<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items/browse?collection=29&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-10-24T18:41:16+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>6</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="516" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="307">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/0c1b2ecb8556ec307b9bda615458b7e0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f21284b0bbace28faa2a5d5d7d3587e5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5815">
                    <text>Oil Spill Analysis on Ambon Bay, Moluccas, Indonesia: Its
Influence on the SS Aquila Shipwreck Site
Ulung Jantama Wisha
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, Ministry of
Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia
email: ulungjantama@gmail.com
Guntur Adhi Rahmawan
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, Ministry of
Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia
email: guntura06@gmail.com
Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, Ministry of
Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia
email: niahasanah79@gmail.com
Gunardi Kusumah
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability, Ministry of
Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia
email: lrkpl.balitbangkp@gmail.com

Abstract
The Steam Ship (SS) Duke of Sparta or SS Aquila shipwreck site is one
of the underwater cultural heritages (UCH) discovered in Ambon Bay,
Moluccas waters, Indonesia. Currently, this 1940-s British-Italian
shipwreck is threatened by an oil spill contamination on Ambon Bay. In
Ambon Bay, there is Wayaime Port, which is a transit port for ships, and
the port for oil tankers to loading and unloading their oil cargoes. One of
the biggest oil spill incidents in Ambon Bay occurred in August 2005,
when a fishing boat of MV Fu Yuan Fu F66 was exploded. This on-going
oil spill occurrence can affect SS Aquila site sustainability due to
corrosion issue, disrupt marine tourism activities, and harm marine biota
in the surrounding area. One purpose of the study conducted by
Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability in 2016 is to
determine the oil spill distribution inside the Ambon Bay which is
threatening the SS Aquila shipwreck site. The method employed in this

�research is a hydrodynamic modelling approach of oil spill module. The
result of oil spill modeling is then analysed spatially. The study results
show the period of diesel oil distribution is reached ± 285 hours, with the
spread direction is toward to Southwest (outer of the bay). The
processes found in this oil spills event includes a process of dissolution,
evaporation, and vertical dispersion. Based on the study, it can be
concluded that the intake of the oil spill on Ambon Bay waters is
undoubtedly threatening the preservation of the SS Aquila underwater
cultural heritage along with its marine environment, and the development
of marine heritage utilization.
Keywords: SS Aquila, hydrodynamic modelling, oil spill analysis,
underwater cultural heritage preservation

Introduction
The waters of Indonesian Archipelago, both in east and west parts, are
significant on the regional-interregional maritime trade routes, and is wellknown as the center of the spice trade. The eastern part of Indonesian
Archipelago became a vital area of global sea navigation due to abundant
spices resources such as cloves, nutmegs, and cinnamon. While, the
western part was important in the spice trade routes due to its position as
the center of pepper trade (Harkantiningsih, 2013). That condition is
caused by the strategic geographical location and the existence of the
transportation network which facilitated the distribution of these primary
trade commodities since an ancient time (Fig. 1). One of the essential
spice trading spots in Indonesia is the Moluccas, which is also popular as
Spice Islands.

�Fig. 1: Map of Maritime Trade Routes
(Source: http://juliansoplanit.blogspot.co.id/2011/11 modified by authors)
The center city of Moluccas is Ambon city. This city has a long history of
World War II (WWII) incident which involved the Japanese imperial troops
and Allied Forces including Dutch Het Koninklijke Nederlands(ch)Indische Leger (KNIL) and Australia. After WWII was over in 1945, Ambon
city along with other cities in eastern part of Indonesia faced a rebel
movement

incident committed by Perdjuangan Rakjat

Semesta

(PERMESTA) or The Universal People Struggle Army in 1957-1958. This
rebellion to attack the Indonesian central government, and implicitly, to reestablished the Dutch colonialism in Indonesia, was supported by Allied
Forces, particularly Dutch and United States of America (USA). In this
PERMESTA rebellion time, the trade ship of SS Aquila was bombed by a
Douglas B26 Invader plane in 1958 in the northern of Ambon Bay. This
bombing of SS Aquila was planned by the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) of USA to clutter up the economic sector from trading activities in
Indonesia (Amal, 2006).

�Today, the location of SS Aquila is well-known as a dive site among the
locals and international divers. It becomes one of the underwater cultural
heritage sites discovered in Ambon Bay1 . This shipwreck is located on a
slope on the seabed off Ambon, with its stern about 15 meters (8 fathoms)
below the surface and its bow about 35 meters (19 fathoms) depth2 .
Besides Aquila, there are some other shipwreck sites which have not been
identified yet found in this bay. Recently, the existence of SS Aquila
shipwreck is threatened by disposal waste, sedimentation, marine litters,
and oil spill contamination which directly stream to SS Aquila and other
UCH sites in the inner of Ambon Bay. A Wayaime Port in Ambon Bay is a
transit port for many types of ships, and also the port for oil tankers to
loading and unloading their oil cargoes. Therefore, oil spill incident
becomes quite common in this bay. In August 2005, a fishing boat of MV
Fu Yuan Fu F66 was exploded3 and became one of the biggest oil spill
incidents in Ambon Bay. This on-going oil spill occurrence may affect SS
Aquila site sustainability due to corrosion issue, disrupt marine tourism
activities, and harm marine biota in the surrounding area. In addition, the
lack of heritage knowledge and awareness of the local community, local
authorities, oil and shipping companies, and general public regarding the
importance of UCH preservation in Ambon Bay require immediate
attention.
Those conditions can endanger the wreck site and inhibit the site
preservation, the development of maritime conservation area, and can
decrease shipwreck diving tourism activities. Due to that reason, the
research which deeply concerns in the oil spill impact to the shipwreck site
is necessary to be conducted. Besides identifying the shipwreck site in
Ambon Bay and researching its current physical condition, the underwater
archaeological study carried out by the research team of Research
Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability in 2016 was also aimed

�to determine the oil spill distribution inside the Ambon Bay which is
threatening SS Aquila shipwreck.

The History of SS Aquila (SS Duke of Sparta)
SS Aquila was a cargo ship which initially named as SS Duke of Sparta.
This Duke of Sparta was launched in 1940 from William Gray Shipyard,
West Hartlepool, and later on, sold to a Napoli Italian company in 1951.
Its name was changed and became SS Aquila. In Indonesian history, SS
Aquila has been targetted to be destroyed by USA to support PERMESTA
rebel movement interest in disrupting an economic sector of Indonesia.
Besides SS Aquila, there are two other cargo ships in Ambon Bay, which
were a Yunani ship, SS Armania, and Panama ship, SS Flying Lark.
Those ships had been raided by Allen Lawrence Pope, a USA
paramillitary aviator who flew CIA bombing missions in the PERMESTA
rebellion. He joined USA Air Force officer, William H. Beale Jr, to operate
a bomber aircraft Douglas B-26 Invader for PERMESTA rebels. In 27th
April 1958, Allen Pope did his first mission at the same time of William
Beale's 3rd bomb mission. The air raid of SS Aquila by Allen Pope was not
resulting in any fatalities, and that ship was sunk one month after bombing
incident on 27th May 1958.

The Potential of Maritime Archaeological Resources of SS Aquila
The top position of SS Aquila shipwreck was found in the depth of 15-35
meters with the bow position facing to southwest. The shipwreck body was
still intact and several parts has collapsed, such as the crane, chimney,
and the crane wall. Some parts of the shipwreck were damaged due to
human pillaging. The ship engines, which were still intact and covered by
cables and stairs, were found in the depth of ± 40 meters. While, the
profiler cannot be seen anymore. Coral covered the shipboard name.

�According to the information obtained from local people, there were
massive lootings of SS Aquila shipwreck committed by irresponsible
people using makeshift tools. It is assumed that the looters salvaged the
ship profiler which has high economic value. The dimension of SS Aquila
can be seen in Table 1. At the time of diving SS Aquila, the team still could
penetrate some parts of the shipwreck to take a video and photo
documentation. Figure 2 shows the underwater documentation of SS
Aquila, and the location of Aquila shipwreck site is shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1. The Specification of SS Aquila
(Source: Tony, 2013)
Name
Type
The sunken date
Weight
Length
Width
Height
Propulsion
Power

SS. Aquila (1951-1958)
SS. Duke of Sparta (1940-1951)
Cargo ship
27th May 1958 in Wayame, Ambon
Bay
5397 Ton
441.1 ft. (134.4 m)
57.8 ft. (17.6 m)
25.4 ft. (7.7 m)
3-cylinder triple-expansion steam
engine
492 NHP

�Fig. 2: SS Aquila and its current condition.

Fig. 3: The location of the SS Aquila.

There were a lot of biota living in the shipwreck site including 42
types of reefs which are covering the ship's body. Additionally, some types
of fish can also be seen around the site. Local communities and foreigners

�have known the presence of Aquila shipwreck. However, even though
today it has been utilized for diving tourism, this Aquila site has not been
managed properly by government, both local and central.
The underwater cultural heritage potential in Indonesia is tremendously
huge (Ridwan, 2011) in the form of shipwreck sites. This includes some
shipwreck sites discovered across the Moluccas waters which related to
the significance of sea trading activities in the maritime history of
Moluccas waters. According to Amal (2006), the trading strategy
implemented was expropriated the spice production area to facilitate
monitoring. While, they also developed the collecting area of spices, such
as Ambon waters, where the spices later on will be sent to Europe.
Therefore, it is clear that the Moluccas is one of the most important regions
of spice sea trading at that time with large number of sailing ships from
many countries and regions. This situation added by many incidents from
WWII until the PERMESTA rebellion caused the richness of UCH found
in this area.
The Oil Spill Problem in the Inner of Ambon Bay
The presence of oil spill in the inner of Ambon Bay was severe alarming.
The ships daily activities in Waiyame Port in Ambon Bay affect and
increase the oil concentration in this sea waters area. This condition which
is also supported by the weak water mass dynamics can result in the
deposition of the oil spilled. According to Huang (1983), nine processes
(including the physical, chemical, and biological processes) can cause the
providence and behavior of spilled oil such as advection, spreading,
evaporation,

dissolution,

emulsification, dispersion, auto-oxidation,

biodegradation, and sinking/sedimentation. The spilled oil does not only
inhibit the environmental condition but also affects negatively the biota.
Moreover, all of part of sea water in the area will be polluted, and

�consequently will also affect SS Aquila site sustainability and cause a
corrosion issue on the shipwreck.
The explosion incident of MV Fu Yuan Fu 66 resulted in the water pollution
in Ambon Bay (Research Center of Biotechnology, 2009), which
widespreaded along the coastline around the exploded ship. The source
of explosion was an engine room and caused the ship's engine leaking,
therefore, the oil spilled into the sea water (Helut, 2015). The prevention
action was done by the local people using an oil boom net. However, the
effort did not really work in reducing the impact of this oil spilled incident.
Oil Spill Simulation Result
The oil spill simulation was supported by a hydrodynamic flow model
implementation which simulated to determine the oil spill distribution. The
simulation applied for 15 days to represent the oil distribution period until
the oil degraded and deposited in the bottom of the water. Flow model
was employed to build a hydrodynamics simulation which is shown in the
form of two-dimensional form (Warren and Bach, 1992; Mehdiabadi et al.,
2015). The input of the model is using winds, bathymetry, and coastline
data digitized using Google Earth image 2016. The surface elevation is
obtained from NAOtide tide forecasting in the form of time series data.
Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) was deployed in shipwreck site
area for 2x24 hours. ADCP records several physical data such as tide,
temperature, and current data. The tides data are used for the verification
of the results of the hydrodynamic modeling which employed Root Mean
Square Error (RMSE) formula.
The simulation applied only used one scenario which employed the diesel
oil with the oil viscosity of 6.9 %v/v. The distribution velocity of oil that
spilled in the surface is based on the viscosity of that oil. Oil with low

�viscosity will be easier to flow and vice versa (Mukhtasor, 2007). The
source of diesel oil spill was implemented as well as the sunken point of
MV Fu Yuan and Wayame Port. The model simulated the oil
contamination from the source which is modeled based on the release of
the particles.
The model result must be validated. The model validated by comparing
the model data and field measurement data obtained. The graph of model
validation is shown in Figure 4, which shows that the fluctuation of surface
elevation has the same phase between two data. The RMSE value
obtained of 4.57 %. The current speed obtained by retrieving the ADCP
measurement result, which ranged from 0.1-0.3 m/s. According to Wang
et al. (2008), the amount of oil released at sea is distributed among a large
number of particles which are tracked separately. These particles are
driven by a combination of induced currents, waves, and wind velocities.

Fig. 4: Model validation using Surface Elevation.
Exposure time is the time needed by the oil spilled to move from one grid
to another grid (DHI, 2007). Based on the 15 days simulation resulted the
distribution pattern of spilled oil, it shows that the diesel oil has the
exposure time of ± 285 hours. According to Simonato et al. (2010), the
diesel oil is easier to be exposed due to the unsupported of residual
fraction. Fig. 5 shows the spilled diesel oil which well distributed around

�the border of inner and outer Ambon Bay. The oil flows gradually following
the current direction. For 15 days simulation, the oil exposed to the area
of UCH preservation in Ambon Bay. The processes found in this oil spills
event includes a process of dissolution, evaporation, and vertical
dispersion. McCAy and Paine (2001) stated that the dissolution rate of
hydrocarbons in water is useful in predicting both weathering pathways
and possible biological harm. The oil evaporation effects on the formation
of emulsification which the different types of emulsification are formed
under different condition (Xie et al., 2007). Li et al. (2008) pointed out that
the effectiveness of dispersion can be found in the water column oil
concentration and size distribution of dispersed oil droplets. It dispersed
and diluted under the regular wave and breaking wave condition.

�Fig. 5: Simulation for exposure time to diesel oil for 15 days.
The thickness of the diesel oil surface layer ranged from 105-185mm. It
shows that the surface layer of diesel oil is 60% wider in the surface water,
and the diesel oil is more readily exposed by hydrodynamic factors. The
influence of spilled oil is threatening the existence of SS Aquila including
the biota around it. This on-going vertically dispersed oil might be evoking
the corrosion issue of the shipwreck impacted.
The impression of SS Aquila is dominated by the remains of the boiler,
engine, and frames which are formed from steel and iron. In the tropical
seawater which is warm, the corrosion of steel and iron are faster due to
the support of encrusting organism’s encapsulation such as bryozoan,
corals and coralline algae (MacLeod, 2002). The occurrence of oil spilled
aggravated the corrosion issue. The oxidation processes occurred
beneath the marine growth and oil compound separation is the major

�factor in the seabed corrosion. Supporting by the high rate of
sedimentation will destroying the UCH of SS Aquila.

Conclusion
Based on the study of oil spill incident in the area of SS Aquila shipwreck
site in Ambon Bay, it can be concluded that the distribution of diesel oil
dominantly caused by hydrodynamic factors which evoke the process of
dissolution, evaporation, and vertical dispersion. The water column
dispersed oil triggers corrosion of the iron material such as a sunken ship
in Ambon Bay. The intake of the oil spill on Ambon Bay is undoubtedly
threatening the preservation of the SS Aquila underwater cultural heritage
along with its marine environment, and disrupting the development of
marine heritage utilization.
This study can be useful as a basis for the preservation of SS Aquila and
other UCH sites in Moluccas waters. This research can also raise
awareness of the local government to give more attention to oil spill
incident, sea water pollution, and plundering activities of shipwreck sites
cpommitted by local communities in Ambon Bay. The rich history and
potential of UCH sites in Ambon Bay can be utilized for the sustainable
tourism development that gives opportunities to prosper the society in the
vicinity.
A lot of method to resolve oil spill problems has been developed by
researchers around the world such as by using oil booms, organic
solvents, and superhydrophobic and superoloephilic sponges. It is
recomended that the local government in particular the environmental
agency to periodically control the condition of the waters and the
symptoms of oil spills in Ambon Bay. Preventive action to safe the marine
environment is urgently necessary to overcome the corrosion effects

�which occur in SS Aquila. The corrosion and site destruction on shipwreck
site are unavoidable. However, it can be reduced through monitoring effort
of ships movement on shipwreck site, decrease oil spill incidents and
other pollutants, and use cathodic protection method .
Endnotes
1

Information related to SS Aquila shipwreck diving can be found in some
blogs of local divers. http://www.divingmaluku.com/2017/03/ambonwreck-diving-ss-aquila-duke-sparta/. The integrated scientific research
regarding SS Aquila shipwreck has never been done before the research
conducted by Research Institute of Coastal Resources and Vulnerability
in 2016.
The specification of SS Aqulla can be found in the Lloyd’s Register,
Streamers &amp; Motorships. London: Lloyd’s Register 1941.
2

3

This information was retrieved from http://www.m.liputan6.com.
(Tumpahan minyak di perairan Ambon meluas/11 July 2017)
Acknowledgements
The acknowledgement and gratitude are given to Research Institute for
Coastal Resources and Vulnerability (LRSDKP) for DIPA research budget
2016 in the Ambon Bay. We pay tribute to all research member team and
everyone who have assisted the completion of this work, particularly Nia
Naelul Hasanah Ridwan who has supervised the writing of this paper.

References
Amal, M. A., 2006. Spice Islands: A Journey History of Moluccas 12501950, Cooperation of Gora Pustaka Indonesia Nala Cipta Litera And
Eastern Indonesia Stock Exchange, Ternate, Indonesia.
DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute Water and Environment), 2007. Manual
Mike 21 Particle and Spill Analysis, Scientific Background, DHI
Headquarters Agem Alle, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark.

�Harkantiningsih, N, 2013. Ceramics Along the Spice Trade Route in the
Indonesian Archipelago in the 16th -19th Century. Forum Arkeologi,
26 (1), 29-37.
Helut, S., 2005. Tumpahan Minyak di Perairan Ambon Meluas, Local
news
online
report
2015.
Website
(http://news.liputan6.com/read/107719/tumpahan-minyak-diperairan-ambon-meluas). Retrieved on 11th July 2017.
Huang, J. C., 1983. A review of the state-of-the-art of oil spill fate/behavior
models. In International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum
Institute, Rhode Island: 313-322.
Li, Z., Lee, K., King, T., Boufadel, M. C., &amp; Venosa, A. D., 2009. Evaluating
crude oil chemical dispersion efficacy in a flow-through wave tank
under regular non-breaking wave and breaking wave conditions.
Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 58 (5): 735-744.
MacLeod, I. D., 2002. In situ corrosion measurements and management
of shipwreck sites. In International handbook of underwater
archaeology (pp. 697-714). Springer. USA.
McCay, D. F., &amp; Payne, J. R., 2001. Model of oil fate and water
concentrations with and without application of dispersants. In
Proceeding of the 24th Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical
Seminar, Environment Canada, Edmonton, Alberta: 611-646.
Mehdiabadi, F. E., Mehdizadeh, M. M., &amp; Rahbani, M., 2015. Simulating
wind driven waves in the Strait of Hormuz using MIKE21. Indonesian
Journal of Marine Sciences, Vol. 20 (1): 1-8.
Mukhtasor, 2007. Coastal and Sea Pollution. Pt. Pradnya Paramita,
Jakarta.
Research Center for Biotechnology, 2009. Molecular analysis of
olyaromatic Hydrocarbon-Dioxygenase Gene from Indonesia
marine bacteria: Strategy for biomonitoring oil spill, Indonesia
TORAY Science Foundation (ITSF TORAY) 2008, Monitoring
Result 29th October 2009, Indonesian Institute of Science, Cibinong.
Ridwan, N. N. H, 2011. The Importance of empowering local community
in preserving underwater cultural heritage in Indonesia: Case study
in Tulamben, Bali and in Taka Kappala, Selayar-South Sulawesi. In
Staniforth, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Asia-Pacific Regional
Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage, Manila: 222-237.

�Simonato, J. D., Guedes, C. L., &amp; Martinez, C. B., 2008. Biochemical,
physiological, and histological changes in the neotropical fish
Prochilodus lineatus exposed to diesel oil. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety, Vol. 69 (1): 112-120.
Tony,

A.,
2013.
SS
Aguila
(II)
(+1941).
Website
(http://www.wrecksite.eu/wreck.aspx?11832). Retrieved on 14th
July 2017.

Wang, S. D., Shen, Y. M., Guo, Y. K., &amp; Tang, J., 2008. Three-dimensional
numerical simulation for transport of oil spills in seas. Ocean
Engineering, Vol. 35 (5): 503-510.
Warren, I. R., &amp; Bach, H.,1992. MIKE 21: a modeling system for estuaries,
coastal waters and seas. Environmental Software, Vol. 7 (4): 229240.
Xie, H., Yapa, P. D., &amp; Nakata, K. 2007. Modeling emulsification after an
oil spill in the sea. Journal of Marine Systems, Vol. 68 (3): 489-506.

Biography
Ulung Jantama Wisha is Oceanography Research Scientist who has
been working in the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries since 2015.
He was graduated from Oceanography Department of Diponegoro
University in 2014. Until present, he has contributed in several research
projects on underwater cultural heritage (UCH) sites in Indonesia which
conducted by Research Institute of Coastal Resources and Vulnerability.
In 2015, he attended an underwater archaeology summer school
organized by Institute of Archaeology-ICOMOS-ICUCH-SEAMEO
SPAFA-UNESCO in Vietnam. His research interest is an applied
oceanography area, including maritime archaeology, ocean modeling,
environmental aspects, as well as ocean climate issues. He has published
17 writings until today.

Guntur Adhi Rahmawan is Geomatics Research Scientist working in
Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries since 2015. He was
graduated from Department of Geomatics Engineering, Diponegoro
University. His research interest is a coastal resources and vulnerability,
particularly in Hydrography area. Last year, he and his team have
conducted research maritime archaeological resources for conservation

�area in Ambon Bay which eventually provided the basis data of this paper.
He also frequently contributed to other archaeological researches in
RICRV and assisted in the making of shipwreck sketches in
complementary analyzes of coastal resources.

Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan is Maritime Archaeology Researcher
working in Ministry of Marine Affairs since 2005. She hold a Master of
Social Science in Environment and Heritage from James Cook University.
Until present, she has led some research projects on underwater cultural
heritage (UCH) sites throughout Indonesian Water. For her dedication,
The President of Indonesia awarded Satya Lancana Wira Karya Award in
2015. Nia's interests include the relationship between UCH and its
environment; threats to UCH; UCH long term protection; maritime
museum affairs, community engagement; marine-heritage tourism; and
illicit trafficking. Nia had attended some trainings held by UNESCO,
ICCROM-SEAMEO SPAFA-The Getty Foundation, and The Netherlands
Cultural Heritage Agency. She has published 51 her research results.

Gunardi Kusumah has been working in the Ministry of Marine Affairs and
Fisheries. In 2010, he was assigned as a Head of Research Institute for
Coastal Resources and Vulnerability (RICRV) until present. His research
interest is an Environmental Geology area. In recent years, he has
focused his research on hydrogeology and groundwater resources,
especially their characteristics and potency, as well as the interaction with
coastal environment. He was also involved in all maritime archaeological
researches conducted by RICRV from 2012-2017, and dedicates his
expertise on sedimentation process and marine geological aspects to
examine the vulnerability of shipwreck sites.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="106">
                  <text>2017 Session 9: Maritime/Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107">
                  <text>Southeast Asia (SEA) has been rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) over a long period, from ancient pre-history, through the age of commerce, into the World War II era. Recently, UCH research, survey, and mapping activities; preservation and management efforts; as well as human capacity building programs show the promising progress in SEA countries. However, various threats to UCH preservation and some shortcomings still can be found in many SEA countries, for instance, lack of funds, inadequate technology, limited human resources, and also lack of public and government attention to UCH legal protection and its long-term preservation.    &#13;
&#13;
This session will highlight some topics, including current status of UCH preservation; current research or investigation on maritime heritage or UCH in SEA countries; maritime history in SEA; current legislations; recent human and natural threats to UCH in SEA countries; raising awareness and public education programs; in-situ preservation of UCH; sustainable shipwreck tourism development and balancing preservation efforts with economic benefit; community and general public engagement in UCH management plan; regional capacity building in Southeast Asia; as well as collaboration opportunities among stakeholders and SEA countries in researching, protecting, preserving, and managing UCH sites.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="108">
                  <text>Jenny Craig, Mc Gill University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5806">
                <text>Oil Spill Analysis on Ambon Bay, Moluccas, Indonesia: Its Influence on the SS Aquila Shipwreck Site</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5807">
                <text>The Steam Ship (SS) Duke of Sparta or SS Aquila shipwreck site is one of the underwater cultural heritages (UCH) discovered in Ambon Bay, Moluccas waters, Indonesia. Currently, this 1940-s British-Italian shipwreck is threatened by an oil spill contamination on Ambon Bay. In Ambon Bay, there is Wayaime Port, which is a transit port for ships, and the port for oil tankers to loading and unloading their oil cargoes. One of the biggest oil spill incidents in Ambon Bay occurred in August 2005, when a fishing boat of MV Fu Yuan Fu F66 was exploded. This on-going oil spill occurrence can affect SS Aquila site sustainability due to corrosion issue, disrupt marine tourism activities, and harm marine biota in the surrounding area. One purpose of the study conducted by Research Institute for Coastal Resources and Vulnerability in 2016 is to determine the oil spill distribution inside the Ambon Bay which is threatening the SS Aquila shipwreck site. The method employed in this research is a hydrodynamic modelling approach of oil spill module. The result of oil spill modeling is then analysed spatially. The study results show the period of diesel oil distribution is reached ± 285 hours, with the spread direction is toward to Southwest (outer of the bay). The processes found in this oil spills event includes a process of dissolution,evaporation, and vertical dispersion. Based on the study, it can be concluded that the intake of the oil spill on Ambon Bay waters is undoubtedly threatening the preservation of the SS Aquila underwater cultural heritage along with its marine environment, and the development of marine heritage utilization.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5808">
                <text>Ulung Jantama Wisha, </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5809">
                <text>Guntur Adhi Rahmawan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5810">
                <text>Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5811">
                <text>Gunardi Kusumah</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5812">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5813">
                <text>2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5814">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="515" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="306">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/9e2cb4a553923b243985815059804f28.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1fd38083f59f409dde4228e958732091</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5805">
                    <text>Conservation of Maritime Cultural Heritage:
View from the Angle of Quang Ngai Province (Vietnam)
Ngo The Bach, M.A., Ph.D. Candidate
Thang Long - Hanoi Heritage Conservation Centre
09, Hoang Dieu St., Hanoi, Vietnam
Email: bach.ngothe@gmail.com
Nguyen Thi Thu Ha M.A., Ph.D. Candidate
Thang Long - Hanoi Heritage Conservation Centre
09, Hoang Dieu St., Hanoi, Vietnam

Abstract
Quang Ngai is a province located in the South Central Coast region of
Vietnam, on the coast of the East Sea. It borders Quang Nam
Province which is home to the famous Cu Lao Cham shipwreck in
the north and the Binh Dinh Province in the south. It has a long coastline
of 129km and wide territorial waters of 11.000km2. Quang Ngai has 6
seaports which are favorable for maritime transport and trade. The Ly Son
Island of Quang Ngai province is located on the north-south waterway
transport of our country, which is also the East-West international trade
route in ancient times. The continuous discovery of shipwreck relics in the
seas of Vung Tau, Binh Chau commune, Binh Son district, and Ly Son
Island in recent years has demonstrated that the potential of maritime
cultural heritage in the sea of Quang Ngai is enormous and rich. However,
such precious heritage now is in danger of being undermined by the illegal
exploitation of some local fisherman. In the context of our current status
of underwater archaeology, the necessity of carrying out the studies,
protection, conservation and promotion of the value of this important
heritage resource is a major issue being faced by professionals and
heritage managers. This article refers to the issues of preserving and
promoting the value of maritime cultural heritage in Quang Ngai province,
in order to serve for the exhibition in place and development of tourism as
a new approach.
Key words: conservation, underwater cultural heritage, shipwreck,
promotion of the value, tourism.

�Introduction
Vietnam is located on a peninsula, one side adjacent to the East Sea,
having a long coastline of 3,260 kilometers with many islands and islets
spreading along the country, making this S-shaped piece of land become
the great crossroads of civilizations from ancient times. Here, on this land,
we realized the formation and development of the cultures, the integration
and acculturation, interference, convergence and the spread of Vietnam
to the world and the world to Vietnam by the sea route, although many
people supposed it simply as a cultural convergence. From East Asia to
Southeast Asia, from the Middle East to India, even Early modern Europe,
the age-old history of the Vietnam sea and island culture has
demonstrated that interference. Therefore, the study on the value of
maritime cultural heritage of Vietnam is extremely necessary for peeling
the depths of cultural values, reaching the awareness and deeper
assessment. Such jobs are supposed to consume so much effort and
time.

In 2000, after the Vietnam Salvage Company (VISAL) finished the first
phase excavation of the ancient shipwreck at Cham island, while many
protection measures have been applied to this ancient shipwreck relic,
many people have still carried out illegal tapping.1 In 2003, the
Government of Vietnam allocated to the Doan Anh Duong Salvage
Company participating in the surveys and excavations of ancient
shipwrecks in many sea areas of Vietnam. In 2012, a 700-year-old ancient
shipwreck was discovered in the sea area of Vung Tau, Binh Chau
commune, Binh Son district, Quang Ngai province. The excavation of this
ancient shipwreck, in association with the continuous discoveries of other
shipwrecks in this sea area led to the need to study methods of

�preservation, conservation and the promotion of underwater cultural
heritagehere.
Vietnam Sea and Islands Cultural Heritage
Regarding the sea and island culture of Vietnam, it is impossible not to
mention the material and the intangible culture of Vietnam's coastal areas.
Right from the Neolithic, the scallop culture in the coastal areas of Vietnam
appeared, bearing many special characteristics as well as general
features to East Asia and Southeast Asia. Bau Du culture, Da But culture,
Thach Lam - Thach Lac cultures ... have provided valuable material on
the mode of living, economic life, culture and spirituality of prehistoric
manthrough the landscaping tools and their habitats.2 By the Bronze Age,
a variety of cultures and places belonging to the great cultures such as
Dong Son, Sa Huynh, Oc Eo was found and studied through out from the
North to the South, including Dau Ram (Quang Ninh province), Hoa Loc
(Thanh Hoa province), Bai Coi (Ha Tinh province), Binh Chau, Long
Thanh (Quang Ngai province), Can Gio (Ho Chi Minh City).

Despite these examples being modest in comparison with the material
provided from archaeology, these findings also help to realize the
tremendous value and clarify the genealogy of Dong Son culture in the
Delta and the northern plains and Sa Huynh..3 All cultures and locations
mentioned above have characteristics from the culture of sea area,
containing many elements of sea and islands culture, but also bearing
many elements of the delta, even in the narrow region at the center of
Vietnam. Coastal heritage also includes the system of ports and subports, existing at least from the ages of Dong Son - Sa Huynh - Oc Eo
(from the 7th BC to 1st-2nd AD) until the 18-19th centuries with relics such
as Lach Truong, Bai Coi, Hoa Diem, Go Que and etc to Van Don, Hoi
Thong, Thanh Ha, Hoi An, and Nuoc Man...4

�Studying the seaport system in the historical process of Vietnam for
identifying the proper role and position on the international maritime route
is a confirmation on the location of S-curved coast of Vietnam on the map.
Those ports and sub-ports were extremely important in commercial
activities. They are not only the place to import goods, but also a haven
for international sailing through the East Sea to take on fresh water and
food, and avoiding storms, and pirates.5 Heritage on the coastal, island
and archipelago areas of Vietnam include temples, pagodas and shrines
where the Ly - Tran dynasties are from. Buddhism, which was considered
as the state religion at that time to carry out a part of the People's Defense
strategy, along with the army defending the borderland, including islands.
Right from the feudal era, it is reported by the ancient people that O Cap
(Vung Tau province today) earned their living from finding sites
underwater. Over twenty years, Vietnam has unearthed six ancient
shipwrecks. They are the merchant ships which passed through the
Vietnamese’s seashore from overseas, but had sunk because of currents,
storms, or fires. However, these are very small numbers compared with
the information we learned from the field through material culture and from
the retrospective information of the fisherman6.

After Hon Cau, X coordinates, the Ba Ria - Vung Tau sea has also
detected another two shipwrecks. Chau Thuan Bien village (Binh Son,
Quang Ngai province) has a lot of shipwrecks with varied dating which
were realized via analyzing the pottery artifacts. It is very clear that the
Vietnamese Sea lies on the important route of international trade;
therefore any and all findings in these seas have demonstrated for the
role, position and value of the East Sea of Vietnam on the East - West silk
and ceramic route.

�The Vietnam Maritime Cultural Heritage preserved the remnants of many
great naval battles in history during the dynasties of Ngo Quyen, Tran
Quoc Tuan’ with the battle on Bach Dang river cited as a typical example.
In addition to the battles, there wer military regimes to protect the sea. The
important findings about the seal called "Phụng mệnh bình hải tướng quân
chi ấn" of Le Thanh Tong (1490) found at sea Van Don (Quang Ninh
province), can confirm on the existence of an army for protection of the
Vietnamese seas from that period. All cases such as the Tran Khanh Du’s
army carried out the business of coal wholesale; Tran Nhan Tong King
moved to Yen Tu mountain for practicing Buddhism; Tran Hung Dao set
up the manor at Van Kiep - Luc Đau river door and the seal called Binh
Hai, the oracles of the East Sea of Nguyen Binh Khiem and etc,7 are the
maritime strategies for sea protection from the fathers, suggesting to us a
direction for more investment on the studies of military heritage and
patriotic wars in the East Sea.

Conservation of Maritime Cultural Heritage in Quang Ngai province
Status of Maritime Cultural Heritage in Quang Ngai Province
Quang Ngai province is located in the south central coast region of
Vietnam. It borders Quang Nam province in the North and Binh Dinh
province in the South and Truong Son High Mountain and majestic Tay
Nguyen in the West and the East Sea in the East. Apart from the business
of domestic trade, foreign trade activities here through the Hoi An port
were also quite developed. In the late 16th century, early 17th century, Minh
Huong (village of the Ming people) merchant ships also docked in Co Luy
- Thu Xa for trading and exchanging goods and etc. The early 20th century,
the Japanese, Chinese and French merchants had their ships docked in

�Co Luy - Thu Xa to sell clothing, kerosene, household items, and then buy
sugar, cinnamon, salt, dried areca, and honey.8
Quang Ngai has a long coastline of 129km and wide territorial waters of
11.000km2. Quang Ngai has 6 seaports which are favorable for maritime
transport and trade. The Ly Son Island of Quang Ngai province is located
on the north-south waterway transport of our country, which is also the
East-West international trade route in ancient times. Thanks to such an
important position, Quang Ngai province was evaluated to be the place
having great potentialities for maritime cultural heritage. The discovery
and excavation of ancient shipwreck dated the 15th century in 1999 in the
place of Song Tau, Vung Tau Sea, Binh Chau commune, Binh Son district,
can be said as the starting point for the process of research and discovery
of maritime cultural heritages in Quang Ngai province. In addition, that
was popular time of hunting antiques underwater carried out by the parts
of the habitants living in this area (Fig. 1).9

Fig. 1: Local fishermen are diving to find antiques.
(Quang Ngai Province Museum, The Center for Southeast Asian
Prehistory)
In recent years, Quang Ngai emerged as a hot spot for marine cultural
heritage. The first discovery is the Binh Chau 2 ancient shipwreck in 2012.
From 4th June to 23th June 2013, Binh Chau ancient shipwreck was
excavated, this Binh Chau ancient shipwreck was located about 200

�meters far from Binh Chau coast and at the depth of 3.5-4m compared
with sea level. We detected the remaining traces of the ship with the length
of 20.5 m, the width of 5.6m and the hull of ship divided into 13
compartments with 12 partitions (Fig. 2). Artifacts collected here from
include 274 ceramics barrels which are goods on board with ceramic lines
such as brown glaze, celadon, blue and white porcelain, blue and white
porcelain glaze, dating from the 13th century (Figs. 3-5). In addition, some
metals like bronze mirror, bronze weights, boat tacks and bronze money
were also discovered on this shipwreck. Archaeological excavation of
Binh Chau ancient shipwreck is the 6th ancient ship excavated in the
Vietnamese seas. In order to protect this national heritage, excavation
experts have wrapped these shipwrecks by steel sheet piles (Larsen),
pumping out the water to expose the hull and artifacts aboard, the
excavations then were carried out conveniently (Fig. 6).10

Fig. 2(left): Detailed drawings of
the part of Binh Chau ship’s
rudder.
(Quang Ngai Province Museum,
The Center for Southeast Asian
Prehistory)

�Fig. 3(left): Hundreds of artifacts burnt and sticking overlap.
(Quang Ngai Province Museum, The Center for Southeast Asian
Prehistory) and Fig. 4 (right): Artifacts found in ancient shipwreck in Binh
Chau - Binh Son.(Quang Ngai Province Museum, The Center for
Southeast Asian Prehistory)

Fig. 5: Celadon-glazed dishes and eel-skin-glazed dishes and apple skin
glazed dishies, dating Nguyen Dynasty, the 13thcentury.
(Quang Ngai Province Museum, The Center for Southeast Asian
Prehistory)

�Fig. 6: The first time of excavation of ancient shipwreck as on land.
(Quang Ngai Province Museum, The Center for Southeast Asian
Prehistory)
Considering a whole, the maritime cultural heritages of Quang Ngai
province are much more than other regions. Until now, they have
discovered 10 shipwrecks, in which 08 shipwrecks discovered in the sea
areas of Vung Tau - Binh Chau and 02 shipwrecks found in Ly Son
Island.11 Most of the shipwrecks lie about 400m far from the coast, in water
depths of between 2m to 5m. It can be seen that the distribution scope of
shipwreck traces is quite concentrated, near shore and at quite shallow
depth. The discovery of shipwrecks in the seas of Vung Tau province with
many different dating, stretching from the 8th-9th centuries to the 18th
century, shown that during 10 centuries, this place was an important
destination on the route of international trade in ancient times.

In Vietnam, currently, we have not yet found any other area where the
relics of shipwrecks distributed densely as the area of Vung Tau, Binh
Chau province and also no other province where having rich maritime

�cultural heritage as Quang Ngai province. It can be said that the sea area
of Vung Tau is an "ancient graveyard" with dozens of shipwrecks have
been identified. But these valuable heritage resources are faced with the
risk of being destroyed because of the illegal exploitation of a part of local
fishermen and the expansion of the project of Dung Quat 2 port. This is
really a big challenge for managers and professionals.

Generally, when shipwreck relics discovered, the excavation experts often
pay attention to the value of goods transported by ships, but not really fully
understood the value of that underwater heritages. Therefore, since the
90s of the last century to now, there have been 6 shipwreck relics
excavated officially, and dozens of illegal salvage were conducted only for
economic purposes. Hundreds of thousands of artefacts were taken up
and carried away for auction at domestic and abroad. By carrying out such
exploitation forms, the State may earn some certain amounts for
immediate benefits, but they gave up long-term benefits with more value.
If we know how to combine with the shipwreck relics with the
archaeological sites for creating an over of maritime cultural heritage, we
will create favorable conditions for development of tourism here.

Direction of Conservation of Maritime Cultural Heritages in Quang
Ngai Province
History has left for Quang Ngai province an extremely valuable heritage
resource is maritime cultural heritage. These are assets, enormous
resources for studying the values of culture, economy, politic and
contemporary society and promoting the value serving for the tourism. To
protect the marine heritage of Quang Ngai, we should have a new
behavior more positive and proactive with this type of heritage. The
question raised here is how to preserve the shipwreck relics and other

�forms of marine heritage in order to promote the value for serving the
public and contribute to improvement of the people's life in the region
through the forms of community tourism and ecotourism.12
Based on analyzing the characteristics of the cultural heritage of Quang
Ngai province and comparison with marine cultural heritage in other
places, the experts came up with a new approach for the maritime cultural
heritage resources of Quang Ngai province. That is the on-site
conservation of shipwreck relics serving for exhibition to promote the
values of heritage, as well as catering for diving tourism to sightseeing
heritage - a favourite tourism type currently being interested by both
domestic and foreign tourists. Moreover, the purpose of heritage
conservation is to promote the values, particularly here is to build the
museum for on-site exhibition and develop forms of diving tourism to
sightseeing the heritages. The conservation and promotion of heritage
values on the site will obtain the long term and sustainable benefits,
creating more jobs and stability for local people. These values will
inevitably create positive effects, which make the life of people in the
region be improved; people will be more involved in the conservation of
heritage. Accordingly, the serious problems such as illegal mining acts
and destruction of heritage will be minimized and replaced by an attitude
of respect and the actions of conservation and promotion of positive
values of the heritages.13
As we know, the cultural heritage is fundamental for economic
development, especially for the tourism industry. Marine cultural heritages
in the sea areas of Quang Ngai and Vung Tau provinces differ with the
others in term of quantity, density distribution, geographical distribution,
the depth, etc. With these characteristics, currently, these sea areas are
filing the application dossier to the competent authority for obtaining the

�approval and recognition as National Maritime Heritage and World
Heritage.
Issues of Replicating the Models for Conservation of Maritime
Cultural Heritage in Vietnam
Conservation of marine cultural heritage is a relatively new field of study
in Vietnam at present and is the top concerns of the archaeologists, the
museology and researchers. Since the early 90s of the 20th century to the
present,

the

Vietnamese

archaeologists

have

conducted

many

excavations of shipwrecks from Quang Nam to Kien Giang provinces.
Especially, similar to the sea areas of Vung Tau - Binh Chau and Ly Son
(Quang Ngai province), Kien Giang province has also become an
interesting place with a lot of shipwreck relics. Kien Giang province in
general and Phu Quoc Island in particular has become the hot spots for
the conservation of marine cultural heritage. Although, the distribution of
heritages is not dense as the one in the sea region of Vung Tau - Binh
Chau in Quang Ngai province, the sea region of Kien Giang province is
potential for various types of heritage. Since 2005, in this sea area, we
have discovered 3 shipwreck relics and simultaneously collected the
information and artefacts from two other shipwrecks kept by local
fishermen.14
Similar to the sea areas of Vung Tau - Binh Chau (Quang Ngai province),
the issues of conservation and promotion of values sustainably with
respect to the relics of shipwreck in Phu Quoc (Kien Giang province) is
very being interested. At the same time, they also carry out the protection
of the relics discovered, implementing the investigations and overall
surveys of the sea areas of Phu Quoc, Kien Giang province, aim at further
discovering the relics hidden, mapping the marine cultural heritage for
conservation planning. The next action is to deploy the on-site
conservation of marine heritages in Quang Ngai province, drawing

�learned lessons and replicating this model for Phu Quoc province. The
conservation and promotion of the marine cultural heritage value in Phu
Quoc sea, Kien Giang province will contribute not only for serving the
political aims of the State in relation to the issues of maritime sovereignty,
but also for the purposes of scientist research and especially supporting
for Phu Quoc in accomplishment of the national strategic by 2020 is to
become the centres for tourism and marine eco-tourism developed at high
level; the center for exchange of commercial, high-quality services of the
country, the region and the world.

Regarding the Duties for Protection and Promotion of Underwater
Cultural Heritage Value in Vietnam
The Government of Vietnam promulgated a Decree on the management
and protection of underwater cultural heritage.15 This Decree provides for
the management and protection of underwater cultural heritage, including
cultural heritage in the inland water areas, internal waters, territorial
waters, exclusive economic zones and continental shelf of the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam. I would like to contribute a few thoughts after 10
years this Decree was issued:
The protection and promotion of the values of Vietnam’s underwater
cultural heritage must firstly carry out the comprehensive studies and
evaluation of the values of heritage. However, the tasks for research,
evaluation of underwater heritage is still very limited. The comprehensive,
systematic and connective studies are not interested. Accordingly, there
still remain a lot of topics and stages which has not been focused and
many studying fields have been left vacant. Each organization, each
group, each individual researcher, owns privately a block of studying
materials and publishes them disjointedly, making our perception
incomplete. That is the limit for the work of protection and promotion.

