<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/items/browse?collection=26&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-10-24T18:41:15+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>14</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="493" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="285">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/b501753de63f323578fb631cd3b3827f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bc1c99ef6aa5ed29d43b31bb8377a6c9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5646">
                    <text>A Methodology for Accurate and Quick Photogrammetric
Recording of Underwater Cultural Heritage
Kotaro
A.P.P.A.R.A.T.U.S.
apparatus.japan@gmail.com

Yamafune
LLC

Abstract
In the past seven years, photogrammetry has become one of the main
recording methods in maritime and underwater archaeology. The
application of photogrammetry allows archaeologists to re-create
underwater cultural heritage sites in 3D digital formats, and extract from
these 3D digital models data and information required for subsequent
scholarly research. The author has been using photogrammetry since
2014 and has successfully created nearly 40 underwater cultural heritage
models on more than 10 archaeological projects. The projects have
ranged in size, accessibility, and water clarity, introducing a number of
variables to the photogrammetry of the artifacts. The variety of
experiences gained on these projects have enabled the author to
construct his own methodology and workflow for photogrammetric
recording. In this paper, the author shares examples of his methodology
and workflow for photogrammetric recording of various projects in different
countries.
Key words: UCH, photogrammetry, Photoscan

Introduction
Agisoft PhotoScan and other off-the-shelf photogrammetry software
became available for archaeologists in 2010. By 2017, after only 7 years,
photogrammetry has become a one of the most frequently used recording
methods for UCH (underwater cultural heritage) sites. The author of this
paper works as a professional maritime archaeologist and applied
photogrammetric recording on more than 35 archaeological sites in more
than 10 different countries. Because of its submerged circumstances of
many shipwrecks, each site has different conditions: such as visibility and

�colors of waters, depth, topography, water current and so on. Those
different conditions create problems that requires different ways to solve
those difficulties. Additionally, each project has different mission
statement, or project’s goal. For that reason, each submerged site
requires different types of methodologies for data-collection and data
processing. Moreover, to use produced 3D digital models as
archaeological data, it is important to create 1:1 scale-constrained
georeferenced 3D models (Yamafune et al., 2016). Yet, to produce these
accurate models, it is essential to takes a week to produce local
coordinate system that gives scale and georeferenced on the model. To
solve these lengthy problem, the author created a methodology that
produces local coordinate system in short time (1 or 2 dives) yet provide
fairly accurate results. In this paper, the author shall share his
methodology of photogrammetric recording that he has developed and
currently

using.

Literature Review and Terminological Confusion of Photogrammetry
Before the author starts discussions regarding his photogrammetry
methodology, there is an important point that must be noted. The point is
a confusion related with the word ‘photogrammetry;’ ‘photogrammetry’
has been used repeatedly in history; probably the first time it appeared
in/as a discipline of science was during the WWII. When airplane became
widely available for military use, cameras were mounted on scouting
airplanes; then photos taken from the mounted cameras where
meticulously re-calibrated and composed to create a photomosaic, or a
map, of enemy’s territories. In other words, ‘photogrammetry’ that were
used first during the WWII was a technique to create accurately composed
photomosaic (Burtch, 2008; Van Damme, 2015; Konecny, 2003). And it

�was a well-known fact that Dr. George Bass and Dr. Frederick Van
Doornick, well-known ‘first generation’ maritime archaeologists, used
photogrammetry for their Yassiada underwater expeditions in 1960s;
detailed site plans were produced based on photomosaic that were taken
from a camera that was mounted on horizontally positioned rails on the
seabed (Van Doorninck, 1967; Bass, 1972; Bass and Van Doorninck,
1982). In their publications, they used a word ‘photogrammetry;’ however,
it

must

be

noted

that

‘photogrammetry’

in

their

article

and

‘photogrammetry’ that produces 3D digital models today uses different
systems and indicate different recording systems.

Another terminological confusion related to a word ‘photogrammetry
occurred in 1990s. In 1990s, maritime archaeologists started practice
DSM (Direct Survey Method); many cases this system is referred as
trilateration. DSM provides a local coordinate system/network to help
production of 2D site plans of submerged shipwreck site. DSM is a method
to

directly

measure

distances

in

between

control

points

and

detailed/reference points to create positional networks. Consequently,
DSM provides XYZ coordinates of control points and detailed points, and
maritime archaeologists use these XY coordinates to produce 2D site
plans (Holt 2003: Green and Gainsford 2003). When DSM became a
popular method among maritime archaeologists as a mapping method in
90s, another method was also often used to produce 2D site plans; and
this

another

method

is

also

called

‘photogrammetry.’

This

photogrammetry is known with the software Photomodeler. Photomodeler
is a photogrammetry software; and this photogrammetry mainly applied
for underwater excavations in 1990s and 2000s uses a meticulously
calibrated camera and its images that captures at least three reference

�points in one image. Thanks to meticulous calibration of the camera and
its series of images, Photomodeler can calculate the XYZ coordinates of
reference points; and these reference points are used to produce 2D site
plans and 3D CAD drawings. Indeed, the data sets that DSM and this
photogrammetry produced were very similar; both system provides XYZ
coordinates of reference points on submerged sites. A few articles were
published in 1990s and the early 2000s related to this photogrammetry
that produce XYZ coordinates of reference points, or a local coordinate
system (Green et al., 2002). However, photogrammetry that related
Photomoder is different from photogrammetry that can produce 3D
models. Confusingly, around 2010, when photogrammetry that can
produce 3D models began to become popular recording methods, EOS
system (the software company manufactures Photomodeler) released
upgraded version of the software called Photomodeler Scanner. This
Photomodeler Scanner can produce 3D models of subjects that uses
similar system with ‘photogrammetry’ that the author will discuss in this
paper. Nonetheless, it is important to be noted that Photomodeler that can
provide XYZ coordinates of reference points and Photomodeler Scanner
that can produce 3D models are different types of ‘photogrammetry.’ And
a word ‘photogrammetry’ mainly referred in articles of maritime
archaeology in 1990s and early 2000s were mainly focus on
Photomodeler and its system that provides XYZ coordinates of reference
points on archaeological sites.
In 2010, Agisoft PhotoScan was released. While Autodesk 123D Catch,
Photomodeler Scanner and other photogrammetry software that produce
3D digital models were also released around the same time, thanks to its
georeferencing systems and user-friendly workflows, Agisoft Photoscan
immediately became popular photogrammetry software among maritime

�archaeologists are keen to apply quick and accurate recording methods
on submerged sites. By 2017, many maritime archaeology projects enjoy
this recording application. Nonetheless, another confusing terminological
problem is happening. After 2010, almost all the time ‘photogrammetry’
indicates a system that produces 3D digital models; however, there are
many different words were being used to indicate this one system. The
author often hears SfM (Structure from Motion) in the United State and
Japan, some articles including IJNA (International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology) prefer Multi-image Photogrammetry, some Italian scholars
sometimes use Close-range Photogrammetry, and scholars form northern
European countries sometimes use Computer-Vision Photogrammetry.
Yet all these words imply one system that produces 3D digital models
based on digital images.
Concluding this section, the word ‘photogrammetry’ implies different
systems when it was used for maritime archaeology. From 1960s and
1980s, ‘photogrammetry’ implies a system that produced a photomosaic
of sites; from 90s and 00s, ‘photogrammetry”’ implies a system that used
calibrated digital cameras and its photos to calculate XYZ coordinates of
reference points located on the site to produce 2D site plans and 3D CAD
drawing (by connecting reference points). After 2010, ‘photogrammetry’
implies a system that produces 3D digital models. Furthermore, this
‘photogrammetry’ after 2010 that produces 3D digital models is called in
different names, such as SfM, Multi-image Photogrammetry, Close-range
Photogrammetry, Computer-Vision photogrammetry, and so on, yet these
all names indicate only one system. In this paper, the author shall use a
word “photogrammetry” in his discussions, and this “photogrammetry”
indicates

a

system

that

produces

3D

digital

models.

�Importance of Local Coordinate Systems
Tying the site plan to a set of local coordinates is a key factor to create
1:1 scale-constrained georeferenced photogrammetric 3D digital models.
There are two reasons that creating a local set of coordinates is important.
The first reason is to correct scale and distortion of the photogrammetric
models and to geographically reference the site plan. One of the
advantages of photogrammetry is that it does not require precise
calibration of the camera. Although calibration is recommended, the
software primarily uses pixel information to reconstruct a site, which
means that the construction of the point clouds does not require manual
calibration. Moreover, the software reads metadata from the camera and
lens and minimizes the errors. Distortions are inevitable, however, and
this possible error can be minimized by applying known distances and
specific photo capturing sequences, or “flight path.” The second reason to
establish local coordinate system is that unless tied to a system of
coordinates, models float in unspecified tridimensional fields. To fix the
models in the correct position, local coordinates must be included on the
models. Without this, it is impossible to export the computer graphics files
to mapping software with the correct position. Georeferenced information
facilitates a straightforward workflow when models and orthophotos (high
resolution photomosaic) are exported.
Also, the processing and rendering capacity of the Agisoft PhotoScan
software is limited by both software and hardware configurations. This
constrains the maximum polygon count for the mesh (which makes up the
surface of the model), and the maximum number and resolution of UV
mapped textures (‘UV’ is a XY coordinates for texture), which are
composed photomosaic on surfaces of mesh. Large data sets can be
divided into smaller Chunks (PhotoScan’s term), which are separately

�processed. These Chunks can be imported into a single PhotoScan file
afterward without merging (Tool &gt; Append) and other modelling and
mapping software applications and merged without decimation (the
reducing of the polygon count). When models and orthophotos are
georeferenced, the merging process is automatic, and exported files are
opened in their correct positions in other software. A set of local
coordinates is paramount to ensure an accurate manipulation of models
or orthophotos.

Scale-bar Methods and DSM
While local coordinates system that is produced by DSM can be used to
scale-constrain photogrammetric model, Agisoft PhotoScan also allows
the input of measurements in a different way. PhotoScan uses scale bars,
or known distance, instead of importing local coordinates collected using
DSM. At actual archaeological sites, establishing control points and local
coordinates may take a week. This may not be suitable for a short-term
survey project. The author had tested the both methods to fix distortions
and scale of photogrammetric models. Measuring methods that will be
discussed and compared are: trilateration (DSM) using 3H Site Recorder,
and scale bars that are placed on the site. To compare and examine the
accuracy both methods, local coordinates and known distances of both
methods were applied to a photogrammetric model, and each different
method

was

compared

to

control

measurements.

The

control

measurements were taken directly from the wooden model. For this test,
the author used a 1:10 scale wooden model of a saveiro, a 20th-century
Brazilian coastal sailing boat. In order to simulate an archaeological
shipwreck site, the wooden model was laid down on its starboard side,

�and its floor timbers were pulled slightly out so that its starboard futtocks
lay on the bottom (See also Fig. 2 and 3).
Direct Survey Method (Trilateration)
The first method to discuss is trilateration, also known as Direct Survey
Method (DSM). Trilateration (DSM) has been repeatedly used in
underwater archaeological recordings. For this DSM, the author used 3H
Site Recorder (Demo Version). In order to acquire coordinates of
reference points, a control network first had to be established. The author
placed eight control points around the wooden model, set all the control
points to a congruent height (40 cm from the ground), and set this height
as the surface of the water, or depth of 0 cm. To establish the positions of
the control points, or a control network, 19 measurements were taken.
The tolerance established for errors was set at 0.3 cm; therefore, all
distance errors bigger than 0.3 cm were shown in red (shorter) and blue
(longer). Only one distance (CP5 – CP7) showed a + 0.39 cm statistical
error after the adjustment of the control points. After the control network,
or positions of datum points, was established, 11 reference points were
placed on the model. A total of 44 measurements were taken from the
control points; each reference point was measured from the nearest four
control points (Fig. 1). Two measurements indicated over 0.3 cm error;
however, both errors were less 0.5 cm, which is within an acceptable
range of error.

�Fig. 1: The Local Coordinate Network of reference points and control
points around the Saveiro Wooden Model (Top View: Horizontal Plane).
Scale-bars Method
Scale bars are often used when pictures of archaeological sites are taken.
These scale bars can be extremely useful in photogrammetry. Scale bars
give accurate scale information in archaeological photography, and when
a site is being mapped using photogrammetry, they can be used to check
measurements after other methods, such as DSM, were used to correct
distortion and scale of a created photogrammetric model. However,
distortions and dimensions can be fixed by using only scale bars, a feature
that allows archaeologists to skip the time-consuming DSM system. To
test the accuracy of this method, four scale bars were placed on the four
sides of the saveiro model. In this particular case, considering the size of
the model the four scale bars available were unnecessarily long.
Therefore, seven 10 cm scale bars with markers were created on the
existing scale bars. These smaller 10 cm bars were entered as fixed
distances in the photogrammetric model (Fig. 2).

�Fig. 2: Seven 10cm scale bars created on the Saveiro Photogrammetric
Model for the Scale Bar Method.
Comparison of DSM and Scale-bars Methods
To test the accuracy of these two survey methods mentioned above, the
measurements from all photogrammetric models of the saveiro were
compared within a single set of control measurements. The control
measurements were taken directly from the wooden model; 21 selected
distances between reference points were taken for this purpose (Fig. 3).
The control measurements were compared to the measurements
obtained by the other methods (Table 1).

�Fig. 3: The photogrammetric model of the Saveiro Wooden Ship Model
and the measured distances between reference points for the
comparison.

�Table 1. Distances between reference points to compare different
surveying methods to fix distortions and scales of the Saveiro Wooden
Ship Model’s photogrammetric mModel

The results suggest that scale-bar can be a more accurate scale-constrain
method in a photogrammetric model. The measurements taken from the
photogrammetric model with trilateration (DSM) coordinates display an
average error of 0.39 cm. The more accurate results obtained were
through the use of scale bars; the scale bars allowed an average error of
0.19 cm.
The results of the experiments with two scale-constrain methods
discussed show that the scale bars method provided better results in fixing
scales from photogrammetry surveys. The main disadvantage of
trilateration (DSM) is that it requires many measurements. For instance,

�the saveiro model required 19 measurements to establish the control point
network and 44 measurements to calculate the coordinates of reference
points. On the other hand, the scale-bars method does not require any
measurements. However, it is important to note that the scale-bars
methods cannot establish a local coordinates system. This is a
disadvantage when compared to the traditional trilateration (DSM)
method; scale bars can fix distortion and scale of photogrammetric
models, but they need a complementary method to establish local
coordinates.

The Recommended Method to Produce 1:1 Scale-constrained
Georeferenced 3D Models

Following is an experimental methodology that author composed and
applied

on

several

underwater

shipwreck

sites,

and

these

photogrammetric models shows successful results.

Testing Scale-bar Method on Larger Underwater Sites
The author tested scale-bars method on various underwater shipwreck
sites; including Operation Forager directed by Dr. Jennifer McKinnon and
Dr. Toni Carrell (Saipan 2017: 8 wrecks), Fourni Underwater Survey
Project directed by Dr. George Koutsouflakis and Dr. Peter Campbell
(Greece 2017: 9 wrecks), and Converging the World Project directed by
Nicholas Budsberg and Charles Bendig (the Bahamas 2017: 1 sites).
While recording those submerged archaeological sites, the author
positioned 4 – 8 scale bars on each site for photogrammetric recording.
To test possible distortions in a larger submerged site (for instances

�around 30m x 30m), the author intentionally scale-constrained only one
corner with a 1m scale bar using the Scale-bars method, and check
calculated distance using a 1m scale bar on the opposite site. The result
showed that the distance error of the 1m scale bar on the opposite side is
2.5mm. And this result stay same with other photogrammetric models of
other sites (errors varies in 0.5mm – 3mm). In other words, if a 3D digital
model is scaled by one side of the 30m x 30m coverage area, distance
error (or distortion) can be less than 2.5mm anywhere if an archaeologist
tries to measure 1m-long areas; and it also means that possible maximum
positional errors from one end to the other end of the 30m-long site (if this
distortion occurs in linier manner) is 7.5cm. Again, the biggest advantage
of the scale-bars methods is its simplicity and speed. It doesn’t require
any tape measurements; scale-bars can be simply positioned around the
sites. More importantly, once ‘Scale Bars’ are created in Agisoft
Photoscan, camera locations and scale of the created model can be fixed
based on known distances by ‘Optimize Cameras’ command (open
‘reference tab’ &gt; input known distances on ‘Scale bar’ &gt; ‘Update’ &gt;
‘Optimize Cameras’). Using this ‘Optimize Cameras’ command, distance
errors on the 1m can be 0.5mm or less. This means possible distance
error of 30m-long site is 1.5cm.

Importance of the ‘Flight Path’
To obtain good/accurate results with minimum distortions on created
photogrammetric models discussed above, the author strong believes that
his distinctive “flight path” is the key factor. The author originally
developed his flight path to ensure successful rate in “Align Photos”
process. Photo alignment is the most important phase in photogrammetric
modeling.

To maximize the probability of creating successful photo

�alignment, the author developed a flight path for sequences of photo
shooting. The best results have been achieved by capturing surrounding
area first to lock the site. Then, photographs are taken perpendicularly to
capture a top view of the site with appropriate overlap. After complete
photo shooting in both transversal and longitudinal paths, additional
photographs must be taken with the camera tilted to capture vertical
surfaces of rich tridimensional structures (Fig. 4). Actual ‘flight path’ of
archaeological sites can vary depending on multiple factors; therefore,
meticulous planning of a flight path is an important part of successful
photogrammetric recording. Most important factor of flight path is its
interwoven manner; sometimes the diver who use photogrammetry only
apply transversal path without the longitudinal path and the locking paths.
In other words, if only one direction of flight path is applied, directional
distance/length of from one point on one side to another point on the
opposite side shall be long, and distortions on images will be
accumulated. However, if three paths (Locking path, transversal path, and
longitudinal path) are properly operated, distance from one side to the
opposite side will be shorter hence the distortion can be minimized. For
that reason, the author strongly recommends that photo-shooting
sequences, or ‘flight path,’ for photogrammetry have to be practiced with
interwoven manners.

�Fig. 4: Recommended flight path for photogrammetric recording.
Applying Local Coordinate System on Scale-bars Method
Next step to create a 1:1 scale-constrained georeferenced 3D models is
to apply a local coordinate system on a created 3D digital model. As it was
discussed earlier, scale-bars methods can produce fairly accurate scaleconstrained

1:1

models;

however,

these

models

cannot

carry

georeferenced/positional information. Having a georeferenced/spatial
information is essential for archaeologists to use 3D photogrammetric
models as scientific data for their analysis. In order to apply/generate a
georeferenced data on a created 3D model, it only requires XYZ
coordinates of three control points within a site. The author uses distances
between three control points placed on the archaeological site to establish
a temporal XY coordinates on the three points. A triangle can be created
if distances between three points are known. To obtain these distances
from a created scale-constrained 3D model, control point must be
created/placed on the model. Control point can be created easily in Agisoft
PhotoScan as markers by double clicking on the respective position on
the mode (these markers can be created on the photos by right clicking
and choose ‘create markers’ in Agisoft PhotoScan). Then scale-bars were

�created between these three points to extract calculated distances
between the points (choose two respective markers on reference pane &gt;
right click on selected markers &gt; create ‘scale bars’ &gt; click ‘view
estimated’). Using these distances between three points, a triangle can
be created using 3D CAD software such as Rhino 3D. Then orientation of
the triangle must be adjusted based on depth-measurements of these
control points collected by diver’s dive computer (Fig. 5). This adjusted
triangle and positions of its three corners give new/adjusted XYZ
coordinates of the three points; the author uses these coordinates to
adjust angle of these three control points on the 3D model in Agisoft
PhotoScan (open reference tab &gt; input XYZ coordinates of the corner of
the adjusted triangles &gt; ‘update’). Once these adjusted coordinates were
applied, the 3D photogrammetric model shall contain georeferenced
information.

Fig. 5: Adjustment of the coordinate triangle (The blue triangle is a
temporal triangle that was created based on distances between control
points. And the red one is the adjusted triangle; its orientation was
adjusted based on depth-measurements of the three control points.
Then new coordinates were collected from corners of the red triangle).

�Using a 1:1 scale constrained photogrammetric model as new local
Coordinate System
On the Conversing the World Project, the team of maritime archaeologists
excavated an early sixteenth century Spanish shipwreck in the Bahamas
during the summer 2017; this shipwreck is also known as the Highbourne
Cay Shipwreck. The author is in charge of photogrammetric recording of
the shipwreck site, and he applied the combination of scale-bars and
triangle geo-referencing methodology explained above to create 1:1
scale-constrained georeferenced 3D digital models. Furthermore, once a
1:1 scale-constrained georeferenced 3D model of the site was created in
Agisoft PhotoScan, it is easy to extract coordinates of any possible points
on the 3D model by creating markers (right click on the model or a photo
&gt; ‘create makers’ &gt; ‘view estimated’). This means that when 3D models
are created on the same area or smaller areas within the site in following
day, coordinates of reference points/markers can be collected from the
first 1:1 scale-constrained georeferenced model, and apply these
coordinates on newly created 3D models. This means once a local
coordinate system is generated within the first model, archaeologists can
use this coordinate system to both scale-constrain and geo-reference
following photogrammetric models. The author prefers to call this first 1;1
scale constrained georeferenced 3D model as ‘Mother Model’, and
following 3D models that receive coordinates from Mother Model as Child
Models. In other words, the Mother Models itself works as a local
coordinate system of the site, and archaeologists can extract XYZ
coordinates of any reference points form the Mother models to create
another 1:1 scale constrained georeferenced 3D digital models.

�Conclusion
Past 7 years, photogrammetry became one of the most frequently used
recording applications on UCH (Underwater Cultural Heritage). However,
if archaeologists use these 3D digital models as scientific data, it is vital
to create 1:1 scale-constrained georeferenced 3D digital models. Once a
3D digital model carries/contains correct/real scale and georeferenced
information, archaeologists are able to extract dimensional information,
section profiles, DEM (Digital Elevation Models) and contour maps,
orthomosaics (high resolution photomosaic), 2D siteplans, and other
scientific data. The author’s methodology uses simple scale bars placed
on site and a triangle created in 3D CAD software based on distances in
between three control points. This methodology provide accurate results
in a short-term (for instances, if a site is 30m x 30m in size and 20m deep,
it will be 0.5mm possible error in 1m, or 1.5cm possible error in 30m, with
the optimization, and it takes only 3 - 4 dives with one diver). Once the
first model, or Mother Model, is created, following photogrammetric
models from the campaign can take advantage of a local coordinate
system of Mother Model. In other words, photogrammetric recording
processes can be much faster, so that archaeologists are able to create
series of 3D digital models during the same excavation campaign.
Consequently, maritime archaeologists can obtain enough dataset to
study a shipwreck site with layers of information and study stratigraphy of
shipwrecks.

References
Bass, G. F. and Van Doorninck, F. H., 1971. A fourth-century shipwreck
at Yassi Ada. American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 75(1): 27–37.

�Bass, G. F. and Van Doorninck, F. H., 1982. Yassi Ada, Vol. 1: A Seventhcentury Byzantine Shipwreck. Texas A&amp;M University Press, College
Station.
Burtch, R., 2008. History of photogrammetry. Lecture Notes on the History
of
Photogrammetry.
Ferris
State
University,
Big
Rapids
(https://spatial.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/HistoryOfPhotogrammetry.pdf,
Last Updated 2008, Accessed 11/24/2015).
Green, J. and Gainsford, M., 2003. Evaluation of underwater surveying
techniques. The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 32:
252-261.
Green, J., Matthews, S. and Turanli, T., 2002. Underwater archaeological
surveying using photomodeler, virtualmapper: different applications for
different problems. The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol.
31: 283-292.
Holt, P., 2003. An assessment of quality in underwater archaeological
surveys using tape measurements. The International Journal of Nautical
Archaeology, Vol. 31(2): 246-251.
Konecny, G., 2003. Geoinformation Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry
and Geographic Information Systems. Taylor &amp; Francis, London.
Van Doorninck, F. H., 1967. The Seventh-century Byzantine Ship at Yassi
Ada; Some Contributions to the History of Naval Architecture. PhD Thesis,
University of Pennsylvania.
Van Damme, T., 2015. Computer Vison Photogrammetry for Underwater
Archaeological Site Recording: A Critical Assessment. MA Thesis,
University of Southern Denmark.
Yamafune, K., Torres, R. and Castro, F., 2016. Multi-image
photogrammetry to record and reconstruct underwater shipwreck site.
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17-3-2016 (online).

.

�Biography
Kotaro Yamafune received his Bachelor of Arts
degree in history from Hosei University in Tokyo in
2006. He entered the Nautical Archaeology
Program in the Anthropology Department at Texas
A&amp;M University in September 2009 and received his
Master of Arts degree in August 2012. He
continued his studies in the Texas A&amp;M University
Nautical Archaeology Program and earned his
doctorate in May 2016. His research interests
include shipbuilding in Medieval Europe and the European Age of
Discovery, and ship reconstruction. He also focuses on photogrammetric
recording of submerged cultural heritage, including ship

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5640">
                <text>A Methodology for Accurate and Quick Photogrammetric Recording of Underwater Cultural Heritage</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5641">
                <text>In the past seven years, photogrammetry has become one of the main recording methods in maritime and underwater archaeology. The application of photogrammetry allows archaeologists to re-create underwater cultural heritage sites in 3D digital formats, and extract from these 3D digital models data and information required for subsequent scholarly research. The author has been using photogrammetry since 2014 and has successfully created nearly 40 underwater cultural heritage models on more than 10 archaeological projects. The projects have ranged in size, accessibility, and water clarity, introducing a number of variables to the photogrammetry of the artifacts. The variety of experiences gained on these projects have enabled the author to construct his own methodology and workflow for photogrammetric recording. In this paper, the author shares examples of his methodology and workflow for photogrammetric recording of various projects in different countries.   </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5642">
                <text>Kotaro Yamafune </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5643">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5644">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5645">
                <text>Kotaro Yamafune </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="492" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="284">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/ca521fbf9871fd5ccea14958a5342eab.pdf</src>
        <authentication>50a2da2b93919375039998fd8e24370c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5639">
                    <text>Seamanship and Navigation: Seafarers on Board Daily
Skills in Chinese Junk
Xu Lu
Chinese Sailing Junk Expedition Society
xuluxm2013@yahoo.com
Yu Long Fa
Xiamen Old Fishing Port
13666084562@163.com

Abstract
Chinese sailing traditions changed a little through time; sailors inherited
their onboard skills, expertise, and experience by orally imparting others
with physical instruction. But these daily skills were rarely recorded or
studied in the past. For seafarers, how to operate and maneuver a
Chinese junk was their daily work; and apart from sparse historical
documents such as Phing-Chou Kho Than (Yu, 1117), Shi Liu-Qiu Lu
(Xiao and Xia, 1580) (Fig. 1), and preliminarily observations by G.R.G.
Worcester, Joseph Needham, Thomas Hoppe, and others, seamanship
and navigation were kept in the minds of surviving successions of living
sailors. In 2004, the author had an opportunity to sail on a nearly 100 year
old Jin Hua Xin as an apprentice sailor for her last voyage. Several months
of onboard experiences provided a rare field investigation to approach the
complex mechanism of crew, their organization and their daily work. This
experience led the authors to raise a marine ethnographic field
investigation project along Fujian coast. Experimental archaeology
creates effective scenes for realistic performance of past systems. A small
full-size replica LanTay II was built for a series of archaeological voyages;
the data gathered from the traces of past sailing routes will verify and add
some knowledge for understanding the real daily work of Chinese
seafarers onboard. In this paper, the authors shall present combined
researches on historical documents, past observations with lively oral
materials achieved by marine ethnographic field investigation on
traditional sailing ports along South Fujian coast; throughout this research,
the authors approach the knowledge about seafarers onboard daily skills
and try to present the research about the sailors methods to maneuver
the junk and its navigation system by means of a combination of instinct,
eyesight, memory, and skill.

�Key words: Chinese junk, seafaring, ethnography

Fig. 1: One of the Earlier Documents to Record the Compass Bearing
Direction for Sailing Routes between Fu-Chow to Ryukyu in 1580.
Introduction
In 2004, the author had opportunity to sail on the three-masted Jin Hua
Xin as an apprentice sailor for her last voyage, this long voyage from Dong
Shan Bay of southern Fujian to Zhu-Hai of Canton took 9 days and
covered 330 nautical miles. Jin Hua Xin was the last working traditional
sailing junk in China coast; nearly 100 years old (Xu, 2010). Several
months of onboard investigation voyage provided a rare field experience
to approach the complex mechanism of crew, their organization, and their
daily work; and this experience led the author to raise a subject of
seafarers with a marine ethnographic field investigation project along the
Fujian coast in 2001. The details of seafarers daily work on Chinese junks
are little known by outsiders previously; yet the last successors of sailors
and fishermen recollected their past stories piece by piece. Experimental
archaeology creates an effective scene for realistic performance of past
systems by sailing a full-scale reconstruction boat. A small full-size replica
LanTay II is planning an archaeological voyage to cross the Taiwan Strait,
the data gathered from the traces of past sailing routes will verify and add
some knowledge for understanding the real daily work of Chinese
seafarers onboard.
Previous Researches

�The studies on seamanship for operating and maneuvering Chinese junks
have not yet been explored in detail. To improve productivity, safety and
speed standards of the traditional water transport industry, a unique
official field investigation and iconographies collected for Chinese cargo
junks had been engaged in Fujian during 1958-1959. These works were
restrictedly published in book in 1960，also a reference for sail design
and use was attached in its appendices. This may be the only short
description in Chinese for sailing practices. Sometime in the early 20th
century, European scholars tried to understand the composition of
Chinese junk. A brief description about the structure and working principle
of yuloh has been included in G.R.G. Worcester’s marine ethnographic
field investigation (1947). Joseph Needham (1971) also had a brief
introduction about the action of wind on a Chinese junk under sail, and the
principles of tacking and wearing. There are also a few references about
the performance of Chinese sails under different angles of apparent wind
in Thomas Hoppe’s English manuscript in 2004.
One of the earlier European scholars who observed Chinese traditional
navigation is G. R. G. Worcester (1947). He noticed some important
details and technical logic that others had not found before; his description
is a following:
“In former days, lighted joss sticks suspended from the deck head
were the only timepieces…the cheap alarm chock has greatly
simplified navigation for the junk master. The junks carry no charts of
any kind. The laodahs find their way by means of a skillful combination
of sea instinct, keen eyesight, good memory, and an instinct for
direction nearly as a homing pigeon…they stand in for the land,
depending entirely upon their knowledge of its appearance and the
depth and nature of the soundings to give them position, for to them
the bottom of the sea has its hills and valleys like the land, and they
acquire an intimate acquaintance with its contours and the type of
bottom to be expected in each locality.”

