Developments
The places where the shipwreck and the underwater remains do exist in the Tidore Islands have
potential for marine tourism, especially for underwater diving objects. Based on the process of
identification and analysis of the data, a strategy for further protection and development of sustainable
UCH in the Tidore Islands can be initiated. The formulation of the management strategy for
developing underwater archaeology potential in the Tidore Islands is shown in Table 1.

7

�Table 1: The formulation of the underwater heritage trail development strategy.
No
Identified Criteria
Strategic Plan
 Aligning the vision and mission makes the Soasio and Tongowai
1
Mutual commitment
sites sustainable tourist destinations
 Involve community members in decision making.
2
People empowerment
 Ensure that local communities receive benefits.
 Ensure environmental sustainability.
 Develop a tourist image (brand image) Gurabunga in line with the
existing tourism image in the area.
 Raising the history of various old buildings in the Tidore Island area,
especially Tongowai and Soasio site
 Environmental conservation.
3
Village attractiveness
 Preservation of traditional customs and culture
 Development of tourism product packaging in the form of
enrichment of tourist attractions, development of tourism packages,
and integrated tourism promotion.
 Provision of supporting facilities for local product development.
 Develop tour packages in Soasio and Tongowai village.
 Education and training on village tourism and tourism awareness.
 Tourism-based entrepreneurship courses/training for residents of
productive age and school dropouts in order to develop local crafts,
4
Human resource development
souvenirs, etc.
 Intensive guidance to local guides on tourist assistance (especially
climbing guides).
 Provide knowledge to the public about UCH.
 Formation of tourism awareness group.
 Increase the creativity of the existing community.
 Provide capital strengthening for the provision of support for tourism
development, both for business capital for souvenirs and capital for
5
Villagers’ motivation
supporting equipment for artistic attractions.
 Equipping tourist companions, especially diving companions, and
providing adequate diving support equipment.
 Encouraging local regulations that facilitate licensing of business
operations in the tourism sector in Soasio and Tongowai villages.
 Planning and development of facilities &amp; infrastructure adapted to
the concepts and strategic plans of tourist destinations (coordination
with Indigenous elders and the Tidore city government).
 Building support facilities for unique traditional tourism activities.
 Prioritizing the development of road infrastructure to facilitate access
for tourists to Tongowai and Soasio Sites and adjacent villages.
 Re-enable the security post along with the security forces or officers,
6
Facility and infrastructure
to avoid criminal acts while in the tourist area.
 The addition of a homestay in an adequate resident's house.
 Public toilet construction.
 Make a spatial/land use plan in the context of developing an
environmentally friendly tourist village.
 Install mooring/marking buoys on the two sites (Figure 8a).
 Promoting Soasio and Tongowai to various mass media, namely print
media, electronic media and also online media.
 Make booklets and leaflets containing information on Soasio and
Tongowai Village and guidebooks about UCH tourism.
 Conduct counselling and socialization for tourism actors.
7
Promotion
 Holding various events related to Tidore UCH.
 Participate in national tourism festival events or exhibitions.
 Installation of information boards (heritage trail) that tell the history
of the sinking of the Trinidad ships and the history of the presence of
the Spanish and Portuguese in Ternate-Tidore (Figure 8b).

8

�The right strategy for developing tourist destinations in Tidore UCH is through Community-Based
Tourism, which reflects the diversity of culture, traditions, natural beauty, crafts and cuisine. Aim to
become the local identity with a concentration of tourist destinations that does not compete for
tourists.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Research Institute of Coastal Resources and Vulnerability (RICRV), Ministry of Marine Affairs and
Fisheries, Indonesia for research funding in 2019 and 2021 in Ternate-Tidore. Gratitude is also given to the local
communities of Tidore who have assisted during the field surveys.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Fahri, J., Abubakar, R. and Alhadar, F.M. “Strategy for developing excellent tourist destination (A case study of Gurabunga
Village, Tidore Island Municipality, North Maluku).” Journal of International Conference Proceedings 5, no.1
(2022): 1-12.
Irani, H.R., Golverdi, M., Rastegar, R. and Rezaei, S. “Rapid ecotourism development and challenges: the case of ecolodge
in Iran.” Tourism Recreation Research (2022):1-6.
Kader, Abdurrahman. "Development planning of tourism destination as local superior economy sector: study at Tidore city
islands." International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences 5, no. 3 (2017): 19-25.
Masberg, B.A. and Morales, N. “A case analysis of strategies in ecotourism development.” Aquatic Ecosystem Health &amp;
Management 2, no.3 (1999): 289-300.
Rahmawan, G.A., Ridwan, N.N.H., Wisha, U.J., Ilham, I., Gemilang, W.A., Andriani, F.W., Sudaryadi, A. and Irwansyah, I.
“Ekowisata Terintegrasi Situs Kapal Tenggelam di Tidore Kepulauan, Maluku Utara.” Jurnal Kelautan Nasional 16,
no. 3 (2021): 169-184.
Runtunuwu, P.C.H. “Tourism sector development strategy in North Maluku: A case study of Tidore Islands.” International
Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific 3, no. 3 (2020): 1-8.
Sosmiarti, S. and Fahlefi, U.A. “Pengembangan Potensi Wisata Sejarah Dan Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Soasio Melalui
Program Paket Wisata Dan Rumah Budaya Sebagai Pusat Kesultanan Tidore.” Buletin Ilmiah Nagari Membangun 2,
no. 2 (2019): 94-108.
Wijayanti, H., Marfai, M.A., Mutaqin, B.W., Hadmoko, D.S., Lavigne, F., Faral, A. and Riasasi, W. “Ecotourism in a
Hazardous Small-Volcanic Island: Tidore Island, Indonesia.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental
Science 1039, no.1 (2022): 12021.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="57">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="319">
                  <text>2023 Session 21: New Technologies and Interdisciplinary Strategies for the Promotion and Protection of Maritime Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="320">
                  <text>Session 21 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="321">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 21 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="322">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="323">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="324">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="325">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="326">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="327">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6107">
                <text>The Potential of Maritime Archaeology (Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical Narrations in Tidore, North Moluccas, Indonesia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6108">
                <text>The potential of shipwreck site resources in “Spice Routes,” Ternate-Tidore, reflects several historical pieces of&#13;
evidence relating to archaeological remains from the Portuguese and Spanish eras in the surrounding sea and&#13;
coastal areas. In the 1990s, a plethora of archaeological remains were salvaged. An integrated archaeological&#13;
study is an initial step to optimize the use of underwater archaeological resources in the area of interest. The&#13;
survey consisted of local coordination, expert consultation, literature study, field surveys and underwater&#13;
observations, mini excavations using water dredging, artefact samplings site measuring and documentation,&#13;
artefact desalination, and C14 carbon dating analysis for wooden materials found within the site. Moreover, the&#13;
water quality survey for marine tourism interests and Trinidad ship reconstruction is significant in supporting&#13;
500 years of circumnavigation of the earth by Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano and supporting&#13;
publication and dissemination. Based on the present study, it is observed that Soasio and Tongowai sites have&#13;
the potential to be developed as the centre of integrated marine ecotourism with maritime archaeology-based&#13;
sites. This consideration is due to plenty of historical artefacts and tourism feasibility assessments. Therefore,&#13;
local and regional regulations relating to regional spatial planning are crucial before implementing the&#13;
ecotourism project in this area. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6109">
                <text>Wisnu A. Gemilang</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6110">
                <text>Nia N. H. Ridwan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6111">
                <text>Guntur A. Rahmawan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6112">
                <text>Ulung J. Wisha</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6113">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6114">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6115">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6116">
                <text>Gemilang, Wisnu A., Nia N. H. Ridwan, Guntur A. Rahmawan and Ulung J. Wisha. 2023. “The Potential of Maritime Archaeology (Shipwreck Sites) for Sustainable Marine Tourism Management and Strengthening Historical Narrations in Tidore, North Moluccas, Indonesia.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Hans van Tilburg. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1916 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 21 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="546" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="337">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/7062be1e10a33b21a436fa48583d28f0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d7b554f1ee475142c7c78319a9bf60ff</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6106">
                    <text>The Application of Photogrammetry for Recording Indonesian Vernacular and Historical
Boats and Boat Miniatures in Museum Collections
Ahmad Ginanjar Purnawibawa1,2 Chiara Zazzaro1 Agni Mochtar1,3
1

Università di Napoli “L’Orientale”, Italy
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
3
National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
2

ABSTRACT
This paper fits best within Session 27 New Technology and Interdisciplinary Strategies as it focuses on the status and
preservation of vernacular and historical boats and boat miniatures within Indonesian museum collections. The case
study under consideration concerns challenges and strategies of using photogrammetry for recording these museum
collections and for preservation, dissemination, and scientific research. The resources available to conduct the work
include the full-size and miniature Indonesian boats kept in the Museum Nasional and Kebaharian Museum in
Jakarta and other collections in Indonesia. The research questions of this project are: what is the suitable method, and
what are the challenges in the 3D documentation of full-sized boats and miniatures in museums using the
photogrammetry technique? The results of this project are comprehensive data regarding the photogrammetry
workflow for museum collections and sets of digital boat models suitable for disseminating information and for
scientific publication. This project is part of the Indonesian Boatbuilding Endangered Heritage Project, an ongoing
collaboration among Indonesian and Italian scholars.
Keywords: boats, miniatures, museum collections, photogrammetry
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1: The comparison of photos sequences between miniature and full-sized boats. Reconstruction on Agisoft
Metashape by C. Zazzaro, 2023.
Figure 2: Detailed result on miniature boat Janggolan Madura. Reconstruction on Agisoft Metashape by C. Zazzaro,
2023.
Figure 3: Defects on models shown on two sides of the boats. Reconstruction on Agisoft Metashape by C. Zazzaro,
2023.
Figure 4: Imperfections due to reflection on sail material. Reconstruction on Agisoft Metashape by C. Zazzaro, 2023.

INTRODUCTION
In the last decades, the application of photogrammetry in the cultural heritage field has dramatically
increased. Photogrammetry is easily accessible to everyone, and it provides a permanent record of heritage
materials and data for accurate measurement and analysis (Yilmaz, Yakar, and Yildiz 2008, 9), which
benefit the documentation and reconstruction process, and research dissemination (Forlin, Valente, and
Kázmér 2018, 2). The digital data recorded by this method benefit researchers from different fields,
including archaeologists, who can better manage the time spent on the field (Puspita et al. 2021, 343). For
Indonesian museums, photogrammetry has become more popular with the rise of demands for digital
access to museum collections. The need for digital access to entertainment and education spiked,
especially during the COVID-19 pandemic (Bramantyo and Ismail 2021, 185; Soraya and Sigit
Martyastiadi 2021, 26). However, only a few museums can cope with the demands, and most collections
still need to be digitally represented nowadays—especially endangered maritime heritage in the form of
historical and vernacular boats. In fact, in nautical archaeology, photogrammetry is especially useful for
reverse engineering processes, extrapolating naval lines from 3D models and creating a permanent record

P
A
G

1

�of boat architectures. Unlike other types of applications, photogrammetry measurements and tolerances
are much less restrictive, and the accuracy obtained is sufficient at this scope (Martorelli, Pensa, and
Speranza 2014).
Vernacular boats and boatbuilding in many places in Indonesia faced a rapid decline with the introduction
of modern shipbuilding, accompanied by a high demand for manufactured ships. The lack of knowledge
transfer within the boatbuilder communities exacerbates the decline. As observed in the boatyards in
Pasuruan, East Java, the skills and knowledge of boatbuilding are only taught from fathers to sons, without
any guarantee that today’s generation wants to continue working on building boats (Mochtar, Taniardi and
Purnawibawa 2021). A similar situation is found in Tana Beru, a village in South Sulawesi, where there is
probably the largest cluster of wooden boatyards in the world, especially for building a type of boat
known as pinisi. Here, most of the production concerns large boats, and only a few builders master the
skills to make boats using traditional tools and processes and with the mandatory accompanying
ceremonies (Zazzaro et al. 2022).
The Endangered Indonesian Boat Building Heritage Project focuses on documenting the endangered
boatbuilding traditions in Indonesia while also building up a digital archive of boats and boat miniatures
collections, which are often overlooked. The digital copy of these collections could be used as educational
tools and for conservation purposes. This latter use, for example, would have helped preserve boats of the
Jakarta Maritime Museum, which lost around 100 collection items to a fire in 2018, including a Balinese
outrigger boat and other important vernacular and historical boats (Nizar 2018). While the museum has
now finished its reconstruction and is operating normally, the loss of part of the collection is severe. Even
though digital archives will not replace the actual collections, their absence prevents the museum from
creating replicas or integrating the exhibit with the digital collection. The Endangered Indonesian Boat
Building Heritage Project campaigns to avoid a similar scenario from happening again using
photogrammetry for documenting the boats and boat miniatures collections.

CASE STUDIES
The case study under consideration concerns challenges and strategies of using photogrammetry for
recording historical and vernacular boats and boat miniatures in museum collections and for preservation,
dissemination, and scientific publication. In the form of boats and their depiction, the maritime heritage is
critically underrepresented in virtual platforms. The only present collections are the pinisi boat and
the janggolan boat. Both miniatures are collections of the National Museum and are featured in the
National Museum virtual tour (Virtual Tour 2023). Another boat type is the alut pasak dayak, a full-sized
boat from the Jakarta Maritime Museum collection featured in the Tetangga Exhibition web-based online
platform (Tetangga Exhibition 2023). Usually, the museum works together with third parties to provide all
models used in these virtual or online exhibitions. The lack of proper equipment and necessary skills is
mentioned as the cause of the museum's inability to support its own need for a virtual museum. Hence,
there is a need to address this issue.
Despite some ambiguous information on the provenance of some boats and boat models, every object has
been carefully documented, just like an archaeological artefact. The recording is performed with a nautical
archaeology approach, meaning that the documentation attempts to record all details in the object in
opposition to merely recording the general form. Besides 3D photogrammetry of the boats and boat
models, the project also aims to produce more detailed information, such as the hull lines and the
description of the boat's components. Therefore, the results of this project would be helpful for the general
public who only wish to see the collection and the specific public, such as researchers and conservators,
who need to observe the detail of the objects. Another aim of the project is to train museum conservators

P
A
G

2

�in photogrammetry documentation so that they will systematically produce digital copies of the new
collection acquisitions in the future.

RESOURCES
The boats and boat miniatures recorded in this research are collections of various museums in Indonesia,
namely the National Museum of Indonesia, Jakarta Maritime Museum, Museum of Indonesia, and
Transportation Museum. The chosen boats and miniatures represent different regions in Indonesia and
represent traditional workmanship for actual-sized boats, while the miniatures, to some degree, provide
accuracy and similarities to the actual boats they represent. Miniature boats are usually made by artisans
who know the boats' architecture very well because they usually live in the area or they were former
boatbuilders.
So far, data have been gathered from 2019 to 2023 through a series of fieldwork by research members.
The documentation processes are conducted using different mirrorless digital cameras, Sony RX 100II,
Sony Alpha 7C, Canon M100, and Canon M50. In order to reconstruct the objects using the
photogrammetry technique, this research uses the program Agisoft Metashape. To support the purpose of
disseminating the project results, Sketchfab is chosen as an online platform. Sketchfab offers dedicated
categories for cultural heritage and historical objects and has been used by institutions as well as amateurs
to display their collections. Sketchfab also provides editing tools and supports virtual reality devices
(Statham 2019).

FRAMEWORK
Considering the urgency of photogrammetry documentation and its benefits for the public and scientific
field, there is a need for rapidly, yet properly, documenting the collection of boats in Indonesian museums.
This article explores the suitable method and challenges in documenting full-sized boats and miniature
boats in museums using photogrammetry.