�However, the results of research on underwater cultural heritage in
Vietnam, based on the foregoing, are only as dotted markings on the
panorama. In fact, the studying material son these issues were much
richer. If the systematization of studying material can be implemented, it
will create many valuable research works. However, those works should
go deeply into each topic, each historical period, each region, each field...
and then, summarize to help managers get the suitable policies and
strategies in terms of not only the protection and promotion of heritage
value, but also the political, economic, cultural, and social aspects.

Regarding documents, artefacts, collections and exhibits of underwater
cultural heritage in Vietnam, though many stages and studying fields
thereof are still vacant, but based on the obtained results from the studies
and the collections from the researchers and museums, it should be better
to have a museum of the underwater cultural heritage. Quang Ngai
province has a museum project in Ly Son on Truong Sa - Hoang Sa and
a museum project on vessels and maritime cultural heritage in Phu Quoc
Island. The above activities have just only exploited in the extreme small
extent of this field in comparison with the large scope of underwater
cultural heritage in Vietnam. Therefore, it is necessary to build a more
comprehensive and broader museum with the investment from the State
to promote underwater cultural heritage in Vietnam. Accordingly, we will
have the orientation and a more in-depth vision in the work of study and
exhibition on this field.

Regarding festival of coastal areas and islands of Vietnam, since there
are many similarities in term of the content, rituals and feature between
them, we suggest expanding the influence of some festivals with the
significance as the festival of ethnic communities, but not just the festival

�at the level of village community, regional or local communities. For last
several years, Ly Son has elevated to the festivals but still not satisfying
as expected. To achieve this, the work for research, evaluation,
rehabilitation and supplementation should be made. Accordingly, we
would promote the influence in terms of politic, society, economy and
culture of the festivals with the local and international communities.
The protection, restoration and embellishment of the cultural heritages in
general and the underwater cultural heritage in particular have been
reached many remarkable achievements during recent ten years.
However, with a huge volume of such heritages, it is impossible for the
state budget to cover all expenses for implementing such jobs. Although,
the socialization of this job in many provinces is very significant for many
years, however it should be applied and replicated in this case. However,
the protection of cultural heritages is still much neglected and loose.
These relics in Cai Beo (Cat Ba - Hai Phong city), how much area is left
while the urbanization rate is going strongly today? The archaeological
sites in Truong Sa discovered by the colleagues from Vietnam
Archaeology Institute in the 90s of last century, but recently, were
concreted. Apart from Truong Sa, in Phu Quoc, with the rate of rapid
growth at present, many construction works were springing up, but
archeology has not reached out to them. Heritage sector should actively
propose in advance the major construction projects in Phu Quoc, Co To...
serving for the investigation, research and excavation.

Conclusion
Since this article presents about cultural properties in the coastal and sea
and island areas of Vietnam only from the perspective of Quang Ngai
province, there are many other findings, important researches and many
valuable scientific insights have not been mentioned here; therefore, the

�author expected that this article will get the reader's sympathy. Apart from
Quang Ngai province, there are currently many other hot spots of marine
cultural heritage in Vietnam. Therefore, there must be a consistent and
long-term strategic and plan for the issues of conservation and protection
of this important heritage for the country and the future generations.

To conclude, there are two main issues we want to affirm:
1. The sea and islands cultural heritage of Vietnam is extremely rich
with the various types, characteristics, and different historical
periods. However, the studies in this regard have not been carried
out regularly, continuously and systematically. The reason for this
situation is that there is no State authorities to be assigned for taking
in charge this issue to manage with the long-term orientation and for
each specific stage.
2. With the abundance of sea and island heritages, the conservation
and promotion of their values should have a strategy, with the longer
and wider vision. However, for each particular case, it should have
the situational reaction to timely protect and preserve the precious
heritages for serving the long-term strategy.

With that spirit, it is necessary for Vietnam to have a research agency
specializing in the underwater cultural heritage, existing besides a
separate museum or sectoral museum under this research agency to
perform research centralised, professional projects. This research agency
also needs a center of underwater archaeology, instead of an underwater
archaeology division under the Vietnam Institute of Archaeology as
present, which was invested by the limited and slow human resource and
facilities. This is the model that the Koreans applied and they also have
cooperated with Vietnam during last years for implementing many

�research programs effectively. In order to make the premise for this
model, all materials, documents, artefacts... should be centrally gathered
with an authoritiy having the same objectives and functions for research
on maritime heritages, announcing the depth issues in each study areas,
each historical period, then to review and evaluate for providing the next
studying direction.

Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism of Vietnam or Vietnam Academy
of Social Sciences, under the National University of... are the appropriate
authorities to perform this task. As the preparatory step, the specific
research programs on maritime cultural heritage should also be planned,
with the detailed assignment for each competent authority with the
objectives and functions for research in each field, implementing each
program or project. One of three ministries and ministerial-level agencies
should gather the above experts, formulating programs, plans, schemes
and projects prior to the assignment. This is a great and long-term
program which needs the investment/funds from the government budget.

Endnotes
1

Excavation team 2001. Excavation of the Cu Lao Cham ancient
shipwreck (1997 to 1999). New discoveries in Archaeology in 2000.
Vietnam Institute of Archaeology, 2001, p. 548-552
2

Ha Van Tan (eds) 1998. Vietnam Archaeology, Volume 1, Vietnam
Stone Age. Hanoi Social Science Publisher.
3

Ha Van Tan (eds) 1998. Vietnam Archaeology, Volume 2, Vietnam
Metal Age. Hanoi Social Science Publisher.
4

Trinh Cao Tuong 1991. Opening and studying the ancient trading port
of Vietnam. Archaeology, 4/1991, p. 66-69.

�5

Hoang Anh Tuan, 2008. The position of Vietnam in the system of East
Sea trade ancient medieval. History research journal, 9 + 10/2008, p. 316
6

The Shipwreck Relics Discovered in Vietnam's Waters and Cu Lao
Cham Shipwreck. International Conference: Shipwrecks and Cultural
History in Goryeo Dynasty. Mopko, South Korea, 10/2011, pp.265-294.
7

Tran Quoc Vuong 2010. The site of Van Don. The cultural history of
Van Don trading port. Hanoi, pp.65-75.
Quang Ngai People's Committee, 2010. Địa chí Quảng Ngãi. The Bach
Khoa Publisher., 2010.
8

9

Nguyen Dinh Chien, Pham Quoc Quan 2013. Initial information about
the shipwreck in Quang Ngai. New discoveries in Archaeology in 2012.
Vietnam Institute of Archaeology, 2013, pp. 714-716.
10

Nguyen Dinh Chien, Pham Quoc Quan 2014. Excavation of the Binh
Chau ancient shipwreck, the 6th ancient ship in Vietnam's waters. New
discoveries in Archaeology in 2013. Vietnam Institute of Archaeology,
2014, pp. 637-642.
11

Nguyen Quoc Hung 1992. Excavation of the antique treasure at the
sea bottom Hon Cau (Ba Ria - Vung Tau). Archaeology, 3/1992, pp. 6273
12

Nguyen Viet &amp; Nguyen Son Ca 2014. The 13/14 CE Wreck Excavated
at the Coast of Binh Chau (Quang Ngai). The Center For Southeast
Asian Prehistory.
13

Nguyen Giang Hai 2014. Vietnam Marine Archaeology: Potential and
Challenges. Conference Proceedings Underwater Archaeology in
Vietnam and Southeast Asia: Cooperation for development. Quang
Ngai, 10/2014, pp. 1-14.
14

Pham Chi Than 2013. Discovery the X3 ancient vessels in the waters
of Vung Tau. New discoveries in Archaeology in 2012. Vietnam Institute
of Archaeology, 2013, pp. 625-626.
15

Government Decree No 86/2005/ND-CP, dated 08.07.2005, On the
management and protection of underwater cultural heritage.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="106">
                  <text>2017 Session 9: Maritime/Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107">
                  <text>Southeast Asia (SEA) has been rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) over a long period, from ancient pre-history, through the age of commerce, into the World War II era. Recently, UCH research, survey, and mapping activities; preservation and management efforts; as well as human capacity building programs show the promising progress in SEA countries. However, various threats to UCH preservation and some shortcomings still can be found in many SEA countries, for instance, lack of funds, inadequate technology, limited human resources, and also lack of public and government attention to UCH legal protection and its long-term preservation.    &#13;
&#13;
This session will highlight some topics, including current status of UCH preservation; current research or investigation on maritime heritage or UCH in SEA countries; maritime history in SEA; current legislations; recent human and natural threats to UCH in SEA countries; raising awareness and public education programs; in-situ preservation of UCH; sustainable shipwreck tourism development and balancing preservation efforts with economic benefit; community and general public engagement in UCH management plan; regional capacity building in Southeast Asia; as well as collaboration opportunities among stakeholders and SEA countries in researching, protecting, preserving, and managing UCH sites.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="108">
                  <text>Jenny Craig, Mc Gill University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5798">
                <text>Conservation of Maritime Cultural Heritage: View from the Angle of Quang Ngai Province (Vietnam)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5799">
                <text>Quang Ngai is a province located in the South Central Coast region of Vietnam, on the coast of the East Sea. It borders Quang Nam Province which is home to the famous Cu Lao Cham shipwreck in the north and the Binh Dinh Province in the south. It has a long coastline of 129km and wide territorial waters of 11.000km2. Quang Ngai has 6 seaports which are favorable for maritime transport and trade. The Ly Son Island of Quang Ngai province is located on the north-south waterway transport of our country, which is also the East-West international trade route in ancient times. The continuous discovery of shipwreck relics in the seas of Vung Tau, Binh Chau commune, Binh Son district, and Ly Son Island in recent years has demonstrated that the potential of maritime cultural heritage in the sea of Quang Ngai is enormous and rich. However, such precious heritage now is in danger of being undermined by the illegal exploitation of some local fisherman. In the context of our current status of underwater archaeology, the necessity of carrying out the studies, protection, conservation and promotion of the value of this important heritage resource is a major issue being faced by professionals and heritage managers. This article refers to the issues of preserving and promoting the value of maritime cultural heritage in Quang Ngai province, in order to serve for the exhibition in place and development of tourism as a new approach.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5800">
                <text>Ngo The Bach</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5801">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5802">
                <text>2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5803">
                <text>Ngo The Bach</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5804">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="514" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="305">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/7b54e17076654610d62193fb40ffd1f9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5f378906707f18454f7a94125912455a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5797">
                    <text>In Search of the Larpent’s Survivors – Hazards and Securities of
Sailing about Taiwan

Kuo-tung Chen
Institute of History and Philology
Academia Sinica
Taipei, Taiwan
e-mail: kchen@asihp.net

Abstract
The British bark Larpent left Liverpool for the Far East in May 1850, and
was lost in the China seas the year next. Three of its survivors were
rescued, and both Great Britain and the United States sent agents to
search other possible survivors in Taiwan. The efforts of the British and
the Americans have produced a bundle of information about the sailing
issues near the island. The paper will explore these materials, and in the
meantime, trace the few earlier European observations about the sailing
conditions by or around the island, such as the records Lord’s Anson’s
and De la Perous’s voyages. The Larpent event, in fact, has something to
do with the overture of lighthouse building in and around Taiwan Straits in
the second half of the 19th century. By studying the sailing facilities in the
Taiwan area before the mid-nineteenth century, the paper will also trace
back the pagodas and old-style lighthouses used by the Chinese to guide
navigators in the 16-18th centuries.
Key words: Taiwan, sailing, structures

Introduction
In 1883, the Eluanbi (South Cape) lighthouse started to work. It greatly
helped improve the safety of navigation in the vicinity of that area. Most
researches on the causes of its construction emphasize the effects of two
events. They believe that the shipwreck of American bark The Rover
brought up the issue of the necessity of building a lighthouse in South
Cape of Taiwan, and then, another event happened in 1874 created the

�conditions of so doing. Such reasoning is, in fact, not quite in accordance
with historical facts. The reason of appealing for a lighthouse lies
prominently in the frequent shipwrecks occurring in the neighborhood of
Southern Taiwan about 1850 and thereafter.
The reasons of incessant shipwrecks were like these: (1) Exportation of
Chinese laborers to America. Great Britain abolished slavery in 1833
produced a vacuum of working force, and Chinese laborers were sought
to fill the gap. From 1845 onwards, the British firm Tait &amp; Co., basing on
Amoy, commenced to ship out coolies to South America. A few years
later, gold mines were discovered in California, and the need of laborers
was enhanced. In consequence, shipping between China and America
grew phenomenally.1 (2) Another reason is, even before the opening of
treaty

ports

in

Taiwan,

foreigners

eagerly

sought

commercial

opportunities down there. Even it was not legal at all, more and more
foreign vessels came to Taiwan for trade, and even tacitly permitted by
local officials.2 (3) A third reason is that in Northern Taiwan, in the area of
Keelung, coal was abundant. Foreign steamers came to refill their tanks
or just ship off coals for profit.
While shipping increased, number of shipwrecks naturally grew up. It is
the reason of navigational disaster that made the necessity of some sorts
of navigational aids apparent. Thus the captain of the Science, an illegal
trading ship operating in the harbor of Takao (nowadays Kaohsiung), went
into an agreement with the Circuit Intendant (Taotae) of Taiwan in written
document. In that agreement, the Intendant “permits him to place lights at
the entrance of the port on a flag-staff erected for such a purpose, and
station buoys on the bar.”3
This is the earliest instance of erecting lights in a Taiwan port at the urge
of foreigners.

In addition to the “lights”, “station buoys” were also

�consented to set up. However, such kinds of port facility to render aids to
shipping vessels were not entirely new to Taiwan. Therefore, the
Intendant was not reluctant to give his permission. Before the first modern
lighthouse (the Xiyu Pagoda Light or the Fishermen’s Island Lighthouse)
was built up in Taiwan region, there were already two predecessors: one
stood in the very site of the Xiyu Pagoda Light, and the other in the estuary
of Tamsui River on Northern Taiwan.4 As for buoys, probably due to the
influence of the Dutch occupation in the period of 1624-1662, the harbor
of Taiwanfu (Tainan) was provided with lines of spar buoys to guide the
operators of vessels. The buoys were called “dangying 盪纓,” and
recorded in many sources. “Dangying” means “swinging tassel,”
describing the motion of spar buoys in the waters.5
Anyway, in the second half of the 19th century, records of shipwrecks were
plenty. Giving some examples, there are the wrecks of the Kelpie (1848),
Sarah Trottman (1849), the Larpent (1850), Lady Evelyn (1853), The
Rover (1867), and so on. A detailed list can be made with the data
provided by James W. Davidson (1872-1933).6 According to this authority,
between 1850 and 1894, some 90 ships encountered bad lucks, two on
average each year. During this period, Taiwan was bestowed an
embarrassing name – the “Inhospitable Shores (Coast).”7
In the unfortunate The Kelpie, there was Thomas Nye on board. His
cousin Gideon Nye (1812-1888) was a famous (or infamous) China trader
of those days. Gideon pressed very hard to the Chinese authorities for
rescuing his relative, but to no avail. In fact, none of the survivors of the
Kelpie was found, and the whereabouts of Thomas Nye was uncertain. It
had to wait for a few years when three survivors of the Larpent made their
appearance in Shanghai that aroused a general concern among the
westerners.

�The Larpent Event and Aftermath
The Larpent event has been quite well told in James W. David’s book
about half a century after the tragedy.8 However, supporting by more
complete sources, we are now enabled to enquire into much more details.
The new data come from different corners. First, the survivor’s testimony
reported in the Treaty Ports newspapers, including the Hong Kong
Register and the North China Herald, etc. Second, the men sent to Taiwan
to distribute rewards to those who had helped the wreckers and to get
information about any other detained foreigners. The British bark
Salamander took them to Taiwan. Among the people involved, Mr. (later
Sir) Harry Smith Parkes (1828-1885) was present as the interpreter.
Although he did not publish his own observations, the Salamander’s
officers did have their reports. In the meantime, the American envoy to
China, the Rev. Peter Parker, also caused a Chinese agent to be sent to
Taiwan for information gathering, and this man’s report was translated into
English and available to concerned parties. A couple of years later, when
the British vessel the Inflexible was ordered to go to Taiwan for conducting
a coastal survey, Robert Swinhoe (1836-1877) was on board to interpret.
He and Inflexible’s captain, as well as the assistant surveyor, all had their
reports. Adding to that, we will also make use of the U.S. government
papers for documentation.
Here follows is a concise summary of the Larpent’s story. The Larpent
was built in Moulmein, Myanmar, owned by a Mr. Thomas Ripley. It left
from Liverpool on May 18, 1850, commanded by Captain Gilson. News of
its anticipated arrival at Shanghai appeared times and again in the North
China Herald. But ultimately it failed. After a voyage of 116 days, it came
to the waters off Island Botel Tobago near Taiwan. The waves and surfs
were not heavy, and the sky was somewhat clear. Unexpectedly, it ran

�aground on the edge of Southeastern Taiwan coast. The captain and
seven others took the gig, while the 23 rest crews took the long-boat to
escape. Later on, the gig was lost. The long-boat, after many hazards,
reached a Sugar-loaf Rock in the southern tip of Taiwan. The men on
board started to land, but were shot by the natives with matchlocks. Some
of them died on the spot, and the rest were forced to disperse. They were
not heard for about eight months. Then, in the beginning of May, 1851,
three survivors were rescued by an American vessel, the Antelope, and
brought to Shanghai via Hong Kong. The British consul at Shanghai, Sir
Rutherford Alcock (1809-1897) took the matters into his own hands. In the
meantime, the Shanghai foreign community also took some steps to help
the survivors.9
The story of the unfortunate Larpent was duly taken down and published,
not only in the North China Herald based on Shanghai, but also in the
Canton-based The Chinese Repository. In consequence the news was
widely circulated in the treaty ports along the China coast.10 Therefore,
when Charles Shaw11 stood out to raise funds on behalf of the crew of the
Larpent, many people came forward. In a few days, a sum of 865 dollars
was collected. A list of the contributors is available from the pages of the
North China Herald. The British decided to dispatch the steam boat
Salamander to Taiwan, with part of the money raised for distributing to the
good-hearted Taiwanese. Apart from Harry Parkes, there were Captain
Ellman and Lieutenant Lambert on board. Surprisingly, an unnamed
employee of the Tait &amp; Co. also went along together. His purpose is
obscure. As for the rescued survivors of the Larpent, two (Alexander
Berries and William Blake) also joined the mission. The last one, James
Hill, being indisposed, was absent. With some difficulty, the Salamander
got a pilot en route in the Pescadores and dropped anchors between

�Xiaoliuqiu Island (the Lamay Is.) and Taiwan mainland. Some of the
members successfully landed on the coast of Fangliao (“Pongle” as
appears in the source materials) by a bamboo raft. They were informed
by local people: it is most advisable to pay a visit to a person by the name
Lin Wanzhang (Wancheang, or Bancheong). He lived not far from the
landing place, and he wielded strong influence upon the aborigines in the
neighboring area. An appointment was duly made and the two parties met
in Lin’s residential compound in Neiliao (or Lailiao), just a few kilometers
away.
From the conversation, it is confirmed that Lin Wanzhang did know the
case quite well. Lin admitted that he had seen Blake and Hill in person in
March of the same year (1851). He said he would have helped the two to
get free but their master wanted them to stay a bit longer, arguing that if
they stayed longer they would learn that his villagers were different from
those who attacked them and killed their companions. Blake and Hill
escaped later with the assistance of Berries and his master. Lin pointed
out straightforwardly that the tribe who had committed the crime was
Koalut. It was a small tribe of about 200 people. Out of them, only 60 or
so could fight. Had it not been there were in want of consensus among
other villagers in the area, it would have been crashed. He added that if
the British party wanted to attack the Koalut, he could provide at least 400
matchlock-men. Thereafter, Lin Wanzhang sent a subordinate to
accompany them to Langjiao for giving out the rewards. Lin also wrote a
letter for them to be delivered to a “towkay” (headman) in a village near
Langjiao.

�Fig. 1: The Location of Koalut.
The Salamander’s men arrived at Langjiao on August 17, 1851. On the
next day, rewards were distributed through the hands of Berries and
Blake. A man by the name Kewah or Kenah received a large share ($225),
because he was the very person who made the final stage of their
liberation and escape possible. Kewah’s relative Chako received $50. He
was quite handsomely rewarded because his wife gave Kewah the
information of Berries’s detention. Chako’s wife was an aborigine woman
whose village had detained Alexander Berries before Kenwah ransomed
him. Some others had also given hands to the Larpent’s survivors and
were duly rewarded. The village head of Sheliao (near Langjiao), who Lin
Wanzhang wrote to, was given some money, too. He was said to have
some influence on “the wilder tribes”.12 As for the information about any
other shipwrecks and possible survivors, the Salamander team was not
able to get solid information. The Salamander then went to the South
Cape for surveying the Koalut area, and finally returned to Shanghai.

