<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items/browse?collection=9&amp;output=omeka-xml&amp;sort_field=added" accessDate="2026-10-24T19:41:09+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>12</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="42" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="42">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/dca92f83a85a0f01eb068d1bed1705b9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7e81fbe181c07bc4ddaddd46f6883ec3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="609">
                    <text>Disaster in the High Seas:
The Spanish Expeditions in the Pacific in the Sixteenth Century
Ma. Luisa De Leon-Bolinao, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, History Department
University of the Philippines-Diliman
Quezon City, Philippines
Email: loudeleon@rocketmail.com
Abstract
The Pacific Ocean is the largest body of water on earth, measuring more than 165
million square kilometers. Although the first European to spot it was Vasco Nuñez de
Balboa in 1513, who named it Mar del Sur (South Sea) due to a miscalculation, it was
Ferdinand Magellan who named it Pacifico after taking notice of its calm waters.
This paper discusses the various disasters that sixteenth-century Spanish expeditions
encountered during their trips to and from the Philippines while crossing the vast Pacific
Ocean. It focuses on four events: (1) natural disasters like storms and gales; (2) health
hazards like diseases and spoiled food provisions; (3) man-made hazards like mutinies
and piracies; and, (4) other accidents like leaks and reef grounding. The study covers
the period from Magellan’s voyage of 1519 up to the trips of the galleons until the end of
the sixteenth century, and concludes with the lessons learned from a century of
traversing the Pacific.
Key words: disasters, Pacific Ocean, Spanish expeditions, galleon trade, Philippines
I. Introduction

A story on Walter McDougall’s (1993) book1 narrated the historic first eastward trip from
the Philippines to Acapulco.

Fray Andres de Urdaneta was on his way back to

Acapulco from the Philippines. He set a course north by northeast in the hope of
bypassing the trade winds and finding the westerlies back to the Americas. Forty-five
years earlier, Magellan first crossed the Pacific westward, but since then no one has
been able to make a tornaviaje (return trip) using the same route through the Pacific.
After a month, Urdaneta’s crew reached 320 north latitude, 1590 east longitude, the
same coordinates reached by Saavedra in 1528 but abandoned after a five-day storm
1

Walter A. McDougall (1993). Let the Sea Make a Noise: A History of the North Pacific from Magellan to
MacArthur. Basic Books, p. 25.

1

�crippled his ship, with his crew weakened by the cold and scurvy. Urdaneta then prayed
for the intercession of St. Peter, patron saint of his ship San Pedro, that the westerlies
would carry them back to Acapulco. The westerlies did pick up, the ship sailed eastward
until the California current caught them and carried them southward to Mexico. They
reached Acapulco on October 8, 1565 after sailing over twelve thousand miles in 130
days. Urdaneta unwittingly discovered the Kuroshio current2 flowing off Japan, the North
Pacific Current flowing towards California, and the tornaviaje route that eluded earlier
Spanish explorers.
Thus began Spain’s mastery of the Pacific Ocean. According to Greg Bankoff (2006),
“The Spanish Empire in the Pacific may have been motivated by ‘God, gold, and glory’
but its realization, in particular its extent and its pulse, was largely determined by the
Pacific wind system.”3 Spain may have built an empire, but it came with considerable
loss of life and property. The Pacific, contrary to Magellan’s initial impression of this
“Spanish lake”, was far from calm. It is the birthplace of numerous tropical storms, the
home of the world’s most active volcanoes and tectonic plates, and the regular site of
earthquakes and tsunamis.
II. Initial Travels to the Philippines: From Ferdinand Magellan to Miguel Lopez De
Legazpi, 1519-1565
Antonio Pigafetta, Magellan’s assistant and chronicler, kept a detailed account of the
events of the 1519 expedition. The fleet began its voyage to the largely unknown waters
in November 1520, with no clue as to direction or length of travel. Three months later,
the food had deteriorated, and morale was low. He notes,
“The tired crew only ate sea biscuits that were full of worms and smelled
of the urine from the rats that had already eaten the good parts. Some men
fought over old cowhides which they softened for four or five days in seawater
2

As described by Shirley Fish in her book, The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the
Pacific. Author House (2011), p. 64: “The Kuroshio Current begins off the coast of Taiwan and flows in a
circular, clock wise pattern as far north as Japan. The current then merges with the North Pacific Current
(NPC) which flows in a westerly pattern taking the ship towards the coast of Northern California and
Mendecino. The NPC is the Pacific’s counterpart of the Atlantic’s Gulf Stream. Once off the coast of
California, the galleon sailed south to Baja California and then to Mexico’s Cape Corrientes and
Acapulco.”
3
Greg Bankoff (2006). “Winds of Colonisation: The Meteorological Contours of Spain’s Imperium in the
Pacific, 1521-1898”, Environment and History 12, p. 67.

2

�before cooking them over a charcoal fire. Others caught and sold rats…and the
demand for this kind of fresh meat could not be met. Nineteen of them perished
from scurvy…”4
Scurvy is a disease that occurs due to the lack of Vitamin C and usually
accompanies malnutrition. Symptoms include pale skin, sunken eyes, and loss of teeth.
It was a common illness among sailors since the 15th century due to the absence of
fresh vegetables and fruits, especially citrus, in their diets. These foods are highly
perishable and cannot last for the several months that the sailors spend in long-distance
travel in ships. A second voyage led by Garcia Jofre de Loaisa, and assisted by Juan
Sebastian Del Cano [Elcano], was mandated by Carlos I to colonize the Spice Islands
for the Spanish Crown. Leaving Spain in 1525 with an impressive fleet of seven ships
and crew of 450, the Loaisa expedition barely survived the Atlantic crossing. Even
before they crossed the Pacific, they were already down to four ships. After the Pacific
voyage, only one ship reached the Spice Islands as three more ships were lost in the
storms, while Loaysa and Elcano both died 5 of scurvy in July 1526.The October 31,
1527 trip of Alvaro de Saavedra Ceron proved most favorable for the Spanish fleet. Not
only were the northeast trade winds strong enough to push them across the vast ocean,
thus making the trip faster, they also arrived in the Philippines after the typhoon season
was over.6 Of course, it helped that one of the captains of the ships was a member of
the earlier Elcano expedition and could have copies of the navigation charts. It was also
the first time that a Spanish fleet originated from Mexico, instead of Spain, which means
the food would remain fresher for a longer period of time during the Pacific crossing.
However, Saavedra could not escape the curse of the Pacific. Only two weeks
into the voyage, the crew discovered that the ship was leaking badly. Wright (1951)
wrote,7
“…The water was pouring into the bread storeroom in the stern of the
ship, in such quantities that the ship was settling rapidly. They hastened to
lighten her by throwing overboard thirty quintales [equivalent to fifty days ration

4

Rodrigue Levesque (trans.) The Philippines: Pigafetta’s Story of Their Discovery by Magellan (n.d.).
Levesque Publications, p. 14.
5
Ibid, p. 111.
6
Ione Stuessy Wright “Voyages of Alvaro de Saavedra Ceron” in R. S. Boggs (ed.) University of Miami
Hispanic-American Studies (1951). University of Miami Press, p. 17.
7
Ibid. p. 19.

3

�for forty men] of bread and meat and other foods, and set to work to get rid of the
water….”
On December 15, 1527, another misfortune happened to the crew. They encountered a
storm, developed rudder trouble, and were forced to wait out the bad weather in the
middle of the sea. Two other ships of the convoy – the Santiago and Espiritu Santo -continued on their journey, but after the storm passed, these two vessels were never
seen again.8
It was Saavedra who first attempted the tornaviaje in June 1528 by sailing
northeastward, but was apparently unprepared for the extreme weather condition and
more storms. He returned to the Moluccas and departed for a second attempt in May
1529, only to be attacked by the native islanders along the way. Saavedra himself fell ill
and died on the return voyage (estimated around October 1529), but barely out of the
western Pacific region. The crew returned to the Moluccas a second time, but was later
captured by the Portuguese and taken to Malacca. After the Spaniards surrendered
their arms to the Portuguese, they were sent to India and finally got back to Spain in
Portuguese ships.
By the time Ruy Lopez de Villalobos set sail in October 1542, a lot of things had been
learned about the Pacific. Captains were further instructed to keep a very detailed log of
each day’s journey, measured in leagues.
Despite all the preparation and the knowledge that went into the Villalobos expedition,
the usual problems surfaced – leaking boats, lack of drinking water, and the occasional
storms and gales, one of which caused one ship, the San Cristobal, to disappear.9 It
would later resurface in Mindanao and rendezvous with the rest of Villalobos’s fleet.
After several months in Mindanao, one of the ships -- the San Juan – would attempt to
return to Mexico via the Pacific Ocean. The Villalobos expedition may have been better
prepared for the journey this time around, but with the persistent lack of adequate
knowledge of wind direction and sea currents occurring in the Pacific, this attempt was
destined to fail. It would take Spain two more decades to figure this out before the
incredible feat of returning to Spain via the Pacific would be accomplished. Miguel

8

Ibid., p. 21.
Andre Gschaedler, “Mexico and the Pacific, 1540-1565: The Voyages of Villalobos and Legazpi and the
Preparations Made for Them”. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University, p. 52.
9

4

�Lopez de Legazpi had one very distinct advantage as he set sail across the Pacific in
November 1564 – he was assisted by Andres de Urdaneta, who, by this time, had been
the foremost expert in navigation. He had been crossing the Pacific since the Loaysa
and Saavedra expeditions, and that his knowledge of cosmography and navigation was
well known throughout the empire. He became an Augustinian friar in 1552, and stayed
in Mexico where he was exposed to more studies on seafaring, particularly on the
meteorological observations made along the coast of California.10
The November 21, 1564 departure of the Legazpi fleet would have spelled
disaster had it not been for the instructions of Urdaneta who outlined different sea
routes for (1) departures between Oct 1 to November 10; (2) departures between
November 10 and January 20; and (3) departures after January which should not
proceed until March.11 Simply put, for every Pacific voyage, timing is paramount; one
cannot take for granted prevailing winds and the sea currents at different times of the
year. Needless to say, the voyage proceeded without any incident, and Legazpi
reached Guam on January 26, 1565, and Samar on February 13, 1565.12 Urdaneta left
Cebu to return to Mexico on June 1, 1565 aboard the San Pedro. Although this was the
voyage that discovered the eastward route back to Acapulco, we do know now that out
of the original 200 people on board, only about 30 people were able to reach their
destination after four months. This fact, however, does not diminish the significance of
this return voyage, and it would serve as the route that the Manila galleons would follow
for 250 years.
III. The Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade
Conquering the Pacific didn’t end the disasters accompanying the subsequent Spanish
expeditions. According to Shirley Fish (2011):13
“After the arrival of the San Pablo in Mexico, it was followed by the San
Geronimo, which arrived at Cebu in October 1566. This proved to be a difficult
journey for all those aboard the vessel as a mutiny arose on the ship. The
captain was murdered by the mutineers and it was a miracle that the ship arrived
in the Philippines at all.”
10

Ibid., p. 84.
Ibid. p. 115-16.
12
Ibid., p. 149, 152.
13
Shirley Fish (2011). The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific. Author House, p.
65.
11

5

�Aside from mutinies, captains also faced the possibility of encountering pirates and rival
foreign ships when traveling over international waters. The galleons were part of the
Spanish Crown Trade Route (SCTR), a larger network of traditional merchant ships that
sailed
-routes. As discussed by Ruescas and Wrana (2012),14
“Thus, two lengthy maritime routes operated across the Atlantic and
Pacific Oceans simultaneously for over two centuries. Both of these lines
were in turn connected by an overland route between Acapulco and
Veracruz via Mexico City…. Through this overland route, the Atlantic and
Pacific lines were connected forming a single combined route that
stretched from Manila to Seville, linking Asia, America, and Europe….”
For both the Atlantic and Pacific fleets, the Spanish Government established a
highly-regulated system of laws that governed everything from cargo and
provisions to weaponry and crew. The schedule for the voyages had to be strictly
followed. Sailing to the Americas had to commence in the months of April or May
in order to arrive in Mexico before the hurricane season, while the Pacific fleets
can only start their voyage in October, but not later than January, to be assured
of calm waters and favorable winds.
The Atlantic waters were likewise used by vessels from other countries such as
the Dutch and British ships which were always hunting for Spanish galleons. That is
why as early as 1526, the King of Spain had decreed that vessels traveling to the
Americas would be escorted by war ships. In contrast, the Pacific galleons were not
accompanied by these vessels, but instead were fitted with cannons to be able to
protect themselves. 15 At times, an incoming Manila galleon was escorted from Baja
California to the port of Acapulco by additional armed warships.
Alas, such precautions proved far from foolproof. One such example was when the
Santa Ana was captured by Thomas Cavendish in 1587 off the coast of Baja
California.16 The Santa Ana was originally with the war ship San Francisco when they
left Manila, but both encountered a typhoon off Japan which considerably wrecked the
14

Javier Ruescas and Javier Wrana, “The West Indies and the Manila Galleons: The First Global Trade
Route” in Probing Philippine-Spanish Connections in History: Selected Papers, Philippine-Spanish
Friendship Day 2011 (2012). National Historical Commission of the Philippines and the History
Department, UP Diliman, p. 8.
15
Ibid., p. 28, 30
16
Ibid., p. 188.

6

�latter, leaving the Santa Ana to continue its voyage back to Acapulco alone and
unarmed. In November 1587, the Cavendish fleet spotted the lone galleon sailing
towards Baja California, chased it, and got control of the ship, the cargo, and the crew.
After picking the best of the lot from the ship, Cavendish set the Santa Ana on fire and
set off, leaving the burning ship which managed to drift to a nearby shore, eventually
getting salvaged by the remaining crew and brought back to Acapulco.17
The Dutch were the more aggressive attackers of the galleons, who constantly
dispatched ships to the Philippines. They had hoped to catch one of the incoming or
outgoing galleons by blockading either Manila Bay or the San Bernardino Strait. One
such encounter happened in December 1600 when Oliver van Noort led the attack in
Cavite, which unfortunately resulted with the sinking of the San Diego.18 It was this San
Diego that was later excavated by underwater archaeologists in 1993, and the artifacts
are presently housed in the National Museum of the Philippines and the Museo Naval in
Madrid (Spain).
Let me end this study with an incident from the seventeenth century. One of the worst
disasters for the Spanish flotilla was the tragedy that befell the Nuestra Señora de la
Concepcion. The Concepcion had quite a reputation as the largest, most indestructible
galleon of its time. It was built using the best tropical hardwoods in the Philippines and
measured 160 feet long, 50 feet wide, with a carrying capacity of 2,000 tons. It was
accompanied by the San Ambrosio, but had become separated from the Concepcion
due to the strong winds they encountered. The San Ambrosio was able to stay the
course and arrived in Acapulco safely; the Concepcion, however, did not.
17

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Cavendish#Capturing_a_Manila_galleon, Accessed October 5,
2013.
18
“Oliver van Noort’s Attack on Luzon” in Blair and Robertson, ‘Documents of 1600’, (Volume 11). The
Philippine islands, 1493-1803 : explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their
peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and
manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from
their earliest relations with European nations to the beginning of the nineteenth century / tr. from the
originals, ed. and annotated by Emma Helen Blair and James Alexander Robertson, with historical
introduction
and
additional
notes
by
Edward
Gaylord
Bourne.
55
Vols.
URL:
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/philamer/afk2830.0001.011/144?page=root;size=100;view=image;q1=blair.
Accessed October 5, 2013.
20
Fish, p. 3.
21
Ibid, p. 3-4.
22
Ibid., p. 11-15. An annotated list of Transpacific Galleons, 1565-1815, can also be found in Fish, pp
492-523.

7

�Fish (2011) relates that on September 20, 1638, the Concepcion encountered bad
weather and crashed into a reef off the southern coast of the Northern Marianas, where
it eventually capsized and broke to pieces. An investigation conducted in 1644
concluded that the ship’s disaster:
“…was brought about by a combination of bad weather and the lack of
vigilance on the part of the pilots in charge of the ship’s navigation. Apparently,
there was a disturbance on the galleon which had become so out of control that
the navigation of the ship was completely forgotten. Perhaps there was a fight
among the officers and crew or a mutiny was attempted with a planned takeover
of the vessel. Whatever happened on the galleon, it appears that no one was
paying attention to the ship’s course and the fact that it had been dangerously
drifting towards the reef.”
Eventually, the culpability was traced back to Manila and to the then
Governor-General Sebastian Hurtado de Corcuera, who was held responsible.
Fifty-nine charges were brought against Corcuera, among which were (1)
appointing his inexperienced nephew as Commander of the Concepcion which
was probably one of the factors that led to a near-mutiny aboard the ship; (2)
illegally-transporting personal cargo of jewelry, gold, and other items aboard the
galleons back to Mexico, to be sold for profit; and, (3) numerous violations of
Spanish trade laws. A recovery team was sent to Saipan by the Spanish
government in Manila in 1684, to at least retrieve the ship’s cannons. But it was
not until 1987 that an archaeological team led by William Mathers and his team
of thirty men and women recovered the riches that the Nuestra Señora de la
Concepcion buried off the waters of the Pacific for 375 years.
Conclusion
The Pacific Ocean had been the last frontier for the Spanish expeditions in the sixteenth
century; their final obstacle to reaching the coveted Spice Islands. Erroneously named
Pacifico by Magellan in 1520 which he based on its calm demeanor when he first saw
the vast ocean, the Pacific is anything but peaceful. For it is the birthplace of numerous
tropical storms, the home of the world’s most active volcanoes and tectonic plates, and
the regular site of earthquakes and tsunamis.
The first hazard they had to overcome was the weather and the ocean current. A ship
captain must possess enough skills and navigation know-how to even begin to sail the
large ocean to lands unknown. Initially a venture based on trial-and error, they had to
8

�leave Acapulco at a specific time of the year, and carefully keep a daily log of their
latitudinal position to even have any hope of surviving the months-long journey or
reaching an island to replenish supplies. Another challenge is rationing their food and
water supply and combatting physical diseases like scurvy, or emotional distress like
loneliness and boredom.
A second hazard is the violent climate. The Pacific is the birthplace of tropical storms, a
phenomena entirely new to citizens of an almost hurricane-free Europe. As such, coping
with shipwrecks, leaks, storms, and gales had become regular struggles for the hapless
sailors.
A third form of challenge was finding the tornaviaje route back to Acapulco. For some
reason, the Pacific waters behaved differently going back east than moving towards the
west. Sixteenth-century navigation meant relying on wind and sea currents in the
absence of modern instrumentation. It took Spain all of half a century before hitting the
Kuroshio Current off Japan which finally gave them that coveted return trip to Acapulco
with a shorter travel time. This historic discovery paved the way for Spain to master the
Pacific Ocean, establish their empire, and build a lucrative trade route for the galleons
for 250 years.
Finally, Spain had one last hurdle to overcome – piracy and attacks in the high seas.
Carrying untold fortune between Manila and Acapulco, the galleons are virtual magnets
to every daring treasure hunter with a sea vessel. The Portuguese had staked their
claim over the Spice Islands and its surrounding lands and waters, and had used this
ruse to capture Spanish vessels which wandered inside its territory. Meanwhile, the
Dutch and British ships lie in wait in pivotal water channels like the San Bernardino
Strait, Manila Bay, and Baja California. Although Spanish galleons frequently carry
cannons and firearms to protect themselves, the length of the travel time and distance
sometimes leave them weak and vulnerable to pirates and bounty hunters who maintain
close proximity to the shore and thus remain healthy and ready to pounce on weary
sailors.
The cost of conquering the Pacific may have been enormous for Spain in the sixteenth
century. The payback, however, was their enduring legacy in structuring the earliest
techniques for modern navigation and map-making, pioneering the methods to building
9

�a formidable, cross-continent empire, and ushering in the first global trade by linking the
largest landmasses of the earth – Asia, the Americas, and Europe.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bankoff, Greg, 2006. Winds of Colonisation: The Meteorological Contours of Spain’s
Imperium in thePacific, 1521-1898, Environment and History (12): 65-88.
Blair, Emma Helen and Robertson, Alexander (eds.). ‘Documents of 1600’, (Volume 11).
The

Philippinne

islands,

1493-1803:

explorations

by

early

navigators,

descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the
Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts,
showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those
islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the beginning of the
nineteenth century / trans. from the originals, ed. and annotated by Emma Helen
Blair and James Alexander Robertson, with historical introduction and additional
notes by Edward Gaylord Bourne. 55 Vols.
Fish, Shirley, 2011. The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific.
Author House.

Gschaedler, Andre,1953. Mexico and the Pacific, 1540-1565: The Voyages of Villalobos
and Legazpi and the Preparations Made for Them. PhD dissertation, Faculty of
Political Science, Columbia University.
Levesque, Rodrigue (trans.), n.d. The Philippines: Pigafetta’s Story of Their Discovery
by Magellan. Levesque Publications.
McDougall, Walter A.,1993. Let the Sea Make a Noise: A History of the North Pacific
from Magellan to MacArthur. Basic Books.
Morga, Antonio de, 1962. Historical Events of the Philippine Islands. Writings of Jose
Rizal Volume VI (Centennial Edition). Jose Rizal National Centennial
Commission.
Paige, Paula Spurlin (trans.),1969. The Voyage of Magellan: The Journal of Antonio
Pigafetta. Prentice-Hall International.
Ruescas, Javier and Wrana, Javier, 2012. The West Indies and the Manila Galleons:
The First Global Trade Route. In Probing Philippine-Spanish Connections in
10

�History: Selected Papers, Philippine-Spanish Friendship Day 2011. National
Historical Commission of the Philippines and the History Department, UP Diliman,
1-32.
Wright, Ione Stuessy, 1951. Voyages of Alvaro de Saavedra Ceron. In R. S. Boggs (ed.)
University of Miami Hispanic-American Studies. University of Miami Press.
Online Sources:
“The Philippine Islands, ”
http://philhist.pbworks.com/w/page/16367055/ThePhilippineIslands
“Thomas Cavendish”,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Cavendish#Capturing_a_Manila_galleon
Biography
Maria Luisa de Leon Bolinao is an Associate professor at the University of Philippines
Diliman. Her area of specialization is Asian History, particularly Southeast Asian History
and West Asian History. She teaches the Contemporary Period (Post-War Philippine
History), and her field of specialization is Environmental History.

11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="605">
                <text>Disaster in the High Seas: The Spanish Expeditions in the Pacific in the Sixteenth Century </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="606">
                <text>The Pacific Ocean is the largest body of water on earth, measuring more than 165 million square kilometers. Although the first European to spot it was Vasco NuÃ±ez de Balboa in 1513, who named it Mar del Sur (South Sea) due to a miscalculation, it was Ferdinand Magellan who named it Pacifico after taking notice of its calm waters.  This paper discusses the various disasters that sixteenth-century Spanish expeditions encountered during their trips to and from the Philippines while crossing the vast Pacific Ocean. It focuses on four events: (1) natural disasters like storms and gales; (2) health hazards like diseases and spoiled food provisions; (3) man-made hazards like mutinies and piracies; and, (4) other accidents like leaks and reef grounding. The study covers the period from Magellanâ€™s voyage of 1519 up to the trips of the galleons until the end of the sixteenth century, and concludes with the lessons learned from a century of traversing the Pacific.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="607">
                <text>Ma. Luisa De Leon-Bolinao, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="608">
                <text>5/14/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="43" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/14c8f3ea381590237f3f41e259b4b766.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d3965fcb793511b47d282a0415f9f200</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="614">
                    <text>The outfitting and sailing of early sixteenth-century vessels in the Pacific:
The Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions (1525-1536)
Jose Luis Casabán
Nautical Archaeology Program
Department of Anthropology
Texas A&amp;M University
College Station, TX, 77843-4352
USA
Email: jlcasaban@tamu.edu
Abstract
This paper examines the information provided by primary written sources in relation to
the outfitting and sailing of the ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions,
which took place between 1525 and 1536. On July 24, 1525, seven vessels, under the
command of Garcia Jofre de Loaysa, departed from La Coruña, Spain, to take the
Moluccas for the king of Spain, Charles I. Only one nao reached its destination where
the Spanish managed to thwart the Portuguese for several years with the help of the
natives. In 1527, Hernán Cortés sent Alvaro de Saavedra with three ships from New
Spain to find Trinidad, a ship from the Magellan’s expedition, and to find out the
outcome of the Loaysa expedition. He never returned. A close examination of eleven
documents written by survivors of both expeditions revealed one hundred and twelve
references regarding the use of nautical technology and operational aspects of
seafaring in the Pacific Ocean in the early sixteenth century. This data includes ship
typology, rigging, navigation techniques, equipment, provisions and containers, ballast,
hull maintenance, seagoing disasters and their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare.
This type of information is useful for nautical archaeologists since it can be compared
with the data provided by contemporary nautical and shipbuilding treatises and be used
to interpret the archaeological data. The analysis of such primary documents is
analogous to the way an archaeologist approach an excavation site – the data is
gathered and then interpreted by the nautical archaeologists.
Keywords: Loaysa, Pacific Ocean, Outfitting, Saavedra, Sailing

Introduction
This paper examines the information provided by primary written sources in relation to
the outfitting and sailing of the ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions,
which took place between 1525 and 1536. Between 1825 and 1837, Martín Fernández
de Navarrete, a Spanish Navy Officer and historian, published a collection of five
volumes about the voyages and discoveries of the Spanish since the fifteenth century.
1

�The original documents used for this collection were compiled and transcribed by
Navarrete in different Spanish archives and libraries since 1789.The Loaysa and
Saavedra expeditions were narrated in the fifth volume published in 1837. The account
was based on the original manuscripts written by members and survivors of both
expeditions and published as an appendix in the same volume. Navarrete cited thirtyseven documents to narrate both expeditions although only eleven of them provided
references related to ship outfitting and sailing in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Table
1). The data gathered includes references to ship typology, rigging, navigation
techniques, equipment, provisions and containers, ballast, hull maintenance, seagoing
disasters and their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare.
Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions (1525-1536)
On July 24, 1525, seven vessels, under the command of García Jofre de Loaysa,
departed La Coruña, Spain, where a Casa de las Especias (House of Spices) was
briefly established (Spate, 1979). The objective of the expedition was to occupy the
Moluccas and to control the spice trade. The expedition was a succession of disasters
and only one ship, the nao Victoria, reached its destination where the Spanish managed
to thwart the Portuguese for several years with the help of the natives. In 1527, Hernán
Cortés sent Alvaro de Saavedra with three ships from New Spain to find the nao
Trinidad, a ship from the Magellan’s expedition, and to find out the outcome of Loaysa’s
expedition. He never returned. In 1532, the Spanish survivors learned through the
Portuguese that king Charles I had sold his rights on the Spice Island to the king of
Portugal in exchange for 350.000 ducats in 1529 (Pigafetta, 2002). Between 1534 and
1535, the last survivors of both expeditions were taken to Cochin (India) and from there
to Lisbon, where they finally arrived in 1536.

Types of ships
The ships that took part in Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions are the typical oceanic
vessels of this period such as naos and caravels although there are also a pataje and a
bergantín (brigantine) (Table 2). However, the term nao (ship) is also applied to all
these vessels in a generic manner. Moreover, the caravel Parral is defined as a galleon
in some documents while Saavedra’s ship, Florida, is named caravel in another
document (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). With respect to the other two ships of
2

�Saavedra expedition, they are simply called navíos (vessels) without providing any
other details about them (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).The documents also refer to
two fustas built at the Moluccas by the Spanish, and one galera (galley) used by the
Portuguese in a naval combat. The variety of definitions for the same types of vessels
reminds us that the debate about sixteenth-century ship typology still needs to be
addressed. Additionally, the Spanish and Portuguese also adapted local boats from the
Moluccas such as paroles (prahu) and caracoras (kora-kora).

Sails
The types of sails mentioned in the documents are the main, fore and mizzen sails.
These references provide useful information about the sailing techniques during this
period. For instance, all ships used the fore course for sailing while the nao Victoria’s
main mast or Parral’s mizzen mast were repaired (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
Moreover, the nao Victoria sailed 20 leagues only using the fore and mizzen sails while
crossing the Pacific Ocean due to the bad weather (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).The
documents also inform us about the sailcloth carried on board the ships. The nao San
Gabriel transported cañamaza (hemp canvas) and holandesa (Dutch canvas) which
might be used to tailor new sails during the voyage (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
During this period sailcloth was known in Spain as olona because a large proportion of
sails mentioned on shipbuilding contracts came from Brittany’s towns such as Nantes
and Olone (Smith, 1993). The word holandesais indicating a Dutch origin for this
material. The San Gabriel’s pilot also tells us about the ship’s rigging lifespan that he
estimates up to seven years (Smith, 1993).

Navigation
In his logbook, the pilot of the nao Victoria mentions that the position of the sun was
measured every day at noon to determine the latitude. This routine was only interrupted
when the sun was not visible because of the clouds. However, he does not indicate the
type of instrument used for the observations, probably an astrolabe. In the same
document there are several references to the use of sounding leads. This instrument
was used to measure the depths and to identify the type of seabed. This data was
crucial when ships navigated close to shore and it also helped to establish the position
of the ship in relation to the coast (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
3

�An emergency communication system was proposed by Elcano before the fleet crossed
the Atlantic (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). If any ship got separated from the fleet
before reaching the Strait of Magellan because of the weather, or any other reason, it
would have to wait for twenty days at All Saints’ Bay (Brazil). After that time, a letter
would be placed inside a clay pot buried under a cross placed on a visible spot. Then
the ship would continue the voyage until the next meeting point where it would leave
another message. This system was employed by the pataje Santiago which left a letter
at Santa Cruz River that was found by the naos Victoria and San Gabriel. The letter
informed the other ships that the Santiago and the rest of the fleet were on their way to
the Cape of the Eleven Thousand Virgins (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).The same
system was employed in the Pacific by Saavedra. On his way to the Moluccas he left a
letter buried in an island of the Marshals where his ship got separated from the rest of
his fleet (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Richard Hawkins used a similar system
during his expedition to the South Sea in 1593. He left the messages inside a musket
barrel place on the top of a hill instead of in a pot (Hawkins, 1970).