RESULTS
Photogrammetry Processes
The principle of photogrammetry is to reconstruct the three-dimensional form of an object in digital form
through a series of photographs. Ideally, the photographs cover 360 degree angles of the object from
different elevations. Considering the complicated shape of the boats, the photos easily surpassed hundreds
to generate desirable results. There are several steps to execute the work efficiently in a photogrammetry
workflow. The basic workflow includes the digitization processes, which can be broken down into several
steps, including preparations, recording, pre-processing, measurement analysis, finishing, exporting
(Puspita et al. 2021, 344), and continued with interpretation and visualization processes to make the
models accessible through different means (Condorelli and Bonetto 2022).
Following those steps should help us to produce optimal results for photogrammetry. However, the shape
of the objects, space, and light limitations inside the museum challenged the workflow. Most of the fullsized boats in the museums cannot be moved from the display room due to their weight and space

P
A
G

3

�limitations inside the museum. For example, the Papua Canoe kept in the Jakarta Maritime Museum is
'trapped' by the museum building's structural pillars due to its large size. Another challenge was the
lighting conditions in the museum: some 'immovable' collections are hard to be photographed with even
lighting due to their positions and the proximity to structural obstacles such as walls and pillars, which
also create shadows. Finally, the museum's lighting level, which was kept dim between 50-100 lux,
proved challenging to work with. Digitisation proceeded in such conditions and limitations.
The first step was the selection of the full-sized boats based on their authenticity, historical information
provided by the museum, and visual observation in the museum. Only historical and vernacular boats were
documented, and modern boats were excluded since they did not provide value to this project. Otherwise
the miniature boats were selected based on their accuracy in representing the actual boat type, museum
information, team observation, and craftsmanship. Miniatures of modern boats and 'strange-looking'
vernacular boats deemed proportionally or architecturally inaccurate, were excluded. The project recorded
two full-sized / eight miniature boats at the National Museum, eight full-sized / five miniature boats at
Jakarta Maritime Museum, four full-sized / four miniature boats at the Transportation Museum, and two
miniature boats at the Museum of Indonesia.
The next step was recording or taking photographs of the boats. Miniature boats were more manageable
compared to full-sized boats due to their size. They were usually displayed in a glass vitrine which can be
easily transported to more open areas and placed on top of a table or pedestal helpful for the
photogrammetry workflow. In order to document the miniatures, the object was photographed from all
directions or 360 degrees with different elevations to capture details. For example, the higher elevation
angles captured the mast, sail, and deck, and the lower angles captured the hull, keel, and rudder. A
detailed photograph can be obtained while maintaining adequate overlap pictures capturing the whole
dimension of the miniature boats.

P
A
G

4

�Figure 1: The comparison of photos sequences between miniature and full-sized boats. Reconstruction on Agisoft
Metashape by C. Zazzaro 2023.

On the other hand, recording a full-sized boat in museum collections requires a different approach. Space
and light limitations and the size of the boat made shooting more complicated. A full-sized boat cannot be
treated as a single object due to its size and obstacle in the working area. The team documented parts of
the boats individually, and then tried to connect to these parts digitally. The focus of the documentation is
on parts that contain essential detail. Since it was almost impossible to photograph the complete shape of
the boat, continuity and overlap from one photo to the next were essential. With this approach, photos
taken on full-sized boats have a clear direction and retain detail from all parts of the boat. The
consequence of this technique was that the number of pictures taken was greater than the photos in the
miniature collection, as shown in Figure 1. This process was also directly followed by museum staff, who
participated in documenting their collection.
Photos from each boat collection were then archived digitally, then processed using Agisoft Metashape
software to produce a three-dimensional model. The processing included aligning the photos, building a
dense cloud, building a mesh, texturing, calibrating, and simplifying the mesh for smaller file-size models.
The final result was then exported in .obj and .mtl format, and texture map files were uploaded to
Sketchfab.
Photogrammetry Results
The results of this project provided us with various data sets of historical and vernacular boats and
miniatures in the form of three-dimensional models and detailed pictures. The photogrammetry method
yielded satisfactory results, with the three-dimensional models successfully preserving the detail and
texture of the boat and miniature boats, as shown in Figure 2. The detail allowed us to access more data
for future research, including the iconography of the boats, decoration, and pattern used by different

P
A
G

5

�vernacular boats. The calibrated model also preserved the detailed measurement of the boat parts. This
record will provide invaluable data for studying boat characteristics, reverse engineering, and
understanding the nature of the boats, especially in full-sized boats.

Figure 2: Detailed result on miniature boat Janggolan Madura. Reconstruction on Agisoft Metashape by C. Zazzaro 2023.

However, on a few models, there are defects in the final results due to imperfections in capturing the
image of the boat. Three factors usually contribute to the quality of the model produced from the
photogrammetry: image quality, scene complexity, and environmental condition (O'Connor 2018). In this
project, two noticeable imperfections can be observed in the final models: the different coloration of the
boat parts and the holes usually in the lower parts of the boat models.
The difference in coloration (as shown in Figure 3) could be observed in two different parts of the models
due to the difference in light exposure. Figure 3 shows that the A side of the boat is correctly exposed to
the light, while the B side is underexposed. Figure 3 shows that if the image records a shadow, the shadow
will also be introduced to the final models (Kreimer 2020). This defect is often shown on full-sized boats,
especially those positioned in the limited space of display rooms, which prohibit the introduction of
additional lights or a tripod for long-exposure photographs. This defect could be reversed using Agisoft
Delighter, with the expense of losing texture and detail on the model's surface, which is not ideal for the
purpose of this project.

P
A
G

6

�Figure 3: Defects on models shown on two sides of the boats. Reconstruction on Agisoft Metashape by C. Zazzaro 2023.

Another visible defect is the presence of holes in less textured and plain materials. In this case, holes
occurred in the sail of miniature boats (see Figure 4). Single-colored materials lacking physical texture are
difficult to reconstruct in photogrammetry (Kreimer 2020, 7). However, Figure 4 shows that Model A
preserves the sail's detail and shape much better due to exposure to adequate light than Model B. The
underexposed Model B also shows the cast of shadows in several parts, including the sail, mast, deck, and
hull. While this defect is less likely to impact measurement data and its potential for scientific purposes
(except the study of iconography, which is affected by the loss of details due to shadows), these models
are less desirable to use for public benefit, considering their appearance.

Figure 4: Imperfections due to reflection on sail material. Reconstruction on Agisoft Metashape by C. Zazzaro 2023.

P
A
G

7

�The photogrammetry results from this project show that practical methods for documenting the objects
needs to be adapted to the complexity of the objects. The shape and size of full-sized boats provide
challenges for the documentation team, which need to be overcome with a slightly different approach
from the usual photogrammetry method. This project also shows the importance of proper lighting and
location setup for object documentation. Considering the high complexity of the vernacular boats and
miniatures, the details need to be preserved properly to allow their digital copies to benefit scientists and
the public. In the case of Indonesian museums, these challenges are relatively common in many museums
since only a handful of museums are equipped with proper working areas and needed equipment. This
condition could change our mindset for displaying collections or storing collections, especially full-sized
boats, in a more proper location, with access from multiple angles.

CONCLUSION
The results obtained from this project show that the photogrammetric method is an effective method for
making three-dimensional collections models and has succeeded in giving a satisfactory output. However,
due to technical challenges, planning and strategy are needed in collecting data for each collection. The
technical challenges found were the position of the collection in the exhibition space or display room. In
some cases the display space could be more conducive to photogrammetry by removing obstruction of
building structures, and more space to place the camera. Another challenge is ensuring enough light in the
photograph process. The position of the collection and the lighting conditions often make the collection
underexposed, or in some cases, cause the material in the collection to reflect light, which makes the 3D
model imperfect.
For this reason, a different approach is needed to record the different types of collections in the form of
full-sized boats and miniature boats. Documentation of full-sized boats can be done in several sections and
focuses on boat attributes, compared to miniature boats that can be documented as whole objects. As a
result, a three-dimensional model can be obtained with accuracy and detail and can be used for
educational, academic, and public purposes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the International Association for Mediterranean and Oriental Studies
(ISMEO) for supporting the Indonesian Boatbuilding Endangered Heritage Project. We are also thankful to the Museum Nasional
Indonesia (Indonesia National Museum), Museum Kebaharian Jakarta (Jakarta Maritime Museum), Museum Indonesia (Museum
of Indonesia), and Museum Transportasi (Transportation Museum) for providing access needed for the documentation of the
museum collections.

P
A
G

8

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bramantyo, B. D., and P. Ismail. “Digital Tourism Museum Nasional Indonesia Melalui Virtual Tour Di Masa Pandemi COVID19.” WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi 20, no. 2 (2021): 184–196. https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v20i2.1616.
Condorelli, F., and J. Bonetto. “3D Digitalization and Visualization of Archaeological Artifacts with the Use of Photogrammetry
and Virtual Reality System.” In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 48 (2022): 51–57. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W1-2022-51-2022.
Forlin, P., R. Valente, and M. Kázmér. “Assessing Earthquake Effects on Archaeological Sites Using Photogrammetry and 3D
Model Analysis.” Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 9, no. 6 (2018): 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00073.
Kreimer, B. “Guide to Photogrammetry Photography.” Washington, D.C: Online News Association, 2020.
Martorelli, M., C. Pensa, and D. Speranza. “Digital Photogrammetry for Documentation of Maritime Heritage.” Journal of
Maritime Archaeology 9, no. 1 (2014): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-014-9124-x.
Mochtar, A., P. Taniardi, and A. G. Purnawibawa. “As my father said Traditional boatbuilding in Pasuruan.” The SEAMEO
SPAFA International Conference on Southeast Asian Archaeology and Fine Arts, December, (2021): 234–240.
Nizar, H. Interview on JPNN, 17 January 2018. https://www.jpnn.com/news/kerugian-akibat-kebakaran-museum-bahari-takternilai, accessed 19 April 2023.
Puspita, A. A., M. Triharini, M. Risfan, and B. Salam. “A Study on Museum Artifact Digitization Using Photogrammetry Method
for Preservation and Design Education.” Advances in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities Research 65 (2021): 343350. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211228.045.
Soraya, A., and Y. Sigit Martyastiadi. “Aesthetics of Virtual: The Development Opportunities of Virtual Museums in Indonesia.”
International Journal of Creative And Arts Studies 8 no. 1 (2021): 25-33. https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v8i1.5346.
Statham, N. “Scientific Rigour of Online Platforms for 3D Visualisation of Heritage.” Virtual Archaeology Review 10, 20 (2019):
1–16. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2019.9715.
Tetangga Exhibition. Jakarta Maritime Museum. https://tetanggaexhibition.com/en/node/3, accessed 19 April 2023.
Virtual Tour. Badan Layanan Umum Museum Nasional Indonesia. https://www.museumnasional.or.id/virtual-tour, accessed 19
April 2023.
Yilmaz, H. M., M. Yakar, and F. Yildiz. “Documentation of Historical Caravansaries by Digital Close Range Photogrammetry.”
Automation in Construction 17, 4 (2008): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.09.003.
Zazzaro, C., H. Liebner, A. Soriente, G. Ferraioli, and A. G. Purnawibawa. “The Construction of an Historical Boat in South
Sulawesi (Indonesia): The Padewakang.” Journal of Maritime Archaeology 17, 4 (2022): 507–557.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-022-09332-5.

P
A
G

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="57">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="319">
                  <text>2023 Session 21: New Technologies and Interdisciplinary Strategies for the Promotion and Protection of Maritime Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="320">
                  <text>Session 21 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="321">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 21 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="322">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="323">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="324">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="325">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="326">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="327">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6097">
                <text>The Application of Photogrammetry for Recording Indonesian Vernacular and Historical Boats and Boat Miniatures in Museum Collections&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6098">
                <text>This paper fits best within Session 27 New Technology and Interdisciplinary Strategies as it focuses on the status and&#13;
preservation of vernacular and historical boats and boat miniatures within Indonesian museum collections. The case&#13;
study under consideration concerns challenges and strategies of using photogrammetry for recording these museum&#13;
collections and for preservation, dissemination, and scientific research. The resources available to conduct the work&#13;
include the full-size and miniature Indonesian boats kept in the Museum Nasional and Kebaharian Museum in&#13;
Jakarta and other collections in Indonesia. The research questions of this project are: what is the suitable method, and&#13;
what are the challenges in the 3D documentation of full-sized boats and miniatures in museums using the&#13;
photogrammetry technique? The results of this project are comprehensive data regarding the photogrammetry&#13;
workflow for museum collections and sets of digital boat models suitable for disseminating information and for&#13;
scientific publication. This project is part of the Indonesian Boatbuilding Endangered Heritage Project, an ongoing&#13;
collaboration among Indonesian and Italian scholars. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6099">
                <text>Ahmad Ginanjar Purnawibawa</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6100">
                <text> Chiara Zazzaro</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6101">
                <text>Agni Mochtar</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6102">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6103">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6104">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6105">
                <text> Purnawibawa, Ahmad Ginanjar, Chiara Zazzaro, and Agni Mochtar. 2023. “The application of photogrammetry for recording Indonesian vernacular and historical boats and boat miniatures in museum collections.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Hans van Tilburg. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1915 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 21 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="545" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="336">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/dd7bbfa214bd7d4937538d155c9f0e91.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9699d2a1a87397f3c219e9a8ecea795d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6096">
                    <text>Satellite-derived bathymetry and rock detection for maritime archaeology using VENÂµS
imagery
Gerardo Diaz1, Dr. Yoav Lehahn2, Dr. Emmanuel Nantet3
1

Department of Bible Studies, Archaeology and the Ancient Near East. Ben-Gurion
University of the Negev, Beâ€™er Sheva, Israel, PhD Student.
2
Department of Maritime Geosciences, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences,
University of Haifa, Israel, Senior Lecturer.
3
Department of Maritime Civilizations, School of Archaeology and Maritime Cultures,
University of Haifa, Israel, Associate Professor.
ABSTRACT
Since its beginnings in 1975, deriving bathymetry by means of multispectral satellite imagery has been a method
that has not yet been fully exploited in the maritime archaeology realm. It focuses on using the blue and green
bands for their water penetration capabilities to later convert each pixel into depth values. This method can be
replicated in time and space, while keeping costs low and covering large areas. In this research, two highresolution bathymetric maps using VENÂµS satellite imagery and a variation of Stumpfâ€™s equation were
produced. Two archaeological sites were selected: the harbour of Sebastos (built by King Herod) and the Achziv
ridges on the northern coast of Israel. The importance of collecting satellite imagery under low Chl-a [mg/m3]
conditions is addressed, and an algorithm for identifying shallow rocks above and below the water level is
included. Our research suggests that satellite-derived bathymetry mapping along the Israeli coast is more
efficient for satellite images taken between March and September, when Chl-a concentrations are likely to be
lower; maximum depth penetration using VENÎ¼S is found to be approximately up to 23 m depth with a Root
Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.53.
Keywords: VENÎ¼S; bathymetry; chlorophyll-a; rock identification
List of Abbreviations
Red, Green and Blue
Satellite-Derived Bathymetry
Chlorophyll-a

RGB
SDB
Chl-a

List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1: Study Areas and Ground-truth data in comparison with VENÎ¼S satellite imagery.
Figure 2: SDB results for low and high Chl-a content for the Achziv ridges.
Figure 3: SDB results for the Harbour of Sebastos and the Hader port.
Table 1: Comparison between in situ depth points taken during the Caesarea shipwreck excavation of December
2017 and the SDB map from May 2020.