�Another European scholar, Joseph Needham, noted the joss sticks used
by Chinese seafarers (1971):
“…(besides sand-glass,) Burning incense in stick-like form is a
practice which goes far back into China’s Middle Ages, and it would
have been very easy to measure time approximately enough with the
‘joss-sticks’.”

Needham (1971) also categorized the history of navigational methods into
three periods: (a) primitive navigation (b) quantitative navigation
(Measurement): +900 A.D. in East Asia (c) mathematical navigation:
+1500 A.D.
In 2008, an original map of the China Seas region was rediscovered in the
Bodleian Library Special Collections in Oxford by Robert K. Batchelor
(2014) and Timothy Brook (2013). The Selden Map is a detailed map of
Southern China dated the mid-16th century; it appears that the old Xiamen
port is the beginning of all the sea routes on the map, it also labeled the
trade routes departing from Xiamen.
A recent paper summarized the navigation and religion in traditional
Chinese junk have listed several historical materials and demonstrated
with two collections of sounding lead in Quan-Zhou (Lin, 2015).
Historical Contexts
A boat under sail is a very complex historical mechanism; the vessel
consists and represents a naval architecture system, as the tools for
different functions, as a space to reflect the weather, the waves and the
currents, and as a society for the composition of crew and their daily life.
In his encyclopaedic work, Heavenly Creations (chapter on boat, Tian-

�Gong-Kai-Wu), Song Yingxing (1637) divided the Chinese vessels into
sea-going, river and other craft; and then, he classified these for many
types according to their different sailing environment. This classification
may be applied even today because Chinese sailing traditions have
changed little through time, and the last sailors and fishermen of wooden
sailing junk still survive/alive. This paper focuses on Sha-Po-Wei, the main
area of old Xiamen port until the first half of the 20th century, the ages
when wooden sailing boats shuttle in the Taiwan Strait.
Sha-Po-Wei, along with adjacent coast lines, was an ideal port for
seafarers due to its location on the sea route connecting East Asia,
Southeast Asia, and Taiwan (Fig. 2). The demand of marine transportation
and ocean fishery brought seafarers from coastal regions of Quan-Zhou
and lower Zhang-Zhou River. Seafarers of Sha-PoWei divided into two
types: crews and fishermen. The crews mainly migrated from Hui-An
county of Quan-Zhou, while fishermen moved from Zhang-Zhou river
basin belong to Hai-Chen county. Fishermen of Sha-Po-Wei called
themselves ‘sea beggars,’ and it is subdivided into several groups
according different fishing method, namely types and lengths of fishing
vessel. Those groups (between fishermen and local resident, fishermen
and crews, even between different groups of Sha-Po-Wei fishermen) were
rarely communicating each other. Furthermore, both fishermen and crews
lived in their own enclosed social space to avoid troubles with others;
many of them have not even walked several miles out to countryside in
whole their life.

�Fig. 2: A Map of South Fujian and Old Amoy Port Sha-Po-Wei.
Organization
To learn composition of crews is the first step to approach their daily life.
In general, 15-20 tons deadweight trade vessel with two sails allocated 56 sailors, 30-35 tons also two sails would be 7-8 sailors, 55-65 tons with
three sails has 12-13 sailors. Crews were temporary employed between
by the ship owner; however, in addition to their lower wage, every sailor
was allowed to carry a few private cargo up to 250 kilograms, and usually
the ‘laodahs’ (equivalent to captain in Western) had doubled weight and
doubled payment more than other crews. There are five chief positions in
Chinese trade vessel; these were laodah, (and vice laodah, which is

�equivalent to helmsman in the western world), mast head, sampan,
foreboard, and supply chief (besides the ‘chu-hai’ who served as ship
owner's representative also in charge of accounting and port to call for
loading and unloading cargo). The crews were on duty during the day and
in two shifts in the night; they changed shifts in midnight. Laodah and vice
laodah keep working throughout the voyage until they cast the anchor.
Chuhai did not participate in onboard works.
For a local long-line fishing vessels crew size was much bigger than a
corresponding-sized merchant ship. Lodah and vice laodah had to work
day and night during the deep-sea fishing voyage; there were no chief
positions for other sailors, hence there were no arranged shifts. After
vessel dropped the long liner fishing, sampans were lowered one by one
along the fishing route; 3-4 sailors on each sampan were taking back the
hooks. This hard work usually lasted all day long.
There is a small shrine at the aft area of the poop deck containing the
effigy of the junk’s patron saints, Goddess of Mercy, Matsu, Guandi, etc.
The laodah or vice laodah of trade vessel burned incense in stick-like
‘joss-stick’ one by one throughout the voyage to keep alight in the shrine
where the compass laid also. For fishing junks, it was same but joss-stick
only burned one in morning and one in evening, as well as some important
occasions and critical times. Many local long liners have one ‘tong-ki’, a
trance-state man while intercommunicated oracles onboard; he would
give advice in case of an emergency. The tong-ki was a fisherman in
normal times, and they did not receive extra payment.
A living room/quarters was located at the aft area of the ship, or the lower
area of the quarter-poop deck; laodah’s bunk on the back on the left,
opposite side was for chu-hai. In Chinese junk, portside also named yuloh
side while starboard called sail side. Ice butt and stove located in the sail

�side, toilet and water bin were in the yuloh side. Sailors carried water in a
bin contained 30 ‘dan’, or 1500 kilograms.
Seamanship
The bamboo strip sails had been adopted in Chinese junks since the
Western Han Dynasty (206 BC-220 AD), and used up until the early 20th
century. However, the last successors of seafarers along the Fujian coast,
which the average age is 80 years old, mostly never saw the bamboo
sails; some of them just heard them from their previous generation or two
generations earlier in which these sails were being used. To operate a
bamboo matting sail, it has to be rolled and unrolled; it is heavier than one
used cloth sail. There is an idiom applied to both sail types, and that says
‘trim one's rubber to the wind’. The cloth lugsail was fasten on odd number
of bamboo from luff to leech where could see the balance from the mast;
each end of the batten on the leech was connected by the bight and
through some euphroes lead the control sheets terminated in one main
sheet to the stern of the upper deck. The sail was often very heavy, and it
required the whole crew at the winch to set the sail. On Jin Hua Xin, it
required approximately 12 minutes with six sailors to turn the winch. The
vice laodah held the tiller and order the trimmer to control the main sheet,
while the laodah served as a navigator and rarely handled the rudder.
The leeward sailing, windward sailing, and wind abeam sailing were the
main points of Chinese sailing junk under different angles of apparent
wind. The latter was rarely recorded by previous researchers, both Song
Yingxing (1637) and Needham (1971) seemed to be confused between
the beam reach and windward sailing. The local seafarers call it ‘tripod
sheet’ as the sheet system have fasted the main sail keep it at
approximate 50 degree angle with the stern, which is the position in
between the leeward sailing and windward sailing. The Old Xiamen

�seafarers often used tripod sheet when they set sail to Tainan by the
winter monsoon (northeast or north wind). The main sail of Fujian junk
was hung on starboard side of the mast, thus the sailors on quarterdeck
would see the bamboo battens while sailing with tripod sheet; they called
it open sail (all the way on the road was port tack, the batten was force to
left the mast). When the boat went back to Xiamen by using same
monsoon, no matter sailing with close reach or beam reach ,it was
starboard tack; this was call close sail (the batten was pushed to touch
the mast) as the bamboo battens could not been seen at the position of
laodah. Moreover, Chinese sailors often worked to windward tacking and
jibing by turn the stern to wind; accident jibe was deemed to be dangerous
especially under the strong wind.
Onboard tools include axes, nails, knives and cloth tec., were used for
emergency repairs. The author learnt and experienced to block the bottom
loopholes in the towed voyage of Lan Tay II at February 2004 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: To block the bottom loopholes of the LanTay II.

�Navigation
Just like people live in mountains naturally know and understand their
surrounding landform, Chinese seafarers understood that the seabed had
hills and valleys similar to the land with different sediment types; sailors
used these sediments and topography of the seabed to acquire positions
of the vessel on voyages. The last successors of Fujian seafarers did not
use the needle sailing route manuscripts, but they relied on their trained
eyesight and memories. Yet, some of them also learnt the manuscripts
given by their previous generation; therefore, they can read and
understand it.
Phing-Chou Kho Than, written between 1111 and 1117 by Chu Yu,
described navigation techniques as follow:
“The ship’s pilots are acquainted with the configuration of the coasts,
at night they steer by the stars, and in the day-time by the sun. In dark
weather they look at the south-point needle (compass). They also use
a line a hundred feet long with a hook at the end, which they let down
to take samples of mud from the sea-bottom, by its smell they can
determine their whereabouts.”

The sounding lead was used to ascertain the depth of water, the head of
lead has a hole filled with soap or grease to stick to a few seabed materials
to identify if there was sand, mud, or stones. The weight of a sounding
lead was between 3-5 kilograms. The word ‘fathom’ and ‘water’ was used
by old Xiamen port seafarers to mean a two-arm span, which is
approximately 1.6 meters. Usage of the sounding lead was also described
by Xiao LiuQiu Man Zhi written in 1755. When thrown into the sounding
lead from window of yuloh or shipboard, sailors should remain the boat
stationary. Every five waters there was a red sign in the rope.

�The laodah or vice laodah burned a joss-stick and kept it alight in the
shrine after the ship set sail, and each incense ran about one hour; this
also helped them to acquire the positions in the sailing route. Chinese
seafarers almost never used the ‘distance’ to describe the sea route, but
instead of ‘how long’ it took.
In the middle of the Selden Map, there is an illustration of a Chinese
mariner’s compass at the top, this may be the earliest sample can be seen
today (Fig. 4). The compass was divided into 24 points represented by the
twelve Chinese, earthly branches and the twelve heavenly stems. The
most common compass was consisted of a round wood box, where an
arrow shaped needle was balanced inside. The oldest style compass was
dry-pivoted, later ones were filled with water; yet both were called ‘drygen’ by local seafarers. After the compass was improved with 12 Chinese
characters, it came to 360 degrees; this compass was called ‘luo-gen’.
The seafarers were taught to use the compass and to calculate the tides
and winds since they were young. Every seagoing junk had two dry-gens,
at least, should one needle lose its magnetic field. The Vice laodah kept
one on his side, while the loadah kept another one. In the night, it was
illuminated by the laodah’s opium pipe. Even sampans from long line
fishing junks had their own small dry-gens.

Fig. 4 (right): The Chinese
Mariner’s Compass on Selden
Map.

�Besides compass and sounding lead, Sha-Po-Wei fishermen used
primitive astronomical guidance for them to orient themselves. They could
read directions by simply by 4 stars during the night. Venus for east,
Needle End Star for south, West Star for west and North Star for north.
Sailing Routes
There are a least eleven historical documents about compasses and its
bearing directions for sailing routes in Taiwan Strait: these are listed as
follows:
1. Si yi Guang Ji (四夷广记), written between 1592 and 1598 by Shen
Mao Shang.
2. Shun Feng Hsiang Sung (顺风相送 Fair Winds for Escort), written in
about 1593.
3. Tung His Yang Khao (东西洋考 Studies on the Oceans East and
West) ,written in 1617 by Chuang Hsich.
4. Chih Nan Cheng Fa (指南正法 General Compass Bearing Sailing
Directions), written before 1669.
5. Hai Kuo Wen Chien Lu (海国闻见录)，written in 1730 by Chen Lun
Jiong
6. Peng hu Ji Lue (澎湖纪略)，written during the reign of Emperor
Qianlong in Qing Dynasty by Hu Jian Wei.
7. Xiao Liu Qiu Man Zhi (小琉球漫志)，written in 1755 by Zhu Shi Jia.
8. Wai Hai Ji Yao (外海纪要), written in early 19th century by Li Zen
Jie.
9. Xia-Men Zhi (厦门志，Xiamen Chronicle), written in 1839 by Zhou
Kai.
10.
Xia-Men-Gang ji shi (厦门港纪事), written in 1843 by Dou
Zheng Biao.
11.
Hai Jiang Yao Lue Bi Jiu (海疆要略必究), written in 1856 by Li
Yan Yu.

�When a ship set sail to Tainan from Xiamen, nearly all the above
documents showed similar descriptions for navigation; departing from
Nan Tai Wu of Xiamen at direction between ‘chen’ and ‘Xun’ (amount to
127.5°)，it takes seven ‘gen’ to Peng-Hu hill, then sail at direction of ‘xun’
(about 135°)，and it takes another five ‘gen’ to Luerhmen of Tainan.
Many sailors of old Xiamen port served on merchant junks between south
Fujian and Taiwan; they sailed to Tai-Nan in north wind season, went to
Wu-Qi of Taichung, Lu-Kang of Chang-Hua, Dong-Shi and Bu-Dai of
Chia-Yi, kee-Lung during south wind season. Mostly, they set sail from
the old Xiamen port; it took less than one tide to arrive Bay Liao-Luo of
Quemoy. After waiting for good wind, they set sail again and used the
tripod sheet sailing to Ma-Kung of Peng-Hu for approximately twenty
hours. They then waited for suitable winds and tides to Luerhmen; it would
take another 10 hours. They would try to sail closer to the east direction
when sailed across Taiwan Strait. It would take much less time when ones
sailed from Tainan to Xiamen.
Archaeological Experiment of LanTay II
On 21st May 2017 at 10 am, LanTay II set sail from port of Liao-Luo of
Quemoy planning to trace the historical sailing route by heading 127.5° to
Peng-Hu (Fig. 5). The weather forecast for the day were Wind Northeast
Beaufort force 3, Swell 1.3 meters, but the author onboard found that the
wind had veered to east and increasingly, while the swell is more angular
than the wind after the ship entered Taiwan Strait. The course of the ship
had to turn in direction of 170°-180° to steer quartering sea. The LanTay
II was under control until 16 pm, when the skipper made the decision to
abandon the boat at the position 24.1743°N, 118.5535°E, while the
situation was Wind East Beaufort force 6-7, Swell 3 meters and 6-7 meters

�instantaneous. The 6 years of preparatory archaeological voyage lasted
6 hours, all the crew numbers transferred to companion ship.

Fig. 5: The archaeological voyage of LanTay II.
As postmortem reports of the experiment, Sha-Po-Wei indigenous
fishermen had compiled the warning signals as below:
a.

The day of 21st May was the 26th day of the fourth month in Chinese

lunar calendar, one of the brightest days of the Great White Planet in the
whole year; and it is the day for brewing disaster the whole year ahead in
Taiwan Strait. It means that this is a day with storm surge and a taboo day
for sailing.
b.

The included angle of wind and wave increasing with the height of

the sun which reached the maximum after 12 am, and they stacked up
into higher swell. The best set sailing time to cross Taiwan Strait was 4
am.

�c.

The position where the ship was abandoned is right between

seabed valley and hills based on the past records; that was where the
swell on the sea surface become rougher (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6: The Sha-Po-Wei indigenous fisherman motioned the topography
of the seabed of the Taiwan Strait they recorded half a century ago.
Discussion
The seamanship and navigation of the Chinese Junk requires a plethora
of nautical knowledge and a variety of onboard skills. All knowledge
regarding Junk ships (including sail and rudder, sounding lead, mariner’s
compass, joss-stick, compass bearing recorded for sailing route, wind and
tide, etc.) formed a closely connected knot of complementary techniques.
The information gathered during the marine ethnographic field
investigations at old Xiamen port indicated that a series of traditional
onboard skills displayed by the last successors of sailors and fishermen
may be closely corresponding to skills and techniques described in the
historical documents that range from Song Dynasty to Qing Dynasty.
Nonetheless, details of the geographic parameters of sailing routes are
still obscure, such as accurate depths and seabed materials, and the
sailing directions under the effect on winds and tides. An old local

�seafarers proverb says, ‘The stationary compass bearing recorded but
flexible brains’, and also says ‘Live performances to speak clearly’, thus
experimental archaeological methodologies, or sailing a real ship, shall be
used to study their historical context to reconstruct navigational practices
and methodologies for sailing in China Seas. The better way forward with
archaeological voyages is involving the older seamen and indigenous
fishermen into the sailing investigations. The authors believe that
expected discoveries of this research-investigation will bring new
evidence that significantly extends our knowledge of earlier onboard lives
of Chinese Junk ships.
Oral Sources
1. Capt. Zhuang XingJie, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 27th March 2012.
2. Capt. Zhuang XingJie, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 30th March 2012.
3. Huang ChaoQi, Ruan PengShi, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 11th April
2012.
4. Capt. Zhuang XingJie, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 13th April 2012.
5. Huang ChaoQi, Yu LongFa, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 21st April 2012.
6. Huang Chao Qi, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 17th June 2014.
7. Ruan YaYing, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 10th November 2014.
8. Ruan YaYing, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 11th April 2015.
9. Zen JinTang, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 12th April 2015.
10. Ruan YaYing, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 12th December 2015.
11. Zen JinTang, Pi Shan Road of Xiamen, 18th December 2015.
12. Ruan QueTou, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 27th December 2015.
13. Ruan ShiLu, Sha-Po-Wei of Xiamen, 30th December 2015.
14. Ruan ShiLu, Ruan QueTou, Sha Po Wei of Xiamen, 8th January
2016.

�15. Capt. Zhang TongLong, Ruan QingTing, and Yu LongFa, Si Ming Nan
Road of Xiamen, 27th May 2017.

References
Anonymous, 1653. Selden Map of Southern China and Southeast
Asia (MS Selden Supro 105). Bodleian Library (University of Oxford),
Oxford.
Anonymous, 1593. Fair Winds for Escort / Shun Feng Hsiang Sung
(MS Selden Supro 145). Bodleian Library (University of Oxford), Oxford.
Anonymous, ca. 1669. Chih Nan Cheng Fa / General Compass Bearing
Sailing Directions (MS Selden Supro 578). Bodleian Library (University of
Oxford), Oxford.
Batchelor, R. K., 2014. The Selden Map and the Making of a Global
City, 1549–1689. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Brook, T., 2013. Mr. Selden's Map of China: Decoding the Secrets of
a Vanished Cartographer. Bloomsbury Press, New York.
Chen, Lun Jiong, 1730. Hai Kuo Wen Chien Lu, Repn. in 1970. Economic
Academe of Taiwan Business Bank, Taipei.
Chu, Yu, 1111-1117. Phing-Chou Kho Than, Repn in 2006. Elephant
Press, Zhengzhou.
Chuang, Hsich, 1617. Tung His Yang Khao (Studies on the Oceans
East and West), Rpen in 1970. Economic Academe of Taiwan Business
Bank, Taipei.
Dou, Zheng-Biao, 1843. Xia-Men-Gang ji shi. In Six Xiamen Territoria
Seas Literatures Annotation of Xiamen, Repn. in 2013, Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen.
Hoppe, T., 2004-2008. Mainland China Revival of the Junk. Unpublished
Manuscript.
Hu, JianWei, ca. 1736. Peng hu Ji Lue, Repn. in 1970. Economic
Academe of Taiwan Business Bank, Taipei.
Li, YanYu, 1856. Hai Jiang Yao Lue Bi Jiu. In Six Xiamen Territoria
Seas Literatures Annotation of Xiamen, Repn. in 2013, Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen.

�Li, ZenJie, ca.1800. Wai Hai Ji Yao. In Six Xiamen Territoria Seas
Literatures Annotation of Xiamen, Repn. in 2013, Xiamen University
Press, Xiamen.
Lin, Han, 2015. Navigation and religion in traditional Chinese ship.
Symposium of Navigation and Religion of the Traditional Ships in
East Asia, Busan.
Needham, J.,1971. Science and Civilisation in China, Nautical
Research, Vol. IV: Physics and Physical, Part III: Civil Engineering
and Nautics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sailing Cargo Junks Office of Department of Transportation of Fujian
(Ed.), 1960. Fu jian sheng Mu Fan Chuan tu ji (Collection of Cargo
Junks Drawings for Fujian Province). Department of Transportation of
Fujian, Fuzhou.
Shen, MaoShang, 1592-1598. Si yi Guang Ji, Repn. in 1947. China
Central Library, Nanking.
Song, YingXing, 1637. Heavenly Creations (Tian-Gong-Kai-Wu) in Sequel
to Si-Ku-Quan-Shu, Zi Radical, Repn. in 2002. Shanghai Ancient Books
Press, Shanghai.
Worcester, G. R. G., 1947. The Junks and Sampans of the Yangtze:
A Study in Chinese Nautical Research, Vol. 1: Introduction and Craft
of the Estuary and Shanghai Area. Statistical Department of the
Inspectorate General of Customs, Shanghai.
Xiao, ChongYe and Xie Jie, 1580. Shi Ryukyu Lu (Diplomatic Mission to
Ryukyu), Repn. in 1997. Economic Academe of Taiwan Business Bank,
Taipei.
Xu, Lu, 2010. A Ship Archaeological Investigation on Canton Style
Sailing Junks: the Jun Hua Xing Case. In China Maritime Museum
(Ed.), The Position and Mission of China’s Maritime Culture,
Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House, Shanghai: 236-252.
Zhou, Kai, 1839. Xia-Men Zhi (Xaimen Chronicle), Repn. in 1996. Lu Jiang
Press, Xiamen.
Zhu, ShiJie, 1755. Xiao Liu Qiu Man Zhi, Repn. in 1970. Economic
Academy of Taiwan Business Bank in 1970, Taipei.

�Biographies
Xu Lu (Chinese: 许路) is
Founding Director and Chief
Maritime Archaeologist of
NVOCC Chinese Sailing Junk
Expedition Society (CSJES).
He is a commissioner of
China
Maritime
History
Studies
Association
and
Fellow of The explorers Club.
He also works as a co-research fellow for NSC-ANR project Maritime
knowledge for China Seas hosted by École française d'Extrême-Orient
(EFEO) and Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica (IHP) in
2014-2018 duration. His English publication include The Naval
Architecture of Ancient Fujian Style Sea Going Sailing Junks: An
Overview (Delta Book World, 2014).
Yu LongFa (Chinese: 余龙发)
is a local fisherman at Xiamen
old fishing port, born in 1952
at ShaPoWei. He works as a
professional fisherman since
the age of 12, being a skillful
master of seamanship and
navigation in east and South
China Sea during past 50
years. He assisted Mr. Xu Lu
with the recording and decoding on board skills in Chinese Sailing Junk.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5631">
                <text>Seamanship and Navigation: Seafarers on Board Daily Skills in Chinese Junk </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5632">
                <text>Chinese sailing traditions changed a little through time; sailors inherited their onboard skills, expertise, and experience by orally imparting others with physical instruction. But these daily skills were rarely recorded or studied in the past. For seafarers, how to operate and maneuver a Chinese junk was their daily work; and apart from sparse historical documents such as Phing-Chou Kho Than (Yu, 1117), Shi Liu-Qiu Lu (Xiao and Xia, 1580) (Fig. 1), and preliminarily observations by G.R.G. Worcester, Joseph Needham, Thomas Hoppe, and others, seamanship and navigation were kept in the minds of surviving successions of living sailors. In 2004, the author had an opportunity to sail on a nearly 100 year old Jin Hua Xin as an apprentice sailor for her last voyage. Several months of onboard experiences provided a rare field investigation to approach the complex mechanism of crew, their organization and their daily work. This experience led the authors to raise a marine ethnographic field investigation project along Fujian coast. Experimental archaeology creates effective scenes for realistic performance of past systems. A small full-size replica LanTay II was built for a series of archaeological voyages; the data gathered from the traces of past sailing routes will verify and add some knowledge for understanding the real daily work of Chinese seafarers onboard. In this paper, the authors shall present combined researches on historical documents, past observations with lively oral materials achieved by marine ethnographic field investigation on traditional sailing ports along South Fujian coast; throughout this research, the authors approach the knowledge about seafarers onboard daily skills and try to present the research about the sailors methods to maneuver the junk and its navigation system by means of a combination of instinct, eyesight, memory, and skill.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5633">
                <text>Xu Lu </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5634">
                <text>Yu Long Fa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5635">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5636">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5637">
                <text>Xu Lu </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5638">
                <text>Yu Long Fa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="491" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="283">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/b529e1801d2ecbc7f3598dd2fa22c6af.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f49e7ebd2cd59e79eab61d7476e47351</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5630">
                    <text>Uraga Port between Manila and Acapulco

Kahoru Suzuki
Japan Society for Nautical Research
s-k20@nifty.com

Abstract
Uraga Port at the southern end of the Miura Peninsula, located at the
entrance of Tokyo Bay, is formed as a deep cove from the Pacific Ocean;
it is less susceptible to weather conditions and is suitable for the natural
environment. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Japan opened three
international trade ports. Holland and England is Hirado, Portugal is
Nagasaki, Spain is Uraga. Ieyasu Tokugawa begins dispatching
shipbuilding engineers and miners from Spain and as a result of
negotiating with the Philippine Governor General, the Spaniards of Manila
visited Uraga Port every year since 1604 and the Franciscan Monastery
in the town was built. Ieyasu Tokugawa also sent British William Adams
to Manila and negotiated to continue dealing with Spain However, contrary
to the intention of Ieyasu Tokugawa, Spain did not convey shipbuilding
technology and mining technology. In 1611, Mexican envoy Sebastián
Vizcaíno came to Uraga, but only the east coast of Japan was
investigated. At the beginning of the Edo period Christianity was forbidden
in 1613. Just before the death of Ieyasu Tokugawa, Diego de Santa
Catalina came to Uraga, Ieyasu Tokugawa questioned Spain's attitude,
banished him to Spain, and the transaction with Spain was completely
completed. Japan took an isolation policy and only Uraga Port quietly
disappeared
as
a
trade
port.
Key words: Galleon, port, Manila, Acapulco
Introduction
When Ieyasu Tokugawa appeared on the political front stage, Japan was
isolated from East Asian countries being a disorderly situation both
economically and externally. For him, therefore, it was natural trend to

�revive the economic infrastructure and turn it into a way to open the
country.
First of all, Ieyasu Tokugawa started the normalization of diplomacy in
Spain, which had been severed by the San Felipe incident. In December
1598, Ieyasu Tokugawa contacted Franciscan missionaries and
negotiated to invite a Spanish ship in Manila to Uraga. He sent a letter to
the Spanish Governor of the Philippines to dispatch construction
engineers of Galleon ship and innovative smelting engineers of Mexico.
As a result, the Franciscan monastery was built in Uraga. Since 1604 a
Spanish ship from Manila to Acapulco had entered to Uraga every year,
which was opened as an international trade port.
It is worth noting that William Adams from England was closely involved
in this Uraga diplomacy. Today, a number of studies on William Adams
conducted by Japanese, Dutch, or British researchers, but on him as a
diplomatic advisor of Ieyasu Tokugawa for Spain is not considered at all.
Despite the fact that politicians did not usually hire foreigners in Japanese
history, reasons why only William Adams was hired were not discussed
among scholars. Although Nagasaki and Hirado trades have been
investigated a lot, no survey on Uraga trade has been done. Why did
Ieyasu Tokugawa abandon the deportation order of missionaries by
Hideyoshi Toyotomi and accept Catholicism?
Request Spanish Miners and Shipbuilding Technicians

�Ieyasu’s negotiations with Spain are not limited to trade. He was trying to
invite shipbuilders for western styled Galleon ships and miners. At that
time Japan was using troublesome method, called haihuki method, for
silver mining. Because of its immaturity, this method led lots of economical
loss. On the other hand, Spain used a revolutionary amalgam method in
Mexico and Peru that used ‘lead’. This technology was discovered in
Mexico in 1557 and was adopted in 1571, whereby Mexico gained a lot of
silver. For Ieyasu’s future perspectives on progress of economic policy,
introduction of this technology to domestic silver mining had an important
meaning. In addition, Japan did not have any construction technologies
for large western typed sailing vessels to withstand trans-Pacific voyage,
Ieyasu Tokugawa thought that its technological introduction from Spain
was important as well.
To accomplish his two plans, in December 1598 Ieyasu Tokugawa
summoned a Franciscan missionary Jerónimo de Jesús who had
experiences of trade-negotiations in Japan since the era of Hideyoshi
Toyotomi. Ieyasu Tokugawa proposed for Spain to use Uraga as a trading
post and build big ships there. In order to avoid drifting alike the San Felipe
issue, Jerónimo de Jesús considered that using another ports in the Far
East between Manila and Acapulco passage was useful. To do so, he
thought, it was essential to survey the east coast of Japan for safe voyage

�around the Far East. Yet, Jerónimo de Jesús explained that he had to
request these plans to the Spanish Governor of the Philippines.
However, the Spanish side did not intend to accept Ieyasu's request at all.
Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia mentioned this issue in his An Account of
Japan, 1609 that there were abundant of silver veins in Japan; even
though they did not have a good smelting technology, production is
surprisingly vast. He also remarked that if Japan had had foreign miners
and mercury for production of silvers, wealth of Japan might have become
a threat for Spain.
As for shipbuilding technologies, Antonio de Morga, an aide of the
Spanish Governor of the Philippines remarked about this issue in his
Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas, he said that giving technology of
shipbuilding to Japan was not a wise decision. Manila did not receive any
attacks from Japan before that time because only because Japan did not
have any technologies to build large sailing vessels. If Japan became to
possess such technologies, Japan would come to Manila by ship to attack
the Spanish territories. If those trading posts were attacked by Japanese
troops, 500 Spaniards in a castle have no power to fight back.
Japanese Laws Regarding Shipwrecks and Extinction of Yawata
Ships
In Japan it was believed that shipwrecks were caused by Gods of the sea
since the ancient times, and cargos and trade goods of the wrecked ships

�were legally confiscated by the owner of the coastal land. To ease the
anger of the sea gods, thereafter, new temples or shrines were built using
sales-profits of such goods from the wrecks. No captain of the ship had
any rights to repair the ships or to retrieve properties and cargos from the
wrecks. The substantial loss of the San Felipe confiscated by Hideyoshi
Toyotomi exceeded 1 million pesos.