Ships equipment
The documents often mention the ships’ pumps although they do not indicate their type.
Pumps are normally cited in plural so it is possible that the ships were equipped with
two pumps or carried a spare pump in case the main one failed during the voyage. Two
pumps were recovered from the Sancti Spiritus wreck at the Cape of the Eleven
Thousands Virgins (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837), and the nao Victoria used two
pumps while crossing the Pacific Ocean because of the heavy leaking of its hull
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).It has to be noted that the House of Trade issued an
ordinance during the reign of Charles I which made mandatory for oceanic vessels to
carry two pumps, one of them as a spare (Consejo de Indias, 1943). On the other hand,
archaeology provides examples of ships equipped with two operational pumps such as
the Highborn Cay shipwreck, an early sixteenth century caravel, and the Emanuel Point
I wreck dated in 1559 (Oertling, 1996). Saavedra also mentions how exhausting was
working at the pumps and how he had to transfer men to his ships to helpwith the work
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). In the same way, the naos San Gabriel and
Victoriakidnapped natives from various islands to work at the pumps (Fernández de
4

�Navarrete, 1837). This could indicate that the ships were equipped with burr pumps that
require a lot of manpower to ensure their effectiveness in comparison with the suction
pumps.
The documents also include references to small service boats such asesquifes and
bateles. According to O’Scanlan (1974), these terms were equally used to name both
types of boats although bateles were larger than esquifes. During the Loaysa
expedition, esquifes were used to carry people and messages between ships, to
explore the shore and provisioning, and to transport materials and equipment from one
ship to another such as during the salvage of the Sancti Spiritus remains (Fernández de
Navarrete, 1837). The loss of a small boat meant that the crew of a ship could not go
ashore to get provisions because the larger ships were unable to anchor in shallow
waters. In that case, the crews depended on the natives to get food and supplies which
was often uncertain. That was the case of Saavedra’s first attempt to return to New
Spain across the Pacific. He had to return to the Moluccas because of the contrary
winds and the loss of the batel that prevented him to get provisions during the journey
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Moreover, various ships had to share one esquife
after theirs were lost during a storm in Bay of la Victoria (Fernández de Navarrete,
1837).
The references to the ground tackle provide information about the number of anchors
carried on board the ships, their effectiveness, and strength. In several occasions,
anchors started to drag even when more than one had been deployed. That was the
case of the nao Victoria that ran ashore in Bay of la Victoria despite deploying five
anchors (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). A few days later, the same ship was at risk
again in Gallegos River when its anchor broke near the stock and had to set sail to
Santa Cruz River (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Saavedra’s ship also experienced
difficulties with its ground tackle while anchoring at the Marshalls. In this case, two
anchor cables were damaged due to the rocky bottom and the ship had to kedge off to
abandon the anchorage (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Moreover, a few days later
the natives stole one of the two anchors he had deployed without a marker buoy
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). On the other hand, there are no references to the
weight and dimensions of the anchors.
5

�Table 1. List of documents containing references to ships outfitting and sailing.
(Navarrete, 1837)

6

�Provisions, containers and ballast
These types of ships could not carry all the provisions needed by the crews to sail
across the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. The documents tell us how the Loaysa’s fleet
had to get provisions from various islands before crossing the Atlantic and once they
reached the American coast, the crew of nao Victoria killed a sea lion in Santa Cruz
River to get fresh meat (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). After leaving the Strait of
Magellan, the fleet got separated. The crew of the pataje Santiago realized that part of
their provisions was carried on board the nao Victoria because its hold as too small. The
ship only carried four quintales of biscuit and eight pipas of water that were insufficient
for a journey of 2,200 leagues (12,100 km) across the Pacific Ocean. Moreover, the
ship had lost its esquife getting provision before arriving at the Moluccas seemed almost
impossible. For that reason the crew decided to abandon the expedition and to sail to
New Spain that was only 1,000 leagues away (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Finally,
when Saavedra arrived at the Marshalls, he ordered to fill some pipas with saltwater to
be used as variable ballast (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). This was an unusual
procedure because this type of ballast generally consisted of cobbles and pebbles of
rock, or even sacks of sand (Smith, 1993).

Hull maintenance
Although the documents indicate that emergency repairs were carried out on the ships
of both expeditions, these references are not common. The lack of facilities such as
shipyards, tools and materials limited the type of repairs that could be made. For
example, the nao Victoria had to be abandoned in Moluccas because its hull was so
damaged that it could not be repaired. Frames and knees were broken after running
aground at Bay of la Victoria, the seams between planks were opened while navigating
across the Pacific, and the vibrations produced when the naval ordinance was fired on
board (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). Additionally, the documents also indicate that
the ships carried materials for hull maintenance such as the cauldron of pitch that
caught fire on board the nao Victoria (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).On the other
hand, the expedition members adapted local materials to repair their ships or to build
new vessels. That was the case of the solution provided to mitigate the effects of the
ship worms on the hull of Saavedra’s ship before departing from the Moluccas to New
7

�Spain. A sacrificial planking layer was added to the ship’s hull with a coat of local
bitumen used by the natives to caulk their own boats (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).

Table 2. Types of ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions. (Navarrete, 1837)

Seagoing disasters and their remedies
The demanding sailing conditions of the oceanic voyages increased the chances of
seagoing disasters. The texts provide several examples and also show the vital
importance of the ships’ carpenters in these expeditions. Carpenters were sent on
8

�anesquife from the Sancti Spiritus to fix the mainmast of the nao Victoria when it broke
after departing from La Gomera. It took them three days to repair it. Meanwhile, the nao
Victoria rammed the stern the caravel Santa Maria del Parral and, once again, an
esquife with carpenters and planks was sent to repair the ship (Fernández de
Navarrete, 1837).
Storms could also disperse damage or sink the ships. The caravel Lesmes was driven
south by a storm before arriving at the Cape of the Eleven Thousand Virgins, and
probably saw Cape Horn before rejoining the fleet (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The
nao Victoria run aground during a storm near the Cape of the Eleven Thousand Virgins
and damaged the rudder, keel and sternpost. The carpenters used planks and lead
sheathing to fix the keel and sternpost and put the rudder back in place (Fernández de
Navarrete, 1837). This situation demonstrates that these ships carried on board enough
spare materials to face this type of incidents, at least for limited period of time. Finally,
another storm separated the Victoria, Lesmes, Parral and Santiago when they were
leaving the Strait of Magellan (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837), and due to rough seas,
the hull of the nao Victoria started to leak. In fact, the crew worked continuously at
pumps until the ship reached the Moluccas Islands. Various members of the crew died
of exhaustions due to the work and the food shortage (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).

Ships ordnance and naval combats
The members of Loaysa’s and Saavedra’s expeditions fought during several years
against the Portuguese at the Moluccas with the help of the natives. For that reason,
there are also references to ship’s ordnance and naval combats in the documents.
While sailing across the Pacific, the ordnance was probably stored in the hold of the nao
Victoria and it was only put on deck when they were approaching the Moluccas, in case
they encountered the Portuguese (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The ordnance had
no use in the Pacific because the possibility of finding enemy vessels was highly
unlikely. In addition, if the artillery was carried in the hold, its weight improved the ship’s
stability. The documents also mention the combat between the nao Victoria and various
Portuguese vessels, including one fusta, one batel and several prahus. The vessels
were equipped with pieces of artillery as they intended to sink the Spanish ship. Part of
the ship’s ordnance had been disembarked to defend the Spanish base on land
9

�(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The lack of weight made the ship’s deck float too high
on the water, making its artillery quite ineffective despite of the crew spending twelve
quintales of gunpowder in firing the cannons. The cannon recoil caused more damage
to the already weakened ship’s structure than the three shots taken from the
Portuguese (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). After this combat, the nao Victoria was
abandoned and two fustas were built using local timbers (Fernández de Navarrete,
1837). The Spanish carpenters ignored the characteristics of the local timbers and only
one fusta was finally used because the other rotted before being launched (Fernández
de Navarrete, 1837).The documents also refer another naval combat between the
Spanish fusta and a Portuguese galley. This reference includes the typical pieces of
artillery of this period such as bronze pedreros, sacres, versos as well as iron versos,
large falconetes, and culebrinas (Fernández de Navarrete, 1837). The ordnance was
very versatile and could be used in different types of ships or on land. Finally, during the
sixteenth century, the proportion of foreign condestables and gunners in the Spanish
fleets was important although the number of Spanish gunners increased by the end of
the century (Pérez-Mallaína, 1998). This situation is also reflected by the documents
which mention the presence of Flemish constables between the Spanish crew
(Fernández de Navarrete, 1837).
Conclusions
The analysis of these eleven documents written by the survivors of the Loaysa and
Saavedra expeditions reveal numerous references regarding the use of nautical
technology and operational aspects of seafaring in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean in the
early sixteenth century. This data includes ship typology, rigging, navigation techniques,
equipment, provisions and containers, ballast, hull maintenance, seagoing disasters and
their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare. On the other hand, most of the information
is provided in an indirect manner because the authors do not intend to teach us
outfitting methods or techniques. They were just describing the situations in which they
become involved and how they solve the difficulties encountered while traveling to the
other side of the world. This type of information is extremely useful for nautical
archaeologists because it can be compared with the data provided by contemporary
nautical and shipbuilding treatises and archaeological data. The accounts also contain
10

�practical descriptions about the use and maintenance of numerous elements of the
ship’s outfitting. However, the data is not provided in a direct manner as a nautical
treaty does. The analysis of such primary documents is analogous to the way an
archaeologist approach the excavation of an archaeological site – the data is gathered
and then interpreted by the nautical archaeologists.
References
Consejo de Indias, 1943. Recopilación de leyes de los reynos de la Indias, mandadas
imprimir y publicar por la Magestad Católica del Rey don Cárlos II. Nuetsro Señor. 4
impresión. Gráficas Ultra S.A., Madrid.
Hawkins, S. R., 1970. The Observations of Sir Richard Hawkins. Da Capo Press, New
York.
Fernández de Navarrete, M., 1837. Colección de los viajes y descubrimientos que
hicieron por mar los españoles desde fines del siglo XV. Volumen V. Expediciones al
Maluco, viages de Loaisa y de Saavedra. Imprenta Real, Madrid.
O’Scanlan, T., 1974. Diccionario marítimo español: que además de las definiciones de
las voces con sus equivalentes en francés, inglés e italiano, contiene tres vocabularios
de estos idiomas con las correspondencias castellanas: redactado por orden del Rey
nuestro señor. Museo Naval, Madrid.
Oertling, T. J., 1996. Ships’ Bilge Pumps: a History of Their Development, 1500-1900.
Texas A&amp;M University Press, College Station.
Pérez-Mallaína, P. E., 1998. Spain’s Men of the Sea: Daily Life on the Indies Fleets in
the Sixteenth Century. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Pigafetta, A., 2002. Primer viaje alrededor del mundo. Dastin, Madrid.
Smith, R. C., 1993. Vanguard of Empire: Ships of Exploration in the Age of Columbus.
Oxford University Press, New York.
Spate, O. H. K., 1979. The Spanish Lake. University of Minessota, Minneapolis.

11

�Biography
Jose Luis Casabán is a PhD candidate in the Nautical Archaeology Program at Texas
A&amp;M University. His dissertation research focuses on the study of the 16th century
Spanish seafaring and shipbuilding technology. He is also specialized in the
applications of photogrammetry for underwater mapping and GIS. Since 2012, Jose is
one of the co-directors of the Finisterre Project, whose objectives are the underwater
survey, mapping, recording, and study of the remains of 1596 Armada shipwrecks
discovered near Cape Finisterre, in the northwest of Spain.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="610">
                <text>The outfitting and sailing of early sixteenth-century vessels in the Pacific: The Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions (1525-1536)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="611">
                <text>This paper examines the information provided by primary written sources in relation to the outfitting and sailing of the ships used in the Loaysa and Saavedra expeditions, which took place between 1525 and 1536. On July 24, 1525, seven vessels, under the command of Garcia Jofre de Loaysa, departed from La CoruÃ±a, Spain, to take the Moluccas for the king of Spain, Charles I. Only one nao reached its destination where the Spanish managed to thwart the Portuguese for several years with the help of the natives. In 1527, HernÃ¡n CortÃ©s sent Alvaro de Saavedra with three ships from New Spain to find Trinidad, a ship from the Magellanâ€™s expedition, and to find out the outcome of the Loaysa expedition. He never returned. A close examination of eleven documents written by survivors of both expeditions revealed one hundred and twelve references regarding the use of nautical technology and operational aspects of seafaring in the Pacific Ocean in the early sixteenth century. This data includes ship typology, rigging, navigation techniques, equipment, provisions and containers, ballast, hull maintenance, seagoing disasters and their remedies, ordnance, and naval warfare. This type of information is useful for nautical archaeologists since it can be compared with the data provided by contemporary nautical and shipbuilding treatises and be used to interpret the archaeological data. The analysis of such primary documents is analogous to the way an archaeologist approach an excavation site â€“ the data is gathered and then interpreted by the nautical archaeologists. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="612">
                <text>Jose Luis CasabÃ¡n, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="613">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="44" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="44">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/d8d9714ea01741734d9379eccaaa5c10.pdf</src>
        <authentication>07ee134fc48130fa36d35bc2699a5a9d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="620">
                    <text>The Southeast Asian Galleon Trade:
A process towards a re-assessment of human-environment interaction
Jennifer Craig and Carl Hughes
McGill University
Indian Ocean World Centre
Montreal, Canada H3A 0E6
Email: Jennifer.craig2@mail.mcgill.ca
Email: carl.hughes@mail.mcgill.ca
Abstract
In 1939, William Schurz published ‘The Manila Galleon’ that has been considered a
seminal work in maritime history (in the English language). In it, he proposed the
shipping route of the galleon trade in the Pacific Ocean during the 16th to 19th centuries.
The directional flow of goods were purported to enter eastern Southeast Asia through
the Philippine archipelago at the San Bernardino Strait. The same strait was also used
as the exit point by the galleons that travelled northeast out of East Asia and east bound
across the Pacific. This paper will reconsider Schurz’s hypothesis with input from up to
date analyses based on environmental data. Our results are displayed in layers on
digital seascape in a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) format? These layers
include detailed water-surface topography (small islands, atolls, reefs) as well as the
dynamic atmospheric and oceanic environment. The data for these layers were
gathered from accessible online datasets generated by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These datasets were then reconfigured into
algorithms and models for use in a set of geovisualizations using GIS and Google Earth.
This is overlaid with Schurz’s hypothesized historic shipping route. The results are a
comparison of human-environment interaction and a re-assessment of a 75 year old
hypothesis.
Keywords: Chart, Digital, Geovisualizations, Manila Galleon, Maritime, Pacific Ocean

Introduction
This paper is a case study and part of a larger project that re-evaluates historians’
works on shipping routes in Southeast Asia from the 14th to mid-18th centuries CE
(Common Era) for maritime archaeology purposes. It discusses the methodology to
produce dynamic charts that visually represent human-environment interaction. The
1

�direct comparison of contemporary data on human activity and environment action was
problematic because there is little information on maritime environment data prior to the
mid-19th century. To overcome this issue, we incorporated recent atmospheric and
oceanic data generated from readily available reputable sources. The results are an
original figure of a chart created in 1939 and three charts created using GIS software.
The first figure is William Schurz’s interpretation based on the Spanish archives. Of the
three figures created by this exercise, the first chart is a detailed shipping route through
the Philippines for the eastward journey. Schurz did not repeat the details for the
westward journey but he inferred similar directions that were followed through the
Philippines to Manila. The second chart showed the breadth of the possible shipping
routes eastward bound for the Americas. The third chart showed the breadth of possible
shipping routes westward bound across the Pacific Ocean.
Schurz’s hypothesis
William Schurz’s (1939) ‘The Manila Galleon’ is considered a seminal work in maritime
history (in the English language). Part of the reason why the book had such impact was
because it contained The Chart of the
Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1; henceforth known as
Schurz’s

Chart).

This

is

a

visual

representation of Schurz’s hypothesis of
past Spanish shipping activity through the
Philippines, across the Pacific Ocean and
along the western coast of the Americas.
However, the choice to include the figure
at the beginning of the book is confusing
because the chart did not represent
Schurz’s whole discussion but only one of
his

subsections

of

a

chapter.

The

subsection titled The Route (Schurz, 1939:
216-250) is summarized in Schurz’s Chart.

Fig. 1 The Chart of the Pacific Ocean. (Schurz,
1939: no number) Image enhancement by Rachid
Hedjam with Synchromedia laboratory, Ecole de
technologiesuperieure de Montreal, University of
Quebec, Canada.

One can see from this figure that Schurz included the multiple possible routes the
Spanish took to establish trade in Southeast Asia. Some of his directions may seem
2

�uncharacteristic of sailing; for example, when the ships heading eastbound suddenly
switched direction from northeast to directly east. Other directions were unclear perhaps
due to the scale of the chart, such as the route through the Philippines.
The environment these voyages took place was highly dynamic; with air and water
movement being the major contributors to the decision-making of shipping activity
timing and location but the figure did not include this information. In fact, the water and
air look placid, and appears practically non-existent. Perhaps this is a restriction during
the time of writing because his text provided details of a very dynamic environment.
Schurz expects his readers to be familiar with major planetary environment. For
example, he writes of prevailing winds. Understanding where these winds blow are
central to appreciating the degrees of latitude ships sailed on the Pacific Ocean’s east
and west bound routes. Due to the Universal Laws of Gravity between the Earth, the
Sun and the Moon, prevailing winds consistently blow across the Pacific Ocean
eastward in the prevailing westerlies belt at latitudes 30º to 60º and westwards in the
north-east trade winds belt between 5º to 30º(Thurman and Trujillo, 2001). Schurz’s
exclusion of major water currents is not surprising. At the time of this publication,
humans knew next to nothing about the seabed. In 1940, the Woods Hole Institute had
just gathered survey information on the Indian Ocean and it was not until 1967 that
Mary Tharp had completed her drawings of the bathometric rift and published her
results in Mercador’s World (Tharp, 1967). Since then, oceanographers have
discovered the planet’s ocean water currents are caused by the prevailing winds and
effects of temperature caused by the Earth’s molten core seeping through the Earth’s
Crust at seabed rifts (Thurman and Trujillo, 2001). In the Pacific Ocean, the
atmospheric and oceanic action is separated by the Equator into Northern and Southern
Hemispheres (Thurman and Trujillo, 2001). In both hemispheres, Subtropical Gyres are
formed by the circulatory movement of water currents caused by the California Rift and
Mariana Trench, along with wind direction caused by prevailing winds. The currents that
form the north Pacific Subtropical Gyre are the Kuroshio Current, at approximately 15º
latitude off the east coast of the Philippines, flowing northeast out of the Philippine Sea;
to the east flowing the North Pacific Current; to the south, flowing California Current and
returns westward across the Pacific Ocean from latitude 10-15º with the North
3

�Equatorial Current (Thurman and Trujillo, 2001). Although these are major systems of
the Earth’s planetary causes there are other seasonal environmental effects. One of the
seasonal details that Schurz discussed is the monsoon.
Schurz pointed out the ‘traditional route’ took months to complete because of the
monsoon winds. The longest stretch of the journey was going through the archipelago
from Manila to the Embocadero and crossing the Pacific Ocean. For the purposes of
this paper it will suffice to say that the sea, as displayed by Schurz, does not show the
dynamism of his text. He expects the reader to be familiar with the local weather
patterns and planetary functions known in the 1930s. When he mentions monsoon he
does not explain the regularity of shipwreck caused by extreme weather but instead
implies this by mentioning the need to be out of harm’s way at the start of the season.
This is certainly the case for the westbound journey timing to enter the Embocadero and
the eastbound journey’s timing for leaving Manila. In order to visualize a closer reality to
the shipping activities of past sailors, the authors are currently developing a
methodology to display dynamic charts with historians’ hypotheses included as layers.
This will provide a platform for comparisons of data, recognition of gaps in the literature
and provide information for maritime archaeologists to recognize areas of potential highrisk for shipwreck of particular cultural groups during specific periods of time. This
exercise identifies cultural-group-specific corridors of maritime activity. It identifies
locations of Spanish galleons in the Philippines at certain periods of time; or when a
shipwreck is located these charts narrow down the possibilities of date and ship-type.
Alternatively, it notes if a shipwreck is in an unexpected area, leading to the hypothesis
of bootlegging.
Methodology: The Digital Data
Geovisualizations bring the dynamisms of the environment to historians’ hypothesized
routes. The results of this exercise are displayed in layers on digital seascape in GIS
format. These layers include detailed water-surface topography (small islands, atolls,
reefs) and the dynamic atmospheric environment. The data for these layers are
gathered from online accessible datasets generated by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These datasets are then reconfigured into
algorithms and models for use in a set of geovisualizations using GIS and Google Earth.
4

�This is overlaid with Schurz’s hypothesized historic shipping route for comparison and
discussion. First, one had to prepare the data for GIS. This required ‘point creation’ of
the geographical locations described in the historian’s text. With these points in place
the authors followed Schurz’s text, the case study, to connect the points and sailing
routes. The reader is reminded that the authors were focused on the Southeast Asian
portion of Schurz’s data so the figures below do not include details about the route from
the Pacific Ocean to the western coast of the Americas, nor along that coast. The
westbound directions from Acapulco are assumed steady across the Pacific Ocean
because, in comparison to the complicated course of the eastbound journey, the
westbound journey is described as regular and straight across the Pacific to the
Ladrones. For example, to describe the eastward route from Manila to the Embocadero
Schurz (1939: 223-4) wrote 23.5 lines of text. From the Embocadero to the point where
the galleon crossed the Pacific Ocean, Schurz (1939: 226-7) wrote 14 lines of text. The
description for the westward route from Acapulco to Manila however, occupied only 8.5
lines of text (Schurz, 1939: 251-252).
Results: Geovisualizations
For the sake of clarity the ‘traditional route’ has been subdivided by the authors into six
steps: 1) Manila to Embocadero; 2) Eastbound from Embocadero to Ladrones; 3)
Eastbound from Ladrones to the Americas; 4) Southbound along the Americas; 5)
Westbound from the Americas to Ladrones; 6) West-Northwest bound from Ladrones to
Embocadero; 7) Embocadero to Manila. Steps 1, 2, 6 and 7 are displayed in full with
only partial discussion of steps 3 and 5. Step 4 is not included in this paper. To discuss
these locations and the consistent and seasonal environment the authors noted details
of timing and direction. Our meaning of the term ‘Direction’ is specifically the
geographical locations of the ‘traditional route’. ‘Timing’ discusses the months chosen
for sail which correspond to environment data of seasonal high and low activity. Steps 1
and 7 are displayed in (Fig. 2). The east bound journey was timed to start with the
beginning of the southwest monsoon. At this time, the winds were strong and would
push the sails of galleons through the archipelago from early May to late September,
with preference for timing during mid-June to mid-July (Schurz, 1939: 251-252). The
route’s direction through the Philippines is provided in minute detail in the book’s text
5

�over two pages (Schurz, 1939: 221-222). However, Schurz’s Chart (Fig. 1) only showed

Fig. 2 Schurz’s hypothesized Spanish galleon ‘traditional route’ through the Philippines
from 1565 to 1730. (Schurz, 1939: 216-283 and Chart created by Carl Hughes)

the exit/entry point of the Embocadero at the San Bernardino Strait. Figure 2 brings to
the foreground the following interesting points. The passage for the shipping activity
should be littered with shipwrecks. However, at this time the authors are unaware of any
underwater archaeology activity from the Verde Passage eastward. Perhaps this has to
do with the highly active environment. At this time, there is little data available on the
surface currents and wind force of the Philippines. Although an Oceanography article
discussed some of these details in the Sulu Sea region, the area is outside the route
discussed by Schurz (Lermusiaux, et al., 2011). Interestingly, Schurz provided minute
details when the route was directed around the entire coast of Capul Island. He included
what was viewed at the portside and starboard along with, one of the few times it is
mentioned, distance. This may have been the same case for San Bernardino Island
6

�situated near the entrance of the San Bernardino Strait. The directions on how a ship
was to sail through this point are confusing, hence the hashed triangle over the island of
San Bernardino and out towards Catanduanes, “northeast with Sorsogon coast to port
and San Bernardino to starboard; northeast by east seven leagues to the Embocadero
with San Bernardino now to port and the island of Biri to starboard” (Schurz, 1939: 222).
Step 2 and half of step 3 are displayed in (Fig. 3). Mid-July was recorded as the best
time to use the wind power of the monsoon in order to reach and sail across the North
Pacific. The Spanish galleons were recorded to regularly leave Manila from mid-June
and reach the Embocadero in mid-July; and then head from the 2nd Midpoint to the
Americas in September through November. Throughout most of the year, the winds and
currents run east from the 2nd Midpoint to the Americas. In (Fig. 3), October is labelled
because it is the middle of that period. In order to get to the Ladrones, they would need
to rely on the July winds to push them out of the Embocadero, up to the latitude where
the current flows eastward and along a narrow band of latitude running parallel to the
arrows on Figure 3. Our data shows that north of the July currents, the wind direction is
straight north then curves west. If this were the case, then ships may not have only
stopped into the Ladrones but also ported the islands south of China and/or Japan.
Schurz (1939: 230) did remark that ships reached Japan, “a galleon occasionally
passed close enough to make out the mountains of Hondo to the west”. On the chart
where the lines are solid, very definitive directions are provided. Where the hashed
triangles are is the potential extent of where the ships may have sailed. Schurz does
mention the full breadth of the route extended from the Shichi-to Islands to Guam but he
is clear that the main area the ships sailed were between the Volcanes and Uracas
(Schurz, 1939: 230-231). The ships again follow a very strict route to Midpoint 1 at 31º
latitude and longitude east of Manila 28.5º”, then east northeast on to Midpoint 2 at
between 36º and 37º in longitude 40º. Within the area represented in the key as the
Extent of the Route, Schurz indulged in Spanish lore of the islands Rica de Oro and
Rica de Plata (‘Rich in Gold’ and ‘Rich in Silver’). He spent some time discussing the
importance of these islands and stipulated the reason the ‘traditional route’ remained on
course for the length of time it did was because of these islands. Rica de Oro and Rica
de Plata had multiple locations over hundreds of years. They were often likened to
7

�Ptolemy’s
Chryse.

Argyre
Henry

and
Yule

(1882) placed a start
point from Orissa, West
Coast India and sailed
east across the Bay of
Bengal to
Arakan,

Argyre

(in

Burma)

in

parallel to the Ganges.
From there one went
south to Chryse within
Indo-China (i.e. Pegu
and

Irrawady

Delta

Myanmar/Thailand).

of

Fig. 3 Schurz’s ‘traditional route’ eastward from the Embocadero to
mid-way across the Pacific Ocean. (Schurz, 1939: 216-283 and Chart
created by Carl Hughes)

In

1885, William Muir in his publication on the Annual Report of the Royal Asiatic Society
cited Yule but went on to place Ptolemy’s Argyre in Arakan, Burma and Chryse as a
misnomer (Muir, 1885). This is interesting timing as the British were attempting to
colonize this part of the planet. Later, when the Americans displayed strong presence in
the Pacific Ocean, Japan was thought to be Chryse / Rica de Plata (Chassigneux 1933;
Moriarity and Roberts 1975). Considering these comments, the authors believe this is
still an area open for debate and one that seems to move geography according to
political maneuvers in colonization.
Half of step 5 and all of step 6 are displayed in (Fig. 4). The westbound voyage was
timed based on the Philippines’ northeast monsoon. It was recorded as best timing to
have the galleons in Manila by mid-April. This journey was only a matter of weeks so
the suggested date for leaving Acapulco was during the month of February through to
the end of March (Schurz, 1939: 225). Spanish galleons sailed westbound from the
Americas to Ladrones, then west bound from Ladrones to Embocadero. The westbound
journey, like the eastbound, also had a wide zone of possible sail route. Within which
any of the islands from the Marianas to Guam were potentially ported. A Royal Decree
in 1668 declared Guam as a regular stop point for all Manila Galleons. In 1681, Guam
8

�was fortified and a royal governor and friars were sent to administer and convert the
local populace in the name of the Spanish crown. When timing is considered, Schurz
referred to Humbolt on the ‘serenity of the sky’, and did not mention a specific month in
which the galleons had favorable conditions; except that it was best to enter the
Embocadero prior to the start of the northeast monsoon that runs from late April to early
October. This corresponds with Schurz’s (1939: 225, 252) comments that galleons were
not expected to reach Manila again until mid-April.

Fig. 4 Schurz’s ‘traditional route’ westward from the mid-Pacific Ocean, through the
Ladrones to the Embocadero. (Schurz, 1939: 216-283 and Chart created by Carl Hughes)

Discussion and Conclusion
The authors provided a methodology to create geovisualizations that displayed the
complex seascape of exchange with details on shipping activity directions and timing.
There are many and varied details to consider if one were to reassess the whole of
Schurz’s chart so the authors narrowed their focus to only Southeast Asia and the
western Pacific Ocean portion of Schurz’s ‘traditional route’, namely the Philippines and
the Ladrones. The Philippines is an archipelago of over 7,000 islands that
topographically intercepts the force of the Pacific Ocean in the Philippine Sea as it
9

�moves over/through the archipelago to continue to flow into the South China Sea, Sulu
Sea and the Indonesian Throughflow. The Ladrones are the Marianas Islands (Schurz,
1939: 247), an archipelago to the east of the Philippine Sea and at the western
boundary of the Pacific Ocean. The directional flow of goods were purported to enter
westward into east Southeast Asia through the Philippine archipelago at the San
Bernardino Strait. The same strait was also the exit point; then northwards close to
Japan with the eastbound route out of East Asia and across the north Pacific. The
locations mentioned in the text were all located and pinpointed on digital charts, along
with lines drawn or hashed-marks used to display breadth of route. The
geovisualizations provided more complete and dynamic figures to accompany the
details of Schurz’s text. It also pointed out the locations of unexpected activities on the
route, such as sailing around the entire island of Capul in the Philippine archipelago.
With these more detailed figures, we can begin to surmise the possibility of bootlegging
having occurred in the Ladrones. This area was visited by both the eastbound and
westbound journeys. The long stay and the false ship manifests are other indicators that
this area was a potential hotspot for illicit activity.
The outcome of this exercise pointed out the inconsistencies between the text and
figures. Schurz’s original chart (Fig. 1) showed an overlap of multiple documents. The
key associated to the Schurz’s Chart entailed five routes, however in his text he
discussed more. Schurz suggested that the galleon trade occurred within the period
from 16th to 19th centuries, specifically from 1565 to 1815. The ‘traditional route’
existed from 1565 to 1762 without much argument but from 1762 to 1814 various other
options were suggested, legislated, decreed and ultimately ignored. The Spanish
consulado, “which embodied the commercial interests at Manila” (Schurz 1939: 226)
nearly consistently argued to re-route different directions but these never took place
(specifically in years 1777, 1782, 1786, 1791, 1794) (Schurz, 1939: 226). An example
that Schurz does include in his chart but does not explain in the key is the Cape
Bojeador option. It was never favored, nor followed by the Spanish (Fry, 1985: 17-18). It
was endorsed by Philip Thompson, a British pilot of the royal navy who stated, “up the
west side of Luzon [a sail ship] could climb to the twentieth parallel in two and a half or
three DAYS” (Schurz, 1939: 224); whereas the ‘traditional route’ took nearly two
10

�MONTHS. Thompson’s route shortened the average time to Acapulco from five or six
months to three months. If this is the case then why follow the southern Embocadero
route? It was also interesting to note that modern day environment data was compatible
for displaying the past seasonal environment information. The seasons Schurz
discussed were from the archival records of the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries and these
matched the seasonality of the data collected by NOAA over an 18 year period, from
1992 to 2010.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our Team Leaders Brendan Gillon and Gwyn Campbell for their
continued academic input and support. This project is funded by the Social Science and
Humanities Research Council of Canada’s Major Collaborative Research Initiative for
the project The Indian Ocean World: The Making of the First Global Economy in the
Context of Human-Environment Interaction (http://indianoceanworldcentre.com/mcri).