INTRODUCTION
Most common approaches for deriving bathymetry rely on acoustic systems (such as sonar) or aerial
alternatives such as LiDAR. However, these methods are expensive, labour-intensive and difficult to
scale them into large areas (Stumpf et al. 2003, 547; Traganos et al. 2018, 2). In contrast, in recent
years, Satellite-Derived Bathymetry (SDB) has been suggested as cost-effective for regions where
traditional methods are either impractical to operate or highly expensive (Jagalingam et al. 2015, 565;
Sam et al. 2018, 750), or there is poor or no data at all (Westley 2021, 17). The use of satellites to
derive bathymetric maps has been proven to be not only reliable (Jagalingam et al. 2015, 560-566;
Guzinski et al. 2016, 243-263; Sam et al. 2018, 1-14) but also cheaper in comparison with the
technologies mentioned above (Jagalingam et al. 2015, 561).
Bathymetric mapping highly benefits maritime and underwater archaeologists by facilitating them to
understand site formation processes, shipwreck scours (Caston 1979, 193-204; Quinn 2006, 14191432); reconstruct paleo-landscapes (Westley et al. 2014, 411-430; Westley 2021, 12-14) as well as to
1

�conserve, protect, and preserve underwater cultural heritage (Maarvelend et al. 2013, 191-192). In this
paper, near-shore landscape reconstruction is assessed through SDB and rock identification through
VENÂµS satellite imagery. The study incorporates a procedural framework encompassing sea
conditions such as low Chl-a content prior to acquiring high-resolution satellite imagery over the area
of interest, and two algorithms capable of identifying rocks above and below the water. The
significance of this approach stems from its replicability in oligotrophic waters of the Pacific Ocean,
as well as the potential utility of the proposed algorithms in coastal environments exhibiting analogous
reflectance properties.
CASE STUDIES
For the application of SDB, two different areas were selected along the coast of Israel. The underwater
aeolian Achziv ridges, located off the coast of the North District (Figure 1A), were chosen due to their
proximity to Shikmona (Haifa), where a 6-year record of Chl-a content is available, and lowbathymetric data is accessible. With respect to important archaeological sites, only Tel Achziv is
known (c. 5 km south of the Israeli border with Lebanon). This site was a Phoenician city that rose at
the end of the 8th century BCE and was also a maritime stop thanks to its convenient seaside location
and easily accessible sand beach for landing (Jasmin et al. 2016, 276).
The second area includes the Roman harbour of Sebastos and the modern port of Hadera (Figure 1A).
The former was chosen because it is a very well-studied harbour (Raban et al. 2009; Bergin 2018;
Galili et al. 2021, 8-16) and in situ depths are available. The latter because it contains low-resolution
bathymetry, which serves as ground-truth data. The harbour of Sebastos, now fully submerged, was
built by King Herod in 21 BCE. It took more than five years to construct, and when completed, it was
the largest artificial harbour of its time in the Mediterranean (Raban 1992). Hadera is a medium-sized
port, located around 3.7 km south of the previous. This port was completed in the early 1960s, and it
currently specialises in coal and fuel oil products and serves the two adjacent power stations
(MarineTraffic 2023; Shipnext 2023).
RESOURCES
The resources available to conduct this work include:
Sonar Data
Sonar bathymetric data was collected between 2001 and 2006. Horizontal resolution is 50x50 m and
one metre vertically. Although this data is highly reliable, its spatial resolution is too broad, and it does
not cover near-shore areas and regions proximate to harbours, which makes it impractical for maritime
archaeology applications.
Chl-a Field Observations
Although there is some research including Chl-a concentrations to produce SDB maps (Li et al. 2019,
4; Li et al. 2021, 4), they do not evaluate how high concentrations can mislead SDB calculations. To
estimate the sensitivity of SDB to fluctuating Chl-a concentrations, a series of measurements were
taken from 2013 â€“ 2019 on a weekly to monthly basis at the Shikmona station (Raveh 2015, 1-23;
Rahav 2018, 10). Two notable contrasting periods were identified: one, during the Israeli summer
season on 25 July 2018 (low Chl-a concentrations), and another on 14 December 2018 (high Chl-a
content).
In-situ Depth Measurements
In December 2017, underwater excavations took place in Caesarea, in the northern part of the bay,
around 60 m offshore (Derenne et al. 2019, 77). The investigation was led by Prof. Emmanuel Nantet
from the University of Haifa. The excavation was aimed at conducting a reappraisal of a shipwreck
discovered in 1976, briefly explored by Avner Raban (2008, 129; 2009, 69-149) and subsequently
2

�studied by Michael Fitzgerald (1989a, 4-9; 1989b, 184-190; 1989c; 1994, 163-223; 1995). Due to the
important dimensions of her hull components, especially the 10-cm thick planking, it seems that she
was initially a large merchantman, that sank in the Early Roman Period (Nantet 2020). Ten hull points
were recorded from the ship, using a Total Station following the technique specified by Bowens
(2009, 92). These points were later used to validate SDB depths in the Habour of Sebastos.
VENÎ¼S Satellite Imagery
VENÎ¼S (Vegetation and Environment monitoring New Micro-Satellite) is a recent initiative between
the Israeli Space Agency (ISA) and the French Space Agency (CNES) aimed at developing,
manufacturing, and operating a new Earth observing satellite using a superspectral camera that
provides high resolution imagery in both space and time (VENÎ¼S, 3). VENÎ¼S acquires satellite
imagery at four, five, and 10 m resolution with a revisit period of every two days. VENÎ¼S can be
accessed at https://venus.bgu.ac.il/venus/. It provides three levels of products: L1 (TOA reflectance),
L2, and L3 (surface reflectance). Two L3 products for the Achziv ridges were employed, one on 25
July 2018, and another on 14 December 2018 for low and high Chl-a content, respectively. The other
product (L2) was used for the Caesarea and Hadera ports under low Chl-a conditions and was taken on
21 May 2020.
Drone Imagery
Although the harbour of Sebastos was the main commercial maritime trading place during the Roman
and Byzantine periods, natural anchorages were highly utilised as well. The Sebastos harbour complex
has two natural anchorages, which have been thoroughly studied by Ratzlaff et al. (2017), Galili
(2017), and Galili et al. (2021). These two natural anchorages are commonly labelled as Northern and
Southern anchorages. In this area, one set of aerial imagery was collected. The UAV deployed was a
DJI Mavic Mini at 50-m above sea level to qualitatively validate the presence of these anchorages as
well as some other underwater and above-water rocks along the study area. Images were taken on 10
February 2021 before the Israeli oil spill (16 February 2021). The images were then converted into
orthomosaics by using the professional 3D modelling software Agisoft Metashape.

FRAMEWORK
The research questions for this paper are:
ï‚· Which climate and water conditions should be considered to derive bathymetry from satellite
sensors?
ï‚· Up to what depth is satellite-derived bathymetry still reliable along the Israeli coast?
ï‚· What is the reliability of the method in comparison with in-situ measurements?
ï‚· How can one easily highlight both above-water and shallow underwater rocks?
ï‚· How do underwater archaeologists benefit from this?

RESULTS
Except for L1 products, VENÎ¼S does not require a long pre-processing stage (e.g., DN to radiance and
radiance to reflectance) or atmospheric corrections. The spectral band ratio model used in this research
is based on Stumpfâ€™s linear algorithm (Equation 1). The algorithm requires tunable constants mo and
m1 to scale the ratio to absolute depth values (Stumpf et al. 2003, 550); n is generally taken as 1000
(Sam et al. 2018, 8; Li et al. 2021, 4; Traganos et al. 2018, 5) to ensure a positive outcome. Bands blue
and green are used due to their maximum penetration capabilities, which correspond to bands two and
four for VENÎ¼S. For this research, a variation of Stumpfâ€™s equation was used (Equation 2) as
proposed by Sam et al. (2018, 4) for relative depths where no tunable parameters are needed but
ground-truth data is employed instead.

3

�ln(ð‘›âˆ—ðµ2)

ð‘ = ð‘š0 ln(ð‘›âˆ—ðµ4) âˆ’ ð‘š1 â€¦.â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Equation 1
ð‘ð‘Ÿ =

ln(ð‘›âˆ—ðµ2)
â€¦.â€¦â€¦..â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦...â€¦.â€¦â€¦â€¦Equation
ln(ð‘›âˆ—ðµ4)

2

First, Equation 2 is applied in a training area where sonar data near the shore is available (Figures 1B
and 1D). The values obtained from this band ratio underwent a low-filter convolution to smooth and
decrease the disparity between pixel values. Then, all pixel values were converted from five to 50 m
pixel size to match the sonarâ€™s spatial resolution. A scatter plot is produced between sonar (x-axis) and
spectral (y-axis) data, and a quadratic regression model is obtained to ensure the best fitting model
(Figures 1C and 1E).
Second, a new band ratio is applied in a near-shore region of interest, and depth values are derived
from the quadratic model, from which only positive and real values are considered. These values are
assigned to a nx1 matrix labelled as Z. An additional nx2 matrix containing values for latitude (X) and
longitude (Y) (in UTM coordinates) is adjoined to the previous matrix. These points are then exported
to ArcGIS 18.0, and an SDB map is obtained by using kriging interpolation (Amante 2016, 123-133).

Figure 1: Study Areas and Ground-truth data in comparison with VENÎ¼S satellite imagery. a) Study Areas; b) Sonar
bathymetry map for the Achziv ridges; c) Scatter plot and regression analysis between sonar bathymetry (x-axis), and
band ratio values (y-axis). For high Chl-a content: Y = 0.00009X2 + 0.00224X + 0.93679. For low Chl-a content, Y = 0.00039X2 + 0.02046X + 0.91304; d) Sonar bathymetry map for the Harbour system of Caesarea; e) Scatter plot and
regression analysis between sonar bathymetry and band ratio values, Y = - 0.0003816X2 + 0.020445X + 0.856941.

SDB Performance under Different Chl-a Concentrations: The Achziv Ridges
Two bathymetric maps were generated for the Achziv ridges, its closeness to Shikmona makes them
ideal for relating Chl-a measurements to specific dates. RGB colour composition is shown for low and
high Chl-a content (Figures 2A and 2B). Maximum depths reach 23 m during July, as shown in Figure
1C, when Chl-a concentrations are likely to be low. In contrast, although the coefficient of
4

�determination (R2 = 0.9784) derived from sonar and spectral values was high during high Chl-a content
(Figure 1C), SDB mapping was demonstrated to be entirely ineffective by not only concealing the
aeolianite ridges but also misleading water depth values (Figure 2D) of up to 62.3-m. Additionally,
white pixels represented erroneous and false bathymetry by showing values up to 12 m above sealevel.
Conversely, SDB for July displays the ridges in detail. A major ridge expanding in a NNE-SSW
direction, and two minor ridges closer to the shore at depths of 6â€“10 m were visible. Additionally,
SDB proved to be useful for identifying shallow coastal geomorphological features such as a possible
basin at 10â€“13 m depth, and an isolated rounded feature around the middle of the main ridge (Figure
2C), all of them not visible on the sonar data.

Figure 2. SDB results for low and high Chl-a content for the Achziv ridges; a) low Chl-a RGB; b) high Chl-a RGB; c)
low Chl-a SDB, two features; d) high Chl-a SDB, pixels in white denote false bathymetry above mean sea level.

SDB and Rock Identification: The Harbour of Sebastos and the Hadera port
The previous methodology was followed for the second study area (Figure 3A), obtaining a point grid
matrix of nx3, containing latitude, longitude, and depths derived from the quadratic equation (Figure
1E), from which a high-resolution (five m/pixel) georeferenced bathymetric map was generated,
covering a total area of 15,770 km2 (Figure 3B). Shallow areas were found between Hadera port and
Sebastos harbour. Within these regions, traditional ship-based measurements would be almost
inaccessible due to high expenses and complicated logistics in comparison with SDB. The algorithmâ€™s
final limitation went up to 23 m (Figure 1E), similar to the Achziv ridges (Figure 2).
In general, SDB has better performance between four and ten metres deep. Uncertainties appear below
four metres deep because the water column attenuation becomes very weak due to the short light
transfer path (Dekker et al. 2011, 405, 415; Li et al. 2019, 11), which can lead to small discrepancies
between the blue (band two) and green (band three). Moreover, the reflective properties of bottom
substrates and bottom albedo also affect its accuracy (Green et al. 2000, 220-233). Above 10 m, light
is attenuated, which can lead to weak signals (Lee et al. 2012, 2578).
To evaluate the SDBâ€™s performance, satellite depths were compared with the data mentioned in the
Resources Section. Comparison between these measurements taken in situ and SDB depths (Figure
3C) yielded an outstanding RMSE of 0.52 m (Table 1), which is remarkably good if compared with
similar studies (Westley 2021, 8), where the best RMSE was 2.56 m using Sentinel 2 data (10 m/pixel)
and a polynomial fitting, or Li et al. (2019, 8), who reported an RMSE of 1.67 m using Planet Dove

5

�satellites (four m/pixel). Note that the shipwreck was again covered by sand during the SDB approach;
thus, satellite depths should be slightly larger to reach the hull.
Concerning rock identification, it was found that due to their water penetration capabilities, by
multiplying bands three (cyan) and four (green), submerged rocks in shallow waters were enhanced.
Likewise, rocks above the water were identified by subtracting band eight (red edge) from band seven
(red). The results of applying both algorithms for rock identification are integrated in Figure 3.
Underwater rocks are displayed in red, while rocks above the water are shown in yellow. Validation of
the proposed algorithms for identifying rocks above and below the water was qualitatively
corroborated in Figure 3D by overlying drone imagery over the rocky areas.

Figure 3. SDB results for the Harbour of Sebastos and the Hader port a) RGB; b) SDB map and rock identification
map; c) location of the Caesarea shipwreck points; d) location and validation of the Northern anchorages; Southern
anchorages are enclosed in the white box.

Table 1: Comparison between in situ depth points taken during the Caesarea shipwreck excavation of December 2017
and the SDB map from May 2020.

Measurement
number

Measured depths in situ
(m)

SDB depths
(m)

Depth Difference
(m)

1
2

2.5441
2.5771

3.021
3.021

0.4769
0.4439

3

2.7984

3.021

0.2226

4

2.6654

3.139

0.4736

5

2.5230

3.139

0.716

6

2.8519

3.139

0.2871

7

2.8090

3.118

0.309

8

2.5481

3.118

0.5699

9

2.1775

3.139

0.9615

10

2.7698

3.118

0.3482

RMSE = 0.5253 m
6

�CONCLUSIONS
The results can be used to comprehend the geological and archaeological landscape of the ancient
harbour of Sebastos as well as the northern ridges of Achziv. This approach can be easily replicated in
other regions as long as Chl-a concentrations remain low using any other multispectral set of imagery
(preferably high resolution). The following conclusions can be drawn from this research:
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·

For the Israeli coast, SDB mapping should be done for images taken between March and
September, when Chl-a concentrations are likely lower.
Results show that a high R2 coefficient between ground-truth and spectral data does not
necessarily mean that SDB values will be accurate or trustworthy; hence, special attention
should be given to the environmental conditions at the time of image acquisition.
Both VENÎ¼S products (L3 and L2) yielded highly reliable results and are highly
recommended for SDB bathymetry studies.
The maximum light penetration depth for the coast of Israel was up to 23 m. Errors likely
below this depth.
The product obtained from multiplying bands three and four from VENÎ¼S can be used for
identifying rocks submerged in shallow waters.
The subtraction of band eight from band seven is suitable for detecting rocks above the
water level.
It is strongly recommended to integrate rock identification with SDB for future research
projects.

It will be of special interest to replicate this method in the Asian Pacific to test both light penetration
capabilities and the ideal yearly timing for multispectral image acquisition based on the Chl-a content
of a proposed study area. Likewise, rock detection using other sensors should be examined as well.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research would not have been possible without the support from the University of Haifa scholarships during my M.A.
programme.