Therefore, the Spaniards from

Manila to Acapulco had to avoid getting stranded in Japan.
Ieyasu Tokugawa was concerned that this Japanese custom regarding
shipwrecks was a biggest obstacle against the negotiations with Spain. In
1602, Ieyasu Tokugawa noted to the Spanish Governor of the Philippines
that ‘in the future we would not confiscate any cargos and trading goods
of drifting ships from your country, and Japan should also provide some
foods and places to repairs Spanish ships’. The similar political
statements were written in the trade patent form with the Netherlands and
with England later.
In a letter of July 1599, the Spanish Governor of the Philippines requested
three issues to Ieyasu Tokugawa, viz. control and punishment of the
Yawata ships (Japanese pirates) in the Philippine Sea, prohibiting
Japanese from visiting Manila without permission, and not dispatching
more than three vessels each year (Ikoku Nikki). Spanish asked for a
proof or an insurance of a public trade to Japanese side, and requested
as many permission documents (Watanai Seal Imprint) for trading with
Ieyasu Tokugawa. According to a study by a Japanese scholar, Ieyasu

�Tokugawa enacted an order that any ships having neither seal nor
permission document should not allowed to go to the Philippines. This
new regulation or red seal system was executed from 1600; the origin of
red seal trade system was born from the Uraga diplomacy by Ieyasu
Tokugawa.
Two Spanish Vessels Drifted into Kanto
There were two records of drift incidents of Spanish ships from Manila to
Kanto has. The first one is commander Don Juan Esquerra drifted to Otaki
Kazusa in the fall of 1601. At this time, Ieyasu Tokugawa provided a
sailing ship built by William Adams in Japan and provisions. He
successfully returned to Luzon in 1604 (Ikoku Nikki). After that, an
ambassador visited to Uraga in May 1606 to display their appreciation for
Ieyasu’s treatment on commander Don Juan Esquerra. This visiting was
recorded as "Sagami-kun to Miura Odori Hanedai" in 1606.
The second wreck occurred in September 1609. The Spanish Governor
of the Philippines Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia or Don Rodrigo wrecked
at Kanto Iwawada on his return trip to Acapulco. This time, Ieyasu
Tokugawa sent William Adams to Iwawada. In An Account of Japan, 1609,
Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia mentioned ‘Ieyasu’s favorite British officer
William Adams brought a passage-permission “salvo conducto” and a red
seal “chapa”’. At this opportunity, Ieyasu Tokugawa tried re-negotiating
with Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia, regarding the dispatch of miners. The
agreements of this negotiation between them were listed below:

�1. Providing provisions and foods for Spaniards.
2. Repair for ships shall be provided by Japanese shipbuilders with
normal wages.
3.

Ambassadors shall be treated respectively in Japan, and
accommodations are provided to them.

4. Between 100 and 200 Spanish miners shall be dispatched to
Japan. When a vein was discovered by Spanish, half of the
smelted silver will be divided among miners, and the remaining
half shall be divided into Ieyasu Tokugawa and King Felipe.
5. Priests have to be allowed to stay in Japan for the Spanish
miners, and all jurisdictions for them were controlled by Spanish
side.
6. When Spanish were attacked by Japanese, the Japanese king
shall punish the offenders.
7. Exorcise Dutch from Japan.
8. Permit Spanish to survey on east coast of Japan.
The reason why ‘shipbuilders and Galleons’ was not a part of this
agreement was that Ieyasu Tokugawa already owned sailing vessels
which were built by William Adams and their construction techniques.
To Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia, Ieyasu Tokugawa gave a 120 ton ship
which was designed and built by William Adams for his return trip. This
ship was named San Buena Ventura and, in August 1610, Rodrigo de
Vivero y Aberrucia left Uraga port for Acapulco. In the maritime history
of Japan, the first ship crossed the Pacific Ocean was this vessel built
by William Adams.
William Adams' Negotiations with Manila
Since 1604, Uraga Minato in the Kanto area had been used as a trading
post by Spanish mercantile ships every year. On the other hand, Portugal

�tried to prevent Manila from its trading with China and Japan. According
to Lorenzo Pérez’s Apostolado y martirio del Beato Luis Sotelo en el
Japón, following this notion, in May 1606 the Spanish Roundtable
Conference was held at the Kingdom of Spain, and the king ordered the
Spanish Governor of the Philippines to stop Manila from its trade with
Japan. To mitigate and solve this problem, Spanish captain Francisco
Moreno Donoso together with a missionary Beato Luis Sotelo visited
Ieyasu Tokugawato in order to seek a solution. Beato Luis Sotelo
suggested Ieyasu Tokugawa to send William Adams to Manila as a
negotiator with Spain. As a result, William Adams visited the Spanish
Governor of the Philippines Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia on 15th June
1608 at Manila. This was thirteen years before the beginning of Japan’s
commerce with England, i.e. Adams' home country. This was also one
year before Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia drifted to Kanto Iwawada on
his return voyage to Acapulco in 1609.
Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia understood the potential of profits that the
Philippines gained from trade and relationships with Japan. On 9th July
1608, he released all Japanese prisoners in order to finish, or get rid of,
issues related to Yawata ships (Japanese pirates) which had been
pending. Then, Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia wrote a letter to Ieyasu
Tokugawa on the same day. This letter in Ikoku Nikki, which was
translated by one of Ieyasu’s personal scholars, is as follows:

�捧 前将軍家康尊公書云
本国伊須波二屋之帝王 当国呂宋為守護拙夫被仰付 今度致渡海
候。然者、前々於守護人 御懇意之段令承知候。到我等、無御異
議候様可恭候 縦雖隔雲山万里候。心中者非其儀候。彌々可申談
候。次又拙夫、此国参着砌 当所数年逗留之日本人徒者共候而
所之騒ニ罷成候之間 当年者壹人も不相残帰国之儀申付候。雖然
毎年渡海之商客 何も無疎意人等候之間 致馳走候。向後別儀有
・ ・

・・

間敷候。如例年 今年も黒船差渡候。則到関東可乗入之旨 安子
申付候。併海路不任雅意候へは 日域中者、皆以御国之儀候之間
何所へ成共 風次第可入津之由申付候 此加飛丹同船中者共 御
馳走奉仰候。兼又貴国居住之ふらて之儀 如前々被加御哀燐候様
是又奉仰候。少進物以目録申上候。奉表寸志而已。恐惶敬白。
慶長拾三年五月廿七日

鈍、ろちりこで

朱印

びへいろ 判也
謹上
日本国御主、大御所様
(Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia, who arrived in Manila was the Governor
of the King of the Spanish Kingdom. In order to strengthen the bond for
long-lasting relationship with your country (Japan), Rodrigo de Vivero y
Aberrucia released all the Japanese prisoners who had been
imprisoned in Manila for several years. Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia
believed that two nations shall have good relationship and conflicts in

�such will not reoccur. This year, Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia will send
one ship, and he will give an order the ship to enter Kanto, and Rodrigo
de Vivero y Aberrucia has already mentioned so to ‘Ange’ and requested
provisions and other hospitality for its captain.)
The author believes that, together with one captain and one navigator of
the ship, William Adams was onboard this ship to Japan in 1608. A person,
who was described as ‘Ange’ in the letter, was also known as Miura Anno.
Indeed, his person was William Adams. His presence onboard was also
described in Lorenzo Pérez’s letter, saying that he ordered William Adams
to enter the Kanto area. The Minister of State of Mexico for Japanese and
Chinese affairs, C. A. Lera also mentioned and described William Adams
as ‘Anjin’. In the book of Ikoku Nikki, additionally, William Adams was
written and named as ‘Anza’, ‘Anji’, ‘Ann’, or ‘Anzin’, and in Japanese
Travel Book written by John Saris, William Adams was named ‘Ange’.
William Adams' trip to Manila, indeed, solved the problems related to
Yawata ships (Japanese pirates) that had been causing problems in
Philippine waters, and he managed to resume the Uraga trade. In the
same year, to avoid unnecessary conflicts, an ordinance was enacted in
Uraga that was to forbid Uraga residency to do any violence activities
against Spanish people. According to Apostolado y martirio del Beato Luis
Sotelo en el Japón, written by C. A. Lera, this ordinance was created
based on William Adams’s advice. In Uraga, a Franciscan monastery was
constructed in the same year as well which was also based on advice of

�William Adams. These generous treatments toward Spanish people in
Uraga were not because Ieyasu Tokugawa mitigated his attitude against
Christianity but because rather Ieyasu Tokugawa needed to withhold his
negative opinions toward Christianity in order to make his business with
Spain more successful.
Importance of William Adams
Why Ieyasu Tokugawa did heavily trust William Adams as a diplomatic
adviser? In the history of Japan, his case was extremely exceptional
because there were no other cases, except for William Adams. Japanese
emperors, shoguns, or important authorities have never used foreigners
as their important consultants before. Presumably, indeed, this happened
because of the Uraga diplomatic and trading policy by Ieyasu Tokugawa.
1. When William Adams visited Ieyasu Tokugawa first time in April 1600,
he asked Ieyasu Tokugawa to give him permission to start business in
Japan like other Portuguese or Chinese merchants, but Ieyasu Tokugawa
did not give him any permissions, which William Adams recorded in his
journal. If Ieyasu’s interest had been to use William Adams for trade
purposes with England or the Netherlands, he might not have had been
allowed by Ieyasu Tokugawa to trade with Spain. Ieyasu Tokugawa would
have asked William Adams on the early stage to look for Dutch or British
trading partners as soon as possible.

However, the trade with the

Netherlands established later in August 1609, nine years after Adams
came to Japan and that one with England was established in October

�1613, thirteen years after his arrival. In addition, trading agreements were
established with the Netherlands and England because these countries
needed Japan for their international competitions. Their positive attitudes
toward trades with Japan were so much different from the passive or
rather negative attitude of Spanish. Ieyasu Tokugawa himself was the
person who eagerly invited Spain to Uraga to establish a good economic
relationship with Manila or Acapulco.
2. Indeed, Ieyasu Tokugawa never invited any mercantile vessels form
the Netherlands and England to enter Uraga. Both nations were only
permitted to build commercial halls in Hirado. If Ieyasu Tokugawa wished,
Ieyasu he could easily have invited or ordered mercantile vessels from the
Netherlands and England to establish trading posts in Unaga, which is
very close to Edo, in order to make Kanto as an international economic
center. However, only Spain was frequently asked and invited to use
Uraga by Ieyasu Tokugawa.
3.

Another interesting fact was that Ieyasu Tokugawa gave William

Adams a house at Edo, as well as at the village of Hemi where close to
Uraga. Ieyase Tokugawa gave even a fief near Uraga to William Adams,
too. These facts clearly indicate that William Adams was expected to work
as an Ieyasu’s diplomatic advisor for Spanish issues, not for a simple
trading advisor with England and the Netherlands. This is obvious
because another Dutch diplomatic advisor Jan Joosten only received a
house at Edo from Ieyasu Tokugawa.

�4. On 15th August 1615 when the ambassador Diego de Santa Catalina,
who was sent by the Spanish Governor Mexico, arrived in Uraga on
Masamune’s ship, San Juan Bautista, Ieyasu Tokugawa summoned
William Adams from Hirado to Uraga. This event also indicated that
William Adams was especially expected to work on diplomatic
negotiations, in particular, with Spain.
It is clear from the above that William Adams was a heavily specialized
personal for Ieyasu’s Spain diplomacy.
Relationship between Masamune’s European Ship and Sebastián
Vizcaíno.
In June 1611, to thanks to hospitalities that Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia
received from Ieyasu Tokugawa during the wreck incidents on his way
returning to Acapulco, Sebastián Vizcaíno, the ambassador of the
Spanish Governor of Mexico, entered Uraga. Another mission of his was
to survey the east coast of Japan and to discover a legendary island where
produced fruitful amounts of gold and silver believed to exist near Japan,
and to make this legendary place as Spanish new trading port in East
Asia. Not surprisingly, Sebastián Vizcaíno did not manage to find a
fictitious gold and silver island, repeatedly encountered storms, and his
ship was destroyed eventually and returned to Uraga for repair on 7th
November 1612. After Sebastián Vizcaíno returned to Uraga, he asked
Ieyasu Tokugawa to lend his help for construction of a new sailing vessel
to go home. However, Ieyasu Tokugawa received from him only some

�nautical charts and maps of east coast of Japan, not any silver mining
engineers. Then, Ieyasu Tokugawa began to realize that his attempt to
invite Spanish miners to Japan to improve Japan’s domestic mining
system would not be materialized.
Instead, Sebastián Vizcaíno asked Masamune Date, a local lord of Oshu,
for help. When he visited the east coast of Japan, such as coasts of Oshu,
for surveying, he met Masamune Date who said to him that Masmune
Date loved to invite mercantle vessels from Mexico. After that, Sebastián
Vizcaíno offered a shipbuilding master to Masamune Date and, thanks to
this goodwill, Masamune Date later dispatched his embassy to Europe.
Accordingly, Ieyasu’s attempt to invite Spanish miners to Japan fell apart
without any successes. It was 1st February 1614 that Ieyasu’s new
executive order to completely ban against Christian propagations
throughout the country was enacted. Thus, his plan to transform Uraga
into

an

international

trade

port

was

perished

and

ended.

Conclusion
Leyasu 's Uraga diplomacy was exclusively focused on relationship with
Spain. Moreover, the port that Ieyasu Tokugawa used to invite Spanish
mercantile vessels was always Uraga port.

Other ports that Ieyasu

Tokugawa used to invite other European nations such as England, the
Netherlands, and Portugal were not Uraga but Hirado or Nagasaki.
Ieyasu’s true intention was to import and learn new profitable techniques
of mining developed in Mexico. For Ieyasu Tokugawa, therefore, William

�Adams was a very important diplomatic consultant to negotiate with Spain.
To build a friendly relationship with Spain, Ieyasu Tokugawa answered to
requests by the Spanish Governor of the Philippines to give permissions
with red seals to the limited numbers of Japanese mercantile ships. In
other words, the original concept of Ieyasu's red seal trade system was
born from his Uraga diplomacy.
From the beginning, Spanish did not have any intentions to send their
silver miners to Japan. Ieyasu’s mistake was that he could not disclose
their intentions. Failure of his Uraga diplomacy resulted in the complete
ban on Christianity in Japan. Nearly 300,000 Japanese who believed in
teachings of the Society of Jesuit and Franciscan were killed in the end.
Consequently, Japan or Tokugawa-Shogunate decided to close the doors
to any foreign countries, except for the Netherlands and for China. It could
be said that Ieyasu’s Uraga diplomacy with Spain also triggered the 250
years of Japan’s national isolation.
References
Suzuki, K., 1994. Uraga port opening and intention of Tokugawa Ieyasu.
Kanagawa Chiikishi Kenkyu, Vol. 12:1-17. .
Suzuki, K., 2010. Diplomatic Relation between Span and Japan by Ieyasu
Tokugawa. Shin Jimbutsuourai Sha, Tokyo.
Suzuki, K., 2014. Spain diplomacy and Uraga minato.
Kanagawa, Vol. 52: 1-20.

Regional

�Biography
Kahoru Suzuki, born in 1946 at the Kanagawa
Prefecture, Japan, is a specialized national public
servant in the Japanese government, who was
decorated with the Order of the Sacred Treasure,
Silver Rays in 2016. She is a member of the Japan
Society for Nautical Research and the Society of
Japanese Historical Research. In 1993 she received
her BA in Japanese History from Kokugakuin
University. Her books include The Sagami Miura
Clan and their History (Shin Jimbutsuourai Sha, 2007), Diplomatic
Relation between Span and Japan by Ieyasu Tokugawa (Shin
Jimbutsuourai Sha, 2010), or The Mukai Navy and its Surroundings
(Shincho, 2014).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5624">
                <text>Uraga Port between Manila and Acapulco </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5625">
                <text>Uraga Port at the southern end of the Miura Peninsula, located at the entrance of Tokyo Bay, is formed as a deep cove from the Pacific Ocean; it is less susceptible to weather conditions and is suitable for the natural environment. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Japan opened three international trade ports. Holland and England is Hirado, Portugal is Nagasaki, Spain is Uraga. Ieyasu Tokugawa begins dispatching shipbuilding engineers and miners from Spain and as a result of negotiating with the Philippine Governor General, the Spaniards of Manila visited Uraga Port every year since 1604 and the Franciscan Monastery in the town was built. Ieyasu Tokugawa also sent British William Adams to Manila and negotiated to continue dealing with Spain However, contrary to the intention of Ieyasu Tokugawa, Spain did not convey shipbuilding technology and mining technology. In 1611, Mexican envoy SebastiÃ¡n VizcaÃ­no came to Uraga, but only the east coast of Japan was investigated. At the beginning of the Edo period Christianity was forbidden in 1613. Just before the death of Ieyasu Tokugawa, Diego de Santa Catalina came to Uraga, Ieyasu Tokugawa questioned Spain's attitude, banished him to Spain, and the transaction with Spain was completely completed. Japan took an isolation policy and only Uraga Port quietly disappeared as a trade port. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5626">
                <text>Kahoru Suzuki</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5627">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5628">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5629">
                <text>Kahoru Suzuki</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="490" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="282">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/77672662d9c01da33bb028fc65000c93.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b6d1299224c66e8e489a69f59c34a38c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5623">
                    <text>Who Were the Africans in Eastern Asia? : The Christian
European Period 1500-1900 AD
Clifford Pereira
Royal Geographical Society
cliffjpereira@hotmail.com
Abstract
Seaways, especially monsoonal ones, allow movement on two directions.
However Eurocentric approaches have tended to create hierarchies of
cultures which have biased movements in particular directions to the
historical exclusion of some narratives. This is a fresh look at a cultural
connection from a perspective that has evaded investigation and seeks to
balance the research on Chinese interactions with Africans in Africa.
Africans have been trading with Asia for hundreds of years, yet their
history and presence in East Asia has been barely suggested or
investigated. The role of African crewmen is an important part of this
narrative and one that brings a new dimension (if not challenges) to
ethnographic studies of maritime cultural landscapes and seascapes.
Key words: Africa, China, interactions, exchange, ethnography

Introduction
In this paper an African is defined as a person whose ancestors were born
in Africa, Therefore discourse not limited to people who are perceived or
perceive themselves as Black or indeed Black African.
Eastern Asia is defined as the territory roughly east of a line 92⁰ East of
the Meridian to 146⁰ East, that is inclusive of Japan, North and South
Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, China and both mainland and maritime
Southeast Asia.
The paper proposes to answer four fundamental yet simple questions:
1) Who were the Africans that came to Eastern Asia (Origins)?
2) How did they get to Eastern Asia (Routes)?
3) What were they known as in Eastern Asia and why (Exonyms)?

�4) What was the nature of their lives in Southeast Asia (Socio-economic
and Political Agency)?
After intense research on the lengthy topic of Africans in Eastern Asia,
much of it from African perspectives, taking in important research
evidenced by Timothy Powers (2010 and 2012), Li Anshan (2015),
George Hatke (2013), Jacques Gernet (1999), William Clarence-Smith
(2006), de Verre Allen (1993), John Sutton (1990), Marina Tolmacheva
(1993), Louise Levathes and Shihan de Silva Jayasuraya (2008a and
2008b) a possible chronological framework consisting of four periods
based on the above criteria was produced:
1) The Hindu-Buddhist Asian period 300BC-700 AD.
2) The Islamic Asian period 700-1500 AD
3) The Christian European period 1500-1900 AD
4) The Modern Period 1900-2000 AD.
It is impossible to cover such an immense timeframe within this paper;
however, a concise bibliography is included for reference and future
research. This paper will concentrate on the evidence provided for period
3, which has been termed ‘The Christian European period 1500-1900 AD’
for the simple reason that the majority of the evidence for this period is
from European sources. The paper examines this and other available
evidence before reaching the conclusion.

The Evidence
Prior to the sixteenth century, Africans that were not Christians or Muslims
were regarded as infidels or Qaffiri (‫كافر‬, singular) by the Arabs and
Persians in Africa and in India (Pankhurst, 2003) and were allowed by the
tenants of Islam to be enslaved. Generally, Christians in the Horn of Africa
were mainly from the Amhara, Tagaru (or Tigrayna) people, and Muslims
were from the coastal Tigre, Tagaru, Afar and Somali peoples. The major

�pagan peoples at this time were mainly Oromoo and Sidama. All of these
were Cushitic speakers. The coastal peoples were in-part the
descendants of the Axumites – an important African maritime people.

Research has already established that the main flow of Africans in the
Islamic Asian period 700-1500 AD (including the Tang, Yuan and
Early Ming Dynasties) was ultimately from the Horn of Africa and along
the Maritime Silk Route to Eastern Asia (Pankhurst, 2003 and Powers,
2010). This trend continued into the sixteenth century when the majority
of Africans arriving in India, including pre-Portuguese Goa came through
the port of Zeila which was the main exporter enslaved pagan Oromoo
and free Abyssinians destined for India where they were called Habshis
(Pankhurst, 2003) and this is confirmed by Linschoten (2005) ‘there are
many Arabians and Abexiins in India’ and he notes that ‘there are many
of them [Abexiins] in India that are captives and slaves’.

From the sixteenth century European records provide evidence of African
presence in East Asia, starting in succession with the Portuguese,
Spanish, Dutch, English and the finally the French.

Portuguese experiences in the Iberian Peninsula and in the Maghreb, had
led them to describe all Muslims as Mouros or Moors. They understood
that the process of Arabisation meant that Arabs were not a race, but a
people. Arriving in East Africa in 1498 the Portuguese regarded the
Muslim people that they encountered on the coast (i.e. Arab, Persian,
Somali and Swahili) all as Moors – a term that they extended with their
travels right across the Indian Ocean to the spice-producing Sultanates of
the Malukas and Southern Philippines. Mistrust and trading necessities
meant that they were reluctant to enslave these Moors. In fact, vastly

�outnumbered and economically reliant on these Muslims produced a
‘keep your enemies close’ approach.

After the Portuguese established themselves in Southeast Africa (modern
day Mozambique) enslaved Africans increasingly came from through
Mozambique Island which they held from 1507, but this trade was still far
below the Arab-Persian trade from the Horn of Africa. The Portuguese
were quick to adopt the Arabic term as Kaffirs or Cafres for the enslaved
pagan Africans as a trading commodity, a labour force, militia, and a
prospective Catholic convert (de Silva Jayaruraya, 2008a).
There were in Goa ‘Many Persians, Arabians and Abexijns, some [of
them] Christians and some [of them] Moors’. Linschoten (2005) notes the
tattoos that identify the Christians and makes it clear that ‘these
Abexiins… such as are free doe serve in al India for sailors and seafaring
men with such merchants as sailed from Goa to China, Japon, Bengala,
Mallaca, Ormus and all the Oriental coast.’ Linschoten explains that after
arriving in India the Portuguese sailors are ‘ashamed to live in that order
and think it is a great discredit unto them’. Interestingly he also explains
that the Abexiins are hired on low wages and travel with their wives under
a Portuguese Captain but possibly an Arab boatswain who oversees the
Abexiins.

Charles Boxer (1997), historian of the Portuguese Empire noted that
‘Portuguese shipping in the inter-port trade of Asia was increasingly
operated from the days of Albuquerque onwards, by Asian seamen
working under a very few white or Eurasian officers. Even the great
carracks of 1,000-2,000 tons which plied between Goa, Macao and
Nagasaki might be entirely crewed by Asians and negro slaves’. However

�Boxer is incorrect. The reputation of the Christian and Muslim Abyssinians
as good sailors was widespread, though the enslaved Abexiin were
actually animist (i.e. kaffir) Oromoo tribesmen, who had a strong military
tradition and were often good horsemen. In several areas of the Indian
Ocean and Western Pacific, piracy was endemic and Africans were rare
enough for their presence to cause fear. It was therefore wise for the
Portuguese to man their ships with Abexiin crew and for the Jesuits to
have kaffir retainers and body guards. This explains the Africans arriving
in Macau from the 1550’s on Portuguese ships and those depicted on the
Japanese Nanban Byobu (southern Barbarian folding screens) in Japan.

In Siam (Thailand) King Chairacha entered relations with the Portuguese
and allowed a trading and religious presence at Ayutthaya. In 1538 as an
assurance against Burmese invasion and eager for Portuguese military
technology he requested that the Portuguese actually retain a military
presence which resulted in 130 Portuguese men being based in the
established Portuguese settlement. Bearing in mind the paucity of
Portuguese men in Asia, it could well be that many of these “Portuguese”
were in fact Africans. There were definitely Japanese and Chinese
Christians, and other Luso-Asians at the settlement which lasted until
1767 when the Burmese destroyed Ayutthaya.

During the early years in Goa the Jesuits employed slaves, and the
Church Provincial Council of 1567 laid down precise rules for the keeping
of slaves (Borges, 1994). Though in reality this was not the case in
Eastern Asia. Perhaps the best known African of this period in East Asia
was the one called Yasuke, who was an African retainer of the Japanese
warlord Oda Nobunaga (1534-1582). Yasuke appears to have arrived in
Japan in 1579 as part of the entourage of the Jesuit Visitor Alessandro

�Valignano. It was Nobunaga who gave the African the name Yasuke
(Lockley, 2017). Both free and bonded helpers were members of the
domestic staff of the Jesuits in the Japan Province, the majority of the
former were Japanese, while the enslaved ones were Africans, Indians,
Malays, Koreans or Japanese (Borges, 1994). Another African is
mentioned in Japanese sources as a gunner in the service of Arima
Harunobu in 1584.

The unification of the Portuguese and Spanish crowns between 1580 and
1640 resulted in the wars with the Dutch and ultimately the downfall of the
Portuguese Eastern Empire. The same wars resulted in an acute shortage
of soldiers throughout the seventeenth century. But the Portuguese
considered sepoys (Indian soldiers) as physically unfit and preferred the
more robust African soldiers (Sequeira-Antony, 2004). By the early
seventeenth century, slaves were the largest non-Goan group living in the
city of Goa, most of these were Africans who had come through
Mozambique Island and other parts of Eastern Africa, and the rest were
Asians. They served as caretakers, guards, servants, concubines and
artisans. From Goa slaves were shipped to other Portuguese settlements
and even to Lisbon (Borges, 1994). The first recorded African to enter the
territory of modern South Korea was a personal servant attached to the
Portuguese trader João Mendes, who was on a Japanese vessel blown
off course by a typhoon while travelling between Phnom Penh and
Nagasaki. They drifted on to the island of Tong Yong in 1604. It appears
that João Mendes was on a diplomatic mission for Shogun Tokugawa
Ieyasu (1543-1616) to the Khymer Kingdom (Kim, 2008). There was a
Portuguese merchant and a Jesuit presence at Hoi An in Vietnam, but no
substantial research has been done on the community to confirm an
African presence.

�Friar Domingo Navarette recorded the presence of African soldiers in
Guangzhou in 1618 and confirmed that they were runaways from Macau
(de Silva Jayaruraya, 2008a). In 1622 enslaved Africans defended the
Portuguese base at Macau which the Dutch attacked with a force of 13
ships and 1300 men. The Portuguese numbered only 150 – two thirds of
which were residents, mostly mestiços. Additionally there were Jesuit
artillerist and decisively up to 100 armed African slaves. There are also
observations in 1637 of the few Portuguese cavalleros (horsemen) being
accompanied by Africans servants dressed in expensive red damask
bearing lances on which were placed the crests of the Portuguese
families. It appears that there were two Africans in Macau who acted as
interpreters between the Portuguese and the Chinese. One of these,
Antonio was a ‘Capher Eathiopian Abissen’. The other is described as a
‘Chincheo runaway from the Portugal’s at Macau’. He was therefore an
enslaved African who had escaped from Macau possibly to the Chenghai
District of Eastern Guangdong Province. Both men appear to have learnt
Cantonese and therefore to have been in Southern China for some time
(Pankhurst, 2003).