References
Chassigneux, Edmond., 1933. Rica de oro et Rica de plata. In T'oungPao, Second
Series, Vol. 30 (1-2): 37-84, Brill, available on the World Wide Web at:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4527041.
Fry, Howard. T., 1985. The Eastern Passage and Its Impact on Spanish Policy in the
Philippines, 1758-1790. Philippine Studies, Vol. 33 (1): 3-21.
GeoNames.,
2013.
GeoNames
http://www.geonames.org/

Geographical

Database,

retrieved

from

Lermusiaux, Pierre, F. J., Haley, Patrick J. Jr., Leslie, Wayne, G., Agarwal, A., Logutov,
Oleg, G., and Burton, Lisa, J., 2011. Multiscale Physical and Biological Dynamics in the
Philippine Archipelago: Predictions and Processes. Journal of Oceanography, Vol. 24
(1): 70-89.
Moriarity, James. R., III and Roberts, William, R., 1975. Between Cipango and Quivira:
The Legends of Rica de Oro, Rica de Plata and Las Islas del. Southern California
Quarterly, Vol. 57 (3): 223-242, University of California Press on behalf of the Historical
Society of Southern California, Santa Cruz, accessed on the World Wide Web
26/11/2013 at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41170604.
Muir, W., 1885.Annual Report of the Royal Asiatic Society. Journal of the Royal Asiatic
Society of Great Britain &amp; Ireland, Vol. 17 (3): f1-f16, accessed on the World Wide Web
11

�26/11/2013 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00165517.
Schurz, W., 1939.The Manila Galleon. E. P. Dutton, (Reprinted 1959), New York.
Tharp, M., 1967. Bathymetric Map. In Mercator’s World and reproduced for National
Geographic Maps the 1999 November/December issue.
Thurman, Harold. V., and Trujillo, Alan P., 2001. Essentials in Oceanography. Pearson
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, Seventh Edition.
Yule, H., 1882. Notes on the Oldest Records of the Sea-Route to China from Western
Asia. In Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society and Monthly Record of
Geography, New Monthly Series, Vol. 4 (11): 649-660, Wiley on behalf of The Royal
Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers), London, accessed on
the World Wide Web 26/11/2013 at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1800301.
Biography
Jennifer Craig is an underwater archaeologist. She attained two Archaeology degrees
from Memorial University in Newfoundland and University of Bristol. She continues to
thank all the people whose projects she was/is invited to join. Jennifer started her
Doctoral degree at the University of Oxford and continues at McGill University.
Carl Hughes is a GIScientist. He attained a degree in Geography from McGill. He
continues to work on novel web based mapping methods in his Masters degree at
McGill University. He would like to thank the support and resources provided to himfrom
within the Indian Ocean World Centre.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="615">
                <text>The Southeast Asian Galleon Trade: A process towards a re-assessment of human-environment interaction</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="616">
                <text>In 1939, William Schurz published â€˜The Manila Galleonâ€™ that has been considered a seminal work in maritime history (in the English language). In it, he proposed the shipping route of the galleon trade in the Pacific Ocean during the 16th to 19th centuries. The directional flow of goods were purported to enter eastern Southeast Asia through the Philippine archipelago at the San Bernardino Strait. The same strait was also used as the exit point by the galleons that travelled northeast out of East Asia and east bound across the Pacific. This paper will reconsider Schurzâ€™s hypothesis with input from up to date analyses based on environmental data. Our results are displayed in layers on digital seascape in a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) format? These layers include detailed water-surface topography (small islands, atolls, reefs) as well as the dynamic atmospheric and oceanic environment. The data for these layers were gathered from accessible online datasets generated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These datasets were then reconfigured into algorithms and models for use in a set of geovisualizations using GIS and Google Earth. This is overlaid with Schurzâ€™s hypothesized historic shipping route. The results are a comparison of human-environment interaction and a re-assessment of a 75 year old hypothesis. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="617">
                <text>Jennifer Craig</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="618">
                <text>Carl Hughes, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="619">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="45" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="45">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/8a03a03e5a3081cad363fe1671f4d882.pdf</src>
        <authentication>832a9cf0a4a07f2888368f764619c27e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="625">
                    <text>A Seat at the Table:
Addressing Artefact Biases in Asian Shipwreck Assemblages
Brian M. Fahy
Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Email: brian.fahy@arch.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
The ceramic trade throughout Medieval Southeast Asia was prolific. Terrestrial sites
have yielded massive amounts of ceramic material and the archaeological reports of
shipwreck cargoes corroborate the versatile and extensive qualities of trade ceramics in
the region. The sheer quantity of ceramic artefacts found in shipwreck assemblages,
paired with a well-researched framework of the aesthetic, show that there is no doubt
that we rely heavily on ceramic data to date wrecks and establish regional trading
patterns. This paper will debate that we are too 'ceramo-centric' in our analyses of
shipwrecks. While ceramics typically represent the bulk of the recovered material in
these instances, many other types of media are present in the assemblage. Yet, these
“lesser” materials suffer from a lack of investigation and therefore play virtually no role in
the archaeological and historical assessment. This case study focuses on the nonceramic assemblages for six shipwrecks from the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries of
Southeast Asia (three Chinese-built and three Southeast Asian-styled junks). The
typological study of the metallurgical, organic and geological material from these wrecks
can complement much of the work surrounding existing trade models as well as reveal
new concepts of crew life, belief systems and culture. These facets come together to
offer a more holistic narrative as well as stimulating the need within the region for more
study regarding the locations where past peoples mined and manufactured raw metals.
Keywords: Southeast Asia, Ceramics, Metals, Shipwrecks, Trade
Introduction
Shipwreck biographies are primarily described through their ceramic complement.
Ceramics make up the bulk of the archaeological material in a shipwreck assemblage,
is the material most likely to survive the underwater environment over a long span of
time, and, due to the large amount of terrestrial archaeology and historical study of the
medium, have become a decent range-dating material as well. These combinations of
features contribute very heavily on a shipwreck narrative purely due to its majoritive
presence. This angle of research can be misleading since it creates a bias toward
ceramic manufacturing and trading centres. Metals and organic material found in such
an environment, while more likely to undergo chemical change or even complete
1

�erosion in these circumstances, still have been found in a preserved condition. This
paper is an attempt to correct that ceramic bias by highlighting material that not only
plays less of a part in the interpretation of the shipwrecks and their cargoes due to its
quantified minority; it also plays less of a part due to the objectiveness of the community
studying and documenting it.

This heavy stress on ceramics in shipwrecks, as it

pertains to Southeast and Eastern Asia, lend us to focus our interests on the ceramic
centres of these regions, thereby “glossing over” regions that may not have a large
ceramic presence, yet assuredly contribute a great deal to the trade both within the
region as well as inter-regionally. This case study encompasses the assemblages of six
14th and 15th centuries shipwrecks; three Chinese built junks and three Southeast
Asian styled boats to highlight a couple of examples in non-ceramic artefact studies
that will hopefully prove the need for increased
scholarship on these less fetishized materials.
These wrecks have been chosen for specific
reasons. Firstly, they are case specific to the
appropriate temporal range of the study. This
encompasses the formation of the Ming Dynasty;
the reign of the Hongwu (洪武) Emperor (13681398CE) through a large portion of the Ming Ban
up to and including the reign of Emperor Hongzhi
(弘治) (1487-1505 CE). They also reflect the wide
stretch of
Southeast Asia (See Fig. 1). The Turiang in
Peninsular Malaysia, the Bakau in Indonesia, the

Fig. 1 Shipwrecks in this case study
(shown in circle). (Brown 2009: 16)

Ko SI Chang III and Rang Kwien in the Gulf of Thailand. The Lena Shoal along the
Palawan coast and the Santa Cruz in the Lingayen Gulf, both found in the Philippines.
These wrecks also represent the diversity of surveyed and excavated practices. The Ko
Si Chang III, Rang Kwien, Lena Shoal and Santa Cruz were undertaken by academic
departments of archaeology throughout Southeast Asia and Australia, or through
cultural heritage schemes

2

�with local museums. The Turiang and Rang Kwien were excavations and surveys
conducted by private entrepreneurs in conjunction with academics from the region.
Some excavations were salvage operations; others were part of an educational
programme. Sites like the Rang Kwien were visited over multiple seasons and used to
teach new students methods of underwater excavation and conservation (Intakosai et
al., 1983, 1984). The Bakau (Flecker, 2001) and the Turiang (Brown and Sjostrand,
2000) were excavations undertaken by private individuals in conjunction with local
academics. However, their respective cargoes were handled differently and ultimately
their final destinations reflect dissimilar filtering processes and circumstances.

The

Turiang assemblage ended up in a ceramic museum and most of the Bakau’s
assemblage went to a hotel resort. These cases offer a glimpse into the various
circumstances surrounding underwater archaeological projects in the area and may give
insight into the biases that enter the filtering process both during and after each
excavation.
Metallurgical Examples
This lack of existing scholarship on metallurgical material in shipwreck publications in
Southeast Asia raise the question of why such artefacts have not been the focus of
greater research. The reason may be a matter of aesthetics, corroded metalwork does
not have the same intrinsic artistic beauty as ceramics; one of quantitative substance, in
that too little metallurgical material survives; one of technological restriction, where
scientific methods are not yet sufficiently advanced to glean adequate data; or simply
money driven since ceramics are a more, sellable commodity. Metals are difficult to
conserve and there is a smaller profit market for it. In the case of each item a
combination of explanations exist for the lack of metallurgical research.
Early Ming wrecks
Turiang (1370 CE- 1400 CE)
Large lumps of iron oxide were found strewn about the wreckage. The shape and
appearance of these iron lumps imply that this cargo was shipped in a granular form. It
is quite common for iron in this form to create a concreted mass when exposed to
seawater. In these situations (where iron in powder form was stowed around ceramics
and exposed to seawater for a long duration) these concretions occasionally envelop
3

�the ceramics. Similar iron lumps were recovered from the Royal Nanhai wreck,
alongside traces of flattened bamboo. The existence of flattened bamboo suggests that
the iron granules were stored into bamboo bags (Brown and Sjostrand, 2000). These
bags not only made decent ballast for the ship, but probably worked rather well as a
securing mechanism for more fragile items. In a subaqueous environment the bamboo
degraded, and the loose powder filled the gaps of the ceramic material below, leading to
ceramic inclusions within the iron masses. No iron in ingot form was recovered from the
site.
Rang Kwien (1400 CE - 1430 CE)
Dubbed the “coin wreck”, The Rang Kwien’s major metallic cargo was nearly 200
kilograms of Chinese coins. Some of the coins date from as early as the 4th century yet
the majority seem to come from the Hongwu reign (1368-1398 CE). The boat also
carried eight copper ingots in its hold. Precious metals off the Rang Kwien include two
early Ayutthaya-style gold bangles and one gold ring with gems. One bronze gong, one bronze mirror,
one bronze bell, three bronze lime pots, as well as fishhooks, bronze harpoons, and hairpins make up
part of the assemblage. (Intakosai et al., 1983, 1984).

The second training excavation conducted

by the Underwater Archaeology Department of Thailand in March of 2013 yielded more
metallic cargo; additional copper ingots (totalling eleven) and a miniature bronze tool (E.
Vatcharangkul, personal communication, 2013).
Bakau (1410-1430 CE)
In the initial report of the Bakau assemblage, the terms that Flecker (2001) used to
describe the metallurgical assemblage were vague and unscientific; and he used terms
such as “small stack” or, “an array”. An inventory for this wreck was given to me by
Angie Liow, curator of the Maritime Experiential Museum in Singapore, which revealed
dozens of items from this wreck that were never published (2013). Ten bronze guns
were recovered, along with over two hundred Chinese coins from the Yong-Lo period of
the Ming Dynasty (1403 CE-1424 CE). Ten bronze mirrors along with eight mirror
handles were found, all of which were detached from each other. Six pairs of copper
alloy tweezers, one bronze bell, and seventeen bronze gongs were a part of the
assemblage, as well as two pewter carafes and one metal kendi. Tin ingots were
recovered, along with a myriad of personal and professional copper alloy effects as well:

4

�crew use items include scissors, rings and lamps; hunting effects like fish-hooks and
spearheads; metal dining wares like bowls, plates and spoons; as well as scale, net and
sounding weights (Flecker, 2001). The partial documentation and recovery of this
assemblage reflects one of many problems when dealing with a treasure hunted wreck.
The motivations of the excavators in the procurement and the sale of this material while
not completely understood, still show a prevalence to promote the more ornate and
probably more expensive artefacts of the inventory.
Middle Ming wrecks
Ko Si Chang III (1460 CE – 1487 CE)
Metal objects recovered from this wreck comprised over 2000 lead ingots. Descriptions
of the ingots are consistent with lead ingots found in the assemblage of the Royal
Nanhai (Brown and Sjostrand, 2000) Pattaya, and Ko Si Chang II (Green et al., 1987)
wrecks. Plano-convex shaped copper ingots were part of the metallic assemblage of the
Ko Si Chang III as well. Metal personal objects collected from the wreck include one
lotus-shaped lead piece, a bronze phallus and a series of bronze lime pots (Green et
al., 1987).
Lena Shoal (1488 CE – 1505 CE)
This wreck was found at a depth of ~46 meters and in a less trafficked area, it
consequently yielded a diverse and sizeable metallurgical assemblage. Manufactured
material such as cast iron bowls, copper repoussé wares and wrought iron needles
were part of the cargo situated below deck. Thirty brass spiral bracelets were also part
of the trade cargo. Four bronze gongs, Three Hongwu reign (1368-1398) coins were
catalogued as well as three bronze cannons which was likely part of the ships
armament.

Raw material commodities of tin ingots and pig iron are also well

represented within the assemblage (Goddio et al., 2002).
Santa Cruz (1488 CE – 1505 CE)
Another well-preserved wreck, the Santa Cruz yielded even more metallic material than
the Lena Shoal. The accession inventory for the wreck noted one hundred and
seventeen ingots of tin as well as six sheets of copper. Twenty two cast iron bowls were
also present. The Santa Cruz excavation returned ship-use metallurgical artefacts as
5

�well. One cooking cauldron and one plate were recovered, along with thirteen net
weights and three weighing scales. Twelve bronze gongs were found in the cargo hold,
along with several brass spiral bracelets. The assemblage contained only three coins.
Armaments on the Santa Cruz consisted of six bronze cannons. A metal box was
catalogued in the assemblage as well. Perhaps most interestingly, the wreck yielded a
unique bronze crown (B. Orillaneda, personal communication, 2012). Tables 1 and 2
indicate the presence of matallurgical material in the assemblages throughout this case
study. It identifies the specific wreck the material was attributed to, along with the
approximate date of each wreck.
Object Narratives
These metal artefacts can be divided into cargo and domestic assemblage. Cargo
material can be further subdivided into raw and processed metals. While the
assemblage items could have been broken down strictly by element, (i.e. iron items,
copper items), such a material-based typology would not have been as thorough as one
that considers the use of the objects themselves. The ship reports and excavation
collections in this case study have already been conducted. That level of detail
contributes to the body of archaeology, but as Muckelroy (1978) states, “It is necessary
to go beyond the individual and specific events enshrined in these entities, and look at
the maritime culture in which they were embedded”. Using a traditional, “by-material”
classification method to analyse this collection would be slightly deficient, specifically
when dealing with metallurgical raw material. Any sort of taxonomic study of metals is
complicated by the corrosion and recovery process. It is highly probable that
metallurgical material excavated in a seawater environment has taken on concretions
and/or undergone degeneration to a point which the artefact looks profoundly different
than before it sank. There are also few style and sourcing guides for the metallurgical
material, particularly in Southeast Asia, which can be unfavourably compared to the
ceramic material, where the level of provenencial detail that archaeologists and
historians can attribute to ceramics is phenomenal. Style, form and glazing guides for
many of the ceramics present in the assemblages of this case study can pinpoint the
exact kiln site, and sometimes date ceramic material to the nearest decade in which it
was produced. Terrestrial archaeology has sourced this information for us spectacularly.
6

�Selected examples of metallurgical objects that, when we go into more detail, help
contribute to the shipwreck narrative are described below.
Bronze Gongs, Mirrors and Tweezers
Seventeen gongs were found on the Bakau wreck, four gongs were recovered from the
Lena Shoal and twelve from the Santa Cruz. The quantities of bronze gongs on the
Bakau and the Santa Cruz lead to the conclusion that these are traded cargo. Though
the gongs are fewer in number from the Lena Shoal, the archaeological report notes
that the gongs were grouped together, this also tends to suggest a cargo item (Goddio,
2002). Bronze mirrors were found on the Bakau wreck in substantial quantity (~10). In
every case, their numbers are not nearly as prolific as traded ceramics, but in that
regard they hold a higher place. It is a specialised commodity, possibly given/sold to
only the most discerning of consumers. Isolated instances and detailed documentation
of where this material was found may raise the issue that some of these Items were not
cargo. It is possible that individual bronze gongs on these boats served as part of the
ships’

equipment

or

crew

possessions.

Contemporary

ethnographic

studies

documented the playing of these instruments in sets (three to seven gongs) in certain
parts of Indonesia (Nicolas, 2009). However, the methods of playing the gong (or
gongs) in East and Southeast Asia varied throughout history; therefore it cannot be
assumed that they were played in a set (Nicolas, 2009).
One single mirror was found in the assemblage of the Rang Kwien (Intakosai et al.,
1983). Found attached to the keel of the boat, it has been suggested that this was a
common practice by Chinese sailors to prevent disaster (Elisseeff, 2000). Its role
(literally) within the boat, most likely makes this personal property of someone on the
vessel. Depending upon where it was found in the keel, it is also plausible that the
mirror rig could have been used as a signalling device. More study is needed to
understand any mystical or practical connotations of its placement on the Rang Kwien.
Six sets of bronze tweezers were in the assemblage of the Bakau (Flecker 2001). As
they were found together during the excavation, it is assumed that they were a trade
commodity (Flecker, 2001). More of these may have been in the cargo, but their small
size could have made them both hard to find, and/or hard to survive the oceanic
environment. An item like this represents a highly valued object, much like the bronze
7

�mirrors found within the assemblage. These two artefact types pair well together. A
mirror would be necessary if a user desired to preen with a pair of tweezers. If we treat
these objects (mirrors and tweezers) as a “set” of artefacts, they could promote
discussion about concepts of grooming and vanity during this age, as well as debate on
the cultural transfers on ideas of beauty and the exotic (Morrison, 2013).
Tin Ingots
Tin ingots were found on the Bakau (A. Liow, personal communication, 2013), Lena
Shoal (Goddio, 2002) and the Santa Cruz (Orillaneda, n.d) wrecks. Two ingots were
recovered from the Bakau, while the Lena and the Santa Cruz yielded over a hundred
ingots each. They are all in the shape of a truncated pyramid. The tin ingots on the
Bakau were not mentioned in Flecker’s (2001) article.
Ship Use/Personal Metal Wares
Quantification methods were used as the criteria to delineate personal material/ship use
material versus material onboard for trading purposes. Isolated items and groups of
item tallying less than three were assumed to be individually owned or ship property,
while items that comprised of four or more were identified as trade material. Nautical
themed artefacts (e.g., net weights and sounding weights, fishhooks, and cannons) are
catalogued as ship use material regardless of inventory amounts. Individual high-end
artefacts (e.g., jewellery, crown) are treated as either personal use or tribute wares.
These criteria are also dependent upon the information gained regarding each ship
excavation. If any of the isolated finds can accurately be provenanced in the respective
cargo hold, then it shall be noted and deemed a trade good or tribute item.
Spearpoint
Of the six wrecks cited, only one spearhead was found on the Bakau wreck (Flecker,
2001). This can mean many things. It is possible that close quarter weapons were not
perceived as needed on journeys such as these or simply that the spearheads (and the
wooden hafts they were attached to) did not survive the long term immersion in
seawater. Due to the lack of similar material on other wrecks, this was most likely not
commonly used as a tool for fishing. Yet if the possibility of pirate invasion was real and
cannons were a viable deterrent for such a scenario, I would beg the question that a

8

�boarding prevention plan would be in place and would facilitate the need for close
quarter weapons like swords, knives and spears.

Lamps
A single metallic lamp was recorded in the assemblage of the Santa Cruz (B.
Orillaneda, personal communication, 2012). Little is known about shipboard practices of
lighting a boat at night. If lamps were commonly used in this capacity then they would
most likely be a part of other shipwreck assemblages. There is, however, a lack of this
type of artefact in shipwreck inventories of the same period. This may be another factor
of the impact of the environment on the material or simply that other types of lighting
implements are used.
Conclusion
Depending upon the author, the non-ceramic assemblage material in many
archaeological reports and catalogues is summed up in a few paragraphs, and in some
cases, merely one sentence. Some material found in the assemblages of this study
was not even mentioned in the published material. This reflects the degree to which this
material is considered when understanding the shipwreck narrative. The manner in
which this material is highlighted mimic Brown’s (2009) catalogue on the chronology of
Thai trade wares. Her goal was to group fourteenth and fifteenth century shipwrecks
and glean their ceramic cargo in order to ascertain the presence (or absence) of cultural
ceramic material (i.e. Chinese blue-and-white, Thai celadon, Vietnamese wares) and
whether or not it corroborates with a ban on overseas trade during that time. Using this
system of dated shipwrecks, an attempt was made to glean the metallurgical objects
from the assemblages and reflect on any overlapping features of this material; both in
terms of trading patterns and in terms of what possible cultural significances these
objects signify. This contribution is valuable to the larger archaeological community
because it is a start to a higher level of interpretation on material that has been largely
neglected.
The ships in this study yielded a wide variety of metallurgical artefacts. Metals, whether
as raw materials or a finished trade good, were clearly a regular complementary part of
the cargoes of trading vessels in fifteenth century Southeast Asia. In Table 2, we see a
9

�widespread increase in the trade of metallurgical raw materials. The iron granules
carried by the Turiang were an isolated instance in this study. The copper ingots on the
Rang Kwien and the Ko Si Chang III show an increased trade in the material but little
could be ascertained as to its intended market. Since the Ko Si Chang III is the smallest
boat in the study, it was most likely a local trading vessel. It could suggest a regional
popularity for the material on the boat, or a boat bound for a larger emporia. The tin
ingots from the Bakau, the Lena Shoal and the Santa Cruz clearly show the increased
trading practice of this material. The few ingots found on the Bakau could reflect a
sample of a new product while the nearly one hundred ingots found on each of the Lena
Shoal and the Santa Cruz wrecks represent a stark increase in the trade of this raw
material.
This study of this type of material highlights some of the problems researchers
encounter

with

modern

maritime

archaeology.

Even

in

perfect

conditions,

archaeologists cannot assume to recover all of the material. Most of the metals undergo
a physical transformation in seawater to some degree; it ranges from mild tarnish to
complete disintegration. Due to this natural transformation, artefact inventories of this
type of material will be lower. The corrosion of this type of material will result in the
removal of some objects from the archaeological record. However we also need to
understand the academic, economic and corporate environments and the motivations
that surround these wrecks as well. Not all wrecks are excavated in the same manner,
and the collection, selection and relation strategies will result in different kinds of
shipwreck assemblages. Without being able to properly observe and document each
excavation from beginning to end, we can only question the motivations behind each
excavator pertaining to what material may have been purposefully overlooked or
recovered. We have five shipwrecks excavated by different entities. Material that was
possibly left in situ on the Bakau wreck might have been due to aesthetic reasons or
monetary ones. An academic entity may have handled the excavation and material
differently. Reciprocally, the excavations of the Santa Cruz and Lena Shoal, managed
by the Frank Goddio and the HILTI Foundation, would have been different if managed
by a firm like Seabed Explorations. The point here is that underwater archaeologists
may use similar methods of extraction and conservation to bring an assemblage to the
10

�surface, but because of the different motivations and ambitions of the excavator
involved on each wreck, we can only compare the assemblages with each wreck with a
small degree of certainly and for commodities such as pottery rather than for metals.
While these examples highlighted in this paper are all metallurgical in nature, they are
not the only artefacts that suffer from this bias. This case study has also revealed
various examples of organic material and stone-carved utility objects that experience
the same representational deficiency in the underwater archaeological narrative. A
similar presence/absence model of organic material found in ceramic containers in
shipwreck assemblages can reflect trading patterns of material that otherwise has
simply been cited in written sources.

Table 1. Manufactured Metals in shipwrecks.

Table 2. Raw Materials on Shipwrecks.

Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the APCONF committee for the opportunity to present my work. Thank
you to the Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology and my supervisor, Dr. Damian
Robinson for your support and critique. I wish to thank the National Museum of Manila,
the Underwater Archaeology Division and Museum in Chanthaburi, Thailand, and Angie
Liow and her staff at the National Experiential Museum in Singapore for access to their
11

�collections. Thank you to fellow students Bobby Orillaneda, Veronica Walker-Vadillo
and Peter Fiske for all the review and input on the paper.
References
Brown, R. M., and Sten Sjostrand., 2000. Turiang: A Fourteenth – Century Shipwreck in
Southeast Asian Waters. Pacific Asia Museum, California.
Brown, R. M., 2009. The Ming Gap and Shipwreck Ceramics in Southeast Asia:
Towards a Chronology of Thai Trade Ware. Siam Society, Bangkok.
Elisseeff, V., (Ed.), 2000. The Silk Roads: Highways of Culture and Commerce.
Berghahn Books, Oxford.
Flecker, Michael., 2001. The Bakau Wreck: An Early Example of Chinese Shipping in
Southeast Asia. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 30 (2): 221–30.
Goddio, F., Monique, C., Peter, L., Stacey, P., and Rosemary, S., 2002. Lost at Sea:
The Strange Route of the Lena Shoal Junk. Periplus Publishing, London.
Green, J., Harper, R., and Intakosi, V., 1987. The Ko Si Chang III shipwreck excavation
1986. In The Maritime Archaeology of Shipwrecks and Ceramics in Southeast Asia.
Special Publication No. 4, Australian Institute for Maritime Archaeology, Fremantle: 3979.
Intakosai, V., 1983. Rang Kwien and Samed Ngam Shipwrecks. SPAFA Digest: Journal
of SEAMEO Project in Archaeology and Fine Arts, Vol. 4 (2): 30–34.
Intakosai, V., 1984. The Excavations of wreck sites in the Gulf of Thailand. In Final
Report Consultative Workshop on Research on Maritime Shipping and Trade Networks
in Southeast Asia, I-W7, Cisarua, West Java, Indonesia, November 20-27, 1984.
SPAFA Co-ordinating Unit, Bangkok: 133-143.
Morrison, W. A., 2013. A Fresh Eye on Familiar Objects: Rethinking Toiletry Sets in
Roman Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 32 (2): 221–30.
Muckelroy, K., 1978. Maritime Archaeology. New Studies in Archaeology. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Nicolas, A., 2009. Gongs, Bells, and Cymbals: The Archaeological Record in Maritime
Asia from the Ninth to the Seventeenth Centuries. Yearbook for Traditional Music, Vol.
41: 62-93.

12

�Biography
Brian Fahy is currently a D. Phil Candidate at the University of Oxford, with the Oxford
Centre for Maritime Archaeology. His D. Phil thesis, “Holistic Shipwreck Narratives in
14th and 15th Century Southeast Asia”, will be completed at the end of 2014. He was
previously awarded a Masters Degree in Chinese Archaeology through the Institute of
Archaeology at the University of Oxford under Jessica Rawson.