7

�BIBLIOGRAPHY
Amante, Christopher J., and Brian W. Eakins. "Accuracy of interpolated bathymetry in digital elevation models." Journal
of Coastal Research 76, (2016): 123-133.
Bergin, B. (2018). â€œThe Innovative Genius of Herod at Caesarea Maritima. Cultural and Religious Studies 6, no.7
(2018): 377-391.
Bowens, A. "Position Fixing." In Underwater Archaeology: The NAS Guide to Principles and Practice, edited by N.
Fleming and J. Dix, 92. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, 2009.
Caston, G. F. â€œWreck marks: indicators of net sand transport.â€ Marine Geology 33, no. 3-4 (1979): 193-204.
Dekker, Arnold G., Stuart R. Phinn, Jody Anstee, Peter Bissett, Vittorio E. Brando, Ben Casey, Peter Fearns, John Hedley,
Wojciech Klonowski, Zhong P. Lee, Merv Lynch, Mitchell Lyons, Curtis Mobley, and Chris Roelfsema.
"Intercomparison of shallow water bathymetry, hydro-optics, and benthos mapping techniques in Australian and
Caribbean coastal environments." Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 9 (2011): 405, 415.
Derenne, B., Nantet, E., Verly, G., and Boone, M. â€œComplementarity between in situ studies and photogrammetry:
methodological feedback from a Roman Shipwreck in Caesarea, Israel.â€ Conference on Underwater 3D Recording
and Modelling-A Tool for Modern Applications and CH Recording 42, no. W10 (2019): 77.
Fitzgerald, M. A. "A Roman merchant ship at Caesarea Maritima, Israel." INA Newsletter 16, no. 2 (1989a): 4-9
Fitzgerald, M. A., and Raban, A. III. S. "Area Y: Roman Shipwreck." In The Harbours of Caesarea Maritima: Results of the
Caesarea Ancient Excavation Project, 1980-1985, vol. 2, edited by Raban, A. et al., 184-190, Oxford: BAR
Publishing, 1989b.
Fitzgerald, M. A. "The Roman Wreck of a Merchantman from Caesarea Maritima." (MA thesis), Texas A &amp; M University,
Texas, 1989c.
Fitzgerald, M. A. "Chapter VI: The Ship." In The Harbours of Caesarea Maritima. Results of the Caesarea Ancient Harbour
Excavation Project (1980-85), vol. 2, edited by Oleson, J. P., 163-223, Oxford: BAR Publishing, 1994.
Fitzgerald, M. A. "Roman Wreck at Caesarea Maritima, Israel: A Comparative Study of Its Hull and Equipment." (PhD
dissertation), Texas A &amp; M University, Texas, 1995.
Galili, E. â€œAncient harbors and anchorages in Caesarea.â€ In Ancient Caesarea-Conservation and Development of a Heritage
Site; Edited by Fuhrmann, Y.L., Porath, S. 11-27, Israel Antiquities Authority: Jerusalem, Israel, 2017.
Galili, E., Salamon, A., Gambash, G., and Zviely, D. â€œArchaeological and Natural Indicators of Sea-Level and Coastal
Changes: The Case Study of the Caesarea Roman Harbor.â€ Geosciences 11, no. 8 (2021): 8-16.
Green, E. P., Mumby, P. J., Edwards, A. J., and Clark, C. "Coastal management sourcebooksâ€ 3. In Remote sensing
handbook for tropical coastal management." Edited by Edwards, A. J., 220-233, Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2000.
Guzinski, R., Spondylis, E., Michalis, M., Tusa, S., Brancato, G., Minno, L., and Hansen, L. B. "Exploring the Utility of
Bathymetry Maps Derived with Multispectral Satellite Observations in the Field of Underwater Archaeology."
Open Archaeology 1 (2016): 243-263.
Jagalingam, P., Akshaya, B. J., and Hegde, A. V. "Bathymetry Mapping Using Landsat 8 Satellite Imagery." Procedia
Engineering 116 (2015): 560-566.
Jasmin, M., Thareani, Y., and Abrahami, P. â€œMission Tel Achziv: Rapport PrÃ©liminaire sur les Deux PremiÃ¨res
Campagnes de Fouilles (2014-2015).â€ Bulletin du Centre de Recherche FranÃ§ais Ã  JÃ©rusalem 26 (2016): 276.
Lee, Z., Weidemann, A., and Arnone, R. "Combined Effect of reduced band number and increased bandwidth on shallow
water remote sensing: The case of worldview 2." IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 51, no.5
(2012): 2578.

8

�Li, J., Knapp, D. E., Lyons, M., Roelfsema, C., Phinn, S., Schill, S. R., and Asner, G. P. "Automated global shallow water
bathymetry mapping using Google Earth Engine." Remote Sensing 13, no.8 (2019): 4.
Li, J., Knapp, D. E., Schill, S. R., Roelfsema, C., Phinn, S., Silman, M., and Asner, G. P. "Adaptive bathymetry estimation
for shallow coastal waters using Planet Dove satellites." Remote Sensing of Environment 232 (2019): 8-11.
Maarleveld, T. J., GuÃ©rin, U., and Egger, B. (Eds.) â€œConservation and Site Management.â€ In Manual for activities directed at
underwater cultural heritage: Guidelines to the annex of the UNESCO 2001 convention. UNESCO, 191-192, Paris:
UNESCO Publishing, 2013.
MarineTraffic. 2023. â€œHadera Port.â€ Accessed on 27 May 2023.
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ports/19583?name=HADERA&amp;country=Israel#Summary
Nantet, Emmanuel. 2020. â€œCaesarea Shipwreck.â€ Accessed on 25 September 2021. http://www.hadashotesi.org.il/report_detail_eng.aspx?id=25879&amp;mag_id=128
Quinn, R. â€œThe role of scour in shipwreck site formation processes and the preservation of wreck-associated scour signatures
in the sedimentary recordâ€“evidence from seabed and sub-surface data.â€ Journal of Archaeological Science 33, no.
10 (2006): 1419-1432.
Raban, A. â€œSebastos: the Royal Harbour at Caesarea Maritimaâ€”A Short Lived Giant.â€ International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology 21, no.2 (1992): 111-124.
Raban, A. J. Underwater excavations in the Herodian harbor Sebastos, 1995-1999 seasons, 129, Oxford: BAR International
Series, 2008.
Raban, A. J., Artzy, M., Goodman, B., and Gal. Z. The Harbour of Sebastos (Caesarea Maritima) in its Roman
Mediterranean Context, 69-149. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2009.
Rahav, E., Belkin, N., Paytan, A., and Herut, B. "Phytoplankton and bacterial response to desert dust deposition in the coastal
waters of the southeastern Mediterranean Sea: A four-year in situ survey." Atmosphere 8 (2018): 305.
Ratzlaff, A., Galili, E., Waiman-Barak, P., and Yasur-Landau, A. â€œThe Plurality of Harbors at Caesarea: The Southern
Anchorage in Late Antiquity.â€ Journal of Maritime Archaeology 12, no.2 (2017): 125-146.
Raveh, O., David, N., Rilov, G., and Rahav, E. "The temporal dynamics of coastal phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in the
Eastern Mediterranean Sea." PLoS One 10, no.10 (2015): 1-23.
Sam, L., Prusty, G., and Gahlot, N. "Evaluation of optical remote sensing-based shallow water bathymetry for recursive
mapping." Geocarto International 33, no.7 (2018): 1-14.
Stumpf, R. P., Holderied, K., and Sinclair, M. "Determination of Water Depth with High-Resolution Satellite Imagery over
Variable Bottom Types." Limnology and Oceanography 48, no. 1/2 (2003): 547-550.
Shipnext. 2023. â€œThe Shipping Platform.â€ Accessed on 27 July 2023. https://shipnext.com/port/hadera-ilhad-isr
Traganos, D., Poursanidis, D., Aggarwal, B., Chrysoulakis, N., and Reinartz, P. "Estimating satellite-derived bathymetry
(SDB) with the Google Earth Engine and Sentinel-2." Remote Sensing 10, no.6 (2018): 2-5.
VENÎ¼S. 2023. "VENÎ¼S Mission and Products." VENÎ¼S (Vegetation and Environment monitoring New Micro Satellite),
accessed on 23 May 2023. https://venus.bgu.ac.il/Links/VENuS_mission_summary_VM05_v02.pdf
Westley, K., Plets, R., and Quinn, R. â€œHolocene paleo geographic reconstructions of the Ramore Head area, Northern
Ireland, using geophysical and geotechnical data: Paleo landscape mapping and archaeological
implications.â€ Geoarchaeology 29, no. 6 (2014): 411-430.
Westley, K. "Satellite-derived bathymetry for maritime archaeology: Testing its effectiveness at two ancient harbours in the
Eastern Mediterranean." Journal of Archaeological Science 38, (2021): 8.

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="57">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="319">
                  <text>2023 Session 21: New Technologies and Interdisciplinary Strategies for the Promotion and Protection of Maritime Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="320">
                  <text>Session 21 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="321">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 21 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="322">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="323">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="324">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="325">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="326">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="327">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6087">
                <text>Satellite-derived bathymetry and rock detection for maritime archaeology using VENµS imagery</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6088">
                <text>Since its beginnings in 1975, deriving bathymetry by means of multispectral satellite imagery has been a method&#13;
that has not yet been fully exploited in the maritime archaeology realm. It focuses on using the blue and green&#13;
bands for their water penetration capabilities to later convert each pixel into depth values. This method can be&#13;
replicated in time and space, while keeping costs low and covering large areas. In this research, two highresolution bathymetric maps using VENµS satellite imagery and a variation of Stumpf’s equation were&#13;
produced. Two archaeological sites were selected: the harbour of Sebastos (built by King Herod) and the Achziv&#13;
ridges on the northern coast of Israel. The importance of collecting satellite imagery under low Chl-a [mg/m3]&#13;
conditions is addressed, and an algorithm for identifying shallow rocks above and below the water level is&#13;
included. Our research suggests that satellite-derived bathymetry mapping along the Israeli coast is more&#13;
efficient for satellite images taken between March and September, when Chl-a concentrations are likely to be&#13;
lower; maximum depth penetration using VENμS is found to be approximately up to 23 m depth with a Root&#13;
Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.53.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6089">
                <text>Gerardo Diaz</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6090">
                <text>Yoav Lehahn</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6091">
                <text>Emmanuel Nantet</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6092">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6093">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6094">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6095">
                <text>Diaz, Gerardo. 2023. “Satellite-derived bathymetry and rock detection for maritime archaeology using VENµS imagery.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T.  Kurlt Knoerl, and Hans van Tilburg. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1914 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="59">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 21 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="544" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="335">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/88a6a949dfd7178bd3445fe4eb22138a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>16dcbcccbbb8647d5df1433c10710ac7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6086">
                    <text>THE SOCIAL HISTORY OF ARTEFACTS AND THE LAW IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
Professor Craig Forrest (University of Queensland, Director, Marine and Shipping Law Unit)
ABSTRACT
The loading of objects on a vessel, their loss, then physical discovery, recovery and subsequent movement, all
take place in a legal context. That context is not static and cannot be viewed entirely in hindsight from the now.
In unravelling the legal rights and interest to recovered objects the inter-temporal nature of the law requires
consideration and possible application. Moreover, irrespective of what law applies at any given time, this
intertemporal legal context reflects evolving values and is part of the object’s social history. This paper examines
this intertemporal nature of salvage law and other related laws as they might apply to objects recovered in
Southeast Asia over the past 40 years.

THE COLLECTION
The Abbott Collection comprises approximately 2300 ceramics purchased by a private collector from
antique markets in Indonesia and Singapore between 1966 and 2016. The collection has never been
catalogued but is believed to include ceramics from a wide range of South-East Asian States, including
Thailand, China, Indonesia and Viet Nam, with some dating from at least the 9th century
(Polkinghorne 2022, 11-12).
As collectables, these ceramics have little or no provenience or provenance other than, in some cases,
the identity of the seller in Indonesia or Singapore. Marine encrustations and glaze condition, together
with information provided by the antique sellers in some cases, suggests that most were recovered
from shipwrecks in Indonesian waters. Otherwise, little is known about these ceramics. They could,
however, reveal much about the Maritime Silk Route and the entities involved. In investigating these
ceramics, the project seeks to establish the ceramics “original cultural and historical contexts and to
re-establish links to their communities of origin” (Polkinghorne 2022, 12). This entails undertaking
provenience and provenance research and linking the collection with communities with verifiable links
to each ceramic. That link could be the place of manufacture, the place of loading on board the ship,
the nationality of the ship and or its owners, or the place of its sinking. That link could also include
those who recovered the ceramics from the shipwrecks, facilitated its movement to market, and
ultimately the seller and purchaser.

THE LEGAL CONTEXT
The collector purchased the ceramics and shipped them from Indonesia or Singapore to Australia in
good faith and in the belief that all actions were in accordance with the laws as understood at the time.
Nevertheless, the lack of any provenience or provenance at the time of purchase means that the legal
context would have been largely unknown. As this project reveals the provenience of each ceramic so
the provenance and wider legal context will require investigation and application. With 2300 ceramics
acquired over a 50-year period, such an undertaking is onerous. This is made more complex as the
manufacture of a particular ceramic, its loading on board a vessel, loss, then physical discovery,
recovery and subsequent movement, all take place in a legal context that changes over time and place.
That context is not static and cannot be viewed entirely in hindsight from the now. This paper
considers this inter-temporal nature of the applicable law, as well as its determination across place –
jurisdictions.
This consideration of the legal context is not, however, purely for the purpose of determining its
current status. The applicable law – in time and place – also reflects the social history of the ceramic.

1

�Each ceramic in this collection was a trade good; manufactured as a commodity. Who owned it, how it
was traded, and how it was shipped would have been governed by the law at that point in time.
Moreover, that law might differ depending on where the ceramic was at that point in time. As such, if
for example, it was manufactured in what is now China, the law of that place might apply to
ownership when manufactured, but the law of some other place, such as what is now Singapore, might
have applied to the sale of the ceramic while the law of the nationality of the ship or its owner might
apply to its transportation. Moreover, what these laws were in the 15th century will be quite different to
that applied in the 18th century.
Having been lost at sea, the ceramics in this collection were likely salvaged sometime in the last 100
years, and more likely only in the last 50 years, given the state of diving and salvage technology. Most,
but perhaps not all, of the ceramics in this collection are thought to have been recovered in waters over
which Indonesia today exercises some form of jurisdiction, and if in the territorial waters – which is
most likely - absolute sovereignty. But it may not have been salvaged by an Indonesian national or
from an Indonesian vessel, and at the time of salvage, the location of the shipwreck might not have
been in Indonesian waters given the changes in jurisdiction over the last 100 years.
Even within Indonesian territorial waters, the law of Indonesia has also changed considerably,
especially in the last 30 years.