By the time Portugal gained her independence from Spain in 1640 as
many as 5000 Africans lived in Macau and there were even special
masses for their wives. They were employed mainly as enslaved personal
servants to the men, as labourers and guards or soldiers. Enslaved
Chinese females were preferred as household maids, cooks, wet-nurses
and personal servants to the ‘Portuguese’ wives who were often mestiços
(de Silva Jayaruraya, 2008a). By the early Qing Dynasty (1644-1912)
Africans were definitely present in small numbers in Guangdong province
as well as at Macau (de Silva Jayaruraya, 2008a). In 1651 the Governor
of Macau requested ‘Negro’ soldiers rather than Mestiços from India (de

�Silva Jayaruraya, 2008b). Friar Domingo Navarette again recorded the
presence of African soldiers in Guangzhou in 1686 (de Silva Jayaruraya,
2008a). According to Brother José de Jesus, in 1745 there were in Macau:
‘twelve thousand men who at the same time dwelt there […]
between Portuguese, half-castes, Nhons [Japanese], Malays,
Canarins [Goans], Timorese, Mozambicans [Mixed heritage
from Mozambique Island], Malabars, Moors [Muslims], Kaffirs
[Non-Muslim Africans], and other nations……’ (Puga, 2013).
No information is available on the African presence in Spanish Formosa
(1626-1642). The people of the Philippine islands had their own form of
slavery before the arrival of the Spanish. In Tagalog these were called
alipin. Africans must have arrived on the Spanish vessels across the
Pacific from Acapulco as sailors, servants and slaves. The Spanish in the
Philippines initially had their local Asian slaves, but in 1586 Philip II of
Spain proposed to slowly eliminate enslavement of his Spanish Indies
subjects by requesting all children to be born free and banning new slave
purchases. The laws proved very successful but started a trend of
purchasing foreigners (including Indians, Chinese and Malays, Koreans
and Japanese) who were not subject to the king’s laws. The Portuguese
seized the trading opportunity and brought enslaved Africans from the
Indian Ocean for sale to the Spanish in the Philippines, these were known
as esclavavos negros (negro slaves). By 1621 Africans constituted about
a third of the Intramuros population at Manila. A Little work has been done
on the African presence in the Spanish Indies in the Marianas which
suggests an African presence from at least 1602. With the termination of
Portuguese interaction, Africans disappear after 1640 and for the entire
Tokugawa period. However, it would be interesting to know of any

�evidence of Africans resident at Hirado or Deshima, or in Taiwan attached
to the Dutch presence in the East Indies.

While the European trade in Africans from the Horn of Africa decreased
the late eighteenth century saw Africans sold at Mozambique Island
arriving at Macau through the Portuguese colonies of Diu, Damman and
Goa. One of the traders was a Portuguese called Joaquim do Rosario
Monteiro (Machado, 2003).

There is no information on Africans in the Maluku Islands. Considering
their troubled history and the use of Africans as soldiers in Sri Lanka by
the Dutch since the mid-seventeenth century one would expect some
African presence in the region. Between 1831 and 1842 the Dutch
attempted to recruit no fewer than 2,200 Africans for service in their
colonial army, primarily in the Dutch East Indies. In the end they only
contracted 44 men from Elmina Castle (Ghana). But another push for men
recruited from Kumasi, mainly from non-Ashanti peoples in the North of
present-day Ghana produced 2,200 men serving 15-year contracts. While
a second attempt among the Ashanti produced 235 men. A consequence
was that this militia was composed of men from different ethnic groups
that spoke different languages. Mistrust among them was a challenge to
the Dutch. To ensure against a mutiny the Dutch distributed them into
separate companies and battalion. It appears that African liaisons with the
Javanese and Sumatrans resulted in many of them being more fluent in
Malay then Dutch. This gave them an advantage when organising
themselves and making demands for equal pay or better living standards.
By December 1841 there were 1,318 Africans in the Koninklijk
Nederlandsch-Indisch

Leger

(Royal

Netherlands-Indies

Army).

Recruitment had been vastly reduced at Africa, but in 1850 The Dutch

�decided to resume African military recruitment in Elmina and 800 were
recruited between 1860 and 1872, mainly from the Ashanti. In the Indies
they were known by the term Londo Ireng in Javanese or Belinda Hitam
(Black Dutch) in Malay. This recruitment ended in 1872 when Britain took
over the Dutch possessions in the Gold Coast (i.e. Ghana), but many of
these Africans stayed in Indonesia (mainly in Java) and married Malay
women. They also had their own area of Purworejo called Kampung
Afrikan. Here the community retained its distinct Afro-Indonesian culture.
Soldiers who lived in other areas and were simply assimilated into
Indonesian societies (van Kessel, 2008).

Around 1879 the Portuguese Governor of Timor had a battalion which
included 200 Africans who the Timorese called Falikas. The 1881 census
of Singapore includes Africans though their numbers were small (de Silva
Jayaruraya, 2008a).

Conclusion
Initially most of the Africans who came to Eastern Asia on board
Portuguese ships where from the present day Ethiopia and Eritrea,
including the Tigre and Tagaru crewmen and pagan Oromoo or Sidama.
Then increasingly from the seventeenth century onwards Africans came
from among the Makua, Yao/Nyanja, and Maravi, of Mozambique, Malawi
and Zimbabwe though the island of Mozambique from the seventeenth
centuries.

Africans arriving with the Dutch in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries
initially came from West Africa, among the Akan and Dagbane language
groups in modern day Ghana, Burkina Faso. There may have been a few
Malagasy boarded at Cape Town.

�Three distinct routes to East Asia for enslaved Africans can be discerned;
the first and oldest route is from Zeila to Oman or Hormuz and on to the
Gujarat on Arab Persian or Gujarati vessels. After purchase in Gujarat the
route was through Goa to Macau and then to any Portuguese or Spanish
port. From around 1600 the route was entirely on Portuguese vessels from
Mozambique Island to Macau via Goa. The nineteenth century Dutch
route was from Elmina in Ghana to Cape Town and directly to Batavia on
Dutch vessels.

This period stands in stark contrast to previous ones for Africans and other
people of colour arriving in Eastern Asia. Formally Africans had arrived as
envoys, merchants, soldiers and slaves into a realm that was composed
roughly of the same elements of stratified society that existed in Eastern
Asia.

But the arrival of Africans with the Europeans was different. Africans of
this period (1500-1900) arrived on European ships as sailors under
European captains, or often in the entourage of the European merchants,
and Jesuit missionaries. The Chinese used the term Gui-nu (Ghost-slave)
for Africans, or in Cantonese Gui-lo (ghost man). In Japanese Africans
were called Kurobo (Lockley, 2017) or Kuronbo in the Nagasaki dialect
(Screech, 2017). So the Africans often arrived in a position subservient to
Europeans who themselves were perceived, at least by the Chinese and
Japanese, as Southern barbarians (Nanbanjin in Japanese) and therefore
below the status of the Chinese and Japanese. This is perhaps most
evident in the seventeenth century use of the Cantonese term Gui-Nu
(ghost-slave) for Africans in Guanghzhou, but also in the Japanese term
Kuronbo (black novice monk). Both of these terms place the Africans as

�subservient to the Europeans. The range of this servitude from novice or
page to slave reflected the reality.

African features and physique were clearly admired for strength (Lockley,
2017), however the subservient status that Africans held almost
everywhere in Eastern Asia (in contrast to South Asia) fed into indigenous
concepts of colour based on working status, caste, or in the case of the
Burmese, Thais, Filipinos and Taiwanese on the perception of subjugated
peoples such as the Mons, Khymers, enslaved Ternate Islanders,
Taiwanese Aboriginals or Philippine Aboriginals (Blussé, 2009) who they
thought of as Blacks. With the exception of Korea, Japan and much of
China, Asians themselves would be colonised by Europeans adding to the
stigma of dark colour, and its association with race, enhanced by the
Atlantic

Slave

Trade

and

Euro-American

concepts

of

racism.

Nevertheless, the adoption of Catholicism brought the Africans some
support from the Catholic Church that effectively managed the civic life of
both Portuguese and Spanish Asia. Friar Domingo Navarrete mentioned
the wives of the “negroes” in Macau at mass, and in 1637 Peter Mundy
mentions that these wives were Chinese slaves. So legitimate
intermarriage between Africans and Chinese took place in Macao (de
Silva Jayasuraya, 2008) and the resulting Afro-Chinese were absorbed in
the Macanese community. Little work has been done on the African
presence in the Philippines or in the Marianas, but presumably the same
Catholic system was at work.

It seems that during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the largest
concentration of Africans in Eastern Asia was at Portuguese Macau. Of
course Macau was governed from Goa which was the terminus of all

�Asian trade to and from Europe via Mozambique Island, and the African
presence in both cities continues to the present day. But foci shifted to the
Dutch city of Batavia in the nineteenth century. Africans arriving with the
Dutch were concentrated in the Batavia area, where they served the Royal
Dutch Indies Army. They married Indonesian and Luso-Indonesian
women and settled mainly in Java. In 1965 when Indonesia gained
independence the Belinda Hitam were offered Dutch citizenship and
immigrated to the Netherlands. Little work has been done on the African
presence prior to the twentieth century in French Indo-China (Laos,
Cambodia and Vietnam).

Acknowledgements
I owe a special debt of gratitude to Dr. Shihan De Silva Jayasuraya
(London), Dr.Thomas Lockley (Tokyo), and Dr. Ineke Van Kessel
(Lieden).
References
Anshan, L., 2015. African diaspora in China: reality, research and
reflection. The Journal of Pan African Studies, Vol.7 (10): 10-43.
Blussé, L., 2009. The cave of the black spirits: searching for a vanished
people. In D. Blundell (Ed.), Austronesian Taiwan: Linguistics, History,
Ethnology, Prehistory, Rev. Ed., University of California, Berkeley: 134152.
Borges, C. J., 1994. The Economics of the Goa Jesuits, 1542-1759.
Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.
Botas, J. F. O., 2016. Macua 1937-45: living on the edge, economic
management over military defences. In G. Gunn (Ed.), Wartime Macau:
Under the Japanese Shadow, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong:
55-71.

�Boxer, C. R., 1997. The Portuguese Seaborne Empire 1415-1825.
Carcanet, Lisbon.
Clarence-Smith, W. G., 2006. Islam and the Abolition of Slavery. C. Hurst
and Company, London.
de Silva Jayasuriya, S., 2008a. African Identity in Asia: Cultural Effects of
Forced Migration. Marcus Wiener Publishers, Princeton.
de Silva Jaysuriya, S., 2008b. Identifying Africans in Asia. In S. de Silva
Jaysuriya and J-P. Angenot (Eds.), Uncovering the History of Africans in
Asia, Brill, Leiden: 7-36.
de Verre Allen, J., 1993. Swahili Origins. East African Educational
Publishers, Nairobi.
Gernet, J., 1999. A History of Chinese Civilisation. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
Gibb, H. A. R., 1962. The Travels of Ibn Battuta A.D. 1325-1354.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hatke, G., 2013. Aksum and Nubia: Warfare, Commerce and Political
Fictions in Ancient Northeast Africa. New York University Press, New
York.
Kim, B. R., 2008. African presence in Korea. In K. K. Prasad and J-P.
Angenot (Eds.), Tadia: The African Diaspora in Asia Explorations on a
Less Known Fact, Jana Jagrati Prakashana, Bangalore: 435-444.
Levathus, L., 1994. When China Ruled the Seas :The Treasure Fleet of
the Dragon Throne, 1405-1433. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Linschoten, J. H., 2005. The Voyage to the East Indies, Vol. 1. Elibron
Classics, London.

�Lockley,
T.,
2017.
『信長と弥助：本能寺を生き延びた黒人侍
(Nobunaga and Yasuke: The Black Samurai Who Survived the Homoji)』
Ohta Publishing, Tokyo.
Mach, J., 1986. Madagascar : Island of the Ancestors. British Museum
Publications, London.
Machado, P., 2004. A forgotten corner of the Indian ocean: Gujarati
merchants, Portuguese India and the Mozambique slave trade, 17301830. In G. Campbell (Ed.), Structure of Slavery in the Indian Ocean,
Africa and Asia, Routledge, London: 17-32.
Pankhurst, R., 2003. The Ethiopian diaspora to India: the role of Habshis
and Sidis from medieval times to the end of the eighteenth century. In S.
de Silva Jayasuraya and R. Pankhurst (Eds.), The African Diaspora in the
Indian Ocean, Africa World Press, Asmara:189-221.
Pereira, C. J., 2008. Nineteenth century European references to the
African diaspora in the Arabian peninsula. In S. de Silva Jaysuriya and JP. Angenot (Eds.), Uncovering the History of Africans in Asia, Brill, Leiden:
121-129.
Pereira, C. J., 2012. Zheng He and the African horizon: an investigative
study into the Chinese geography of early fifteenth-century eastern Africa.
In Chia Lin Sien and S. Church (Eds.), Zheng He and the Afro-Asian
World, Melaka Museums Corporation, Melaka: 248-279.
Powers, T., 2010. The Red Sea Region during the ‘Long’ Late Antiquity,
AD 500-1000. D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.
Powers, T., 2012. The Red Sea from Byzantium to the Caliphate, AD 5001000. The American University in Cairo Press, Cairo.
Puga, M. G., 2013. The British Presence in Macau 1635-1793. Hong Kong
University Press, Hong Kong.

�Screech, T., 2017. The image of the black in Japanese art: from the
beginning to 1850. In D. Bindman, S. P. Blier and H. L. Gates Jr. (Eds.),
The Image of the Black in African and Asian Art. Harvard University Press,
Cambridge: 235-340.
Sequeira Antony, P., 2004. The Goa-Bahia Intra-Colonial Relations 16751825. Institute for Research in Social Sciences and Humanities MESHAR,
Tellichery.
Sutton, J., 1990. A Thousand Years of East Africa. British Institute of
Eastern Africa, Nairobi.
Tolmacheva, M., 1993. The Pate Chronicle. Michigan State University
Press, East Lansing.
van Kessel, I., 2008. Becoming Black Dutchmen: West African Soldiers in
the Dutch East Indies. In K. K. Prasad and J-P. Angenot (Eds.), Tadia:
The African Diaspora in Asia Explorations on a Less Known Fact, Jana
Jagrati Prakashana, Bangalore: 361-381.
Biography
Clifford Pereira is a Historical Geographer
specialising in ‘hidden histories’ and migrations
from and within the Indian Ocean World. A
graduate of Geography and Asian Studies from
the University of Ulster, he is a long-term fellow
of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG),
where he was also curator, consultant and
facilitator on outreach projects (2006-2013).
Pereira was Honorary Research Assistant with
Royal Holloway, University of London (2010-2013), and Visiting Assistant
Researcher for Dalian Maritime University, China (2011-2015). He is
currently a Researcher on the African collection of the Museum of
Anthropology (MOA) at UBC, Canada and specialist researcher and for
the international heritage consultancy firm Barker-Langham, London
(2008-Present).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5617">
                <text>Who Were the Africans in Eastern Asia? : The Christian European Period 1500-1900 AD </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5618">
                <text>Seaways, especially monsoonal ones, allow movement on two directions. However Eurocentric approaches have tended to create hierarchies of cultures which have biased movements in particular directions to the historical exclusion of some narratives. This is a fresh look at a cultural connection from a perspective that has evaded investigation and seeks to balance the research on Chinese interactions with Africans in Africa. Africans have been trading with Asia for hundreds of years, yet their history and presence in East Asia has been barely suggested or investigated. The role of African crewmen is an important part of this narrative and one that brings a new dimension (if not challenges) to ethnographic studies of maritime cultural landscapes and seascapes. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5619">
                <text>Clifford Pereira </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5620">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5621">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5622">
                <text>Clifford Pereira </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="489" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="281">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c5f116d37fd59d72ae742b75a7690f4f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4338c70a07b08939373ab4d32b4e3df5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5616">
                    <text>Legal Status of Sunken State Vessels and Sovereign
Immunity
Kaè Oyama
Chukyo University
k-oyama@mecl.chukyo-u.ac.jp
Abstract
The entry into force in 2009 of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection
of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as ‘UCH
Convention’) adopted in 2001 could be regarded as a welcome
development to elaborate or clarify any ambiguity of only two marginal
provisions as Article 149 and 303 with regard to underwater cultural
heritage in United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982
(hereinafter referred to as ‘UNCLOS’). Some texts of the UCH
Convention, however, give controversy in fact to the comprehensive
international order of the seas in relation to the other provisions of
UNCLOS and customary international law, e.g., the definition of
underwater cultural heritage, the ‘creeping’ expansion of coastal states’
jurisdiction especially in the EEZ and on the continental shelf, and the
sovereign immunity of sunken state vessels [The paper primarily follows
to the terminology of the UCH Convention which uses ‘state vessels’. It is
defined as ‘warships, and other vessels…that were owned or operated by
a State and used, at the time of sinking, only for government noncommercial purposes’ in Article 1(8).] This presentation will especially
focus on the issue of sovereign immunity of sunken state vessels amongst
them. International law in relation to warships is complex and uncertain
and the issue has high political sensitivity as Article 2(8) of the UCH
Convention reflects such a circumstance. The purpose of the
presentation, therefore, is to explore the legal status of sunken state
vessels. It examines the related provisions and their drafting process of
the UCH Convention, the legal status of warships which UNCLOS
provides and in the rules of customary international law. It will also
observe some cases including notable States practices.
Key words: UNESCO, UNCLOS, UCH

�Introduction
The entry into force in 2009 of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection
of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as ‘the UCH
Convention’) adopted in 2001 could be regarded as a welcome
development to elaborate or clarify any ambiguity of only two marginal
provisions as Article 149 and 303 with regard to the protection of
underwater cultural heritage in United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea in 1982 (hereinafter referred to as ‘UNCLOS’), though it is called
as ‘A Constitution for the Oceans’ with 320 Articles and 9 Annexes. Some
texts of the UCH Convention, however, give controversy in fact to the
comprehensive international order of the seas in relation to the other
provisions of UNCLOS and general rules of international law.
The treatment of sunken state vessels1 is also one of the most
controversial and challenging issues which the drafters of the UCH
Convention faced. International law in relation to warships is complex,
uncertain, and politically highly sensitive. The key provisions of the UCH
Convention regarding this issue, the legal status of sunken State vessels,
are Article 2(8), 7(3), and 10(7) and, due to them, most of maritime States
do not have wish to ratify the Convention2.
This article will focus on the reason and background of such controversy.
First, it examines the existing international law and related State practices
in order to evaluate the legal status of sunken State vessels under
customary international law. Second, it reviews mainly Article 2(8), 7(3),
and 10(7) of the UCH Convention. The purpose of this article is to clarify
the gap between the UCH Convention and customary international law in
relation to the legal status of sunken State vessels and, thereafter, try to
explore a key to resolve the gap.

�Sunken State Vessels in General International Law
Definition of Warships in UNCLOS
According to Article 29 in UNCLOS, ‘warship’ means ‘a ship belonging to
the armed forces of a State bearing the external marks distinguishing such
ships of its nationality, under the command of an officer duly
commissioned by the government of the State and whose name appears
in the appropriate service list or its equivalent, and manned by a crew
which is under regular armed forces discipline’.
Warships had enjoyed specific right for centuries under customary
international law and it codified in Article 95 that they ‘have complete
immunity from the jurisdiction of any State other than the flag State’ on the
high seas. Also Article 96 provides that ‘[s]hips owned or operated by a
State and used only on government non-commercial service shall, on the
high seas, have complete immunity from the jurisdiction of any State other
than the flag State’.
This principle also extends in Article 58(2) to the vessels navigates in the
EEZ of coastal States ‘in so far as they are not incompatible’ with the
provisions relating to the EEZ set out in Part V of UNCLOS. Also in Article
32 which provides as below, the rules of innocent passage (Migliorino,
1985) are respected in the territorial sea of the coastal states:
‘With such exceptions as are contained in subsection A and in
articles 30 and 31, nothing in this Convention affects the
immunities of warships and other government ships operated for
non-commercial purposes.’

�Sovereign Immunity
Until early nineteenth century, the immunity of foreign States was absolute
(absolute doctrine). Then, towards the end of the nineteenth century, a
restrictive view gradually took place (restrictive doctrine). An exception
was envisaged for acts performed jure gestionis or jure privatorum that is,
performed by a foreign State in a private capacity as a legal person subject
to private law (Cassese, 2005).
In the line with the restrictive doctrine, whereby immunity is confined to
circumstances in which a State acts as a State, immunity extends only to
State craft that are engaged in non-commercial service. Governmentowned ships operated for commercial purposes are subject to the same
treatment as privately owned merchant ships (Dromgoole, 2013).
The question is that whether or not the principle of sovereign immunity
continues to apply to a State vessel even after it has sunk. There are two
streams; first, immunity does not apply after a warship sunk on ground of
that a warship is not a warship any longer once it sunk, and a ship is not
a ship any longer. Sunken vessel is not the object which can meet the
definition of vessel. With regard to warships particularly, as Article 29
provides a ship must be ‘under command’ and ‘manned’ and the
conditions which are only possible while it is operational (Caflisch, 1983;
Strati, 2005). Sunken warships are not the objects to meet the definition
of warship. As such, they are not subject to flag state jurisdiction any
longer and therefore not retain their immunity any longer. This position
leads to the conclusion that the flag State, qua flag State, cannot prohibit
a salvage attempted by another State or private operator.

�Second position is more promising that sunken State vessel retains
immunity because the argument for immunity is on the fact that such craft
are state property. States have reasons for maintaining an interest in State
vessels after their sinking and these interests are not confined merely to
casualties. There are therefore legitimate basis for affording such property
indefinite immunity (Rubin, 1975).
A number of maritime States defend the second position and according to
general rules of international law the title of the sunken warships may be
only lost or transferred by: express abandonment; or capture or surrender
under the law of war (Yamamoto, 1981).
International Conventions and State Practices
International legislation and State practices show that the legal status
implies that sunken State vessels, such as warships and vessels on
government service, regardless of location or of the time elapsed since
their wreckage, remain the property of the State owning them at the time
of their sinking, unless it explicitly and formally abandon its ownership.
Such sunken vessels should be respected as maritime graves or reservoir
of classified information of the flag State. Thus, it is applied sovereign
immunity to sunken State vessels and they shall not be salvaged without
the express consent of the flag State (Aznar-Gómez, 2003).
This position is confirmed by several international instruments, e.g., Article
14 of 1910 Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules with Respect
to Assistance and Salvage at Sea3, Article 4 (1) of the 1989 International
Convention on Salvage4, 2007 International Convention on the Removal
of Wrecks5. There are also some representative cases where State have
recognized the sovereign immunity and title of sunken State vessels; the
Exchange of Note Constituting an Agreement between UK and Italy

�Regarding the Salvage of HMS Spartan in 19526; Italy recognized the
British title to the wreck; Australia recognized the Dutch title to the Old
Dutch Shipwrecks belonging to the Dutch East India Company, covered
by 1972 Agreement7; France recognized US title to the CSS Alabama in
19898; US recognized the French title with La Belle9 in 2003.
There are remarkable cases in the US, the Juno and La Galga case in
2000 and the Mercedes case in 2011. It should be noted that after these
cases, some particularly concerned States, including US, Germany,
Japan, Russia, Spain, UK, clarified their position in their unilateral
declaration on the legal status of sunken State vessels by stating that
sunken state vessels continue to enjoy sovereign immunity after sinking,
wherever they are located10.

The Juno and La Galga Case
In 1990s, a commercial salvage company, Sea Hunt Inc., submitted an in
rem claim respectively against two Spanish frigates, La Galga de
Andalucia and the Juno, which were sunk in 1750 and 1802 in the US
contiguous zone (Vierucci, 2001). The Sea Hunt was issued with a permit
by the State of Virginia to search for the wrecks and, when they were
found, Virginia claimed title to them under the Abandoned Shipwreck Act
of 1987 (ASA). When the Spanish government knew that a permit for
commercial exploitation had been awarded, it issued a diplomatic note of
protest and expressed its wish to protect the sanctity of its maritime
gravesites. Despite the protest, intervention at the site went ahead and
Sea Hunt initiated an in rem salvage action in the District Court in Norfolk.
Although the District Court partially supported Sea Hunt Inc.11, the Court
of Appeal of the 4th Circuit fully supported Spanish claims to the two

�wrecks12. The US Supreme Court then finally confirmed this legal position
in 200113.
The salvor insisted that the vessels had been abandoned by their owner
and that it was entitled to recover artefacts by the permit issued by the
state of Virginia. It concluded that vessel had not been expressly
abandoned by Spain, by reversing a finding of the District Court that Spain
had expressly abandoned La Galga when it entered into the 1763
Definitive Treaty of Peace between France, Great Britain and Spain.
Spain had transferred most of its New World territories to Great Britain in
the Treaty. Court of Appeal noted that the terms of the treaty did not
provide the ‘clear and convincing evidence’ of express abandonment that
was required, because of the absence of specific reference to vessels or
shipwrecks in the Treaty. It continued that ‘[i]t is the right of the owner of
any vessel to refuse unwanted salvage’14
This case shows some important points; first, it gave the opportunity to
several States to explicitly state their position regarding the legal status of
sunken State vessels including warships. It was confirmed in US
Presidential Statement in 2001 that ‘title to foreign sunken State craft may
be transferred or abandoned only in accordance with the law of the foreign
flag State15’ and US ‘recognizes that title to a United States or Foreign
sunken State craft, wherever located, is not extinguished by passage of
time, regardless of when such sunken State craft was lost at sea’.
Second, the Court of Appeals held that sovereign vessels must be treated
differently

from

privately

owned

ones.

The

so-called

‘implied

abandonment standard’ would seem therefore to be least defensible
where a nation has stepped forward to assert ownership of its sovereign
shipwrecks16.

�Third, unauthorized salvage of sunken State vessels is legally precluded,
the salvor is denied any kind of reward, and artifacts removed from the
bottom of the sea must be returned to the sovereign owner (AznarGómez, 2010).
The Mercedes Case
Odyssey Marine Exploration (OME) in the US discovered a shipwreck in
international waters about 100miles west of the Straits of Gibraltar in
2007. A number of coins and small artefacts were recovered from the site
and flown into the jurisdiction of the US District Court of Tampa, Florida,
by OME17. Spain asserted; (a) the vessel was the Nuestra Señora de las
Mercedes, a frigate of war of the Royal Spanish Navy that had exploded
with great loss of life in 1804; (b) Spain had not abandoned its sovereign
rights over the vessel; (c) under international and domestic US las, foreign
State vessels should be afforded the same legal regime as those of the
US; (d) the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the res under the
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act of 1976 (FSIA).
In 2009, the Magistrate Judge Pizzo issued Report &amp; Recommendations
(R &amp; R) in favour of the legal position of Spain. He concluded, on the
balance of evidence, that the wreck was the Mercedes and
‘unquestionably’ the property of Spain18. Under the FSIA, which set out
the basis for US court jurisdiction over foreign States, a foreign State and
its property are presumptively immune from the jurisdiction of the US
courts unless an exception applied19. Judge Pizzo concluded that none of
the exceptions put forward by OME was applicable and consequently, the
court was ‘without jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims against Spain’s
property’20. He recommended OME to return the recovered items to
Spain21.

�The Treatment of Sunken State Vessels in the UCH Convention
Drafting Process
The 1994 International Law Association (ILA) draft and 1998 UNESCO
draft of the UCH Convention excluded warships and other state-owned or
operated vessels and aircraft used for non-commercial purposes from the
scope of application of the Convention by following the approach of many
maritime treaties because of its high political sensitivities. It meant that
most of the UCH in the world put outside of the protective framework of
the Convention and that it would seriously undermine the object of the
Convention.
One of the obstacles to removing the exclusion was the provision in the
1998 draft for abandonment “to be deemed” in certain cases. The
application of such a provision to state vessels was unacceptable to many
States that strongly insisted that their ownership rights could be lost only
through an express abandonment (Dromgoole and Gaskell, 1999) and it
was dropped.
The preferable outcome for the maritime States would have been for the
Convention to codify their stance on express abandonment and immunity
by providing that the express consent of the flag State would be required
in all cases of proposed interference with sunken State vessels. However,
a number of Latin American and Caribbean States refused to recognize
the title of the flag State to colonial-era vessels in their coastal waters.
They asserted that the UCH ‘is the property of the State in which it is found
and through this it is the heritage of the humanity22’. As a consequence, a
specific regime for sunken state vessels set out in the final text proved to
be unacceptable to most of maritime States.

�Definition of “State Vessels and Aircraft” and General Principle
Article 1(8) of the UCH Convention defines ‘state vessels and aircraft’ to
mean:
‘warships, and other vessels or aircraft that were owned or
operated by a State and used, at the time of sinking, only for
government non-commercial purposes, that are identified as such
and that meet the definition of underwater cultural heritage.’

The definition is consistent with those in other Conventions, including
UNCLOS and Salvage Convention in1989 and it excludes state-owned
vessels that were engaged in trade or other private service.
With regard to sovereign immunity, there were concerns about the
extent to which any new convention would afford coastal State
jurisdiction in respect of State vessels. The final text of the Convention
draws a compromise between the interests of flag States and coastal
States. In Article 2 (8), it is stated that:
‘(N)othing in this Convention shall be interpreted as modifying the
rules of international law and State practice pertaining to sovereign
immunities, nor any State’s rights with respect to its State vessels
and aircraft.’

Control Mechanisms in each maritime zone
Despite of the Article 2(8), Maritime powers such as France, the UK,
Russia and US voted against the adoption of the UCH Convention. One
of the main reasons of this was that the Convention prepares some
challenging provisions with regard to the control mechanisms in each
maritime zone, especially in Article 7(3) and 10(7), and they understood

�that the text did not cover all their legal expectation as flag States
protecting their sunken State vessels, particularly their sunken warships.
One of the most controversial is the regime of the territorial waters. Article
7(3) states:
‘Within their archipelagic waters and territorial sea, in the exercise
of their sovereignty and in recognition of general practice among
States, States Parties, with a view to cooperating on the best
methods of protecting State vessels and aircraft, should inform the
flag State Party to this Convention and, if applicable, other States
with a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or
archaeological link, with respect to the discovery of such
identifiable State vessels and aircraft. [Emphasis added.]’