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="621">
                <text>A Seat at the Table: Addressing Artefact Biases in Asian Shipwreck Assemblages</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="622">
                <text>The ceramic trade throughout Medieval Southeast Asia was prolific. Terrestrial sites have yielded massive amounts of ceramic material and the archaeological reports of shipwreck cargoes corroborate the versatile and extensive qualities of trade ceramics in the region. The sheer quantity of ceramic artefacts found in shipwreck assemblages, paired with a well-researched framework of the aesthetic, show that there is no doubt that we rely heavily on ceramic data to date wrecks and establish regional trading patterns. This paper will debate that we are too 'ceramo-centric' in our analyses of shipwrecks. While ceramics typically represent the bulk of the recovered material in these instances, many other types of media are present in the assemblage. Yet, these â€œlesserâ€ materials suffer from a lack of investigation and therefore play virtually no role in the archaeological and historical assessment. This case study focuses on the non- ceramic assemblages for six shipwrecks from the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries of Southeast Asia (three Chinese-built and three Southeast Asian-styled junks). The typological study of the metallurgical, organic and geological material from these wrecks can complement much of the work surrounding existing trade models as well as reveal new concepts of crew life, belief systems and culture. These facets come together to offer a more holistic narrative as well as stimulating the need within the region for more study regarding the locations where past peoples mined and manufactured raw metals. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="623">
                <text>Brian M. Fahy, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="624">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="46" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="46">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/24588eecd4fbf2d12022196d20ddd53f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6196beedd0b120b4215b1cef5ca263f5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="629">
                    <text>Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain Collection
M. S. Jessica Lally
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Washington 98908
USA
Email: lally.js@gmail.com

Abstract
An assemblage of 1577 porcelain sherds associated with a historically recorded but
unidentified shipwreck on the north Oregon coast was analyzed to determine the age
and intended destination of the ship and its cargo. Prior to this study, only a limited
number of studies of Asian export porcelain to the New World were available, and even
fewer studies of their occurrence in the Pacific Northwest. This study provides a date
range for the manufacture of the porcelain and information on the nationality of the
Beeswax Wreck. The presence of the shipwreck, known locally as the Beeswax Wreck,
has been documented through both historic sources and archaeological research.
Archaeological materials associated with the wreck are consistent with a Manila galleon
bound for Acapulco.
Keywords: Beeswax, Chinese porcelain, Galleon, Oregon coast

Introduction
This study details the analysis of an assemblage of 1577 porcelain sherds thought be
directly associated with a historically recorded but unidentified shipwreck on the north
Oregon cost. The shipwreck, known locally as the Beeswax Wreck, has been
documented through both historic sources (Franchere, 1967; Gibbs, 1993; Hult, 1968;
Lee and Frost, 1968; Marshall, 1984) and archaeological research (Williams, 2007).
Previous archaeological research indicates that the archaeological materials associated
with the wreck are consistent with a Manila galleon bound for Acapulco. The purpose of
this study was to analyze the assemblage of sherds in order determine the age,
nationality, and intended destination of the ship and its cargo (Lally, 2008).
Methodology
The Beeswax Wreck porcelain collection consists of 1577 porcelain sherds, with 1442
recovered through the beachcombing efforts of one individual over a period of more
than 15 years from five separate locations near Manzanita, Oregon (Lally, 2008; Lally,
1

�In Press). The majority of the sherds are from Oswald West State Park (OWSP) and
Nehalem Bay, with a small number of sherds collected from Tillamook Head, Tillamook
Bay, and Nehalem Falls (map?). Also within the collection are 127 sherds collected from
two archaeological sites, 35-TI-1 and 35-TI-4, curated at the University of Oregon
Museum of Natural and Cultural History and Tillamook County Pioneer Museum (Table
1). Analysis of chronological and stylistic attributes of decoration style, motif type, and
marks was conducted. Sherds were measured and identified to vessel element (base,
rim, body) and vessel type (open-form, closed-form, cups, vases, etc). Degree of
erosion, glaze, and cobalt tone were noted. A date range for the porcelain’s
manufacture was determined based on 15 attributes and porcelain types to suggest a
date range using South’s (2002) model of visual interpretation. Additionally, 13
attributes and types were used to establish a mean ceramic date for the collection using
South’s (2002) equation. Those attributes and types excluded from the visual
interpretation and mean ceramic date calculation were later compared to both methods
in order to confirm or refine the date generated.
Results
Porcelain attributes identified during the analysis provide data on the manufacturing
date. Examined independently, these attributes suggest a wide date range, indicating
manufacture from both the Ming (1368-1644 AD) and Qing (1644-1911 AD) Dynasties.
However, in many instances this apparently wide date range is due to the continued use
of traditional Chinese motifs through time. Considered together, though, these attributes
strongly suggest a date of manufacture for the collection between the later portion of the
Transitional Period (1620 and 1683) and Kangxi Reign (1662-1722 AD). The visual
interpretation model supports this, providing a date range between 1670 and 1700, as
did the calculated mean ceramic date of 1690. Calculation of both is discussed in detail
below. Analysis of sherd type identified six attributes and vessel types to which a date
could be assigned. Grooved-foot rims were observed exclusively on monochrome white
porcelain. This feature is particularly important in regard to the porcelain’s date of
manufacture as the grooved foot rim was only produced between 1644 (Butler, 2002;
Butler and Curtis, 2002; Curtis, 2002; Donnelly, 1967; Harrisson, 1995; Mudge, 1986)
and 1690 (Harrison, 1995). A beveled foot rim, thought to be a feature unique to the
2

�Kangxi reign (1662-1722) (Vermeer, 2005), was observed on a single sherd (Sherd
8692). In addition, six sherds were identified as klapmutsen, or wide flat rims, generally
attributed to production between 1620 and 1680 (Fischell, 1987), though possibly as
early as 1613 (van der Pijl-Ketel, 1982).
Sherds of lidded vessels, lidded cups, and lids were identified among the collection. The
sherds are similar in measurement, potting, and decoration, indicating that the lids were
likely intended for the lidded cups. Similar lidded cups were observed among the Vung
Tau cargo of 1690 (Jorg and Flecker, 2001). In addition to the cups, 19 sherds were
identified as compressed globular boxes (or lids). Two of the compressed globular box
sherds have unglazed bases, discolored slightly from exposure to kiln heat and curdled.
Donnelly (1967) noted that during the post-Transitional Period and height of the Dehua
kiln production, similar small globular boxes with unglazed, curdled bases were
produced. These unique unglazed, curdled bases are indicative of origin at the Dehua
kilns between 1675 and 1725 (Donnelly, 1967), when unglazed bases were out of
fashion for other porcelain vessels (Butler, 2002). Four monochrome white sherds
represent a variety of more unusual vessel types typical of manufacture at the Dehua
kilns between 1675 and 1725. Sherd NH386 bears a striking resemblance to Marco
Polo Censers that Donnelly (1967) dated between 1675 and 1725. Sherd NH88 is a
molded European figure. Sherd NH657 is a molded petal, possibly from a Quan Yin
figure.
Decoration Attributes and Ware types
The majority of the collection consists of porcelain sherds decorated with cobalt
underglaze-blue outline-and-wash. Cobalt attributes are highly indicative of transitional
Period (1620-1683 AD) or Kangxi Reign (1662-1722 AD) date of manufacture, being
violet to violet-blue in color and lacking classic Ming Dynasty attributes such as the
“heaped and piled” cobalt application. Ming Dynasty glaze characteristics are also
absent from the collection. Two sherds clearly appear to be Chinese Imari (Numbers
LL2/18, LL2/43), displaying gold gilt pine branches with red overglaze and underglazeblue. Chinese Imari remained popular from the late-1600s to the mid-1700s, and in
general, red overglaze on Chinese porcelain was imported to Mexico in quantity during
the late 1600s (Mudge, 1986). Two sherds in the collection (NH359 and NH532) are
3

�identified as Batavian ware, having brown slip applied to the exterior of the sherds and
interiors decorated with underglaze-blue motifs. Batavian ware was only produced
during the Kangxi Reign, specifically the late-seventeenth century to the early
eighteenth century (Donnelly, 1967; Fuchus and Howard, 2005; Mudge, 1986; Sheaf
and Kilburn, 1988). The Beeswax Wreck collection also contains monochrome white
sherds with molded ribbing, strikingly similar to Donnelly’s (1967) examples of wine
cups and Rhinoceros Horn Cups made at Dehua kilns between 1650 and 1750.
Motif Attributes
Floral themes are the most common motif and accounted for 13 percent of the
collection. A total of 39 Prunus blossom or Prunus plant motifs were identified, depicted
in underglaze-blue, incised motif, and applied decoration. Two sherds (NH029, NH334)
have Prunus blossoms depicted in white on a blue cracked-ice background (Fig. 1).
This was an exceptionally popular motif, especially on Hawthorn Jars, during the Kangxi
Reign (Frank, 1969; Kerr, 1986). Also among the Prunus motifs are several
monochrome sherds that, based on examples provided by Donnelly (1967), Mudge
(1986), and Bass (2005), appear to date between 1675 and 1710. Sherd NH392 can be
assigned a specific date range based upon the chronology provided by Donnelly: it is
decorated with a high-relief, molded
and applied Prunus plant blossom,
stem, and leaves, with a plain-centered
flower with long petals and a single vein
running

the

length

of

the

petal.

Donnelly dated this style from 1675 to
1725.
The collection also contains a number
of sherds decorated with peach and
peony

blossoms.

While

utilized
Fig. 1 Sherd NH29, Prunus blossoms depicted in

throughout the production of Chinese white on a blue cracked-ice background. (J.
porcelain, these motifs strongly support Lally)
a Shunzhi (1644-1661 AD) or Kangxi Reign (1662-1722 AD) date of manufacture (Lally,
2008; Lally, In Press) as both motifs experienced a period of increased popularity during
4

�those Reigns (Macintosh, 1977). Underglaze-blue floral scroll motifs also provide strong
indications of manufacture date. A total of 143 sherds were decorated with tiger lily
scroll, a motif Frank (1969) identifies as exclusive to Kangxi Reign export porcelain. Ten
of the tiger lily scroll sherds include a four-petal flower often associated with the tiger lily
motif (Lally, 2008; Lally, In Press) having been observed among shipwreck cargos
dating between 1690 (Jorg and Flecker, 2001: 72, figure 65) and 1735 (Chiến, 2002:
figure 156). The tiger lily four-petal flower was also observed on three sherds absent
tiger lily scroll. The tiger lily four-petal flower was depicted in similar fashion in the Vung
Tau (1690) (Jorg and Flecker) shipwreck cargos, and reference examples dating
between the late-seventeenth or early-eighteenth centuries (Harrisson, 1995: 33, figure
38; Valenstein, 1989: 224, figure 217).
Six sherds display a variation of
floral scroll, described among some
sources as lion and plant design.
Butler

(2002:18)

and

Harrison

(1995:45) provide examples of lion
and

plant

design

on

porcelain

vessels dating between 1650 and
1670.

Boneless

common

style

floral
of

scroll,

under

a

glaze

painting utilized in the Chenghua
Reign

(1464-1487)

and

also

prevalent on Kangxi imitations of
Fig. 2 Sherd NH483, hundred boys motif or the
Chenghua Reign porcelain (Frank,
scholars motif. (Jessica Lally)

1969), was identified on two sherds
(NH218 and NH351). Thirteen sherds have human figure motifs. Six sherds (NH022,
NH483, NH661, NH660, LL2/18/39a and LL2/18/39b) appear decorated with the
hundred boys motif or the scholars motif (Fig. 2). A traditional motif utilized throughout
Chinese porcelain production, the hundred boys and scholars motif were of immense
importance during the Reign of Shunzhi (1644-1661) and Kangxi Reign (1662-1722)
(Curtis, 2002: 50). Further indication of this time period is the manner in which the figure
5

�motifs are painted, being more typical of the Shunzhi Reign or Kangxi Reign, with fine
outline and violet-blue cobalt. The seven remaining human figure sherds are also
painted in Shunzhi Reign or Kangxi Reign-style and depict human figures in
combination with landscape elements and lattice fences, common motifs in both Reigns
(Curtis, 2002; Frank, 1969; Mathers et al., 1990).
Paneled motifs are present on 12 sherds. Seven paneled sherds resemble the paneled
motifs of the Vung Tau (1690) (Jorg and Flecker, 2001), the Ca Mau (1723-1735)
(Chiến, 2002) and the Geldermalsen (1752) (Sheaf and Kilburn, 1988) wrecks. Five
sherds, however, appear kraak-like, having specific attributes typical of kraak porcelain:
decorative motif; v-shaped, inward-sloping footrim; “moth-eaten” edges (areas where
the glaze is receded from the rims); and apricot colored foot rims. The quickly executed
manner of decoration on these sherds may be indicative that the vessels were made
during the height of porcelain production, post-1600. Several border motifs were
identified within the collection. Three sherds depict the zigzag border motif, utilized
during the 1640s or 1650s but used no later than 1675 (Butler, 2002). A single sherd
(NH 235) was decorated with the stonewall or cracked ice border, which Butler
attributes to the same time frame as the zigzag border. Sheaf and Kilburn (1988),
however, suggest an even narrower time frame for the stonewall border, anywhere from
1660 to 1670. “Blobby dots,” were also identified on three sherds (NH44, NH226, and
NH608). This motif was utilized as a background motif as well as a border motif and is
generally attributed to manufacture between 1645 and 1660 (Butler, 2002; Curtis, 2002:
44). The collection contained 47 rim sherds with brown dressing, a trait that did not
appear within the Chinese domestic or export market until the 1640s-1660s. It was
eventually discontinued in early Kangxi and was not utilized again until the eighteenth
century (Butler, 2002: 23).
Marks
A total of 32 sherds in the collection had hallmarks or symbol marks. Among identifiable
marks were a single Artemisia leaf mark and three swastika marks. Both were symbols
of good fortune used during the Kangxi Reign (1662-1722) in place of the nein-hao, or
reign mark (Macintosh, 1977; Mudge, 1986). Sherd NH482 contained a partial hallmark
that translated as “of (the) beautiful jade” (Penglin Wang, personal communication April
6

�17, 2008). Although utilized during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) (Butler and Curtis,
2002:108), marks containing reference to the Jade Hall were particularly fashionable
during the Shunzhi Reign (1644-1661) (Curtis, 1995; Curtis, 2002:42) and rarely used
during the Kangxi Reign (Butler and Curtis, 2002:108).
Date range determination
Attributes and ware types within the collection tend to suggest a Transitional Period
(1620-1683), Shunzhi (1644-1661), or Kangxi Reign date (1662-1722). To determine a
narrower date range, analysis of attributes and vessel types was conducted. First, a
visual interpretation of attributes and porcelain types associated with specific date
ranges were conducted, using the model provided by South (2002). Second, a set of
attributes was selected for determination of the mean ceramic date, again following
South’s model (2002). This model is designed to examine occupation periods among
sites, and unlike the visual interpretation method, takes into account the frequency of
attributes by using a weighted average. Time frames, attributes, and types were
adapted for the purposes of this study to reflect Chinese porcelain attribute dates. The
mean ceramic date and visually interpreted date range were compared to known dates
concerning the Chinese porcelain trade, the dates of two shipwrecks that Williams
(2007) suggested as likely to be the source of the porcelain, and the collection attributes
not included in the aforementioned calculations. These attributes were used to refine,
narrow, or invalidate the dates suggested. Not all attributes and types were suitable for
inclusion in the visual interpretation of attributes and mean ceramic date, and so were
omitted either for lack of definitive information or for lack of consensus among existing
porcelain literature.
Often, existing Chinese porcelain literature refers to dates by nonspecific periods such
as “late-seventeenth century” or “early 18th century.” In order to produce a mean
ceramic date as well as a visual interpretation of attribute date ranges, more precise
dates are needed. Therefore, for the purposes of this study, the most commonly agreed
upon attribute date among existing research was used. When porcelain attributes and
types were given a date range of “late,” “middle,” or “early” in the century, they were
defined in this study as follows: early - turn of the century through the 30s, middle - 40s
through the 60s, and late - 70s to the end of the century. A total of 15 dateable
7

�attributes and ware types identified among the collection were determined to have
enough documentation among resources to be included in determining a date range
(Table 2). The attributes and porcelain ware types are graphed on a timeline (Fig. 3). To
determine the date range of the attributes, South (2002) suggests that at least half of
the attributes coincide with the earliest time period marker. Similarly, at least half must
coincide with the latest time period marker. However, the latest period marker must at
least touch the beginning of the latest attribute observed. Thus, given 15 attributes and
types, it was necessary that 8 7.5 (half of 15 or

15

∕2) of them corresponded with each

date range marker. As shown by Fig. 3, this provides a date range for the collection
between 1670 and 1700, indicated by the solid vertical lines. A mean ceramic date was
then calculated for the collection, providing a weighted average for attributes identified
(Table 3). The mean ceramic date was calculated using the following equation (South,
2002: 217):
Y=
where n = the number of attributes identified, Xi = the median date for each attribute,
and fi = the frequency at which it occurred in the collection.
Utilizing the documented date range, a median date was calculated for each attribute.
The median date was multiplied by the number of times the attribute occurred within the
collection. The total sum of the frequency column was then divided into the total sum of
the product column, resulting in a mean ceramic date. A total of 13 attributes and types
were used, resulting in a mean ceramic date of 1690. That date falls closer to the later
portion of the visually interpreted date range (1670-1700 AD), and supports the
shipwreck identities proposed by Williams (2007). The indication is that the majority of
features identified in the collection correspond to the later portion of the date range
suggested by the visual interpretation model. Attributes and types not included in the
mean ceramic date calculation or the visually interpreted date range support the dates
generated by the two models. These include klapmutsen-style or wide flat rims (16201680 AD) (Fischell, 1987); evidence of Dehua kiln production (1675-1725 AD)
(Donnelly, 1967; Gordon, 1977); human figure elements (1644-1722); the Prunus
blossoms with cracked-ice motif (Kangxi Reign, 1662-1722 AD) (Frank 1969), lidded
8

�cups (circa 1690) (Jorg and Flecker, 2001), an Artemisia hallmark (Kangxi Reign, 16621722) (Macintosh, 1977; Mudge, 1986), and non-kraak panel motifs (1690 - 1752) (Kerr,
1986: 65; Jorg and Flecker, 2001; Chiến, 2002; Sheaf and Kilburn, 1988).
Several attributes among the collection sherds are associated with dates earlier than
the visually interpreted date range (1670-1700). Such motifs include the peach motif
(Jiajing Reign, 1522-1566 or Shunzhi Reign, 1644-1661 AD) (Bai, 2002; LionGoldschmidt, 1978), hallmark reference to “the beautiful jade” (Shunzhi Reign) (Curtis,
2002: 42), lion and plant design-floral scroll (1650-1660) (Butler, 2002: 18, figure 3), and
boneless floral scroll (1465-1487) (Frank, 1969). Considering these attributes along with
early attributes used in both the mean ceramic date calculation and the date range
determination, it is apparent that there is also a population among the collection sherds
(approximately 5% of the total sherd population) that suggests an earlier date, possibly
during the Shunzhi Reign. The presence of earlier attributes is a relatively minor issue
as motifs were reused and older styles imitated in later reigns. Furthermore, such finds
are not uncommon among shipwrecks. Often during the excavation and analysis of
shipwreck porcelain cargoes, porcelain has been discovered that does not fit the time
period of the shipwreck, or the time period suggested by the bulk of the porcelain cargo
(Sheaf and Kilburn, 1988). They have, in large part, simply been considered anomalies.
The appearance of a few “earlier” porcelain sherds among a collection of later sherds
may, however, simply reflect a lack of information regarding export porcelain. Dates for
only a few specific attributes are known for certain, or agreed upon among the existing
literature. It is quite possible that many of the attributes considered to be early attributes
in this study coexisted with later attributes.
Discussion and Conclusion
The Beeswax Wreck collection exhibits porcelain attributes and types typical of export
types common to the markets in New Spain. The presence of monochrome porcelain,
likely from the Dehua kilns, including ribbed and molded porcelain, Marco Polo censers,
Batavian ware, and a sherd with a European face, are all indicators of European export.
More specifically, large quantities of monochrome-white porcelain, as well as the
identification of lidded cups and Middle-Eastern influences among the collection sherds,
indicate that the ship was a Spanish vessel involved in the Manila trade. This supports
9

�the finding of Williams's (2007) research that indicates that the Beeswax wreck was a
Manila galleon carrying quantities of porcelain, beeswax, and other goods from Manila
to Acapulco. After consideration of attributes and porcelain types among the collection
sherds, the visually interpreted date range (1670-1700), and the mean ceramic date
(1690), it is apparent that the majority of evidence strongly indicates that the porcelain
found on the Nehalem-Manzanita coast is from a Spanish Manila galleon that wrecked
during the Kangxi Reign, specifically between 1670 and 1700. The date of the collection
is not likely later as many late-Kangxi porcelain attributes are absent. Therefore, the
identity of the shipwreck responsible for the porcelain deposition is not likely the 1705
wreck of the San Francisco Xavier. Rather, analyses conducted in this study strongly
indicate that the Beeswax Wreck was the Santo Cristo de Burgos, lost in 1693.

Fig. 3 Visually interpreted date range for the collection porcelain attributes. (Jessica
Lally)

10

�Table 1. Number of Sherds in the Beeswax Collection by Provenience.

11

�Table 2. Attributes Used for Visual Interpretation of Date Range.

12

�Table 3. Attributes Selected for Mean Ceramic Date.

Acknowledgements
There are many who deserve thanks for their involvement and contribution to my
research: Steve Hackenberger, Pat Lubinski and Scott Williams who provided guidance
and support; Penglin Wang; Lise Zimmerman; and the Tillamook County Pioneer
13

�Museum; and Pam Endzweig and the University of Oregon Museum of Natural and
Cultural History and John Dubé.
References
Bai, Q., 2002. Inscriptions, Calligraphy, and Seals on Jingdezhen Porcelains from the
Shunzhi Era. In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an Unknown Reign: Shunzhi
porcelain 1644-1661, Art Services International, Alexandria, VA: 24-34.
Bass, G. F., (Ed.), 2005. Beneath the Seven Seas: Adventure with the Institute of
Nautical Archaeology. Thames and Hudson, New York.
Beals, H. K., and Steele, H., 1981. Chinese Porcelains from Site 35-TI-1, Netarts Sand
Spit, Tillamook County, Oregon. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 23,
University of Oregon, Portland, OR.
Butler, M., 2002. Introduction. In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an Unknown
Reign: Shunzhi Porcelain 1644-1661, Art Services International, Alexandria, VA: 12-23.
Butler, M., and Curtis, J. B., 2002. Catalogue. In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an
Unknown Reign: Shunzhi Porcelain 1644-1661. Art Services International, Alexandria,
VA: 82-244.
Chiến, N. D., 2002. The Ca Mau Shipwreck: 1725-1735. Há Nôi, Viet Nam: Ca Mau
Department of Culture and Information, the National Museum of Vietnamese History.
Curtis, J. B., 1995. Chinese Porcelains of the Seventeenth Century: Landscapes,
Scholars’ motifs and Narratives. China Institute Gallery, New York.
Curtis, J. B., 2002. Shunzhi styles: The decoration and iconography of porcelains from
Jingdezhen, 1644-61, In J. N. Newland (Ed.), Treasures from an Unknown Reign:
Shunzhi Porcelain 1644-1661, Art Services International, Alexandria, VA: 42-55.
Donnelly, P. J., 1967. Blanc de Chine: The porcelain from Têhua in Fukien. Praeger,
New York.
Fischell, R., 1987. Blue and White China: Origins/Western Influences. In J. Esten (Ed.),
Little Brown, Boston.
Franchere, G., 1967. Adventure at Astoria, 1810-1814. In H. C. Franchere (Ed.),
University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
Frank, A., 1969. Chinese Blue and White. Walker, New York.

14

�Fuchus, R. W. II, and Howard, D. S., 2005. Made in China: Export Porcelain from the
Leo and Doris Hodroff Collection at Winterthur. University of New England, Winterthur,
DE.
Gibbs, J. A., 1993. Pacific Graveyard. (4th edition), Binford &amp; Mort, Portland, OR.
Gordon, E., 1977. Collecting Chinese export porcelain. Main Street Press, New York.
Harrisson, B., 1995. Later Ceramics in South-East Asia: Sixteen to Twentieth Centuries.
Oxford University Press, New York.
Hult, R. E., 1968. Lost Mines and Treasures of the Pacific Northwest. Binford &amp; Mort,
Portland, OR.
Jorg, C. J. A., and Flecker, M., 2001. Porcelain from the Vung Tau Wreck: The
Hallstrom Excavation. Sun Tree, Singapore.
Kerr, R., 1986. Chinese Ceramics, Porcelain of the Qing Dynasty 1644-1911. Victoria
and Albert Museum, London.
Lally, J., 2008. Analysis of the Chinese Porcelain Associated with the Beeswax Wreck,
Nehalem, Oregon. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Central Washington University.
Lally, J., In Press. Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain Collection, HarvardYenching Institute, Oregon, USA.
Lee, D., and Frost, J., 1968. Ten Years in Oregon. Ye Galleon Press, Fairfield, WA.
Lion-Goldschmidt, D., 1978. Ming Porcelain. K. Watson (Tr.), Rizzoli International, New
York.
Macintosh, D., 1977. Chinese Blue and White Porcelain. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle.
Marshall, D., 1984. Oregon Shipwrecks. Binford and Mort, Portland, OR.
Mathers, W. M., Parker, H. S., and Copus, K., 1990. Archaeological Report; The
recovery of the Manila Galleon Nuestra Senora de la Concepcion. Pacific Sea
Resources, Sutton, V.
Mudge, J. M., 1986. Chinese Export Porcelain in North America. Clarkson and N.
Potter, New York.
Sheaf, C., and Kilburn, R., 1988. The Hatcher Porcelain Cargoes: The Complete
Record. Phiadon, Oxford.
South, S., 2002 Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology. Percheron Press, New
York.
15

�Valenstein, S. G., 1989. A handbook of Chinese Ceramics. The Metropolitan Museum
of Art, New York.
van der Pijl-Ketel, C. L., (Ed.), 1982. The Ceramic Load of the Witte Leeuw: (1613).
Jijks Museum, Amsterdam.
Vermeer,

M.,

2005.

Glossary,

undercut.

Retrieved

August

1,

2008,

from

http://gotheborg.com/glossary/glossaryindex.htm
Wang, P., (April 17, 2008). Personal communication.
Williams, S., 2007. A Research Design to Conduct Archaeological Investigations at the
Site of the Beeswax Wreck of Nehalem Bay, Tillamook County, Oregon. Unpublished
report on file at Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, Salem, OR.
Williams, S., In Press. The Beeswax Wreck, a Manila Galleon in Oregon. HarvardYenching Institute, USA.

Biography
Jessica Lally began her analysis of the Beeswax Porcelain Collection in 2007, as a
portion of her graduate research project. Her work on the subject has continued,
documenting additional finds and associated museum collections. Since 2008, Jessica
has worked as an archaeologist for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama
Nation in Washington State. She specializes is regulatory compliance, documentation of
Traditional Cultural Properties, and documenting traditional lifeways of indigenous
peoples. Her professional interests are varied, including many aspects of proto-historic
and prehistoric archaeology of the Pacific Northwest.

16

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="626">
                <text>Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain Collection </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="627">
                <text>An assemblage of 1577 porcelain sherds associated with a historically recorded but unidentified shipwreck on the north Oregon coast was analyzed to determine the age and intended destination of the ship and its cargo. Prior to this study, only a limited number of studies of Asian export porcelain to the New World were available, and even fewer studies of their occurrence in the Pacific Northwest. This study provides a date range for the manufacture of the porcelain and information on the nationality of the Beeswax Wreck. The presence of the shipwreck, known locally as the Beeswax Wreck, has been documented through both historic sources and archaeological research. Archaeological materials associated with the wreck are consistent with a Manila galleon bound for Acapulco.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="628">
                <text>M. S. Jessica Lally, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="47" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="47">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/6a7473ea5a87a40995343a3ec25a99f0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>efd5864c643ce2e369d34295003c00cd</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="634">
                    <text>Oceanic deaths aboard the Manila galleons

Miguel Luque-Talaván
Complutense University of Madrid
Geography and History Faculty
Department of American History I
28040 Madrid
Spain
Email: mluque_t@ghis.ucm.es

Abstract
In the present investigation we aim to make an approach to some aspects concerning
life aboard the Manila Galleon (from the 16th to the 19th centuries), such as diseases,
death and burial of bodies, the psychology of the crew in face of these facts, etc. All with
the aim of contributing to a better knowledge of the life of the crew and the passengers
on one of the most complex and long-lasting sea trade routes that have ever existed in
the Modern Age.
Keywords: Manila Galleon, Tornaviaje, Acapulco, Life Aboard, Marquis of Ovando

Introduction
The present text focuses on an event that happened quite often on the Manila Galleon
trade route: the death of some, sometimes many of its passengers, especially during
the Tornaviaje (return journey) from Manila to Acapulco. There are several cases that
we have been able to collect as examples during the course of our investigation. One of
these cases is particularly significant based on the importance of the person involved in
it. We refer to the death of Don Francisco José de Ovando y Solís, marquis of Ovando,
in 1755, who was on his way back to Spain after having served as Governor and
Captain General of the Philippines from 1750 to 1754. Through the analysis of this case
and similar others we aim to approach the way in which death was confronted in one of
the hardest and oldest overseas communication routes in History.
A hard and long journey: the trans-pacific galleon
Both the Acapulco-Manila outward route (which set sail in the month of April) and the
Manila-Acapulco return route (which set sail in the month of June) were long and full of
difficulties. More than 2000 leagues were covered from Acapulco to Manila. The
Tornaviaje, which was longer, used to take about five or six months. Although in 1724,
1

�the La Sagrada Familia galleon took nine months to complete the voyage (Luque
Talaván, 2013: 64). In such a long journey, diseases were very frequent, with scurvy
being very common and one of the diseases that claimed more casualties. This feared
illness, of which nineteen crew members of the Fernando de Magallanes – Juan
Sebastian Elcano journey (1519-1522) were the first casualties in the Pacific, used to
appear in about two or three months from the beginning of the route due to the lack of
vitamine C (Pigafetta, 1988: 61-62)1. One of the ships of the expedition lead by Miguel
López de Legazpi, the famous patache San Lucas, would reach the novohispanic port
of La Navidad in 1565 after a very hard voyage: lack of water and supplies, scurvy and
an attempted revolt aboard that ended with two men thrown into the sea as a measure
of punishment and to set an example. Even at the late date of 1806, the San Andrés
galleon suffered the loss of thirty six men due to the scurvy (Carrera Stampa, 1959:
104-105; Schurtz, 1992: 207, 241-242; Veyrat, 1995: 186; Vas Mingo and Luque
Talaván, 2002: II, 603-618).
Judging from the preserved testimonies, the journey, especially from Manila to
Acapulco, was very harsh; which caused great mortality (Cruz, 1962: 139-141)2. The
severity of this navigation is attested by, for example, the statements of father Pedro
Cubero Sebastián dated to the 17th century (Cubero Sebastián, 1680, chapter XLV); or
the ones made by the Italian passenger Giovanni Francesco Gemelli Careri, who took
the mentioned journey from 1697 to 1698 and left the statements written in his
renowned Giro del Mondo3.

Health issues aboard
Health issues aboard the Manila Galleon were similar to those given in the West Indies
Fleet. Thus, to diseases that might appear on journeys across the Pacific like colds and
other lung conditions arising from the ascent towards the north in order to avoid the
1

In this same expedition travelled a surgeon and three barbers, of whom only one survived (Pollak, 1973:
231). Domingo Galán Ahumada has transcribed the list of products of which the expedition first aid kit
consisted of, see: Galán Ahumada, 1988: 16-18.
2
In regard to the voyagem see: Schurz, 1919: 632-638; Cruz, 1962: 97-118; Velázquez, 1968: 159-178;
García de los Arcos, 1996: 175-180; Yuste, 2000: 139-150.
3
In recent days a new study about Gemelli Careri’s work has been published: Bernabéu Albert, 2012:
229-317.