�More than one decade later, Sir Harry Parkes made a statement in the
meeting of the Royal Geographic Society. Though his memory is not
completely sound, he did give a short account about the mission:
“The South Cape was about the very worst point for a vessel to
get on shore; for on that extreme point of the island there was a
particular aboriginal tribe, numbering 200 or 300 individuals,
who had an unfortunate passion for human heads, and it was a
habit with them to murder any foreigner that came in their way.
He had occasion to make the acquaintance of these people
about twelve years ago, when one of our vessels were lost on
that point, and he was sent over by Her Majesty’s Government
to make some inquiries respecting the missing crew. They
succeeded in rescuing two of the men, who were in the hands
of another tribe on the western point, the wreck having taken
place on the eastern point of the said Cape. These two men had
been bought by the Chinese at 6 dollars a head, and had been
in captivity with them six months.” 13

As Harry Parkes was the interpreter, he was responsible for transmitting
the information. However, probably time weakened his memory, he made
the mistake to say only two men were rescued. Probably he was confused
by the fact that only two out of the three were accompanying the
Salamander to visit Taiwan. The money paid for ransoming those men
was seven dollars each for Hill and Blake, although Berries was six. Blake
and Hill were detained by aborigines for 4 months (not 6 months) and then
purchased by a Chinese, who kept them with him for another four months
until they escaped to Berries’s place. Berries’s master (Kewah) then
arranged them to reach the Antelope and leave Taiwan.
In the beginning, the Americans also tempted to send a gunboat to
Taiwan, but after learning of the commission of the Salamander arranged
by the British, they dispatched a Chinese agent, by the name Oo-sian,

�instead. This Oo-sian took a Chinese junk on August 8 in Amoy and
arrived at Donggang, Taiwan, in the evening of the 11th. When still in the
harbor, he encountered a typhoon and lost almost all his belongings. He
spent a couple of days in Donggang and then went to Neiliao (Lai-liao) to
pay Lin Wanzhang a visit.
There he learned that the men of the Salamander had already been to.
Oo-sian and Lin Wanzhang met on the 17th of August. The latter
ascertained that there were no more Western fugitives. He himself knew
the whole southernmost area well. And, he added, if there were any more
Westerners in captivity, they must have been found out for rewards owing
to the Salamander men had given such a promise.
Before going to see Lin Wanzhang, Oo-sian had also collected information
from local folks. It was said Lin Wanzhang owned a watch, a spyglass,
and a sextant, apparently from certain wrecks. Oo-sian mentioned this to
Lin Wanzhang for clarification. Lin Wanzhang replied that they were
brought to him by some aborigines about four years ago for sale, so he
exchanged some goods for them. Sometimes later, a mandarin shew his
interest in these objects and Lin Wanzhang just gave them away. Lin
Wanzhang expressed that he did not know anything more about the origin
of those objects.
According to Oo-sian’s report, he visited the South Bay where the
attackers of the unfortunate sailors lived, then he went to some hillside
places, several harbors in the southwestern coast of Taiwan, and even
the Pescadores, but no more important information was gathered.14
Time elapsed for a couple of years, then, in 1858 another British steam
ship the Inflexible, came to Taiwan for surveying the coast of that island.
Robert Swinhoe, who later became the first vice-consul to Taiwan and

�was renowned for his discovery of several endemic species of flora and
fauna, was on board to render interpretive service. Swinhoe, as well as
the commander of the Inflexible and an assistant surveyor all reported this
visit.
The Inflexible left Amoy on June 7, 1858 for Taiwan via the Pescadores.
After visiting a few harbors to distribute proclamations in search of
surviving ship wreckers and seeing some dignitaries, it arrived at the road
of Fangliao on June 14, 1858. The men took bamboo raft to land, and
went directly to see Lin Wanzhang (spelt as Bancheang in Swinhoe’s
paper). On the way to Neiliao, Swinhoe found that Fangliao was at odd
then with Neiliao, but they were not molested, anyway. Upon arrival, he
found there were two Chinese characters written on the door lintel,
reading as “wan ke”.15 Douglas Fix thinks the original words for “wan ke”
must be “wanji萬記”16 – some sort of house name –, but I would like to put
it as “Fange 番割” – broker with the aborigines –, which we will dwell upon
a little bit more later in this paper. As the group of men from the Inflexible
had read Oo-sian’s (spelt as Urian) report beforehand, they also asked
about the instruments Lin Wanzhang once in possession, and he gave the
same answer as what to Oo-sian. Lin Wanzhang added that he did not
hear any news about shipwreck after the event of the Larpent.
Lin Wanzhang: In the Vacuum of Government Power
The men of the Salamander, Oo-sian, and the officers of the Inflexible all
paid Lin Wanzhang visits when they came to Taiwan for finding out
information about Western ship-wreckers. Then, who is Lin Wan Zhang?
And, why should they do so?
Swinhoe describes his impression of Lin Wanzhang: “The Hero in his
house we found, not as we expected to meet him, a dashing Robin Hood,

�but a thin stooping elderly man, with bad teeth.” He also records that Lin
Wanzhang was married to an aborigine woman, and guesses that Lin
Wanzhang might have learned tribal language from her.17 In another
publication, he has more about this man:
“……When circumnavigating the island in 185718, I had the
pleasure of seeing a few women, who were married to Chinese
at Pongle and Langkeaou. They were much browner than
ordinary Chinese, and had their hair plaited and entwined with
red cotton after the manner of their people, but they were
otherwise dressed like Chinawomen. At Laileaou a Chinaman
named Bancheang, of large landed property, traded with the
Kalees of the hills, and was on very friendly terms with them. He
was constantly at variance with the Chinese authorities who had
outlawed him, but could not touch him, as he was so well
defended by his numerous Chinese dependents and the large
body of Aborigines at his beck. This man was wedded to a
Kalee, but she was shy and would not show during our visit. He
evidently considered himself vastly superior to Europeans, for
he evinced to us none of that formal civility characteristic of a
Chinese gentleman.”19

Again, as we see before, Lin Wanzhang was married to an aborigine
woman, and here Swinhoe describes here of the Kalee tribe. The family
records of Lian Wanzhang’s descendants disclose that this woman
(named Talimaraw Sauniyaw) belongs to the Paiwan ethnic group living
not far from Neiliao where Lin Wanzhang resides. This is an important
clue to ascertain that the words written on the lintel of his house should
be “fange” instead of “wanji”. In fact, an Intendant of Taiwan, by the name
Xü Zonggan, once wrote “Lin Wanzhang (is) a fange 番格 (Those who
married to aborigine woman is called a fange). His family serves as Yimin
義民 for generations.”20 Fange was the kind of person who stood between
Chinese and aborigines as liaison person, but mainly for the purposing of

�exchanging materials.

A fange was usually a Chinese, or a man

descended from a Chinese father and an aborigine mother. In the latter
case, he is called a tushezai or tushenan, meaning a “mestizo”.21
The commander of the Inflexible, G. A. C. Brooker, was not failing to
mention Lin Wanzhang’s involvement in trading with the aborigines:
“Mancheong (Lin Wanzhang) is in the habit of trading with some
of the aborigines through some of his people; and he assures
me, from what he knew of their fierce, savage disposition and
thirst for blood, no European’s life would be spared if one fell into
their hands. He says, they are more savage in some parts of
the island than in others, especially in the South. I left several
proclamations with Mancheong, who would have them
conveyed and explained to the savages, whose language is
quite distinct to the Chinese, and totally different in sound. I
heard there were many Chinese settled among these wild
inhabitants of the woods, and had great influence with them,
because they were the means of procuring articles from the
Chinese which the aborigines themselves could not obtain.”22
Lin Wanzhang had proficiency in aboriginal language, traded with the
aborigines, and wielded influence upon the latter, hence was a suitable
person to contact. This explains why everybody directed the Westerners
to visit Lin Wanzhang when they came to Taiwan for shipwreck issues.
One thing also merits mentioning. Swinhoe noticed the forces possessed
by Lin Wanzhang, and could commandeer aborigines to fight for his
cause. G. A. C. Brooker also observed:
“This Mancheong has upwards of five thousand men under his
control, whom he employs tilling the land, of which he possesses
a large extent in the neighbourhood of the hills where he resides.
Consequently he commands great influence with the people,
and at times sets the authority of the Mandarins at defiance, and
presents so formidable an appearance that the latter have more
than once retired from an attack they have made on Mancheong
for the purpose of extorting money from him.”23

�Robert Swinhoe told a much vivid story in his report. After seeing Lin
Wanzahng, they left Neiliao and passed the village of Fangliao where they
called upon the tiny military officer stationed there. Swinhoe found the
Chinese officer and soldiers were much afraid of Lin Wanzhang, because
they were defeated by him not long times ago. According to Swinhoe, the
Chinese authorities sent an army of a thousand men to invade the area
under Lin’s control. When they came near, “Bancheang himself loaded a
gun and discharged it at the invaders, knocking over eighteen men at one
discharge. The Imperialists were bewildered and immediately made good
their retreat…”24
The event described by Swinhoe happened in 1855. Why the authorities
had taken troubles to attack Lin Wanzhang? It is not clear, but we can
guess. In the previous passages, we cite Xü Zonggang’s description about
this man. Xü Zonggang wrote in his diary that the family of Lin Wanzhang
“serves as Yimin 義民for generations.”“Yimin” (literally “righteous person”)
were those men who stood on the government’s side to fight against
rebels. Lin Wanzhang did help the government in quelling some social
unrest. However, he was implicated in a rebellion occurred in 1853 which
his relatives got involved. He was not indicted after the 1853 event was
over. Probably the authorities postponed taking action until 1855 for a
better timing, although still failed. Anyway, all these facts reflect that Lin
Wanzhang was too strong to be controlled.
To sum up the observations of British visitors about the person Lin
Wanzhang, we have no doubt that he is an influential local bully. He
wielded power over the local people in the neighborhood of Fangliao, both
the Chinese and the aborigines through his role as a fange. As he owned
his own force, he was also daring to offend the authorities, even fought

�and defeated their armies. Why the Qing government performed so badly
then? It is because that the southernmost past of Taiwan was declared
“Forbidden Land” (jindi 禁地) after a fierce rebellion occurred in 1721 and
the government force withdrew from the territory south of Fangliao.
Fangliao became the last point with a very small army (no more twenty
soldiers) and in fact, the southernmost region was left uncontrolled by the
government. Several ethnic groups of aborigines occupied that region.
Although the Qing government prohibited and dissuaded Chinese to enter
into that region, it was not successful at all. As a result, besides the
aborigines, there were other ethnic groups consisting of Fujianese
Chinese, the Hakkas, and identifiable mestizos. They also took on their
own hands to protect their own interests. Lin Wanzhang was one of such
ethnic leaders, and probably the strongest. This explained why he was
named to visit by local informants to western visitors.
Shipwrecks and the Safety of Survivors
However, it is still quite a distance from Fangliao to the very end of the
Island. On the area near the southeast tip of Taiwan lived the Koalut tribe
who was accused by Lin Wanzhang and others as the bloodthirst killers
of the wreck survivors. Although Lin Wanzhang boasted that if the British
wanted to attack that tribe, he would be happy to provide more than 400
men with matchlocks, no party was interested so to do at that moment.
Later on, in 1867, due to the incident of the wreck of the American bark
the Rover, Le Gendre – U.S. consul at Amoy – came to Taiwan. He was
successful to reach an agreement with the common leader of the league
of aborigines in the southernmost region, Tok-e-tok. Killing or harassment
against ship wreckers did not happen again, at least in the area under
Tok-e-tok’s sway. But there was still another issue waiting to be solved. It
is the improvement of sailing security.

�The most dangerous threat to navigation is the Vele Rete Rocks. The
group of rocks and shoals lie about 10 kilometers south of the South Cape
(the southeast corner of Taiwan). Citing the result of Capian Ross’s
investigation, James Horsburgh has the following description about the
Vele Rete Rocks:
“This is a mass of rocks, several of them a little detached from
each other, and even with the surface; some of them are above
water, and may be seen 9 or 10miles. The channel betwixt this
danger and the South end of Formosa, is about 4 leagues wide,
and very safe. But very turbulent ripplings are often experienced
in this, and the neighbouring channels, which Capt. Ross
observed to extend in a N. E. and S. W. direction, and running
so high, that the breakers resembled the sea beating furiously
over a dangerous shoal.”25

It is confirmed that the Rover broke up on the Vele Rete Rocks and the
unfortunate survivors were murdered by the Koalut.26 The landing place of
the survivors was in Dawan (now the famous resort of Kenting) within the
sphere of the Koalut. In the time of Le Gendre, what occupied his thought
was the safety of the survivor, not the navigational security. In
consequence he pressed hard to the Chinese authorities to build up a fort
in the southwestern tip of the southern end of Taiwan (now called
Maobitou). Although the idea of a lighthouse to guide the sailors existed
in his mind, he did not emphasize the importance and the urgent need of
such a construction.27 Although Robert Hart, in cooperation with the Qing
government, started to launch lighthouse-building along the China coast
in 1867, a lighthouse in the neighborhood of the Vele Rete Rocks was not
in his plan.28

�Fig. 2: The Location of Dawan in Kualut Sphere.
The construction of a lighthouse in the southern tip of Taiwan still had to
wait for decades. In 1874, the Japanese invaded Taiwan in excuse for
revenging on behalf of the Ryukyuans, whose compatriots were killed
after a shipwreck in 1871 by the tribes a bit north of the former league
under Tok-e-tok.

In the negotiation between China and Japan, the

question of navigation safety was raised, and setting up a lighthouse was
brought forward.29 One year after, it started. In January 1875 the engineerin-chief of the Customs, David Marr Henderson, trekked to the Southeast
tip for a survey.30 Thereafter, Michael Beazeley, an assistant engineer of
the Customs in Takao (Kao-hsiung), went to the South Cape to purchase
a piece of land for the use of erecting a lighthouse with local chieftain. The
place he acquired, he pronounced, is Wo-lan-pi, now styled as Eluanbi.31
A temporary screw-pile lighthouse was erected soon after, but the
permanent one took a long time to come out. When the lighthouse was
first lighted in 1883, it turned out to be an unusual, fortified lighthouse. 32

�Its chief engineer John Reginald Harding had in fact called it a “fightinglighting machine”. Navigation security and personal safe were all taken
into consideration in designing and building the lighthouse. What can do
better?
Endnotes
Robert Nield, China’s Foreign Places: The Foreign Presence in China in
the Treaty Port Era, 1840-1943 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press,
20150, pp. 17 and 27;Tan Chee-Beng ed., Routledge Handbook of the
Chinese Diaspora (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon. And New York:
Routledge, 2013), p. 76. Cf. Elizabeth Sinn, Pacific Crossing: California
Gold, Chinese Migration, and the Making of Hong Kong (Hong Kong:
Hong Kong University Press, 2013).
1

2

James W. Davidson, The Island of Formosa, Past and Present: History,
People, Resources, and Commercial Prospects (London, New York:
Macmillan; Yokohama: Kelly &amp; Walsh, 1903), p. 172.
3

Jules Davids ed., American Diplomatic and Public Papers: The United
States and China, Series 1: The Treaty System and the Taiping Rebellion,
1842-1860 (Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, 1973), vol. 12, p. 218,
Document no. 26, “Agreement entered into between the Intendant of
Formosa and George A. Potter on Carrying on Trade in the Island.”
Please see Stephen Davies’s wonderful paper for this
conference:“China’s first purpose designed and built lighthouse: findings
from the analysis of a long lost but recently rediscovered photograph of
the Xiyu Pagoda Light (李西山塔晚燈, Lixishanta Wangdeng)”.
4

5

Cf. Wang Bichang 王必昌, Xüxiu Taiwanxian Zhi 續修臺灣縣志 (Taipei:
Bank of Taiwan, 1961), pp. 35-36.
6

James W. Davidson, The Island of Formosa: Past and Present (London
and New York: Macmillan , 1903), pp. 180-182 and 216-218.
7

For example, the commander of the American fleet in China, Captain W.
S. Walker, wrote to U.S. chargé d’affaires Peter Parker, reporting the
British motion after hearing the case of the Larpent on July 14, 1851. In
that letter, Captain Walker writes: “any of the missing vessels (of whatever
nation) having been wrecked on this inhospitable coast….” See Jules
Davids ed., American Diplomatic and Public Papers: The United States

�and China, Series 1: The Treaty System and the Taiping Rebellion, 18421860 (Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, 1973), vol. 12, p. 56.
8

James W. Davidson, The Island of Formosa: Past and Present, pp. 110112.
9

North China Herald, May 17, 1851. Cf. The Chinese Repository, vol. 20
(1851), pp. 490-492.
10

For the influence of newspapers published in the treaty ports, please
refer to Marlon Zhu, “Diplomatic Intelligence and Inter-port Journalism:
The News of Japanese and Chinese Troop Steamers during the Formosa
Incident of 1874,” Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History, Academia
Sinica, no. 93 (September 2016), pp. 1-39.
11

Mr. Shaw is one of the proprietors of the Shaw, Bland and Co. Cf. The
Chinese Repository, vol. 15, p. 8.
12

The Nautical Magazine and Naval Chronicle, October 1851, pp. 520525, “Salamander’s Visit to Formosa.”
13

Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, vol. VIII (25th Feb.,
1864), p. 27.
Oo-sian’s report was translated and published in the July 1851 issue of
The Chinese Repository, pp. 490-492. It seems available to many
interested persons. In G. A. C. Brooker, “Journal of H.M.S. Inflexible on
a Visit to Formosa in Search of Shipwrecked Seamen,” in The Nautical
Magazine and Naval Chronicle, vol. XXXVIII, no. 1 (January 1859), pp. 911, a “Translation of a Report by Urian, who was sent to Formosa by the
United States Consul at Amoy, to search for missing Europeans”is also
included. The content is almost the same with a little variance only.
However, for unknown reason, Oo-sian was spelt as Urian.
14

Robert Swinhoe, “Narrative of a Visit to the Island of Formosa,” Journal
of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. I, no. ii (May
1859), pp. 149-150.
15

16

費德廉(Douglas Fix)、羅效德編譯，《看見十九世紀臺灣――十四位西
方旅行者的福爾摩沙故事》（臺北：如果出版，2006）, pp. 21-22.
Robert Swinhoe, “Narrative of a Visit to the Island of Formosa,” Journal
of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. I, no. ii (May
1859), p. 150.
17

�18

Swinhoe makes the mistake to record it in 1857, in fact, it was taken
place in 1858.
Robert Swinhoe, “Notes on the Island of Formosa,” in Henrietta
Harrison ed., Natives of Formosa: British Reports of the Taiwan
Indigenous People, 1650-1950 (Taipei: Shung Ye Museum of Formosan
Aborigines; SMC Publishing, 2001), pp. 66 and 74.
19

“林萬掌，番格也（娶番婦為室，謂之番格），世為義民。” See Xü
Zonggan’s “Diary of 1853” in his Suweixinzhai zalu 斯未信齋雜錄 (Taipei:
Bank of Taiwan, 1960), pp. 84-85.
20

See Kuo-tung Ch’en, “Chinese Frontiersmen and Taiwanese
Tushengnan in the Local Economy of Taiwan before 1900,” in Wang
Gungwu and Ng Chin-keong, eds., Maritime China in Transition, 17501850 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2004), pp. 139-149.
21

G. A. C. Brooker, “Journal of H.M.S. Inflexible on a Visit to Formosa in
Search of Shipwrecked Seamen,” The Nautical Magazine and Naval
Chronicle, vol. XXXVIII, no. 1 (January 1859), pp. 4-5.
22

G. A. C. Brooker, “Journal of H.M.S. Inflexible on a Visit to Formosa in
Search of Shipwrecked Seamen,” The Nautical Magazine and Naval
Chronicle, vol. XXXVIII, no. 1 (January 1859), p. 4-5.
23

Robert Swinhoe, “Narrative of a Visit to the Island of Formosa,” Journal
of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. I, no. ii (May
1859), p. 150.
24

25

James Horsburgh, India Directory, or Directions for Sailing to and from
the East Indies, China, New Holland … , vol. ii (London, 1827 third
edition), p.384.
26

James W. Davidson, Formosa Past and Present (London and New York:
Macmillan, 1903), p. 115. In the letter from Anson Burlingame to William
H. Seward, Secretary of State, U.S.A. (Peking to Washington, April 23,
1867), it is clearly stated that the place of tragedy is “evidently the Vele
Rete rocks.” See, United States Department of State, Executive
documents printed by order of the House of Representatives, during the
second session of the fortieth Congress, 1867-’68, China, pp. 477 and
499.

�27

Douglas L. Fix and John Shufelt eds., translation of Charles Willian Le
Gendre’s Notes of Travel in Formosa (Tainan: National Museum of
Taiwan History, 2013) , pp. 314-318.
28

United States Department of State, Executive documents printed by
order of the House of Representatives, during the third session of the
fortieth Congress, 1868-69, Vol. I (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1868-1869), pp. 467-470.
29

Edward Howard House, The Japanese Expedition to Formosa (Tokyo:
1875).
30

Robert Bickers, The Scramble for China: Foreign Devils in the Qing
Empire, 1832-1914 (London: Penguin Books, 2011), p. 266.
M. Beazeley, “Notes of an Overland Journey through the southern part
of Formosa, from Takow to the South Cape, in 1875, with an Introductory
Sketch of the Island,” Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society and
Monthly Record of Geography, no. 7 (January 1885), p. 5.
31

32

John King Fairbank, Katherine Frost Bruner, Elizabeth MacLeod
Matheson eds., The I. G. in Peking: Letters of Robert Hart, Chinese
Maritime Customs, 1868-1907 (Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press, 1975), pp. 355-356.
References
“林萬掌，番格也（娶番婦為室，謂之番格），世為義民。Suweixinzhai
zalu 斯未信齋雜錄, 1960. Taipei: Bank of Taiwan.
Beazeley, M., 1885. “Notes of an Overland Journey through the southern
part of Formosa, from Takow to the South Cape, in 1875, with an
Introductory Sketch of the Island,” Proceedings of the Royal Geographical
Society and Monthly Record of Geography, No. 7 January 1885.
Bichang, W., 王必昌, Xüxiu Taiwanxian Zhi 續修臺灣縣志, 1961, Taipei:
Bank of Taiwan, pp. 35-36.
Bickers, R., 2011. The Scramble for China: Foreign Devils in the Qing
Empire, 1832-1914, London, Penguin Books.

�Brooker, G. A. C., 1859. “Journal of H.M.S. Inflexible on a Visit to Formosa
in Search of Shipwrecked Seamen,” in The Nautical Magazine and Naval
Chronicle, January 1859, Vol. XXXVIII (1): 9-11.
Ch’en, K., 2004. “Chinese Frontiersmen and Taiwanese Tushengnan in
the Local Economy of Taiwan before 1900,” in Wang Gungwu and Ng
Chin-keong, eds., Maritime China in Transition, 1750-1850, Wiesbaden:
Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 139-149.
Chee-Beng, T., ed., 2013. Routledge Handbook of the Chinese Diaspora
(Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon. And New York: Routledge.
Davids, J., ed., 1973. American Diplomatic and Public Papers: The United
States and China, Series 1: The Treaty System and the Taiping Rebellion,
1842-1860. Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, Vol. 12: 218.
Davidson, J.W., 1903. The Island of Formosa, Past and Present: History,
People, Resources, and Commercial Prospects. London, New York:
Macmillan; Yokohama: Kelly &amp; Walsh.
Davies, S. “China’s first purpose designed and built lighthouse: findings
from the analysis of a long lost but recently rediscovered photograph of
the Xiyu Pagoda Light (李西山塔晚燈, Lixishanta Wangdeng)”.
Document no. 26, “Agreement entered into between the Intendant of
Formosa and George A. Potter on Carrying on Trade in the Island.”
Edward Howard House, 1857. The Japanese Expedition to Formosa,
Tokyo.
Fairbank, J. K., Bruner, K. F., Matheson, E.M., eds., 1975. The I. G. in
Peking: Letters of Robert Hart, Chinese Maritime Customs, 1868-1907,
Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Fix, D.L., and Shufelt J., eds., 2013. Translation of Charles Willian Le
Gendre’s Notes of Travel in Formosa, Taiwan, National Museum of
Taiwan History.