In this Article, the problem is the use of term ‘should’ rather than ‘shall’
and it is highly contentious. It means the notice to the flag State is not
legally obliged and no consent of the flag State is required to conduct
activities directed at their sunken State vessels.
The mechanism in the EEZ and continental shelf is also highly
contentious. Article 10(7) states:
‘Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 4 of this Article, no
activity directed at State vessels and aircraft shall be conducted
without the agreement of the flag State and the collaboration of the
Coordinating State.’

It provides that no activity shall be conducted without the agreement of
the flag State, however it made two exceptions in cases; first, emergency
measures are required to prevent ‘immediate danger’ to UCH from ‘human
activities or any other cause, including looting’, in which case the consent
of the flag States does not have to be obtained first; second, the sovereign
rights or jurisdiction of a State party in its EEZ or on its continental shelf

�may be interfered with unless it takes action to prohibit or authorize
activities directed at UCH located in that zone.
In such cases, a State party may prohibit or authorize those activities
without first consulting the flag State. It seems that this is in consistent
with what Article 2(8) provides and gives rise to the confusion. Flag States
are bound to see the possibility of a coastal States acting under one of
these exceptions as an infringement of their sovereign rights, and
therefore, by using Article 2(8), they may challenge the coastal State’s
right to act (Dromgoole, 2003).
Conclusion
The UCH Convention seems to attempt challenging the existing
international law and State practices on the sovereign immunity issue in
order to accomplish the purpose of this Convention. It must be said,
however, the UCH Convention has failed to provide a satisfactory
compromise between the interests of flag States and coastal States on
the issue and it is the major obstacle to the ratification of the Convention
by a number of States. In fact, when the UK abstained from voting on the
final text of the Convention, it noted that the UK considers that ‘the current
text erodes the fundamental principles of customary international law,
codified in [the UNCLOS], of Sovereign Immunity which is retained by a
State’s warships and vessels and aircraft…. until expressly abandoned by
that State’. ‘The text purports to alter the fine balance between the equal,
but conflicting rights of Coastal and Flag States, carefully negotiated in
[the UNCLOS] in a way that is unacceptable’ to the UK. It highlights a
conflict between existing international law and the UCH Convention.

�In order to resolve such a conflict, it is needed to interpret once again
Article 2(8) which states ‘nothing in this Convention shall be interpreted
as modifying the rules of international law and State practice’ (emphasis
added) and observe the building process of customary international law
which is crystalized through the accumulation of States practices. The
UCH Convention has already entered into force with more than 50 State
parties. The Article 2(8) leaves the elaboration of the argument of the legal
status of sunken State vessels and their sovereign immunity in the future
State practices for building of customary international law and the
Convention itself might have the possibility of the evidence of them,
although several maritime States attempt to stop such a stream by stating
their position on the sovereign immunity of sunken State vessels as
mentioned above after the Juno and La Galga case and the Mercedes
case
In observation, in the favor of the UCH Convention, of the process of
crystallization of customary international law on this issue, ‘cooperation
among States’ which is the basic philosophy of the UCH Convention as it
is stated in its Preamble could be any key element. Cooperation, in fact,
can be seen in several bilateral agreements as introduced above and
might lead a new stream. In this context, some special circumstances
might give the wreck a particular status when it is considered to be either
a human grave (Aznar-Gómez, 2010; Garabello, 2004) or/and a historical
or cultural site.
When we consider thousands of military vessels and aircraft lost during
the First and Second World Wars in the twentieth-century, they will have
involved many human fatalities and the primary concern of States will be
to preserve the sanctity of the site and to ensure that any human remains
are afforded appropriate treatment (Dromgoole, 2013)23. The debate of

�this issue on sovereign immunity of sunken State vessels should keep reopening among States and their practices are needed to be continued to
observe carefully.
Endnotes
1

The paper primarily follows to the terminology of the UCH Convention
which uses “state vessels” in Article 1(8).
2

France ratified the Convention in 2013.

3

Adopted on 23 September 1910, US Treaty Series, p. 576.

4

Adopted on 28 April 1989, UN Treaty Series, Vol. 1953, p. 165

5

Adopted on 23 May 2007, IMO Doc. LEG/CONF.16/19 (2007).

6

Concluded on 6 November 1952, UN Treaty Series, Vol. 158, p. 432.

7

Concluded on 6 November 1972, Australian Treaty Series, No.18
(1972).
8

Concluded on 3 October 1989, UN Law of the Sea Bulletin, Vol. 20
(1996) p. 26.
9

Signé à le 31 mars 2003, Journal officiel de la République française, No.
144, p. 10560.
10

These unilateral declarations can be found in Federal Register, Vol.69,
No. 24 (2004) pp. 5647-5648.
11

Sea Hunt Inc. v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, 47 F.
Supp. 2d 678 (E.D. Va. 1999).
12

Sea Hunt Inc. v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, 221 F.31d
634 (4th Cir. 2000).
13

Sea Hunt Inc. v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, 221 F.3d
634 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 148 L.Ed. 2d 956, 121 C. Ct. 1079
(2001).
14

Sea Hunt Inc. v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, 221 F.3d
634 (4th Cir. 2000), pp. 640-641.
15

Expressed on 19 January 2001, Federal Register, Vol.69, No.24 (2004),
p. 5648.
16

Sea Hunt Inc. v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, 221 F.3d
634 (4th Cir. 2000), p. 647.

�17

Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. v. Unidentified, Shipwrecked Vessel,
675 F Supp. 2nd P. 1126 (2009).
18

Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. v. Unidentified, Shipwrecked Vessel,
675 F. Supp.2nd P. 1126, 1139 (2009).
19

FSIA, Section 1609.

20

Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. v. Unidentified, Shipwrecked Vessel,
675 F. Supp. 2nd P. 1126, 1130 (2009).
21

There were other parties to file a claim against the res, such as Peru
and 25 descendants of passengers transporting goods on the Mercedes.
22

Adopted on 16 June 1998, in UNESCO, Background Materials on the
Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, Vol.2 (2000), p. 341-342.
23

One of the Japanese main concerns is recovering remains in the naval
battle site in the Pacific War. See (Iwabuchi, 2012) p.88-90.

References
Aznar-Gómez, M. J., 2003. Legal status of sunken warships ‘revised’.
Spanish Yearbook of International Law, Vol.9: 61-101. .
Aznar-Gómez, M. J., 2010. Treasure hunters, sunken state vessels and
the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural
Heritage. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol.25: 209236. .
Cassese, A., 2005. International Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Caflisch, L., 1983. Submarine antiquities and the international law of the
sea. In Asser Institute (Ed.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law,
Vol.13, Springer, Heidelberg: 3-32.

Dromgoole, S., 2013. Underwater Cultural Heritage and International
Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dromgoole, S. and Gaskell, N., 1999. Draft UNESCO Convention on the
Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage 1998. International Journal
of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 14:171-192.

�Garabello, R., 2004. La Convenzione UNESCO sulla protezione del
patrimonio culturale subacqueo, Univ. Milano Bicocca, Milan.
Iwabuchi, A., 2012. Cultural Heritage under the Sea: An Introduction to
Underwater Archaeology. Kagaku-Dojin, Kyoto.
Migliorino, L., 1985. The recovery of sunken warships in international law.
In B. Vukas (Ed.), Essays on the Law of the Sea, Sveucilisna Naklada
Liver, Zagreb: 244-258.
Rubin, A., 1975. Sunken Soviet submarines and central intelligence: law
of property and the agency. American Journal of International Law,
Vol.69: 855-858.
Strati, A., 1995. The Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage: An
Emerging Objective of the Contemporary Law of the Sea. M. Nijhoff, The
Hague.
Vierucci, L., 2001. Le statut juridique des navires de guerre ayant coulé
dans des eaux etrangères: le cas des frégates espagnoles Juno et La
Galga retrouvées au large des côtes des Etats-Unis, Revue générale de
droit international public, Vol. 105: 705-725.
Yamamoto, S., 1981. Salvage of sunken foreign vessel and the
ownership. Hogaku Kyoushitsu, Vol. 1(4): 61-65.

Biography
Kaè OYAMA is an Associate Professor of International
Law at Chukyo University Japan. She finished her
Ph.D. course and LL.M course at Keio University,
Japan. Before her academic position, she was a fellow
at the Ocean Policy Research Foundation, and an
international legal analyst at the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of Japan. She also experienced a Visiting
Professor of the United Nations University (2006-14)
and a visiting fellow at Lauterpacht Centre for
International Law, University of Cambridge (2012-13).
Her main publications include Introduction to International Law (2014),
International Order of the Seas and Ocean Policy (2006), and so forth.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5610">
                <text>Legal Status of Sunken State Vessels and Sovereign Immunity </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5611">
                <text>The entry into force in 2009 of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as 'UCH Convention') adopted in 2001 could be regarded as a welcome development to elaborate or clarify any ambiguity of only two marginal provisions as Article 149 and 303 with regard to underwater cultural heritage in United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'UNCLOS'). Some texts of the UCH Convention, however, give controversy in fact to the comprehensive international order of the seas in relation to the other provisions of UNCLOS and customary international law, e.g., the definition of underwater cultural heritage, the 'creeping' expansion of coastal states' jurisdiction especially in the EEZ and on the continental shelf, and the sovereign immunity of sunken state vessels [The paper primarily follows to the terminology of the UCH Convention which uses 'state vessels'. It is defined as 'warships, and other vessels...that were owned or operated by a State and used, at the time of sinking, only for government noncommercial purposes' in Article 1(8).] This presentation will especially focus on the issue of sovereign immunity of sunken state vessels amongst them. International law in relation to warships is complex and uncertain and the issue has high political sensitivity as Article 2(8) of the UCH Convention reflects such a circumstance. The purpose of the presentation, therefore, is to explore the legal status of sunken state vessels. It examines the related provisions and their drafting process of the UCH Convention, the legal status of warships which UNCLOS provides and in the rules of customary international law. It will also observe some cases including notable States practices.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5612">
                <text>Kaè Oyama </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5613">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5614">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5615">
                <text>KaÃ¨ Oyama </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="488" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="280">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/c1533cde635f46a15ced79111b4ae56d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>68cbd8b6f8e30e8c16513cc98c636d6c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5609">
                    <text>The Iron Grapnel Supposed to Belong to the Sinan
Shipwreck and Other Anchors in East Asia

Mitsuhiko Ogawa
Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology
qq3a3qt9@poppy.ocn.ne.jp

Abstract
In 2016 an iron grapnel was shown in some special exhibitions marking
the 40th anniversary of the Sinan shipwreck excavation in Korea. The
grapnel 2.3m length has four arms, and it had been raised by a
fisherman’s net in 1972 before the wreck was discovered. Around the
Song Dynasty of China, stone anchor stocks composed of wooden shanks
were generally used; their distributions ranged from the Primorsky region
of Russia in the north to the south in Vietnam and the Philippines. In
Korea and in Japan, crude stone anchor stocks modelled after Chinese
anchors were widely used at that time. From the Takashima underwater
site associated with the Mongolian invasion of Japan in the 13th century
or during the early Yuan Dynasty, stone anchor stocks of separate type
were frequently discovered. After the Ming Dynasty, iron grapnels started
to be used in large, but at the same time wooden anchors were also kept
in use on different styles from region to region. In Japan, iron four-armed
grapnels were appeared in some art pictures after the Muromachi Period,
and then during the Edo Period those grapnels became popular as the
mainstream of Japanese anchors. The iron four-armed grapnel, which is
considered to have belonged to the Sinan shipwreck, seems to have
equipped on a Japanese vessel dated from the Edo period to early
modern times as its characters are found among Japanese grapnels.
However, the possibility that it still belonged to the Sinan shipwreck could
not be denied completely, because the actual origin of Japanese grapnels
is unknown; Chinese manufacturing technology of grapnels, which is
known for the time being, was different from Japanese one, but another
technology, which would have an impact upon both Japanese and the
Sinan shipwreck’s grapnels, might have existed in China.
Key words: Sinan shipwreck, Korea, grapnel, anchor

�Introduction: The Iron Grapnel Believed to belong to the Sinan
Shipwreck
In

2016,

an

iron

grapnel

was

displayed

along

with

the

reconstruction/restoration model of Sinan Shipwreck in a special
exhibition that commemorate the 40th year anniversary of the Excavation
of the Sinan Shipwreck in Korea. This iron grapnel displayed along with
the restoration model was stated that it was a Chinese steel anchor from
the Yuan Dynasty, and it belongs to ‘the Sinan shipwreck’ (National
Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2016). The grapnel is
2.3m in length and has four arms. It was raised by a fisherman’s net in
1972, before the wreck was discovered (National Research Institute of
Maritime Cultural Heritage, Korea, 2016).

The author has observed iron grapnels at museums in China; these
anchors were dated later than the Ming Dynasty. Also in Japan, iron
grapnels were used from the Edo Period to modern era. The author only
had a brief knowledge of iron grapnels that were widely used in China and
Japan, and he never had conducted a research on it. Moreover, the author
could not find any researches focused on iron grapnels conducted by
other scholars. The author has observed an interesting point on these
anchors that, about morphology-wise, the iron grapnel found near the
Sinan Shipwreck site was very similar to Japanese type. In this paper, the
author shares his comparative studies on iron grapnels that was believed
to belong to the Sinan Shipwreck and other ones which were widely used
in China and Japan.
Chinese Iron Grapnels

�Tiangong Kaiwu, a Chinese technical document at the end of the Ming
Dynasty, described methods to manufacture ‘Iron anchor anchors’ (Song,
1639). To build an iron grapnel, individually made four arms were joined
to a shank on after another at the end. For forging, materials from an old
earth wall sieve were sprinkled on the forging areas. On the iconography
that explain the forging processes, total 15 people were displayed,
including who supported shanks and arms and who forging. From these
iconographies, peculiar rectangle sectional shapes of the grapnel were
not yet confirmed. Around this time, a ship carries 5 to 6 Iron anchors; the
largest one is about 500 loaves, and it is used in emergency. In addition,
it was described/instructed that Iron grapnels could not be used on the
stone bottom area; it had to be used on sandy and mud seabed. Also,
there is a description that a ship applied sudden stop by dropping a stern
anchor to avoid collisions to ships in front.
According to Guanzhuo Wang, a historian who studies ships in China, it
is said that ‘stone anchor’, ‘wooden anchor’ and ‘Iron anchor’ coexisted
simultaneously in the Song and Yuan Dynasties, while primarily ‘woodstone anchor’ was widely used (Wang, 2000). In Chiming Uekgo Picture
of the Northern Song Dynasty, a ‘small iron anchor’ was depicted near the
bow of the river ship. In Jilin City, Jilin Province in 1975, a small three-arm
iron grapnel (22.5cm in length) dated the early in the Kim Dynasty was
found. In historical written sources from the Song and Yuan Dynasties,
these were descriptions on different types of anchors: ‘iron anchor’ and
‘iron anchor with four nails’ were widely used; in the Ming and Qing
Dynasties, ‘iron anchor’ was used in the northern sea area of hard mud
bottom; ‘wooden anchor’ was used in the southern deep sea of soft mud
bottom, both are respectively used depending on the types of sediments;
and for river ships ‘iron anchor’ was widely used. Regarding

�archaeological examples of ‘iron anchors’, an iron grapnel was found on
the Ming dynasty shipwreck during its excavation in the Songji River,
Liangshan, Shandong Province, in 1956. This anchor was 1.36m long and
had inscriptions on the surface, and it said ‘Hongwe 5th made’ and ‘85
loaves of heaviness’. Another archaeological example was found from
Quanzhou, Fujian, in 1981; it was an iron grapnel which was 2.68m long
and 758.3kg.
The author also visited and observed a few iron grapnels; he visited the
sea castle in Penglai City in Shandong Province, the Quanzhou Bay Old
Ship Museum in Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, the Guangzhou
Museum in Guangzhou City in Guangdong Province. Additionally, there
are reported documents about iron grapnels excavated from the Penglai
Sea castle (Chen,1989) (Fig. 1). The author analysed and studied
characteristics of those iron grapnels from these materials, but since the
amount of information is too big to share in this paper; therefore, detailed
descriptions of individual materials shall be reported in another occasion.

Fig. 1 (left): Iron Grapnel Excavated
from Penglai Sea Castle. (Chen,
1989)

�Chinese iron grapnels were built by forging individually forged arms to the
shank; in many cases, the joint points between arms and the shank
displayed peculiar shapes of remnants created by the forging (Fig. 2).
Additionally, there were examples that used/forged steel sheets on the
joinery points as a reinforcement. The cross-sectional shapes of the shank
and arms have irregular circular shape or irregular square shape; there
are no examples of clear rectangle shapes that can be seen on iron
grapnels found in Japan. The anchor ring had a small circular shape, and
its inner diameter was relatively small. It indicates that the end of the
shank was molded to make a hole. In many cases, those forging marks
were conspicuous. Also, there were examples that wood leaf-shaped fluke
were attached at the tip of arms. The shape of four arms formed a ‘+’
shape when it was seen from the crown side (Fig. 3).

�Fig. 2 (left): Iron Grapnel of the Ming Dynasty at the Dengzhou
Museum. Fig. 3 (right): Iron Grapnel of the Qing Dynasty at the
Dengzhou Museum.
Japanese Iron Grapnels
Ishii Kenji, a scholar who studied history of ships in Japan, explained
weights of the ‘the first anchor’ of the Bezai ship. He also studied
transition/evolution of Japanese anchors (Ishii, 1983). His studies on
history of Japanese anchors started with ancient simple stone anchors
that composed of a rope tied to a natural stone. On the ships traveled to
Tang (China), as well as on ships used between Heian Period and the
Medieval Era in Japan, wooden anchors were commonly used. The
wooden anchors used on these ships composed of a flat stone
sandwiched by two branches of hook-shaped trees. Based on
iconography that ‘iron grapnel’ and ‘wooden anchor’ were depicted in the
Scroll ‘Jinguu Kougou Engi Emaki’ in 1443, he believed that iron grapnels

�might be used on Daimyo's warships and other large ships around the
15th century.
Yet, Ishii indicated that there must be technical difficulties to forge iron
grapnels if Japan tried to build it domestically around that time; and the its
cost for mass-production must be another problem. Therefore, he
suspects that the iron grapnels in the 15th century were imported from
China. In the 16th century, use of iron anchors become popular among
warships. Yet, wooden anchors were often depicted with merchant ships
in the first half of the 17th century; the beginning of wide spread uses of
iron grapnels might need to wait until the middle of the 17th century.

Other Japanese scholars agree with Ishii 's theory about date of its
beginning and wide distribution of iron grapnels. Matsui analyzed 49 iron
grapnels found mainly northern area (Hokuriku) in the main island of
Japan, and he concluded that the transition to iron grapnels occurred
sometime in the 18th to the 20th centuries based on morphological
analysis on anchor rings and attached rings (Matsui, 2013). Ishihara restudied researches on wooden anchors conducted by Wang, Ishii,
Tamura, and several other researches, and he concluded that transition
from wooden anchors to iron grapnels were caused/triggered by
shipworms which ate wooden products in the sea (Ishihara, 2015).
Ninomiya examined the maritime traffic in Tokyo Bay and the Sodegaura
fishery industry based on literature/historical sources; also, he descrived
the perspectives of trading and distribution of iron grapnels in the Edo
Period in Japan (Ninomiya, 2017). Tamura, a folklore scholar, conducted
folklore investigations on ‘anchor blacksmith’ in Fukuyama City, Hiroshima
Prefecture. Tamura noted that iron grapnel was forged by superimposing
plate-like steel called ‘Yao’ (Tamura, 1978). He also described the

�manufacturing process of the iron grapnels: each part, such as four parts
of arms, a shank, an anchor ring and an attached ring were individually
prepared first, and then the arms and anchor rings were forged onto the
shank, and arms were spread into form 4 arms, then the loop of anchor
ring was expanded. His investigation was very important to conduct a
comparative study of manufacturing methodology of different anchors;
therefore, his research is especially important for the author’s researches
In Japan, at least 50 iron grapnels are known to be exist. The author
studied characteristics of these anchors; however, its information may be
too detailed to share in this paper, so that he has to wait to share such
detailed information until other opportunities. In general, Japanese iron
grapnels were composed/welded of separately built plate-shaped steels,
so that the cross-section of the shank and arms display a clear-cut
rectangular shape (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4: Iron Grapnel Raised up off Suzu City, Ishikawa Prefecture.
Although sometimes it displays slight lamellar traces and forge contact
traces due to forge weld, surfaces of Japanese iron grapnel are flat.

�Nonetheless, there are no examples in Japanese grapnels that shows
wrapped steel sheets reinforcements on arms alike Chinese grapnels.
The arms of Japanese grapnels were forged into the shank, and then the
arms were expanded after; henceforward, many of the (side-profile)
shapes of anchors showed a gentle ‘J’ shape (Fig. 5). And the shape of
the four arms from the crown exhibited a ‘X’ shape (Fig. 6). Although the
anchor ring displayed a large almond shape; the introduction of the
electric hammer in the modern period has made it smaller and the crosssectional shape tends to be circular.

Fig. 5: Iron Grapnel at Fukuura Shika Town, Ishikawa Prefecture.

�Fig. 6: Iron Grapnel at Fukuura Shika Town, Ishikawa Prefecture, from
its Crown Side.
Anchor of the Era before and after the Yuan Dynasty
Regarding the small iron grapnels, the first evidence appeared in the
North Song and Kim Dynasties. Although, the word/noun of ‘iron anchor’
and ‘iron anchor four nails’ appeared in literatures of the Song Dynasty,
the first archaeological evidence of iron grapnel had to wait until the
beginning of the Ming Dynasty (Wang, 2000). Anchors that widely used in
the Song Dynasty were ‘wood-stone anchor’ with ‘mono style stone
anchor stock.’ Regarding Yuan Dynasty, wood-stone anchors with
‘separate style stone anchor stock’ were main archaeological evidence
found from the underwater site at Takashima Island, Nagasaki Prefecture,
Japan; this site is also known for the Mongolia Attack to Japan in 1281.
Contrarily, mono style stone anchor stocks were rarely found in this site
(Takashima Town Board of Education, 1996). In the Takashima Island
site, however, a mono-style stone anchor stock was cut in half and

�converted as ‘separate style stone anchor stock’. This may indicate that
the both types had been coexisted, or it was at their transition period
(Ogawa, 2008a and 2008b). Those wood stone anchors with this
‘separate style stone anchor stocks’ was also used at Penglai Sea Castle
in Shandong Province and Quanzhou Bay in Fujian Province (Li, 1998).
Afterwards, ‘wood-stone anchor’ with ‘mono style stone anchor stock’ had
shifted into ‘wooden anchor’ with wooden stock. Iron grapnels appeared
at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, yet it did not mean that wooden
anchors disappeared due to the appearance of iron grapnels. An
iconography from Qing dynasty displayed sea boats using both wooden
anchor and iron grapnels. Therefore, for the Sinan Ship dated the middle
of the Yuan Dynasty, there is a possibility that Sinan Ship used wood
stone anchors (or wooden anchors) and iron grapnels at the same time.
Conclusion
The cross-section of the shank likely belonging to the Sinan shipwreck is
rectangular in shape, and a part where the arms as well as the anchor ring
are attached to the shank is pounded to connect by a flat piece of iron.
The arms curve gradually inward and make a figure of ‘J’. The crosssection of the arm is flat rectangular. The anchor ring is large, narrowly
long and almond like shape. Moreover, the cross-section is flat
rectangular. There features obviously resemble the futures of Japanese
iron grapnel; based on those reasons, the author believed that the
grapnels that believed to belong to the Sinan shipwreck was most likely
belonged to the iron grapnels of the Japanese vessels dated from the
early modern period to the modern period.

�In the current state, however, it is difficult to establish precise dating of the
Japanese style iron grapnels due to lack of the data and information for
establishment of manufacturing. On the other hand, there is another
possibility for the iron grapnel from the Sinan shipwreck to seek its origin
in China. There might be some manufacturing techniques in China that
would become the origin of Japanese grapnel manufacture later. This
possible original manufacture technique has not been found/confirmed yet
in China; however, it could be possible that Sinan shipwreck had carried
Chinese iron grapnel that produced by Chinese manufacturing techniques
that would be taught to Japanese later was onboard the Sinan shipwreck
of the Yuan Dynasty. Nonetheless, the author concludes that, under these
circumstances, it was most likely that the iron grapnels that is believed to
belong to the Sinan shipwreck was a Japanese iron grapnel from the early
modern period to the modern period.
Acknowledgements
The detailed data on the four-armed iron anchor that believed to belong
to the Shinan shipwreck has been shared by Dr. Hong Soon-Jae and Dr.
Park Ye-Ree of the National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural
Heritage. Mr. Yuichiro Tashiro also helped me greatly for the related
articles on the webpages. I deeply express my gratitude toward them.
References
Chen, T.,1989. Penglai Old Ship Belongings Analysis: Penglai Old Ship
and Dengzhou Old Port. Dalian Maritime College Publishing House,
Dalian (in Chinese).
Ishii, K., 1983. Zusetsu Wasen Shi Wa, Zusetsu, Nippon Kaiji Shi Wa
Sosho, Vol.1. Shiseido, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Ishii, K., 1995. Wa Sen I, Mono to Ningen no Bunkashi, Vol. 76, Hosei
University Press, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Ishihara, W., 2013. Ikari No Bunka Shi, Book Series of Bukkyo University,
Shibunkaku Publisher, Kyoto (in Japanese)

�Li, G., 1998. Ancient Chinese anchors: their rigging and conservations.
The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol. 27(4): 307-312.
Matsui, H., 2013. Yotsuzume tetsuikari no kisoteki kenkyu: fune ni
kakawaru mono no keishiki gakuteki kosatsu. Bulletin of Archaeology
(Department of Archaeology University of Kanazawa), Vol.134: 27-52 (in
Japanese).

National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2016.
http://blog.naver.com/seamuse1994/220889730348
National Research Institute of Maritime Cultural Heritage, 2017.
http://www.seamuse.go.kr/seamuseweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?
nttId=1155&amp;bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000249&amp;pageIndex=2&amp;searchtitle
=&amp;searchcont=&amp;searchkey=&amp;searchwriter=&amp;searchWrd=&amp;searchCtgryY
n=A&amp;mn=KO_02_04#link
Ninomiya, T., 2017. Yotsu zume ikari ni tsuite, Study of the History of
Sodegaura City, Vol.18: 69-79 (in Japanese).
Ogawa, M., 2008a. Kaiiki ajia no ikariishi koroshi. In Y. Yokkaichi (Ed.),
Mono Kara Mita Kaiiki Ajiashi, Kyudai Ajia Sosho, Kyushu University
Press, Fukuoka: 1-37 (in Japanese).
Ogawa, M., 2008b. Higashi ajia kaiiki ni okeru chugoku sutairu ikariishi no
Kkenkyu. Proceeding of the First Korea-Japan Underwater Archaeology,
Korea: 103-144 (in Japanese and Korean).
Song, Y., 1637 (1969). Tiangong Kaiwu (in Chinese), Trans. K. Yabuuchi,
Toyo Bunko, Vol.130, Heibonsha, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Takashima Town Board of Education, 1996. Takashim Kaitei Iseki III,
Takshima-cho Bunkazai Chosa Hokokusho, Vol. 2. Takashima Town
Board of Education, Takashima-cho (in Japanese).
Tamura, Z., 1978. Tomo no ikari to kugi. In Hiroshima Prefecture (Ed.),
History of Hiroshima Prefecture: Folk Custom, Hiroshima Prefecture,
Hiroshima: 709-716 (in Japanese).
Wang, G., 2000. Chinese Old Ship Graphic Chart. SDX Joint Publishing
Company, Beijing (in Chinese).