2

�trade winds; several types of dermatitis, the already mentioned scurvy, dysentery, etc.
we need to add the ones transmitted by mice and insects (Veyrat, 1995: 186, Nussio,
2001: 106). Many of the aforementioned diseases were contracted or made worse due
to the weakness of the passengers and the crew, which had its origin in sudden
changes of temperature, along with undernourishment or lack of hygiene. Diet was, for
most people, poor in variety and quality; consisting mainly of biscuits made from bran,
salted fish and meat, and some legumes. Big quantities of water that tended to go bad a
few weeks after having boarded and was strictly rationed 4, and wine were stored in clay
pots in order to drink (Pérez-Mallaína Bueno, 1992: 152; Nussio, 2001: 103-104). Due
to their importance, provisions in the Manila galleons were under the care of a master of
provisions and rations, a cook, a storekeeper and a waterkeeper (Lorente Rodrigáñez,
1944: 112-113; Carrera Stampa, 1959: 103).
Meanwhile, prophylaxis was almost non-existent. The limited space of the ships
resulted in overcrowding and, along with it, in the accumulation of waste and odours
coming from stagnant water in the holds, excrements, stored food and body effluvia,
that rarefied the atmosphere aboard. This became a breeding ground for numerous
infectious-contagious diseases. To gain a clear understanding of the problem, it should
be taken into account that there were between four and six hundred people in each
ship, passengers and crew combined (Lorente Rodrigáñez, 1944: 113; Landín
Carrasco, 1978: 68; Pérez-Mallaína Bueno, 1992: 139-148; Veyrat, 1995: 176). Another
important matter in these sailings was the psychological suffering that came from the
fear and the mental exhaustion of people obliged to live in the limited space of the
ships, under dangerous circumstances and with no sign of land for months. This
situation kept happening well into the 19th century on the sailing ships en route between
Cadiz and Manila. Furthermore, this situation could cause all sort of conflicts and
arguments among the members of the crew and the passage (Fernández Palacios,
2011: 111-119).

4

For example, the San Diego transported fifty five barrels of water —the equivalent of 24000 litres—; valid
for a month of self-sufficient navigation (Veyrat, 1995: 182). Several large clay pots where the precious
liquid was stored have been found in the wreckage of the ship, some of which are exhibited at the Naval
Museum of Madrid (Spain), See: VV.AA., 2000: 260-261.

3

�The ships that made the trans-pacific route were not always provided with the services
of a qualified health professional. Surgeons, doctors, pharmacists or barbers were taken
on board many times only on the condition that they owned a well-stocked medicine
chest. In each case, these persons had to face the medical emergencies resulting from
the previously described diseases or from the accidents that tended to happen aboard
the ship bruises after sudden swerves of the ship, blows from the sea, falls from the
yard arm, etc (Veyrat, 1995: 186-187; Vas Mingo and Luque Talaván, 2002: II, 603618). The naval health staff’s medicine chests from the 16th and 17th centuries were
mainly stocked with remedies of vegetable origin that were applied by using the
language of those times anointings, rubbings, garglings and fumigations, antidotes,
syrups and purgatives (Ballesteros et al., 1947: 521-523; Zúñiga Cisneros, 1978: 381382; Veyrat, 1995: 186-187; Schaedel, 2000: 433; Gracia Rivas, 2006: 167-185). In
addition to these medicines, health staff had tools such as saws, trepans, bandages,
dressings, mortars and pestles in order to crush powders and prepare ointments,
weighing scales to calculate dosages, funnels, palette knives, spoons, braziers to warm
up preparations, etc 5 . The preferred methods to alleviate the patients’ diseases or
humors were purging by means of enemas and syringes and bloodletting performed in
the arms, sometimes on an ongoing basis, which instead of relief could cause the
hastening of the death of a weak patient. These practices, as well as surgical
operations, were performed at the bottom of the main mast; close the ship’s centre of
gravity, in order to achieve the maximum possible stability to perform such delicate
procedures.
Medical attention in the ports of Manila and Acapulco
Although health measures were taken on board, these were not always effective and
either the patient died, or he reached the port of destination in a precarious state of
health. For the latter case, two hospitals were built: one in Manila and another one in
Acapulco. The one known as Hospital de las Naos del Comercio was built in Manila in
1625. The only information of it existence is provided by Díez de la Rosa, who says that
5

Several objects that must have belonged to a surgeon have been found in the wreckage of the San
Diego galleon, such as a small golden porcelain jar for ointments, two big containers made of the same
material, weighing scales lead weights in conical shapes and a bronze mortar (Veyrat, 1995: 186-187).

4

�its function was to give assistance to the crew of the merchant ships of the Philippines.
The aforesaid hospital was funded by the Real Patronato, which set aside 1000 pesos
per year for its maintenance. Francisco Guerra Pérez suggests that such amount was
intended to pay the stay of the merchant ship sailors in the Hospital Real de Manila founded in 1571- therefore raising the question of the existence of a specific Hospital de
las Naos del Comercio (Guerra Pérez, 1994: 548) 6 . Meanwhile, in Acapulco, the
health facilities in which the crew and passengers that arrived sick to the novohispanic
port were taken care of was the Hospital de Nuestra Señora de la Consolación, founded
in 1570. Supported with the income of the Real Patronato, a two percent rate on the
goods from the Philippines was used for its repair in 1651. At the beginning of the 18th
century the Hospital gave assistance to numerous sailors and soldiers of the Fort of San
Diego so, in practice, it was a military hospital. For this reason, those in charge - the
Brothers of Charity first, and the Real Caja de Acapulco later - received two reales, later
increased to three, for each sailor’s or soldier’s convalescence (Guerra Pérez, 1994:
262-263; Luque Talaván, 2008: I, 397-398)7.
In addition to the port of Acapulco, the galleons anchored occasionally, and between the
end of the 16th century and the beginning of the 19th century, in several locations of
Baja California - like the Mission San José del Cabo -, as well as in the ports of San
Blas, La Navidad or Barra de Navidad, Manzanillo and Zihuatanejo. The progressive
development of this network of small ports of anchorage to support the navigation of the
Manila galleon also served the purpose of the Crown of consolidating its presence in
such a vast region, especially during the troublesome - from a warlike point of view 18th century8. In this regard, it should be noted that the first land that the ships on the
Manila-Acapulco route spotted in months was the coast of California, where they could
replenish provisions. “The journey of the Nuestra Señora del Rosario in 1706 can be
considered to be representative. It set sail from Manila on July 6, it left behind the
6

In Manila, during the 16th century, there was a scarcity of doctors, pharmacists and medicines (GarcíaAbásolo Gónzález, 2000: 202). In regard to the Army health facilities on Philippine soil, see: Clavijo y
Clavijo, 1944: 289-306; Clavijo y Clavijo, 1950a: 383-Ss; Clavijo y Clavijo, 1950b; Casero Nieto, 1985:
101-124.
7
Francisco Santiago Cruz tells how the Manila galleons used to leave some of those gravely ill in the
Jesuit Mission San José del Cabo, located on the southern end of Baja California. After the expulsion of
the Order in 1767, the mission was abandoned (Cruz, 1962: 141).
8
The following book is very useful: Pinzón Ríos, 2011.

5

�Embocadero9 on August 3, it crossed the meridian of the Marianas on September 29, it
found “signs”10 on November 16, it sailed past Cabo San Lucas on December 4 and
entered the port of Acapulco on December 20, after a journey of five months and fifteen
days” (Schurtz, 1992: 240).
Religious practices on the high seas: oceanic death and burials
The issue of death on the sea is deeply related to the sailors’ and passengers’
devotions and religious practices, who were obliged to use this uncertain means of
transportation. Orations, prayers, ex-votos, rituals, faiths and legends are plentiful in this
transport. These questions have been addressed very efficiently by specialized
historiography, for different ages and geographical spaces (Gil Muñoz, 2004; Ferrer
Albelda et al., 2012). We are only going to address then the issue of death and burial on
the high seas of the members of the crew and passengers that died during the course of
the navigations. For example, the 1606 galleon registered a total of eighty deaths during
its journey; while the 1629 galleon only had five deaths. A very tragic case is that of the
San José, which was found drifting in 1657, a year after it set sail from Manila, with all
its crew and passengers dead. In 1678, father Cubero Sebastián made the journey to
Acapulco aboard the San Antonio de Padua galleon, where only a hundred and ninety
two men out of the four hundred who left Manila arrived alive. Just on the journey
between the coasts of California and Acapulco he officiated at a hundred and ninety two
funerals (Cubero Sebastián, 1680: 321-339; Schurtz, 1992: 241-242). The ceremonial
followed in these occasions was very simple for the sailors, whereas a more elaborate
funeral could be arranged for distinguished people. The bodies, wrapped in a shroud,
were weighed down with stones or water pots (Tempère, 2002: 115-116). It is not hard
to imagine the terrible feeling that the death of their colleagues might cause among the
persons embarked.
The oceanic death of the marquis of Ovando (1755)
We could mention innumerable examples of all of the aforesaid until now. In this regard,
documentation is well explicit, but we will only focus on one of them 11: the death of the
9

Particular reference is made to the Embocadero of San Bernardino [Strait of San Bernardino].
Natural signs that indicated the proximity of the American coast.
11
In the Archivo General de Indias, we have been able to locate one of them. For example, that referred
to the death of the Bishop of Troas, Friar Ginés de Barrientos (OP), aboard the Nuestra Señora del
10

6

�marquis of Ovando, who died aboard the Santísima Trinidad y Nuestra Señora del Buen
Fin galleon during the return journey to Spain across New Spain. The large ship left
Manila on July 23rd 1755 commanded by the marquis of Villamediana. The diseased
and casualty statistics are highly significant: twenty sick persons on October 1st, sixty
on November 30th, eighty on December 24th, one hundred and two on January 4th
1756; one hundred and fifty on the 13th of the same month. On February 1st, two
hundred sick persons were disembarked in Cabo San Lucas, at the southern end of the
Baja California peninsula, and left to the care of the Jesuits of Mission San José del
Cabo. Out of the four hundred and thirty five crew members that initially left Manila,
eighty two died on the high seas. The cause of such many deaths was a tabardillo or
typhus epidemic outbreak that made a significant dent in great part of the members of
the crew and passengers. William Lytle Schurtz notes that upon arriving in Acapulco,
the ship had no more than twenty seven men able to stand on their own feet.
It was a thankless journey for Ovando since, in addition to the terrible disease and its
fatal outcome he suffered the loss of his infant son, Ignacio José Camilo, on August 5th
born aboard the ship on July 29th. Ovando fell ill on August 16th. On December 6th he
was brought the Viaticum. Finally, death took him on December 9th, 1755 when the ship
was sailing on the same latitude as the Gulf of California, in whose waters, following the
seafaring tradition, he was laid to rest (Ortiz de la Tabla Ducasse, 1974: 241-242;
Zárate Toscano, 2000: 418). Before his death, he was able to make his will; a document
rich in information in which he wanted to leave his earthly and spiritual matters sorted
out. Among the aspects related to his burial, Ovando ordered to be shrouded in the
habit of St. Francis, to whose Third Order he belonged; to have his heart extracted in
order for it to be placed inside a reliquary at the foot of the Nuestra Señora del Buen Fin
statue in the convent of Santa Clara in Cáceres (Spain), and to have masses celebrated
for the eternal repose of his soul. Ovando’s firstborn son, José Francisco, II marquis of
Ovando12, unable to comply with the request relating to his father’s heart, ordered a

Rosario, San Francisco Javier y Santa Rosa galleon, in 1698 – Archivo General de Indias (Seville),
Filipinas, 119, N. 4-.
12
He himself born aboard the Nuestra Señora del Rosario galleon on April 15 1750, on his parents’
outward journey from Acapulco to Philippines (Zárate Toscano, 2000: 418).

7

�golden heart to be made so it could replace that of his father’s and be placed in the
location stated in his will (Ortiz de la Tabla Ducasse, 1974: 242-243).
Final thoughts
The aforementioned Gemelli Careri’s words in relation to the oceanic voyage may serve
as a good summary of what has been said above: “The voyage from the Philippine
Islands to the American continent can be considered the longest and hardest that exists
worldwide, not only because of the vastness of the ocean to be crossed, almost half of
the globe, against the headwinds, the storms that take place in it, one after the other,
and the diseases that afflict the people on board for seven or eight months, remaining
for a long period of time close to la Línea, sometimes in the cold, sometimes in
temperate weather, sometimes in warm weather, which is sufficient to wreck a man as
tough as iron, and much more a man of flesh and blood, who during the navigation is
not fed very well (…).” (translated from: Schurtz, 1992: 233).
In short, what we have intended is to point out, with several examples, some of the
aspects related to life aboard the Manila galleon, contributing to delve deeper in the
understanding of a sea route that is still in need of new studies of the many aspects
that compose it.
Acknowledgements
I am particularly grateful for the commentaries of José María Fernández Palacios, and
the translation of José Luis Sedano Rosa.
References
Ballesteros Gaibrois, M. R., Santaella, D., Espinosa Navarro., 1947. Aportaciones de
los médicos y farmacéuticos españoles a la obra de España en América. Anuario de
Estudios Americanos (Sevilla), Vol. 4: 521-578.
Bernabéu Albert, S., (coordinador), 2012. Dossier: los trabajos y los días en el Galeón
de Manila: el relato de Gemelli Carreri. Anuario de Estudios Americanos (Sevilla), Vol.
69 (1): 229-317.
Carrera Stampa, M., 1959. La nao de la China. Historia Mexicana (México), Vol. 9 (1):
97-118.
Casero Nieto, J. A., 1985. Hospitales y enfermerías navales en las islas Filipinas
durante la colonización española. Revista de Historia Naval (Madrid), Vol. 9: 101-124.

8

�Clavijo y Clavijo, S., 1950a. La Orden hospitalaria de San Juan de Dios en la Marina de
guerra de España: Presencia y nexo IV centenario de la muerte del Santo Fundador
1550-1950. S.n., Madrid.
Clavijo y Clavijo, S., 1950b. La obra de la Orden Hospitalaria de San Juan de Dios en
América y Filipinas. Artes Gráficas Arges, Madrid.
Clavijo y Clavijo, S., 1944. La trayectoria hospitalaria de la Armada española. Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Histórico de la Marina, Madrid.
Cruz, F. S., 1962. La Nao de China. Editorial Jus (figuras y episodios de la historia de
México), México, D.F.
Cubero Sebastián, P., 1680. Breve relación, de la peregrinación que ha hecho de la
mayor parte del Mundo Don Pedro Cubero Sebastián, Predicador Apostolico del Assia,
natural del Reyno de Aragon; con las cosas mas singulares que le han sucedido, y visto,
entre tan barbaras Naciones, su Religion, Ritos, Ceremonias, y otras cosas
memorables, y Curiosas que hà podido inquirir; con el viage por tierra, desde España,
hasta las Indias Orientales. Escrita por el mismo Don Pedro Cubero Sebastian. Por
Iuan Garcia Infançon, Madrid.
Fernández Palacios, J. Mª., 2011. De la aventura incierta al placer de viajar en el siglo
XIX: la evolución de las comunicaciones navales entre España y Filipinas a través del
relato de los viajeros. Revista Española del Pacífico (Madrid), Vol. 24: 101-131.
Ferrer Albelda, E., Mª C. Marín Ceballos, Á. Pereira Delgado., (coordinadores), 2012.
La religión del mar. Dioses y ritos de navegación en el Mediterráneo antiguo.
Universidad de Sevilla, Secretariado de Publicaciones (Spal monografías; 16), Sevilla.
Galán Ahumada, D., 1988. La farmacia y la botánica en el Hospital Real de Marina de
Cádiz. Editorial Naval (Hombres, hechos e ideas; XX), Madrid.
García de los Arcos, Mª F., 1996. Forzados y reclutas: Los criollos novohispanos en
Asia (1756-1808). Potrerillos Editores, México, D.F.
García-Abásolo Gónzález, A. F., 2000. Formación de las Indias orientales españolas.
Filipinas en el siglo XVI. In L. Cabrero Fernández (coordinador), Historia General de
Filipinas, Ediciones de Cultura Hispánica (Historia): Agencia Española de Cooperación
Internacional (Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores), Madrid: 171-205.

9

�Gil Muñoz, M., 2004. La vida religiosa de los mareantes. Devociones y prácticas.
Ministerio de Defensa, Secretaría General Técnica : Instituto de Historia y Cultura Naval,
Madrid.
Gracia Rivas, M., 2006. La Sanidad naval española: De Lepanto a Trafalgar.
Cuadernos de Historia Moderna. Anejos (Madrid), Vol. 5: 167-185.
Guerra Pérez, F., 1994. El hospital en Hispanoamérica y Filipinas 1492-1898.
Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Secretaría General Técnica, Madrid.
Landín Carrasco, A., 1978. Mourelle de la Rua. Explorador del Pacífico. Ediciones
Cultura Hispánica del Centro Iberoamericano de Cooperación, Madrid.
Lorente Rodrigáñez, L. Mª., 1944. El Galeón de Manila. Revista de Indias (Madrid), Vol.
15: 105-120.
Luque Talaván, M., 2013. Océano Pacífico, océano de intercambios. In Varela, J.; A.
Gutiérrez; M. Luque; A. Reséndez, De La Florida de Ponce al Pacífico de Balboa
(1513-2013), Ayuntamiento de Valladolid: Fundación Consejo España-EE.UU: Centro
de Estudios de América (Casa Colón): Universidad de Valladolid, Seminario
Iberoamericano de Descubrimientos y Cartografía, Valladolid: 59-82.
Luque Talaván, M., 2008. Galeón de Manila. In L. Cabrero Fernández; M. Luque
Talaván; F. Palanco Aguado (coordinación y dirección), Diccionario histórico,
geográfico y cultural de Filipinas y el Pacífico, Agencia Española de Cooperación
Internacional para el Desarrollo (Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación de
España): Fundación Carolina, Madrid: Vol. I, 397-398.
Nussio, E., 2001. Vida y muerte en los viajes a las Américas, durante el siglo XVI. In E.
Martín Acosta; C. Parcero Torre; A. Sagarra Gamazo (compiladoras), Metodología y
nuevas líneas de investigación de la Historia de América, Servicio de Publicaciones,
Universidad de Burgos, Burgos: 103-114.
Ortiz de la Tabla Ducasse, J., 1974. El Marqués de Ovando, Gobernador de Filipinas
(1750-1754). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Escuela de Estudios
Hispano-Americanos, Sevilla.
Pérez-Mallaína Bueno, P. E., 1992. Los hombres del Océano. Vida cotidiana de los
tripulantes de las flotas de Indias. Siglo XVI. Sociedad Estatal para la Exposición
Universal Sevilla 92 : Servicio de Publicaciones de la Diputación de Sevilla, Sevilla.
10

�Pigafetta, A., 1988. Primer viaje alrededor del globo, Ediciones Grech, Madrid.
Pinzón Ríos, G., 2011. Acciones y reacciones en los puertos del Mar del Sur.
Desarrollo portuario del Pacífico novohispano a partir de sus políticas defensivas, 17131789. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones
Históricas (Serie Historia Novohispana; 87) : Instituto Mora, México, D.F.
Pollak, K., 1973. Los discípulos de Hipócrates. Una historia de la Medicina. Círculo de
Lectores, Barcelona.
Schaedel, R. P., 2000. La nueva farmacopea. In Historia General de América Latina.
Volumen II. Director del volumen: Franflin Pease, G.arcía-Y.rigoyen. Codirector:
Frank Moya Pons, Ediciones Unesco: Editorial Trotta, París: 433-451.
Schurt, W. L., 1992. El Galeón de Manila. Estudio introductorio, notas y bibliografía de
L. Cabrero [Fernández]. Traducción al español de P. Ortiz Armengol, Ediciones de
Cultura Hispánica, Madrid.
Schurz, W. L., 1919. The Voyage of the Manila Galleon from Acapulco to Manila.
Hispanic American Historical Review , Vol. 2 (4): 632-638.
Tempère, D., 2002. Vida y muerte en alta mar. Pajes, grumetes y marineros en la
navegación española del siglo XVII. Iberoamericana (Berlín), Vol. 5: 103-120.
Vas Mingo, M. M. del; M. Luque Talaván., 2002. Medicina y terapéutica medicamentosa
en las navegaciones transpacíficas del Galeón de Manila (1565-1815). Notas para su
estudio. In F. A. Antón Burgos; L. Ó. Ramos Alonso, Traspasando fronteras: el reto de
Asia y el Pacífico, Asociación Española de Estudios del Pacífico: Universidad de
Valladolid, Centro de Estudios del Asia, Valladolid: II, 603-618.
Velázquez, Mª del C., 1968. La navegación transpacífica. Historia Mexicana (México),
Vol. 18 (2): 159-178.
Veyrat, E., 1995. Vida a bordo. In VV.AA., El San Diego. Un tesoro bajo el mar,
Compañía Española de Petróleos, S.A. CEPSA, Madrid: 170-194.
VV. AA., 2000. El galeón de Manila. Catálogo. Aldeasa: Ministerio de Educación,
Cultura y Deporte, s.l..
Yuste, C., 2000. Un océano de intercambios. In VV.AA., El galeón de Manila. Catálogo,
Aldeasa, Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, s.l.: 139-150.

11

�Zárate Toscano, V., 2000. Los nobles ante la muerte en México. Actitudes, ceremonias
y memoria (1750-1850). El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Históricos: Instituto
Mora, México, D.F.
Zúñiga Cisneros, M., 1978. Historia de la Medicina. Tomo II. La Medicina de los
tiempos modernos: siglos XVI y XVII. Ediciones Edime, Caracas-Madrid.
Biography
Miguel Luque-Talaván is a lecturer at the Department of American History I of the
Complutense University of Madrid. He has directed and taken part in several research
projects, the last one under the title "Ethnohistoric and Topogenetics Atlas of The
Philippine Islands". He has received several grants that allowed him to conduct
researches in Mexico, Peru, Great Britain, USA, Portugal and the Philippines. His
principal areas of specialization are the Derecho Indiano and the Iberoasia's History. As
author or publisher, has published fourteen books and more than one hundred works.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="630">
                <text>Oceanic deaths aboard the Manila galleons</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="631">
                <text>In the present investigation we aim to make an approach to some aspects concerning life aboard the Manila Galleon (from the 16th to the 19th centuries), such as diseases, death and burial of bodies, the psychology of the crew in face of these facts, etc. All with the aim of contributing to a better knowledge of the life of the crew and the passengers on one of the most complex and long-lasting sea trade routes that have ever existed in the Modern Age. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="632">
                <text>Miguel Luque-TalavÃ¡n, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="633">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="48" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="48">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/559faca3d210e85b7892a2c75884b232.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b3a652b025647a012f023591600d30c1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="639">
                    <text>Maritime Trade in Southeast Asia during the Early Colonial Period

Bobby C. Orillaneda
Underwater Archaeology Section
National Museum of the Philippines
P. Burgos Street, Manila
Philippines 1000
Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Email: bobbyorillaneda@yahoo.com

Abstract
The arrival of naval expeditions in the Philippines and Melaka from Spain and Portugal
respectively during the early sixteenth century CE created profound transformations in
patterns of Southeast Asian maritime trade as European markets became available to
Southeast Asian products and vice versa. The production and distribution of Southeast
Asian natural and manufactured products intensified in response to increased supply
and demand. This subsequently led to the discovery of raw material sources and
production centres as well as the emergence and development of maritime polities that
serve as ports of call by various types of watercraft vessels. This paper will present the
archaeological excavation results of sixteenth century shipwrecks in Malaysia (Xuande
and Wanli), the Philippines (San Isidro and Royal Captain junk) and Thailand (KoSamui
and KoKradat) in an attempt to analyse maritime trade patterns as the Southeast Asian
region transitioned from its previous intraregional-focus on maritime trade to participants
of the global trade economy.

Keywords: Shipwrecks, Southeast Asia, Maritime trade, Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand

Introduction
The Southeast Asian region played an important role in the development of global
maritime economy in the sixteenth century. Anthony Reid’s thesis on the ‘Age of
Commerce’ highlighted the economic prosperity in Europe, the eastern Mediterranean,
1

�China, Japan and perhaps India from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries (Reid,
1988, 1990, 1993). The ‘long sixteenth century,’ Wallerstein (2004) noted, is the period
‘during which our modern world-system came into existence as a capitalist worldeconomy.’ The raison d'etre for this commercial boom was largely the demand for
spices (pepper, cloves, nutmeg, and camphor) and other exotic marine and forest
products in India and Southeast Asia (Reid, 1980, 1993). Although the spice trade
intensified in the fifteenth century, the arrival of the Europeans in Southeast Asia
created new market opportunities and reoriented maritime network circuits as the region
accommodated the new players in addition to the Southeast Asian, Chinese, and Indian
Ocean merchants (Reid, 1980). This led to the emergence of insular and mainland
Southeast Asian-controlled trade centres such as Aceh, Banten, Makassar, Demak,
Gresik, Surabaya, and Hoi An that catered mostly to international seaborne trade (Reid,
1989, 1999; Lockard, 2010). The Europeans later established their own port cities, with
the Portuguese in Melaka and the Spanish in Manila and, a century later, the Dutch in
Batavia (Doeppers, 1972; Andaya, 1992; Thomaz, 1993). Reid (1993: 23) summarised
the range and diversity of exchanged trade commodities in Southeast Asia: “The pattern
of exchange in this age of commerce was for Southeast Asia to import cloth from India,
silver from the Americas and Japan and copper-cash, silks, ceramics and other
manufactures from China, in exchange for its exports of pepper, spices, aromatic
woods, resins, lacquer, tortoise shell, pearls, deerskin, and the sugar exported by
Vietnam and Cambodia”. For non-Southeast Asian traders, Indian cloth and silver were
crucial commodities as these are what Southeast Asians wanted in exchange for spices
and other natural and manufactured products (Lieberman, 2009).
The Southeast Asian Scene in the Sixteenth Century
At the beginning of the sixteenth century, Ayutthaya and Melaka became dominant
trade centres in Southeast Asia (Reid, 1999; Andaya and Andaya, 2001; Lockard,
2010). Melaka underwent a difficult transition as the Portuguese takeover in 1511
caused the exodus of Malay rulers and maritime trade was diverted to other areas. The
Muslim traders who felt the discriminatory policies of the Christian Portuguese opted to
dispatch their goods at Brunei, Johor, Aceh, Patani and Perak (Reid, 1989; Lieberman,
2009). The setback in the Indonesian archipelago was, however, compensated with the
2

�establishment of a trading concession in Macau in 1557 that led to the Portuguese
being the sole carrier of the China and Japan trade that exchanged Chinese silk and
gold with Japanese silver bullion (Boxer, 1953). Ayutthaya benefited from Melaka’s
difficulties in the early part of the century and became the focus for the China,
Southeast Asia and Muslim trade (Reid, 1995; Lockard, 2010). The kingdom’s
expansionist ambitions led to war with the Toungoo rulers of Burma who seized and
destroyed the Thai capital in 1569, transferring the lucrative China trade to Cambodia
(Wade, 2000). Meanwhile China, incognizance of the ineffective implementation of the
previous overseas trade restrictions during the early Ming period, officially lifted its
maritime ban in 1567 and opened the Yuegang ports in Fujian to foreign trade (Lockard,
2010). In its early stages, “fifty junks per year were licensed to trade at first, but this
figure grew to 88 by 1589 and to 117 by 1597” (Reid, 1993: 18). Majority of the Chinese
trading vessels were destined to Southeast Asian markets1.
When the civil wars in Japan came to an end in the middle sixteenth century the
Japanese opened its ports to international trade (Andaya, 1992). The Japanese
merchants sailed into Southeast Asian waters using the Red Seal permit with
accompanying letters and gifts from the shogun. The foreign enterprise was, however,
short lived as the ports were closed again in 1635 due to the Tokugawa government’s
restrictive overseas policy although the Japanese-Siam trade remained open and
continued until the eighteenth century (Lieberman, 2009).
The Entry of the Europeans
The Portuguese appearance in Melaka and the Spanish in the Philippines in the early
sixteenth century was a consequence of European territorial, economic and religious
ambitions in Southeast Asia (Dixon, 1991). Both countries were primarily driven by the
desire to acquire Southeast Asian spices and other natural and manufactured produce
that were in growing demand in Europe (Boxer, 1953; Phelan, 1959). The Portuguese
reached Southeast Asia via the western route through the Cape of Good Hope and
India, establishing trading outposts along the way. By 1511, Afonso de Albuquerque
captured Melaka, Southeast Asia’s premier city in the 15th century in order to take
control of Southeast Asia’s maritime trade (Boxer, 1953; Hall, 2004; Leiberman, 2009).
By the middle sixteenth century, Andaya (1992: 355) notes, “Portuguese trade had to all
3

�intents and purposes become a part of the Asian system”. Melaka continued its role as
a trade entrepôt under Portuguese authority for more than a century albeit in gradually
declining capacity before the Dutch successfully seized the city in 1641 (Dixon, 1991).
Spain’s arrival in the Philippines in 1521 was an extension of its colonial policies that
began in the Americas in the fifteenth century (Phelan, 1959). After initial occupations in
Cebu and Panay, Miguel Lopez de Legazpi finally settled in Manila in the late sixteenth
century (Doeppers, 1972; Reed, 1979). Manila became the commercial centre of the
world in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries due primarily to the galleon trade that
linked the trading commodities of the east and west (Schurz, 1985; Fish, 2011). The
galleon trade would run for 300 years, from 1565 to 1815. The Chinese demand for
American silver from the trade brought Chinese merchants to Manila to trade silk,
porcelain and other manufactured merchandise in exchange for the precious metal
(Phelan, 1959; Andaya, 1992). This is evidenced by the large number of Chinese junks
licenses (wen-yin) to Manila during the period 1589 and 1592 (Reid, 1995). Japanese
merchants also sailed to Manila to exchange their silver for Chinese silk and Southeast
Asian spices and bulk foods. Other Southeast Asian port cities brought spices and other
natural and manufactured produce to Manila in exchange for Chinese, Japanese and
American commodities.
The Shipwrecks
The proliferation of port cities meant new shipping routes and shipping destinations. It is
also logical to assume that the number of ships increased in direct proportion to the
greater demand of foodstuffs, staples and merchandise. Below are the ships that were
excavated in Southeast Asian waters dated to the sixteenth century (Brown, 2009):
The San Isidro
The San Isidro wreck was found in 1996 during an underwater survey approximately
nine km from the shore of San Isidro, Cabangan, Zambales (Goddio, 1997; Dizon and
Orillaneda; 2002). Subsequent excavation of the site in the same year revealed a
shipwreck with predominantly Chinese ceramic cargo. The Chinese ceramics were
predominantly blue and white porcelains of the Zhangzhou ware type, otherwise known
as “Swatow” wares that were dated to the early sixteenth century, during the reign of
4