�Horsburgh, J., 1827. India Directory, or Directions for Sailing to and from
the East Indies, China, New Holland… , Vol. ii, third edition, London.
Nield, R., 2015. China’s Foreign Places: The Foreign Presence in China
in the Treaty Port Era, 1840-1943. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University
Press.
North China Herald, May 17, 1851.
Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, 1864. Vol. VIII, 25
February 1864, p. 27.
Sinn, E., 2013. Pacific Crossing: California Gold, Chinese Migration, and
the Making of Hong Kong. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press.
Swinhoe, R., 1859. “Narrative of a Visit to the Island of Formosa,” Journal
of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. I(ii): 149-150.
Swinhoe, R., 2001. “Notes on the Island of Formosa,” in Henrietta
Harrison ed., Natives of Formosa: British Reports of the Taiwan
Indigenous People, 1650-1950, Taipei, Shung Ye Museum of Formosan
Aborigines; SMC Publishing.
The Chinese Repository, 1851. Vol. 15: 8.
The Chinese Repository, 1851. Vol. 20: 490-492.
The Nautical Magazine and Naval Chronicle,
“Salamander’s Visit to Formosa.” pp. 520-525,

October

1851,

United States Department of State, Executive documents printed by order
of the House of Representatives, during the second session of the fortieth
Congress, 1867-’68, China.
United States Department of State, Executive documents printed by order
of the House of Representatives, during the third session of the fortieth

�Congress, 1868-69, Vol. I, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1868-1869).
Zhu, M., 2016. “Diplomatic Intelligence and Inter-port Journalism: The
News of Japanese and Chinese Troop Steamers during the Formosa
Incident of 1874,” Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History, Academia
Sinica, No. 93 September 2016: 1-39.
費德廉(Douglas Fix)、羅效德編譯，《看見十九世紀臺灣――十四位西方
旅行者的福爾摩沙故事》（臺北：如果出版，2006. pp. 21-22.

Biography
Kuo-tung CH’EN received his Ph.D. degree from Yale University in 1990,
is now affiliated with the Institute of History and Philology, Academia
Sinica. His previous publications in English, among others, include: The
Insolvency of the Chinese Hong Merchants, 1760-1843 (Taipei: The
Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, 1990), etc. His works in Chinese
language are three books, in addition to several papers on the Chinese
practice of bottomry loan (marine insurance), Chinese adoption of
Vietnamese terms for sandbars, sea routers and landscape guide for
Chinese mariners, observations on underwater archaeology, and so on.
He is at present working with Paola Calanca of EFEO in a Taiwan-France
joint project: “Maritime knowledge for China Seas”. The main themes
include: Nautical and navigation knowledge, Port governance and
infrastructure, and Seafaring language.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="106">
                  <text>2017 Session 9: Maritime/Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107">
                  <text>Southeast Asia (SEA) has been rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) over a long period, from ancient pre-history, through the age of commerce, into the World War II era. Recently, UCH research, survey, and mapping activities; preservation and management efforts; as well as human capacity building programs show the promising progress in SEA countries. However, various threats to UCH preservation and some shortcomings still can be found in many SEA countries, for instance, lack of funds, inadequate technology, limited human resources, and also lack of public and government attention to UCH legal protection and its long-term preservation.    &#13;
&#13;
This session will highlight some topics, including current status of UCH preservation; current research or investigation on maritime heritage or UCH in SEA countries; maritime history in SEA; current legislations; recent human and natural threats to UCH in SEA countries; raising awareness and public education programs; in-situ preservation of UCH; sustainable shipwreck tourism development and balancing preservation efforts with economic benefit; community and general public engagement in UCH management plan; regional capacity building in Southeast Asia; as well as collaboration opportunities among stakeholders and SEA countries in researching, protecting, preserving, and managing UCH sites.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="108">
                  <text>Jenny Craig, Mc Gill University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5790">
                <text>In Search of the Larpent’s Survivors –Hazards and Securities of Sailing about Taiwan&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5791">
                <text>The British bark Larpent left Liverpool for the Far East in May 1850, and was lost in the China seas the year next. Three of its survivors were rescued, and both Great Britain and the United States sent agents to search other possible survivors in Taiwan. The efforts of the British and the Americans have produced a bundle of information about the sailing issues near the island. The paper will explore these materials, and in the meantime, trace the few earlier European observations about the sailing conditions by or around the island, such as the records Lord’s Anson’s and De la Perous’s voyages. The Larpent event, in fact, has something to do with the overture of lighthouse building in and around Taiwan Straits in the second half of the 19th century. By studying the sailing facilities in the Taiwan area before the mid-nineteenth century, the paper will also trace back the pagodas and old-style lighthouses used by the Chinese to guide navigators in the 16-18th centuries.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5792">
                <text>Kuo-tung Chen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5793">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5794">
                <text>2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5795">
                <text>Kuo-tung Chen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5796">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="52">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="513" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="304">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/a4acebed64062ad76364cbf87b38279e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>98c692ab4592db6be67c9789b9c25c8d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5789">
                    <text>Living and Trading: A Dual Approach to Studying
Southeast Asian Port Cities
Charlotte Papillaud Looram
George Town World Heritage Incorporated
charlotte@gtwhi.com.my
Abstract
The historical ports of Southeast Asia were highly active regional
mercantile hubs located at the crossroads between the East Asian and
Indian Ocean trading networks. These strategically places attracted
merchants and sailors from the world over, some of whom stayed on a
permanent or semi-permanent basis to carry out their business. By their
very nature, Southeast Asian ports are thus both economic spaces
dedicated to maritime activities, and cosmopolitan spaces where people
from different social and cultural backgrounds came together. This duality
is expressed in the built environment, which contains specialised
structures to facilitate trade (such as wharves, warehouses, and
boatyards) but also communicates people’s identity. This paper proposes
studying historical port cities by combining a maritime cultural landscape
approach and urban social theory to understand the economic as well as
the socio-cultural fabric of Southeast Asian ports.
This approach will be applied to two very different port cities: Hội An in
Central Vietnam, and George Town in Malaysia. Whereas Hội An was an
informal temporary market place that grew to be one of the region’s
biggest entrepôt ports in the 18th century, George Town was founded as
a trading outpost for the British East India Company in 1786, before
becoming the seat of many mercantile firms and banks in the 19th century.
Key words: ports, economies, structures, socio-cultural

Introduction
Ports, by their nature, are highly economic spaces dedicated to maritime
activities. The ports of Southeast Asia, strategically located at the
crossroads between the East Asian and Indian Ocean trading networks

�(and by extension the East-West trading network), were chiefly stopovers
and entrepôts through which moved traders from all corners of the world.
Due to the monsoon trade, merchants would often stay in these ports for
months at a time waiting for the winds change, and created settlements
where the various traditions would intermingle, yet remained distinct (Li,
1998; Lockard, 2010; Reid, 1993). Southeast Asian port cities were thus
— in addition to being highly economic — also highly culturally and
socially diverse; in other words they were cosmopolitan. Craig Lockard
(2010) described them as “places of economic exchanges as well as
cosmopolitan gateways for the import and export of people, goods, and
ideas.” This paper proposes to apply a maritime cultural landscape
approach in conjunction with the environment-behaviour theory in order to
highlight this duality and understand the fabric of historic Southeast Asian
ports.
This paper will address two case studies to illustrate this dual approach:
Hội An in Vietnam, and George Town in Malaysia. Both are inscribed on
the UNESCO World Heritage List, Hội An in 1999 and George Town in
2008, under criterion (ii): “to exhibit an important interchange of human
values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on
developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, townplanning or landscape design” (UNESCO, 2016).1 Hội An is located on the
Thu Bon river in Quảng Nam province in central Vietnam. It was
established as a foreign port for the Nguyen Lords some time in the mid
to late sixteenth century, though the exact date and circumstances are
unknown (Dror and Taylor, 2006; Wheeler, 2006). Hội An was a
successful entrepôt until the eighteenth century when was eclipsed by Đà
Nẵng, a few kilometres north. During this time, the Japanese and the
Chinese were the two largest foreign trading groups in Hội An. George

�Town, Penang was established in 1786 by Sir Francis Light as an East
India Company free port and naval base (though the naval base did not
actually succeed) (Hussin, 2009). It was the first British port city in
Southeast Asia, and had attracted over ten thousand Malay, Chinese, and
Indian merchants within a decade (Hussin, 200; Lewis, 2016).
Theoretical Background
Both the maritime cultural landscape and environment-behaviour
concepts ultimately aim to understand tangible manifestations of culture,
the former from an archaeological perspective and the latter from an urban
studies perspective. Underlying these concepts are discussions regarding
the nature of culture. The urban theorist Amos Rapoport (1998)
summarizes

the

scholarship

on

culture

by

presenting

three

complementary views of culture: “one view defines it as a way of life typical
of a group; the second, as a system of meanings and schemata
transmitted through symbolic codes; the third, as a set of adaptive
strategies for survival related to ecology and resources.” He views culture
as too abstract for his purposes (understanding culture in the built
environment); it is unobservable and thus “essentially useless” in
environment-behaviour studies (Rapoport, 1998). It is instead the “effects,
expressions, or products” of culture, such as social variables, that are
visible and useful (Rapoport, 1998). He describes increasingly specific
expressions of culture in order to arrive at something actionable: lifestyles
and activity systems. A lifestyle is “the outcome of choices about how to
allocate resources,” in other words; it is composed of a series of activities,
and is influenced by norms, standards and expectations (Rapoport, 1998).
Christer Westerdahl arrived at a similar conclusion regarding maritime
culture specifically, as will be described below.

�Maritime archaeologists have long debated whether there is such a thing
as a distinct maritime culture — that is a culture specific to communities
living on or near the sea that is inherently and completely different to
inland culture. Many have concluded that the separation between land
and sea is not in fact absolute (Tuddenham, 2010; Westerdahl, 2007,
2011). Indeed, humans do not ever exclusively experience the sea
unconnected to land (Mushynsky, 2011; Tuddenham, 2010; Westerdahl,
2007, 2011). Christer Westerdahl (2007) explains that maritime culture is
“eminently a mixture, a creolization, of others. It is based on the
subsistence gained from the seas and the water, and consists of all the
thought patterns, cosmologies, customs, objects, phenomena and
patterns of action connected with a life by the sea.” Like Rapoport, his
view of culture is ultimately related to subsistence strategies, even
referring to the “life mode” concept, and conceptualizing the maritime life
mode as a series of subsidiary trades dictated in this case by living on the
coast or related to a primary maritime trade, not unlike Rapoport’s lifestyle
concept (Westerdahl, 1992, 2007). Some examples he presents are
fishing, hunting, and gathering (at sea or on land), as well as boat building,
shipping, ferrying, pilotage, and lighthouse attendance (Westerdahl,
2007). It is this recurring idea of culture as a “mixture” of activities that
guides this paper. In order to understand the cultural fabric of Southeast
Asian ports, a port should be seen as a sum of parts: a trading community,
a crossroad of sea routes, and a concentration of different traditions.
Ports are often described in the literature as transit points: the point of
change between land and sea, of changing modes of transportation, and
of exchanging goods and ideas (Lockard, 2010; Reid, 1993; Parker, 2001;
Westerdahl, 1992, 1999, 2006, 2011). They are also, in Westerdahl’s
(2006, 2011) words, “maritime enclaves:” semi-permanent or permanent

�settlements engaged in maritime activities. As he conceptualises maritime
culture as a concentration of maritime activities, these enclaves can be
considered the origin of maritime culture, as well as its centre
(Westerdahl, 2006, 2007). In them are thus found the “remains,” or
expressions, of maritime culture such as sailing marks, beacons, loading
places, anchorages, inns, and other cultural deposits (Westerdahl, 2006).
Likewise, Jan Bill and Birthe Clausen (1999) argue that maritime trade
directly impacts the physical development and appearance of towns,
giving them a distinct “maritime town topography.” These are towns that
developed around a port or harbour, and thus had to build specialised
structures such as wharves, jetties, warehouses, and boatyards in order
to participate in maritime trade.
This perspective on ports focuses on its economic fabric, not without
reason considering their role. It is predicated on Westerdahl’s (1992)
innovative maritime cultural landscape concept, which represents “human
utilisation (economy) of maritime space by boat: settlement, fishing,
hunting, shipping and its attendant sub-cultures.” The maritime cultural
landscape is thus a visualisation of people’s relationship to the sea, in
particular with regard to economic exploitation. Many of Westerdahl’s
definitions of the concept focus on seafaring, for example a later one in a
paper about roads and sea routes describes it as the “network of sea
routes, with harbours and related constructions and remains of human
origin, below as well as above the water” (Westerdahl, 2006). Maritime
enclaves are thus the nodes of this network, where maritime culture
comes about and a concentration of “constructions and remains” are
found. Much of Westerdahl’s discussions still focus on economy and
transport, because “their occupations […] to a large extent define their
culture” and “living in an ecological niche leads to an adaptation precisely

�to that niche” (Westerdahl, 2007). Indeed maritime, riverine, and
lacustrine environments tend to develop a culture of transport and
communication characterised by rapid transmission of information and
spatially extended networks (Westerdahl, 1999, 2006). Thus, taking a
maritime cultural landscape approach— as Westerdahl defines it —helps
highlight the adaptations specific to maritime environments and maritime
activities.
This approach however risks overemphasizing the economic role of trade
in the development of ports, to the detriment of social and cultural factors.
As has been reiterated throughout this paper, ports are very diverse
spaces by virtue of their need and ability to attract merchants from all over
the world. Along with goods to trade, these merchants bring with them
their culture: their beliefs, their values, their lifestyles, their tastes in food,
clothes, and architecture... The interaction of people from different social
and geographical backgrounds, all of whom are trying to maintain their
identity, is reflected in the built environment.
Adam Rogers (2013) argues for a more social approach to port and
harbour archaeology, as he believes that studies of ports have focused
too often on how changing technologies (including the characteristics of
ships) and commercial trends have impacted the design of harbours.
Paralleling Rapoport and Westerdahl, Rogers brings up the concept of
“taskscapes,” explaining that the environmental context of ports, the
waterfront, dictates the type of activities people engage in, which in turn
influences the shape of the port (Rogers, 2013). He however goes beyond
this idea by reminding scholars that “by their nature and function, the
connection [of ports] with places across water and overseas means that
they could often attract a large range of different peoples with varying
perspectives” (Rogers, 2013). He proposes drawing from the domestic

�architecture discourse as one way of highlighting the diversity of people
living in ports but points out that in a port setting, it might be difficult to
separate “domestic” and “business” (Rogers, 2013).

Environment-

behaviour theory does not necessitate such a distinction, which is why it
is well suited to the study of ports.
As stated above, Rapoport’s environment-behaviour theory posits that
certain aspects of culture, lifestyles and activity systems, are observable
in the built environment. He states that in order to understand culture fully
in built structures, it is the “latent aspect of activities,” meaning, which
must be considered (Rapoport, 1998). This meaning is connected to
values and social variables such kinship, gender, social roles, and status,
and is transmitted through symbolic codes; it is thus reflected in the choice
of things like colour, material, and spatial organisation (Rapoport, 1998).
Rapoport (1998) illustrates his point with the example of the kitchen: food
preparation varies greatly across cultures, it is also related to other
activities and meanings (for example rituals, familial ties, gender roles), all
of which affect the design of the kitchen and location within the house. In
short, buildings reflect the wants and needs of its users in their structure,
layout, and decorative elements. As lifestyles are expressed in the built
environment, maritime culture is expressed as “a recurrent set of maritime
traits and repetitive maritime behaviour,” which is visible in the
archaeological record (including the built environment) (Mushynsky,
2011). David Tuddenham (2010) puts forward the concept of “maritimity”
to help guide studies of maritime culture. This concept is based on the
idea that material culture is rarely either maritime or terrestrial, rather
somewhere on a scale between the two. In order words, determining
maritimity asks “how maritime is this?” It is however “to be understood as
a category of understanding, not something with empirical qualities,” the

�same way that thinking of life modes, activities, and social variables helps
understand (maritime) culture (Rapoport, 1998; Tuddenham, 2010;
Westerdahl, 2007).
The maritime cultural landscape approach in conjunction with the
environment-behaviour theory provides a conceptual structure with which
to understand the fabric of Southeast Asian port cities, and in particular
how maritime trade influenced their development. It is clear that the
economic and technological aspects of trade highly dictate the use of
space. Their reason for being and their continuing success hinges on the
efficiency with which merchants can participate in regional and/or global
trade. On the other hand, it is important to continuously remember that
around the ports grew towns built by foreign people. In order to
understand a Southeast Asian port, one must consider how the Chinese,
or European, or Indian trader experienced the setting and how (or if) they
maintained their identity.
The Development of Hội An
The practical application of the above approach can take many forms by
focusing on different aspects and characteristics of the port in question.
For example, one could look at community-specific trade practices, the
way they were adapted to function in a foreign port, and the way they may
have been expressed in specialized structures. Another avenue of enquiry
would be to compare the inns and hostels of different communities within
a same port. Westerdahl sees inns as a major feature of the maritime
cultural landscape, acting as relay stations and safe havens in an
emergency (Westerdahl, 2006, 2007). The Chinese, Japanese, British,
and Indian people of Hội An and George Town had similar institutions that
served as accommodation and aid for visiting members of their
communities. Though a cross-cultural study would more fully address the

�question of cosmopolitanism, this paper will focus on a single foreign
merchant community. It will analyse the public buildings and residences
of the Chinese merchant communities in Hội An and George Town in
order to understand the impact of trade on its lifestyle.
The overseas Chinese community represents a large group of migrants in
Southeast Asia, who have played important roles in the history of the
region since the third century before the Christian Era (Mackie, 1996;
Wu, 2010). It is composed chiefly of groups from the southern provinces
of China, especially Fujian and Guangdong. Due to the mountainous
geomorphology of their home, the inhabitants of this region did not
establish very strong ties with Central China, instead turning to the sea
and developing mercantile and fishing activities, and later being highly
involved in regional and global trade. In addition, population pressures
such as poverty, war, and disease, resulted in migration towards
Southeast Asia, in particular after the Qing conquest of the Ming in 1644
and in the second half of the nineteenth century as a result of the two
Opium Wars (1840–1842, 1858–1860) and the Taiping Rebellion (1851–
1864) (Wu, 2010).
The Chinese communities living in Hội An and George Town immigrated
at different times and for different reasons. The first Chinese to arrive in
Hội An after its establishment were highly involved in maritime commerce,
either as traders themselves or running businesses to support trade
(Chen, 2002). This was a relatively small group, outnumbered by the
Japanese until the mid-seventeenth century. The Togukawa policies of
the 1630s prevented Japanese nationals from leaving Japan, leaving a
vacuum in Hội An which was quickly filled by the Chinese (Wheeler,
2001). Furthermore, a substantial number of Ming loyalists sought refuge
in Hội An in 1644; they were given a special status, Minh Hương, which

�allowed them the right to own land, marry local women, and hold office
(Chen, 2002). The height of Hội An’s success, the eighteenth century,
coincided with what Anthony Reid (1993) and Carl Trocki (1997) refer to
as the “Chinese century” when the Qing rescinded the Ming trading bans
and breathed new life into the junk trade. Contemporary visitors to Hội An
often describe the town as a Chinese town, and comment on the affluence
of their neighbourhood (Chen, 2002; Morel, 2010; Wheeler, 2001). The
exact number of Chinese living in the Nguyen port is unclear: Thomas
Bowyear counts around 100 Chinese households in 1696; an anonymous
source counts 6,000 Chinese in 1744, while another estimates 10,000
“married and tax-paying Chinese” in 1750 (Chen, 2002; Dalrymple, 1791–
1797).
The bulk of Chinese immigration in Penang takes place over a century
later, during the decline of the junk trade and the integration of Chinese
merchants into the global capitalist system (Wu, 2010). The majority of
Penang’s early Chinese migrants in fact were not from China but from the
Malay Peninsula, mostly from Kedah (Hussin, 2009). Only the wealthiest
Chinese participated in trade, as owners of shops, shop houses, and ships
or members of mercantile companies; while the majority worked for wages
as skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled labour (Hussin, 2009). Along with
the Indian community (Chulias), the Chinese community formed the bulk
of George Town’s population; the number of Chinese grew steadily in the
first decades of the nineteenth century, overtaking the number of Indians
in 1828 (Hussin, 2009). Both communities dominated the commercial
centre bounded by Light Street, Beach Street, Chulia Street, and Pitt
Street (Hussin, 2009).
Despite these inceptive differences, there are many similarities in the
Chinese settlements in Hội An and George Town, particularly with regard

�to economic and cultural institutions. The first thing to note is that the
“Chinese community” in both these ports was in fact several communities,
dictated by clan or hometown, each with distinct traditions and languages
(Hussin, 2009). Often, they would create associations, guilds, or societies
according to dialect or family name, which provided a sense of comfort
and belonging to its members. This institution has purely economic origins
in fifteenth century trade guilds that helped regulate business abroad
(Moll-Murata, 2008; Naquin and Rawski, 1987; Purcell, 1965; Wu, 2010).
The associations in Southeast Asia, named kongsi, provided lodging and
a meeting space for visiting merchants, and offered assistance to new
settlers, but also served as a storage facility and as the custom house
(Naquin and Rawski, 1987). Oftentimes, they would take on the role of a
municipal government for the local overseas Chinese population,
providing fire-fighting, policing, and schooling services, as well as
maintaining public infrastructure (Moll-Murata, 2008; Naquin and Rawski,
1987; Wu, 2010). At the end of the 19th century, the kongsis lost their
economic and regulatory roles, instead becoming hui guan: commonorigin associations and public assembly places that promote history and
traditional knowledge (Moll-Murata, 2008; Wu, 2010). The institution is
made concrete in the form of assembly halls and clan houses that are
considered symbols of their community, reflecting unity, loyalty, and
prosperity.
In Hội An there are five Assembly Halls: four common-origin guilds
(Fujian, Guangdong, Teochew, and Hainan) and the Trung Hoa guild that
brings together all the Chinese communities; the latter was originally
established as the Dương Thương guild, the guild for Maritime Commerce
(Chen, 2002). It is notable that an association intended as a professional
guild for the main economic activity of Hội An later came to be a pan-

�Chinese cultural space. In addition to accommodating travelling
merchants and drafting an ethical code of conduct in trade, Dương
Thương hall contained a shrine to the Goddess of Mercy2, the patron of
fishermen and sailors, and the first deity for whom overseas Chinese
would erect a shrine after sailing away from home to settle in a new place
(Chen, 2002; Purcell, 1965). Today’s Trung Hoa Assembly Hall still
maintains the shrine, which now also contains a model of a Chinese junk.
There are some 170 Chinese associations in George Town relating to clan
or dialect; some are headquartered in shop houses, such as the Ch’ng Si
Soo Bee Tong (now Persatuan Zhuang &amp; Yan Pulau Pinang), though most
are housed in grand hall such as Lim Kongsi. The Lim clan had been
trading in Penang since 1821 and established their clan house in 1863 on
Beach Street, the busiest commercial street of George Town, located on
the waterfront until the reclamation projects in the 1870s and 1880s
(George Town World Heritage Incorporated, n.d.; Langdon, 2015). Like
the Dương Thương in Hội An, Lim Kongsi pays tribute to the goddess of
seafarers. She is a recurrent figure around George Town, including at
Kuan Im Teng temple, the oldest Chinese temple in Penang built in the
eighteenth

century.