INDONESIAN LAW
The earliest applicable Indonesian law that will have applied is ‘Barang Muatan Kapal Tenggelam
(BMKT)’ which translates to ‘valuable items recovered from shipwreck’, contained in Chapter VII of
the Indonesian Commercial Code since 1938 and based on traditional Dutch salvage law. That is not to
say that it was actually applied and there are likely to have been many cases where local communities
simply recovered ceramics and sold them to dealers without recourse to any legal mechanisms; and
without any original owner to pursue the ceramics, no legal issues would have arisen.
Indonesian law also provided some protection over cultural heritage that was also based on early
Dutch colonial law. In 1931, the colonial government enacted the Monumenten Ordonnantie Number
19 of 1931 (Stbld. 1931 no. 238) which imposed an obligation to register cultural property and banned
their export. This Law was subsequently amended by Monumenten Ordonnantie Number 21 in 1934
(Stbld. 1934 no. 515). It is not likely these laws applied to underwater cultural heritage.
Following the salvage and sale of ceramics from the Geldermalsen, Indonesia introduced legislation,
Presidential Decree Number 43 of 1989, that regulated the salvage of historic wrecks and asserted
ownership of all wrecks within Indonesian territorial waters (Pearson 2019, 709). This legislation also
established the National Committee for the Recovery and Utilisation of Valuable Items from
Shipwrecks. This Presidential Decree was subsequently replaced with Presidential Decree Number 25
of 1992 together with Law No. 5 year 1992 concerning Cultural Heritage, which was enacted
following the Belitung looting in the early 1990s. At the same time, the salvage law regime was also
changed when Chapter VII was taken out of the Commercial Code and replaced with Law Number 21
of 1992 concerning Navigation (which was later replaced by Law No. 17 of 2008 concerning
Navigation) (Nayati 1998, 144).
Further legislative changes occurred in the 2000s. In 2009, a Minister of Finance Regulation No. 184
of 2009 addressed Procedures for Determining the Status of Use and Sale of Valuable Objects from the
Ship's Shipwreck, followed, in 2010, by amendments to the law protecting cultural property in Law
No. 11 of 2010 that imposed a temporary moratorium on commercial salvage. This was made
permanent in 2016 in Presidential Decree No. 44 of 2016 which included historic wrecks in one of the
Negative List of Investment, effectively imposed a moratorium on salvage operations (Pearson 2019,
709). Other relevant regulations include an export ban under Ministry of Trade Regulation No.
44/M-DAG/PER/7/2012 and optimisation of Indonesian cultural heritage under Law No. 5 of 2017
2

�concerning Cultural Advancement. Most recently, Presidential Decree No. 1 of 2022 concerning
Registration of Cultural Property was introduced. These amendments were largely intended to ensure
that Indonesia kept significant and scarce artefacts stored in museums. But legislative definitions of
‘cultural heritage value’ and ‘national identity’ are so ambiguous as to have little or no legislative
significance.
Most importantly, Presidential Decree Number 8 of 2023 reinstituted the government-controlled
salvage regime, which reverted to the shared model of public/private sharing of the salvage of
underwater cultural heritage (UCH).

AUSTRALIAN LAW
While the Indonesian law is pertinent to the provenance of the ceramics, the collection is in Australia
and subject to Australian – South Australian and Federal – law. It is thus principally Australian law
that governs the ceramics. In light of the socio-legal history of a ceramic, how then is Australian law
to address them? While this short paper cannot address this complex issue in detail, three important
underlying principles are considered: the nature of inter-temporal law, non-retrospectivity and the
choice of law in conflict of laws.
Inter-temporal law
The doctrine of intertemporal law, in the words of Judge Huber of the International Permanent Court
of Arbitration, means that “a juridical fact must be appreciated in the light of the law contemporary
with it, and not of the law in force at the time when a dispute in regard to it arises or falls to be settled”
(Island of Palmas 1932, 845; Elias 1980, 286).
As such, whether the recovery of a particular ceramic in, say, 1967, was legal, recourse must be had to
the law that existed in 1967 at the place where the salvage occurred, or, if then in international waters,
at the place where the ceramic was landed. It is the law as then in existence that will determine rights
and duties of the relevant actors, including the salvor, the original owner and the relevant State. The
collection is therefore going to be divided into categories dependant on the governing law at the time
and place of their recovery; each category giving rise to possibly different rights and obligations. The
greater the incremental change in the law in a particular place and the more places involved, the more
categories are likely to emerge.
Judge Huber went on to clarify the doctrine by declaring that “as regards the question which of
different legal systems prevailing at successive periods is to be applied in a particular case (the
so-called intertemporal law), a distinction must be made between the creation of rights and the
existence of rights” (Island of Palmas, 1932 845; Elias 1980, 286).
What this means is that while the right might be acquired in accordance with the law at that time, its
continued validity is also dependant on the law at any point in time thereafter when the right is
relevant to a dispute. This clarification on the doctrine is, at least in an international law context, is
subject to some debate but as a general proposition it is appropriate for the case in question (Elias
1980, 292). It means that, for example, the salvor might acquire salvage rights over the wreck, but
over time, should the law as to the rights of the salvor over the wreck site change, then the changed
law might apply. That new law would not address the acquisition of the right to the wreck, but only the
continuation of that right. The debate concerning this clarification of the doctrine lies in the risk that
the application of a new law might, in effect, amount to a retrospective law that negates the original
acquisition of the right. This is a particular risk where the new law arises from a statutory instrument
or an international agreement domestically implemented, such as the 2001 UNESCO Convention on
the Protection of UCH (2001 Convention).

3

�The emergence of Australia’s Historic Shipwreck Act 1976 might illustrate this point. The Act was
adopted in part to address the discovery of a number of old Dutch shipwrecks and the recovery of
objects from these sites. For current purposes, the recovery was legal in accordance with the law at the
time, and as such, the new Act could not apply retrospectively such that it negated the acquisition of
the salvage rights of the salvors. The Act did, however, impose a new obligation on the salvors: a
requirement that they register all objects that had been recovered from those sites. Since his new law
did not impact the right acquired at the time of recovery, but imposed a new statutory obligation, it
applied only from 1976 onwards.
Inter-temporal law then is not only a consideration of the rights acquired at the relevant point in time,
but also the impact that changing laws then have on those rights over time (and place), provided that
the new law did not apply retrospectively.
Non-retrospectivity
The prohibition of the application of any law retrospectively is often, but not universally, regarded as a
fundamental principle of law, especially with respect to criminal law (Kryvoi and Matos 2021, 46). It
is generally applied to international conventions such as the 2001 Convention. As codified in article 28
of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties which declares that “[u]nless a different intention
appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, its provisions do not bind a party in relation to any
act or fact which took place or any situation which ceased to exist before the date of the entry into
force of the treaty with respect to that party”.
As article 28 evinces, this is not an absolute prohibition. Indeed, States may give a treaty, or some of
its provisions, retroactive effect (von der Decken 2018, 510). Many States, for example, argued the
1970 UNESCO Convention that addresses the illicit trafficking of cultural heritage, should have
applied retrospectively in order to address the loss of their heritage during the colonial era. Whilst not
accepted, this nevertheless illustrates the circumstance in which States may regard retroactivity as
legitimate. It may thus be open to a State such as Indonesia to address the issue of salvage and export
of UCH through retrospective legislation, though this may come at a cost in terms of claims for lost
rights from individuals. Such legislation would have to be unequivocal in its scope of application. It
remains to be seen whether this research project will reveal any instances of retrospective legislative
application and its effect on the applicable law.
Choice of law in conflict of laws
Since the Abbott Collection ceramics are found in Australia, only Australia has the judicial capacity to
determine and enforce rights to them. It is thus Australian law that applies. That does not, however
necessarily mean that Australian domestic rules will apply given Australian choice of law rules that
are applied when there is a conflict between the laws of different jurisdictions relevant to the dispute in
question; and in this case between the laws of Australia and Indonesia (though other jurisdiction may
also be pertinent, such as China, Viet Nam etc, depending on the ceramic in question). As a general
proposition, the Australian common law choice of law rule for rights to property is the law of the place
where a property was situated at the time the property right is said to be acquired - the lex rei sitae
(Davies et.al 2019, 795). A salvor’s property right to ceramics salvaged in Indonesian territorial sea
will therefore be determined in accordance with Indonesian law at that time, even if that dispute were
to be adjudicated in Australia. Where the location is not in Indonesian waters, the determination of the
applicable law may be rather more complex and require detailed consideration of the conflict of law
rules in an intertemporal context: not always an easy undertaking.

4

�A SOCIO-LEGAL HISTORY OF THINGS
The ceramics in this collection, ranging from as early as the 9th century and recovered in different
locations over a period of 50 years, means the applicable law at any given point in time is not a
straightforward task. If identifying a particular right, or the legality of a particular act needs to be
determined, then this is a necessary task. But for each ceramic the continually changing legal context
is also part of its social history. The applicable law would have played a role in shaping the initial
commodification of the ceramic, its transformation across space and time as its exchange value and
use by different social groups have altered to a point where it is elevated beyond commodification and
transformed into a public good This project therefore not only seeks to identify and apply the relevant
law to each ceramic, but to place its socio-legal history as a fundamental component of the ceramic as
we understand and utilise it today.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Davies, Martin; Bell, Andrew, Brereton, Pau and Douglas, Michael. Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia, 10th
ed LexisNexis, 2019.
Elias, T.O. “The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law” The American Journal of International Law n. 74 (1980) 285.
Hatcher, Michael and Thorncraft, Anthony The Nanking Cargo Hamish Hamilton 1987
Island of Palmas case (Netherlands, United States) 2 R. Int’l Arb. Awards 831
Polkinghorne, Martin. Reuniting cargoes: Underwater Cultural Heritage of the Maritime Silk Route, Australian
Research Council Linkage Grant, 2022 (on file with author)
Kryvoi, Yarik and Matos, Shaun. “Non-Retroactivity as a General Principle of Law” Utrecht Law Review no.
17(1) (2021) 46–58.
Nayati, Pudak. “Ownership Rights Over Archaeological/ Historical Objects Found in Indonesian Waters:
Republic of Indonesia Act No 5 Of 1992 on Cultural Heritage Objects and its Related Regulation” Singapore
Journal of International and Comparative Law, no. 2 (1998): 142 – 174.
Pearson, Natali. “Protecting and Preserving UCH in SE Asia.” in The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. Edited
by Hufnagel, Saskia and Chappell, Duncan, 685-730. Palgrave MacMillan, 2019
von der Decken, Kersten. ‘Article 28’ in Oliver Dőrr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds) Vienna Convention on the
Law of Treaties: A Commentary Springer Palgrave, 2018 510.

5

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="60">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="346">
                  <text>2023 Session 24: Recovering dispersed and salvaged legacy collections of UCH in Southeast Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="347">
                  <text>Session 24 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="348">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 24 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="349">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="350">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="351">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="352">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="353">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="354">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6079">
                <text>The Social History of Artefacts and the Law in Southeast Asia  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6080">
                <text>The loading of objects on a vessel, their loss, then physical discovery, recovery and subsequent movement, all&#13;
take place in a legal context. That context is not static and cannot be viewed entirely in hindsight from the now.&#13;
In unravelling the legal rights and interest to recovered objects the inter-temporal nature of the law requires&#13;
consideration and possible application. Moreover, irrespective of what law applies at any given time, this&#13;
intertemporal legal context reflects evolving values and is part of the object’s social history. This paper examines&#13;
this intertemporal nature of salvage law and other related laws as they might apply to objects recovered in&#13;
Southeast Asia over the past 40 years.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6081">
                <text>Craig Forrest</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6082">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6083">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6084">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6085">
                <text>Forrest, Craig. 2023. “The social history of artefacts and the law in Southeast Asia.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, and T. Kurt Knoerl. Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1913 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="58">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 24 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="543" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="334">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/1a998882def4719a29729a35d110c954.pdf</src>
        <authentication>109ba92ad732ad752e8068cb3a296555</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6078">
                    <text>Analysis of UNESCO Best Practices of Underwater Cultural Heritage from the
perspective of marine sustainable development and challenges in 2022 New
Chinese UCH Regulations
Liu lina
Associate Professor in Xi’an Jiaotong University, PhD. Master's Supervisor. Research interests in
cultural heritage law, international law, IP law. Email:liulina@ xjtu.edu.cn

ABSTRACT
The topic of this paper fits best within this Session17, the 2001 Convention: from ‘constructive
ambiguities’ to ‘destructive misunderstandings’ ,because it summarizes the ways in which underwater
cultural heritage contributes to the sustainable development as a Marine resource through its own
inheritance and development, and suggests that China should change its legislative idea of underwater
cultural heritage.
The case studies under consideration are the latest 13 Best Practices of UNESCO 2001 Convention for
the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage, which are analyzed in three aspects: 1) legal
protection based on the legislative concept of marine resource law, 2) protection of cultural heritage
resources through long-term monitoring and dynamic classification, and 3) sharing the benefits of
cultural resources and environmental economic development.
The resources available to conduct the work include the list of Best Practices of UNESCO 2001
Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage and China's newly revised version of
Regulations on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage in 2022.
The research questions are how underwater cultural heritage can contribute to the sustainable
development of the oceans through its own inheritance and development, and how China should
change its legislative idea of underwater cultural heritage. The research approaches are case review and
legal text analysis.
The results are the legal protection of underwater cultural heritage in international law with the concept
of resource law, and China’s responses.

Keywords: Underwater Cultural Heritage; Best Practices; sustainable development; UNESCO

1

�1.

INTRODUCTION

The topic of this paper fits best within this Session 17, the 2001 Convention: from
‘constructive ambiguities’ to ‘destructive misunderstandings’, because the newly revised
Chinese Regulations on the Protection and Administration of Underwater Cultural Relics is
implemented in April 2022. The protection of underwater cultural heritage (hereinafter
referred to as “UCH”) in China is facing a historical opportunity of rapid development of
environmental and resource protection. This paper proposes the rule of law that
environmental resources should be used to promote the sustainable development of
underwater cultural heritage, through the evaluation and analysis of the current UNESCO
"Best Practice of Underwater Cultural Heritage". And this paper lays out that China should
change the concept of governance of underwater cultural relics - from the protection of
cultural relics themself only to the governance of environmental resources.
2.

CASE STUDIES

The case studies under consideration are the Best Practices of UNESCO 2001
Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred
to as “the 2001 UNESCO convention”).

In 2015, the Meeting of States Parties (hereinafter referred to as “MSP”), by its
Resolution 4/5MSP adopted at its fifth session, wished to strengthen cooperation
among States Parties by inviting them to submit examples of Best Practices in the
implementation of the Convention. To submit a Best Practice example to the
Conference of States Parties, heritage must1:
● i）fall within the definition of Article 1 of the 2001 Convention or is at least
100 years old, but is classified as underwater cultural heritage under national
legislation, ii) be adequately protected both legally and practically, in
particular through the implementation of the Rules concerning activities
directed at underwater cultural heritage of the Convention, iii) respect
responsible and non-intrusive access, iv) have a framework for sustainable
management.
These Best Practices are evaluated by the Scientific and Technical Advisory Body
(hereinafter referred to as “STAB”), which makes recommendations to the MSP
1

https://en.unesco.org/underwater-heritage/best-practices
2

�regarding their designation. Until May 2023, this establishes a register of 13 Best
Practices for use by all States Parties to the 2001 UNESCO Convention. After
consideration, the reasons are analyzed in three aspects.
2.1

The establishment of national legal frameworks for UCH protection

First of all, the Best Practice encourages countries to ensure their legal protection for UCH
archaeology, conservation, and management by establishment of national legal

frameworks for UCH protection. There are 6 Spain’s UCH practices2 selected into the
list of Best Practices, benefiting from a series of special laws. For example, the Historical
Heritage Act (law 16/1985 of 25 June, on Spanish Historical Heritage ) and the Andalusian
Historic

Heritage

Law

(Law

14/2007 of 26

November on

the Historical

Heritage of Andalusia). Secondly, the Best Practices encourages countries to make specific
laws that define their own underwater cultural heritage. According to the Portuguese law
"Decree No. 164/97 on underwater archaeological activities[3]", underwater heritage is
recognized on the basis of its cultural value, not on the basis of 100 years. Spanish law
believes the value of underwater heritage reflects the memory and identity of the marine
community, which is more important than age. In 2009, the National Museum of Underwater
Archaeology of Spain (ARQUA) launched The National Plan for the Protection of
Underwater Cultural Heritage (the Green Book), which aims to the adoption of a series of
specific measures for the protection, conservation and diffusion of this rich heritage in waters
to create awareness, in a coordinated way, for all the departments and public government
bodies involved in this protection.in Spain. Finally, Protection and fight against commercial
exploitation by law. One of the six Best Practice, the Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes Project,
Spain4 is an excellent example for UCH protection by effectively combating illegal
commercial salvage activities on an international level and resolving ownership issues
through judicial means. And the de las Mercedes cargo was definitively deposited in the
2

Such as “Andalusian Underwater Heritage Conservation Project,Spain”, “Cap del Vol and Cala Cativa

shipwrecks, Spain”，“Deltebre I shipwreck, Spain”, “the Bou Ferrer Shipwreck, Spain”, “the Nuestra Senora de las
Mercedes Project, Spain”, “The National Museum of Underwater Archaeology（ARQUA）,Spain”
3