�Chinese emperor Zhengde (1506 - 1521 CE) (Goddio, 1997; Tan et al., 2007). The
other ceramic wares were two stoneware jarlets from the Sisatchanalai kilns in Thailand
and a blue and white box possibly from the Chu Dau kilns of Vietnam. Other artefacts
included iron bars that may have been used as ballast, iron-cooking cauldrons, a knife,
betel nuts that were found in a small jar, a coconut a sap of the Agathisphilippinensis
Warb or almaciga tree used for caulking.
Initial measurements of the timber remains estimated that the length of the ship could
be 15 m and ‘clinker’ ship construction type, with the planks connected with ropes made
from plant fibers (Goddio, 1997). Much of the hull was constructed using material
commonly found in the Philippines. Analysis of the hull structure and the wood
composition indicated that the San Isidro ship may have been a local boat used to
transport trading commodities from bigger trading ships to land-based merchants and
equipped with sails, no outriggers and similar to the indigenous Garay, Parao and
Barangay Philippine boats (Santiago, 1997; Tan et al., 2007).
The Xuande
The Xuande site was found in 1996 between the coasts of Malaysia and Pulau Tionam
(Brown and Sjostrand, 2002; Sjostrand et al., 2006). Chinese blue and white porcelains
and monochrome white-glazed wares were found, as well as Thai ceramics from the
Sisatchanalai kilns and the Sukhothai kilns (Sjostrand et al., 2006). Other finds include
bracelets and glass beads that were found inside a stoneware jar. It is notable that no
shipwreck remains were found despite deeply probing the seabed and sub bottom
profiling. This could be due to the soft wood composition of the vessel (Brown and
Sjostrand, 2002). The cargo mound, however, formed on the outlines of a ship that led
to estimation that the shipwreck could have measured 28 m long and 8 m wide. The
initial fifteenth century date of the site based on the Xuande reign marks turned out to
be misleading (Brown, 2009). The presence of sixteenth century blue and white
ceramics along with two bronze cannons that could not have been manufactured earlier
than 1520 CE revealed that the shipwreck was 100 years later than previously assumed
(Brown and Sjostrand, 2002; Sjostrand et al., 2006). The porcelains with Xuande reign
inscriptions were actually copies made by potters who worked during the reigns of later

5

�Chinese emperors, most probably during the Zhengde (1506 - 1521 AD) and Jiajing
(1521 – 1567 AD) reigns (Brown, 2009).
KoKradat
This shipwreck was discovered in 1977 by a Thai-Danish team and excavated in 1979
and 1980 as part of a training course in maritime archaeology sponsored by the
Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Project in Archaeology and Fine
Arts (SEAMEO-SPAFA) (Green et al., 1981; Prishanchit, 1996). The site lies near
KoKradat Island, Trat Province, southeast Thailand (Green et al., 1981). The ship
remains comprised fragments of the lower hull, its planks edge-joined by wooden
dowels, indicating Southeast Asian shipbuilding construction (Green et al., 1987). The
wood was also identified as of the genus Terminalia found in Africa and Southeast Asia
(Prishanchit, 1996). Approximately 35 tons of ballast stones were found scattered
around the site. The majority of the recovered artifacts comprised of Thai stone wares
from the Sisatchanalai kilns and earthen wares from possibly Thai kilns, as well as
different types of Chinese blue and white porcelains. Based on the stylistic analysis of
the ceramic cargo, the shipwreck was dated to the mid-sixteenth century (Brown, 2009).
After examination of the circumstances of the wreck and its cargo, Green (1981:42)
concluded that ‘the vessel may have been carrying an additional light cargo, or, she was
returning home in ballast, with a small proportion of her cargo unsold, or undischarged’.
The site was deemed significant as it showed the association of Sisatchanalai wares
with Chinese blue and white materials, indicating the continued operation of the Thai
kilns well into the sixteenth century (Green et al., 1987).
KoSamui
The KoSamui shipwreck was excavated by the Thai Fine Arts Department in 1984 off
the shores of SuratThani (Intakosi, 1984). The wreck contained mostly earthenware
pots, lids, stove, kendi, from local Thai kilns as well as small and large stoneware jars
and celadon bowls, plates, bottles and jarlets from the Sisatchanalai kilns (Green et al.,
1987). A few pieces of Chinese blue and white wares were also recovered. Similar large
storage jars were also found in other 15th and 16th centuries shipwrecks in Thailand
such as the Pattaya, Ko Si Chang III, and KoKhram. The meagre amount of large
6

�Sisatchanalai jars were found in the shipwreck, indicating that these were utility wares
and not used for trade. Storage jars from the Mae Nam Noi kiln site in Singburi Province
were also recovered (Charoenwongsa and Praicharnjit, 1990). The ship was reported to
be double planked and without a keel.
The Wanli
A fisherman accidentally discovered the site in 1997 approximately six nautical miles off
Tanjong Jara, in the state of Terengganu, on the east coast of Malaysia (Sjostrand et
al., 2006; Sjostrand and Idrus, 2007). Exploration and cargo recovery in 2004 revealed
a site extensively damaged by fishing trawlers and as high as 90% of the ceramics have
been damaged (Sjostrand et al., 2006). The blue and white ceramic pieces were of the
‘Kraak’ type wares, manufactured in the kilns of Jingdezhen. Other artefacts included
two iron cannons, various bronze and brass objects, a sounding lead, and tons of
ballast stones (Sjostrand and Idrus, 2007).The parts of the wooden ship found appeared
to be joined by iron nails (Sjostrand and Idrus, 2007). Based on the measurements, the
ship was approximately 18 m long and 6 m wide and constructed with a ribbed
framework, suggesting a European style of shipbuilding. However, the wood used was a
tropical type most frequently found in the Philippines and India. It appeared that this is a
European type vessel that had been built in South-East Asia or India and had later
additional ‘sacrificial’ planks added in China to compensate for woodworm damage
(Sjostrand et al., 2006). Sjostrand (2006) surmised that the ship belonged to a
Portuguese merchant based in Macao and may have been used on the Estado de India
route that serviced the Macao, Melaka, Goa and Manila route and may have carried the
whole range of Chinese ceramics that were traded during the period. It is believed that
the Kraak wares were primarily destined for Europe; while others could be traded in
local South-East Asian markets.
The Royal Captain Junk
The Royal Captain junk, found in 1985, was located west of Palawan Island in the
Philippines (Alba, 1988; Goddio, 1988). A wide range of ceramic wares, predominantly
blue and white porcelain wares of various shapes, sizes and decoration was recovered
along with stoneware jars, coloured glass beads, bronze gongs, iron bars, copper
7

�bracelets, and other metal objects. Goddio (1988: 115) concluded that “(the style of the
ceramic wares) very clearly points to the Wan Li Period (1573 - 1620 AD)”. The nature
of the recovered material evidence indicated the Royal Shoal junk to be an Asian vessel
despite the very meagre wooden remains. Its small size meant it travelled shorter
distances, possibly from Borneo to Manila, carrying trade goods in exchange for other in
demand merchandise back to its home port (Goddio, 1988).
Conclusion
The study of shipwrecks and its associated cargo is just a part, albeit an important one,
in untangling the complex and multi-layered maritime trade of sixteenth century
Southeast Asian maritime trade. Based on the shipwreck material evidence, two general
themes are examined:
The ships
The ships enumerated in this paper are of a wide range of type, size and construction.
The information gathered from documents is insufficient to generate conclusive
statements about vessel types and destinations but some information can be gleaned
from them. The San Isidro, KoKradat and KoSamui wrecks appears to be examples of
local, coastal traders that engaged in commercial activities within their immediate
sphere. The San Isidro ship may have transported merchandise from bigger junks to
local ports and carried out local trade between small ports and polities within the
Philippines. The KoSamui ship was reportedly double-planked with no keel, an
indication that the vessel is not built for long-distance, ocean-going voyage, as keels are
needed to survive in a more hostile open sea environment. The KoKradat, meanwhile,
is constructed using the local Southeast Asian tradition as evidenced by the use of
wooden dowels in edge-joining the planks. Both the KoSamui and the KoKradat also
carried predominantly local Thai ceramic wares. The Wanli, on the other hand, was
constructed with a ribbed framework; a diagnostic European style of shipbuilding built
for long distance trade. Sjostrand (2006, 2007) posited that the vessel serviced the
Macao, Melaka, Goa and Manila route. The Royal captain junk and the Xuande did not
yield any wooden vestiges due to various reasons. It is speculated that the Xuande was
constructed using soft wood that deteriorated over time while the Royal Captain timber

8

�remains also deteriorated and widely dispersed as it sits on top of a shallow reef and
exposed to natural elements.

The cargo
Although historical documents emphasise the importance of spices as the primary
driving force of the global maritime economy, the enumerated shipwrecks also show
other types of artifacts that have been circulated and exchanged throughout Southeast
Asia. Ceramic wares, mostly porcelain and stone wares from China seemed to be an
important trading commodity as all the ships contained significant amounts in its holds.
This gives tangible evidence of the re-exportation of these wares for Southeast Asian
markets and beyond. From the late fourteenth century and most of the fifteenth century,
these wares were largely absent outside China when the country restricted overseas
trade and economic exchange can only be carried out through official and diplomatic
foreign missions. The European demand for Chinese ceramics is also apparent in the
Wanli shipwreck that carried porcelains made for the European market. There are also
significant amounts of Thai stone wares but are mostly storage jars that contain liquids,
foodstuffs and spices except for the Thai ceramics found in the KoSamui with
Sisatchanalai celadon bowls, plates, bottles and jarlets and the Xuande that consisted
of jarlets from Sisatchanalai and bowls from Sukhothai kilns that may be for trade. The
presence of the Thai wares in sixteenth century shipwrecks also meant that some Thai
kilns were still in operation during this century. The Wanli shipwreck on the other hand,
carried predominantly Chinese blue and white porcelains destined for Europe that, at
this time, was in great demand for Chinese ceramics. Iron bars were also found in the
lower hulls of most ships as paying ballast and are used to manufacture other metal
objects. Other items of trade included copper bracelets, glass beads and bronze gongs.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology (OCMA) especially my
supervisor, Dr. Damian Robinson, for allowing me to engage in a research that, at first
glance, may be outside the immediate scope of my thesis topic but is also equally
important in terms of Southeast Asian maritime trade elucidation. Thanks also to my
9

�colleagues at the Thailand Underwater Archaeology Division (UAD) for permitting me
access to their valuable shipwreck data and most importantly to the National Museum of
the Philippines for permitting me to go on study leave to pursue my graduate studies.
Endnote
Reid (1993:19) further noted: “roughly half the Chinese junks in 1589 were licensed for the “Southern
Seas”—the Philippines and Borneo. Spanish-controlled Manila was an important destination due to the
galleon trade that brought American silver that the Chinese highly desired (Andaya, 1992). Of the half
licensed for the “western seas,” the principal destinations were west Java (8), Cochin-China (8), southern
Sumatra (7), Siam (4), Cambodia (3), and Champa (3). Japanese merchants began engaging in maritime
trade in the fifteenth century, bringing silver to Chinese and Southeast Asian markets (Lockard, 2010).

References
Alba, L., 1988. A preliminary report on the 1985 Royal Captain Shoal expedition. Paper
read at the Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists in Western Europe Second
International Conference, Paris, Musee Guimet on 19 - 23 September 1988.
Andaya, L. Y., 1992. Interactions with the outside world and adaptation in Southeast
Asian Society 1500-1800.The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, 1(Part 2),
Cambridge University Press, England: 345-95.
Andaya, B. W., and Andaya, L. Y., 2001. A History of Malaysia. University of Hawaii
Press, Hawaii.
Boxer, C. R., 1953. The Portuguese in the East, 1500-1800. Portugal and Brazil: An
Introduction. With the assistance of W. J. Entwistle, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 185-247.
Brown, R. M., 2009. The Ming Gap and Shipwreck Ceramics in Southeast Asia:
Towards a Chronology of Thai Trade Ware. Siam Society. The Siam Society under
Royal Patronage, Bangkok.
Brown, R. M., and Sjostrand, S., 2002. Maritime archaeology and shipwreck ceramics in
Malaysia. Dept. of Museums and Antiquities and Nanhai Marine Archaeology Sdn. Bhd.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Charoenwongsa, P., and Praicharnjit, S., 1990. Underwater Archaeology in Thailand II:
Ceramics from the Gulf of Thailand. (In Thai with English summaries), Department of
Fine Arts, Bangkok.
Dixon, C., (Ed.), 1991. Southeast Asia in the world economy (No. 16), Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.

10

�Dizon, E., and Orillaneda, B., 2002. Ming Blue and Whites found from Shipwrecks in the
Philippines. In Yuan and Ming Blue and White Ware from Jiangxi, Jiangxi Provincial
Museum and the Art Museum and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong kong:
211-223
Doeppers, D. F., 1972.The development of Philippine cities before 1900. Journal of
Asian Studies, Vol. 31(4): 769-92.
Fish, S., 2011. The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific: With
an Annotated List of the Transpacific Galleons 1565-1815. Author House. Bloomington,
Indiana.
Goddio, F., 1988. Discovery and archaeological excavation of a 16th century trading
vessel in the Philippines. World Wide First, Lausanne, Switzerland
Goddio, F., 1997.San Isidro Wreck ’96: Excavations’ preliminary report and ceramic
cargo’s study. Unpublished excavation Report, National Museum of the Philippines,
Manila.
Green, J. N., Harper, R., and Prishanchittara, S., 1981. The excavation of the KoKradat
wreck site, Thailand 1979-1980. Special Publication, Dept. of Maritime Archaeology,
Western Australian Museum.
Green, J. N., Harper, R., and Intakosi, V., 1987. The Maritime Archaeology of
shipwrecks and ceramics in Southeast Asia (No. 4). Australian Institute for Maritime
Archaeology, Vol. 4: 1-36.
Hall, K. R., 2004. Local and International Trade and Traders in the Straits of Melaka
Region: 600-1500. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 47 (2):
213 – 260.
Intakosi, V. 1984. The Excavations of Wreck sites in the Gulf of Thailand. SPAFA
Consultative Workshop on Research on Maritime Shipping and Trade Networks in
Southeast Asia, I-W7, Cisarua, West Java, Indonesia, November 20-27, 1984,Spafa
Co-Ordinating Unit.
Lieberman, V., 2009. Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context 800-1830.
Mainland Mirrors: Europe, Japan, China, South Asia and the Islands, Vol. 2, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.

11

�Lockard, C. A., 2010. "The Sea Common to All": Maritime Frontiers, Port Cities, and
Chinese Traders in the Southeast Asian Age of Commerce, ca. 1400–1750. Journal of
World History, Vol. 21(2): 219-247.
Phelan, J. L., 1959. The hispanization of the Philippines: Spanish aims and Filipino
responses, 1565-1700. University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.
Prishanchit, S., 1996. Maritime Trade during the 14th to 17th Centuries: Evidence from
the Underwater Archaeological Sites in the Gulf of Thailand. In Ancient Trades and
Cultural Contacts in Southeast Asia, Bangkok: 275-300.
Reed, R. R., 1979. The Foundation and Morphology of Hispanic Manila: Colonial
Images and Philippine Realities. In D. K. Basu (Ed.), The rise and growth of the colonial
port cities in Asia. Center for South Pacific Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz:
169- 177.
Reid, A., 1980.The structure of cities in Southeast Asia fifteenth to seventeenth
centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 11(2): 235-250.
Reid, A., 1988.Southeast Asia in the age of commerce. Yale University Press, New
Haven, Connecticut.
Reid, A., 1989. The organisation of production in the pre-colonial Southeast Asian
polity. In F. Broeze (Ed.), Brides of the Sea: Port Cities of Asia from the Sixteenth to the
Twentieth centuries, (Vol. 1), University of Hawaii Press, Hawaii: 56-74.
Reid, A., 1990. An 'Age of Commerce’ in Southeast Asian History. Modern Asian
Studies, Vol. 24 (1): 1- 30.
Reid, A., 1993.Southeast Asia in the age of commerce, 1450-1680. Expansion and
crisis, Vol. 2.Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Reid, A., 1995. Documenting the Rise and Fall of Ayudhya as a Regional Trade Centre.
In Reid, A. (Ed.), Charting the shape of Early Modern Asia. University of Washington
Press, Washington: 85 – 99.
Reid, A., 1999. Charting the shape of early modern Southeast Asia. University of
Washington Press, Washington: 39- 55.
Santiago, R., 1997. Preliminary Observation of the San Isidro Wreck. In San Isidro
Wreck’96: Excavations’ preliminary report and ceramic cargo’s study. Unpublished
Excavation Report, National Museum of the Philippines Schurz, Manila.
12

�Sjostrand, S., Bin Haji Taha, A., and Bin Sahar, S., 2006. Mysteries of Malaysian
shipwrecks. Ministry of Culture, Arts and Heritage Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Sjostrand, S., and S. LokLok., Syed, I., 2007. The Wanli shipwreck and its ceramic
cargo, Malaysia. Dept. of Museums Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Schurz, W. L., 1985. The Manila Galleon. Historical Conservation Society.
Tan, R. C., Li, J. A., Dizon, E. Z., and Orillaneda, B. C., 2007. Zhangzhou ware found in
the Philippines: "Swatow" export ceramics from Fujian 16th-17th centuries. Art Post
Asia, Malaysia.
Thomaz, L.F.F.R., 1993. The Malay Sultanate of Melaka. In Anthony Reid (Ed.),
Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power, and Belief. Cornell University
Press, Ithaca: 69-75.
Wade, G., 2000. The Ming shi-lu as a Source for Thai History Fourteenth to
Seventeenth Centuries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 31(2): 249-294.
Wallerstein, I. M., 2004.World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press,
Durham, North Carolina.
Biography
Bobby C. Orillaneda is currently studying for a doctorate degree in maritime
archaeology at the Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology in the University of Oxford.
He is also a Museum Researcher at the Underwater Archaeology Section of the
National Museum of the Philippines and has been involved in underwater
archaeological projects since 1999 and has worked in the Philippines, Thailand,
Indonesia, Taiwan Sri Lanka and Egypt.

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="635">
                <text>Maritime Trade in Southeast Asia during the Early Colonial Period </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="636">
                <text>The arrival of naval expeditions in the Philippines and Melaka from Spain and Portugal respectively during the early sixteenth century CE created profound transformations in patterns of Southeast Asian maritime trade as European markets became available to Southeast Asian products and vice versa. The production and distribution of Southeast Asian natural and manufactured products intensified in response to increased supply and demand. This subsequently led to the discovery of raw material sources and production centres as well as the emergence and development of maritime polities that serve as ports of call by various types of watercraft vessels. This paper will present the archaeological excavation results of sixteenth century shipwrecks in Malaysia (Xuande and Wanli), the Philippines (San Isidro and Royal Captain junk) and Thailand (KoSamui and KoKradat) in an attempt to analyse maritime trade patterns as the Southeast Asian region transitioned from its previous intraregional-focus on maritime trade to participants of the global trade economy. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="637">
                <text>Bobby C. Orillaneda, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="638">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="49" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="49">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/7c0ccb1c1189faec8d0702f52c565177.pdf</src>
        <authentication>93452adb14f3d1912b3121bd9fe95dc6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="644">
                    <text>East in the West : Investigating the Asian presence
and influence in Brazil from the 16th to 18th centuries.

Cliff Pereira
Royal Geographical Society,
London, ,SW7 2AR
United Kingdom
E-mail: cliffjpereira@hotmail.com
Abstract
This study is the second part of investigative research into early Asian presence in the
Atlantic. The first investigation focused on the islands of Macaronesia (Canary Islands,
Madeira, Azores and Cape Verde Islands), and resulted in a better understanding of the
motives, means and influences that defined Asian presence in some of these islands,
and not in others. It identified the existence of a maritime “Lusitanian space” which
provided the vehicle of culture contact, and conveyance of Luso-Asians into the Atlantic
World primarily through maritime employment, the work of the Society of Jesus
(commonly known as the Jesuits) and within the entourage of people in governance and
social prominence. This initial multi-disciplinary investigation hinted at a connection
between Portuguese Asia and Brazil, which forms the basis of this research study.
Keywords: Iberia, Portugal, Brazil, Maritime trade, Networks, 16th, 18th, centuries, Asia,
Roteiro

Introduction
The arrival of Columbus in the Bahamas in 1492 and Cabral in Brazil in 1500 were
voyages associated with the discovery of “the Indies” (i.e. all regions east of the Cape of
Good Hope), resulting in the terms Indians or “Indios” for the aboriginal inhabitants of
the Americas. To avoid confusion and respect the rights of the indigenous Americans
this paper uses the term “indigenous Brazilians” when describing the aboriginal people
of Brazil.
Luso-Asians are Asians who came under the sway of Portuguese influence since Vasco
Da Gama arrived in Calicut in 1498. From an archival perspective they were
characteristically Catholic and had Portuguese names. Remnants of Luso-Asians still
exist in Asia and in other parts of the world (Pereira, 2011). Luso-Asians shared aspects

1

�of culture, including maritime traditions, art, architecture, religion and cuisine that were
reinforced by centuries of Iberian rule and the impact of Iberian-based Catholicism.
Methodology.
Preliminary research was conducted prior to the fieldwork. This shaped the study to
focus on specific localities and disciplines within the limitations of time and funds.
The resultant focus is on the period from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries,
concentrating on Northeast Brazil. The field work was concentrated in two areas in the
state of Bahia; the state capital of Salvador in the north and the southern provincial
capital of Ilhéus where tangible and intangible aspects of heritage were identified. This
study aims to academically validate and interpret the multidisciplinary investigation in a
discussion leading to a conclusion.
Discussion.
In the early sixteenth century Portuguese colonisation with European settlers only really
existed in Macaronesia, where the islands were originally uninhabited, with the
exception of the Canary Islands. Portuguese colonisation in Brazil was based on initially
sending out degredados (petty criminals) and adventurers who were sentenced to the
new lands in the hope that they would settle among the indigenous Brazilians, learn
their language and culture and produce a mixed population who would later serve the
Portuguese as translators, and allies against hostile local or foreign invaders (Bradford
Burns, 1980). Between 1530 and 1535 the coast of Brazil was divided into 15 almost
equal parts of around 50 leagues, each governed by a hereditary captain. Each
captaincy extended inland from the coast to the longitudinal line established by the 1494
Treaty of Tordesillas between Spain and Portugal. The Brazilian state of Bahia was
composed of the Baia, Ilhéus and Porto Seguro captaincies.
Portuguese presence in the Indies focused on strategic coastal feitorias (Factories) that
were protected by forts. In 1534 Francisco Pereira Coutinho (d.1547) who had been at
the conquest of Goa in 1510 was offered the captaincy of Baia. A factory was
established at Salvador, Baia, but Brazil at first offered little in comparison to the riches
of the East Indies and Coutinho established a wooden fort (Russell-Woods, 1998). In
the Ilheus captaincy the village of Ilheus was founded in 1536 (Vianna, 1893). Another
Asia-hand Tomé de Sousa (1503 -1579) arrived in Salvador as first governor-general of
2

�Brazil in 1549 with the first Jesuit missionaries (Russell-Woods, 1968). He established a
shipyard in Salvador and encouraged the escala (calling for victualling and repairs) of
Portuguese East Indiamen. But Lisbon was keen to keep a tight control on the high
value imports from Asia including those (e.g. pepper) that were under a royal monopoly
(Bentley Duncan, 1972).
In the East Indies, trade and fortification was followed by the church who effectively
managed the spiritual life of the new lands, moving into agriculture, education and
medicine. A Misericordia was established at Salvador in 1549, just forty-four years after
the one in Cochin, India (Malekandathil, 2001). It probably initially administered to the
sailors, slaves and indigenous Brazilians. Through works by Jesuits in India like Garcia
d’Oterga (Dalby, 2002) the use of Asian spices and herbs in medicine, were passed to
the Jesuits in South America, and Jesuit discoveries spread from Tropical America to
Asia (Hobhouse, 1987).The Misericordia in Salvador still holds a collection of labelled
drug containers called mangas de farmácia for the major spices; pepper (Piper nigrum),
cloves (Sygium aromaticum), and nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) and cinnamon
(Cinnamomum zeylanicum). All of these came from Asia (Malekandathil, 2001).
The Jesuit priest Manoel de Nóbrega described how the first bishop Dom Pedro
Fernandes Sardinha (d.1556) who served in Goa arrived in Salvador “with all his
attendants and crew in good health” in 1552 (Vianna, 1893) and pronounced Ilheus as
town and separate parish. Since their arrival in the Ilheus captaincy the Jesuits
controlled the extraction of timber for construction and the navy, especially in the Fundo
das Doze Légaus (Dias, 2010). Fieldwork suggests that the original Portuguese
settlement at Ilhéus was on the easily defensible quarter now known as the Alto de
Vitoria, with a harbour frontage below it within the estuary along what is now Avenida
Dois De Julho. On the hill was a wooden church that was later built into the stone
church of São Jorge in 1556.
The third governor of Brazil was Mem De Sá (c1500 -1572) who assumed the role in
1558. Labour shortages led the colonists to enslave the indigenous Brazilians who were
under the patronage of the Jesuits missions. De Sá was retained long after his difficult
term (Bradford Burns, 1980) which was marked by a reduction of the number of East
India vessels arriving in Lisbon. But in the following decade the number of East India
3

�vessels reaching Lisbon would increase to levels unseen for seventy years with many
calling at Salvador. The area around the bay or Baia de Todos Santos known as the
Recõncavo contains many rivers, islands and promontories that offered routes and
easily defensible sites for the establishment of sugar estates and engenhos (sugar
mills). On the outskirts of Santo Amaro is the small cloistered convent at Praça Frei
Bento that includes the Museu do Recolhimento dos Humildes. Unfortunately the
museum was shut, however a sister of the convent acknowledged the existence of
many items which displayed Asian influences. São Francisco was the third town of the
Recõncavo to be settled by the Portuguese. After Mem de Sá had subjugated the
indigenous Brazilians he gave his land to his son Francisco who paid for the
construction of the convent of Santo Amaro and the church with the possible Asian
religious artefacts. Felipa, the daughter of de Sa’ eventually inherited the land and
married Fernando de Noronha Third Count of Linhares (1540-1608), who was the
cousin of the viceroy of India between 1629 and 1645. In the Ilheus captaincy Mem de
Sá founded the engenho (sugar mill) on the Santana River at the site of the Church of
Nossa Senhora de Santana. This is one of three pre-1550 churches in Brazil and has
some architectural similarities with churches in Goa. The mill, large estate and church
became the property of the absentee Fernando de Noronha and passed into the
possession of the Jesuits. By 1585 Brazil was the largest producer and exporter of
sugar in the world (Sequeira Antony, 2004) and Salvador developed rapidly (RussellWoods, 1968).
The first stone fort to be built in Brazil was the Fort of Santo Antonio de Barra Salvador
constructed in 1583, which is now the Museu Náutico da Bahia. A vessel called the
Saveiro was once common in the calm waters of the bay and the Recõncavo. Many of
the features of this craft have similarities with Asian vessels, especially Arab dhows for
inshore trade. In fact the Saveiro is constructed with the use of measurements based on
the palm of the hand, and an instrument from India called the Graminho. Another craft
was the coastal raft or Jangada whose name itself is from Malayam (the language of
Kerala, India). It appears that the Jangada was once widespread along the coast of
Brazil, but is now only found in the Northeast, especially Ceará.