�Biography
Mitsuhiko Ogawa was bone in Ishikawa Prefecture in
1968. He received MA degree in Archaeology from the
University of Kanazawa in 2005. He is majoring in
underwater archaeology, especially, in anchors and
stone anchor stocks as well as in Chinese ceramics. He
became a member of the Kyusyu Okinawa Society for
Underwater Archaeology in 1992 and has been a senior
research associate of the Asian Research Institute of
Underwater Archaeology since 2011. He has excavated
many underwater archaeological sites such as
Takashima Island, the Maegata Bay or Ojika Island (Yamami), and has
also involved in the survey of underwater cultural heritage around the
Japan Sea. He has published many papers related to underwater
archaeology in East Asia.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5603">
                <text>The Iron Grapnel Supposed to Belong to the Sinan Shipwreck and Other Anchors in East Asia </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5604">
                <text>In 2016 an iron grapnel was shown in some special exhibitions marking the 40th anniversary of the Sinan shipwreck excavation in Korea.  The grapnel 2.3m length has four arms, and it had been raised by a fishermanâ€™s net in 1972 before the wreck was discovered.  Around&#13;
 the Song Dynasty of China, stone anchor stocks composed of wooden shanks were generally used; their distributions ranged from the Primorsky region of Russia in the north to the south in Vietnam and the Philippines.  In Korea and in Japan, crude stone anchor stocks modelled after Chinese anchors were widely used at that time.  From the Takashima underwater site associated with the Mongolian invasion of Japan in the 13th century or during the early Yuan Dynasty, stone anchor stocks of separate type were frequently discovered.  After the Ming Dynasty, iron grapnels started to be used in large, but at the same time wooden anchors were also kept in use on different styles from region to region.  In Japan, iron four-armed grapnels were appeared in some art pictures after the Muromachi Period, and then during the Edo Period those grapnels became popular as the mainstream of Japanese anchors.  The iron four-armed grapnel, which is considered to have belonged to the Sinan shipwreck, seems to have equipped on a Japanese vessel dated from the Edo period to early modern times as its characters are found among Japanese grapnels. However, the possibility that it still belonged to the Sinan shipwreck could not be denied completely, because the actual origin of Japanese grapnels is unknown; Chinese manufacturing technology of grapnels, which is known for the time being, was different from Japanese one, but another technology, which would have an impact upon both Japanese and the Sinan shipwreckâ€™s grapnels, might have existed in China.   </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5605">
                <text>Mitsuhiko Ogawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5606">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5607">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5608">
                <text>Mitsuhiko Ogawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="487" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="279">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/af279e045e2565b015f5a1a7aac7184d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>08b852799248f4a5a7fe57f063e63904</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5602">
                    <text>Developing the Foundation for Sustainable Management of
Underwater Cultural Heritage Starting from Local
Involvement: Case Studies in Okinawa
Yumiko Nakanishi
Osaka Prefectural Board of Education
NakanishiYum@mbox.pref.osaka.lg.jp
Rintaro Ono
Tokai University
or109423@tsc.u-tokai.ac.jp
Norimitsu Sakagami
Tokai University
sakagami@scc.u-tokai.ac.jp
Hironobu Kan
Research Center for Coastal Seafloor, Kyushu University
kan@scs.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Chiaki
Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center
chiakik0407@gmail.com

Katagiri

Abstract
The Ryukyu Archipelago is well known for its beautiful ocean and coral
reefs; and thanks to these beautiful oceans, scuba diving and snorkeling
and have become one of the most important activities for its tourist
industry of the archipelago. Around the islands, 230 underwater cultural
heritage sites were found and identified. In this presentation, the authors
shall introduce their attempts and case studies regarding the public
engagement of local communities with management of underwater
cultural heritage, including providing guidelines for sustainable
valorization of the site with local marine sports industry. For Yarabuoki
underwater site of Ishigaki Island, there are seven iron grapnel anchors
and a cluster of Early Modern Ryukyuwan ceramic jars (tsuboya-yaki). To
establish a connection/relationship between the site and the local
professional divers, who actually go into the sea and see the site most
frequently, the authors provided workshops about UCH and a place where

�archaeologists and the local professional divers can exchange their
opinions. The goal of these activities is to ask professional divers of local
communities help to monitor UCH after scientific evaluations led by
archaeologists are completed. The Ohajima underwater site is located off
the Coast of Kume Island in Okinawa. This site contains a dense
distribution of medieval Chinese pottery. Public open-houses were
experimentally organized twice for local communities. The Board of
education from local communities (for instance, Kumejima Museum) and
local diving communities were heavily involved and helped underwater
archaeologists and the research team to organize this event. After
continuous attempts of public outreach, public awareness and interests
for UCH among the local diving communities has increased. More divers
have started visiting the sites. However, an increase in public awareness
creates another concerns that it exposes the UCH sites into social media
such as blogs by visitors, articles on diving magazines, and so on.
Henceforth, the next challenge confronting the authors and the local
communities regarding these sites are plans to properly monitor those
sites and a proposal for a reliable long-term management plans. More
importantly, these monitoring and management plans have to involve wide
varieties and different type of local communities
Key words: Ryukyu, UCH, public engagement, management

Introduction
In past few decades, in addition to conventional preservation operations
for cultural heritage sites, understanding values of cultural heritages, and
utilizing those as cultural resources for local communities has become a
very important perspective to manage cultural heritage. Archaeological
sites are often turned to site museums where visitors actually visit and
enjoy the original sites. This new phenomenon is widely seen not only on
terrestrial sites, but also on underwater sites. This paper aims to share the
authors’ attempts and experiences of their attempt to establish the
involvement of local communities towards sustainable management plans
of underwater cultural heritage, and their case studies around the area of
Okinawa Prefecture.

�Background and Subjects of Underwater Cultural Heritage in
Okinawa
Okinawa consists of the southern half of the Ryukyu Archipelago with 199
islands, and its area expands over 1200km between Kyushu Island and
Taiwan. Because of its location, islands of Okinawa have subtropical
climates which makes Okinawa differs from other areas of Japan, and it
gives warm climate through a year. Islands of Okinawa are surrounded by
amazingly beautiful ocean with flourishing coral reefs. Therefore, these
beautiful waters are very popular among scuba divers and snorkelers.
Sometimes, those divers and snorkelers become to be interested in
something different from beautiful fishes and corals; they want to see
something different yet attractive. Therefore, authors believe that UCH
has great potential to be a resources of truism, or diving industry.
Indeed, underwater cultural heritage often attracts non-archaeologists
and non-experts. For instance, the wreck-diving is one of the very popular
diving-tour options in many countries, such as Malta and other
Mediterranean islands. It is already the major tourist attraction in many
countries. In the case of Okinawa, a beautiful coral reef with schools of
colorful fishes shall provide special background which adds extra value
on diving on UCH.

230 underwater cultural heritage sites are identified

around the islands in the Okinawa Prefecture. This presentation is about
the authors’ attempts to establish strong ties between the local public and
underwater cultural heritage managements and to provide guidelines for
sustainable managements of the site and involving of local marine sports
industry into this management plans.
The Ohajima underwater site is located off the coast of Kume Island in
Okinawa. The site contains dense distributions of medieval Chinese
pottery. Public Open Site Day was experimentally held twice in the island.

�Along with the authors’ research team of underwater archeologists and
researchers who organized the events, attendance, and support from the
Local Board of Education (Kumejima Museum) and local diving
communities (Katagiri et al., 2012).
The Yarabuoki underwater site of Ishigaki Island consists of seven iron
grapnel anchors and a cluster of Early Modern Ryukyuwan ceramic jars
(tsuboya-yaki). During field campaigns, authors and its research team
provided workshops and a meeting to exchange opinion with local
communities in order to establish a new tie and relationship between the
UCH of the islands and local professional divers who visit the the sites
most frequently (Ono et al., 2015 and Nakanishi et al., 2016). The aim of
these activities and meetings are to ask local diving communities to
monitor the sites even after the scientific academic evaluations of the site
led by authors is completed in near future, and to share general
knowledges and perspectives of protecting UCH as our common
heritages and value those heritages in non-intrusive manners.
After the continuous attempts, public awareness and interests in UCH
have increased dramatically among the local divers and its communities.
More divers began to visit the sites. Yet, this new movements and trends
has invoked another potential dangers toward this UCH. The potential
dangers is an increased number of divers and exposure of UCH into wider
range of the general public; the UCH have started to appear in divers’
SNS, blogs, diving magazines, and so forth. This trend may trigger
unfriendly and intrusive activities on the sites, such as lootings and
destructions. Henceforward, now the authors have to urgently focus on its
plans of site managements and monitoring plans, and to accomplish this
task, involvement wide variety of scholars as well as local communities
are essential.

�Case Studies in Okinawa Part 1: Ohajima Site in Kume Island,
Okinawa: Open Site Day
Location and Characteristics of the Site
The Ohajima underwater site is located off the coast Oha Island where is
annexed to Kume Island in Okinawa. The site consists of a dense
distribution of Chinese pottery that is dated between the latter half of the
14th century and the beginning of the 15th century. A Public Open Site
day was experimentally held twice (in 2011 and 2013). Local Board of
Education (Kumejima Museum) and local diving communities supported
underwater archaeologists and researchers to organize this event
(Katagiri et al., 2012).
The main attraction of the event was a tour to Ohajima underwater site
either by snorkeling or a glass-bottomed boat. The event schedule was
especially composed for the general public to understand general ideas
of UCH; the schedule (described as Step 1 - 5) of the event can be seen
below:
Step 1: Lecture ‘History and Culture of Kume Island’
Step 2: Material Observation of Ceramics Excavated from Underwater
Site
Step 3: Tour of the On-land Site Where Was Important for Maritime
Trades.
Step 4: Snorkeling Practice
Step 5: Snorkeling Tour of the Site
Step 1: Lecture ‘History and Culture of Kume Island’
First, archaeologists gave a 30 minute long preliminary lecture prior to the
site visit. This lecture was about general knowledge and information
regarding history of Kume Island. The authors believed that providing

�historical information and knowledge to the participants is very important
because the lecture and its information transform this event into a learning
opportunity rather than be a just sightseeing for fun (Katagiri et al., 2012).
Step 2: Material Observation of Ceramics Excavated from the
Underwater Site
As the second step, the participants experienced observation-practice on
raised artefacts; those artefacts used for this 30 minutes long observationpractice included pottery pieces were collected from Ohajima site and a
stone anchor from Uegusuku (Castle) Site (Fig. 1). The purpose of this
practice is for participants to understand the appearances of underwater
artefacts; and this experience helped the participants to find/recognize
artefacts during the following underwater on-site tour. Experiences of
observations on artefacts together with the lecture of preliminary
knowledge of the site provided a great preparation for the following tour
and this event (Katagiri et al., 2012).

Fig. 1: Material observation excavated ceramics from underwater site.
(Kumejima Museum, Kume Island)

�Step 3: Tour to the On-land Site Where Was Important for Maritime
Trades
Furthermore, the participants attended a tour to terrestrial cultural heritage
sites: on this tour, participants visited the Tenkogu Site, the Kuramoto-ato
Site, the Majako Port Site, quarries, and so on. This one hour long tour
was organized and guided by archaeologists. The aim of this tour was to
explain site-formation processes of Ohajima underwater site and to
provide comprehensive knowledge of archaeological sites and its
surrounding environments (Katagiri et al., 2012).
Step 4: Snorkeling Practice
Before visiting the underwater site, a practice session was provided to
participants who decided to visit the site with snorkeling. For this tour, two
different options were provided for participants; one is visiting the site by
snorkeling, and the other option is to visit the site by a glass-bottomed
boat. Twenty participants visited the site by snorkeling, and the other
participants who did not want to swim chose the glass-bottomed boat.
Both tour lasted one hour-long each. This practice-session of snorkeling
was taught by local professional divers for safety reasons of participants
(Katagiri et al., 2012).
Step 5: Snorkeling Tour of the Site
Finally, as the last activities of the Open Site Day, the participants visited
and enjoyed the actual UCH site. Fig.2 displays a scene of the snorkeling
tour in Ohajima underwater site (Katagiri et al., 2012).

�Fig. 2: A snorkelling tour of the site. (Ohajima Underwater Site, Kume
Island)

Discussion
The authors believed that the Open Site Day was successful; this
experiment of public outreach that take local participants to the actual
UCH sites can be a great case study for other UCH site across the Ryukyu
Archipelago. Although this experiment was generally a successful case,
the authors also became to acknowledge its difficulties and rooms for
improvements in order to use it this experiments using it as a case study
of public outreach with other UCH sites across the archipelago. Also, this
type of events still requires experienced archaeologists to organize and to
provide informative lectures; nonetheless, these archaeologists were
most cases not originally from local communities. The authors believe that
an ideal perspective of local workshops and public outreach for UCH is
‘sustainability’; local divers and communities became to be able to provide
workshops as well as monitoring and management UCH without supports
from outside. Thus, next challenge for this public outreach experiments is

�to compose a flexible guideline that make those events more sustainable
by local diving experts and communities.
Case Studies in Okinawa Part 2: Yarabuoki Underwater Site
Location and Characteristics of the Site
Yarabuoki underwater site is located off the coast of Yarabuzaki in Nagura
Bay of Ishigaki Island in Okinawa Prefecture. This site contains seven iron
grapnel anchors of various sizes and a cluster of Early Modern Okinawan
ceramic jars (tsuboya-yaki). This type of ceramic jars were originally
produced in Okinawa Islands between the 16th century and the 19th
century, which also corresponding to the time periods of the Early Modern
Ryukyu Kingdom Period for Okinawa Islands and the Edo Period for the
main lands of Japan (Fig. 3). Also those grapnel anchors found in this site
are the only examples of grapnel anchors that are found in Japan.

Fig. 3: The assemblage of Okinawa produced pottery in good condition
at the Yarabuoki underwater site. (Okinawa Prefectural Archaeology
Center)

�The site was discovered by a local professional diver, Seiji Fujii, in 2009.
And in 2010, the Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center conducted
inspection survey with assistances of the Nansei Islands Underwater
Cultural Heritage Study Group (Katagiri, 2010 and 2013). This newly
discovered UCH site also required an accurate recording by experienced
diving archaeologists, and then values of the site have to be evaluated
and disseminated. Currently authors and their research team is operating
an

interdisciplinary

research

project

to

evaluate

historical

and

archaeological values of the site, as well as its potentials as a cultural
resource for local communities (Ono et al., 2016).
Moreover, authors also believe that geographical and topographical data
around site area shall greatly contribute to understand site formation
process and its reconstruction. Under this scope, Dr. Kan conducted a
multibeam echo sounding (MBES) survey around Yarabuoki underwater
site in August 2011 (Kan et al., 2015 and Ono et al. 2016). This multibeam data successfully visualized the bathymetry around the site with
lateral grid resolution of one metre. Fig. 4 displays enlarged image of the
multibeam bathymetric map of Yarabuoki underwater site with plotted
locations of its components. The authors believe that this multibeam map
is an essential tool for their public outreach because the map can be a
tool to convey accurate academic evaluations of the site to its readers and
visitors. The authors have to remark on the importance of scientific and
historical values of UCH sites and its dissemination to local communities;
without understanding its cultural significance, divers will not be able to
appreciate UCH and visiting the sites will be a part of fun dives, not a part
of cultural activities. Moreover, without understanding cultural values of
UCH properly, its exposures to the general public may trigger negative
impacts on the sites.

�Fig. 4: Multibeam bathymetric map of the Yarabuoki underwater site.
(Hironobu Kan)

Workshops with the Local Professional Divers
First, the authors tried to build a network with local professional divers who
frequently visit this UCH site. Also Mr. Fujii, who found and reported the
site to Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center, has been involved in
archaeological investigations since the beginning. A goal of this was to
establish strong ties with the local diving communities and to ask them to
monitor the UCH sites; also the authors tried to share histories and
archaeological information of the site based on scholarly researches as
well as methods for non-intrusive/non-disturbance recreation diving on
UCH sites. With supports from Ishigaki City Board of Education where
manages cultural heritages around/in the island, authors organized
several workshops and invite local divers; during this workshops, divers
also visited the site with authors and diving archaeologists. Then the
authors and participants exchange opinions towards UHC of the islands

�and discussed values of the sites for local communities and importance of
in situ preservation (Nakanishi et al., 2016).
These workshops started November 2015, and the authors have tried to
share the idea of UCH and its important concepts that is not to touch or
remove artefacts and contexts from its original positions. Also as a part of
the workshop, the authors and archaeologists invited participants, or local
professional divers, to the UCH sites during the archaeological
investigations; aims of this activities are to share archaeological methods
of underwater recording of UCH, such as measuring and drawing of the
sites in scientific manners. Throughout these workshops, the author
believes that the local divers become to be aware of significances of
archaeological information of the site that may help archaeologists to
reconstruct the past (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5: Site visit with the local professional divers. (Yuji Yamamoto)

�Discussion
For this experimental research in Ishigaki Island, the authors also focused
on involvements of local communities into monitoring and managements
plans. Therefore collaborative efforts with local authorities and the general
public were essential. Local divers may be able to visit the sites as their
daily activities, yet they also do monitoring while they do so, and when
they found a new archaeological site, they can quickly yet properly report
their discoveries to the local authorities using established network via
authors’ workshops. An ideal goal of this workshops and experimental
research is to establish a sustainable management and monitoring plans
of UCH site; once archaeological investigations are completed, the
authors want local diving communities and their local dive shops to bring
their customers (recreation divers who visit the island) to UCH sites with
providing proper information of its history and archeology. When those
diving tours on the UCH become popular activity, their frequent visit may
function as a monitoring activity, not to mention that these tours may have
positive impacts on the local tourist businesses by bringing customers to
the island by.
The authors’ main question for this experimental research on public
outreach and dissemination is ‘how to maintain and protect qualities of
scientific information and values of archaeological sites during the course
of dissemination’.
Discussion:

Developing

the

Foundation

for

Sustainable

Management Plans on Underwater Cultural Heritage with Local
Involvement
The authors’ main purpose of this research is to establish sustainable
management and monitoring plans for UCH. It is important to remark that

�the sustainable management and monitoring plan is different from other
leisure diving activities on shipwreck sites that are often intrusive and
destructive to UCH. Also, to make the stated management and monitoring
plans different from other uncontrolled leisure shipwreck diving activities,
it is very important for archaeologists to provide good scientific information
to local diving communities and dive shops where will bring leisure divers
to the UCH sites after archaeological investigations are completed. If the
local diving communities recognize and share values of UCH, they will
respects its presence, and keep non-intrusive and non-destructive
methods to enjoy their underwater common heritages. In order convey
values of UCH to the local communities properly, it is important for
archaeologists and researchers to provide ‘good’ information and data.
For instance, in case of Yarabuoki underwater site, high-resolution multibeam maps were provided to local communities. Indeed, there are many
good case studies of similar concepts: for instance, similar case studies
were done for Baia Underwater Archaeological Park (Nogami et al., 2007),
protected-sites-tours in Sicily (Soprintendenza del Mare, 2009 and Tusa,
2009) and so forth (Nakanishi et al., 2017). For this authors’ experimental
researches around Okinawa areas, authors need to find the most suitable
case study and its fittest methodology to accomplish their dissemination
and monitoring plans as socio-cultural and natural environmental studies.
Throughout the authors’ researched and the workshops in Kume Island
and Ishigaki Island, local communities and diving shops displayed strong
interest to be a part of the management and monitoring plans. Now, the
authors have to move to next step; that is further development of the local
networks and capacity buildings. Those two developments are essential
for the plan to be established with local communities for long-term site
management. For this purpose, authors composed four-step work-

�models; this model can be seen as Fig. 6 (Nakanishi and Katagiri 2017,
amended by the authors).

Fig. 6: Suggested model case: 4 steps and subjects to overcome.
(Nakanishi and Katagiri, 2017, amended)
For an already identified UCH site, four-step process shall be expected to
accomplish a sustainable management plan. First, as Step 1,
archaeologists and researchers have to investigate and identify values of
the UCH site. It is an essential process because these values display how
to manage and protect the sites. Also this value shall be shared with local
communities; therefore, values of the sites have to be identified and
studied before the following dissemination processes. Also, these
archaeological investigation by scholars may take multi-years and can be
labor intensive; therefore, collaboration with local diving communities are
often very helpful. Moreover, this collaborative efforts between

�archaeologists and local diving communities can be a positive first steps
of local involvement for the management and monitoring UCH.
The second step is capacity building. The capacity building include
introduction of UCH to local communities; therefore, providing proper
knowledge and methods to protect and manage the sites is essential. For
that reason, workshop-style, such as Yarabuoki underwater site, is an
effective method to accomplish this step. Additionally, this step may widely
expose UCH into the general public; therefore, one of the important tasks
for archaeologists is to evaluate preservation condition/status of sites, and
its access have to be restricted if it is necessary. In short, it is important
for archaeologists and experts to share and disseminate good knowledge
and information with the local communities.

The third step is ‘risk management’ and ‘establishment’. UCH has been
opened to the general public via the processes of the previous step; and
it may trigger influx of tourists into the UCH. The main task of this stage is
to closely monitor the UCH. To do this correctly and frequently, supports
of local diving communities with proper networking shall become
essential. On the other hand, the authors hope another potential of UCH;
the beginning of new touristic trends by utilizing UCH may generate new
values of UCH for local communities. The authors is hoping that practice
of UCH site management and monitoring shall be established throughout
this step.
Final stage, or Step 4, is about ‘sustainability’ by the local communities. It
is important for local communities to lead site managements and
monitoring operation of UCH. While archaeologists and other experts still
be able to support the local communities if necessary, the author strongly

�believe that main groups that manage and monitor the UCH have to be
local communities. This shifting process may take long time. However the
authors also hope that the local communities may become to realize their
own values on UHCs throughout their experiences of the management.
When the local communities understand values and methods to manage
and monitor UCH without helps by archaeologists and experts,
‘sustainability’ of the management will be achieved. To accomplish the
Step 4, supports from local authorities, such as Board of Education of a
municipal government where is responsible for managing cultural
heritages found in the region, is essential. Two main important tasks for
them are: to secure and maintain academic values of UCH and keep
qualities of its management; to report and register new discoveries of UCH
within their jurisdictions.

Before closing this paper, the authors want to give special thanks to
Coastal Area Capability Project in Southeast Asia (Research Institute for
Humanity and Nature), Tokai Project Study ‘Okinawa Underwater Cultural
Heritage and Underwater Museum Project’ (Tokai University), and
Mitsubishi Foundation, for their supports by funding this research project.
References
Kan, H., Urata, K., Nagao, M., Hori, N., Fujita, K., Yokoyama, Y.,
Nakashima, Y., Ohashi, T., Goto, K. and Suzuki, A., 2015, Submerged
karst landforms observed by multibeam bathymetric survey in Nagura
bay, Ishigaki island, south-western Japan. Geomorphology, Vol. 229: 112124.
Katagiri, C. (Ed.), 2009. Distribution Survey Report of the Coastal Sites
(II): Volume on Miyako of Yaeyama. Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological
Center, Naha (in Japanese).

�Katagiri, C. (Ed.), 2010. Distribution Survey Report of the Coastal Sites
(III): Site Map Volume. Okinawa Prefectural Archaeological Center, Naha
(in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., 2013. Iron anchors discovered in Nansei islands. In Asian
Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology, Association for Nansei
Islands Underwater Cultural Heritage Study Group and Kagoshima
University The Faculty of Law, Economics and Humanities, (Eds.), The
Database of Underwater Cultural Heritage and Promotion of Underwater
Archaeology: Nansei Shoto, ARIUA, Fukuoka: 136-141 (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., Miyagi, H. and Watanabe, M., 2014. Underwater Cultural
Heritage in Okinawa: Pieces of History in the Blue (Okinawa No SuichuBunka-Isan: Aoi Umi ni Sizunda Rekishi no Kakera), Borderink, Naha (in
Japanese).
Katagiri, C., Yamada, H., Sakihara, T., Nakajima, T., Miyagi, H.,
Watanabe, Y., 2012. The report of an underwater cultural heritage tour in
Kumejima: the project of ‘the museum of underwater cultural heritage’.
Bulletin of the Museum, Okinawa Prefectural Museum and Art Museum,
Vol. 5: 19-36 (in Japanese).
Katagiri, C., Yamamoto, Y. and Nakanishi, Y., 2014b. Distributional survey
of underwater cultural heritage and its experimental presentation in the
Ryukyu archipelago, Okinawa, Japan. In H. van Tilburg et al. (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater
Cultural Heritage, Vol. 2, APCONF 2014, Honolulu: 655-668.
Nakanishi, Y. and Katagiri, C., 2017. Okinawa kaiiki deno
suichubunkaisan no hozonkatsuyou moderu kouchiku no tameno
kokusaihikakukenkyu. The Summary of Research Presentations at the
General Assembly of the Japanese Archaeological Association, 83th: 6869 (in Japanese).
Nakanishi, Y., Katagiri, C., Tusa, S., Agneto, F. and Selvaggio, P., 2017.
A study on the development of underwater cultural heritage management
in Sicily, Italy. Bulletin of the Museum, Okinawa Prefectural Museum and
Art Museum, Vol.10: 19-42 (in Japanese with English summary).
Nakanishi, Y., Tetsu, T. and Ono, R., 2016. Pursuing Sustainable
Preservation and Valorisation of Underwater Cultural Heritage: Attempt in

�Okinawa to Underwater Site Museum. Poster Session at IKUWA VI,
Fremantle.
Nogami, T. and Petrella, D., 2007. Report on the visits of Baia underwater
park. Kanazawa University Archaeology Department Bulletin, Vol. 59:2631 (in Japanese).
Ono, R., Katagiri, C., Sakagami, N., Kan, H., Miyagi, H. and Yamamoto,
Y., 2013. Present and future of the underwater cultural heritages in the
Yaeyama islands: perspective from the recent research of Yarabuoki.
Proceedings of Yaeyama Museum, Vol. 22:20-43 (in Japanese).
Ono, R., Katagiri, C., Kan, H., Nagano, N., Nakanishi, Y., Yamamoto, Y.,
Takemura, F. and Sakagami, N., 2016. Discovery of iron grapnel anchors
in early modern Ryukyu and management of underwater cultural heritages
in Okinawa, Japan. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, Vol.
45(1):75-91.
Ono, R., Kan, H., Sakagami, N., Nagano, M. and Katagiri, C., 2014. First
discovery and mapping of early modern grapnel anchors in Ishigaki island
and cultural resource management of underwater cultural heritage in
Okinawa. In H. van Tilburg et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd AsiaPacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage, Vol. 2,
APCONF 2014, Honolulu: 983-697.
Ryukyu Shinpo (琉球新報), 2013. Moved by underwater cultural heritage:
Chinese pottery on the seabed (Suichu isan ni kando, kaitei no chuugoku
san toujiki). Ryukyu Shinpo, 10th October 2013 (in Japanese) .
Sakagami, N., Li, Y., Yamada, Y., Kawasaki, I., Niki, M., Ono, R. and
Ishikawa, S., 2014. Ocean environmental education through ‘monozukuri’
in Ishigaki island. Journal of Japan Society for Engineering Education, Vol.
62(3): 47–52 (in Japanese).
Soprintendenza del Mare, 2009. Manutenzione degli itinerari culturali
subacquei della soprintendenza del mare: norme di progettazione e
fruizione. Assessorato dei beni culturali e dell’identità siciliana,
Dipartimento dei beni culturali e dell’identità siciliana, Palermo.
Tusa, S., 2009. Research, protection and evaluation of Sicilian and
Mediterranean marine cultural heritage. Conservation Science in Cultural
Heritage, Vol. 9(1): 79-98.

�Biographies
Yumiko Nakanishi is a senior archaeologist working
at Cultural Properties Protection Division, Osaka
Prefectural Board of Education. She obtained MPhill
in Archaeology at Cambridge University in 2001 and
is currently a PhD candidate, specializing on
heritage management and public archaeology, as
well as the final phase of Kofun Period in Kinki
region of Japan. She has been involved in projects
on underwater cultural heritage in Okinawa area.
Her publication includes ‘The Great East Japan Earthquake and Cultural
Heritage: Towards an Archaeology of Disaster’, Antiquity, Vol. 87: 258269, ‘Archaeological Administration and Japanese Archaeology’,
Japanese Journal of Archaeology, No. 4 (2017): 171-184, and so on.

Dr. Rintaro Ono is an Associate Professor of School
of Marine Science and Technology at Tokai
University, Japan. His research is focused on
Maritime Archaeology and Anthropology, and
specifically: human maritime adaptation process,
human migration into Island Southeast Asia and
Pacific Islands, human maritime exploitation history,
and maritime trade history. He has been involved in
many research projects in Japan, Indonesia,
Philippines, Palau, and Vanuatu. He has been visiting researcher or
collaborator with some national and international laboratories and
universities. He is author of more than 50 academic papers, two books,
and editor of Prehistoric Marine Resource Use in the Indo-Pacific
Regions. (ANU E Press, 2013).

�Dr. Norimitsu Sakagami is an Associate
Professor of the School of Marine
Science and Technology at Tokai
University, Japan. He has developed
marine robotic systems such as a
human-sized underwater robot with
manipulators, underwater soil core
sampling robot, wave-powered boat and
so on. The primary focuses of his
research are motion control of marine surface vehicles and underwater
vehicles. His major works include ‘Development of an Underwater
Robotic Inspection System Using Mechanical Contact’, Journal of Field
Robotics, Vol.30(4):624-640, 2013 (co-author) and others.