UNESCO.List of National Cultural Heritage Laws,

https://en.unesco.org/cultnatlaws/list/last-update-august-2015?page=50&amp;order=title_field&amp;sort=asc
4

On May 18, 2007, the US company Odyssey Marine Exploration announced in the media that it had transported a

cargo of 500,000 gold and silver coins to the United States but did not give any information about the identity of
the wreck from which the extraction originates or the exact location of the extraction.The Spanish government, in
the face of suspicion that a Spanish ship could be treated,decides to wage a legal battle against the treasures haut
company in the courts of United States, Finally, on February 14, 2012, the US courts give the final reason to the
Spanish State to  return the cargo to Spain in 2022. More information on website:
https://www.culturaydeporte.gob.es/mnarqua/en/colecciones/yacimientos/ns-mercedes.html
3

�National Museum of Underwater Archeology in 2012.
2.2

To promote the appropriate conservation of UCH through long-term monitoring

and dynamic classification
The best practice also emphasizes long-term monitoring and dynamic protection models of
UCH. Firstly, it shows how to establish UCH databases to improve the electronic information
management. Compared with the cultural heritage on land, information of UCH is more
difficult to collect. In 2004, the government of Andalusia in Spain established the
Management and Information System of Cultural Assets of Andalusia (MOSAICO), which
systematically manages hundreds of historical shipwrecks in the region. Secondly, the daily
management of UCH requires multiple and dynamic monitoring. For example, Portugal has
formed a conventional management model with multiple departments, interdisciplinary
personnel to protect UCH in the Cascais region: the UCH management is carried out by the
Cascais City Council. Underwater archaeologists have dedicated their time and effort to locate
those sites, by drafting an archaeological map. Besides, the Directorate General of Cultural
Heritage, the National Maritime Authority, and the Cascais Port Authority, which are
responsible for different protection issues. Lastly, a dynamic and continuous model of

UCH conservation should be developed. For example, the "Underwater Cultural
Heritage in Chinchorro Bank, Mexico" was selected as Best Practice in 2019,
developed interdisciplinary studies to understand the formation and the transformation
processes of submerged archaeological contexts. The Sub-Directorate of Underwater
Archaeology of the Mexican National of Anthropology and History Institute (INAH)
has been conducting investigations and evaluations of 69 underwater sites recorded in
the region's underwater cultural resources database since 2006.
2.3

Increase public awareness, recognition and protection of heritage

Best practices encourage responsible and non-intrusive public access to underwater
cultural heritage in accordance with Articles 2.55 and 2.106 of the Convention,
because public awareness can prompt regional economic growth and protect UCH.
Several examples of Best Practices have shown that UCH protection and economic
development are mutually reinforcing. First of all, local governments can develop
5

Articles 2.5: The preservation in situ of underwater cultural heritage shall be considered as the first option before

allowing or engaging in any activities directed at this heritage.
6

Articles 2.10: Responsible non-intrusive access to observe or document in situ underwater cultural heritage shall

be encouraged to create public awareness, appreciation, and protection of the heritage except where such access is
incompatible with its protection and management. 
4

�non-intrusive and diverse UCH tourism activities which have demonstrated the
protection of cultural resources and environmental development complement each
other. For example, the “underwater archaeology Museum in Ferte de san Jose El
Alto, Mexico7” One of two locations of this Museum of Campeche is in Playa Bonita,
which strengthen the visibility of UCH and promote economic growth through
various public hands-on activities. Another example is the "the Barge Arles-Rhône 3,
France8" was taken out of the waters of the Rhône in 2011 to be restored and it thus
joined the very exclusive club of boats found complete (or almost) in excavations, and
presented in The Departmental Museum of Arles Antique in 2013. This Museum was
expanded in order to exhibit these wrecks since 2013. Hence, it is also a good
demonstration of boosting economic growth by constructing an underwater
archaeological museum, which can share and display the submerged underwater
heritage to the public.
3.

RESOURCES

The resources available to conduct the work include the list of Best Practices of
UNESCO 2001 Convention9 (which have been analyzed above) and latest revised
version of Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Protection and
Management of Underwater Cultural Relics in 202210.
In the 1980s, China began to pay attention to the importance of marine resources and
underwater cultural relics. In order to protect the marine resources, and reasonable
and effective use of water resources, the State Council has successively promulgated
Marine Environment Protection Law of the People's Republic of China and the Water.
In order to manage the protection of underwater cultural relics, the Regulations of the
People's Republic of China on the Protection and Management of Underwater
Cultural Relics”(hereinafter referred to as the "The Chinese UCH Regulation") were
promulgated in 1989. Since then, China's UCH protection has developed with laws to
follow, and China has become one of the few countries in the world to formulate
7

https://www.inah.gob.mx/red-de-museos

8

https://www.arlesantique.fr/le-musee/lhistoire-du-musee

9

Best Practices of UNESCO 2001 Convention: https://en.unesco.org/underwater-heritage/best-practices

10

Regulations on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (2022 version),

https://www.doc88.com/p-41999417420347.html
5

�specialized legal regulations for UCH.
Since the implementation of 1989 Chinese UCH Regulation for 30 years, the close
relationship between UCH and other marine resources has become deeply realized by
Chinese legal experts. UCH in China (such as sunken ships and submerged towns and
villages) serve as stable and long-term habitats for marine life. The Chinese UCH
Regulation revised in 2022 is mindful of the concept of coordinated and integrated
management of UCH as an important marine resource.
4.

FRAMEWORK

The research questions are how Chinese UCH can sustainably develop as a marine
resource, through the change of Chinese legislative idea of UCH after analysis of the
UCH best practices in 2001 UNESCO Convention. The research approaches are case
review and legal text analysis of the Chinese UCH Regulation (2022 version）.
The Chinese UCH Regulation (2022 version）was implemented in April 2022.
Drawing on 13 UCH best practices of 2001 UNESCO Convention. China needs to
change the legal idea from the protection of UCH itself to the management of a kind
of marine resource along with promotion of the high-quality development of UCH.
The approach of rule of law presents 3 aspects.
Firstly, according to different types of underwater heritage, enhance the capacity
building of China UCH as marine cultural resources. For example, the duty of "other
relevant departments of governments" as the coordinating authority is clarified in the
Chinese UCH Regulation (2022 version）. It takes into account the need to consider
the development and utilization of UCH in the use of sea area, and the need to pay
attention to the protection of underwater resources in the development of fisheries and
port operations, and the need not to neglect UCH in port security and military use of
the sea area. Article 4(2)5 provides that “other relevant departments of the people’s
governments at or above the county level shall be responsible for the work concerning
the protection of underwater cultural relics within the scope of their respective scope
of responsibilities”, which clarify the responsibility of “other government
departments” as the coordinating authorities.

6

�Secondly, adhering to sustainable development of UCH, Chinese legal protection of
UCH need to formulate a dynamic and long-term management instead of only the
establishment of UCH databases. Taking protection of UCH as an example of marine
use, the Chinese UCH Regulation (2022 version）adds a consultation mechanism for
the delimitation of the protected zone of UCH. The Article 7(2) states that “for the
delimitation and adjustment of underwater cultural relics reserves, the opinions of
relevant departments and holders of rights to use water areas should be solicited,
advice of experts and the public shall be taken, and the opinions of relevant military
organs shall also be solicited where military administrative areas and military use of
seas are involved”5. Thus, it is clear that UCH, as a type of water resource, should be
consulted through the mechanism of delimitation and adjustment of UCH protection
areas, the relevant departments and the right to use the waters should be consulted.
Thirdly, UCH, as a kind of non-renewable marine cultural resource, so the the
Chinese UCH Regulation (2022 version) shall increase public awareness and
participation,

and

encourage

UCH

protection coordinated with economic

development. Art. 16 is a new article that is “the competent cultural relics
departments, cultural relics collection entities, and other entities shall, by holding
exhibitions, visits, scientific research, and other means, fully maximize the role of
underwater cultural relics, strengthen the publicity and education of Chinese excellent
traditional culture and the legal system for the protection of underwater cultural relics,
and improve the awareness of the whole society for protection of underwater cultural
relics and the enthusiasm for participating in the protection of underwater cultural
relics”5. Take the “Nanhai No.1 shipwreck11” for example, in 2007, China Central
Television（CCTV) broadcasted the entire salvage of the "NanhaiNo.1 shipwreck",
which attracted public attention. The construction of the Nanhai No. 1 shipwreck
Museum, also called “The Guangdong Maritime Silk Road Museum”. Nowadays,
Hailing Island, where the “The Guangdong Maritime Silk Road Museum '' is located,
is already Top 10 most popular islands in China, with beautiful scenery and cultural
relics accompanying it.

11

No.1 Nanhai shipwreck,a shipwreck dating back to the Song Dynasty (960 A.D.-1279 A.D.),. The excavation the

ancient shipwreck was listed by China in its top 10 archaeological discoveries for 2019. More information on
website: https://www.msrmuseum.com/Home/Enindex
7

�5.

RESULTS

The results are that from the perspective of marine sustainable development,
protection UCH under the Chinese UCH Regulation (2022 version) faced new
challenges. On the basis of a clear and complete UCH database formed, regular monitoring
and continuous dynamic management should be established for specific UCH projects.
Flexibly utilizing UCH, such as non-intrusive tours, on the other hand should be invested

in the conversation of UCH with economic growth
After analyzing the new developments of UCH legal protection in China, it becomes
obvious that isolated national UCH legal systems still face the problems in the
effective protection of the UCH. The 2001 UNESCO Convention provides for its
States Parties an effective international cooperation scheme. It is beneficial for a state,
like China, to protect its national UCH under the legal instrument of the UNESCO
2001 Convention.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

8

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="53">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="283">
                  <text>2023 Session 17: The 2001 Convention: from ‘constructive ambiguities’ to ‘destructive misunderstandings’</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="284">
                  <text>Session 17 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="285">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 17 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="286">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="287">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="288">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="289">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="290">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="291">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6071">
                <text>Analysis of UNESCO Best Practices of Underwater Cultural Heritage from the&#13;
perspective of marine sustainable development and challenges in 2022 New Chinese UCH Regulations&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6072">
                <text>The topic of this paper fits best within this Session17, the 2001 Convention: from ‘constructive&#13;
ambiguities’ to ‘destructive misunderstandings’ ,because it summarizes the ways in which underwater&#13;
cultural heritage contributes to the sustainable development as a Marine resource through its own&#13;
inheritance and development, and suggests that China should change its legislative idea of underwater&#13;
cultural heritage.&#13;
The case studies under consideration are the latest 13 Best Practices of UNESCO 2001 Convention for&#13;
the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage, which are analyzed in three aspects: 1) legal&#13;
protection based on the legislative concept of marine resource law, 2) protection of cultural heritage&#13;
resources through long-term monitoring and dynamic classification, and 3) sharing the benefits of&#13;
cultural resources and environmental economic development.&#13;
The resources available to conduct the work include the list of Best Practices of UNESCO 2001&#13;
Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage and China's newly revised version of&#13;
Regulations on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage in 2022.&#13;
The research questions are how underwater cultural heritage can contribute to the sustainable&#13;
development of the oceans through its own inheritance and development, and how China should&#13;
change its legislative idea of underwater cultural heritage. The research approaches are case review and&#13;
legal text analysis.&#13;
The results are the legal protection of underwater cultural heritage in international law with the concept&#13;
of resource law, and China’s responses.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6073">
                <text>Liu lina</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6074">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6075">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6076">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6077">
                <text>Lina, Liu. 2023. “Analysis of UNESCO Best Practices of Underwater Cultural Heritage from the perspective of marine sustainable development and challenges in 2022 New Chinese UCH Regulations.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Mariano Azna. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1912 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="57">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 17 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="542" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="333">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/ec28e12b41c45c37b9eb472c7d3cc427.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4b983e86c60a5911c3b8876bd21a7003</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6070">
                    <text>Motivating and Enabling Pacific States to Ratify the 2001 UCH
Convention
Dennis Marita (Director of the Culture Division at the Ministry of Culture and Tourism,Solomon
Islands)
Ellen Lekka (UNESCO, Samoa)
Craig Forrest (University of Queensland)
ABSTRACT
Ratifications of the 2001 UCH Convention by Pacific States has been poor. Using Solomon Islands and the Marshall Islands
as case studies, this paper begins by considering the utility of the 2001 UCH Convention for these States before turning to the
difficulties and challenges in enabling ratification. These include not only capacity issues but also the extent to which
ratification requires amendment of existing laws and broader policy issues relating, for example, to tourism and international
relations.
KEYWORDS: Solomon Islands; Marshall Islands; UNESCO

INTRODUCTION
There are 15 States widely regarded as Pacific States - Federated States of Micronesia
(FSM), Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Fiji, Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu,
Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu, New Zealand, Cook Islands and Niue – and a number of territories
belonging to Australia, United States and France. Of these Pacific States only two have ratified
the 2001 UCH Convention: FSM and Nuie. With 72 States Party to the 2001 UCH Convention,
this is a significant under-representation. The more so when considering the extent of the
maritime zones (exclusive economic zones and continental shelf) of these States, which together
make up the largest maritime domain in the world’s largest ocean. This non-participation was
reflected in the negotiations that led to the 2001 UCH Convention at which only New Zealand,
Papua New Guinea and Samoa attended at least one of the four negotiation meeting; the remaining
States did not attend at all.
UNESCO has sought to educate, facilitate and encourage Pacific States to engage with and ultimately
ratify the 2001 UCH Convention. So far this has had limited immediate success. The resulting underrepresentation is not, however, confined to the 2001 UCH Convention, but across all the
UNESCO Cultural Heritage Conventions. None are party to the 1954 Convention for the Protection
of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict or the 1970 Convention on the Means of
Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.
Of the only three UN Member States not party to the World Heritage Convention, two are from the
Pacific – Nauru and Tuvalu. Moreover, other than New Zealand, no Pacific State has more than one
World heritage site, and some – Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tonga – have none. And while all
are party to the 2003 Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention, engagement in that Convention is
also limited, with only four States having a single item each on the World List – FSM, Samoa,
Tonga and Vanuatu; the rest have none.
In this broader heritage contest, the lack of representation in the World Heritage and
Intangible Cultural Heritage lists is both a function of the increasingly complicated processes for
nomination, and the concern that Pacific States do not have the resources to effectively manage and
protect significant heritage that is subject to the relevant international Convention and the obligations
contained therein. It is clear that a lack of human and financial resources constrain the ability of
Pacific States to act. It is thus worth contextualising this by noting that the bottom seven positions of
the 207 listed States in the World Bank’s 2021 ranking by GDP were taken up by Pacific States:
Tonga, FSM, Marshall Islands, Palau, Kiribati, Nauru and in last place Tuvalu (World Bank 2012).
Not surprising many of the Pacific
1