4

�At the Museu da Gastronomia Baiana local cuisine featured as an intangible heritage
and sensory experience. In Brazilian popular culture the African connection to Baiana
cuisine is stressed. However there are many ingredients that are not of African origin.
The coconut (cocos nucifera) appears to have been unknown in the Atlantic at the time
of the Portuguese discoveries and work on plant distribution suggest that there were
two centres of origin for the coconut in tropical Asia. The Portuguese first encountered
the coconuts in Eastern Africa where they called them “Indian palm or nut trees”
(Linschoten, 2005). But the importance of the coconut tree was highlighted in India
where they described how the Indians produced books “written on leaves of some trees
which appear to be palms on which they always write and of these trees and their fruit
are made these things; sugar, honey, vinegar, fruit and cordage for ships and for all
other purposes” (Roxburgh McClymont, 1914). The Portuguese subsequently
introduced the coconut to tropical Atlantic. However, this is quite different to introducing
the technology and knowledge to produce the “things” encountered in India, especially
the production of coir for cordage. The Portuguese word cayro (coir) is a corruption of
the Malayalam “Kayara” (Linschoten, 2005). The production of coconut milk (as
opposed to coconut water) by scraping and shredding the hard white coconut meat is
done on a metal scraper and the extraction of the milk is done on a grinding stone in
India. The use of the milk is a characteristic of South Indian and Southeast Asian
cuisine. But two specific Baiana recipes use coconut milk; the popular prawn or fish
Moqueca, and the chicken Xinxim de Galinha. The chicken recipe is particularly
interesting for its use of ginger (zingiberi), garlic and onions. This combination is termed
the “Indian culinary trinity”. It also has cloves and black pepper. Ginger in its green form
was rare in Europe until the late twentieth century and was imported since medieval
times from Asia as a ginger preserve. Garcia d’Orta mentioned that the best quality of
preserved ginger came from the Bay of Bengal (Dalby, 2002). Asian influence is
strongest in Brazilian sweets. The grated coconut that produces coconut milk is used in
Brazil to make Cocada (Coconut Ice). The Brazilian and Goan versions of this sweet
have the same name and use lime as flavouring. In Asia the outer flesh of the nutmeg
was also preserved in sugar (Dalby 2002). When the Portuguese took the Guava from
Brazil to India they called it Pera (i.e. Pear). The Goans produced a preserve that they
5

�called Perada, and it is this recipe that returned to Northeast Brazil where it is known as
Goiabada. The Mango was introduced to Bahia from India along with Mangada (Mango
preserve). Another Brazilian sweet that demonstrates Indian influence is the steamed
rice pudding known as Acaça.
The joining of the Portuguese and Spanish crowns opened the Portuguese empire to
English and Dutch attack, resulting in much reduced Portuguese shipping from Asia and
attacks on Salvador in 1625 (Russell-Woods, 1968) and Ilheus in 1635 (Vianna, 1893).
Asian administrators such as the Viceroy of Goa Vasco Mascarenhas (1605-1678) were
appointed to Brazil and despite the prohibition on the escala for ships returning from the
Indies in 1656 and further decrees (Sequeira Antony, 2004), ships calling at Salvador
from Lisbon were carrying Asian wares as shown by the artefacts from the 1668 wreck
of Santissimo Sacramento. This period was marked by the growing presence of the
Jesuits who between 1657 and 1672 began construction on a Jesuit church in Salvador.
In 1677 the Viceroy of India Dom Pedro de Almeida (d.1678) was ordered to send spice
cultivators to Bahia and in 1682 two Canarin (Goan) spice cultivators were to be sent to
Bahia (Sequeira Antony, 2004). In that year the Jesuits succeeded in growing pepper
and cinnamon at their Quinta de Tanque or Casa Suburbana de São Christavão
(Russell-Woods 1998). In 1690 under the governorship of Antonio Luiz Gonzalves de
Camara Coutinho (1638-1702) two Canarins were sent to Bahia. Their names were
Laurenço de Noronha and Salvador de Tavora, both aged 30 and from Bardez. These
men were unable to accomplish their work as spice cultivators and were returned to
Goa as they were unskilled at peeling cinnamon bark (Sequeira Antony, 2004).
Coutinho ended his governorship in 1694 and went on to serve as viceroy of India. The
Misericordia in Salvador holds a painting of Captain Francisco Fernandes de Sym that
appears to have been executed at the end of the seventeenth century and is accredited
to Laurenço Veloso (d.1708), a Goan-born painter, who was trained by the Jesuits in
Goa. Veloso also painted the local merchant Coronal Domingas Pires Carvalho in the
Igreja da Ordem Terceira de São Francisco in Salvador. It seems that Carvalho was
responsible for funding the rebuilding of the church in 1702. Two other viceroys had
served in India in the seventeenth century and were later to serve in Brazil; Viceroy
Pedro António Meneses de Noronha de Alburquerque (1661-1731) was appointed as
6

�viceroy of Brazil between 1714 and 1718 and Vasco Fernandes Cesar de Noronha de
Albuquerque (1673-1741) who served as Viceroy of Brazil between 1720 and 1735. In
1722 a Portuguese Dominican missionary Brother Gabriel Baptista arrived in Bahia from
India and established the Dominican order in Brazil (Vianna, 1893). Bahia increasingly
offered a market for European and Asian goods and the British East India Company
bound to or from Bombay or Bengal would often put in at Salvador. (Sequeira Antony,
2004). In 1750 fresh orders were issued from the Royal Court for married couples,
especially from Bengal and the Coromandel Coast of India who were weavers or dyers
of cottons and “muslins”. In a reply the viceroy of India explained the reluctance of
Indians to go to Brazil due to caste restrictions and there being few Catholic converts
among the textile workers. In 1752 the viceroy sent six Canarins as paid workers to
Bahia with a detailed report on the uses of the coconut tree in Goa. Two died of scurvy
on the voyage. For the remaining four we have the names of three of them, Pedro
Ventura Castilho, João Rebeiro and Laurenço Raposo. These Canarins found that the
palm trees of Brazil were not suitable for the extraction and production of palm arrack
(Sequeira Antony, 2004).
When the captaincy of Ilhéus was incorporated into the captaincy of Bahia in 1761 the
functions of the captaincy were replaced by the comarça (county). In 1763 Rio de
Janeiro replaced Salvador as the capital of Brazil and in 1767 the Portuguese crown
outlawed the escala (Sequeira-Antony, 2004). The plantation at Ilhéus was destroyed
by ants in 1788 and in 1798 the Viceroy of India was asked to remit teak plants from
Daman, and Sandalwood from Goa, Timor or Solor for transplanting in Brazil. It appears
that the cultivation of teak had been undertaken in the Comarça dos Ilheus (Sequeira
Antony, 2004).
Conclusion.
From 1502 to around 1650 the jewel in the Portuguese Crown was India with its
connections to the Spice Islands. Toby Green (2007) argues that the inquisition was
established earlier in Goa then in Brazil because that was simply where greater profits
could be made. The suggestion is that the colonisation of Brazil was initially based on a
“blue-print” used by the Portuguese in the Indies. It is interesting that the Portuguese
chose to locate Ilhéus within a river estuary, on an easily defensible island which is a
7

�similar geography to Cochin and Goa in India. Evidence of transfer of experience and
skills acquired in Asia to Brazil was considerable, even though the social conditions
were different. The Indian historian Dr. Malekandathil (2001) has suggested that the
lack of sufficient ships for the India run in the early sixteenth century forced the
construction of vessels at Cochin, where initial plans for a shipyard were established in
1504-1505. With Indian Teak, the yard was capable of building large vessels such as
the 800 tonne capacity carrack Santa Catarina do Monte Sinai launched in 1520. This
ship became the flagship of Vasco da Gama on his third voyage to India in 1525.
Malekandathil (2001) points out that the master shipwright was Portuguese, but
essential carpenters and dockyard workers were Indian. These vessels were in contact
with Brazil and the returning Portuguese East Indiamen were manned with a
supplement of “East Indian” crew. It is proposed that these men introduced Asian
constructional elements found in the production of the Saveiro around Salvador. These
shipwrights may have also initially introduced or at the least modified the raft that they
named the Jangada in Northeast Brazil. Interestingly it is the culinary historian Michael
Krondl (2007) who states that “the little Iberian kingdom never produced enough sailors
to man every spritsail and ratline in its navy, as a result it had long been common for
other nationals to join up”. Though in this case Krondl was discussing the employment
of Europeans and not Asians. Contrary to the view of John Ferguson (1923) that “little
interest seems to have been taken in coconut planting by Portuguese”, it appears that
the Portuguese were fully aware of the importance of the coconut tree for its safe water,
and useful cordage and promoted its cultivation in the tropics. In the sixteenth century
prominent administrators, clergy, soldiers and merchants were transplanted from Asia,
accompanied by an entourage of followers, wives, concubines, servants and slaves. As
pointed out by Bradford Burns (1980). Portuguese women were notably absent from the
settlement pattern during the first century of Portuguese-Brazilian history and the
Portuguese became increasingly attracted to indigenous Brazilian, Asian and African
women, but we have no idea of the early movements of Luso-Asian women whose
voices and original names are rarely recorded. However in the second half of the
eighteenth century Goan women were definitely sent to Brazil (Da Silva Gracias, 2001).
Women are repositories of culture and we can attribute the use of coconut in Baiana
8

�cuisine to Luso-Asian women, or possibly enslaved African women from India. They
also introduced the use of key spices. Ginger arrived in Brazil from São Tomé in the
sixteenth century. But Russell-Wood (1998) does not explain how ginger got to the
West African islands. Transplanted ginger production in Brazil and Africa was so
successful that in 1578 the King forbade exports from the Atlantic in order to protect
Asian exports.
In the seventeenth century sugar production required abundant labour by enslaved
Africans. At the same time the rise of the Dutch forced the Portuguese to consider other
sources for spices and Asian textiles leading to specific requests for Luso-Asians in
attempt to transplant Asian agriculture and textile technology to Brazil (Russel-Woods,
1998). This was also a period when Asian influences and presence were linked with the
Jesuits and their global organisation, which acted like a modern multinational
corporation, where concepts, technologies and people are relocated depending on
needs. Brazilian ports like Salvador were regarded by captains, crew and passengers
returning from Asia as places to legally and illegally exchange Asian exotics for
Brazilian sugar, tobacco and gold. Among the items imported from the Indian Ocean
were Zimbo’s or Buzio de Costa (Cowrie shells). These shells were important for the
Atlantic slave trade, where they served as a currency and were among the artefacts
recovered from the Santissimo Sacramento that sank off the coast of Salvador on 5th
May 1668. Also in the wreck were ceramics from Macau bearing the coat of arms of the
Silva family, which connects the wreck to Francisco Correa da Silva who died during the
incident (Pernambucano de Mello, 1979). The recovery of Nozeras (Nutmeg containers)
from the wreck suggest Asian trade and Luso-Asian contact via Lisbon.
In conclusion this paper suggests that Luso-Asians were not isolated in Asia, rather they
were present in and influencing the Atlantic World in a variety of ways in the sixteenth
century. Luso-Asians have left identifiable legacies from their contact with early colonial
Brazil in a number of disciplines. It also appears that people from all sectors of LusoAsian society were transplanted into seventeenth century Brazil directly from Asia or
through Lisbon. This research like the previous one in Macaronesia breaks new ground
for merely considering Asian heritage in this region of South America (Pereira, 2011). It
is not the only Luso-Asian heritage in the Americas that has been ignored and a similar
9

�and overlapping Hispano-Asian (Filipino) narrative in the Americas remains to be fully
studied. This opens up the notion of Asians across the Pacific, thereby combining the
distribution of peoples with that of trade and ideologies in a global Iberian network
(Junco, 2011).
Bibliography
Bentley Duncan, B., 1972. Atlantic Islands. Madeira, the Azores and the Cape Verdes in
the Seventeenth-Century Commerce and Navigation. The University of Chicago Press.
Chicago.
Bradford Burns, E., 1980 A History of Brazil. Columbia University Press. Guildford.
Dalby, A., 2002. Dangerous Tastes: The Story of Spices. British Museum Press.
London.
Da Silva Gracias, F. 2001. Goan Women in other Lands. In Malekandathil, P and
Mohammed, T.J. (Eds.), The Portuguese, Indian Ocean and European Bridgeheads.
Tellicherry: 364-373.
Dias, Marcelo Henrique (2010). The Mercantile Forest: timber exploration in the
captaincy of Ilheus in the18th Century. Revista Brasileira de Historia, 30(59) 193-214.
Retrieval

December

27,

2013.

From

http://www.sceilo.br/sceilo.php?script=sci_artex&amp;pid=S010201882010000100010&amp;Ing=en&amp;ting=en.
Ferguson, J., 1923. Coconut Planter’s Manual. Ferguson’s “All About the Coconut Palm”
(Cocos nucifera). Treating of the history and cultivation, chemistry and physiology of the
palm, and about its commercial products. Ceylon Observer Press. Colombo.
Green. T., 2007. Inquisition-The reign of fear. Pan Books. London.
Hobhouse, H. 1987. Seeds of Change: Five Plants That Transformed Mankind. Harper
&amp; Row. New York.
Junco, R., 2011. The Archaeology of Manila Galleons. In M. Stanforth, J. Craig, S.C.
Jago-on, B. Orillaneda and L. Lacsina (Eds.), Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific Regional
Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage. Manila: 877-886.
Krondl, M., 2007. The Taste of Conquest: The Rise and Fall of the Three Great Cities of
Spice. Ballantine Books. New York.

10

�Linschoten, H., 2005. The Voyage to The East Indies. Volume 1. Elibron Classics.
London.
Malekandathil, P. 2001. Portuguese Cochin and the Maritime Trade of India 1500-1663.
Manohar Publishers and Distributers. New Delhi.
Pereira, C., Luso-Asian influences in Macronesia. In M. Stanforth, J. Craig, S.C. Jagoon, B. Orillaneda and L. Lacsina (Eds.),Proceedings on the Asia-Pacific Regional
Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage. 2011. Manila: 981-990.
Pernambuco De Mello. U., 1979. The shipwreck of the galleon Sacramento 1668 off
Brazil. The International Journal of Archaeology and Underwater Exploration. Vol. 8(3)
211-223.
Roxburgh McClymont, J., 1914. Pedralaurez Cabral (Pedro Alluarez de Gouvea). His
Progenitors, his life, his voyage to and from America and the Indies. Forgotten Books.
London.
Sequeira Antony, P., 2004. The Goa-Bahia Intra-Colonial relations. 1675-1825.
MESHAR. Tellicherry.
Russell-Wood, A.J.R., 1968. Fidalgos and Philanthropists: the Santa Casa de
Misericordia of Bahia. 1550-1755. Duke university Press. London.
Russell-Wood, A.J.R., 1998. The Portuguese Empire 1415-1898. A world on the move.
John Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.
Vianna, F.V. 1893. Memoir of the State of Bahia. Bahia Print &amp; Book Binding Office of
the “Diario da Bahia”. Salvador.
Biography:
Cliff Pereira is a senior researcher specialised in bringing the strands of history and
geography, community, heritage and academia together to create factual, colourful,
strong, interwoven social narratives with equity and cultural sensitivity leading to
personal and community empowerment with an emphasis on shared cultural spaces.
He has broad experience consulting for development in the heritage sector, especially
for small, medium-sized and large museums, sensitive narratives, diversity and
inclusion and accessibility.

11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="640">
                <text>East in the West : Investigating the Asian presence  and influence in Brazil from the 16th to 18th centuries.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="641">
                <text>This study is the second part of investigative research into early Asian presence in the Atlantic. The first investigation focused on the islands of Macaronesia (Canary Islands, Madeira, Azores and Cape Verde Islands), and resulted in a better understanding of the motives, means and influences that defined Asian presence in some of these islands, and not in others. It identified the existence of a maritime â€œLusitanian spaceâ€ which provided the vehicle of culture contact, and conveyance of Luso-Asians into the Atlantic World primarily through maritime employment, the work of the Society of Jesus (commonly known as the Jesuits) and within the entourage of people in governance and social prominence. This initial multi-disciplinary investigation hinted at a connection between Portuguese Asia and Brazil, which forms the basis of this research study. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="642">
                <text>Cliff Pereira, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="643">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="50" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="50">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/914cc6338642585d5b75ca6155cbc631.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c48a9ee57bfdd64486addea0890318d9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="649">
                    <text>All our vessels are rowed from within, these are paddled from without, Spanish
and European Colonial Reception of Philippine Indigenous Craft
Roderick Stead
Centre for Maritime Archaeology
Southampton University
Southampton SO17 1BJ
UK
Email: mrs1e08@soton.ac.uk
Abstract

When the European visitors arrived in the Philippines from the Sixteenth century,
they encountered a range of indigenous craft ranging from logboats to plank-built
vessels. These boats, especially the plank-built vessels, were built in a very
different style to their own. They were particularly interested in the single and
double outriggers employed on these craft. The plank-built craft used hand
carved strakes rather than sawn timber and were held together by dowels and
treenails. The hull strakes were fastened together by the lashed-lug technique or
sewn. No metal fastenings were used in the construction. Similar techniques
were used throughout Island Southeast Asia. They recognised the maritime skills
of the Filipinos and soon used them as crew on their own vessels and as
craftsmen to build European-style vessels using local materials. The Spanish
noted the suitability of the local vessels in the Philippine environment, due to their
speed and ability to cross shallow coral reefs, even though they were largely
ineffective in fighting against European vessels. They continued to employ boats
built in the local tradition for communications and to suppress maritime raiders
from the areas not under colonial control. These vessels continued in this role
until replaced by steam vessels in the nineteenth century. This paper will explore
the European views on these traditional craft and the way they were utilised and
adapted by the Spanish and other Europeans powers.
Keywords: Plank-built vessels, Colonialism, Sail, Paddle, Philippines

Introduction
The first recorded European visit to the Philippines was by Magellan in 1521, whilst
in the service of the Spanish crown. This visit was well documented by his
chronicler, Pigafetta (1874) (translated by Stanley, 2010). He was immediately
impressed with the local plank-built boats he saw, the balangay, which he
transcribed as ballanghai. Pigafetta records “we came upon two long boats, which
1

�they called ballanghai, full of men. In the largest of them was the king sitting under
an awning of mats” (Stanley, 2010: 76). He also records a conference near Samar
“the king… led us under a place covered with canes, where there was a ballanghai,
that is to say, a boat, eighty feet long or thereabouts, resembling a fusta. We sat
with the king upon its poop” (Stanley, 2010: 78). The fusta was a kind of light galley
from this period, used mainly in the Mediterranean, with a single mast, a lateen sail
and usually up to 18 oars.
The picture below (Fig. 1) is
of a Portuguese fusta, with
22 oars, from a book by Jan
Huygen van Linschoten, a
Dutch traveller. Despite this
comparison,

most

commentators of this period
were

struck

differences
Philippine

by

the

between

the

indigenous

craft

and the European tradition.
They

were

Fig. 1 Portugese fusta from Jan Huygen van Linschoten,

particularly 1595
interested in the shallow draft,

which was necessary to sail over the numerous coral reefs and the use of the
double outrigger in order to give lateral stability. The practice of sitting o n the
outriggers in order to paddle was remarkable and was feasible only in the warm
tropical waters of the islands. The Asian lug sail was also a novel approach
compared to the square sails or lateen sails to which they were accustomed. The
Philippine vessels were part of a larger tradition that was found through much of
Indonesia. Therefore many of the comments referred to vessels in the Moluccas or
Sulawesi as much as in the Philippines.

2

�The European Colonial Settlement in the Philippines
The main Spanish interest was initially in the Moluccas and in the trade with China
and so the colonial regime developed slowly in the Philippines. After a number of
exploratory voyages, Miguel López de Legaspi founded the initial settlement at
Cebu, which was an established emporium for Chinese and Southeast Asian
traders. Fort San Pedro was built there in 1565. A further settlement was built on
the island of Panay. In 1571 Legaspi moved the capital to Manila, another
established trade emporium. The young colony was threatened by Chinese and
Japanese pirates and Moslem raiders from the south, but the main danger was the
rivalry with other European colonial powers, particularly the Portuguese and later
the Dutch. Few Spanish settlers came to the Philippines, but it proved a fertile
opportunity to convert the animist inhabitants to Christianity and the Church
maintained a strong grip on the colonial administration (Phelan, 1959).
Indigenous Philippine Craft
Our knowledge for the Philippine craft in the pre-colonial world is limited. The
evidence we have is drawn essentially from the accounts of early travellers or
colonisers, referred to below. There is little archaeological information available,
although this is expanding steadily as new discoveries are made. There is a single
archaeological site with preserved vessel hulls, at Butuan in Northern Mindanao
(Scott, 1981: 1). There is also some, very limited, iconographic evidence such as
the Manunggul Jar, which appears to illustrate a logboat conveying a dead soul to
the afterlife. This is one of the most famous prehistoric artefacts from the
Philippines, currently in the National Museum in Manila, which was discovered in a
cave of the same name in Palawan and has been dated to 800 BC (Dizon and
Ronquillo, 2010: 22). The jar is for a secondary burial and the figures on this
ceramic show a log boat used to transport the soul. The dead soul is the first figure
with crossed arms conveyed by a boatman who is paddling the logboat. The front of
the boat is carved with anthromorphic details of eyes, nose and mouth. The boat
appears to have had a pole mast, which is now missing. There is considerable
evidence from ethnographic sources that many of the traditional skills and design
features have been retained until the present day. The banca remains the standard
3

�small fishing boat and means of local communication throughout the islands (Fig. 2).
This is a plank built vessel with double outriggers with many similarities to traditional
craft. However there is now a very rapid rate of change as engines have largely
replaced sails and paddles to power these vessels.
The vessels observed by the
initial

visitors

fall

into

two

categories; logboats and plankbuilt

boats.

category

An

was

intermediate

the

log

boat

expanded by the addition of
washboards or strakes of wood
or rattan to increase freeboard
and

make

the

boats

more

seaworthy. The logboats were
more familiar to the visitors as

Fig. 2 Modern banca. (M. R. Stead)

they follow closely examples
from other parts of the world including the Americas, Africa and Europe. The plankbuilt boats were more exotic in that they were constructed of hand carved planks
rather than sawn timber. The hulls were fastened together using dowels recessed in
the planks and lashings to the ribs. There were no nails in these vessels at all. It
was these plank-built vessels that generated most comment. They were perceived
to be very insubstantial for maritime voyages. There are extensive European textual
descriptions from the sixteenth century and later years. The Spanish sources are
most extensive, but are supplemented by a range of accounts from other European
visitors in English, Portuguese and Dutch. The Tagalog/Spanish dictionary of Pedro
de Buenaventura, Vocabulario de La Lengua Tagala, elromance castellaño presto
primero (Vocabulary of the Tagalog language with Castillian Romance given first)
published in 1613 is particularly valuable. It lists sixteen types of boats from the log
boats, bilog and bawoto, to the plank-built boats, the balangay, kopit, birok and
biroko. Many words for nautical activities and boat equipment are included. These
are, of course, just the Tagalog names and the dictionary does not include the
4

�names in Visayan or other Philippine dialects. However there are other dictionaries
for those areas, such as the later Diccionario Español-Bisayaparalasprovincias de
Samar y Leyte (De la Rosa-Alcázar, 1914).
Accounts by Europeans who had sailed vessels built in the local tradition, or had
even constructed such craft, are particularly valuable. The most complete guide to
the indigenous ships and the shipbuilding techniques used to construct them are
contained in Ignacio Francisco Alcina’s unpublished text, Historia de las Islas e
Indios de Bisayas (Alcina 1668: 159-215). He recorded that he had actually built
and sailed more than twenty such plank-built boats. He discussed the balangay, the
biruk and the caracoa, after stressing that these plank-built boats were all
constructed in a similar way. The biruk was mostly for carrying cargo and the
balangay was a general-purpose vessel. The caracoa was used for raiding and
warfare and built in a style to accommodate a large crew.
Logboats
The logboats are simple dugout vessels cut from large tree trunks. As the Philippine
forests were well supplied with large trees suitable to construct such boats then
these were the most likely vessels utilised since prehistory for local fishing and
communications. A recently discovered example is the logboat found at Rosales in
Pangasinan province, northwest Luzon. This is a 7.10 m logboat found in a tributary
of the Agno River, one of the largest rivers in Luzon, which drains into the Lingayen
Gulf. This has been radiocarbon dated to between 1480 and 1650 AD with a 95%
probability (Stead, 2014: 12). Alcina (1668: 197-199) describes the construction
process for a logboat in detail and all his technical terms are in Visayan with some
use of Iberian terminology. He refers to a logboat as a balato. A fresh trunk was
felled and stripped to a depth of two fingers. This reflects the experience that the
soft outer wood would tend to rot. A centre line (called a kutur) was provided to give
a guide to the carpenter. The upper part of the trunk was removed by axe or adze,
often leaving an upstanding bow and stern. They would carve out the inside leaving
protrusions in the wood to support the thwarts (agar). The ends would be trimmed
into a boat shape.

5

�The most difficult technical issue was to achieve a suitable thickness of wood, so
that the boat was robust, but not too heavy, which was achieved by using a gauge
or auger called a lokob. This would leave trial holes in the timber that would need to
be patched carefully. The tools used to excavate were a square adze (daldag) and a
skewed adze (called a binkong).The thwarts had a key role to provide beam
strength to the hull, as well as seating for the paddlers and as a basis for lashing on
washboards or extension planks. According to Alcina (1668: 167), a typical baloto
would be up to nine (9) m in length with a beam up to one metre. This represented
eight to ten man-day’s construction time. These log boats would often be furnished
with a single or double outrigger to improve stability. Lateral stability has often been
a problem for log boats in any environment and the Philippine solution was very
effective. Due to the difficulties of working nets over the side of a log boat,
outriggers may be absent or they might be removed for convenience whilst fishing.
Planked Boats
The hulls were constructed with hardwood planks attached to a central keel or a
simple centre plank. Sawing technology was not used before the colonial period and
the planks were carved by hand, using axes and adzes. Lugs were left carved as
protrusions on the inner side of the planks to form transverse rows. The usual
method of fixing the planks together was by the use of circular dowels, inserted in
the edges of the individual strakes. The size of these dowels was about 3 cm in
diameter. The boat was then lashed together using the carved lugs on the inside of
the planks and series of ribs. Transverse thwarts were also lashed to the lugs and
ribs to create a firm inverted bell-shaped structure.
Balangay
The planked boat, the balangay, referred to above in the account of Pigafetta, were
very numerous in the pre-colonial period. Antonio de Morga, a senior civil servant in
the Spanish service, referred to them in his Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (De
Morga, 1609: 190). He describes the barangays as “certain quick and light vessels
that lie low in the water, put together with little wooden nails. These are as slender
at the stern as at the bow and they can hold a number of rowers on both sides”.
These early accounts indicate that they were general-purpose, cargo-carrying
6

�vessels widely used in inter-island trade. They were propelled by rowers or paddlers
and by sail. De Morga also noted the palm leaf awnings or cayanes, which gave
protection to the boat and the crew from the fierce tropical sun. He noted that the
ships would not capsize due to the outriggers and, even if flooded, the bamboo
outriggers would prevent the boat from sinking. Alcina (1668: 201-202) described
the barangays “the lightest that were used and are still being used by these natives
here. They are built upon a square keel, adding boards for the side. They are
completed with low sides suitable for rowing…” We are in the fortunate position of
having a number of balangay boats that have been discovered at the Butuan site in
Northern Mindanao (Stead and Dizon, 2011: 3). These were buried in silt deposits in
the estuary of the Agusan River. A total of twelve hulks or wreck fragments have
been reported in total. Three balangay vessels have been fully excavated and a
further hull is currently being excavated. These correspond closely to the
descriptions of these vessels and are between 14 and 20 m long (Stead and Dizon,
2011). Three underwater wrecks in Philippine waters appear to be the remains of
such Southeast Asian vessels, although the hull remains are fragmentary. These
are the Pandanan wreck
and

the

Wreck
and

Lena

from

the

Shoal

Palawan,

Santa

Cruz

wreck

from

Zambales

(Dizon

and Ronquillo,

2010:

201-213)

(see

Fig. 3 for a photo of a
modern replica).

Fig. 3 Replica balangay boat, National Museum, Manila. (P. L. Stead)

The Caracoa
The caracoa was a military version of the balangay. It was considered larger and
faster, and was most suitable for raiding and slave trading. As Retana (cited by
Martínez de Zúñiga, 1803: ii, 513)has pointed out, this word does not appear in
early Tagalog or Visayan dictionaries, but as the word exists in both Spanish and
Portuguese dictionaries, he suggests that this may be a Portuguese rendering of the
7

�Malay root of corocoro. The Spanish documents from the colonial period in the
Philippines consistently refer to these vessels as the caracoa, but in the Moluccas
corocoro was the more normal name. Blair and Robertson (1904) list 117 references
to the caracoa in their compendium of sources from the Spanish archives. Alcina
(1668: 207) refers to this class of vessel and commented that they were traditional
in the Philippines and were widely used in his time. He said “It closely resembles
the brigantines of Spain, although (the caracoa) is larger in size”. He notes that this
is due to the outriggers, paddling seats on the outrigger booms and the fighting
platforms, which were features of the caracoa (Alcina, 1668: 207). He also gave the
opinion that “For these islands they are the best ships or vessels and the most
suitable for war fleets. These people used them in ancient times when, as infidels,
they went out to plunder other enemy islands ….”Alcina (1668: 207). He specifically
mentions that Spanish authorities continued to construct caracoa in the seventeenth
century for military use. The rowers and sailors would be Filipinos, but the soldiers
would normally be Spanish. The same arrangement can be noted on the Manila
galleons that carried many Filipino sailors. He comments that the caracoa was a
more comfortable means of travel in the Philippines than the Spanish ships due to
many being fitted with a thatched palm roof. However, he notes that the Spanish
made these vessels heavier and their boats often could not catch the raiding
vessels built in the traditional style. These vessels were used for carrying
dispatches, defence against pirate attacks from the Sulu Sea and for major assaults
on pirate bases. A manuscript, thought to be by Pedro Gutierrez S.J., describes a
typical example of the use of the caracoa to repulse pirate attacks from the Moslem
south (Gutierrez, 1637). This raid was by four Muslim ships and their repulse by
Spanish-led caracoas is also recorded in Montero y Vidal (1888: 162). William
Dampier, the English buccaneer, describes this type of vessel as used by the Sultan
in Mindanao as seen in his voyage in the seventeenth century. He describes how
the boats were rounded like a half-moon, but with outriggers designed for paddling.
He recounts how
“there run a-cross the Out layers two tire of Beams for the Padlers to sit
on, on each side of the Vessel. The lower tire of these Beams is not
8

�above a Foot from the Water; so that upon any the least reeling of the
Vessel, the Beams are dipt in the Water, and the Men that sit are wet
up to their Waste; their Feet seldom escaping the Water. And thus as all
our Vessels are rowed from within, these are paddled from without (sic)”
(Dampier, 1797: 230).
Current knowledge of the caracoa is based mainly upon iconography, such as the
representation (Fig. 4) from Thomas Forrest (1779). None of these vessels survive
until today and, as yet, there are no identified examples in the archaeological
record. Forrest was well acquainted with the caracoa as he acquired two small
ones, the ‘Banguey’ and the ‘Borneo’ to assist his proa galley in his eighteenth
century voyage in Southeast Asia. The ‘Banguey’ measured just 18ft (5.5 m) keel
length with a beam of 8ft (2.4 m, and carried a crew of 14 men. Forrest (1779: 23)
gave a particularly clear description in a footnote to his account of his voyage “a
corocoro (caracoa) is a vessel generally fitted with outriggers, having a high arched
stem and stern, like the points of a half moon. They are used by the inhabitants of
the Molucca Islands chiefly, and the Dutch have fleets of them at Amboyna, which
they employ as guarda costas. They have them from a small size, to above ten tons
burthen; and on the cross pieces which support the outriggers are often put fore and
aft planks, on which the people sit and paddle, beside those who sit in the vessel on
each gunnel. In smooth water they can be paddled very fast, as many hands may
be employed in different ranks or rows. They are steered with two commoodies
(broad paddles), and not with a rudder. When they are high out of the water, they
use oars, but on the outriggers they always use paddles.”The caracoa were not
really a match for a European vessel in a fleet action. When Legaspi took Manila in
1571, there was a sea battle in Manila Bay with twenty or thirty local vessels, mainly
caracoas. These mounted one or two culverins each. The Spanish defeated this
fleet without difficulty (Anon, 1572, Relation of the Conquest of the Island of Luzon).
De Morga took two caracoas in his fleet when he sailed out against the Dutch under
Van Noort in 1600. They could not keep up with the European style ships d ue to the
choppy sea and adverse winds (de Morga, 1609: 177). It was reported that
caracoas were used by the Spanish against the Maranao tribes around Lake Lanao
9

�in Mindanao in 1639, by
transporting them overland
as

components

and

reassembling them at the
lake (Scott, 1981: 10). The
joanga was a larger size
version of the caracoa and
typical of the Moluccas,
Mindanao and the Sulu
Sea. A description of the
joanga,

or

juanga,

is

contained in a paper by de
Bobadilla which describes
an action in 1638, “they
were all embarked in a
Fig. 4 Illustration of a caracoa (corocoro). (Reproduced fleet of caracoas, which
from Forrest, 1779: plate 12)
are oared vessels much

used in Filippinas, carrying from fifty to a hundred rowers apiece. There are larger
ones called juangas, and carry from one hundred and twenty to one hundred and
thirty rowers (sic)” (de Bobadilla, 1639). Paris (1841: 91, 92) describes one of these
vessels as observed in the Moluccas, drawing on information from the voyages of
Pagès (1782). He refers to this vessel in French as a buanga. His drawing shows a
total 74 rowers on each side in three banks, rather similar to a classical Roman
trireme, but with a further 18 paddlers on the outrigger platform. Taking the two
sides together this would give a total of 184 crew, engaged primarily in powering the
vessel. The joanga and caracoa remained in service into the nineteenth century for
raiding and piracy in the whole of Southeast Asia from bases in the Sulu Sea area.
However, the outriggers were eventually discarded and the vessels came to have
heavier lines and a broader beam. This may reflect the need to carry heavier guns.
Eventually, they were defeated when the Spanish and British and Dutch navies

10

�brought in steam powered naval units (Warren, 1981: 256-258). One of the last
voyages recorded in a caracoa was by the famous naturalist, Wallace, in 1859,
when he rode on a Dutch government-owned vessel from Bacan to Ternate in the
Moluccas. This boat was of four (4) tons burthen, with twenty rowers (rather than
paddlers), a thatched canopy, a low freeboard, and double outriggers at five (5) feet
either side of the hull. There was a tripod mast and a mat sail. He complained about
the constant drumming, used to keep the rowers in time (Wallace, 1869: 358).
Conclusion
We are indebted to the early Spanish explorers and colonialists, and travelers from
many nationalities for most of the information we have on the indigenous Philippine
boats. Hopefully the progress of maritime archaeology in the area will contin ue to
supplement these early sources.
Acknowledgements
My thanks to my supervisors for this research work, for their guidance, Dr Lucy Blue
and Dr Jesse Ransley, both of the University of Southampton, as well as Dr Eusebio
Dizon of the National Museum in Manila.
References
Alcina, I. F., 1668. Historia de las Islas e Indios de Bisayas…, Part One, Book 3,
Vol. 3: 197-213, re-published in 2005 by UST with a translation by C. J. Kobak and
L. Gutiérrez, Manila.
Anon., 1572. Relation of the Conquest of the Island of Luzon, mss. translated by
Blair and Robertson in their compendium of documents, Vol. 3: 156-7.
Blair, E. H., and Robertson, J.A., 1903-7.The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, 55
Vols, Clark, Cleveland.
de Bobadilla, D., 1639. Glorious victories against the Moros of Mindanao, paper
printedin Mexico and translated by A.B. Myrick, reprinted in Blair and Robertson,
Vol. 29: 86-03.
Dampier, W., 1797. A New Voyage around the World, 1927 edition, Argonaut Press,
London.
Dizon, E. Z., and Ronquillo, W. P., 2010. Maritime and Underwater Archaeology in
the Philippines, from A Passage to Asia. Bozar, Brussels.
11

�Forrest, T., 1779. A Voyage to New Guinea and the Moluccas from Balambangan.
G. Scott, London.
Gutierrez, P., 1637. Defeat of Moro Pirates MSS in Academia Real de la Historia,
Madrid, trans by A. B. Myrick and E. H. Blair.
Huygen

van

Linschoten,

J.,

1595.