Dr. Hironobu Kan is a Professor in the Graduate
School of Integrated Sciences for Global Society,
Kyushu University, and Director of the Research
Center for Coastal Seafloor, Kyushu University,
Japan. The primary focus of his current research is
Coral Reefs and Coastal Seafloor Geomorphology
using Multibeam Bathymetric Echo Sounder and
SCUBA Diving Surveys. His recent work includes
‘Submerged karst landforms observed by multibeam
bathymetric survey in Nagura bay, Ishigaki island, southwestern Japan’,
Geomorphology 229:112-124, 2015 (DOI:
10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.032).
Chiaki Katagiri is a senior archaeologist at Okinawa
Prefectural Archaeological Center. He was born in
Nagano Prefecture, Japan in 1976, graduated from
Okinawa International University in 1999 majoring in
archeology. He is specializing in the anthropology of
the islands, carrying out anthropological and
archaeological fieldwork throughout Asia. He has been
actively engaged in investigation and many research
projects of underwater cultural heritage in the Ryukyu
Archipelago. He is a co-author of Underwater Cultural Heritage in
Okinawa: Pieces of History in the Blue or Okinawa No Suichu-BunkaIsan: Aoi Umi ni Sizunda Rekishi no Kakera (Borderink, Naha, 2014).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5588">
                <text>Developing the Foundation for Sustainable Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage Starting from Local Involvement: Case Studies in Okinawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5589">
                <text>The Ryukyu Archipelago is well known for its beautiful ocean and coral reefs; and thanks to these beautiful oceans, scuba diving and snorkeling and have become one of the most important activities for its tourist industry of the archipelago. Around the islands, 230 underwater cultural heritage sites were found and identified. In this presentation, the authors shall introduce their attempts and case studies regarding the public engagement of local communities with management of underwater cultural heritage, including providing guidelines for sustainable valorization of the site with local marine sports industry. For Yarabuoki underwater site of Ishigaki Island, there are seven iron grapnel anchors and a cluster of Early Modern Ryukyuwan ceramic jars (tsuboya-yaki). To establish a connection/relationship between the site and the local professional divers, who actually go into the sea and see the site most frequently, the authors provided workshops about UCH and a place where &#13;
archaeologists and the local professional divers can exchange their opinions. The goal of these activities is to ask professional divers of local communities help to monitor UCH after scientific evaluations led by archaeologists are completed. The Ohajima underwater site is located off the Coast of Kume Island in Okinawa. This site contains a dense distribution of medieval Chinese pottery. Public open-houses were experimentally organized twice for local communities. The Board of education from local communities (for instance, Kumejima Museum) and local diving communities were heavily involved and helped underwater archaeologists and the research team to organize this event.&#13;
 After continuous attempts of public outreach, public awareness and interests for UCH among the local diving communities has increased. More divers have started visiting the sites. However, an increase in public awareness creates another concerns that it exposes the UCH sites into social media such as blogs by visitors, articles on diving magazines, and so on. Henceforth, the next challenge confronting the authors and the local communities regarding these sites are plans to properly monitor those sites and a proposal for a reliable long-term management plans. More importantly, these monitoring and management plans have to involve wide varieties and different type of local communities.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5590">
                <text>Yumiko Nakanishi</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5591">
                <text>Rintaro Ono</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5592">
                <text>Norimitsu Sakagami </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5593">
                <text>Hironobu Kan </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5594">
                <text>Chiaki Katagiri</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5595">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5596">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5597">
                <text>Yumiko Nakanishi</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5598">
                <text>Rintaro Ono</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5599">
                <text>Norimitsu Sakagami </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5600">
                <text>Hironobu Kan </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5601">
                <text>Chiaki </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="486" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="278">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/6a275ffeef37f06e94530ed5134b2791.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c2dbaf85d61bbd705bbb1f792d2e8a97</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5587">
                    <text>The Historical Transition of Lakefront Environment and
Use in Lake Biwa, Japan

Hisashi Nakagawa
Toyohashi City Museum Art and History
nakagawa_134@yahoo.co.jp

Abstract
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan. It has approximately
4,000,000 years of history, and many people have lived on this lake. More
than 90 underwater archaeological sites exist here, and we are able to
understand the subtleties of history. As an example, the Awazu-bottom
site,is dated to the middle of the Jomon period approximately 5,000 years
ago, and is the largest freshwater shell mound in Japan. It was formed
near the lakefront at first, but now submerged on the bottom of lake. The
Shiozu-port site is a late Heian period dated to 800 years ago, and is one
of the oldest harbor sites in Japan. It was constructed to reclaim the lake,
and prospered as water transport area. Many important remains, not only
port facilities but also shrines and more, have been excavated, but it
disappeared in the 12th century. The causes of this sites’ submergence
is closely related an environmental transition of the lakefront. The water
balance is particularly important problem. Approximately 460 rivers flow
into this lake, but the discharge is only through the Seta-River. Therefore,
the water level is greatly fluctuated by the sedimentation situation of the
riverbed. According to the old historical documents, many floods have
occurred. Therefore, sometimes dredging is carried out by the
government to this day. Not only are water levels problematic, but ground
sedimentation is as well. The lakefront is convenient for fishery and water
transportation, but on the other hand, the land is soft. In a certain study,
the ground water level is slightly 20cm higher than water level of lake. As
a result of this, serious damage to the settlements have occurred by
earthquakes. The extreme effect of this has settlements bring submerged
to the bottom of lake by lateral Flow; landslide by the soil liquefaction. In
this paper, I would like to study a historical transition of the lakefront
environment and its use.
Key words: landscape, Lake, Japan, riverine

�Introduction
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan and many people have
lived on this lake. There are more than 90 underwater or lakeside
archaeological sites that exist here. As it has approximately 4,000,000
years of history, its form has been changed due to a variety of factors such
as crustal deformations or sediment depositions. In recent years, the
relation between these geographical or geological changes and lives of
the local people has gradually been revealed by a lot of archaeological
materials acquired through some investigations of the submerged sites
(Nakagawa, 2016). In this paper, the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen in Nagahama city is discussed in order to describe the
natural and historical environmental changes at Lake Biwa from the
ancient times to the middle age.
General Description of the Site
The underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen site is located at
the bottom of Lake Biwa in front of the town of Gion in Nagahama city,
which is in northeastern part of Shiga Prefecture. Local oral tradition tells
us that ‘the village called Nishihama formerly existed here, but it was
submerged into the bottom of lake by a big earthquake during the Kansho
year of the Muromachi period (1460-1466)’.
Before examining historical facts, first of all, some current aspects of the
bottom topography found from survey maps and sedimentation situations
have to be shown. The investigation area is shallow off shore; around
100m. It is less than 1.5m deep and more than 82.8 m of altitude. There
3 topographical elevated points are characteristically observed (Fig. 1).
These points have been named A, B, and D as each survey ward (Fig. 2).
In addition, the survey ward of C has no elevation, and a medieval

�graveyard does not have any elevated peaks, either. In more than 80m
of offing, the more clay-like topography regarded as former ground is still
spread. Its average bottom attitude is less than 82.8m (about more than
1.5m deep). In this very peculiar area, old withered trees have been
excavated. Because some botanical analyses prove that its soil contains
large amounts of plant opals from bamboo grasses, this area was certainly
dry land in earlier times.

Fig. 1: Topographical lakebed map around the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen.

�Fig. 2. Research areas of the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen.
In the survey ward of A, its highest bottom elevation is approximately
83.7m (about 0.6m deep). This relatively elevated ward is situated on the
western part of the investigation area, measuring about 40m from east to
west and 60m from south to north. Around the survey ward of A, the
gentle collapse-like topography which was caused by the power waves
from the offing direction could be seen (survey ward of A’). In the survey
ward of B, its highest bottom elevation is approximately 83.75m (about
0.55m deep). This relatively elevated ward is situated on the east part of
the investigation area, measuring about 40m from east to west and 50m
from south to north. Around the survey ward of B, as A, the gentle
collapse-like topography could be seen (survey ward of B’). In the survey
ward of C, the average bottom elevation is approximately 83.3m (about
1m deep). It is on the western part of the investigation area along the
lakeshore, measuring about 80m from east to west and 15m from south
to north.
In the survey ward of D, its highest bottom elevation is approximately
83.4m (about 0.9m deep). This relatively small and oval elevated ward is
situated at the centre of the investigation area, measuring about 35m from

�east to west and 15m from south to north. Around the survey ward of D
as well, as A and B, the gentle collapse-like topography could be seen
(survey ward of D’). The survey ward of a medieval graveyard is situated
about from 50m to 70m off the lakeside, and its average bottom altitude is
83.1m (about 1.2m deep). There many stone materials, most of which
used to be grave stones, are found; each medieval grave consisted of
many stones, which were nearly a size larger than a fist of a grown-up
man or smaller than human skull, forming a rectangular section or a cairn.
The bottom material at the flat part (less than 83.2 m of altitude) at the
investigation area consists of small grains of sands. They seem to have
been brought there later by wave action or longshore currents. The
survey ward of a medieval graveyard is buried under these sands by half.
Contra to this, the bottom material of elevated wards of A, B, and D
consists of round-shaped small river stones, each of which is from
approximately 5cm to 10cm in diameter. Although one of the survey ward
of C consists mainly of such river stones, many bigger stones, each of
which is from 20cm to 30cm in diameter, are also observed sporadically
on this ward.
As for the reason why there are some topographical elevated points there,
as this area used to be a river delta. Because of this fact, small river
stones are found in the elevated wards of A, B, and D. Each ward still
looks like the shape of a river delta. Judging from the survey map, around
four tributary branches might have flowed into Lake Biwa, but the direction
of water flows may have been altered in later years. So presumably the
river was about 250m wide at the mouth.

�Historic Environmental Transition Judging from Old Topographies
and Relics
Development Process of the Sites
Figure 3 shows the graphic chart of the number of excavated relics from
this site for each century. Obviously its peaks were the 8th and the 12th
centuries while only one relic from the 14th century was found. Since the
15th century, this site seems to have restarted as a new site.

The

tendencies at the 12th and the 13th centuries look similar, but almost all
relics from the 12th century consist mainly of unglazed pottery named
‘yama cha wan’, which disappeared before the first quarter of the 13th
century. In the survey ward
C, the remains of a well was found which seems to be abandoned
deliberately during the 13th century. The cultural discontinuation of this
underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen could be observed
around the 13th century; this place itself was deserted with awareness.

Fig. 3: Numbers of excavated relics.
Only one relic from the 14th century at the survey ward of C is either air
ring of a five-ring stone pagoda. It was originally made in the 14th century,

�but later after the 15th century it was reutilized as a tomb stone. In the
same elevated zone as the pagoda was found, an elected stone Buddha
statue from the 16th century was also found.

The end time of the

underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen might be the latter
half of the 16th century, because only one relic, i.e. a cup made from
celadon porcelain, from the 17th century was found there.
The transition period of the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen could be divided into three or four phases, viz. Phase I
around the 8th century, Phase II in the 12th century which was the most
flourishing time of this site, Phase of Rupture from the middle of the 13th
century to 14th century, and Phase III from the 15th to 16th centuries when
the site had been revived.

Distribution Situation of Relics Every Investigation Area
Then, is such situation universal at the whole survey wards of the site?
Figure 4 shows the graphic chart of the number of excavated relics for
each survey ward for each century. Before Phase I, all wards had relics
although its number was relatively small.

This trend seems to have

continued until the 10th century. Because this investigation area used to
be a river delta, these small relics were flowed there together with
sediment along the river branches. At first, it was the secondary centre to
accumulate broken relics.

Some relics, in particular, from the 10th

century, are not broken at all and not obliterated; the original places of

�those relics would not have been so far away. Perhaps, they might be
used directly above this site.

Fig. 4: Numbers of excavated relics at each research area.

�Phase II is completely different from Phase I. Almost all relics from this
phase were found only around the survey ward of B, although only one
relic was found around the survey ward of A. Relics from the 11th century,
as well as ones from the 13th century, have been excavated only at the
survey ward of B. This distribution of relics does not seem to be originated
from the natural sedimentation but from real human activities.

After Phase of Rupture, this site might have been developed as a new
zone at Phase III after the 15th century. Relics belonging to this period
were mainly distributed over the survey ward of a medieval graveyard and
the offshore places of each survey ward. As no relic is found in the survey
wards of A and B and the survey ward of a medieval graveyard is situated
between the survey wards of A and B, the site of Nishihamasengen had
been changed into land or from drying at Phase III.

Constitution of Relics and Land Use in Phase II
At Phase II around the peak period of the 12th century, what kind of
human activities were observed on the site? When did its rivers run dry?
The compositions of relics from the survey wards of B are shown in Figure
5. Most of the relics are things for offering only, while ones for boiling or
for storing do not exist. Therefore, the survey ward of B at Phase II was
not a waste site of general daily necessaries near commoners’ hamlets,
but maybe it would have had several mounds of Buddhist scriptures.
Because some sutra cases or substitute inkstones are excavated, literate
people, which differed from common villagers, might be living there at
Phase II.

�Fig. 5 (left): Relics at the research area
of B from the 12th to 13th Century.

In former days, men of weight who wished for peaceful death built mounds
of Buddhist scriptures in order to bury the scriptures under the mounds.
The height of prosperity of this custom was the 12th century in Japan
(Sugiyama, 2007); this historical fact may correspond to the case of the
site of Nishihamasengen. As for substitute inkstones, they started to be
used in the latter half of the 11th century in Japan. Literate people
intentionally built mounds of Buddhist scriptures at the survey ward of B,
because at the time of Phase II, which extended over 150 years from the
latter half of the 11th century to the first quarter of the 13th century, the
survey ward of B was dryland, not half-submerged land. This fact is also
proved by the restricted size of ward, measuring about 40m from east to
west and 50m from south to north; throwing sutra cases and substitute
inkstones away from the lakeshore is the out of question.
The concentration of the relics and its conglomeration at the survey ward
B suggest that this zone began to become dry before the middle of the
11th century. A study of historical geography (Mizuno, 2011) says that

�during the Hoen period (1135-1141) the shrine territory of the Gion Shrine
was established around this investigation area and its territorial landsubdivision would have been spread far into under the current Lake Biwa
(Fig. 6).

It could also be imagined that sutra cases and substitute

inkstones from the survey ward B would have been used by some men of
weight who managed this shrine territory and conducted its religious
activities.

Fig. 6: Land division of the Medieval Period. (S. Mizuno)
New Development after Phase III
It is after 15th century that human beings restarted to live around the site
of Nishihamasengen. No relic has been excavated at all at the survey
wards of A and B, while at the survey wards of a medieval graveyard, C
along the lakeshore, and offshore sinking parts of each ward small amount
of relics have been found. These consist of not only stone material
cultures but also old china plates, earth pottery plates, pots, grinding
bowls, many variations of receptacles. On the grinding bowls some usewear is observed, which proves the existence of real human living there
at this time.

�The medieval graveyard must not have built on the submerged land but
on the riverbed of some flow channels when the survey wards A, B, and
C were formed as a river delta at the beginning, which was not suitable
for plotting rice fields. This ward seemed to have been looked like the
actual banks of hell at the middle age.

According to some botanical

analyses and natural scientific dissections of lakebed soil, much larger
offshore areas of the current underwater site of Nishihamasengen were
used for dryland agriculture at Phase III after the 15th century.
Some oral traditions and historical materials tell us that there used to have
been a village named ‘Nisihama-mura’.

The relics discovered in the

underwater site of Nishihamasengen prove that the village of Nisihamamura was founded after the 15th century. The oldest and first historical
material titled Eikyo Shichinen Kanjin Sarugaku Hogacho which
mentioned this village was written in 1435. Since the number of relics
near the lakeshore is relatively small, the village centre at that time might
have been on more offshore place among agricultural fields.
Cause of Its Submergence and Time
What was the actual cause of the submergence of the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen and when? From the 15th to the
16th centuries, undoubtedly, the water level of Lake Biwa varied from 84.2
m 84.7m approximately above sea level (Nakagawa, 2017).
Judging from many aspects of the excavated relics from the site of
Nishihamasengen, Phase III was terminated at the latter half of the 16th
century. Although some stone materials were sometimes reutilized, no
relics from the Edo period was found and the newest one is from the first
half of the 17th century. During Phase III, the highest peak attitude of the
ward of a medieval graveyard is 83.2m (about 1.2m deep). If its ground

�attitude nowadays were the same as one in the middle age, villagers had
built their graveyard on the bottom of Lake Biwa. Indeed, the water level
fluctuation of Lake Biwa is about 1m throughout the year all through the
ages, but its fluctuation could not explain why a medieval graveyard is
now under Lake Biwa. Some botanical analyses also tell us that around
the graveyard the ground was dry at that time. Therefore, the ground
subsidence must have happened between the end of the 16th century and
the beginning of the 17th century.
The most probable movement of the earth's crust was the big earthquake
occurred on 18th January 1586.

According to Luís Fróis, a Jesuit

missionary, because of this earthquake many ground cracks ate
thousands of houses and villagers, and the remaining ones were
destroyed by fires. He also described its ground liquefactions, saying that
from ground cracks black and liquid soil was coming out (Ida, 1987). The
legendary village of Nisihhama-mura or the contemporary underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen was submerged under Lake Biwa
in 1586.
Conclusion
Lakeshore and seashore has changed due to water fluctuation, soil
sedimentation, crustal movement, and so on. Underwater archaeology
could investigate some causes of those changes, studying submerged
sites. In Japan, however, most think that underwater archaeology is the
study of shipwrecks and not many archaeologists are interested in the
historical transitions of waterfront environment or underwater settlement
sites. In the Japan archipelago, on the other hand, there are still to be
many unknown underwater sites, which are similar to the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen. Researching upon them will be
able to cast a new light on the history of Japan or human beings generally.

�References
Ida, K., 1987. History of Tensho Big Earthquake. Nagoya University
Press, Nagoya.
Mizuno, S., 2011. Historical environment of Lake Biwa and human
beings. In S. Mizuno (Ed.), Environmental History of Lake Biwa and
Human Beings, Iwata, Tokyo: 5-26.
Nakagawa, H., 2017. Archaeological study of water level fluctuation at
Lake Biwa: some phases from the end of the ancient times to the middle
age. Busshitsu Bunka, Vol. 97:113-154.
Nakagawa, H., (Ed.), 2016. The Site of NIshihamasengen: Surveys and
Studies of Submerged Sites at Lake Biwa, Sunrise, Shiga.
Sugiyama, H., 2007. Kyo-zutsu. In M. Ono et al. (Eds.), Great
Encyclopaedia of Historical Archaeology, Yoshikawakobunkan, Tokyo:
339-340.
Biography
Hisashi Nakagawa was born in Aichi Prefecture in 1988. During the
undergraduate level, he learned underwater archaeology and supervised
by Prof. Hiromichi Hayashi at the University of Shiga Prefecture (20072011). Prof. Hayashi did study underwater
archaeology from Prof. Yoshio Oe, who is respected
as "Father of Underwater Archeology in Japan". In
2013 he completed the master program (Human
Culture) at the University of Shiga Prefecture, and
then, he had been a PhD candidate in the same
university, and a Research Fellow of Japan Society
for the Promotion of Science (2013-2016). He works
now at the Toyohashi City Museum Art and History.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5581">
                <text>The Historical Transition of Lakefront Environment and Use in Lake Biwa, Japan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5582">
                <text>Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan. It has approximately 4,000,000 years of history, and many people have lived on this lake. More than 90 underwater archaeological sites exist here, and we are able to understand the subtleties of history.  As an example, the Awazu-bottom site,is dated to the middle of the Jomon period approximately 5,000 years ago, and is the largest freshwater shell mound in Japan. It was formed near the lakefront at first, but now submerged on the bottom of lake.  The Shiozu-port site is a late Heian period dated to 800 years ago, and  is one of the oldest harbor sites in Japan. It was constructed to reclaim the lake, and prospered as water transport area. Many important remains, not only port facilities but also shrines and more, have been excavated, but it disappeared in the 12th century.  The causes of this sitesâ€™ submergence is closely related an environmental transition of the lakefront. The water balance is particularly important problem. Approximately 460 rivers flow into this lake, but the discharge is only through the Seta-River. Therefore, the water level is greatly fluctuated by the sedimentation situation of the riverbed. According to the old historical documents, many floods have occurred. Therefore, sometimes dredging is carried out by the government to this day.  Not only are water levels problematic, but ground sedimentation is as well. The lakefront is convenient for fishery and water transportation, but on the other hand, the land is soft. In a certain study, the ground water level is slightly 20cm higher than water level of lake. As a result of this, serious damage to the settlements have occurred by earthquakes. The extreme effect of this has settlements bring submerged to the bottom of lake by lateral Flow; landslide by the soil liquefaction.  In this paper, I would like to study a historical transition of the lakefront environment and its use.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5583">
                <text>Hisashi Nakagawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5584">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5585">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5586">
                <text>Hisashi Nakagawa </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="485" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="277">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/47d565c29bb6b4ef88960eedc05eef95.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c2dbaf85d61bbd705bbb1f792d2e8a97</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5580">
                    <text>The Historical Transition of Lakefront Environment and
Use in Lake Biwa, Japan

Hisashi Nakagawa
Toyohashi City Museum Art and History
nakagawa_134@yahoo.co.jp

Abstract
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan. It has approximately
4,000,000 years of history, and many people have lived on this lake. More
than 90 underwater archaeological sites exist here, and we are able to
understand the subtleties of history. As an example, the Awazu-bottom
site,is dated to the middle of the Jomon period approximately 5,000 years
ago, and is the largest freshwater shell mound in Japan. It was formed
near the lakefront at first, but now submerged on the bottom of lake. The
Shiozu-port site is a late Heian period dated to 800 years ago, and is one
of the oldest harbor sites in Japan. It was constructed to reclaim the lake,
and prospered as water transport area. Many important remains, not only
port facilities but also shrines and more, have been excavated, but it
disappeared in the 12th century. The causes of this sites’ submergence
is closely related an environmental transition of the lakefront. The water
balance is particularly important problem. Approximately 460 rivers flow
into this lake, but the discharge is only through the Seta-River. Therefore,
the water level is greatly fluctuated by the sedimentation situation of the
riverbed. According to the old historical documents, many floods have
occurred. Therefore, sometimes dredging is carried out by the
government to this day. Not only are water levels problematic, but ground
sedimentation is as well. The lakefront is convenient for fishery and water
transportation, but on the other hand, the land is soft. In a certain study,
the ground water level is slightly 20cm higher than water level of lake. As
a result of this, serious damage to the settlements have occurred by
earthquakes. The extreme effect of this has settlements bring submerged
to the bottom of lake by lateral Flow; landslide by the soil liquefaction. In
this paper, I would like to study a historical transition of the lakefront
environment and its use.
Key words: landscape, Lake, Japan, riverine

�Introduction
Lake Biwa is the largest and oldest lake in Japan and many people have
lived on this lake. There are more than 90 underwater or lakeside
archaeological sites that exist here. As it has approximately 4,000,000
years of history, its form has been changed due to a variety of factors such
as crustal deformations or sediment depositions. In recent years, the
relation between these geographical or geological changes and lives of
the local people has gradually been revealed by a lot of archaeological
materials acquired through some investigations of the submerged sites
(Nakagawa, 2016). In this paper, the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen in Nagahama city is discussed in order to describe the
natural and historical environmental changes at Lake Biwa from the
ancient times to the middle age.
General Description of the Site
The underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen site is located at
the bottom of Lake Biwa in front of the town of Gion in Nagahama city,
which is in northeastern part of Shiga Prefecture. Local oral tradition tells
us that ‘the village called Nishihama formerly existed here, but it was
submerged into the bottom of lake by a big earthquake during the Kansho
year of the Muromachi period (1460-1466)’.
Before examining historical facts, first of all, some current aspects of the
bottom topography found from survey maps and sedimentation situations
have to be shown. The investigation area is shallow off shore; around
100m. It is less than 1.5m deep and more than 82.8 m of altitude. There
3 topographical elevated points are characteristically observed (Fig. 1).
These points have been named A, B, and D as each survey ward (Fig. 2).
In addition, the survey ward of C has no elevation, and a medieval

�graveyard does not have any elevated peaks, either. In more than 80m
of offing, the more clay-like topography regarded as former ground is still
spread. Its average bottom attitude is less than 82.8m (about more than
1.5m deep). In this very peculiar area, old withered trees have been
excavated. Because some botanical analyses prove that its soil contains
large amounts of plant opals from bamboo grasses, this area was certainly
dry land in earlier times.

Fig. 1: Topographical lakebed map around the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen.

�Fig. 2. Research areas of the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen.
In the survey ward of A, its highest bottom elevation is approximately
83.7m (about 0.6m deep). This relatively elevated ward is situated on the
western part of the investigation area, measuring about 40m from east to
west and 60m from south to north. Around the survey ward of A, the
gentle collapse-like topography which was caused by the power waves
from the offing direction could be seen (survey ward of A’). In the survey
ward of B, its highest bottom elevation is approximately 83.75m (about
0.55m deep). This relatively elevated ward is situated on the east part of
the investigation area, measuring about 40m from east to west and 50m
from south to north. Around the survey ward of B, as A, the gentle
collapse-like topography could be seen (survey ward of B’). In the survey
ward of C, the average bottom elevation is approximately 83.3m (about
1m deep). It is on the western part of the investigation area along the
lakeshore, measuring about 80m from east to west and 15m from south
to north.
In the survey ward of D, its highest bottom elevation is approximately
83.4m (about 0.9m deep). This relatively small and oval elevated ward is
situated at the centre of the investigation area, measuring about 35m from

�east to west and 15m from south to north. Around the survey ward of D
as well, as A and B, the gentle collapse-like topography could be seen
(survey ward of D’). The survey ward of a medieval graveyard is situated
about from 50m to 70m off the lakeside, and its average bottom altitude is
83.1m (about 1.2m deep). There many stone materials, most of which
used to be grave stones, are found; each medieval grave consisted of
many stones, which were nearly a size larger than a fist of a grown-up
man or smaller than human skull, forming a rectangular section or a cairn.
The bottom material at the flat part (less than 83.2 m of altitude) at the
investigation area consists of small grains of sands. They seem to have
been brought there later by wave action or longshore currents. The
survey ward of a medieval graveyard is buried under these sands by half.
Contra to this, the bottom material of elevated wards of A, B, and D
consists of round-shaped small river stones, each of which is from
approximately 5cm to 10cm in diameter. Although one of the survey ward
of C consists mainly of such river stones, many bigger stones, each of
which is from 20cm to 30cm in diameter, are also observed sporadically
on this ward.
As for the reason why there are some topographical elevated points there,
as this area used to be a river delta. Because of this fact, small river
stones are found in the elevated wards of A, B, and D. Each ward still
looks like the shape of a river delta. Judging from the survey map, around
four tributary branches might have flowed into Lake Biwa, but the direction
of water flows may have been altered in later years. So presumably the
river was about 250m wide at the mouth.

�Historic Environmental Transition Judging from Old Topographies
and Relics
Development Process of the Sites
Figure 3 shows the graphic chart of the number of excavated relics from
this site for each century. Obviously its peaks were the 8th and the 12th
centuries while only one relic from the 14th century was found. Since the
15th century, this site seems to have restarted as a new site.

The

tendencies at the 12th and the 13th centuries look similar, but almost all
relics from the 12th century consist mainly of unglazed pottery named
‘yama cha wan’, which disappeared before the first quarter of the 13th
century. In the survey ward
C, the remains of a well was found which seems to be abandoned
deliberately during the 13th century. The cultural discontinuation of this
underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen could be observed
around the 13th century; this place itself was deserted with awareness.

Fig. 3: Numbers of excavated relics.
Only one relic from the 14th century at the survey ward of C is either air
ring of a five-ring stone pagoda. It was originally made in the 14th century,

�but later after the 15th century it was reutilized as a tomb stone. In the
same elevated zone as the pagoda was found, an elected stone Buddha
statue from the 16th century was also found.

The end time of the

underwater archaeological site of Nishihamasengen might be the latter
half of the 16th century, because only one relic, i.e. a cup made from
celadon porcelain, from the 17th century was found there.
The transition period of the underwater archaeological site of
Nishihamasengen could be divided into three or four phases, viz. Phase I
around the 8th century, Phase II in the 12th century which was the most
flourishing time of this site, Phase of Rupture from the middle of the 13th
century to 14th century, and Phase III from the 15th to 16th centuries when
the site had been revived.

Distribution Situation of Relics Every Investigation Area
Then, is such situation universal at the whole survey wards of the site?
Figure 4 shows the graphic chart of the number of excavated relics for
each survey ward for each century. Before Phase I, all wards had relics
although its number was relatively small.

This trend seems to have

continued until the 10th century. Because this investigation area used to
be a river delta, these small relics were flowed there together with
sediment along the river branches. At first, it was the secondary centre to
accumulate broken relics.

Some relics, in particular, from the 10th

century, are not broken at all and not obliterated; the original places of

�those relics would not have been so far away. Perhaps, they might be
used directly above this site.

Fig. 4: Numbers of excavated relics at each research area.

�Phase II is completely different from Phase I. Almost all relics from this
phase were found only around the survey ward of B, although only one
relic was found around the survey ward of A. Relics from the 11th century,
as well as ones from the 13th century, have been excavated only at the
survey ward of B. This distribution of relics does not seem to be originated
from the natural sedimentation but from real human activities.

After Phase of Rupture, this site might have been developed as a new
zone at Phase III after the 15th century. Relics belonging to this period
were mainly distributed over the survey ward of a medieval graveyard and
the offshore places of each survey ward. As no relic is found in the survey
wards of A and B and the survey ward of a medieval graveyard is situated
between the survey wards of A and B, the site of Nishihamasengen had
been changed into land or from drying at Phase III.

Constitution of Relics and Land Use in Phase II
At Phase II around the peak period of the 12th century, what kind of
human activities were observed on the site? When did its rivers run dry?
The compositions of relics from the survey wards of B are shown in Figure
5. Most of the relics are things for offering only, while ones for boiling or
for storing do not exist. Therefore, the survey ward of B at Phase II was
not a waste site of general daily necessaries near commoners’ hamlets,
but maybe it would have had several mounds of Buddhist scriptures.
Because some sutra cases or substitute inkstones are excavated, literate
people, which differed from common villagers, might be living there at
Phase II.

�Fig. 5 (left): Relics at the research area
of B from the 12th to 13th Century.

In former days, men of weight who wished for peaceful death built mounds
of Buddhist scriptures in order to bury the scriptures under the mounds.
The height of prosperity of this custom was the 12th century in Japan
(Sugiyama, 2007); this historical fact may correspond to the case of the
site of Nishihamasengen. As for substitute inkstones, they started to be
used in the latter half of the 11th century in Japan. Literate people
intentionally built mounds of Buddhist scriptures at the survey ward of B,
because at the time of Phase II, which extended over 150 years from the
latter half of the 11th century to the first quarter of the 13th century, the
survey ward of B was dryland, not half-submerged land. This fact is also
proved by the restricted size of ward, measuring about 40m from east to
west and 50m from south to north; throwing sutra cases and substitute
inkstones away from the lakeshore is the out of question.
The concentration of the relics and its conglomeration at the survey ward
B suggest that this zone began to become dry before the middle of the
11th century. A study of historical geography (Mizuno, 2011) says that

�during the Hoen period (1135-1141) the shrine territory of the Gion Shrine
was established around this investigation area and its territorial landsubdivision would have been spread far into under the current Lake Biwa
(Fig. 6).

It could also be imagined that sutra cases and substitute

inkstones from the survey ward B would have been used by some men of
weight who managed this shrine territory and conducted its religious
activities.

Fig. 6: Land division of the Medieval Period. (S. Mizuno)
New Development after Phase III
It is after 15th century that human beings restarted to live around the site
of Nishihamasengen. No relic has been excavated at all at the survey
wards of A and B, while at the survey wards of a medieval graveyard, C
along the lakeshore, and offshore sinking parts of each ward small amount
of relics have been found. These consist of not only stone material
cultures but also old china plates, earth pottery plates, pots, grinding
bowls, many variations of receptacles. On the grinding bowls some usewear is observed, which proves the existence of real human living there
at this time.