�States are also the smallest in the World by pollution, with all but New Zealand and Papua New
Guinea having a pollution of less than 1 million, and in some cases considerably less. Palau has a
population of around 18,000; Tuvalu 12,000 and Nauru 11,000 (Worldometer 2023). As a region,
Oceania has the lowest pollution in the world with a total of less than 20 million, spread over the
largest maritime domain (UN World Pollution Prospects 2002).
Against the backdrop, there are a range of underlying reasons for a lack of interest in the 2001 UCH
Convention. In the context of current challenges faced by Pacific States, UCH is not a priority on the
political and national agenda and not surprisingly there is “a lack of visibility, public support and
understanding of the values attached to UCH, and the incompatibility with economic development
projects.” (Nikishiwa 2017, 20) There is also a basic lack of understanding of the convention and
uncertainty as to its relation with the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
This paper considers the difficulties Pacific States face in the process of considering ratification of the
2001 UCH Convention through a review of two case studies – Solomon Islands and Marshall Islands.
ADVANTAGES OF RATIFICATION
The Pacific States were born by seafarers undertaking significant feats of seamanship and navigation
over hundreds of years beginning as far back as 3,500 years ago. Little has been found of the physical
remains of these endeavours, but better technology and a greater emphasis on Pacific indigenous
heritage bods well for the future. Much more recently, the western age of exploration, colonialisation
and a world war have left UCH across the Pacific. Not only is this historically and archaeologically
important heritage but is of great tourism potential and requires sustainable management.
The 2001 UCH Convention provides the bedrock upon which this UCH can be managed. It contains
an internationally agreed legal framework supported by international best practice in maritime
archaeology. Perhaps more importantly, the 2001 UCH Convention is essentially a framework for
State cooperation, including in the sharing of information, training and in the use and transfer of
relevant technology. Only through ratification and ‘membership’ as States Parties, can a State engage
in deliberations about UCH in an international context; participate in the UNESCO organs of the 2001
UCH Convention, particularly in the Scientific and Technical Advisory Body and have access to the
UCH Fund that supports various activities, including training, workshops, public awareness
raising and technical missions.
There is little cost to ratification, with representation the only direct cost, and that, in any event, is a
matter for each State to decide as to the level of participation. The only indirect cost is the law reform
required to ensure a State gives effect to its international obligations arising out of the 2001 UCH
Convention.
Despite these obvious advantages, Pacific States have not ratified the 2001 UCH Convention. The case
of Solomon Islands and Marshall Island may highlight some of the reasons for this.
SOLOMON ISLANDS
The UCH resources of the Solomon Islands includes caves and sacrificial sites used for shark or
crocodile worship, submerged villages and artificial islands, historic shipwrecks including the
remains from La Perouse expedition of 1788, and famously, hundreds of planes and shipwrecks
2

�resulting from the fierce battles of the WWII. Indeed, Iron Bottom Sound, between Guadalcanal and
Savo Islands, is so named because of the number of WWII wrecks lying there. It is a particularly
popular dive tourism site.
UNESCO’s bid to encourage ratification of the 2001 UCH Convention in the Pacific began shortly
after it came into force in 2009. UNESCO organised an inter-governmental meeting in Honiara,
Solomon Islands, attended by representatives of Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Palau, Papua New
Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Vanuatu (Takahashi 2011, 6). It was designed to
stimulate interest and assist States in ratifying the 2001 UCH Convention; reinforce existing cooperation in the Asia Pacific Region and set up new linkages for the protection and management of
UCH.
While useful in that it introduced the 2001 UCH Convention to Pacific States, little came of this
meeting. UNESCO did publish Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania in 2010 to raise awareness
within the region, and a Feasibility Study on a Pacific UCH Capacity Building programme did follow,
but nothing appears to have come of that (Mckinnon and Kimura 2012). Pacific States did not show
any real interest in pursuing ratification.
In 2021 UNESCO (author Ellen Lekka) and contracted consultants (author Craig Forrest, together
with Matthew Carter and Ole Varmer) organised a consultation workshop on the 2001 UCH
Convention in the Solomon Islands over two days: 23–24 June, bringing together key stakeholders
representing government, industry, development partners and international experts to discuss possible
ratification of the 2001 UCH Convention. A draft Gap Analysis was prepared to compare Solomon
Islands’ legislation to the requirements of the 2001 UCH Convention, as well as a National Interest
Analysis detailing the benefits and obligations should Solomon Islands ratify. At that meeting, the
Director of the Culture Division at the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (author Dennis Marita), spoke
about the importance of the ocean to Solomon Islanders’ identity, he declared that “Solomon Islands is
a maritime country, and a great part of its heritage and history is based on the ocean”. The Director
also expressed the desire of the Solomon Islands Government to ratify the 2001 UCH Convention.
This has yet to happen, and a number of reasons might explain why.
While the 2001 UCH Convention does not impose significant obligations on States Parties, each State
does need to ensure that its legislation is capable of giving effect to these obligations. The extent to
which each State can respond to this obligation is both a function of the complexity and modernity of
its existing legislation and its capacity to amend that legislation or introduce new legislation. The
Solomon Islands Gap Analysis revealed that the existing law applicable to wrecks, salvage and
maritime jurisdiction (Shipping Act 1998; Protection of Wrecks and War Relics Act 1980) required
some amendment, as did aspects of related legislation such as the Environment Act 1998 and
Protected Areas Act 2010; though these do provide a sound footing for the implementation of the 2001
UCH Convention – subject to minor amendments. In many respects, while the needs for amendments
were modest, the task of coordinating these across multiple legislative instruments (and relevant
departments) is time consuming and requires dedicated human resources. Indeed, the age of some of
the legislation that required amendment (eg. Protection of Wrecks and War Relics Act 1980) attests to
the difficulty in generally keeping legislation contemporary and up to date. The main recommendation
from the Gap Analysis was the adoption of a new stand-alone legislative instrument to give effect to
the 2001 UCH Convention. Given that the 2001 UCH Convention provides the framework this should
not be a particularly difficult legislative instrument to draft but it does require time and resources and a
certain level of subject matter expertise.
3

�Time and resources that are not easily directed to heritage, especially heritage like UCH, which is out
of sight and not immediately relevant to much of the population, whose cultural traditions often favour
intangible heritage (Jeffrey et al 2021, 137). This is hardly surprising when considering issues such as
climate change and other threats that challenge a State’s very existence. As such, attempts to address
issues related to heritage are often tagged on to broader issues such as sustainable development. And
these all compete for limited resources.
The nature of UCH in Solomon Islands may also play a role, in that the most obvious examples of
UCH are not indigenous Solomon Islander heritage, but rather that from World War II (Forrest and
Corrin 2013). It is often perceived in tourism terms and as a financial commodity, rather than genuine
heritage. At the very least the idea of it being heritage does exist because of the emphasis placed on it
by the two belligerent States: Japan and Untied States. That this heritage will not in fact fall within the
scope of the 2001 UCH Convention until the early 2040s is not always appreciated and therefore
coloured the view they have of the 2001 UCH Convention as to its role in Solomon Islands.
Solomon Islands has also not fared well in terms of its engagement with other international cultural
heritage regimes. In 1998, East Rennell was inscribed on the World Heritage List. At the time, the
World Heritage Committee noted that adequate long-term legislative, regulatory or institutional
protection was not in place. Nevertheless, the property was inscribed on the list with a number of
recommendations made to address these issues, but Solomon Islands failed to address them and, in
2003, the property formally entered the non-compliance response system, and in 2013, placed on the
List of World Heritage in Danger where it remains (Hamman and Hølleland 2023, 98-99). This
illustrates the significant capacity challenges faced in all areas of cultural heritage management and
does not bode well for UCH without external assistance.

MARSHALL ISLANDS
Having been discovered by around 2000 years ago, the Marshallese archipelago, with 1225 islands
and islets, is vast. The settlement of this archipelago required extraordinary navigational skills and
seaworthy craft. While little physical remains of this early seafaring have been discovered, other
traditional sites demonstrate the intimacy Marshallese have with the ocean, including coral reef heads
featured in traditional oral history and ancient fish traps, some of which are still in use today. The
UCH resources of the Marshall Islands also extend to the Japanese and United States wreckage of
WWII; and the material evidence of nuclear testing at Bikini Atoll (Naone 2011, 1).
The notion of cultural heritage in Marshall Islands appears to be coloured by its association with the
United States. After achieving self-governance in 1979, the Marshall Islands entered into a Compact
of Free Association with the United States which allowed, amongst many things, for the Historic
Preservation Office to continue its roles as provided for in the 1966 U.S. National Historic
Preservation Act. Indeed, four sites are listed on the US National Register of Historic Places: Kwajalein
Island Battlefield, Roi-Namur Battlefield, Debrum House and Marshall Islands War Memorial Park
(Forrest and Jeffrey 2018). In 1991, the Historic Preservation Act was adopted by the Nitijela as a
response to the perceived legal vacuum in relation to indigenous Marshallese historic preservation.
This included submerged cultural heritage and was followed by the adoption of Regulations
Governing Access to Prehistoric and Historic Submerged Resources. These provide for a reasonable

4

�protective regime, though difficult to enforce given the vast distances involved and the limit
enforcement capability (Naone 2011, 1 and 5).
Whilst there was therefore some recognition of the importance of UCH, the Marshall Islands was not
engaged in the negotiations that lead to the 2001 UCH Convention. Importantly though, it was
engaged with the World Heritage Convention and in 2010 the Bikini Atoll Nuclear Test Site was
inscribed on the World Heritage List; including the ships that were sunk during the 67 nuclear tests
that took place there. These form an integral part of the World Heritage site and are the only UCH
specifically protected in Marshall Islands. However, these wrecks are not only cultural resources but
also an environmental threat. Other than the affect that atomic tests have had, and continue to have, on
these wrecks, a number still have potentially polluting bunker fuel on board, and some still have
unexpended ordinance, requiring intervention (Forrest and Jeffrey 2018, 61-64).
As part of its commitment to educate, facilitate and encourage States to ratify the 2001 UCH
Convention, UNESCO commissioned desk-based reports on the State of the legislative framework and
UCH related programme in the five States of Micronesia – including Marshall Islands (Forrest and
Jeffrey 2018). The key recommendation was that Marshall Islands become a party and adopt a new
Act to give effect to the Convention, at the same time making consequential amendments to the
Historic Preservation Act, Regulation and Control of Shipping Act and Wrecks and Salvage Act, and
others as appropriate. In 2021, this was followed by a more detailed consideration of this legislative
framework together with a draft National Interest Analysis and a two-day workshop (7-8 December
2021) together with educational material, based on the model used for the work undertaken the
previous year for Solomon Islands.
The recommendations arising out of that work were substantially similar to those for Solomon Islands:
ratification of the 2001 UCH Convention with consequential, but limited, amendments to a range of
legislation and the adoption of a new stand-alone legislative instrument to give effect to the 2001 UCH
Convention. As yet, no action appears to have been taken following this work and recommendations.
Trite, but again the underlying cause is a lack of resources.
SUSTAINED INSTITUTIONAL AND STATES PARTIES ASSISTANCE
Both Solomon Islands and Marshall Islands would benefit from ratification of the 2001 UCH
Convention and both States appear eager to do so. The inevitable effect of consultants working
remotely with no ongoing relationship with those in the States responsible for progressing the path to
ratification has begun to toll on the momentum generated by the work undertaken in the past two
years. Given these States’ significant financial and capacity constraints, and where cultural heritage
issues are a low priority given the geo-political and environmental challenges being addressed, it is
difficult to criticise lack of progress. It thus falls to those assisting these States to persist in ongoing
dialogue, and perhaps just a little bit of pressure, to ensure that momentum does not falter and fade
entirely. There is thus a role to play for organisations such as UNESCO Pacific Office, Pacific Islands
Museum Association, International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) - both ICOMOS
Pacifika and ICOMOS International Committee on Underwater Cultural Heritage), and the Pacific
Heritage Hub at University of the South Pacific. All have an interest in assisting these States, but there
appears to be little coordination and sharing of the load, in part because these organisations too face
resourcing constraints. Perhaps what is needed is a more coordinated approach with one organisation
that takes the lead and coordinates the efforts of all other organisations with an interest in the
protection and management of the Pacific UCH.
5

�The 2001 UCH Convention (article 2(2)) is, above all, a cooperative regime and States Parties are
bound to cooperate as a fundamental principle of this regime. Australia is edging close to ratification.
In 2018, the federal government adopted the Underwater Cultural Heritage Act that is consistent with
the 2001 UCH Convention and will allow for Australia to fulfil its obligations following ratification.
In March 2003 the Federal government’s Joint Standing Committee on Treaties concluded its hearing
and report on the 2001 UCH Convention by recommending ratification. If, as is now highly likely,
ratification will take place, Australia will owe obligations to other States Parties, and if those were
Pacific States, the benefits of having a relatively well resourced and highly skilled neighbour would be
of significant benefit. Pacific States would do well to follow an Australian ratification.

Bibliography
Forrest, Craig and Corrin, Jennifer. “Legal Pluralism in the Pacific: Solomon Island’s World War II Heritage” International
Journal of Cultural Property 20 (2013): 1-21.
Forrest, Craig and Jeffrey, Bill. UNESCO Report: Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH)-related legislation and
programme review in the five countries in Micronesia United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization,
2018.
Guerin, Ulrike, Egger, Barbara and Penalva, Vindha. Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania. Paris: UNESCO, 2010.
Hamman, Evan and Hølleland, Herdis. Implementing the World Heritage Convention. Cheltham (UK): Edward Elgar Press,
2023.
Jeffrey, Bill, McKinnon Jennifer F. and Van Tilburg, Hans. “Underwater cultural Heritage in the Pacific: Themes and Future
Directions.” International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 17, no. 2 (2021): 135-168.
Mckinnon, Jennifer F. and Kimura, Jun. Feasibility Study on a Pacific Underwater Cultural Heritage Capacity Building
Programme. Paris: UNESCO, 2012.
Naone, Mary Jane. The Underwater Cultural Heritage of the Marshall Islands; A Discussion of the Resources, the
Legislation, the Community, Protection and Preservation. The MUA Collection, 2011
http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1185
Nishikawa, Chihiro. “Underwater Cultural Heritage in Asia Pacific and UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the
Underwater Cultural Heritage.” International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 17, no. 2 (2021): 15-38.
Takahashi, Akatsuki. “UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and the Pacific Small
Island Developing States (SIDS).” The MUA Collection, 2011 http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1575
World Bank Gross Domestic Product 2021 https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/GDP.pdf
Worldometer 2023
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
UN World Pollution Prospects 2002: Summary of Results
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf

6

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="53">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="283">
                  <text>2023 Session 17: The 2001 Convention: from ‘constructive ambiguities’ to ‘destructive misunderstandings’</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="284">
                  <text>Session 17 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="285">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 17 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="286">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="287">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="288">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="289">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="290">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="291">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6061">
                <text>Motivating and Enabling Pacific States to Ratify the 2001 UCH&#13;
Convention</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6062">
                <text>Ratifications of the 2001 UCH Convention by Pacific States has been poor. Using Solomon Islands and the Marshall Islands&#13;
as case studies, this paper begins by considering the utility of the 2001 UCH Convention for these States before turning to the&#13;
difficulties and challenges in enabling ratification. These include not only capacity issues but also the extent to which&#13;
ratification requires amendment of existing laws and broader policy issues relating, for example, to tourism and international&#13;
relations.&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6063">
                <text>Dennis Marita</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6064">
                <text>Ellen Lekka</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="6065">
                <text>Craig Forrest</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6066">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6067">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6068">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6069">
                <text>Marita, Dennis, Ellen Lekka, and Craig Forrest. 2023.  “Motivating and enabling Pacific States to ratify the 2001 Convention.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Mariano Azna. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1911 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="57">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 17 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="541" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="332">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/49930b45db7e90226999b355c41c2ed9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>fa7982c3988e4735ab59b2773cb3c268</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="6060">
                    <text>The Next Steps of Underwater Cultural Heritage Preservation in Taiwan: A Legal
Aspect
Wen-Yan Chiau
(National Taiwan Ocean University &amp; National Sun Yat-sen University, Chair Professor;
Apconf-5, liaison for Taiwan)
Email: chiau0717@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
In order to preserve, protect and manage underwater cultural heritage (UCH) and to value the spirit of
the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, in 2015 Taiwan
passed its Underwater Cultural Heritage Act (UCHA). Although the law has been in force for seven
years, there are still many important elements that have not yet been fully implemented. The main
reasons are the insufficient capacity of the competent authorities, the lack of underwater archaeology
talents, and Taiwan's special environmental conditions. For example, the implementation of in-situ
preservation, the designation of UCH protected areas, shallow water survey technology, the
establishment of a national research center of UCH, and the raising of public awareness and school
education all need to be further studied and implemented. Therefore, this article will illustrate the
intention of important parts of UCHA, as well as the challenges promoted by practice, and finally put
forward some suggestions for future protection of UCH in Taiwan. It is believed that the experience of
Taiwan may serve as a reference to other countries concerned.
Key words: underwater cultural heritage (UCH), Underwater Cultural Heritage Act (UCHA), Taiwan.