Reys-gheschrift

vande

navigatien

der

Portugaloysers in Orienten, Cornelis Claesz, Amsterdam.
Martínez de Zúñiga, J., 1803. Estadismo de las islas Filipinas. In W. E. Retana (ed
and annotated) in 1893, Madrid.
Montero y Vidal, D. J., 1888. Historia de la Pirateria Malayo-Mahometana en
Mindanao, Jolo y Borneo, Madrid.
de Morga, A., 1609. Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas, trans by J. S. Cummins for the
Hakluyt Society, 1971, London.
Pagès, P. M. F., de 1782 Voyages Autour Du Monde, Et Vers Les Deux Poles, Par
Terre Et Mer, Pendant Les Annes 1767, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1773, 1774, &amp;
1776, Chez Moutard, Paris.
Paris, F. E., 1841. Essaisur la constructionnavale des peuples extra-Europeens :
oucollection desnavires et piroguesconstruits par les habitants de l'Asie, de la
Malaisie, du Grand Ocean et del'Amerique ... pendant les voyagesautour du monde
de l'Astrolabe, la Favorite et l'Artemise, Arthus Bertrand, Paris.
Pedro de San Buenaventura, 1613. Vocabulario de la Lengua Tagala, republished
by Domingo de los Santos in 1835.
Phelan, J.L., 1959. The Hispanization of the Philippines, Spanish Aims and Filipino
Responses 1565-1700. University Press of Wisconsin, Madison.
Pigafetta, A. trans. by J. E. H. Stanley, 2010. First Voyage Round the World by
Magellan: Translated from the Accounts of Pigafetta and Other Contemporary
Writers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
De la Rosa-Alcázar, S., 1914. Diccionario Español-Bisaya para las provincias de
Samar y Leyte, Santos y Bermal Manila.
Scott, W.H., 1981. Boat Building and Seamanship in Classic Philippine Society.
Anthropological Papers No. 9, National Museum, Manila: 1-38.

12

�Stead, M. R.,and Dizon, E., 2011. A National Cultural Treasure Revisited – Reassessing the ‘Balangay’ Boat Discoveries. In Mark Staniforth, Jennifer Craig,
Sheldon Clyde Jago-on, Bobby Orillaneda, Ligaya Lacsina (Eds.), Proceedings of the
Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage, Manila: 425 436.
Stead, M. R., 2014. Dating a Philippine Logboat. Nautical Archaeology, Nautical
Archaeology Society, Spring 2014: 12.
Wallace, A. R., 1869.The Malay Archipelago, The Land of the Orang-Utan and the
Bird of Paradise, London, MacMillan, reprinted 1989, Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
Warren, J. F., 1981.The Sulu Zone 1768-1898. Singapore University Press,
Singapore.
Biography
Roderick Stead was originally trained as an economist and accountant. Since 2004 he
has re-trained as an archaeologist with a specific interest in maritime archaeology. His
current research interest is the development of Philippine indigenous craft. He has a BA
in Archaeology from Birkbeck College, University of London and completed an MA in
Maritime Archaeology at the University of Southampton in 2010. Currently he is a PhD
student at the Centre for Maritime Archaeology at the University Southampton

13

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="645">
                <text>All our vessels are rowed from within, these are paddled from without, Spanish and European Colonial Reception of Philippine Indigenous Craft </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="646">
                <text>When the European visitors arrived in the Philippines from the Sixteenth century, they encountered a range of indigenous craft ranging from logboats to plank-built vessels. These boats, especially the plank-built vessels, were built in a very different style to their own. They were particularly interested in the single and double outriggers employed on these craft. The plank-built craft used hand carved strakes rather than sawn timber and were held together by dowels and treenails. The hull strakes were fastened together by the lashed-lug technique or sewn. No metal fastenings were used in the construction. Similar techniques were used throughout Island Southeast Asia. They recognised the maritime skills of the Filipinos and soon used them as crew on their own vessels and as craftsmen to build European-style vessels using local materials. The Spanish noted the suitability of the local vessels in the Philippine environment, due to their speed and ability to cross shallow coral reefs, even though they were largely ineffective in fighting against European vessels. They continued to employ boats built in the local tradition for communications and to suppress maritime raiders from the areas not under colonial control. These vessels continued in this role until replaced by steam vessels in the nineteenth century. This paper will explore the European views on these traditional craft and the way they were utilised and adapted by the Spanish and other Europeans powers.  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="647">
                <text>Roderick Stead, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="648">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="51" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="51">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/e5437f1323681fdd18f5a57a92a2ef56.pdf</src>
        <authentication>02c8cd13e8024965162da571d520b67d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="654">
                    <text>A Manila Galleon in Oregon:
Results of the “Beeswax Wreck” Research Project

Scott S. Williams
Naga Research Group
1324 Eskridge Blvd SE
Olympia, WA 98501
USA
Email: Beeswax.wreck@gmail.com

Abstract
The results of a seven-year, multi-disciplinary investigation into the identity and origin of
the “Beeswax Wreck” are discussed. The “Beeswax Wreck” is the name historically
given to a 17th century source of marked beeswax blocks and candles found along
beaches of the north Oregon coast. Artifact analysis, remote sensing,
geoarchaeological investigations, and archival research indicate the Beeswax Wreck
was an Acapulco-bound galleon that wrecked near Nehalem Bay prior to AD 1700, and
is most likely the remains of the galleon Santo Cristo de Burgos. The Santo Cristo de
Burgos sailed from the Philippines on July 1st, 1693 and disappeared. No trace of the
vessel was ever found despite years of searching by the Spanish in the islands of the
west Pacific and along the Mexican coast.
Keywords: Manila, Acapulco, Philippines, Beeswax, Porcelain, Geoarchaeology
Introduction
At the turn of the 19th century, the first Euro-American settlers in the Oregon Territory of
the Pacific Northwest coast noted wreckage on the beach of the Nehalem Bay sandspit
in what is now Tillamook County, Oregon (Fig. 1). The unknown ship was constructed
of teak and carried a large cargo of beeswax in the form of large blocks and candles,
which were strewn for miles over the spit and shores of the lower Nehalem Valley. The
amount of beeswax scattered over the beach and lower valley was so great that mining
the beeswax became a source of income for early settlers in the area.

Both the

“Beeswax Wreck” as it was called and its cargo were the topic of much speculation in
the scientific and popular press throughout 19th and 20th centuries, because the ship
1

�wrecked at least a century prior to
Euro-American

settlement

of

the

region and its large cargo of beeswax
made its origin a mystery to the
settlers. Since 2006, a volunteer
group of professional archaeologists,
historians, coastal geomorphologists,
and interested community members,
in coordination with Oregon State
Parks

and

the

Oregon

State

Archaeologist, have researched the
origin and identity of the Beeswax
Wreck. The goal of the research has
been to locate wreck remains and
confirm the identity of the vessel.
Archaeological evidence indicates that

Fig. 1 Portion of NOAA Chart 18520 showing the
Beeswax Wreck Project Area. The Nehalem sand spit
extends from the town of Manzanita to the river
mouth, in the area marked “Nehalem Beach” on the
chart. Short Sands Beach is the large cove at Cape
Falcon. (NOAA Chart 18520)

the Beeswax Wreck was a Manilla
galleon en route
to Acapulco, sailing or drifting north of the normal galleon trade route when it wrecked
off Nehalem at 45 degrees north latitude. Based on stylistic analysis of design motifs on
recovered sherds of the porcelain cargo that the ship carried, the vessel wrecked
sometime between 1670 and 1700, during the reign of the Kangxi Emperor of the Qing
Dynasty (Lally, 2008).
Project Location and Environment
Nehalem Bay is located on the Nehalem River in Tillamook County, northwest Oregon
(Fig. 1). Nehalem Bay is protected by a 5-6 km long sand spit that varies in width from
0.5-1.0 km, extending south from Neahkanie Mountain. Neahkanie Mountain is a large
headland that rises abruptly from the ocean to an elevation of 497 meters and marks
the north limit of the Nehalem River watershed, the Manzanita dune field, and the
Nehalem littoral cell (Peterson et al., 2011). The seaward side of Neahkanie Mountain
presents sheer cliffs, broken by the large sandy cove known as Short Sands Beach and
2

�other, smaller coves and natural rock arches (Fig. 2). Today, Nehalem spit is vegetated
with introduced non-native beach grass, shrubs and trees. The fore dune along the
beach reaches 10-15 m in elevation.

Prior to the mid 20th century, however, the

Nehalem Spit was an active dune field with little to no vegetation and dune heights of 58 m (Cooper, 1958). Starting in the 1950’s, Oregon State Parks undertook an intensive
program of planting non-native beach grass to stabilize the dunes for park development.
Between the fore dune and a large sand ridge known as Cronins Point to the east lies a
low-lying deflation basin. Prior to revegetation efforts and construction of the Nehalem
Airstrip, this deflation basin often became a lake in winter and portions of it still pond
water to this day. Historically, much of the wreck debris and beeswax was found in this
area as windblown dunes migrated over the
spit, alternately exposing and covering
wreck materials. The introduced beach
grass and other non-native vegetation has
since stabilized the dunes, and wreck
materials are now only found through
chance

excavations

associated

with

development in the area (Peterson et al.,
2011).
Historical Accounts
The Lewis and Clark expedition noted that
the local Clatsop Indians brought beeswax
to trade with the explorers when they were
camped on the Columbia River in the winter
of 1805-1806 (Moulton, 2003). The wreck
itself was first recorded in 1813 by the fur
trader Alexander Henry (Coues, 1897).
Local Indians told Henry the wreckage and
beeswax were from a large ship that had
wrecked many years before the fur traders

Fig. 2 Shoreline cliffs and offshore pinnacles,
Neahkanie Mountain. Short Sands Beach is the
large sandy beach in the left background;
Neahkanie Mountain rises out of the picture to
the right. View to northeast. (Richard Rogers,
Beeswax Wreck Project).

settled the area in 1811 (Coues, 1897: 768). The origin of the ship was a mystery,
3

�although Henry referred to the wreck as that of “the Spanish ship… cast away some
years ago, and the crew all murdered by the natives” (Coues, 1897: 841). The wreck
and the mystery of its beeswax cargo were written about extensively in newspapers and
regional journals as settlement of the region increased in the latter half of the 19th
century (cf. Giesecke, 2007; Williams, 2007, 2008). Popular novels were even written
describing the supposed adventures of the wreck survivors (Rogers, 1898; 1929). When
conditions were right and wreckage was exposed or beeswax was found, newspapers
in Oregon and across the country carried stories about the wreck, speculating whether
the beeswax was truly the cargo of a ship or a natural deposit of mineral wax (Cotton,
1915). Arguments over whether the material was beeswax cargo from a wrecked ship
or petroleum wax seeping from underground continued through the early decades of the
20th century, and exploratory wells were drilled to locate the presumed vast fields of oil
thought responsible for the wax. In the latter half of the 20th century archaeologists and
historians became interested in the wreck (Gibbs, 1971; Marshall, 1984). Its origin and
identity were the focus of several archaeological investigations (Woodward, 1986;
Scheans and Stenger, 1990). Some investigators suggested the vessel may have been
an Asian junk, a Portuguese merchant, or a Dutch or English pirate rather than a Manila
galleon (Stenger, 2005; Woodward, 1986). Much of the accessible wreck material was
collected by local residents and souvenir hunters in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries, and only small pieces of beeswax and sherds of late 17th century Chinese
export porcelain and earthenware are rarely collected by beachcombers in the area
today.
The Beeswax Wreck Project
The Beeswax Wreck Project is as an all-volunteer organization bringing together
various professionals and community members interested in the Beeswax Wreck. The
first phase of the project synthesized known historical and archaeological information
pertaining to the wreck and prepared a research design to guide the project (Williams,
2007).

Information on the wreck includes 19th and 20th centuries newspaper and

journal articles; physical remains such as beeswax blocks and candles, ceramic sherds,
and wooden artifacts in museums and private collections; and reports of previous
4

�archaeological and geotechnical investigations in the area. Evidence indicates that the
Beeswax Wreck carried goods typically transported by Manila galleons, including
Chinese export porcelain, earthenware dragon jars, and Philippine beeswax in large
blocks marked with Spanish shipping symbols, material not normally transported on
Asian junks. The quantity of the beeswax is a significant clue to the nationality of the
vessel that wrecked. Historic accounts indicate that during the 19th century anywhere
from 5 to 20 or more tons of beeswax was shipped from Nehalem to markets in Oregon,
California, and Hawaii (Cotton, 1915). The volume of beeswax was so large that several
19th century observers assumed the source was natural petroleum wax, as they could
not conceive of any “ancient” ship carrying so much beeswax, despite the shipping
symbols carved into the beeswax blocks, the presence of candles with wicks, and even
bees preserved in the wax. Radiocarbon dating of the beeswax and diagnostic Chinese
porcelain associated with the wreck indicate the vessel sailed during the mid to late 17th
century (Erlandson et al., 2001; Lally, 2008).

In the comprehensive and detailed

Spanish records of galleon sailings and losses, only two Acapulco-bound galleons went
missing during that time: the Santo Cristo de Burgos, which disappeared in 1693, and
the San Francisco Xavier, lost in 1705 (Blair and Robertson, 1909; Dahlgren, 1916;
Levesque, 2002; Schurz, 1939). The San Francisco Xavier has been identified as the
likely candidate for the Beeswax Wreck by previous researchers (Giesecke, 2007;
Marshall, 1984).
Our initial research focused on the San
Francisco Xavier as the most likely
vessel for the Beeswax Wreck for two
reasons: 1) Schurz’s (1939) statement
that the Santo Cristo de Burgos burned
and wrecked near the Marianas Islands,
citing Hill’s (1928) account; and 2) a
large tsunami struck the Oregon coast in
1700 AD, and we expected such an
event would have obliterated evidence of

Fig. 3 Remote sensing survey areas on Nehalem
Spit and offshore. (Scott Williams, Beeswax Wreck
Project)

a vessel that wrecked prior to that year.
5

�Fieldwork began in 2007 with terrestrial magnetometer survey of the Nehalem spit, from
the town of Manzanita to the river mouth during the lowest tide of the year. This survey
covered the length of the spit, from the fore dune crest to the low tide level (Fig. 3), to
determine if any ferrous objects such as cannons or anchors were present from a ship
wrecked on the tsunami-eroded beach and covered by sand redeposited on the spit
after the tsunami. Additional survey was done in the deflation basin near the airstrip, in
areas reported to have contained wreckage into the 20th century (Giesecke, 2007).
With no magnetic anomalies detected either along the shore or in the deflation basin, a
limited marine survey was conducted just offshore and parallel to the spit, using a
Zodiac and magnetometer. Several potential anomalies were located (Fig. 3), but
deteriorating weather conditions prevented accurately locating the sites.

Ground

penetrating radar surveys were started in 2007 as well, to characterize the
geomorphology of the spit and the effects of the tsunami (Peterson et al., 2011).Also in
2007 analysis was started on a large collection of porcelain sherds collected over the
previous fifteen years by a resident beachcomber who recognized the sherds as
potentially associated with the wreck.

The dispersed pattern of these sherds in

terrestrial sites suggests an offshore source is “feeding” a beach deposit at Neahkanie
(Fig. 1), perhaps off the wreck. Further evidence of an offshore source is suggested by
an area of the spit with tsunami deposits incorporating the porcelain sherds (Peterson et
al., 2011), which limits the date of their arrival in the bay.
Based on these factors, our focus shifted to the possibility of a pre-tsunami wreck, with
lower hull deposits offshore and the historically described distribution of terrestrial wreck
materials being the result of tsunami deposition. In 2008, a second magnetometer
survey was conducted from the river mouth to Arch Cape, north of Neahkanie Mountain
(Fig. 3). Weather and ocean conditions prevented diving on the magnetic anomalies
identified during that survey. Analysis of the porcelain was completed that same year,
confirming that the cargo represented Chinese export ware intended for the markets in
New Spain, and dated to the period between 1670-1700 with 1690 AD as the mean
manufacturing date (Lally, 2008; In Press). Geotechnical surveys continued through the
summers of 2008 and 2009 (Peterson et al., 2011). A terrestrial magnetometer survey
was conducted of Short Sands Beach in 2010 to determine if anchors or other large
6

�metallic artifacts might be present there
(Fig. 4). None were found. Continued
mapping of porcelain finds resulted in the
identification of a likely search area for the
offshore source (Fig. 4).

In late 2011, a

multi-beam sonar survey identified two
potential wreck sites in the area.

Dive

surveys to examine the two sites were
undertaken in the summer of 2012, but
were limited due to adverse weather
conditions. No wreck materials were found.
Additional magnetometer and side scan
sonar surveys were undertaken on the
offshore anomalies in the summer of 2013.
The surveys produced promising signals, but
poor visibility, rough ocean conditions, and
equipment issues limited our ability to finish

Fig. 4 USGS 7.5 minute quad maps showing the
Beeswax Wreck Project Area showing areas of
remote sensing surveys by type. (Beeswax
Wreck Project)

the systematic survey and dive on the sites.
No offshore wreck deposits were located before bad weather forced an end to the dive
season.
Discussion
The Pacific Northwest is a tectonically active area that has undergone repeated megaearthquakes and associated subsidence-generated tsunamis, with the last major
rupture in 1700 (Atwater, 2005; Peterson et al., 2011). Based on our analysis of the
historical record along with recovered ceramic types and their association with dated
tsunami deposits, we know that the Spanish vessel carrying these ceramics wrecked
before the last sailing of the San Francisco Xavier. We now believe that the Beeswax
Wreck is instead the remains of the galleon Santo Cristo de Burgos, lost in 1693.
Reports of its demise in the Marianas Islands are based on a fictional story first offered
by Hill (1925; 1928) and then repeated by Schurz (1939) as fact. We propose that the
7

�following sequence of events distributed and then buried debris from a single galleon,
which wrecked on pinnacle rocks or in shallow water offshore of Neahkanie Mountain
prior to 1700 AD. After the vessel wrecked, the Cascadia earthquake of 1700produced
a large tsunami that swept onshore wreck debris over the spit and into Nehalem Bay
and the river channel, depositing material on inflow strandlines (Peterson et al., 2011).
Heavy materials such as ballast, cannons and porcelain likely remained offshore where
the galleon sank, while lighter materials such as timbers and beeswax floated south
onto
the spit.

The returning tsunami wave deposited more material on the outflow

strandlines, including debris described as the inland wreck and porcelain sherds found
in the tsunami drape deposit. One section of superstructure, historically described as
the offshore river-mouth wreck, lodged in the bar at the river mouth. Following interseismic rebound and uplift, the beach began recovery and sand washed into the ocean
by the tsunami was redeposited on the beach, eventually burying wreck debris by the
mid-1900s.
The study by Peterson et al., (2011) showed that the spit did not subside or erode
enough for a post-tsunami wreck (e.g., the San Francisco Xavier) to have been washed
over the spit by normal ocean processes.

Therefore, historical accounts of wreck

materials in the back-dune basin of the spit and the lower reaches of the Nehalem
valley indicate those materials had either washed into the back-dune area through nowburied channels, or were carried over the fore-dune by the tsunami wave. The GPR
survey revealed that there were no relic river channels through the spit, and that the spit
has been stable for at least the last 1000 years in terms of size, elevation, and river
mouth location (Peterson et al., 2011). The only viable mechanism for ship timbers and
beeswax to get over the fore dune and up the river valley is a tsunami cresting over the
spit. To explain Schurz’s (1939) account that the Santo Cristo de Burgos burned and
sank near the Marianas Islands, we note that other sources (Blair and Robertson, 1909;
Dahlgren, 1916) make no mention of any known wreckage or survivors from the Santo
Cristo de Burgos, only that the ship disappeared without any knowledge of its fate.
Schurz cited Hill (1928) as the source for his assertion the Santo Cristo de Burgos
burned, yet Hill’s account is clearly apocryphal. Additional archival work in Seville in
8

�2012 located documents (Archivo de Indies, 1699) confirming that as of 1699 the Santo
Cristo de Burgos was still missing, with no survivors and no wreckage having been
found up to that date.
In conclusion, the multi-year, multi-disciplinary research conducted on the Beeswax
Wreck has resulted in the development of a working hypothesis on the identity of the
vessel and potential locations where underwater wreck deposits are likely to be found.
Archival research for the project has confirmed the total loss of the Santo Cristo de
Burgos in 1693, and refutes the claims by Hill (1925; 1928) and Schurz (1939) that the
Santo Cristo de Burgos burned in the west Pacific. The research also revealed a
number of sources that can be used to correlate future finds with archival records,
including 998 pages of documents detailing the crew and construction details of the
Santo Cristo de Burgos, and accounts of the 1692 aborted voyage and the refitting for
the 1693 voyage. In the near future, as weather and funding allow, we plan to expand
the survey area and conduct additional dive surveys on the targets identified in 2013. If
we can confirm the identity of the Beeswax Wreck, we will likely solve the mystery of the
fate of the Santo Cristo de Burgos, as well.
Acknowledgments
The Beeswax Wreck Project has been possible through the generous financial and
technical support of Naga Research, Dr. Mitch Marken and the Nehalem Valley
Historical Society. This paper has benefitted from the insight and research of Dr. Mitch
Marken, Dr. Curt Peterson, Richard Rogers, and numerous others, although any errors
or omissions are the sole responsibility of the author. The paper has greatly benefited
by review of earlier drafts from Dr. Lance Wollwage and Craig Holstine.
References
Archivo de Indies., 1699. Letter dated 29 April 1699. Filipinas 26, R.7, N.27, Audiencia
de Filipinas, Archivo General de Indias, Seville.
Atwater, B., 2005.

The Orphan Tsunami of 1700: Japanese clues to a Parent

Earthquake in North America. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1707,
University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Blair, E., and Robertson, J., 1909. The Philippine Islands, 1493-1803: Explorations by
9

�early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and their Peoples, their History and
Records of the Catholic Missions, as related in contemporaneous books and
manuscripts, showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious conditions of
those islands from their earliest relations with European Nations to the beginning of the
Nineteenth century / translated from the originals. A.H. Clark Co., Cleveland.
Cooper, W., 1958. Coastal sand dunes of Oregon and Washington. Memoir Series of
the Geological Society of America No. 72, Geological Society of America, Boulder.
Cotton, S., 1915.Stories of Nehalem. M.A. Donohue and Company, Chicago.
Coues, E., 1897.

New Light on the Early History of the Greater Northwest: the

Manuscript Journals of Alexander Henry Fur Trader of the Northwest company and of
David Thompson official Geographer and Explorer of the same company 1799-1814,Vol.
II. Francis P. Harper, New York.
Dahlgren, E., 1916. Were the Hawaiian Islands visited by the Spaniards before their
discovery by Captain Cook in 1778? A contribution to the Geographical History of the
North Pacific Ocean especially of the relations between America and Asia in the
Spanish period. AMS Press, New York.
Erlandson, J., Losey, R., and Peterson, N., 2001.

Early Maritime contact on the

Northern Oregon Coast: Some notes on the 17th Century Nehalem Beeswax Ship. In
Jason Younker, Mark A. Tveskov, and David G. Lewis (Eds.), Changing Landscapes:
“Telling our stories,” Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Coquille Cultural Preservation
Conference, Coquille Indian Tribe, North Bend: 45-53.
Gibbs, J., 1971. Disaster Log of Ships. Superior Publishing Company, Seattle.
Giesecke, E., 2007.

Beeswax, Teak and Castaways: Searching for Oregon’s lost

Protohistoric Asian Ship. Nehalem Valley Historical Society, Manzanita.
Hill, P., 1925. Romantic Episodes in Old Manila: Church and State in the Hands of a
Merry Jester -Time. Sugar News Press, Manila.
Hill, P., 1928. Romance and Adventure in Old Manila. Philippine Education Co., Manila.
Lally, J., 2008. Analysis of the Chinese Blue and White Porcelain associated with the
“Beeswax Wreck,” Nehalem, Oregon. Unpublished thesis, Department of Anthropology,
Central Washington University. Ellensburg.
Lally, J., In Press. Analysis of the Beeswax Shipwreck Porcelain collection, Nehalem,
10

�Oregon, USA. Harvard-Yenching Institute, Cambridge.
Lévesque, R., 2002. History of Micronesia, Vol. 20.Lévesque Publications, Québec.
Marshall, D., 1984. Oregon Shipwrecks. Binford and Mort, Portland.
Moulton, G., (Ed.), 2003.The Definitive Journals of Lewis &amp; Clark, Vol. 9, John Ordway
and Charles Floyd. U. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Peterson, C., Williams, S., Cruikshank, K., and Dube, J., 2011. Geoarchaeology of the
Nehalem Spit: Redistribution of Beeswax Galleon wreck debris by Cascadia Earthquake
and Tsunami (~AD 1700), Oregon, USA. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, Vol.
26 (2): 219-244.
Rogers, T., 1898. Nehalem, A Story of the Pacific AD 1700. H. L. Heath, McMinnville,
OR.
Rogers, T., 1929. Beeswax and Gold: A story of the Pacific AD 1700.

J. K. Gill,

Portland.
Scheans, D., and Stenger, A., 1990. Letter Report: 35-TI-1A and Related Porcelains.
Ms. on file, Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, Salem, OR
Schurz, W., 1939.The Manila Galleon. E. P. Dutton and Co., Inc., New York.
Stenger, A., 2005. Physical evidence of shipwrecks on the Oregon Coast in Prehistory,
Current Archaeological Happenings in Oregon (CAHO), Vol. 30 (1): 9-13.
Williams, S., 2007. A Research design to conduct Archaeological Investigations at the
site of the “Beeswax Wreck” of Nehalem Bay, Tillamook County, Oregon. Manuscript on
file at Oregon State Parks and Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, Salem.
Williams, S., 2008. Report on 2007 Fieldwork of the Beeswax Wreck Project, Nehalem
Bay, Tillamook County, Oregon. Manuscript on file at Oregon State Parks and Oregon
State Historic Preservation Office, Salem.
Woodward, J., 1986.

Prehistoric Shipwrecks on the Oregon Coast? Archaeological

Evidence. Manuscript on file, Oregon State Historic Preservation Office., Salem.
Biography
Scott Williams received his Bachelor’s in Anthropology from the University of Hawaii in
1985 and his Master’s in Anthropology from Washington State University in 1989. He
has conducted archaeological research throughout the Pacific Basin and in various
Pacific Rim nations for government agencies, private consultants, and the Bishop
Museum, Honolulu. He currently resides in Olympia, Washington, and is the Cultural
Resources Program Manager for the Washington State Department of Transportation,
11

�overseeing the agency’s archaeology and history program.

12

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="9">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="28">
                  <text>Session 6: Iberian Global Interactions: the Manila Galleon and the Roteiro </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="29">
                  <text>Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo and links to the papers presented in the session.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="30">
                  <text>The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="31">
                  <text>Veronica Walker Vadillo</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="650">
                <text>Results of the "Beeswax Wreck" Research Project</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="651">
                <text>The results of a seven-year, multi-disciplinary investigation into the identity and origin of the â€œBeeswax Wreckâ€ are discussed. The â€œBeeswax Wreckâ€ is the name historically given to a 17th century source of marked beeswax blocks and candles found along beaches of the north Oregon coast. Artifact analysis, remote sensing, geoarchaeological investigations, and archival research indicate the Beeswax Wreck was an Acapulco-bound galleon that wrecked near Nehalem Bay prior to AD 1700, and is most likely the remains of the galleon Santo Cristo de Burgos. The Santo Cristo de Burgos sailed from the Philippines on July 1st, 1693 and disappeared.  No trace of the vessel was ever found despite years of searching by the Spanish in the islands of the west Pacific and along the Mexican coast. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="652">
                <text>Scott S. Williams, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="653">
                <text>5/15/2014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="10">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2014</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