The associations and halls are a public expression of the Chinese
merchant identity. In the above examples, the sea plays a clear role in the
way the community both views itself and connects with each other. As a
community of seafarers, the sea represents to the Chinese merchant
group a connection and a divide from home, yet it is also their livelihood.
The central role of maritime trade is further illustrated in Hội An and
George Town’s predominant style of housing: the shophouse. As its name
suggests, the shophouse is both a commercial and residential space. The
shop is located at the front of the building, opening on the street, and is

�generally larger than the residential part, which is located in the back or
on the top floor. In Hội An, the shop houses are built as near as possible
to the water to facilitate loading and unloading from ships. Though the
basic layout remains the same, the materials and ornamentations varied
slightly from Hội An to George Town. The Hội An shop houses were
mostly built from an incredibly strong local wood called tin (ironwood); the
early George Town houses had attap roofs, while the later houses were
built of burnt clay bricks (Dror and Taylor, 2006; Hussin, 2009). The
houses in Hội An were also built with flooding in mind, as the river was
known to overflow during the monsoon; they had removable boards and
pulley systems to protect goods (Dror and Taylor, 2006; Morel, 2010). The
façade of shop houses in George Town very distinctly reflected the
ethnicity of its owner through ornamentation: “carved wood panels and
fascia boards of the indigenous and Indo-Malay, elaborate and
superstitious images of the Chinese, the arches of Mogul India, the neoclassical elements of British architecture of the Georgian and Regency
periods and the modernism of art deco and modern architecture” (World
Heritage Site Special Area Plan SAP §A4.11.8).
Conclusion
This analysis of Chinese public and private buildings in Hội An and
George Town has helped understand one aspect of the fabric of
Southeast Asian ports. The overseas Chinese merchant community was
a significant presence throughout the region and thus highly impacted
both its economy and society. However, this study has also shown that
their seaward migration and activities in trading has impacted their lifestyle
and culture. The built environment reflects the dual relationship of this
group with the sea: there is a preoccupation with efficiently utilizing it for

�trading and an understanding of it as something that both separates and
connects them to the homeland.
The theoretical approach outlined in the first section of this paper
considers the port both as part of the maritime cultural landscape and as
a maritime cultural landscape in and of itself in order to visualise how the
economic and technological aspects of maritime trade impact its form and
development. It also proposes focusing on the built environment in order
to draw out the characteristics of a cosmopolitan port culture, based on
the idea that trade forces cosmopolitanism, that is the coexistence of
various cultural groups in one space. The reverse relationship has not yet
been investigated. With the same approach, it may be possible to
visualise how cosmopolitanism impacts trade (the same way it impacted
architecture as seen in the evolution of shop houses in George Town),
where

the

specialised

trade

structures

(wharves,

warehouses,

customs…) would reflect adaptations to new environments and new
people.
Endnotes
1
Hội An also fits criterion (v): to be an outstanding example of a traditional
human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a
culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment especially
when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change.”
George Town also fits criterion (iii): to bear a unique or at least exception
testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilisation which is living or which
has disappeared;” and criterion (iv): to be an outstanding example of a
type of building, architectural or technological ensembles, or landscape
which illustrates (a) significant stage(s) in human history.”
2
Known in different contexts as Mazu/Matsu, Tianhou, (Thiên Hậu in
Vietnamese), or Guanyi (Kuan Im in Penang)
References
Bill, J., and Clausen, B. L., 1999. Maritime Topography and the Medieval
Town: Papers from the 5th International Conference on Waterfront

�Archaeology in Copenhagen, 14–16 May 1998. The National Museum,
Copenhagen.
Chen, C. H., 2002. Historical Notes on Hội An (Faifo). In John E. Wills Jr.
(Ed.), Eclipsed Entrepôts of the Western Pacific: Taiwan and Central
Vietnam, 1500–1800, The Pacific World Series, Vol. 5. Ashgate
Publishing, Hampshire: 285–361.
Dalrymple, A., 1791–1797. 1791–1797 Oriental Reperatory. 2 vols.
London.
Dror, O., and Taylor, K., 2006. Views of Seventeenth-Century Vietnam:
Christoforo Borri on Cochinchina &amp; Samuel Baron on Tonkin. Southeast
Asia Program Publications. Cornell University, Ithaca.
George Town World Heritage Incorporated, n.d. A Guide to Selected
Chinese Clan Houses in the George Town World Heritage Site. George
Town World Heritage Incorporated, George Town.
Hussin, N., 2009. Trade and Society in the Straits of Melaka. Dutch
Melaka and English Penang, 1780-1830. NIAS Press, Copenhagen.
Langdon, M., 2015. A Guide to George Town’s Historic Commercial and
Civic Precincts. George Town World Heritage Incorporated, George
Town.
Lewis, S. L., 2016. Cities in Motion Urban Life and Cosmopolitanism in
Southeast Asia, 1920–1940. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Li, T., 1998. Nguyễn Cochinchina: Southern Vietnam in the seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries. Studies on Southeast Asia no. 23. Southeast
Asia Program Publications, Ithaca, N.Y.
Lockard, C. A., 2010. “The Sea Common to All”: Maritime frontiers, port
cities, and Chinese traders in the Southeast Asian Age of Commerce, ca.
1400–1750. Journal of World History, Vol. 21 (2): 219–219.
Mackie, J. A. A., 1996. Introduction. In Anthony Reid (Ed.), Sojourners
and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese, University of
Hawai’I Press: Honolulu:xii–xxx.

�Moll-Murata, C., 2008. Chinese Guilds from the Seventeenth to the
Twentieth Centuries: An Overview. International Review of Social History,
Vol. 53 (S16): 213–247.
Morel, J. P., 2010. Pierre Poivre en Cochinchine. Electronic document,
http://www.pierre-poivre.fr/Poivre-en-Cochinchine.pdf, accessed June 22
2016.
Mushynsky, J., 2011. Sea Fluidity: Recording Indigenous Seascapes and
Maritime Cultural Landscapes in Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Department of
Archaeology, Flinders University, Adelaide.
Naquin, S., and Rawski, E. S., 1987. Chinese Society in the Eighteenth
Century. Yale University, New Haven.
Parker, A.J., 2001. Maritime landscapes. Landscapes, Vol. 2 (1): 22–41.
Purcell, V., 1965. The Chinese in Southeast Asia. Oxford University
Press, London.
Rapoport, A., 1998. Using ‘culture’ in housing design. Housing and
Society, Vol. 25 (1–2): 1–20.
Reid, A., 1993. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680,
Volume Two: Expansion and crisis. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Rogers, A., 2013. Social archaeological approaches in port and harbour
studies. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 8 (2): 181–196.
Trocki, C. A., 1997. Chinese Pioneering in Eighteenth-Century Southeast
Asia. In Anthony Reid (Ed.), The Last Stand of Asian Autonomies:
Responses to Modernity in the Diverse States of Southeast Asia and
Korea, 1750–1900, Macmillan Press Ltd, London: 80–101.
Tuddenham, D. B., 2010. Maritime Cultural Landscapes, Maritimity and
Quasi Objects. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, Vol. 5: 5–16.
UNESCO 2016 Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the
World Heritage Convention. UNESCO, Paris.

�Westerdahl, C., 1992. The maritime cultural landscape. The International
Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 21 (1): 5–14.
Westerdahl, C., 1999. Inland water boats and shipping in Sweden the
Great Lakes: The application of a theory on transport zones and maritime
enclaves. Archaeonautica, Vol. 14: 135–143.
Westerdahl, C., 2006. The relationship between land roads and sea
routes in the past – Some reflections. Deutsches Schiffarhrtsarchiv, Vol.
29: 59–114.
Westerdahl, C., 2007. Fish and Ships. Towards a theory of maritime
culture. Deutsches Schiffarhrtsarchiv, Vol. 30: 191–236.
Westerdahl, C., 2011. The maritime cultural landscape. In Alex
Castambis, Ben Ford, Donny L. Hamilton (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of
Maritime Archaeology, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 733–762.
Wheeler, C., 2001. Cross-Cultural Trade and Trans-Regional Networks in
the Port of Hội An: Maritime Vietnam in the Early Modern Era.
Unpublished PhD dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School, Yale
University, New Haven.
Wheeler, C., 2006. One Region, Two Histories: Cham Precedents in the
History of the Hội An Region. In Nhung Tuyet Tran and Anthony Reid
(Eds.) Vietnam Borderless Histories, The University of Wisconsin Press,
Madison: 163–193.
World Heritage Site Special Area Plan SAP §A4.11.8
Wu, X. A., 2010. Chinese Business in the Making of a Malay State, 1882–
1941 Kedah Penang. NUS Press, Singapore.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="106">
                  <text>2017 Session 9: Maritime/Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107">
                  <text>Southeast Asia (SEA) has been rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) over a long period, from ancient pre-history, through the age of commerce, into the World War II era. Recently, UCH research, survey, and mapping activities; preservation and management efforts; as well as human capacity building programs show the promising progress in SEA countries. However, various threats to UCH preservation and some shortcomings still can be found in many SEA countries, for instance, lack of funds, inadequate technology, limited human resources, and also lack of public and government attention to UCH legal protection and its long-term preservation.    &#13;
&#13;
This session will highlight some topics, including current status of UCH preservation; current research or investigation on maritime heritage or UCH in SEA countries; maritime history in SEA; current legislations; recent human and natural threats to UCH in SEA countries; raising awareness and public education programs; in-situ preservation of UCH; sustainable shipwreck tourism development and balancing preservation efforts with economic benefit; community and general public engagement in UCH management plan; regional capacity building in Southeast Asia; as well as collaboration opportunities among stakeholders and SEA countries in researching, protecting, preserving, and managing UCH sites.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="108">
                  <text>Jenny Craig, Mc Gill University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5783">
                <text>Living and Trading: A Dual Approach to Studying Southeast Asian Port Cities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5784">
                <text>The historical ports of Southeast Asia were highly active regional mercantile hubs located at the crossroads between the East Asian and Indian Ocean trading networks. These strategically places attracted merchants and sailors from the world over, some of whom stayed on a permanent or semi-permanent basis to carry out their business. By their very nature, Southeast Asian ports are thus both economic spaces dedicated to maritime activities, and cosmopolitan spaces where people from different social and cultural backgrounds came together. This duality is expressed in the built environment, which contains specialised structures to facilitate trade (such as wharves, warehouses, and boatyards) but also communicates people’s identity. This paper proposes studying historical port cities by combining a maritime cultural landscape approach and urban social theory to understand the economic as well as the socio-cultural fabric of Southeast Asian ports.&#13;
&#13;
This approach will be applied to two very different port cities: Hội An in Central Vietnam, and George Town in Malaysia. Whereas Hội An was an informal temporary market place that grew to be one of the region’s biggest entrepôt ports in the 18th century, George Town was founded as a trading outpost for the British East India Company in 1786, before becoming the seat of many mercantile firms and banks in the 19th century.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5785">
                <text>Charlotte Papillaud Looram</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5786">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5787">
                <text>2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5788">
                <text>Charlotte Papillaud Looram</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="52">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="512" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="303">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c7b4e985d10b43309880ebd1ff8539ff.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c815c45ad5c9ab379eabfe0e9b86013d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5782">
                    <text>China’s First Purpose Designed and Built Lighthouse:
Findings from the Analysis of a Long Lost but Recently
Rediscovered Photograph of the Xiyu Pagoda Light
(李西山塔晚燈, Lixishanta Wangdeng)
Stephen Davies
University of Hong Kong
Email. stephen.davies79@gmail.com
Abstract
Although it has long been known that a purposely designed and built
‘pagoda’ lighthouse existed on the Penghu Islands’ Xiyu (Fisher’s) Island
as of 1778, exactly what it looked like, how large it was and where it was
placed vis-à-vis the 1875 Chinese Imperial Maritime Customs light that
still exists has never been known. Existing Chinese data, from a
contemporary stele the text of which was written by or for the then Taiwan
Prefect, Jiang Yunshu, uses self-consistent traditional units of measure
suggesting the seven level pagoda was of the order of 18m or more high.
Other contemporary Chinese data speak of a powerful light that,
rhetorically at least, could be seen from Taiwan in one direction and
Xiamen in the other! Western reports, which we have from 1797 and more
systematically as of Captain Richard Collinson’s survey of 1844, propose
a tower only some 10m high and a very occasional light visible at best
only one mile distant. There has been no way of reconciling these very
different reports until the recent discovery in a major British archive of a
photograph of the 1778 pagoda - as rebuilt after typhoon damage in 1823
- that can be dated to c.1875. In this paper this photograph will be
presented and discussed and an attempt made, thanks to modern three
dimensional modelling, to give accurate dimensions. Additional
discussion will focus on features of the pagoda lighthouse revealed in the
photograph that connect with hitherto ill-understood remains both in the
present day lighthouse compound and in the Buddhist temple in the
nearby village of Wai’an.

Keywords: Fisher Island, Collinson, Revit, zhang, chi, Jiang Yuanshu,
temple, Heavenly General

�Introduction
The author is part of a City University of Hong Kong lighthouse heritage
project sponsored by the Office of the Provost and led by Prof. Steve
Ching. The project aims to make Hong Kong, Taiwan and China’s
lighthouse heritage more widely known and appreciated through wellmade videos focussed on specific heritage lighthouses.
In support of the film-making the lighthouses are extensively researched,
which is the author’s main role in the team. Other than the obvious aim to
ensure that the videos are factually correct, the project aim is to highlight
the international, cross-cultural character of heritage lighthouses and the
strong historical links between China’s coast and the wider world, as well
as to provide or supplement data for use by historians and archaeologists
working on regional lighthouse heritage. One of the team’s recent foci has
been the heritage lighthouses of Taiwan’s Penghu Islands (澎湖群島), in
particular what is today called Yuwengdao Lighthouse on Yuweng Dao (
漁翁島 (Fisher Island)) in Xiyu County (西嶼鄉)).
The Puzzle
The location of the old Pagoda Lighthouse1 is now occupied by Penghu
and Taiwan’s oldest modern lighthouse, the Yuwengdao Lighthouse. The
latter was built in 1875, following a site survey in 1874, as part of the
second lighthouse programme of the CIMCS Marine Department.2
However, it had been preceded by an earlier, entirely Chinese designed,
funded, and built structure dating from a century earlier.
Data recounting the erection of the 1778 lighthouse and an affiliated Mazu
Temple can be found on two granite stelae, now so weathered as to be
all but illegible, in the forecourt of the Wenchang Wang Temple (西嶼鄉外

640

�垵村溫王宮) in the village of Wai’an (外垵), 1.4 kilometres west-north-west
of the old lighthouse site, and two copies in the present lighthouse
compound. The structures were built with money raised by the Taiwan
Prefect, Jiang Yuanshu (蔣元樞), and the local Penghu magistrate, Xie
Weiqi (謝維祺), largely from Taiwan and Xiamen based shipping interests.
Styled the Xiyu Pagoda Courtyard, the construction began in 1777 and
completed in 1778 on the site of a collapsed 17th century pagoda or,
possibly, fort. In 1823, a typhoon severely damaged the structure. It was
rebuilt and renamed the Xiyu Pagoda Temple and was back in
commission in 1828.
The pagoda was of seven storeys and five zhang (丈) high, built of granite
and was in some sense Buddhist.3 The stele text also gives the
measurement of the sides of the base of the tower as five zhang. Although
the translation is uncertain, it further states that each storey was served
by a staircase that rose seven chi (尺), which may be another way of
saying each floor was 7 chi high. That would be consistent with the height
of five zhang allowing for a roof finial.4
Five zhang is not a determinate measurement. The zhang was divided
into 10 chi but the relevant modern value of the chi in SI units is uncertain.
The original value is thought to have been 9.5” (0.24m) to 9.8” (0.25m).
As Louise Levathes notes however, by the Ming dynasty and probably for
centuries before as in contemporary Europe, values for the chi varied
between regions and between trades. Within shipbuilding alone one
provincial range was from 10.53” (0.27m) to 13.338” (0.34m), and across
China could be as small as 9.5” (0.24m)..5 G.R.G. Worcester noted that in
his days (1930s-40s) the value of the chi varied from 8.6” (0.22m) to 27.8”
(0.71m) and that the China Commercial Guide of the day gave over 100

641

�different values for the unit.6 The bounds of those values place the height
of the Xiyu Pagoda Light as lying between 11m and 35.5m.
There are also descriptions in western sources. The earliest was on 1st
July, 1797 by the Briton, William Broughton, passing two or three miles to
westward, who noted,7 “an Obelisk of Stones rais’d I shou’d imagine for
the advantage of the Junks who trade to these Islands.” The next came
from Captain Richard Collinson’s surveying exercise along the coasts of
China in HMS Plover from 1843 until 1846.8

The resulting sailing

directions (a sort of sailor’s guidebook), the “Sailing Directions for the
Panghu or Pescadore Archipelago, with notices of the islands”, recorded,
“On (Fisher’s Island) SW. extreme is a Light-house 225 feet above the
sea.”
A little over a decade later, a further British survey in 1858 by Captain
GAC Brooker in the steam paddle sloop HMS Inflexible supplemented the
earlier description. The third edition of The China Pilot in 1861, collated
by John W. King, gave Captain Brooker’s update, which agreed with
Collinson’s height above the sea, identified the date of construction, but
declared the pagoda to be only 30’ (9.14m) high..9 It is evident that the
differences between the given western height and the estimate from
Chinese values (11m-35m) are hard to reconcile.
In addition to the uncertain measurements and verbal descriptions, two
images of the old pagoda lighthouse survived. Jiang Yuanshu
commissioned some paintings of his time in Taiwan that are now in the
National Palace Museum, Taipei. One of them is of the Penghu Islands
and shows a distinctly geographically separated pagoda and temple. The
temple, shown in some respects where today Wai’an lies, is labelled Tiãn
Hòu gōng (天后宮, Tian Hou temple). The pagoda, shown quite
conventionally as of a traditional form with seven storeys including the
642

�base, is labelled Juān jiàn xī yǔ fútú (捐建西嶼浮屠, roughly “Buddhist
pagoda/stupa established on Xiyu (Island) by donation”).
The second small and schematic image is on Captain Collinson’s
manuscript chart.10 The structure shown had a wide base and a low
building with a short tower on its seaward side. A doorway faced the
viewer and a lantern chamber with a traditional curved-eaves roof topped
the whole. Neither image is helpful in resolving either measurement issues
or the actual appearance of the pagoda light.
Physical Remains
At the lighthouse site there is thought to be the following possible remains.
To the north of the present lighthouse compound there is a debris field of
bricks and brick fragments that may be associated with the earlier
structure. No archaeological work seems to have been done on this, so
the exact status of the remains is uncertain. Within the lighthouse
compound there are two walls, of unknown age, not aligned with the
present structure that folk memory associates with the earlier structure.
There is also a raised, almost square c.15m x c.15m area similarly
associated in folk memory with the earlier structure but aligned with the
present compound on approximately 0180T south to north and 2900T east
to west axes, not the 0000/1800 and 0900/2700 of the old walls. In neither
of these cases has systematic research been done. Folk memory also
associates some of the cut granite stones used in the present compound
with relics from the older structure.
In addition, local Wai’an folk memory believes the smaller of two images
of Mazu in a side altar in the Wenchang Wang Temple may have come
from the temple built near the Pagoda Lighthouse. In a side recess in the

643

�Wenchang Wang Temple there is also a board with large, carved
characters, believed to be from above the altar in the small Mazu temple.
Separately, in the Wai’an, Buddhist, Cí Hángsì (慈航寺) Temple there are
twelve, carved, bas-relief stone tablets around the main altar that are also
associated with the old lighthouse buildings.11
Finally, in the modern lighthouse enclosure is a solid, granite, jar-shaped
object, around 0.80m tall and 0.4m in maximum diameter with three holes
drilled into its top surface. Local folk memory describes this somewhat
loosely as ‘the old light’, though exactly what is intended by the description
is not certain. The three holes in the top may have been locators to hold
something in position on the top surface of the stone.
It follows that no data, or no fully reliable data existed as to what the old
pagoda lighthouse looked like, what its dimensions were, where exactly it
stood, and how it related to the affiliated Mazu Temple. My main research
thrust was to find a reliable image, if one existed, so that we could use it
to resolve some of these puzzles and in the video.
Discovery
After a frustrating initial period that looked like the search could take years
and may have gone nowhere, blind good luck during an Internet search
found a photograph titled “Lighthouse on Fisher Island (Pescadores)”,
dated to c.1900, in the collection of London’s Royal Geographical Society.
The luckily spotted screen grab image was good enough to identify a
catalogue number that, on enquiry, Ms Joy Wheeler of the RGS confirmed
to be what I sought.
An inspection of a high-resolution, digital copy provided by the RGS
allowed a ballpark date of 1874/75. We know that a Chinese Maritime
Customs survey of the site took place in 1874, that the first notice of an
644