1. INTRODUCTION
In order to preserve, protect and manage underwater cultural heritage (UCH) and to value the
spirit of the UNESCO 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater
Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention), Taiwan passed its Underwater Cultural Heritage Act
(UCHA) in 2015. Although the law has been in force for several years, there are still many
important elements that have not yet been fully implemented. The main reasons are the
insufficient capacity of the competent authorities, the lack of underwater archaeology
talents, and Taiwan's special environmental conditions. For example, the
implementation of in-situ preservation, the designation of UCH protected areas, shallow
water survey technology, the establishment of a national research center of UCH, and
raising of public awareness and school education all need to be further studied and
implemented. Therefore, this article will introduce the recent activities at UCH, illustrate the
intention of important parts of UCHA, as well as the challenges promoted by practice, and
finally put forward some suggestions for future protection of UCH in Taiwan.
2. RECENT ACTIVITIES IN UCH
Since 2006, the Bureau of Cultural Heritage (BOCH) of the Ministry of Culture has promoted
the “Project for the General Survey of Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Seas of Taiwan”.
This has included the investigation of waters surrounding the Penghu
Archipelago (Pescadores), Green Island, Matsu Islands, Dongsha (Pratas) Atoll, and
Taiwan Island. The project has already progressed through four stages of assessing the
overall value of UCH in the waters of Taiwan. As of the end of December 2019, a total of 90
specific targets had been found through underwater verification by the underwater
archaeology team led by Dr. Cheng-Huan Tsang. Of these, 20 objects have been identified as
shipwrecks and other specific target objects. Six of these have complete underwater cultural
inventories (Shy 2016; Underwater Cultural Heritage Network 2022).
1

�3. ISSUES IN THE IMPLIMENTATION OF UCHA
Taiwan’s UCHA consists of seven chapters and 44 articles. The chapters cover general
provisions, rights attribution and international cooperation, activities directed at UCH, in situ
preservation of UCH, excavating out of the water, penalty provisions, and supplementary
provisions (Kuo et al 2017). The Act was adopted in 2015 and amended in 2022 with minor
revisions. Although the law has been in force for several years, it has not yet been fully
implemented. The key issues are summarized as follows.
3.1 Enforcement capacity of competent authority
Article 2 of the UCHA clearly stipulates that “the competent authority of this Act is the
Ministry of Culture (MOC).” Operationally, its subordinate agency – BOCH – is the
responsible authority for day-to-day management. Under the BOCH, there are four divisions
and a research institute. Of these, the “Underwater Cultural Heritage Section” of the
“Division of Antiquities and Archaeological Sites” is the body that is responsible for all
relevant UCH affairs (BOCH 2021). However, the BOCH is essentially a land-based
authority that is located in downtown Taichung in the City of Taiwan, and it is without any
vessel or port facilities for enforcement of the UCHA. In addition, the BOCH is also in lack of
underwater archaeology professionals due to the limitation of budget and manning quotas.
3.2 Establishment of the national UCH research institute
Taiwan has long anticipated the establishment of a research institute dedicated to UCH.
Referring to similar foreign cases (e.g., the National Research Institute of Maritime Culture
Heritage (NRIMCH) in Mokpo, Korea (UNESCO 2023); the Department of Underwater and
Marine Archaeological Research (DRASSM) in Marseille, France (Ministère de la Culture
2023), Article 7 of the UCHA stipulates that the BOCH may “designate” a dedicated
organization for the preservation of and research on UCH. However, UCH is a new concern
for Taiwan and as yet there is no such research institute. In this regard, the former legislators
Wen-Yan Chiau and Yi-Hua Lin proposed an amendment bill to amend Article 7 of the
UCHA to say: “The competent authority may ‘establish’ or designate a dedicated organization
for the preservation of and research on underwater cultural heritage, to perform any necessary
investigation, research, excavation, restoration, education, promulgation, international
cooperation, and other activities with respect to UCH.” This amendment bill was passed on
15 November 2022 (Liberty Times 2022). Even with the legal support, the establishment of
national UCH research institute still needs more supports from the central government.
3.3 In situ preservation and UCH protection zones
Echoing the spirit of the 2001 Convention, Article 27 of the UCHA expressly stipulates that
“the preservation of UCH in situ shall be the first option considered, before any activities
directed at this heritage are allowed or commenced.” Further, the proper means for in situ
preservation may include record management, protection zones, or other proper preservation
measures. When the review committees decide that it is necessary to designate a specific
UCH protection zone, according to Article 28 of the UCHA, the BOCH should consult with
the relevant authorities to designate and publicize it within the relevant area to preserve the
UCH in situ. To allow for public engagement, Article 28 also stipulates that the authority
should hold a public hearing or explanation session inviting civilians or groups with an
interest in the area to attend. Since Taiwan still does not have a UCH protected area, it is
necessary to learn from countries that ratified the 2001 Convention some time ago, in
planning and management matters in the future.

2

�3.4 Conditions for UCH excavation
In principle, the UCH should not be removed from the water. Pursuant to Article 34 of the
UCHA, exceptions are limited to the following situations: (1) the UCH is related to the
historical status or recognition of the nation; (2) if the UCH were absent, it could preclude a
full understanding of human history; (3) the UCH is of substantial commercial value that
could not be protected without removing it from the water; (4) excavation is necessary for
investigating and conducting research on the UCH; (5) the UCH could not be sufficiently
preserved, protected, or managed without being removed from the water because of an
emergency or changes in the existing environment; (6) other situations in which the
competent authority deems it necessary to remove the UCH from the water. When excavation
is to be undertaken, pursuant to Article 35 of the UCHA, a preservation and maintenance plan
for the UCH should be proposed at the same time. In this plan, “nondestructive technology
and survey methods should be used preferentially.” In addition, people with expertise in
underwater archaeology, underwater operations, and preservation science should collaborate
to design the measures for the excavation or emergency response. For more than a decade,
nevertheless, the UCH affairs in Taiwan have focused on general surveys, and there are still
no plans to excavate UCH from its waters. Many opportunities for UCH research and
presentation were missed due to the overly conservative mentality of officials, lack of largescale funding, and the expansion of in-situ conservation to a no-excavation concept, which
made it difficult to excavate.
3.5 Public education on UCH
Article 12 of UCHA stipulates that “the competent authority shall promote the underwater
cultural heritage education at each level of school. After consulting the Ministry of Education,
the competent authority shall stipulate regulations related to the implementation and
encouragement of the aforesaid education.” Although the authorities have organized many
popular science exhibitions, special lectures and training of underwater archaeologists in
recent years, the promotion of UCH at all levels of schools has not yet been launched.

4. STRATEGIES FOR BETTER PRESERVATION OF UCH
In response to the above issues and challenges, a number of strategies are proposed to
strengthen the protection of UCH in Taiwan.
4.1 Raising the public awareness on the importance of UCH
In addition to the aforementioned education about UCH at all levels of school, it is necessary
to raise awareness of the importance of UCH among the general public. The BOCH has held
many underwater archaeology exhibitions in recent years, and has also used new technologies
such as Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, which have attracted many people (Tung
2020). However, the popularity of these exhibitions is still insufficient; In particular, in order
to properly protect UCH, it is necessary the public understand that underwater archaeology is
not treasure hunting, but protection of the common heritage of mankind.
4.2 Involving the stakeholders and designating UCH protected areas
The Regulations on Delineation and Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage
Protection Zones are derived from Articles 28, 30, and 31 of the UCHA. Multiple
stakeholders (e.g., diving associations and tourism companies) will be highly interested in the
nominated UCH waters. Therefore, before designating UCH protection zones, negotiation
among stakeholders, nongovernmental organizations, and relevant agencies is essential to
3

�promoting UCH preservation and management. The BOCH already held a first-ever
workshop on March 28, 2023 in Green Island, Taitung County on the delineation and
management of “Green Island Wreck No. 1”. To win support from the local stakeholders it is
recommended that the BOCH organise more workshops, explanation sessions and public
hearings.
4.3 Conducting a pilot excavation project of important shipwreck
In regards to the multiple purposes of research, restoration, training, education and exhibition,
Taiwan needs to go further to identify a valuable shipwreck for excavation. Surely, this
activity shall meet the requirements of excavation regulated in Articles 34 and 35 of UCHA.
UCH professionals from other countries could initially provide guidance on the excavation
projects.
4.4 Facilitating the international cooperation on preserving stone tidal weirs
Based on recent investigations, there are approximately 600 stone weirs in the waters of
Taiwan, nearly 350 of which are in the Penghu Archipelago (Penghu National Scenic Area
Administration 2022; Stoneweir.info 2023). This example of UCH is important because these
are included in the project “Indigenous People, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and
Climate Change: The Iconic Underwater Cultural Heritage of Stone Tidal Weirs, ID 180”.
This project forms part of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development
2021–2030 (IOC 2021). In this regard, Taiwan is urged to actively participate in this
international cooperation project to preserve its abundant stone tidal weirs.
4.5 Establishing the national research institute of cultural heritage
Pursuant to Article 7 of the UCHA, the Ministry of Culture may establish or designate an
institute responsible for UCH preservation, protection and management. It is believed that this
national-level institute can best integrate various research resources, including technologies,
professions and budgets. As mentioned earlier, the French DRASSM is a national-level
research institute of 50+ years. Equipped with research vessels and many professionals, the
DRASSM has participated in various international UCH projects and achieved fruitful results
with stable budgets and operations. In 2009, the NRIMCH was established in Korea to
promote the country’s maritime culture and exchange research results with other international
research institutions or museums. These institutes are all worth referring to as Taiwan
establishes its own. In 2022, Penghu County Government entrusted Dr. Cheng-Hua Tsang of
the National Tsing Hua University to conduct a project to establish the National Underwater
Cultural Museum. The first step is to establish a research institute for the museum.
4.6 Integrating the planning and management of all marine protected areas
The marine protected areas (MPAs) is an umbrella name which may include national parks,
fishery resource protected areas, national scenic areas, national monuments and marine
sanctuaries. However, the administrative jurisdiction of MPAs is scattered among Taiwan's
numerous agencies. As the Government is drafting a bill on the Marine Protection Act, there
is an opportunity to integrate planning and management of marine protected areas, including
natural and cultural heritage.
4.7 Actively participating the international organizations and related meetings
Although Taiwan is not currently a member of the United Nations, many laws and policies
still follow international treaties and initiatives. UCH is an emerging matter, and Taiwan does
not have enough experience in this regard, and needs to absorb the experience of other
countries. Therefore, Taiwan should actively participate in international organizations and
4

�relevant meetings and cooperate with other countries or regions to jointly protect the UCH.
5. CONCLUSION
In 2015, Taiwan adopted UCHA in accordance with the spirit and intent of the 2001
Convention. The passage and enforcement of UCHA represents Taiwanese determination to
preserve, protect and manage this common heritage of mankind. As UCH is a new affair in
this country, Taiwan still lacks experience in law enforcement, professional manpower,
related technology, protected area designation and underwater archaeology excavation. In
particular, better planning and stable funding support are needed for school education at all
levels and the establishment of specialized research institutions. Eight years after the
enactment of the law, therefore, it is necessary for Taiwan to review its UCH protection
performance, learn from countries that ratified the 2001 Convention some time ago, and
formulate the steps and projects to promote UCH protection.
Bibliography
[1] Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture (BOCH), Republic of China (Taiwan) (2021), Organization
Chart, https://www.boch.gov.tw/home/en-us/Chart (Accessed 1 April 2023).
[2] Kuo, C-C., Liao, C-P., Chiau, W-Y., Preservation of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Taiwan: Legislation and
Challenges, paper presented at the Third Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage,
2017.
[3] International Oceanographic Commission (IOC), UNESCO, Letter to Dr. Akifumi Iwaqbuchi, Ref.:
IOC/VR/21.362/JB/AC/ml, 6 October 2021.
[4] Ministère de la Culture, Department of Underwater and Underwater Archaeological Research (2023),
https://www.culture.gouv.fr/en/Thematic/Archaeology/Actors-training/Archaeology-services-at-the-Ministryof-Culture/Department-of-Underwater-and-Underwater-Archaeological-Research (Accessed 3 Marc 2023).
[5] Liberty Times, Adoption of the Third Reading of the Amendment to the Underwater Cultural Heritage
Preservation Act, the competent authority may establish a dedicated institution, 25 November 2022,
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/4123994 (Accessed on 4 April 2023) (in Chinese)
[6] Penghu National Scenic Area Administration, Twin-Hearts Stone Weir, 12 May 2022,
https://tinyurl.com/yvfh4nnm (Accessed 25 May 2022)
[7]Shy, G-L., The preservation and reuse of underwater cultural heritage, In: Chiau, W-Y., and Huang, H-W., Blue
Economy and Marine Conservation, The Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Ocean and Taiwan, 2016,
310-338.
[8] Stoneweir.info, The Records of the Stone Weirs, https://stoneweir.info/List?M=CAT001&amp;S=All&amp;P=1
(Accessed 10 April 2023).
[9] Tung, Y-Y., A Review of Taiwan’s underwater cultural heritage dissemination works and future prospects,
Journal of Cultural Heritage Sep. 2020 (53): 7-26.
[10]Underwater Cultural Heritage Network, Taiwan’s Promotion of Underwater Cultural Heritage, Bureau of
Cultural Heritage (BOCH) of Ministry of Culture, 2022, https://uch.boch.gov.tw/AboutHeritage/Promote
(Accessed 4 April 2023).
[11] UNESCO, National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/silk-roadinstitutions/national-research-institute-maritime-cultural-heritage (Accessed 28 April 2023).

5

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="53">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="283">
                  <text>2023 Session 17: The 2001 Convention: from ‘constructive ambiguities’ to ‘destructive misunderstandings’</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="284">
                  <text>Session 17 papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="285">
                  <text>Papers presented at Session 17 of the 2023 Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="286">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="287">
                  <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="288">
                  <text>November 2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="289">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="290">
                  <text>English</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="91">
              <name>Rights Holder</name>
              <description>A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="291">
                  <text>Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6053">
                <text>The Next Steps of Underwater Cultural Heritage Preservation in Taiwan: A Legal Aspect </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6054">
                <text>In order to preserve, protect and manage underwater cultural heritage (UCH) and to value the spirit of&#13;
the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, in 2015 Taiwan&#13;
passed its Underwater Cultural Heritage Act (UCHA). Although the law has been in force for seven&#13;
years, there are still many important elements that have not yet been fully implemented. The main&#13;
reasons are the insufficient capacity of the competent authorities, the lack of underwater archaeology&#13;
talents, and Taiwan's special environmental conditions. For example, the implementation of in-situ&#13;
preservation, the designation of UCH protected areas, shallow water survey technology, the&#13;
establishment of a national research center of UCH, and the raising of public awareness and school&#13;
education all need to be further studied and implemented. Therefore, this article will illustrate the&#13;
intention of important parts of UCHA, as well as the challenges promoted by practice, and finally put&#13;
forward some suggestions for future protection of UCH in Taiwan. It is believed that the experience of&#13;
Taiwan may serve as a reference to other countries concerned. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6055">
                <text>Wen-Yan Chiau</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6056">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6057">
                <text>2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6058">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="80">
            <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
            <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="6059">
                <text>Chiau, Wen-Yan. 2023. “The Next Steps of Underwater Cultural Heritage Preservation in Taiwan: A Legal Aspect.” Edited by Jennifer Craig, Jay Mok, T. Kurt Knoerl, and Mariano Azna. In Proceedings of Fifth Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage: Gwangju, The Republic of Korea, November 13-18 2023. The Museum of Underwater Archaeology. URL: https://apconf.omeka.net/exhibits/show/apconfproceedings/item/1910 </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="57">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 17 2023</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