�The medieval graveyard must not have built on the submerged land but
on the riverbed of some flow channels when the survey wards A, B, and
C were formed as a river delta at the beginning, which was not suitable
for plotting rice fields. This ward seemed to have been looked like the
actual banks of hell at the middle age.

According to some botanical

analyses and natural scientific dissections of lakebed soil, much larger
offshore areas of the current underwater site of Nishihamasengen were
used for dryland agriculture at Phase III after the 15th century.
Some oral traditions and historical materials tell us that there used to have
been a village named ‘Nisihama-mura’.

The relics discovered in the

underwater site of Nishihamasengen prove that the village of Nisihamamura was founded after the 15th century. The oldest and first historical
material titled Eikyo Shichinen Kanjin Sarugaku Hogacho which
mentioned this village was written in 1435. Since the number of relics
near the lakeshore is relatively small, the village centre at that time might
have been on more offshore place among agricultural fields.
Cause of Its Submergence and Time
What was the actual cause of the submergence of the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen and when? From the 15th to the
16th centuries, undoubtedly, the water level of Lake Biwa varied from 84.2
m 84.7m approximately above sea level (Nakagawa, 2017).
Judging from many aspects of the excavated relics from the site of
Nishihamasengen, Phase III was terminated at the latter half of the 16th
century. Although some stone materials were sometimes reutilized, no
relics from the Edo period was found and the newest one is from the first
half of the 17th century. During Phase III, the highest peak attitude of the
ward of a medieval graveyard is 83.2m (about 1.2m deep). If its ground

�attitude nowadays were the same as one in the middle age, villagers had
built their graveyard on the bottom of Lake Biwa. Indeed, the water level
fluctuation of Lake Biwa is about 1m throughout the year all through the
ages, but its fluctuation could not explain why a medieval graveyard is
now under Lake Biwa. Some botanical analyses also tell us that around
the graveyard the ground was dry at that time. Therefore, the ground
subsidence must have happened between the end of the 16th century and
the beginning of the 17th century.
The most probable movement of the earth's crust was the big earthquake
occurred on 18th January 1586.

According to Luís Fróis, a Jesuit

missionary, because of this earthquake many ground cracks ate
thousands of houses and villagers, and the remaining ones were
destroyed by fires. He also described its ground liquefactions, saying that
from ground cracks black and liquid soil was coming out (Ida, 1987). The
legendary village of Nisihhama-mura or the contemporary underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen was submerged under Lake Biwa
in 1586.
Conclusion
Lakeshore and seashore has changed due to water fluctuation, soil
sedimentation, crustal movement, and so on. Underwater archaeology
could investigate some causes of those changes, studying submerged
sites. In Japan, however, most think that underwater archaeology is the
study of shipwrecks and not many archaeologists are interested in the
historical transitions of waterfront environment or underwater settlement
sites. In the Japan archipelago, on the other hand, there are still to be
many unknown underwater sites, which are similar to the underwater
archaeological site of Nishihamasengen. Researching upon them will be
able to cast a new light on the history of Japan or human beings generally.

�References
Ida, K., 1987. History of Tensho Big Earthquake. Nagoya University
Press, Nagoya.
Mizuno, S., 2011. Historical environment of Lake Biwa and human
beings. In S. Mizuno (Ed.), Environmental History of Lake Biwa and
Human Beings, Iwata, Tokyo: 5-26.
Nakagawa, H., 2017. Archaeological study of water level fluctuation at
Lake Biwa: some phases from the end of the ancient times to the middle
age. Busshitsu Bunka, Vol. 97:113-154.
Nakagawa, H., (Ed.), 2016. The Site of NIshihamasengen: Surveys and
Studies of Submerged Sites at Lake Biwa, Sunrise, Shiga.
Sugiyama, H., 2007. Kyo-zutsu. In M. Ono et al. (Eds.), Great
Encyclopaedia of Historical Archaeology, Yoshikawakobunkan, Tokyo:
339-340.
Biography
Hisashi Nakagawa was born in Aichi Prefecture in 1988. During the
undergraduate level, he learned underwater archaeology and supervised
by Prof. Hiromichi Hayashi at the University of Shiga Prefecture (20072011). Prof. Hayashi did study underwater
archaeology from Prof. Yoshio Oe, who is respected
as "Father of Underwater Archeology in Japan". In
2013 he completed the master program (Human
Culture) at the University of Shiga Prefecture, and
then, he had been a PhD candidate in the same
university, and a Research Fellow of Japan Society
for the Promotion of Science (2013-2016). He works
now at the Toyohashi City Museum Art and History.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5574">
                <text>A Preliminary Study on the Barrier of the Sino-French War of 1884 at Tamsui Estuary, Taiwan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5575">
                <text> During the Sino-French War of 1884, the Qing military intentionally sank a number of wrecks filled with rocks under the Tamsui River and surrounded them with naval mines and many railings to form a barrier against the French invasion. In 2014, one hundred and thirty years later, the government planned to construct a bridge across the river estuary; and, in accordance with the law concerning environmental impact assessments and archaeological impact assessments, the author conducted an investigation to find potential underwater archaeological remains.  The survey tools for this project included a side scan sonar, a multi-beam sonar, a magnetometer, and a sub-bottom profiler. A total of 31 anomalies were detected by these sonars; most of them were lain on the surface of the river bed, and these were believed to be modern debris. However, some anomalies were covered by the sand or under the river bed; therefore, the team could not identifiy these targets further without underwater operations. First, In order to verify the anomalies lying on the surface of the river bed, the team used an underwater camera and diverbased investigation.  As a result of the investigation, no specific archaeological remains were found on the surface of the river bed; also the team found out that the sediments of the riverbed had accumulated repeatedly by erosion and floods since 1884. It seems that a strong power of natural dynamics on this region may had destroyed the barrier. In conclusion, the underwater investigation could not confirm archaeological remains of the barrier. Further investigation is required to find archaeological remains.  In this paper, the author shall share historical contexts related to the Tamsui Estuary that were found during his historical literature reviews. Also the author shall share his hypothesis of where to find, or what might have happened to, the potential archaeological remains from Sino-French War of 1884. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5576">
                <text>Tai-Lung </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5577">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5578">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5579">
                <text>Tai-Lung </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="484" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="276">
        <src>https://apconf-much.org/proceedings/files/original/b5a07bd794490d688d66b73e322c9f8a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e7f8ae641174dd9f1248d675050774e0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="92">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="5573">
                    <text>The 17th Century Wooden Shipwreck off Hatsushima
Island, Japan
Hayato Kondo
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology
hkondo@kaiyodai.ac.jp
Akifumi Iwabuchi
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology
iwabuchi@kaiyodai.ac.jp
Toshiaki Hayashibara
Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology
sea.museum@gmail.com

Abstract
The Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology (ARIUA) at
Fukuoka and Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, which
is a member institution of the UNESCO Underwater Archaeology Unitwin
Network, have researched upon the 17th century wooden shipwreck off
Hatsushima Island in front of Atami city, Shizuoka Prefecture, since 2011.
The shipwreck lies on the seabed at the depth of 20 metres, 200 metres
from the western shore. It consists mainly of a cargo of roof tiles or
grinding bowls and some parts of the wooden hull. Judging from them,
the original vessel seems to have been a 17th or 18th century wooden
freighter or kaisen (廻船), which left a port of western part of Japan for the
capital town of Edo; most of well made roof tiles were not made in eastern
part at that time. Because most of the roof tiles are high-quality and one
of them is marked by the wild ginger trefoil coat of arms of the Shogunate
family, they might mean to have been used for the Edo Shogunate castle.
In 2011 and 2012, archaeologists with financial assistance from the
Nippon Foundation, did the submersible survey upon this wreck site,
about which local fishermen had already known to identify its exact
position. In 2013, then, its bathymetry was made with a multibeam sonar.
In order to make a precisely measured drawing of the 5 metre square
wreck site, an AUV in 2013 and a ROV in 2015, both of which were
developed uniquely by Tokyo University of Marine Science and
Technology, and divers in 2016 were deployed to collect numerous
underwater photos to generate 3D photogrammetric models with
photogrammetry software Agisoft ‘PhotoScan’.
Key words: Shipwreck, survey, Photogrammetry

�Introduction
Hatsushima Island is approximately 4km around and located in the
Sagami bay off east coast of Izu peninsula. In terms of its administration,
it belongs to Atami city, Shizuoka Prefecture. From the mainland city, we
could always see the island and vice versa, and regular ferry services are
frequently available between them (Fig. 1).

Hatsushima Island has

approximately 200 inhabitants, most of whom engage in fishery and tourist
industries. There is only one elementary school, about 30 guest houses,
and a resort hotel on it. The surrounding sea around Hatsushima Island
is managed by the Fisheries Cooperative Association of the Hatsushima
Island; without permission from the association, neither recreation fishing
nor fun diving around the island is allowed.

Fig. 1: Location of Hatsushima Island.

�The so-called Hatsushima shipwreck lies on the seabed at the depth of
20 metres, being 200 metres from the western shore. Its cargo mainly
consists of roof tiles or grinding bowls and some parts of wooden hulls.
Judging from them, the original vessel seems to have been a 17th or 18th
century wooden freighter or kaisen (廻船), which left a port of western part
of Japan, might be Osaka or Hyogo, for the capital town of Edo, which is
currently known as Tokyo. During the Edo period, Japan was in national
isolation, called sakoku (鎖国); consequently, there was only limited
contact with foreign countries, while domestic seaborne transportation
systems were highly developed.

Almost all areas in Japan were

connected by the shipping traffic with wooden freighters. Using ships, rice
was transported from northern Japan to Edo or Osaka, which was the
largest town in western Japan; earthenware from western Japan to Edo;
marine products from Hokkaido to western Japan, and so on.

The shipwreck site was officially found in the latter half of 1970s by a
constructor of underwater pipelines which supplied pure water to
Hatsushima Island from mainland. Even before, however, it has been
known by fishermen that roof tiles and grindstones have sometimes been
caught by fishing nets. In addition, the islanders have inherited legends
testifying that at the shipwreck, night after night, a sodden samurai who
wore armour used at that time, landed on the western shore of
Hatsushima island from the bottom of the sea. Since the area was opened
as a diving spot, some leisure divers have recognized the shipwreck.
Because the Fisheries Cooperative Association of the Hatsushima Island
has strictly managed the wreck, its destruction has been prevented
somehow.

�A series of surveys have been done mainly by the Asian Research
Institute of Underwater Archaeology (ARIUA) and by Tokyo University of
Marine Science and Technology, a member institution of the UNESCO
Underwater Archaeology Unitwin Network. The Asian Research Institute
of Underwater Archaeology is the only an active academic society for
underwater cultural heritage in Japan. Although its headquarters is
situated at Fukuoka city, Kyushu, the institute has not only Japanese
members but also foreign scholars including from Korea and Germany. It
was founded in 1986 under the name of the Kyushu Okinawa Society for
Underwater Archaeology or KOSUWA, and then in 2005 it became a nonprofit organization. The president director is Kenzo Hayashida, who is an
expert advisor of the Submerged Sites Study Committee at the Agency
for Cultural Affairs. The institute has regally published a journal titled The
Journal of Underwater Archaeological Studies which is the only one
periodical specialized about underwater cultural heritage in Japan.

In November 2011 and in February 2012, several ARIUA underwater
archaeologists did the underwater survey upon the Hatsushima shipwreck
site to locate its exact position. The third diving campaign was executed
on April 2012, which was covered by a TV programme, and the fourth
diving campaign was executed on October 2012 in order to create plans
for future surveys and excavations. On March 2013, the multibeam sonar
survey and pilot survey using an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV),
which was built by Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology,
were executed (Kondo, 2017). Figure 2 shows the bathymetry around the
site generated by a multibeam sonar mounted. A group of embossments
surrounded in a circle shows the wreck site.
multibeam survey was a SONIC 2024.

A sonar used for this

�Fig. 2: Bathymetry of the archaeological site.
Archaeological Relics
The shipwreck site itself measures 4.7m from east to west and 5m from
north to south. In an area of 5m square, the freighter’s cargos, such as
roof tiles, grinding bowls, and whetstones are spread (Fig. 3). Although
decorative ridge-end tiles, pan eaves-tiles, and whetstones are found
dispersedly, other cargo components such as pan-tiles, round eaves-tiles,
and grinding bowls are well aligned. It could be imagined that, when this
freighter sank, the heavy cargos might be placed bottom on the wooden
hull. The number of pan-tiles, round eaves-tiles, and grinding bowls were
spread far more than that of decorative ridge-end tiles, pan eaves-tiles,
and whetstones. As for the hull, its greater part seems to be buried inside
the sandy seabed; after the sand is push aside, a few wooden plates from
the ship could be observed between the group of aligned pan-tiles and
grinding bowls.

�Fig. 3: Rough drawing of the wreck site.
At the southern part of the relics-concentrated site, pan-tiles are aligned
in five rows and two layers to the east-west directions; and others are
aligned in one row and one layer to the north-south directions. About the
northern part, round eaves-tiles are aligned in two rows and two layers.
Contrarily, pan eaves-tiles and decorative ridge-end tiles are sporadically
spread to relatively outside of the relics-concentrated site.

Judging from their forms and characteristics, the grinding bowls were
produced from the middle of the 17th century to the beginning of the 18th
century in the Tamba region of western Japan, which is now in Hyogo
Prefecture. This Tamba ware or Tamba-Tachikui ware had started to be
made around 1000 years ago, and then became famous in Japan

�especially for its grinding bowls.

Before the 18th century almost all

Japanese grinding bowls came either from the area of Tamba or from
Seto. After the middle of the 18th century, however, the cheap bowls
produced in a town of Sakai, near Osaka, became much more popular.

As for roof tiles, the original production area might be Awaji Island, which
is also now in Hyogo Prefecture. Throughout Japanese History, we had
three famous roof tile production areas, viz. Awaji Island at Hyogo,
Sanshu at Aichi, and Sekishu at Shimane. The roof tile production at
Awaji Island is said to have started around the 6th or the 7th centuries.
The roof tiles produced at Awaji Island are characterized by their beautiful
silvery colour, which could be observed on some roof tiles at the
Hatsushima wreck. Indeed, it would be possible that not all roof tiles
belonging to the wreck came from Awaji Island, but other roof tiles might
have also been produced at some tile kilns, at least near Awaji Island,
such as kilns around Osaka or Kyoto.

Most of roof tiles found on the shipwreck seem to be relatively high-quality
products. One of the decorative ridge-end tiles has a well-known mark, its
centre displays the wild ginger trefoil coat of arms (三葉葵文) of the
Tokugawa Shogunate family or clan. The decorative cap of each round
eaves-tile presents the crest of three comma-shaped figures (連珠三巴文)
in a circle without circular line. On the other hand, the decorative cap of
each pan eaves-tile has the ‘Osaka-typed’ motif of arabesque (均整唐草
文) which is marked by elongated calyxes and y-shaped sides both on the
right and left. All the roof tiles were polished-up beautifully that even did
not display trace of polishing marks.

�These high-qualitied roof tiles seem to have been produced especially for
the Edo Shogunate castle as one of the decorative ridge-end tiles that has
the crest of the Tokugawa family or clan. In 1657, the Great Fire of Meireki
burned down more than the half districts of Edo, including the castle;
therefore, the roof tiles of the Hatsushima wreck might be ordered for the
reconstruction attempt of the castle after the fire. Also, there is a record
that the Genroku earthquake hit Edo in 1703, yet the physical damage on
the castle against the Edo castle was minor; only some gates or guard
houses were reported to be collapsed.

Consequently, it is natural to

consider that the roof tiles were to be used for the repair works after the
fire rather than the earthquake.

The roof tiles of the Hatsushima wreck must be specially ordered products
by the Tokugawa Shogunate family or clan, while the grinding bowls seem
to have been general-purpose products. As this freighter carried both
products, it was not a ship owned by the government but rather a private
merchant vessel.

During the Edo period, two types or systems of

mercantile operations were recorded. One was ‘kaizumi (買積)’, in which
vessels itself went to productions, factories, or industrial areas to buy
goods directly in order to bring those goods back home ports or to bring
them to the big cities such Edo or Osaka to sell. The other one was
‘unchinzumi (運賃積)’, in which vessels carried cargos for customers, for
instance the government and other merchants, based on orders and
requests of customers. The Hatsushima wreck did belong to the latter
system.

The wreck of the same trading type was discovered off of

Kozushima Island (Iwabuchi, 2012).

Survey after 2015

�The main purpose of the survey after 2015 was to map the wreck site
accurately using a 3D photogrammetry technique. The obtained data will
help us to understand the whole archaeological site off Hatsushima Island
including the shipwreck. Presumably the evaluation of this site by using
this data would open a way that the site will be registered as a place of
buried cultural properties which will be a legal evidence to help the site.
Another purpose of this survey is to consider the potential usage of
underwater vehicles and underwater photogrammetry for archaeological
site.

Methodology: A remotely operated vehicle (ROV) was operated to take
pictures while keeping close distance over the wreck for mapping. Divers
were attended at the seabed to prevent any accidents. To complement
for the mapping, visual inspections and measuring were operated by
divers. The survey area was set to 5m square focusing on the relicsconcentrated area. A small boat was locally hired to serve as a research
vessel which delivered divers and instruments from pier to the site; and
operation of the ROV was also done from the boat. The survey operations
were completed by both photo-shooting by the ROV and visual inspection
by divers; any destructive operations such as excavation and rising
artefacts of the relics were not executed.

Homemade Remotely Operated Vehicle: A simple ROV was designed and
constructed by Kondo laboratory of Tokyo University of Marine Science
and Technology. Figure 4 shows the general arrangement of the vehicle.
The length of the ROV is 1m, width is 0.58m and the depth is 0.48m
(excluding hanging points). The weight is about 70kg, yet it is neutrally
buoyant in seawater. Four propeller thrusters are mounted on the vehicle;
two horizontal thrusters are mounted horizontally to make the vehicle

�move forward and backward; the other two thrusters are mounted
vertically (see Fig. 4) to make the vehicle to move upward and downward.

Fig. 4: General arrangement of the homemade ROV.

Four cameras are mounted on the vehicle as observational equipment.
Main camera has Type 4/3 sized, 3296 x 2472 resolution CCD. An F
mount lens was attached to the camera. The camera is sealed in a
homemade pressure bottle with underwater connectors. Still images are
transmitted from the ROV to the surface boat via an umbilical cable, and
stored in a laptop computer.

This main camera is mounted

vertically/perpendicularly as the camera face-down to the seabed. Other
used cameras were wearable cameras (GoPro), one camera was
mounted perpendicularly to take top-view movies. Other two were paired
as works as stereo cameras, and mounted slightly diagonally angled down
to take slant-view movies of the site. Three original underwater LED lights
were also mounted to provide lighting.

A syntactic foam, which is a buoyancy material made of glass
microspheres and compound was mounted on top of the vehicle. A main
pressure bottle made of aluminum alloy was attached beneath the
buoyancy material. Microcomputers, control units, a depth sensor and
batteries were stored in the main bottle. The main bottle was relatively

�heavy to make the long separation between centers of buoyancy and
gravity to provide better stability for the vehicle’s motions.

An umbilical cable which encloses ethernet and power lines connected
the main bottle and a laptop computer on the boat. Operator can control
the vehicle’s motion and onboard equipment from the laptop.

The

structure of the ROV consists of High Density Poly Ethylene (HDPE),
which is positively buoyant in seawater, free from corrosion and easy to
let any equipment to be mounted.

Results: Although divers supported the ROV (Fig. 5) because of electric
failure of thrusters, an orthophoto mosaic of the wreck (Fig. 6) was
obtained from 3D spatial data generated by photogrammetric processing
using digital images taken by the ROV. Agisoft ‘PhotoScan’ was used for
photogrammetric processing. Although blank parts can be seen on the
orthomosaic because of the bad image conditions, distortions of the
orthomosaic are minimum, and this orthomosaic can be used for
archaeological drawings.

�Fig. 5: A photo taken by a diver during the Survey.

Fig. 6: Orthophoto mosaic of the wreck site.

�In November 2016, to obtain better 3D photogrammetric data, several
ARUIA divers took numerous underwater photos of the Hatsushima
shipwreck. At that time, two grapnels were discovered at north-east from
the wreck site (about 10 metres apart from the site).

However, the

relationship between these anchors and the wreck is still under
investigation. Both in 2015 and in 2016, the open briefing sessions of the
survey for the general public living in Hatsushima Island were organized
by ARIUA and Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology during
the campaigns.

Many islanders, including members of the Fisheries

Cooperative Association of the Hatsushima Island, attended the sessions
and displayed their high interests to this underwater cultural heritage
(Hayashibara et al., 2016). We have once again understood that working
together with local people is necessary.

Additionally, foreign researchers participated in the surveys at
Hatsushima Island both in 2015 and in 2016. In 2015, one Indonesian
student from the graduate school of Tokyo University of Marine Science
and Technology received hands-on training of underwater archaeology in
this field campaign. This was a part of the programmes of the UNESCO
Underwater Archaeology Unitwin Network at TUMSAT. In 2016, two
Italian scholars from the International Research Institute for Archaeology
and Ethnology, one Dutch from ICOMOS Netherlands, and one American
from the Oxford Centre for Maritime Archaeology, attended the survey to
help the underwater investigations.

Complying with the UNESCO

international standard, ARIUA and Tokyo University of Marine Science
and Technology are planning to make good use of this underwater
archaeological site for education and training, not only as a touristic
attraction.

�Conclusions and Perspectives
An orthophoto mosaic of the wreck was generated from 3D spatial data
generated by photogrammetric processing using digital images taken by
the ROV and divers. Line art (2D site plan) for the cultural heritage
documentation is under drawing. Currently, the team is planning more
data collection in order to obtain sectional drawings. The ROV operation
was executed twice and its total time is about one hour; this is a large
saving

for

divers’

archaeological sites.

underwater

operation

time

for

underwater

The advantage of underwater vehicles for

archaeological survey has been confirmed by the orthophoto mosaic of
the wreck. Also, we are planning to evaluate the validity of increasing the
image quality and usage of underwater technological instruments.

The goal of these investigations is to produce a site map as an orthophoto
mosaic, and share detailed and accurate information of the site with the
Board of Education of Atami city. Although it has already recognized its
existence, the Hatsushima shipwreck has not designated as a ‘Buried
Cultural Property’ or ‘Historic Site’ under the Japanese domestic law of
the Cultural Properties Protection Act (Hayashibara, 2013). The board of
education believes that more detailed information is required, for instance
its historical values or current situation including the complete picture of
the hull buried beneath the seabed. Without raising all archaeological
components of the site, which is against the Convention on the Protection
of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, its general view of the site could not
be appeared and observed. The other reason why the board of education
does not want to protect this site under the civil law is that the Agency for
Cultural Affairs has ordered every board of education to execute the
Cultural Properties Protection Act upon all sites before the Middle Age,

�but this order also implies that it is not priority to apply this order to heritage
sites dated after the Early Modern Age.

Acknowledgements
The research in 2011 and in 2012 was carried out with financial assistance
from the Nippon Foundation, in 2013 from the Canon Foundation, and in
2015 from the Asahi Shimbun Foundation, to which our thanks are due.
We also wish to thank ARIUA members and graduate or undergraduate
students at Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology who
helped our surveys.
References
Hayashibara, T., 2013. Off Hatsushima Island, Atami city. Archaeology
Quarterly, Vol. 123: 31-33.
Hayashibara, T., Kondo, H., and Iwabuchi, A., 2016. Making a site map
of underwater cultural heritage off Hatushima Island. ARIUA Newsletter,
No. 5: 2-11.
Iwabuchi, A., 2012. Cultural Heritage under the Sea: An Introduction to
Underwater Archaeology. Kagaku-Dojin, Kyoto.
Kondo, H., 2017. Underwater techniques to exploit new possibilities of
deepwater archaeology. In K. Hayashida (Ed.), Underwater Cultural
Heritage: History Resuscitated from the Sea, Bensei, Tokyo: 175-203.
Biographies
Hayato Kondo is Associate Professor at Tokyo
University of Marine Science and Technology. His
research
interests
include
ocean-related
autonomous
system,
high-resolution
ocean
observation, AUV system design, and its payload
system including optical and acoustic sensors. He
received his PhD from the University of Tokyo in 2002
on naval architecture and ocean engineering, M.Eng.
and B.Eng. from Waseda University on mechanical
engineering. He is a co-chair of the technology committee on unmanned

�maritime vehicles and submersibles, Oceanic Engineering Society, IEEE.
He is also a member of the Japan ICOMOS National Committee.

Akifumi Iwabuchi is Professor of Maritime
Anthropology and Nautical Archaeology at Tokyo
University of Marine Science and Technology, a
member institution of the UNESCO Underwater
Archaeology Unitwin Network. He is the ICOMOSICUCH National Representative for Japan, being
also Directors of the Japan Society for Nautical
Research, of the Asian Research Institute of
Underwater Archaeology, and of the Forum on the
Oceanic State of Japan. He received his PhD from the University of
Oxford in 1990. His publications include The People of the Alas Valley
(Clarendon Press, 1994) and Cultural Heritage under the Sea: An
Introduction to Underwater Archaeology (Kagaku-Dojin, 2012).

Toshiaki Hayashibara was born in Tokyo in 1960. He
received his MA from Toyo University in 1986. He is
a director of the Asian Research Institute of
Underwater Archaeology at Fukuoka and lecturer in
underwater archaeology at Tokyo University of
Marine Science and Technology. He is also a
member
of
the
Japanese
Archaeological
Association. His archaeological specialties include
prehistorical bronze wares in Japan, underwater
cultural heritage, and heritage management.
In the process of
participating in underwater researches all over Japan, he has most
gradually come to have his doubts about treatments of underwater
archaeological sites and their managements in Japan.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="26">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="94">
                  <text>2017 Session 6: History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="95">
                  <text>East Asia is extremely rich in underwater cultural heritage, such as conventional shipwrecks under the sea, submerged settlement sites on the bottoms of inland lakes and rivers, or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones.  For instance, the medieval or post-medieval aged wrecks and their cargos have recently been discovered one after another in the waters, or the underwater cultural heritage or seascape of stone tidal weir is a common cultural trait to the Ryukyu archipelago, western Japan, southern Korea, mainland China, and Formosa, which surround the East China Sea or a northern part of the Asian Mediterranean. No East Asian nation has ratified the UNESCO 2001 Convention, partly because it does not exactly correspond with oriental philosophy, it does not properly resolve the controversial issues upon sovereign immunity of warship wrecks, and so forth.  Occasionally, the principle of preservation in situ in the convention has not been the first choice as Asian waters have poor water clarity generally.  &#13;
&#13;
Nevertheless, each country has already moved forward with its own underwater archaeological policies and projects both on governmental and grassroots levels.  Some activities are in close cooperation with foreign institutions or universities.  In East Asia, document-based historical study or terrestrial archaeology has a long tradition, which has had a noteworthy impact upon underwater archaeology and its methodology.  Even in this region as well as in other Pacific areas, contrariwise, the technological advancement in underwater survey has remarkably been made recently; using remote-sensing with satellites, robotics for ROVs or AUVs, or 3D photogrammetry by computer software mitigates or cancels the limitations regarding accessibility and working time caused by underwater environment.  The tie between such modern technologies and archaeology has minted new applications and perspectives of underwater cultural heritage study.  The multi-disciplinary or holistic approaches are increasingly more and more necessary among Asian researchers.  &#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="96">
                  <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi&#13;
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Japan    </text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="97">
                  <text>Kotaro Yamafune                                   &#13;
APPARATUS, LLC, Japan   </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="18">
      <name>Document</name>
      <description>A resource containing textual data.  Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5563">
                <text>The 17th Century Wooden Shipwreck off Hatsushima Island, Japan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5564">
                <text>The Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology (ARIUA) at Fukuoka and Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, which is a member institution of the UNESCO Underwater Archaeology Unitwin Network, have researched upon the 17th century wooden shipwreck off Hatsushima Island in front of Atami city, Shizuoka Prefecture, since 2011.  The shipwreck lies on the seabed at the depth of 20 metres, 200 metres from the western shore.  It consists mainly of a cargo of roof tiles or grinding bowls and some parts of the wooden hull.  Judging from them, the original vessel seems to have been a 17th or 18th century wooden freighter or kaisen ( å»»èˆ¹ ), which left a port of western part of Japan for the capital town of Edo; most of well made roof tiles were not made in eastern part at that time.  Because most of the roof tiles are high-quality and one of them is marked by the wild ginger trefoil coat of arms of the Shogunate family, they might mean to have been used for the Edo Shogunate castle.  In 2011 and 2012, archaeologists with financial assistance from the Nippon Foundation, did the submersible survey upon this wreck site, about which local fishermen had already known to identify its exact position. In 2013, then, its bathymetry was made with a multibeam sonar.  In order to make a precisely measured drawing of the 5 metre square wreck site, an AUV in 2013 and a ROV in 2015, both of which were developed uniquely by Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, and divers in 2016 were deployed to collect numerous underwater photos to generate 3D photogrammetric models with photogrammetry software Agisoft â€˜PhotoScanâ€™.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5565">
                <text>Hayato Kondo </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5566">
                <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5567">
                <text>Toshiaki Hayashibara</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5568">
                <text>The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5569">
                <text>11/24/2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="5570">
                <text>Hayato Kondo </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5571">
                <text>Akifumi Iwabuchi </text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="5572">
                <text>Toshiaki Hayashibara</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Asia-Pac Session 6 2017</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