�intended new light was published shortly after construction began on 11
July,12 and that it was first lit on 20th December 1875.13 The light tower
itself has a label above the entry reading “David Marr Henderson 1874.”
Indicative of the advent of the new authority and its assumption of control
over the old lighthouse, in the left middle ground of the picture there is a
small, upright stone block reading閩海關 (Mǐn hǎiguān – Fujian Maritime
Customs (authority)).
Fieldwork done in Penghu in October 2016 meant immediate identification
of one significant element in the photograph. In the left background of the
image, just below the horizon line, there is a conspicuous row of pale
objects. When shown in detail, it shows sixteen wedge-shaped blocks of
grey stone. These are identical in conformity and number to the stones
comprising the foundation of today’s lighthouse tower. Close to the blocks
are at least six long wooden poles of the sort that are typically used as the
main uprights in Chinese bamboo construction scaffolding. In addition, on
the top of the plinth there appears to be some heavy cable and possibly
chain flaked down, along with what may be a heavy sheave. There is also
a tall bin in the shape of a truncated cone close to the entrance door from
the plinth into the pagoda. It is possible to read these as preparations for
the demolition of the older structure.
In short, the first elements necessary for the construction of the new
lighthouse and demolition of the old are in place in the photograph. That
would be consistent with a generous date bracket between at the earliest
the very end of 1874 and the latest late spring/early summer 1875. The
image shows an uncharacteristically stepped, octagonal pagoda fronted
by a low, three component building. The latter consists of two projecting,
single storey wings joined by a gateway topped by an illegible signboard
at the right hand end and by a slightly taller, single-storey building across

645

�their ends nearest the pagoda. A small courtyard lies between the
gateway and the transverse building. Between the transverse building and
the pagoda would appear to have been a second courtyard formed by the
back of the transverse building and two enclosing walls joining the ends
of the transverse building to the corners of the pagoda base.
The pagoda was built of ashlar blocks described in the stele as granite.
The laying pattern cannot be distinguished, save that it is in parallel
courses of long blocks irregularly interspersed with shorter stones that
may be bond- or through stones. The small temple would appear by
contrast to have been built using a random rubble construction technique
with ashlar quoins.
The pagoda is a low, stepped structure consisting of six octagonal storeys
stood on a massive square plinth and topped by a classic, curved eave
Chinese roof, itself topped by a Buddhist, ‘precious water jar’ shaped
finial. This is identical in shape to ‘the old light’ that now stands in the
present lighthouse compound. The seven levels are not equal, the values
being broadly what we treat as a ‘whole height’ base or 1st and 4th, 5th, 6th
and 7th levels, with the 2nd and 3rd levels each of half height. However, as
with all vernacular, artisanal architecture, the ‘whole height’ measure,
taking this to be the height of the plinth (=1), varies irregularly between
0.66 and 1.03.14
Much the most important element in the photograph is the six visible inset
tablets with bas-relief images carved on them. These are on storeys four,
five and six. The images on each level are on alternate faces. However
the images on storey five are on the four faces left blank on storeys four
and six. The visible images imply a further six on the faces of the pagoda
out of shot for a total of twelve. Insofar as the resolution allows us to
decide the matter, the visible images tally with some of the twelve images
646

�in the Cí Hángsì temple in Wai’an, believed to have come from the old
pagoda. The images would appear to be variants on what Chinese (and
Japanese) Buddhism call the Twelve Heavenly Generals (十二神將,
Shí'èr Shén Jiāng). In our estimation, the two sets of twelve are the same
and more research is at present concerned with these images.
There is no certainty about the orientation of the pagoda and temple.
However, the shadows beneath the shutters projecting from the two wings
of the small temple suggest a sun high in the sky within an hour or so of
local midday. The initial hypothesis was that the pagoda and temple
complex were orientated North/South, with the pagoda to the north.15 This
idea is supported by the entrance to the tower being on the south, and the
two evident doors from the lantern chamber to the upper parapet walkway
(which can be identified because some of its stonework has visibly
collapsed), opening east and west. All the access points make sense
because in Penghu the prevailing, very strong winds of winter are NE to
N and in the summer, though far less strong, from S to SSE. The
entrances thus offer sheltered access from the prevailing winds.
Evaluation
Dimensions
The main puzzle was the uncertain dimensions of the pagoda and temple,
much confused by the very different values given by the traditional
Chinese units of measure and the height of the pagoda from British
sources.
To help decide this and more closely date the photograph, Steve Ching
organized the help of Anthony Leung Ka Ho, an architecture student at
the City University of Hong Kong, who is an adept with Autodesk Revit
Architecture software.16 With the photograph as a backdrop template,

647

�Leung drew a 3D CAD drawing, which he artistically rendered to replicate
tones and textures of the original albumen image. This was then a fully
manipulating computerized 3D model, the only missing aspects of which
were the interior of the buildings, on which we remain entirely ignorant. All
we can conjecture at present is that a closer investigation of the brick
debris area just north of the present compound may give evidence of the
tower interior to have been of brick.
The software also allowed analysis of the model to establish probable
parameters for dimensions. This was done by scaling off such things as
the height of any people and any known dimensions of objects in the
original photograph. To this end the most important features of the
photograph were two.
The first was the two human figures. One stands on the plinth leaning
against the wall of the pagoda’s second level with his elbow resting on its
top. The second is standing in a doorway leading out from the small
courtyard between the Mazu temple and the pagoda. Both figures are
dressed in western clothing, though it is not possible to be sure if both are
in fact westerners. In the present context, their importance lies in helping
to narrow down feasible answers to the issue of the height of the pagoda.
The broad height bracket that covers averages of the era is for Chinese
people around 1.63m, Europeans around 1.67m and North Americans
around 1.73cm.17 The normal variance in the mid-1870s for the average
heights in question is ±7cm, so with one Chinese and one Western
person, working numbers were taken to be 1.55-1.65m and 1.75-1.85m.
Similarly, it was supposed that doorway heights in the visible doors were
c.2m. Scaling the drawing using these values led Mr Leung to use a plinth
height of 3.1m, which gave a pagoda height of 16m.

648

�This estimated value vindicated and gave a more precise value to the
traditional Chinese measure and led us to discard the Captain Brooker’s
claimed 30’ (9.14m), but left us uncertain how to evaluate the given height
of the lantern of 225’ (68.6m) agreed by both Collinson and Brooker, which
will have been measured by vertical sextant angle and will have been
accurate to within quite close tolerances.
Today’s height above sea level to the focal plane of the light is given as
199’ (61m); the height above ground of the focal plane is listed as 36’
(11m).18 It follows that ground level is 163’ (50m) and within reasonable
error margins this is confirmed by Google Earth, with its terrain layer set
‘on’, on which the average of eleven readings inside the lighthouse
compound around the light itself is 48.4m.19 On that measurement the
pagoda would have been between (68.6m – 48.4m) = 20.2m and (68.6m
– 50m) = 18.6m. The estimated spread for the pagoda’s height is therefore
16m to 20.2m giving a chi of 0.32m to 0.404m.
One route to tighter measurement is via the bas-relief carvings on the
pagoda’s faces and now in the Cí Hángsì temple in Wai’an. Whilst we
cannot be certain that the tablets are exactly as they were when in situ,
given that they are granite it seems unlikely they will have emerged
significantly reduced in size. Although the twelve tablets are not all of the
same dimensions, they are all the same height to within c.10mm, which is
c.500mm. Using these as a gauge suggests a pagoda height of c.15.5m.
The final benefit of the software was that, once we were sufficiently
satisfied that the CAD model we had derived was close enough to what
we thought the photograph showed, it enabled us to 3D print a plastic
scale model, the evaluation of which has allowed us further to refine the
3D CAD drawing.

649

�Orientation
An additional bonus was that with the use of the software’s built in sun
and shadow creation tools and some initial ideas, based on crude onscreen analysis of the photograph and data on annual and diurnal solar
movements (altitude/elevation, azimuth and declination) derived from a
nautical almanac, the shadow patterns observed in the original
photograph could be replicated on the CAD model. The key shadows were
those cast by the shutters on the temple annexes’ windows, by the
overhang of the eaves above the windows, and by the intensity of the
shade on the left side of the ensemble of structures.
Once the shadows were matched, the software settings gave the time of
year in which the photograph was taken to within extremely tight
parameters. The precision of the result is probably illusory but the
software suggests the photograph was taken at c.1105 a.m. on 17th May,
1875. A safe conclusion would be that the image was taken in mid-May
1875.
The software also supported the hypothesis that the pagoda and temple
complex was orientated facing south. This was derived from the azimuth
(compass bearing) of the sun when the shadows on 3D rendering and
photograph matched. For the sun’s path from sunrise to sunset was
shown on the CAD drawing as a celestial arc orientated in relation to a
compass rose on the ‘ground’ around the model. This showed that to
within a few degrees the orientation of the structures was as surmised.
Location
The final element of the puzzle, which could then guide further, on site
investigation, was the location of the pagoda and temple complex in

650

�relation to the present Yuwengdao Lighthouse compound. The
photograph offers only three indirect hints.
The first and least reliable is the stockpile of cut stones for the platform on
which the new light would be erected. Given that each would have
weighed perhaps two tonnes,

20

it is unlikely they would have been

stockpiled very far from where they were expected to be needed, though
manifestly well out of the way of the intended demolition work on the old
pagoda and temple and subsequent marking out of the site and site
formation.
A second, possibly more reliable hint is what appears to be the line of a
footpath or track coming in from the right, about one third of the way up
the photograph’s edge, running across in front of the temple and petering
about in the area of what we surmise to be scaffolding poles. There is a
fork in the path just to the left of the temple, leading around in the general
direction of the doorway into the back courtyard between temple and
pagoda, suggesting that there may have been no direct access from the
temple into the courtyard and to the pagoda. Supposing the old structures
to be facing south, the track has roughly the alignment of today’s motor
road from Wai’an as it reaches the lighthouse compound, which is what
one would expect.
The present location of the lighthouse is surrounded on the southwest,
west and northwest by a roughly ten metre high, vertical cliff varying from
twenty to forty metres from the compound wall. Because of this, and as
we know from how new lighthouse machinery was delivered by the
Japanese authorities in 1937 or 1938,21 the materials for building the new
lighthouse will have been landed at Wai’an and then probably carried or
dragged overland to the intended lighthouse site along the track we can
see.
651

�This thought leads to the final, more indicative, but extremely hard to
interpret hint. This comes from the horizon beyond the pagoda and
temple. The indicator is the visibly different ‘firmness’ to the horizon line
on the two sides of the building complex. On the left it is sharp and closer
to the camera. On the right it is further away, less well defined and
suggestive of ground rising very gradually up the right of the picture. When
related to a contour map of the south western end of Xiyu Island, the
presumed location of the old structures can be inferred from these
observations and the location of the materials stockpile shown.
Put briefly, the left horizon is the nearby cliff edge. The right horizon, which
reappears from noticeably further ‘behind’ the old structures, suggests
that, in the region we cannot see behind structures, the horizon has
trended more north-easterly. This is what it does on the ground today.
From the contour map, we can also see that northeastward through east
from the presumed location the ground rises very slowly and unevenly to
around 60m as part of the plateau on the western extreme of which today’s
lighthouse compound stands. This fits the image and helps explain the
less sharply defined horizon line to the right of the buildings.
A further bonus of the 3D modelling software is that it allowed us to work
out the placement of the camera in relation to the building depending on
some tentative conclusions as to the lens used. This in turn allowed us to
assess the suggestion that the raised area by the present generator house
and the old wall on the north side of the animal pen are relics of the old
structures.
From a contour map with today’s compound, it is clear the camera and
photographer had to have been almost on the edge of the low, 10m cliff
that surrounds today’s compound from south round to north, at most
around 40m distant but as little as 20-25m. The computer modelling
652

�showed that this was indeed the case. Taking the centre of the west wall
of the temple and pagoda complex as the reference point, the analysis
placed the camera 28.94m away in a direction of 2100T so that it stood
just short of the cliff edge. The angle of around 200 between the camera
and the top of the pagoda accounts for the foreshortening evident in the
photograph.
That this was the broad set of relationships was partially supported by a
review of the range of what were called view or landscape lenses in use
in the 1870s.22 Crucially, these had angular fields of view of 600 to 1000,
with the most common types having a field of view of 600 – 800. Analysis
suggested that the lens used to take the image covered an angular field
of view of 630. This incidentally also helped support our conclusions
derived from other sources as to the height of the pagoda.
This photographic and desktop analysis is intended as a preliminary guide
to guide on site investigation that will serve to assess the analysis with
archaeological work on the area of raised ground in the pagoda and the
area with brick remains to the north of the present compound.
Conclusion
In default of precise data, our research has shown how, with modern
computerised tools and a photograph, uncertain verbal and visual data
from historical sources about vanished coastal buildings like lighthouses
can be used to derive quite tightly defined measurements and locations
that, in turn, can help guide subsequent archaeological fieldwork.
Endnotes
The first western chart named it Lixishanta Wangdeng (李西山塔晚燈)
for reasons utterly obscure. Although western Light Lists referred to the
light as Litsitah Light until well into the 20th century, in Penghu the name
is unknown and the characters bear no relation to any current or
1

653

�historical Chinese name. In early days the Chinese for lighthouse was 晚
燈 (wǎndēng, night light), not today’s 燈塔 (dēngtǎ, light tower)
2

Banister, T. Roger, 1932. The coastwise lights of China: an illustrated
account of the Chinese Maritime Customs Lights Service, Inspector
General of Customs, Shanghai: 6. The CIMCS Marine Department had
been created in 1868

大清乾隆44年 (1779) 澎湖廳通刊謝維祺撰的「澎湖西嶼浮圖記」(建修
西嶼塔院落成碑記). The local rock is basalt, so if the structure was of
3

granite, it will have been imported, probably from Fujian.
see清乾隆43年 (1778) 台灣府知府蔣元樞所撰的「刀建西嶼浮圖記」(建
修西嶼塔院落成碑記 / 創建西嶼塔燈碑記)
4

5

Levathes, Louise, 1994. When China ruled the seas: the treasure fleet
of the Dragon Throne 1405-1433, Simon &amp; Schuster, New York: 80.
6

Worcester, G.R.G., 1947-48. The junks and sampans of the Yangtze; a
study in Chinese nautical research, 2 vols., Inspectorate-General of
Customs, Shanghai: vol.1, xiv. Morrison, John Robert, 1834. A Chinese
commercial guide, consisting of a collection of details respecting foreign
trade in China, The Albion Press, Canton: 70 gives a range of 12.65”
(0.32m) to 14.58” (0.37m). A later edition has values 12.1” (0.31m) to
14.81” (0.38m), see Williams, Samuel Wells, 1856. A Chinese
Commercial Guide, 4th ed., The Chinese Repository, Canton.
7

Broughton, W.R., (Intro &amp; Ed. Barry Gough) 2016. William Robert
Broughton's Voyage of Discovery to the North Pacific 1795–1798, CRC
Press, Boca Raton FL: 140
8

Dawson, L.S., 1885. Memoirs of hydrography, vol. II, Henry Keay, The
Imperial Library, Eastbourne: 31. See also Fix, Douglas, 2014. Charting
Formosan waters: British surveys of Taiwan's ports and seas, 18171867. 漢學研究 (Hanxue Yanjiu (Chinese Studies)), 2014, Vol. 32.2: 748 and Barr, William, 2007. Arctic Hell-ship: The Voyage of HMS
Enterprise, 1850-1855, University of Alberta Press: 7-8
9

King, John W. (Ed.), 1861. The China Pilot, 3rd Edition, The
Hydrographic Office, London: 127.
10

Collinson, Richard, 1844, Draft survey, H.M.S. Plover and Young
Hebe. Hydrographic Office archives, L4368 Shelf 13G.

654

�11

The project team is indebted to Mr Xu Youzhi, president of the Da Chi
elementary school and keen local historian for showing us these relics.
12

For the survey and the date of the start of construction on July 11 1875
see Taiwan’s National Cultural Heritage Database Management System
at
https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/English/cultureassets/Building/upt.aspx?p0=1
0116 accessed on 23.6.2017. For the notice of intention July 13 1875.
Notice to Mariners No.99—CHINA—PESCADORES ISLANDS—
FISHER ISLAND. (1.) Intended Light on Litsitah Point. The London
Gazette, No. 24227: 3566,
March 3, 1876, Notice to Mariners No.25 —CHINA—PESCADORES
ISLANDS—FISHER ISLAND. (1.) Fixed Light in Litsitah Point, The
London Gazette, No.24302: 1734 The version of the Taiwan National
Heritage Database in Chinese contends that the light was first lit on 18
November, shortly after completion.
13

14

The actual values, using the plinth as unity, are approximately: Plinth =
1, 2nd level = 0.41, 3rd level = 0.34, 4th level = 0.81, 5th level = 0.75,
6th level = 0.66, 7th level (to top of finial) =1.03. The total value is
exactly 5 ‘plinth units’
In general temples – like many important Chinese buildings – were
orientated (i.e. had the principal entrance) facing south – see Mak,
Michael Y. and So, Albert T., 2015. Scientific Feng Shui for the Built
Environment: Theories and Applications, New Ed., City University of HK
Press, Hong Kong: 83-85. Tian Hou /Mazu temples were often
exceptions since there was an overriding requirement that the temple
faced the sea, see Wang, Chen-shan Ellen, 2003. Historic Preservation
in Taiwan: The Restoration of Tainan Da Tianhou Gong, unpublished
Master of Science thesis, University of Pennsylvania: 50. The Xiyu
Pagoda temple could achieve both.
15

16

See https://www.autodesk.com.hk/products/revit-family/architecture

17

see https://ourworldindata.org/human-height/ accessed on 15.5.2017

18

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2015. Pub. 112 - List Of
Lights Radio Aids And Fog Signals 2015: Western Pacific And Indian
Oceans Including The Persian Gulf And Red Sea, National GeospatialIntelligence Agency, Springfield VA: 172. For the listed height as to the
focal plane of the light see International Hydrographic Bureau, 2004.

655

�Standardization of List of Lights and Fog Signals, International
Hydrographic Bureau, Monaco: para. 3.1, A-4 and para 4.5, A-13.
19

the values were 45m, 44m, 47m, 49m, 50m, 49m, 50m, 49m, 49m,
50m and 50m – Google Earth sampled 11.5.2017. Errors are known to
be &lt;±30m – see discussion at
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/earth/3Th8MuHzKtE
accessed on 15.5.2017
20

Online tables and calculators give one cubic metre of granite as
weighing c.2,75 tonnes. Each of the granite stones will have been c.0.70.8 cu. m.
21

Oral testimony gathered in Wai’an Village, October 2016

22

Illustrated Catalogue issued annually by Thomas H. McCollin, Thos H.
McCollin, Philadelphia: 1-17 and other related materials on the excellent
website at http://piercevaubel.com/cam/catalogs/1876mccollinlp819.htm

References
Banister, T. Roger, 1932. The coastwise lights of China: an illustrated
account of the Chinese Maritime Customs Lights Service, Inspector
General of Customs, Shanghai.
Broughton, W.R., (Intro &amp; Ed. Barry Gough) 2016. William Robert
Broughton's Voyage of Discovery to the North Pacific 1795–1798, CRC
Press, Boca Raton FL.
Dawson, L.S., 1885. Memoirs of hydrography, vol. II, Henry Keay, The
Imperial Library, Eastbourne.
Illustrated Catalogue issued annually by Thomas H. McCollin, Thos H.
McCollin, Philadelphia.
International Hydrographic Bureau, 2004. Standardization of List of Lights
and Fog Signals, International Hydrographic Bureau, Monaco.
Levathes, Louise, 1994. When China ruled the seas: the treasure fleet of
the Dragon Throne 1405-1433, Simon &amp; Schuster, New York.

656

�Mak, Michael Y. and So, Albert T., 2015. Scientific Feng Shui for the Built
Environment: Theories and Applications, New Ed., City University of HK
Press, Hong Kong.
Morrison, John Robert, 1834. A Chinese commercial guide, consisting of
a collection of details respecting foreign trade in China, The Albion Press,
Canton.
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2015. Pub. 112 - List Of Lights
Radio Aids And Fog Signals 2015: Western Pacific And Indian Oceans
Including The Persian Gulf And Red Sea, National Geospatial-Intelligence
Agency, Springfield VA.
The London Gazette, No.24227, 1875 and No. 24302. 1876.
Wang, Chen-shan Ellen, 2003. Historic Preservation in Taiwan: The
Restoration of Tainan Da Tianhou Gong, unpublished Master of Science
thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Williams, Samuel Wells, 1856. A Chinese Commercial Guide, 4th ed., The
Chinese Repository, Canton.
Worcester, G.R.G., 1947-48. The junks and sampans of the Yangtze; a
study in Chinese nautical research, 2 vols. Inspectorate-General of
Customs, Shanghai.

657

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="106">
                  <text>2017 Session 9: Maritime/Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107">
                  <text>Southeast Asia (SEA) has been rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) over a long period, from ancient pre-history, through the age of commerce, into the World War II era. Recently, UCH research, survey, and mapping activities; preservation and management efforts; as well as human capacity building programs show the promising progress in SEA countries. However, various threats to UCH preservation and some shortcomings still can be found in many SEA countries, for instance, lack of funds, inadequate technology, limited human resources, and also lack of public and government attention to UCH legal protection and its long-term preservation.    &#13;
&#13;
This session will highlight some topics, including current status of UCH preservation; current research or investigation on maritime heritage or UCH in SEA countries; maritime history in SEA; current legislations; recent human and natural threats to UCH in SEA countries; raising awareness and public education programs; in-situ preservation of UCH; sustainable shipwreck tourism development and balancing preservation efforts with economic benefit; community and general public engagement in UCH management plan; regional capacity building in Southeast Asia; as well as collaboration opportunities among stakeholders and SEA countries in researching, protecting, preserving, and managing UCH sites.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="108">
                  <text>Jenny Craig, Mc Gill University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5776">
                <text>China’s First Purpose Designed and Built Lighthouse: Findings from the Analysis of a Long Lost but Recently Rediscovered Photograph of the Xiyu Pagoda Light</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5777">
                <text>Although it has long been known that a purposely designed and built ‘pagoda’ lighthouse existed on the Penghu Islands’ Xiyu (Fisher’s) Island as of 1778, exactly what it looked like, how large it was and where it was placed vis-à-vis the 1875 Chinese Imperial Maritime Customs light that still exists has never been known. Existing Chinese data, from a contemporary stele the text of which was written by or for the then Taiwan Prefect, Jiang Yunshu, uses self-consistent traditional units of measure suggesting the seven level pagoda was of the order of 18m or more high. Other contemporary Chinese data speak of a powerful light that, rhetorically at least, could be seen from Taiwan in one direction and Xiamen in the other! Western reports, which we have from 1797 and more systematically as of Captain Richard Collinson’s survey of 1844, propose a tower only some 10m high and a very occasional light visible at best only one mile distant. There has been no way of reconciling these very different reports until the recent discovery in a major British archive of a photograph of the 1778 pagoda - as rebuilt after typhoon damage in 1823 - that can be dated to c.1875. In this paper this photograph will be presented and discussed and an attempt made, thanks to modern three dimensional modelling, to give accurate dimensions. Additional discussion will focus on features of the pagoda lighthouse revealed in the photograph that connect with hitherto ill-understood remains both in the present day lighthouse compound and in the Buddhist temple in the nearby village of Wai’an.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5778">
                <text>Stephen Davies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5779">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5780">
                <text>2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5781">
                <text>Stephen Davies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="52">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="511" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="302">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/5331163ab82870b891ed770de6bfa474.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6ee4d7466115f2d00aac8853e5edd12d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5775">
                    <text>Maritime Activities in Ancient Bali

I Wayan Ardika
Udayana University, Bali
ardika52@yahoo.co.id

Abstract
Archaeological discoveries at Sembiran and Pacung in Northeastern Bali
indicate that contacts between Bali and India, China, as well as Mainland
Southeast Asia have already occurred at the late second century BC. At
the same time, maritime activities and exchanges of goods might have
also existed between these areas.
Inscriptional data from the late 9th up to the 12th century describe the
regulations concerning the stranded ship. The use of woods of the
stranded ship, the treatment of foreign traders who died in the port sites
in Bali, as well as the utilization of their inheritances are also mentioned
in these inscriptions. In addition, the Balinese inscriptions dated from the
12th century also describe the types of watercraft such as ships (Chinese
jong) and boats (bahitra) which encored at Manasa in the northern coast
of Bali. The situation of port sites and social disturbances due to pirates
are also described in the Balinese inscriptions. Bali seems to be located
in the inter-regional trade routes connecting India, Mainland Southeast
Asia, and China in ancient times, therefore maritime activities must be
very busy in the northern coast of Bali.
Key words: Bali, ships, inscriptions
Introduction
Archaeological discoveries in northern coast of Bali indicate that the island
has been involved in maritime activities for nearly 2150 years. The sites
of Sembiran and Pacung which was part of ancient port of Julah produced
archaeological artefacts mainly potteries of India, mainland of Southeast
Asia, and China. In addition, glass, stone beads as well as Han’s bronze
mirrors were also discovered at Pangkung Paruk in the northwestern
coast of Bali. Two fragments of molds for casting bronze drum and

�socketed bronze axe were discovered repectively at Sembiran (Ardika,
1991; Ardika and Bellwood, 1991; Calo et.al, 2015). The discovery of
fragments of molds indicate that Sembiran was also an important centre
of local craftsmanship. The appearance of those artefacts suggests that
long distance or international exchange or trade might have already
occurred at the beginning of our century.

Inscriptional data

from Julah and Sembiran suggest that maritime

activities and trade might have continuously occurred in the northeastern
coast of Bali at least from the late second century BC until the 12th century
AD. The inscription of Sembiran AI dated AD 922 mentions a market
(pasar) and a market officer (ser pasar) at Julah. A regulation concerning
stranded ships and their cargos (taban karang) was also stated in the
inscription (Goris, 1954; Ardika, 1991). It records that people who lived at
a fortified settlement (kuta) at Julah were attacked by their enemies
(tarahan) and some of them fled to othe villages. On the basis of the
inscriptional data, this paper will describe several pieces of information
related to maritime activities in ancient Bali from the early 10th up to 12th
century AD. Relevance data from later period are also utilised in this
paper.

Regulation Concerning Stranded ship (Taban/Tawan Karang)
Balinese inscriptions from the early 10th century AD stated the regulations
(taban karang) concerning stranded ships or watercrafts in northern Bali.
The inscription of Sembiran AI states that if there were stranded ships,
boats, or canoes within Julah territory, which are known to the villagers,
the cargos had to be donated to the temple for welfare. The captives must
be reported to Sang Ratu or King Ugrasena who reigned Bali at that time.

�In order to maintain and enforce this regulation, worship was to be offered
to Bhatara Punta Hyang (Agastya?)(Ardika, 1991: 227).
As far as Taban or Tawan Karang is concerned, this regulation was still
utilised until the colonial period in the 19th and the 20th century. The Dutch
government and the Balinese kings ratified the regulation, however, they
did not implement it properly. The case of Tawan karang at Sangsit port
in north Bali was the trigger of Buleleng and Jagaraga wars in the 1846
and 1849, between the Buleleng’s king and the Ducth government. The
Jagaraga war can be said as the end of the Buleleng souvereignty, and
the beginning of colonialization of the Ducth government in north Bali
(Wirawan, 2017).
Similar phenomena also occurred at Karangasem and Klungkung
kingdoms in east and south Bali. Conflict on Tawan karang regulation
caused the Dutch government to send a military expedition to
Karangasem and Kusamba, Klungkung. The Karangasem palace was
occupied by the Dutch on 20 May 1849. Gusti Gede Ngurah Karangasem,
the king, and his family members fought against it, causing them to be
killed. Klungkung and Kusamba could be occupied by the Dutch troop at
3 pm on 24 May 1849 (Agung, 1989: 327). General Michiels and his troop
rested at Kusamba Palace used as the headquarters of the General
Commander Michels.

At midnight on 24 May or at dawn on 25 May 1849, Dewa Agung Istri
Kanya, A.A. Ketut Agung and A.A. Made Sangging planned to attack the
Dutch troop. At 3 am on 25 May 1849 the Klungkung soldiers reached the
target. When the light bullet was fired, all the camps, which had been dark,
became bright. General Michiels could be clearly seen standing in front of
the palace.

�A gun was fired by the Klungkung troops and the general’s right leg got
shot, causing him to be upended. The bone of his right leg turned out to
be completely wrecked (Agung, 1949: 328). The health officer suggested
that it should be amputated; however, he disagreed. He demanded that
he be carried to the command ship where he could be treated. His physical
condition was getting worse and finally he died at 11 pm on 25 May 1849.
On 26 May 1849 the corpse was carried by the warship “Etna” to Batavia
(Agung, 1989, 328).

The conflict between the King of Badung and the Dutch East Indies
government was triggered by the incident in which the Dutch-flagged ship
“Sri Kumala” stranded at Sanur beach controlled by the Badung Kingdom
on 27 May 1904. The Dutch East Indies government demanded that the
compensation amounting to 7,500 guldens to be charged to the Badung
King. The local people did not pay for the compensation as they swore
that they had not robbed what the ship had carried including uang kepeng
(coin with square hole in center). The Badung King’s refusal caused the
Badung waters to be blockaded on 6 January 1905 (Agung, 1989: 5). On
20 September 1906 the final war or Puputan Badung occurred and the
kingdom of Badung was conquered by the Dutch.
The practice of the tawan karang traditional law was getting weaker when
the Bali and Lombok kings were getting familiar with the foreign
governments especially the Dutch government (Wirawan, 2017: 2).
Different perceptions of the tawan karang tradition led to the blood
conflicts and wars involving the Dutch colonial government in Bali and
Lombok from the middle of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th
century.

�Since the 19th century, the tawan karang tradition has also been referred
to as a legal institution of the traditional countries which could not only be
found in Bali and Lombok. According to van Vollenhoven, the tawan
karang institution could also be found in the Tanimbar archipelago and
Central Kalimantan (Utrecht, 1962: 122). The practice of tawan karang
showed the royal waters (kliprecht). Tawan karang was the right of a king
and his people who controlled a coastal area. They had the right to detain
and own any foreign ship. They also had the right to employ its
passengers as the slaves that could be traded or killed. It used to be
considered the law of god of the seas (Lord Baruna) who was believed to
control the coastal area and sea (Utrecht, 1962: 122). However, it was
then flexibly defined and applied.

The Regulation for Foreign Trader
The inscription of Bebetin dated 896 AD describes the regulations
concerning the properties of banyaga (seafaring merchants who died at
Banwa Bharu (Goris, 1954: 54). The properties had to be divided into two
parts, although it is not mentioned what the two divisions were used for. It
is also mentioned that timber from the wrecked ships of the banyaga were
used for fences or palisades around the fortified settlement (kuta) at
Banwa Bharu. It thus seems that the fortified settlements at Julah and
Banwa Bharu were both surrounded by wood or bamboo fences (Ardika,
1991: 141). This was also the characteristic of city in Southeast Asia
between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries AD (Reid 1980: 242).

It should be noted that the terms kuta and ser pasar (market officer) are
also mentioned in the inscription of Bebetin AI dated AD 896 (Goris, 1954:
54). Banwa Bharu could have been another port site in north Bali, possibly

�located near the modern village of Sangsit, about 15 km west of Julah,
where the small port still exists.

Based on the inscriptions of Bebetin AI dated AD 896 and Sembiran AI
dated AD 922, it is impossible to find wrecked ship in the northern coast
of Bali. It is due to the regulation that the timbers of the wrecked ship was
used for fences or palisade of fortified settlement at Julah and Banwa
Bharu.

The Type of Watercrafts
The Balinese inscriptions mentioned several types of watercrafts including
perahu, bahitra, jong, lancang, etc. For instance, the inscription of
Sembiran AI dated AD 922 mentions: IIIb.3 ... yanada taban karang ditu,
parahu, lancang jukung, talaka ... (Ardika, 1991: 227; Goris, 1954). It
means if there were ship, boat, canoe and canoe (?) captured based on
taban karang regulation at Julah. Based on Sembiran AI inscription at
least there were four types of watercrafts at that time. The inscription also
indicates the Balinese can make canoe or ship. There are several terms
of watercrafts mentioned in Old Balinese inscriptions. These terms are in
Table 1 below.
Table 1. Several terms of watercrafts mentioned in Old Balinese
inscriptions
No

Balinese inscriptions

Terms of watercrafts

1

Bebetin AI dated AD 896

Lancang, parahu

2

Sembiran AI dated AD 922

Parahu, lancang, jukung,
talaka

3

Sembiran AIV dated AD 1065

Jong, bahitra, parahu

4

Sembiran C dated AD 1181

Parawu, jong, banawa

�The term of parahu or parawu has been mentioned in the four inscriptions
namely Bebetin AI (AD 896), Sembiran AI (AD 922), Sembiran AIV (AD
1065), and Sembiran C (AD 1181). The term parahu or parawu literary
means boat (Zoetmulder, 1982: 1280). Parahu seems to be the oldest
watercraft mentioned in Balinese inscriptions. Lancang was mentioned in
the inscriptions of Bebetin AI (AD 896) and Sembiran AI (AD 922).
Lancang literary means small boat (Zoetmulder, 1982).
The term of Jukung was mentioned in the inscription of Sembiran AI (AD
922). Jukung means small vesel or dug out canoe (Zoetmulder, 1982:
752). Even today, jukung is still made and used in modern Balinese.
Similar to Jukung, the term talaka was only used mentioned in the
inscription of Sembiran AI (AD 922). Talaka literary means canoe. The
term Jong was mentioned in the inscriptions of Sembiran AIV (AD 1065)
and Sembiran C (AD 1181). Jong is sea going ship.( Zoetmulder, 1982:
748). It is also associated with the Chinese ship. The term bahitra was
only mentioned in the inscription of Sembiran AIV (dated AD 1065). This
term literary means boat or vessel (Zoetmulder, 1982:188). The term
banawa was mentioned the inscription Sembiran C (AD 1181) which
literary means boat or any kind of ship (Ardika, 1991: 262). On the basis
of these inscriptions, Julah seems to be one of the most important ports
or harbours in the northern coast of Bali. Chinese jong and big ship might
have anchored at Julah in the 11th and 12th century AD. During the Song
dynasty, China also took part in trade out of China.

Piracy in Ancient Bali
The kuta or fortified settlement and pasar or market at Julah were attacked
by enemy or pirate many times. The attacks caused social disturbance in
Julah and the adjacent area. This situation was first mentioned in the

�inscription of Sembiran AI dated to AD 922. The inscription states: Ib. 3.
...lagi tawan bunin...they are continously captured by enemies... (Ardika,
1991: 221). The villagers of fortified settlement at Julah were captured by
enemies, and some of them might have fled to other villages. Therefore
the king Ugrasena asked them who fled to other villages to return to Julah.

The inscription of Sembiran AII dated to AD 975 mentions that king Sri
Janasadhu Warmadewa gave a grant of copper plates inscription to the
market officer at Julah namely Ida Kumpi Dyah Damai, who gathered
together the villagers of Julah and those who lived around the fort, being
many of those who returned during the reign of Sang Ratu (king) who was
buried at Bwah Rangga (Ardika, 1991:228-233). The inscription mentions
the regulation concerning the rights and reponsibilities of the villagers of
Julah, and those who lived around the fort.

It is worth to noticing that the inscription of Sembiran AIII dated to AD 1016
indicates that the village officers of Julah pay respect to Sang Ratu
(Queen) Sri Sang Ẫjṅadewi. The villagers told the Queen that the number
of families who lived at Julah formerly was 300, but now only 50 remained.
Therefore, the villagers asked taxes to be reduced (Ardika, 1991: 334).
On the basis of those inscriptions it seems that the fortified settlement and
a market at Julah was attacked and the villagers were killed or captured
by enemies or pirates? This attack caused the villagers of Julah to flee to
other villages. The Queen or central authorities called them to return to
Julah. The Queen renewed the regulation and also reduced taxes for
those who lived at Julah.

The inscription of Sembiran AIV dated to AD 1065 indicates that the
village officers of Julah they consulted and paid respects to Paduka haji

�or King Anak Wungsu. The village officers of Julah asked for a grant in
order to write down their inscription on copper plates, which was a grant
of the previous king. Because they did not think that what was described
in the palm leaves would be preserved for the future. It should be noticed
that the villagers were allowed to destroy coconut trees which blocked and
caused it to be seen by a plundering ship which came to Julah at night
(Ardika, 1991: 247). This statement suggests that central authority or King
Anak Wungsu protected the villagers of Julah from the attack of
plunderers or pirates.

As far as plunderers or piracy is concerned, it is clear that their activities
caused social disturbances as well as economic instabilities. The
inscriptions of Sembiran AI, Sembiran AII, Sembiran AIII, and Sembiran
AIV suggest that the villagers of Julah were killed and captured by
plunderes, and some of them also fled to other villages. This social
disturbance at Julah was handled by Queen or King of Bali, Regulations
concerning those people who lived at Julah were described at royal edits.
From an economic point of view, plunderers or pirates at Julah might
search for goods and valuable things. As already noted, there was a
market place at the fortified settlement at Julah. The plunderers or pirates
at Julah not only killed and captured people, but also robbed goods and
materials at the market. Similar stories were mentioned in the inscription
of Sawan AI or Bila I dated to AD 1023. The villagers of Bila were reduced
from 50 to 10 families who could not pay the full tribute, so they had to ask
the king (raja) for a reduction (Goris, 1954: 101-103). Why the villagers of
Bila decreased in number was not mentioned in the inscription.
Piracy might have already existed in ancient Bali around the 9th up to 11th
century AD. The pirate might attack the anchored ships and market at of

�Julah. They killed and captured the villagers and possibly robbed the
cargos as well as the goods at the ports site of Julah. The coastal villages
in the northeastern coast of Bali might have been plundered by pirates.
This attack caused the villagers to flee to other villages, and this
authomatically brought about the decreasung number of the people in the
village.

Conclusion
Bali has been involved in maritime activities since prehistoric times. The
Balinese inscriptions from the late Ninth and early Tenth century indicate
the regulations concerning stranded ship (taban/tawan karang) and an
inheritance of foreign traders (banyaga) who died at kuta or fortified
settlement in the northern cost of Bali. These regulations suggest that the
central authority or king/queen has managed to control the coastal areas
of Bali at least in the late Ninth and early Tenth century AD. The regulation
of taban/tawan karang was still utilized until the 20th century and
throughout the colonial period. In other words, the regulation of
taban/tawan karang has been used for more than 1000 years. The
taban/tawan karang regulation also triggered conflict and war between the
Balinese kings and the Dutch Government in the 19th and 20th century

Several types of watercraft were mentioned in the Balinese inscriptions
such as: parahu, lancang, jukung, talaka, jong, bahitra, and banawa.
These terms might have been related to the sizes and measurements of
watercrafts.

Piracy might have already existed in Bali or in Indonesia in general in the
early 10th century AD. The fortified settlement or kuta and pasar or market
at Julah were attacked by plunderers or pirates. The villagers were killed

�and captured by plunderers, and some of them fled to other villages. The
villagers who lived at Julah could not to pay the full taxes and they asked
for reductions to the king/queen. Therefore, the king/queen asked them to
return to Julah.

References
Agung, Ide Anak Agung Gde, 1989. Bali Pada Abad XIX. Yogyakarta:
Gajah Mada University Press.
Ardika, I Wayan. 1991. Archaeological Research in Northeastern Bali,
Indonesia. Disertation. Canberra: Australian National University.
Ardika, I Wayan and Peter Bellwood, 1991. Sembiran: the beginnings of
Indian contact with Bali. Antiquity, 1991. 65: 221-32.
Ardika, I Wayan et.al. 2016. Archaeological Research at the Blanjong Site,
Sanur, Bali. Singapore: Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre. Archaeology Report
Series.
Calo, Ambra, Bagyo Prasetyo, Peter Bellwood, James W. Lankton,
Bernard Gratuze, Thomas Oliver Pryce, Andreas Reinecke, Verena
Leusch, Heidrun Schenk, Rachel Wood, Rochtri A. Bawono, I Dewa
Kompiang Gede, Ni L.K. Citha Yuliati, Jack Fenner, Christian Reepmeyer,
Cristina Castillo &amp; Alison K. Carter. 2015. Sembiran and Pacung on the
norht coast of Bali a strategic croassoads for early trans Asiatic exchange.
Antiquity. 89, 344: 378-396.
Goris, R. 1954. Prasasti Bali I &amp; II. Bandung: Masa Baru.
Reid, Anthony. 1980. ‘The Structure of Cities in Southeast Asia, Fifteenth
to Seventeenth Centuries’. JSEAS, 11,2: 235-250.
Utrecht, E. 1962. Sedjarah Hukum Internasional di Bali dan Lombok.
(Pertjobaan sebuah studi hukum internasional regional di Indonesia).
Bandung: Sumur Bandung.

�Wirawan, A.A.B. 2017. Tawan Karang Tradition Law and Conflict of
Power in Bali and Lombok in the Middle of the 19th Century and
beginning of the 20th Century. Denpasar: Faculty of Arts, Udayana
University.
Zoetmulder, P.J. 1982. Old Javanese English Dictionary. S’ Gravenhage

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="29">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="106">
                  <text>2017 Session 9: Maritime/Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107">
                  <text>Southeast Asia (SEA) has been rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage (UCH) over a long period, from ancient pre-history, through the age of commerce, into the World War II era. Recently, UCH research, survey, and mapping activities; preservation and management efforts; as well as human capacity building programs show the promising progress in SEA countries. However, various threats to UCH preservation and some shortcomings still can be found in many SEA countries, for instance, lack of funds, inadequate technology, limited human resources, and also lack of public and government attention to UCH legal protection and its long-term preservation.    &#13;
&#13;
This session will highlight some topics, including current status of UCH preservation; current research or investigation on maritime heritage or UCH in SEA countries; maritime history in SEA; current legislations; recent human and natural threats to UCH in SEA countries; raising awareness and public education programs; in-situ preservation of UCH; sustainable shipwreck tourism development and balancing preservation efforts with economic benefit; community and general public engagement in UCH management plan; regional capacity building in Southeast Asia; as well as collaboration opportunities among stakeholders and SEA countries in researching, protecting, preserving, and managing UCH sites.&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="108">
                  <text>Jenny Craig, Mc Gill University</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5768">
                <text>Maritime Activities in Ancient Bali</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5769">
                <text>Archaeological discoveries at Sembiran and Pacung in Northeastern Bali indicate that contacts between Bali and India, China, as well as Mainland Southeast Asia have already occurred at the late second century BC. At the same time, maritime activities and exchanges of goods might have also existed between these areas.&#13;
&#13;
Inscriptional data from the late 9th up to the 12th century describe the regulations concerning the stranded ship. The use of woods of the stranded ship, the treatment of foreign traders who died in the port sites in Bali, as well as the utilization of their inheritances are also mentioned in these inscriptions. In addition, the Balinese inscriptions dated from the 12th century also describe the types of watercraft such as ships (Chinese jong) and boats (bahitra) which encored at Manasa in the northern coast of Bali. The situation of port sites and social disturbances due to pirates are also described in the Balinese inscriptions. Bali seems to be located in the inter-regional trade routes connecting India, Mainland Southeast Asia, and China in ancient times, therefore maritime activities must be very busy in the northern coast of Bali.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5770">
                <text>I Wayan Ardika</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5771">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5772">
                <text>2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5773">
                <text>I Wayan Ardika</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5774">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="52">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 9 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
